California State University, Northridge Research Building ...csun.edu/sites/default/files/CSUN Research Project...• Phase 3: 2015–2019 • Phase 4: 2020–2035 . Research Building

California State University, Northridge

Research Building Project

Addendum to the 2005 Master Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report

August 2015

Research Building Project CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR - Addendum

California State University, Northridge i

California State University, Northridge 2005 Master Plan Update

Addendum to the Final EIR for the Research Building Project

Table of Contents Page

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Decision Not To Prepare A Subsequent EIR .......................................................................................... 6 Environmental Impacts of The Proposed project .................................................................................. 6

Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................ 13 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................... 15 Noise ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Population and Housing ..................................................................................................................... 20 Public Services ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Public Utilities ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Recreation ............................................................................................................................................. 25 Transportation and Traffic ................................................................................................................. 25

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 27

List of Tables

Table 1 Estimated Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Construction Table 2 Estimated Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Operation

List of Figures

Figure 1 Regional Location Figure 2 Project Location Figure 3 Campus Master Plan Map Figure 4 Site Photos

Appendices

Appendix A – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling


California State University, Northridge ii

This page intentionally left blank.


California State University, Northridge 1

INTRODUCTION

This document is an Addendum to the California State University, Northridge 2005 Master Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR - SCH# 2005051008).

In accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency shall prepare an Addendum to an EIR if some changes or additions are necessary that will not have significant new impacts or substantially increase previously identified significant impacts. Specifically, the Guidelines state:

• The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR ifsome changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred (Section 15164 (a));

• An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to thefinal EIR or adopted negative declaration (Section 15164 (c));

• The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negativedeclaration prior to making a decision on the project (Section 15164 (d)); and

• A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, orelsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence (Section15164 (e)).

This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines.

According to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document in instances when “only minor technical changes or additions are necessary” and when the new information does not involve new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the previous EIR.

This Addendum describes the details of the Research Building Project (“the proposed project”) and compares its impacts to those identified in prior Master Plan EIR. The analysis demonstrates that the proposed project is consistent with the CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update and with the certified EIR.

The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot building (24-30 feet in height) with flexible space that can be used for research programs on-campus, on the site identified for Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Off-site mitigation is not required. On-site mitigation is limited to dust, noise, and traffic control during construction and mitigation of potential hazardous materials.



2

BACKGROUND Project Site Location

The CSUN campus is located in the community of Northridge in the City of Los Angeles. Northridge is located in the San Fernando Valley, approximately 22 miles northwest of downtown Los Angles. The University occupies 356 acres in north-central Northridge. The campus setting is generally suburban with single-family and multi-family residential uses and commercial uses adjacent to the campus perimeter. The campus is irregular in shape and comprises two distinct sub areas known as the north and south campuses. The campus is generally bounded on the north by Devonshire Street; on the south by Nordhoff Street; on the east by Zelzah Avenue; and on the west by Lindley Avenue and Darby Avenue.

The site of the proposed building is located on the west side of campus off of Plummer Street, between Etiwanda Avenue and East University Drive. See Figure 1 for the regional location, Figure 2 for the project location and Figure 3 for the project location within the CSUN campus. CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update

The 2005 Master Plan was the first comprehensive update of the campus master plan since 1998. The 2005 Master Plan increased the campus enrollment ceiling from 25,000 to 35,000 full time equivalent students (FTEs) to allow the University to accommodate projected enrollment increases. The 2005 Master Plan horizon was set at 30 years to facilitate long-term planning. The 2005 Master Plan addresses land uses and facilities required to accommodate the projected enrollment increase and the evolving pedagogical needs of the University’s academic, administrative, student support, and campus support departments and programs. A minimum increase of approximately 1.15 million gross square feet of new academic and administrative facilities was determined to be necessary to accommodate the projected additional 10,000 FTEs. In addition, 2,688 student-housing beds were proposed, along with a net increase of approximately 4,500 parking spaces.

The 2005 Master Plan addresses six major programs that apply throughout the campus:

• Academic and Administrative Facilities; • Student Support and Recreational Facilities; • Housing and Campus Support Facilities; • Landscaping, Open Space, and Pedestrian Circulation; • Transportation Management, Campus Entry, Vehicular Circulation, and Parking

Facilities; and • Campus Utilities and Infrastructure

The 2005 Master Plan included a four phase (three 5-year phases and a final 15-year phase) implementation plan as follows:

• Phase 1: 2005–2009 • Phase 2: 2010–2014 • Phase 3: 2015–2019 • Phase 4: 2020–2035



3

The objectives of the 2005 Master Plan Update are as follows:

• Enable CSUN to accommodate an increased enrollment cap of 35,000 FTEs by 2035, as required by the CSU and California Education Code;

• Accommodate lower-division students in on-campus housing to support the University’s living-learning programs and other campus activities;

• Provide facilities for expansion of academic programs and administrative functions at a rate of 115,000 gross square feet per 1,000 FTEs;

• Provide appropriate facilities for instructional athletics, informal and organized recreation, and intercollegiate athletics;

• Reinforce the University’s active learning focus by providing opportunities for interactions and collaborations among students, faculty, and staff;

• Improve campus vehicular and pedestrian circulation; • Accommodate parking demand at the rate of 0.39 space per commuter FTE; 0.63

space per student dormitory bed; 0.58 space per campus employee (faculty/staff); and 2 percent of the total FTE parking needs for visitors;

• Improve pedestrian safety; • Provide on-campus housing for faculty and staff to aid in employment

recruitment; • Enhance the visual appearance of the campus core and perimeter through the

implementation of aesthetic improvements; • Develop more prominent and visually defined campus entries; • Reinforce campus identity and increase public awareness of the campus’ location

and presence through a program of off-site aesthetic enhancements; • Adequately maintain and manage all campus facilities; • Make efficient use of developable land and avoid developing existing open

space; • Maintain stewardship of campus landscape and natural resources; and • Serve as a regional center for intellectual, cultural, and lifelong learning.

These project objectives guided the 2005 Master Plan process and the identification of physical improvements necessary and appropriate for the CSUN campus to fulfill its educational mission as well as implement its campus mission, values, and vision statement. CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update EIR

Under CEQA, a program EIR is prepared for a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project, with related actions forming logical parts in a chain of contemplated actions (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(a)). A program EIR allows the lead agency to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures early in the program process; subsequent project-specific activities are evaluated in light of the program EIR to determine if additional environmental documentation is required (State CEQA Guidelines 15168(b) and (c)). A program-level analysis is intended to provide the public and decision makers with an overview of the potential environmental impacts associated with one large project. A project EIR examines the environmental impacts of a specific development project, including planning, construction, and operations.



4

At the time that the EIR for the 2005 Master Plan was prepared, CSUN had developed sufficient detail concerning six Master Plan Phase 1 projects, six Master Plan Phase 2 projects, and the Valley Performing Arts Center to permit project-level evaluation of potential environmental impacts in the EIR. These projects, which were evaluated at the project level, were referred to in the EIR as “near-term” projects. The EIR evaluated the remainder of the 2005 Master Plan Update at a program level. The proposed Research Building, referred to as “Building F” in the 2005 Master Plan, is a Phase 3 project and therefore was not evaluated at a project level along with the “near-term” projects (Phase 1 and Phase 2 projects), but was evaluated at the program level in the 2006 FEIR. Building F was planned to be an academic/administrative building, have a 25,000 square foot building footprint and be three levels in height, equaling a total of 75,000 gross square feet (all of which would be state funded). In March 2006, the CSU Board of Trustees certified the Final EIR for the 2005 Master Plan Update and adopted CEQA Findings of Fact for the significant environmental impacts identified in the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the unavoidable significant environmental impacts identified in the EIR. The 2006 Final EIR is hereafter referred to as the 2006 FEIR and the 2005 Master Plan Update is hereafter referred to as the 2005 Master Plan. Summary of Conclusions Reached in the 2006 Final EIR

Based on the analysis in the 2006 FEIR, the following impacts were determined to be significant unavoidable impacts:

• Impacts to air quality attributable to construction equipment emissions and operational emissions from project-related traffic

• Noise impacts associated with construction activities • Direct and cumulative traffic impacts at two intersections, three street segments, and

three freeway segments; and • Impacts to off-site water and wastewater facilities improvements.

In March 2006, the CSU Board of Trustees adopted CEQA Findings of Fact for the significant environmental impacts identified for the 2005 Master Plan Update and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the unavoidable significant environmental impacts identified in the EIR. Pursuant to Section 21081(a) (3) of the Public Resources Code, as described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the Board of Trustees determined that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the 2006 FEIR and the identified impacts were thereby deemed acceptable because of specific overriding considerations. Based on the analysis contained in the 2006 FEIR, the following impacts were determined to fall within the category of impacts that can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the mitigation measures set forth below:

• Aesthetics; • Hazards and Hazardous Materials; and



5

• Noise (operation-related). Based on the analysis contained in the 2006 FEIR, the following impacts were determined to fall within the category of impacts that would be less than significant and do not require mitigation measures: Population and Housing; Public Services (Police Protection and Fire Protection); and Recreation. Section 7.0 of the 2006 FEIR, Effects Not Found to be Significant, addressed potential environmental effects found not to be significant as a result of the NOP scoping process. Based on the NOP scoping process, potential impacts on the following resources were determined to be less than significant without the implementation of mitigation measures and were, therefore, not discussed in detail in the EIR: Agricultural Resources; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geotechnical/Soils; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Mineral Resources; Public Services (Libraries, Parks, Schools) and Public Utilities (Solid Waste Disposal). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The original Phase 3 academic/administrative building F project, as described in the 2006 FEIR, would involve the construction of a new academic/administration building on the site of Building F on the Campus Master Plan. The proposed project would encompass 10,000 square feet with flexible space that can be used for research programs. It would be a high bay building1 that could potentially have mezzanine space added in the future. As another 10,000 square foot phase could be constructed at a later date, this addendum analyzes potential maximum development of the project (20,000 gross square feet). The building would be a pre-engineered facility with basic interior improvements. As research programs come or go, smaller tenant improvements would be made as needed to provide research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collaborative areas. The collaborative areas would aid in the partnership of different research groups on campus. The building would accommodate existing staff and faculty on campus and therefore it would not require additional parking. The project site located on the west side of campus on Plummer Street, between Etiwanda Ave and East University Drive. The proposed building would neighbor Laurel Hall to the East, the Chicano House Resources and Cultural Arts Center to the west and face the Art and Design Center to the North, across Plummer Street. The project site is identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. The project site is currently a lawn with six landscaping trees along the perimeter of the plot. These trees would not be removed. The proposed project would feature a smaller footprint and height compared to the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would

1 A high bay building is a building where the height of the ceiling is larger than average.



6

be a one- to two-story, research building up to 20,000 gross square feet and approximately 24-30 feet in height. The proposed project would relocate and consolidate existing campus academia and staff and therefore would not result in an increase in enrollment at the university. The proposed project would not increase FTES on campus beyond what was previously analyzed as part of the 2006 FEIR and is not anticipated to result in new vehicle trips or substantially redistributed traffic patterns when compared to existing conditions.

