17
ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND PERSPECTIVE TAKING EDC 448 WORKSHOP Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives

Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives

  • Upload
    iain

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives . Academic Language and Perspective Taking EDC 448 Workshop. Objectives. Collect Reading notes and Concept Definition Map Review directions for posting Text Set on the wikispace Pass back essays and review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND PERSPECTIVE TAKING

EDC 448 WORKSHOP

Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives

Page 2: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Objectives

Collect Reading notes and Concept Definition MapReview directions for posting Text Set on the wikispace Pass back essays and review Discuss the role of higher level questions/tasks and

how to support/scaffold students through the process of answering them with evidence based reasoning QAR, QtA, Whose perspective is missing? (Critical

Literacy) Considering two sides of an issue (Argumentation

Essays with Claims and Counterclaims) Considering insights gained from a variety of

viewpoints (Different Perspectives for Reading)

Page 3: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Common Core Standards

AS.W.1 - Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.

AS.W.4 - Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

AS.W.9 - Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

Page 4: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Tasks: Academic Language & Perspective Taking

Argumentation Essay: Consider and develop claims and counterclaims related to: 1) Students Should Regularly Read/Use

Challenging Texts 2) Using Accessible Texts Doesn’t Sacrifice Rigor

Consider and Develop Multiple Perspectives

About An Issue Should students have to meet a grade

requirement to participate in sports? Should Students Be Paid To Do Well In School?

Page 5: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE OF AN ARGUMENTATION ESSAY?

HOW CAN EXPLICIT TEACHING AND A GRAPHIC ORGANIZER

SUPPORT YOUR ABILITY TO WRITE AN ARGUMENTATION ESSAY?

Argumentation Essay vs. Persuasive Essay or

Five Paragraph Explanation Essay

Page 6: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Explicit Teaching: Argumentation Essay Format

STATE YOUR CLAIM Consider Claim 1

Develop Claim 1: Reason A; Reason BConsider Counterclaim 1:

Develop Counterclaim 1: Reason A; Reason B Consider Claim 2

Develop Claim 2: Reason A; Reason BConsider Counterclaim 2:

Develop Counterclaim 2: Reason A; Reason BCome to a conclusion (restate claim and sum up key

evidence that suggests it is the claim best supported by the most reasonable evidence)

Page 7: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

State claim: Students should read challenging texts, but teachers can make them accessible

without sacrificing rigor.

Question: Consider Claim (Agree) and develop evidence that supports

Consider Counterclaim (Disagree) and develop evidence that supports

SHOULD students read challenging text on a daily basis?

Students SHOULD read challenging texts on a regular basis• Evidence (Reason A)• Evidence (Reason B)

Students SHOULD NOT read challenging texts on a regular basis• Evidence (Reason A)• Evidence (Reason B)

CAN rigorous texts also be accessible?

Accessible text DOESN’T sacrifice rigor• Evidence (Reason A) – explain what teachers can do • Evidence (Reason B) - explain what teachers can do

Accessible text DOES sacrifice rigor• Evidence (Reason A)• Evidence (Reason B)

Conclusion: Restate your claim and sum up key ideas to reinforce your claim with the most reasonable evidence

Page 8: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Digital Scaffolding Tool for Evaluating and Synthesizing Multiple Online Texts

Page 9: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Reasoning with Evidence from the Text:

Turn and Talk

What can teachers DO to make sure that accessible text DOESN’T sacrifice rigor? Create text sets that pair more rigorous

texts with less rigorous texts But what can you do while still using the

same rigorous text?? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Page 10: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

ACTIVITY 2Considering Different Perspectives

Page 11: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Linking Instruction in Academic Vocabulary and Questioning

Introduce target words through brief passages outlining real-world controversies and weekly activities (define, word problems, debates, science experiments, writing)

Should secret wiretapping by the government be legal? Graphic organizers, differentiated discussion

prompts, higher level questions & evidence based reasoning

The Value of Hearing Multiple Perspectives

Page 12: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

The Role of Classroom Talk in Teaching for Understanding

Promoting classroom discussion and talk that have certain features can result in particular kinds of academic benefits, such as improved word knowledge

Rich teacher-student discussion also supports the development of students’ reasoning and supports their abilities to express their reasoning.

How can we differentiate our instruction while using academic language in talk and/or writing? See example in handout

Page 13: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives
Page 14: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Advancing Academic Language

ccdd.serpmedia.org

wg.serpmedia.org/

Page 15: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Different Perspectives

Each person is assigned a different role

Identify needs and concerns from each perspective

Re-read, looking for specific text statements and note reactions from that perspective.

Discuss and compose a summary position statement from each perspective.

TRY IT OUT!

Page 16: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Reflections – Quick Write

How are these two scaffolds (argumentation writing graph and different perspectives organizer) useful for building skills in: reading and writing academic language

perspective taking? Might they be useful in your own lesson plan? In your discipline?

Page 17: Building/Supporting  Critical Thinking from  Multiple Perspectives

Homework