By Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair F - NACE … · So the answer to the initial question ... NACE-certified Coating Inspector Level 1 ... heavy paper such as what is used for

1 InspectThis! Spring 2015

Supplement to CoatingsPro Magazine Spring 2015

So the answer to the initial question—which is more important for a coating inspector, the certification or the experi-ence—is that both are important and necessary. Many experienced inspectors want the certification because inspection firms and owners often require it before they will hire an individual. However, the main reason the certification is worth the cost is that the candidate learns to do the work correctly.

One must learn to perform the various tests and use the equipment before going into the field and doing the actual work. However, one becomes skilled and knowledgeable about the tests and equipment through experience in the field.

Individuals need the training they receive in the classroom to be able to put it into practice in the field. So certification and experience go hand in hand. The most qualified inspector is the one who has both the certification and the experience.!

IN THIS ISSUE...

From the Chairman ....................................... 1

Coating Failures— A Coating Supplier’s Perspective ....... 2

Get This! ............................................................ 6

NACE Coatings Course Schedule ........... 8

Coatings Resources .................................... 10

Certification vs. ExperienceBy Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair

Fo r the past few w e e k s I h a v e been fo l lowing

comments and discus-sions being posted on the various forums on the Internet relating to the coating inspector’s certi-

fication and/or experience. The issue being discussed is, “Which is more important for a coating inspector to have, a certification or field experience?” It is quite interesting to see the different viewpoints expressed on this subject.

The NACE International Coating Inspector Program (CIP) requires no experience for an individual to take Level 1; recommends at least two years of experience as a Level 1 inspector before taking Level 2; and requires a minimum of two years verifiable experience before taking the Peer Review to achieve Level 3 certification. Other programs vary as to the requirements for the certifications offered.

NACE CIP recommends that a NACE-certified Coating Inspector Level 1 conducts inspections in the field only under the supervision of a Coating Inspector Level 3. Obviously this does not always happen as owners hiring third-party independent coating inspectors may not want to pay for a Level 3 inspector. This brings us to the old adage, “you get what you pay for.” Does this mean that there are no Level 1 inspectors out there qualified to do inspection without the supervision of a Level 3 inspector? Now we come to the experience issue.

Many individuals have gained field experience before taking a course and getting certified, so they may be well qualified at Level 1. The quality of the experience is what makes the difference. As an instructor of the NACE CIP courses, I have had students in my classes who have years of experience before taking the course but do not know how to use a dry film thickness gauge properly. Unfortunately the experience they had was flawed and they were not properly trained.

I have had students in my classes who have years of experience before taking the course but do not know how to use a dry

film thickness gauge properly.


ing contractor error, bad specifications, improper product select ion, Mother Nature, etc. This article will discuss a few incidents where the coating manufacturer was the primary cause of a problem.

Coating Reformulation on the Fly The raw materials used in protec-

tive coatings do not remain constant, and are occasionally changed for a number of reasons. Manufacturers and vendors are continually looking to consolidate raw materials to minimize inventory and gain better purchasing power for higher volumes. Regulations sometimes force change and raw material vendors are required to refor-mulate their products. Good examples of regulatory impacts are the volatile organic compound (VOC) rules, which have become more restrictive in the last 20+ years. Additionally, some raw materials are discontinued by vendors for economic reasons, such as a lack of sufficient volume of sales and profitability to justify their continued sale.

When these raw material changes occur, manufacturers are sometimes confronted with the challenge of quickly reformulating their products to meet market demand. While a great effort is made by both the raw material supplier and the coating manufacturer to fully evaluate new substitute raw materials, formulation mistakes sometimes occur.

Some of the common substitute raw materials used in recent years to meet regional regulations have been “VOC-exempt” solvents. These exempt solvents meet the regulations for VOC contribution in a coating formula, but do not always yield the same performance in finished products. Depending on the formula, these exempt solvents do not yield the same wetting characteristics, thixo-tropic development, sag resistance, etc. The negative effects of substitute materials are not always realized in the lab, but sometimes appear when the products are being applied in the field under “real world” conditions.

An epoxy coating that had been used for many years as an anticorrosive inter-mediate coat for tank exteriors in Southern California is one example of a simple solvent change in a formula causing a major problem on a project. Prior to the formu-lation change, this epoxy had the ability to be applied at 100 to 150 μm (4 to 6 mils) by either spray or roller, and flowed and

Coating Failures— A Coating Supplier’s Perspective By Russell Spotten, Corrosion Probe, Inc.

As a 30-year veteran of the coatings industry, I have seen just about everything that could go wrong

on a project. These problems have been caused by any number of factors, includ-

Spring 2015 InspectThis! 3

leveled nicely when applied by a reasonably competent painter. The finish coat in these tank exterior systems is typically aliphatic polyurethane; therefore, a smooth interme-diate coat is desirable.

After the solvent change, complaints immediately began coming in that the epoxy coating looked horrible on application. If sprayed, the coating would start to ball up and look like cottage cheese. If applied by brush or roller, it would look ropey and would not flow to form a uniform film. When confronted with these problems, the manufacturer’s solution was to mix additional VOC-exempt solvent into the paint in the hopes that it would improve the film properties. This did not work. It seems as though the epoxy resins and other raw materials in the formula had a compat-ibility issue with the solvent. Therefore, this product as manufactured was unsuitable for use and the manufacturer was forced to pull this product from the market. It took several months of trial and error reformulation in the lab before a new version of the product could be reintroduced to the market.

