Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bulk viscosity of baryonic matter with trappedneutrinos and its application to neutron star mergers
Arus Harutyunyan
Collaborators: A. Sedrakian, M. AlfordBased on: arXiv:1907.04192
Justus-Liebig-Universitat Gießen, October 23, 2019
October 23, 2019
Outline
Introduction & motivationUrca processes and bulk viscosityDensity functional theoryResults for bulk viscosityConclusions
Introduction & motivation
Compact stars
Introduction & motivation
The structure of a neutron star
Introduction & motivation
Compact-star binaries
Compact stars are natural laboratories which allow us to study the properties of nuclearmatter under extreme physical conditions (strong gravity, strong magnetic fields, etc.).
The recent detection of gravitational and electromagnetic waves originating from blackhole or neutron star mergers motivates studies of compact binary systems.
Such studies might place constraints on the properties of compact star parameters andcontain useful information about the properties of extremely hot and dense matter.
Various physical processes in the compact binary systems can be modelled in theframework of general-relativistic hydrodynamics simulations.
Transport coefficients are key inputs in hydrodynamic modelling of compact star mergersas they measure the energy dissipation rate in hydrodynamic evolution of matter.
The bulk viscosity might affect the hydrodynamic evolution of mergers by damping thedensity oscillations which can affect the form of the gravitational signal.
Our aim is to study the bulk viscosity in dense baryonic matter for temperatures relevantto neutron star mergers and supernovas T ≥ 5 MeV.
At these temperatures neutrinos are trapped in matter, and the bulk viscosity arises fromweak interaction (neutron decay and electron capture) processes.
Introduction & motivation
Relativistic hydrodynamics and bulk viscosity
Hydrodynamic evolution of a relativistic system is described by means of theenergy-momentum tensor and particle current which obey the conservation laws
∂µTµν = 0, ∂µNµ = 0.
For ideal hydrodynamic, i.e., without dissipation
Tµν0 = ε0uµuν − p0∆µν , Nµ0 = n0uµ,
and the system of conservation laws is closed by an equation of state p0 = peq(ε0, n0).
For a dissipative fluid with velocity gradients
Tµν = εuµuν − p∆µν + πµν , Nµ = nuµ.
In this case the pressure obtains a non-equilibrium contribution
p = peq + Π.
where the bulk viscous pressure reads Π = −ζθ with θ = ∂µuµ.
Thus, the bulk viscosity ζ describes dissipation in the case where pressure falls out ofequilibrium on uniform expansion/contraction.
Introduction & motivation
Literature on bulk viscosity
R. F. Sawyer, Damping of neutron star pulsations by weak interaction processes,Astrophys. J. 237 (1980) 187-197.
R. F. Sawyer, Bulk viscosity of hot neutron-star matter and the maximum rotation rates ofneutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 3804-3806.
P. Haensel and R. Schaeffer, Bulk viscosity of hot-neutron-star matter from direct URCAprocesses, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4708-4712.
P. B. Jones, Bulk viscosity of neutron-star matter, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 084003.
M. G. Alford, S. Mahmoodifar and K. Schwenzer, Large amplitude behavior of the bulkviscosity of dense matter, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics 37 (2010) 125202,[1005.3769].
M. G. Alford, L. Bovard, M. Hanauske, L. Rezzolla and K. Schwenzer, ViscousDissipation and Heat Conduction in Binary Neutron-Star Mergers, Physical ReviewLetters 120 (2018) 041101, [1707.09475].
D. G. Yakovlev, M. E. Gusakov and P. Haensel, Bulk viscosity in a neutron star mantle,Mon. Not. RAS 481 (2018) 4924-4930, [1809.08609].
A. Schmitt and P. Shternin, Reaction rates and transport in neutron stars, The Physicsand Astrophysics of Neutron Stars 457 (2018) 455-574 [1711.06520].
M. Alford and S. Harris, Damping of density oscillations in neutrino-transparent nuclearmatter, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 035803, [1907.03795].
