19
COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION Compliance Review Unit State Personnel Board October 09, 2015

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

COMPLIANCE REVIEW REPORT

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE

REGULATION

Compliance Review Unit State Personnel Board October 09, 2015

Page 2: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 

Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 

Scope and Methodology .................................................................................................. 2 

Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 3 

Examinations ............................................................................................................. 3 

Appointments ............................................................................................................. 5 

Equal Employment Opportunity ............................................................................... 10 

Personal Services Contracts .................................................................................... 12 

Departmental Response ................................................................................................ 14 

SPB Reply ..................................................................................................................... 14 

Page 3: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

1

EstablisBoard) iprobatiodisciplinrecruitmemployeto, protepromotindirection Pursuan(CRU) careas: eservicesregulatiowith meidentified The CRwhen th

The CRRegulatiEEO, asummar

A

Exam

Appo

Appo

Appo

hed by thes charged w

onary perioary actions

ment and seees provideecting life ang the pun to departm

nt to Goveconducts coexaminations contracts ons. The puerit related d during the

U may alsoe SPB obta

U conducteion (DPR) nd PSC’s rizes the co

Area

minations

intments

intments

intments

Ca

e Californiawith enforcods and s and merlection proc

e critical seand propertblic healthments throu

rnment Coompliance rns, appointm

(PSC’s) turpose of thlaws, rules

e reviews. T

o conduct sains informa

ed a routinepersonnelfrom July

ompliance re

Equal EWe

Equal EWe

Probatio

Appoin

SPB alifornia Depa

INTR

a Constituting and adclassificat

rit-related acess for thervices to thty, managin, and pre

ugh the Boa

ode sectionreviews of aments, equato ensure hese reviews, and poliThe SPB co

special inveation sugge

EXECUT

e complian practices 1, 2013,

eview findin

Employmenre Not Sep

Employmenre Not Sep

onary Evaluall Appo

tment Docuthe Approp

Compliance artment of Pe

RODUCTIO

tion, the Sministeringtions, adoappeals. Te hiring of ohe people ong emergeserving theard’s decisio

n 18661, tappointing aal employmcompliance

ws is to ensicies and tonducts the

estigations esting a pot

TIVE SUMM

ce review oin the are

through Mngs.

Finding nt Opportunarated From

nt Opportunarated From

uations Werintments Rumentationpriate Amou

Review esticide Regul

N

State Perso the civil se

opting regThe SPB oover 200,00of Californiancy operate environmons, rules,

he SPB’sauthority’s p

ment opporte with civilsure state ato identify ese reviews

in responstential merit

MARY

of Californiaeas of exaarch 31, 2

nity Questiom Applicati

nity Questiom Applicatire Not Prov

Reviewed Was Not Kunt of Time

lation

onnel Boarervice statuulations, oversees th00 state ema, includingtions, proviment. The policies, an

Compliancpersonnel ptunity (EEOl service la

agencies areand share

s on a three

se to a spet-related vio

a Departmeaminations,2014. The

onnaires ons

onnaires ons vided for

Kept for

rd (the SPutes, prescrand reviehe merit-b

mployees. Tg but not limding educaSPB prov

nd consulta

ce Review practices in

O), and persaws and be in compli best prace-year cycle

ecific requeolation.

ent of Pest appointmfollowing t

Severity

Very Serio

Very Serio

Serious

Serious

PB or ribing ewing ased hese

mited ation, vides ation.

Unit n four sonal board ance

ctices e.

est or

ticide ents, table

y

ous

ous

s

s

Page 4: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

2

A

Equal EOpp

PersonaCon

A color-c

R O Y G

The DPpesticideemploysRegionaEnvironmToxicololocal petheir com

The scoappointmThe primpolicies,and to re A cross-to ensurand levprovided511b’s,

Area

mploymentportunity

al Servicesntracts

coded syste

Red = Very Orange = SYellow = NoGreen = In

PR’s missioe sales ans approximal, Central mental Proogists, Admesticide enfombined staf

ope of thements, EEOmary objec and proceecommend

-section of re that samvels were d, which iscoring re

Ca

t Equ

Comp

Perso

em is used

Serious Serious on-serious oCompliance

on is to prd use, and

mately 400 Regional,

ogram Maministrative orcement pff of approx

S

e compliancO program,ctive of theedures com corrective

the DPR’s mples of var

reviewed. ncluded esults, notic

SPB alifornia Depa

al Employmplied with Ci

onal ServiceProcedu

to identify

or Technicae

BAC

rotect humd by fosteremployeesand Sout

nagers, EnStaff, and

programs oximately 280

COPE AND

ce review , and PSC’e review w

mplied with action whe

examinatiorious examThe CRUxamination

ce of perso

Compliance artment of Pe

Finding ment Opporivil Service

Rules es Contractural Requir

the severity

al

CKGROUND

an health ring reduces within thhern RegionvironmentAttorneys.