What is This Crud in My Epoxy?Every once in a while, a complaint

comes in from the field that just does not make any sense—at least on first report. While working as a sales manager for a small regional coatings company in the 1980s, I received one of these complaints from an applicator in Wyoming. He was working on a tank lining project at a refinery and was using one of this manufacturer’s more popular epoxy phenolic coatings, which was specified for the work. The contractor reported that when he opened the can and mixed the two components together, he noticed “big chunks of crud” in the bucket. Knowing how the products are manufac-tured, filtered, and canned, the plant quality control (QC) manager was stumped and had no explanation for this complaint of “crud.”

Since this project was located at a far distance from the manufacturing plant and the project was on a tight schedule, it was decided that the painter should buy some filter bags and strain the material on site into new clean buckets before use. A week

or so later, we received a plastic sandwich bag in the mail that contained a few of these epoxy-coated “chunks of crud.” The QC manager took some of these chunks into the lab for analysis and quickly realized that they were not chunks of epoxy or any other

raw material used in the formula; rather, they were chunks of what appeared to be a heavy paper such as what is used for packag-ing one of the raw materials.

When we interviewed the plant manager and a couple of the workers, the truth came

every missiona forSPY

Inspect Any Metal Surface Coating

SPY® Model 780, 785 and 790 Portable Holiday Detectors

SPY® Wet Sponge Portable Holiday Detectors

SPY® In-Plant Holiday Detector Systems

For pipes, tanks or any coated contoured surface in the field or inside your manufacturing facility, we simplify coating integrity testing with our full line of SPY® portable and permanent Holiday Detectors.

• New ergonomic design• Pipe coating inspections up to 60”• Extremely durable• Infinite voltage setting on the fly

• No belts, lightweight, fast set-up• Sponge roller speeds large flat surface area inspections• Interchangeable flat or roller sponge

• Custom designed to streamline manufacturing• From pipecoating inspections to large flat surfaces

Compact, lightweight wet sponge

holiday detectors

Reliable continuous inspections on the assembly line

For more details on SPY® products and our complete line of SPY® Holiday Detection Equipment visit our website @ www.picltd.com

PIPELINE INSPECTION COMPANYPh: (713) 681-5837 Fax: (713) 681-4838


out. During manufacturing of the product, one of the new employees on the production floor was asked to add a raw material to the batch by “throwing” a bag in. The produc-tion supervisor did not explain to this new worker that the bag should be opened and the contents emptied into the batch tank—not just thrown in, bag and everything.

While this rookie mistake was unfor-tunate, it should not have created much of a problem in the finished product as all paint was required to be filtered at filling. As is the case with many problems, this one was the result of multiple missteps. In this instance, in an effort to speed up the filling process of this one batch, another worker had decided to remove the filter bag near the end of the canning process so the crew could finish their day’s work on time. This was obviously a bad decision, given the chunks of paper bag in the batch of epoxy. The result was a delayed project and a negative experience for an otherwise satisfied customer.

Purple Haze on Hot Steel—or ‘Yes We Can’

There are times when a salesperson best serves the coatings industry by just saying “no.” There are simply some projects where either the standard products in a manufacturer’s line do not meet the perfor-mance requirements of the job, or there are other manufacturers’ products that are, in fact, better for the intended service. Sales is a game of numbers, however, and the pressure to generate revenue and provide excellent service to good customers sometimes clouds decision making. The following example is from a direct personal experience when I made the mistake of saying “yes we can.”

In the early 1980s, my company was the selected supplier of protective coatings for a major new construction project for a large wastewater treatment plant on the West Coast of the United States. This was a multi-year project and we were challenged at times to meet the product requirements and schedule for this project. For the most part, the project progressed well—especially with regard to the main coating systems submitted; such as tank linings, exterior finish coats, and architectural paints.

There was one small section in the specification, however, that was overlooked at the submittal phase. There were six exhaust stacks to be built, ~1.2 m (4 ft) in diameter by 12.2-m (40-ft) tall and all located close together in a line. The specification for

these stacks listed a high-heat silicone finish paint. This high-heat system is normally seen in specifications, and one of our high-heat silicone aluminum finishes was submit-ted for this portion of the work. All of this should have worked just fine, except that we received a phone call during the project and were told the city’s architect was looking at the plant during construction and decided he now wanted these six stacks to make some sort of “visual statement.” Even though this was a wastewater treatment plant, and not really something that would have a lot of public exposure, the architect’s desire was to make this a designer showcase of sorts.

The architect and contractor asked if our standard high-heat finish could be made in a range of six color shades, from light blue to purple. The visual impact of the stacks, for the architect’s eye, would be stunning! This would have been a good time for us to admit that we had never attempted to make a colored high-heat paint, and just say no. Instead, we took the challenge (and the order) and produced a small quantity of finish paint in each of the six colors selected. The stacks were painted, the colors matched the architect’s vision, and everyone involved was quite happy with the look of those freshly painted stacks. That is, until they were fired up. While our plant was able to produce the small batches of tinted high-heat paint, no one ever thought to see what the paint would look like once it was heated. The colorants used were not suitable for exposure to high temperatures, and when heated in excess of 205 °C (400 °F), they all turned a burnt umber (brown) color. Of course, the surfaces of the stacks soon turned multiple shades of brown and were very unsightly. Needless to say, the city’s architect was not happy.

Our company suffered embarrassment, as well as a significant financial loss on the

rework. The engineer found suitable high-heat paint from a different manufacturer, and the stacks were repainted in the desired six colors at our expense.

ConclusionsThere is an old adage that states,

“if something can go wrong, it probably will.” This is certainly the case in the industrial coatings business, especially when economic considerations or project demands require a quick judgment call from the paint supplier. Manufacturers go to great lengths to get things right and to formulate and test products that are suitable for the intended service. The cases discussed in this article are just a few examples where things went wrong despite good intentions. Project failures or poor performance are never acceptable. It is incumbent upon all parties—the owner, engineer, manufac-turer, contractor, and inspector—to be diligent in asking the right questions and expecting nothing short of the best-quality products and workmanship for any given project.

This article is based on CORROSION 2013 paper no. 2863, presented in Orlando, Florida.

Russell Spotten is a senior consultant at Corrosion Probe, Inc., PO Box 1151, Templeton, CA 93465, e-mail: [email protected]. He has more than 35 years of experience in the industrial coatings market. He has been an active member in NACE International since 1981 and previously served on the board of the NACE Channel Islands Chapter. He is a NACE-certified Senior Corrosion Technologist and Protective Coatings Specialist (#6107). !

A poor epoxy intermediate coat caused the poor finish because of solvent incompatibil-ity. Photo courtesy of CSI Services, Santa Clarita, California.

[email protected] www.elcometer.comElcometer 456 & Elcometer 224 Model T: Made for iPhone 5S, iPhone 5C, iPhone 5, iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPad (4th generation), iPad mini, iPad 2, and iPod touch (4th and 5th generation).“Made for iPod,” “Made for iPhone,” and “Made for iPad” mean that an electronic accessory has been designed to connect specifically to iPod, iPhone, or iPad, respectively, and has been certified by the developer to meet Apple performance standards. Apple is not responsible for the operation of this device or its compliance with safety and regulatory standards. Please note that the use of this accessory with iPod, iPhone, or iPad may affect wireless performance. iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. All other trademarks acknowledged.

wireless technology

™

USA & Canada: (800) 521-0635

More accurate, repeatable and faster than ever before and now made for iPhone and other mobile devices.

Collect your coating measurements using either the new Bluetooth® enabled Elcometer 456 Coating Thickness or Elcometer 224 Surface Profile Gauges, connect the gauge to your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch using the free ElcoMaster™ Mobile App and download your data. Press ‘Generate PDF’ and watch the ElcoMaster™ App produce a professional report instantly. Email the report to your client seconds after you have finished inspecting.

Your office is now wherever you are.

From inspection to report submission in seconds

ElcoMaster™

Surface Profile

Climate Monitoring

Coating Thickness

Surface Cleanliness

Adhesion

ElcoMaster™

Mobile App

Elcometer 456 with Ultra Scan Probe


Get This!

Graham Carr of ION Protective Services, LLC, a NACE-certified Coating Inspector, is the winner

of this issue’s drawing for a free Coating Inspector Program (CIP) course. Based in Alvord, Texas, Carr is currently certified to CIP Level 1.

How can you enter the drawing to win a free CIP course?

Simply send an e-mail message to [email protected] and mention that you saw this article. To be eligible, you must have completed CIP Level 1 and your certification must be active. The free CIP course (Level 2 or Level 3—Peer Review) must be taken within one year of winning the drawing.

Please note that the drawing only applies to CIP courses and not other NACE course offerings. The prize is transferrable but may not be sold. If the prize is trans-ferred, the recipient must meet the same criteria as the winner. !

Measures: Surface Profile

Soluble Surface SaltClimatic Conditions

Coating ThicknessBuilt in GPS

(860)[email protected]

Finally, one instrument that meets all the needs of the protective coatings industry.

DUALSCOPE® with NEWCORROSION MODULE


AUSTRALIA

CIP LEVEL 1

Adelaide, SA, Australia April 13-18, 2015

Melbourne, VIC, Australia May 4-9, 2015

Sydney, NSW, Australia June 15-20, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Perth, WA, Australia March 16-21, 2015

Melbourne, VIC, Australia May 11-16, 2015

Sydney, NSW, Australia June 22-27, 2015

BELGIUM

CIP LEVEL 2

Brasschaat, Belgium March 16-21, 2015

CANADA

CIP LEVEL 1

Edmonton, AB, Canada April 26-May 1, 2015

Edmonton, AB, Canada May 3-8, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2



CIP PEER REVIEW


PIPELINE APPLICATION TRAINING

Edmonton, AB, Canada April 27-May 1, 2015

CHINA

CIP LEVEL 1

Shanghai, China March 22-27, 2015

Beijing, China April 13-18, 2015

Shanghai, China May 10-15, 2015

Beijing, China June 22-27, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Shanghai, China March 29-April 3, 2015

Beijing, China April 20-25, 2015


CIP PEER REVIEW


EQUADOR

CIP LEVEL 2

Quito, Ecuador April 13-18, 2015

INDIA

CIP LEVEL 1

Chennai, India March 16-21, 2015

Chennai, India April 13-18, 2015

Chennai, India May 18-23, 2015

Chennai, India June 15-20, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Chennai, India March 23-28, 2015

Chennai, India April 20-25, 2015

Chennai, India May 25-30, 2015

Chennai, India June 22-27, 2015

ITALY

CIP LEVEL 2

Genova, Italy June 7-12, 2015

JAPAN

CIP LEVEL 1

Miura, Kanagawa, Japan June 5-10, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Imabari, Japan April 16-21, 2015

MALAYSIA

CIP LEVEL 1

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia April 6-11, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2


CIP PEER REVIEW


MEXICO

CIP LEVEL 1

Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico May 18-23, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico May 25-30, 2015

THE NETHERLANDS

CIP LEVEL 2

Spijkenisse, The Netherlands April 13-18, 2015

SINGAPORE

CIP EXAM COURSE 1

Singapore April 8-10, 2015

CIP EXAM COURSE 2

Singapore April 13-15, 2015

SOUTH AFRICA

CIP LEVEL 1

KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa April 20-25, 2015

Midrand, South Africa May 18-23, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Midrand, South Africa March 23-28, 2015

Cape Town, South Africa June 22-27, 2015

SOUTH KOREA

CIP EXAM COURSE 1

Ulsan, Korea March 30-April 1, 2015

Ulsan, Korea June 22-24, 2015

CIP EXAM COURSE 2

Ulsan, Korea April 2-4, 2015

Ulsan, Korea June 25-27, 2015

TURKEY

CIP LEVEL 1

Istanbul, Turkey April 13-18, 2015

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

CIP LEVEL 1

Dubai, UAE April 11-16, 2015

Dubai, UAE May 30-June 4, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2

Dubai, UAE June 6-12, 2015

NACE Coatings Course Schedule

WAIT LIST ONLYREGISTER NOW—SEATS AVAILABLE LIMITED SEATS AVAILABLE (5 OR LESS) CONTACT LOCAL SPONSOR


UNITED KINGDOM

CIP LEVEL 1

Newcastle, UK March 16-21, 2015


Harrogate, UK April 27-May 2, 2015

Aberdeen, UK May 4-9, 2015

Aberdeen, UK May 10-15, 2015

Harrogate, UK June 15-20, 2015

CIP LEVEL 2



Harrogate, UK June 23-28, 2015

CIP PEER REVIEW


UNITED STATES

CIP LEVEL 1

St. Louis, MO March 15-20, 2015

Houston, TX March 15-20, 2015


Houston, TX March 28-April 2, 2015

Cape Canaveral, FL March 29-April 3, 2015

Kansas City, MO March 29-April 3, 2015

Seattle, WA April 5-10, 2015

Houston, TX April 6-11, 2015

Virginia Beach, VA April 12-17, 2015

Denver, CO April 12-17, 2015

Anaheim, CA April 12-17, 2015


Philadelphia, PA April 13-18, 2015





New Orleans, LA April 26-May 1, 2015

Houston, TX May 2-7, 2015

Albuquerque, NM May 3-8, 2015


Williamsville, NY May 11-16, 2015



New Orleans, LA May 24-29, 2015

Houston, TX May 30-June 4, 2015

Mobile, AL May 31-June 5, 2015

Bakersfield, CA May 31- June 5, 2015


Cape Canaveral, FL May 31-June 5, 2015

Houston, TX June 1-6, 2015

Waipahu, HI June 7-12, 2015


Newington, NH June 7-12, 2015

Anchorage, AK June 14-19, 2015



CIP LEVEL 2



Houston, TX March 28-April 2, 2015


Cape Canaveral, FL April 12-17, 2015

Virginia Beach, VA April 19-24, 2015

Denver, CO April 19-24, 2015

Anaheim, CA April 19-24, 2015



Philadelphia, PA April 20-25, 2015



New Orleans, LA May 31-June 5, 2015


Bakersfield, CA June 7-12, 2015



Waipahu, HI June 14-19, 2015


Newington, NH June 14-19, 2015

Anchorage, AK June 21-26, 2015

CIP ONE DAY BRIDGE COURSE

Virginia Beach, VA April 18, 2015

New Orleans, LA May 12, 2015

CIP PEER REVIEW

Baton Rouge, LA March 13-16, 2015



Cape Canaveral, FL April 17-20, 2015




Bakersfield, CA June 12-15, 2015

COATINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH CATHODIC PROTECTION



MARINE COATING TECHNOLOGY


PCS 1 BASIC PRINCIPLES


Amarillo, TX May 4-6, 2015

PCS 2 ADVANCED


NACE Coatings Course Schedule

WAIT LIST ONLYREGISTER NOW—SEATS AVAILABLE LIMITED SEATS AVAILABLE (5 OR LESS) CONTACT LOCAL SPONSOR


Coatings Resources

TECHNICAL COMMITTEES

Committee Description Scope/Assignment

STG 02 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Atmospheric Scope: Determine uses, application, and performance of coatings for atmospheric service. Atmospheric service denotes industrial and commercial equipment, architectural structures, and bridges.

TG 146 Coatings, Thermal-Spray Assignment: Review and revise joint standard NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/SSPC-CS 23.00, “Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metalizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel.”

