Upload
pedro-m-borges
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Low Tech Rehabilitation
Basic Protocols for Immediate Use
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Some Background……
• 2 year degree/training as PTA• Graduated 1980 from LACC• 18 years practice Ithaca, NY• 3 years practice Boston, MA
– Private Practice– Ergonomic Consultant
• October, 2002 - Logan Clinical Faculty
Structure of Content
• Theory and Background• Functional Anatomy • Testing, Analysis & Diagnosis• Hands-on practical experience
2
Overview of Weekend• Introduction & Testing
– Basic Concepts & Foot Evaluation– Manual Muscle Testing & Flexibility
• Core Stability – Neck Flexors and Neck Stability– Swiss Ball
• Posture & Knee – Postural Awareness & Anterior Pelvic Tilt – Knee Rehab. & Rocker/Wobble Boards– Case Study
• Upper Body– Shoulder Rehabilitation– Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
Assumptions
• Detailed History including:– Nature of Chief Complaint– Past Personal History & Review of Systems– Past Family History
• Appropriate Orthopedic, Physical, Neurological & Chiropractic Exams
• Differential Diagnosis
Special Tools of Assessment
• Full sized pain drawing with five types of discomfort
• Analog Pain scale• Oswestry Quality of Life Index
– Neck– Low Back
3
Role of Manipulation
• Direct experience that….– Spinal manipulation is potent– Chiropractic adjustment is central
• Active management compliments• Exercise programs do not replace the
importance of manipulation
Low-Tech Rehab• What – Low cost tools for
rehabilitation• Why – Pain management,
myofascial pain & long term fitness
• Who - Nearly all your patients• How – Selective techniques
geared to individual need, dependent upon place in the treatment cycle
Philosophical Perspective• Passive vs. active management• Part of problem or part of the solution• Not dependent but empowered patients• Differentiate & build your practice• Give patients something to look forward to• It’s fun to teach!
4
Managed Care
• Carriers are expecting active treatment protocols
• Continued reimbursement based upon outcomes
• Appreciable improvement when active management has been instituted
Getting Paid
• 97110 “Rehab/Exercise”• 97112 “Neuromuscular Re-Education”• One unit = 8 to 25 minutes• One unit = $45
The Terrible Triad• Pain interferes with patient’s
ADL’s• Decreased mobility causes
segmental dysfunction• Decreased function causes
muscle atrophy• Lack of motion allows patient
to fixate on pain• Sleeplessness does not allow
muscles to relax• Hopelessness sets in,
reinforcing cycle
Pain
ImmobilityDysfunction
5
Neurological Basis - Pathways
• Primary sensory afferents - to spinal cord• Ascending relay neurons - spinal cord to brain
stem / thalamus• Thalamocortical projections• Modulation: Nociceptive transmission is modified• Perception: Transduction, transmission,
modulation interact to create subjective emotional experience of pain
Neurological Basis - Pathways
Afferents
Ascending pathways
Dorsal horn
Neurological Basis• Large scale motor activity
given preference• Low grade pain perceived in
absence of large scale motor activity
• Chronic pain associated with aberrant changes in dorsal horn organization
• Prompt action necessary to avoid these changes!
6
Interlocking Systems
Cognitive
Perceptual
Limbic
EmotionalMotor
Codependency of major CNS systems & environment
Testing - Biomechanical Analysis
• Leg length discrepancies– Functional or anatomical
• Muscle strength deficiency• Muscle tension,
hypertonicity or shortening• Foot dysfunction• Recurrent patterns of
segmental dysfunction• Ergonomic factors
When do you start?• Active management
– Immediately– Gauged to patients abilities or
level of function• Rehabilitation
– When most acute phase has passed
– Pain present so keeps patient interested
– Before “auto discharge” occurs
7
Goals of Rehabilitation• Decreasing pain• Take away the fear of movement• Decreasing mechanical stress on spinal
structures• Strengthening weak muscles• Stabilizing hypermobile segments• Improved mobility• Improved posture• Improved fitness levels to prevent injury
Increasing Compliance
• Partnership with patient• Have you engaged the patient?
– Why am I doing this exercise?– How does it relate to my diagnosis?
• Post-instructional Check– Check patient’s technique within 1-3 day– Are they doing the exercise(s) correctly?– Are they doing them at the recommended
frequency?– Document compliance in SOAP
Documentation
• Note the time rehabilitation started and ended in date area.
• Briefly describe type of exercise, program, tool and why.
• Describe patient’s immediate understanding• Note frequency, duration, weight used and
how many times per day• List any handouts given to the patient
8
Patient Handouts
• Ease of Creation
• Individualized
• Covers various rehab tools
• Covers documentation
• Reasonably priced
Tools of the Trade
• Swiss ball• Foam rolls• Wobble & rocker board• Soft kickball• Elastic bands• Kinesiotape• Hand & wrist devices
Swiss Ball
• Trunk Strengthening• Targeting of select muscle groups• Enhanced Proprioception• Mimics Real Activities & Demands• FUN!
9
Foam Rolls
• Compliments Swiss ball type activities• Trunk stability• Balance and coordination
Wobble & Rocker Board
• Ankle stability• Knee stability• Post ankle sprain rehabilitation• Functional challenge to area• Re-establishes proprioception
Soft Kickball
• Resistance exercises – neck flexors• Post-MVA rehabilitation• Headaches• Extensor & SCM myofascial pain• Loss of cervical lordosis
10
Elastic Bands
• Strengthening for all extremities• Graded resistance activities • Easy to target selective groups• Functional activities can be mimicked
Kinesiotaping
• Provides “touch” to area of chief complaint
• Lifts skin to open lymphatic channels
• Increased mechanoreceptor stimulation
Wrist & Hand Devices
• Selective stability across wrist• Strengthening of forearm muscles• Used when acute phase has passed• Tools:
– Dynaflex balls– Wristiciser– Handmaster
11
Summary of Process• Examination/Analysis• Diagnosis
– Understand contributing factors– Patient seen in wholestic manner
• Formulate a treatment plan– Short term goals– Long term goals
• Reassess at appropriate intervals
Evaluation of Foot Biomechanics
• Evaluation• Biomechanics• Proprioception
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Foot Evaluation – Why?• Foundational when considering:
– Biomechanics/positioning– Proprioception to all postural
muscles
• Small change inferior = large change superior
• “Bed” of proprioceptors is rich given role of feet in standing and locomotion
12
Foot Dysfunction
• Foot dysfunction < > foot pain• Recurrent dysfunction in:
– Ankle, knees, hip– Sacral-iliac joints, lumbar spine– Neck, headaches– Shoulder diagnosis
• Do symptoms increase with weight bearing activity?
