8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
M t. M
yr t u s s a
Temple of
Zeus Olympios
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
Life and Works
Callimachus o Cyrene was he mos imporan poe o he Hellenisic age. He
lived a he momen o ransiion rom he classical world o old Greek
ciy-saes o he new oundaion o Polemaic Alexandria in Norh Arica—a
megaciy ha atraced people o diverse ehniciies rom locaions hroughou
he Medier- ranean. Faciliaed by his new environmen, Callimachus
appropriaed he li- erary pas and posiioned himsel beween poery as
perormance in radiional
venues and he new possibiliies afforded by he ex. His poems
conain explicisaemens on poeic aesheics, ofen consruced as
responses o his “criics.” Wheher hese saemens were serious
and sysemaic, or playul, and wheher his enemies were real, or
ficional oils o dramaize his own aesheics, he was unique in his
expression o wha consiued excellence in conemporary poeics. His
insisence on his own poeics as “new” in combinaion wih his composi-
ions in muliple genres provoked requen and coninuous imiaion among
laer poes o boh Greece and Rome.
His was a remarkable creaive range. His poery included hymns,
epigrams, iambic poery ( Iambi and he Ibis), an
elegiac poem o 4,000–6,000 lines on he origins o culic pracices
hroughou he Greek-speaking Medierranean ( Aetia), a hexameer
poem o abou 1,000 lines on an early exploi o Teseus and he bull o
Marahon (Hecale), vicory odes, and encomia o kings and queens.
According
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 26/344
Introduction 5
and he firs line rom a poem ha seems o have been writen or he
marriage o Arsinoe II o her ull broher, Polemy II (r. 392 P.), an
even ha occurred
beween 279 and 274 . Callimachus also wroe on Arsinoe II’s
deah (r. 228
P.), which ell in 270 . wo oher ragmenary poems now incorporaed ino
he Aetia eaure Berenice II, he daugher o Magas he king o
Cyrene and wie o Polemy III: he Victory of Berenice , a he
opening o Aetia book 3, commemo- raes he queen’s chario
vicory a he Nemean Games in eiher 245 or 241; he
Lock of Berenice , which ends he Aetia ,
commemoraes her marriage o Polemy III Euergees in, probably, 246.
According o he Suda , Callimachus also wroe poems (now los) on
he Gauls (he Galatea) and on Argos (he Foundation of
Argos , he Arrival of Io), opics ha seem calculaed
o suppor he sel-ashioning
o he ruling dynasy. 3
Callimachus’ connecion wih Cyrene and Alexandria is no in
doub, bu asserions ha he raveled elsewhere are more problemaic. An
Ahe- nian inscripion ha liss conribuors o a special levy o aid he
sae includes he name Callimachus, wihou urher qualificaion. I has
recenly been re-daed o a period well wihin he poe’s lieime (around
247 ), and hereore i may in- dicae his presence in Ahens (Oliver
2002: 6); Callimachus was no, however, an uncommon name a Ahens (c.
RE s.v. Kallimachos 1–3).
Furher biographic deails are less cerain. Te Suda claims ha
he was a
schoolmaser (γραμματικς) in he Alexandrian suburb o Eleusis (1 P.),
al-hough zezes (14c P.) assers ha he was a νεανσκος τς ας (“a youh
o he cour”), a rank incompaible wih he posiion o an elemenary
school eacher. Cameron argues persuasively ha oher members o his
amily were highly placed, including a number who were known o be
Cyrenaic philosophers (1995: 3–5). Why or when Callimachus moved
rom Cyrene o Alexandria is no known, and how long he resided in one
or he oher ciy is equally unclear. Be- ween 275 and 246 he wo ciies
were echnically a war. Probably his did no
require all raffic beween hem o cease; more probably exchanges
coninued, aleas sporadically, especially in he long period o he
berohal o Magas’ daugher Berenice o he son o Polemy II (c.253–246).
Where Callimachus spen hese
years is no known, hough his poem on he deah o Arsinoe
suggess ha he was in Alexandria a leas in 270. According o Ahenaeus
(6.252), Callimachus re- corded in his Pinakes ha one
Lysimachus wroe on he educaion o Atalus. Te firs Atalus o Pergamum
ook he hrone only in 241, so i Ahenaeus’ saemen is accurae, hen
Callimachus mus sill have been wriing in 240, or even laer.
A conroversial piece o evidence or Callimachus’ chronology is
he elegiac epinician or Sosibius (rr. 384 and 384a P.). Ahenaeus
(4.144) claims ha
3. For he successors o Alexander, he Gauls had come o occupy he
ideological space ha he Persians held in he Classical age; and he
Polemaic house raced is Greek lineage rom Argos, see
hAth Inroducion.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 27/344
6 C A L L I M A C H U S
his elegy was writen or a Sosibius who lived and wroe in he cour o
Cas- sander o Macedon. Cassander died in 297 , so i he idenificaion
is correc, he elegy would be Callimachus’ earlies known work,
belonging some ime in
he 290s, and his presupposes a birhdae no laer han 320–315. Mos
scholars now believe ha Ahenaeus was wrong and ha he subjec o he
elegy was he noorious advisor o Polemy IV, he Sosibius laer
responsible or he deah o Berenice II. In his case, he poem could no
have been writen much beore 240 and may have been as lae as 230. Te
epinician (r. 384 P.) isel is ambiguous: in lines 39–41
Callimachus’ speaker remarks: κ δ διαου, | Λαγεδη, παρ σο
πρτον εθοφορεν | ε
λ μεθα, Πτολεμ[α]ε (“we chose firs o win a
vicory in he diaulos near by you, Polemy son o Lagus”). I he
vocaive reers o he
living Soer, hen he poeic subjec mus be he earlier Sosibius, bu i
he even recalled is he Ptolemaia , he esival esablished
by Philadelphus c. 276 o honor his deceased aher, he epinician mus
be or he laer Sosibius, and he aposrophized Polemy no he living
sovereign bu he deified Soer heralded as proecor o he
games.4 As a corollary, Callimachus’ birh would need o all
around 305 (o accommodae he daing o hZeus o around 284) and his
deah someime afer 240. In his commenary I ollow he laer
daing.
Callimachus lived in Alexandria, a ciy ha had been ounded wihin a
genera-
ion o his birh. His was no he ciy described by Srabo, who was
wriing a heend o he firs cenury , bu a ciy in he process o being
buil: high levels o immigraion, dynamic physical changes, and rapid
growh would have persised during his lieime. Tis earlier ciy had
some sor o walls (he firs menion o
which is acually by Callimachus in Iambus 1),
palace environs, and he Museion (which may or may no
have included he Library). Te lighhouse was buil be- ween 297 and
285; he sadium ( Lageion) was probably compleed by he ime o
he Ptolemaia. Polybius is he firs o menion he heaer (15.30.4)
and a Tesmo-
phorion (15.29.8) in connecion wih he evens o 203/202, hough hese
may well have been earlier consrucions since documens reer o
esivals o Demeer as early as 257 (Perpillou-Tomas 1993:
78–81).5 Callimachus himsel provides evidence or he Cape
Zephyrium emple dedicaed o Arsinoe- Aphrodie and or Arsinoe’s
moruary emple. Tese were likely o have been consruced afer
Arsinoe II’s deah in 270, and he later seems never o have
been finished. Wihin his rapidly expanding civic environmen,
he Greek communiy was
a diverse mix. o judge rom papyrus evidence drawn rom he res o
Egyp,
4. See Fraser 1972: 2.1004–5 or a ull discussion.
5. For deails o Alexandrian monumens organized chronologically, see
McKenzie 2007: 32–79.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 29/344
8 C A L L I M A C H U S
for Helen and Menelaus ( Idyll 18) has close
verbal parallels in he Hymn to Athena (F. Griffihs 1979:
89–90). Araus o Soli (c.315–240 ) wroe he Phaenomena , a
didacic reamen o Eudoxus’ asronomy ha was subsequenly o grea
influence
on Lain poery. He probably wroe in he cour o Anigonus Gonaas o
Macedon, and he may never have been in Alexandria. Noneheless, he
proem o Zeus and oher passages in he Phaenomena have
clear parallels wih Callimachus’ hymns, even hough prioriy canno be
esablished (Cuypers 2004: 102). Epigrammaiss rom a variey o
locaions also achieved prominence during his period. Teir epi-
grams, ofen imiaing earlier sone inscripions, were beginning o be
colleced ino poery books. Te mos imporan o hese wriers were
Asclepiades o Samos and Posidippus o Pella. A roll o more han a
hundred epigrams o he later, daable
o he lae hird cenury , was firs published in 2001. Te epigrams o
his new collecion share many eaures in common wih Callimachus’
poery, including an emphasis on he ahleic vicories o Polemaic
queens.