Urca processes and bulk viscosity
Urca process rates
We consider a simple composition of baryonic matter consisting of neutrons, protons,electrons and neutrinos. The simplest weak-interaction processes are the following(direct) Urca processes
n p + e− + νe (neutron decay process) (1)
p + e− n + νe (electron capture process) (2)
In β-equilibrium the chemical potentials of particles obey the relationµn + µν = µp + µe. Out of β-equilibrium in general implies an imbalance
µ∆ ≡ µn + µν − µp − µe 6= 0.
as a measure of deviation from β-equilibrium. The rate at which µ∆ relaxes to zero is ameasure of speed at which the constitution of matter adjusts to a change in pressure.The β-equilibration rate for the neutron decay is given by
Γ1p(µ∆) =
∫dΩ∑
si
|MUrca|2 f (p′) f (k′) f (k) f (p) (2π)4 δ(4)(p + k + k′ − p′),
with f (p) = 1− f (p). Similar expressions can be written also for Γ1n, Γ2p and Γ2n.The squared matrix element of Urca processes is
[G2 = G2
F cos2 θc(1 + 3g2A)]]∑
si
|MUrca|2 = 32G2(k · p′)(p · k′) ' 32G2p0p′0k0k′0.
Urca processes and bulk viscosity
Density oscillations in neutron-star matter
Consider now small-amplitude density oscillations in baryonic matter with frequency ω
nB(t) = nB0 + δnB(t), nL(t) = nL0 + δnL(t), δnB(t), δnL(t) ∼ eiωt.
The baryon and lepton number conservation ∂ni/∂t + div (niv) = 0 implies
δni(t) = −θ
iωni0, i = B, L, θ = div v.
The oscillations cause perturbations in particle densities nj(t) = nj0 + δnj(t), due towhich the chemical equilibrium of matter is disturbed leading to a small shiftµ∆ = δµn + δµν − δµp − δµe, which can be written as
µ∆ = (Ann − Apn)δnn + Aννδnν − (App − Anp)δnp − Aeeδne, Aij =
(∂µi
∂nj
)0.
The off-diagonal elements Anp and Apn are non-zero because of the cross-species stronginteraction between neutrons and protons.
If the weak processes are turned off, then a perturbation conserves all particle numbers
∂
∂tδnj(t) + θnj0 = 0, δnj(t) = −
θ
iωnj0.
Urca processes and bulk viscosity
Chemical balance equations and bulk viscosity
Out of equilibrium the chemical equilibration rate to linear order in µ∆ is given by
Γp − Γn = λµ∆, λ > 0.
The rate equations which take into account the loss and gain of particles read as
∂
∂tδnn(t) + θnn0 = −λµ∆(t),
∂
∂tδnp(t) + θnp0 = λµ∆(t).
Solving these equations we can compute the pressure out of equilibrium
p = p(nj) = p(nj0 + δnj) = p0 + δp = peq + δp′,
where the non-equilibrium part of the pressure - the bulk viscous pressure, is given by
Π ≡ δp′ =∑
j
(∂p∂nj
)0δn′j =
∑ij
ni0Aijδn′j .
The bulk viscosity is then identifined from Π = −ζθ
ζ =C2
AλA
ω2 + λ2A2
with susceptibilities A = −1
nB
(∂µ∆
∂xp
)nB
and C = nB
(∂µ∆
∂nB
)xp
.
Urca processes and bulk viscosity
Limiting cases for bulk viscosity
In the low-temperature limit the matter is ν-transparent, and the equilibration rate λ reads
λtrans =17
240πm∗2G2T4pFeθ(pFp + pFe − pFn),
where pFi are Fermi-momenta of particles. The θ-function blocks direct Urca processesat densities where pFp + pFe < pFn ⇒ modified Urca processes should be included.
The neutrino-trapped β-equilibration rate for strongly degenerate matter is given by
λtrap =1
12π3m∗2G2T2pFepFν(pFe + pFν − |pFn − pFp|).
In contrast to the ν-transparent case here the rate is finite in the low-temperature limit⇒ modified Urca reactions are not required to be included.
Because in the degenerate regime pFi T , the equilibration rate is alwals much larger inthe case of trapped neutrinos.
In the high-frequency (ω λA), low-frequency (ω λA) limits and at the maximumof the bulk viscosity (ω = λA) we find
ζhigh =C2λ
ω2, ζlow =
C2
λA2, ζmax =
C2
2Aω.
Density functional theory
Beta-equilibrated nuclear matter
We use the density functional theory approach to the nuclear matter, which is based onphenomenological baryon-meson Lagrangians of the type proposed by Walecka and others.
The Lagrangian density of matter is given by
L =∑
N
ψN
[γµ(
i∂µ − gωNωµ −12
gρNτρµ
)− m∗N
]ψN +
∑λ
ψλ(iγµ∂µ − mλ)ψλ
+12∂µσ∂µσ −
12
m2σσ
2 − U(σ)−14ωµνωµν +
12
m2ωω
µωµ −14ρµνρµν +
12
m2ρρµρµ.
