21
PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE – FULL TEXT The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation G.R. No. 152133 February 9, 2006 ROLLIE CALIMUTAN VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 152133 February 9, 2006 ROLLIE CALIMUTAN, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL., Respondents. D E C I S I O N CHICO-NAZARIO, J.: In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court, petitioner Rollie Calimutan prays for the reversal of the Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR No. 23306, dated 29 August 2001, 1 affirming the Decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 46, of Masbate, Masbate, in Criminal Case No. 8184, dated 19 November 1998, 2 finding petitioner Calimutan guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of homicide under Article 249 of the Revised Penal Code. The Information 3 filed with the RTC charged petitioner Calimutan with the crime of homicide, allegedly committed as follows – That on or about February 4, 1996, in the morning thereof, at sitio Capsay, Barangay Panique, Municipality of Aroroy, Province of Masbate, Philippines within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused with intent to kill, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault and throw a stone at PHILIP CANTRE, hitting him at the back left portion of his body, resulting in laceration of spleen due to impact which caused his death a day after.

Calimutan vs. People GR 152133

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Rem01

Citation preview

PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE FULL TEXT The Lawphil Project - Arellao Law Fo!"atio #$R$ No$ %&'%(( Fe)r!ar* +, '--. R/LLIE CALI0UTAN 1S$ PE/PLE /F THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL$Rep!)lic o2 the Philippie3SUPREME COURT0ailaFIRST DI1ISI/NG.R. No. 152133 February 9, 2006ROLLIE CLIMUTN, Petitioer, 43$PEOPLE OF T!E P!ILIPPINES, ET L., Re3po"et3$D E C I S I / NC!ICO"N#RIO, J.:I thi3 Petitio 2or Re4iew o Certiorari !"er R!le 5& o2 the Re4i3e" R!le3 o2 Co!rt, petitioer Rollie Cali6!ta pra*3 2or the re4er3al o2 the Deci3io o2 the Co!rt o2 Appeal3 iCA-#$R$ CR No$ '((-., "ate" '+ A!7!3t '--%,% a22ir6i7 the Deci3io o2 the Re7ioal Trial Co!rt 8RTC9, :rach 5., o2 0a3)ate, 0a3)ate, i Cri6ial Ca3e No$ ;%;5, "ate" %+ No4e6)er %++;,' 2i"i7 petitioer Cali6!ta 7!ilt* )e*o" rea3oa)le "o!)t o2 the cri6eo2 ho6ici"e !"er Article '5+ o2 the Re4i3e" Peal Co"e$The I2or6atio( 2ile" with the RTC char7e" petitioer Cali6!ta with the cri6e o2 ho6ici"e, alle7e"l* co66itte" a3 2ollow3 That o or a)o!t Fe)r!ar* 5, %++., i the 6ori7 thereo2, at 3itio Cap3a*, :ara7a* PaiEARS o2 Pri3io 0a*or a3 6ii6!6, to T?EL1E 8%'9 >EARS a" /NE 8%9 DA> o2 Recl!3io Te6poral a3 6aFi6!6, a" to i"e6i2* the heir3 o2 Philip Catre the 3!6 o2 Fi2t* Tho!3a" 8P&-,---$--9 Pe3o3 a3 co6pe3ator* "a6a7e3 a" the 3!6 o2Fi2t* Tho!3a" 8P&-,---$--9 Pe3o3 a3 6oral "a6a7e3, witho!t 3!)3i"iar* i6pri3o6et i ca3e o2 i3ol4ec*$Petitioer Cali6!ta appeale" the Deci3io o2 the RTC to the Co!rt o2 Appeal3$ The Co!rto2 Appeal3, i it3 Deci3io, "ate" '+ A!7!3t '--%,%@ 3!3taie" the co4ictio o2 ho6ici"e re"ere" )* the RTC a7ai3t petitioer Cali6!ta, ratiociati7 th!3 The pro3ec!tio ha3 3!22icietl* e3ta)li3he" that the 3erio!3 iteral ij!r* 3!3taie" )* the 4icti6 wa3 ca!3e" )* the 3toe throw at the 4icti6 )* the acc!3e" which, the acc!3e"-appellat "oe3 ot "e*$ It wa3 li=ewi3e 3how that the iteral