DECISION NOT TO PREPARE A SUBSEQUENT EIR As outlined in Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. As discussed in detail in the following sections, the proposed project is consistent with the 2005 Master Plan. As such, it is within the parameters considered in the CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR that was certified in 2006. In addition, as supported by the following analysis, the proposed project would have no new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR. Based on these findings, substantial evidence has been provided to support the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 and, as such, this Addendum is the appropriate environmental documentation under CEQA. This Addendum will be considered by the decision-making body, in this case the Board of Trustees of the CSU, along with the 2006 FEIR prior to making a decision on the project, as required by Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. As discussed below, mitigation measures identified in the 2006 FEIR would apply to the current proposal, as would the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programs for that EIR.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT This section addresses each of the environmental issues discussed in the 2006 FEIR to determine whether or not the current proposal has the potential to create new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the significance of a significant impact as compared to what was identified in the 2006 FEIR. Additionally, impacts are compared to existing on the ground conditions. Aesthetics Scenic Vistas and Resources

The 2006 FEIR identifies less than significant impacts with respect to scenic vistas and scenic resources. No scenic vista has been identified in the local land use plan at or near the campus. State Route 118 (SR-118), located approximately 2 miles north of the campus, is not a state-



7

designated scenic highway. SR-118 is a designated scenic highway in the City of Los Angeles. However, due to the relatively flat topography of the San Fernando Valley, the campus is not visible from the highway, and the highway is not visible from the campus.

The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot building (24-30 feet in height) with flexible space that can be used for research programs including research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collective areas. The project site is identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would involve a smaller footprint and height in square feet compared to the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts to scenic vistas or resources, or increase the severity of impacts, beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Visual Character

The 2006 FEIR identifies less than significant visual resource impacts with respect to construction, campus visual resources, open space, campus precincts, and shade/shadow.

Construction

The 2006 FEIR indicated that construction of the components of the 2005 Master Plan would expose neighboring land uses to construction equipment, incomplete structures, stockpiled cut material, and areas in landscaping transition. This could result in short-term impacts on views from surrounding uses. The short-term visual impacts of construction operations are considered unavoidable, as little can be done to improve the aesthetics of a large construction site; however, construction activities would be temporary in nature. Further, construction of the Master Plan would occur incrementally over 30 years and would not involve the simultaneous construction of many buildings. In addition, lighting for construction purposes, if needed, would be directed toward the worksite and shielded as much as feasible. The 2006 FEIR concluded that aesthetic impacts during construction activities would be less than significant.

The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot building with an elevation of approximately 24-30 feet. The building would consist of flexible space that can be used for research programs, including research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collective areas. Impacts associated with construction of the proposed project, such as staging of materials and equipment would be temporary in nature. Further, activities would be limited to the construction staging areas. Construction activities would not block any views. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant aesthetic impacts from construction activities or increase the severity of impacts beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Visual Resources

The 2006 FEIR found a less than significant impact with respect to visual resources. Notable visual resources on the CSUN campus include the historic Orange Grove, Botanic Garden, and Magnolia Walk, a walkway extending from the Oviatt Library lined with large, mature trees. The 2005 Master Plan is intended to preserve important visual resources, such as Magnolia



8

Walk, and, in certain instances, would enhance existing aesthetic resources on campus, such as perimeter landscaping and the Orange Grove Arts Walk. The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot building with an elevation of approximately 24-30 feet. The building would consist of flexible space that can be used for research programs including research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collective areas. The project site is identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan Update. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/ administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would involve a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan Update. The proposed project would not involve the removal of the six mature trees located on the perimeter of the project site (see Photos 1, 2, and 4 on Figure 4 to see landscaping and trees around the proposed project area). The 2005 Master Plan does not address individual trees on the campus since that level of detail is outside the Plan’s scope. If the landscaping plans were to change and trees required removal, the proposed project would involve replacement of trees and landscaping as part of the buildings landscaping plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts to scenic resources, or increase the severity of impacts, beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Open Space

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact to open space since the 2005 Master Plan would increase the number of usable public outdoor gathering places and enhance existing open space resources. The proposed project would involve construction of a new building on a site identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square feet. The proposed project site is currently an open lawn area; however, the proposed project would involve a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. Therefore, the removal of lawn area would not cause a significant reduction of open space. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts to open space, or increase the severity of impacts, beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Campus Precincts

The project site is located within the Academic Core. The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact to the aesthetic character of the area as the 2005 Master Plan features within the Academic Core precinct would enhance the aesthetic character of the area. The proposed project would involve construction of a new building on a site identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would involve a smaller footprint and height, and less square footage, than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. The proposed project would be architecturally consistent with the existing buildings on campus and landscaping associated with the project would remain consistent with the Landscaping Master Plan. Therefore, the



9

proposed project would not create any new significant impacts to the aesthetic character of the Academic Precinct or increase the severity of impacts beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Shade/Shadow

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact regarding shade/shadows associated with proposed buildings. Building heights on campus range in height from one to eight stories. New structures proposed in the 2005 Master Plan would be six stories or less. As such, on- and off-site views and shade/shadow effects from campus buildings would be similar to existing conditions. To address the shortage of sufficiently shaded outdoor space, 2005 Master Plan design guidelines suggest the introduction of structures and landscaping to create shade in otherwise exposed places, to provide comfortable outdoor gathering places and seating areas for students, faculty, staff, and visitors. The proposed project involves the construction of a new building on a site identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would involve a smaller height as the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant shade/shadow impacts or increase the severity of impacts beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Light and Glare

The 2006 FEIR identifies significant but mitigable impacts related to light and glare from the proposed playing fields along Zelzah Avenue and parking structures along Darby Avenue. Mitigation Measures AES-1 through AES-8 in the FEIR would reduce impacts to less than significant. The 2006 FEIR identifies a less than significant impact with respect to glare. The proposed project does not involve the playing fields along Zelzah Avenue or the parking structures along Darby Avenue. Therefore, mitigation identified in the 2006 FEIR to mitigate significant lighting impacts associated those projects would not apply. The proposed project involves a new building on a site identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan that would feature a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than shown in the Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square feet. The new building would be subject to the lighting and design guidelines in the 2005 Master Plan, which are intended to facilitate safe nighttime use of the campus while limiting impacts on neighboring residences. Consequently, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts related to light and glare beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR or increase the severity of significant impacts already identified in the 2006 FEIR.



10

Air Quality Construction Impacts

The 2006 FEIR identifies construction-related air quality impacts as potentially significant emissions would exceed the SCAQMD’s VOC, NOX, and CO thresholds of significance. Impacts would be reduced with implementation of mitigation measures; however, impacts could not be mitigated to a less than significant level. The proposed project would involve construction activity that would generate emissions of VOC, NOX, CO, and particulate matter. The proposed project would contribute to the significant impact for construction emissions already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Table 1 shows the estimated maximum daily construction emissions from construction of the proposed project. As shown in Table 1, construction of the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds, but would contribute to the overall generation of VOC, NOX, and CO by the campus, which was identified as an unavoidably significant impact in the 2006 FEIR.

Table 1 Estimated Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Construction

Maximum Emissions (lbs/day)

VOC NOx CO PM10 PM2.5

Maximum lbs/day 48.74 14.01 9.30 1.67 1.21

SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 55

Exceed Threshold? No No No No No

Notes: All calculations were made using CalEEMod. See Appendix A for calculations.

The 2006 FEIR analyzed the potential impacts of all facilities associated with buildout of the Master Plan, including buildout of the project site. The current proposal would not increase building square footage or facilities on campus beyond what was considered in the 2006 FEIR. Mitigation measures AIR-1 through AIR-3 from the 2006 FEIR would apply to the proposed project:

AIR-1: Develop and implement a construction management plan, as approved by

CSUN prior to issuance of a grading permit, which includes the following measures recommended by the SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD:

a. Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. b. Provide temporary traffic controls during all phases of construction

activities to maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag person). c. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial

system to off-peak hours to the degree practicable. d. Re-route construction trucks away from congested streets. e. Consolidate truck deliveries when possible.



11

f. Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on and off site.

g. Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers’ specifications and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize exhaust emissions.

h. Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog alerts. Contact the SCAQMD at 800/242-4022 for daily forecasts.

i. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline-powered generators.

j. Use methanol- or natural gas-powered mobile equipment and pile drivers instead of diesel if readily available at competitive prices.

k. Use propane- or butane-powered on-site mobile equipment instead of gasoline if readily available at competitive prices.

AIR-2: Develop and implement a dust control plan, as approved by CSUN prior to issuance of a grading permit, which includes the measures recommended by the SCAQMD, or equivalently effective measures approved by the SCAQMD, as provided in Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust from construction activities.

AIR-3: All on- and off-road construction equipment shall, to the extent feasible as determined by CSUN, use emulsified diesel fuel.

The proposed project would not generate any new significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR or increase the severity of significant impacts already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Operational Impacts

The 2006 FEIR found that Phase 3 projects at full operation would generate emissions above SCAQMD thresholds for VOC. Although mitigation measures are required, impacts would be unavoidably significant.

Table 2 shows the estimated maximum daily air pollutant emissions associated with operation of the proposed project.

