Upload
brianpempus
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
1/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General.of California
SARA
J.
DRAKE
State Bar No. 102565
Senior Assistant Attorney General
WILLIAMP TORNGREN
State
BarNo.
58493
Depu x Attorney General
1300 I Street
1
Suite 125
P.O.
Box
944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 323-3033
Fax: (916) 313-1319
E-mail: William.Tol1.}gren@doj ;ca.gov
Attorneys
or
Plaintiff State aj California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13 STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,.
Case No.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
IIPAY NATION OF SANTA
YSAJ3EL, also known as SANTA
YSABEL
-BAND
OF-DIEGUENO
MISSION INDIANS; a federal Y
recQg_nized. Ind.iall
r i b ~ ~
SANTA
YSABEL
INTERACT
v a tribal
economic devehwment. entity.
SANTA
YSABEL
GAMING COMMISSION,
DAVID
CHELETTE, l>AVID .
VIALPANDO,
ANTHONY .
BUCARO,
MICHELLE MAXCY,
VIRGIL PEREZ, alld BRANDlE
TAYLOR,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR
INJUNCTIVE
AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
25 The State of California (State) alleges:
26
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
27 1 This action seeks appropriate injunctive reliefto prevent unlawful Internet
28 gambling; Defendant I-ipayNationofSantaYsabel, also known as Santa Ysabel
1
Complaint For Injunctive
And
Declaratory Relief
'14CV2724 NLSAJB
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 1 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
2/88
1
Band
ofDie.gueno Mission Indians (Tribe), has begun to offer a facsimile
ofbingo
2 over the Internet to bettors, who are not located on the
Tribe s
Indian lands.
In
3 addition to violating state and federal law, the Tribe s conduct materially breaches
4 the tribal-state class III gaming compact (Compact) between the Tribe. and the
5 State. This constitutes an imminent threat to the public health, safety, and welfare
6 of the State s residents, and a threat to good order. Therefore, this Court should
7 issue orders temporarily restraining, and permanently enjoining, the
Tribe s
8 offering and conducting Internet gambling in breach
of
the Compact and in
9 violation of state and federal law. This Court further should declare that the
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Internet gambling materially breaches the Compact.
JURISDICTION
ND
VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1331 because the
State s claim arises under federal statutes and the federal common law. This Court
also has jurisdiction pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) because this
l:l ction
is
initiated by the State to enjoin conduct related to the
Tribe s
class III gaming
activity that violates its Compact with the State. This Court further has jurisdiction
under
31
U ~ S C
5365(a) because the State brings
this
action to prevent and
restrain restricted transactions that violate the Unlawful Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act.
3. Venue is proper
in
his District because the State s claims arise from
conduct occurring in part, and the underlying Compact is to be performed, in the
Southern District of California.
GENER L LLEG TIONS
The
o m p ~ c t
and Waiver o Sovereign Immunity
4.
On
September 8,
2003,the
Tribe and the State entered into the Compact
- . . . .
pursuantto
the_Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C.
2701-2721,
18
U.S.C.
1166-1167. A true and correct copy
ofthe Compact
is Exhibit 1 to
.
this complaint and incorporated
by
reference. On December 22, 2003, the Compact
2
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 2 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
3/88
1 became effective upon its pqblication in the Federal Register. 68 Fed. Reg. 71131
2
(Dec. 22, 2003).
3 5. Section 2.13 .1 of the Compact defines the terms Santa Y sahel Tribe'' or
4 Tribe to include the Tribe, as well as its authorized officials and agencies.
5 (Compact,
6
2.13.1.) Based upon information obtained from the National Indian
6 Gaming Commission (NIGC), the Tribe's website, and the press release
7 announcing the Internet gambling's launch, the State is informed and believes and,
8 therefore, alleges that each defendant, other ~ a n the Tribe itself, is an official or an
9 agency of the Tribe, as follows:
10 a. Santa Ysabel Interactive is a tribal economic development entity
11
that operates the Internet gambling.
12
13
b. David Chelette is Santa Ysabel Interactive's president.
c.
The Santa Ysabel Tribal Gaming Commission (Gaming
14
Commission) is the tribal entity that purports toregulate the Internet gambling The
. . . . . . - .. .
15 State is informed and believes and, therefore, alleges that the Gaming Commission
16 is a ''Tribal Gaming Agency within the meaning of the Compact.
See
Compact,
17 7, . 2 0 ~
18 d. David Vialpando is the Gaming Commission's chairman.
19
e.
Anthony Bucaro is the Gaming Commission's gaming/compliance
20 agent.
21
f.
Michelle Maxcy is the Gaming Commission's background
22 investigator.
23
g. Virgil Perez is the Tribal Chairman.
24
h.
Brandie Taylor is the Tribe's Vice-Chairwoman.
25 6 The Compact establishes the parties' rights, privileges, duties, and
26 obligations with respect to class III gaming on the Tribe's Indian lands.
27
7.
The Compact's purposes and objectives include, among other things,
28 ensuring a fair and honest gaming operation in accordance with IGRA, promoting
3
Complaint For Injunctive
And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 3 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
4/88
1 ethical practices, and maintaining a high level
of
integrity in the Tribe's gaming.
2 (Compact, 4, 1.0.)
3 8 The Compact provides that the Tribe may combine and operate in,its
4 gaming facility any kinds
of
gaming permitted under law,
except to the extent
5
limited under IGRA
. (Compact, 8, 4.2 (emphasis added).)
i 9 Section 3.0
of
the Compact provides that the Tribe shall not engage in
7 class Ill gaming that is not expressly authorized in the Compact. Under section 4.1
8
the Tribe is authorized and permitted to operate (a) gaming devices- i.e., slot
9 machines, (b) banking and percentage card games, and (c} any devices or games
10 that are authorized under state law to the California State Lottery,
provided that the
11
[Tribe] will not offer such games through.use
of
he Internet unless others in the
12
st te re permitted to do so under state nd ederal law. ;
(Compact,8,
4.l c)
13
( m p h s i s added).)
14 10. The Compact provides that a tribal gaming agency, as.designated under
15
tribal law, shall conduct on-site gaming regulation and control ''in order to enforce
16 the terms of this Compact [and] I GRA with respect to the business enterprise
1
7
that offers and operates class III gaming activities and the facilities that serve that
18 business enterprise. (Compact, 22,
7.1.) The tribal gaming agency is, among
19 other things, to ensure
e n f o r ~ m e n t of
all relevant laws and rules and to prevent
20 illegal activity occurring with regard to the business enterprise that offers and
. . . .
21 operates class III gaming activities and within the facilities that serve that business
22 enterprise.
23 11 Gaming conducted under the Compact must comply with ordinances
24 approvedin accordance with IGRA. (Compact, 11,
6.l(a)).) The gaming agency
. 25 shall transmit copies ofits rules, regulations, and the like, as well as gaming
26 ordinance amendments,. to the California Gambling Control Commission within
27 twenty days following adoption or amendment. (Compact, 11,
6.1(c).) Under the
28 Compact, the Tribe is not to permit persons under the age oftwenty-one years to be
4
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 4 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
5/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
present in any room or area in which class
III
gaming activities are conducted.
(Compact,
11, 6.3.)
12. Section
8 2ofthe
Compact provides:
Nothing in this Gaming Compact affects-the civil
.or crimin_aljurisdiction
of
the State under Public Law
280 08 . ~ . C . Sec. 1162; 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1360) or
JGM, t9
the extent applicable. ID addition., criminal .
JUnsdtctlon to enforce t a t ~ gambhng laws Is transferred
to the StateP._.ursuant t9
18
U.S.C. I166(d), P.rovided
that no Gammg Activity conducted by the
Tnbe
pursuant
to this. Gaming Compact may be deemed to be a civil or.
criminal violation of any law
of
the State.
13. The Compact requires that the parties meet and confer in a good faith
attempt to resolve disputes that occur under it. This requirement is "without
prejudice to the right of either party to seek injunctive relief against the other when
circUinstances are deemed to require immediate relief." (Compact, 27,
9.1.)
14. Section
9.4
of the Compact provides for a limited waiver of sovereign
immunity as follows:
t:.t} In the event t iat a
giSP.l te
is be resolved in
federal.court
; as provtded m this Section 9, the State
and fue
S a i 1 t ~ 1
ysabel'I):ibe expressly consent to be. sued
thh_
r e i 1 1 . ~ ~ d w . d a i t h v e
any
Immumty therefrom that they may
. ave p r p v l _ ~ ,_-_.at: . .
.
0} The
g ~ s p l t ~
litnited solely to issues arising
under this. Grunmg ,Compac;t; -
(2) Neither side makes any claim for monetary
damages (that is,
on.ly
ipjunctive, specific performance,.
or declaratory rehef Is sought); and _ _
. (3) No person or entity other than the Santa
Y sahel 'tribe and the State is party to the action
15. Section 11.2.1(c) ofthe Compact empowers either party to bring an
action in federal court, after providing a sixty-day written notice
of
an opportunity
to cure any alleged breach, for a declaration that the other party has materially
breached
the
Compact. Upon issuance
of
that declaration, the complaining party
unilaterally may tertriif1ate the Compact.
5
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 5 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
6/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Tribal Gaming Under IGR
16. Congress passed IGRA to provide a statutory basis for the operation
of
gambling by Indian tribes. Among other things, IGRA created the NIGC.
17. IGRArestricts tribal gaming to Indian lands, which include Indian
reservations and lands held in trust
by
the United States for the benefit
of
any
Indian tribe. 25
U.S.C.
2703(4). IGRA does
not
authorize tribal gaming outside
of Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C.
2710(b)(1), (d)(l).
18. IGRA divides tribal gaming into three classifications: class I, which
involves traditional forms of tribal gaming and social games solely for minimal
prizes; class II, which is bingo meeting certain criteria and some card games; and
class III, which is all forms
of
gaming
that
are not class I
or
class II. 25 U.S.C.
2703(6), (7), (8). Class III gaming includes banking card games, electronic
facsimiles
of
any
game of
chance, and slot machines
of
any kind.
25
U.S.C.
2703(7)(B). The NIGC defines an electronic facsimile to be
a
game played in an
electronic format that replicates a game of chance by incorporating all of the
characteristics ofthe game, except when, for bingo , the electronic format
b r o ~ e n s ~ ~ r t i c i p t i o n
by allowing multiple players
to
play with
or
against each
other rather than with or against a machine. 25 C.P.R. 502.8.
19. Class III gaming activities are lawful on Indian lands
onlyifthe
activities
are (a) authorized by a tribal ordinance
or
resolution approved by the NIGC's chair,
(b) located in.a state that permits such gaming, and (c) conducted in conformance
witha tribal-state compact. 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(l).
20. IGRA waives sovereign immunity with respect to, and confers federal
24 district court jurisdiction over, any cause of action initiated by a State or Indian
25 tribe to enjoin class III gaming activity located on Indian lands and conducted in
26 violation
of
any Tribal-State compact. 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii).
27
28
6
. Complaint For Injunctive
And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 6 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
7/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Unlawful Internet ambling
21. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA), 31
U.S.C.
5361-5367, defines unlawful Internet gambling as placing, receiving, or
otherwise transmitting a bet or wager by any means that involves the Internet
where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federalor State law in
the State or Tribal lands in which the e t h ~ initiated, received, or otherwise made.
31
U.S.C. 5362(1
O) A).
22. The UIGEA contains an intrastate exception for bets or wagers that (a)
occur exclusively within a single state, (b) are expressly authori:(;ed by state Jaw, (c)
are subject to state law or regulation requiring verifications reasonably designed to
block access to minors and persons located out
of
the state, and (d) do not violate
any provisions of enumerated federal laws including IGRA.
31
U.S.C.
5362(10)(B).
73. The UIGEA contains an intra-tribal exception for bets or wagers that (a)
occur exclusively within a single tribe's Indian lands as defined by IGRA, (b)are
authorized by ordinance and, for class III gaming, a compact, (c) are subject to an
ordinance that includes verifications ''reasonably designed to block access to
minors and persons located out
of
the applicable Tribal lands, and (d) do not
violate IGRA.
31
U.S.C.
5362(10)(C).
24. The
UIGEA prohibits a person engaged in the business
of
betting or
wagering from knowingly accepting credit, electronic fund transfers, checks, or the
proceeds
of
any other form
of
financial transaction in connection with another
person's participation in unlawful Internet gambling.
31
U.S.C. 5363.
25. The UIGEA confers original and exclusive federal district court
jurisdiction to prevent and restrain prohibited transactions. 31 U.S.C. 5365(a).
The UIGEA allows a state to pursue the remedies provided under its compaC?t ~ i t h
respect to a prohibited transaction that allegedly has been or will be initiated,
7
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 7 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
8/88
1 received, or otherwise made on Indian lands (as that term is defined in [25 U.S.C.
2 2703( 4)]). 31 U.S.C. 5365(b )(3)(A)(ii).
3 alifornia Gambling Laws
4 26. The California Constitution broadly prohibits lotteries. Cal. Const. art.
5 IV, 19(a). It allows for the California State Lottery and bingo games for
6 charitable purposes. Cal. Const. art.
IV,
19(c), (d). t also allows the negotiation
7 and legislative ratification
of r i b a l ~ s t a t e
gaming compacts for the operation of slot
8 machines and for the conduct of lottery games and
banki1;1g
and percentage games
9 by federally recognized tribes on Indian lands in California. Cal. Const. art. IV,
10
19(f). The State's Legislature has found and declared that unregulated gambling
11
enterprises are inimical to the public health, safety, welfare, and good order. Cal.
12 Bus. Prof. Code 19.80 1 d).
13 27. California's statutory prohibitions relating to gambling as they existed on
14 November
6,
1984, have been constitutionalized. Hotel Employees nd Restaurant
15 Employees lnt lv. Davis, 21 Cal. 4th 585, 6 5 ~ 6 (1999). California statutes make
16
setting up and drawing a lottery, selling or furnishing a chance in a lottery, and
17
aidingor assisting in those acts, crimes. CaL Penal Code 320, 321, 322.
18 California Penal Code section 337a broadly prohibits keeping a place with devices
19 for the purpose
of
recording any bets or wagers, receiving anything
of
value bet or
20 wagered, recording bets or wagers, or offering or accepting any bets or wagers.
21
Prevailing
1,1pon
a person, through invitation or device,. to visit a place kept for the
22 purpose of illegal gambling is a crime. Cal. Penal Code 318. Every
l a c ~
used
-
23 for the purpose
of
illegal gambling is a nuisance. Cal. Penal Code 11225( a (1 ).
24 28. In the years following its creation pursuant to the California Constitution,
25
the California State Lottery has offered games, the names of which included
26
~ ~ b Th . 1 d . h 1 . . HB B Bl k
go. . ese games me u e, wit . out .
1m1tatwn,
. mgo . oxes, .ac. out
27
B. ' ' D' dB' d B' T'
5
N C l C . . S L
mgo, 1amon . mgo, an . mgo .. 1mes . o a I.t.orma tate otte.ry
28 game is permitted to be otiered through the Internet.
8
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 8 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
9/88
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29.
California
laws
regarding charitable bingo require that each participant
in
a game
be
physically present at the time and place where the game
is
being
conducted.
E.g.
Cal. Penal Code 326.5(m). California laws regarding charitable
bingo generally prohibit using electronic or video displays in connection with the
game ofbingo.
E.g. Cal.
Penal Code 326.5(o). California does not expressly
authorize Internet bingo
as
required forUIGEA s intrastate exception. 31
U.S.C.
5362 1 O) B
).
The NIGC s Interpretations
30.
Interpreting
IGRA,
the NIGC
has
determined that bingo, or
a
bingowlike
game, has three elements: (a) it is played
for
prizes with cards bearing numbers or
other designations;
b)
multiple players cover the numbers when objects, similarly
numbered,
are
drawn or electronically determined; and
c)
the.game
is
won
by
the
first person covering a previously designated arrangement o numbers. Based on
these elements, the NIGC has determined that bingo requires participation beyond
hitting a start button and having numbers covered. The NIGC further has
determined that allowing a game system
to
cover the bingo .card, rather than the
player, incorporates
all
characteristics
o
the game
o
bingo into an electronic
machine and system, and renders such a system
an
electronic facsimile.
