Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Category-Level Product Environmental Footprints of FoodsFood Life Cycle Assessment Literature Review
Report No. CSS16-02February 25, 2016
Martin Heller, Tara Narayanan, Robert Meyer, and Gregory Keoleian
1FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
1. IntroductiontoLifeCycleAssessmentandRelevantEnvironmentalImpactCategories
LifeCycleAssessment(LCA)isanaccounting,evaluationandinterpretationmethodologicaltoolusedtoassessthepotentialenvironmentalimpactsofproductsystemsandservices,accountingfortheemissionsandresourceusethroughoutaproduct’slifecycle.“Productlifecycle”referstothestagesfromrawmaterialacquisitionthroughproduction,distribution,use,anddisposal(seeFigure1).LCAisdefinedandstandardizedthroughinternationalguidelines(ISO-14040-2006,ISO-14044-2006)butremainsaflexiblemethodologicalframeworkpermittingapplicationtoawiderangeofquestionsandproductsystems.ThebasicLCAframeworkisaniterativeprocedureinvolvingfourmainsteps:1)definitionofthegoalandscopeofthestudy–whatarewestudying,howarewestudyingit,why,andforwhom?;2)lifecycleinventoryanalysis–datacollectionandcalculationprocedurestoquantifyrelevantinputsandoutputs(energy,rawmaterials,co-products,waste,emissionstoair,water,andsoil)acrosseachunitprocesswithinthesystemboundary;3)lifecycleimpactassessment–associatinginventorydatawithspecificenvironmentalimpactcategoriesandmodelingtherelevanceofthoseimpacts;and4)interpretationofoutcomes.LCAcanbeveryusefulinprovidingabroadsystemsperspectiveinidentifyingopportunitiesforimprovedenvironmentalefficiency.Itsapplicationsincludeidentifyingenvironmentalhotspots,evaluatingalternativescenarios,andidentifyingandavoidingburdenshifting–betweenlifecyclestagesorbetweenenvironmentalimpactcategories.
STATEMENTOFWORK:Initialliteraturescan:Contractorwillidentifyandreviewinsummaryfashionexistingliteratureevaluatingthelifecycleenvironmentalimpactsoffoods.ContractorwillprovidetoDEQanannotatedsummaryofallrelevantdocuments,notingforeachdocument,ataminimum:theauthorsandtheiraffiliations,yearofpublication,typesoffoods,geographicrepresentation,typesofenvironmentalimpactcategoriesincluded,andlifecyclestages(e.g.,cradle-to-farmgate,cradle-to-factorygate,orcradle-to-grave).
Figure1.Genericproductlifecyclediagramshowing“cradletograve”lifecyclestages.
2FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
WhiletheLCAidealiscertainlytoincludefull“cradletograve”lifecyclestagesandevaluateadiversesetofenvironmentalimpactcategories,oftenaparticularresearchgoalorlimitedavailabilityofdatawarrantsareducedscope(e.g.,cradletofarmgate,orafocusonlyongreenhousegasemissions).Muchcanbegainedfromsuchstudies,butinterpretationrequirescaveats.EnvironmentalimpactcategoriesthatmaybeevaluatedinfoodandagriculturalLCAsinclude:cumulativeenergydemand,globalwarmingpotential,eutrophicationpotential,acidificationpotential,ozonedepletionpotential,landuse,wateruse,andhumanandeco-toxicitypotentials.Briefdescriptionsoftheseareprovidedbelow.Cumulativeenergydemand(E):Virtuallyallproductsrequireenergyaspartoftheirlifecycle,eitherdirectly–asintheusephaseofanautomobile–orindirectly–asintheembodiedenergycontainedinplastics.What’smore,differentenergycarriers–coal,oil,electricity–requiredifferentamountsofprimaryenergyfortheirproduction(extraction,processing,generation)anddelivery(transport,transmissionanddistribution).Cumulativeenergydemand,alsocalledprimaryenergyconsumption,isameasureoftheenergyneedsthroughoutaproduct’slifecycle,andiscommonlyexpressedinmegajoules(MJ).Globalwarmingpotential(GHGE):IncomingsolarradiationisabsorbedandreemittedbackfromtheEarth’ssurfaceasinfraredenergy.Greenhousegases(GHGs)intheatmospherepreventsomeofthisheatfromescapingintospaceandinsteadreflecttheenergybacktofurtherwarmthesurface.HumanactivitiesthatproduceGHGsamplifythisgreenhouseeffectbymodifyingtheEarth’senergybalancebetweenincomingsolarradiationandtheheatreleasedbackintospace,resultinginclimatechange.Anthropogenicemissionsthatcontributesignificantlytoclimatechangeincludecarbondioxide,methaneandnitrousoxide.Therelativecontributionsofdifferentchemicalemissionstothegreenhouseeffectarecommonlycalculatedrelativeto1massunitofcarbondioxide(e.g.,kgCO2equivalents).TheIntergovernmentalPanelforClimateChange(IPCC)providestheserelativefactors,typicallybasedoneffectsoveratimehorizonof100years.Forexample,1kgofmethaneiscurrentlyunderstoodtohavetheequivalentglobalwarmingpotentialas28kgofCO2.Nitrousoxideis265timesaspowerfulasCO2.Eutrophicationpotential(EP):Eutrophicationoriginatesmainlyfromnitrogenandphosphorusinsewageoutlets,manuresandfertilizers.Nutrientsthatrunoff,leachorotherwiseenterwaterwaysacceleratethegrowthofalgaeandothervegetationinwater.Degradationofthisexcessorganicmaterialconsumesoxygen,resultinginoxygendeficiencyandfishkills(deadzones).Eutrophicationpotentialquantifiesnutrientenrichmentbythereleaseofsubstancesinwaterorintothesoil,andiscommonlyexpressedinPO4equivalents.
3FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Acidificationpotential(AP):Acidificationoriginatesfromtheemissionsofsulfurdioxideandoxidesofnitrogen,whichreactwithwatervaporintheatmosphereandformacidsthatprecipitatetotheearth’ssurface(acidrain).Acidificationpotentialmeasuresthecontributionofanemissionsubstancetoacidification,typicallyexpressedinSO2equivalents.Ozonedepletionpotential(ODP):TheozonelayerintheatmosphereprotectsplantsandanimalsfromharmfulUV-radiationfromthesun.Somesubstancesintheatmospheremaketheozonelayerdecline,resultinginincreasedUV-radiationatgroundlevel.Theozonedepletionpotentialisthecontributionofasubstancetothedepletionoftheozonelayer,andistypicallyexpressedinCFC-11equivalents.LandUse(LU):Landresourcesareobviouslyveryimportantforagriculturalproduction,butimpactassessmentmethodscapableofdifferentiatinglandusepracticesintermsofecosystemservicesprovidedareatearlystagesofdevelopmentandnotyetroutinelyappliedinLCAstudies.IflanduseisreportedinafoodLCA,itoftenismerelyaninventoryoflanduse(e.g.,hectaresperyearperkgofproduct).Forannualcrops,thisisadirectreflectionofyield,butitcanalsobeausefulindicatorforanimalbasedfoodswherelandisusedinproducingfeeds.Landuseisalsohighlydependentonlocation,asyieldsvarywithsoilsandclimate,sogeneralizationsacrossregionsaredifficult.Wateruse(WU):Waterresourcesarealsoessentialforagriculturalproduction,andirrigationwithsurfaceandgroundwater(termed“bluewater”inwaterusejargon)makesagriculturepossibleinmorearidregions.Again,geographicallocationinfluencestheamountofbluewaterrequiredtoproduceagivencrop.Theimpactofthatwateruseonthelocalenvironmentandotherpotentialusers,however,alsovarieswithlocation:usingwaterinwaterstressedregionsismoreimpactfulthanusingwaterinregionswithamplesupply.Generalizationofwaterusefromoneproductionregiontoanotherisdifficultandunadvisable.WateruseinLCAisoftenreportedsimplyasaninventory(liters),butconsensusisbuildingastohowbesttoincorporatetheimpactofwateruseinanLCAframework.Humantoxicitypotential(HTP),eco-toxicitypotential(ETP)Atoxicologicaleffectisanadversechangeinthestructureorfunctionofaspeciesasaresultofexposuretoachemical.Characterizationfactorsforvariouschemicalsaredevelopedbasedonmultimediachemicalfatemodels,exposurecorrelations,andchemicalriskscreenings.HTPcanbeexpressedintermsofdisabilityadjustedlifeyears(DALYs)toallowcomparisonswithotherhumanhealtheffects.ETPareoftendisaggregatedintoterrestrialeco-toxicitypotential(TETP)andaquaticormarineeco-toxicitypotential(AETP)andcanbeexpressedintermsofpotentiallyaffectedfractionofspeciesorpotentiallydisappearedfractionofspecies.Toxicitypotentialsarecharacterizedbyhighuncertaintiesduetothecomplexfate,exposureandtoxicologicalmodelingrequired.
4FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
2. LiteraturereviewoffoodLCAsAgriculturalandfoodproductsystemshaveofferedbothanidealandchallengingapplicationofLCAmethodsduetotheircomplexityandtheircloseinterlinkbetweennatureandhumanbuiltandmanagedsystems.GrowinginterestintheenvironmentalimpactoffoodproductionsystemshasresultedinanaccumulatingnumberofLCAsconductedonawidevarietyoffoodsproducedindiverseregionsacrosstheglobe.Here,weofferabroadoverviewofavailablefoodLCAresearch.LiteraturereviewapproachAsacomplementtoliteraturegatheredinpreviousresearchefforts,weconductedasystematicsearchinWebofScienceandGoogleScholardatabases.Searchtermsincludedcombinationsof“LCA”and“lifecycle”with“food”aswellasspecificfoodtypesimportanttothePacificNorthwest.Articlesandreportspublishedinthepasttenyears(after2005)thatappliedLCAmethodstooneormorefoodproductswerereviewedandinventoried.Peerreviewedjournalarticlesaswellasthoroughlydocumentedreportsfromgovernmentalandnon-governmentalorganizationswereconsidered.Theliteraturereviewwaslimitedtoreportsavailableinthepublicdomain,andthusdidnotincludeprivately-fundedstudiesintendedforinternaluse.Agriculturalcropsnotexpresslygrownashumanfood(e.g.,biofuels,timber,fibers)wereexcluded.SummaryofliteraturereviewresultsTheliteraturereviewresultedin184uniquepublicationsand771entries,wherean“entry”representsafoodtype–productionscenariocombination(e.g.,anarticlecomparingorganicandconventionalproductionofappleswouldresultintwoormoreentries).Thefulllistofentriesiscatalogedinthespreadsheet,“FoodLCALitReviewDB020216.xlsx”;fieldscontainedwithinthiscatalogaredescribedinAppendixA.ThisdatabaserepresentsabroadbutinitialscanoftheLCAliterature,andoncefoodsareselectedforfurtherresearch,moredirectedsearchingmayidentifyadditionalstudies.ThefollowingfiguressummarizeandcharacterizethiscollectionoffoodLCAs.Figure2showsthedistributionofentriesbyfoodtype.Arelativelyevendistributionacrossmeat,vegetables,fruitanddairywasfound.Table1furtherdescribesthefrequencyofoccurrenceofspecificfoodswithintheliteraturereviewcatalog.
5FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Meat16.6%
Vegetables16.5%
Fruit14.9%
Dairy13.7%
FishandSeafood9.7%
CerealsandGrains6.3%
LegumesandNuts5.7%
Beverages5.4%
Eggs3.9%
Other2.7%
OilsandFats2.6%
MeatSubstitutes1.6%
Sweeteners0.4%
Figure2.BreakdownofentriescontainedinFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabasebyfoodtype.
6FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Table1.ListingofthenumberofentriescontainedinFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabaseforspecificfoodsinmajorfoodcategories.
