Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contents
Summary: Caledonian Sleeper results, Quarter 4 2016/17 3
Overall opinions of the Caledonian Sleeper 4
Customer experience of stations 11
Customer experience on board 21
Experience of delays 43
Ticketing & accessing information 51
Customer feedback and suggested improvements 58
Caledonian Sleeper customer priorities 63
Appendix: Methodology, sample profile and quality 66
Page
Summary: Caledonian Sleeper Quarter 4 2016/17
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
Overall journey satisfaction 83 81 85
Satisfaction with…
Standard of service provided by staff on the platform and/or on-
board91 91 91
Quality of the journey experience 80 79 82
Getting a good nights sleep 60 55 63
Punctuality/reliability 92 91 92
Sufficient room in your bed/compartment 67 63 69
The ease of being able to get on and off the train 90 90 90
Cleanliness of the sleeping accommodation 88 87 90
The provision of information during the journey if requested 84 79 86
Net Promoter Score 29 18 36
87
90
86
86
88
Caledonian Sleeper(446)
Travelling for work(64)
Leisure (381)
Weekday (345)
Weekend (100)
2
2
1
3
7
5
7
8
3
8
7
9
9
7
43
51
42
41
48
40
37
41
40
40
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
Q28a. Overall, how satisfied have you been with your journey today?
Base: in brackets above
% very/fairly satisfied
83
88
82
82
88
Overall journey satisfaction by passenger group
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Overall journey satisfaction by route
Caledonian Sleeper (446)
Lowlander (165)
Highlander (280)
2
2
1
7
8
6
8
9
8
43
41
44
40
40
40
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
83
81
85
% very/fairly satisfied
Q28a. Overall, how satisfied have you been with your journey today?
Base: in brackets above
87
89
85
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Overall journey satisfaction - trend
Q28a. Overall, how satisfied have you been with your journey today?
Overall journey satisfactionTrend: % very/fairly satisfied
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Caledonian Sleeper
Net Promoter Score by passenger group
Q28b. On a scale of 0-10 (where 0 is not at all likely and 10 is very likely), how likely is it that you would recommend Caledonian Sleeper to a friend or colleague?
Base: in brackets above
CaledonianSleeper (447)
Travelling for work(64)
Leisure (383)
Weekday (347)
Weekend (100)
21
16
21
21
20
30
38
28
29
33
50
46
50
50
48
Detractors (0-6) (7-8) Promoters (9-10)
29
30
29
29
29
Net promoter score
29
21
30
30
24
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Net Promoter Score by route
29
18
36
Net promoter score
Q28b. On a scale of 0-10 (where 0 is not at all likely and 10 is very likely), how likely is it that you would recommend Caledonian Sleeper to a friend or colleague?
Base: in brackets above
Caledonian Sleeper (447)
Lowlander (165)
Highlander (282)
21
26
17
30
29
30
50
44
53
Detractors (0-6) (7-8) Promoters (9-10)
29
19
34
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Caledonion Sleeper - Net Promoter Score Caledonion Sleeper - Detractors
Caledonion Sleeper - Promoters
Q28b. On a scale of 0-10 (where 0 is not at all likely and 10 is very likely), how likely is it that you would recommend Caledonian Sleeper to a friend or colleague?
Promoters(9-10) Detractors (0-6)
Net promoter scoreTrend: % promoters, detractors & Net Promoter Score
Net Promoter Score trend
Caledonian Sleeper(440)
Travelling for work(64)
Leisure (383)
Weekday (347)
Weekend (100)
2
2
1
3
12
8
12
12
10
22
15
24
24
17
46
45
46
44
52
18
31
16
18
18
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
% very/fairly satisfied
64
76
62
62
70
Overall station satisfaction by passenger group
Q19. Overall, how satisfied are you with the station?
Base: in brackets above
74
81
72
73
74
Q4/17
2016Q3
2016
Overall station satisfaction by route
Caledonian Sleeper (440)
Lowlander (165)
Highlander (282)
2
1
2
12
8
14
22
18
25
46
52
42
18
20
17
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
64
72
59
% very/fairly satisfied
Q19. Overall, how satisfied are you with the station?