31. Interpreting IGRA, the NIGC has opined that i a particular aid to. a game
becomes a necessity, or encompasses all the ;l.Spects o a particular game, it ceases
to be a.teclu1ological aid and becqmes an electronic facsimile.
32. Because IGRA gaming
is
limited to Indian lands, the NIGC consistently
has concluded that tribes making Internet gambling available to persons not located
. -
on
Indian lands violate IGRA.
The Tribe s Internet Gambling Is Accessible Outside its Indian Lands
33.
On or about November
3, 2014,
the Tribe began
to
offer a facsimile o
bingo over the Internet
to
bettors, eighteen years or older, without regard
to
whethe
they are located
on
the Tribe s Indian lands. Under
the.
Tribe s facsimile, bettors
9
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 9 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
10/88
1 use the Internet and
log
into the Tribe s bingo website
w w w . g e s e r t r o s ~ b i J 1 g < ; > . p o m ) .
2 The bettors
place
a bet
by
withdrawing money from accounts. Bettors fund their
3 accounts by credit card or other electronic funds transfer. The Tribe knowingly
4 accepts such funds. After the bet is placed, the game system plays the game
5 including covering the bingo card and determining the winner. The bettor s
6 participation is limited to electing the
amou11t
to bet and how many cards to play in
7 any game.
8 34. Based upon tribal representatives representations,
t ~ e
State is informed .
9 and believes and, therefore, alleges that the servers for, or other equipment integral
10
to, the Tribe s Internet gambling are located on the Tribe s Indian lands. The State
11
further is informed and believes and, therefore, alleges that the Tribe claims that
12 some portion,
if
not all,
of
the Internet gambling occurs on its Indian lands.
13
35
..
Persons, who are not located on the Tribe s Indian lands, can open
14 accounts and participate in the Tribe s Internet gambling. The State s investigators
.
.
.
15
opened an
a c c o u n ~
and participated in the Tribe s Internet gambling
fr om off of
the
16
Tribe s Indian lands.
O 0
, ,,,
17
36. Basedupon the NIGC s website and responses to inquiries, the State is
18
informed and believes and, therefore, alleges that the Tribe s gaming ordinance, as
19 approved by the NIGC s chair, does not expressly authorize Internet bets
or.
wagers
20
and the method by which they are initiated and received or otherwise made. The
21 State further is informed and believes and, therefore, alleges that the Tribe s
22 gaming ordinance, as approved by the NIGC s chair, does not include age and
23 location verification requirements. reasonably designed to block access to minors
.
.
...
24 and persons located outside the Tribe s Indian lands. The State also isinformed
25
and believes and, therefore, alleges that the Tribe s gaming ordinance, as approved
26 . by the
NIGC s
chair, does not include appropriate data security standards to preven
27 unauthorized access by any person whose age and current location has not been
28 verified. Finally, the State is informed and believes and, therefore, alleges that the
10
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 10 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
11/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Tribe's ordinances, as approved by the NIGC s chair, do not include provisions
required to meet any intra-tribal exception under the UIGEA.
37. The Compact does not expressly authorize Internet bets or wagers and the
method by which they are initiated and received or otherwise made. The Compact
does not include age and location verification requirements reasonably designed to
block access to minors and persons located outside the Tribe's Indian lands. The
Compact does not include appropriate data security standards to prevent
~ a u t h o r i z e d access by any person whose age and current location has not been
verified. The Compact thus does not include provisions required to meet any intra
tribal exception under the UIOEA.
The Meet and Confer Process
38. In July 2014, information appeared in the gaming press and gambling
: blogs that the Tribe intended to launch real money online poker in California
within a short time. On July 14,2014, the State sent a letter to the Tribe requesting
that the parties meet and
o n f e r
concerning
\iVhether
the Tribe's l n n ~ d Internet
gambling materially breached the Compact. That letter also referred to Internet
bingo.
39. By letter dated July 17, 2014, the Tribe rejected the State's request to
meet and confer. The Tribe responded that it intended to offer only online poker,
and not Internet bingo, conducted from servers located on tribal lands. The Tribe
-
- '
\
-;
-
- -
-
-
claimed that its prospective Internet gambling was not covered by the Compact.
The Tribe advised that it had no intention
of
discussing with the State any federal
statutes, including IGRA and the UIGEA.
FIRST CLAIM-FOR RELIEF
Breach
o
Compact)
40. The State realleges and incorporates by reference each and every
allegation set forth above in paragraphs 1 through 39.
11
Complaint
For
Injunctive And
Declaratory
Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 11 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
12/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
19
11
12
13
41. Under the Compact, the Tribe agreed not to engage in class III gaming
that is not expressly authorized by the Compact and not to conduct gaming to the
extent
limited under IGRA. The Tribe further agreed not to offer, by using the
Internet, games authorized to the California State Lottery unless others in California
were permitted to do so under state and federal law. The Tribe also agreed to
control its class III gaming so as to enforce the Compact s terms and IGRA and to
prevent illegal activity
in
operating class III gaming activities.
u r t h e r m o r e ~
the
Tribe agreed that its class III gaming would comply with ordinances approved
in
accordance with IGRA and would not be available to persons under twenty-one
years old.
42. The Internet gambling alleged in this Complaint is class III gaming not
authorized by the Compa,ct, is not conducted in accordance with IGRA,and. is
illegal.under state and federal laws. Among otherthings,:the T r i b y ~ I n t e ~ e t .
_
14 gambling cQnstitutes unlawful Internet gampling and violates, without limitation,
.
.
15 California Penal Code sections 318, 32Q 321, 322, 337a, 326.5(m), and326.5(o).
16 Additionally, the Tribe s Internet gambling does not comply with ordinances
17 approved in accordance
withiGRA
and is available to persons under twenty-one
18 years old.
19 43. By the actions alleged in this Complaint, the Tribe materially breached,
20 and continues to breach, the Compact.
21 44. The facts alleged in this Complaint demonstrate that emergency relief is
22 . required to maintain the public health and safety and general good order. The facts
23
alleged in this Complaint further demonstrate that the State is entitled to injunctive
24 relief as a result of the Tribe s material. breach of the Compact. .
' - ---
25
4.5.
By this Complaintandpursuant to Compact section l1.2.l{c), the State
26 gives the Tribe written notice of an opportunity to cure its breach
of
the Compact.
7 If
the Tribe does not cure within sixty days, the State is entitled to a declaration that
28 the Tribe has materially breached the Compact.
12
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 12 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
13/88
1
SECOND CL IM
FOR RELIEF
2
Unlawful Internet Gambling)
3 46. The State realleges and incorporates by reference each and every
4 .
allegation
set
forth above in paragraphs
1
through 45
5 47 The Internet gambling offered by
the
Tribe is unlawful Internet gambling
6 under the UIGEA.
7
48 The
Tribe is engaged in the business of betting and wagering under the
8 UIGEA.
9 49. In connection with the Internet gambling. th t it offers nd other persons
10 participation in that gambling, the Tribe knowingly has accepted, and is accepting,
11
credit, the proceeds
of
credit, electronic fund transfers, and other funds and monies
12
denominated in 31 U.S.C. 5363.
- . .
13 50. The State has authority to enforce the Compact, and the Tribe has waived
14
sovereign immunity with respect to such enforcement. The Compact provides
.
15
authority for the State to initiate enforcement proceedings. The UIGEA authorizes
16
such
proceedings in connection with the unlawful Internet gambling offered by the
17 Tribe.
18
51. The facts alleged in this Complaint demonstrate that emergency relief is
r
19 rt(.quired to maintain the public health and s fety and general good order and to
20 restrain the Tribe s violation of the UIGEA. The facts.alleged in this Complaint
21 further demonstrate that the State is entitled to injunctive reliefas a result of he
.
.
