35
Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class

Banding

25 August 2006

Page 2: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Background

In the past, banding of classes applies only to P5 and P6 to allow for more differentiated teaching and learning approach for pupils with different learning ability.

Last year, class banding was also introduced at P4 to capitalize on the GEP screening and selection test.

Page 3: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Background

With this year’s P2 lot of 30 per class going to P3 next year of 40 per class, some re-arrangement of classes is necessary.

So it is important to have a guideline or policy on how we should re-organise the classes using the banding system..

Page 4: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Rationales for Class Banding

Allow smaller class size for weaker class Identify weaker pupils for early intervention Better deployment of teachers Teacher will be able to pitch it at the appropriate

level and devise different strategies to engage pupils in their learning

Differentiated teaching strategies can be better deployed for more effective engagement of pupils’ learning

Better monitoring and feedback from class

Page 5: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Guiding Principles Equal coverage of curriculum for all – matter of

pace Equal learning opportunities for all in the areas

of enrichment programmes Allow some flexibilities within structure if it

benefits pupils as a class (± 1 class)

Page 6: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Considerations taken in the Approach to Class Banding

For P5 and P6, based on all the 4 core subjects Equal weighting at PSLE on all 4 core subjects Sample Analysis on last year P2/3 exam results Same Principle applies - Equal Emphasis on all

core (eg BiCEP criteria) as fundamental Minimise subjectivity Bigger class size for academically stronger

pupils and smaller class size for weaker pupils Stability in class (if possible) – EMSS for P3/4

Page 7: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Sample study on 2005 P2 results

To test the hypothesis: Pupils who are good in Math are generally good in all the other subjects (namely EL and CL) and vice versa

Method: Using 2005 P2 results on EL, CL and Maths Rank all pupils based on the overall marks of EL,

CL and Maths Assign classes by placing top 40 in class A, next

40 in class B etc Now rank all pupils based on Maths result alone. Assign classes by placing top 40 in class A, next

40 in class B etc

Page 8: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Sample study on 2005 P2 results

For each pupil, compare if there is any difference in the class assigned based on 2 different rankings. Difference could be 0, 1, 2, 3 or even 4

For eg a difference of 2 could mean: based on overall, the child is in class C but based on Math, the child could be in class A or E.

Using overall mark ranking as ‘base-class’, find out the % of pupils with difference of 0, 1, 2 etc.

Result of the finding is shown in the next slide

Page 9: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Sample Analysis – P2 result 2005

Class Banding by Overall vs Maths

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

A B C D E F G H I J

Class

Nu

mb

er

5

4

3

2

1

0

Page 10: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Sample study on 2005 P2 results

Result shows a high correlation for both ends (ie strong and weak academic classes)

Pupils who are strong in Maths are also strong in all other subjects and pupils who are weak in Maths are also weak in the other subjects.

Page 11: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Class Banding at P3/4 Based on final results in P2/3

P2 – EL, Math & CL P3 – EL, Math, CL & Sc

For P3 (depending on pupil performance) 2 to 4 ‘strong’ classes of 42 pupils 2 ‘weak’ classes of 30 pupils 4 to 6 classes of mixed in between

For P4 (depending on pupil performance) 2 to 4 ‘strong’ classes of 42 pupils 2 ‘weak’ classes of 25 pupils 4 to 6 classes of mixed in between 1 class of BiCEP (20 to 25 pupils)

Page 12: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Will there be differentiation between those weak in various subjects? Eg good at EL & Maths but weak in CL or good at Maths & CL but weak in EL?

A: At P3/4, not advisable to have many different teachers teaching different subjects. Stability is important especially when comes to class management.

Page 13: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Will there be different curriculum for different bands?

A: No. All classes will be taught the same curriculum and cover the same syllabus. The only difference is the pace, teaching strategies and work. The key here is to engage pupils with different ability differently.

Page 14: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: More able pupils – faster pace? How the school intend to monitor and address this concern?

A: It is not about faster pace but maybe more challenging task and learning to stretch the able pupils so that they are engaged and not bored. At the end, the objective here is to maximise all pupils’ potential whether they are from weak or strong academic group. The school formal assessment will be the yardstick in our monitoring system

Page 15: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: During June’s briefing, it was mentioned that banding for P2 will be based on Maths grade only. Why is there a sudden change in criterion?

A: As explained in earlier slides

Q: How many bands are there?A: Broadly speaking, only 3 – strong, weak and

middle.

Page 16: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Are better band classes with 40 pupils and weaker band classes with 30 pupils?

A: See earlier slides. For P4, we hope to have 25 pupils for weaker band classes.

Q: Can pupils switch from one band to another within the year?

A: No, as the class number will have been filled. Not beneficial to pupils to change class in the middle of year.

Page 17: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Are better teachers assigned to better classes?A: With banding and good knowledge of the class,

all teachers will be able to engage pupils better with more focused strategies. This will make all teachers better teachers.

Q: How many weak classes and strong classes are there?

A: Estimate 2 weak classes; 2 to 4 strong classes.

Page 18: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Should give diff weighting for CL and the other subjects. Why is CL mark taken into consideration for banding purpose?

Q: Won’t banding based on all core subjects disadvantage pupils weak in CL?

A: As explained in earlier slides that, for Tao Nan, we should focus on all core subjects. This is esp so if we want to promote strong bilingual and bicultural among our pupils.

Page 19: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Will banding be based on SA results or the continuous assessment of whole year performance, including teacher assessment?

