BIBLIOGRAPHYGREETINGS,

I am Siok Yee Tan, a third year stu-dent majoring Architecture in Uni-versity of Melbourne. This is my third year being in Melbourne and I would say I have been exposed to different experiences not just in terms of cul-ture and food, but the Architecture too. Melbourne CBD is an art itseld containing different type of arts rang-ing from musics to graffiti drawings to sculptures to buildings.

During the first year of the course in Bachelor of Environments, I am exposed to the usage of technologies to aid the designing process. The software namely Rhino in short. Rhino is a 3D programmes which helps the process of designs and explorations. While during the sum-mer, I’m fortunate to intern in an architecture firm backed in Malaysia and managed to pick up another 3D software, SketchUp. In compari-son, I personally prefer Rhino over SketchUp as it’s not just user friend-ly but it came along with more functions for the users to explore the different possibilities. Now, am required to pick up Grasshopper, a parametric-related software which connected to Rhino. I have not learn any parametric softwares but looked at some work of Grasshopper, it got me really ex-cited as it produce some really nice decent works. It will be my first and challenging experience in exploring the new software.

ARCHITECTURE as DISCOURSE Through decades and centuries, architecture had been evolving into a type of philosphical language. Definitions for it there are plenty, some may agree with it, some may think the other way round. So, is there a specific stan-dard to determine the meaning of architecture?

According to William in his article, Exploring Visual Culture, architec-ture has been defined into 3 types, as Art, as Sign, as an Experience. Architects are somehow similar to sculptors but involving in bigger scale and where hu-mans are able to inhabit the space, building. To be known as Art, it has to posse the value of aesthetic. Looking at Ruskin’s works, they are always decorative and expressive with styles. He was then moved his focus to building facades. Even though, the structures had play a more important role than facades, the aesthet-ics of it still is the consideration that making it an art, architecture. Architecture has then further involved with providing experiences for the users interface. To conclude William’s writting, it is more to creating architecture due to what the architects want and what the societies’ want. His description for Architecture is more abstract.

As for Schumacher’s writing, A New Framework For Architecture, he described architecture as system of communications. With the on-going de-veloped technologies, architectural practices change all the time. Schumacher’s view regarding architecture is more relevant with the current studies in ar-chitecture involving the mix use of different media to translate this architec-tural language. Medias involving, CAD, renderings, photographs of buildings, sketches and drawings. Contrasting with Willaim’s writing, Schumacher is say-ing that architecture is not just a building but everything that promotes it to the society.

An example that I found it would be interest-ing to look at is Sagrada Familia, Barcelona by Anto-nio Gaudi. La Sagrada Familia is an expiatory church, meaning the modal for the construction based purely from the donation of the public. This was a project by the architect Francisco de Paula del Villar. However at the end of 1883, Antonio Gaudi was commissioned to carry on the works till his death in 1926. Till now it has been 131 years and still yet to be completed. It is ex-pected to be finished on the first third of 21st century.

The gigantic building sits in the center of Bar-celona and is an attraction of tourists every year. This precedent fits the context of William’s writing where architecture as a sign. La Sagrada Familia has been a sign not just the city the country but internationally. Almost everyone know the existence of this building due to the interesting outlook and the time to build it.

This building itself is a good representation of an art piece. From the facade to the interior, every faces and corners are carefully crafted, moulded and designed and giving the community element of surprise. Coincide with the idea of John Ruskin, architecture has to be decorative and Gaudi had obviously shown the decorative of his masterpiece not just the facade but the interior as well. `

La Sagrada Família

During that period of time, absence of advance technologies, no machines, no softwares, drawings were hand-drawn, models were physically made, sculptures sculped mannually. In order to build this structure, he had build a hanging chain mod-el to explore the possible arches that could bear the load. It is known as the parabolic and catenary arches. The hanging chain model is a parametric model. In order to test the system that could withstand the load, when 1 part of the string is moved, others will shift accordingly too to form the balance due to the center of gravity. It’s amazaing how it ables to produce a parametric related design without the aid of software whereas now we have Grasshopper to help in our parametric design. As to provide guidlines to the architects who working for him, he built models of 1:10. In contrast to today, 3D printers were used to create the model.

With the gigantic structure of this cathedral, it can be a debate whether is it architecture still or have it moved on as engineering? For me, I would say it is an archi-tectural masterpiece. The organic looking of the facade and the decorative expressiveinteriors had made it not just a piece of art but also a very dominant sign, trademark in the local.

“The expiatory church of La Sa-grada Família is made by the peo-ple and is mirrored in them. It is a work that is in the hands of God and the will of the people.’’ - Antonio Gaudi.

However in my point of view, architecture do not just restricted to the 3 categories stated by William. I agree with Schumacher that architecture is not just about a building, it is a package of everything. With the ever growing of technologies, buildings that do not ac-commodate changes will eventually became part of the histories. Society now do not just view the building, the architecture in just 1 preception. Different type of me-dias help in spreading the architecture of the particular building.

I have always love the work of Bjarke and one of his project that I found could be used to support my point of view here is the Beach & Howe Tower. It is a 150m high skyscrapper in the downtown Vancouver, Canada. The interesting twisted form is produced due to the limitation of space on site. As part of it is residential levels, the set back is to prevent overlooking from the motorway next to it.

With the evolving usage of technologies in aid of designing process, the idea of making the facade aesthetic still stays. But due to the availability of technologies, i.e. 3D softwares, it enabled the team to explore the possible outcome of the build-ing without the need of continuous making a new physical model for each options they opt to. Technologies not just time saving but cost saving too. Besides, 3D pro-grames, rendering programes able to give a visual graphic effect too. Through ren-derings, it will be transmitting the idea of the project to the client and to the public. This saying that architecture as a form of system communication by Schmacher.

With the aid of 3D soft-wares, exploration like these had made possible. Not just saving the time and cost, it enables to determine the issues on the site.Be-sides, these softwares enable the architects to develop more design options and explore with differential.

1 2 3

4 5

Beach & Howe Tower