Upload
kerrie-carson
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CAMA
Separate Funding from State Agency - Municipality Budgets
DHS – LE – DA – Medical – Mental Health
Investigative Case Work Done Together
Information Sharing
Outcomes – Open System
Collective Decisions
DA to Judiciary
3 Major Areas of Child Abuse
Child Advocacy Center
Facility Based Multidisciplinary Approach to the Investigation and Prosecution of Child Abuse.
Child Advocacy Centers
Investigations Services by Protocol
Calendar Year 2010:
5881Children Served
72% Sexual Abuse
National Children's Alliance
Non Profit – Washington DCEstablished 1985DOJ Recognizes NCA
National Organization in this Field
NCA Accreditation
Well Established High Standards Essential and Rated Criteria 5 Year Cycle 2010 New Standards
Across the State Updated Services
2010 New Standards
Initial Trainings Peer Reviews Ongoing Training Evidence Based – Research
DocumentationLibrary National Children’s Advocacy Center Huntsville Alabama
10 Component Accreditation Model
Organization Capacity MDT Cultural Competency / Diversity Medical Mental Health Forensic Interviewing Case Review Case Tracking Facility Victim Advocacy
3rd Year State ReviewEssential NCA Accreditation
Components
NCA Site Reviewer
Guidance on Rated Criteria –Re- Accreditation Review – Year 5
Our Great State!!
Private / Public Partnerships 50% CAMA to 50% Private Funding Not all CAC – Seek out Private Funds
For Those That Do Good Investment !!!
Washington County 2011 – Great Job Re-Acredication
Technical Assistance Center
Accreditation Components
Facility – Jay, Oklahoma
Organizational Capacity Board of Director’s
District Attorney's Office
Policy / Procedures
Annual Audits of Each Center
Meeting Routine
Victim Advocacy New Standards 2010
Very Detailed on Supporting the Child And Non – Offending Care Givers Through the Process – System – Child Feelings / Actions
Case Review - Tracking Process by which CAC share and collaborate
on cases and maintain on going records for review until closure of case as determined by MDT
Systemic Information Accountability
Review Process for CAC 2002 – Legislated to NCA Standards for CAC Accreditation Process Neutral Reviewers
Switch Gears
WHY – CAMA Funding
Protecting Oklahoma’s Children--Who is ResponsibleStudy 1988 - 1989
Past
Ryan Luke to Kelsey Briggs
Ten Years Between
Present
*
Future Build Upon the Current CAC and FSMDT Create a Check and Balance System
Securing a System Where
Joint Investigative Services
are Routinely Conducted
County Based Services Strong Practice Implementation Quality Service Delivery Continual Improvement Evidence Based Practices Best Practices