15
Census.ac.uk SARs 2011

Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

SARs 2011

Page 2: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Where we arePhase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007• consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007.

Phase 2: SARs user meeting 23 April 2009– Business Case by Keith Dugmore on the demand for the

2011 Census.– We proposed the 5 files/first document outlining the

principles underlying the strategy for 2011 census microdata presented to the ONS

Phase 3: SARs user meeting 28 Jan 2011• Produced file specifications and made available online • Consultation October 2010-Jan 2011. • Summary of consultations now online• Final consultation and feedback today!

Page 3: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Key Feature of the 2011 SARs

• Coverage• Size• Ethnicity and religion• Geography• Multivariate• Household structure• Comparability with other census products• Easy access

Page 4: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Importance of features 2011

Importance of file features 2011

0102030405060708090

100

feature

coun

t Not very importantFairly importantVery important

Page 5: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Issues around data access

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Per

cen

t

routine

exceptional

no

work in

instit-ution

institut-ion safe setting

analy-ses

checked

month long

applic- ation

travel away

Microdata research facilities survey 2009n(u) = 197Microdata users only

• Limited detail in EUL files• Institutions have

appropriate facilities• Biggest obstacle is long

waits• Travelling and having

analyses checked also unpopular

• Past CAM VML use is low• CAM users had mixed

experiences

Page 6: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Recommendation of the Business Case

• Two popular files: for quick queries, education, and to attract new users

• Two professional files: offering more detail, but requiring more security

• Microdata Laboratory Facilities: offering considerable detail, but access only under strictest security con

• Production file: 15% household file – other files derived from ‘mothership’

Page 7: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Access for 2011 SAR data

• Legal protection for personal data• Statistics Act establishes “Approved

Research Status”• High level spec assumed 3 levels of

security• ONS policy distinguishes 4 levels of

data (impact level)– Public use (0)– Licensed (1)– Contracted(2)– Identified (3)

• Secure Data Service is key for Approved Research Files

Balancing access against detail

Page 8: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Statistical Disclosure and microdata policy

Level of SDC on the source data (protection via record swapping?)

Extra protection from sampling, imputation (item and non-response), churning (with time), , variable coding, large households?

SARs disclosure risk depends on other outputs (need to be considered in tandem)

Outputs policy in each country Different levels of SDC depending on access Special licences phased out? Secure Data Service (SDS) Virtual Microdata Lab (VML)

Page 9: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

2011 SpecificationsFile Sample

typeGeography Similar to Impact

levelAccess

1a General Regional File

3% indivi.

Region 2001 Individual Licensed SAR

1 licensced

EUL, available from CCSR

1b Local Authority File (EUL)

5% indivi.

Region 2001 Small Area Microdata file

1 EUL, available from CCSR

2a Individual File

3% indivi.

LAD/ UA/Metropolitan District/London Borough/ Parliamentary Constituencies (NI)

1991 Individual SARs, but with enhanced features

2contracted

Approved Researcher

SDS?

2b Household File

1% hierar-chal file

None 2001 Special License Household file.

2 Approved Researcher

SDS?

3. Controlled Access Microdata file.

Approx 15% HH

LAD/ UA/Metropolitan District/London Borough/ Parliamentary Constituencies (NI)

Facility to match small area indicators?

2001 CAMS files.

2 Approved Researcher

VML or SDS?

Page 10: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Summary of the consultation on the variables for 2011• The specifications for the 5 files became available on the

SARs web page in Sep 2010:– Expert consultation in Sep. and open consultation in Dec 2010.– Most comments made by invited expert users, but also some

substantial comments by other users. – A total of 30 users commented on the variable specifications

for the different files

• Types of comments and actions required by the SARs team:– Comments that required simple modifications- some of which

have been adopted– Comments that needed further consultation and deliberation or

depend on sdc trade-offs between access/detail/other variables (some of these may be discussed here)

– Comments which are affected by circumstances beyond our control (e.g relating to the structure of the census questions)

Page 11: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

EUL LA file• COB — Country of birth (6 cat.)• AGE — Age of individual (0-89 singly, 90+ banded)• MARSTAT - Marital status (4 cat.)• DPCHUK11 - Household dependent children (not available)• BUSINESS Industry of employment (27 cat.)• ISCO — International Standard Classification of Occupations

(9 cat)• MAINLANG — Main language (2 cat)• ETHNICITY(NI) (2 cat.)• ETHNICITY (E&W) (18 cat)

Page 12: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

EUL Individual File

• COB — Country of birth: 16 cat. • DPCHUK11 Household dependent children (19

cat)• BUSINESS Industry of employment (17 cat.)• DTWPEWNI11 — Distance travelled to work (10

cat)• YRARR — Year of arrival in UK (14 cat.)• QUALVEWN Level of highest qualifications (6 cat.)

Page 13: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Approved Individual File

• COB — Country of birth (49 cat)• DTWPEWNI11 — Distance travelled to work (0.1-

9999.9 km in 0.1 km units)• YRARR — Year of arrival in UK (Banded in 4 cat.

Until 1970, 1980+ in single years)• IDENTITY — National identity (49 cat)• ETHNICITY (E&W) (18 cat)• CITIZENSHIP — Passports held (7 cat)• MAINLANG — Main language (16 cat)• RELIGION(E&W) Religion (7 cat)

Page 14: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

Approved Household

• LARPUK11 Living arrangements (11 cat)• BUSINESS Industry of employment (98 cat)• ISCO — International Standard Classification of

Occupations (Full classification)• MOVEFROM — Address 1 year ago. (Banded

distance, 18 cat.)• ETHNICITY (E&W) (18 cat)

Page 15: Census.ac.uk SARs 2011. Census.ac.uk Where we are Phase 1: SARs user meeting 12 November 2007 consultation survey with users/non-users in 2007. Phase

Censu

s.ac.

uk

CAMS

• BUSINESS Industry of employment (98 cat.)• ISCO — International Standard Classification of

Occupations (Full classification)• LAWRK —Local Authority District/ Unitary

Authorities /MD /London Borough/ Parliamentary Constituencies (NI) of Workplace (not available on EUL files)

• COB — Country of birth: Full country classifications