The pressure of baryonic matter is given by
PN = −m2σ
2σ2 − U(σ) +
∑λ
gλ6π2
∫ ∞0
k4 dk(k2 + m2
λ)1/2
[f (Eλk − µλ) + f (Eλk + µλ)
]+
m2ω
2ω2
0 +m2ρ
2ρ2
03 +∑
N
2JN + 16π2
∫ ∞0
k4 dk(k2 + m∗2
N )1/2
[f (EN
k − µ∗N) + f (EN
k + µ∗N)]
Here m∗N = mN − gσNσ and µ∗N = µN − gωNω0 − gρNρ03I3 are the nucleon effective mass
and effective chemical potentials, respectively; I3 is the third component of nucleon isospin and
σ, ω0 and ρ03 are the mean values of the meson fields.
Density functional theory
Meson mean-fields and susceptibilities
The mean-field values of the ω and ρ mesons are given by
gωω0 =
(gωmω
)2
(nn + np), gρρ03 =12
(gρmρ
)2
(np − nn).
The mean value of the scalar field is given by
gσσ = −gσm2σ
∂U(σ)
∂σ+
1π2
(gσmσ
)2∑N
∫ ∞0
p2dpm∗√
p2 + m∗2[fN(p) + fN(p)].
The “beta-disequilibrium–proton-fraction” susceptibility in low-T limit is given by
A =π2
m∗
(1
pFn+
1pFn
)+π2
p2Fe
+2π2
p2Fν
+
(gρmρ
)2
.
The “beta-disequilibrium–baryon-density” susceptibility in low-T limit reads
C =p2
Fn − p2Fp
3m∗+
pFν − pFe
3+
nn − np
2
(gρmρ
)2
+ nBp2
Fn − p2Fp
2m∗2
(gσmσ
)2
.
Density functional theory
Particle fractions in equilibrium
The particle fractions are found from β-equilibrium conditions µn + µν = µp + µe andµµ = µe, the charge neutrality condition np = ne + nµ, the baryon number conservationnB = nn + np, and the lepton number conservation nl + nνl = nL = YLnB.
1 2 3n
B/n
0
νe
νµ
νe
1 2 3n
B/n
0
10-2
10-1
100
Yi n
p
e−
µ−
T = 5 MeV T = 50 MeV
YL = 0.1
(a) (b)
1 2 3n
B/n
0
1 2 3n
B/n
0
10-2
10-1
100
Yi
np, e
−
νe
µ−
T = 5 MeV T = 50 MeV
YL = 0.4
(a) (b)
We consider two cases: (i) YL = 0.1 for both flavors, typical for neutron star mergers;(ii) YLe = 0.4 and YLµ = 0 typical for matter in supernovae and proto-neutron stars.
The particle fractions are not sensitive to the temperature for the given value of YL.
In the low-density and high-temperature regime the net neutrino density becomesnegative, indicating that there are more anti-neutrinos than neutrinos in that regime.
Merger matter has much smaller electron neutrino fraction than supernova matter.
Density functional theory
The equation of state for two models of nuclear matter
1 2 3n
B/n
0
0
50
100
150
p [
MeV
fm
-3]
YL = 0.4, T = 50 MeV
YL = 0.1, T = 50 MeV
Yν = 0, Τ = 0
DD-ME2
NL3
In the case of model DD-ME2 U(σ) = 0, and the couplings gσ , gω and gρ aredensity-dependent.
In the case of model NL3 U(σ) = g2σ3/3 + g3σ
4/4 6= 0, but the couplings gσ , gω andgρ are density-independent.
Results for bulk viscosity
β-equilibration rates (DD-ME2)
n p + e− + νe p + e− n + νe
1 10 100T [MeV]
10-40
10-30
10-20
10-10
10-40
10-30
10-20
10-10
Γ1
[MeV
4]
nB/n
0 = 0.5
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 3
YL = 0.4
YL = 0.1(a)
(b)
10-12
10-10
10-8
10-6
Γ2
[MeV
4]
nB/n
0 = 0.5
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 3
1 10 100T [MeV]
10-10
10-8
10-6
YL = 0.4
YL = 0.1(a)
(b)
The neutron decay rate Γ1 is exponentially suppressed at low temperatures because ofdamping of anti-neutrino population in the degenerate matter.
The electron capture rate Γ2 has a finite low-temperature limit which is ∝ T3.
In the regime of interest Γ1 Γ2, therefore the electron capture process dominates inthe β-equilibration and the bulk viscosity.