Table 2 Estimated Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Operation

Emissions (lbs/day)

ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5

Maximum lbs/day 2.58 1.84 6.68 0.02 1.19 0.34

SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55

Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No

Source: CalEEMod, see Appendix A for calculations



12

Operation of the proposed project would not in itself generate emissions exceeding SCAQMD thresholds; however, it would contribute to the overall generation of VOC and PM10 by Phase 3 projects, which was identified as an unavoidably significant impact in the 2006 FEIR. The following mitigation from the 2006 FEIR would apply:

AIR-4: CSUN shall comply with applicable Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) energy conservation requirements.

AIR-5: To the extent CSUN has not previously implemented the following

transportation control measures, as soon as reasonably feasible, CSUN, or its designee, will:

a. Provide preferential parking spaces on campus for employee carpools and vanpools;

b. Schedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours where feasible and require that delivery trucks turn off their engines if the anticipated duration of idling exceeds 5 minutes; and

c. Participate in public outreach programs that promote alternative methods of transportation.

The 2006 FEIR analyzed the potential impacts of all facilities associated with buildout of the 2005 Master Plan. The building square footage associated with the proposed project would be within the anticipated building square footage identified in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square feet. Consequently, the current proposal would not increase building square footage or facilities on campus that would exceed that identified in the 2006 FEIR. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would be within those identified for the 2005 Master Plan in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate any new significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR or increase the severity of significant impacts already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots

The 2006 FEIR identifies a less than significant impact with respect to creation of carbon monoxide (CO) “hot spots” where CO concentrations exceed state and/or federal standards. CO hot spots are primarily related to traffic congestion and, as discussed under Transportation and Traffic, the proposed project would not generate traffic impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant CO impacts or increase the severity of CO impacts beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Air Quality Management Plan

The 2006 FEIR found that the 2005 Master Plan would be consistent with the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan and impacts would be less than significant. Anticipated population increases associated with the 2005 Master Plan was found to be planned in a way that results in the minimization of vehicle miles traveled and associated air pollution emissions. The proposed project would not generate increased student, faculty, or staff enrollment beyond what is



13

planned under the 2005 Master Plan; therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The 2006 FEIR did not discuss Greenhouse Gas Emissions as the inclusion of this issue was not yet required under CEQA at the time these documents were prepared. Therefore, a discussion of greenhouse gas emissions is provided herein to supplement the 2006 FEIR. Gases that absorb and re-emit infrared radiation in the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases (GHGs), in reference to the fact that greenhouses retain heat. Common GHGs include water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxides (NOx), fluorinated gases, and ozone. GHGs are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. Of these gases, CO2 and CH4 are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. Emissions of CO2 are largely by-products of fossil fuel combustion, whereas CH4 results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Man-made GHGs, many of which have greater heat-absorption potential than CO2, include fluorinated gases, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) (California Environmental Protection Agency [CalEPA], 2006). Different types of GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a GHG is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere. Because GHGs absorb different amounts of heat, a common reference gas (CO2) is used to relate the amount of heat absorbed to the amount of the gas emissions, referred to as “carbon dioxide equivalent” (CDE), and is the amount of a GHG emitted multiplied by its GWP. CO2 has a GWP of one. By contrast, methane (CH4) has a GWP of 21, meaning its global warming effect is 21 times greater than CO2 on a molecule per molecule basis. The accumulation of GHGs in the atmosphere regulates the earth’s temperature. Without the natural heat trapping effect of GHGs, the Earth’s surface would be about 34°C cooler (CalEPA, 2006). However, it is believed that emissions from human activities, particularly the consumption of fossil fuels for electricity production and transportation, have elevated the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere beyond the level of naturally occurring concentrations. Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97, the Resources Agency adopted amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions. The adopted CEQA Guidelines provide regulatory guidance on the analysis and mitigation of GHG emissions in CEQA documents, while giving lead agencies the discretion to set quantitative or qualitative thresholds for the assessment and mitigation of GHGs and Climate Change impacts. In addition, in an effort to guide professional planners, land use officials and CEQA practitioners, OPR prepared the document, CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document offers informal guidance regarding the steps lead agencies should take to address climate change in CEQA documents. This guidance was developed in cooperation with the Resources Agency, Cal EPA, and the CARB.



14

GHG Emissions

Although not formally adopted, SCAQMD has proposed a plan-based threshold of 6.6 metric tons of CDE per service population (defined to include both residents and employees) per year or 3,000 metric tons CDE/year for all land use types for use in the South Coast region (SCAQMD, “Proposed Tier 4 Performance Standards, September 2010). Since the project does not include an increased service population, it has been analyzed against the 3,000 metric tons CDE/year SCAQMD threshold to determine impacts. Implementation of the proposed project would result in direct and indirect construction and operational GHG emissions. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) was used to quantify GHG emissions associated with the proposed project (see Appendix A for complete modeling results). Construction GHG emissions would result from the combustion of fossil fuels from heavy-duty construction equipment and from construction worker vehicles and would occur only when construction activities are underway. However, the SCAQMD recommends amortizing construction-related GHG emissions over the project’s lifetime in order to include these emissions as part of a project’s lifetime total emissions so that GHG reduction measures will address construction GHG emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies. A 30-year project lifetime is recommended. Therefore, the construction GHG emissions have been amortized over a 30-year period and included in the operational GHG emissions. Operational emissions would result from fossil fuel combustion for energy usage associated with the project and from motor vehicles. The proposed project would not increase vehicle trips because it would not increase student enrollment or staffing beyond what is already identified in the 2005 Master Plan. The project involves the relocation of academia and staff into a new building. Construction activities would be temporary and would not substantially increase GHG emissions. The estimated total operational GHG emissions from the proposed project would be approximately 421 metric tons CDE/year (2 annual MT of CDE from construction emissions and 419 MT of CDE/year operational emissions, see Appendix A). Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the 3,000 metric tons CDE/year threshold. GHG Plans and Policies

On April 4, 2012, the Regional Council of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The 2012–2035 RTP/SCS includes a strong commitment to reduce emissions from transportation sources to comply with SB 375, improve public health, and meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards as set forth by the federal Clean Air Act. As such, the 2012–2035 RTP/SCS contains a regional commitment for the broad deployment of zero- and near-zero emission transportation technologies in the 2023–2035 time frame and clear steps to move toward this objective.



15

The project would not conflict with SCAG’s SCG or any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant GHG impacts.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact with respect to public hazards. All known hazardous materials users, generators, and disposers on campus are inventoried and are in compliance with federal and state regulations and by the CSUN Environmental Health and Safety Office. Implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would not introduce new hazards or hazardous materials onto the CSUN campus, but rather may incrementally increase quantities of existing hazardous materials used on campus as the campus population and operations increase. The proposed project would not increase the population of the campus but may involve the increased use of hazardous materials. The proposed building involves academic research space, mostly consisting of dry labs (computer labs), collaborative areas and potentially wet lab space. The potential addition of wet lab space may increase the use of chemicals and other hazardous materials on campus, however, the use of hazardous materials would have to comply with campus safety requirements mentioned above. The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact with respect to the incrementally increase of quantities of existing hazardous materials used on campus. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those already identified.

Release of Hazardous Materials

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact from the potential release of hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. The CSUN Environmental Health and Safety Office has adopted numerous programs, policies, and procedures intended to prevent accidents resulting from the release of hazardous materials. The proposed project involves construction of a building for research purposes that would not involve the use of hazardous materials and would be required to comply with all adopted CSUN hazardous materials plans and procedures. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Hazardous Materials near Schools

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact with respect to hazards materials release within ¼ mile of a school. The proposed project is not located within ¼ mile of a school and does not involve activities that use or store hazardous materials. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Hazardous Materials Sites



16

The 2006 FEIR identified a significant but mitigable impact with respect to hazardous material sites. The EIR determined that the state of hazardous materials site listings on the CSUN campus is unknown and construction and operational activities associated with implementation of the 2005 Master Plan could have the potential to create a hazard to the public and/or the environment. Mitigation measure HAZ-1 was required to mitigate impacts from potential hazardous material sites.

HAZ-1: For each proposed project to be implemented under the CSUN Master Plan, CSUN shall consult specified comprehensive lists of contaminated sites to determine whether the site contains hazardous materials (PRC §21092.6, Government Code §65962.5). Where a proposed project is identified on one of the lists, CSUN shall determine whether the site’s hazardous materials pose a significant threat to the public and/or the environment.

Therefore, the following databases compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 were checked (August 20, 2015) for known hazardous materials contamination at the project site:

• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) database

• Geotracker search for leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) • Cortese list of Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites • Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Site Mitigation and Brownfields Database

The proposed project site is not listed on a hazardous materials site list compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5. Therefore, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 has been completed and additional Mitigation Measures HAZ-2 through HAZ-5 in the FEIR are not applicable. The proposed project would not create any new significant construction noise impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Emergency Response or Evacuation Plan

The 2006 FEIR identified a less than significant impact with respect to an emergency response or evacuation plan. The EIR determined that the 2005 Master Plan would not interfere with the University Department of Public Safety’s and/or the Environmental Health and Safety Office’s emergency preparedness recommendations and/or campus emergency response and evacuation procedures. CSUN’s Department of Public Safety and Environmental Health and Safety Office would review and update all emergency preparedness recommendations and campus emergency response and evacuation procedures to reflect changes in campus layout through implementation of the 2005 Master Plan. The proposed project involves development of a new building on a site identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would be a one- to two-story, approximately 24-30 feet in height, research building with a maximum of 20,000 gross square



17

feet. The proposed project would feature a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. The proposed project would be required to adhere to the University’s emergency procedures such as the creation of a College/Department Emergency Action Plan and adherence to the campus-wide Emergency Operations Plan. The purpose of CSUN’s Emergency Operation Plan (EOP) is to establish policies, procedures and an organizational structure for response to an emergency. In compliance with the State of California's Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and with the National Incident Management System (NIMS), the EOP is designed to provide optimal coordination between responding agencies, and to facilitate the rapid deployment of resources in the event of an emergency. With the complexity of a campus like CSUN, it requires participation of the entire community in an emergency. The Department/College Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) are an integral part of the overall emergency management program, and Departments/Colleges throughout the University are strongly encouraged to develop their own Emergency Action Plans for practical reasons. The EAP is a template that a college, division, and/or department may use to complete the Emergency Action Plan. Members of each department best understand the nature of their work, potential work place hazards, the layout of their facilities, and special needs specific to their Department. The EAP may be edited to suit the needs of the department and once completed, a copy of the EAP is to be sent to the Department of Police Services. Emergency Management. Since the proposed project would adhere to the University’s emergency procedures, it would not create any new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts beyond what was already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Noise Off-Site Construction Noise

The 2006 FEIR identified an unavoidably significant impact related to temporary noise increases associated with individual construction projects within the CSUN campus. The 2006 FEIR determined that potential construction-related noise impacts were expected to exceed existing ambient exterior noise levels by more than 5 dBA at off-site noise-sensitive uses, as allowed by the Municipal Code. Master Plan and near-term project-level noise impacts to off-site sensitive receptors were, therefore, determined to be significant. Mitigation Measures Noise-1 through Noise-5 from the 2006 FEIR specify a range of requirements pertaining to construction activity and would apply to the proposed project:

NOISE-1: As per Section 41.40 of the City of Los Angeles Noise Ordinance, construction operations shall be limited to the hours of 7 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday, and 8 AM to 6 PM on Saturdays and holidays. No construction operations shall be permitted on Sundays.