of all 55 co0 biologists

D METHOD

was limite’s from Jul

was to detestate civil

ere deficien

ons and apinations anexamined

plans, exonnel actio

Review esticide Regul

rtunity ProgLaws and

ts Compliedrements

y of the vio

D

and the eed-risk peshe headquonal officetal Scientis

The DPR ounty agricus.

DOLOGY

ed to reviey 1, 2013,ermine if Dservice lawcies were i

ppointmentsnd appointmd the docuxaminationn (NOPA)

lation

gram Board

d with

lations as f

environment managemarters coms. These sts, Reseaprovides o

ultural com

ewing DPRthrough M

DPR persows and boadentified.

s were selement types,umentation bulletins, forms, vac

Severity

In Complia

In Complia

follows:

nt by regulment. The mplex, Nort

employeesarch Scienoversight omissioners

R examinatMarch 31, 2onnel practard regulat

ected for re, classificat

that the job analy

cancy post

y

nce

nce

ating DPR thern s are ntists, of the s and

tions, 2014. tices, tions,

eview tions, DPR yses, tings,

Page 5: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

3

applicatimovemereports. The revprocedudiscriminaccommAdvisory The DPreview tlegally sproceduregulatio On Octothe CRU2015,to CRU recomplian

Examina Examinafairly to perform Code, §the formBoard eof emplo§ 18931

1 If an emcompliancaudit the process. I

ion screenient worksh

view of theures; the Enation com

modation py Committe

PR’s PSC’s to make cosufficient. T

ures relativons.

ober 1, 201U’s initial finsubmit a w

eceived andnce report.

ations

ations to estest and

the duties 18930.) Ex

m of a demestablishes oyees for ea.) Within a

mployee organce review per

contract. InsIn this instanc

Ca

ing criteriaeets, emp

DPR EEOEEO officemplaint prorogram; th

ee (DAC). T

were alsoonclusions The review

ve to PSC

5, an exit cndings andwritten respd carefully

FINDI

stablish an determine of the classxaminations

monstration minimum qach class o reasonabl

nization requeriod or prior tostead, the SPce, none of th

SPB alifornia Depa

, hiring inteloyment hi

O program r’s role, docess; thehe discrimiThe CRU als

o reviewed.as to whe

w was limiC’s complie

conference recommen

ponse to threviewed

NGS AND

eligible listthe qualifi

s of positios may be aof skills, o

qualificationof position ae time befo

ests the SPB o the completPB will reviee reviewed P

Compliance artment of Pe

erview ratinstory recor

included euties, and

e upward nation comso interview

.1 It was bether DPRited to whed with a

e was held ndations. Te CRU’s dthe respon

RECOMM

t must be cications, fitn for which

assembled or any comns for deterand for appore the sch

to review antion of the finaw the contra

PSC’s were ch

Review esticide Regul

ng criteria, rds, corres

examiningreporting mobility p

mplaint prowed approp

eyond the justificationether DPRpplicable s

with the DPThe DPR wdraft report.nse, which

ENDATION

competitivetness, and

h he or she or unassem

mbination ormining thelicants for e

heduled dat

ny personal seal complianceact pursuant hallenged

lation

certificatiospondence,

written EErelationsh

program; tocess; andpriate DPR

scope of ns for the

R practicesstatutory la

PR to explaas given u. On Octobh is attache

NS

e and of suc ability of seeks app

mbled, writtof those tee fitness anexaminationte for the e

ervices contrae review repoto its statuto

on lists, tran and prob

EO policies ip; the intethe reasond the Disastaff.

the complicontracts w

s, policies, aw and b

ain and disntil Octobe

ber 7, 2015ed to this

ch charactecompetitor

pointment. (ten or oral, ests. (Ibid.) nd qualificans. (Gov. C

examination

act during theort, the SPB wory and regu

nsfer ation

and ernal nable ability

ance were and

board

scuss er 14, 5, the

final

er as rs to (Gov. or in The

tions Code, n, the

e SPB will not ulatory

Page 6: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

4

designatestablishcontain minimumthe officexaminaeach peof the ecompetitemploym During reviewed

C

BusineAssista

Senior ScientisStaff Se(Gener

FINDIN

Summa

2 The trainapplicant performinwhich arescore. 3A writtenassessedor subject

ted appoinhment of esuch inform

m qualificatce of the ation annourson compe

earned ratintor shall b

ment list res

the period d three of t

Classificatio

ss Service ant (Special

Environmest (Superviservices Anaral)

NG NO. 1 –

ary:

ning and expto answer m

g certain taske totaled by th

n examinationthrough the

tively scored.

