12
Change in Patient- Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Alcon sponsored the study and provided statistical and presentation support.

Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs

Stephen Lane, MD

Consultant, Alcon Laboratories, Inc.Alcon sponsored the study and provided statistical and presentation support.

Page 2: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Methods

Purpose To assess changes in patient-reported outcomes (PRO),

satisfaction, and visual acuity (VA) after bilateral implantation of the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D IOL in cataract patients

Prospective, multi-center, 6-month trial Twelve U.S. study centers Subjects ≥21 years of age in need of bilateral cataract

surgery Bilateral implantation of IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D IOL Cataract TyPE at baseline and 6 months post-operatively Results reported for 147 subjects

Page 3: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Assessments Binocular Uncorrected Visual Acuities

100% contrast Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart under photopic lighting Uncorrected Near VA (UCNVA) at 40 cm Uncorrected Intermediate VA (UCIVA) at 60 cm Uncorrected Distance VA (UCDVA) at 4 m

Cataract TyPE questionnaire Limitations in distance vision function Limitations in near vision function Limitations in social activities Satisfaction with vision Self rating of vision quality

Page 4: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Uncorrected Near Visual AcuityHorizontal line across the center of each diamond = group mean. Vertical span

of each diamond = 95% confidence intervals around the group mean

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

LogM

AR

Visit 0 UCNVA Visit 6M UCNVA

Label

log

MA

R

Preop 6 months

p<.0001

20/40

20/20

Statistically significant improvement in Near VA from preop baseline.

20/25

20/32

20/50

20/80

20/60

Page 5: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity

p<.0001

log

MA

R

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Log

MA

R A

djus

ted

Visit 0 UCIVA Visit 6M UCIVA

Label

Statistically significant improvement in Intermediate VA from preop baseline.

6 months

p<.0001

log

MA

R

Preop

20/20

20/25

20/40

20/32

20/50

20/80

20/60

Page 6: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

LogM

AR

Visit 0 UCDVA Visit 6M UCDVA

Label

log

MA

R

Preop 6 months

p<.0001

20/40

20/20

20/25

20/32

20/50Statistically significant improvement in Distance VA from preop baseline.

20/60

Page 7: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Limitations in Distance Vision

Assessed limitations associated with: usual daily activities, recognizing people or objects across the street, daytime & nighttime driving, reading street or freeway signs, watching television, walking up or down stairs.

0

1

2

3

4

PreopWithout Glasses

PreopWith Glasses

PostopWithout Glasses

Lim

itatio

n S

cale

(0-

4)

Statistically significant less limitations in distance vision activities.

p<.0001

None

Extreme

PreopWithout Glasses

PreopWith Glasses

6 monthsWithout Glasses

Lim

itat

ion

Sca

le (

0-4)

Page 8: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Limitations in Near Vision Function

Assessed limitations associated with activities such as: reading a magazine, doing crafts or hobbies (sewing, painting), reading labels or prices, depth perception (pouring coffee, hitting a golf ball, or parking a car), and shaving or putting on makeup.

0

1

2

3

4

DAT

A

LNV V0 WOG LNV V0 WG LNV V6M WOG

LABELPreop

Without GlassesPreop

With Glasses6 months

Without Glasses

Lim

itat

ion

Sca

le (

0-4)

p<.0001

None

Extreme

Statistically significant less limitations in near vision activities.

Page 9: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Limitations in Social Function

Assessed limitations in social activities such as: going out to dinner, going to the movies, visiting with friends or relatives, going to party or dance, going to sporting events or church.

0

1

2

3

4

DAT

A

LSA V0 WOG LSA V0 WG LSA V6M WOG

LABEL

Lim

itat

ion

Sca

le (

0-4)

PreopWithout Glasses

PreopWith Glasses

6 monthsWithout Glasses

None

Extreme

Statistically significant less patient reported limitations in social activities.

p<.0001

Page 10: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Overall Satisfaction with Vision

0

1

2

3

4S

AT

ISF

AC

TIO

N

SC

AL

E

VIS

IT 0

OV

ER

AL

L W

OG

VIS

IT 0

OV

ER

AL

L W

G

VIS

IT 6

M

OV

ER

AL

L W

OG

CLASS

PreopWithout Glasses

PreopWith Glasses

6 monthsWithout Glasses

Sa

tis

fac

tio

n S

cale

(0

-4)

p<.0001

Statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction from preop baseline.

Not Satisfied

Completely Satisfied

Page 11: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Self-rating of vision quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

SE

LF

-RA

TIN

G

OF

VIS

ION

VIS

IT 0

SR

V W

OG

VIS

IT 0

SR

V W

G

VIS

IT 6

M

SR

V W

OG

Class

PreopWithout Glasses

PreopWith Glasses

6 monthsWithout Glasses

Se

lf-R

atin

g o

f V

isio

n

(0-1

0)

p<.0001Best

Worst

Statistically significant higher self-rating of uncorrected vision quality compared with preop baseline.

Page 12: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon

ASCRS 2010

Conclusions

Statistically significant improvements observed for patients with bilateral AcrySof IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D Add IOL at 6 months compared with preoperative visit:

improved near, intermediate, and distance VA less limitations in distance vision activities less limitations in near vision activities less limitations in social activities greater overall satisfaction with vision higher self-rating of vision