NOISE-2: As per Section 112.05 of the City of Los Angeles Noise Ordinance, all

technically feasible measures shall be implemented to reduce noise levels of construction equipment operating within 500 feet of residential areas in cases where noise levels exceed 75 dB(A) at 50 feet from the noise source. Technically feasible measures include, but are not limited to, changing the



18

location of stationary construction equipment, shutting off idling equipment, notifying adjacent land uses in advance of construction work, ensuring that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound reduction equipment, and installing temporary acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources.

NOISE-3: Equipment used for project construction shall be hydraulically- or

electrically-powered impact tools (e.g., jack hammers) wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically-powered tools. Where use of pneumatically powered tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used. A muffler could lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dB (A).

External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where feasible; this

could achieve a reduction of 5 dB (A). Quieter procedures shall be used (such as drilling rather than impact equipment) wherever feasible. The project applicant shall require construction contractors to ensure that construction equipment is fitted with sound reduction equipment, per manufacturer’s specifications.

NOISE-4: The City shall require the posting of signs prior to construction activities

with a phone number for residents to call with noise complaints. NOISE-5: Prior to construction, noise barriers with a sound transmission coefficient

(STC) that would attenuate noise levels at off-site noise sensitive uses for all construction phases shall be specified by an acoustical engineer.

The proposed project would contribute to construction noise impacts insofar as it would involve construction of an approximately 24-30 feet in height and up to 20,000 gross square foot building at the CSUN campus. Construction noise associated with the proposed project would be audible at nearby receptor locations, including apartment buildings located approximately 800 feet north of the project site. During construction, trucks would access the project site via Plummer Street. Worker vehicles and construction equipment would be staged on the project site. Potential construction-related noise impacts are expected to exceed existing ambient exterior noise levels by more than 5 dBA at off-site noise-sensitive use and noise impacts would, therefore, be considered significant even with the implementation of mitigation. Although the proposed project would result in a significant and unavoidable construction noise impact, the impact would not be greater than what has been evaluated and disclosed in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe off-site construction-related noise impacts would occur.The above mitigation measures would reduce construction noise to the degree feasible. On-Campus Construction Noise

The 2006 FEIR identified an unavoidably significant impact with respect to construction noise levels at on-campus residential buildings. The FEIR found that any campus residential building within 1,581 feet and within an uninterrupted line-of-site to construction noise sources could be



19

exposed to noise levels above the 65 dBA maximum threshold for multi-family residential uses; and all other campus buildings within 889 feet and with an uninterrupted line-of-site to construction noise sources could be exposed to noise levels above the 70 dBA maximum threshold for all other school uses. The on-campus sensitive receptor closest to the project site is Chicano House Resources and Cultural Arts Center. The proposed Project has an uninterrupted line-of-site to Chicano House Resources and Cultural Arts Center, which is approximately 50 feet west of the project site. In addition, the project site has an uninterrupted line-of-site to Laurel Hall, an office building for the Cal State Northridge Alumni Association and Department of Environmental and Operational Health lecturers. Laurel Hall is located approximately 75 feet west of the project site, and the Art and Design Center, is approximately 125 feet north of the project site. Loud construction equipment, such as tractors, backhoes, trucks, and jackhammers, would be utilized during project construction and would generate noise levels over 95 dBA at 50 feet from their operation. Therefore, noise at Chicano House Resources and Cultural Arts Center and other nearby buildings could be exposed to noise levels above 70 dBA maximum threshold for all other school uses. The closest on-campus residential buildings are approximately 2,000 feet away and would not be significantly affected by construction noise. Nevertheless, Mitigation Measures Noise-1 through Noise-5 would apply. Implementation of these measures would reduce impacts to the degree feasible, but impacts would remain significant after mitigation. Although the proposed project would result in a significant and unavoidable noise impact at the surrounding buildings, it would not create any new significant construction noise impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Off-Site Operational Noise Roadway Noise

The 2006 FEIR identifies a less than significant impact with respect to roadway noise. The proposed project would increase traffic-related noise during construction, due to worker trips, hauling, and other construction related trips. However, these impacts would be temporary. During operation, the proposed project would not generate automobile or truck traffic exceeding the levels identified in the 2006 FEIR as it would not involve an increase in student enrollment or campus staffing (see discussion under Transportation and Traffic). Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts related to roadway noise, nor would it increase the severity of impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Point-Source Noise

The 2006 FEIR identifies a less than significant impact associated with noise from new parking lots and structures located on the campus periphery near residential uses. The proposed project does not involve development of a parking lot or structure and would not create noise impacts with respect to parking noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts related to point-source operational noise, nor would it increase the severity of impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR.



20

On-Site Operational Noise Roadway Noise

Zelzah Avenue south of Lassen Street and Lassen Street east of Lindley Avenue are roadways identified in the 2006 FEIR that are adjacent to existing and/or proposed on-site residential uses. The 2006 FEIR determined that exterior noise levels along the two roadways, in the year 2035 with project traffic volumes, would be above the “normally acceptable” category for multi-family uses and would be above the 45 dBA CNEL maximum interior threshold utilized by the Department of Health Services. These exterior noise levels would attenuate at a rate of 3 dBA per the doubling of distance and by about 5 dBA for a single row of building and 1.5 dBA for each additional row of buildings. Nonetheless, the 2006 FEIR determined that onsite impacts along these roadways would be significant prior to the incorporation of mitigation. With implementation of mitigation, impacts were reduced to less than significant levels.

The proposed project would increase traffic-related noise during construction, due to worker trips, hauling, and other construction related trips. However, these impacts would be temporary. During operation, the proposed project would not generate automobile or truck traffic exceeding the levels identified in the 2006 FEIR as it would not involve an increase in student enrollment or campus staffing (see discussion under Transportation and Traffic). Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts related to roadway noise, nor would it increase the severity of impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Point-Source Noise

The 2006 FEIR determined that any school building within 79 feet and with an uninterrupted line-of-sight to a proposed parking structure would experience exterior noise levels above the maximum thresholds under the “normally acceptable” category for multi-family and school uses. The 2006 FEIR also found that noise from rooftop-mounted equipment would be less than significant because existing ambient noise levels would mask on-site sources and the height differential between the roof of the project and nearby receptors would attenuate noise levels associated with rooftop equipment.

The proposed project would involve construction of an academic research building that may include rooftop-mounted equipment. However, as mentioned above, the 2006 FEIR found that noise impacts from rooftop equipment would be less than significant. A parking lot is located north of the project site, but it is approximately 180 feet away; therefore, exterior noise levels at the proposed building would not exceed maximum thresholds. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts related to noise, nor would it increase the severity of noise impacts beyond those already identified in the 2006 FEIR. Population and Housing The 2005 Master Plan is intended to accommodate projected enrollment increases at CSU Northridge through 2035. The 2006 EIR determined that the 2005 Master Plan is consistent with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and Northridge Community Plan



21

projections and would not induce growth or exceed local population projections. In addition, implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would not displace existing housing, especially affordable housing. Population and housing impacts were determined to be less than significant. The proposed project would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus beyond what was planned for in the 2005 Master Plan and does not involve any new campus housing; therefore, it would not add population or housing beyond what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR. Public Services Fire Protection

The 2006 FEIR determined that implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses either during construction or operation. Operational impacts associated with emergency preparedness were also determined to be less than significant. The 2006 FEIR determined that existing fire protection services for the campus were considered adequate and that construction associated with buildout of the 2005 Master Plan would not substantially increase demand for those services. Master Plan buildout construction impacts on fire protection services were, therefore, found to be less than significant. Implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would not increase fire hazards in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees during either construction or operation. Implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would have no effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered government services in the area of fire protection during either construction or operation. No mitigation measures were required.

The proposed project involves the construction of a new, up to 20,000 square foot building, with an elevation of 24-30 feet. The building would include research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collective areas. The building is identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would involve a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan. The proposed project would have a different use than the project contemplated in the 2005 Master Plan, as the proposed project would be a research building and not an academic/administrative building. Any flammable materials associated with potential wet lab space would have to comply with campus safety regulations (see discussion in Hazardous Materials section). In addition, the proposed project would not add any students or faculty beyond the levels analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not increase demand for fire protection services compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. As such, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR. The City of Los Angeles Fire Department would review plans for new development to ensure adequate access, proper fire flow, and hydrant locations, and to review overall site plan layout. In addition, the State Fire Marshal maintains ultimate review and approval authority over aspects of the proposed 2005 Master Plan that relate to fire protection, and may identify further recommendations and/or requirements. The proposed project would



22

also be required to comply with applicable fire and life safety standards and code requirements, such as fire hydrant flows, hydrant spacing, adequate fire lane turning-radius, access, and design to comply with LAFD’s fire protection requirements, as well as standard design requirements in accordance with the CBC. These requirements include fire sprinklers and fire alarm devices.

Police Protection

The 2006 FEIR determined that University Police Department staff ratios were below the recommended ratio of one officer per 1,000 students and therefore not sufficient to serve growth associated with the 2005 Master Plan. However, the 2006 FEIR noted that an increase in the campus residential population is planned and that the Police Department would continually reassess the need for additional staff and equipment and acquire those resources as needed, so that service to the campus would remain adequate. Further, implementation of the 2005 Master Plan would include security features that would reduce the demand for police services. Consequently, the 2006 FEIR determined that impacts on police protection services would be less than significant.

The proposed project involves the construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot building with an elevation of 24-30 feet. The building would include research offices, dry lab space, wet lab space, and collaborative areas at a site that is identified as Building F in the 2005 Master Plan. Building F was planned to be a three-story, academic/administration building with 75,000 gross square feet. The proposed project would feature a smaller footprint and height, and a smaller square footage, than the project contemplated in the Master Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not increase demand for police protection services compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. In addition, the proposed project would not add any students or faculty beyond what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Public Utilities Water

The 2006 FEIR identifies a less than significant impact regarding increases in potable water demand associated with the buildout of the 2005 Master Plan. The 2006 FEIR also determined that the existing on- and off-campus water facilities would need to be upgraded and extended to meet future demand associated with 2005 Master Plan buildout, and that this impact is considered significant and unavoidable.

The proposed project would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus beyond what was planned for in the 2005 Master Plan and the overall square footage for the proposed new building is less than shown in the Master Plan. The original Phase 3 academic/administrative building F project, as described in the 2006 FEIR, was planned to have a 25,000 square foot building footprint and be three levels in height, equaling a total of 75,000 gross square feet. Based on calculations in Appendix E of the 2006 FEIR, the original Building



23

F’s water use would equal 20 acre-feet per year2 (assuming that water use is 120% of wastewater generation). The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot research building that would require a water usage of 5 acre-feet per year3. Thus, the proposed project would not consume water in excess of the water demand calculated in the 2006 FEIR and would have no impact on local water supplies. Compliance with the following mitigation measures described in the 2006 FEIR would be required:

WAT-1: CSU, CSUN, or its designee shall consult with the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power on exact sizing and extensions required for water lines that will serve each project component at the time it undertakes site-specific design plans.

WAT-2: CSU, CSUN, or its designee shall comply with the requirements of Government

Code §54999 with respect to connections to off-site water facilities and improvements to off-site water facilities.

California is facing one of the most severe droughts on record. On January, 17, 2014, the governor proclaimed a State of Emergency and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to make water immediately available (CA Dept of Water Resources, 2015). The proclamation included several key measures such as requesting all Californians to reduce their water consumption by 20% and the immediate implementation of local water shortage contingency plans by water suppliers. On April 25, 2014, an executive order was issued by the governor to speed up the previous measures and request the Californians redouble their efforts to conserve water. In its draft 2014 CSU Sustainability Report, the California State University Chancellor’s Office issued a directive calling for all of its 23 campuses to reduce water use by 10 percent by 2016, and 20 percent by 2020, from a baseline water usage average of 243.1 million gallons. The baseline average uses figures taken from fiscal year 2013/2014 average water usage. A year later, on April 1, 2015, the governor issued Executive Order B-29-15— to be adopted by the CSUs — would see the university system further reduce water usage by as much as 25 percent below the average baseline. The most recent total figures of water use at CSUN reported a water usage of approximately 239 million gallons of water in fiscal year 2013/2014, or one percent below the Chancellor’s Office Baseline of 243.1 million gallons (The Sundial, 2015). For fiscal year 2014/2015, CSUN has so far used 112.2 million gallons of water. By the end of the fiscal year, the university is projected to use a total of about 205.7 million gallons of water, a 10 percent reduction from the Chancellor’s Office Baseline, which meets the 2016 goal.

2 Calculations based on Appendix E, Water Supply Technical Data; Los Angeles Department of Water And Power “Will Serve” Letter, 2005 Master Plan Update California State University Northridge FEIR 3 20,000 gross square feet x 200 gallons per day/1,000 square feet (unit sewer flow) x 120% x 1 acre foot per year/892 gallons per day



24

In fiscal year 2015/2016, the school is expected to use about 186.2 million gallons of water, or about 23 percent below the Chancellor’s Office Baseline, which meets the 2018 goal. Tactics being undertaken to reduce CSUN’s water usage include irrigation system upgrades and the addition of water absorbing polymers to the Sierra Quad and North Field. Consequently, there would be no increase in water demand compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR and the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Wastewater

The 2006 FEIR determined that wastewater generated by the 2005 Master Plan projects would represent a relatively small fraction of the projected available capacity of the Hyperion Treatment Plant (HTP) and that impacts regarding wastewater treatment facilities would be less than significant. The 2006 FEIR also determined that water quality impacts would remain consistent with the operational activities currently occurring on campus and the Master Plan would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements. Consequently, impacts would be less than significant. With respect to off-site wastewater collection systems the 2006 FEIR found a significant impact. Compliance with the following mitigation measures described in the 2006 FEIR would be required:

WW-1: CSU, CSUN, or its designee shall consult with the City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works on exact sizing and extensions required for wastewater lines that will serve each project component at the time it undertakes site-specific design plans.

WW-2: CSU, CSUN, or its designee shall comply with the requirements of Government

Code §54999 with respect to connections to off-site wastewater facilities and improvements to off-site wastewater facilities.

The 2006 FEIR noted that the existing on-and off-campus wastewater facilities systems would need to be upgraded and extended, and new connections would be required to meet the future demands of the near-term Master Plan projects. The impacts of the near-term Master Plan projects with regard to connections to and coordination with the City DPW would be the same as the Master Plan project. The DPW requires that the new development connect to the City’s existing sewer system. The Campus is responsible for all lines within its property and for installing connections to the DPW’s lines off-campus. It would then be the responsibility of the DPW to upgrade the wastewater collection and treatment systems by providing relief for existing trunk lines nearing capacity and expanding treatment facilities. Connection to the DPW’s lines would require coordination with the DPW to ensure the off-site DPW improvements can accommodate on-site Campus improvements. . The DPW would require a development fee for each new connection. CSU/CSUN would coordinate directly with the DPW at the appropriate times during project phasing. Mitigation Measure WW-2 requires that CSUN comply with the requirements of Government Code §54999 with respect to connections to off-site wastewater facilities and improvements to off-site wastewater facilities



25

Development of the Master Plan would result in an incremental increase in demand for wastewater facilities. However, the implementation of the mitigation measures proposed and the implementation of similar mitigation measures by other related projects would reduce any potentially significant cumulative impacts with regard to the wastewater treatment system to a less than significant level.

The proposed project would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus beyond what was planned for in the 2005 Master Plan and the overall square footage for the proposed new building is less than shown in the 2005 Master Plan. The original Phase 3 academic/administrative building F project, as described in the 2006 FEIR, was planned to have a 25,000 square foot building footprint and be three levels in height, equaling a total of 75,000 gross square feet. Based on calculations in Appendix E of the 2006 FEIR, the original Building F’s wastewater generation would have equaled 15,000 gallons per day4. The proposed project would involve construction of a new, up to 20,000 gross square foot research building that would generate 4,000 gallons per day of wastewater5. Consequently, the increase in wastewater generation would be less than was considered in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR. Recreation The 2006 FEIR found that the 2005 Master Plan would have a beneficial impact on recreational resources. Though buildout of the 2005 Master Plan would increase the on-campus population to 35,000 FTEs and the increased population would likewise increase demand for campus athletic and recreational facilities, the Master Plan would involve a six-acre increase in recreational field acreage. The recreational needs of the projected students would be met through a combination of existing facilities as well as enhancement and construction of new facilities. The proposed project would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus beyond what was planned for in the 2005 Master Plan. Consequently, there would be no increase in demand for recreational facilities compared what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR. Transportation and Traffic Construction Impacts

The 2006 FEIR identified a significant but mitigable impact with respect to construction-related traffic on neighboring residential streets. The 2006 FEIR required mitigation to ensure that

4 Calculations based on Appendix E, Water Supply Technical Data; Los Angeles Department of Water And Power “Will Serve” Letter, 2005 Master Plan Update California State University Northridge FEIR 5 20,000 gross square feet x 200 gallons per day/1,000 square feet (unit sewer flow)



26

construction vehicle routes are planned to avoid using neighboring residential streets to the greatest extent feasible during construction operations:

TRAF-14: CSUN shall state in its construction contract conditions that construction

traffic shall be routed in such a way to reduce the use of neighboring residential streets to the greatest extent feasible during all Master Plan construction activities.

Implementation of this measure would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed project would not create not create any new significant construction traffic impacts or increase the severity of significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIR. Operational Impacts

Circulation

Of the 46 intersections analyzed in the 2006 FEIR, significant unavoidable impacts were identified at two intersections: Zelzah Avenue and Devonshire Street during the AM peak hour and Balboa Boulevard and Devonshire Street during the PM peak hour. The 2006 FEIR also found unavoidably significant impacts on three street segments: Dearborn Street west of Darby Avenue, West University Drive/Etiwanda Avenue south of Nordhoff Street, and Prairie Street east of Zelzah Avenue. Lastly, the 2006 FEIR identified an unavoidably significant impact on three freeway segments: westbound SR 118 between Balboa Boulevard and Havenhurst Avenue (AM peak period), westbound SR 118 between Woodley Avenue and I-405 (AM peak period), and eastbound SR 118 between Reseda Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard (AM peak period). The proposed project would involve the expansion and relocation of existing research space into a new building and would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus compared to the number of students and associated facilities analyzed under the 2006 FEIR. Consequently, there would be no increase in trips compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Hazards and Emergency Access

The 2006 FEIR found less than significant impacts with respect to traffic hazards and emergency access. In addition, the LAFD and State Fire Marshall would review all detailed building plans as individual structures are constructed to assure that adequate emergency access is maintained. Impacts would remain less than significant with the proposed project. The proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR. Public Transit

The 2006 FEIR found a less than significant impact regarding public transit. The 2005 Master Plan includes an Alternative Transportation Plan with a target parking demand reduction of 12.5 percent. Transit trips generated by the 2005 Master Plan were projected to increase;


California State University, Northridge 27

however, the EIR determined that significant impacts were not anticipated given the number of new transit trips projected relative to the planned increases in future transit system capacity.

