10
10/5/21 1 THE CHILD ATTACHMENT &PLAY ASSESSMENT(CAPA) TRAINING Using narrative stems to assess attachment, play and mentalizing in children aged 3-11 years By Dr Steve Farnfield Trainers: Dr Steve Farnfield, and Fan Zhang 1 PRACTICAL COURSE INFORMATION Three teaching blocks: 3+3+2 days. Each day between 10:30 and 16:30 with lunch and coffee breaks. Lunch between 12:45 and 13:45. Sessions will be video recorded with consents and available on Vimeo. All information on Slack. Fan can be contacted via Slack or email. Steve can be contacted via email. All practice videos on the CAPA’s website. For tech support, go to Fan. 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE WITH THE CAPA? Distinguish between safe and at-risk children Identify DMM attachment strategies Assess mentalizing in children Screen for unresolved loss and trauma Develop interventions 3 AIM OF PART 1 Understanding of the theories and models underpinning the CAPA. Become familiar with the DMM attachment strategies. Become familiar with the procedural elements of the CAPA and able to give codable interviews. Understanding of the coding process and the constructs used. Able to recognise and code the following strategies: Bs, A1-2 and C1-2. 4 THE CAPA-NARRATIVE STEMS A doll play procedure. The interviewer gives the child the beginning of a story (the stem) and asks the child to “show me and tell me what happens next”. Can be used with children aged from 37 months to about 11 years. Video recorded: the coder’s main source of information. 5 THE HISTORY OF THE INSTRUMENT Established by the MacArthur Working Group (Bretherton et al., 1990) The prototype coding system by Robinson and colleagues (2004). There have been various additions and modification by other groups, for example, the Anna Freud Centre’s version. Typically used a behavioural observation method and certain behaviours fall in categories which indicates a certain attachment strategy. The CAPA is more qualitative and dynamic. Behaviours are only expressions of their attachment FUNCTION! 6

CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

1

THE CHILD ATTACHMENT &PLAY ASSESSMENT(CAPA) TRAINING

Using narrative stems to assess attachment, play and mentalizing in children aged 3-11 years

By Dr Steve Farnfield

Trainers: Dr Steve Farnfield, and Fan Zhang

1

PRACTICAL COURSE INFORMATION

• Three teaching blocks: 3+3+2 days.

• Each day between 10:30 and 16:30 with lunch and coffee breaks.

• Lunch between 12:45 and 13:45.

• Sessions will be video recorded with consents and available on Vimeo.

• All information on Slack. Fan can be contacted via Slack or email. Steve can be contacted via email.

• All practice videos on the CAPA’s website. For tech support, go to Fan.

2

WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE WITH THE CAPA?

• Distinguish between safe and at-risk children

• Identify DMM attachment strategies

• Assess mentalizing in children

• Screen for unresolved loss and trauma

• Develop interventions

3

AIM OF PART 1

• Understanding of the theories and models underpinning the CAPA.

• Become familiar with the DMM attachment strategies.

• Become familiar with the procedural elements of the CAPA and able to give

codable interviews.

• Understanding of the coding process and the constructs used.

• Able to recognise and code the following strategies: Bs, A1-2 and C1-2.

4

THE CAPA-NARRATIVE STEMS

• A doll play procedure.

• The interviewer gives the child the beginning of a story (the stem) and asks

the child to “show me and tell me what happens next”.

• Can be used with children aged from 37 months to about 11 years.

• Video recorded: the coder’s main source of information.

5

THE HISTORY OF THE INSTRUMENT

• Established by the MacArthur Working Group (Bretherton et al., 1990)

• The prototype coding system by Robinson and colleagues (2004).

• There have been various additions and modification by other groups, for

example, the Anna Freud Centre’s version.

• Typically used a behavioural observation method and certain behaviours fall in

categories which indicates a certain attachment strategy.

• The CAPA is more qualitative and dynamic. Behaviours are only expressions of

their attachment FUNCTION!

6

Page 2: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

2

THE CAPA-UNDERPINNING IDEAS

• Two discrete but connected behavioural systems: attachment –

play/exploration.

