Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Business Drivers behind Mobile Learning. Dr. András Gábor. Mobile Learning. Technology (platforms) Smartphone PDA Notebook Methodology Infrastructure Domain Economic rationale Contact hours Credit. Convergence of Technologies. WiF I WiMAX UMTS. Why Mobile Learning?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Technology Transfer Center
Business Drivers behind Mobile Learning
Dr. András Gábor
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
2Technology Transfer Center
Mobile Learning
Technology (platforms)– Smartphone– PDA– Notebook
Methodology – Infrastructure– Domain
Economic rationale– Contact hours– Credit
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
3Technology Transfer Center
Convergence of Technologies
WiF I WiMAX UMTS
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
4Technology Transfer Center
Why Mobile Learning?
Scope: Higher Education, regular teaching environment Blended learning
– F2F education– e-Learning– syncrhonous– asynchronous
Organisational approach– matrix organisation– program management– organisational containers
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
5Technology Transfer Center
Assumptions
Normative financing– number of active students– normative cost per capita per type of education– 60 credits / students/ year
Courses– Number and composition of instructors
• wage• % working time devoted to teaching
– Number of desired contact hours– Credit associated with the course– Infrastructure cost– OH
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
6Technology Transfer Center
Balance equation
Balance requirement: [cost of credit] = [revenue on credit]
[cost of credit] = [instructors] * [wage] / [working hours] * [contact hours]
[revenue on credit] = [students] * [normative reimbursement] / [total credit/year/student]
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
7Technology Transfer Center
Balance equation
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0
Balance requirement: [cost of credit] =[revenue on credit]
[cost of credit] =[instructors]*[wage]/[working hours]*[contact hours]
[revenue on credit] = [students]*[normative reimbursement]/[total credit/year/student]
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
8Technology Transfer Center
Balance equation
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 80 1440 60 0
Remark: Seminars means uses more resources
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
9Technology Transfer Center
Balance equation
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 80 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 75 1440 60 -120102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 85 1440 60 120
Remark: Less student means loss, more student makes profit
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
10Technology Transfer Center
Balance equationResource based financing
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 80 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 75 1440 60 -120102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 85 1440 60 120102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 85 1440 60 -360102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 100 1440 60 0
Remark: Wages are the same, the available working time is smaller
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
11Technology Transfer Center
Balance equationmLearning means making profit?
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 80 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 75 1440 60 -120102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 85 1440 60 120102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 85 1440 60 -360102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 100 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 120 5 960 40 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 120 5 960 100 1440 60 1440
Remark: The difference comes from e(m)-Learning. Also infrastructure cost can be saved
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
12Technology Transfer Center
Balance equationStrategic options
Course Instructors #
% of teaching activites
Wages (total)
Working hours per year
Contact hours
Credit Cost / credit
Students # Normative re-imbursement /year/student
Credit total p.a.
Balance
101 1 100% 20000 2000 60 5 120 5 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 80 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 75 1440 60 -120102 4 100% 80000 2000 240 5 1920 85 1440 60 120102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 85 1440 60 -360102 4 80% 80000 1600 240 5 2400 100 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 120 5 960 40 1440 60 0102 4 100% 80000 2000 120 5 960 100 1440 60 1440
Program total
1080
Remark: Cross financing
September 8-9, 2005, DublinmLearning Conference,
13Technology Transfer Center
Balance equationStrategic options
Course distribution
20% 30% 50%Total wages 10000 20000 10000
101 -9880 31840 -6400102 11800 20000 10000102 -10000 31840 -6400102 12040 20000 10000102 -10000 31840 -6400102 11920 20000 10000102 -10960 31840 -6400102 13360 20000 10000
Program total
-13360 207360 14400
P/L per organisational container (department, unit, institute, group, etc.)
![Cyber- [.......] Hype or Trend? The drivers behind malware development](https://img.dokumen.tips/doc/110x75/56816931550346895de081dd/cyber-hype-or-trend-the-drivers-behind-malware-development.jpg)