Results for bulk viscosity
β-relaxation rate (DD-ME2)
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
λA
[M
eV
]
YL = 0.4
YL = 0.1
Yν = 0
1 10 100T [MeV]
10-17
10-15
10-13
10-11
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 0.5(a)
(b)
f = 10 kHz
f = 1 kHz
The β-relaxation rate λA determines the frequency at which the bulk viscosity reaches itsresonant maximum (ωmax = λA).The relaxation rate is slowest in the neutrino-transparent case, and increases with thelepton fraction in the neutrino-trapped case.In neutrino-trapped matter λA ω for oscillation frequencies typical to neutron starmergers and supernovas ⇒ the bulk viscosity takes the form ζ ≈ C2/(λA2).The neutrino-transparent matter instead features a relaxation rate which is comparable tothe oscillation frequencies at typical temperatures T ' 2÷ 7 MeV.
Results for bulk viscosity
The susceptibility prefactor C2/A (DD-ME2)
104
106
C2/A
[M
eV
4]
T = 5 MeVT = 50 MeV
1 2 3n
B/n
0
104
106
YL = 0.1
YL = 0.4
(a)
(b)
C =
0
C =
0
1 2 3n
B/n
0
0,188
0,19
0,192
0,194
0,16
0,17
0,18
0,19
Yp
T = 5 MeV
T = 50 MeV
YL = 0.1
(a)
(b)
nB/n
0 =
1.6
The susceptibility A does not depend strongly on the density and temperature and hasroughly the same order of magnitude A ∼ 10−3 MeV−2.The susceptibility C increases with density and at high temperatures T & 30 MeVcrosses zero at certain values of density where the proton fraction attains a minimum.At this critical density the system is scale-invariant: it can be compressed and remain inbeta equilibrium ⇒ the bulk viscosity drops to zero at the critical point.
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of neutrino-trapped matter (DD-ME2)
1 10T [MeV]
1020
1022
1024
1026
ζ [
g c
m- s
-1]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
1 10 100T [MeV]
(b)(a)
YL
= 0.1 YL
= 0.4
The density dependence of the bulk viscosity follows that of the susceptibility C2/A.The temperature dependence of ζ arises mainly from that of β-relaxation rate λA ∝ T2.Bulk viscosity is independent of oscillation fequency and decreases as ζ ∝ T−2 in theneutrino-trapped regime.This scaling breaks down at high temperatures T ≥ 30 MeV where the bulk viscosity hassharp minimums ζ → 0 when the matter becomes scale-invariant.
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of neutrino-trapped matter (NL3)
1 10T [MeV]
1020
1022
1024
1026
1028
ζ [
g c
m- s
-1]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
1 10 100T [MeV]
(b)(a)
YL
= 0.1 YL
= 0.4
The density dependence of the bulk viscosity follows that of the susceptibility C2/A.The temperature dependence of ζ arises mainly from that of β-relaxation rate λA ∝ T2.Bulk viscosity is independent of oscillation fequency and decreases as ζ ∝ T−2 in theneutrino-trapped regime.This scaling breaks down at high temperatures T ≥ 30 MeV where the bulk viscosity hassharp minimums ζ → 0 when the matter becomes scale-invariant.
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of neutrino-transparent matter
1 2 4 8T [MeV]
1021
1024
1027
1030
ζ [
g c
m-1
s-1
]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
1 2 4 8T [MeV]
Yν = 0
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz(a) (b)
The bulk viscosity in neutrino-transparent matter is frequency-dependent.
The relaxation rate is slower for neutrino-transparent matter, and the resonant peak of thebulk viscosity occurs within its regime of validity.
It attains its maximum value at temperature T ' 2÷ 7 MeV, where ω = λA.
This is the temperature range which is relevant for neutron-star mergers. 1
1M. G. Alford, et al., On the importance of viscous dissipation and heat conduction in binary neutron-star mergers, 2017
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of neutrino-transparent matter (NL3)
1 2 4 8T [MeV]
1021
1024
1027
1030
ζ [
g c
m-1
s-1
]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
1 2 4 8T [MeV]
Yν = 0
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz(a) (b)
The bulk viscosity in neutrino-transparent matter is frequency-dependent.
The relaxation rate is slower for neutrino-transparent matter, and the resonant peak of thebulk viscosity occurs within its regime of validity.
It attains its maximum value at temperature T ' 2÷ 7 MeV, where ω = λA.
