cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Report out from Personal Learning and Research Environments

Oleg Liber, Sharon Perry, Phil Beauvoir, John Swannie, Tom Franklin, Sarah Davies, Dan Corlett,

Hugh Davies, Sandy Patrick Carmichael, Sandy Leaton-Gray, Michael Sellway, Rob Crouchley, Rob Allan, Adrian Fish, Christina Smart, Maia Dimitrova, Marcello Allegri, Charles Severance, Wilbert Kraan

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Presentations VRE/VLE/IE• Colloquia

• Interactive Log

• Teaching and Learning Portal

• TLRP - Teaching and Learning Research Program

• AERS

• ReDRESS - Resource Discover for Researchers in e-Social Science

• VRE Sakai Demonstrator

• GROWL - Grid Resources of Workstation Library

• VRE: Integrated Biology Demonstration

• CQeSS - Collaboratory for Quanatative e-Social Science

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Problem: Many “personal” environments

CollaborativeVLE/VRE/IE

Requirements

VLE “Experts”

VLE Customers

VRE “Exp

erts

”

VRE Cust

omer

s

IE “Experts”

IE Customers

When we treat Virtual Learning, Virtual Research, and Information Environments as different, we end up developing divergent environments which satisfy similar requirements in very different ways based on the experts who are funded to produce the VRE, VLE, or IE solutions.

Each expert group is often influenced by a different field of research: VLE’s are influenced by Educational Technology experts, VRE’s are often influenced by Computer Scientists, while IE’s are influenced by Library Sciences.

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

End users are people too…

CollaborativeVLE/VRE

Requirements

VLE “Experts”

Customers

VRE “Exp

erts

”

Custom

ers

IE “Experts”

Customers

As painful as it may be, the VRE, VLE, and IE experts must begin to coordinate so that some point in the future, users don’t have environments with completely different approaches to the same problem.

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Why have a “Personal” in personal

Learning/Research EnvironmentMove from a provider or institution focused set of capabilities to an environment where users “assemble” their environment to suit their needs.

System that maps to how I think and operate so that things are made easier for me. How do I bend this tool to suit the way that I work? Especially as my skills as a user improve.

Move bits around arrange the way you like. This is both things like my own folder arrangements and things like accessibility (i.e. how I want to “see” these things)

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Requirements appear to be different…

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Traditionally, there are some differences•Locus of control •Existing versus emerging information•Fixed versus fluid agenda•Different tools in use

Similarity and Differences

VRE Phys

ics

VRE ChemistryIE Social

ScienceTeaching Learning

VisualizationGrid Computing

Annotation

QTIScormAttendance

ChatDiscussionResources

Repository

Shared Data

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Why not apply it

all to learning

and integrate it

together? VLE

Visualization

Annotation

QTIScorm

Chat

Shared Data

Computing

IE

VRE

VRE

The Personal Learning/Research Environment (PLRE) effectively adds a “productivity” layer to the VLE/VRE/IE space which unifies the look/feel/usability across the multiple sources of information

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Today’s PLRE is a CompromiseWeb browser with lots of bookmarks to many sites - each quite different

Computer desktop with files, folders

E-Mail client

Calendar client

… All quite different - user figures tools out as best they can and to the extent they can

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Someday the PLRE will not be a browser

a. pure html web page

b. web page based, but with browser enhancements

c. browser extension

d. dedicated desktop network client

e. extensible desktop application platform

f. common desktop application

Better user experienceIncreased productivity

More complex to buildDifficult to keep up with changing technology

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Promising TrendsStandards based portals - JSR-168, etc.

API standardisation

Basic look and feel standardisation - CSS

Federating portals - WSRP

User control over assembly of many sources

Ability to write portable full-featured tools

Java

Eclipse

Flash MX

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

High Level RecommendationsContinue to invest in VLE/VRE/IE efforts, accepting the fact that for the moment they will not converge immediately

Continue to invest in portals and WSRP activities to explore federation within current presentation technologies

Invest in research into new technologies to federate information sources beyond the browser.

Act to maintain communication between the VLE/VRE/IE and PLRE efforts so that common solutions can be shared and evolved over time.

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

More RecommendationsInvestigate techniques for the learner/researcher to “own” their information over their lifetime and “share” it with institutions and groups at the appropriate time.

Encourage projects which support flexible roles and structures (i.e. not just instructor can write and students can read or anyone can create groups)

Investigate techniques where PLRE’s can operate in both connected and disconnected modes

cetishttp://www.cetis.ac.uk

c e t i s

Thank you for your time…