Briefed by: [insert briefer’s name here] [insert briefer’s organization code here]

[insert briefing type here][insert program name here]

for[insert name and organization of

person(s) to be briefed here]

[insert “month day, year” of brief here]

Briefed by:[insert briefer’s name here]

[insert briefer’s organization code here]

[insert briefer’s phone number here]

[Insert briefer’s e-mail address here]

Insert program logo in this area

Distribution Statement

Insert program

logo herePurpose of Briefing

Insert program

logo hereExit Criteria

Insert program

logo hereBriefing Outline

Insert program

logo hereConcept/Requirement

Insert program

logo here

[insert program name]Program Overview

DATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YYYY

PM / Sponsor Cost Schedule PerformanceProgrammaticCompliance

Logistics Overall

Contact Info hereContact Info here

Description:Program Start Date: MM / YY[Insert program description here]

Issues:[Insert significant program issues here]

Key Performance ParametersKPP Objective Threshold DemoOP Avail .90 .90 .98S/W Reliability 200 hrs 200 hrs 1000 hrsS/W Mean 5 sec 5 sec 3.2 secxxxx x x x

Acquisition ObjectivesQuantity 650IOC 12 / 99Target Price (unit) $Various$M (FY XX) $610.12

Contractor DataContractor Litton DSDValue / Type $NA / GSAStart / Complete APR97 / APR03

Contractor XXXValue / Type $XX / XXXStart / Complete XXX / XXX

Cost Data ($ in M)*Cost Objective Threshold Current Est.R&D 0 0 0Proc 300.3 300.3 380O&S 250.5 250.5 276.1xxxx x x x

* Values from last approved APB

(IT) ACAT Level:MDA:

XXXXXX

Budget Source:

SCHEDULEFY by QuartersMilestones

TestingDevelopmentProductionInstallation

R&D / Studies

FY 00I II III IV

FY 01I II III IV

FY 02I II III IV

FY 03I II III IV

FY 04I II III IV

FY 05I II III IV

FY 06I II III IV

FY 07I II III IV

201

CDR

3 3

SVR

MS IIIDMS-IIB&C

FOT&E

LRIP

OPEVAL

BUDGET ($M)RDT&EProcurement

TOTALOM&N

$5.0

$17.5$2.0

$7

$20$3

FY 02

$8.5

$23$4.5

FY 03

$8

$23.5$5.5

FY 04

$7

$11$4

FY 05

$4

$9$5

FY 06

$0

$3$3

FY 07

$0

$3$3

FY 01FY 00$10.5 $10 $10 $10 $0$0 $0 $0

145

Total Program Cost*$20

$27.5$25

$72.5

*Note: Total Program Cost shown is FY 02 through FY 07

5

Insert program

logo here

Program Assessment Indicators/Program Manager’s Assessment (indicate Green/Yellow/Red, Program managers comments, an assessment based on current funding profile and current approved Acquisition Program Baseline)

Program Assessment Indicators

Performance Characteristics Green Schedule Green

Test & Evaluation Green Contracts Green

Logistics Reqts & Readiness Obj Green Production Green

Cost Green Management Structure Green

Funding Green Interoperability Green

Managers’ Assessment (for each Assessment Indicator rated Green Advisory, Yellow, Yellow Advisory, or Red).

PM:

PEO:

Program Assessment

Insert program

logo here

Program OverviewComponent Illustration

Insert program

logo here

Program OverviewCapability Enabler

Insert program

logo here

Deployed/MobileUnits

BASE

IMAFISC

PierConnections

CLINIC

TRNG CENHQ

TELEPORT/STEPLong Haul (DISN & Commercial)

TRAININGCENTER

USN/USMCLOGISTIC BASE

NAVALAMPHIBIOUS

BASE

NOC

BASE

MC AIRSTATION

End-to-End Connectivity

NMCI atthe Pier

10

Development StrategyEnd-to-End Capability

Insert program

logo hereInteroperability & Supportability

Net Ready

Insert program

logo hereProgram Schedule

Insert program

logo here

Program OverviewRecent Accomplishments

Insert program

logo here

Program OverviewSignificant Challenges

Insert program

logo hereProgram Information Status

R Required at this time, but does not exist B Requires development or updating w/in 12 months