22 Tribe s violation of the UIGEA.
23 PR YER ND RELIEF
REQUESTED
24 WHEREFORE, the State prays that:
25
1
This Court enter a temporary restraining order, and preliminary and
26 permanent injunctions, prohibiting the defendants, including their officers, agents,
27 servants, employees and persons acting under any defendant s direction and .
28
13
Complaint
For Injunctive And
.
Declaratory
Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 13 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
14/88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
13
14
15
.
16
17
18
9
20
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
control from offering and operating Internet gambling in violation o the Compact
IGRA and the UIGEA.
2.
This Court declare that the Tribe has materially breached the Compact
that the Tribe has failed to cure the breach within sixty days
o
written notice and
that the State may exercise all rights powers and privileges accorded it with
respect thereto including without limitation the right to terminate. the Compact.
3. This Court enter such further orders and judgments as it deems
appropriate.
Dated: November 18 2014
Respectfully submitted
KAMALA D. HARRis
Attorney General o California
SARA
J.
DRAKE
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Is WILLIAM
P.
TORNGREN
WILLIAM P. TORNGREN
~ ~ ~ ~ Z Y ~ 2 ~ 1 a g ~ f f S ~ ~ t e o
alifornia
.
14
Complaint For Injunctive And
Declaratory Relief
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 14 of 14
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
15/88
'14CV2724 NLSAJB
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 1 of 2
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
16/88
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 2 of 2
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
17/88
EXHIBIT
1
TO COMPL INT
FOR
INJUNCTIVE
AND
DECL R TORY RELIEF
Tribal State Compact Between the
Santa Ysabel Band ofDiegueno Mission Indians
of the Santa Ysabel Reservation
and the State of California
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 1 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
18/88
;
-
\...
-
I
I
I
,_
-...........
... .
TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT
BETWEEN
THE
SANTA YSABEL BAND OF
DIEGUENO MISSION INDIANS OF
THE
SANTA YSABEL RESERVATION
.AND THE.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
-.
-"---
-
\
/
..:: ' '
~
- - - - - ~ -
-
-
....... ..... -- ________ ._____
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 2 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
19/88
1
i
I
I
J
t
~
)
...
,
I
()
TRIBAL-STATE GAMING COMPACT
Between the SANTA YSABEL BAND OF DIEGUEN.O MISSION
INDIANS OF THE SANTA YSABEL RESERVATION;
a federally recognized lndjan Tribe,
and the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
. This Tribal-8tate
G a ~ n g
Compact is entered into on a government
to-government basis by and between the Santa Ysabel Band ofDiegueno
Mission Indians of
the
Santa
Y s a b ~ l
Reservation, a e d e r a l ] y - r e c o g n i z e ~
sovereign Indian
tribe
(hereafter Santa Ysabel Tribe or Tribe, ), and
the
State of California, a sovereign
State
of he United States (hereafter State ),
pursuant to
the
Indian
Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (}l.L. 100-497,
codified at 18 U.S.C.
Sec.
1166 et seq. and 25 U.S.C.
Sec. 2701 et
seq.)
I ,
(hereafter IGRA ),
and
any
successor
statute
or
amendments .
PREAMBLE
A. The State
enters
into this Compact at
this
time in recognition that the
Santa Ysabel Tribe (1) communicated its interest n a compact in
May
2000,
.not long after compacts were signed in 1999 with other California Indian
Tribes; (2) possesses Indian lands as defined by
IGRA;
(3) will operate no
more than 350 Gaming Devices
at this
time on its Indian land
as
defined in
IGRA described in Appendix A attached hereto; and (4)
is
committed to
working cooperatively with local governmental entitiesin California to
mitigate off-reservation
m p a c t s
.
B. The State enters into this Compact out of respect for the unique
history and circumstances
of
the Tribe. The Tribe represents that, prior to
European contact,
~
~ c e s t o r s of the Santa Ysabel Tribe lived in
an
area
from the Pacific coast to the inland mountains of Southern California
'
C. On December 1875, U1ysses S. Grant, President of the United
States, signed an executive order establishing the original boundaries of the
Santa Ysabel Indian Reservation. The Tribe eventually permanently
relocated to the rocky mountain tops within the Reservation
D. The Santa Ysabel IndianReservation now consists of three separate
parcels, currently called Tract 1, Tract
2,
and Tract 3, totaling
;:;tpproximately
1?,500 acres and
is
within the original boundaries ofthe Santa Ysabel
.
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 3 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
20/88
. _
i )
..
I
(
r ~
,
I
_/
,
,
Reservation.
The Tribe has approximately 800 enroJled mei)lberS
who
possess at
least 1/8
degree Indian blood .
B. The Tribe has
faced
and o n t i n u ~ s
to
face
a
number of
economic
hardships including butnoflimited to: the destruction of valuable timber and
natural resources loca-ted n l h e
Reservation
due to an. extensive fire
in
2002
and
an
unprecedented bark reetle infestation; the
lack
of running water or
electricity for many
members
of
the
Tribe; and a high unemployment rate.
F. The Santa Ysabel Tribe
is
governed by r t i c l e ~ ofAssociation
adopted
by the Tribe on June 2, 1974,.as amended. The Tribe does not have
a tribal court
G.
In
1988, Congress enacted
IGRA
as
the
federal statute governing
Indian gaming
in the
United
States.
The
purposes
ofiGRA are
to
provide a
.statutory basis for
the
operation ofgaming by Indian tribes as a means of
promoting tribal economic development, self sufficiency, and.strong tribal
governments.;
to provide a statutory
basis
for regulation oflndian ginning
adequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting n f l u e n c e s ~
to ensure
that the Indian tribe is
the
prima ry beneficiary of the gaming
operation; to ensure that gaming
is
conducted fairly and honestly by both
the
operator and players; and to declare that the establishment
of
an independent
federal regulatory authority for gaming on Indian lands, federal standards for
gaming on Indian lands, and a National
Indian
Gaming Commission are
necessary to m e e ~ congressional concerns.
H.
The
system
of regulation oflpdian gaming. fashioned by Congress in
IGRA
rests on an allocation of regulatory jurisdiction among the three
sovereigns involved: the federal
government,
the state in. which a tribe has
land,
and
the tribe itself. lORA makes
Class
III
gaming
activities lawful on
the lands. of federallyrecognized Indian tribes only if such activities
are:
(1)
authorized by a tribal
ordinance,
(2) located in a state. that permits such
gaming for
any
purpose by
any
person, organization or entity,
and
{3)
conducted
in
conformity with a gaming
compact
entered into between
thy
Indian tribe and
the
state and approved by
the
Secretary of the Interior
I.
The Santa
YsabelTribe doesnot currently operate a Gaming Facility
that offers
Class
III Gaming Activities. However, on or after the effective
date of this Compact, the Santa Ysabel
Tribe
will develop and operate a
2
~
..
--
...
- .. _ -
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 4 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
21/88
)
t
.
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Gaming
Facility with up to 350
Gaming Devices
in
San
Diego County,
California, on
the
parcels
described in Appendix
A
J.
The
Santa
Y
ahel
Tribe
and
the
State share
an
interest in mitigating
off-reservation impacts of the Gaming Facility, as
well
as an interest in .
fostering a
good
neighbor relationship
among the.
Tribe,
the
State
and the
community that borders on
the
Tribe's reservation
land.
For these
reason.s,
the Santa Ysabel Tribe and
the
State believe it is in the best interests of the
Tribe and the State for the Tribe
to
enter into eJ.Iforcea,ble and binding
agreements with San Diego County and any other local governmental
entities that will either provide services to,. or be adversely impacted by, the
con'struction or' operation
of
the Gaming
Facility
to address off:-reservation
impacts of the Santa Ysabel Tribe's a m i ~ g Facility:
K.
The exclusive rights that
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe
will
enjoy under
this
Compact create a unique opportunity for 'the Santa Y ahel Tribe
to
operate
its Gaming Facility in an econoniic environment
free
of competition from
the
Class III gaming referred to in Section 4.0. of
this
Compact
on
non
Indian lands
in
California.