Base: in brackets above
74
77
72
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Overall station satisfaction - trendOverall station satisfactionTrend: % very/fairly satisfied
Q19. Overall, how satisfied are you with the station?
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Caledonian Sleeper
Customer experience at stations:
functional aspects Provision of information
about train times/ platforms(423)
Connections with other formsof public transport (340)
Facilities for car parking (75)
Facilities for bicycle parking(41)
Ease of being dropped off bycar/taxi (162)
2
2
17
8
6
4
2
13
16
6
13
7
12
19
9
45
4
35
33
37
35
49
23
24
41
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
Q15. How would you rate the station where you boarded this train for…?
Base: in brackets above
% very/fairly good
88
83
62
53
73
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
81
89
58
57
79
Customer experience at stations: functional aspects
Q15. How would you rate the station where you boarded this train for…?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Provision of information about train times/ platforms
Connections with other forms of public transport
Ease of being dropped off by car/taxi
Customer experience at stations: Trend: % very/fairly good
Facilities for car parking not shown: sample sizes too low for
analysis
Customer experience at stations:
environmental aspects The upkeep/ repair (393)
Cleanliness of the station(418)
The facilities and services atthe station (341)
Your personal security whilstusing that station (405)
Overall station environment(425)
The provision of shelterfacilities (258)
Availability of seating (357)
Choice ofshops/eating/drinking (337)
The waiting facilities (330)
Shower facilities at arrivalstation (52*)
3
3
8
1
4
5
14
6
10
11
9
7
12
8
13
11
23
14
21
9
23
23
24
25
23
19
20
22
27
6
49
51
42
44
47
39
31
41
29
25
16
16
14
22
13
26
13
17
14
51
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very goodQ15. How would you rate the station where you boarded this train for…?
Q23b. How would you rate the shower facilities at your arrival station?
Base: in brackets above *CAUTION LOW BASE
65
67
56
66
60
65
43
57
42
75
% very/fairly good
73
76
59
71
67
68
47
57
43
70
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Customer experience at stations
Q15. How would you rate the station where you boarded this train for…?
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
The upkeep/ repair of the station buildings/ platforms Cleanliness of the stationOverall station environment Personal security whilst using stationProvision of shelter facilities Choice of shops/eating/drinking facilitiesThe facilities and services at the station Availability of seatingWaiting facilities
Customer experience at stations: Trend: % very/fairly good
8
2
3
11
7
12
24
17
9
36
39
31
21
34
44
The availability of staff at the station (323)
The attitudes and helpfulness of the staff (284)
Satisfaction with how request was handled (105)
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissastisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
62
82
84
Staff interactions at stations
11 147
70
Yes - asked for help Yes - asked for information Couldn’t find anyone to ask No - didn’t need help or information
Q17. Did you ask staff for help or information? (Base: 447)
Q15. How satisfied were you with the availability of staff, the attitudes and helpfulness of the staff? Base in brackets above
Q18. How satisfied were you with the way your request was handled? Base in brackets above
Asked for help/informationCaledonian Sleeper, Quarter 4 2016/17 %
Satisfaction with station staff
Caledonian Sleeper, Quarter 4 2016/17 %
% very/fairly
satisfied
57
73
75
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Staff interactions at stations
Q15. How would you rate the station where you boarded this train for…?
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
The availability of staff at the station The attitudes and helpfulness of staff
Staff interactions at stations: Trend: % very/fairly good
Caledonian Sleeper(447)
Travelling for work(64)
Leisure (383)
Weekday (347)
Weekend (100)
2
1
2
2
2
8
12
8
8
9
7
6
8
6
11
41
45
40
41
42
41
37
42
43
36
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
% very/fairly
satisfied
85
89
84
85
85
Overall train satisfaction by passenger group
Q23a. Overall, how satisfied were you with the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded for your journey? Please base your answer on the train only and exclude any
experience at the station
Base: in brackets above
82
82
82
84
78
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Overall train satisfaction by route
Caledonian Sleeper (447)
Lowlander (208)
Highlander (192)
2
5
3
8
4
6
7
5
7
41
49
41
41
37
43
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
85
86
84
% very/fairly satisfied
Q23a. Overall, how satisfied were you with the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded for your journey?
