59
City Attorney Dennis Herrera News Release [MORE] For Immediate Release: January 2, 2014 Contact: Matt Dorsey (415) 554‐4662 City College wins reprieve, as court enjoins ACCJC from terminating accreditation Herrera grateful to court ‘for acknowledging what accreditors callously won’t: that the educational aspirations of tens of thousands of City College students matter’ SAN FRANCISCO (Jan. 2, 2014)—A San Francisco Superior Court judge has granted a key aspect of a motion by City Attorney Dennis Herrera to preliminarily enjoin the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges from terminating City College of San Francisco’s accreditation next July. Under terms of the ruling Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow issued late this afternoon, the ACCJC is barred from finalizing its planned termination of City College’s accreditation during the course of the litigation, which alleges that the private accrediting body has allowed political bias, improper procedures, and conflicts of interest to unlawfully influence its evaluation of the state’s largest community college. Judge Karnow denied Herrera’s request for additional injunctive relief to prevent the ACCJC from taking adverse accreditation actions against other educational institutions statewide until its evaluation policies comply with federal regulations. A separate motion for a preliminary injunction by plaintiffs representing City College educators and students was denied. In issuing the injunction, the court recognized that Herrera’s office is likely to prevail on the merits of his case when it proceeds to trial, and that the balance of harms favored the people Herrera represents as City Attorney. On the question of relative harms, Judge Karnow’s ruling was emphatic in acknowledging the catastrophic effect disaccreditation would hold for City College students and the community at large, writing: “There is no question, however, of the harm that will be suffered if the Commission follows through and terminates accreditation as of July 2014. Those consequences would be catastrophic. Without accreditation the College would almost certainly close and about 80,000 students would either lose their educational opportunities or hope to transfer elsewhere; and for many of them, the transfer option is not realistic. The impact on the teachers, faculty, and the City would be incalculable, in both senses of the term: The impact cannot be calculated, and it would be extreme.”

Ccsf injuction granted

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A press release from the SF City Attorney and the actual decision.

Citation preview

Page 1: Ccsf injuction granted

City Attorney Dennis Herrera News Release 

[MORE]

ForImmediateRelease:January2,2014Contact:MattDorsey(415)554‐4662

City College wins reprieve, as court enjoins ACCJC from terminating accreditation 

Herrera grateful to court ‘for acknowledging what accreditors callously won’t: that the 

educational aspirations of tens of thousands of City College students matter’ SANFRANCISCO(Jan.2,2014)—ASanFranciscoSuperiorCourtjudgehasgrantedakeyaspectofamotionbyCityAttorneyDennisHerreratopreliminarilyenjointheAccreditingCommissionforCommunityandJuniorCollegesfromterminatingCityCollegeofSanFrancisco’saccreditationnextJuly.UndertermsoftherulingJudgeCurtisE.A.Karnowissuedlatethisafternoon,theACCJCisbarredfromfinalizingitsplannedterminationofCityCollege’saccreditationduringthecourseofthelitigation,whichallegesthattheprivateaccreditingbodyhasallowedpoliticalbias,improperprocedures,andconflictsofinteresttounlawfullyinfluenceitsevaluationofthestate’slargestcommunitycollege.JudgeKarnowdeniedHerrera’srequestforadditionalinjunctiverelieftopreventtheACCJCfromtakingadverseaccreditationactionsagainstothereducationalinstitutionsstatewideuntilitsevaluationpoliciescomplywithfederalregulations.AseparatemotionforapreliminaryinjunctionbyplaintiffsrepresentingCityCollegeeducatorsandstudentswasdenied.Inissuingtheinjunction,thecourtrecognizedthatHerrera’sofficeislikelytoprevailonthemeritsofhiscasewhenitproceedstotrial,andthatthebalanceofharmsfavoredthepeopleHerrerarepresentsasCityAttorney.Onthequestionofrelativeharms,JudgeKarnow’srulingwasemphaticinacknowledgingthecatastrophiceffectdisaccreditationwouldholdforCityCollegestudentsandthecommunityatlarge,writing:“Thereisnoquestion,however,oftheharmthatwillbesufferediftheCommissionfollowsthroughandterminatesaccreditationasofJuly2014.Thoseconsequenceswouldbecatastrophic.WithoutaccreditationtheCollegewouldalmostcertainlycloseandabout80,000studentswouldeitherlosetheireducationalopportunitiesorhopetotransferelsewhere;andformanyofthem,thetransferoptionisnotrealistic.Theimpactontheteachers,faculty,andtheCitywouldbeincalculable,inbothsensesoftheterm:Theimpactcannotbecalculated,anditwouldbeextreme.”