Apollonius o Rhodes, whose surviving poem is he epic
Argonautica , is hough o have been a naive Alexandrian
and a slighly younger conemporary o Callimachus. He ollowed
Zenodous as head o he Alexandrian Library. Te Suda makes him
Callimachus’ μαθητς ( 11a P.). Few scholars believe Apol- lonius
was in ac Callimachus’ pupil, bu he erm does imply a degree o
arisic
closeness ha is borne ou by he poems. A ew examples will suffice o
illusraehe relaionship beween he Argonautica and he
hymns: Apollonius’ poem has a hymnic opening and closing (1.1–2 and
4.1773–81); he beginning o he Ar-
gonautica includes reerences o Zeus, Apollo, and Aremis
(1.508–9, 536–39, 569–72) ha parallel momens in Callimachus’ firs
hree hymns respecively; he scene o Zeus’s childhood on Cree appears
wice, once in he conex o Orpheus’ cosmogony (1.508–9) and hen a he
opening o book 3. Aphrodie’s descripion o he ball given o Zeus by
his nurse Adraseia includes several allu-
sions o hZeus
(e.g., 3.134: τι νπια κουρζοντι = hZeus
54: μ σεο κουρζοντος);finally, he narraives o Paraebius and o
Phineus in book 2 are parallel o he paired narraives o
hAth and hDem , see p. 22.7
Te exac chronology o Callimachus’ conemporaries will coninue o be
dis- pued, no leas because hey evidenly wroe in response o each
ohers’ exs. Bu we know so litle abou sraegies o poeic
exchange—wheher inormal or public—ha asserions abou allusive
prioriy mus be made wih exreme cau- ion. Te obviously shared subjec
mater o hese poes indicaes a rich and very ineracive poeic
environmen, while also suggesing he growing imporance o he ex as a
viable poeic and ideological medium.
7. See Sephens 2003: 200–10 (on hZeus, hAp); Köhnken 2003 (on hAp,
hDelos); Eichgrün 1961: 111–18 (on hArt ).
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
Te Hymnic radition and Callimachus’ Hymns
Hymns were among he oldes and mos enduring elemens in wha comes
o
be he Greek poeic reperory. Hymns survive on sone and in
manuscrips rom he earlies recorded wriing o he end o aniquiy. Tey
ake many orms over ime, and share many eaures wih choral song; in
essence, hey were ormal ad- dresses o a god or group o gods on
behal o a communiy. Ta address could call upon he god in he second
person (someimes called Du-Stil) or speak abou he god in he
hird person (someimes called Er-Stil), or speak in he firs
person on behal o he group. Hymns may have been sung by a communal
group in unison, or perormed by a chorus wih musical accompanimen
and dance, or
perormed by a solo singer. Tey migh even be in prose like he
so-called Isis arealogies.
radiionally, scholars have divided hymns ino culic, rhapsodic, and
lierary, depending on he assumed conex o perormance and audience.
Culic hymns
were sung and/or danced perormances or specific deiies and in
specific loca- ions (e.g., he Palaikasro hymn o Zeus, paeans o
Apollo a Delphi). o he exen ha hey survive, hey were inscribed on
sone (like he Palaikasro hymn) or cied in a laer Greek auhor (see,
or example, he hymn cied by Aelian, which
is discussed in he inroducion o hAth). Hymnlike lyric monody can be
oundin he archaic poes (e.g., Sappho, Alcaeus, Alcman, Pindar,
Bacchylides), hough scholars are divided abou wheher hey were
perormed in culic environmens in real ime (see, e.g., Ahanassaki
2009: 242–43). Hymns were also a prominen eaure wihin he choruses o
Greek ragedy and comedy, and hese examples, al- hough removed rom
local perormance, are helpul in undersanding he sruc- ure and
ubiquiy o he genre (see, e.g., Swif 2010). Cul hymns vary in lengh:
many are under hiry lines; ohers well over a hundred. Bu he ormal
elemens
o all ypes o hymns are more or less consisen, which promps he
ollowingschemaic:8
1. Te invocaion (epiklesis), or summoning o he diviniy. Te name
will naurally occur a he beginning o a hymn, accompanied by relevan
cul iles and epihes. In his ormal opening here may be a genealogy
ha links he god o a paricular place (see, e.g., hZeus 5–14),
and com- panion deiies may also be menioned.
2. Praise o he diviniy (eulogia, euphemia). Tis has various pars ha
may be more or less elaboraed. Tey include a lising o he
god’s
8. See Furley and Bremer 2001: 1.1–64 or a ull discussion o hymnic
orms, and hroughou or examples o Greek hymns.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 31/344
10 C A L L I M A C H U S
unique powers, reminders o pas benefis ha he god has conerred on
worshippers, a narraive o he god’s birh and relevan deeds o prowess
(e.g., killing he Pyho, deeaing he Gians), descripions o
he god’s avorie locales and aciviies, inerspersed hroughou wih
repeaed addresses.
3. Te prayer. Usually inroduced by χαρε or oher orm o χαρω, i
expresses he communiy’s graiude, or which i hopes or avor in reurn
(see, e.g., hZeus 91–94). Tis secion may include imperaives o
summon he god o appear.9
In addiion o culic, lyric, and dramaic hymns, hiry-hree hexameer
hymns
in an epic dialec were ransmited under he name o Homer, hough
composi- ional daes and provenances vary.10 Te majoriy o hem
are quie shor (3–22 lines), bu here are six major hymns ranging in
size rom ory-nine lines (o Pan) o 580 lines (o Hermes). Tere is
also a Hymn to Dionysus , rom which abou sixy o he original
400+ lines survive (see Wes 2011: 29–43). Tis hymn seems o have
opened he collecion in he manuscrip radiion. Mos o hese hymns begin
by naming he god in he hird person, or calling upon he Muses o help
he singer bes hymn he god, hough he hymns o Dionysus and
Apollo
open wih a Du-Stil address o he god himsel. Homeric hymns
coninue wihhe sandard atenion o he god’s birh, naure, and deeds, he
narraives o which in he hymns o Dionysus, Demeer, Apollo, Hermes,
and Aphrodie have been expanded over several hundred lines. Tey
close wih a greeing o he god (a his juncure he poe ofen uses he
firs person) and may call or anoher song (see, e.g.,
HhAphr 292–93: χαρε, θε, Κπροιο κτιμνης μεδουσα | σε δ’
γ ρξμενος μεταβσομαι ον ες μνον [“Hail, goddess, guardian o
well-culi-
vaed Cyprus. Having begun wih you, I will urn o anoher
hymn”]). Tey will
someimes have inernal reerences o perormance (see, e.g., HhAp
171–78).Homeric hymns are hough no o have been composed or a
specific culic even, bu are classified as “rhapsodic,” rom he
pracice in rhapsodic peror- mance o beginning wih
a prooimion or prelude o he main even wih a hymn (see
Pi. Nem. 2.1–5; [Plu.] De musica 6.1133). Te likely
locaion or peror- mance o hese hymns would have been rhapsodic
compeiions a Panhellenic ceners and also, as J. S. Clay (1989:
3–16) has suggesed, a banques. Tese
9. Menander Rheor (1.333–44 Russell-Wilson) divides hymns ino eigh
ypes, he mos sig- nifican o which are cleic (conaining invocaions o
he god); scienific, i.e., hose writen by philosophers expounding he
naure o he deiy; myhological; and genealogical. Elemens rom all o
hese ypes may be ound in Callimachus’ hymns.
10. See Faulkner 2011b: 7–16 or a discussion o daing o he
individual hymns. In his view almos all would have been writen by
300 , and hus available o Callimachus.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 33/344
12 C A L L I M A C H U S
or where he hymns were or could have been perormed.13 Wha
conuses he mater is ha Callimachus seems, as a composiional sraegy,
deliberaely o blur he dis- incion beween a one-ime real perormance
even and a careully conrived fic-
ion. He posiions his poems o be boh he mimesis o a specific even,
as he culic hymns seem o be, and he ex ha firs creaes, hen enables
he coninual recre- aion o he even (see Acosa-Hughes and Sephens
2012: 145–47). Finally he exen o which mimicry was already
incorporaed in ancien riual pracices, paric- ularly processions
(see, e.g., Connelly 2007: 104–15), migh be significan or Cal-
limachus’ composiional syle, especially in he case o he mimeic
hymns.
