32
CBOE Risk Management Conference Europe September 2013 Understanding Volatility Sheldon Natenberg & Tim Weithers Chicago Trading Co. 440 South LaSalle St. Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 863-8000 [email protected] [email protected]

CBOE Risk Management Conference Europe September · PDF fileCBOE Risk Management Conference Europe September 2013 Understanding Volatility ... [email protected] ... CBOE

  • Upload
    dinhnga

  • View
    218

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CBOE Risk Management Conference Europe

September 2013

Understanding Volatility

Sheldon Natenberg & Tim Weithers

Chicago Trading Co.

440 South LaSalle St.

Chicago, IL 60605

(312) 863-8000

[email protected]

[email protected]

What is the value of a call option at expiration?

intrinsic value

0

exercise

price

+1

+1

: maximum [S - X, 0]

security price

pro

ba

bil

ity

Suppose we create a probability distribution

and then overlay the option’s intrinsic value

on the probability distribution.

n

i=1

For each underlying price we have an intrinsic

value and a probability, p.

The expected value for the option at expiration

is the sum of all these individual values.

p * intrinsic value = p * maximum[S - X, 0]

Σ pi * maximum[Si - X, 0]

The theoretical value is the present value of

this amount.

What probability

distribution

should we

use?

With slight modification most traditional pricing

models (Black-Scholes, binomial) assume a

normal distribution

of underlying

prices.

All normal distributions

are defined by their mean (μ)

and their standard deviation (σ).

Mean – where the

peak of the curve

is locatedStandard deviation –

how fast the curve

spreads out.

low standard deviation

high peak

narrow body

high standard deviation

low peak

wide body

underlying price

120 call

option value

80 put

+1 S.D.

+1 S.D. ≈ 34%

-1 S.D.

-1 S.D. ≈ 34%

+2 S.D.-2 S.D.

+2 S.D. ≈ 47.5%

-2 S.D. ≈ 47.5%

±1 S.D. ≈

68% (2/3)

±2 S.D. ≈

95% (19/20)

mean

exercise price

time to expiration

underlying price

interest rate

volatility

(dividends)

mean?

standard

deviation?

Mean –

Standard deviation –

(underlying price, time to expiration,

interest rates, dividends)

Volatility: one standard deviation, in percent,

over a one year period.

stock: S * (1+r*t) - D

foreign currency: S *1+rd*t

1+rf*t

futures contract: F

forward price

volatility

1-year forward price = 100.00

volatility = 20%

One year from now:

• 2/3 chance the contract will be

between 80 and 120 (100 ± 20%)

• 19/20 chance the contract will be

between 60 to 140 (100 ± 2*20%)

• 1/20 chance the contract will be

less than 60 or more than 140

1-year later

underlying price = 180

Was 20% an accurate volatility?

If 20% was correct, how many standard deviations

did the market move? (180-100) / 20 = 4

What is the likelihood of a 4 standard

deviation occurrence? ≈ 1 / 16,000

Is one chance in 16,000 impossible?

What does an annual volatility tell us about

movement over some other time period?

monthly price movement?

weekly price movement?

daily price movement?

Volatilityt = Volatilityannual * t√

Daily volatility (standard deviation)

Trading days in a year? 250 – 260

Assume 256 trading days

Volatilitydaily ≈ Volatilityannual / 16

t = 1/256 =t√ √ 1/256 = 1/16

current price = 100.00

volatilitydaily ≈ 20% / 16 = 1¼%

One trading day from now:

• 2/3 chance the contract will be trading

between 98.75 and 101.25 (100 ± 1¼%)

• 19/20 chance the contract will be trading

between 97.50 and 102.50 (100 ± 2*1¼%)

Weekly volatility:

Volatilityweekly ≈ Volatilityannual / 7.2

t = 1/52 =t√ √ 1/52 ≈ 1/7.2

Volatilitymonthly ≈ Volatilityannual / 3.5

t = 1/12 ≈ 1/3.5

Monthly volatility:

=t√ √ 1/12

daily standard deviation?

stock = 68.50; volatility = 42.0%

≈ 68.50 * 42% / 16

= 68.50 * 2.625% ≈ 1.80

weekly standard deviation?

≈ 68.50 * 42% / 7.2

= 68.50 * 5.83% ≈ 4.00

daily standard deviation?

stock = 68.50; volatility = 42.0%

+1.25 -.95 +.35+.70 -1.60

Is 42% a reasonable volatility estimate?

How often do you expect to see an occurrence

greater than one standard deviation?

≈ 1.80

∞+∞–

normal

distribution

lognormal

distribution

0

normal

distribution

110 call

lognormal

distribution

forward price = 100

3.00

90 put 3.00

3.20

2.80

2.90

3.10

price

Are the options mispriced?

Maybe the marketplace is right.

Maybe the marketplace thinks the model is wrong.