Page 2: Ccsf injuction granted

CityAttorneyDennisHerrera—Page2“I’mgratefultothecourtforacknowledgingwhataccreditorshavesofarrefusedto:thattheeducationalaspirationsoftensofthousandsofCityCollegestudentsmatter,”saidHerrera.“JudgeKarnowreachedawiseandthoroughdecisionthatvindicatesourcontentionthataccreditorsengagedinunfairandunlawfulconduct.GiventheACCJC’sdubiousevaluationprocess,itmakesnosenseforustoracetheclocktoaccommodateACCJC’sequallydubiousdeadlinetoterminateCityCollege’saccreditation.”JudgeKarnowadjudicatedfourseparatepre‐trialmotionsintoday’srulingfollowingtwodaysofhearingsonDec.26and30.HerrerafiledhismotionforpreliminaryinjunctiononNov.25—threemonthsafterfilinghisinitiallawsuit—blamingtheACCJCforproceduralfoot‐dragginganddelaytactics,whichincludedafailedbidtoremovethecasetofederalcourtanditsmonths‐longrefusaltohonordiscoveryrequests.JudgeKarnowgrantedinpartanddeniedinpartHerrera’smotion,issuinganinjunctionthatappliesonlytotheACCJC’sterminationdeadlineforCityCollege’saccreditation,andnotstatewide.ApartfromHerrera’smotion,AFTLocal2121andtheCaliforniaFederationofTeachersalsomovedforapreliminaryinjunctiononNov.25,citingadditionallegaltheories.Thatmotionwasdenied.AthirdmotionbytheACCJCaskedthecourttoabstainfromhearingtheCityAttorney’slawsuitforinterferingwithcomplexaccreditingprocesseslargelygovernedbyfederallaw;or,failingthat,tostayHerrera’sactionpendingtheoutcomesofCityCollege’saccreditationproceedingandACCJC’sowneffortstorenewitsrecognitionwiththeU.S.DepartmentofEducation.Afourthmotion,alsobytheACCJC,requestedthatthecourtstriketheAFT/CFT’scaseunderCalifornia’sAnti‐SLAPPstatute,whichenablesdefendantstodismisscausesofactionsthatintendtochillthevalidexerciseoftheirFirstAmendmentrightsoffreespeechandpetition.(SLAPPisanacronymfor“StrategicLawsuitsAgainstPublicParticipation.”)BothoftheACCJC’spre‐trialmotionsweredenied.TheACCJChascomeunderincreasingfirefromstateeducationadvocates,abipartisancoalitionofstatelegislatorsandU.S.Rep.JackieSpeierforitscontroversialadvocacytodramaticallyrestrictthemissionofCalifornia’scommunitycollegesbyfocusingondegreecompletiontothedetrimentofvocational,remedialandnon‐crediteducation.Theaccreditingbody’spoliticalagenda—sharedbyconservativeadvocacyorganizations,for‐profitcollegesandstudentlenderinterests—representsasignificantdeparturefromtheabiding“openaccess”missionrepeatedlyaffirmedbytheCalifornialegislatureandpursuedbySanFrancisco’sCommunityCollegeDistrictsinceitwasfirstestablished.Herrera’saction,filedonAug.22,allegesthatthecommissionactedtowithdrawaccreditation“inretaliationforCityCollegehavingembracedandadvocatedadifferentvisionforCalifornia’scommunitycollegesthantheACCJCitself.”ThecivilsuitoffersextensiveevidenceofACCJC’sdoublestandardinevaluatingCityCollegeascomparedtoitstreatmentofsixothersimilarlysituatedCaliforniacollegesduringtheprecedingfiveyears.Notoneofthosecollegessawitsaccreditationterminated.TheCityAttorney’scaseis:PeopleoftheStateofCaliforniaexrel.DennisHerrerav.AccreditingCommissionforCommunityandJuniorCollegesetal.,SanFranciscoSuperiorCourtNo.13‐533693,filedAug.22,2013.TheAFT/CFTcaseis:AFTLocal2121etal.v.AccreditingCommissionforCommunityandJuniorCollegesetal.,SanFranciscoSuperiorCourtNo.534447,filedSept.24,2013.DocumentationfromtheCityAttorney’scaseisavailableonlineat:http://www.sfcityattorney.org.

###

Page 3: Ccsf injuction granted

 

54782229 Jan 02 2014 03:28PM 

 

Page 4: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 5: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 6: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 7: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 8: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 9: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 10: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 11: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 12: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 13: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 14: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 15: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 16: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 17: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 18: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 19: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 20: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 21: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 22: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 23: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 24: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 25: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 26: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 27: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 28: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 29: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 30: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 31: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 32: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 33: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 34: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 35: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 36: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 37: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 38: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 39: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 40: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 41: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 42: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 43: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 44: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 45: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 46: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 47: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 48: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 49: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 50: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 51: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 52: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 53: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 54: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 55: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 56: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 57: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 58: Ccsf injuction granted
Page 59: Ccsf injuction granted