Ca

nting poweligible lists.

mation as thions. (Ibid.)departmen

uncement. (eting in anyngs on all be notified sulting from

under revhese exam

n E

list) DeP

ental sory) alyst

Equal ESeparate

Out of 3 EEO queemploym

erience (T&Emultiple-choicks typically pehe online sys

n is a testing use of a varie

SPB alifornia Depa

r shall an (Gov. Cod

he date and) Every appt or a des(Gov. Codey examinatiphases of in writing

m the exami

view, the Dinations, w

Exam Type

epartmentaPromotional

Open

Transfer

Employmened From Ap

exams reestionnaireent applica

E) examinatioce questionserformed by tstem or a dep

procedure inety of item fo

Compliance artment of Pe

nounce or de, § 18933d place of tplicant for esignated ae, § 18934.on is to be the examinof the re

nation is es

DPR conduhich are lis

ExComp

al TraininExpe

(T&

T&

Writ

nt Opportpplications

viewed, 2es were nation. Spe

n is administeabout his o

those in this partment exa

n which candrmats. Writte

Review esticide Regul

r advertise 3, subd. (ahe examina

examinationppointing p) Generallydetermined

nation. (Gosults of thstablished.

ucted foursted below:

xam onents ng and rience

&E)2

&E

tten3

tunity Qus

exams incnot separaecifically, 5

ered either onor her level classificationm analyst, an

didates’ job-ren examinatio

lation

the exam).) the adveation and thn shall file apower as y, the final ed by the weov. Code, §he examina

(Gov. Cod

examinati

Final File Date

7/08/2013

Continuous

11/26/2013

estionnair

cluded appated from 5 of the 3

nline or in wrof training

. Responses nd then assig

elated knowleons are either

mination forertisement he nature oan applicatidirected inearned ratineighted ave§ 18936.) Eation whene, § 18938

ons. The

No. oApplicat

3 17

s 21

3 7

res Were

plications wthe STD

38 applica

riting, and askand/or experyield point va

gned a perce

edge and skilobjectively s

r the shall

of the on in

n the ng of

erage Each n the .5.)

CRU

of tions

Not

where 678

tions

ks the rience alues,

entage

ls are scored

Page 7: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

5

Criteria

Severity

Cause:

Action:

Appointm In all caappointi

:

y:

ments

ases not exng power

Ca

reviewed from the S

Governmdepartmeany appliany protesubdivisioorigin, aconditionidentity, gveteran sasked to such dataResourceand sex fmonitorinEEO que“This quethe exam

Very Sersubjecting

The DPRplace to 678 was does ackthe EEO

The DPRquestionnapplicatioresponse

xcepted or must fill p

SPB alifornia Depa

included STD 678 em

ent Code ent to requircation indic

ected categon (a) (e.g.,ncestry, p, genetic ingender expstatus). App

provide voa is determes (CalHR)fairness of g of affirma

estionnaire estionnaire ination and

rious. Theg the agenc

R states thatensure thaonly seen

knowledge tquestionna

R has submnaires areon and con, therefore

exempted positions b

Compliance artment of Pe

EEO quesmployment

section 19re or permitcating or ingory listed i, a person's

physical dinformation, ression, ag

plicants for oluntarily emined by thto be necethe selecti

ative actionof the statewill be sep

d will not be

e applicancy to potent

t their Examat the EEO

by the exathat 5 of th

aire attache

mitted a corseparated

nfidentially no further a

by Article Vby appointm

Review esticide Regul

stionnaires t application

9704 maket any notati any way sin Governms race, religsability, m marital sta

ge, sexual oemployme

ethnic data he Californ

essary to anion processn efforts. (Ge applicatioparated fro

e used in an

nts’ protecttial liability.

minations Uquestionna

amination ahe 38 applicd.