TG 148 Threaded Fasteners: Coatings for Protection of Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment

Assignment: Revise NACE Publication 02107, “Coatings for Protection of Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment.”

TEG 192X Coating Industry Problems Confronting Owners and Contractors

Assignment: To provide a format for handling problems and issues that affect the owner and contractor utilizing coatings. Problems and issues may include hazardous waste, volatile organic compounds, applicator training, federal and state regulations, and others that may develop.

TEG 255X Coatings, Thermal-Spray for Corrosion Protection Assignment: Exchange of information regarding thermal-spray coatings (TSCs) used for corrosion protection.

TG 260 Review of NACE Standard TM0304-2004 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0304.

TEG 311X Threaded Fasteners: Coatings and Methods of Protection for Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment

Assignment: Share information concerning, and discuss effective methods for, corrosion control of fasteners used with structural, piping, and equipment connections.

TG 312 Offshore Platform Coatings for Atmospheric and Splash Zone New Construction

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0404.

TG 340 Offshore Coating Condition Assessment for Maintenance Planning

Assignment: Develop a standard practice addressing a standard method and grading system to assess the in-service condition of offshore coatings. Provide direction regarding the use of assessment data in managing maintenance painting programs. The documented process will serve as an aid in the planning, budget, and execution of offshore maintenance programs.

TEG 346X Offshore Coatings: Laboratory Testing Criteria Assignment: Review and critique laboratory testing methods designed to predict performance in an offshore environment. Assess test variables and gather data needed to improve industry standard techniques.

TEG 399X Evaluation, Testing, and Specifying Coating Materials for Elevated Temperatures for Insulated and Uninsulated Service

Assignment: Exchange information, create a task group for state-of-the-art report, followed by formation of a task group to write a standard practice, and sponsor symposium.

TG 415 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard RP0281-2004

Assignment: Review and revise if necessary NACE Standard RP0281-2004, “Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in Atmospheric Exposures.”

TG 422 Coatings for Elevated-Temperature Insulated or Noninsulated Exterior Service

Assignment: To write a state-of-the-art report.

TEG 424X Liquid-Applied Insulative Coatings for Atmospheric Service at 0 to 375 °F

Assignment: To discuss issues of spray-applied insulative coatings for elevated-temperature exterior surfaces.

TEG 428X Hot-Dip Galvanizing for Steel Corrosion Protection Assignment: To discuss and furnish technical information on the process of hot-dip galvanizing and its use as a corrosion protection system for steel fabrications as well as the inspection of hot-dip galvanized coatings with other corrosion protection systems.

TG 477 Test Methods for Determining True Insulation Value of Liquid Insulative Materials Applied on Steel Surfaces from 80 °F to 275 °F

Assignment: To write a standard to determine thermal conductivity of liquid applied insulative materials.

TG 525 Determining True Insulative Value of Liquid Insulative Materials Applied on Steel Surfaces

Assignment: Develop test methods for determining the true insulative value of liquid insulative materials applied on steel surfaces.

NACE International Technical Committees Need You!

• Help influence industry standards. • Exchange technical information. • Strengthen your leadership skills.

As a NACE International member, you can sign up online to join a committee—go to the NACE Committees section at www.nace.org to join an STG or TEG. Contact the chair of a TG to indicate interest in that type of committee.

Types of Committees• Specific Technology Groups (STGs) • Task Groups (TGs) • Technology Exchange Groups (TEGs)


Coatings Resources

STG 03 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Immersion and Buried Service

Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs of immersion coatings and lining materials used in immersion service.

TG 009 Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Linings for Aboveground Storage Tank Floors

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for installing fiberglass-reinforced plastic linings within aboveground storage tanks.

TG 030 Coating Conductance Assignment: To update and revise NACE Technical Committee Report 1D157, “Methods for Measuring Leakage Conductance of Coating on Buried or Submerged Pipelines,” into a NACE standard test method.

TG 031 Pipeline Coating, Plant-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy: Review of NACE Standard RP0394

Assignment: To update and revise NACE Standard RP0394-2002, “Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipe Coating.”

TG 034 Pipeline Coatings, External: Gouge Test Assignment: To write a test method and criteria for evaluation of gouge resistance of a particular coating.

TG 037 Pipelines, Oilfield: Thermoplastic Liners Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0304-2004 as necessary.

TG 141 Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical Immersion and Containment Service

Assignment: To update SP0892-2007 to incorporate current technologies and practices to successfully protect concrete.

TG 246 Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied to Process Vessels and Tankages

Assignment: Develop application technology for applying thin-film linings to prevent corrosion, hydrogen-induced cracking, or other corrosion deterioration by internal corrosion mechanisms.

TG 247 Reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005 Assignment: To reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005, “External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Pipelines.”

TG 248 Coatings, Heat-Shrink Sleeves for External Repair, Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: To review and revise as needed NACE Standard RP0303-2003, “Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”


Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0402-2002, “Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth Weld Joints: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 250 Coal-Tar Enamel Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: Review and revise/reaffirm as necessary NACE Standard RP0602-2002, “Field-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 251 Review and Revise or Reaffirm SP0109-2009 Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm SP0109-2009, “Field Application of Bonded Tape Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Buried Metal Pipelines.”

TG 263 Review of NACE Standard TM0104-2004 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0104-2004.