Base: in brackets above
82
81
83
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Overall train satisfaction - trendOverall train satisfactionTrend: % very/fairly satisfied
Q23a. Overall, how satisfied were you with the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded for your journey?
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Caledonian Sleeper
Customer experience on board
Punctuality/reliability (447)
Scheduled journey time (447)
Connections with other trainservices (243)
Value for money (445)
Value for money compared toequivalent separate transport and
accommodation (433)
2
2
2
3
2
2
8
7
2
5
18
18
15
8
16
15
43
41
84
77
63
30
34
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied
91
91
82
70
N/A
% very/fairly good
Q20 Based on your experience on that journey, how satisfied were you with…?
Base in brackets above
92
94
78
73
76
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Customer experience on board
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Punctuality/reliability Scheduled journey time
Value for money Connections with other train services
Customer experience on boardTrend: % very/fairly good
Q20 Based on your experience on that journey, how satisfied were you with:
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
Punctuality/reliability 92 91 92
Scheduled journey time 94 92 95
Connections with other train services 78 79 78
Value for money 73 70 75
Customer experience on boardCustomer experience on board:Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly satisfied
Q20 Based on your experience on that journey, how satisfied were you with:
Customer experience on board
Up keep and repair (442)
The provision of information during thejourney if you requested it* (271)
The availability of staff (400)
The helpfulness and attitude of the staff(434)
The space for luggage (422)
Space for bicycles (33*)
The ease of being able to get on/off (445)
Your personal security whilst on board(431)
6
2
1
1
4
3
1
1
15
4
4
3
19
13
2
3
20
11
11
4
25
28
7
13
42
27
30
22
35
25
39
34
18
56
53
70
17
32
51
50
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
% very/fairly good
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of
Base in brackets above *CAUTION LOW BASE
60
84
83
92
51
57
90
83
58
65
78
87
52
51
80
86
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
*Labelled ‘The provision of
information’ in Q3
Customer experience on board
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Period 7 Period 8 Period 9 Period 10 Period 11 Period 12 Period 13 Period 14
Up keep and repair The provision of information during the journey
The availability of staff The helpfulness and attitude of staff
The space for luggage Ease of being able to get on/off
Your personal security on board the train
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of:
Customer experience on boardTrend: % very/fairly good
Space for bicycles: sample
size too low for analysis
across all Periods
Customer experience on board
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
Upkeep and repair 60 60 60
The provision of information during the journey 84 79 86
The availability of staff 83 85 82
The helpfulness and attitude of the staff 92 92 92
The space for luggage 51 51 52
Space for bicycles 57* N/A** N/A**
The ease of being able to get on and off 90 90 90
Your personal security whilst on board 83 86 82
Customer experience on board:Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
*CAUTION LOW BASE
** sample size too low for analysis
Customer experience on board
The quality of the journey experience (447)
The standard of service provided byCaledonian Sleeper staff on the platform
and/or on-board the train (439)
4
1
6
3
10
5
46
27
35
64
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
% very/fairly good
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of
Base in brackets above *CAUTION LOW BASE
80
91
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
N/A
N/A
Customer experience on board
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
The quality of the journey experience 80 78 82
The provision of information during the journey if
you requested it91 91 91
Customer experience on board:Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
Customer experience on board
Sufficient room in your berth/compartment(396)
The comfort of the bed/seat (445)
The toilet facilities (434)
Wash facilities (413)
Bedding, sheets, duvets and pillows (394)
Getting a good nights sleep (446)
The lounge car facilities (260)
3
4
8
8
5
7
3
12
8
21
20
6
14
13
19
11
25
28
6
19
12
39
39
35
32
28
38
44
28
38
10
13
56
22
28
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of:
Base in brackets above
% very/fairly good
67
77
45
45
84
60
72
Q4
2016/17
Q3
2016
66
79
51
49
90
58
72
Customer experience on board
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Period 7 Period 8 Period 9 Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Sufficient room in your berth/compartment The comfort of the bed/seat
The toilet facilities Wash facilities
Bedding, sheets, duvet and pillows Getting a good night's sleep
The lounge car facilities
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of:
Customer experience on boardTrend: % very/fairly good
Customer experience on board
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
Sufficient room in your bed/compartment 67 63 69
The comfort of the bed/seat 77 80 75
The toilet facilities 45 42 47
Wash facilities 45 45 45
Bedding, sheets, duvets and pillows 84 83 85
Getting a good nights sleep * 60 55 63
The lounge car facilities 72 82 68
Customer experience on board:Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of:
*Getting a good night’s sleep code ‘fairly/very poor’ n = 18. Insufficient base size to show Q21b ‘..can you tell us the reasons for this?’
