Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Challenging Cases - Discussions with PCCN
By
Fatima Zahir
Consultant Paediatrician
Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust
Four different children who presented to our hospitals
Interactions within our own team
Interactions between specialties
Complexities of managing unique situations
Guidance, support and feedback from the network.
Introduction
Case 1 A series of referrals
18/12 girl SMA type 1 / 2
5 critical care presentations over 2017-2018
September 2017 – admitted with respiratory illness in extremis – placed onto AIRVO then intubated 2 weeks later
October 2018 Admitted onto AIRVO then intubated a week later
Admitted onto AIRVO and transferred out to Heartlands for induction of BIPAP
Background
Induction on BIPAP
Home BIPAP machine given for overnight use
Attendance less frequent. – next referral Aug 2018 – HDU transfer with paramedic and Nurse on BIPAP
September 2018 – HDU transfer on BIPAP with paramedic and nurse
Heartlands Journey
Patient Journey
Pre-BIPAP
Lingered on AIRVO for weeks
Waiting for her to deteriorate
Unneccessary suffering for a child
At the mercy of a stretched DGH and network in winter
Disengaged angry mum who refused to come in until child in extremis
Post BIPAP
Child more stable when she comes in
Earlier presentation with calm mum
More comfortable quick transfer on BIPAP
Heartlands expects her / knows her
Not being sent to PICU that mum cannot travel to
Winters – the pressure is on us – without the safety of knowing if there will be a place for HDU level 2 children
More children with SMA – where will they go? BIPAP training BIPAP machines Visiting other units How can KIDS and the network help?
Guidance on courses Guidance on nurses Recommendations on nursing and medical training / numbers / support Drop in support when we are desperate KIDS occasionally has a second team in case of multiple referrals
Our Unit Journey and KIDS discussions
Case 2 A difficult airway
Presentation
18/12 boy
Ambulance call
Acute respiratory distress and marked stridor
Background
Ex-37/40 BW 1.7 kg
First 7 weeks on NICU
Diabetes Insipidus
Undescended Testes
Hypospadius
Single Umbilical Artery
Sacral dimple
Failure to thrive
Tracheal stenosis
Tracheal balloon dilatation 24/11/17
Slide tracheoplasty 22/05/18 at GOSH
Recurrent respiratory exacerbations
Severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
Unsafe swallow
Naso-gastric feeds discontinued by mother since July 2018
Assessment
Respiratory
Marked inspiratory stridor
See-saw breathing
Saturations with mid 90s with oxygen from ambulance crew
Kyphoscoliosis and tracheoplasty mid sternal scar
Systemic
CVS – tachycardic, normal CRT / Normal BP
Abdominal examination Normal
Management
Immediate
ABC / monitoring
Nebulised adrenaline and budesonide
NGT dexamethasone
ENT team BCH contacted
ENT and paediatric teams SWBH contacted
Subsequent
Repeat adrenaline nebulisation
IV Access attempted when calmed down
Conference call KIDs / BCH ENT / Paeds SWBH – urgent transfer required – KIDS coming
Outcome
Local ENT team felt this was out of their remit
Joint decision for un-intubated transfer
Reviewed in A&E at BCH
Went up to theatre for videoscope and granuloma found and managed.
Safe monitored extubation in PICU.
Discussion
Went well
Rapid intervention by ED/ Anaesthetic / Paed staff – adrenaline neb, crash call to Paeds and contacted the BCH services
Excellent joint working – ED / Paeds / local anaesthetist / KIDS / ENT BCH to provide safe outcome for child
We are improving
ENT felt the child was too complex to attend
Difficult airway policy now drafted and
Awareness of supporting colleagues in complex situations which are arising more often
CASE 3 Where should this child go?
Background
Wolf-Hirschorn syndrome
Epilepsy
Global developmental delay
NG fed
3 previous PICU admissions (last 2017)
Presentation
Known to BCH/ Community Paediatrics
Status Epilepticus
Intubation and Ventilation
Very difficult access/ failed I.O
NO PICU bed in UK
Retrieval team not available for several hours
Discussion KIDS- ITU bed locally, trial extubation locally. Aware may fail extubation/recurrence of seizures.
Difficult interactions
ITU feel complex background of child/history of epilepsy/ busy ITU –do NOT want to admit.
Further discussions with KIDS/Paeds , child admitted to Theatres. Anaesthetic Reg/Paed Consultant/later Paed Reg.
Successful Extubation, admission to Paed HDU.
ISSUES: Difficult access/Disagreement on where child should be admitted/disagreement on whether child still fitting/support for team members
Winter pressure mean straightforward seizures may need to be extubated locally
Discussions and policies need to be arranged locally
Kids will support extubations
Difficulties in communication within the Multidisciplinary team affect patient care
Discussions with Network
Case 4 A ‘stable’ child requiring KIDS
Background
13year old morbidly obese Severe Learning Disability (non-verbal), mental age
18months old Known to be placid and gentle usually Autistic Spectrum disorder PICA Recurrent vomiting/haematemesis Tear /Ulcer lower oesophagus-swallowed a pen nib Significant Weight Loss 20% of body weight Difficult to manage NGT pulled out, on-going vomiting
Complex needs plan
Admitted to BCH
Prolonged admission on PICU/HDU/Wards
Tolerated NGT feeds whilst sedated IV
Had CAMHS/psychology /Gastro/Gen Paeds
PO sedation/NG tube transferred to SGH
If problems General Paeds would take back.
Journey at SGH
CAMHS reduced medication, then discharged him.
Vomiting gradually increased
Pulling out cannulas/NG tubes
Psychology saw intermittently. Adult CAMHS refused.
Escalation over 2 weeks-attempts to increase oral sedation failed as vomiting
CAMHS said no place to see him at BCH
Multiple phone calls to gain support to manage him
Journey at SGH
Could not admit to HDU or PICU. I.M and IV sedation failed – team member injured while trying to
facilitate this Became more aggressive / drinking from taps/ going to other
patients beds/drinking own vomit. Weight loss further 5KG KIDS contacted-as issue of dehydration and access with ‘mental
health issues advised they would not accept and own ITU to assist. Na 180
ITU-no beds/age/no expertise to mange such individual on ITU-refused. Had 3.5L fluid bolus after further 10 attempts IV access whilst IM ketamine injections. Further 4L fluid over next 24hours.
Stayed on Ward HDU with ITU reg coming to give IV sedation drugs-Lead to CONFLICT too.
Multiple doses given
R.K Journey at SGH
Escalation to medical director
Bed on PICU further 24-36hours later
Went to PICU as a KIDS transfer and was sedated with IV infusion.
Still in hospital 7 months later
Discussion
Where should this child go
How do we keep these children safe
How do we keep our staff safe
Heated discussions about acute deterioration in behaviour warranting sedation -
How could we prevent this child’s journey from happening again?
Questions / Discussion