Meat 127 Vegetables 126 Fruit 111Beef 48 Tomatoes 48 Apples 27Pork 39 Lettuce 20 Strawberries 11
Chicken 18 Potatoes 16 Bananas 9Sheep 10 Broccoli 6 Pears 8
Rabbit,Hare 3 Mushrooms 5 Peaches 7Turkey 3 Carrots 4 Oranges&othercitrus 7Veal 3 Escarole 4 Pineapple 6Duck 1 GreenBeans 4 Avocado 5Goat 1 Cucumber 3 Kiwi 5Snail 1 Garlic 3 Raspberries 5
Dairy 100 Peas 3 othertropicalfruits 5FluidMilk 46 Asparagus 2 Blueberries 4
Cheese,Assorted 25 BellPeppers 1 Olives 4Yogurt 11 Cauliflower 1 Cherries 3Butter 5 Eggplant 1 Grapes 3
Buttermilk 4 Fennel 1 Mango 1Cream 2 Leek 1 Melon 1
SheepMilk 2 Onions 1 Wildcaughtfish&seafood 39Buffalomilk 1 Spinach 1 AtlanticCod 13
DairyPowders 1 Zucchini 1 Mackerel 5FrozenDairyProducts 1 CerealsandGrains 45 Lobster 4
Sourcream 1 Wheat 15 Herring 3ConcentratedMilk 1 Bread 11 Sardines 3
Nuts&Legumes 42 Rice 9 Haddock 2Cashews 14 Corn 4 Hake 2Hazelnuts 9 BreakfastCereal 2 AlaskanPollock 2Almonds 7 Wheatflour 2 AlaskanSalmon 2Peanuts 7 Barley 1 Octopus 1
Soybeans 2 Oatmeal 1 Saithe 1Walnuts 2 Tuna 1Pistachio 1 Farmedfish&seafood 36
Salmon 17 Trout 6 Mussels 4 SeaBass 3 Shrimp 2 Tilapia 2 ArticChar 1 Turbot 1
LCAstudiescanvaryintheirscope,includingthelifecyclestagesincluded,dependingontheparticulargoalofthestudy.Ourliteraturereviewcatalogsspecificallywhichlifecyclestagesareconsideredinagivenentry.Figure3summarizesthisinformation:whileall
7FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
entriesconsideredsomeformofagriculturalproductioninordertobeincludedinthecatalog,only60%oftheentriesaccountedforprocessingoffarmgatecommodities,27%followedthoseproductsthroughtoretailstages,and7%includeduse(consumption)stagesofhouseholdstorageand/orpreparation&cooking.Typically,ifasuccessivestageisincluded,transportationtothatstageisaccountedforintheLCA.
LCAstudiesalsovaryintheenvironmentalimpactcategoriesevaluated,dependingonthegoalofthestudy,butalsooftenontheavailabilityofdata.AscanbeseeninTable2,globalwarmingpotential(greenhousegasemissions)isthemostcommonenvironmentalindicatorevaluatedinfoodLCAstudies.InLCAstudiesoftypicalindustrialprocesses,combustionoffossilfuelsdrivesnotonlycumulativeenergydemand,butalsoglobalwarmingpotentialandacidificationpotential;theseindicatorsthereforetendtotrackoneanother.Sinceagriculturalproductioncaninvolvesignificantgreenhousegasemissionsfromnon-fossilfuelsources,suchasmethanefromentericfermentationandmanurehandlingornitrousoxideemissionsfromfertilizedsoils,performanceinoneimpactcategoryisnotalwaysagoodpredictorofothercategories.Table2.PopularityofenvironmentalimpactcategoriesamongentriescontainedintheFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
CumulativeEnergyDemand 37%GlobalWarmingPotential 97%EutrophicationPotential 34%AcidificationPotential 32%WaterUse 18%LandUse 29%OzoneDepletionPotential 8%HumanToxicityPotential 8%AquaticToxicityPotential 5%TerrestrialToxicityPotential 4%
100%
60%
27%
7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
AgriculturalProduction
Processing
Retail