TG 264 Offshore Exterior Submerged Coatings: Standard Test Methods

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE Standard TM0204-2004.

TG 266 Coating and Lining Materials in Immersion Service: Review of NACE Standard TM0174

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard TM0174-2002, “Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining Materials in Immersion Service.”

TG 281 Coatings, Polyurethane for Field Repair, Rehabilitation, and Girth Weld Joints on Pipelines

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for a minimal specification for the field application, repair, and testing for a polyurethane coating to be used on the exterior of buried pipelines.

TG 296 Coating Systems, Wax, for Underground Piping Systems: Review of NACE Standard RP0375

Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0375, “Wax Coating Systems for Underground Piping Systems.”


Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0399-2004, “Plant-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”

TG 336 External Pipeline Coatings: Practices, Test Methods, and/or Test Methodologies for High-Operating-Temperature Pipelines, Immersion and Buried Service Only

Assignment: Develop a technical committee report that outlines state-of-the-art practices as described in the title.

TG 337 External Pipeline Coatings: Field Installation and Inspection Criteria for Maximum Performance

Assignment: Develop a standard practice that identifies common aspects of field installation pertaining to quality installation and long-term performance.

TG 352 Coating Systems (External) for Pipeline Directional Drill Applications

Assignment: To develop a standard practice for minimum specifications for external coatings for use in directional drill service.

TG 425 State of the Art in CUI Coating Systems Assignment: Describe available systems, performance, and industry-accepted criteria for coatings under insulation.

TEG 435X Effects of Bioethanols on Fused Silica Containment Vessels in Immersion and Phase Change Exposures

Assignment: To hold technical information exchanges (TIEs) on the effects of bioethanols, aromatic ethanols, and sulfurous emissions on fused silica containment vessels.



Coatings Resources

TG 470 Cathodic Disbondment Test for Coated Steel Structures under Cathodic Protection

Assignment: To develop a standard test method to conduct the cathodic disbondment test.

TG 479 NACE Adoption of ISO 21809-3 Assignment: Review ISO 21809 with the goal to adopt or adopt with changes (amendments) to the standard and create a NACE/ISO, possibly modified, standard.

TG 490 Review and Adoption of API 5L2, “Recommended Practice for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive Gas Transportation Service”

Assignment: To review and modify (if and where necessary) API 5L2, “Recommended Practice for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive Gas Transmission Service,” with input from NACE user community. The standard will have a dual NACE/API number.

TG 507 Review and Revise as Necessary SP0188-2006 Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0188-2006, “Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates.”

TG 508 Review and Revise as Necessary SP0490-2007 Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0490, “Holiday Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to 760 µm (10 to 30 mils)

TG 516 Standard Practice for Evaluating Protective Coatings for Use under Insulation

Assignment: To write a standard practice for testing coatings for corrosion under insulation (CUI) prevention.

TG 520 Pipeline Coating Peel Strength Test Assignment: To develop a simple and reliable peel test standard for the three-layer polyethylene, three-layer polypropylene, heat-shrink sleeve, and tape coatings in the field and laboratory.

STG 04 Coatings and Linings, Protective: Surface Preparation Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs of various methods of surface preparation for the application of coatings and linings.

TG 006 Blasting: Review of Joint Standards NACE 1-4/SSPC-SP 5, 10, 6, and 7, and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14

Assignment: To review, revise, or reaffirm as necessary joint blasting standards NACE No. 1-4/SSPC-SP 5, 10, 6, 7: “White Metal Blast Cleaning,” “Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning,” “Commercial Blast Cleaning,” and “Brush-Off Blast Cleaning,” and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14, “Industrial Blast Cleaning.”

TG 320 Review and Revise as Necessary NACE No. 13SSPC-ACS-1 Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE No. 13/SSPC-ACS-1, “Industrial Coating and Lining Application Specialist Qualification and Certification.”

TG 323 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning Assignment: To review and update joint technical committee report NACE 6G198/SSPC-TR 2, “Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning.”

TG 350 Surface Preparation by Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning Assignment: Develop a standard for wet abrasive blast cleaning of steel surfaces that will complement the existing NACE/SSPC joint standards for dry abrasive blast cleaning.

TG 417 Review and Revise as Necessary Joint Surface Preparation Standard NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13

Assignment: Review and revise as necessary joint standard NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13, “Surface Preparation of Concrete,” to reflect current industry practices and to reflect proper reference to other industry publications.


Assignment: Review and revise as necessary RP0287-2002, “Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast-Cleaned Steel Surfaces Using a Replica Tape,” and to include other methods of profile measurement now being widely used throughout the industry.

TEG 423X Nonvisible, Nonwater-Soluble Contaminants Affecting Corrosion Protection

Assignment: Discuss the effects of coating performance when applied over nonvisible, nonwater-soluble contaminants and their effects on coating performance.

TG 443 Field Testing for Soluble Salts: Commonly Used Methods Assignment: Develop a technical committee report detailing commonly used soluble salts field test methods.

TEG 469X Surface Preparation Issues Assignment: To provide a forum to discuss various issues affecting surface preparation.

TG 518 Soluble Salt Testing Frequency and Locations on Previously Coated Surfaces

Assignment: Develop a standard regarding soluble salt testing frequency and locations on previously coated surfaces.

STG 43 Transportation, Land Scope: To promote the development of techniques to extend the life of land transportation equipment.