The proposed project would involve the consolidation of existing space on campus into a new building and would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus compared to the number of students and associated facilities analyzed under the 2006 FEIR. Consequently, there would be no increase in transit trips compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR and the proposed project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR.

Parking

The 2006 FEIR identified a parking surplus under 2035 conditions and thus a less than significant impact with respect to parking demand. Under full buildout of the 2005 Master Plan (year 2035), parking supply would be reconfigured and new parking structures would be constructed. Parking supply would consist of approximately 16,991 on-campus spaces and 531 off-campus spaces for a total of 17,528 spaces. With the demand reduction program and assuming a 5% contingency, parking demand in 2035 is estimated to be 17,413 spaces. Therefore, there would be a surplus of 115 spaces.

The proposed project would involve the expansion and relocation of existing research space into a new building and would not increase the number of students or faculty members on campus compared to the number of students and associated facilities analyzed under the 2006 FEIR. Consequently, there would be no increase in parking demand compared to what was analyzed in the 2006 FEIR. The proposed project does not involve the removal or addition of any parking spaces and would not create any new significant impacts, nor would it increase the severity of impacts identified in the 2006 FEIR.

CONCLUSION

As discussed in detail in the preceding sections, the proposed project is consistent with the CSUN 2005 Master Plan. As such, it is within the parameters considered in the CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR that was certified in March 2006. In addition, as supported by the analysis above, the proposed project would have no new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR. Based on these findings, substantial evidence has been provided to support the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 and as such this Addendum is the appropriate environmental documentation under CEQA. This Addendum will be considered by the decision-making body, in this case the Board of Trustees of the CSU, along with the 2006 CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR prior to making a decision on the project, as required by Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines.

As discussed above, mitigation measures identified in the 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR would apply to the current proposal, as would the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programs for the EIR.

_̂

California State University, NorthridgeRegional Location Figure 1

±Basemap Source: ESRI Data, 2004, and USGS/CDFG, 2002.

_̂

Imagery provided by National Geographic Society, ESRI and its licensors © 2015.The topographic representation depicted in this map may not portray all of thefeatures currently found in the vicinity today and/or features depicted in this mapmay have changed since the original topographic map was assembled.

_̂ Project Location

0 1,200600Feet ±

CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR - AddendumResearch Building F Project

Halsted St

Plummer St

California State University, NorthridgeProject Location Figure 2

0 200100Feet ±

Imagery provided by ESRI and Google and their licensors © 2015.

CSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR - AddendumResearch Building F Project

Project Location

Research Building F ProjectCSUN 2005 Master Plan Update Final EIR- Addendum

Source: CSUN 2005 Campus Master Plan Update Campus Master Plan Map Figure 3California State University, Northridge

/0 300 600 Feet

Academic Building F in the Campus Master Planand Proposed Research Building Site

Site

Pho

tos

Figu

re 4

Cal

iforn

ia S

tate

Uni

vers

ity, N

orth

ridge

Phot

o 1:

Vie

w o

f Chi

cano

Hou

se R

esou

rces

and

Cul

tura

l Arts

Cen

ter n

orth

wes

t of

pro

ject

site

.Ph

oto

2: V

iew

of L

aure

l Hal

l on

east

sid

e of

pro

ject

site

.

Phot

o 3:

Vie

w o

f Nor

th U

nive

rsity

Driv

e an

d A

rt an

d D

esig

n C

ente

r nor

th o

f pr

ojec

t site

. Ph

oto

4: V

iew

of l

ands

capi

ng a

nd c

oolin

g to

wer

s on

sou

th s

ide

of p

roje

ct s

ite.

Res

earc

h B

uild

ing

F P

roje

ctC

SUN

200

5 M

aste

r Pla

n U

pdat

e Fi

nal E

IR- A

dden

dum

Appendix AAir Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Results

Appendix AAir Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Results

Construction Phase - To be more representative of VOC emissions

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - Estimated by site location

Area Mitigation - zero is the default for VOC paint

South Coast Air Basin, Annual

CSUN Research Building

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Research & Development 20.00 1000sqft 0.35 20,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

9

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

2017Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 10.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.46 0.35

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2017

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Date: 8/12/2015 11:54 AMPage 1 of 26

2.1 Overall Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.3250 0.8140 0.5369 7.7000e-004

6.4700e-003

0.0551 0.0616 1.9100e-003

0.0510 0.0529 0.0000 71.3297 71.3297 0.0186 0.0000 71.7209

Total 0.3250 0.8140 0.5369 7.7000e-004

6.4700e-003

0.0551 0.0616 1.9100e-003

0.0510 0.0529 0.0000 71.3297 71.3297 0.0186 0.0000 71.7209

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2016 0.3249 0.8131 0.5363 7.7000e-004

6.4700e-003

0.0551 0.0615 1.9100e-003

0.0509 0.0528 0.0000 71.2534 71.2534 0.0186 0.0000 71.6441

Total 0.3249 0.8131 0.5363 7.7000e-004

6.4700e-003

0.0551 0.0615 1.9100e-003

0.0509 0.0528 0.0000 71.2534 71.2534 0.0186 0.0000 71.6441

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.0308 0.1167 0.1099 0.0000 0.0000 0.1270 0.0974 0.0000 0.1177 0.1135 0.0000 0.1070 0.1070 0.1074 0.0000 0.1070


2.2 Overall Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Energy 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 154.3032 154.3032 3.5500e-003

1.0200e-003

154.6953

Mobile 0.2558 0.2473 0.9307 2.3300e-003

0.1593 3.3700e-003

0.1627 0.0426 3.1000e-003

0.0457 0.0000 180.0026 180.0026 7.0600e-003

0.0000 180.1507

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3086 0.0000 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1198 71.3172 74.4371 0.3221 7.9100e-003

83.6552

Total 0.3533 0.2657 0.9464 2.4400e-003

0.1593 4.7700e-003

0.1641 0.0426 4.5000e-003

0.0471 3.4284 405.6235 409.0519 0.3510 8.9300e-003

419.1932

Unmitigated Operational




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Energy 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 154.3032 154.3032 3.5500e-003

1.0200e-003

154.6953

Mobile 0.2558 0.2473 0.9307 2.3300e-003

0.1593 3.3700e-003

0.1627 0.0426 3.1000e-003

0.0457 0.0000 180.0026 180.0026 7.0600e-003

0.0000 180.1507

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3086 0.0000 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1198 71.3172 74.4371 0.3221 7.9000e-003

83.6502

Total 0.3533 0.2657 0.9464 2.4400e-003

0.1593 4.7700e-003

0.1641 0.0426 4.5000e-003

0.0471 3.4284 405.6235 409.0519 0.3509 8.9200e-003

419.1882

Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0171 0.1120 1.1856e-003


Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2016 1/14/2016 5 10

2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2016 1/15/2016 5 1

3 Grading Grading 1/16/2016 1/19/2016 5 2

4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/20/2016 6/7/2016 5 100

5 Paving Paving 6/8/2016 6/14/2016 5 5

6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/15/2016 6/28/2016 5 10

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29

Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20

Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42

Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37

Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Trips and VMT


3.2 Demolition - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 6.5600e-003

0.0562 0.0435 6.0000e-005

4.0200e-003

4.0200e-003

3.8400e-003

3.8400e-003

0.0000 5.4141 5.4141 1.0800e-003

0.0000 5.4369

Total 6.5600e-003

0.0562 0.0435 6.0000e-005

4.0200e-003

4.0200e-003

3.8400e-003

3.8400e-003

0.0000 5.4141 5.4141 1.0800e-003

0.0000 5.4369

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

Acres of Grading: 0.5

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 5 6.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.0500e-003

2.9000e-004

3.0600e-003

1.0000e-005

5.5000e-004

0.0000 5.5000e-004

1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.5000e-004

0.0000 0.5140 0.5140 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.5145

Total 1.0500e-003

2.9000e-004

3.0600e-003

1.0000e-005

5.5000e-004

0.0000 5.5000e-004

1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.5000e-004

0.0000 0.5140 0.5140 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.5145

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0561 0.0435 6.0000e-005

4.0100e-003

4.0100e-003

3.8300e-003

3.8300e-003

0.0000 5.4077 5.4077 1.0800e-003

0.0000 5.4304

Total 6.5500e-003

0.0561 0.0435 6.0000e-005

4.0100e-003

4.0100e-003

3.8300e-003

3.8300e-003

0.0000 5.4077 5.4077 1.0800e-003

0.0000 5.4304

Mitigated Construction On-Site




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.0500e-003

2.9000e-004

3.0600e-003

1.0000e-005

5.5000e-004

0.0000 5.5000e-004

1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.5000e-004

0.0000 0.5140 0.5140 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.5145

Total 1.0500e-003

2.9000e-004

3.0600e-003

1.0000e-005

5.5000e-004

0.0000 5.5000e-004

1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.5000e-004

0.0000 0.5140 0.5140 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.5145

Mitigated Construction Off-Site


3.3 Site Preparation - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 2.7000e-004

0.0000 2.7000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


6.8200e-003

3.6700e-003

0.0000 4.2000e-004

4.2000e-004

3.8000e-004

3.8000e-004

0.0000 0.4414 0.4414 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4442

Total 6.8000e-004

6.8200e-003

3.6700e-003

0.0000 2.7000e-004

4.2000e-004

6.9000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.8000e-004

4.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4414 0.4414 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4442


Acres of Grading: 0




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.5000e-004

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0257 0.0257 0.0000 0.0000 0.0257

Total 5.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.5000e-004

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0257 0.0257 0.0000 0.0000 0.0257


Acres of Grading: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 2.7000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


6.8100e-003

3.6700e-003

0.0000 4.2000e-004

4.2000e-004

3.8000e-004

3.8000e-004

0.0000 0.4409 0.4409 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4437

Total 6.8000e-004

6.8100e-003

3.6700e-003

0.0000 2.7000e-004

4.2000e-004

6.9000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.8000e-004

4.1000e-004

0.0000 0.4409 0.4409 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4437





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.5000e-004

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0257 0.0257 0.0000 0.0000 0.0257

Total 5.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.5000e-004

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0257 0.0257 0.0000 0.0000 0.0257


Acres of Grading: 0

3.4 Grading - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 7.5000e-004

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.1000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0112 8.7000e-003

1.0000e-005

8.0000e-004

8.0000e-004

7.7000e-004

7.7000e-004

0.0000 1.0828 1.0828 2.2000e-004

0.0000 1.0874

Total 1.3100e-003

0.0112 8.7000e-003

1.0000e-005

7.5000e-004

8.0000e-004

1.5500e-003

4.1000e-004

7.7000e-004

1.1800e-003

0.0000 1.0828 1.0828 2.2000e-004

0.0000 1.0874



3.4 Grading - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.1000e-004

6.0000e-005

6.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1029

Total 2.1000e-004

6.0000e-005

6.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1029



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0000 7.5000e-004

4.1000e-004

0.0000 4.1000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0112 8.6900e-003

1.0000e-005

8.0000e-004

8.0000e-004

7.7000e-004

7.7000e-004

0.0000 1.0815 1.0815 2.2000e-004

0.0000 1.0861

Total 1.3100e-003

0.0112 8.6900e-003

1.0000e-005

7.5000e-004

8.0000e-004

1.5500e-003

4.1000e-004

7.7000e-004

1.1800e-003

0.0000 1.0815 1.0815 2.2000e-004

0.0000 1.0861



3.4 Grading - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 2.1000e-004

6.0000e-005

6.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1029

Total 2.1000e-004

6.0000e-005

6.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

0.0000 1.1000e-004

3.0000e-005

0.0000 3.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1028 0.1028 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.1029


3.5 Building Construction - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0691 0.6853 0.4106 5.7000e-004

0.0470 0.0470 0.0432 0.0432 0.0000 53.4584 53.4584 0.0161 0.0000 53.7970

Total 0.0691 0.6853 0.4106 5.7000e-004

0.0470 0.0470 0.0432 0.0432 0.0000 53.4584 53.4584 0.0161 0.0000 53.7970


Acres of Paving: 0




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 2.3500e-003

0.0136 0.0175 3.0000e-005

9.2000e-004

2.1000e-004

1.1400e-003

2.6000e-004

2.0000e-004

4.6000e-004

0.0000 2.9587 2.9587 2.0000e-005

0.0000 2.9592

Worker 6.2700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0184 4.0000e-005

3.2900e-003

3.0000e-005

3.3200e-003

8.7000e-004

3.0000e-005

9.0000e-004

0.0000 3.0837 3.0837 1.7000e-004

0.0000 3.0872

Total 8.6200e-003

0.0154 0.0359 7.0000e-005

4.2100e-003

2.4000e-004

4.4600e-003

1.1300e-003

2.3000e-004

1.3600e-003

0.0000 6.0424 6.0424 1.9000e-004

0.0000 6.0464


Acres of Paving: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0690 0.6845 0.4101 5.7000e-004

0.0469 0.0469 0.0432 0.0432 0.0000 53.3948 53.3948 0.0161 0.0000 53.7330

Total 0.0690 0.6845 0.4101 5.7000e-004

0.0469 0.0469 0.0432 0.0432 0.0000 53.3948 53.3948 0.0161 0.0000 53.7330





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 2.3500e-003

0.0136 0.0175 3.0000e-005

9.2000e-004

2.1000e-004

1.1400e-003

2.6000e-004

2.0000e-004

4.6000e-004

0.0000 2.9587 2.9587 2.0000e-005

0.0000 2.9592

Worker 6.2700e-003

1.7700e-003

0.0184 4.0000e-005

3.2900e-003

3.0000e-005

3.3200e-003

8.7000e-004

3.0000e-005

9.0000e-004

0.0000 3.0837 3.0837 1.7000e-004

0.0000 3.0872

Total 8.6200e-003

0.0154 0.0359 7.0000e-005

4.2100e-003

2.4000e-004

4.4600e-003

1.1300e-003

2.3000e-004

1.3600e-003

0.0000 6.0424 6.0424 1.9000e-004

0.0000 6.0464


Acres of Paving: 0

3.6 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0266 0.0182 3.0000e-005

1.6500e-003

1.6500e-003

1.5300e-003

1.5300e-003

0.0000 2.4575 2.4575 6.7000e-004

0.0000 2.4717

Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 2.8000e-003

0.0266 0.0182 3.0000e-005

1.6500e-003

1.6500e-003

1.5300e-003

1.5300e-003

0.0000 2.4575 2.4575 6.7000e-004

0.0000 2.4717



3.6 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 9.4000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-004

1.3000e-004

0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4626 0.4626 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4631

Total 9.4000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-004

1.3000e-004

0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4626 0.4626 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4631



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0265 0.0182 3.0000e-005

1.6500e-003

1.6500e-003

1.5300e-003

1.5300e-003

0.0000 2.4546 2.4546 6.7000e-004

0.0000 2.4687

Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 2.8000e-003

0.0265 0.0182 3.0000e-005

1.6500e-003

1.6500e-003

1.5300e-003

1.5300e-003

0.0000 2.4546 2.4546 6.7000e-004

0.0000 2.4687



3.6 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 9.4000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-004

1.3000e-004

0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4626 0.4626 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4631

Total 9.4000e-004

2.6000e-004

2.7600e-003

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-004

1.3000e-004

0.0000 1.3000e-004

0.0000 0.4626 0.4626 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.4631


3.7 Architectural Coating - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.2318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0119 9.4200e-003

1.0000e-005

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.2798

Total 0.2336 0.0119 9.4200e-003

1.0000e-005

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.2798


Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 30,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 10,000




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.0000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.1000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-005

0.0000 6.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0514 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0515

Total 1.0000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.1000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-005

0.0000 6.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0514 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0515




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.2318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0119 9.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

0.0000 1.2751 1.2751 1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.2783

Total 0.2336 0.0119 9.4100e-003

1.0000e-005

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

9.8000e-004

0.0000 1.2751 1.2751 1.5000e-004

0.0000 1.2783



4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.2558 0.2473 0.9307 2.3300e-003

0.1593 3.3700e-003

0.1627 0.0426 3.1000e-003

0.0457 0.0000 180.0026 180.0026 7.0600e-003

0.0000 180.1507

Unmitigated 0.2558 0.2473 0.9307 2.3300e-003

0.1593 3.3700e-003

0.1627 0.0426 3.1000e-003

0.0457 0.0000 180.0026 180.0026 7.0600e-003

0.0000 180.1507

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.0000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.1000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-005

0.0000 6.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0514 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0515

Total 1.0000e-004

3.0000e-005

3.1000e-004

0.0000 5.0000e-005

0.0000 6.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 1.0000e-005

0.0000 0.0514 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0515




4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Research & Development 162.20 38.00 22.20 420,497 420,497

Total 162.20 38.00 22.20 420,497 420,497

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Research & Development 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 82 15 3

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

0.513125 0.060112 0.180262 0.139218 0.042100 0.006630 0.016061 0.030999 0.001941 0.002506 0.004348 0.000594 0.002104

Historical Energy Use: N



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Electricity Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 134.2277 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

Electricity Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 134.2277 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

NaturalGas Mitigated

2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

NaturalGas Unmitigated

2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

Research & Development

376200 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

Total 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

Unmitigated



NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr


376200 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

Total 2.0300e-003

0.0184 0.0155 1.1000e-004

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

1.4000e-003

0.0000 20.0755 20.0755 3.8000e-004

3.7000e-004

20.1976

Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr


241000 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

Total 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

Unmitigated


6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Unmitigated 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use


Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr


241000 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

Total 134.2277 3.1700e-003

6.6000e-004

134.4976

Mitigated


7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural Coating

0.0232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0723 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Landscaping 3.0000e-005

0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Total 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Unmitigated


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr


0.0232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.0723 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Total 0.0955 0.0000 2.6000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-004

5.0000e-004

0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-004

Mitigated



Category MT/yr

Mitigated 74.4371 0.3221 7.9000e-003

83.6502

Unmitigated 74.4371 0.3221 7.9100e-003

83.6552

7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


9.83388 / 0

74.4371 0.3221 7.9100e-003

83.6552

Total 74.4371 0.3221 7.9100e-003

83.6552

Unmitigated


8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


9.83388 / 0

74.4371 0.3221 7.9000e-003

83.6502

Total 74.4371 0.3221 7.9000e-003

83.6502

Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail


MT/yr

Mitigated 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Unmitigated 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Category/Year


10.0 Vegetation

8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


1.52 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Total 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Unmitigated

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


1.52 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Total 0.3086 0.0182 0.0000 0.6915

Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type


Construction Phase - To be more representative of VOC emissions

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - Estimated by site location

Area Mitigation - zero is the default for VOC paint

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

CSUN Research Building

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Research & Development 20.00 1000sqft 0.35 20,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

9

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

2017Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 10.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.46 0.35

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2017


2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year lb/day lb/day

2016 46.7424 14.0073 9.3028 0.0135 0.8645 0.9446 1.6694 0.4434 0.8691 1.2116 0.0000 1,310.4074

1,310.4074

0.3596 0.0000 1,317.9598

Total 46.7424 14.0073 9.3028 0.0135 0.8645 0.9446 1.6694 0.4434 0.8691 1.2116 0.0000 1,310.4074

1,310.4074

0.3596 0.0000 1,317.9598

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year lb/day lb/day

2016 46.7421 13.9947 9.2948 0.0135 0.8645 0.9438 1.6686 0.4434 0.8683 1.2109 0.0000 1,309.3261

1,309.3261

0.3593 0.0000 1,316.8717

Total 46.7421 13.9947 9.2948 0.0135 0.8645 0.9438 1.6686 0.4434 0.8683 1.2109 0.0000 1,309.3261

1,309.3261

0.3593 0.0000 1,316.8717

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

7.2739e-004

0.0897 0.0859 0.0741 0.0000 0.0921 0.0443 0.0000 0.0909 0.0578 0.0000 0.0825 0.0825 0.0918 0.0000 0.0826




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category lb/day lb/day

Area 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Energy 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Mobile 2.0439 1.7364 6.5943 0.0165 1.1621 0.0242 1.1864 0.3105 0.0223 0.3328 1,405.3320

1,405.3320

0.0558 1,406.5036

Total 2.5782 1.8375 6.6812 0.0171 1.1621 0.0319 1.1940 0.3105 0.0300 0.3405 1,526.5934

1,526.5934

0.0581 2.2200e-003

1,528.5032

Unmitigated Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Energy 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Mobile 2.0439 1.7364 6.5943 0.0165 1.1621 0.0242 1.1864 0.3105 0.0223 0.3328 1,405.3320

1,405.3320

0.0558 1,406.5036

Total 2.5782 1.8375 6.6812 0.0171 1.1621 0.0319 1.1940 0.3105 0.0300 0.3405 1,526.5934

1,526.5934

0.0581 2.2200e-003

1,528.5032

Mitigated Operational


3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2016 1/14/2016 5 10

2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2016 1/15/2016 5 1

3 Grading Grading 1/16/2016 1/19/2016 5 2

4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/20/2016 6/7/2016 5 100

5 Paving Paving 6/8/2016 6/14/2016 5 5

6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/15/2016 6/28/2016 5 10

OffRoad Equipment


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Percent Reduction

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29

Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20

Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42

Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37

Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 5 6.00 3.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.3122 11.2385 8.7048 0.0120 0.8039 0.8039 0.7674 0.7674 1,193.6106

1,193.6106

0.2386 1,198.6217

Total 1.3122 11.2385 8.7048 0.0120 0.8039 0.8039 0.7674 0.7674 1,193.6106

1,193.6106

0.2386 1,198.6217




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976

Total 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976


3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.3110 11.2281 8.6968 0.0120 0.8031 0.8031 0.7667 0.7667 0.0000 1,192.5155

1,192.5155

0.2384 1,197.5221

Total 1.3110 11.2281 8.6968 0.0120 0.8031 0.8031 0.7667 0.7667 0.0000 1,192.5155

1,192.5155

0.2384 1,197.5221




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976

Total 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 1.3593 13.6350 7.3401 9.3500e-003

0.8338 0.8338 0.7671 0.7671 973.0842 973.0842 0.2935 979.2481

Total 1.3593 13.6350 7.3401 9.3500e-003

0.5303 0.8338 1.3640 0.0573 0.7671 0.8243 973.0842 973.0842 0.2935 979.2481


Acres of Grading: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.1197 0.0286 0.2990 6.6000e-004

0.0559 4.7000e-004

0.0564 0.0148 4.3000e-004

0.0153 55.7848 55.7848 3.0500e-003

55.8488

Total 0.1197 0.0286 0.2990 6.6000e-004

0.0559 4.7000e-004

0.0564 0.0148 4.3000e-004

0.0153 55.7848 55.7848 3.0500e-003

55.8488





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 1.3581 13.6225 7.3334 9.3400e-003

0.8330 0.8330 0.7663 0.7663 0.0000 972.1915 972.1915 0.2933 978.3496

Total 1.3581 13.6225 7.3334 9.3400e-003

0.5303 0.8330 1.3632 0.0573 0.7663 0.8236 0.0000 972.1915 972.1915 0.2933 978.3496


Acres of Grading: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.1197 0.0286 0.2990 6.6000e-004

0.0559 4.7000e-004

0.0564 0.0148 4.3000e-004

0.0153 55.7848 55.7848 3.0500e-003

55.8488

Total 0.1197 0.0286 0.2990 6.6000e-004

0.0559 4.7000e-004

0.0564 0.0148 4.3000e-004

0.0153 55.7848 55.7848 3.0500e-003

55.8488



3.4 Grading - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 1.3122 11.2385 8.7048 0.0120 0.8039 0.8039 0.7674 0.7674 1,193.6106

1,193.6106

0.2386 1,198.6217

Total 1.3122 11.2385 8.7048 0.0120 0.7528 0.8039 1.5566 0.4138 0.7674 1.1811 1,193.6106

1,193.6106

0.2386 1,198.6217



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976

Total 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976



3.4 Grading - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 1.3110 11.2281 8.6968 0.0120 0.8031 0.8031 0.7667 0.7667 0.0000 1,192.5155

1,192.5155

0.2384 1,197.5221

Total 1.3110 11.2281 8.6968 0.0120 0.7528 0.8031 1.5559 0.4138 0.7667 1.1804 0.0000 1,192.5155

1,192.5155

0.2384 1,197.5221



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976

Total 0.2393 0.0572 0.5980 1.3300e-003

0.1118 9.3000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.6000e-004

0.0305 111.5695 111.5695 6.1000e-003

111.6976





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646 1,178.5549

1,178.5549

0.3555 1,186.0202

Total 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646 1,178.5549

1,178.5549

0.3555 1,186.0202


Acres of Paving: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0492 0.2671 0.3592 6.5000e-004

0.0188 4.2700e-003

0.0230 5.3400e-003

3.9300e-003

9.2700e-003

64.9108 64.9108 4.8000e-004

64.9210

Worker 0.1436 0.0343 0.3588 8.0000e-004

0.0671 5.6000e-004

0.0676 0.0178 5.2000e-004

0.0183 66.9417 66.9417 3.6600e-003

67.0186

Total 0.1928 0.3014 0.7180 1.4500e-003

0.0858 4.8300e-003

0.0907 0.0231 4.4500e-003

0.0276 131.8525 131.8525 4.1400e-003

131.9395





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 0.0000 1,177.4736

1,177.4736

0.3552 1,184.9321

Total 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 0.0000 1,177.4736

1,177.4736

0.3552 1,184.9321


Acres of Paving: 0


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0492 0.2671 0.3592 6.5000e-004

0.0188 4.2700e-003

0.0230 5.3400e-003

3.9300e-003

9.2700e-003

64.9108 64.9108 4.8000e-004

64.9210

Worker 0.1436 0.0343 0.3588 8.0000e-004

0.0671 5.6000e-004

0.0676 0.0178 5.2000e-004

0.0183 66.9417 66.9417 3.6600e-003

67.0186

Total 0.1928 0.3014 0.7180 1.4500e-003

0.0858 4.8300e-003

0.0907 0.0231 4.4500e-003

0.0276 131.8525 131.8525 4.1400e-003

131.9395



3.6 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.1203 10.6282 7.2935 0.0111 0.6606 0.6606 0.6113 0.6113 1,083.5832

1,083.5832

0.2969 1,089.8175

Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.1203 10.6282 7.2935 0.0111 0.6606 0.6606 0.6113 0.6113 1,083.5832

1,083.5832

0.2969 1,089.8175



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.4308 0.1029 1.0764 2.3900e-003

0.2012 1.6800e-003

0.2029 0.0534 1.5500e-003

0.0549 200.8251 200.8251 0.0110 201.0556

Total 0.4308 0.1029 1.0764 2.3900e-003

0.2012 1.6800e-003

0.2029 0.0534 1.5500e-003

0.0549 200.8251 200.8251 0.0110 201.0556



3.6 Paving - 2016


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 1.1192 10.6185 7.2868 0.0111 0.6600 0.6600 0.6108 0.6108 0.0000 1,082.5891

1,082.5891

0.2966 1,088.8176

Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 1.1192 10.6185 7.2868 0.0111 0.6600 0.6600 0.6108 0.6108 0.0000 1,082.5891

1,082.5891

0.2966 1,088.8176



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.4308 0.1029 1.0764 2.3900e-003

0.2012 1.6800e-003

0.2029 0.0534 1.5500e-003

0.0549 200.8251 200.8251 0.0110 201.0556

Total 0.4308 0.1029 1.0764 2.3900e-003

0.2012 1.6800e-003

0.2029 0.0534 1.5500e-003

0.0549 200.8251 200.8251 0.0110 201.0556





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 46.3500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449

Total 46.7185 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e-003

0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.1449




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0239 5.7200e-003

0.0598 1.3000e-004

0.0112 9.0000e-005

0.0113 2.9600e-003

9.0000e-005

3.0500e-003

11.1570 11.1570 6.1000e-004

11.1698

Total 0.0239 5.7200e-003

0.0598 1.3000e-004

0.0112 9.0000e-005

0.0113 2.9600e-003

9.0000e-005

3.0500e-003

11.1570 11.1570 6.1000e-004

11.1698



4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 46.3500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.3681 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e-003

0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.8860

Total 46.7181 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e-003

0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.8860




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 0.0239 5.7200e-003

0.0598 1.3000e-004

0.0112 9.0000e-005

0.0113 2.9600e-003

9.0000e-005

3.0500e-003

11.1570 11.1570 6.1000e-004

11.1698

Total 0.0239 5.7200e-003

0.0598 1.3000e-004

0.0112 9.0000e-005

0.0113 2.9600e-003

9.0000e-005

3.0500e-003

11.1570 11.1570 6.1000e-004

11.1698




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 2.0439 1.7364 6.5943 0.0165 1.1621 0.0242 1.1864 0.3105 0.0223 0.3328 1,405.3320

1,405.3320

0.0558 1,406.5036

Unmitigated 2.0439 1.7364 6.5943 0.0165 1.1621 0.0242 1.1864 0.3105 0.0223 0.3328 1,405.3320

1,405.3320

0.0558 1,406.5036

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Research & Development 162.20 38.00 22.20 420,497 420,497

Total 162.20 38.00 22.20 420,497 420,497

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Research & Development 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 82 15 3

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

0.513125 0.060112 0.180262 0.139218 0.042100 0.006630 0.016061 0.030999 0.001941 0.002506 0.004348 0.000594 0.002104

Historical Energy Use: N



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



NaturalGas Mitigated

0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950


NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day


1030.68 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Total 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Unmitigated


6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Unmitigated 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003


NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day


1.03068 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Total 0.0111 0.1011 0.0849 6.1000e-004

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

7.6800e-003

121.2571 121.2571 2.3200e-003

2.2200e-003

121.9950

Mitigated


7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory lb/day lb/day


0.1270 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.3960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Total 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Unmitigated


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory lb/day lb/day


0.1270 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.3960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Total 0.5232 2.0000e-005

2.0800e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

4.3800e-003

4.3800e-003

1.0000e-005

4.6300e-003

Mitigated


8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

10.0 Vegetation

9.0 Operational Offroad

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type


Documents

California State University, Northridge Research Building ...csun.edu/sites/default/files/CSUN Research Project...• Phase 3: 2015–2019 • Phase 4: 2020–2035 . Research Building