62
CNAP/CNAL 3500.1 Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation 01 January, 2016

Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Reporting (SHARP/DRRS-N) Agenda This Capabilities-based T&R course will cover the following topics Overview T&R Matrices FHP Overview Simulators Ordnance Reporting (SHARP/DRRS-N)

Citation preview

Page 1: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

CNAP/CNAL 3500.1Capabilities-Based T&R

Presentation

01 January, 2016

Page 2: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Overview• T&R Matrices• FHP Overview• Simulators• Ordnance• Reporting (SHARP/DRRS-N)

This Capabilities-based T&R course will cover the following topics

Agenda

2

Page 3: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Overview

General Policy Guidance

Page 4: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

“ The mission of Naval Aviation training is to prepare tactically and technically skilled aircrew to win at war. To develop the combat skills required to accomplish this mission, Naval Aviation relies on many interrelated components: Capabilities-Based Training and Readiness (CB T&R) Matrices, the Flight Hour Program (FHP), Non-Combat Expenditure Allocation (NCEA) ordnance, simulation, Type Wing Advanced Readiness Programs (ARP), Air Combat Training Continuum (ACTC) and FRTP major events. “

This policy is the CNAP/CNAL 3500.1 (CB T&R), dated 10 Dec 2015

Enclosures 1-15 contain the specific TMS matrices Appendix A - Matrix FormatAppendix B - Ordnance CategoriesAppendix C - Reserved for Interim MatricesAppendix D - Equivalent Sortie Length MatrixAppendix E - Number of Authorized Aircrew Appendix F - FRTP Ordnance Expenditure PlanAppendix G - Glossary of Terms

Policy Overview

4

Page 5: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

The overall training objective of Naval Air Force units is to achieve the highest level of training attainable with the resources available. To execute this training strategy, Naval Aviation relies on many interrelated components.

The CB T&R is based on the Major Combatant Operations (MCO) standard

Introduction – Building Block Approach

5

Page 6: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Training NTAs are assigned a color in DRRS-N based on the TFOM calculation

TFOM = Pf x Ef

80 - 100

0 - 59

60 - 79

TFOM CDR Assessment

General Policy Guidelines - T&R in DRRS-N

6

Page 7: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

R+1

R+2

R+3

R+4

R+5

R+6

R+7

R+8

R+9

R+1

0

R+1

1

R+1

2

R+1

3

R+1

4

R+1

5

POM

D+1

D+2

D+3

D+4

D+5

D+6

POM

R+2

4

R+2

5

R+2

6

R+2

7

% F

HP

Fund

ing

CVW FUNDING PROFILE (FRP)

Basic Integrated SustainDeploymentMaintenance Sustain

ULT/ACTC

TSTA C2X

ARP

AWF

General Policy Guidelines - CVW/EXP FRTP Cycle

7

Page 8: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

General Policy Guidelines - Key FRTP Dates

It is essential that squadrons and detachments understand the impact of the following dates since they can greatly effect the readiness calculations in SHARP. These dates are managed at the TYCOM level via the Master Aviation Plan (MAP) and, in some cases, delegated to TYPEWINGs for management.

• FRTP Start Date This the beginning of an FRTP Cycle. Normally, the FRTP date affects ordnance

expenditures and other SRS/DRS items

• Employability Start Date For CVW squadrons, this is the completion of C2X or Fallon, whichever happens last For non-CVW units, this is the completion of C2X or as defined by your TYPEWING For all units, this date marks the crossover point between Production and Sustainment

skills

• Phase Transition date Normally used by non CVW based units (VP, Exp, ETC) Indicates the date the unit moves from Production to Sustainment

8

Page 9: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

“The overall training objective of Naval Air Force units is to achieve the highest level of combat readiness as efficiently as possible with the resources available. Although training is continuous, it is recognized that readiness levels will vary depending on the phase within the FRTP.”