The cleanliness of thesleeping accommodation
(422)
The cleanliness of thelounge car (273)
The cleanliness of theoutside of the train (365)
1
1
3
3
4
5
7
10
16
33
40
38
55
44
37
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
Q22 Specifically thinking about the cleanliness of the train you boarded for that journey, how would rate it for…
Base in brackets above
Customer experience on board
% very/fairly good
87
85
70
88
85
76
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Period 7 Period 8 Period 9 Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
The cleanliness of the sleeping accommodation
The cleanliness of the lounge car
The cleanliness of the outside of the train
Q21a How would you rate the Caledonian Sleeper you boarded in terms of:
Customer experience on boardCustomer experience on boardTrend: % very/fairly good
Customer experience on board
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
The cleanliness of the sleeping accommodation 88 87 90
The cleanliness of the lounge car 85 89 83
The cleanliness of the outside of the train 76 80 73
Customer experience on board:Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
Q22 Thinking specifically about the cleanliness of the train you boarded for that journey, how would you rate it for…?
Customer experience on board - catering
Q21c Whilst on board, did you have…? Base: All (447).
46
14
50
2
20
Breakfast
Evening meal
Drink/snack
Other
No food or drink
Use of on-board cateringQuarter 4 2016/17 %
Quality of the food (173)
Taste of the food (174)
Size of food portions (173)
Range offered on ourmenu* (165)
Selection of drinks (140)
Quality of hot drinks (152)
Range available on thenight you travelled (135)
2
2
2
3
1
4
1
11
12
6
9
4
8
10
15
17
19
19
14
16
17
40
41
42
43
42
43
45
31
28
31
26
40
29
27
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
Customer experience on board - catering
Breakfast% very/fairly satisfied
71
70
73
69
82
72
72
Q21d(1) How satisfied were you with the breakfast in terms of the…? Base in brackets.
Q4
2016/17
68
69
73
65
78
72
N/A
Q3
2016
*Labelled ‘Range of
food options’ in Q3
Quality of the food (46*)
Taste of the food (46*)
Size of food portions (46*)
**Range offered on ourmenu (46*)
Selection of drinks (45*)
Quality of hot drinks (26*)
Range available on thenight you travelled (46*)
7
3
3
7
6
7
3
5
12
6
6
13
9
6
15
9
39
39
33
49
37
21
38
46
46
48
35
55
59
42
Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither / nor Fairly satisfied Very satisfied
Customer experience on board - catering
Evening meal% very/fairly satisfied
Q21e(1) How satisfied were you with the evening meal in terms of the…? Base in brackets.
Q3
2016
84
84
81
84
92
80
79
*Caution: low base
Q4
2016/17
79
79
82
76
87
73
N/A
**Labelled ‘Range
of food options’ in
Q3
Catering experience – customer comments
Veggie cooked breakfast other than porridge is needed
Space in the lounge car for second class passengers is limited, but
once in, the quality and atmosphere were excellent.
The breakfast I pre-booked was not available which was disappointing. However I was offered a range of
alternatives.
The cup of tea / juice brought to us in the morning was very much appreciated
Perhaps rotate menus according to time of year ?
Having been very satisfied with the evening meal, we were very dissatisfied with breakfast. It was microwaved by the attendant and carried in a bag to the lounge car in a polystyrene box. By being tipped up in the box , the food was mixed together in one corner so it looked very unattractive. The
taste was poor. Only flimsy plastic cutlery was provided and the single knife had to be used for the pre-packed roll and jam. We had to ask for butter and napkins. This experience was such a contrast to the previous evening when good quality cutlery, crockery and glasses were used. Why, then, was
breakfast so disappointing?