• Crittenden’s DMM: developmental and dynamic

• Winnicott’s potential space: inner and external reality and the development of mentalizing in children

• Mentalising: thinking about thinking- evaluating others’ internal experiences

7

IT FURTHER DRAWS ON:

• Constructs in MacArthur & Story Stem Assessment Profile (Hodges et al.,

2003;2009) Coding Systems

• Play therapy with traumatized children

• Observation of children’s behaviours in the DMM Strange Situation Procedure(PAA)

• Discourse markers and constructs in the DMM-Adult Attachment Interview

• Porges polyvagal theory

8

CONSTRUCTS USED IN CODING

• The child’s relationship with the interviewer

• Child’s level of physiological arousal: with or without attachment functions

• Social engagement signals (body langauge)

• Discourse, either verbal or in the play (telling or showing)

• Mentalising: play based categories developed around the potential space

• Markers and patterns for unresolved trauma, unresolved loss and depression

• DMM modifiers: intrusion of forbidden negative affect (INA) , expressed somatic signs (ESS), reorganising (R) and

• Quasi-autistic (QA) which is unique to the CAPA

9

VALIDATION

• Farnfield, S (2015) The child attachment and play assessment (CAPA): validation

of a new approach to coding narrative stems with children ages 3 to 11 years. International Journal of Play Therapy.

• Farnfield, S (202) Report to the Mulberry Bush School: attachment, trauma and play.

• In progress: the CAPA, heart rate variability & play therapy (Hadiprodjo); the

CAPA, HRV, cortisol & alpha-amylase (Zhang).

• Validity: the CAPA reliably discriminates between at risk and normative insecure children.

10

THE LEARNING PROCESS

• Underpinning theories: attachment strategies, functions of behaviours and

physiology

• Information from the constructs used in the CAPA coding process

• Exemplars: what does this video remind you of?

• Calibration: what are your tendencies as a coder? What process fits me best?

How does my coding fit with in a group?

11

EXAMPLE OF THE CAPA

• 6-8 stories

• Two different sets depending on the child’s age: preschool (3-8 yrs) and school

age (8-11 yr), but not hard and fast!

• Dramatisation at the point of conflict then invite the child to show or tell what happens next

• Ask thinking and feeling questions

• Practice makes perfect

• Watch Hannah

12

Page 3: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

3

CRITTENDEN’S DMM

• A theory of attachment in its own right

• A testable set of constructs that have greater explanatory power regarding the

identified range of maladaptive behaviours than is provided by the mainstream ABC+D model.

• Adaptive strategies that promote self protection and survival, sometimes under conditions of great danger to the self or attachment figures.

• Opportunity for sex and reproduction is critical.

• Patterns of behaviours than becomes organized based around the functions of

the self protective strategies.

13

DMM ATTACHMENT

STRATEGIES

• Developmental potential limits the variety of strategies, as well as dangers one is exposed to.

• Strategies are not fixed for life. It changes with the context :dynamic maturation.

• As the context becomes more complex, one can have more than one strategy: adaptation.

14

DMM ATTACHMENT STRATEGIES

15

DMM ATTACHMENT STRATEGIES

16

DMM ATTACHMENT STRATEGIES

• Again, not hard and fast, the

strategies depend on the complexity of the child’s life

context, as well as chronological age.

• A8 imitation is coded for children in the CAPA.

17

PLAY AND EXPLORATION

• Equally important for survival

• Pretend play and mental representation development: theory of mind, 4-6

years.

• Based on observed and experienced life scripts: enactment

• Used as an opportunity to mentally process own experiences: exploration in

play

• In infancy and preschool years, play is constrained when they don’t feel safe (A and C strategies) and given full rein when they do (B strategies).

18

Page 4: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

4

WINNICOTT’S POTENTIAL SPACE

• A third place between the infant’s inner self and outer reality

• A kind of mental lap where the infant, with the help of mother, learns how to

play

• Exploration can take place without real world consequences, thus the freedom to be myself and find out who ME is

• Safety (secure attachment) maximises the opportunity to bring the real world and play world together

19

ATTACHMENT AND PLAY IN POTENTIAL SPACE

• Type A inhibited; externally generated information

• Type B playful, integrated – the foundation of reflective functioning/theory of

mind

• Type C affect led; acts on internally generated information

20

WHAT DOES THE CAPA ACTUALLY ASSESS?

Attachment or exploration?Or both?