• Capabilities-Based Training & Readiness (CB T&R) Matrices• Flying Hour Program (FHP)• Simulation• Non-Combat Expenditure Allocation (NCEA)• Advanced Readiness Program (ARP)• Air Combat Training Continuum (ACTC)• FRTP Major Events

ARP ISATT (HSM) TSTA Air Wing Fallon COMPTUEX/CERTEX

General Policy Guidelines - T&R Objective

9

Page 10: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• FDNF Units include: CVW-5 HSM-51

• Due to the dynamic schedule and OPLAN requirements, FDNF units are required to maintain higher levels of readiness

• Flight Hour funding is elevated to maintain higher state of readiness

• All FDNF ordnance is considered End-to-End

General Policy Guidelines - FDNF Units

10

Page 11: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Reserve Units Include: TSW (VFC-12, VFC-111, VFC-13, VAQ-209) VR (C-40/C-130/C-20G) VP-62 and VP-69 HSC-85, and HSM-60

• HM-14 and HM-15 reserve components use the Active Component matrix

• Same format and methodology as their Active Component counterparts

• Higher periodicities due to greater experience levels

General Policy Guidelines - Reserve Units

11

Page 12: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

General Policy Guidelines - Waivers

• Waivers may be requested when resources are not available or when external factors (weather, operational tasking, range availability, etc.) preclude execution of tasks in the T&R matrix

• Carrier Air Wing Commanders shall initiate waiver requests for squadrons under their operational control

• Type Wing Commanders shall initiate waiver requests for squadrons not attached to a CVW and all detachments under their administrative control

• Waiver format example embedded within instruction

• Waivers are submitted to the CNAP or CNAL N40 for approval. If resources such as Ordnance or Flight Hours are affected, the decision to approve/disapprove moves to the CNAP or CNAL Chief of Staff

12

Page 13: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

General Policy Guidelines - Waivers

Sample Waiver MessageFROM (CVW or TYPE WING)TO COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA or COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA//INFO COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA or COMNAVAIRPAC SAN DIEGO CA// (Other PLAs as required)BTCLASSIFICATION //N03210//MSGID/GENADMIN/ //SUBJ//TRAINING AND READINESS WAIVER REQUEST//REF/A/DOC/ CNAP-CNALINST 3500.1/DDMMMYY /AMPN/TYCOM TRAINING AND READINESS INSTRUCTION//POC //REMARKS/[THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH SQUADRON FOR WHICH THE WAIVER IS REQUESTED. THE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN A FOUR COLUMN FORMAT]1. [SQUADRON OR DETACHMENT/ORDNANCE TYPE OR SRS ITEM/START DATE/END DATE (EXAMPLE)]VFA-XXX/SLAM-ER/ DDMMMYY /DDMMMYYVFA-YYY/SLAM-ER/ DDMMMYY / DDMMMYYVFA-ZZZ/MAVERICK/ DDMMMYY / DDMMMYYVAQ-XXX/HARM/ DDMMMYY / DDMMMYYHSM-XX/HELLFIRE/ DDMMMYY / DDMMMYY2. JUSTIFICATION.(A) [DESCRIBE THE REASON FOR THE WAIVER (NCEA SHORTFALL/TYPE ORDNANCE)]. (B) [IS THE WAIVER REQUIRED DUE TO THE LACK OF AN EXTERNAL RESOURCE (RANGE, TARGETS, ETC.), AND WHAT IS THE EXPECTED FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF THAT RESOURCE]3. MITIGATION STRATEGY. [WHAT HAS THE UNIT ACCOMPLISHED TO MITIGATE THE TRAINING ORDNANCE SHORTFALL (SIMS, CATMS, ETC.)]4. CLOSING REMARKS.//

13

Page 14: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Matrices &

Wing Training Manuals (WTM)

Enclosures 1-15

Page 15: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Standardized across all communities

• Max value on CAG/CO judgment, increased flexibility

• Aligned to the FRTP Advanced Readiness Program (ARP) Air Wing Fallon Embarked Operations (TSTA/COMPTUEX) Phase transition/CERTEX