Steps for Evaluation• Observe• Palpate• Heel Strike Test• Recommendation
Leg Length Discrepancies• Functional
– Pelvic unleveling– Pronation– Supination
• Measurement – Pelvic Influence– Fixed to non-fixed measurement– Patient lies supine with legs in neutral position– Measure both legs from umbilicus to medial malleolus– Unequal measurement suggests functional shortening– Radiographic methods
13
Leg Length Discrepancies• Structural
– Growth plate injury
– Trauma - Fracture– Infection– Poliomyelitis– Cerebral Palsy
Observe• Hip Height Difference• Achilles Tendon Deviation• Medial Malleolus• Hallux Valgus Deviation
Palpate
• Inform the patient of your intentions• Hold the ankle with one hand• Firmly palpate the longitudinal arch
– Taut– Loss of height– Pes Planus– Tender
14
Mechanism of Heel Strike
• Phases of gait:– Heel strike Stance Toe-off Swing
• Heel strike moment facilitation of quadriceps group
• Loss of strength at this moment = inhibition at moment weight shifts to limb in stance
• Patient prone, hip at 45 degrees• Show patient direction of travel• Test muscle strength• Inform patient of procedure• Do a “dry run”• Heel strike, withdrawal & test
Heel Strike Muscle Testing
• Is there a loss of strength?• Double strapping across arch & ankle• Retest strength• Proprioception is aberrant
Heel Strike Muscle Testing
• No loss of strength?• Biomechanics alone a factor• Consider orthotics on other factors
15
Heel Strike Muscle Testing
• With strapping – no change in quadriceps?
• Consider joint dysfunction along kinetic chain:– Ankle– Knee– Hip– SI joint
Aberrant Heel Strike Effects
• Loss of stability across the knee– 60% muscular & 40%
ligamentous– Recurrent knee pain with weight
bearing activities• Loss of anterior stability to the
ilium– Chronic recurrent SI joint
instability– Compensatory muscle tightening
Gait Cycle Revisited
• Heel Strike• Stance Phase• Toe-Off• Swing
16
Proprioceptors
• Golgi tendon organs (GTO) activated• Spindle cell receptors in longitudinal arch• Between each bone – capsular receptors• Mechanoreceptors in longitudinal ligament
Heel Strike through Toe-Off
Neurological Basis• GTO signals to anterior horn
of spinal cord• Type 1B afferents signal
inhibition• Possible nocioception below
threshold for perception• Upon taping, possible
unloading of mechanoreceptors in the plantar fascia
Proprioception & Postural Muscles
• Test latissimus dorsi or neck flexors seated
• Test standing with & without taping
• More then heel strike perception may be dysfunctional
• Correlate findings to patient’s symptoms
17
Recommendation
• Do not need to have positive heel strike to recommend orthotics
• Pronation alone adequate indicator• Common bilateral equal pronation off
the shelf device may suffice• Marked deviation with chronic foot pain
podiatrist referral may be indicated
Supinated Feet
• High arch = rigid arch• Inflexible• Poor shock absorption• Tendency towards heel pain
Types of Orthotics
• Casting weight bearing• Casting non-weight bearing• Hard vs. “soft”
18
Documentation• S: The patient states that her symptoms of headaches/shoulder pain/low back pain is/are worse after
long period of standing at work, although she does not complain of foot pain.O: While weight bearing there is a deviation of the Achilles tendon bilaterally with the right greater then the left. This deviation on the right appears to be approximately 15 degrees with the medial malleolus also more prominent on the right towards the midline. Palpation with light/moderate/deep pressure of the mid longitudinal arch while weight bearing elicited marked/moderate/mild tenderness and there was mild/moderate/marked tonicity of the plantar musculature. The strength of the quadriceps muscle was bilaterally +5. When heel strike was mimiced the strength of the quadriceps bilaterally/right/left was inhibited to +4. Taping of the ankle into neutral position and elevation of the arch with two closely set bands was performed. After this procedure the heel strike response was retested with the quadriceps strength returning to +5.A: Bilateral pronation, right > left with proprioception loss during gait contributing to biomechanical problems of the ankle/knee/hip sacral iliac joint(s)/lumbar spine/shoulder/cervical spine. It is my opinion that P: Cast the patient for ___________ orthotics, dispense and monitor for improvement in the biomechanical dysfunction of ___________ (named regions). It may also be valuable to provide manipulation for the intrinsic foot bones to aid the patient's adaptation to the orthotics.
Evaluation of Muscle Function
• Clinical Correlations• Documentation of Soft Tissue Findings• Testing Procedures
– Direct or Prime Groups– Antagonists
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Stages of Assessment
• Do we have stability across the region?
• Is there flexibility in all muscles that cross the joint or that effect the region?
• Is there adequate range of motion– Segmental (vertebral)– Global
• Exercise or general fitness level
19
Muscle Testing – Why?
• Assess stability• Identifying true weakness• Correlate with diagnosis• Measure effectiveness of manipulation• Know which muscles to rehabilitate• Objective measurement of outcomes• Measure patient compliance
Applied Kinesiology
• Prior to Goodheart muscle testing existed!
• Muscle testing will lead to various conclusions
• Emphasis-– Relation to vertebral subluxation– Weakness secondary to
biomechanical factors
Role of Manipulation
• Profound effects that are:– Direct – Corresponding to neurological level– Indirect – complex proprioception mechanisms
• If weakness persists– Are you adjusting all involved segments?– Is the muscle weak for another reason?
20
Muscle Balance & Function
• Balance across structures• Considerations for all testing
– Hypertonicity– Postural shortening– Inhibition– Atrophy– Myofascial pain
Vladimir Janda on Joint Dysfunction
• Muscle spasm is always present in area of a painful lesion.
• Pressure of muscle in spasm increases the characteristic pain.
• Muscles & fascia are common to several spinal segments & if strained may restrict several contiguous segments.
• Muscle fatigue = predisposing factor that decreases the force available to meet demands.
• Muscle tightness may influence joint position stain of soft tissue & joints even within the normal ROM.