I did not expect the coffee to be instant coffee. The porridge tasted well and the portion size was satisfying, but it could have been served in a more appetizing way (instead of a plastic packet). But I really appreciate the big range of food and drinks
as well as the closeness to Scotland!
I loved the fact that the food was served on proper plates. I think that the lounge car could do
with a refurb though as it looked very much eighties style. It was a pleasure though to have
dinner there. We really enjoyed it. The service was very slow but the stewardess was very kind and
caring.
Q21f Please use the space below for any comments you would like to make about the on-board catering
I wasn't sure how the lounge car worked. There were very nice menus in the seating car, but
nobody came to take an order and there weren't clear instructions about how to obtain the food. I felt like I was encroaching on a first class dining
carriage when I went to buy a drink, but the staff were very friendly anyway.
Experience of delays
CaledonianSleeper (447)
Lowlander (165)
Highlander (282)
Travelling forwork (64)
Leisure (383)
Weekday (347)
Weekend (100)
4
4
8
3
4
3
8
8
9
13
8
6
16
88
89
87
79
89
89
82
Serious delay Minor delay No delay
Experience of serious/minor/no delayQuarter 4 2016/17: %
Q24 Did you experience any delay either on this train or because the train you had planned to catch there was cancelled?
Q25 How long was the delay? Base: all experiencing delay
Base in brackets above
Average length of
delay (perceived),
minutes
62
62
63
61
62
70
45
Experience of trains arriving on time
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Caledonian Sleeper
Experience of trains arriving on timeTrend: % did not experience any delay
Q24 Did you experience any delay either on this train or because the train you had planned to catch there was cancelled?
Rate of delay handling by passenger groupRating of delay handlingQuarter 4 2016/17 %
% very/fairly good
Q26. How well do you think the train company dealt with this train delay?
Base in brackets above, **sample size too low for analysis *CAUTION LOW BASE
CaledonianSleeper (53*)
Travelling for workN/A**
Leisure (40*)
Weekday (35*)
Weekend N/A**
2
3
3
17
15
11
13
13
11
41
40
40
27
29
34
Very Poorly Fairly Poorly Neither well or poorly Fairly Well Very Well
68
69
74
61
58
N/A
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Caledonian Sleeper (53*)
Lowlander N/A**
Highlander (36*)
2
3
17
13
13
14
41
40
27
30
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly well Very well
61
59
% very/fairly good
Rate of delay handling by routeRating of delay handlingQuarter 4 2016/17 %
Q26. How well do you think the train company dealt with this train delay?
Base in brackets above **sample size too low for analysis *CAUTION LOW BASE
68
70
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Request for delay information
Q23c Did you request for the Caledonian Sleeper staff to keep you informed about any delays during your journey ?
Base: All (n=477)
11
89
Yes
No
Quarter 4 2016/17 %
Experience with aspects of delay handling
The amount of information provided aboutthe delay (40*)
The accuracy of information given aboutthe delay (35*)
The usefulness of the information (33*)
The speed with which information wasprovided (39*)
The time taken to resolve the problem(31*)
The availability of alternative transport ifthe train service could not continue N/A**
20
15
8
18
8
19
22
14
17
10
16
21
34
26
39
34
23
23
19
29
12
19
21
20
14
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
Q27 How well do you rate the train company for each of the following, in relation to the delay that occurred?