The volatility of the

underlying contract over some period

of time (historical, future)

realized volatility:

derived from the prices of options in

the marketplace

implied volatility: The marketplace’s

consensus forecast of future volatility;

pricing

model

theoretical

value

5.50

6.75

exercise price

time to expiration

underlying price

interest rate

volatility 27%volatility

???31%

implied volatility

today

realized

volatility

backward

looking

(what has occurred)

implied

volatility

forward

looking

(what the marketplace

thinks will occur)

implied volatility = price

realized volatility = value

30 August 2013

S&P 500 = 1632.97

Time to October expiration = 7 weeks

1525 call

1625 call

1725 call

1525 put

1625 put

1725 put

price 12% 16% 20% implied

115.95 21.67%

40.35 17.32%

3.70 13.29%

21.63%

17.32%

13.29%

105.74

28.66

2.50

108.94

37.45

6.87

113.66

46.24

12.71

11.55

35.95

99.25

1.40

24.27

98.04

4.60

33.05

102.42

41.84

108.26

October

9.32

Interest rate = .50%

30 August 2013

S&P 500 = 1632.97

Time to October expiration = 7 weeks

1525 call

1625 call

1725 call

12% 16%

105.74

28.66

2.50

108.94

37.45

6.87

October

Interest rate = .50%

ITM

ATM

OTM

increase %

3%

31%

175%

3.20

8.79

4.37

1525 put

1625 put

1725 put

1.40

24.27

98.04

4.60

33.05

102.42

OTM

ATM

ITM

229%

36%

4%

8.78

4.38

3.20

30 August 2013 S&P 500 = 1632.97

Time to December Expiration = 16 weeks

1525 call

1625 call

1725 call

increase implied

21.67%

17.32%

13.29%

3.20

8.79

4.37

October

Time to October Expiration = 7 weeks

price 12% 16%

115.95

40.35

3.70

105.74

28.66

2.50

108.94

37.45

6.87

1525 call

1625 call

1725 call

increase implied

19.23%

16.28%

13.57%

9.90

14.33

10.90

December price 12% 16%

127.95

58.15

15.15

108.98

42.81

11.11

118.88

57.14

22.01

1. In total points an at-the-money option is

always more sensitive to a change in volatility

than an equivalent in- or out-of-the-money

option.

2. In percent terms an out-of-the-money option

is always more sensitive to a change in volatility

than an equivalent in- or at-the-money option.

3. A long-term option is always more sensitive

to a change in volatility than an equivalent

short-term option.

Volatility Characteristics

serial correlation – in the absence of other

information, the best estimate of volatility over

the next time period is the volatility which

occurred over the previous time period.

mean reversion – over long periods of time

volatility tends to revert to its average.

momentum – when volatility begins to rise or

fall, it tends to continue in the same direction.

GARCH model (generalized auto-regressive

conditional heteroscedasticity)

Changes in implied volatility

March implied

Mean volatility = 20%

June implied

September implied

20%

20%

20%

25%

23%

21%

15%

17%

19%

Term Structure of Volatility

time to expiration

Imp

lie

d v

ola

tility

CBOE Risk Management Conference Europe

September 2013

Option Risk Measures

Sheldon Natenberg & Tim Weithers

Chicago Trading Co.

440 South LaSalle St.

Chicago, IL 60605

(312) 863-8000

[email protected]

[email protected]

option

pricing

model

theoretical

value

42.17

exercise price

time to expiration

underlying price

interest rate

volatilityvolatility

theta: θθθθ

delta: ∆: ∆: ∆: ∆

gamma: Γ: Γ: Γ: Γ

rho: ρ

vega: ν: ν: ν: ν

Option Valuation or Option Pricing

Bloomberg SPX Option Valuation Page (OV)

Delta: ∆∆∆∆A measure of how long or short an option makes you.

An option’s underlying price sensitivity:

∆ Hedge ratio

Equivalent position in the underlying (∆ = 742).

If a Call is deep in-the-money (X = 100, S = 1685), ∆ = If a Call is at-the-money (X = 1685, S = 1685), ∆ =

If a Call is out-of-the-money (X = 2000, S = 1685), ∆ =

The probability the option will end up in-the-money.

A measure of directional market (spot price) risk.

S

C

∂=

Delta: ∆∆∆∆

Before, C = 42.17 with S = 1685.

Now, with S = 1686 . . .

since ∆ = dC/dS and ∆ = .4845

dC = +.48, so . . .

new C should = 42.65

(Pretty good, huh?)

Graphically, Delta = Slope

What is ∆ at expiration?

1685-Strike Call Option

0

Value

Underlying Price

X = 1685

+ C

∆∆∆∆ =dC

dS

{dC

{dS

Vega: ν (ν (ν (ν (Tau: τ): τ): τ): τ)

An option’s underlying volatility sensitivity:

ν

The higher the volatility (of the underlying),

the higher option values will be.

Longer-dated options are more volatility sensitive.