The
parties
are m i ~ d f u l
that
this
unique economic
environment is of great
value to the
Santa Y ahel
Tribe and the
fact that
income from Gaming
Devices will
represent a b s t a n t i a l portion
of the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe's revenues. The parties
are
also mindful of he fact that
the
State will bear costs directly related to the regulation.and operation of
Gaming Devices. In consideration for the exclusive rights enjoyed l:?Y the .
.Santa Ysabel Tribe, and
in
further .consideration for the State's ~ . i l l i n g n e s s
to
enter into this Compact,
and to
bear such costs,
and
in light of the
meaningful concessions offered.by the State
i11.
good faith negptiations, the
Santa Ysabel Tribe
has agreed
to provide
to
tb,e
State, on
a sovereign-to
sovereign basis, a portion of its revenue from
Gaming
Devices. .
L. The State
has
a legitimate interest in promoting the purposesofIGRA
for all
federally recognized
Indian tribes
in
California;
whether gaming or
non-gaming. The State also has a legitimate sovereign interest in regulating
the growth of Class III
Gaming
Activities in California. The Santa Ysabel
Tribe
and the
State
share
a joint sovereign interest in ensuring that tribal
gaming activities are
free from
criminal
and
other undesirable elements .
M. The State enters into this Compact in reliance on the representations
of the Santa Ysabel Tribe that the land identified in the box described as
Proposed Development. Zone
in
Appendix A is
the
land
on which it
will
3
~ ~ - .
--------
~ ~
, ~
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 5 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
22/88
I
.......)
.
I
I
I
I
I
..
}
__;
locate the
Gaming
Facility, and that such land
is
Indian lands acquired prior
to October 17, 1988 imd qualifies for gaming under IGRA.
N.
The
State
also
enters
into
this
Compact
out
of a respect
for the
sentiment o f t h ~ _ v o t e r s of California
who,
in approving P r o p o s i t i o ~ s 5
and
lA, expressed their b e l i e f t h ~ t the forms
of
gaming authorized herein should
be allowed. /
0.
The
parties
to
this Compact recognize each other s respective lawful
govemmental interests, and further recognize that any
and
all obligations,
waivers
of
urisdictionalinununities_o_r.agreements to abide
by
governmental
laws and regulations arising
from
this Compact are solely by means
of
this
contractual
agreement, which
is
an exercise of
the
governmental authority of
the parties. Except as provided in this Compact, nothing herein contained
shall
be
construed
as
actual or
implied derogation or
shall
be applied
so as
to
hinder,
any and all powers of internal sel.f-govemment of
the
Santa Ysabel
Tribe or
the State of California,
or
their respective governmental standing
Section l.O. PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES.
The tenns of his Compact
are
designed and intended to:
(a) Evidence the goodwill and cooperation of the
Santa
Ysabel-Tribe
and
the
State
in fostering a mutmilly respectful government-to-government
relationship that will
serve
the mutUal interests of the parties .
(b) D e v ~ l o p and implement a mearis of regulating Class l l gaming,
and only Class Ill gaming, on the Santa
Ysabel
T r i b ~ s Indian lands to
ensure
its.
fair and honest operation in accordance with IGRA, and through
that regulated
Class
III
gaming, enable the Santa Ysabel Tribe to develop
self-sufficiency,_
promote tribal economic development,
and
generate jobs
and revenues
to
support the Santa Y,sabel Tribe s government
and
governmental
services
and
programs. .
(c) Promote ethical practices in
conjunction
with that gaming, through
the licensing and
control ofpersons and
entities
employed in,
or
providing
goods and services
to,
the
Santa Ysabel Tribe s Gaming Operation and
protecting against the presence or participation of persons whose criminal
backgrounds, reputations, character, or associations make
them
unsuitable
for
participation
iri
gaming,
thereby maintaining a high level of integrity in
tribal
government
gaming.
4
___
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 6 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
23/88
l
t
-
)
'
'
'
'
'
'
I
-
)
' _ /
I
'
'
. \
I
.1
Section 2.0.
DEFINITIONS.
Sec. 2.1. Applicant
means
an
individual or
entjty that applies for a
Santa Ysabel Tribal hcense
or
State certification.
Seer.
2.2.
Association means an
association,
of California tribal and
_state
gaming
regulators, the membership ofwhich comprises up to two
representatives
from
each tribal
g aming
agency of those tribes with
\YhO,m.
the State has a gaming compact under
lORA, and up
.to
two
delegates each
from the Division of
Gambling
Control in the California Department o
Justice
and
the California Gambling Control Commission.
Sec. 2.3. Class Ill gaming
means
the forms of Class III
gamhi.g
defined as such in 25
U.S.C.
Sec. 2703(8) and by regulations o the National
Indian Gaming Commission .
Sec. 2.3
.1
.. Coordinator means t h ~ .Office o the American Indian
Coordinator in the Office of the Governor.
I I
Sec.
2.4. Gaming
c t i v i t i e s ~
means
the
Class
III gaming activities
authorized under
this Gaming
Compact.
Sec. 2.5.
Gaming Compact or Compact means this compact.
Sec. 2.6. Gaming Device means a slot machine,
inCluding an
electronic., electromechanical, e l e c t r i c a l ~ or video device that, for
consideratio n,. pemrits: individual play with or against that device or the
participation in any electronic, electromechanical, electrical, or video system
to wl)ich that device is connected; the playing of r n ~ s thereon or therewith,
including, but not limited to, the playing of
~ c s i m i l e s
o games
o
chance or
skill;
the
possible deliveryof, or entitlement by the player to, a prize or
something.ofvalue as a result of the application of
an
element of. chance;
and-a
method for viewing the outcome, prize
won,
and other infonnation
regarding the playing of games thereon or
ther.ewith.
'
Sec. 2.7.
Gaming Employee means.any natural person
who (a)
operates, maintains, repairs, assists
in
any Class Ill gaming activity, or is in
any way responsible for supervising such Gaming Activities or
e r ~ o n s
who
conduct
1
operate, account
for,
or supervise any such gaming activity, (b) is
in a category under
federal or
tribal gaming law requiring licensing,
(c) is
an
employee of the Tribal Gaming Agency with access
to
confidential
information,
or
(d)
is
a person whose employment-duties require or authorize .
access to
areas
of the Gaming Facility that ate not open to the public
Sec. 2.8. Gaming Facility or ''Facility means any building in
California
in
which Class liT gaming activities or gaming operations occur,
or
in
which
the business records, receipts,
or
other funds o the gaming
operation
are
maintained (but excluding offsite facilities primarily dedicated
to storage of those records, and financial institutions), and all rooms,
5
_________________ ---- .... -----------
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 7 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
24/88
'
,
.,
-
)
.
t
.
t
t
t
,
- I
'-
buildings,
and areas: including
parking lots
and walkways,
a principal
purpose of
which
is to serve the activities of the
Gaming
,Operation,
provided that nothing herein prevents the conduct of Class
II
gaming (as
defined
under
IGRA) therein.
Sec. 2.9. Gaming Operation m ~ n s the business enterprise that
offers and
Operates Class
III Gaming
Activities, whether
exclusively or'
otherwise .
S e c ~ 2.1 0. Gaming Ordinance means a tribal ordinance or resolution
duly
authorizing the conduct of Class
III Gaming
Activities
on the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe's
Indian, Lands and approved
under
IGRA.
Sec. 2.11.
Gaming
Resources means any goods or
services provided
or used in connection with Class III Gaming Activities, w:hether exclusively
or
otherwise, including, but not limited
to,'
equipment, furniture, gambling
devices
and
ancillary equipment, implements of gaming activities such as
playing
cards and
dice, furniture designed primarily for Class III ganring
activities, maintenance
or
security equipment
and
services, and
Class l l
gaming
consulting services. Gaming R e s o u r ~ e s does not include .
professional accounting
and
legal services .
Sec. 2.1.2.