Tere can be no doub ha Callimachus consciously engages in a lierary
recol- lecion o earlier poeic pracice. In his reamen o culs in he
hymns he adaps
a lyric or hymnic persona, as he occasion demands. Bu he culic
inormaion in each o hese hymns, insoar as we can judge, accuraely
reflecs conemporary reli- gious pracices. Cerainly he locaions
Callimachus chooses o menion are ofen cul ceners o he deiy in
quesion ha are newly creaed or have been recenly revived (e.g., M.
Lycaeon in hZeus, Ephesus in hArt ). I is also imporan o
realize ha archaeologiss and scholars o ancien religion ofen rely
upon Callimachus’ hymns or local culic inormaion. While his by no
means guaranees ha Calli- machus’ inormaion is accurae, i does
guaranee ha expers have no ound i o
be in error or o conradic wha physical remains can ell hem.
14
Tere coninuedo be a wide range o perormance pracices in he
early Hellenisic period—esab- lished esivals like he Cyrenean
Carneia , newly esablished esivals in Polemaic
Alexandria (e.g., Basileia, Ptolemaia, Arsinoeia),
coninuing radiions o rhapsodic perormance, and symposia o he
Successors—a which Callimachus’ hymns could have been perormed,
alhough his is no o say ha hey were.
Te Hymns as a Collection
Wheher i is Callimachus himsel who is responsible or a laer
edior, he hymns give every indicaion o being a careully arranged
collecion a boh ormal and hemaic levels.
Te six hymns all ino hree pairs. HZeus and hAp locae heir
diviniies re- specively in Alexandria and Cyrene and insis on he
closeness o he wo di-
viniies—Apollo (hAp 29) sis a he righ hand o Zeus. Tese
wo, more han
13. For a summary o he debae wih relevan bibliography see Perovic
2011: 264–65. Huner and Fuhrer 2002 and Vamvouri Ruffy 2004 discuss
he heology o Callimachus’ hymns in he conex o early Polemaic
Alexandria; Perovic 2007, 2011 in erms o conemporary culic
pracices.
14. See, e.g., Billo 1997–98 on Argive legends or Laronde 1987:
362–65 on he Carneia.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 34/344
Introduction 13
he ohers, ocus on one specific area o concern or he diviniy: kings
or Zeus and song or Apollo. Boh eaure movemen rom norh o souh. Te
win chil- dren o Leo—Aremis and Apollo—are he subjecs o he nex wo
hymns,
which are also he longes. Boh diviniies move rom he cenral o
he easern Medierranean and boh hymns end wih vignetes o cul-sies
imporan o he Polemies—Ephesus and Delos respecively. Boh porray
hese cul-sies as under atack and successully deended. Boh are alive
wih culic song and dance. Te final pair eaure Ahena and Demeer in
closely parallel narraives (see Hopkin- son’s very ull analysis,
pp. 13–17). Boh are mimeic wih insered ales o young men rom whom he
goddess exacs reribuion: Ahena akes away he sigh o iresias or
accidenally seeing her as she bahed in he wild; Demeer
punishes
Erysichhon or deliberaely rying o cu down her sacred ree. In conras
o he firs our hymns writen in epic Ionic, hese wo are in he Doric
dialec.
Callimachus’ hymns reflec he Homeric hymns in he ollowing ways: he
opening o he firs hymn, hZeus , echoes he opening o he now
ragmenary HhDion , which may have been he firs hymn in he
earlier collecion, while he pre- cociy o Zeus owes somehing o
HhHerm. HArt depends on HhAp or is overall srucure:
like he earlier hymn, i alls ino wo pars, he firs o which seems o
provide closure, afer which he hymn begins again. HhPan has
influenced he Ar-
cadian secion o his hymn. HDelos reflecs he Delian porion o
HhAp. HDem exiss in counerpoin wih HhDem , and
hAth wih HhAphr. Finally, hAp reprises momens in
HhAp , bu is Cyrenean ocus and paeanlike rerain makes i he
leas “Homeric” o he hymns. (See urher Acosa-Hughes and Cusse
2012.)
Te order o he individual hymns describes an arc, wih he wo longes
in he cener; heir respecive lenghs are: 96 lines, 113 lines, 268
lines, 326 lines, 142 lines, and 138 lines. Hymns or wo male
diviniies open, hymns or wo emale diviniies close he group, and
hymns devoed o Aremis and Apollo and heir
moher Leo occupy he cener. wo-hirds o he way hrough he collecion
wefind Apollo prophesying he birh o Polemy II on Cos and his
subsequen rule over Egyp (hDelos 162–70). Te mimeic and
non-mimeic hymns are loosely inerwoven: non-mimeic (hZeus), mimeic
(hAp), non-mimeic (hArt ), non- mimeic (hDelos), mimeic
(hAth), and mimeic (hDem).
Te middle our all have large narraive secions on specific
culs—Cyrene, Ephesus, Delos, Argos; he flanking wo do no, hough
hZeus is surely or Al- exandria, and hDem is, according
o he scholias, also or Alexandria, hough a number o scholars have
argued or oher locaions (see p. 266). I he firs and las are cenered
on Alexandria, however, ha migh accoun or heir flanking posiions
and perhaps or heir lack o local specificiy.
Te firs our insis on he divine amily o Zeus, Leo, and heir wins.
Hera, when she does appear, is hosile o boh moher and
children. Zeus poinedly re- marks, “When goddesses would bear me
such children as his, I would have litle
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 35/344
14 C A L L I M A C H U S
concern or he jealousy o an angry Hera” (hArt 29–31).
Her wrahul pursui o he pregnan Leo hroughou he Medierranean prevens
Apollo’s birh. Te narraives include birh sories (hZeus, hDelos),
diviniies growing ino heir ma-
uriy (hZeus, hAp, hArt ); virgin goddesses (hArt, hAth);
goddesses punishing ransgressors (hArt, hAth, hDem). Maerniy is a
srong heme in he las hree; ahers and sons o a lesser exen in
hZeus and hDem.
Te hymns show a large number o unique verbal repeiions beween one
an- oher. Tese have been mos recenly sudied by Ukleja 2005: 21–108,
and many are indicaed in he noes below.
Te Hymns and the Ptolemies
When Polemy I Soer became king o Egyp, he was required o rule
wo dis- incly differen populaions: ehnic Greeks and Greek-speakers
immigraing ino he new ciy o Alexandria and he much larger naive
Egypian popula- ion o he chora. He solidified his hold exernally by
engaging in sraegic alliances and occasional wars wih his ellow
Diadochs, while inernally he suppored naive prieshoods in he
building o Egypian emples and engaged
in he riuals ha were essenial o Egypian belie. Te pharaoh was he
liaison beween he human and divine spheres and responsible or
cosmic and social order. Ta he Polemies ruled heir Egypian subjecs
as pharaohs is abun- danly clear rom rilingual inscripions like he
Pihom Sele and he Roseta Sone. Te ciy o Alexandria incorporaed
Egypian culs, such as ha o Isis, and Egypian ariacs seem o have
been impored o adorn i. Polemy II, or example, impored an obelisk
or his siser-wie’s unerary emple and he oundaions o he Serapeium
had inscripions in hieroglyphics as well as
Greek. Callimachus’ hymns (and Teocrius’ Idylls 15, 17,
and 24) include re-erences no only o he Polemies in heir role as
Greek sovereigns bu also ele- mens ha parallel myhs cenral o
pharaonic ideology (hese are indicaed in he noes on individual
hymns). Below is a lis o hose Polemies who figure in discussion o
he hymns, wheher in Greek or Egypian hisorical conex.