21

A DEVELOPMENTAL APPROACH

• The child’s behaviours with the interviewer is based on previous experience with attachment figures built up since birth.• This enactment of previous experience is largely

unconscious or preconscious.

22

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NARRATIVE SELF

0-2m

Affect regulation

2-4m

Turn taking

4m-2 yrs

language

2-6yrs

Peer interaction

6 yrsonwards

Narrative self

23

CONSTRUCTS USED IN CODING

• The child’s relationship with the interviewer and social engagement signals

• Child’s level of physiological arousal

• Discourse, either verbal or in the play (telling or showing)

• Play based categories developed around the potential space: mentalizing

• Markers for unresolved trauma/loss and depression, etc.

24

Page 5: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

5

RELATIONSHIP WITH THE INTERVIEWER AND SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT SIGNALS

• How does the child deal with the stranger (the interviewer) socially?

• How is their connection?

• What are the social engagement signals (body language and facial expressions)?

• And most importantly, what are the functions of these signals?

25

DO YOU SPEAK MY LINGO?

26

27 28

29

SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT SIGNAL S

• Can be clear and explicit; fleeting; subtle.

• Meant to be perceived by the other side of the social

relationship to communicate what we want them to see.

• Some universal and some culturally specific.

• Important for us to understand the function of a person’s

attachment strategies: how does the child want to be perceived?

30

Page 6: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

6

SYNCHRONY PROMOTES SELF REGULATION AND

MENTALISING

31

UNMATCHED SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT IS

UNCOMFORTABLE

32

USE WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED

Ayeesha CARE-Index video

Questions:

- How does Ayeesha want to be perceived by her mum?

- What did she do to achieve this? Or what social engagements signals did she use?

- Was it effective in the relationship?

33

THE FUNCTION OF SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT SIGNALS

• “same” behaviours may not mean the same thing or have the same functions

• How can we tell?

Contingencies! • What happened just before and after the signal? In other word, what in the

interaction activated the need for this signal and what effect did it achieve?

• Compare smiles in Shanice and Precious

34

LEVEL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AROUSAL

• Polyvagal theory: the vagus acts as a brake for the sympathetic and

parasympathetic nervous systems’ balance.

• Physiological regulation is important for social engagement - otherwise, it’s fight/flight or freeze.

• There are bodily indicators of physiological arousal.

• Differentiate behaviours with sensory integration/regulatory purposes and social engagement signals.

• Watch Chloe

35

DISCOURSE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING

• The information comes from all senses and and the mind needs to organiseand make sense of it.

• The mind unconsciously processes information about danger, safety and comfort in an attachment context.

• Sources: internal V.S. external

• Information types: cognition V.S. affect

The brain maintains a representation of what goes on in the body.

Feeling is the conscious experience of emotion.

Damasio, 2000

36

Page 7: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

7

DISPOSITIONAL REPRESENTATION-CRITTENDEN FOLLOWING DAMASIO

• The information we receive is constantly being re-worked according to

perceived level of threat

• This information forms mental representations (consciously and unconsciously) of every interaction we have. For example, think ‘mother’ and you will have a multitude of representations accounting for the many different interactions with your mother

• A DR of attachment is a disposition to act that connects the person to the context in a particular way, using information that they already know to predict

the outcome of this action

37

BOWLBY-DEFENSIVE EXCLUSION

• The exclusion of information which, if we allowed it to reach conscious

processing, would cause us to suffer more than we do now.

• The basis of psychoanalytical defences.

• What was said and what was omitted are equally important.

38

INFORMATION: COGNITION AND AFFECT

Sensory Stimulation

Temporal order

Cognition

intensity

Affect

39

COGNITION

• Temporal order- what follows what

“Mum took out the cake. Then the boy saw it.”

• Conditions: if/then; when/then

“When my father was drinking, I knew I had to stay out of his way”

• Causations: who/what lead to what

“He broke the glass because it was slippery.”

40

AFFECT

• Information from all 5 senses

• Physiological arousal – motivates action

• All significant memories are imaged and written in the body

41

COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE MEMORY SYSTEMS

Cognition Affect

Implicit Procedural Memory

From birth

Imaged Memory

From birth

Explicit Semantic Memory

3 yrs onwards

Connotative Language

3-4 yrs onwards

42

Page 8: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

8

PROCEDURAL MEMORY

• Rapid, preverbal and preconscious – can be inaccurate

• ‘Knowing how’ to do something e.g. knowing how to ride a bike.