Gaming Resource Supplier
11
means
any
person
or
entity
who, directly or indirectly, manufactures, d i s t r i b u t e s ~ supplies, vends, leases,
or otherwise purveys Gaming Resources to the' Garmng Operation or
Gaming
Facility, provided that
the
Tribal Gaming Agency may exclude a
purveyor of equipment
or
furniture that is.
not
specifically designed for,
and
is distributed generally for
use
othet: thari in connection with, Gaming
Activities, if
the
purveyor is
not
otherwise a Gaming Resource Supplier as .
described by of Section 6.4,.5, the compensation received by the purveyor is
not groSsly disproportionate to the value of the
goods
or services provided,
and the purveyor is not otherwise a
person
who exercises a significant
influence
over the
Gambling Operation. . .
Sec.
2.13
.. IGRA means the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988
(P.L. 100-497,
18
U.S.C. Sec. 1166 et seq. and
5
U.&.C.:Sec.
2701
et
seq.}
any
amendments
thereto, arid all regulations promulgated thereunder
Sec. 2.13
.1.
Santa Ysabel Tribe or Tribe means the Indian tribe
listed in the Federal Register
as
the Santa Ysabel Band ofDiegueno Mission
indians ofthe Santa Ysabel Reservation or an authorized official
or
agency
thereof.
Sec. 2.14.
Management Contractor
means any Gaming
Resource
Supplier
with
whom the Santa Ysabel Tribe has c o n t r a c t ~ d
for the
management of any
Ga:miDg
Activity
or
Gaming Facility, including, but not
6
__
---- ........ .
.
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 8 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
25/88
. .
.
)
.
.
..
........
)
.
~ -
limited
to,
any person who would be regarded
as
a management contractor
under IGRA .
Sec. 2.15. Net Win means net win
as defined by
American
Institute
of
Certified Public Accountants.
1 .
Sec. 2.16.
NIGC means the
National Indian Gaming Commission .
Sec. 2 . 1 7 . S t a t ~ means
the
State of California
or
an authorized
official oragency thereof designated by this Compact or by
the
Governor.
Sec. 2.18. State Ga11iing Agency means the entities authorized to
investigate, approve, and regulate
gaming
licenses and regulate
gaming
pursuant to the
Gambling
Control Act (Chapter 5 (commencing
with
Section
19800)
of
Division 8 of the
Business and Professions Code)
.
Sec. 2.19. '
0
Tribal Chairperson means the
person
duly elected under
the Santa Ysabel Tribe's Articles of Association to serve
as
the primary
spokesperson
for
the
Santa
Ysabel Tribe. '
Sec. 2.20.
Tribal
Gaming
Agency
means
the
person, agency,
b ~ a r d
committee, cormnission, or council designated under tribal law, including,
but not limited to, an intertribal gaming regulatory agency approved to fulfill
those
functions
by the National
Indian Gaming
Connnission,
as
primarily .
responsible for carrying out the Santa Ysahel Tribe's regulatory .
r(fsponsibilities under IGRA and the Tribal Gariring Ordinance. No person
employed in, or in connection with, the management,' supervision, or
conduct ofany gaming activity may
be
a member or employee
of
the Tribal
Gaming Agency.
Section 3.0.
CLASS
III
GAMING
AUTHORizED ANn
PERMITTED. The
Santa ,ysabel Tribe is hereby authorized and pennitted to
engage in only the Class III Gaming Activities expressly referred to in .
Section 4.0 and shall not engage in Class III gaming that is not expressly
authorized in that Section.
The
gaming activities herein refer.red to are
authorized
to
be
conducted at
the Gaming Facility situated on the Tribe's
Indian lands within
the
meaning ofiGRA, identified in Appendix A, whicb
is hereby represented by
the
Tribe to be located within
the
boundariesof ts
original Reservation established pursuant to an Executive Order issued by
President Ulysses
S. Grant
for the Tribe's benefit on December 27, 1875. It
is specifically understood that
this
Compact is entered
into
by the State in
reliance
upon
the Tribe's representation and
is
null
and
void
if
the
representation is not accmate.
1
See
Addendum
regarding the Meaning
of
Terms.
7
...
~ -----.---
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 9 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
26/88
,
.,_
J
')
.
'
'
'
/
-J
'
Section
4.0.
SCOPE OF
CLASS III GAMING.
. Sec. 4;1. Authorized
and
Permitted Class
III
Gaming. The Santa
Ysabel Tribe is hereby authorized and permitted to operate
the
following
Gaming Activities under
the terms and
conditions set
forth in
this Gaming
Compact: .
(a) Gaming
Devices.
1
(b) Any banking or.
~ r c e n t a g e card
game .
(c) Any devices
or
games
that are
authorized
under state
law
tothe
California
State
Lottery, provided that the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe will
not offer
such games through use of the Internetunless o ~ e r s in the state
are
permitted to do
so
under state
and
federal law .
(d) Nothing
herein
shall be construed to preclude negotiation ~ f a
separate, compact governing
the
conduct of off-track wagering at the a n ~ a
Ysabel
Tribe's
Gaming
Facility.
.
(e)
In
recognition that
the
scope of
gaming
pennitted
to
Indian tribes
in California under Tribal-State gaming ~ o m p a c t s now in existence is
governed by unifonn language
in
each compact,
the
Santa Ysabel. Tribe and
the State acknowledge that the scope of
Class III gaming permitted
by
this
Gaming Compact 1s identical to the
s c o p ~
of Class III gaming permitted to
aily tribe under any
compact
now in existence, and will remain SQ during the
duration of his Gaming Compact.
Sec. 4.2. Authorized Gaming Facility. The Santa Ysabel
Tribe
may
establish
and
operate one Gaming Facility on the site identified in Appendix
A of
this
Compact,
which
is located on Indian landson which gaming may
lawfully beconducted under
the
Indian Gaming
ReiDJlatory
Act. The
Santa
Ysabel Tribe may
combine and
operate
in
this Gaming Facility any forms
.and kinds
of
gamill;g permitted under
law,
except to the extent limited under
IGRA, this
Compact, or' the Santa Ysabel
Tribe's.
Gaming Ordinance. If he
Santa Ysabel
Tribe
requests in writing that the State negotiate with the Santa
Ysahel Tribe for a second
Gaming
Facility
on
i ~ s Indian lands as defmed by
IGRA, the parties agree to negotiate such request in
good
faith.
Sec.
4.3.
Authorized Number of Gaming
Devices
Sec.
4.3.1 (a) The Santa Ysabel Tribe may operate no more than 350
Gaming Devices. From and after the first day of
operatiop.
of its first
Gaming
Facility,
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe shall pay five percent (5 ) of ts
Net
Win
from
the
operation of Gaming Devices
to
the California Gambling
Control
Connnission, or such other State entity as may be designated by
the
Governor, for deposit
into the
General
Fund. Payments
shall
be
made
on a
quarterly
basis
and
shall be
determined aitd made not later than the thirtieth
(30th) day following the end of each calendar quarter.
The
first payment shal1
8
~
..
'- .- ....
.
................
~ ~ .... . ---- -- ---
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 10 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
27/88
t .
t
t
t
.
.
t
t
t
l )
...
t
)
I
L
be made. at the conclusion of the
first
full calendar quarter following the first
.
day of
operation of
any
Gaming Device. . .
(b)
Any quarterly payment not paid on or before the date
on
which ,
such amount
is
due
shall
be
deemed overdue.
I f
any
quarterly payment
under subdivision (a) is overdue, the Tribe shall
pay,
in addition to the
overdue quarterly paym ent, interest on such amount from the date sucp .
quarterly
payment
was due until the date such quarterly payment (together .
with interest
thereon)
was actually paid at the rate of 1.0% per month or the
maximum rate permitted
by
state law,
whichever is
less. Entitlement
to such
'interest shall be in addition
to
any other remedies the State may have.
.
(c)
At the
time
each quarterly payment is made, the Tribe shall submit
.
to tl;le
California Gambling Control Commission, or such other State entity
as
may
be
designated
by
the Governor, a
re,port (the
Quarterly Net Win
Payment Report ) certified
by an
authorized e p r e s e n ~ a t i v e of Tribe
reflecting
the
Net Win, and the total amount of the quarterly payment.
