2
Recent media and non-government organization (NGO) attention have cast light on how prevalent human trafficking and slavery are around the world. Multinational companies with global supply chains who realize that their own operations may be supporting the practice often struggle to incorporate information and methods into their due diligence programs to tackle the issue. In addition, regulations such as the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act have increased the urgency of establishing sound practices to support public disclosure requirements on the subject. BSI Supply Chain Services and Solutions has responded by developing the BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment. BSI’s expertise and focus on the breadth of supply chain threats – human rights abuses, security threats, and business continuity risks – uniquely positions us to support our clients’ needs in understanding and mitigating such a large-scale and complex issue. BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment Client Global Footprint, Country Risks and Site Locations Cambodia India Pakistan Offices l Retail Sites l l Suppliers l l l Afghanistan Bangladesh Ethiopia Guatemala Iraq Kenya Libya Myanmar Nepal Qatar Turkey Vietnam l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Severe Risk High Risk Elevated Risk This map presents the relative risk of countries in which the client’ operates, either directly or indirectly through its supply chain and business partners, according to the BSI Forced Labour Risk Index. Additional factors are illustrated in subsequent graphics, including the relative level of exposure of the client’s sites/products, and controls that The client employs to manage those risks. The BSI Forced Labour Index is calculated based on the following criteria: Regulatory Environment Consistency and effectiveness of enforcement Scale and frequency of incidence Presence of forced labour within export industries “It is not acceptable for any organisation to say, in the twenty-first century, that they did not know. It is not acceptable for organisations to ignore the issue because it is difficult or complex. And, it is certainly not acceptable for an organisation to put profit above the welfare and well-being of its employees and those working on its behalf.” Theresa May, UK Prime Minister “Organisations can be implicated in modern slavery both directly and indirectly in a variety of ways: in their own operations, through their global supply chains and through their involvement with business partners. Companies also risk employing exploited workers in the construction, maintenance and servicing of their facilities, particularly in cases where those functions are outsourced to third-party suppliers.” Guarded/Low Risk 21M people subjected to forced labour globally High Risk Algeria Argentina Armenia Bolivia Brazil Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cypruss Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Georgia Greece HK Indonesia Iran Jordan Kazakhstan Kingdom of Bahrain Kuwait Kyrgystan Lebanon Malaysia Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Nicaragua Oman Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Romania Saudi Arabia Serbia Sri Lanka Thailand Trinidad Tunisia U.A.E. Ukraine Venezuela Zambia Offices l l l l l Retail Sites l ll lllllllllllllllllllll lll ll llllllllllllll Suppliers l l l l l l l l Andorra Australia Austria Bahamas Belgium Canada Czech Reppublic Denmark France Germany Ireland Israel Italy Japan Korea Latvia Malta Netherlands Portugal Singapore South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan UK Uruguay USA Unknown Offices l l l l l l Retail Sites l llllllllllllllll lllllllll Suppliers l l ll ll lllll

BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment · In addition, regulations such as the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California ... exploited workers in the construction, maintenance and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment · In addition, regulations such as the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California ... exploited workers in the construction, maintenance and

Recent media and non-government organization (NGO) attention have cast light on how prevalent human trafficking

and slavery are around the world. Multinational companies with global supply chains who realize that their own

operations may be supporting the practice often struggle to incorporate information and methods into their due

diligence programs to tackle the issue. In addition, regulations such as the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California

Transparency in Supply Chains Act have increased the urgency of establishing sound practices to support public

disclosure requirements on the subject.

BSI Supply Chain Services and Solutions has responded by developing the BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment.

BSI’s expertise and focus on the breadth of supply chain threats – human rights abuses, security threats, and business

continuity risks – uniquely positions us to support our clients’ needs in understanding and mitigating such a large-scale

and complex issue.

BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment

Client Global Footprint, Country Risks and Site Locations

Cam

bodi

a

Indi

a

Pak

ista

n

Offices l

Retail Sites l l

Suppliers l l l

Afg

hani

stan

Ban

glad

esh

Ethi

opia

Gua

tem

ala

Iraq

Ken

ya

Liby

a

Mya

nmar

Nep

al

Qat

ar

Turk

ey

Vie

tnam

l l

l l l l l l l l l l l

l l l

Severe Risk

High Risk

Elevated Risk

This map presents the relative risk of

countries in which the client’ operates,

either directly or indirectly through

its supply chain and business

partners, according to the BSI Forced

Labour Risk Index. Additional factors

are illustrated in subsequent graphics,

including the relative level of exposure

of the client’s sites/products, and

controls that The client employs

to manage those risks.

The BSI Forced Labour Index is calculated based on the following criteria:

• Regulatory Environment

• Consistency and effectiveness of enforcement

• Scale and frequency of incidence

• Presence of forced labour within export industries

“It is not acceptable for any organisation to say, in the twenty-first century, that they did not know. It is not acceptable for organisations to ignore

the issue because it is difficult or complex. And, it is certainly not acceptable for an organisation to put profit above the welfare and well-being of its

employees and those working on its behalf.”

Theresa May, UK Prime Minister

“Organisations can be implicated in

modern slavery both directly and

indirectly in a variety of ways: in

their own operations, through their

global supply chains and through their

involvement with business partners.

Companies also risk employing

exploited workers in the construction,

maintenance and servicing of their

facilities, particularly in cases where

those functions are outsourced

to third-party suppliers.”