TG 061 Revision of NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated (90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service”

Assignment: To update and revise NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated (90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service.”

TG 063 Railcars: Corrosion Protection and Control Program Assignment: Develop guidelines for railcar lining requalification.

TEG 064X Railcar Surface Preparation Assignment: To keep abreast of industry changes and techniques and report findings annually.



Coatings Resources

TG 067 Review and Revise or Reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007 Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007, “Selection and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service.”

TG 271 Removal Procedures for Nonvisible Contaminants on Railcar Surfaces

Assignment: To prepare a technical committee report describing surface decontamination for railcars prior to coating application.

TEG 291X Land Transportation: Information Exchange on Corrosion and Coating-Related Issues

Assignment: Technical information exchange in conjunction with an STG meeting.

TG 332 Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE SP0386-2007

Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE SP0386-2007 (formerly RP0386), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of Covered Steel Hopper Railcars in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service.”

TG 333 Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE SP0295-2008

Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0295-2008 (formerly RP0295), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars.”

TG 339 Railcars: Coating Application on Exterior Surfaces of Steel Railcars

Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Standard RP0692-2003, “Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail Cars.”

TG 366 Railcars: Corrosion under Tank Car Insulation Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Publication 14C296 to ensure information is still relevant.

TG 378 Waterborne Coatings on Railcars Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on waterborne coatings on railcars.

TG 379 Surface Preparation by Encapsulated Blast Media for Repair of Existing Coatings on Railcars

Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on surface preparation by encapsulated blast media for repair of existing coatings on railcars.

TG 394 Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters and Coating and Lining Applicators in the Rail Industry

Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0495-2003.

TG 406 Review of NACE SP0398-2006 Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE SP0398-2006 (formerly RP0398), “Recommendations for Training and Qualifying Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining Inspectors.”

TG 437 Maintenance Overcoating of Railcar Exteriors Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report for the application of maintenance overcoating of railcar exteriors.

TG 444 Guidelines for Data Collection and Analysis of Railroad Tank Car Interior Coating/Lining Condition

Assignment: To produce a standard that provides guidelines for inspecting, rating, and documenting the condition of interior coatings and linings in railroad tank cars to comply with H-201.

TG 456 Coating Thickness Measurement, Methods, and Recording—Specific to the Railcar Industry

Assignment: Prepare a state-of-the-art report outlining currently used procedures for dry film thickness measurement and recording for coatings on railcars.

STG 44 Marine Corrosion: Ships and Structures Scope: To study the corrosion mechanisms, causes, effects, and corrosion control remedies for ships, structures, and equipment exposed to marine environments and to disseminate information in the form of industry standards and formal and informal technical information exchanges on the research, devel-opment, and performance of materials, coatings, and improved or innovative methods to mitigate problems related to marine corrosion.

TEG 181X Marine Vessel Corrosion Assignment: To study the causes, effects, and remedies of corrosion in various marine vessels.

TG 452 Testing of Coating Suitability, Anode Consumption, and Corrosion Evaluation with Use of BWT Systems

Assignment: To write a standard on evaluation of risk for damage to coatings, increased anode consumption, and corrosion in conjunction with the use of ballast water treatment (BWT) systems.

TG 461 Standard for Hull Roughness Measurements on Ship Hulls in Dry Dock

Assignment: To develop a standard on how to perform both in-docking hull roughness readings (before blasting and cleaning in dry dock) and before out-docking hull roughness readings.

TG 475 Standard for Underwater Evaluation of Degrees of Fouling Assignment: To develop a pictorial standard to be used to evaluate the (1) extent, (2) location, and (3) type of fouling to ship hulls and propellers.

TG 476 Corrosion Protection of Offshore Wind Power Units Assignment: To write a standard practice that defines a life cycle of corrosion protection for offshore wind power structures.

TEG 523X Marine Corrosion of Copper Alloys Assignment: To discuss and disseminate information on marine corrosion of copper and copper alloys.



Coatings ResourcesSTANDARDS & REPORTSAtmospheric ServiceStandards Item NumberSP0108-2008 Corrosion Control of Offshore Structures by Protective Coatings 21126RP0281-2004 Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in Atmospheric Exposures 21026SP0297-2012 (formerly RP0297) Maintenance Painting of Electrical Substation Apparatus Including Flow Coating of

Transformer Radiators21081

NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/SSPC-CS 23.00

Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metallizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and Their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel (RP0203-2003)

21100

TM0304-2004 Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone Maintenance Coating System Evaluation 21245TM0404-2004 Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone New Construction Coating System

Evaluation21246

Reports Item NumberNACE Publication 80200/SSPC-TR 4 Preparation of Protective Coating Specifications for Atmospheric Service 24209NACE Publication 02103 Liquid-Applied Coatings for High-Temperature Atmospheric Service 24219NACE Publication 02203/ICRI Technical Guideline 03741/SSPC-TR 5

Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Protective Polymer Flooring Systems for Concrete 24220

Immersion/Buried ServiceStandards Item NumberSP0274-2011 (formerly RP0274) High-Voltage Electrical Inspection of Pipeline Coatings Prior to Installation 21010RP0375-2006 Field-Applied Underground Wax Coating Systems for Underground Pipelines:

Application, Performance, and Quality Control21013

SP0185-2007 (formerly RP0185) Extruded Polyolefin Resin Coating Systems with Soft Adhesives for Underground or Submerged Pipe