• In terms of attachment – what has the child learned about the likely response

of the parent if they show distress (what the Strange Situation Procedure

• assesses)

• Information about ‘when’ in the sequence a particular event will occur

43

IMAGED MEMORY

• Preverbal and preconscious – can be erroneous

• Any significant memory is imaged

• Represents sensory aspects of the context and is linked to previous

experiences – leads to changes in arousal

• Images of touch, taste and smell are particularly powerful

• Information about ‘where’ an event might happen

• The sickening taste that goes everywhere with the child who feels rejected by

his parents

44

SEMANTIC MEMORY

• Develops with language from second year of life

• ‘when…then…’ / ‘if…then…’ statements

• Includes family scripts about how to behave (“Mum needs to know where I am

so that she knows I am safe”) and can be used to blame someone else (“Dad didn’t say I couldn’t go there”)

• Borrowed - Children adopt observations from others about their own behaviour

• In terms of attachment – what does the child think about themselves based on

existing family scripts

45

CONNOTATIVE LANGUAGE

• Verbal counterpart of imaged memory – introduced by Crittenden

• Used to increase or decrease affect on both speaker and listener;

• Taunting chants used to evoke an emotional response: evocative

• Used to control or down regulate arousal – e.g. using a‘mantra’: plain and dry

• Affects how we and others feel – feeds into disposition to act

• How does the the speaker use language to regulate their own and the listener’s emotions

46

EPISODIC MEMORY-THE STORY TELLING

• Develops from the third year of life

• Integrates cognitive and affective information

• Pre-school children need guidance from parents who can also teach children

what to include, omit, distort – important because this is how children make meaning of past events

• Involves reactivation of neural networks at the time of the event and also networks that represent the state of self in the present

• Important subset is source memory –where has the information come from?

How do I know what I know

47

INTEGRATIVE OR WORKING MEMORY

• LeDoux (2002) calls it a work space

• Refers to the process by which information from all the other systems

becomes consciously available

• Active process in which past and present information is integrated to form new DRs

• Time consuming – Under conditions of threat and perceived danger we don’t have this time – revert to an old DR that might not be as adaptive

48

Page 9: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

9

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

• Refers to coherence of speech and coherence of play

• We are more interested in HOW the story is told than what it is about.

• Defensive exclusion in action: what should be said but is not present in the story telling?

49

A STRATEGIES DISCOURSE

• Removes negative affect from conscious processing

• Blames the self

• Exonerates parents

• GTO – good temporal order

• Tend to be connotatively flat but there are exceptions

• Information is biased towards external source: parental perspective

50

C STRATEGIES DISCOURSE

• Uses feelings to organise thinking

• Uses own perspective: internal source

• PTO – poor temporal order

• ROS – run on speech

• Uses evocative and imaged language to increase or maintain arousal

51

B STRATEGIES DISCOURSE

• GTO Good temporal order

• Coherent - dysfluency does not transform meaning

• Easy repair of breakdown in communication

• Integrates feeling and thinking

• Thoughtful, high mentalising

• Humour

52

EXAMPLE

• Two “Spilt Juice” stories told by two children

53

MENTALISING

“Mentalization … is the process by which we realize that having a mind mediates our experience of the world” and as such “is intrinsically linked to the development of the self” (Fonagy et al. 2004:3).

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E.L., and Target, M. (2004) Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of Self. London: Karnac Books.

54

Page 10: CAPA teaching slides Part 1 handout

10/5/21

10

MENTALISATION

“The mental world can feel either totally real or totally unreal to a young child, and we suggest that playing with reality, making the real unreal and vice versa, is the principal avenue for the development of mentalization” (ibid page 18).

55

MENTALISATION AND ATTACHMENT

• “Attachment has been selected by evolution as the principal “training ground”

for the acquisition of mentalization.”( Fonagy et al 2014).

• For Fonagy the evolutionary function of mentalising is to develop social co-operation in humans.

• There is a primacy given to high level mentalising over distortions of mentalising (cf. secure v insecure attachment).

• Thinking about other people’s minds guides how we behave around them.

56