CARL D. PERKINSSPRING INFORMATIONAL SESSION

for Colleges

Wednesday, May 10, 2006Ohio Board of Regents

Main Conference Room, 36th Floor10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

WELCOME

INTRODUCTIONS

PERKINS COORDINATORS

STATE STAFF

Perkins Reauthorization

April 26, 2006

Congressional staff continue to work informally to negotiate differences between the House- and Senate-passed Perkins reauthorization bills.

While we still await the appointment of a formal conference committee, staff have recently expressed optimism that a bill will be completed soon, perhaps this summer. 

Changes in leadership of the House Education and the Workforce Committee do not seem to have impeded progress, as new Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-CA) has included Perkins among his initial legislative priorities.

Perkins Reauthorization

Has not been reauthorized as of 5-10-2006

Congress conferees have not been selected for joint conference committee

Congress wants to get this Bill finished

Safe to plan for FY2007

Perkins Reauthorization

THE BILL Incorporate sanctions for local programs

Focus on sequences or pathways of courses—students should have available information showing them how they will begin HS and end College

Review ways to strengthen programs

Perkins Reauthorization

THE BILL

House proposes to reduce state administration from 5% to 2%

House eliminates Tech Prep as separate line item; Senate supports as separate

House uses “Vocational” and Senate wants “Career Technical”

Negotiate performance levels with locals (difficult to do at 2% administration)

Some wording focuses on “Rigorous and Challenging”

One year to effectively plan and transition to the new law

USDE Monitoring Visit

HighlightsWeeklong visitCampus visitsRecommendations

Special Populations Data CollectionSurveyHEI

Special Populations—CAR Report

STATE: OHProgram Year: 2004-2005

A B C D E F G

Number Of Students In the

Numerator

Number Of Students In The

DenominatorAdjusted Level Of Performance

Actual Level Of Performance

Adjusted Vs. Actual Level Of

Performance*

1 GRAND TOTAL 77,537 118,525 57.00% 65.42% E2 Male 33228 54423 61.06%3 Female 44309 64102 69.12%4 Gender Unknown 0 0 0.00%5 American Indian or Alaska Native 337 529 63.71%6 Asian or Pacific Islander 1324 1756 75.40%7 Black, non-Hispanic 11951 15918 75.08%8 Hispanic 1618 2324 69.62%9 White, non Hispanic 58368 92436 63.14%10 Unknown/Other 3939 5562 70.82%11 Individuals With Disabilities N/P N/P 0.00%12 Economically Disadvantaged N/P N/P 0.00%13 Single Parents N/P N/P 0.00%14 Displaced Homemakers N/P N/P 0.00%15 Other Educational Barriers N/P N/P 0.00%16 Limited English Proficient N/P N/P 0.00%17 Nontraditional Enrollees N/P N/P 0.00%18 TECH PREP 1,904 3,082 61.78%

FORM IV, Page 2

OMB NO: 1830-0503

Level Population

ACADEMIC ATTAINMENT - POSTSECONDARY (1P1)

CORE INDICATOR #1: ATTAINMENT OF ACADEMIC SKILLS (1P1)

VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

* All Cells must have either a number or "N/P"

Additional Information:The Higher Education Information (HEI) System provides the data necessary for measuring performance for the Carl. D. Perkins Grant. However the HEI system was developed for the purpose of calculating state financial allocations to Ohio’s public colleges and universities and does not have the capacity to collect Special Populations data. As a result, the 26 participating Perkins Grant colleges via a separate survey instrument provided data on the Special Populations served on their campus utilizing Perkins funding. The duplicated counts are as follows: Individuals with Disabilities 7,687; Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families 59,817; Individuals with Limited English Proficiency or Other Educational Barriers 57,448; Nontraditional Training and Employment 82,300.

* "M" = "MET"; "E" = "EXCEEDED"; "D" = "DID NOT MEET"

Special Populations—CAR Report

LEVEL STUDENT POPULATION Grand Total (Unduplicated

count)

Agri., Food, & Nat.

Resources

Archit., & Const.

Arts, A/V Tech., & Comm.

Bus., Manag'nt., &

Admin.

Education, & Training

Finance

1 A B C D E F G HMale 217,557 22,881 16,992 19,028 32,210 8,436 994 86Female 229,551 10,164 1,721 25,477 45,158 23,726 1,564 270Gender Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0GRAND TOTAL 447,108 33,045 18,713 44,505 77,368 32,162 2,558 356

2 Male 79,755 1,022 1,891 13,604 9,617 7,721 334 863 Female 110,780 368 514 18,309 13,168 15,150 454 2704 Gender Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5

TotalNOTE: On some computers, you need to use TAB key after entering numbers to auto-calculate.

190,535 1,390 2,405 31,913 22,785 22,871 788 356

6 American Indian or Alaska Native 842 1 12 135 99 96 5 07 Asian or Pacific Islander 2,654 2 21 542 313 237 15 28 Black, non-Hispanic 28,034 26 218 5,166 4,000 2,475 201 849 Hispanic 4,046 15 47 634 482 537 23 2

10 White, non-Hispanic 143,971 1,309 1,987 23,552 16,637 18,403 518 22911 Unknown/Other 10,988 37 120 1,884 1,254 1,123 26 39

12 Individuals With Disabilities N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P13 Economically Disadvantaged N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P14 Nontraditional Enrollees N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P15 Single Parents N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P16 Displaced Homemakers N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P17 Other Educational Barriers N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P18 Limited English Proficient N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P

Additional Information:

POSTSECONDARY

The Higher Education Information (HEI) System provides the data necessary for measuring performance for the Carl. D. Perkins Grant. However the HEI system was developed for the purpose of calculating state financial allocations to Ohio’s public colleges and universities and does not have the capacity to collect Special Populations data. As a result, the 26 participating Perkins Grant colleges via a separate survey instrument provided data on the Special Populations served on their campus utilizing Perkins funding. The duplicated counts are as follows: Individuals with Disabilities 7,687; Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families 59,817; Individuals with Limited English Proficiency or Other Educational Barriers 57,448; Nontraditional Training and Employment 82,300.

VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL EDUCATION BASIC GRANT STUDENT ENROLLMENT REPORTSTATE:

PROGRAM YEAR: 2004-2005LEVEL: POSTSECONDARY

OMB NO: 1830-0503

All (Sec

+Psec +Adult)

Program Monitoring

Two Year CycleSame process, same monitoring guide

Self-Assessment (DUE on Monday, May 15)Desk AuditPhone AuditOnsite VisitCorrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plans—Follow Up

Program Monitoring

Campuses Monitored in FY2006

Central Ohio Technical CollegeColumbus State Community College

Cuyahoga Community CollegeJames A. Rhodes State College

Lorain County Community CollegeNorthwest State Community College

Shawnee State UniversityStark State College of Technology

Washington State Community CollegeZane State College

Jefferson Consortium (w/Terra Community College)

Program Monitoring

Campuses Monitored in FY2007

Belmont Technical CollegeCincinnati State Technical Community College

Clark State Community CollegeLakeland Community CollegeNorth Central State CollegeOwens Community CollegeSinclair Community College

University of ToledoYoungstown State University

Marion Technical Consortium (w/Southern State & Edison State)

Stakeholders Meetings

Stakeholders Meeting Minutes

Stakeholders Participant Lists

Stakeholders Meetings (April 1)

Extension Letters

DUE BY

FRIDAY, JUNE 23, 2006

Letter must be signed by the President

EXTENSION LETTERS

FOUR KEY AREAS

ACHIEVEMENT Ensuring challenging academics, Special Populations

TRANSITION Aligning secondary/postsecondary, college academic

preparation, articulated paths

OCCUPATIONAL PREPARATION Alignment & support of programs to prepare for

occupations In demand with “family supporting wage”

HIGH QUALITY PROGRAMS Resource investment and monitoring criteria to assure

local programs of sufficient size, scope and quality

EXTENSION LETTERS

Ohio Department of Education

Career-Technical and Adult Education

Administrative Field Services

25 S Front Street; Mail Stop 610

Columbus, OH 43215-4183

ATTN: Veronica Larcher

FY 2007PERKINS BUDGET

Annual Allocation

OHIO PERKINS COLLEGES

FY2007 TOTAL ALLOCATION

$3,189,650.00

FY2006 – 3,287,487.00

FY2005 – 3,215,702.97

FY2004 – 3,216,215.91

Annual Allocation

10 MINUTE BREAK

CCIPComprehensive Continuous

Improvement Plan

WORKING LUNCH

GROUP ACTIVITY

Reviewing Concentrator Definition

Reviewing 1P1 & 1P2

PERKINS WEB SITE

PERFORMANCE MEASURE REPORTS

Previous Campus Report Look

Core Indicator 1P1: Attainment of Academic Skills Numerator: Of the concentrators, the number of students who completed 28 quarter or 19 semester credit hours of non-technical/ academic course work by Spring 2002 (courses that are not from subject codes identified as technical). Denominator: Concentrators Numerator Denominator Per

Core Indicator 1P2: Attainment of Technical Skills Numerator: Of the concentrators, the number of students who completed 30 quarter or 20 semester credit hours of Technical course work by Spring 2002 (courses that are from subject codes identified as technical). Denominator: Concentrators Numerator Denominator Per

Full Population 2,101 4,152 51%

Full Population 3,972 4,152 96%

Information: Increased by 3%.

Information: Stayed consistent

Campus Performance Report

Performance Measure Numerator Denominator

FY 2005 Percentage

STATE PERCENTAGE

FY 2004 Percentage

FY 2003 Percentage

FY 2002 Percentage

1P1 256 1886 13.57% 65.42% 11% 10% 11% 1P2 1865 1886 98.89% 87.89% 99% 99% 99% 2P1 202 247 81.78% 77.38% 79% 76% 82% 3P1 148 215 68.84% 72.48% 47% 40% 40% 3P2 113 148 76.35% 68.46% 49% 88% 42% 4P1 173 937 18.46% 21.95% 18% 19% 18%

4P2 38 175 21.71% 23.24% 20% 20% 13%

Annual Average Performance Improvement Measures 1P-3P: Please improve by 1% for FY 2006

Measures 4P: Please improve by .5% for FY 2006

OBSERVATIONS:

1P1 IMPROVEMENT: 3% increase. 1P2 DID NOT IMPROVE: Measure remains the same.

2P1 IMPROVEMENT: 3% increase.

3P1 IMPROVEMENT: Measure remains an issue. 3P2 IMPROVEMENT: Measure remains an issue.

4P1 DID NOT IMPROVE: Measure remains the same.

4P2 IMPROVEMENT: 2% increase.

The Future

AUTOMATED REPORTS

Statewide Performance & Negotiated Levels

1P1 – Have exceeded USDE negotiated levels.

1P2 – Have fluctuated 2P1 – Have exceeded USDE negotiated

levels.3P1 & 3P2 – Remains an issue4P1 & 4P2 – Have struggled to improve

THANK YOU AND

HAVE A NICE DAY