7
Quackwatch Home Page "Cellulite" Removers Stephen Barrett, M.D. Cellulite is a term coined in European salons and spas to describe deposits of dimpled fat found on the thighs and buttocks of many women. Widespread promotion of the concept in the United States followed the 1973 publication of Cellulite: Those Lumps, Bumps and Bulges You Couldn't Lose Before, by Nicole Ronsard, owner of a New York City beauty salon that specialized in skin and body care. Cellulite is alleged to be a special type of "fat gone wrong," a combination of fat, water, and "toxic wastes" that the body has failed to eliminate. Alleged "anticellulite" products sold through retail outlets, by mail, through multilevel companies, and through the Internet have included "loofah" sponges; cactus fibers; special washcloths; horsehair mitts; creams [A , B , C ] and gels to "dissolve" cellulite; supplements containing vitamins; minerals and/or herbs [A , B , C ]; bath liquids; massagers [A, B ]; rubberized pants; exercise books; brushes; rollers; body wraps; and toning lotions. Many salons offer treatment with electrical muscle stimulation, vibrating machines, inflatable hiphigh pressurized boots, "hormone" or "enzyme" injections, heating pads, and massage. Some operators claim that 5 to 15 inches can be lost in one hour. A series of treatments can cost hundreds of dollars. "Cellulite" is not a medical term. Medical authorities agree that cellulite is simply ordinary fatty tissue [1]. Strands of fibrous tissue connect the skin to deeper tissue layers and also separate compartments that contain fat cells. When fat cells increase in size, these compartments bulge and produce a waffled appearance of the skin. Many years ago, Neil Solomon, M.D., conducted a doubleblind study of 100 people to see whether cellulite differed from ordinary fat. Specimens of regular fat and lumpy fat were obtained by a needle biopsy procedure and given to pathologists for analysis and comparison. No difference between the two was found. More recently, researchers at Rockefeller Institute used ultrasonography, microscopic examinations, and fatmetabolism studies to see "affected" and unaffected skin areas differed in seven healthy adult subjects (five women, two men; four affected, three unaffected). The researchers concluded: (a) certain characteristics of skin make women more prone than men to develop cellulite; (b) the process is diffuse rather than localized; and (3) there were no significant differences in the appearance or function of the fatty tissue or the regional blood flow between affected and unaffected sites within individuals [2]. Electrical Muscle Stimulators (EMS) and Iontophoresis Devices Muscle stimulators are a legitimate medical device approved for certain conditions to relax muscle spasms, increase blood circulation, prevent blood clots, and rehabilitate muscle function after a stroke. But many health spas and figure salons claim that muscle stimulators can remove wrinkles, perform face lifts, reduce breast size, reduce a "beer belly," and remove cellulite. Iontophoresis devices are prescription devices that use direct electric current to introduce ions of soluble salts (i.e., medications) into body tissues for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. The only approved use is for diagnosing cystic fibrosis. The FDA considers promotion of muscle stimulators or iontophoresis devices for any type of body shaping or contouring to be fraudulent [3,4]. The most infamous of these devices, the RelaxACizor, was claimed to reduce girth by delivering electric shocks to the muscles. More than 400,000 units were sold for $200 to $400 each before the FDA obtained an injunction in 1970 to stop its sale. At the trial, 40

Cellulite Removers

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Beauty

Citation preview

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 1/7

    QuackwatchHomePage

    "Cellulite"Removers

    StephenBarrett,M.D.

    CelluliteisatermcoinedinEuropeansalonsandspastodescribedepositsofdimpledfatfoundonthethighsandbuttocksofmanywomen.WidespreadpromotionoftheconceptintheUnitedStatesfollowedthe1973publicationofCellulite:ThoseLumps,BumpsandBulgesYouCouldn'tLoseBefore,byNicoleRonsard,ownerofaNewYorkCitybeautysalonthatspecializedinskinandbodycare.Celluliteisallegedtobeaspecialtypeof"fatgonewrong,"acombinationoffat,water,and"toxicwastes"thatthebodyhasfailedtoeliminate.Alleged"anticellulite"productssoldthroughretailoutlets,bymail,throughmultilevelcompanies,andthroughtheInternethaveincluded"loofah"spongescactusfibersspecialwashclothshorsehairmittscreams[A,B,C]andgelsto"dissolve"cellulitesupplementscontainingvitaminsmineralsand/orherbs[A,B,C]bathliquidsmassagers[A,B]rubberizedpantsexercisebooksbrushesrollersbodywrapsandtoninglotions.Manysalonsoffertreatmentwithelectricalmusclestimulation,vibratingmachines,inflatablehiphighpressurizedboots,"hormone"or"enzyme"injections,heatingpads,andmassage.Someoperatorsclaimthat5to15inchescanbelostinonehour.Aseriesoftreatmentscancosthundredsofdollars.

    "Cellulite"isnotamedicalterm.Medicalauthoritiesagreethatcelluliteissimplyordinaryfattytissue[1].Strandsoffibroustissueconnecttheskintodeepertissuelayersandalsoseparatecompartmentsthatcontainfatcells.Whenfatcellsincreaseinsize,thesecompartmentsbulgeandproduceawaffledappearanceoftheskin.Manyyearsago,NeilSolomon,M.D.,conductedadoubleblindstudyof100peopletoseewhethercellulitedifferedfromordinaryfat.Specimensofregularfatandlumpyfatwereobtainedbyaneedlebiopsyprocedureandgiventopathologistsforanalysisandcomparison.Nodifferencebetweenthetwowasfound.

    Morerecently,researchersatRockefellerInstituteusedultrasonography,microscopicexaminations,andfatmetabolismstudiestosee"affected"andunaffectedskinareasdifferedinsevenhealthyadultsubjects(fivewomen,twomenfouraffected,threeunaffected).Theresearchersconcluded:(a)certaincharacteristicsofskinmakewomenmorepronethanmentodevelopcellulite(b)theprocessisdiffuseratherthanlocalizedand(3)therewerenosignificantdifferencesintheappearanceorfunctionofthefattytissueortheregionalbloodflowbetweenaffectedandunaffectedsiteswithinindividuals[2].

    ElectricalMuscleStimulators(EMS)andIontophoresisDevices

    Musclestimulatorsarealegitimatemedicaldeviceapprovedforcertainconditionstorelaxmusclespasms,increasebloodcirculation,preventbloodclots,andrehabilitatemusclefunctionafterastroke.Butmanyhealthspasandfiguresalonsclaimthatmusclestimulatorscanremovewrinkles,performfacelifts,reducebreastsize,reducea"beerbelly,"andremovecellulite.Iontophoresisdevicesareprescriptiondevicesthatusedirectelectriccurrenttointroduceionsofsolublesalts(i.e.,medications)intobodytissuesfortherapeuticordiagnosticpurposes.Theonlyapproveduseisfordiagnosingcysticfibrosis.

    TheFDAconsiderspromotionofmusclestimulatorsoriontophoresisdevicesforanytypeofbodyshapingorcontouringtobefraudulent[3,4].Themostinfamousofthesedevices,theRelaxACizor,wasclaimedtoreducegirthbydeliveringelectricshockstothemuscles.Morethan400,000unitsweresoldfor$200to$400eachbeforetheFDAobtainedaninjunctionin1970tostopitssale.Atthetrial,40

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 2/7

    witnessestestifiedthattheyhadbeeninjuredwhileusingthemachine.Thejudgeconcludedthatthedevicecouldcausemiscarriagesandaggravatemanypreexistingmedicalconditions,includinghernias,ulcers,varicoseveins,andepilepsy.

    BodyWrapping

    Manysalonsandspasexistwhereclientssupposedlycantriminchesoffthewaist,hips,thighs,andotherareasofthebody.Thesefacilitiesusewrapsorgarments,withorwithoutspeciallotionsorcreamsappliedtotheskin.Thegarmentsmaybeappliedtopartsofthebodyortotheentirebody.Clientsaretypicallyassuredthatfatwill"meltaway"andtheycanlose"upto2inchesfromthoseproblemareasinjustonehour."SuddenlySlender,whichlicensesbodywrapshopsintheUnitedStatesandCanada,claimsthat"wrappingworksbecausecelluliteiswaterloggedfattytissue."Aspartofitssalespitchtoprospectiveowners,thecompanynotesthatfreepublicitymaybeobtainable.ItsWebsitestates:"Becauseclientsgetdressedupas"mummies"andthen,almostmiraculously,achievemajorinchlossandstartlingimprovementstotheirfigures,localandnationalmediahavebeenoverwhelminglyreceptivetofeaturingpresentationsabouttheservice."

    HomeusesystemsarealsobeingmarketedthroughtheInternet[A,B]andthroughmultilevelmarketing[X,Y].Manyofthesystemsareclaimedto"removetoxins."Somemarketerssuggestmeasuringalargenumberofbodyareasbeforeandafterwardandaddingupthedifferencestoget"totalincheslost."LifeForceInternational,forexample,recommendsaddingtheresultsof17measurements.Thisenablesminorchangesduetotemporaryeffectsortomeasurementvariationstoappeartobelargenumbers.

    Noproducttakenbymouthcancauseselectivereductionofanareaofthebody.Althoughwrappingmaycausetemporarywaterlossasaresultofperspirationorcompression,anyfluidwillsoonbereplacedbydrinkingoreating[5].Theideathatherbalwrapsdetoxifythebodyisabsurd.

    Cellasene

    AnherbalproductcalledCellaseneisbeingvigorouslypromotedasacelluliteremedy.TheproductwasdevelopedbyanItalianchemistnamedGianfrancoMerizzi.Itsingredientsareeveningprimroseoil,driedfucusvesiculosisextract,gelatine,fishoil,glycerol,soyaoil,grapeseed,bioflavonoids,soyalecithin,fattyacids,driedsweetcloverextract,driedginkgobilobaextract,andironoxide.Theproduct,tobetakentwicedaily(orthreetimesperdayforan"intensive"program)fortwomonthsandthenoncedailyformaintenancecosts$1.50to$2.00percapsule.Here'swhatoneInternetmarketersays[followedbymycommentsinbrackets]:

    Driedginkgobilobaextractassistsinbloodcirculationandstimulatesthemetabolismoffats.[Althoughginkgocanincreasecirculation,itdoesnotstimulatefatmetabolism.Evenifitdid,thereisnoreasonwhyitwouldexertalocalizedeffect.]Driedsweetcloverextractcanincreasebloodcirculationandassistinremovingfluidbuildup.[Thisingredientmayhavemilddiureticaction,butisnot"fluidbuildup"isnotafactorintheappearanceorcompositionoffattytissue.]Grapeseedbioflavonoidsarepowerfulantioxidantsthatprotectcellsandbloodvesselsfromdamage.[Whetherantioxidantsupplementshelpprotecttissuesisnotscientificallysettled.Regardless,anysuchmechanismhasnothingtodowiththequantityorappearanceoffattytissues.]Driedfucusvesiculosusextractstimulatesmetabolismandcanhelpreducelocalizedfats.[Thisherbcontainssignificantamountsofiodineandcouldadverselyeffectthethyroidgland.TheU.S.RecommendedDailyAllowance(USRDA)foriodineis150micrograms.TheaverageAmerican

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 3/7

    womaningests170microgramsperdayfromfood(notincludingiodizedsalt).EachcapsuleofCellasenecontains240microgramsofiodine.Ifenoughweretakentoincreasethyroidfunction,theresultwouldbeunhealthy.]Eveningprimroseoilandfishoilarerichinpolyunsaturatedfattyacids,asourceofenergythatincreasesmetaboliclevelsandhelpsindiminishingsaturatedfattyacids.[The"energy"issimplythecaloricvalue.Neitheroilincreasesmetabolismorreducestheamountofotherfatsoneeats.]Soyalecithinhelpstobreakdownfats.[Thebodymakesallthelecithinitneeds.Lecithinsupplementsdonotcausethebodytoshedfat.]

    RexallSundown,Inc.hasbeenCellasene'sprimarymarketerintheUnitedStates.Thecompany'sWebsitehasclaimed:

    Cellaseneworksfromwithin,nutritionally,tohelpfightcelluliteatitssource....

    Cellaseneisasafe,clinicallystudiedformulathatworksovertimeatthesourceoftheproblembelowthesurfaceoftheskin.Thisuniqueformulaofplantextractsandotherbeneficialdietarysupplementsnourishesconnectivetissuefromwithinandhelpsreducecellulite.TheherbalingredientsinCellaseneworktoincreasebloodcirculation,reducefluidbuildup,stimulatemetabolismandreducelocalizedfats.CONVENIENTANDEASYTOUSE....

    YoudonotneedtochangeyourdietandexerciseroutineforCellasenetowork.ItissimpleandeffortlesstoincorporatetheeasytoswallowCellasenesoftgelsintoyourdailyregimen.

    OnMarch15,1999,duringaninterviewonCNBCTV,Rexall'schiefexecutiveofficerclaimedthatthreeclinicaltrialssponsoredbythecompanyhaddemonstrateda90%successrate,buttheresultswouldnotbesubmittedtoscientificjournalsbecauseRexalldidnotwanttorevealtheamountsofeachingredientinitsformula[6].Thisstatementwaspreposterousbecauseresultscouldpublishedwithoutrevealingtheexactamountsofeachingredient.Twoweekslater,IsearchedMedlinefor"cellulite"and"Cellasene"andfoundnoreportthatanyproducttakenbymouthwasprovenusefulagainstcellulite.

    NeartheendofMay,apparentlyinresponsetocriticisminthemedia[7],RexallreleasedvariousdetailsontwoofthestudiesandpostedthemtoitsScienceonCellaseneWebsite.Thefirststudywasperformedon25healthyfemalevolunteerswhosehipandthighandanklecircumferenceweremeasuredbeforeandaftereightweeksofdailyconsumptionoftheproduct.Althoughdifferencesbetweentheinitialandfinalmeasurementswerereported,nocontrolgroupwasused,sothatitwouldnotbepossibletotellwhetheranychangeswererelatedtotakingtheproductsortomeasurementvariations.Inaddition,neitherindividualmeasurementsnorweightswerereported,sothatitisnotpossibletojudgefromthedatawhetherthereductionswererelatedtoweightloss,whethercoincidentalorotherwise.

    Thesecondstudycompared25peoplewhotooktheproductwith15peoplewhotookaplaceboforeightweeks.Accordingtothereport,theaverageweightofbothgroupsvariedlittlebutaveragehipandthighcircumferenceandskinthickness(measuredwithanultrasoundtest)decreased.However,theexperimentaldesignwassoseriouslyflawedthatthefindingsshouldnotberegardedasvalid.TheparticipantswerenottoldwhethertheywerereceivingCellaseneortheplacebo,buttheinvestigatorsknewwhowasineachgroupbecauseonlytheCellasenegrouphadblooddrawnfortesting.Thiscouldhaveinfluencedthewaythemeasurementswereperformed,aswellastheparticipants'motivation.Nodataweregiventodemonstratewhetherthemeasurementprocesswasaccurateorwhethertheappearanceorfeelofthewomen'sskinhadchanged[7].Inaddition,althoughmeasurementsweremadeattheexperiment'sbeginning,midpoint,andend,themidpointmeasurementswerenotreportedonRexall'sWebsite.

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 4/7

    Itseemstomethatavalidtestshouldinvolve:(a)moreparticipants,(b)alongerinitialinvestigativeperiodplusmonthlyfollowupmeasurementsforatleastayear,(c)standardizationofthemeasurementtechnique,(d)measurementstakenbyatleastthreeinvestigators,(e)blindingoftheinvestigatorsaboutwhoreceivedtheCellaseneandwhodidnot,(f)measuringseveraltimesaweektoseewhethermeasurementstendtochangeorremainconstant,(g)weeklyratingsoftheappearanceoftheskinbyboththeparticipantsandtheexperimenters,and(h)releaseoftheindividualdatainadditiontothegroupaverages.IhavesuggestedthesepointstoRexall'schiefexecutiveofficer[8].

    AspokespersonforCellasene'sItalianmanufacturerstatedthatastudyinvolving200womenwouldbedoneattheUniversityofMiamiwithresultsexpectedintheFallof1999[9].InJune2000,however,theleadresearcherstudystatedthatthe$400,000studycouldnotbecompletedbecausesomeoftheparticipantshadnotcometothetestingsitetobemeasured[9].IntheinterimaBritishresearcherreportedfindingnodifferenceinhipandthighmeasurementsbetween11womentakingCellaseneand8womenusingaplacebo[10].

    PiggybackAttempt?

    InHealthAmerica,ofCarlsbad,California,competedwithRexallbymarketingasimilarproductcalledCelluLean.Thecompany'sWebsite,whichwasregisteredduringtheweekRexallintroducedCellasene,stated:

    CelluLeanmeltsawaycellulitebyincreasingyourmetabolismandbloodcirculation,breakingdownthefatsfoundincellulite,andremovingtoxinsfromyourbody.TheherbalextractsinCelluLeanhavebeenproventobeeffectiveinreducingfattydeposits.Simplyput,CelluLeanhelpsyourbodytoreachandbreakdowncellulite,enablingyourskintoregainitsyouthfulsmoothappearance.

    OnewaytoattractbrowserstoaWebsiteistoplace"metatags"intothesite'ssourcecode.Thewordsinthemetatagsarenotvisiblewhenlookingatthepage,butsearchenginessearchenginesusethemashintsabouttherelevanceofasite.Forexample,ifausersearchesfor"cancer,"andawebsiteuses"cancer"asametatag,thesearchenginemayconsiderthesitetoberelevanttothesearch,regardlessofthesite'sactualcontent.InHealthAmerica's"keywords"metatagread:

    Cellasene,Cellulean,selesene,neurosharp,cellesene,selasene,selleseen,cellasene,celesene,celasene,SlimRX,Rexall,cellulite,Cellulene,Cellutrim,InhealthAmerica,InHealthAmerica,InHealthAmerica,Pharmaceuticals,interactive,InHealth,InHealth,America,Metabolife,Metabo,356,Herbalife,Nuway,MegaTrim,MegaTrim,Megatrim,Adaptogenol,Adaptagenol,Adaptogen,Adaptagen,Adaptotrim,Adaptatrim,Lipuramine,Liporimine,Arthranol,Artharanol,stress,Stress,health,liver,arthritis,SanDiego,Carlsbad,California,NASA,diet,weightloss,heal,herbal,MLM,networkmarketing,marketing,unilevel,binary,multilevelmarketing,interactive,business,homebusiness,downline,sponsors,products,compensation,joints,businessopportunity,remedy,pain,relief,natural,performance,endurance,mental,concentration,sleep,research,immunesystem,fatigue,weightgain,California,inflammation,supplement,science,doctor,energy,recovery,future,Fat,Cortisol,eat,food,highfat,lowfat

    ThuspeoplesearchingforanyoftheabovetopicscouldfindalinktoInHealthAmerica'ssite.

    Endermologie

    In1998,theFDAapprovedahighpowered,handheldmassagetoolthatconsistsofatreatmentheadand

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 5/7

    twomotorizedrollerswithasuctiondevicethatcompressestheaffectedtissuebetweenthetworollers.Themanufacturerispermittedtopromoteitfor"temporarilyimprovingtheappearanceofcellulite."TheprocedurecalledEndermologieusuallytakes10to20treatmentstogetthebestresults,andoneortwomaintenancetreatmentspermontharerequiredtomaintainthem.Withoutthemaintenance,thebenefitswillsoonbelost.Thetypicalcostis$45to$65persession.Arecentlypublishedstudyof85womenbetweentheagesof21to61foundthat46patientswhocompletedsevensessionsshowedameanindexreductioninbodycircumferenceof1.34cm,while39patientswhocompleted14sessionsoftreatmentsshowedameanindexreductioninbodycircumferenceof1.83cm[11].However,anotherstudy,involving52women,foundnoobjectivedifferenceinthighgirth(attwopoints)orthighfatdepth(measuredbyultrasound).[12]

    EnforcementActions

    TheFTChastakensuccessfulactionagainstmanymarketersofallegedcellulitereducingproducts:

    In1991,SlenderYou,Inc.,signedaconsentagreementprohibitingunsubstantiatedclaimsthatitscontinuouspassivemotion(CPM)tablesenabletheusertoloseweightloseinchesremovecelluliteflushouttoxinstoneandfirmmusclesorachievephysicalfitnessbenefitscomparableorsuperiortothoseprovidedbyrigorousexercise[13].In1993,asimilaractionwastakenagainstFleetwoodManufacturing,Inc.,ofMesa,Arizona,anditsowner,ThomasA.Fleetwood.[14]In1993,Nature'sCleanser,basedinBeverlyHills,California,andDonaldDouglasTorryagreednottomakeunsubstantiatedclaimsthatitsherbaltabletswouldpromoteweightlossby"cleansing"thebowel.Thecompanyhadclaimedthatweightcouldbeimmediatelycontrolledbywithoutdietingorwatchingcaloriesbyeliminatingwastesuchasfattytissues,cellulite,toxins,mucus,hardenedfecalmatterandharmfuldrugresidues[15].In1993,Revlon,Inc.anditssubsidiary,CharlesRevson,Inc.,signedaconsentagreementnottomakeunsubstantiatedclaimsthattheirUltimaIIProCollagenanticellulitebodycomplexwould:(a)significantlyreducecellulite,helpdispersetoxinsandexcesswaterfromareaswherecelluliteappears(b)reduceskin'sbumpytexture,ripplesorslacknesscausedbycellulite(c)helpdispersetoxinsandexcesswaterfromareaswherecelluliteappearsand(d)increasesubskintissuestrengthandtone[16].In1993,SynchronalCorpagreedtostopunsubstantiatedclaimsforitsAnuskaBioResponseBodyContouringProgramcellulitecreamandtopay$3.5millioninconsumerredress.In1993,NationalMediaCorp./MediaArtsInternational,Ltd.,agreedtoaconsentagreementand$275,000inconsumerredressinconnectionwithinfomercialsclaimingthatitsCosmetiqueFrancaiswouldsubstantiallyreduceoreliminatecellulite,wasmoreeffectivethandietorexercise,andwouldpreventrecurrenceifusedonceortwiceaweek[17].In1995,afederaljudgeinCaliforniapermanentlybannedSiluetaDistributors,Inc.,aChatsworth,Californiabasedcompany,anditspresident,StanleyKlavir,fromdeceptivelyclaimingthattheir"SistemaSilueta"creamandtabletswouldreducecellulite.ThejudgeconcludedsaidthatSistemaSiluetawasnothingmorethanmoisturizeranddiuretictablets,neitherofwhichwouldcausecelluliteloss.Thedefendantswerealsoorderedtopay$169,339inconsumerredress[18].In1995,EuropeanBodyConceptsanditsanditspresidentJamesMarinosignedaconsentagreementprohibitingitfrommakingunsubstantiatedclaimsthatitsbodywrappingsystemwouldcausetheusertoloseinches,pounds,andcellulitequicklyandeasily,withoutdietingorexercising,andthatthesystemcouldreducethesizeofspecificareasofthebody[19].In1995,NationalDietaryResearch,Inc.(NDR)anditsownerWilliamH.Morrisagreedtopay$100,000tosettleFTCchargesofdeceptivelyadvertisingFoodSourceOne(FS1)asaweightlossandcholesterolreducingproduct.Theproductwasacompressedtabletmadelargelyfrom

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 6/7

    plantfiber.Theconsentagreementincludedaclausethatprohibitedunsubstantiatedclaimsofcellulitereduction[20].In1998,anAustralianfederaljudgeorderedtheSwissSlimmingandHealthInstituteanditsdirectortopaytheCommission$1.47millioninpenaltiesandinterest,someofwhichwouldberefundedtodefraudedclients[21].In1999,theIowaAttorneyGeneralobtainedanorderprohibitingLipoSlim,Inc.,ofNewYorkCityfromcontinuingtomarketingits"LipoSlimBriefs"inIowa.Adssaidwearingthebriefswould"getridofyourcellulite"and"dissolvefatandhydricdepositsthataccumulateinyourhips,stomach,buttocksandthighs."AnadintheNationalEnquirersaidthat"thousandsofthermoactivemicroporecells"inthebriefs"produceagentlemassagethatdestroysdeepfatparticlesandliquidmoleculeswhicharethecauseofexcessfat."TheorderrequiredthecompanytoofferfullrefundstoitsIowabuyersandpay$12,000tothestateconsumereducationfund[22].In1999,theFDAorderedCelluliteReductionofNewYorktostopsuggestingthatEndodermologycouldhavemorethanatemporaryeffectoncellulite[23].InJuly2000,theFTCchargedRexallSundown,Inc.,withmakingfalseandunsubstantiatedclaimsforCellasene[24].

    TheBottomLine

    Theamountoffatinthebodyisdeterminedbytheindividual'seatingandexercisehabits,butthedistributionoffatinthebodyisdeterminedbyheredity.Inmostcasesreductionofaparticularpartcanbeaccomplishedonlyaspartofanoverallweightreductionprogram.Endermologiemaytemporarilyimprovetheappearanceofdimpledareas,buttheprocedureistimeconsumingandexpensive.Liposuctionmaypermanentlyhelpinsomecases.

    References

    1. FennerL.Cellulite:Hardtobudgepudge.FDAConsumer14(4):59,1980.2. RosenbaumMandothers.Anexploratoryinvestigationofthemorphologyandbiochemistryof

    cellulite.PlasticandReconstructiveSurgery101:19341939,1998.3. FDA.ElectricalMuscleStimulatorsandIontophoresisDevices.ImportAlert#8901,revised

    3/17/97.4. FDA.ElectricalMuscleStimulators(CPG7124.26),RevisedMarch1995.5. WillsJ.Aboutbodywraps,pills,andothermagicwandsforlosingweight.FDAConsumer

    16(9):1820,1982.6. DeSantisD.InterviewonPowerLunch,CNBCTV,March15,1999,1:20pm7. SrinivasanK.Fedswanttheskinnyoncellulitepill'sclaims.AssociatedPress.May28,1999.8. BarrettS.EmailmessagetoD.DeSantis,June2,1999.9. MurawskiJ.Anticellulitedrug'stestresultswerejilted.PalmBeachPost,June27,2000.

    10. LisBalchinM.Parallelplacebocontrolledclinicalstudyofamixtureofherbssoldasaremedyforcellulite.PhytotherapyResearch13:627629,1999.

    11. ChangPandothers.Noninvasivemechanicalbodycontouring:(Endermologie)Aoneyearclinicaloutcomestudyupdate.AestheticandPlasticSurgery22:145153,1998.

    12. CollisNandothers.Cellulitetreatment:amythorreality:aprospectiverandomized,controlledtrialoftwotherapies,endermologieandaminophyllinecream.PlasticandReconstructiveSurgery104:11101114,1999.

    13. FTCchargesmarketerof"CPM"tableswithmakingunsubstantiatedweightlossclaimsconsentagreementwouldsettlecharges.FTCnewsrelease,Nov27,1991.

    14. FTCchargesmarketerof"CPM"tableswithmakingfalseweightlossclaimsconsentagreementwouldsettlecharges.FTCnewsrelease,Feb25,1993.

  • 3/31/2015 "Cellulite"Removers

    http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/cellulite.html 7/7

    15. Nature'sCleanserSettlesFTCchargesthatitmadedeceptivehealthandweightlossclaimsforherbalproducts.FTCNewsrelease,April23,1993.

    16. Revlon,Inc.tosettlechargesofunsubstantiatedadclaimsfor"anticellulite"andsunscreenproducts.FTCnewsrelease,Aug24,1993.

    17. Infomercialmarketeragreestopay$275,000tosettleFTCchargesoverdeceptiveadvertisingofseveralproducts.FTCNewsrelease,March30,1993.

    18. FederalcourtbansclaimsforshamcellulitereductioncreamfeaturedonnationalSpanishlanguagetelevision.FTCnewsrelease,March10,1995.

    19. BodywrappingsalonssettleFTCchargesthatweightandinchlossclaimswerefalse.FTCnewsrelease,March29,1995.

    20. Floridabasedcompanyagreestopay$100,000tosettleFTCchargesofdeceptivelyadvertisingweightlossandcholesterolloweringproducts.FTCnewsrelease,May4,1995.

    21. AustralianCompetitionandConsumerCommission.RefundsorderedforformerSwisslimclients.Newsrelease,June22,1998.

    22. IowaAttorneyGeneral.LipoSlimBriefs:"NotAvailableinIowa."Newsrelease,March10,1999.23. GillLJ.WarninglettertoLeahLewis,Nov19,1999.24. RexallSundownChargedByFTCwithMakingFalseandUnsubstantiatedClaimsfor"Cellasene."

    FTCnewsrelease,July20,2000.

    MoreonCellasene|||QuackwatchHomePage

    ThispagewasrevisedonOctober9,2000.