Upload
vuongminh
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Call Light Response TimeInternal Leadership Project
By: Jaclyn Jezierski
Opportunity
To delight our customers and better serve our residents at Walker Methodist Health Center we are striving to improve the call light response time on the Transitional Care Unit. Our current call light response time is below average and we would like to reduce the call light response time to improve our customer service and to improve satisfaction for our residents.
Knowledge of Task
When performing interviews, residents felt that their call lights are not answered in a timely manner due to our customer satisfaction surveys. With our “NO PASS” policy at Walker Methodist, we will educate all staff on the importance of answering the call light in a timely manner.
Methodology
Summary of Success
We have reduced our average call light response time from 3 minutes and 9 seconds to 2 minutes and 8 seconds. With the staff education on call lights and customer satisfaction, we have seen a positive change with our residents. They are receiving better customer service due to the call lights being answered in a timely manner, employees smiling, introducing themselves as they enter the resident’s room and asking the resident if there is anything else that they can get for the resident before leaving room. With this success, it is also providing a better quality of life for our residents.
To successful complete this project we will use root cause analysis to find out when the call light occurrences are the highest and how a long call light is on. We will analyze what the residents normally push there call light for by performing interviews with the residents and employees. After performing the root cause analysis we will educated employees and focus on being proactive in residents care.
Recommendations
The recommendations that I have for this project is to use the PDCA cycle to continue to monitor the response time to the call lights and to ensure that we are satisfying our customers needs and wants.
Acknowledgments
A special thanks to these individuals that have made the project a success.• Brooke Viegut: Administrator• Kija Robberstad: DON• Mary Januszewski: RN Educ. Specialist• Janet Gonnella: Director of TCU • Bri Prew: ADONAll the staff on the TCU that have made a difference to improve the response time to call lights.
Step 1
• Perform Resident Interview
Step 2
• Perform Call Light Audits
Step 3
• Gather Information and Put Together Education
Step 4
• Perform Education with Staff
Step 5
• Perform Audits to Ensure Success
Step 6
• Continue to Audit While Using the PDCA Cycle
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1-3
Min
ute
s
3-5
Min
ute
s
5-7
Min
ute
s
7-9
Min
ute
s
9-1
1 M
inu
tes
11
-13
Min
ute
s
13
-15
Min
ute
s
15
-18
Min
ute
s
18
-21
Min
ute
s
21
-24
Min
ute
s
24
-27
Min
ute
27
-30
Min
ute
s
Occ
ura
nce
s
Time in Minutes
Response Time to Call Lights
Response Time to CallLights Occurances
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Occ
ura
nce
s
Time
Call Light Occurances
Call Light OccurancesOccurances
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
12
am-2
am
2am
-4am
4am
-6am
6am
-8am
8am
-10
am
10
am-1
2p
m
12
pm
-2p
m
2p
m-4
pm
4p
m-6
pm
6p
m-8
pm
8p
m-1
0p
m
10
pm
-12
am
Occ
ura
nce
s
Time
Call Light Occurances
Call Light OccurancesOccurances
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
1-3
Min
ute
s
3-5
Min
ute
s
5-7
Min
ute
s
7-9
Min
ute
s
9-1
1 M
inu
tes
11
-13
Min
ute
s
13
-15
Min
ute
s
15
-18
Min
ute
s
18
-21
Min
ute
s
21
-24
Min
ute
s
24
-27
Min
ute
27
-30
Min
ute
s
Occ
ura
nce
s
Time in Minutes
Response Time to Call Lights
Response Time to Call LightsOccurances
• Monitor call lights
• Encourage staff
• We will act on situations that do not work and will find a solution for the problem
• Re-educate staff if needed
• Monitor call lights
• Educate staff on the importance of customer service and answering call lights in a timely manner
• Perform resident interviews
• Plan how we are going to monitor call lights
• Plan the education that we will be giving to employees
Plan Do
CheckAct