Upload
marvin-richards
View
219
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act:
MCCCD Performance
Jennifer Kaufman FournessManager, Workforce Initiatives
Workforce Development
March 7, 2013
1
Carl D. Perkins Performance Measures
2
• Perkins recipients are required by law to report on 6 specific core indicators each year
• Individual state performance levels are set by the Office of Vocational Education, with input from the state
• Recipients must meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance
If a recipient fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance, a performance improvement plan is required
If a recipient fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon level of performance for any core indicator 3 years in a row, some or all funds may be withheld
MCCCD Performance 2011-2012
3
Measure Title 11-12 Final Agreed Upon Performance
Level
11-12 MCCCD Actual
1P1 Technical Skill Attainment 85.0 96.5
2P1 Credential, Certificate, Degree 41.5 44.7
3P1 Student Retention or Transfer 50.0 67.4
4P1 Student Placement 38.0 49.1
5P1 Nontraditional Participation 22.5 29.3
5P2 Nontraditional Completion 17.5 27.0
Performance Measures: MCCCD Operational Definitions
4
Participant: Student who earned credit in a vocational course (flagged as vocational in SIS during FY11-12 (Summer II 2011 through Summer I 2012) Concentrator: Student that has been a PS student at the college for not longer than five(5) years who attended in FY11-12 (Fall 2011 or Spring 2012) and met either of the following 2 conditions:
1.Had at least 9 cumulative earned hours in a single vocational subject area earned through Summer II 2012 AND had at least 12 cumulative earned hours in the vocational course subject plus additional AGEC coursework earned through the same period
OR
2. Received an occupational certificate (plan begins with 5) of less than 12 credit hours in FY11-12 (Fall 2011 – Summer II 2012)
Performance Measures: MCCCD Operational Definitions (cont.)
5
• MCCCD uses student course taking behavior to determine student program assignment
• Courses are organized by prefix and are assigned to one, and only one, 6 digit CIP (Classification of Instruction Program) code – NOT program
• This system allows us to see how may concentrators we have in a particular field of study, NOT Program
* Understanding the concentrator definition and how MCCCD ‘operationalizes’ the definition is key to correctly interpret all Perkins data
1P1: Technical Skill Assessment
6
Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (we are analyzing students who left the college) who did not enroll in Fall 2011 and who took an assessment while enrolled or up to December 31. 2012
Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who passed the exam
# Test Takers Denominator: # Test Takers Who
Met Concentrator
Definition
Numerator: # Test Takers Who
Met Concentrator Definition and
Passed
MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon
Level of Performance
2,025 1,304 1,259 96.5% 85.0%
1P1: Technical Skill Assessment
7
Program Areas Assessment
Education and Training AEPA – Arizona Educator Proficiency Assessments
Business Management Arizona Department of Education
Nurse Assisting CNA – Certified Nurse Assistant
Respiratory Therapist CRT – Certified Respiratory Therapist
Dental Assisting-HygieneNBDHE – National Board Dental Hygiene Examination
EMT EMT – Emergency Medical Technician
Practical NursingNCLEX-PN – National Council Licensure Examination
Registered NurseNCLEX-RN – National Council Licensure Examination
Automotive Technician Sec 609 – Environmental Protection Agency
Business Management WAFCRMC – Western Association of Food Chains
2P1: Credential, Certificate or Degree
8
Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who did not enroll in Fall 2011
Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who received an award in FY10-11
Denominator Numerator: MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance
14,496 6,476 44.7% 41.5%
3P1: Student Retention or Transfer
9
Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who enrolled in Fall 2011 and did not receive an award in FY10-11
Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who either re-enrolled in Fall 2011 (retention)OR enrolled in a university or other community college in Fall 2011 (transfer); use National Student Clearinghouse
Denominator Numerator: MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance
15,499 10,443 67.4% 50.0%
4P1: Student Placement
10
Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators (prior year concentrators) who did not enroll in Fall 2011 Numerator: Number of students in the denominator who had Q4 2011 wages of at least $3750, use Department of Economic Security Data
Denominator Numerator: MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance
7,112 14,496 49.1% 38.0%
DES Data-Sharing Agreement
11
• The current agreement for Perkins is with the Unemployment Insurance (UI) division of DES. In the current process, we send UI a file of student data, and UI responds with wage data for the students they can find/match in the identified time period.
• UI is only able to provide wage data. Research has begun to determine if another unit of DES would be able to provide sector or SOC code data. Internal efforts to date, and efforts of other states will be reviewed.
5P1: Nontraditional Participation
12
Denominator: FY11-12 participants in programs designated as non-traditional for one gender Numerator: Number of students in the denominator whose gender is the under-represented gender for the program
Denominator Numerator: MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance
35,407 10,369 29.3% 22.5%
5P2: Nontraditional Completion
13
Denominator: FY10-11 concentrators who received an award in FY10-11 in a program designated as non-traditional for one gender Numerator: Number of students in the denominator whose gender is the under-represented gender for the program
Denominator Numerator: MCCCD Actual Performance
State Final Agreed Upon Level of Performance
3,680 992 27.0% 17.5%