Janda on Chronic Pain
• Impaired CNS motor programming may be due to:– Stress & chronic fatigue– Constrained movements or posture
• Leads to:– Muscle imbalance– Overstress on structures of musculoskeletal
system
21
Janda on Increased Muscle Tone
• May arise from:– Dysfunction of the limbic system– Impaired function at the segmental
(interneuronal) level– Impaired coordination of muscle contraction,
possibly due to trigger points– As a response to pain irritation
Myofascial Pain
Prime Mover - weak
Synergist - overworked
Antagonists – hypertonic
Active Trigger Point• Produces pain WITHOUT digital
compression• Very tender on palpation• Characteristic pain pattern for the
muscle (either with ischemic compression or without)
• Impedes muscular flexibility• Produces muscle weakness• May elicit a local twitch response with
compression (or needle stimulation)
22
Latent Trigger Point• Usually silent – no spontaneous pain• Tender on palpation• Produces referred pain pattern only with
ischemic compression• Impedes muscle flexibility• Produces muscle weakness• May elicit a local twitch response with
compression (or needle stimulation)• Active TrP may become latent in a chronic
stage• May become active with
microinjury/microtrauma or macrotrauma
Muscles Prone to Tightness
• Gastrocnemius • Soleus • Tibialis Posterior • Short Hip Adductors • Hamstrings • Rectus Femoris• Iliopsoas • Tensor Fasciae Latae• Flexors of Upper Limb
•Piriformins•Erector Spinae•Quadratus Lumborum•Pectoralis Major •Upper Trapezius •Levator Scapulae •Sternocleidomastoid •Scaleni•Masticatories
Muscles Prone to WeaknessPeroneiTibialis Anterior Vastus Medialis &Lateralis Gluteus MaximusGluteus Medius &MinimusRectus AbdominisExtensors of Upper Limb
Serratus Anterior Rhomboids Middle and Lower Trapezius Deep Neck Flexors Digastricus
23
Muscle Palpation-Described• Area being palpated?
– Example: Right pectoralis minor• Pressure of palpation used?
– Superficial, moderate, deep• What did you feel?
– Taut, band-like, nodule, involuntary twitch, diffuse
• What did the patient experience?– Discomfort, pain: mild, moderate, severe– Distribution of the pain
Art of Muscle Testing• Force aligned with muscle fibers• Force appropriate for length of lever arm• Force appropriate for frame size• Force appropriate for muscle size• Match strength to strength gradually• Is there a reserve after contraction against a
moderate graded force?• Are there fasciculations?• Is there an obvious effort or recruitment?
Muscle Strength Grading
• 0 – No contraction• 1 – Slight contraction, no movement• 2 – Full range of motion without gravity• 3 – Full range of motion with gravity• 4 – Full range of motion , some
resistance• 5 – Full range of motion, full resistance
24
IliopsoasL2, 3
Rectus FemorisL2, 3, 4
Sartorius L2-L3
25
Tensa Fascia LataL4, 5 S1
Hip AdductorsL2, 3
Quadratus LumboriumT12, L1-4
26
Gluteus MediusL4, 5, S1
Gluteus MaximusL4, 5, S1
Piriformis L5, S1 & S2
27
HamstringsL5, S1, 2
Rectus Abdominus
Caution: Not to be done with an acute or grossly unstable patient! Use the Swiss ball as a functional test.
Caution: Not to be done with an acute or grossly unstable patient! Use the Swiss ball as a functional test.
Oblique & Transverse Abdominals
28
Gastrocnemius/Soleus
S1-S2
Latissimus DorsiThoracodorsal, C6, 7 & 8
Teres Minor & InfraspinatusC4, C5 & C6
29
Pectoralis MajorClavicular Sternal
C5-C6C6-C7
DeltoidsAxillary, C5, 6
SupraspinatusSuprascapular, C5
30
Infraspinatus C4, C5 & C6
SubscapularisC5-T1
Rhomboids & SubscapularisC5 C5-T1
Integrated or Functional Version
31
Rhomboids
Palpate the inferior aspect of the scapula to feel if it remains fixed towards the spine.
C5
Lower Trapezius
Because of attachment of lower trapezius to inferior scapula, palpate for maintenance of scapula in a diagonal towards lower thoracic spine.
Mid-Trapezius
32
Teres Major C6-C7
Upper Trapezius Accessory Nerve – Cranial XI (spinal portion)
Deep Neck Flexors & SCM
• Covered in a separate section• Very important in a variety of syndromes
33
Antagonists or Reciprocal Testing
• Test one muscle rapidly followed by it’s antagonist
• Dampening is short lived unless first muscle tested is excessively tight
• Patient must be well coached prior to testing• Excellent patient education tool
– Found mostly in athletic patients– Stretching proven essential to outcome
Reciprocal Inhibition• Hamstring to Quadriceps (likely)• Quadriceps to Hamstrings (less
likely)• Adductors to Abductors (likely)• Abductors to Adductors (less likely)
Testing Reciprocal Inhibition
• Test the antagonistic muscles singly
• Train the patient for test– Positioning– Perform a “dry run”
• Quickly test one group• Rapidly switch to antagonist
34
Summary
• Understand balance of function across joint• Analysis of various factors effecting muscle• Check if VSC is causing weakness• Disuse atrophy of select groups is common• Selective strengthening programs based
upon findings
Neck Flexors• Anatomy Review• Syndromes and Symptoms• Myofascial Pain Patterns• Observation & Testing• Strengthening• Expectations & Charting
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Anatomy Review – Prime MoversLongus Capitis
Longus Colli
Scalaneus Anterior
Anterior rami C1-C3
Anterior rami C2-C6
Anterior rami C4-C6
35
Anatomy Review – Prime Movers
Platysma
Anatomy Review – Synergists
Spinal portion of Accessory Nerve (Cranial XI) & Anterior rami C2-C3
Sternocleidomastoid
Anatomy Review – Synergists
Scalenes
36
Anatomy Review - Antagonists
Suboccipitals
Anatomy Review - Antagonists
SemispinalisCapitis
Anatomy Review - Antagonists
Splenius Capitis
37
Anatomy Review - Antagonists
Upper Trapezius
Anatomy Review - Antagonists
Temporalis
Spindle Cells• Rich endowment of spindle cells in:
– Neck flexors– Sub-occipital triangle– Longus colli
38
Reciprocal Inhibition Cascade
Injury, posture, VSC
Facilitated neck extensors
Inhibited neck flexors
Time, adaptation &
postural changes
Neck flexor disuse atrophy
Pre-Disposing Factors
• History of a motor vehicle accident (or several) or other neck trauma, even if this event was many years ago
• Occupational – flexor dominant• Behavioral – slumped body posture
Syndromes• Loss of the cervical lordotic curve
visible on a lateral radiograph • Anterior head carriage • Hypertonicity of the sub-occipital
muscles, levator scapula, upper trapezius, SCM's and TMJ related muscles
• Headaches, especially those of myofascial origin (see muscles noted above)
39
Syndromes
• TMJ dysfunction • Inability to maintain cervical
corrections • Chronic tension between the
shoulders
Myofascial Pain Principles
Prime Mover - weak
Synergist - overworked
Antagonists – hypertonic
Myofascial Pain Patterns
Levator Scapula
40
Myofascial Pain Patterns
Splenius Capitus
Myofascial Pain Patterns
SCM’s
Myofascial Pain Patterns
Suboccipitals
41
Myofascial Pain Patterns
Temporalis
Postural Evaluation
•Forward head carriage
•Stooped posture
•Loss of curve on lateral cervical
Testing - Observation
• Translation or “chin jut”• Fasciculations• Chest raised• Arms brought forward• Terminal flexion or none
Instructions to patient:“Please lift your head
off the table.”