A measure of (implied) volatility risk.

σ∂

∂=

C

Vega: νννν (Tau: ττττ)

Before, C = 42.17 with σ = 13.784.

Now, with σ = 14.784 . . .

since ν = dC/dσ and ν = 3.32

dC should = + 3.32, so . . .

new C should = 45.49

(That worked well!)

1685-Strike Call Option

0

Value

Underlying PriceX = 1685

+ C

νννν =dC

{dC

C(σ=13%) C(σ=14%)

Graphically, Vega

Theta: θθθθ

An option’s sensitivity to the passage of time:

θ

Typically, option values fall over time.

Some refer to theta as “decay”.

If you have a one-year option and a day goes by, . . .

Option values depend on time (in multiple ways).

t

C

∂=

If you have a one-week option and a day goes by, . . .

Theta: θθθθ

Before, C = 42.17 with t = 90 days.

Now, with t = 89 days . . .

since θ = dC/dt and θ = -.21

dC = -.21, so . . .

new C should = 41.96

(Not too bad.)

Graphically, Theta

1685-Strike Call Option

0

Value

Underlying PriceX = 1685

+ C

θθθθ =dC

dt

{dC

Rho: ρ ρ ρ ρ

An option’s underlying volatility sensitivity:

ρ

All these option risk measures assume you hold

all the other “variables” constant.

All these option risk measures are additive

A measure of interest rate risk.

r

C

∂=

Rho: ρρρρ

Gamma: Γ Γ Γ Γ

An option’s Delta sensitivity with respect to price:

Γ

If Delta is the hedge ratio, Gamma is a measure

of how quickly you’re becoming unhedged.

When/where is Gamma large?

A second-order risk measure.

2

2

S

C

S

∂=

∆∂=

Option traders live and die for gamma/volatility.

Gamma: ΓΓΓΓ

Before, ∆ = 48.45 with S = 1685.

Now, with S = 1686 . . .

since Γ = d∆/dS and Γ = 5.79

d∆ should = +5.79 per 1% (16.85),

so . . . d∆ should = +.34

so new ∆ should = 48.79

1685-Strike Call Option

0

Value

Spot Price

X =1685

+ C

∆∆∆∆ = .10

{

dS

{ {

∆∆∆∆ = .50

∆∆∆∆ = .90

Graphically, Gamma = Curvature

Implied Probability Distributions

If you have enough market option prices,

you can back out or “infer” a probability density.

There’s a large academic literature on this:D. Breeden and R. Litzenberger (1978) “Prices of State-Contingent Claims in Option Prices”

J.-C. Jackwerth and M. Rubinstein (1996) “Recovering Probability Distributions from Contemporary Security Prices”

W. Melick and C. Thomas (1997) “Recovering an Asset’s PDF from Option Prices: An Application to Crude Oil”

Y. Ait-Sahalia (2001) “Do Option Markets Correctly Price the Probabilities of Movement of the Underlying Asset?”

The logic behind these sorts of approaches:

99 100 101 S

1.00

If the 99-100-101 butterfly is trading at 0.05, . . .

CBOE Risk Management Conference Europe

September 2013

Capturing Volatility Value

Sheldon Natenberg & Tim Weithers

Chicago Trading Co.

440 South LaSalle St.

Chicago, IL 60605

(312) 863-8000

[email protected]

[email protected]

Suppose an option is trading at an implied

volatility of 20%, but we “know” that the true

realized volatility of the underlying contract

over the life of the option will be 25%.

option price = 4.50 (implied volatility = 20%)

option value = 5.00 (future realized volatility = 25%)

If 25% does in fact turn out to be the actual

volatility, how can we turn the difference

between the price of the option (4.50) and its

value (5.00) into a profit of .50?

buy a call option

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

underlying price

exercise

price

value at expiration?

value prior to

expiration?

buy a call option

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

determine the

option’s delta

(ΔC)

ΔC-ΔC

take an opposing

delta position in the

underlying contract

(-ΔC)

delta neutral or flat

underlying price

current

underlying

price

Due to the option’s curvature, as market conditions

change the position will become unhedged.

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

{

ΔC-ΔC

unhedged

amount

underlying price

current

underlying

price

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

new ΔC

Determine the new delta of the option.

Rehedge the position to return to delta neutral

new -ΔC

underlying price

current

underlying

price

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

new ΔC

new -ΔC

Continue the rehedging process throughout

the life of the option.

underlying price

}

current

underlying

price

the

ore

tica

l va

lue

Dynamic Hedging

underlying price

ΔC

-ΔC

current

underlying

price

Continue the rehedging process throughout

the life of the option.

Suppose we add up all the profit opportunities

over the life of the option which result from the

rehedging process.

the option’s theoretical value

The rehedging process is a type of

statistical arbitrage.

What should they add up to?

Each time the position becomes unhedged

there is a potential profit opportunity. We can

capture this profit by rehedging the position.