21029

SP0111-2011 Coating Technical File in Accordance with the IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coatings

21153

SP0188-2006 (formerly RP0188) Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates 21038SP0288-2011 (formerly RP0288) Inspection of Linings on Steel and Concrete 21039SP0490-2007 (formerly RP0490) Holiday Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to 760 µm (10

to 30 mils)21045

SP0892-2007 (formerly RP0892) Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical Immersion and Containment Service 21060SP0394-2013 (formerly RP0394) Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy

External Pipe Coating21064

SP0298-2007 (formerly RP0298) Sheet Rubber Linings for Abrasion and Corrosion Service 21085RP0399-2004 Plant-Applied, External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance,

and Quality Control21089

NACE No. 10/SSPC-PA 6 Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Linings Applied to Bottoms of Carbon Steel Aboveground Storage Tanks (RP0202-2002)

21093

RP0402-2002 Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth Weld Joints: Application, Performance, and Quality Control

21096

RP0105-2005 Liquid-Epoxy Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Buried Steel Pipelines

21106

SP0181-2006 (formerly RP0181) Liquid-Applied Internal Protective Coatings for Oilfield Production Equipment 21025RP0602-2002 Field-Applied Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and

Quality Control21098

NACE No. 11/SSPC-PA 8 Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied in New Carbon Steel Process Vessels (RP0103-2003) 21099RP0303-2003 Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application, Performance, and Quality

Control21101

RP0304-2004 Design, Installation, and Operation of Thermoplastic Liners for Oilfield Pipelines 21103TM0174-2002 Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining Materials on

Metallic Substrates in Immersion Service21206

TM0102-2002 Measurement of Protective Coating Electrical Conductance on Underground Pipelines 21241TM0104-2004 Offshore Platform Ballast Water Tank Coating System Evaluation 21243TM0204-2004 Exterior Protective Coatings for Seawater Immersion Service 21244SP0109-2009 Field Application of Bonded Tape Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld

Joints on Buried Metal Pipelines21143

TM0109-2009 Aboveground Survey Techniques for the Evaluation of Underground Pipeline Coating Condition

21254


Coatings ResourcesSurface Preparation

Standards Item Number

SP0178-2007 (formerly RP0178) Design, Fabrication, and Surface Finish Practices for Tanks and Vessels to be Lined for Immersion Service

21022

RP0287-2002 Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel Surfaces Using a Replica Tape

21035

TM0105-2012 Test Procedures for Organic-Based Conductive Coating Anodes for Use on Concrete Structures

21247

NACE No. 1/SSPC-SP 5 White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0494-2007) 21065

NACE No. 2/SSPC-SP 10 Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0594-2007) 21066

NACE No. 3/SSPC-SP 6 Commercial Blast Cleaning (SP0694-2007) 21067

NACE No. 4/SSPC-SP 7 Brush-Off Blast Cleaning (SP0794-2007) 21068

WJ-1: SP0212-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Clean to Bare Substrate (WJ-1)

21158

WJ-2: SP0312-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Very Thorough Cleaning (WJ-2)

21155

WJ-3: SP0412-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Thorough Cleaning (WJ-3) 21156

WJ-4: SP0512-2012 Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Light Cleaning (WJ-4) 21157

NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13 Surface Preparation of Concrete (RP0397-2003) 21082

NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14 Industrial Blast Cleaning (SP0299-2007) 21088

NACE No. 13/SSPC-ACS-1 Industrial Coating and Lining Application Specialist Qualification and Certification 21122

SP0508-2010 Methods of Validating Equivalence to ISO 8502-9 on Measurement of the Levels of Soluble Salts

21134

SP0213-2013 Definition of Set Soluble Salt Levels by Conductivity Measurements 21172

Reports Item Number

NACE Publication 6A192/SSPC-TR 3 Dehumidification and Temperature Control during Surface Preparation, Application, and Curing for Coatings/Linings of Steel Tanks, Vessels, and Other Enclosed Spaces

24083

NACE Publication 6G194/SSPC-TR 1 Thermal Precleaning 24183

NACE Publication 6G197/SSPC-TU 2 Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Coating Systems for Concrete Used in Secondary Containment

24193

NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning 24199

Land Transportation

Standards Item Number

SP0386-2007 (formerly RP0386) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of Covered Steel Hopper Rail Cars in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service

21033

SP0592-2006 (formerly RP0592) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Concentrated (90 to 98%) Sulfuric Acid Service

21057

RP0692-2003 Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail Cars 21058

SP0295-2008 (formerly RP0295) Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars 21070

RP0495-2003 Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters and Coating and Lining Applicators in the Rail Industries

21072

SP0398-2006 (formerly RP0398) Recommendations for Training and Qualifying Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining Inspectors

21086

SP0302-2007 (formerly RP0302) Selection and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service

21095

Reports Item Number

NACE Publication 14C296 Protective Coatings for Mitigating Corrosion under Insulation on Rail Tank Cars 24191

NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning 24199

16 InspectThis! Spring 2015Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!Introducing the 3-Year Warranty on the Model 10/20 Holiday Detector!

Documents

By Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair F - NACE … · So the answer to the initial question ... NACE-certified Coating Inspector Level 1 ... heavy paper such as what is used for