rective actid from thedestroyedaction is re

VII of the Cment, inclu

lation

that were n.

es it unlawion or entrysuggesting ment Code gious creedmental disaatus, sex, orientation,nt in state about the

nia Departmn assessmes and to thGov. Code,on form (STom the appny employm

ted classes

Unit did havaire portion

analyst, howcations rev

ion plan fore STD 67as part of quired at th

California Cuding case

not separ

wful for a hy to be mador pertaininsection 12

d, color, natability, megender, ge, or militarycivil service

emselves wment of Huent of the ehe planning, § 19705.)TD 678) st

plication priment decisio

s were vis

e procedurn from the wever, the viewed did

r ensuring 78 employm

its departmhis time.

Constitutiones of trans

rated

hiring de on ng to 2940, tional edical ender y and e are

where uman ethnic g and ) The ates, or to ons.”

sible,

res in STD DPR have

EEO ment ment

n, the sfers,

Page 8: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

6

reinstateAct and way of tfitness, positionmental f During reviewed

C

AssociatProgram

Auditor

Data ProIII EnvironmManage

Environm

Office T

Office T

Program

Researc(PhysicaScienceSenior EScientistStaff EnScientistStaff Se(Genera

Program

EnvironmManage

ements, proBoard rule

transfer, orwhich requ, including fitness. (Ca

the complid 40 of thos

Classificatio

te Governmm Analyst

I

ocessing M

mental Proger II

mental Scie

echnician (

echnician (

m Technicia

ch Scientistal/Engineers)

Environment (Specialisvironmentat rvices Anal

al)

m Technicia

mental Proger II

Ca

omotions, aes. (Gov. Cr by way ofuires consid

his or her l. Code Re

iance reviese appointm

on

mental

Manager

gram

entist

Typing)

Typing)

an

t III ring

ntal st) al

lyst

an II

gram

SPB alifornia Depa

and demotiCode, § 190f reinstatemderation of

knowledgegs., tit. 2, §

ew period, ments, whic

AppointmType

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

CertificatList

MandatoReinstatem

RetiredAnnuita

Compliance artment of Pe

ions in stric050.) Appoment, must each indivi

e, skills, ab§ 250, subd

the DPRch are listed

ment Te

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Tem

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

tion Per

ory ment

Per

d ant

Tem

Review esticide Regul

ct accordaointments m be made idual’s job-

bilities, expe. (a).)

made 86d below:

enure T

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

mporary

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

mporary In

lation

nce with thmade from

on the bas-related quaerience, an

appointme

Time Base

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

ntermittent

he Civil Seeligible listssis of meritalifications nd physical

ents. The

No. oAppointm

1

1

1

1

8

1

1

2

2

4

1

1

1

2

rvice s, by t and for a l and

CRU

of ments

Page 9: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

7

C

Scientifi

EnvironmResearc(EpidemSenior EScientistStaff EnScientistStaff Se(GeneraStaff SeSenior EScientist FINDING

Summa

Criteria

Classificatio

c Aid

mental Sciech Scientist

miology/BiosEnvironment (Specialisvironmentat rvices Anal

al) rvices Man

Environment (Specialis

G NO. 2 –

ary:

:

Ca

on

entist t I statistics) ntal st) al

lyst

nager I ntal st)

Equal EmSeparated

Out of 40where EEemploymreviewed from the S

Governmdepartmeany appliany protesubdivisioorigin, aconditionidentity, gveteran sasked to such datassessmeand to th(Gov. Co

SPB alifornia Depa

AppointmType

TemporaAuthoriza

Transfe

Transfe

Transfe

Transfe

Transfe

TransfeVoluntaDemotio

mploymend From Ap

0 appointmeEO questioent applicaincluded

STD 678 em

ent Code ent to requircation indic

ected categon (a) (e.g.,ncestry, p, genetic ingender expstatus). App

provide vota is deteent of the ehe planningode, § 19

Compliance artment of Pe

ment Te

ary ation

Tem

er Per

er Per

er Per

er Per

er Per

er Perary on

Per

nt Opportuplications

ent files revnnaires we

ation. SpecEEO quesmployment

section 19re or permitcating or ingory listed i, a person's

physical dinformation, ression, ag

plicants for oluntarily eermined byethnic and sg and mon9705.) The

Review esticide Regul

enure T

mporary In

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

manent

unity Que

viewed, 11 ere not sepcifically, 20stionnaires t application

9704 maket any notati any way sin Governms race, religsability, m marital sta

ge, sexual oemployme

ethnic data y CalHR sex fairnesnitoring of e EEO qu

lation

Time Base

ntermittent

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

Full Time

estionnaire

files includparated from

of the 1,1that were

n.