O Required at this time and under development/update G Current, with all required approvals

Y In approval cycle. Expected Date in Comments NR Not required. Rationale in Comments

Program Information Status Date CommentsMission Need Statement/Initial Capabilities Document NR * DMS MROC 3-88 was 1988 equivalent to MNS for AIS program.Acquisition Decision Memorandum G Jul 02 * MS III for DMS Release 3.0 (MDA: ASD C3I)Acquisition Coordination Team (ACT) NR Documentation accomplished by DISA -- ACT requirement for Navy ACATAnalysis of Alternatives G May 02 * Joint AoA updated for DMS 3.0 Gold MS IIITechnology Development Strategy (TDS) O * DISA action to include in next update to Acquisition StrategyACAT Designation Letter NR * Designated Joint ACAT I by OSD listing, pre-1990 (no letter available)ORD/Capabilities Development Document G Aug 01 * DMS MROC 3-88 Ch 2 (Oct 97), revalidated by JROCCAIV Objectives NR CAIV requirements not invoked by MDA (ASD C3I)Risk Assessment G Jun 02 * Included in Acquisition Strategy and CARDProgram Envornmental Safety & Health Evaluation (PESHE) G Jun 02 * Requirement met in Acquisition Strategy documentLife Cycle Cost Estimate/Economic Analysis G Jun 02 * Navy LCCE included in Joint LCCE as part of Joint EA for DMS 3.0Affordability Assessment G Jun 02 * Part of Joint Economic AnalysisAcquisition Strategy G Jun 02 * Joint AS updated for DMS 3.0 Gold MS IIIAcquisition Program Baseline G Jun 02 * DISA APB with ASD(C3I)Information Support Plan (ISP) G Jun 02 * Joint C4ISP developed for DMS 3.0 Gold MS III and CCA complianceClinger-Cohen Compliance G Jun 02 * Confirmed by DoD CIO and ASD(C3I) in MS III ADM for DMS 3. 0 GoldTest & Evaluation Master Plan G Mar 05 * Capstone TEMP updated for upcoming DMS 3.1 OAInteroperability Certification B Oct 02 * (Part of DMS 3.0 Gold OT) DMS 3.1 Interop Cert projected Jul 05Information Security Certification and Accreditation B Mar 05 * (DMS 3.0 Gold ATO Feb 04) DMS 3.1 IATO (ATO projected Sep 05)Program Protection Plan NR Not a Navy ACAT, PPP letter not required though (FYI, no CPIs)Logistics Assessment Certification G Feb 99 Navy DMS program ILA conducted by SPAWAR 04 (Nov 98)Operational Test & Readiness Review B Apr 02 * (DMS 3.0 Gold OT) DMS 3.1 OARR scheduled May 05Test Results (DT&E/OT&E/FOT&E) B Jul 02 * (DMS 3.0 Gold OT) DMS 3.1 OA to be conducted May 05Capability Production Document G Jun 02 *Fulfilled by Joint Performance Measures Assessment, MS C ProgramLow Rate Initial Prod (LRIP) Decision G Oct 97 * MAISRC ADM for DMS 1.0Post-Deployment Performance Review G Feb 05 * DMS Post Implementation Review (PIR) Final ReportInitial Operational Capability G Jul 98 Navy DMS IOC -- NCTAMS EURCENT Area Control Center (ACC)

* Joint program document prepared by DISA or ASD(C3I)

Insert program

logo hereClinger Cohen Compliance

• Address the certification (ACAT IAC/IAM) or confirmation (ACAT ID/IC/II/III/IV) status and issues.– Add the following statement “Receipt of CCA

Confirmation/Compliance from PEO C4I and Space CIO (enter date (mm/dd/yy))”.