Ptolemy I (Soter) c.367–283, the son of Lagus. He was
one o Alexander’s gen- erals, who claimed Egyp as his porion in he
division o he empire a Alexan-
der’s deah in 323 . He had a number o children by Eurydice, he
daugher o Anipaer, including several sons. However, he divorced
Eurydice and married Berenice I, who gave him a leas our children,
hree o whom are imporan or he hymns: Arsinoe II, Polemy II, and
Philoera. He was deified wih Berenice I as Teoi Soteres afer
his deah.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 36/344
Introduction 15
Ptolemy II (Philadelphus) 308–246. He was he son o
Polemy I and Berenice I. Te younges o Polemy’s sons, he inheried he
hrone in preerence o his older
brohers. He firs married Arsinoe I, he daugher o Lysimachus o
Trace. Te
marriage produced a number o children, including Polemy III
(Euergees) and Berenice Syra. He hen married his ull siser, Arsinoe
II. He and Arsinoe were deified afer 270 as Teoi Adelphoi.
Arsinoe II 316–270. She was daugher o Polemy I and
Berenice I. She was firs married o Lysimachus o Trace rom 300/299
unil his deah in 281. Ten
briefly, and disasrously, o her hal-broher Polemy Ceraunus
(he son o Pol- emy I and Eurydice, and someime king o Macedon), who
was insrumenal in
killing her children by Lysimachus. Afer hese evens she reurned o
Egyp and married her ull broher someime beween 279 and 274. She
died in 270 and
was deified. Te emple a Cape Zephyrium, abou 15 miles eas o
Alexandria, was buil in her honor; here she was worshipped as
Arsinoe-Aphrodie. She was widely worshipped hroughou Egyp
proper, being co-empled wih naive gods. During her broher-husband’s
reign a number o ciies hroughou he Medier- ranean were renamed
“Arsinoe” in her honor.15
Philotera d. 272? She was he ull siser o Polemy II and
Arsinoe II. She diedshorly beore Arsinoe II and was deified, and
perhaps co-empled wih her siser in Alexandria (see Fraser 1972:
2.377n314). She is associaed wih Demeer in
Callimachus’ Ektheosis of Arsinoe (r. 228.43–45 P.). A
number o owns were named afer her.
Magas of Cyrene c.317 to 250. Te son o Berenice I and a
Philip o Mace- don, he ruled Cyrene as regen or his sepaher, hen
Polemy II, beore he re-
voled o become is sole ruler around 275 . His daugher,
Berenice II, was berohed o Polemy III Euergees and, afer
Magas’ deah, was finally married o him in 246.
Ptolemy III (Euergetes) c.284–222. He was associaed wih
his aher as co- regen and was sole ruler o Egyp rom 246 o 222. He
was berohed o Berenice II or several years beore he marriage in
246.
Berenice Syra c.280–246. Te daugher o Polemy II and
Arsinoe I, she was called “Syra” because o her marriage o he
Seleucid king, Aniochus II, who had
15. For a recen biography o his queen see Carney 2013.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 37/344
16 C A L L I M A C H U S
divorced his firs wie Laodice in order o marry her. Aniochus was
murdered shorly afer he deah o Polemy II in 246. Berenice claimed
he regency or her son, bu hey were quickly murdered. Posidippus has
writen a number o
epigrams or her vicories in chario-racing a he Panhellenic
games.16
Berenice II 267/266–222. Te daugher o Magas o Cyrene,
she married Polemy III. She is eaured in wo o Callimachus’ poems—he
Victory of Berenice (celebraing her chario vicory a he Nemean
games) and he Lock of Berenice (a dedicaion or he sae
reurn o her husband rom he Syrian war). Tese poems open he hird and
close he ourh book o he Aetia. She was murdered a he insigaion
o her son, Polemy IV.17
Dating the Hymns
I he hymns were an auhorially organized collecion, hey do no appear
o have been writen a he same ime. A a conservaive esimae,
here seems o be a range o five o en years beween hZeus and
hDelos , and possibly as much as a ory-year span beween
hZeus and hAp. Daes or individual hymns have been as-
signed by hree differen crieria: (1) inernal sylisic consideraions;
(2) evensor people menioned in he hymns or which an exernal dae can
be esablished; and (3) exual borrowings by or rom Callimachus or
sel-reerenialiy beween one and anoher o Callimachus’ poems. All
hree are problemaic, bu (1) and (3) especially so, since hey ofen
are based on scholarly preerences raher han demonsrable acs.
Inernal sylisic crieria include argumens abou mauriy o syle and
more objecive comparison o merical phenomena. Te crierion o mauriy
o syle,
when applied o his or ha hymn, ounders on he ac ha much o
Callima-chus’ ruly maure work, books 3-4 o he Aetia, is
now oo ragmenary o un- derpin he discussion. Argumens rom
predicable merical eaures have similar drawbacks. Alhough
Callimachus has clearly defined merical preerences or
boh his hexameers and his elegiac couples, he corpus o he
hexameer hymns is only 942 lines; he now ragmenary
Hecale would have been a leas as long, and here were oher
hexameer and elegiac poems ha have no survived. Tereore, he merical
daa rom he hymns are only parial and insufficien o gauge he validiy
o apparen rends. G. Kaibel’s (1877: 327) argumen or an
16. I ollow he scholarly consensus (bu noe ha Clayman 2014: 146–58,
ollowing Huss 2008, argues ha he Berenice in quesion is Berenice
II).
17. For a recen biography o his queen, see Clayman 2014.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 38/344
Introduction 17
order based on increasing presence o he bucolic dieresis, or
example, resuls in an ordering o hDem, hArt, hAth, hZeus, hAp,
hDelos. However, he apparen linear progression includes a large gap
beween he firs five (bucolic dieresis
omited once in every 11, 13, 17, 32, 40 lines) and hDelos
(omited once in 108 lines) ha does no fi well wih (2) exernal
crieria. I exernal crieria are acored in, he early dae or
hZeus would require he firs hree hymns o have been writen
beore or around 280 and all six o have been composed by c. 270.
While in principle here is nohing wrong wih his early assignmen o
he hymns, apar rom he crierion o increasing bucolic diereses, here
is litle o suppor i. Moreover, observaion o a differen merical
phenomenon, inci- dence o spondaic lines, yields a differen order:
he requency decreases rom
hZeus (15 per cen) o hDelos (3 per cen), hough his oo is
unlikely o corre- lae wih composiional order.
Exernal evens provide a slighly more reliable ool, hough his
crierion also suffers rom ediorial subjeciviy. O he six hymns, hose
eauring gods, hZeus, hAp, and hDelos, all menion
conemporary kings. While many scholars have dismissed hese
reerences in hZeus and hAp as convenional and see no need
o ideniy which king lies behind he remark (see, e.g., Williams
p.1), he reerence in hDelos is undeniably specific, and his
ac would miliae agains
hese oher reerences being generic. Furher, wheher a poem was ever
per-ormed or simply circulaed, is issuance, ipso facto , mus
have coincided wih he reign o one or anoher monarch whose exisence
would have condiioned a local audience’s response, a response o
which Callimachus could hardly have
been unaware, since he capialized on i in hDelos. Tus when he
Hymn to Zeus draws an explici parallel beween he swifness wih
which Zeus accomplishes his deeds and “our king” (86: μετρ
μεδοντι), he ideniy o he siting mon- arch will necessarily orm par
o he recepion. Allusions in he ex, in ac,
poin o wo: according o Jusin (13.4.10) “Egyp . . . ell o Polemy by
lo”( Ptolemaeo Aegyptus . . . sorte evenit ), an even o
which Callimachus seemingly al- ludes in lines 62–64 (Carrière
1969). He declares he sory ha Zeus and his
brohers drew los or heir domains o be an implausible ficion,
which in urn undermines any ale ha Polemy I go Egyp by chance as
opposed o capabil- iy or conques. Bu a ew lines beore (58–59)
Callimachus claimed ha Zeus’s siblings “alhough hey were older, did
no begrudge you heaven o hold as your alloted home.” Tis is a
unique and poined commen on he myhological divi- sion bu would no
apply o Polemy I. I does o Philadelphus. Te younges o Soer’s sons,
he acceded o he hrone while his older brohers lived. Te good-
will among hem did no las much beyond Soer’s deah, which
gives a narrow window or he allusion o be appropriae and hus
or he composiion o he hymn (roughly 285–280). Moreover, he explici
discussion o youh, growh, and coming-o-age makes sense or Polemy
II, who would have been 23 a he
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 40/344
Introduction 19
II, or a he very leas menion o two rulers. (Callimachus, afer
all, is no shy abou menioning his Cyrenean queen in he Aetia.)
Following Laronde (1987: 362), Cameron suggess raher ha he king is
Magas, an idenificaion srenghened
by he ac ha Magas was he eponymous pries o Cyrenean Apollo,
and ha Callimachus apparenly celebraes Magas in a now quie
ragmenary elegy (r. 388 P.). A scenario ha would accoun or he
single king and he srong em- phasis on marriage is ha he poem was
writen beore Magas’ deah in 250, a he ime when his daugher was
berohed o Euergees, bu beore hey became he ruling couple in 246. A
urher indicaion o dae may be he reerence o ζωστρες (85). I he word
was seleced o recall he cul ile Apollo Zoster and his
sancuary in Atica, he ac ha Zoser was orified a he ime o he
Chre-
monidean war (267–261), when he Polemaic empire was closely allied
wih Ahens, would locae he hymn no earlier han 267. However,
hese argumens are speculaive; he daing o his hymn is by no means
secure.
Argumens predicaed on he assumpion ha similariies beween he
sphragis o his hymn and he Aetia prologue require
hem o have been writen a he same ime are no cogen. Despie he ac ha
boh passages conain rebarbaive saemens abou poeic pracice, i he
Aetia prologue is lae (afer 246), here is no inheren
reason why Callimachus could no have writen he hymn wih
is sphragis much earlier. Apollo as Callimachus’ paron in boh
exs should noaffec he dae: he was he diviniy who oversaw poery, and
he was he paron deiy o Callimachus’ home ciy, Cyrene.
None o he hree hymns addressed o goddesses (Aremis, Ahena, Deme-
er) menions conemporary queens, hough Callimachus does so in
he Aetia. A simple inerence rom his is ha hese hymns were
writen when here were no queens—Polemy II married his siser, his
second wie, beween 279 and 274,
bu afer her deah in 270 he did no remarry. Egyp had no queen
unil Euer-
gees married Berenice II in 246 . Tere are, however, good reasons o
sus-pec emale members o he royal house may sand behind he goddesses
in hese hymns.
Te very close srucural parallels beween hDelos and
hArt sugges ha hey are conceived as a pair (despie he
differen reamen o bucolic dieresis). Nohing precludes he Hymn to
Artemis being writen well beore or well afer hDelos , bu
he ac ha he hymn ends wih so much atenion o Ephesus poins o a
conemporary conex. Ephesus was closely conneced o Arsinoe II. When
she was sixeen years old, she was firs married o Lysimachus, he
Diadoch
who ruled Trace and Asia Minor. Te marriage lased unil
Lysimachus’ deah. During he period when he conrolled Ephesus, he
buil a new own o he wes o he Aremision, which he named Arsinoe,
hough he name did no long survive his deah (Srabo 14.1.21). Te
connecion o Apollo wih Polemy II is over in hDelos; hereore i is
worh considering wheher Arsinoe II is o be idenified
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 41/344
20 C A L L I M A C H U S
wih Aremis, via her close associaion wih Ephesus.19 I
hDelos can only have been writen afer 275,
hArt migh well have been earlier, belonging o he period
o her marriage o Lysimachus and beore his deah (Ragone 2006:
74–77).20 I
he poem was writen afer he deah o Arsinoe II, a suiable ime period
would be beween 262, when Ephesus came under Polemaic conrol,
and 255, when i revered o he Seleucids. A decade laer he
relaionship was no so posiive. In he 250s Berenice Syra, he siser o
Polemy III, was married o Aniochus II,
who died in Ephesus in 246 under dubious circumsances, while
Berenice Syra hersel was murdered shorly hereafer. Polemy III hen
esablished a garrison a Ephesus, and i served as his base agains he
oher dynass or he duraion o his reign (Hölbl 2001: Appendix 262–246
).
No exernal evidence exiss or daing he las wo hymns, which also seem
o have been a ighly consruced pair, despie he ac ha hey are in di-
eren meers. For he daing o he Hymn to Athena we mus urn o (3)
ex- ual borrowings eiher by or rom Callimachus. hese are o limied
reliabiliy
because he relaive chronologies or poes wriing in early
Alexandria are no secure (see pp. 7–8). Sill, wih respec o
hAth 2, i seems clear ha he phrase ρτι φρυασσομενν was
subsequenly imiaed in an epigram ( AP 5.202) a- ribued
eiher o Asclepiades o Samos or Posidippus o Pella, in which
wo
hetairai engage in sexual comba. he overly sexual epigram
dicaes he di-recion o he borrowing: despie he repressed sexual
energy ha surrounds Callimachus’ porrai o Ahena, allusion o he
explici sexual behavior o prosiues is unlikely o belong o he hymn.
In he epigram Ahena’s mares
become “cols o he evening,” i.e., he young men being “ridden”
by he con- ending hetairai. O he wo epigrammaiss, he only secure
evidence or daing Asclepiades comes rom he 270s (Sens 2011: xxvi),
which would dicae an even earlier dae or he hymn. I he auhor o he
epigram was
Posidippus, he was he recipien o a proxeny decree in 263 or 262 a
her-mon in Aeolia. His recenly discovered collecion o epigrams
celebraes he equesrian vicories o Berenice I, Arsinoe II, and
Berenice Syra, bu appar- enly no Berenice II, whose vicory a he
Nemean games in 245 or 241 was he subjec o Callimachus’ Victory of
Berenice. Cameron (1995: 241–45) has argued ha he epigram in which
he imiaion occurred was a poem or Bilis- iche, he misress o Polemy
II, who won Olympic vicories in chario racing
19. A signe ring rom Egyp seems o show Aremis wih he eaures o
Arsinoe (see Prom- mer 2001: 38–39), and coin issues rom Ephesus
show a head ha appears o be Arsinoe on he obverse, wih Aremis’ bow
and quiver on he reverse (see Müller 2009: 345–48 and or
illusraions, 451).
20. Meillier 1979: 114 objecs o an early dae or he hymn because
Callimachus does no allude o he desrucion ha he ciy suffered around
290. I was rebuil beween 287 and 281.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 42/344
Introduction 21
in 268 and 264, and i he is correc, hAth mus precede 264.
However, Sens (2011: 235–36) disagrees, suggesing raher ha
Posidippus may be indulg- ing in insoucian sel-reerenialiy, since
one o his own equesrian epigrams
celebraes he riumph o Berenice I in a chario vicory over a much
earlier emale conender, Cynisca o Spara (87 A-B). Cerainy is
impossible, bu i Posidippus is he auhor, a dae or he hymn in he
260s is he mos rea- sonable guess, and he borrowing ino a conex o
horse racing migh have resuled rom he implici associaion o he Ahena
o he hymn wih one o he Polemaic royal ladies who had recenly won an
equesrian vicory in a Panhellenic game.
Bulloch (p. 41 and noes ad loc.) argues ha in hAth Callimachus
imiaes Te-
ocrius’ epihalamium or Helen and Menelaus ( Id. 18),
specifically 22–24: μμες δ’ α πσαι συνομικες, ας δρμος ωτς |
χρισαμναις νδριστ παρ’ Ερταο
λοετρος, | τετρκις ξκοντα κραι . . . (“We are all age-maes,
who have his place or running, having anoined ourselves in manly
ashion by he bahing-places o he Euroas, our imes sixy
maidens . . . ”). A hAth 23–30 Ahena runs a δς ξκοντα
course along he Euroas (παρ’ Ερτ) and anoins hersel wih manly olive
oil (ρσεν αιον . . . χρεται). I he direcion o he allusion is
correc, we may be able o make some headway on a dae. Some scholars
have hough ha
Id. 18 was writen or he marriage o Polemy II and Arsinoe
II (beween 279and 274). I so, he hymn should be laer, and i a emale
Polemy is o be imag- ined behind he chario-driving Ahena, hen he
previous associaion o he lan- guage wih Arsinoe would make her he
mos likely candidae, and he hymn could be no laer han 270. Tese
assumpions abou he prioriy o Teocrius’ poem (and is relaionship o a
royal marriage) do no have he ring o inevia-
biliy, bu hey do fi he radiional chronologies or he wo
possible auhors o he epigram.
Te Hymn to Demeter
canno be daed by exernal evidence. However, Phi-loera, he
siser o Arsinoe II and Polemy II, was closely associaed wih Deme-
er in cul, as we learn rom he Ektheosis of Arsinoe.
Te Ektheosis mus have been composed a he ime o Arsinoe’s
deah in 270, and in ha poem Philoera is al- ready dead. I
hDem has Philoera in he background (or as he hymnic preex),
i
would have been composed afer her deah and deificaion, bu
probably no oo much laer, hus probably beore he Ektheosis.
Moreover, here are disincive
verbal echoes beween he Ektheosis and hDem. Lines
45–46 o he ormer read: Δηος πο νεισομν σο δ’ ν
π [υστος], | δαμοσιν ρπαγμα . . . (“[by Phi-
loera] having reurned rom visiing Deo. She was unaware o you [sc.
Arsinoe II], O carried off [i.e., in deah] by he gods”). Tese same
wo rare words appear a hDem 9: ρπαγμας κ’ πυστα μετστιχεν χνια
κρας. Ten a 47–48 Philoera urges her companion o si upon he lofy
(π[τ]αν) peak and gaze (αγασαι),
while hDem 3–4 urges he ββαλοι . . . μηδ’ ψθεν
αγσσησθε. D’ Alessio p. 34
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 43/344
22 C A L L I M A C H U S
argues, I hink correcly, ha he direcion o hese verbal reminiscences
canno be deermined, bu ha boh poems probably belong o he end
o he 270s.