(d) f the California
Gambling Con'trol Commission, or such
other
State entity
as
may be designated by the
Governor, causes
an audit to
be
made by or on behalf of
the
State
of
he Quarterly Net Win Payment Report
submitted pursuant to subsection (c), and the quarterly Net Win payment for
any quarter
as
reflected on such quarter's
Q ~ a r t e r l y
Net Win Payment
Report is found to be understated, the State will promptly notify the Tribe,
and the Tribe will either accept the difference or provide.a reconciliation
satisfactory
to
the State. If the Tribe accepts the difference or d o ~ s not
provide a reconciliation satisfactory to the State wjthin.sixty (60)
days
of
receipt
of
the
notice, the Tribe.rnust immediately pay the arnount ofthe
. resulting deficiencies
in
the quarterly payment plps interest on such amounts
from
the date they were due at
the
rate of
1.0%.
per month or the maximum
rate permitted by state law, whichever is less. .
(e)
The
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe
shall
not conduct any
Gaming
Activity
authorized by
this
Compact if
he
Santa Ysabel Tribe is more.thaii o (2)
quarterly contributions il l arrears in its payments to the General Fund
Sec. 4.3.2. Revenue Sharing with
N o n ~ G a m i n g T r i b e s .
(a) For the purposes
of
this Section 4.3.2
and
Sections 4.3.1 and 5.0,
the
following definitions apply:
(i)
A Compact Tribe is a tribe having a compact with the. State that
authorizes
the Gaming
Activities authorized
by this
C o m p ~ c t .
Federally
recognized tribes that
are
operating fewer than 350
Gaming
Devices
are
Non-Compact Tribes. Non-Compact Tribes
shall
be deemed third party
beneficiaries of
this
and other compacts identical in all material respects. A
Compact Tribe that becomes a Non-Compact Tribe may not thereafter return
9
- - ~ - - - - - - - - - -
~
------------------------------------------
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 11 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
28/88
---------
r 1
)
~
i . =:
to
the status of a Compact Tribe for a period of two (2) years after becoming
a N
n ~ o m p a c t
Tribe.
(ii)
The
Revenue Sharing Trust Fund is a fund created by the
Legislature
and
administered by the California Gambling Control
Commission, as Trustee,
for
the receipt, deposit,
and
distribution
of
monies
paid pursuant to
this
Section 4.3.2.
(iii) The Speciai Distribution Fund is a fund created by the Legislature
for the receipt, deposit, and distribution of o ~ i e s p a i ~ pursuant
to
Section
5.0. .
. Sec. 4.3.2.1. Revenue Sharing Trust Fund .
(a) The Santa Ysabel Tribe agrees with all other Compact Tribes that
are
parties
to
compacts having this
Sectiol.14.3.2,
that each N o n ~ C o m p a c t
Tribe in
the
State shall receive the
sum
of $1.1 million per year. In the event
there are insufficient
monies
in the Revenue Shanng rust Fun'd to pay $1.1
million per year
to
each
o n ~ C o m p a c t
Tribe,
any
available monies
in
that
Fund shall be.distributed
to
Non-Compact Tribes in equal shares. Monies in
excess of the amount necessary
to
pay $1.1 million to
each
Non-Compact
Tribe in
any
given year shall remain in the R ~ v e n u e .Sharing Trust Fund
available for disbursement in future years.
'(b)
Payments
made to Non-Compact Tribes
~ ~ h a l l be
made quarterly
and in equal shares out of the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund. The Commission
shall serve
as
the trustee
of
the fund. The Coinmtssion shall have no
discretion with respect
to
the
use or
disbursement
of
the trust :fluids. Its sole
authority shall be to serve as a depository of the trust
Unds
and d i s ~ u r s e
them
on
a quarterly basis
to
N o n ~ o i n p a c t
Tribes.
In no
event shall the
State s General Fund
be
obligated to make up any shortfall or pay any
unpaid claims .
Section 5.0. REVENUE DISTRIBUTION
Sec.
5.1. The
parties acknowledge that certain
o m p ~ c t
Tribes make
co.ntributions
to
the Special Distribution Fund created
by
the Legislature .
Sec. 5.2.
Use
of
funds. The Special Distribution Fund is available for
appropriation by the Legislature for the following purposes:
(a)
grants,
including
any
administrative costs,
for
programs designed to address
gambling addiction; (b) grants, including any administrative costs, for the
support of state
and
local government agencies impacted by tribal
govertunent gaming; (c) compensation for regulatory costs incurred by the
State Gaming Agency and the State Department of Justice in connection
with the implementation and administration. of the Compact; (d) payment of.
shortfalls that may occur in the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund; and (e) any
1
~ . . : _
- - - - ww--
--
.
------
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 12 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
29/88
.-----
t
t
t
1.
--
. I
1
:
I
.
__
other
purpqses
specified by the Legislature. It is the intent of the parties that
Compact Tribes will be consulted
in
the
process of identifying p u r p o ~ e s
for
grants
made
to local
governments.
Section 6.0. LICENSING.
Sec. 6.1. Gaming
Ordinance
and
Regulations .
a) All
Gaming Acti ities conducted under
this
Ganring Compact
shall, at a minimum, comJ?1Y with a Gaming Ordinance duly adopted by the
Santa Ysabel Tribe
and
approved in accordance with
IGRA,
and with
all
rules, regulations, procedures, specifications, and standards duly adopted by
the
Tribal
Gaming
Agency.
(b)
The
Santa Ysabel Tribe
shall
transmit a copy of its Gaming
Ordinance to the California Gambling Control Commission or such other
State entity
as
may be designated by the Governor, within twenty 20) days
following execution of
his
Compact.
c) The Tribal Gatniitg AgenGy shall transmit a copy
of
its rules,
regulations, procedures, specifications,
and
standards, and any amendments
thereto or to its Gaming Ordinance, to
the
California Gambling
Control
Connnission or. such other State entity
may be
designated by
the
Governor, within twenty 20) days following adoption or amendment.
d) The. documents
identified
in
subdivisions (b)
and
(c) b o v ~
applicable to
the
public shall be
made
available to
any
member ofthe public
upon request for i n s p e c t ~ o n and copying at
the
Tribe s offices or
in
such
other manner as the Tribe may designate .
Sec. 6.2.
Tribal Ownership, Management,
and
Control
of
Gaming
Operation. The Gaming Operations authorized under this Gaming Compact
shall be owned solely by
the
Santa Ysabel Tribe .
Sec.
6.3. Prohibition Regarding
Minors.
The Santa Ysabel Tribe shall
not permit persons under the age of 21 years
to
be present in ,any room or
area in which Class ~ I I
Gaming
Activities
are
being conducted unless the
person is
en
route to a nongaming area
of
the Gaming facility
Sec.
6.4. Licensing Requirements and Procedures .
Sec. 6.4.1. Summary
of
Licensing Principles.
All
persons in
any
way
connected with the
Gaming
Operation or Facility
who
are required to be
licensed
or
to submit to a background investigation under IGRA, and any
others required
to
be licensed under
this
Gaming Compact, including, but
not limited to, all
Gaming
Employees and Gaming Resource Suppliers,
and
any
other person having a significant influence over
the
Gaming Operation
must be licensed by the Tribal
Gaming Agency.
The p r t i e ~ intend that the
licensing process provided for in
this
Q ~ t n r i n g Compact shall involve joint
11
-----
---
--
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 13 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
30/88
.
)
.
t
)
I
I
I
\
__ .
cooperation between
the Tribal
Gaming
Agency
and
.the State
Gaming
Agency,
as
more particularly described herein.
Sec.
6.4.2,
Gaming
Facility. .
(a) The Gaming Facility authorized by this Gaming Compact shall be
licensed
by
the Tribal Gaming
Agency in
conformity with the requirements
o
this Gaming Compact,
thd
Tribal Gaming Ordinance,
and
IGRA. The
}jcense shall be reviewed and renewed, i appropriate, every two 2) years
thereafter. The Santa Ysaoel Tribe shall provide a copy of the initial license .