• State whether or not this system has been registered in the DoN CIO database.

• Discuss the Information Assurance Strategy.

Insert program

logo hereAnalysis of Alternatives

KPP ALT 1 ALT 2 ALT 3 ALT 4

KPP 1

KPP 2

KPP 3

KPP 4

LCC ($TYM)Then Year Millions

$ $ $ $

Insert program

logo here

Acquisition Strategy (Requirements and Approach)

• Source Documents:

• Approach: Single Step or Evolutionary

Insert program

logo here

Acquisition Strategy (Program Structure)

Concept Decision

Milestone A

RFP Development

Milestone B

Contract Award

Development Test/OA

Milestone C/LRIP Decision

Operational Test

IOC

FRP Decision

FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

Insert program

logo here

Acquisition Strategy (Business Approach)

Current ContractsProgram Product or Service Total Contract ValueCompeted Contract Type Period of Performance Approved AP

Y or N FFP 10/1/03 - 9/30/04 Y or N

New Procurement Actions• Proposed [name of effort] Contract

– Competitive or Sole Source (if sole source provide justification– Contract Type:– Estimated contract value: – Period of Performance:– Acquisition Objectives:– Estimated Contract Award:– Status of Acquisition Plan:

Insert program

logo hereAcquisition Strategy (Competition)

Insert program

logo hereContracting Strategy

Insert program

logo here

Contractor Name, Contract Number, Contract Type, Short Contract Title

Contract Metrics and Performance Projections

YSolvency (Provide

comments in notes page)

PEO and Program Manager/PMS-XXX, Program Acronym, ACAT XX, Date Reported

Microsoft Excel Worksheet

Cost Schedule Variance Trends

($30,000)

($25,000)

($20,000)

($15,000)

($10,000)

($5,000)

$0

$5,000

J-98

J-98

A-98

S-98

O-98

N-98

D-98

J-99

F-99

M-99

A-99

M-99

J-99

J-99

A-99

S-99

O-99

N-99

D-99

J-00

F-00

M-00

A-00

M-00

J-00

J-00

A-00

S-00

O-00

N-00

D-00

Do

lla

rs i

n T

ho

us

an

ds

Cost Variance ($1,460) Sched Variance ($809) Mgmt Reserve $1,968 10% Thresholds PM VAC ($24,000) CONTR VAC ($22,500)

START

COMPLETE

Insert program

logo here

BudgetPEO C4I and Space

Programmed (% Obligated)

Note: All amounts in $M

Source: FY2004 DoN President’s Budget January 2003.

Y Solvency

Insert program

logo here

Budget(By Functional Area)

Programmed (% Obligated)

Note: All amounts in $M

Source: FY2004 DoN President’s Budget January 2003.

Y Solvency

INVENTORY OBJECTIVE: _____________

Insert program

logo here

Cost as an Independent Variable(CAIV)

Insert program

logo here

Testing Strategy

Insert program

logo hereTesting BudgetProgrammed (% Obligated)

Insert program

logo here

Developmental Testing &Evaluation (DT&E) Results

Insert program

logo here

Proposed DT&E Corrective Actions

Insert program

logo hereT&E Exceptions

• Waivers

• Deferrals

Insert program

logo here

Software MaturityS/W Trouble Reports (STRs)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

- 360Days

- 270Days

- 180Days

- 90Days

- 45Days

Present

PRI 1's

PRI 2's

PRI 3's

PRI 4's

Others

S/W BuildVersion x.xx

# of STRs

Insert program

logo hereEducation & Training Efforts

Insert program

logo hereLimitations to the Scope of Testing

Insert program

logo hereTesting Waivers

Insert program

logo here

Bullets on projections for the contract completion plan (use additional slide for comments if necessary). For example:• Company is consolidating two facilities into one and reducing unnecessary redundancy, which is anticipated to

improve cost and schedule efficiency by about 5%.• Government is accelerating GFE delivery, which better supports the contractor’s performance measurement baseline

and is intended to reduce the cost variance at completion and time to complete.