A: Yes, banding will be based on SA results only. Teachers’ input will be sought during the level meeting at the end of the year to identify special cases for special arrangement if it benefit the child concerned.

Page 20: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: Is banding the same as ‘streaming’?A: No. Streaming here refer to pupils are placed in

different class because they are doing different subject combinations.

Q: Will there be sufficient buses for the morning session’?

A: Yes there will be. With P3 to P6 in the morning session, there is only a slight increase of pupil population.

Page 21: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A

Q: How to motivate children?A: …..

Page 22: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Bicultural Chinese Elective Programme

(BiCEP)双文化华文优选课程

Page 23: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

开办目的 培养一群精通双语、掌握华文听说培养一群精通双语、掌握华文听说读写四大技能,并了解华族历史文读写四大技能,并了解华族历史文化的小学生。化的小学生。

提升本地小学生的华文文化水平。提升本地小学生的华文文化水平。 在小学开办双文化课程,将来与中在小学开办双文化课程,将来与中学及高中的双文化课程接轨,形成学及高中的双文化课程接轨,形成一个完整的体系。一个完整的体系。

Page 24: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

参与学生 参与学生 从从 20072007 年开始,福建会馆属下五间年开始,福建会馆属下五间小学将同时开办这项课程。第一年将小学将同时开办这项课程。第一年将从四年级开始,每班从四年级开始,每班 2525名学生左右。名学生左右。

道南将为主流与高才四年级各开一班,道南将为主流与高才四年级各开一班,每班每班 2525名学生左右名学生左右

Page 25: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

课程内容 教育部所规定的核心及深广课程。教育部所规定的核心及深广课程。 专为这项课程设计的四项内容:专为这项课程设计的四项内容:

中华文化中华文化 儿童文学赏析与创作儿童文学赏析与创作 语言训练语言训练 中英双语对比中英双语对比

国内外浸濡活动国内外浸濡活动 以华语教导其它非核心科目如:小组作业、美以华语教导其它非核心科目如:小组作业、美术、音乐、体育等。术、音乐、体育等。

Page 26: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

课程内容安排四个单元在三年课程计划里的分布概况:每个课时为 2 小时

单元单元 // 年级年级四年级四年级 五年级五年级 六年级六年级 总课时总课时

中华文化中华文化 1111 1010 88 2929

儿童文学赏析与创作儿童文学赏析与创作 88 88 44 2020

语言训练语言训练 66 66 00 1212

中英双语对比中英双语对比 55 66 44 1515

小结小结 3030 3030 1616 7676

Page 27: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

考查方式 学习成品展学习成品展 小组作业小组作业 学习进展记录学习进展记录

Page 28: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

国内外浸濡活动 国内浸濡活动在四年级的年中假期时国内浸濡活动在四年级的年中假期时进行,这个进行,这个 55 天天 44 夜的学习营将由福夜的学习营将由福建会馆文化艺术团负责。建会馆文化艺术团负责。

假期国外浸濡活动则计划在五年级的假期国外浸濡活动则计划在五年级的年中假期进行。六年级由于要举行成年中假期进行。六年级由于要举行成品展,又要准备小六离校考试,因此品展,又要准备小六离校考试,因此没有浸濡活动。没有浸濡活动。

Page 29: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

师资与教材 由校长委派华文教师参与试教与编写由校长委派华文教师参与试教与编写教材的工作。至于教材则由福建会馆教材的工作。至于教材则由福建会馆属下五间小学参与这项课程的老师共属下五间小学参与这项课程的老师共同编撰,并将所有教材上载在南侨小同编撰,并将所有教材上载在南侨小学的网络平台上,供所有授课老师分学的网络平台上,供所有授课老师分享及使用。享及使用。

Page 30: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

学生遴选标准 从从 20062006 年开始,学校每年将从现有年开始,学校每年将从现有的小三学生中遴选出一批在课业上表的小三学生中遴选出一批在课业上表现优异,又对这项课程有兴趣的学生现优异,又对这项课程有兴趣的学生参加。为达到更好的教学效果,班级参加。为达到更好的教学效果,班级人数将维持在人数将维持在 2020 至至 2525人之间。人之间。

Page 31: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

进行时间表

20072007 年年 小四开始实行这项课程。小四开始实行这项课程。 小五将以深广课程的形式进行两个学小五将以深广课程的形式进行两个学段。段。

Page 32: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A - BiCEP

Q: Can a pupil be attending both BiCEP and GEP or BiCEP and ordinary programme at the same time?

A: 1 class of BiCEP will be selected from P4 mainstream pupils; another class will come from pupils in the GEP. Where possible, there will be opportunities for these 2 BiCEP classes to interact and learn together.

Page 33: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A - BiCEP

Q: What are the criteria to be in the BiCEPA: Pupils who obtained band 1 in all the 4

core subjects (ue EL, CL, Maths & Sc) at the end P3 will be considered first.

There will be 2 rounds of selection assessment to assess their language ability in both EL and CL:

1) A short written test (CL)2) Interview (EL & CL)

Page 34: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A - BiCEP

Q: Can pupils subsequently opt to go back to the normal programme?

A: Yes. However, we would require parents to write in and provide reasons for withdrawal. The school will provide the necessary assistance to help the child to go back to the normal programme.

Page 35: Briefing for P2/3 Parents on Class Banding 25 August 2006

Q & A - BiCEP

Q: Will there be follow-up programme in secondary level – what are the options available?

A: At secondary level, IP schools like Dunman High, Hwa Chong family of schools and Rivervalley High are offering Bicultural Studies.

We will explore possible collaboration and tie up with the schools in the near future.