•Have table at horizontal neutral•Arms overhead decrease role of synergists
42
Testing – Challenge•Chin tuck
•15-20 degrees of flexion
•Two finger or hand edge resistance
Further Testing - SCMSternocleidomastoid
Strengthening
•Guide patient to neutral head position
•Have the patient walk into the ball slowly.
•Avoid translation
•Instructions: “Keep ear over shoulder”
43
Strengthening
•Hands on the wall to maintain the the chest-wall inter-space
•Keep just enough pressure to maintain the ball on the forehead
Strengthening
•With guidance have the patient perform a chin tuck
•Do they feel an increase in pressure on the forehead?
Strengthening
•Guidance can be given both during the chin tuck & flexion
•Always ask permission to touch
44
Strengthening
•Have the patient complete flexion
•Repeat at least several times under observation to insure correct technique
Follow-up
• Insure compliance by having the patient return in 2-3 days for an exercise check
• Watch for lack of neutral start, translation or excessive pressure
Additional Care
• Regular manual manipulation • Coaching in proper
ergonomics and posture • Performance of gentle and
regular stretching of the cervical extensor groups
• Soft tissue release techniques
45
Expectations for Outcome• Observation = nearly full
translation• Testing elicits fasciculations• Testing = +4 or less strength• 4-6 weeks of rehabilitation may
be necessary
• Observation = flexion occurs early during motion• Testing = +4 or better strength• 7-10 days may show good results
Factors Effecting Outcomes• Inhibition secondary to segmental dysfunction of the
cervical spine • Inhibition secondary to excessive overuse of neck
extensors from poor ergonomics or posture • Loss of neuromuscular higher level integration from
disuse • Atrophy secondary to long-term inhibition • Atrophy secondary to cervical trauma (both short-
term and long-term) • Applied Kinesiology factors (a separate study not
within the scope of this presentation) • Pathological factors possibly not uncovered during
the history
Charting• Objective:
• What was observed?• What was the results of testing?
• Assessment:• Loss of deep neck flexor strength
• Plan:• Strengthen with soft ball 10x twice per day• Recheck patient’s compliance and technique
within three days
46
Muscle Flexibility
• Testing of Key Groups
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Vladimir Janda
• Czech doctor of neurology & physical medicine
• Extensive contribution to understanding muscle function
Upper Cross Syndrome
• Tightness of:– Upper Trapezius– Pectoralis Major– Levator Scapulae
• Weakness of: – Rhomboids– Serratus Anterior– Middle and Lower
trapezius– Deep neck flexors,
especially the scalene muscles.
FROM: J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004 (Jul); 27 (6): 414—420
47
Upper Cross Syndrome• This syndrome produces:
– Elevation & protraction-shoulders– Winging of the scapula– Protraction of the head
• Overstress of:– Cervical cranial junction
• C4-5 and T4 segments– Shoulder due to altered motion of the
glenohumeral joint
Lower Cross Syndrome
• Tightened Muscles:– Gastrocnemius– Soleus– Hamstrings– Adductors– Hip flexors (i.e. iliopsoas, rectus femoris,
tensor fascia latae– Erector spinae
Lower Cross Syndrome
• Weakened/Inhibited Muscles:– Posterior & anterior tibialis– Gluteus maximus– Gluteus medius– Transverse abdominus– Internal oblique– Multifidus
48
Lower Cross Syndrome
• Common Joint Dysfunctions:– Subtalar joint– Proximal tibio-fibular joint– Tibio-femoral joint– Iliofemoral joint– Sacroiliac joint– Lumbar facet joints
Lower Cross Syndrome
• Common Movement Dysfunctions:• Excessive lumbar lordosis during
movements such as squatting, lunging, and overhead pressing
• The result of:– Tight hip flexors– Erector spinae, – From weakness/inhibition of the inner unit (i.e.
the transverse abdominus and multifidus).
Lower Cross Syndrome
• Common/Predictable Injuries: – Low back pain– Anterior knee pain– Hamstring injuries
49
Evaluation Muscle Length
• Accurate positioning of the joints– Insure maximum lengthening of origin &
insertion• Adequately stabilization of one end• Smooth motion during stretch, especially at
end range• Patient’s perception of tightness not a
reliable guide• Rely on maintaining positional stability &
doctor’s assessment of end feel
Modified Thomas Test
• Support the patient on the edge of the table
Thomas Test – Lay Back
• Help the patient lay back flat on table
50
Assess Resting Length
• To what degree does the thigh go into hip extension?
Additional Flexibility - Iliopsoas
• Can the thigh be extended another 10-15 degrees?
Movement should occur without loss of lumbar or pelvic stabilization.
Flexibility – Rectus Femoris
• While still in modified Thomas test position flex the knee
Observe for patellar position: Is it superior?
Is there an indentation superior to the patella?