Contractor Name, Contract Number, Contract Type, Short Contract Title

Contract Metrics and Performance Projections

YSolvency (Provide

comments in notes page)

Provide notations of CPI/SPI as of the current (or latest available) month of the briefing and for the previous 3 months and show the dates. If the contractor is in an OTB, the the CPI/SPI should reflect performance since the new baseline.Also, note in this chart the TAB and cumulative BCWP, ACWP, and BCWS since beginning of contract and since the most recent rebaselining (if any) of the contract.

CPI SPI (Cum Since Rebaselining to OTB)Dec 01 0.842 0.873Jan 02 0.840 0.870Feb 02 0.835 0.880Mar 02 0.835 0.890

PEO and Program Manager/PMS-XXX, Program Acronym, ACAT XX, Date Reported

Amount of overrunbuilt into the new contract baseline, if in OTB

New Contract Baseline

If EVM is not reported, PMs will still provide the rest of the information required on this slide, including contract start and completion dates.

Insert program

logo hereCPARS/IPARS/Award Fee MatrixContractor PM Name/Gov’t PM Name Date of Review: ddmmmyy

Contractor:

Program:

Contract Number:

Item: (CPAR, IPAR or AF) AF CPAR AF AF IPAR CPAR IPAR AF IPAR IPAR IPAR CPAR IPAR

Period Ending: (Mmm YY) Jan 02 Apr 02 Jul 02 Jan 03 Mar 03 Apr 03 Jun 03 Jul 03 Sep 03 Dec 03 Mar 04 Apr 04 Jun 04

Months Covered: (NR) 6 12 6 6 3 12 3 6 3 3 3 12 3

Areas to Evaluate

a. Technical (Quality of Product) EXC EXC EXC EXC

(1) Product Performance VG VG VG VG

(2) Systems Engineering SAT SAT SAT SAT

(3) Software Engineering MARG MARG MARG MARG

(4) Logistics Support/Sustainment UNSAT UNSAT UNSAT UNSAT

(5) Product Assurance EXC EXC EXC EXC

(6) Other Technical Performance EXC EXC EXC EXC

b. Schedule SAT SAT SAT SAT

c. Cost Control MARG MARG MARG MARG

d. Management UNSAT UNSAT UNSAT UNSAT

(1) Management Responsiveness EXC EXC EXC EXC

(2) SubContract Management VG VG VG VG

(3) Program Mgmt and Other Mgmt SAT SAT SAT SAT

e. Other Areas MARG MARG MARG MARG

(1) Communications EXC EXC EXC EXC

(2) Support to Government Tests EXC EXC EXC EXC

Award Fee Percentage: 85% 70% 90% 84%

N00000-00-C-0000

Contract Start Date:

Estimated Completion Date:

MMM YY

MMM YY

((Contractor Name))

((Program Name))

Insert program

logo here

e

LIK

EL

IHO

OD

e

d

c

b

a

CONSEQUENCEdcba

HighMedium

Low Medium

Risk Advisory Board:[Mr. X, PMA xxx][Ms. Y, XYZ Corp][Ms. Z, DASN YY]

• •

•

• A brief description of Issue # 4 and rationale for its rating.

• Approach to remedy/mitigation


• Approach to remedy/mitigation• A brief description of Issue # 3 and rationale for its rating.




















•

• •

Acronyms:[IMA= Intermediate Maintenance Activity]

Program Risk Assessment

Acrobat Document

Insert program

logo hereLife-Cycle Support

Insert program

logo hereLife-Cycle Support

Insert program

logo hereLogistics Risk Assessment

e

LIK

EL

IHO

OD

e

d

c

b

a

CONSEQUENCEdcba

HighMedium

Low Medium

: Overall Assessment1: Training2: Support Equipment3: Publications4: Facilities5: Maintenance Concept6: Supply Support7: MTBF

Logistics Areas Logistics Areas (examples)4

1

2

6

5

3

7

RISK # 4

Brief description of Issue and rationale for its rating.