ij!r* 3!3taie" )* the 4icti6 wa3 the re3!lt o2 the i6pact o2 the 3toe that hit the 4icti6$ It re3!lte" to a tra!6atic ij!r* o2 the a)"o6e ca!3i7 the laceratio o2 the 4icti6E3 3plee$Thi3 i3 clearl* 3how )* the a!top3* report prepare" )* Dr$ Roal"o 0e"eB, a Seior 0e"ico Le7al /22icer o2 the N:I a2ter the eFh!6atio o2 the 4icti6E3 ca"a4erJThe Co!rt caot 7i4e cre"ece to the po3t 6orte6 report prepare" )* 0!icipal Health /22icer Dr$ Cochita Ula"a* 3tati7 that the ca!3e o2 the 4icti6E3 "eath wa3 2oo" poi3oi7$ Dr$ Ula"a* wa3 ot e4e pre3ete" to te3ti2* i co!rt hece 3he wa3 ot e4e a)le to i"eti2* a"Kor a22ir6 the cotet3 o2 her report$ She wa3 ot 6a"e a4aila)le 2or cro33-eFa6iatio o the acc!rac* a" correcte33 o2 her 2i"i73$Dr$ Cochita Ula"a*E3 po3t 6orte6 report caot pre4ail o4er the a!top3* report 8EFh$ ICI9 o2 the 0e"ico-Le7al /22icer o2 the N:I who te3ti2ie" a" wa3 cro33-eFa6ie" )* the "e2e3e$:e3i"e3, i2 acc!3e"-appellat wa3 co4ice" that the 4icti6 i"ee" "ie" o2 2oo" poi3oi7,a3 reporte" )* Dr$ Cochita Ula"a*, wh* "i" the* ot pre3et her a3 their wite33 to )eliethe report o2 the 0e"ico-Le7al /22icer o2 the N:I$The trial co!rtE3 e4al!atio o2 the te3ti6o* o2 Dr$ 0e"eB i3 accor"e" the hi7he3t re3pect )eca!3e it ha" the opport!it* to o)3er4e the co"!ct a" "e6eaor o2 3ai" wite33$?HEREF/RE, i 4iew o2 the 2ore7oi7, the "eci3io o2 the Re7ioal Trial Co!rt o2 0a3)ate, :rach 5., 2i"i7 acc!3e"-appellat 7!ilt* )e*o" rea3oa)le "o!)t o2 the cri6e o2 ho6ici"e i3 here)* AFFIR0ED$The Co!rt o2 Appeal3, i it3 Re3ol!tio, "ate" %& Ja!ar* '--',%; "eie" the 0otio 2or Reco3i"eratio 2ile" )* petitioer Cali6!ta 2or lac= o2 6erit 3ice the i33!e3 rai3e" therei ha" alrea"* )ee pa33e" a" r!le" !po i it3 Deci3io, "ate" '+ A!7!3t '--%$Co6e3 ow petitioer Cali6!ta, )* wa* o2 the pre3et Petitio 2or Re4iew o Certiorari, 3ee=i7 8%9 the re4er3al o2 the Deci3io3 o2 the RTC, "ate" %+ No4e6)er %++;, a" o2 theCo!rt o2 Appeal3, "ate" '+ A!7!3t '--%, co4icti7 hi6 o2 the cri6e o2 ho6ici"eC a", 8'9 co3ee3, 3ir$ :!t that wo!l" "epe" o how 3tro7 or 2orce2!l the i6pact wa3$I cotra3t, Dr$ 0e"eB "e3cri)e" i hi3 te3ti6o* )e2ore the RTC(% how he co"!cte" thea!top3* o2 the )o"* o2 the 4icti6 Catre, a3 2ollow3 L ?hat 3peci2ic proce"!re "i" *o! "o i coectio with the eFh!6atio o2 the )o"* o2 the 4icti6 i thi3 ca3eMA ?e opee" the hea", che3t a" the a)"o6e$L That wa3 part o2 the a!top3* *o! ha4e co"!cte"MA >e3, 3ir$L A3i"e 2ro6 opei7 the hea" a3 well a3 the )o"* o2 the 4icti6 Philip Catre, what other 6atter3 "i" *o! "o i coectio therewithMA ?e eFa6ie" the iteral or7a3$L ?hat i partic!lar iteral or7a3 *o! ha4e eFa6ie"MA The )rai, the heart, the l!73, the li4er, the =i"e*3, the pacrea3 pl!3 the ite3tie3$F F F FL The ca!3e o2 "eath a3 *o! ha4e li3te" here i *o!r 2i"i73 i3 li3te" a3 tra!6atic ij!r* o2 the a)"o6e, will *o! =i"l* tell !3 Doctor what i3 the 3i7i2icace o2 thi3 6e"ical ter6 tra!6atic ij!r* o2 the a)"o6eMA ?e, 6e"ico-le7al o22icer3 o2 the N:I "oEt "o what other "octor3 "o a3 the* 6a=e ca!3e3 o2 "eath a3 iteral he6orrha7e we partic!larl* poit to the ij!r* o2 the )o"* li=e thi3 partic!lar ca3e the ij!r* wa3 at the a)"o6e o2 the 4icti6$L ?ill *o! tell a3 Doctor what partic!lar portio o2 the a)"o6e o2 the 4icti6 thi3 tra!6aticij!r* i3 locate"MA Alo7 the 6i"lie )!t the "a6a7e" or7a wa3 at the le2t$L ?hat partic!lar or7a are *o! re2erri7 toMA The 3plee, 3ir$The "i22erece i the eFtet o2 the eFa6iatio3 co"!cte" )* the two "octor3 o2 the )o"* o2 the 4icti6 Catre pro4i"e3 a a"e