Guarded/Low Risk

21Mpeople subjected to forced labour globally

High Risk

Alg

eria

Arg

entin

a

Arm

enia

Bol

ivia

Bra

zil

Chi

le

Chi

na

Col

ombi

a

Cos

ta R

ica

Cro

atia

Cyp

russ

Dom

inic

an R

epub

lic

Ecua

dor

Egyp

t

Geo

rgia

Gre

ece

HK

Indo

nesi

a

Iran

Jord

an

Kaz

akhs

tan

Kin

gdom

of

Bah

rain

Kuw

ait

Kyrg

ysta

n

Leba

non

Mal

aysi

a

Mex

ico

Mol

dova

Mon

golia

Mor

occo

Nic

arag

ua

Om

an

Pan

ama

Par

agua

y

Per

u

Phi

lippi

nes

Pol

and

Rom

ania

Saud

i Ara

bia

Serb

ia

Sri L

anka

Thai

land

Trin

idad

Tuni

sia

U.A

.E.

Ukr

aine

Vene

zuel

a

Zam

bia

Offices l l l l l

Retail Sites l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Suppliers l l l l l l l l

Ando

rra

Aust

ralia

Aust

ria

Bah

amas

Bel

gium

Can

ada

Cze

ch R

eppu

blic

Den

mar

k

Fran

ce

Ger

man

y

Irela

nd

Isra

el

Italy

Japa

n

Kor

ea

Latv

ia

Mal

ta

Net

herla

nds

Port

ugal

Sing

apor

e

Sout

h Af

rica

Spai

n

Swed

en

Switz

erla

nd

Taiw

an

UK

Uru

guay

USA

Unk

now

n

Offices l l l l l l

Retail Sites l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Suppliers l l l l l l l l l l l

Page 2: BSI Supply Chain Slavery Gap Assessment · In addition, regulations such as the UK Modern Slavery Act and the California ... exploited workers in the construction, maintenance and

Supply Chain Services and SolutionsFor more information visit our website at bsi-supplychain.com or contact us at [email protected]

AMERICAS4150 Drinkwater Boulevard, Ste 160 Scottsdale, AZ 85251Tel: +1 480 421 5099

EUROPE Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, KnowlhillMilton Keynes, United Kingdom MK5 8PPTel: +44 0845 080 9000

ASIA23rd Floor, Cambridge House, Taikoo Place,979 King’s Road, Island East, Hong KongTel: +852 3149 3300

Copyright © 2017 The British Standards Institution. All Rights Reserved.

BSI leverages years of proprietary intelligence and analysis captured in our SCREEN platform, and pairs that with in-depth

analysis of your company’s practices and supply chain by our team of seasoned practitioners to provide objective

feedback, prioritized risks and recommendations by assessing key risk criteria:

• Exposure: The level of vulnerability and visibility the

client is likely to have based on the nature of the

product, material, or worksite

• Environment: This focuses on factors related to the

country in which a workplace operates, including its

legal framework of labor law, enforcement capability

and environment related to freedom of association

and collective bargaining. This is represented by the

BSI Forced Labor Index, which rates countries along a

five-tier scale according to the criteria above, as well

as historical incidence of cited threats.

• Controls: This focuses on the relative strength of

controls employed by our client to identify and

mitigate the risks to which the organization is exposed

within the environments in which the organization

directly or indirectly operates.

The collaborative engagement and subsequent report identifies and prioritizes the relative risks, current controls

employed by the organization, areas of strength, and gaps that represent areas of risk; allowing our clients to:

• Comply with disclosure requirements of the UK

Modern Slavery Act, California Transparency in Supply

Chains Act, and similar current/future regulatory

requirements

• Identify high-risk and/or near-term forced/trafficked

labor threats due to systems gaps that require

immediate action; as well as gaps that require

longer-term improvements to due diligence systems

• Identify opportunities to mitigate risk and drive improvement via improved visibility into organizational business

practices, the supply chain and business partner activity.

Sin

gapo

re

Sou

th A

fric

a

Spa

in

Sri

Lan

ka

Sw

eden

Sw

itze

rlan

d

Taiw

an

Thai

land

Trin

idad

Tuni

sia

Turk

ey

U.A

.E.

UK

Ukr

aine

Unk

now

n

Uru

guay

US

A

Ven

ezue

la

Vie

tnam

Zam

bia

Client’s Regional Offices l l l l l l l

Retail Sites - Client Owned l l l l l l

Franchisees l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Finished Goods l l l l

GNFR Non-Branded l l

GNFR Branded/Packaging l

Materials & Components l l l l l l l l l

Accessories l l l l

4. Client Franchisee Sites

4.1 Policies, Procedures & Process Gap in Controls

Risk Level

4.1.1 Presence of corporate policies regarding forced labor, overtime, hiring, recruitment and use

of staffing agencies and contract labor/service providersMajor l

4.1.2 Contractual language in franchisee agreements regarding forced labor, overtime, hiring,

recruitment and use of staffing agencies and contract labor/service providersMajor l

4.2 Communication & Information Flow4.2.1 Clear and consistent communication of policy requirements, ongoing changes to policies,

for the client’s staffMinor l

4.2.2 Clear and consistent communications of policy requirements, ongoing changes to policies, and

grievance mechanisms to franchisee owners and staffMinor l

4.3 Skills & Training4.3.2 Training provided for managers & staff regarding hiring, workplace rights, forced labor, overtime,

grievance mechanisms and risks related to staffing agencies and contract service providers Major l

4.4 Measurements4.4.1 Internal audit process, or another suitable means of measurement, to assess compliance with

corporate policies related to hiring, forced labor, use of staffing agencies, etc. Major l

4.4.2 Measurements demonstrating effectiveness of grievance mechanism, examples of grievances,

and history of complaint type/closureMinor l

4.5 Governance & Integration 4.5.1 Executive-level visibility and ownership into management systems related to forced labor and

workplace slavery risksMajor l