Approach to remedy/mitigation.

Risk mitigation funding.

RISK # 5




RISK # 6




Acrobat Document

Insert program

logo here

[Combat capability]

Threshold Objective

[C4I Interoperability, (Strategic, Theater, Force Coord.)]

[Endurance]

[Cost]

[Manning]

[Sustained Speed]

KPP “Sliding Diamond” ORD Compliance Status

Insert program

logo hereManning and Qualification

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Jun 03 Sep 03 Dec 03 Mar 04 Jun 04 Sep 04 Dec 04 Mar 05

MIL Billet Unfilled

MIL Not Certified

MIL Fully Certified

MIL No DAWIARequiredCIV Billet Unfilled

CIV Not Certified

CIV Fully Certified

CIV No DAWIARequired

MIL

CIV

MIL

CIV

GOALGOAL

GOALGOAL

Insert program

logo here

Add Title Appn/Add Status/Actions TakenCommittee(s)/ Member(s)

Hokum Processor RDT&E/$ 5M HAC/SmythOSD Hold / Release Requested

Outyear Impact

Program accelerated-$5M in FY XX likely

FYXX Congressional Adds

Insert program

logo hereKey Issues

No further action required

Significant interest outside Program

Cannot be solved within the Program

Legend

Issue Due Date Response Status

Insert program

logo hereOther Decision Factors

Insert program

logo here

Desired Capability(Requirements)

• Summary description of the requirements• Source Documents:

– Examples: • MNS/ICD• ORD/CDD • ADMs – what decisions have been made and when

• Identify the approach the program will use to achieve full capability: an evolutionary approach or a single step approach

Insert program

logo here

Acquisition Coordination Team(ACT)

• The following (Program Name) ACT members have been briefed on the program status and concur with the fielding of (Program Name).

Functional Area Name OrganizationProgram Manager Acquisition PM Project Engineer Resource Sponsor Requirements Sponsor Contracts Legal Operational Test Coord./Director (OTC/OTD) PEO Acquisition Management Lois Harper PEO C4IPEO T&E John Hartford PEO C4IPEO Installation Susan Senese PEO C4IPEO Logistics CAPT Pete Bauman PEO C4IPEO Business Financial Manager (BFM) Susie Drew/Program BFM PEO C4I

Cost Analysis Mourad Yacoub SPAWAR 01-6Command Information Officer Scott Saunders SPAWAR 08

Counterintelligence Kurt Fabrizio SPAWAR 00-NCIS

Environmental Safety and Health Jerry Olen SPAWAR/NFESC

System Security/Information Assurance Dave Crotty PMW 161

Spectrum Management Mike Stewart SPAWAR 05Interoperability Certification Kevin Wu SPAWAR 05Information Support CDR Leon Stone SPAWAR 05Manpower Analysis Human Systems Integration Joe Berkely SPAWAR 05

Insert program

logo hereMajor Program Review

Readiness Sheet

Insert program

logo herePEO C4I and Space

Major Review Checklist

Insert program

logo here

PEO C4I and Space Major Review Checklist

Insert program

logo herePEO C4I and Space

Major Review Checklist

Insert program

logo here

PEO C4I and Space Major Review Checklist

Insert program

logo here

Program Manger’sOTRR Checklist

Navy Criteria for Certification: The following criteria for certification of readiness applies to all OT&E for all Navy Programs (EOA, OA, IOT&E, FOT&E). The program manager with the concurrence of the OTA, may tailor criteria listed below ( with the exception of item #1). The MDA may add criteria as necessary to determine the readiness for OT.

Yes No N/A Approval

Date

1. The TEMP is current and approved. OT prior to Milestone B shall have

an approved T&E Strategy (TES).

