Upload
jerome-stewart
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Capacity needs for managing mining impacts on rivers
Neil McIntyre1, Alan Woodley1,2, Natasha Danoucaras1, Neil Coles3
1. Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland2. School of Computing Science and Electrical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology 3. School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia
IM4DC AchievementsSUCCESSFUL TRAINING OUTCOMES
SUCCESSFUL TRAINING OUTCOMES
October 2011 to February 2014
IM4DC deliveryGLOBAL CAPACITY-BUILDING OUTPUTS 2012-2015
GLOBAL CAPACITY-BUILDING OUTPUTS 2012-2015
2749participants from 65 developing countries
16109 102 participant short courses training days
30.4% 1700+ 66
female participation in mining & development action research
alumni network projects
Mining and healthy economies
www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=pe&v=69
IMF, World Economic Outlook, 2014
Pressure for rapid development
Area of new mining claims in Peru
1M
2M
3M
4M
1990 1999 2008
Hec
tare
s
From: Bebbington and Bury 2009. Institutional challenges for mining and sustainability in Peru www.pnas.org/cgi/doi10.1073/pnas.0906057106 From: Cane, I. Schleger, A. Ali, S. Kemp, D. McIntyre, N. McKenna, P. Lechner, A.
Dalaibuyan, B. Lahiri-Dutt, K. and Bulovic, N. (2015). Responsible Mining in Mongolia: Enhancing Positive Engagement. Sustainable Minerals Institute: Brisbane
IM4DC water projects and their participants
Projects:
• Literature review
• 3-week knowledge exchange event (Philippines, Mongolia, Indonesia, Ghana, Zambia, Peru)
• Summer school (Colombia)
• River ecosystem workshop (Peru)
• Pilot of Social Water Assessment Protocol (Ghana)
Participants:
• Mining companies
• Governments (politicians, regulators, scientists)
• University staff & consultants
• NGOs
• Communities
• Undergraduate and postgraduate students
Conclusions and recommendations
Research and advanced education staff• Lack of staff who have had substantial exposure to good
practice and with high-level expertise• Need investment in exchanges where staff can be embedded
in suitable working environments
Conclusions and recommendations
University students• Baseline skills and knowledge acquired in relevant university
courses; but mining poses particular river management problems • Graduates do not have balanced view of mining: Need
modules embedded in engineering and environmental courses
Conclusions and recommendations
Mine company staff • Limited understanding of interactions with catchment; limited
stewardship culture• More effective communication with communities and
understanding the values attached to water
Conclusions and recommendations
Policy makers and regulators • Good knowledge of the generic water issues• Training priorities relate to implementing regulations;
disseminating knowledge of risks and technological solutions to communities and miners; and building frameworks for cooperative agreements between mining and other water stakeholders
Conclusions and recommendations
Community representatives • Community need to understand water risks and opportunities
from mining; and negotiation skills• Small-scale mining communities needs to be informed about
low-cost technological solutions that prevent erosion and pollution
Concluding messages
• Healthy rivers - healthy economies is possible in mining regions if good practice is implemented
• Stakeholders need to know what mining projects can and should achieve by applying good practice
• Governments in emerging mining regions need to develop capacity to effectively regulate
• Mining industry needs to develop its land and water stewardship culture and capacity to act