Upload
dinhnhu
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Carbon Management in Power Generation
CCS - Carbon dioxide Capture and StorageMischa Werner
Institute of Process Engineering, ETH ZurichZurich, Switzerland
Business and Politics of Climate ChangeHS 2010
Zurich, November 23, 2010
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 2
By 2050, global population will rise from 7 to 9 billion people World energy demand is expected to increase
by 50% over the next 20 years
7 billion people
Why do we Need CO2 Capture and Storage?
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 3
Fossil fuels (coal, gas and oil) represent 80%of the global energy mix Renewables
only account for 13% of our total energy supply
Source: IEA, Key World Energy Statistics, 2009
Fossil Fuels
81.1%Renewables13%
Nuclear5.9%
World total primary energy supply (2007)
We Still Rely on Fossil Fuels
Today
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 4
We need to cut CO2emissions fast…
… as energy consumption continues to rise
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 5
By using a portfolio of solutions:
How do we Meet this Challenge?
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 66
CCS will provide up to 20% of the CO2 emission reductions we need to make by 2050
Source: OECD/IEA, 2008
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 7
Concentrated emissions (2004):
20 Gt CO2/yr
GHG total (2004): 50 Gt CO2-eq/yrCarbon dioxide (2004): 30 Gt CO2/yr
Source: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007)
GHG emissions per sector (1990-2004)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 8
We can capture at least 90% of emissions from fixed emitters
We have been transporting CO2for decades
CO2 can be storedsafely and permanentlyusing natural trapping mechanisms
CCS – Concept
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 9
Pre-combustion: Where CO2 is captured before fuel is burned Oxy-fuel:
Where CO2 is captured during fuel combustion Post-combustion:
Where CO2 is captured after fuel has been burned (can also be retrofitted to existing power and industrial plants)
There are 3 technologies to capture CO2 :
CO2 Capture
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 10
carbon dioxide
nitrogen
CH4 + 2 O2 + 8 N2 CO2 + 2 H2O + 8 N2
CoalGas
Oil
Conventional power plant
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 11
CH4 + 2 O2 + 8 N2 CO2 + 2 H2O + 8 N2
CoalGas
Oil
Post-combustion(new + retrofit)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 12
CH4 + 2 O2 CO2 + 2 H2OO2 + 4 N2
Oxyfuel (new + retrofit)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
13
mechanicalenergy
3 C + O2 + 4 H2O 3 CO + 3 H2O + H2
Pre-combustion (new, e.g. IGCC)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 14
mechanicalenergy
O2 + 4 N2
3 C + O2 + 4 H2O 3 CO + 3 H2O + H2 3 CO2 + 4 H2
2 H2 + O2 2 H2O
Pre-combustion (new, e.g. IGCC)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 15
Source: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Examples of existing CO2-capture plants
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 16
Schwarze Pumpe, E-Germany, Source: Vattenfall
Examples of existing CO2-capture plants
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 17
Conventional power plant
[same net power output]
New power plant with CCS
Energy penalty and additional cost
Δenergy= + 10 to +40%Δefficiency= -7 to - 12%ΔCOE= + 20 to +90%
Power generation w/ and w/o CCS
Source: IPCC SRCCS, 2005
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 18
Once captured, the CO2 is compressed into a liquid state and dehydrated for transport and storage CO2 is preferably transported by pipeline …or by ships when a storage site is too far from the CCS
capture plant
CO2Transport
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 19
Source: BP
The USA’s existing CO2-pipeline network:
Liquid gas Trans-Port by shipSource: IPCC SRCCS, 2005
CO2-pipeline
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 20
We use a natural mechanism that has trapped CO2, gas and oil for millions of years Liquid CO2 is pumped deep underground into one
of two types of reservoirs: deep saline aquifers (700m-3,000m) depleted gas and oil fields (up to 5,000m) Both types of reservoirs have a layer of porous rock to
absorb the CO2 and an impermeable layer of cap rock to seal the porous layer
Safely Storing CO2
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 21
CO2 Storage:CapacityInjectivityContainment
The liquid CO2 is pumped deep underground into one of two types of CO2 storage reservoir (porous rock)
Cap rock
Cap rock
Deep saline formations700m - 3,000m
up to 5,000m
Depleted oil and gas fields
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 22
(kg/m3)
Capacity and injectivity: storage conditions
Optimal CO2 injectiondepth for density and permeability
Pressure: 80 – 150 barTemperature: 40 – 70°C
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 23
Mineral trappingCO2-rich water sinks to the bottom of the reservoir and reacts to form minerals
1
2
3
Dissolution trappingCO2 dissolves into surrounding salt water
Residual trappingCO2 is trapped in tiny rock pores and cannot move
... due to 3 natural mechanisms
The Safety of Stored CO2 Increases Over Time
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 24
The Safety of Stored CO2 Increases Over Time
Source: IPCC SRCCS, 2005
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 25
To be mapped & avoided when choosing storage formation!