• ACTC integrated into T&R

• Simulation integrated into T&R

T&R Matrices - Overview

15

Page 16: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• COMNAVAIRPAC/LANT 3500.1 Signed 10 December 2015

• Enclosures:(1) VFA/VFC Training Matrix (2) VAQ Training Matrix (3) VAW Training Matrix (4) VRC Training Matrix (5) VP Training Matrix (6) VPU Training Matrix(7) VQ(E) Training Matrix (8) VQ(T) Training Matrix (9) VR (C-20/C-40/C-130) Training Matrix

T&R Instruction

16

Page 17: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Enclosures (cont.):(10) HSC (SH-60F/HH-60H) Training Matrix (11) HSC (EXP/NSW) Training Matrix (12) HSC (CVW/ M-197/UGR) Training Matrix (13) VTUAV (MQ-8B/C) Training Matrix (14) HSM (MH-60R) Training Matrix (15) HM (MH-53E) Training Matrix

T&R Instruction

17

Page 18: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Avg 27.0 Hours / Crew / Month

Ef = SRS Pf = IARS

Skill to flight task mapping + Skill periodicity

Flight Tasks

Flight Tasks

Simulators

80-100

60-79

0 -59

TFOM = Ef x Pf

VFA T&R Matrix

18

Page 19: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• NTA Required Capabilities

NMETL derived

o NMETL (Navy Mission Essential Task List)

COCOM/OPLAN driven

USFFC approved

Navy Tactical Tasks (NTA)

19

Page 20: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Measure of squadron level training requirements ACTC, ARP, C2X, Fallon Ordnance 90 day avg flight hours T/M/S specific quals/designations

• Ef is a number from 0.0 – 1.0 but displays as a whole number in DRRS-N

• Ef items are minimums Resourcing ensures minimums

are met over the FRTP

Experience Factor (Ef)

20

Page 21: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Ef – VFA Matrix

21

Page 22: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Skills Completed by executing flight tasks Periodicity driven by;

o Number of required iterations by crew seat (pilot, NFO, Aircrew etc)o How often the skill needs to be repeated

• Flight Tasks Specific events required to achieve a skill The Wing Training Manual contains the prerequisites

• Individual Crews are formed when all required crew positions have achieved all the required skills for a given NTA

Performance Factor (Pf)

22

Page 23: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Performance Factor is broken up into the Production and Sustainment skills Production Skills

o Require resources– Ranges– Bandits– Targets– Simulators

Sustainment skillso Skills that must be

maintained while deployed

VAQ (CVW) Skills

VQ (T) Skills

Pf – VAQ & VQ (T) Matrix

23

Page 24: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Pf – P-8 Matrix

24

Page 25: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Numbers = number of required tasks • “O” = Optional items

Pf & Skills – Matrix format

Partial List – for illustration only25

Page 26: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Partial List – for illustration only

FRS Baseline – VFA Matrix

26

Page 27: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Partial List – for illustration only

ACTC Mapping – VFA Matrix

27

Page 28: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Partial List – for illustration only

Task Packs – VFA Matrix

28

Page 29: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Wing Training Manuals (WTM)

The T&R Instruction is the foundation upon which the WTM is based. The WTM sets forth requirements for individual aircrew training and defines the resources required. The WTM is intended to provide community-specific details required to successfully execute training. As a minimum, the WTM (and addendums) shall include:• A detailed description of each training task in the task to skills section of the matrix. • The prerequisites for each training task in the task to skills section of the matrix.  • The specific training objectives of each task that are aligned with T/M/S NMETLs. • The requirements for completion and pass/fail criteria for each task in the Task List. Initial criteria will be based on fleet

experience or existing training documents and will be adjusted as required after periodic review of aircrew performance data. • The Measures of Performance (MOP) and MOE shall be used to evaluate each task. Debrief sheets will be included when

applicable. • WTM performance metrics shall be linked and consistent with each community NMETL standards to ensure uniform Current

Readiness Assessments. • An Enlisted Aircrew Training Syllabus (other than the simulators and flights already listed in the matrix, if required). • Ensure that a defined link between ACTC flight and simulator events directly to T&R tasks is accomplished. • Clearly define special qualification definitions and requirements (e.g., FAC A, Strike Lead). • Clearly define stand-alone academic requirements that are not tied directly to a specific T&R Task. • Clearly define squadron ground training requirements. Squadrons shall implement a ground-training program to support the

flight-training syllabus, satisfy the requirements of mission qualifications and maintain the professional standards required of Naval Aviators and Aircrewmen.