51
Flexibility – Rectus Femoris Prone
• Use Nachlas Test: patient prone and flex the knee by bringing the knee to the buttock
Hamstring Assessment
• Opposite knee bent• Support the heel in a bent elbow• Apply pressure to anterior tibia
Hamstring Assessment
• Palpate at ASIS for pelvis movement
• >70 degrees flexion = marked loss of length
52
Hip Adductors• Move the non-testing
leg approximately 15 degrees into abduction
• Cradle the leg as in assessment of the hamstrings
• Slowly abduct the leg, palpating for when pelvic movement sets in
Hip Adductors
• Leg should be abduct to 45 degrees without pelvic movement
• Flexing the knee eliminates the hamstrings as a source of restriction
Assessment - Piriformis
• Flex the leg to no more than 60 degrees• Provide compression along the axis of the
femur• Adduct the thigh• Internally rotate
the femur• Feel for smooth
movement with no restriction
53
Palpation - Piriformis
• Mentally draw a line between the PSIS and the greater trochanter
• The second line is from the ischial tuberosity to the ASIS
Palpation - Piriformis
• Palpation where these two lines cross • Palpation is conducted with one hand
reinforcing the other and is very deep
Gastrocnemius & Soleus
• Patient is supine, distal one-third of the tibia/fibula not supported by the table
• Distract the calcaneus caudally then raise the foot into dorsiflexion
• It should be able to flex to 90 degrees
54
Gastrocnemius & Soleus
• To eliminate the soleus and isolate the gastrocnemius
• Flex the knee while maintaining the calcaneal distraction
• If the ROM increase the gastrocnemius is the tight muscle
Pectoralis Major
• Patient supine close to the edge of the examination table
• Stabilization of the trunk is essential
• Place the arm in slight external rotation at 120 degrees of abduction
• Palpate the muscle for tenderness while detecting the length
Upper Trapezius
• Patient supine, stand at the head of the table• Use your right hand on top of the right
shoulder to assess elevation• Use the left hand to flex the head fully, followed by lateral flexion
• Head rotation is to the ipsilateral side. Traction the shoulder girdle inferior
55
Levator Scapulae• With the patient supine, stand
at the head of the table• Flex the head while
maintaining downward pressure on the shoulder
• Head is rotated contralateralto the side being held
• Depress the shoulder girdle and assess the quality of the end feel, comparing left and right sides
• Also palpate the insertion of the levator scapulae at the superior angle of the scapula
Active Care – Patient Self Stretches
• Upper trapezius• Levator scapulae• Iliopsoas• Piriformis• Pectoralis group
Basic Instructions
• Move into stretch position slowly • Setting the intensity (just right 4-6)
– Fine tune the position• 10-12 Breaths per position (audible)• Notice softening or increased ease• Release the pose carefully• Repeat the position of challenge
56
Stretch - Upper trapezius
Stretch - Upper trapezius
• With less stretch
Stretch - Levator scapulae
57
Stretch - Iliopsoas
Stretch - Iliopsoas
Stretch - Iliopsoas
58
Stretch – Iliopsoas (supine)
Stretch - Piriformis
Stretch - Piriformis
59
Stretch - Pectoralis group
Stretch - Pectoralis group
Resource
• “Stretching” by Bob Anderson
60
Introduction to Swiss Ball & Foam Roll Exercises
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Swiss ball offers:
• Trunk Strengthening• Enhanced Proprioception• Mimics Real Activities & Demands• FUN!
Ball Diameter User Height
• 75 cm. ball (29 inches) >6 ft. 0 in. tall• 65 cm. ball (25 inches) 5 ft. 5 in. to 5 ft.
11in. tall• 53 cm. ball (21 inches) 4 ft. 11 in. to 5 ft. 4 in. tall• 42 cm. ball (16 inches) <4 ft. 10in. tall• 30 cm. ball (14 inches) children 1-2 years old• 20-25 cm. ball (8-10 inches) for non-sitting
exercises requiring a small ball
61
Swiss Ball Safety
• Padded floor – foam mats• No furniture in fall zone• Mounting - Hand & eye on the
Swiss ball • Patient and doctor face each other • May require safety belt around
mid-section• Assistant as spotter
Global Evaluation
• Relative function of muscle groups• Weakness or hypertonicity• Compensatory mechanisms• Neurological deficit• Synergetic movement• Lack of balance
General Indications
• Decreased range of motion• Decreased strength• Decreased balance reactions• Decreased coordination• Decreased endurance• Decreased proprioception
62
Patient Population – Entry Level
• Chronic low back pain (if not in acute phase)• Deconditioned• Increased pain with ADL’s• Instability – i.e.: “I just stepped off the curb
and my low back went out.”
Contra-Indications
• Profound balance problems• Acute pain• Distress with sitting• Increase in pain during exercises• Ringing in the ears• Ball frightens patient
Signs of Sensory Overload
• Pupil dilation• Sweaty palms• Changes in respiration rate• Flushing or pallor• Complaints of dizziness
63
Primitive People & Abs
Misconceptions
• “Definition” < > Toned Abdominal Muscles
• Raw Strength vs. True Functional Tone
Reminders to Patients
• Exercises take concentration• Safety zone if they fall• Perform exercises slowly (generally)• Any exercise can be “backed down”
64
Reminder to Doctor
• Doctor - No “hard”agenda on a given visit
• Observe• Guide and encourage• Advance program only
when appropriate
Circles & Figures of Eight
• Sit on ball• Hands on inguinal
fold region• Feet apart• Eventual trunk &
head move contra to hips
• Doctor Observes:• How steady• Fasciculations• Flattening of pattern• Hip movement
matched by contralateral torso
Abdominal Sit-Back
• Feet spread apart• Roll hip forward• Slowly lean straight
back• Lean back to point
can still maintain mobility
• Doctor Observes:• How steady?• Fasciculations• Maintaining
balance• Anterior vs.
posterior pelvic tilt
65
Diagonal Sit-Back
• Feet spread apart• Roll hip forward• Slowly lean back
diagonal• Lean back to point
can still maintain mobility
• Doctor Observes:• How steady?• Fasciculations• Maintaining
balance• Anterior vs.
posterior pelvic tilt
One Leg Lift• Can the patient keep
balance?• Is there excessive
torso shift or does one hip hike up?– Transverse obliques– Quadratus
lumborium
Contralateral Puppet
• Do not advance if the “one leg lift” is poor!
• Lift leg and arm at the same time
• Keep torso even and balanced
66
Quadratus Lumborium• Hip pointed at ceiling• Bring hip to shoulder,
shoulder to hip• Not a lateral leg lift alone
Bridged Supine
• Lay over the ball• Feet spread apart at first• Arms out for stability• Start with ball under mid back• Slowly roll out to ball across upper
shoulders• Maintain flat abdominal platform
Full-Spine Roll-Out• Start seated & slowly roll out• Feet wide apart• Slowly stretch torso over ball• Place arms at 45 degrees
overhead• Lay back and let neck relax• Coming up – start with neck
curl
•Contraindications:
•Neck pain
•Poor stability on less advanced exercises
67
Full-Spine Roll-Out - 1
Full-Spine Roll-Out - 2
Full-Spine Roll-Out - 3
68
Full-Spine Roll-Out - 4
Gluteus Medius
• Lay on side over the ball• Bend bottom leg
underneath• Keep hip pointed at the
ceiling• Lift high leg towards
ceiling
Gluteus Maximus
• Lay prone over the ball on knees
• With knee bent, lift one leg
• Keep torso flat with no torque
• Do not want lumbar extensor activation
69
Increasing the Challenge
• Further COG is away from ball• Further away extremities from ball• Bouncing• Closing the eyes• Providing external manual
resistance
Swiss Ball and Athletes
• Activate a myriad of motor recruitment patterns, as the ball is unstable. It never moves the same way twice in a row!
• Enhance both spinal and peripheral joint stability, which help to prevent injury
• Swiss Balls are also effective stretching aids and can be used to develop strength in both open and closed chain environments.