Base in brackets above *caution: low base **Sample size too low for analysis
% very/fairly good
46
42
44
39
43
52
59
49
44
31
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
Experience of delays and information provision
*CAUTION: LOW BASE **sample size too low for analysis
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander*
The amount of information provided 46 N/A** 45
The accuracy of the information 42 N/A** 38
The usefulness of the information 44 N/A** 41
The speed with which information was provided 39 N/A** 39
The time taken to resolve the problem 43 N/A** N/A**
The availability of alternative transport if the train
service could not continueN/A** N/A** N/A**
Customer satisfaction with… Quarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
Usage of ticket types
Railcards %
None 49
16-25 6
Senior 19
Family & Friends 7
Disabled Persons 2
HM Forces Railcard 1
Two together 10
Other 6
Tickets types %
Singles / Returns
Caledonian Sleeper Fixed 86
Caledonian Sleeper Flexible 9
Anytime 1
Anytime Day 1
Off-Peak / Super Off-Peak 3
Off-Peak Day / Super Off-Peak Day 1
Quarter 4 2016/2017 %
Q14a What type of ticket did you use for your journey? (Base: 447)
Q14b Was your ticket for your journey… (Base: 447)
Q14d Was your fare reduced because you have any of the following Railcards? (Base: 447)
Class %
First Class 28
Standard Class 57
Seat 16
<1
4
10
28
35
21
2
1
On the day of travel
In last week
In last fortnight
In last month
In last two months
In the last 3-6 months
In the last 7-9 months
In the last 10-12 months
When tickets purchasedQuarter 4 2016/17 %
Purchasing tickets
88
6
2
2
1
1
<1
In advance – via the Sleeper.scot website
In advance – booked over phone to Caledonian
Sleeper
In advance - via anotherwebsite
In advance - via theCaledonian Sleeper App
In advance at station
Ticket was organised forme
Other
Method of purchasing ticket Quarter 4 2016/17 %
Q10 Could you please confirm how you bought the ticket for your journey? (Base: 447)
Q11 When did you buy your ticket for your journey? (Base: 447)
Purchasing tickets
28
57
16
First Class
Standard Class
Seat
46
24
25
3
1
<1
Paper ticket - Printed athome, work or somewhere
else
Paper ticket - Collectedfrom ticket office or station
Paper ticket - Posted to me
E ticket - On mobile phone
Paper ticket - Purchasedfrom ticket office or station
Other
Form and delivery of ticketQuarter 4 2016/17 %
Class of ticketQuarter 4 2016/17 %
Q12 Was the ticket for your journey... Base (447)
Q14b Was your ticket for your journey Base (447)
Information about ticketsavailable (441)
Range of tickets offered byCaledonian Sleeper* (430)
Ease of ticket purchase(445)
Information about the serviceand berth options (443)
1
1
2
5
3
3
8
16
4
9
40
45
30
42
49
33
61
46
Very poor Fairly poor Neither / nor Fairly good Very good
Experience of ticket purchasing
Q13 How would you rate the following:
Base in brackets above
% very/fairly good
89
78
92
88
91
74
90
82
Q4
2016/17Q3
2016
*Termed ‘Range of tickets available’ in Q3
50
60
70
80
90
100
Period1
Period2
Period3
Period4
Period5
Period6
Period7
Period8
Period9
Period10
Period11
Period12
Period13
Period14
Information on tickets available Range of tickets available
Ease of purchase Information about the service and berth options
Experience of ticket purchasingTrend: % very/fairly good
Experience of ticket purchasing
Q13 How would you rate the following…
Caledonian
SleeperLowlander Highlander
The information provided about tickets available 89 89 89
The range of tickets available 78 77 79
Ease of ticket purchase 92 93 91
Information about the service and berth options 88 88 88
Purchasing tickets: Experience of ticket
purchasingExperience of ticket purchasingQuarter 4 2016/17: % very/fairly good
Q13 How would you rate the following…
40
35
18
16
15
14
6
15
24
See following
slidesSee following slides
Suggestions for improvements
Potential improvementsQuarter 4 2016/17: %
Q33 Which of these potential improvements do you think would be most likely to assist you when planning future journeys on the Caledonian Sleeper?
Base (447)
Caledonian Sleeper waiting facilities at stations
More information about our new trains currently being
constructed
Better information about on-train facilities at the time of
boarding
Better Caledonian Sleeper internet enquiry / booking
service
Better information service, confirming your journey on
the day of travel
Better Caledonian Sleeper internet facilities at stations
Better Caledonian Sleeper telephone enquiry / booking
service
Other
None of these
Other suggested improvements for journey planning
Better plan to choose seats (show which way faces front, and once seat is booked, respect it - do not place
people in front of others when the opposite was booked)
Information on availability of berths on the same day.
Q33 Which of these potential improvements do you think would be most likely to assist you when planning future journeys on the Caledonian
Sleeper?
Base (78) those who stated other
Better information about sleeping options on the train (e.g. small group bookings).
Times when dinner served in lounge car. Had to ask and advised on platform, the earlier
the better as gets very busy before departing.
Better pricing options for frequent travellers, purchasing in advance
(non 1st class)
Having a Caledonian Sleeper Representative prominently at key stations - particularly
when there are issues with the service. At the moment, you can be left rather in limbo
Better information on the reclining and comfort of the seats as well as the light in the car and amount of
stops
Overall we loved our journey. If it wasn't for the wait at London Euston it would have been perfect. The Caledonian sleeper is a great experience, the lounge car and toilets could be refurbished, but the rooms are good, the duvet and pillow very nice and the staff really
amiable and helpful.
Overall, the sleeper train is a fantastic experience. The lack of money to maintain the train in good order seemed evident to me. The staff were very helpful and could not do more, but this can't remove the fact that the trains seem very old and in need of some refitting. Much of the plastic fittings were very battered, and although the bedding was nice and clean, the actual berth
was not very clean. There was even mould on the upper pull out tray which had been there some time.
Great as a one-off experience but won't use again (will fly). Felt the train was very tired and
in need of a major overhaul/refit.
Enjoyed my journey but viewed it very much as a 'one-off luxury' - if I had to make the same journey I would consider booking overnight accommodation in Glasgow and taking
a cheaper daytime train
Always enjoy travelling by the sleeper service. The staff are always very friendly and helpful. Not so happy when the service is diverted via the East
Coast Main Line which results in a late arrival time into London Euston.
The service is great because it takes me from my door to the heart of London which is perfect for when I have meetings to go to in Central London. To fly down means either a 4am start to drive to Inverness or a train to Glasgow or Edinburgh and then an overnight stay before a
morning flight to London. All these options then require additional travel and cost to get from the airport to London whilst the Sleeper doesn't. The Sleeper generally costs slightly more than the alternatives, however it can't be beaten for convenience. Glad to see that you
have added mobile charging facilities in the cabins but the real change will come when the new trains arrive. Hopefully these will be fit for the 21st century!
Q39 Do you have any further comments you would like to make about your journey on the Caledonian Sleeper?
The helper on our carriage was very helpful, easy to contact and kind. This made the trip much easier. The cabins were very small with a
couple of suitcases, but it was bearable.
General comments
The temperature control in the seated
carriage was extremely poor. It started out
very over-heated, went to very cold during
the journey then returned to over-heated.
The harshness of the overhead lights made
it difficult to sleep even with the eye masks.
It was very uncomfortable and very
expensive because of the flaws
General comments
Q33 Which of these potential improvements do you think would be most likely to assist you when planning future journeys on the Caledonian Sleeper?
Base (73) those who stated other
It would be useful to put on the ticket what time
you can board the train. We could have
boarded about an hour before we did. The
sleeping berth could have been cleaner on top
of the upper shelves - I know it is hard to reach
but there was toothpaste and other marks up
there. Otherwise I thought the design of the
berth was excellent, the bed comfortable and
the bedding lovely. The sleep experience was
not good due to the movement of the train - not
sure what you can do about that!
There are 3 areas that I think need to be improved: The quality of the rolling stock - will hopefully
improve comfort and noise levels. The cost - I would use the sleeper more if it was competitive with
air travel. The arrival facilities - the shower facilities at Euston are inadequate and there is often a
considerable wait which is very frustrating.
It would be very desirable to have free
wifi. Also the main annoyance during my
journey was that the lights were kept on
all the time, the seat did not recline and
the carriage cycled between being
extremely warm (too warm for comfort)
and freezing cold (far too cold for
comfort).
The concept of the Caledonian Sleeper is excellent and in the past I have used the service x 2 or x3 per year. The service itself needs
seriously updating: new rolling stock, new engines, improved sleeping accommodation both first and standard class and a more competitive
pricing structure especially for single accommodation , currently only first class. There is no quality breakfast provided on board or even a good
snack service for standard class passengers. The staff, some of whom are welcoming and really helpful, while others are distant to the point of
boredom, need to undertake a period of training and refreshment in that it is the passengers who provide the revenue for their salaries.