29

Page 30: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

FLYING HOUR PROGRAM

Page 31: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Monthly Hours % of T&R Matrix based on R+ or D+ months Model vs. Reality

o Quarterly allocation• Readiness Expectation

Mapped to FHP execution

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

R+1

R+2

R+3

R+4

R+5

R+6

R+7

R+8

R+9

R+1

0

R+1

1

R+1

2

R+1

3

R+1

4

R+1

5

PO

M

D+1

D+2

D+3

D+4

D+5

D+6

PO

M

R+2

4

R+2

5

R+2

6

R+2

7

% F

HP

Fund

ing

CVW FUNDING PROFILE (FRP)

Basic Integrated SustainDeploymentMaintenance Sustain

Flying Hour Program

31

Page 32: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Flight Hour Execution is a measure of Readiness

Target Valueo 90 day entitlement rolling

averageo T&R (baseline) hours only

Measurement Valueo 90 day actual rolling

averageo All hours flowno MESH not factored

into readiness

Flying Hour Requirements

32

Page 33: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

SIMULATORS

Page 34: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Simulators

• Credit Required or Optional tasks Number per periodicity

• NASMP Naval Aviation Simulator

Master Plan Validates sim contribution Completed for each T/M/S

• Simulator contribution Determined by Type Wing

34

Page 35: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Simulator only Skills

Simulator contribution to all skills

Simulator Contribution – HSC Matrix

35

Page 36: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Simulator Contribution Log in SHARP All simulators

o NATOPSo Instrumento FCLPo ACTC

• Simulator Utilization Tracked monthly for all T/M/S SHARP vs. Simulator Logs

o Large discrepancies in utilization rates

Simulator Tracking

36

Page 37: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Non-Combatant ExpenditureAllowance (NCEA)

Appendix F(Formerly Enclosure 17)

Page 38: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Refined Ordnance Category Definitions End-to-End (E2E)

o Remains with the Squadrono Tests break out, build up, and tactical expenditure

High Training Value (HTV)o Transfers with Aircrew

Training Ordnance (TO)o Transfers with Aircrew

• FDNF requires all ordnance to be End-to-End

• Appendix F Ordnance allotment by T/M/S and event (ARP, C2X, AWF)

Ordnance - Policy Guidelines

38

Page 39: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Training Ordnance(TO)

20MM (VFA) BDU-45LGTR Mk-76 Chaff FlaresSSQ Crew Served Mk-58

High Training Value Ordnance

(HTV)

LGB (GBU-12/16/10) GP Live (Mk-80)HELLFIRE JDAMTorpedoes 2.75” rockets 20MM (HSC)

End to End Ordnance(E2E)

IR Missiles SLAM-ERRadar Missiles HarpoonHARM MaverickJSOW GBU-24B/B

Ordnance Categories

39

Page 40: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• E2E $$$$$ Validates full kill chain

o Ordnance Loadingo Aircrew planning and tacticso Weapon reliability

1-2 per squadron• HTV $$

Combat ordnance (live/inert) 1-7 per aircrew

• TO & CATM $ Repetition

• Flight & Sims Building block Practice prior to , HTV, & E2E

E2E

HTV

Training Ordnance

CATMS

FLIGHTS & SIMULATORS

Readiness requires the complete combination of simulators, CATMs, Training Ordnance, HTV, & E2E in training.