Swiss Ball and Athletes
• High levels of nervous system activation, = greater neurological capacity in the playing environment
• Reduces the incidence of injury• Athletes who predominately use
machine training have a difficult time transferring their strength and power to the playing environment.
70
Progressive Push-Ups
• Lay prone over the ball• Have ball hit across hips• Keeping back stable perform push-up• Slowly walk out to knees• Eventually walk out to ankle• Always maintain flat back platform with no
dipping
Progressive Push-Ups - 1
Progressive Push-Ups - 2
71
Progressive Push-Ups - 3
Rhomboids
• Face down – kneeling• Arm out at 45 degree to
head/neck• Thumb up• Attempt to lift arm• Doctor observe/palpate for
scapular control
Rhomboids 2
72
Subscapularis & Rhomboid Dips
• Assume “progressive push-up” position• Extend out only to knees – esp. beginning• Drop chest/upper torso through scapula• Doctor directs by placing hand on sternum
and/or mid thoracic spine
Subscapularis & Rhomboid Dips
Balancing Bear
• Kneel on all fours on ball• Maintain position• Don’t fall off
73
Kneeling on Ball
• From “Balancing Bear” advance• Kneeling on ball• From arms outstretched to resting on hips• Great for knee stability from trunk
Foam Rolls
• Beginners Position– Sit back on the foam roll
placed vertically under the full length of your back
– Have your head and neck supported on the foam roll
– Bend your knees with your feet on the floor
Foam Roll - Stretch position:• Start with your arms at your side and then
raise one, then both of them overhead • Hold for 20-30 seconds
74
Foam Rolls - Prone
Have Fun!
Shoulder Rehabilitation
•Anatomy Review•Muscle Testing Review•Common Problems•Treatment
75
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Pectoralis minor– Common TOS
provoker– Tension rolls gleno-
humeral joint anterior– Tightness common
with forward rolled posture
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Latissimus dorsi– Inhibited by: thoracic
fixations & C1– Major posterior postural
stabilizer– Readily inhibited by foot
dysfunction– Weakness allows anterior
glenohumeraldisplacement
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Infraspinatus & Teres minor – Inhibited by
fixation in lower cervical spine
76
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Deltoid– Anterior– Middle– Posterior
• Fixation mid to lower cervicals will inhibit
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Rhomboids– Inhibited by both
lower cervical & thoracic fixations
– Inhibited by excessive flexor tone
– Under used by most patients
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Supraspinatus– Inhibited by
mid to lower cervical fixations
77
Anatomy Review - Shoulder
• Subscapularis– Tendon easily
entrapped as it passes through the gleno-humeral joint
– Increased wear & tear with advancing age
Evaluation
• History• Orthopedic, neurological &
physical– Remember probing palpation of
soft tissue structures to patient tolerance
• Radiographic• Chiropractic spinal analysis• Selective muscle testing
Radiographic
Osteonecrosis, both humeral heads, due to steroids used to treat this patient's chronic leukemia
78
Tendonitis, Capsulitis & Bursitis
• Uneven balance of forces across a joint• Impingement of soft tissues
– Tendons, bursa & joint capsule– Vascular components (TOS)– Neurological entrapment
• Improper coupled motions across joint• Excessive wear and tear of soft tissues
Myofascial Pain
Prime Mover - weak
Synergist - overworked
Antagonists – hypertonic
Myofascial Pain - Triggers• Pressure – direct contact by leaning• Stretching – passively while sleeping or indirectly
during activity• Use – contraction, especially with considerable
resistance or posturally
• Pressure – ischemic compression• Stretching – gentle, slowly, regularly• Use – low resistance, aerobic style
Myofascial Pain - Treatments
79
Trigger Points
• Latissimus Dorsi– Mid-thoracic– Posterior scapula– Anterior shoulder– Entire arm to hand
Trigger Points
• Subscapularis– “Frozen Shoulder”– Posterior shoulder– Arm– Wrist
Trigger Points• Teres major
– Similar to latissimus dorsi
– Deltoid & arm pain
80
Trigger Points • Deltoid– Local pain at shoulder
Trigger Points • Coracobrachialis– Similar to deltoid– Arm, forearm &
wrist
Trigger Points • Biceps brachii– Pain lateral
shoulder– Pain anterior elbow
81
Trigger Points • Supraspinatus– Mimics subdeltoid bursitis– Elbow, arm & forearm
Treatment Steps
• Pain relief– Ice, modalities (electrical stimulation,
ultrasound)– Possible start trigger point release work
• Passive motion• Manipulation when applicable• Gentle resistance within non-painful
range• Gradual increase in range and resistance
Passive Motion• Pendulums or Codman’s arm swing
82
• Wall walking
Passive Motion
Resistance Exercises
• Internal Rotation– Pectoralis major– Subscapularis
Resistance Exercises
• External Rotation– Teres minor
83
Resistance Exercises
• Abduction– Supraspinatus– Deltoid
Resistance Exercises
• Scapular Retraction– Rhomboids– Trapezius
• Scapular “Fixing”– Subscapularis
Knee Rehabilitation
Wobble Board
Resistance Bands
Stretching
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
84
Overview
• Anatomy Review• Syndromes and Symptoms• Myofascial Pain Patterns• Observation & Testing• Strengthening• Expectations & Charting
Assumptions – Prior to Treatment
• Detailed History of Chief Complaint• Full Regional Work-up of the Knee
– Standard Orthopedic Testing• What do we know?
– Rule out primary pathologies– Diagnosis – do we treat, co-manage or
refer?
Anatomy Review
• Quadriceps
85
Anatomy Review
• Adductors• Adductors
Anatomy Review
• Tensa Fascia Lata
Anatomy Review
• Gluteus Medius
86
Anatomy Review
• Hamstrings
Anatomy Review• Gastrocnemius
• Soleus
Myofascial Pain - Knee
• Rectus Femoris
87
Myofascial Pain - Knee
• Vastus Intermedialis
Myofascial Pain - Knee
• Vastus Lateralis
Myofascial Pain - Knee
• Vastus Medialis
88
Feet Biomechanics
• Pronation causes angular forces• Supination causes contralateral stresses• Poor proprioception causes abherrent
muscle firing during the gait cycle
Ankle Stability & Proprioception• History of repeated
ankle sprains
Rocker Board
• Renewal of proprioception
• Progression– Two feet – AP motion with
control– One foot - maintaining
control• No looking at the feet!