use
Figure3.DemonstrationofthelifecyclestagesconsideredinentriescontainedinFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
8FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Figure4.CountryofagriculturalproductionforentriescontainedintheFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
978484
6347
3827
232120
151413131212111111
9988888776666544444333322222211111
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
NetherlandsUSAUKItalySpain
SwitzerlandNorwayCanada
AustraliaSwedenDenmark
NewZealandGlobalIran
BrazilWestAfrica
ChinaEU
FinlandTurkeyAustria
ColumbiaCzechRepublic
FranceIndonesia
PeruIndia
PortugalBelgium
CostaRicaJapanSerbia
NAmericaEcuadorGermanyGhanaPoland
ThailandArgentina
ChileGreeceKenya
HondurasIcelandMexicoTunisiaUgandaUkraineCyprus
MauritaniaSouthAfrica
SouthernHemisphereTasmania
No.ofentries
9FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Figure4demonstratesthediversityofcountriesforwhichfoodproductionhasbeenevaluatedviaLCA.NorthernEuropehasdominatedmuchofthefoodLCAresearchoverthepasttwodecades,butanumberofU.S.basedstudieshaveariseninrecentyears.TheextenttowhichtheseU.S.studiesfocusonparticularregionsintheU.S.isshowninFigure5.WewereunabletoidentifyLCAstudiesfocusedonfoodproductionwithinthePacificNorthwest.FurthercharacterizationofthedocumentscatalogedrevealsanincreasingnumberoffoodLCAstudiesoverthepastdecade(Figure6)andadominanceofpeerreviewedjournalarticles(Figure7).Whileotherimportantreporttypesfromgovernmentalentities,industry,andNGOswereincluded,thelargemajorityofpeerreviewedjournalarticlesaddsacertainlevelofqualityassurance.
Figure5.RegionaldistributionofU.S.basedfoodLCAentriesidentifiedintheFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
Wefoundthat43%ofthedocumentscatalogedmakecomparisonsbetweenproduction(orotherlifecycle)strategiesormethods.Thesecomparisons,forexample,maybebetweenconventionalandorganicproductionmethods,betweenflow-throughandrecirculationaquaculturesystems,ormayconsiderlocalproductionrelativetoimportfromadistantproductionregion.
5787
43221
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
USA(National)California
UpperMidwestNorthernGreatPlains
AlaskaMidwestFloridaMaine
No.ofentriesrecorded
10FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Figure7.DistributionofthetypeofdocumentscatalogedintheFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
3. ConclusionsThepastdecadehasseenagreatupsurgeintheenvironmentalfootprintingoffoodsusinglifecycleassessmentmethods.WhentheCenterforSustainableSystemsbeganworkinthisareaintheearly2000s,examplesofLCAstudiesoffoodwereextremelylimited.Today,thequantityandqualityofcompletedassessmentsaresuchthattheyarebeingusedinawiderangeofapplicationsfromimprovingproductionpracticestoon-packageProduct
5 64 4
14
2118 19
28
22
34
6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016Num
berofDocum
entscataloged
YearofPublication
Figure6.DistributionoftheyearofpublicationfordocumentscatalogedintheFoodLCALiteratureReviewdatabase.
