2
Book review Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China, Xin-min Zheng and Chris Davison. 2008 London: Continuum ISBN-10: 0-8264-8876-5 (hbk); ISBN-13: 978-0-8264-8876-3 (pbk) 220 pages (jncl. index) £70 hardcover. The aim of this book, as can be inferred from its title, is to present a snapshot of ELT teachers in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) at a time of change, the change in this case being the phased introduction (2001–2007) of a new English curriculum. The stated focus is on ‘how teachers in different situations with different backgrounds and motives approach the implementation of the curriculum, how they make decisions about what and how to teach, and the extent to which they adopt the promoted methods in their individual environments’ (p. 1). The book consists of eight chapters. Chapter 1 provides a helpful orientation for those unfamiliar with English language education in the PRC and the changes that have taken place since World War 2, including changing attitudes towards English. It also introduces a thought-provoking distinction between methodology (as exter- nal, theoretically coherent, typically prescriptive and generalisa- ble) and pedagogy (as an individual’s way of reconciling educational goals, theories and personal beliefs in response to a specific classroom context) that is developed in the next two chapters. Chapter 2 focuses on the first of these two concepts, methodology. It establishes a theoretical framework for the analysis of method based on Richards and Rodgers’ (2001) now familiar posited hierarchical relationship between approach (i.e. theories of language and learning), (instructional) design and (classroom) procedure; this is then made concrete through a selective historical survey of ELT methods and the extent and nature of their realisation in the PRC, primarily as reflected in materials. Chapter 3 begins by arguing the interesting proposition that pedagogy can be similarly conceptualised in terms of three linked levels: teachers’ implicit and explicit theories, principles and beliefs; their plans or designs; and how they implement these in practice. It then reviews the literature on teacher beliefs and models of change. Chapters 4–6, which take the form of detailed case studies of three teachers from Fujian province in the East of the PRC, constitute the descriptive-analytical heart of the book. Each case study follows the same format (biographical profile; description – using standardised categories – of the teacher’s practice; discussion of relationships between teacher’s beliefs and practices; concluding interpretive analysis), and this helps to establish the distinctiveness of each teacher and teaching context. Chapter 7 then shows persuasively how the unique practice of the three teachers has been shaped by the interplay of complex forces, these forces being external (the ‘intended’ curriculum, the demands of the national college entrance exam, the ‘intended’ commu- nicative methodology), internal (their own beliefs and reflections on their practice) and situated (the context in which they work, and the influence of such factors as students’ aptitudes and attitudes, expectations of school authorities and parents, and resources available). Chapter 8 draws conclusions about the three teachers’ beliefs, designs and practices and briefly states a number of implications for practice and for further research. There is a detailed index. The authors claim that the book ‘contributes to our knowledge about the act of teaching, at the same time enhancing our understanding of ELT pedagogic change and the implementation of curriculum in the PRC, assisting teacher educators and publishers in providing teacher support, and providing curriculum planners with information to help design future curricular reforms’ (p.3). Claims such as these are perhaps best made on the back cover of a book, to attract as wide a range of readers as possible. Given that the database is limited to just three teachers, they seem a little overblown. My own feeling is that the wealth of detail in the case studies makes them potentially of great interest to both practi- tioners, who may wish to compare their own ideas and practices with those described here, and researchers, who will find the analytical framework easy to follow and dip into. While teacher educators and curriculum planners should also find the case studies instructive, I am less convinced that they will feel able to draw usable conclusions, partly because the database is so small. The fact is that on a general level, the book provides vivid evidence of the importance of the human element in the implementation of innovation and the complexity of factors that influence this—and this seems to me, along with its logical structure and strong argumentation, one of its strengths. To put it differently, materials and training can provide a helpful and supportive framework for innovation, but what counts is how teachers interpret (literally) and respond to the external pressures and context-specific realities that are clearly distinguished here, and how they balance these with their own knowledge-systems and personal beliefs based on learning and teaching experience. If there is a general implication to be drawn it is that teacher educators and curriculum planners need to take account of these very individual circumstances. Although no reference is made to this, the book appears to draw heavily on the first author’s PhD thesis (Zheng, 2005) and the literature reviews (of teacher beliefs, educational change, and so on) will be of value to other researchers. It is somewhat surprising therefore that there is not more explicitness about research method. We are told that subjects were interviewed, their lessons videorecorded, and their lesson plans and journals analysed, but what little additional information is provided is dispersed, and some even tucked into footnotes. My final quibble is also related to the origins of the book. It is perhaps inevitable that in a book written by two or more authors, the distinct voices will be heard. In this case, I felt the need to adjust not only to changes of style but also, occasionally, of perspective. Some ‘smoothing’, perhaps with the help of a desk editor, would have been desirable. These concerns apart, I recommend the book highly to those interested in change at the level of classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Development 29 (2009) 544–545 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Educational Development journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev 0738-0593/$ – see front matter ß 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.05.004

Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China, Xin-min Zheng and Chris Davison. 2008 London: Continuum ISBN-10: 0-8264-8876-5 (hbk); ISBN-13: 978-0-8264-8876-3 (pbk) 220 pages

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China, Xin-min Zheng and Chris Davison. 2008 London: Continuum ISBN-10: 0-8264-8876-5 (hbk); ISBN-13: 978-0-8264-8876-3 (pbk) 220 pages

International Journal of Educational Development 29 (2009) 544–545

Book review

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Educational Development

journa l homepage: www.e lsev ier .com/ locate / i jedudev

Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China, Xin-minZheng and Chris Davison. 2008 London: Continuum ISBN-10:0-8264-8876-5 (hbk); ISBN-13: 978-0-8264-8876-3 (pbk) 220pages (jncl. index) £70 hardcover.