Finally, Apollonius alludes o hAth and hDem in a way ha
suggess he received
hem as a pair. His narraive o Phineus (2.178–93, 444–47) parallels
ha o ire- sias, while he neighboring ale o Paraebius (2.456–89),
who suffered because his aher had chopped down an oak agains he
proess o is residen Hama- dryad, is oo close o ha o Erysichhon o be
a coincidence. Poeic economy
would dicae ha he allusive direcion runs rom Callimachus o
Apollonius, and no ha Callimachus se ou o wrie wo disinc hymns in
response o
Apollonius’ ex.21 Sill, his does no help wih daing,
since he daing o he Argonautica is around 240, or around
he ime ha we have our las daable evi-
dence or Callimachus’ lie. Bu i may have implicaions or he hymn
collecion as a whole. Paired hymns sugges a collecion by
Callimachus, no a laer edior.
Language and Style
Callimachus composed his poery in hird-cenury Norh Arica, in Cyrene
or Alexandria or in boh locaions. As a Cyrenean, Callimachus
would
have been a Doric speaker, and Cyreneans in Alexandria, i early
immigra-ion ino he res o Polemaic Egyp is an accurae indicaor, were
likely o have been 30–40 per cen o he ciy’s naive Greek populaion.
In addiion many immigrans rom oher locaions would have reained heir
regional di- alec preerences,22 alhough he official ciy and he
army would have used a koine ha was an admixure o Atic and
Ionic.23 I is also imporan o noe ha Homer and Homeric
language would have occupied a unique place in he consciousness o
hose who possessed an educaion sufficien or enrance
ino Polemaic adminisraion. Te prevailing educaional sysem
dependedheavily on Homer, which guaraneed ha Homeric Greek isel
uncioned as a lierary koine or all Greek speakers, whaever
heir individual dialecal affiliaions. Tus i is unsurprising ha in
his wriing o hymns, Callimachus adaps a language and dicion based
primarily on Homer. Abou 80 per cen
21. Bulloch pp. 41–42 argues ha Callimachus imiaes Apollonius on he
basis o he place- men o he procliic ο beore he main caesura (only a
hDem 103, bu hree imes in Apol- lonius, including he passage
in quesion, 2.444). Tere is no doub ha one poe imiaed he oher, bu
he value o his merical evidence is quesionable because here are our
imes as many exan hexameers o Apollonius. Bulloch does no acor in
he Paraebius vignete.
22. See, e.g., Teoc. 15.92, where he ladies asser heir righ o
“speak Peloponnesian.”
23. See Colvin 2011 or he consiuion o various koinai in he
early Hellenisic world; see Parsons 2011 or Callimachus’
koinai.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 44/344
Introduction 23
o his vocabulary occurred previously in Homer; in his he is no
unique—he Homeric hymns also have a raio o 80 per cen o heir
vocabulary coinciden
wih previous epic o 20 per cen ha is new. Pervasive epic
eaures include
vocabulary, orms, dicion, and occasionally synax, all o which
conribue o an amosphere o inheried seriousness and link he new
composiions o a a- miliar lierary pas. Te opening o he Hymn to
Zeus provides an example o how Callimachus achieves his:
Ζηνς οι τ κεν ο παρ σπονδσιν εδειν λον θεν ατν, ε
μγαν, αν νακτα,
Πηλαγνων ατρα, δικασπον Ορανδσι;
πς κα νιν, Δικταον εσομεν Λυκαον; 5 ν δοι μα θυμς, πε γνος
μφριστον. Ζε, σ μν δαοισιν ν ορεσ φασι γενσθαι, Ζε, σ
δ’ ν ρκαδ·
Te underlined iems are eiher common Homeric words or orms (κεν,
-δσιν, -οισιν, λον, αν), words ha occur requenly bu no exclusively
in Homer (εδειν, ναξ, θυμς, ορεσι), or rarely bu in significan
conexs (ν
δοι, δικασπον, μφριστον). Even words ha are no paricularly marked
as Homeric ake on a Homeric idiom: or example, φασι and γενσθαι are
hardly exclusive o epic, ye wih φασι γενσθαι Callimachus has writen
a phrase ha occurs our imes in he Iliad and
Odyssey a verse end. Αν and νακτα never occur ogeher in
Homer, bu each word does occur several imes in Homer in he merical
posiion in which Callimachus places hem.
Callimachus and Homer
Callimachus’ pracice wih respec o Homeric language may be
caegorized in our disinc ways:
1. I provides he linguisic background and sonoriies ha connec he
poems o a amiliar, collecive Greek culural experience, an
experience reinorced by he educaional sysem and he pracice o public
recia- ion o Homer. Tus i allows he poe o posiion his hymnic
subjecs, gods or a new place, wihin (and a imes agains) he epic
pas.
2. Te developing ineres in he saus o Homer’s exs in early
Hellenisic Alexandria mean ha numerous Homeric expressions
were quesioned or debaed; Callimachus’ ex, hereore, will
occasionally reflec eiher
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 45/344
24 C A L L I M A C H U S
his undersanding o a dispued Homeric passage or his own deermi-
naion o a orm.24 In hZeus 11–13, or example, Callimachus
describes he sacred place where Rhea gives birh, afer which copious
rivers flow:
νθεν χρος ερς, οδ τ μιν κεχρημνον Εειθυης ρπετν οδ γυν πιμσγεται .
. .
Te phrase οδ τ μιν occurs seven imes in he Iliad and
Odyssey. A Il. 17.749–51 in paricular i describes he
sudden flow o rivers:
ς τε κα φθμων ποταμν εγειν εθρασχει, φαρ δ τε πσι ον πεδονδε τθησι
πλζων· οδ τ μιν σθνε ηγνσι οντες·
[a wooded ridge] which checks he grievous sreams o mighy rivers,
and sraighway or all o hem urns he flow o wan- dering over he
plain; nor do hey, hough flowing in srengh,
break hrough i (μιν) a all.
Bu in his passage Hellenisic scholars debaed he exac meaning o οδ τ
μιν. According o a scholium on he passage, Arisophanes o Byzanium
ob-
jeced o μιν and proposed emending o οδ τι μν. Alhough earlier
han Arisophanes, Callimachus’ use o he phrase οδ τ μιν in he
conex o flowing rivers does seem o have signaled his preerred
reading o Homer.25
3. Homeric dicion provided a number o predicable derivaives and
orms upon which Callimachus was able o model his coinages.
For
example, hAth 91 has δρκας, rom δρξ, δορκς. Te usual orm is
δορκς, δορκδος, bu Callimachus has apparenly modeled his noun on
anoher Homeric word or deer, πρξ, προκς, ha has he double
προκς. (Te varian ζρξ occurs in
hArt 97.)26 Tese neologisms are occasionally
discussed in he noes o each poem, bu since his maerial is much more
horoughly handled in he commenaries on individual hymns, ineresed
readers will be direced o he relevan ediions.
24. For Callimachus’ inerpreaion o Homeric words see Rengakos 1992;
or he Hellenisic poes’ views on he ex o Homer see Rengakos
1993.
25. Tis argumen is based in par on McLennan p. 41n12.
26. Tis example is based on Bulloch pp. 201–3nn91–92.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 46/344
Introduction 25
4. Scholars have requenly commened on Callimachus’ predilecion or
rare or hapax words in Homer, which hey someimes characerize
as re- cherché or even as a display o learned obscuriy. In ac, he
Homeric
conex o such marked borrowings almos always lends a significan
inerexual resonance o Callimachus’ own ex, as i he earlier
poe’s
voice could be heard in he disance. μφριστον, quoed above,
provides an example. Te word occurs wice, in Il. 23.382 and
527, in reerence o charios racing in a dead hea. In he firs
occurrence he ie is broken by he inervenion o Apollo. In
hZeus someone—he god?—inerrups o
break he dead hea a line 8. O course, Callimachus does no
resric his specific ype o inerexual voice o Homer. He appropriaes
Hesiod, he
Homeric hymns, lyric, ragedy, and even prose wriers in a similar
way.