PeerReviewedJournal,79.9%
IndustryBased
Report,4.5%
ConferenceProceedings,
3.9%
GovernmentReport,2.8%
NGOReport,2.8%
Consulting,2.8%
Other,1.7%
Master'sthesis,1.7%
DocumentType
11FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
EnvironmentalFootprintdeclarations(predominantlyinEurope).Still,asthisliteraturereviewdemonstrates,therearelimitations.First,muchoftheworktodatehasfocusedonalimitednumberofcropsand/orfoodtypes.Forexample,thegreatvarietyoffruitsandvegetablesgrownaroundtheworldarenotwellrepresentedinthecurrentliterature.Evensomeverycommonfoods,suchasonions,forexample,havelimitedLCAdataavailable.Second,muchoftheresearchtodatehasbeenconductedinaEuropeancontext.WhilethenumberofU.S.studiesisincreasing,representationisstilllimitedtoahandfuloffoods,andthediversegeographiesoftheNorthAmericancontinentarepoorlyrepresented.Third,manyofthestudiesidentifiedinthisliteraturerevieware“cradletofarmgate”assessments,meaningtheyonlyaccountforagriculturalproduction.Whilethismaybeanecdotallyjustifiedasagriculturalproductionoftendominatestheimpactsoffulllifecyclestudies,itnonethelessrepresentsalimitationinconsideringtheimpactsofthefoodsystemasawhole.Fourth,manystudiesfocussolelyongreenhousegasemissions,withotherimportantenvironmentalimpactindicatorssuchaseutrophication,wateruse,andlandusebeingfarlesscommon.Thisislikelyduetothefactthateutrophication,wateruseandlanduseimpactsinparticulararefeltlocallyandrequiremorespecificdatatobemeaningful,whereasgreenhousegasemissionsareaglobalimpactthatcanbemoreeasilygeneralized.DespitelesserpopularityinLCAstudies,theseotherimpactcategoriesareveryimportantforfoodandagriculturalsustainability,andthereisrealpotentialtoshiftimpactstoothercategoriesbyfocusingonasingleimpact.Despitethesecaveats,therearemanyconclusionsfromthecurrentliteratureinLCAthatcaninformfoodsystemstakeholders,includingproducers,consumersandpolicymakers,inimplementingimprovementstrategies.Applicationofthesefindingsinfuturetasksofthisprojectwillrequirecarefulandbalancedconsiderationofastudy’sresultsalongsideitsresearchgoalandscope.
12FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
AppendixA.DescriptionofFieldsinFoodLCACatalogTheaccompaniedExcelspreadsheet(“FoodLCALitReviewDB020216.xlsx”)containssummaryinformationoftheFoodLCAstudiescatalogedaspartofthisliteraturereview.Rowswithinthespreadsheetrepresentindividual“entries”whichmaybedifferentfoodsorthesamefoodindifferinglifecyclescenarios(e.g.,differentproductionpractices,countriesoforigin,ordistributionmethods).Thefollowingdescriptionsofcolumncategoriesareintendedtoaidininterpretationofinformationloggedinthecatalog.Columnname descriptionFoodentryFoodtype Groupingfoodsintothefollowing:beverages,cerealsandgrains,dairy,eggs,fishand
seafood,fruit,legumesandnuts,meat,meatsubstitutes,mixeddishes,oilsandfats,sweeteners,vegetables,other.
Specificfood FoodstudiedFoodform Whereappropriate,offersadescriptionofthefinalfoodform:fresh,canned,frozen,
dried,curedorpickled,andotherProductorproductionspecifics
Textfieldofferingadditionaldescriptiveinformationaboutthespecificentry
Comparesproductionstrategies/methods?
Yes/nofieldidentifyingwhethertheentrywascomparedagainstotherproduction/distributionscenarioswithinthegivenLCAstudy
Countryoforigin IndicatesthecountryofproductionoftheFOODinquestion,NOTthedocumentCitationyear Indicatesyearofdocumentpublicationauthors Fulllistingofauthornames,typicallywithsymbolicreferencetoaffiliationcolumnAuthoraffiliations ListingofauthoraffiliationsasindicatedindocumentSourcetype Peerreviewedjournal,conferenceproceedings,governmentreport,industrybased
report,NGOreport,database,other.Bibliographiccitation
Completecitationfordocumentretrieval
DOIorURL DOI=”digitalobjectidentifier”,andisauniqueserialcodetoidentifyaspecificjournalarticleonline.TheDOIcansimplybecopiedintoGoogleScholarorotherliteraturedatabasetolinkwiththearticleonline.Forotherdocumenttypes,aURLisincluded.
Lifecyclestagesincluded(allyes/nofields)Agriculturalproduction
DoestheLCAboundaryincludeagriculturalproduction?Notethatdifferentaspectsofagriculturalproductionthatcouldorcouldnotbeincludesarenotfurtherspecifiedhere.Inthecaseofwildcaughtseafood,thisreferstothefishingstage.
LU/LUC Doesthestudyincludelanduseand/orlandusechangeaspartofitsgreenhousegasemissions(GHGE)inventory?Whiletechnicallynotalifecyclestage,thiscontroversialtopicisimportanttonoteinLCAstudiesoffood/agriculture.SomestudiesconsidertheGHGEimpactofchangesinlanduse(e.g.,deforestationforagriculturalpurposes),especiallywhenfood/feedcropsaresourcedfromSouthAmericawheremarketforcesareturningrainforestintocropland.Whilecertainlyrelevant,thiscanhaveasignificantinfluenceonresultsandshouldbeconsideredwhenmakingbroadergeneralizations.
Transport:farmtoprocessing
Doesthestudyaccountfortransportfromfarmgatetoprocessingfacility?
Processing IssomeaspectofprocessingbeyondfarmgatecommodityaccountedforinLCA?Packaging DoestheLCAstudyaccountforpackagingmaterials?Transport:processingto
Isatransportstagefromtheprocessortoretailordistributionhubincluded?
13FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
retailerordistributionhubretail Areenergyuseandemissionsassociatedwithretailingthefoodproductincluded?Transport:retailtoconsumer
Doesthestudyaccountfortransportbytheconsumerfromthepointofpurchasetothehomeorpointofconsumption?
Householdstorage Isrefrigerationorotherstorageinthehomeaccountedfor?Prepandcooking Doesthestudyincludeimpactsduetopreparationorcookingofthefoodfor
consumptionpurposes?dishwashing Doesthestudyincludetheimpactsofdishwashingassociatedwithconsumingthe
foodinquestion?Capitalgoods Often,theproductionofcapitalgoods(e.g.,tractors,barns,processingmachineryor
facilities)areexcludedfromfoodLCAstudiesbecausetheyhaveproventobenegligiblecontributors.Somestudies,however,choosetoincludethemanufactureofthesecapitalgoods.Thisfieldischecked“yes”ifproductionofmajorcapitalgoodshavebeenincludedatsomelifecyclestage
other Acatch-allfieldforotherrelevantlifecyclestagesnotcapturedinpreviousfieldsLifecyclestages:notes
Atextfieldofferingadditionalrelevantinformationaboutthelifecyclestagescoveredorcaveatsofthestudyinquestion.
Foodwasteincluded?
FoodLCAsthatcovercradletograveimpactsmayaccountforwastageofthefoodproductinquestionalongtheproductchain(e.g.,atretailorconsumerstages).Suchwastageincreasestheimpactperunitoffoodconsumed.Thisisayes/nofieldindicatingwhethersuchfoodwasteisaccounted.
Resultsatintermediarystages?
Somestudiespresentresultssuchthattheimpactsofintermediarylifecyclestagescanbeascertained,whereasothersmaypresentonlyoverallresults.Thisyes/nofieldindicateswhetherresultsatintermediarystagesareavailable.
Reportedfunctionalunit
ThefunctionalunitofanLCAstudyistherelativebasisonwhichtheresultsarepresented.Choiceoffunctionalunitisparticularlyimportantwhencomparingimpactsofdifferentsystems.Ideally,thechoiceoffunctionalunitreflectstheultimate“function”ofthesysteminquestion.Giventhecomplexityoffood“function”,amassorvolumebasedfunctionalunitisoftenused.
EnvironmentalimpactcategoriesCumulativeenergydemand
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Greenhousegasemissions
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Wateruse Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.Landuse Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.Freshwatereutrophicationpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Marineeutrophicationpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Acidificationpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Ozonedepletionpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Abioticdepletionpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Humantoxicity Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.Freshwatereco-toxicity
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
Photochemicaloxidationpotential
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
14FoodLifeCycleAssessmentLiteratureReview
Marineeco-toxicity Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.Terrestrialeco-toxicity
Yes/nowhetherstudyreportsonthisimpactcategory.
School of Natural Resources & Environment, 440 Church Street, 3012 Dana Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1041 734-764-1412 | css.snre.umich.edu