The aim of this book, as can be inferred from its title, is topresent a snapshot of ELT teachers in the People’s Republic of China(PRC) at a time of change, the change in this case being the phasedintroduction (2001–2007) of a new English curriculum. The statedfocus is on ‘how teachers in different situations with differentbackgrounds and motives approach the implementation of thecurriculum, how they make decisions about what and how toteach, and the extent to which they adopt the promoted methodsin their individual environments’ (p. 1).

The book consists of eight chapters. Chapter 1 provides a helpfulorientation for those unfamiliar with English language educationin the PRC and the changes that have taken place since World War2, including changing attitudes towards English. It also introducesa thought-provoking distinction between methodology (as exter-nal, theoretically coherent, typically prescriptive and generalisa-ble) and pedagogy (as an individual’s way of reconcilingeducational goals, theories and personal beliefs in response to aspecific classroom context) that is developed in the next twochapters. Chapter 2 focuses on the first of these two concepts,methodology. It establishes a theoretical framework for theanalysis of method based on Richards and Rodgers’ (2001) nowfamiliar posited hierarchical relationship between approach (i.e.theories of language and learning), (instructional) design and(classroom) procedure; this is then made concrete through aselective historical survey of ELT methods and the extent andnature of their realisation in the PRC, primarily as reflected inmaterials. Chapter 3 begins by arguing the interesting propositionthat pedagogy can be similarly conceptualised in terms of threelinked levels: teachers’ implicit and explicit theories, principlesand beliefs; their plans or designs; and how they implement thesein practice. It then reviews the literature on teacher beliefs andmodels of change. Chapters 4–6, which take the form of detailedcase studies of three teachers from Fujian province in the East ofthe PRC, constitute the descriptive-analytical heart of the book.Each case study follows the same format (biographical profile;description – using standardised categories – of the teacher’spractice; discussion of relationships between teacher’s beliefs andpractices; concluding interpretive analysis), and this helps toestablish the distinctiveness of each teacher and teaching context.Chapter 7 then shows persuasively how the unique practice of thethree teachers has been shaped by the interplay of complex forces,these forces being external (the ‘intended’ curriculum, the demandsof the national college entrance exam, the ‘intended’ commu-nicative methodology), internal (their own beliefs and reflectionson their practice) and situated (the context in which they work, andthe influence of such factors as students’ aptitudes and attitudes,

0738-0593/$ – see front matter � 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.05.004

expectations of school authorities and parents, and resourcesavailable). Chapter 8 draws conclusions about the three teachers’beliefs, designs and practices and briefly states a number ofimplications for practice and for further research. There is adetailed index.

The authors claim that the book ‘contributes to our knowledgeabout the act of teaching, at the same time enhancing ourunderstanding of ELT pedagogic change and the implementation ofcurriculum in the PRC, assisting teacher educators and publishersin providing teacher support, and providing curriculum plannerswith information to help design future curricular reforms’ (p.3).Claims such as these are perhaps best made on the back cover of abook, to attract as wide a range of readers as possible. Given thatthe database is limited to just three teachers, they seem a littleoverblown. My own feeling is that the wealth of detail in the casestudies makes them potentially of great interest to both practi-tioners, who may wish to compare their own ideas and practiceswith those described here, and researchers, who will find theanalytical framework easy to follow and dip into. While teachereducators and curriculum planners should also find the casestudies instructive, I am less convinced that they will feel able todraw usable conclusions, partly because the database is so small.The fact is that on a general level, the book provides vivid evidenceof the importance of the human element in the implementation ofinnovation and the complexity of factors that influence this—andthis seems to me, along with its logical structure and strongargumentation, one of its strengths. To put it differently, materialsand training can provide a helpful and supportive framework forinnovation, but what counts is how teachers interpret (literally)and respond to the external pressures and context-specific realitiesthat are clearly distinguished here, and how they balance thesewith their own knowledge-systems and personal beliefs based onlearning and teaching experience. If there is a general implicationto be drawn it is that teacher educators and curriculum plannersneed to take account of these very individual circumstances.

Although no reference is made to this, the book appears to drawheavily on the first author’s PhD thesis (Zheng, 2005) and theliterature reviews (of teacher beliefs, educational change, and soon) will be of value to other researchers. It is somewhat surprisingtherefore that there is not more explicitness about researchmethod. We are told that subjects were interviewed, their lessonsvideorecorded, and their lesson plans and journals analysed, butwhat little additional information is provided is dispersed, andsome even tucked into footnotes. My final quibble is also related tothe origins of the book. It is perhaps inevitable that in a bookwritten by two or more authors, the distinct voices will be heard. Inthis case, I felt the need to adjust not only to changes of style butalso, occasionally, of perspective. Some ‘smoothing’, perhaps withthe help of a desk editor, would have been desirable. Theseconcerns apart, I recommend the book highly to those interested inchange at the level of classroom practice.

Page 2: Changing pedagogy: Analysing ELT teachers in China, Xin-min Zheng and Chris Davison. 2008 London: Continuum ISBN-10: 0-8264-8876-5 (hbk); ISBN-13: 978-0-8264-8876-3 (pbk) 220 pages

Book review 545

References

Richards, J., Rodgers, T., 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching,second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Zheng, X.M., 2005. Pedagogy and pragmatism: secondary English teaching in thePeople’s Republic of China. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong.

Ian McGrathSchool of Education, University of Nottingham,

United Kingdom

E-mail address: [email protected]