This is the temperature range which is relevant for neutron-star mergers. 2
2M. G. Alford, et al., On the importance of viscous dissipation and heat conduction in binary neutron-star mergers, 2017
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of baryonic matter (DD-ME2)
1 10T [MeV]
1022
1025
1028
1031
ζ [
g c
m- s
-1]
1 10 100T [MeV]
(b)(a)
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz
ν-trapped
ν-trapped
ν-transparent
ν-transparent
3 3
1
2 2
1
We interpolate our numerical results for the bulk viscosity between theneutrino-transparent and neutrino-trapped regimes in the interval 5 ≤ T ≤ 10 MeV.
The bulk viscosity in the neutrino transparent regime is larger, and drops by orders ofmagnitude as the matter enters the neutrino-trapped regime.
The bulk viscosity attains its maximum at temperatures T ' 2÷ 6 MeV.
Results for bulk viscosity
Bulk viscosity of baryonic matter (NL3)
1 10T [MeV]
1022
1025
1028
1031
ζ [
g c
m- s
-1]
1 10 100T [MeV]
(b)(a)
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz
ν-transparent
ν-trapped
ν-trapped
ν-transparent
1
2
3 3
2
1
We interpolate our numerical results for the bulk viscosity between theneutrino-transparent and neutrino-trapped regimes in the interval 5 ≤ T ≤ 10 MeV.
The bulk viscosity in the neutrino transparent regime is larger, and drops by orders ofmagnitude as the matter enters the neutrino-trapped regime.
The bulk viscosity attains its maximum at temperatures T ' 2÷ 6 MeV.
Results for bulk viscosity
Estimation of oscillation damping timescale
The energy density of baryonic oscilations with amplitude δnB is
ε =K2
(δnB)2
nB.
Coefficient K is the compressibility of nuclear matter
K = nB∂2ε
∂n2B.
The enegy dissipation rate per volume by bulk viscosity is
dεdt
=ω2ζ
2
(δnB
nB
)2
.
The characteristic timescale required for dissipation is τ = ε/(dε/dt)
τ =KnB
ω2ζ.
In the high-frequency (ω λA), low-frequency (ω λA) limits and at the maximumof the bulk viscosity (ω = λA) we find
τhigh =KnB
λC2, τlow =
λ2A2
ω2
KnB
λC2, τmin = 2
KnB
λC2.
Results for bulk viscosity
Nuclear compressibility for two EoS
1 2 3n
B/n
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
K [
MeV
]
T = 1 MeV
T = 5 MeV
T = 50 MeV
DD-ME2
NL3
Results for bulk viscosity
Oscillation damping timescale for DD-ME2 model
1 10T [MeV]
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
τ [
s]
1 10T [MeV]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
(b)(a)
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz
Damping timescales are comparable to the merging timescales τmerg ' 10 ms attemperatures T . 7 MeV where neutrinos are not trapped.Therefore, bulk viscosity will have its greatest impact on neutron star mergers in regionsthat are neutrino transparent rather than neutrino trapped.This also implies weak damping of gravitational waves emitted by the oscillations of thepost-merger remnant in the high-temperature, neutrino-trapped phase of evolution.
Results for bulk viscosity
Oscillation damping timescale for NL3 model
1 10T [MeV]
10-4
10-2
100
102
τ [
s]
nB/n
0 = 3
nB/n
0 = 2
nB/n
0 = 1
nB/n
0 = 0.5
1 10T [MeV]
(b)(a)
f = 1 kHz f = 10 kHz
Damping timescales are comparable to the merging timescales τmerg ' 10 ms attemperatures T . 7 MeV where neutrinos are not trapped.Therefore, bulk viscosity will have its greatest impact on neutron star mergers in regionsthat are neutrino transparent rather than neutrino trapped.This also implies weak damping of gravitational waves emitted by the oscillations of thepost-merger remnant in the high-temperature, neutrino-trapped phase of evolution.
Conclusions
Conclusions
We studied the bulk viscosity of dense nuclear matter in the case of trapped neutrinos.
We find that the bulk viscosity is dominated by electron capture process and its inverse.
The bulk viscosity attains its maximum at temperatures 2÷ 7 MeV forneutrino-transparent matter.
The neutrino-trapped bulk viscosity does not attain its maximum within its range ofvalidity because of faster equilibration rates.
The nuclear matter becomes scale-invariant at a critical density at high temperaturesT ≥ 30 MeV driving the bulk viscosity to zero at those points.
The bulk viscosity of neutrino-trapped matter is several orders of magnitude smaller thanthat of neutrino-transparent matter.
We find that the neutron star oscillation damping timescales in neutrino-trapped matterare likely to be too long to affect the evolution of neutron star mergers.
This also implies weak damping of gravitational waves emitted by the oscillations of thepost-merger remnant in the high-temperature, neutrino-trapped phase of evolution.
THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION!