Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Case 231: F7. Exophytic naevus over left trapezious. Grown over a few
weeks. Iniitally flat. ?Spitz naevus, ?Malignant
RAC7750 c/o A, B, C
Dermoscopy:
coarse vascular
structures.
c/o D
Case 231: F7. Exophytic naevus over left trapezious. Grown over a few
weeks. Iniitally flat. ?Spitz naevus, ?Malignant
RAC7750
Base
Necrotic foci
Atypical mitotic figure
Deep mitosis
Pie Chart Participants
N=74
Benign: 9
Spitz 30
Uncertain favour benign 16
Uncertain favour malignant 20
Malignant 27
Spitzoid 30
Nodular 8
SSMM 1
Table for Malignant Responses
MPathDx*
*I: Leave as is even if incompletely excised; II: Complete excision <5mm; III: 5mm; IV:
as pT1a, pT1b; 1cm +/-; V: as pT2 or greater e.g. >1cm
EQA Participants: Benign N=9
Symmetrical with collarette and maturation with depth. No
destructive growth. I'd at least be asking a local colleague for a
second opinion, though.
Almost symmetrical compound lesion with epithelioid cells
having promiennt eosinophilic nucleoli and mitotic activity
(9mf/10HPF); focal indvidual cells wrapping around dermal
collagen; no definite pagetoid spread. Overall spitzoid lesion,
favour spitz naevus with atypia (focal ulceration and high
mitoses).
EQA Participants: Uncertain favour benign N=16
Atypical Spitz tumour - low score (according to Barnhill), uncertain malignant
potential. Needs molecular analysis (HRAS mutation or kinase fusion, PTEN,
9p21 deletion, etc); also BRAF, BAP1. I would treat as malignant, but without
SLNB.
Bapoma? Several. DD with Epithelioid spitz
polypoid tumour of large pleomorphic epitheliod naevus cells with big pink
nucleoli, some multinucleated. Some mitoses incl deep ones. Vascular
network and lymphocytes present ? BAPoma
Sheets of mitotically active spitzoid cells forming a wedge shaped but
expansile dermal nodule. Given age group of patient, I would categorise as
atypical Spitz tumour. Need to ensure complete excision (with more sections)
and keep under clinical follow up for 5 years.
Difficult case. On balance I favour atypical spitz, considering the age of the
patient, otherwise could easily be diagnosed as melanoma
EQA Participants: Uncertain favour malignant N=20
I am wary of an outright diagnosis of melanoma in this age
group, and would prefer to call STUMP (but clearly very
worrying), and advise FISH, etc.
Atypical Spitz tumour. STUMP. Favour melanoma, but this is a
young patient
Spitzoid lesion. Young child. Atypia with pleomorphism and deep
mitoses. Do not wish to call MM but worrying features therefore
classify atypical spitz tumour and manage as MM. SNB
questionable.
Looks like a Spitzoid melanoma. STUMP at least. Very mitotic,
but well circumscribed and age 7. Would request FISH before
calling it melanoma
BAPOMA?
EQA Participants: Malignant N=27
Spitzoid lesion but without maturation and several deep mitoses
seen such that despite the patients young age should be
regarded as malignant
Difficult case but I think on balance this is a Spitzoid malignant
melanoma. Pushing deep border and occasional deep mitotic
figures.
Symetrical but consumption of epidermis, variable
pleomorphism, loss of maturation, increased mitotic activity with
deep mitoses.
Pie Chart Slide Club
N=24
*1 STUMP, NOS assigned to Favour Malignant
SLIDE CLUB RESPONSES
Uncertain favour malignant, Spitzoid
Uncertain favour malignant
Spitzoid MM.Highly cellular predominantly dermal tumour with barely any intervening stroma, a
complete lack of architectural and cytological maturation and several deep mitoses.
Nodular severely atypical epithelioid/spitzoid melanocytic tumor; lots of mitoses superficial and
deep, no maturation, no definite ulceration, deep dermal bulky growth. I would prefer a
classification as high risk Spitzoid tumor/STUMP, but melanoma not excluded, based on
histological findings alone. I would definitely do additional immunostainings and molecular analysis
before signing out such a case.
It is a young girl. I have seen such cases in young children with favourable outcome, more than 20
years follow-up without recurrences.
AST, high risk (Spatz et al)
Age is the obvious confounder here, but despite the patient's age, I suspect this is malignant
melanoma, nodular type. While the age definitely prompts consideration of a Spitzoid melanoma,
I see few genuinely 'Spitzoid' histopathologic features here. Ancillary testing might help with
classification.
Spitzoid melanoma of childhood with a comment that these tumours may have a favorable
outcome and that LNSB is unnecessary.
Epithelioid spitz naevus
SLIDE CLUB RESPONSES
Uncertain favour benign. Requires molecular correlation with FISH. Atypical Spitzoid tumour,
deep and atypical mitotic figures but no necrosis. Malignant rare at this age so more likely benign
although uncertain malignant potential
Spitzoid tumor of uncertain malignant potential. Cannot rule out Spitz melanoma. Would do
HMB45, MelanA/Mart, Ki-67 and p16 stains, also BRAF V600E and available usion genes if BRAF
negative. CGH could be a useful next step. Will be interested in results of these studies.
clearly spitzoid in type. At low power the lesion has a rather dumbell configuration with focal
extension into superficial subcutis. The lesion comprises epithelioid and spindle shaped cells in
compact aggregates with little intervening stroma. There is uniform and severe nuclear atypia,
mitoses at varying levels and also attenuatuion of the epidermis. This lesion is a spitzoid nodular
melanoma.
1st: High-risk atypical Spitz tumor (inflamed, with necrosis)
2nd: This is an atypical Spitz tumour with high-risk features. Pleomorphic epithelioid cells with
inflammation; cells are larger in the depth than close to the surface; there is a group of apoptotic
cells (this is a bad sign).
Atypical Spitz tumor with extension into the deep dermis. Would order immunostains
(Ki67/MelanA, p16, HMB45). The mitotic activity is worrying but could be related to the initial fast
growth phase of the tumor. I would recommend to manage this lesion by complete excision with 5-
10 mm margin and clinical surveillance.
SLIDE CLUB RESPONSES
the combination of deep expansive nodules, pleomorphism and mitoses makes the diagnosis of
benignity impossible. This even though the evolution will probably be favourable. In my own limited
experience only a small fraction of these lesions kills the patient
Very spitzoid in nature, but with severe nuclear atypia with irregular large nucleoli deep, plus
mitoses and pushing margin all point to uncertain malignant potential [favour malignant]
spitzoid nodular melanoma of childhood In view of the large atypical cell type; massiveness of
the dermal architecture associated with ‘epidermal consumption’; mitotic activity at all levels), and
add a note that, although regional lymph node involvement may well occur (be detected at SN),
distant metastasis is relatively unlikely to occur (though can by no means be ruled out).
spitzoid MM with atypical mitoses
Spitzoid melanoma. I thought also in polypoid Spitz nevus, but neoplastic melanocytes are
confluent, there is no maturation and I think that I have seen some mitotic figures in deeper areas
(digital); Polypoid melanoma (glass)
[Spitzoid, Uncertain favour malignant] No obvious pagetoid spread but the epidermis is
considerably thinned and there are intraepidermal melanocytes. The atypia and mitotic activity are
too much to simply ascribe to the young age. However, I would recommend genetic analysis and
make a final report in the light of the findings.
SLIDE CLUB RESPONSES
Melanoma, Spitzoid. Young age gives me a low baseline level of suspicion but histology is very
worrying
high risk atypical Spitzoid tumour and favour a malignant Spitz tumour (normally for a case like
this we would do BRAF & NRAS IHC as well as immunochemistry for assessment of proteins
associated with various chromosomal fusions including ALK, ROS1, NTRK1&3, MET & RET, p16
and FISH) (glass)
Spitz Tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP)
High risk Spitz tumour with numerous mitoses and extends focally into subcutis. Could consider
ABBOTT probe set and p16/C-MYC or aCGH but advise wide local excision.
[Spitzoid, Uncertain favour malignant] Exophytic, symmetric prolieration of spitzoid
melanocytes extending into the reticular dermis. Lesional melanocytes show prominent nucleoli
and pleomorphism. There is associated inflammation. Worrisome features include signficnt mitotic
rate of dermal melanocytes and melanocytes with pyknotic nuclei. Little maturation. However,
given the patient's young age and history of recent growth, this could be a Spitz nevus in its
growth phase.
HMB45 & S100 strong, diffuse
p16 widespread loss
Ki67: lack of maturation, high superficial
& deeper areas
ALK1 negative
Additional Studies: IHC
HMB45
p16
Ki67: lack of maturation, high in superficial & deeper areas
Ki67
MICRO REPORT: Case 231
Nov17
AST, high risk features
Absent Kamino bodies
Pleomorphic, large epithelioid melanocytes
Expansile growth, little intervening stroma
Extending deep, into the subcutaneous fat with a focal pushing deep
margin.