89
Wobble Board
• Two feet – AP rocking with control
• Two feet – lateral stability• One foot – four point
motion• One foot – slow circles
without touching floor
Trunk Stability & Proprioception
• An unstable pelvis causes– Angular forces from superior to inferior– Greater stress across the knee
Muscular Tension
• Hamstrings• Quadriceps Group• Calf Group (soleus &
gastrocnemius)• Adductors• Abductors• Gluteal group
90
Stretching
• Hamstrings
Stretching• Calf Group
Gastrocnemius
Soleus
• Quadriceps femoris
Stretching
91
Reciprocal Inhibition
• Hamstring to Quadriceps (likely)• Quadriceps to Hamstrings (less
likely)• Adductors to Abductors (likely)• Abductors to Adductors (less likely)
Testing Reciprocal Inhibition
• Test the antagonistic muscles singly
• Train the patient for test– Positioning– Perform a “dry run”
• Quickly test one group• Rapidly switch to antagonist
Strengthening
• Quadriceps
92
Strengthening
• Gluteus medius
Strengthening• Adductors
Adductors & Gluteals
Strengthening• Abductors
93
Postural Awareness &Anterior Pelvic Tilt
McKenzie's –Back
Extension Exercises
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
Syndromes- Indicators
• Facet syndrome• Excessive lumbar lordosis• Poor abdominal control/positioning• Chronic low back pain with weight bearing• Poor standing posture• Runner’s posture
Assessment• Lateral lumbar radiographs• Standing postural analysis• Muscle testing for facetal
jamming
94
Radiographic Analysis
• George’s weight-bearing line
• Sacral base angle• Spondylolisthesis
Muscle Testing – Facetal “Jamming”
• Patient prone• Test the hamstring strength• Careful instruction performing a “press-up”
– Keep the hips on the table– Use arm strength only– Extend to 2/3 to ¾ of full extension range– Respect painful limit of ROM
• Hamstring inhibition present?
Anterior Pelvic Tilt• Engage the patient
– Explain diagnosis– Explain progression– Give demonstration
• Progression– Prone position & strengthening– Standing wall tilts– Standing, walking & running
95
Exercise Progression - Prone• Patient on a firm, comfortable
surface• Patient contacts pubic bone• Place small firm object under
lumbar spine• Instruct them to roll pelvic so
that pubic bone “rolls” towards the nose
• Hold for 3-5 count and relax
One-Third Curl• Patient can perform a good anterior pelvic
tilt• Cross arms over chest or behind the head• Set a pelvic tilt• Slowly curl 1/3 towards full sit-up• Hold for a slow count of 3-5• Slowly roll back down while maintaining
the pelvic tilt throughout
Wall-Tilt• If the patient shows good
control during pelvic tilts and 1/3 curls
• Start in a low squat and perform tilt against the wall
• Slowly move up the wall, performing a tilt at each level
• If shoulders start to roll forward then patient to perform exercise at last correct level
96
Standing Tilt• If the patient can work their
way up the wall to nearly standing
• One hand low on the anterior pelvic area
• One hand in the lumbar lordosis
• Perform a pelvic tilt without shoulders rolling forward
• Imagine a “sky hook” lifting head towards the ceiling
• All postural changes occur from the pelvis up
• “Goldielocks Principle” for degree of tilt
Integration into ADL’s
• If good control with standing• Patient can assume posture
– Walking– Running– Sitting
• Visual cues in regular activities as triggers
McKenzie Method
• Comprehensive assessment• Positions that centralize pain• Committed to either flexion or extension • Performance independently at home• Neutral spine and dynamic muscle
support of their spine
97
Observation/Assessment
• Patient's response to repeated, near end-range spinal motions
• Patients are diagnosed with either postural, dysfunction or derangement
• Derangement = alteration in the structure and mechanics of the intervertebral disc
Prime Patient for Extension
• 65-70% require extension*• Maintaining extension during all ADL’s• Non-weight bearing extension• Standing extension• Repeated throughout the day
* Stats put forth by McKenzie practitioners
Low Tech RehabArm
WristHand
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
98
Introduction
• Biomechanics are considered• Touch on carpel tunnel syndrome• Complete work-up including:
– Metabolic– Cervical Disc– Tumors especially apical lung– Orthopedic & Neurological
Anatomy Review
• Pronator Quadratus– Approximates ulna &
radius– Inhibited by injury
• Extension of wrist
– Origin-insertion STM helpful
Anatomy Review
• Flexor digitorium profundus– Hypertonicity leads to
medial epicondylitis
99
Anatomy Review
• Extensor digitorium communus– Hypertonicity leads to
lateral epicondylitis– Frequent source of
myofascial pain syndrome
Anatomy Review
• Pronator teres– Consider involvement
when pronation causes pain
Anatomy Review
• Median nerve
• Ulnar nerve
100
Myofascial Pain
• Latissimus dorsi• Pain in the arm,
forearm & hand
Myofascial Pain
• Scalenes• Pain along entire upper
extremity to wrist & hand
• Associated chest pain• Post MVA
Myofascial Pain
• Extensors• “Wrist pain”• Pseudo-carpal tunnel• “Painful weak grip”• Frequently associated
with lateral epicondylitis
101
Myofascial Pain
• Finger Flexors• “Stiff fingers”• Pseudo-carpal tunnel• Frequently
associated with medial epicondylitis
• Wrist & finger pain
Myofascial Pain
• Palmaris longus• Hand pain• Associated with
“Dupuytren’sContracture”
Myofascial Pain
• Opponens Pollicis• Thumb pain
102
Other Sources – TP’s
• Scalenes
Other Sources – TP’s
• Latissimus Dorsi
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome• Is the presentation “classic”
– Frequent burning, tingling, or itching numbness in the palm of the hand and the fingers, especially the thumb and the index and middle fingers
– Some carpal tunnel sufferers say their fingers feel useless and swollen, even though little or no swelling is apparent
103
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
• Not all wrist or hand pain is CTS• Causes of pain
– TP’s of flexor or extensor muscles– TP’s of latissimus dorsi– TP’s of the scalenes– Median nerve entrapment at the elbow– TOS from the pectoralis minor
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
• Screen the patient for true CTS• Mixed or multiple diagnosis is possible• Each component of pain production must be
addressed• Trace the entire path of both nerve and
referred pain patterning
Treatments - Passive
• Spinal manipulation• Extremity manipulation• Ischemic compression• Kinesiotaping• Gentle stretching
104
Manipulation - Rationale
• Spinal: Consider levels of innervations to injured area
• Primary problem = extremity• Reflex arcs will spinal
segmental dysfunction• Marked reduction in healing time
gained
Extremity Manipulation
• Is there joint instability?– Yes: may be contraindicated– No: proceed as indicated
• Lateral & medial radius/ulnar displacement– Analysis: tenderness of origin & insertion of
pronator quadratus– Spongy springiness upon medial squeeze