Ordnance Categories

40

Page 41: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

17 Crews Onboard (COB)

T/M/S Specific Notes:

2. Indicates the number of weapons per squadron that must be expended. (E2E)

3. Indicates the number of weapons/rounds per aircrew that must be expended. (TO)

4. Indicates the number of crews that must expend a weapon. (HTV)

VFA T&R Ordnance Requirements

41

Page 42: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• A/A Missiles 2 x IR: AIM-9M 2 x RDR: AIM-7 or

AIM-120• 1 x AGM-154 JSOW• 1 x AGM-88 HARM• Constrained

1 x AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER 1 x AGM-65E/F LMAV 1 x GBU-24B/B LGHTP

Squadron (E2E) Requirements

42

Page 43: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Laser Guided Rounds (LG Rounds Per Crew)

Avg 10 per COB 9 LGTR 1 Heavy LGB (-12/16/10)

o 12 of 15 COBo 12 of 17 COB

• GP Live (Mk-80) Avg 7 per COB

• 20mm 1500 rounds per crew

• JDAM 12 of 15 aircrew 12 of 17 aircrew

• FY16 1 x GBU-54 LJDAM 1 x GBU-12F/B DMLGB

=150 round belt

VFA Aircrew (HTV & TO) Requirements

43

Page 44: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Appendix F – FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan

44

Page 45: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Maintenance / ULT Basic Integrated Deploy Sustain

ARPType Weapon Schools

Air Wing FallonNAWDC

COMPTUEXCSG-3 / CSG-4

ULT

FY FY

ULT90-days

ULT90-days

TSTA(ULT)

ULT90-days

ULT30 day

E2E MISSILEX

Deploy NCEA

Appendix F – FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan

45

Page 46: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

CVW FY16 NCEA – Sample Roll-up

46

Page 47: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Chronic shortages MAVERICK SLAM-ER GBU-24B/B Hellfire

• Acute shortages 500-lb warheads 500-lb JDAM tail kits Towed decoys

FY16 NCEA Shortages

47

Page 48: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Waivers requested by CVW along with any other readiness items

• Complete prior to completion of C2X or Air Wing Fallon, whichever is last

• Expect CNAP or CNAL to deny the ordnance portion in order to “Show the Pain”

• Future Weapons AARGM LRASM SDB II JAGM

Ordnance Shortages and T&R Waivers

48

Page 49: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) CATM-88E delivered to flight lines this fall AURs available

• GBU-53B Small Diameter Bomb (SDB II) Entered LRIP (144 bombs) 12 June, 2015 Planned NCEA

• AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) First airworthiness test with a mass model 14 Dec 2015 No planned NCEA

• Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) USN/USMC re-entered development with USA in March 2014

Future Weapons

49

Page 50: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

REPORTING

50

Page 51: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• SHARP Single data capture tool for squadron training Only data source to feed the DRRS-N T Pillar

for squadrons and detachments Reports module provides current training status

and analysis for readiness reporting

Data Management – SHARP

51

Page 52: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• The Aviation Data Warehouse is the centralized data store for all SHARP data.

• ADW houses the metrics and algorithms used to calculate the Training Figure of Merit (TFOM) used in DRRS-N to describe the training capability of a Mission Essential Task (MET)

Data Management – ADW

52

Page 53: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

SHARP - Reports

• Units should review the various SHARP reports when assessing training readiness in DRRS-N.

• These reports provide a comprehensive picture of the Ef and Pf elements that make up the TFOM in DRRS-N.

• These reports also provide the basis for the CO to make comments in DRRS-N that explain which skills are required to achieve MCO readiness levels.

• Two useful reports for assessing the T Pillar in DRRS-N Current Readiness Assessment (CRA) Crew METs with Individual Skills Report

53

Page 54: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

SHARP - Reports

• Current Readiness Assessment (CRA) The CRA is submitted by the unit every 15 to update the T pillar in

DRRS-N Even though the CRA displays the Ef and Pf elements that make up

the TFOM scores in DRRS-N, is only provides an explanation the Ef scores.