2. DT&E results indicate DT objectives and performance thresholds

identified in the TEMP have been satisfied for the ORD/CDD/CPD, as

appropriate.

a. If no, are they projected to be at system maturity, and do the results

indicate that the system will perform successfully in OT&E?

b. In addition, will they meet the criteria for approval at the next program

decision milestone (e.g., full rate production on completion of

IOT&E)?

3. All significant areas of risk have been identified and corrected, or

mitigation pans are in place.

4. DT&E data and reports have been provided to the OTA not less than

30 days prior to the commencement of OT, unless otherwise agreed to

by the OTA.

5. Entrance criteria for OT identified in the TEMP have been satisfied.

Insert program

logo here

Program Manger’sOTRR Checklist (con’t)


Yes No N/A Approval

Date

6. System operating, maintenance, and training documents have been

provided to the OTA 30 days prior to the OTRR, unless otherwise

agreed to by the OTA.

7. Logistic support, including spares, repair parts, and support/ground

support equipment is available as documented.

a. Is there any logistics support which will be used during OT&E, but will

not be used with the system when fielded (e.g., contractor provided

depot level maintenance)?

8. The OT&E manning of the system is adequate in numbers, rates,

ratings, and experience level to simulate normal operating conditions.

9. Training has been completed and is representative of that planned for

fleet units.

10. All resources required to execute OT including instrumentation,

simulators, targets, and expendables have been identified and are

available.

11. Models, simulators, and targets have been accredited for intended

use.

Insert program

logo here



Yes No N/A Approval

Date

12. The system provided for OT&E, including software, is production

representative. Differences between the system provided for test and

production configuration shall be addressed at the OTRR.

13. Threat information (e.g., threat system characteristics and

performance, electronic countermeasures, force levels, scenarios, and

tactics), to include security classification, required for OT&E is

available to satisfy OTA test planning.

14. The system is safe to use as planned in the concept of employment.

Any restrictions to safe employment are stated.

a. The environmental, safety, and occupational health (ESOH) program

requirements have been satisfied.

b. The system complies with Navy/Marine Corps environmental, safety,

and occupational health/hazardous waste requirements, where

applicable.

c. Environmental, safety, and occupational health/hazardous waste

reviews and reports have been provided to the OTA.

Insert program

logo here



Yes No N/A Approval

Date

15. All software is sufficiently mature and stable for fleet introduction.

a. All software Trouble Reports are documented with appropriate impact

analyses. There are no outstanding Trouble Reports that:

1) Prevent the accomplishment of an essential capability.

2) Jeopardize safety, security, or other requirement designated "critical“.

3) Adversely affect the accomplishment of an essential capability and no

work-around solution is known, or

4) Adversely affect technical, cost, or schedule risks to the project or to

life-cycle support of the system, and no work-around solution is

known.

16. For software qualification testing (SQT), a Statement of Functionality

that describes the software capability has been provided to the OTA

and CNO (N091).

Insert program

logo here



Yes No N/A Approval

Date

17. For programs with interoperability requirements (e.g., NR-KPP

ORD/CDD/CPD), appropriate authority has approved the ISP.

a. JITC concurs that program interoperability demonstrated in

development has progressed sufficiently for the phase of OT to be

conducted.

18. Approval of spectrum certification compliance and spectrum

supportability has been obtained.

19. For IT systems, including NSS, the system has been assigned a MAC

and Confidentiality Level.

a. System certification accreditation documents, including the SSAA and

the Authority to Operate (ATO) or Interim Authority to Operate (IATO),

has been provided to the OTA.

20. Other(s)…

Insert program

logo here



Yes No N/A Approval

Date

21. For aircraft programs, there are no unresolved NAVAIRSYSCOM

deficiencies that affect:

a. Airworthiness

b. Capability to accomplish the primary or secondary mission(s)

c. Safety of the aircrew/operator/maintainer

d. Integrity of the system or an essential subsystem

e. Effectiveness of the operator as an essential subsystem

Insert program

logo hereRecommendations