Customer priorities within current service
provision
Key drivers of overall journey satisfactionCombined periods 2 – 14 2016/17
CaledonianSleeper
Value for money of the price of your ticket Punctuality/ reliability of the train
The comfort of the bed/seat Cleanliness of the sleeping accommodation
Getting a good nights sleep Journey length
Personal security whilst on board the train Availability of staff on the train
Other
CaledonianSleeper
How train company dealt with delayThe availability of staff on the trainUpkeep and repair of station/platformComfort of the bed/seatGetting a good nights sleepConnections with other train servicesCleanliness of the sleeping accommodationThe value for money of the price of your ticketCleanliness of the lounge carJourney length
Customer priorities within current service
provision
Key drivers of customer dissatisfactionCombined periods 2 – 14 2016/17
Sample size447
%
Journey Purpose
Travelling for work 14
Personal Business 7
Visiting friends/family 20
Shopping <1
Holiday travels 38
A day out 3
Sport 2
Other leisure 16
Leisure 86
Sample size447
%
Age
16-34 18
35-54 47
55+ 35
Gender
Male 55
Female 45
Working status
Full time 58
Part time 19
Not working 2
Retired 16
Student 4
Residence
UK 89
Non-UK 11
Sample size447
%
Health Conditions
None 90
Vision 1
Hearing 1
Mobility 3
Dexterity -
Learning/concentrating <1
Memory -
Mental health 1
Stamina/ breathing 1
Socially 1
Other 1
Ethnicity
White British/ Any other
white background 93
Other ethnic
background4
Prefer not to say 3
Sample profile – journey details
Sample size447
%
Travelling party
Alone 47
With children 0-4 3
With children 5-10 9
With children 11-15 7
With other adults 16+ 43
Friends 77
Family 23
Colleagues 2
Luggage etc.
Heavy/bulky luggage 36
Pushchair/pram 1
Bicycle 2
Dog 2
Wheelchair/frame <1
Helper <1
Mobility scooter -
None apply 61
Sample profile – journey detailsSample size
447
%
Accommodation
Sleeper berth 84
Seat in seated car 16
Journey direction
Outward 56
Return 20
One way 23
Specific journey
frequency
Once a week or more 1
1-2 times a month 6
Once every 2-3 months 14
Once every 6 months 19
Less often 50
Never/first time 10
Sample size15
%
Duration of using the
Caledonian Sleeper**
Under a year n/a
1-4 years n/a
5-9 years n/a
10 years or more n/a
**base too low for analysis
Sample size447
%
Caledonian Sleeper
travel frequency
First time 52
Once or twice a year 33
3-5 times a year 10
6-12 times a year 3
More than 12 times a
year2
The Caledonian Sleeper Customer Satisfaction Survey provides feedback about customer experience and opinions of the
Caledonian Sleeper. The survey is designed to mirror the National Rail Passenger Survey, but it is carried out as an online
survey.
Passengers who have recently travelled on the Caledonian Sleeper are invited to take part in the online survey. Fieldwork is
continuous and started 3rd May 2015. A dashboard report is provided at the end of every Rail Period, and a more detailed
report is provided every quarter.
This report contains results for the final quarter of fieldwork for the year, combining Period 12, 13 and 14 2016/17.
Fieldwork for quarter 4 2016/17 took place between 5th February – 30th April 2017.
447 surveys were completed in total.
The data is weighted at analysis stage on the same parameters as the National Rail Passenger Survey: time of day, day of
week, station size band, and ‘building block’
Methodology overview
Quality details BDRC Continental comply with ISO 20252, the recognised international quality standard for market research, thus the project
has been carried out in accordance with this standard.
• Adherence to the standard is independently audited once a year
• Where subcontractors are used by BDRC Continental, they are briefed to ensure any outsourced parts of the research are
conducted in adherence to ISO 20252
Full methodological details relevant to the project, are available upon request
This research was designed to ensure robust sample sizes for analysis.
As the survey is conducted with a sample of the target audience, we cannot be 100% certain that a census of the whole
population would yield the same results.
We can be 95% certain that the actual figure (in the population as a whole) falls within a certain range of the survey figure.
The percentages within the table represent the error variance.
Survey finding of…
Base 5 / 95% 20 / 80% 50 / 50%
Total Sample (447) +/- 2.0% +/- 3.7% +/- 4.6%