Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID

Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID

Michelle [email protected]

Kim [email protected]

PJ Settlement Goals

Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers)

Reduction in the disparate identification of students by LEA, race, ethnicity, gender

Increase in the mean and median % of the school day spent with nondisabled peers

PJ Settlement Goals

Increase in the % of students who attend their “home school” (school they would otherwise attend if not disabled)

Increase in the % of students who participate in school-sponsored extracurricular activities with nondisabled students

Goal #1

An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who are placed in regular classes, as measured by the federal

definition (i.e. 80% or more of the school day with non-disabled

students).

Goal #3

An increase in the mean and median percent of the school day that students with mental retardation or intellectual disability spend with non-disabled

students. (TWNDP)

Education Location of Students With ID

RESC2.4%

Hospital/ Homebound

0.0%Parochial or Private Non-Special Education

0.0%

Private Special Education

2.0%

Group Home/Shelter

0.0%

Quasi-Public0.0%

Out of State0.0%

Other Agency0.8%

Local School District93.7%

Other Public School Districts

1.2%

2001-2002 School Year Data

Education Location of Students With ID

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Bridgeport 93.6% 1.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%

Connecticut

Local School

Other Public

RESCParochial or Private

Quasi-Public

Private Special

Group Home/

Other Agency

Hospital/ Home-

Out of State


Average Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-

Disabled

24.5%

41.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

Bridgeport Connecticut


Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-

Disabled

72.2%

26.6%

1.2%

79%-100% (Regular Classroom)

40%-79% (Resource Room)

0%-40% (Separate Special Education)



Disabled

1.2%

26.6%

72.2%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%


79-100% (Regular Classroom)40-79% (Resource Room)0-40% (Separate Sp. Ed. Classroom)



Disabled

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

90.01

-100

%

80.01

-90%

70.01

-80%

60.01

-70%

50.01

-60%

40.01

-50%

30.01

-40%

20.01

-30%

10.01

-20%

0-10

%



Disabled

0.0%

16.3%

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%

10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%

100% Time with Non-DisabledPeers

0% Time with Non-DisabledPeers



Goal #2

A reduction in the disparate identification of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability by

LEA, by racial group, by ethnic group or by gender group.

Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Gender

43.3%

56.7%

42.3%

57.7%

43.5%

56.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Female Male

Bridgeport ERG I State


Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group

Other0.0%

Native American

0.0%Asian

American1.6%

White14.3%

Black46.8%

Hispanic37.3%



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Students with ID 0.0% 1.6% 46.8% 37.3% 14.3% 0.0%

All students withdisabilities

0.0% 0.1% 43.3% 44.3% 11.2% 0.2%

Total school population 0.2% 3.4% 43.1% 42.5% 10.8% ---

Native America

Asian America

Black Hispanic White Other



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

Bridgeport 0.0% 1.6% 46.8% 37.3% 14.3% 0.0%

Connecticut 0.4% 1.3% 28.5% 21.3% 48.2% 0.4%

Native American

Asian American

Black Hispanic White Other


Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency

Proficient91.7%

Non-Proficient

7.1%

Proficiency Unknown

1.2%



0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Bridgeport 91.7% 7.1% 1.2%

All students withdisabilities

90.5% 6.7% 2.8%

Total school population 39.4%

ProficientNon-

ProficientProficiency Unknown

Students with non-English



0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Bridgeport 91.7% 7.1% 1.2%

Connecticut

Proficient Non-Proficient Proficiency Unknown


Goal #4

An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who attend the school they would attend if not disabled (“home

school”).

Goal #5

An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who participate in school-

sponsored extracurricular activities with non-disabled students.

Other Data

Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Total Enrollment

1.1%

1.4%

0.7%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1.2%

1.4%

1.6%

% of Students with ID



Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Special

Education

9.7% 9.3%

5.3%

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%

% of Students with ID



Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education

Deceased0.0%

Reached Maximuun Age

0.0%

Moved-Contiunued Education

35.8%

Moved-Unknown if Contiunued Education

26.4%

Returned to Regular

Education3.8%

Dropped Out0.0%

Graduating with Certificate of Completion

11.3%

Graduating with Diploma22.6%



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

Students with ID 22.6% 11.3% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 35.8% 26.4%

All students with disabilities 11.4% 1.9% 2.2% 17.1% 0.2% 1.7% 40.4% 25.1%

Graduating with

Diploma

Graduating with

Certificate

Dropped Out

Returned to Regular

EducationDeceased

Reached Maximuun

Age

Moved-Contiunued Education

Moved-Unknown if Contiunued



22.6%

11.3%

0.0%3.8%

0.0% 0.0%

35.8%

26.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

Graduatingwith Diploma

Graduatingwith

Certificate ofCompletion

Dropped Out Returned toRegular

Education

Deceased ReachedMaximuun

Age

Moved-ContiunuedEducation

Moved-Unknown ifContiunuedEducation


Staffing Ratios Per 1,000 School District Students

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

Bridgeport 7.70 0.50 1.20 1.10 1.40 2.00 4.80

ERG I 10.47 1.49 1.76 1.18 1.76 1.73 10.97

State 8.77 1.53 1.91 1.42 1.12 2.23 11.64

Sp. Ed. Teachers

Speech Pathologists

School NursesSchool

PsychologistsSchool Social

WorkersSchool

CounselorsSp. Ed. Aides


Documents

Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID