26
Effects of Prehabilitation on Post-OP Success William Cote PT/s 2-24-16

CEIII IS PP

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CEIII IS PP

Effects of Prehabilitation on Post-OP Success

William Cote PT/s

2-24-16

Page 2: CEIII IS PP

Overview

• What is Prehabilitation?

• Prehabilitation focus

• Prehabilitation effects on invasive surgeries

• Limitations

• Future of Prehabilitation

• What can we do?

• Summary

http://www.apta.org/uploadedImages/APTAorg/News_and_Publications/PT_in_Motion/2016/02/Prehabilitation.png?n=38

Page 3: CEIII IS PP

What is Prehabilitation?1

• Prehabilitation refers to physical therapy treatment in the pre-operative setting.1

• Goal is to reduce post-op complications and reduce costs.

• The concept is new and ever changing in recent years, due to many eye-catching studies.1

• Concept has been found helpful for patients preparing for:

• Joint replacements

• Cardiac/abdominal surgeries

• Cancer related therapy/surgeries

Page 4: CEIII IS PP

The Many Focuses of Prehabilitation

• Pre-operative strength training

• Inspiratory training

• Pre-operative education

• Anxiety-reducing strategies

• Increase patient sense of control

• Supplementation

http://www.litigationps.com/.a/6a01156e439be2970c01a73e06ada4970d-pi

Page 5: CEIII IS PP

Effect of prehab on elective cardiac surgery

• AHA reports total number of inpatient cardiovascular procedures increased 28% between 2000-2010 (total of 7,588,000).2

• Of total cardiac surgies, 400,000 were Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG).2

• Although post-op mortality numbers have been reduced, there is still signifiicant risk of pulmonary complications, which increases morbidity and mortality. 2,3

Page 6: CEIII IS PP

Prehab and effects w/ CABG

• Post-op CABG complications include, but are not limited to:

• Altered breathing patterns

• Decreased chest wall movement

• Decreased mucous clearance

• Hypoxia

• Limited walking ability

• Decreased respiratory muscle function

• Increased hospital stay

• Decreased QOL

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Blausen_0152_CABG_All.png

Page 7: CEIII IS PP

Prehab and Effects w/ CABG –Inspiratory Training

• Intervention group received inspiratory muscle training 7 days/ week x20min along with usual care (education, and cough support)

• Control group received only usual care3

• Control group insp. Muscle strength increased by 15%

• Intervention group increased by 36%.3

• Control group has higher incidence of atelectasis (6 pts) in comparisons to intervention group (2)

• Average hospital stay 2 days longer for the control.3

Page 8: CEIII IS PP

Prehab and Effects w/ CABG – Exercises & Education

• Control group received 3 hour pre-surgery assessment

• Intervention group pariticpated in education classess and exercise 2x/week x 4 weeks.4

• Exercise group based on interest and ability, to include: walking (8/8), cycling (2/8) and stretching (2/8).4

• Primary outcomes included walking distance (6 min walk test).4

• Secondary outcomes: Gait speed (5 meter speed test) and cardiac rehab attendence post-op 3 months.4

Page 9: CEIII IS PP

Prehab and effects w/ CABG – Exercises & education4

Outcome Control Group (n=7) Intervention group (n=8)

Walking distance (6 min walk test) (meters)

Unchanged 474 +/- 101 (at pre-op)487 +/- 106 (x3 months)

Gait speed (5 meter gait speed) (seconds)

Unchanged 4.0 +/- 0.7 (at pre-op)3.7 +/- 0.9 (x3 months)

Cardiac rehab attendence x3 months

43% of patients attended 100% of patients attended

Page 10: CEIII IS PP

Effects of Prehabilitation on joint replacements

• Observation cohort comparion study of 4,733 hip or knee replacement cases within Medicare hospital referral cluster.5

• Outcome measured was use of post-acute care services; with 77% of patients using these services, which include:

• Skilled Nursing Facilities

• Home health Agency

• Inpatient Rehab Facility

Page 11: CEIII IS PP

Effects of Prehabilitation on joint replacements

• Post-op acute care utilization decreased if prehabilitation was used

• only 52.4% of cohort using services.

• However, 79.7% of non-prehabilitation patients used post-acute services.5

• Overall, use of prehabiliation was associated with a significant 29% reduction in post-acute care services.5

• In turn, this equates to an estimated CMS payment reduction of approx $1,215 per patient. 5

Page 12: CEIII IS PP

Effects of Prehabilitation on Colorectal Resection for Cancer

• Research evaluated effects of prehabilitation on recovery of functional exercise capacity vs patients receiving rehabilitation status post resection.6

• Both groups pariticpated in home based intervention including:

• Mod level aerobic/resistance exercises

• Nutritional counseling

• Relaxation exercises

• initiated 4 weeks before surgery, or immediately after. 6

• Primary outcome measured was functional exercise capacity

• Using 6-min walk test.6

Page 13: CEIII IS PP

Effects of Prehabilitation on Colorectal Resection for Cancer

• Preoperative period: Patients in prehabilitation group significantly improved walking capacity by 25.2 meters;

• rehab group declined by 16.4 meters.6

• Four weeks after surgery: 50% of patients in both groups remained >20m below baseline distances.6

• 8 weeks after surgery:

• Patients in prehab were significantly above their baseline walking distances (+23.7 meters),

• Rehab group patients were significantly below baseline (-21.8 meters).6

Page 14: CEIII IS PP

Effects of prehabilitation on Colorectal Resection

for Cancer 5

• Image shows effects of prehabilitation vs rehabilitation

from baseline through 8 week post operation5

Page 15: CEIII IS PP

Effects of prehabilitation on invasive surgeries

• Research evaluating effects of prehab on patients undergoing invasive surgeries, in relation to postoperative complication rate and hospital stay.7

• Search of relevant conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, and CINAHL.7

• Evaluated joint replacement, cardiac, and abdominal surgeries7

Page 16: CEIII IS PP

Effects of prehabilitation on invasive surgeries

• Use of prehabilitation prior to cardiac or abdominal surgery led to a shorter hospital stay and reduced postoperative complication rates.7

• Pulmonary complications are leading cause of postoperative morbidity after cardiac or abdominal surgery.7

• Main preoperative method use was inspiratory training, which targets respiratory muscle function, thus directly affecting pulmonary function, and reducing complications after cardiac/abdominal surgery.7

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-o8q0L32YBM4/UFBiAOGZDOI/AAAAAAAADNU/PJvK81j323g/s1600/incentive.jpg

Page 17: CEIII IS PP

Effects of prehabilitation on invasive surgeries

• By contrast, length of stay and complication rates s/p joint replacement surgery were not significantly affected by preoperative exercise.7

• Common complication in patients undergoing joint replacement procedure is wound infection.7

• Preoperative exercises/mobility training may not directly influence postoperative incidence of wound infections.7

http://www.oxfordvalleypain.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Fitness-Walking.jpg

Page 18: CEIII IS PP

Limitations of Prehabilitation • Research to examine the impact of prehabiliation is in the beginning stages1

• More “good studies” necessary to help promote the field/increase use

• Many insurance companies will not fund prehabilitation, or will take from overall visits, thus reducing post-op rehabilitation access1

• Specific exercises for specific procedures

• Trial and error

• Lack of marketing/promotion

http://www.desertsojourn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Limitations.jpg

Page 19: CEIII IS PP

Limitations of Prehabilitation

• One of largest limitations is lack of support from physicians, who remain skeptical of prehab’s benefits1

• According to 2013 Study from Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55-90% of pts diagnosed with cancer may benefit from prehabilitation, yet only 5-20% of those are referred to PTs/OTs.

• Further collaboration would be beneficial to improve working relationships and increase referrals/use of prehabilitation.

Page 20: CEIII IS PP

The Future of Prehabilitation

• With increase in aging and baby boomers seeking to prolong active lifestyles, preoperative care will increase in demand as research grows.1

• Implementation of Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model from the federal governement will give prehabiliation a major push.1

• Mandates bundling payment and quality measures for each episode of care.

• Idea is to encourage hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers to work together to improve quality and coordination of care.

Page 21: CEIII IS PP

The Future of Prehabilitation

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model

http://image.slidesharecdn.com/ccjr-overviewwebinar-slides72015-150720123312-lva1-app6892/95/webinars-comprehensive-care-for-joint-replacement-model-overview-2-638.jpg?cb=1437751166

Page 22: CEIII IS PP

The Future of Prehabilitation• APTA is set to launch an online resource center in order to help PTs:

• navigate through new programs

• to help compile data

• show physical therapy, specifically prehabilitations, benefits.

• With an increase in bundle style payments, the importance of prehabiliation and its cost savings are going to assume increased importance moving forward.1

Page 23: CEIII IS PP

What can we do?

• Educate patients that are candidates for elective surgery?

• Promote prehabilitation…

• To patients

• To other physical therapists/occupational therapists

• To physicians

• Continue research on benefits with larger and a wider variety of populations

Page 24: CEIII IS PP

Summary

• Prehabilitation has been proven to have beneficial implications on post-op success.

• While research may be limited, the focus on prehabilitation is a rapidly growing field.

• It is up to us as physical therapists to help prehabilitation reach its utmost potential

Page 25: CEIII IS PP

Questions?

Page 26: CEIII IS PP

References

1. Ries E. Prehabilitation: Better sooner and later. PT In Motion. February 2016.

2. Humphrey E, Malone D. Effectiveness of preoperative physical therapy for elective cardiac surgery. Phys Ther. 2015;95(1):160-166.

3. Hulzebos EHJ, Meeteran N, Buijs B, De Bie RA, Riviere AB, Helders P. Feasibility of preoperative inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complication: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(1):949-959.

4. Sawatzky J, Kehler DS, Ready AE, et al. Prehabilitation program for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients: a pilot randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(7): 648-657.

5. Snow R, Granata J, Ruhil A, Vogel K, McShane M, Wasielewski R. Associations between preoperative physical therapy and post-acute care utilization patterns and cost in total joint replacement. 2014;96(19):1-12.

6. Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: A randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesilogy. 2014;121(5):937-947.

7. Valkenet K, De Port I, Dronkers JJ, et al. The effects of preoperative exercise therapy on postoperative outcome: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(2):99-111.