Upload
jorge-nunez-ferrer
View
256
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
For a training course for World Bank officials on 'The role of regional policy in the EU and its mutating objectives'
Citation preview
04/10/2023
1Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
The role of regional policy in the EU and its mutating objectives
Jorge Nuñez FerrerCEPS
04/10/2023
2Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THE EUTHE TREATY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION• Economic Growth: “economic progress”• Sustainable Growth: “balanced and sustainable
development”, “employment” and “social progress”• Cohesion or convergence: “economic and social
cohesion” + External Security and Internal SecurityPresent motto: Smart, sustainable and inclusive
growth - EUROPE 2020 strategy3rd attempt to implement the ‘failed’ Lisbon Agenda and
Gothenburg declarations 2000-2010
04/10/2023
3Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
2007-2013 instruments• Structural and Cohesion Funds• Common Agricultural Policy (mainly direct payments)
+ Rural Development Funds (mainly agriculture)• Competitiveness for growth and employment (new):– Support innovation (R&D) and growth – SMEs, ICT, energy– TENs
• Each has a different role at different territorial level+ External, i.e. Neighbourhood - IPA
04/10/2023
4Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • Place du Congrès 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
www.ceps.eu
04/10/2023
5Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
Evolving strategy and philosophy• EU system of support in constant mutation within a policy
paralysis over 30 years – complex, imperfect & difficult• Philosophy of structural (and other) funds based on
changing development theories: – Growth pole and centre-periphery theories (60s – 70s)– Infrastructure endowments (80s)– Endogenous growth theories & human capital
(endogenous technical growth, i.e. Lisbon agenda (90s)– + PPPs, blending, mission oriented Europe 2020 (2010-)
• Philosophy of rural development funds – Sectoral agricultural lobby dominated still today– Unclear future
04/10/2023
6Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
Evolving objectives of regional policyTransfers for economic and social cohesion
Mainly infrastructures & trainingObjectives, strategy mainly national – no strong guidelines
Increasing focus on growth – search for fundamental growth factorsRaising importance of R&D, SMEs
Increased importance of strategiesNational Strategic Reference Frameworks
Budget Review / CAP and ‘old Structural Funding dominate’Stronger ‘Mission oriented’ sought budget: R&D, climate, energy
Funding needs far above budget – increased need for extra budgetary funding and ‘blending’
80s-90s
00-10
2010-
• Convergence:• 99 regions with per capita <75% of EU GDP AV.• € 283bn• Cohesion Fund for countries with <90% of av GDP• Competitiveness & employment:• 172 regions - €55 bn• Territorial cooperation
04/10/2023
7Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • Place du Congrès 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
www.ceps.eu
Regional Policy today
04/10/2023
8Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • Place du Congrès 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
www.ceps.eu
Achievements and failures of regional policy
• Difficult to attribute impacts to policy, but:– Most supported regions have seen a real GDP rise per capita– Declines have been rare– Improved governance and administrative capacity– Improved infrastructures
• However: – Sub-optimal use of funds– Weak strategies– Weak accountability– Weak evaluations, no efficient performance monitoring– Weak ex-post evaluations and integration of lessons
04/10/2023
9
• Big tensions on scope and size of structural policies and new objectives: e.g. – Energy grids– Innovation, R&D, Demonstration
• Should wealthier regions be supported?• The Commission seeks extra budgetary solutions out
of the budget:– Blending instruments (EIB blending RSFF, LGTT, etc.)– External blending (NIF, ITF, WBIF, LAIF, FEMIP, etc.)– Bond issue
• Seeks BETTER STRATEGIES AND CONTROLThinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
Budget reform coming
04/10/2023
10Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • Place du Congrès 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
www.ceps.eu
Challenges for territorial development• Incorporating growing number of EU objectives in
strategies in a blocked budget• Redistributing the funds – large West –East imbalances,
specially the CAP• EU objectives costly: funds are more to help implement
EU acquis and objectives than to focus on own development
• Increasing the quality of NATIONAL STRATEGIES and better accountability of recipients
• Increasing value added & value for money• Increasing public and private leverage• Promoting innovative funding and increasing leverage
04/10/2023
11Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu
National strategies are crucial• 1st problem: Administrations do not really grasp what
this is all about! (Including Commission officials)• Performance of funds highly connected to national
macro policy & quality of strategy and implementation– Strategy (NSRF, RDP, etc.) should be based on local needs,
built on incentives – setting direction. – These are not fund application formularies – these are
strategies for the countries not the Commission. These are implementation documents. Others do applications.
– Successful countries usually have implemented clear and sometimes unpleasant strategies
04/10/2023
12Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • Place du Congrès 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
www.ceps.eu
04/10/2023
13
Thank you
Recommended reading:FAO/World Bank working paper: The evolution and impact of
EU regional and rural policywww.fao.org/docrep/011/aj280e/aj280e00.htm
For external finance – new blending mechanisms and aid coordination:Innovative Approaches to EU Blending Mechanisms for Development Finance
CEPS special Report (published 18 May)www.ceps.eu/books
On Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentTHE EU ADDED VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL EXPENDITURE – FROM MARKET TO MULTIFUNCTIONALITY –
GATHERING CRITICISM AND SUCCESS STORIES OF THE CAPStudy for the European Parliament`
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?language=en&file=20293#search=%20THE%20EU%20ADDED%20VALUE%20OF%20AGRICULTURAL%20EXPENDITURE%20–%20FROM%20MARKET%20TO%20MULTIFUNCTIONALITY%20–%20GATHERING%20CRITICISM%20AND%20SUCCESS%20STORIES%20OF%20THE%20CAP%20%20
Thinking ahead for Europe • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) • www.ceps.eu