.and each renewal license
to
the California
Gambling
Control
Commissio:rt
or
such other State entity
as may be
designated
by
the Governor, within
tWenty
20) days
after issuance of
the
license and
each
renewal. The active license
or renewal thereof shall
be
posted
in
a conspicuous
and
public
place. in
the
Gaming
Facility
at all times
.
b) In
order
to
protect
the
pealth.and safety of all Gaming Facility
patrons, guests, and employees, the Ganring Facility o the Santa Ysabel
Tribe
constructed after
the
effective date
o this
Gaming Compact,
and all
expansiens or modifications
to
a Gaming Facility in operation
as o
the
effective date
o
tNs
Compact,
shall meet
the
building
and
safety codes
o
the Santa Ysabel Tribe,
which, as
a condition for engaging in that
construction, expansion, modification, or renovation, shall amend its
e;xisting
building
and
safety
codes i
necessary, or enact
such
codes ifthere
are none,. so that they meet the standards of either the building an d safety .
codes
o
any county within
the
boundaries of which the site
o
the Facility is
located, or the Uniform Building Codes, including
a11
uniforin
fire,
plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and related codes then in effect provided
that nothing herein shall
be
deemed
to
confer jurisdiction
upon.
any county
or the State with respect to .any reference
to
such building and safety codes.
Any
s ~ c h
construction,
expansion
or modification will also comply with the
federal Americans with Disabilities
Act, P.L. 1 0 1 ~ 3 3 6 as
amended
1
42
U.S.C.
12101 et
s e q ~
.
c)
Any Gaming Facility in which gaming authorized by this Gaming
Compact
is
conducted
shall be
issued a certificate
o
occupancy by the
Tribal Gaming Agency prior
to
occupancy
i
it
was
not used for
any
Gaming
Activities under lORA prior
to
the effective date of this Gaming Compact,
or, i
it
was so
used, within
one
year thereafter.
The
issuance
o
this
certificate shall be reviewed by the Tribal Gaming Agency for continuing
compliance every two years thereafter Inspections by qualified building and
safety experts shall be conducted under the direction of the Tribal Gaming
Agency
as the
basis for issuing any certificate hereunder.
The
Tribal Gaming
Agency shall determine
and
certify that,
as
to
new construction or new use
12
________
____________________________
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 14 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
31/88
t
t
r, )
.
. _
)
--
.
for gaming,
the FacjJity
meets the Santa Ysabel
Tribe s
building and safety
code, or,
as
to facilities or
portions of
facilities-that w e r ~
used for
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe s
Gaming
Activities prior
to this
Gaming
Compact,
that
the
facility
or
portions
thereof
do
not endanger
the
healthor
safety
o
occupants
or
the integritY
of
the Gaming Operation. The SaJ?ta Ysabel
Tribe
will
not
offer Class
III gaming
in a Facility
that
is constructed
or
maintained
in a,
manner that
endangers the health or safety
of
occupants or
the integrity o .
the
gaming operation .
(d)
The State shall
designate
an agent or agents to be
given reasonable
notice ofeach
inspection by the
Tribal
Gaming Agency s
experts,
whicp
state agents may
accompany
any
such inspection.
The
Santa Ysabel Tribe
agrees to correct
any
Gaming Facility condition
noted
in
an
inspection that
does not meet the
standards
set
forth
in subdiVisions (b) and (c). The Tribal
Gaming Agency and the
State s designated
agen.t
or agents s h l ~ exchange
any
reports of
an
inspection
within ten
19)
days after
completion of
the
report,
which
reports shall also be separately and simultaneously forwarded
by both agencies
to the
Tribal
Chairperson.
Upon
certification
by the
Tribal
Gaming
Agency s experts
that a Gaming
Facility meets
applicable standards,
the Tribal
Gaming
Agency shall forward
the
experts certification to the
State
Within ten (10) days
of issuance. Ifthe
State s agent
objects
to
that
certification,
the Santa
Y ahel
Tribe shall make
a
g0od faith
effort to
address
the State s
concerns,
but
i
he State does not :withdraw its objection, the
matter
will be resolved
in
accordance
with
the dispute
resolution.provisions
o Section 9.0.
Sec.6.4.3. Suitability Standard
Regarding
Gaming
Licenses. In .
reviewing an
application for
a
gaming
license,
and
in addition
to any
standards
set.forth
in
the
Tripai
Gaming
Ordinance, the Tribal Gaming_,
Agency
shall
consider whether issuance of
the
license
is
inimical to public
health, safety,. or welfare, and
whether
issuance,
of
the
license will
undermine public trust that the
Santa
Ysabel Tribe s
Gaming Oper }tions,
or
tribal
government gaming
generally, are
free
from criminal and dishonest
elements and would be
conducted honestly. A license
may
not
be
issued
unless, based on all information
and
documents submitted, the Tribal .
Gaming
Agency
is
satisfied that the applicant is all of
the
following, in
addition
to
any
other criteria in
lORA
or
the Tribal
Gaming
Ordinance:
.
(a)
A
person
of
good
character,
honesty,
and
integrity .
(b)
A person
whose
prior activities,
criminal
record (if
any),
reputation,
habits,
and associations do not
pose
a threat
to
the public interest
.
or
to.
the
effective regulation and control of
gambling,
or create or enhance
the dangers
of unsuitable, unfair,
or
illegal
practices, methods,
or activities
13
~ . . . . . . . . _ . . ___ ______
Case 3:14-cv-02724-AJB-NLS Document 1-2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 15 of 72
8/10/2019 California vs Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
32/88
/ I
'
( )
.
I
--
a
in the conduct of gambling, or
in
the carrying on of the business and
financial arrangements incidental
thereto
(c)
A
person who
is in all
other
respects qualified to be licenseq as
provided
in this
Gaming
Compact,
IGRA,
the Tribal Gaming
Ordinance,
and
any other criteria adopted
by
the
Tribal Gaming Agency
or
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe. An
applicant-
shall not
be
found
to
be unsuitable solely on the ground
that the applicant
was
art employee of a
tribal gaming
operation
in
California
that
was
conducted
prior
to
the effective.date of this Compact.
Sec. 6.4.4.
Gaming
Employees. (a) Every G ~ m i n g Employee shall
obtain,
and
thereafter maintain current, a valid tribal gaming license, which
shall
be
subject to biennial renewal; provided that in accordance
with
Section
6.4.9,
tbose.persons
may be
employed
on a
emporary
or
conditional
basis pending completion of
the
licensing process .
(b) Except as provided
in
subdivisions
(c)
and
(d), the Santa Ysabel
Tribe will not employ or continue
to
employ, any person whose application
to
the State Gaming Agency
for
a determination of suitability,
or
for a
renewal o
such
a determination,
has
been
d e ~ e d
or has expired i t ~ o u t
renewal.
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a),
the
Santa Ysabel Tribe may
retain
in
its
employ
a
~ s o n whose applicatiop. for a.-determination
o
suitabiHty, or
for
a renewal o
such
a e t e n n i n t i o n ~ has been deJ:}ied
by the
State
Gaming
Agency,
if:
(i)
the person holds
a v alid
and
current license
issued by
the
rnbal
Gaming Agency
that must
be
renewed at least
biennially; (ii) the denial of the application by the state Gaming Agency is
based solely
on
activities, conduct,
or
assoCiations
that
n t e d ~ e
the
filmg of
the
person s initial application to the State Gaming Agency for a
determination o suitability; (iii)the person
is
not an. employee or agent o
any other gaming operation; and
(iv)
the person has been in the continuous
employ of
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe
for at least three years prior to the
effective date o this Compact.
(d)(l) Notwithstanding subdivision (a),
the
Santa
Ysabel
Tribe may
employ or retain in its employ a person whose application for a
detennination of suitability, or for a renewal o such a determination, has
been denied
by
the State Gaming
Agency, i the
person
is
an enrolled
member of the Santa Ysabel Tribe, as defined in this s:ubdivision, and
i
(A)
the
person
holds
a valid
and
current license
issued
by the Tribal Gaming
Agency
that
must be
renewed
at
least biennially;
(B)
the denial
o
the
application
by
the State
Gaming Agency is
based solely Qn activities,
conduct, or associations that antedate the filing o he person sinitia