Other Linguistic Influences
In addiion, Callimachus had a his disposal a wide variey o previous
poeic models ha came wih generically marked dialecs. His linguisic
exure is en- riched wih words amiliar rom he lyric poes (which may
be Doric), paricu-
larly in hAp and hDelos; ragedy (which may be Atic or Doric),
paricularly in hespeeches in hDelos and he insered sory o
iresias in hAth; and laer epiciss like Animachus o Colophon and
Callimachus’ immediae poeic predecessor, Philias o Cos, who wroe in
boh hexameers and elegiacs. Very ofen bor- rowing a unique word or
phrase rom an earlier poe brings wih i specific poeic connoaions,
hough, as is ofen he case wih he lyric poes and laer poes
like
Animachus and Philias, he ragmenary naure o a predecessor may
obscure he ull exen o he borrowing.
In conras o he amiliariy o Homer and his linguisic pracice, a
veryhigh proporion o Callimachus’ non-Homeric words are no ound in
previous poery. Many occurred previously only in prose, ohers have
been ound in con- emporary documens and he koine; some describe
objecs or evens or which
we have no oher poeic esimony (hough i may well have exised);
some are inroduced or a paricular effec; some words are new
coinages. Since so litle poery has survived beween he end o he fifh
cenury and Callimachus’ ime, i is no easy o assess he exen o which
words appearing in his exs or he firs ime are ruly novel, belong o
a now los poeic subsraum, or he koine. For example, a hDem 110
he manuscrips read α λουρον, which he scholias glosses as “ca,” bu
he papyrus has μουριν (which is now generally acceped). Hesychius
glosses he unique word (μουρις) as “whie-ailed”; did Callima- chus
coin i, was i colloquial Greek, or simply unatesed in earlier
lieraure?
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 47/344
26 C A L L I M A C H U S
Callimachus’ lexicon has been well sudied: F. Lapp (1965: 155–72)
liss eighy-six neologisms or varians o previously known words ha
occur only in Callimachus’ hymns and anoher niney-six ha firs occur
here. An in-
novaor, Callimachus coined new nouns or alernaive orms in -τειρα
(e.g., ρτειρα, πιθυμτειρα, θηρτειρα); -τς (e.g., ρπακτς, γελαστς,
διωκτς); -ς (e.g., μβολαδς, λεχως, σαρωνς); -η (e.g., κυνηλαση,
υηθενη); adjecives in -σιος and -τιος (e.g., πιδασιος, εστιος,
πανυσττιος), maro- and paro- nymics in -ις (e.g., Λητωις,
Πελασγις), as well as evocaive compounds like οφνος, “awn-slaying”
o Briomaris (hArt 190), μουνγληνος, “one-eyed” o he
Cyclops (hArt 53), or ψευδοπτωρ, “alse aher,” addressed
o Poseidon
by riopas (hDem 98). While many o hese may have been
coined o allow
greaer merical flexibiliy, hey simulaneously impar a sense o
linguisic in- novaion and reshness o he oherwise radiional Homeric
language.
A final aspec o Callimachus’ language has been his influence
on laer poes: laer epigrammaiss, Dionysius he Periegee,27
Nonnus, Oppian, and riphio- dorus clearly imiaed his vocabulary and
merical refinemens (see De Seani and Magnelli 2011). Tere is, o
course, also considerable linguisic overlap wih conemporaries like
Teocrius, Araus, Asclepiades, Posidippus, and Apollonius,
bu wih hese poes i is much harder o decide he direcion o he
borrowing.
Callimachus’ Doric
Te firs our hymns are writen in epic Ionic and dacylic hexameer;
hDem is in hex- ameers as well. However, hAth and
hDem are writen in he Doric dialec, hough epic-Ionic orms also
occur. Doric dialecs were spoken in Wes Greek ciy-saes like
Argos and Spara, and as a resul o colonizaion hey were ound
in Sicily and Souh
Ialy, Cree, Cos, Rhodes, Tera, and Arican Cyrene.
28
Ruijgh (1984) has arguedha he Doric o Teocrius (and
Callimachus) refleced he dialec as spoken by Cyrenean immigrans o
Alexandria, bu his heory has no been widely embraced (see Parsons
2011: 142–43). Mos scholars believe ha Callimachus did no adhere o
any one Doric dialec in hese hymns, bu employed wha is usually
described as “lierary” Doric, by incorporaing he mos recognizable
eaures o Doric speakers: long α or η; -τι in hird person verbal
endings; -μες or -μεν; ahemaic infiniives in -μεν; λς or θς; πρτος
or πρτος; τνος or ()κενος; -οκα or -οτε (e.g., ποκα = ποτε); μστα
or μσφα; -ευ as a conracion o Ionic -εο; -ω or -ου in
masculine
27. J. L. Lighoo’s 2014 commenary now makes he ull exen o
Dionysius’ deb o Cal- limachus accessible, on whom see her general
index s.v. Callimachus.
28. For characerisics o individual Doric dialecs see Buck
§§242–73.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 49/344
28 C A L L I M A C H U S
he ouside, he common nouns wihin. Beween he second and hird quesion
anoher se o doubles occurs: Δικταον or Λυκαον (again similariy o
sounds),
varied as δαοισιν ν ορεσ or ν ρκαδ in lines 6–7. In line 4 he
wo adjecives
all on eiher side o he verb (Δικταον εσομεν Λυκαον), while in line
5 he wo cenral nouns, θυμς, γνος, are flanked, now by variaions on
doub, ν δοι, μφριστον.
Sound is a paricularly imporan eaure o he hymns: a he opening o
hZeus he ε o εδειν is repeaed in he ε μγαν, αν νακτα o he nex
line and comes back in 4: εσομεν (hus “eernal” is buil ino he ac o
singing).
Anaphora and oher ypes o repeiion are common in hymns in
general, and Callimachus uses i in his hymns very requenly and o
grea effec. A orm o
he god’s name, Ζηνς, Ζε, opens lines 1, 6, and 7, he las wo wih
anaphora and similariy o sounds (paronomasia) in Ζε, σ μν, Ζε, σ δ’
ν. Similarly, noe he opening o he firs wo lines o hAp: οον τπωνος,
οα δ’ ον, and hroughou ha hymn he requen play on Apollo and orms o
πολς (see noes ad loc.). In hArt 6–18, he young
goddess’s demands are consruced around a repeaed δς μοι, “gimme.”
In hDelos 70–75 he fligh o he landscape rom Leo is puncuaed
wih repeaed φεγε. HZeus 55 opens and closes wih similar
sounds: καλ . . . ξευ, καλ . . . -ιε Ζε. A hAp 101–2
Apollo rapidly shoos his
arrows: ον π’ | βων.In addiion o his aural effecs Callimachus’ word
order ofen creaes word picures ha reinorce sense, a phenomenon more
requen in Lain han in Greek poery. A hAp 54: δ κε μουνοτκος
διδυμητκος αψα γνοιτο, he
juxaposiion o he wo rare nouns (μουνοτκος, διδυμητκος) shows
us he one “suddenly” becoming he oher. (Tis is also a good
illusraion o he gen- eraive skills o Callimachus’ lexical
imaginaion.) A hAp 88–89: ο δ’ οπω
πηγσι Κρης δναντο πελσσαι | Δωριες, he Dorians are separaed
as ar as
possible rom he “sreams o Cyre,” o which hey were no ye able o
drawnear (δναντο πελσσαι). A hDelos 91–93: …φις μγας, ’ τι
κενο | θηρον ανογνειον π Πειστοο καθρπον | Παρνησν νιφεντα
περιστφει ννα κκλοις, he grea serpen (φις μγας) wih is nine coils
(ννα κκλοις) sreches over hree lines as i encloses snowy Parnassus
(Παρνησν νιφεντα). A hArt 192: δ’ τ μν λασσιν π δρυσ
κρπτετο νμφη, he nymph (Briomaris) is posiioned a he end o he line,
hiding under he shrubs, as ar away as pos- sible rom Minos (named a
he end o 190), who pursues her. A hDem 120–21: χς α τν καθον
λευκτριχες πποι γοντι | τσσαρες, he anomalous posiion o he objec
(τν καθον) wihin he aricle-noun group (α . . . πποι) creaes he
word picure by locaing Demeer’s baske behind he horses ha lead i
orward.
Callimachus was a maser o polyphony. In he hymns he deploys a wide
and someimes decepive range o poeic voices. On he surace he
non-mimeic
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 50/344
Introduction 29
hymns (hZeus, hArt, and hDelos) seem o have one auhoriaive
narraing I, who inroduces he divine subjec (πς κα νιν…εσομεν;
ρτεμιν…μνομεν, τν ερν, θυμ,…εσεις | Δον) and relaes his/her birh
and deeds. However,
here are requen inrusions o oher, someimes ambiguous voices: in
hZeus 8, or example, who uters he saemen “Creans always lie”?