Foci of tumour cell necrosis
Mitotic activity was moderately high at 8/mm2
Atypical mitotic figures
Dec 17: At post-operative review, a palpable ipsilateral
supraclavicular lymph node was noted. A CT PET confirmed an
enlarged 10mm markedly FDG avid lymph node that was highly
metabolically active and suspicious for metastasis
c/o A: Lymph node 1.6cm diameter, grossly involved
Dear Y,
This girl has now come up with a gross (palpated) lymph node deposit 1.6cm in the
neck.
Question is whether at this age she should undergo a full neck dissection.
I’d be tempted to say not if it was my daughter but obviously you might have a view
with the results of CGH still pending.
She’s actually provisionally booked for a neck dissection next Monday.
Kind regards, X
DLRS = 0,20
Initial cytogenetic tests, namely comparative genomic
hybridisation showed multiple segmental gains and
losses on chromosomes 1, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 17.
[Y]:
Preliminary RNA sequencing data revealed mutations in
PIK3CA p.5733F (c.2318C>T), MTOR p.A2416V (c.7247 C>T)
and 3 different mutations on the BRCA 1 gene.
A new analysis we have identified an exon 2 G12S mutation in
KRAS in this child.
There are very few data on KRAS mutated melanocytic
tumors to my knowledge. (But I am working on this topic…)
It is not very good news on the therapeutic options if they
were needed in the future.
Discussion with the adult specialist skin cancer MDT (SSMDT)
highlighted the difficulty in predicting malignant potential from the
clinical, biological and molecular features.
Detailed further discussion with the general paediatricians,
paediatric head and neck and plastic surgeons resulted in the
difficult decision to recommend a therapeutic level 1-3 partial neck
dissection in view of the number of severely atypical
histopathological and molecular features with lymph node
involvement, which suggested a less indolent course despite the
age of the patient.
Following the radical neck dissection, 56/56 lymph nodes were
subsequently negative. The patient made an excellent post-
operative recovery, with minor wound infection and mild
lymphoedema of the ipsilateral jaw post-operatively only.
Clearly age led a significant proportion of EQA responders to
favour benign diagnosis despite worriesome histology
Bapoma mentioned by some participants
Slide Club Panel: More decisively away from benign/favour
benign (<20%)
“Spitzoid”: How can we define today?
Spatz et al: Unfortunately grading AST is based on a now
quite old paper with relatively few cases and little molecular
work-up
Discussion: Slide Club Responses
GENERAL DISCUSSION POINTS
This rare case of a paediatric spitzoid melanoma with lymph node involvement highlights
the challenges in the clinical, histopathological and molecular diagnosis of atypical
spitzoid lesions.
Molecular studies can play a key role in the diagnosis of spitzoid melanomas in
paediatric patients.
KRAS exon 2 mutations, as found in our patient have been rarely described in
melanomas to date. In the Cancer Genome Atlas database only 0.9% (6/666) of
melanomas displayed a KRAS mutation. G12D mutation was the most frequently found
(3/6).
Management of atypical spitzoid tumours is variable, with a lack of evidence of
prognostic benefit for sentinel lymph node biopsy over wide local excision and regular
clinical follow-up (ref).
Managing rare paediatric spitzoid lesions within an adult SSMDT is less than ideal /
remains a challenge and may impact on the provision of optimal holistic and
developmentally appropriate care.
Provision of a paediatric-specific SSMDT at a regional or national level may help tailor
potentially radical treatment decisions in this group of patients.
Melanomas of
childhood.
Am J Pathol.
1948;24:591–609.
“Differentiation
histologically
between juvenile
and adult melanoma
could not be made
with certainty in
most cases” Sophie Spitz
Alan Spatz University of McGill
Canada
Spatz A, Calonje E, Handfield-Jones S, Barnhill RL. Spitz
tumors in children: a grading system for risk stratification.Arch
Dermatol. 1999 Mar;135(3):333-5.
Eduardo Calonje St John’s Institute
UK
Raymond Barnhill Institut Curie
Paris, France
ATYPICAL SPTIZ TUMOUR (AST)
SPITZ TUMOUR OF UNCERTAIN
MALIGNANT POTENTIAL (STUMP)
• GRADING for childhood cases
• May promote better
reproducibility for diagnosis
between observers
• Should be born in mind that not
all cases of metastasis
(especially loco-regional nodes)
indicate a long-term adverse
outcome
• But…even lesions in low risk
category may result in death
from metastatic disease
• Needs validation in a larger
dataset
SPITZ NAEVUS v ATYPICAL SPTIZ TUMOUR
(STUMP)
Spatz A, Calonje E, Handfield-Jones S, Barnhill RL. Spitz tumors in children: a
grading system for risk stratification.Arch Dermatol. 1999 Mar;135(3):333-5.
