Upload
abbey-rady
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
California Common Core State Standards
A Teacher Leader’s Perspective
Kathy Harris, Teacher, Olivet Elementary School
Tulare County Office of Education
September 28, 2011
Professional History Classroom teacher since 1986
Site Director for California Reading and Literature Project 1998-2009
CTA leader since 1994
Member of various State committees focused on ELA and ELD
Recently appointed to California Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Personal CCSS Timeline
Fall 2009: joined NCTE Review Panel for CCSS, with focus on K-5 ELA standards
November 2009: invited to join K-2 Text Complexity subgroup, worked on qualitative scale for K/1 text
January 2010: attended Aspects of Text Complexity Working group meeting in Chicago
June-July 2010: member of Academic Content Standards Commission. California adopted the CCSS in August 2010
Timeline cont’d January 2011- present: member, Striving
Readers Comprehensive Literacy team
Continuing as member of Text Complexity Working group, with current work focused on text analysis using CCSS qualitative scale and Coh-metrics web-based tool
CCCSS used as planning guide for third grade, and current 4/5 combination class
How has CCCSS changed the way I teach?
Anchor Standards Fewer, clearer, higher
Text Complexity Matching kids to text
Comprehension Understanding, not strategies
Math Pedagogically appropriate
Anchor Standards College and Career Readiness Standards for
Reading (K-5, 6-12)
College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing (K-5, 6-12)
College and Career Readiness Standards for Speaking and Listening (K-5, 6-12)
College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Language (K-5, 6-12)
Not Adopted The Anchor Standards are not currently part
of the California CCSS
Pending legislation will include the Anchor Standards in the adoption process.
California did not adopt the appendices: Appendix A, B, or C. These documents are available as resources for teachers and professional development. Check them out!
CCSS Appendices Appendix A: Research Supporting Key
Elements of the Standards, Glossary of Key Terms. Text Complexity Resources
Reading Foundational Skills
Writing
Speaking and Listening
Language (Vocabulary)
Bibliography
CCSS Appendices Appendix B: Text Exemplars and Sample
Performance Tasks for K-1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-8, and 9-10 and 11-CCR bands Stories
Poetry
Read-Aloud Stories
Read-Aloud Poetry
Sample Performance Tasks for Stories and Poetry
Informational Text
Read-Aloud Informational Text
Sample Performance Tasks for Informational Text
Sample Performance Task
2-3 band, stories and poetry: When discussing E. B. White’s book Charlotte’s
Web, students distinguish their own point of view regarding Wilbur the Pig from that of Fern Arable as well as from that of the narrator. [RL.3.6]
CCSS Appendices Appendix C: Samples of Student Writing
By grade level
Argument (Opinion)
“My fabit Book is do you Want to be my FRIEND” (K)
Informative/Explanatory
“Author Response: Roald Dahl (5)
Narrative
“My first tooth is gone” (2)
Text Complexity Anchor Standard 10: Range of Reading and
Level of Text Complexity
Grade 4, Informational Text, Standard 10: By the end of the year, read and comprehend informational texts, including history/social studies, science, and technical texts, in the grades 4-5 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
Measuring Text Complexity
Qualitative evaluation of the text See Handout- Companion to the Qualitative
Dimensions Scale, or Appendix A
Quantitative evaluation of the text Lexile
Coh-Metrix
Measuring Text Complexity
Matching Reader to text and task
Reader Variables Motivation
Knowledge
Experience
Measuring Text Complexity
Task Variables Purpose
Complexity generated by the task assigned and the questions posed
Paying attention to cognitive load- are we putting the new on the new or the new on the known? Are students familiar with the vocabulary of the questions as well as the text?
Lexile Ranges Text Complexity Grade Band in the
Standards: 4-5
Old Lexile Ranges: 645-845
Lexile Ranges Aligned to CCR expectations: 770-980
Reference: CCSS Appendix A, page 8
Lexile assigns a measure based on word frequency and sentence length. Assessments assign a Lexile score to readers, to allow the matching of reader to text.
Coh-MetrixUniversity of
Memphis Coh-Metrix system focuses on the cohesiveness of a text—basically, how tightly the text holds together.
A high-cohesion text does a good deal of the work for the reader by signaling relationships among words, sentences, and ideas using repetition, concrete language, and the like;
A low-cohesion text, by contrast, requires the reader him- or herself to make many of the connections needed to comprehend the text.
High- cohesion texts are not necessarily “better” than low-cohesion texts, but they are easier to read. (Appendix A)
Comprehension 1997 Framework and Standards: teach
comprehension strategies (predict, infer, summarize)
CCCSS 2010: teach comprehension so that students will understand what they read Refer to details and examples in a text (4),
quote accurately from a text (5)
“Read the part that tells…”
Demonstrate understanding ,Describe in depth, Explain
In My Class… Vocabulary- Freddy’s Filters
All subjects
Read the part that tells
Informational text (Social Studies, Science, Math) What I have right now- making it work
Resources http://www.corestandards.org (Appendices A, B, and C-
go to “The Standards” tab at the top of the page)
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cc/ (California adoption of CCSS- standards unique to California adoption are in bold type)
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/grlevelcurriculum.asp (A Look at Kindergarten through Grade 6 in California Public Schools)
http://csmp.ucop.edu/crlp/ California Subject Matter Projects, California Reading and Literature Project
http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Publications/Journals/Educational_Researcher/4005/223-234_07EDR11.pdf (Article about Coh-Metrix published by AERA)