34
Bullyproofing and PBIS: Part II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Bullyproofing and PBIS: Part IITeri Lewis

Oregon State University

Page 2: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Review: Goal• Present information on intervention• Link bullyprofing and PBIS

Page 3: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Review: Bullyproofing Options• Prevent bullying - Universal

• Reduce bullying - Individual

Page 4: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Intervention

•Primary• Reduce new cases of problem behavior

•Secondary• Reduce current cases of problem behavior

•Tertiary• Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases

Page 5: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Academic Systems Behavioral Systems

1-5% 1-5%

5-10% 5-10%

80-90% 80-90%

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response

Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive

Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

Page 6: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

2001 Surgeon General’s Report

• Number of assaults & other antisocial behavior are increasing

• Risk factors• Antisocial peer networks• Reinforced deviancy

Page 7: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

2001 Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence: Recommendations

• Establish “intolerant attitude toward deviance”• Break up antisocial networks…change social context• Improve parent effectiveness

• Increase “commitment to school”• Increase academic success• Create positive school climates

• Teach & encourage individual skills & competence

Page 8: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Responses to Antisocial Behavior• Reviews of over 500 studies indicate that the least

effective responses to school violence are• Punishment• Counseling• Psychotherapy

Page 9: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

• Exclusion is the most common response for conduct disordered youth (Lane & Murakami, 1987)

• Punishing problem behaviors without a school-wide system of support is associated with increased (a) aggression, (b) vandalism, (c truancy, (d) tardiness, and (e) dropping out (Mayer, 1995; Mayer & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1991)

Page 10: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

• The most effective responses educators can make to school violence include• Social skills instruction• Behaviorally based interventions• Academic interventions

Page 11: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Summary- Effective Bullyproofing

• Involve all staff, students, family and even community• Focus on both prevention (SW) and intervention (function-

based)• Embed w/i existing curriculum, etc. • Adapt to fit context/culture• Sustain - no quick fixes

Page 12: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

What Works? Effective Approaches

• Social skills training• Skill v. performance deficit• Incorporated across day/life

• Social behavioral interventions• Functional behavior assessment based• Teach alternative skills

(e.g., self-management)

Page 13: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

• Academic/curricular restructuring• Academic & behavior relationship

• Systems approach• Create supportive school environment

• Community/home interventions• Wrap-around

Page 14: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Process for Identifying Students

1. Establish Behavior Support Team to guide/lead process.

2. Secure & establish behavioral competence within school.

3. Develop three level system of school-wide behavior support:

a. Universal Interventionsb. Targeted Group Interventionsc. Individual Interventions

Page 15: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Universal Interventions• School-wide discipline system for all students, staff, &

settings that is effective for “80%” of students.• Clearly & positively stated expectations. • Procedures for teaching expectations.• Continuum of procedures for teaching expectations.• Continuum of procedures for encouraging expectations. • Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations.• Procedures for monitoring & modifying procedures.

Page 16: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Targeted Group Interventions• Specialized group administered system for

students who display high-risk problem behavior & are unresponsive to universal interventions.

• Functional assessment based intervention decisions.• Daily behavioral monitoring.• Regular & frequent opportunities for positive reinforcement.• Home-school connection.• Individualized academic accommodations for academic

success. • Planned social skills instruction.• Behaviorally based interventions.

Page 17: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Individual Interventions

• Specialized individually administered system for students who display most challenging problem behavior & are unresponsive to targeted group interventions.

• Simple request for assistance.• Immediate response (24-48 hours).• Functional behavioral assessment-based behavior support

planning. • Team-based problem solving process. • Data-based decision making.• Comprehensive service delivery derived from a wraparound

process.

Page 18: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

4. Establish data decision system for matching level of intervention to student.

a. Simple & direct request for assistance process for staff.

b. Data decision rule for requesting assistance based on number of major behavioral incidents.

Page 19: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

5. Establish a continuous data-based system to monitor, evaluate, & improve effectiveness & efficiency.

a. Are students displaying improved behaviors?

b. Are staff implementing procedures with high fidelity?

c. What can be modified to improve outcomes?

d. What can be eliminated to improve efficiency?

Page 20: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

FBA ProcessStart

Conduct FBA

High confidence in hypothesis?

Conduct full FA

Develop BIPMonitor & modify BIP regularly

Satisfactory improvement in behavior?

Develop BIP yes

no

Page 21: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Activity: Systems• Begin developing a systems approach to identifying

potential bullies• Screening (ODR, SSBD, Etc)• Teacher Request for Assistance• Meeting structure (when, where, what, who, how)• Quick assessment process

Page 22: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

What is Function-based approach?• A systematic problem solving process for developing

statements about factors that:• Contribute to the occurrence and maintenance of problem

behavior, and• More importantly, serve as basis for developing proactive &

comprehensive behavior support plans.

Page 23: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Purpose• Increase efficiency, relevance, & effectiveness of behavior support interventions.

• Improve consistency with which behavior support plans are implemented.

• Increase accountability (legal & professional)

Page 24: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Use when…• Students are not successful

• Interventions need to be developed

• Existing interventions need to made more effective and/or efficient

Page 25: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

How do I know if I have enough information?

• Description of problem behavior

• Identification of conditions that predict when problem behavior will and will not occur

• Identification of consequences that maintain problem behaviors (functions)

Page 26: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

• Summary statements or testable hypotheses that describe specific behavior, conditions, and reinforcers

• Collection of direct observation data that support summary statements

Page 27: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

When selecting a specific practice:

• Base selection on student identified• What, when, where, & why

• Adopt a function-based approach• Gain social or item/activity, escape social or demand, automatic

Page 28: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

• Choose the practice that is least intrusive yet effective• Balance • Begin where you will be successful

• Match practice to context• Skills, resources, values, etc.

• Match practice to systems level• SW - Setting - Group - Individual

Page 29: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Function of Behavior• Power, authority, control, intimidation, bullying, etc. are

not functions

Two basic research validated functions• Positive reinforcement (get/access)• Negative reinforcement (avoid/escape)

Page 30: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

A Matter of Perspective

•Always define the who and what you are interested in.

Page 31: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University
Page 32: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Why Function?• Understand the interaction from the students perspective

• Know what skills to teach

• Know how to modify the environment to:• Prevent (antecedents)• Increase appropriate (reinforcement)• Decrease inappropriate (punishment)

Page 33: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Activity• Moving to individual students

• Identify a list of students who you believe may need support for bullying behavior

• Choose one student and begin completing a brief behavioral assessment

• Identify: • what (behaviors), • when (antecedents), • why (maintaining consequences) and • what make its worse (setting events).

Page 34: BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University

Resources• safetyzone.org• bullying.org• dfes.gov.uk/bullying

• PBIS.org• marylandPBIS.org• nmPBIS.org