Potential CO2 Migration Pathways
Old wells Spill points Faults Cap rock
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 26
To ensure that a CO2 storage site functions as it should, a rigorous monitoring process begins at the reservoir selection stage and continues for as long as required Look for and avoid potential migration paths Monitor the environment on the surface (permanent data loggers) Watch stored CO2 (geophysical methods, e.g. 4D seismic)
Monitoring CO2 Storage Sites
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 27
Expert‘s view on risk:Risk size =
(Probability of occurrence)*(Loss due to occurrece)
Probability minimized: Site selection, characterization, construction, retirement
Loss minimized: „safe-by-design“ operation, monitoring, remedial measures
Risk and Risk Management
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 28
Public‘s view on risk:Risk size =
(„Known“ factor)*(„Dread“ factor)
… needs to be understoodand carfully addressed:
Public outreach!
Risk and Risk Management
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 29
Examples of risks and its management
FAZ online: „Hessens Verkehrsminister Dieter Posch lässt vielerorts auf Autobahnen das Tempolimit aufheben“
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 30
Examples of risks and its management
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 31
Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
Source: IPCC SRCCS, 2005
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 32
Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM)CO2 (about twice more adsorbable) displaces CH4 from deep unminable coal seams
1 CO2
12
plus 1 CO2 power
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 33
Source: IPCC SRCCS (2005) Chpt. 7
2
Mineral Carbonation
Mg2SiO4 + 2 CO2 2 MgCO3 + SiO2
Exothermic, slow, activation needed
Natural mineral feedstock:Serpentine, olivine, wollastonite
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 34
Example of existing CO2 storage site
Injection well head, CO2CRC R&D Project, Otway, VIC, Australia
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 35
(Statoil - 1996)(StatoilHydro - 2008)
(BP, Statoil, Sonatrach - 2004)
(Encana - 2000)
Aquifer
Aquifer
Aquifer
EOREach project ≈ 1 Mt CO2/yGlobal emissions ≈ 28 Gt CO2/y2030 EU target ≈ 400 Mt CO2/y (≈ 80 GW)
Commercial CCS operations
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 36
Natural gas with ~9% CO2
CO2 injection in the Utsira formation
ca. 1 Mton per year
~ 2500 m
~ 1000 mCO2 separation
from gas
~ 3000 mGas
CO2
Source: StatoilHydro
Sleipner (Statoil – 1996)
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 37
4D-Seismics at Sleipner
Source: StatoilHydro
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 38
Operating and planned pilots in Europe
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 39
Large-scale future CCS projects
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 40
Challenges in CCS implementation Technical challenges…? …Economic challenges! Cost and energy penalty, likely to be passed to the
consumer Public understanding and acceptance, to be overcome
by information and transparency Absence of policy, legislation and regulatory framework Carbon prize: internalize the externalities Capture, transport, and injection (operational phase) are or can
be regulated Post-operational, storage part of CCS is an issue
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 41
There is an urgent need to dramatically increase public understanding and awareness of the technology through CCS demonstration programmes.
Enabling CCS to be commercially viable by 2020 means validating the technology through large-scale demonstration programmes that require:
sufficient and flexible funding
clear knowledge-sharing principles to maximise learnings
appropriate and comprehensive legislation
accelerated permitting processes
1234
Commercially Viable by 2020
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 42
Alongside more renewables and greater energy efficiency, CO2 Capture and Storage will help us get to the sustainable, renewable energy systems of the future!
A Portfolio of Solutions
Carbon Management in Power Generation
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 D-MAVT/IPE/SPL – Mischa Werner, [email protected] 43
CCS lecture in FS 2011 151-0928-00L Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) W4 KP 3G M. Mazzotti, C. Cremer, C. Müller, P. Radgen