es it unlawion or entrysuggesting ment Code gious creedmental disaatus, sex, orientation,nt in state about the

to be necss of the se

affirmativeuestionnaire

No. oAppointm

4

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

es Were

ded applicam the STD47 applicanot separ

wful for a hy to be mador pertaininsection 12

d, color, natability, megender, ge, or militarycivil service

emselves wcessary to

election proe action effe of the

of ments

Not

tions D 678

tions rated

hiring de on ng to 2940, tional edical ender y and e are

where o an ocess forts. state

Page 10: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

8

Severity

Cause:

Action:

FINDING

Summa

AssociatProgramOffice TResearc(PhysicaScienceSenior EScientistStaff Se(Genera

y:

G NO. 3 –

ary:

Classificat

te Governmm Analyst echnician (

ch Scientistal/Engineers)

Environment (Specialisrvices Anal

al)

Ca

applicatioseparatedbe used i

Very Sersubjecting

The DPRperiod unServices

The DPRquestionnapplicatioaction is r

ProbationAppointm

The DPRprobationreviewed

ion

mental

Typing) t III ring

ntal st) lyst

Total

SPB alifornia Depa

on form (Sd from the n any empl

rious. Theg the agenc

R states thnder reviewBranch (PS

R has submnaires are on as part orequired at

nary Evaments Revie

R did notnary reports

by the CRU

AppoinTy

Certifica

CertificaCertifica

Certifica

Certifica

Compliance artment of Pe

STD 678) applicationloyment de

e applicantcy to potent

hat they haw and highSD).

mitted a corseparated

of its departhis time.

luations ewed

t prepare, s of performU.

ntment ype

ation List

ation List ation List

ation List

ation List

Review esticide Regul

states, “Th prior to thecisions.”

ts’ protectetial liability.

ad a high h vacancy

rective actid from thertment resp

Were N

completemance for

No. of Appointme

1

1 1

3

1

7

lation

his questioe examinat

ed classes

staff turnorate within

ion plan fore STD 67ponse, there

Not Provi

, and/or r7 of the 40

ents No. o

P

onnaire wition and wi

s were vis

over during the Perso

r ensuring 78 employmefore no fu

ided for

retain requ0 appointm

of Uncomplrob. Report

2

1 1

4

1

9

ll be ll not

sible,

g the onnel

EEO ment

urther

all

uired ments

leted ts

Page 11: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

9

Criteria

Severity

Cause:

Action:

:

y:

Ca

A new pappointedtit. 2, § 3period is permanentit. 2, § 32power, a appointedwithout a has comappointinsubstantiaand salarthe proba& (2).)

During thevaluate frequent progress 599.795.)performaRegs., tit.

Serious. process perform probationperformathat the aemployee

The DPRdid not probation

The DPRcompliancGovernmresponse

SPB alifornia Depa

robationaryd by reinsta322, subd.

required wnt appointm22, subd. (anew proba

d to a posbreak in se

mpleted theg power; aally the samry range asationary per

e probationthe work intervals toon the job.

) The appoince each o. 2, § 599.7

The probato ensure the full sc

nary period nce or ter

appointmene and serve

R states thacontain a

nary reports

R has submce in ment Code ; therefore

Compliance artment of Pe

y period is atement wit(d)(2).) How

when an emment from aa).) In addiationary persition undeervice in th

e probationnd (2) withme or lowes a class inriod. (Cal. C

nary periodand efficieo keep the (Gov. Codinting poweone-third of795.)

ationary pethat the i

cope of thto assist a

minating tht is not a g

es to erode

at the procedequate s

s.

mitted a comeeting th

section 1no further a

Review esticide Regul

not requirth a right ofwever, the mployee enan employmtion, unlessriod is requer the follohe same clanary periodout a breaker level of dn which theCode Regs

d, the appoency of a e employeede, § 19172er must pref the proba

eriod is the ndividual s

heir job duan employehe appointood job/pethe quality

ess in placesteps to e

orrective ache probati19172 as action is re

lation

red when af return. (Caservice of

nters state ment list. (Cs waived by

uired when owing circass in whicd, but undk in serviceduties and employee

s., tit. 2, § 3

inting poweprobationee adequate

2; Cal. Codeepare a writtionary per

final step selected cauties. Failiee in improtment uponrson matchof state go

e during thensure com

ction plan fionary re

part of quired at th

an employeal. Code Rf a probatiocivil servical. Code Ry the appoian employumstancesh the emplder a diffee to a class

responsibihas comp

322, subd. (

er is requirer at sufficiely informee Regs., tit.tten appraisriod. (Cal. C

in the selean successng to useoving his on determinh is unfair toovernment.