“...currently no IHC or Molecular …that
can be used to make an entirely safe
diagnosis of Spitz nevus or melanoma in
problematic cases.”
• 40% 15y or younger
• H&N commoner location in children
c/w adults
• Compouned (46%); Junctional (33%);
Dermal (21%)
• Epithelioid and/or spindle cells: 100%
• Maturation: 72%
• Inflammation: 70% (rarely dense)
• Epidermal hyperpalsia: 66%
• Melanin: 50%
• Telangiectases: 40%
• Kamino bodies: 34%
• Desmoplastic stroma: 26%
• Mitosis: 23%
• Pagetoid: 13%
• Stromal hyalinisation: 8%
Note: Polypoid SN looks decidedly uncommon!
Am J Dermatopathol. 2009 Apr;31(2):107-16.
Clinical view of a heavily pigmented asymmetric plaque
located on the left arm of a 33-year-old man. B,
Dermoscopically, the lesion exhibits a starburst pattern
typified by pigmented streaks distributed at the periphery in a
regular fashion. Despite the shape, asymmetry, distribution of
color, and structure are rather homogenous in dermoscopy.
C, Histopathologically, the lesion is slightly raised and sharply
circumscribed (hematoxylin–eosin 340); D, there is a
moderate epidermal hyperplasia with hypergranulosis and a
prevailingly nested junctional proliferation of spindle and
epithelioid melanocytes (hematoxylin–eosin 3250). The
overall histopathologic features are quite in between a
PSCSN and a RN.
Ferrara et al Am J
Dermatopathol. 2010
Jun;32(4):410-4.
• Reed / PSCN is recognisable
clincally & dermascopically
• The commonest variant of
Spitz naevus in one large
series
A, Clinical view of a pink nodule located on the right arm of an 11-year-old girl. B, At a first
dermoscopic examination, the lesion exhibits a few red to black hemorrhagic globules over
a pink background. C, The second dermoscopic view refers to the same lesion after 15
days when the planned excision was finally performed. The hemorrhagic globules are no
more appreciated, and the lesion shows a tan pigmentation at the periphery with a few
irregular vessels in the amelanotic central portion. D, Histopathologically, the lesion is
nodular and asymmetric (hematoxylin–eosin 340); E, despite the absence of any pagetoid
spread, there is atrophy of the epidermis, together with some irregular architecture of the
dermal nests, which are notably larger in the depth than close to the surface (hematoxylin–
eosin 3100). The lesion was 4.48 mm in thickness: a sentinel node biopsy showed isolated
tumor cells within the subcapsular sinus.
• “…pink-red
papulonodular lesions,
previously considered
“classical” Spitz nevus,
could be
histopathologically
atypical with a great
probability than tan-
black macules &
plaques of PSCSN/RN”
• The previously “typical”
clinical lesions
associated with Spitz
naevus are probable not
infrequently AST (a
tumour of intermediate
or borderline
malignancy)
Ferrara et al Am
J Dermatopathol.
2010
Jun;32(4):410-4.
Requena et al Am J Dermatopathol. 2012 Jul;34(5):478-86.
• 18 cases
• Mean age 35.2 (15 to 56)
• Mean size 7.27mm
• Mean Breslow 2.51
• High cell density 10/18
• Atypia 9/18 (marked in 1)
• Mitoses 8/18 (atypical & clustered in
4)
• Absent maturation 9/18
• Absent zonation 8/18
SUBTYPES
• Genuine (7)
• Uniform (5)
• Packed (5)
• Polypoid (3)
• Pigmented (2)
BEST PARAMETERS: cell density,
mitosis, zonation, infiltration pattern,
consumption of epidermis
….mitoses in Spitz nevus are scarce, typically in the
superficial areas of the neoplasm. We consider this
criterion very important in the differential diagnosis of
Spitz nevus and spitzoid melanoma; thus, the presence
of mitoses in the lower portion or many grouped in an
area of a spitzoid lesion must be considered highly
indicative of melanoma
Last follow-up: slight keloid scar at the site of her
original surgery and the worrisome moment in April
time when she presented with a changing melanocytic
lesion on her parietal scalp which we excised and
was shown to be a benign melanocytic naevus she
has full mobility and dances and acts and is doing
fantastically. She has slight swelling on the side of the
surgery but not significant lymphoedema.
Acknowledgements:
All EQA and Slide Club responders
Dr Ina Nicklaus
Dr Bella Ganatra
Dr Emma Howard
Dr Claire Bowen
Dr Arnaud de la Fouchardiere