Ischemic compression• In belly of muscle palpate for
area of:– Taut– Tenderness– Nodularity– Possible fasciculation or
involuntary twitch• Steady pressure to patient
tolerance• Patient takes slow deep breaths• Cannot breath through pain, too
much
105
Kinesiotaping
• Provides “touch” to area of chief complaint
• Lifts skin to open lymphatic channels
• Increased mechanoreceptor stimulation
Active Care: Stretching
• Comparative body awareness– Sitting, close the eyes– Tune into how the arms feel
• Perform the stretches unilaterally• Compare left to right arms
– Lighter, at ease, increased sense of energy• Goal: increased compliance
Active Care: Stretching• Three basic stretches:
– Extensors– Flexors– Thenar
• Held for ten slow deep breaths• Patient to pace themselves• Can be done with elbow bent• Excellent injury prevention for
patients who use their hands a lot
106
Forearm - Flexors
• Outstretched arm• Reach across fingers• Gently pull back• Can be performed with
elbow bent• Hold for ten slow deep
breaths
Hand Stretch - Thenar
• Keep hand in “stop”position
• Gently pull the thumb down towards the beltline
• Hold for ten slow deep breaths
Forearm - Extensors
• Outstretched arm• Reach across back of
knuckles• Gently pull back• Can be performed with
elbow bent• Hold for ten slow deep
breaths
107
Compare Extremities• Kinesthetic feedback• How does the stretched side compare to the
unstretched side?– Lighter– Warmer– More at ease
• Reinforces value of stretch• Now stretch the opposite extremity
Dyna-Flex• Gyroscopic action
provides resistance• Full circle of strength
training• Enhanced stability
across wrist
Handmaster Plus
• Open
• Closed
108
Wristiciser
• Go through all principle diagnosis
Summary
• Multifactorial nature of hand, wrist and arm pain
• CTS may be present yet with other contributors
• LTR instituted only when:• Through understanding of diagnosis has
been reached• Acute phase has passed
Knee Pain Patient
Problem Centered Orthopedic Tests and
Functional Muscle Testing
Low Tech RehabPost Graduate ProgramsMark Hartsuyker, D.C.
109
Pain Presentation• Bilateral anterior-medial knee pain with left side
more troubled then the right• Aggravated by squatting, prolonged sitting and
extending the leg into extension• “Feels like the knee is going to lock” when the
knee is in flexion• 3 months prior had a couple of acute episodes
during a long inventory inspection, which called for repeated squatting & kneeling, with pain so intense the patient could not arise.
• Within an hour of aggravation, the knees felt fine
Pain Drawing
• Primary pain quality = “achy”
History - Activity
• 50 year old male• Recreational bicyclist 3-
4X/wk for 45 minutes per session on X-country ski simulator (Nordic-Trak)
110
History - Occupational
• Occupation – warehouse inspection, calling for sitting at a computer, repeated kneeling and squatting and standing on hard concrete floors
• Medical history unremarkable• No trauma to the area of
involvement
History - Podiatrist
• Pronation corrected many years ago by orthotics
Physical Examination
• Visual inspection unremarkable with no edema• Q angle normal• Knee ROM full & without pain• Motion palpation detects a definite eccentric glide
of the patella bilaterally as patient extends the knee
• Pain upon palpation at lateral aspects of knee, left > right
111
Q-Angle (Reference)• The Q-angle (or "quadriceps angle) is formed in the frontal plane by two
line segments: – from tibial tubercle to the middle of the patella – from the middle of the patella to the ASIS
• The q-angle in adults is typically 15 degrees. Increases or decreases in the q-angles are associated in cadaver models with increased peak patellofemoral contact pressures (Huberti & Hayes, 1984). Insall, Falvo, & Wise (1976) implicated increased q-angle, along with patella alta, in a prospective study of patellofemoral pain.
• Increases in q-angle are associated with: – femoral anteversion– external tibial torsion – laterally displaced tibial tubercle – genu valgus
References: • Huberti, H.H., & Hayes, W.C. (1984). Patellofemoral contact pressures:
The influence of Q-angle and tendofemoral contact. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 66A, 715-724.
• Insall, J., Falvo, K.A., & Wise, D.W. (1976). Chondromalacia patellae: A prospective study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 58A, 1-8.
Orthopedic Evaluation
• Thomas Test - indicative of a flexion contracture involving the iliopsoas musculature
Positive
Physical Examination
• Marked tenderness of the entire iliotibial band, especially near the distal portion when mild to moderate pressure was applied
• No obvious muscle atrophy• Circumference of thighs was
symmetrical
112
Physical Examination
“Latent” trigger point of vastus medialis
Orthopedic Evaluation• Abduction Stress Test (valgus)
Indicative of a medial collateral ligament injury
Negative
Orthopedic Evaluation• Adduction Stress (varus)
Lateral collateral ligament damage
Negative
113
Orthopedic Evaluation
• Apley’s Compression
Negative
Meniscus Injury
Orthopedic Evaluation
• Clarke’s SignIndicative of patellar chondromalaciaMildly Positive
Orthopedic Evaluation• Trendelenburg’s Test
Suggestive of insufficiency of the hip abductor system
Mildly positive
114
Muscle Testing• +5 bilateral quadriceps
Muscle Testing
• Hamstrings +5 bilaterally
Muscle Testing• +4 Hip Adductors bilaterally
115
Muscle Testing
• +4 gluteus medius bilaterally
Muscle Testing
• Poor core stability
Poor Flexibility
• Hamstrings• Calf musculature
116
Chiropractic Findings
• Gillet’s Test• Motion Palpation L/S spine• Mild extension fixation – right ilium• Conclusion: not a significant contributor to
patient’s symptoms• Possibly compensatory to knee pain
Your clinical impression…..?
• IDKInternal Derangement of the Knee
I don’t know!
Condromalacia PatellaFunctional Muscle Imbalance
Myofascial Pain of Vastus Medialis
Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Treatment
• Soft tissue release of ITB• Deep pressure to tolerance for
vastus medialis trigger point
117
Treatment
• Strengthening of:– Adductors– Gluteus Medius
Treatment• Core stability strengthening• Progressive Swiss Ball routines
Treatment of Trigger Point“Application of slowly increasing, non-
painful pressure over a trigger point until a barrier of tissue resistance is encountered. Contact is then maintained until the tissue barrier releases, and pressure is increased to reach a new barrier to eliminate the trigger point tension and tenderness.”
Travell & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction - 2nd edition
118
Treatment
• Stretching :– Iliopsoas– Calf group– Hamstrings
Conclusions
• Orthopedic testing is valuable yet has limits• In the face of hard orthopedic findings,
functional testing may lead to actual conservative therapy applied
• Multiple diagnosis may exist and all may need to be pursued
• Use your knowledge to understand