e review pempletion o

for ensuringquirementsits departm

his time.

ee is egs.,

onary ce by egs., nting ee is : (1) oyee erent

s with ilities leted (c)(1)

ed to ently

ed of . 2, § sal of Code

ction sfully

e the r her ation o the

eriod of all

g full s of ment

Page 12: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

10

FINDING

Summa

Criteria

Severity

Cause:

Action:

Equal E Each staThe appthe effeappointiopportuncomplain

G NO. 4 –

ary:

:

y:

mployment

ate agency pointing powectiveness ng power nity; issuents; issue

Ca

AppointmAmount o

Specificaretain 6 criteria foeligible lis

In relevaprocedurestate lawsState ageapplicatiorecords arecords a12946.) Sapplicantsyears afte

Serious. appointm

The DPRdid not documen

The DPRcompliancGovernmresponse

t Opportuni

is responswer for eacof its EEOmust issu

procedureprocedure

SPB alifornia Depa

ment Documof Time

lly, of the NOPA’s, 1or an appost.

ant part, cies of each s governingencies are ons, persoand files fand files aState agencs or terminer the date

Without dents were p

R states thacontain a

tation was

R has submce in ment Code ; therefore

ty

sible for an ch state ageO programue a policyes for filins for prov

Compliance artment of Pe

mentation

40 appoin1 applicati

ointment m

vil service state agen

g employmrequired to

onnel, memor a minimre initially cies are alsnated emplthe employ

documentatproperly co

at the proceadequate kept for the

mitted a comeeting th

section 1no further a

effective Eency has th

m. (Gov. Cy statemenng, proces

viding equa

Review esticide Regul

Was Not K

ntments revions, 2 cer

made from

laws requncy shall cent practiceo maintain mbership, mum periodcreated or

so required oyees for

yment actio

tion, the CRonducted.

ess in placesteps to

e appropria

orrective ache probati18720 as action is re

EEO prograhe major reCode, § 1nt committessing, andal upward

lation

Kept for th

viewed, thertification lia designa

uire that thconform to es. (Gov. Cand preseor emplo

d of two yr received. to retain pea minimum

on is taken.

RU could n

e during thensure a

ate amount

ction plan fionary re

part of quired at th

m. (Gov. Cesponsibility19794.) Toed to equ resolvingmobility a

he Approp

e DPR didists, and rated three-

he employmthe federal

Code, § 187rve any an

oyment refyears after(Gov. Cod

ersonnel filem period of

(Ibid.)

not verify i

e review peall appointmof time.

for ensuringquirementsits departm

his time.

Code, § 197y for monito

o that end,al employm discriminnd promot

priate

d not ating -rank

ment l and 720.) nd all ferral r the de, § es of f two

f the

eriod ment

g full s of ment

790.) oring , the ment ation tional

Page 13: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

11

opportun(CalHR)the apporeport ddevelopCode, § Becausesexual hfrom thehead of the EEO Each stindividuahead of 19795, committmember§ 19795 The CRreview p

After revthe EEOguidelineinformatdiscriminresponsOfficer, the directhe direevidenceincreasefor its en

FINDIN

nities; and ) by providinointing pow

directly to, , implemen19795.)

e the EEO harassmene regular chthe organiz

O officer ma

tate agencals with a dthe agencysubd. (b)(ee and takers who have

5, subd. (b)(

RU reviewedperiod. In ad

viewing theO programes, the CRtion and gunation claibilities of who is at actor of the

ector on ise of its efe its hiring ontry-level st

NG NO. 5 –

Ca

cooperateng access t

wer must apand be unnt, coordina

Officer invt and othe

hain of comzation. In a ay be the pe

cy must esdisability, oy on issues1).) The de appropriae disabilitie(2).)