HSM (CVW) Example54

Page 55: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

SHARP - Reports

• Crew METs with Individual Skills Report The Crew METs report explains the Pf side of the TFOM equation Since there is no Pf drill down data available in DRRS-N, this

report provides an means to understand which skill sets are deficient for each NTA

E-2C Example55

Page 56: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

56

CNO/USFFC• OPNAVINST 3501.360 (DRRS-N)• NRTP 1-03.5 (DRRS-N Manual)

TYCOM • CNAP/CNAL 3500.38(DRRS-N Supp)

CVN and T/M/S DRRS-N Guidance• CNAP/CNAL 3500.1 (T&R Matrix)

Determines T&R policy and format Contains T/M/S training matrices

Pf =Number of Skilled Crews

Number of Skilled Crews Required

TFOM = Pf x Ef

Pf = performance factor

Ef = Experience factor

Metric/Process Owner T-Pillar Metric

Ef =Number of SRS Items Completed

Number of SRS Items Required

Type Wing• Wing Training Manuals• T&R matrix mapping for each TMS

Pf =How skills are mapped in the IARS

# of Skilled Crews required per NTA

Ef =How SRS items are mapped to NTAs

Which SRS Items are required

T Pillar Metrics

Page 57: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Readiness Calculations – Performance Factor (Pf)

• The Performance factor is calculated for units with six crews or more using the equation on the right

• Units with five crews or less use fixed numbers (see table below)

Caveat: If Ef < 100, then Pf is held at 80.

Required Skilled Crews

Number of Skilled Crews Attained

1 2 3 4 5

1 100

2 50 100

3 33 66 100

4 25 50 75 100

5 20 40 60 80 100

Pf =100 x

Description Calculation Number of Skilled Crews

Number of Required Skilled Crews

57

Page 58: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Readiness Calculations – Experience Factor (Ef)

• The Experience factor is based on a unit’s ability to meet all the SRS requirements for each NTA as outlined in each T/M/S matrix

Number of SRS Items CompletedNumber of SRS Items Required

Ef = 100 x

Description Calculation

• The Ef value has two possible outcomes: If the unit completes all the SRS requirements, a maximum value of 100 is

assigned If one or more of the required SRS items is not completed, a value less than

100 is assigned

Reflects accomplishment of Aircrew and Squadron Qualifications Numeric Value between 0 – 100

58

Page 59: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Training NTAs are assigned a color in DRRS-N based on the TFOM calculated in ADW and NTIMS

• The unit updates the T (Training) pillar in DRRS-N by submitting a Current Readiness Assessment (CRA) from SHARP

• CRAs are submitted every 15 days or when readiness changes occur

TFOM = Pf x Ef

80-100

60-79

0 -59

T&R Calculations to DRRS-N

59

Page 60: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

• Know your average flight hour funding for 90 days to know your expected level of readiness for the end of that period

• You have to fly to get readiness (a GOOD thing)

• Logging really matters! Especially in skills that cross multiple NTAs

• Management of the SHARP Program is critical Training Officer, AOPS T&R and syllabus both have to factor into how your write your flight schedule

• Understand your readiness expectations

• Know what your R+ months are throughout your FRTP cycle

• Use the SHARP CBR skills report to explain Pf degradations in DRRS-N

Keys to Success

60

Page 61: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

CDR Timothy “Tonto” Young T&R Officer

SHARP Program Manager 619-767-7745

LCDR Roy “Os” DeCosterNCEA Manager757-836-8239

Points of Contact

Contractor Support Leads

CNAL SupportMr Chris Soler 757-836-8243

CNAL_NFLT_N40_T&[email protected]

CNAP SupportMr. Jim McDonald 619-767-7748Mr. Tim Leonard 619-767-1191CNAP_T&R@navy.(smil.)mil

Mr. Dan ScholtesLead SHARP Support Rep

757-270-0955

Mr. Mark BurgunderSHARP Aviation Support Programs

619-249-442661

Page 62: Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Questions?