Is i he poe? Zeus himsel? Or he ancien sage Epimenides o whom he
line was atribued in aniq- uiy? Te heavy borrowing o specific
language rom Hesiod ha leads up o he quoaion o T. 96 (κ δ Δις
βασιλες) a hZeus 79 makes i seem as i Hesiod has inruded ino
his successor’s poem. Te exchange o Aremis and Zeus a he opening o
hArt seems o move direcly ou o a Homeric scene; he
exchange o Leo and Peneius in hDelos is colored wih ragic
language, paricularly ha o
Euripides; Apollo, speaking rom he womb in hDelos , assumes a
vaic persona. Te siuaion o he mimeic hymns (hAp, hAth, hDem)
is even more complex. In all hree he speaker is anonymous and
his/her connecion o he rie is no rans- paren. Is here one narraor
in hAp who exhors he unclean o depar beore he god appears, who
exhors he chorus o sing, hen narraes he god’s biography? Or does he
speaker exhor he chorus, who hen sing he lines ha ollow as a paean
o he god? In hDem he narraor is a woman (see 124); in
hAth he gender is ambiguous. As a resul, considerable
scholarship has been devoed o sudying he
narraive voice in Callimachus (or recen reamens see Morrison 2007:
105–78,Fanuzzi 2011).
Te Hexameter Hymns
Five hymns (hZeus, hAp, hArt, hDelos, hDem) are writen in dacylic
hexameer, he meer o Homeric epic, which was said o express a
dignified and elevaed
syle and o be more oleran han ohers o rare words and meaphor
(Aris. Poet. 1459b32–36). By he hird cenury hexameer had
exended is generic reach o include didacic, hymns, and even
bucolic, and as he wriing (as opposed o oral perormance) o poery
came o assume greaer imporance, Homer’s rhyhmical and prosodic
pracices were disilled and refined, a endency ha reached is apex in
he hexameers o Callimachus.
Homer avails himsel o weny-wo differen arrangemens o dacyls and
spondees wihin his hexameer line, Callimachus resrics himsel o
seven,
which grealy increases rhyhmic regulariy. He also smoohs ou
he hexam- eer line by limiing he number o shor words, incidence o
hiaus, and unusual rhyhms. Callimachus’ verses eel ligher han
Homer’s, an effec achieved by a slighly higher average number o
dacyls per line, bu mainly by careul manage- men o he placemen o
spondees. For example, Callimachus ends o avoid wo spondees in
succession. I we exclude he final meron, he has a disinc
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 51/344
30 C A L L I M A C H U S
preerence or lines wih our dacyls + one spondee, and he never wries
a line wih our spondees.30
A Homeric hexameer is generally undersood o be organized ino
a series o our unis, called cola; hese are marked off by word
boundaries and/or semanic
pauses. 31
Colon-breaks occur mos requenly a caesurae, diereses, and
verse end, bu addiional locaions o colon-breaks, especially
in he firs hal o he line, yielded a number o uneven cola, and no
all lines are cleanly divisible ino our. Callima- chus epiomized he
endency, ound in oher Hellenisic poes, o regularize he dimensions o
he Homeric colon, which resuls in considerable resricion o his
sense-pauses o cerain locaions in he line (see below or examples)
and o words (or word-groups) wih specific merical shapes wihin he
hexameer line (called he inner meric). Tis has generaed wha Fanuzzi
calls “a nework o ‘prohibiions’ o
word end a various poins in Callimachus’ verse, which were
idenified by scholars(paricularly) in he second hal o he nineeenh
cenury.”32
| | | — — ———— | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
1 3½ 9½7½5½1½ 2 3 6 8 9 10 11 124 5 7
1st metron 2nd metron 3rd metron 4th metron 5th metron 6th metron|
| | | |
1. Callimachus usually resrics his sense-pauses o cerain locaions
in he line: a 2, 3, 5, 5½, 8, and 12 or verse-end. For example, in
hZeus 4: πς
30. aken rom Mineur pp. 35–36, hese numbers are expressed as
percenages, excluding he final meron. Tey have been adjused and
rounded.
31. Te idea originaed wih H. Fränkel and has been modified by
subsequen scholars, see Kirk’s helpul discussion o Homer (1985:
18–23).
32. Fanuzzi and Huner 2004: 36. For hese “prohibiions,” see
below.
33. For comparison o word shape and meric posiion organized by
hexameer poe, see O’Neill 1942: 156; Hagel 2004 has refined O’Neill
by adjusing or he presence o encliics and procliics, which should
be reaed as a uni wih he word o which hey adhere.
Homer Homeric Hymns Callimachus
4 dacyls + 1 spondee 42% 42% 49%
3 dacyls + 2 spondees 30% 28% 25%
2 dacyls + 3 spondees 8% 9% 3%
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 52/344
Introduction 31
κα νιν, / Δικταον / εσομεν / Λυκαον; he colon breaks occur a 3, 5
½, 8, 12. Te firs and las colon breaks coincide wih a pause in
sense. Four-
word lines like hZeus 3: Πηλαγνων / ατρα, / δικασπον /
Ορανδσι
are he exreme example o his endency. 2. Hexameers usually have a
main word end (caesura), ofen wih a sense
break, in he hird meron, eiher a 5 (called masculine) or a 5½
(called eminine). All o Callimachus’ hexameers have a caesura in he
hird meron, and he showed a marked preerence or he eminine, which
occurs in 74 per cen o his lines in comparison o 57 per cen in
Homer.34
3. Coincidence o word end wih he end o a meron was normally avoided
excep in cerain locaions: i was requen a he end o he ourh
meron
(8, called he bucolic dieresis). Tis pause occurs in 63 per cen o
Cal- limachus’ lines, in comparison o 47 per cen in Homer.
4. Spondees in the ourth metron are rare; when hey do occur,
Callima- chus does no allow a word end o coincide wih he end o he
meron (his is called Naeke’s Law ; or an example see
hZeus 1 below).
5. Alhough spondees in the fifh metron (σπονδειζοντες) became
a ashion in some wriers o hexameer poery (or example, hey occur in
22 per cen o Animachus’ verses, and in 24 per cen o
Eraoshenes’),
hey occur in only 7 per cen o Callimachus’ and wih considerable
vari-aion beween hymns. When Callimachus does wrie σπονδειζοντες,
he ourh meron will always be a dacyl, and ofen he firs our mera are
dacyls, which again alleviaes he weigh o he verse. He preers our-
syllable words or occasionally six-syllable words o end hese lines.
Like oher Hellenisic poes, he someimes wries wo σπονδειζοντες in
suc- cession (hZeus 46–47, hArt 97–98, 170–71,
237–38, 251–52; hDelos 65–66) and once hree in succession
(hArt 222–34).35
6. Callimachus shows a sric pracice wih respec oelision. He almos
alwaysavoids elision a cerain posiions in he line: a 3½ (called
Meyer’s bridge); a he caesura (5, 5½); a 7½ (called Hermann’s
bridge); and a he bu- colic dieresis (8, called Naeke’s bridge).
Preposiions, adverbs, correlaives, conjuncions, and paricles ha end
in a shor vowel are normally elided;
bu elision o endings on nouns, adjecives, and verbs is ar
less common.36
7. Callimachus does no inroduce hiatus beween mera. Wihin he
meron hiaus is normally allowed only afer or beore preposiions
in
34. Wes 1982: 36 (Homer, recalibraed as a percenage) and 154
(Callimachus).
35. See Hollis pp. 16–18; he observes ha Romans probably go heir
ase or σπονδειζοντες rom poes like Euphorion, no Callimachus.
36. See Silva Sanchez 2003: especially 75, 77–78.
8/20/2019 Callimachus The Hymns
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/callimachus-the-hymns 53/344
32 C A L L I M A C H U S
anasrophe (bu see hArt 176, 233, 237). Words ha
in Homer appear in hiaus because hey originally began wih a digamma
are someimes,
bu no always, reaed he same way in Callimachus (especially
οι).
8. Oher resricions, named or he scholars who firs observed hem,
are: Meyer’s First Law (words o he shape × rarely
end in he second meron; he excepions are hAp 41 and
hDem 91); Meyer’s Second Law (words o he shape
are usually avoided beore a caesura); Giseke’s
Law (words o he shape × never end wih he
second meron); Hilberg’s Law (a word break rarely
occurs afer a spondaic second meron); Naeke’s Law (a
word break does no ollow a spondaic ourh meron); Bulloch’s
Law (a word