d the DPR’ddition, the

e policies, pm’s role anRU determinuidance onims. Furththe EEO O

a manageriaDPR. In adsues affecfforts to prof persons taff

Equal EmService L

SPB alifornia Depa

e with the to all requirppoint, at tder the suate, and m

vestigates aer employeemand, as wstate agen

ersonnel off

stablish a or who havs of concerdepartmentate steps toes or who h

’s EEO proCRU interv

proceduresd respons

ned that then the EEOhermore, tOfficer, as al level, anddition, the

cting persoromote EEwith a disa

mploymenLaws and B

Compliance artment of Pe

California red files, dohe managepervision o

monitor the

and ensuree complain

well as reguncy with lesficer. (Ibid.)

separate ve an interern to emplot must invo ensure thahave an inte

ogram that viewed app

s, and progibilities acce DPR EEO process ithe EEO well as sud is the pe

e DOF has ons with a O in its h

ability, and t

t OpportunBoard Rule

Review esticide Regul

Departmeocuments aerial level, of, the dire departme

es proper hnts, the poular and uness than 500)

committeeest in disaboyees with ite all empat the final erest in disa

was in effepropriate DP

rams nececording to O programncluding inprogram

upervisors rsonnel offan establisdisability.

iring and to offer upw

nity Prograes

lation

ent of Humnd data. (Iban EEO of

ector of thent’s EEO

handling ofosition requencumbere

0 employees

e of emplobility issuesdisabilities.ployees tocommittee ability issue

ect during PR staff.

essary for cstatutory

m provided enstructions

outlines tand manag

ficer and reshed DAC,The DPR

employmenward mobili

am Compl

man Resoubid.) In addfficer, who e departmeprogram. (

f discriminauires separed access tos, like the D

oyees whos, to advise. (Gov. Cod

o serve onis comprise

es. (Gov. C

the compli

compliance and regula

employees on how to

the roles gers. The ports direc, that repor

R also provnt practiceity opportun

lied with C

urces ition, shall nt to

(Gov.

ation, ation o the DPR,

o are e the de, § n the ed of

Code,

ance

with atory with

o file and

EEO tly to rts to vided s, to nities

Civil

Page 14: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

12

Persona A PSC personaperson pas an eConstituwith priperformeexceptioPSC’s t19130 astate fuincidentaservices For cosexecute reviews employe During t12 controur proc

Ven

CaliforniUniversiFresno FoundatNationalAcademScience

The Regthe Univof Califo

al Services

includes aal services performing employee

ution has anvate entitieed. Gover

ons to the chat are of

are also pernction, seral to a con

s that are of

t-savings Psuch a conthe adequ

ee organiza

the compliaracts were cedural revi

ndor

ia State ity,

tion l

my of s

gents of versity ornia

Ca

Contracts

any contrais a significthe serviceof the Sta

n implied cives to perfrnment Cocivil servicea type enu

rmissible. Srvices that ntract for tf an urgent,

PSCs, a stntract. (Gouacy of thation repres

ance reviewsubject to Dew, which a

Ser

Evaluate achange

assessme

Evaluatiohuman h

assessmeResearc

pesticide aand provid

pest maprofes

SPB alifornia Depa

ct, requisitcant, separes is an indate. (Cal. vil service mform servic

ode section mandate wumerated in

Subdivision are not av

the purchas, temporary

tate agencyov. Code, §e propose

senting state

w period, thDepartmenare listed b

rvices

and forecases in mill

ent revenue

on of DPR’shealth risk ent process

ch of urban application

de training tnagement ssionals

Compliance artment of Pe

tion, or purately identdependent Code Regmandate limces the stn 19130, where PSCn subdivisi(b) contracvailable witse or leas

y, or occasio

y is require§ 19131.) Fd or execue employee

he DPR hadt of Genera

below:

ConDa

st

es

11/01/11/30

s

s

10/01/3/31/

s to

7/01/6/30/

Review esticide Regul

rchase ordtifiable elemcontractor

g., tit. 2, §miting the state has hsubdivision

C’s achieve on (b) of G

cts include pthin state se of real oonal nature

ed to notifyor subdivisuted contraes. (Gov. C

d 17 PSC’sal Services

ntract ates

/2013-0/2015

$

/2013-/2015

$4

/2013-/2016

$

lation

der under ment, and tthat does

§ 547.59.) state’s authhistorically n (a), howcost saving

Governmenprivate conservice, seor personae.

y the SPB sion (b) conact at the Code, § 191

s that were(DGS) app

Contract Amount

185,533.23

450,000.00

$54,000.00

which labothe businesnot have stThe Califo

ority to conor custom

wever, codgs for the snt Code setracts for a

ervices thatal property,

of its intentracts, the

request o132.)

e in effect. proval, and

JustificaIdentif

3 Yes

0 Yes

Yes

or or ss or tatus ornia ntract marily difies state. ction new t are

and

nt to SPB

of an

Only thus

ation fied

s

s

s

Page 15: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

13

Ven

The Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof CalifoThe Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof Califo

The Regthe Univof Califo

United SDepartmAgricultuAgricultuResearcService

ndor

gents of versity ornia

gents of versity ornia

gents of versity ornia

P

gents of versity ornia

gents of versity ornia

O

gents of versity ornia

gents of versity ornia

gents of versity ornia

States ment of ure, ural ch

Ca

Ser

Evaluate treatme

removal offrom cole c

ruResearch

runoff frconcrete

RetrospecPest Manag

Outcometermporal pesticide u

crResearc

contaminastorm wate

mitig

Organize aSoil Health

Researchstorm wat

Identifymanaging of chlorpy

key pesCaliforn

Researchand imIntegra

Managemeto redupesticid

Research emission

SPB alifornia Depa

rvices

alternativents for the f chlorpyrifocrop tailwatunoff

on pesticidrom urban e surfacesctive study ogement Graes: spatio-analyses o

use trends orops h pesticide tion of urbaer runoff angation

nd produceh Symposiu

h toxicity inter samples

ying and critical userifos againssts in four nia crops

h to developmplement ated Pest ent practice

uce urban de runoff

of pesticids reduction

Compliance artment of Pe

ConDa

e

os er

10/21/12/31

de 11/01/5/15/

of ant

on on

11/01/11/30

an nd

12/01/9/30/

e a m

1/15/9/30/

s

8/01/6/30/

es st

1/01/4/30/

p

es 10/01/11/30

e n

10/01/6/30/

Review esticide Regul

ntract ates

/2013-/2015

$2

/2013-/2016

$

/2013-0/2015

$

/2013-/2016

$

/2014-/2014

$

/2013-/2016

$

/2014-/2016

$4

/2013-0/2015

$

/2013-/2015

$

lation

Contract Amount

225,016.00

149,999.00

185,000.00

156,112.00

$55,667.00

180,000.00

478,590.00

147,072.00

$60,000.00

JustificaIdentif

0 Yes

0 Yes

0 Yes

0 Yes

Yes

0 Yes

0 Yes

0 Yes

Yes

ation fied

s

s

s

s

s

s

s

s

s

Page 16: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

14

When a agency specific or moreCode Re

The totaof the relegally sdetailed contractsubdivis

The DPR

Based recommdepartm

FINDIN

state agenmust incluand detaileconditions

eg., tit. 2, §

al amount oeview to masufficient. F

factual ints met at lsion (b). Acc

R’s respons

upon the mendations mental findin

NG NO. 6 –

Ca

ncy requestude with itsed factual ins specified 547.60.)

of all the PSake conclusor all PSC’

nformation least one ccordingly, t

D

se is attach

DPR’s wrand finding

ngs that we

PersonaRequirem

SPB alifornia Depa

s approval s contract nformation in Governm

SC’s reviewesions as to s subject toin the wricondition she DPR PS

DEPARTME

hed as Attac

SP

ritten respgs. The DPre out of co

l Servicesments

Compliance artment of Pe

from the Dtransmittalthat demo

ment Code

ed was $2,whether DPo DGS apptten justific

set forth inSC’s compli

ENTAL RES

chment 1.

PB REPLY

ponse, the PR submittompliance.

s Contrac

Review esticide Regul

DGS for a su a written nstrates hosection 19

326,989.23PR justifica

proval, the Dcations as n Governmied with pro

SPONSE

DPR willted correct

cts Comp

lation

ubdivision (justificatio

ow the cont9131, subdi

3. It was beations for thDPR provid

to how eent Code

ocedural re

l comply ive action

plied with

(b) contractn that incltract meetsvision (b).

eyond the se contract w

ded specificeach of thesection 19quirements

with the plans for t

h Procedu

t, the udes

s one (Cal.

cope were

c and e 12 9131, s.

CRU the 4

ural

Page 17: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

Attachment 1

Page 18: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

Attachment 1

Page 19: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION · audit the process. I on screeni nt worksh iew of the res; the E ation com odation p Committe R’s PSC’s o make co ufficient. T

Attachment 1