158
2012 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT THE NEXT LEAP FORWARD BREADTALK GROUP LIMITED BREADTALK GROUP LIMITED

Breadtalk AR 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Breadtalk AR 2011

2012ANNUAL REPORTANNUAL REPORT

THE NEXT LEAP FORWARD

BREADTALK GROUP LIMITEDBREADTALK GROUP LIMITED

Page 2: Breadtalk AR 2011

The Next Leap Forward

With 10 successful years under its belt, BreadTalk® is well poised to take on its next stage of growth. Moving forward with the times means to first take stock of the present and build on past achievements before we can look ahead to a brighter, greater future.

As we look back on the momentum that we have built steadily and carefully over the years, we are certain that we have amassed the critical force we need to steer confidently ahead. Through consolidating our present means and strategically planning for the future, we move forward more prepared than ever before.

With our stable of seven brands well-loved by many consumers, we look forward to the next 10 years as the next great leap for us to surmount. Here’s to growing and advancing together in The Next Leap Forward, towards the future and beyond.

CR

EA

TIV

ER

AT

ION

ALE

Page 3: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EP

RO

FIL

E

Founded in 2000, and listed on the SGX since 2003, BreadTalk® transformed the face of the humble bun with innovative fl avours and a distinctive identity. Our endeavours to surprise and delight customers have earned us numerous awards and growing popularity among consumers. Focused on our vision of becoming an international, trend-setting lifestyle company, BreadTalk Group Limited has become a distinctive F&B brand with acclaimed bakery, restaurant and food atrium footprints. Our proprietary brands are BreadTalk®, Toast Box, Food Republic, RamenPlay and The Icing Room. We also manage franchises from Taiwan’s Michelin Star recipient Din Tai Fung and USA’s Carl’s Jr.

In just a decade, the Group has expanded into a network of 16 countries, including Singapore, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Indonesia. Supported by our global staff of 6000, we manage over 500 F&B outlets.

CONTENT

Corporate Profi leFinancial HighlightsChairman’s StatementBoard of DirectorsSenior ManagementBrand AccoladesGroup StructureGeographical ReachBusiness ReviewBakeryRestaurantFood AtriumCorporate GovernanceFinancial StatementStatistics of Shareholdings Notice of Annual General Meeting

0102 04070910 121416 1620242945

145 146

Our signature Flosss

bun has sold more than

50 million globally.

11

Page 4: Breadtalk AR 2011

FIN

AN

CIA

LH

IGH

LIG

HT

SRevenue ($ Million) Profi t Before Tax ($ Million)

156.6 11.2

212.2 12.0

246.5 15.6

302.9 16.7

365.9 17.1

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Food Atrium25.8%

Restaurant21.0%

Bakery53.2%

Revenue Mix By Business Segment FY2011

Hong Kong9.6%

Singapore 52.3%

Rest of World

6%

Mainland China32.1%

Revenue Mix By Geographical Segment FY2011

2

Page 5: Breadtalk AR 2011

BreadTalk Group Limited & Its Subsidiaries - Group Financial Highlights

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

Financial Results ($’000)

Financial Positions ($’000)

Ratios

REVENUE

OPERATING PROFIT

PROFIT BEFORE TAX

PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY

HOLDERS OF THE COMPANY

156,610

12,150

11,228

7,319

212,249

13,227

12,001

7,770

246,493

16,253

15,615

11,092

365,904

16,995

17,127

11,592

302,888

16,564

16,688

11,266

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATE /JOINT VENTURES

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIES

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

MINORITY INTERESTS

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

EARNINGS PER SHARE (CENTS) - BASIC(1)

EARNINGS PER SHARE (CENTS) - DILUTED(1)

NET ASSET PER SHARE (CENTS)(2)

NET TANGIBLE ASSET PER SHARE (CENTS)(2)

GEARING (TIMES)(3)

RETURN ON SHAREHOLDERS’ FUND (%)(4)

44,893

1,333

9,665

710

59,089

(62,996)

(5,428)

(3,170)

44,096

2.69

2.69

15.64

12.21

0.25

20.9

58,156

422

9,205

2, 026

77,348

(82,866)

(8,158)

(3,623)

52,510

2.76

2.76

18.63

15.36

0.30

16.1

64,352

284

9,097

3,890

94,462

(97,197)

(8,722)

(5,504)

60,662

3.95

3.94

21.61

18.37

0.24

19.6

4.12

4.10

27.78

24.50

0.47

15.82

4.01

3.99

24.37

21.12

0.26

18.0

(1) The basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share for FY2011 are computed based on the weighted average number of ordinary shares (excluding treasury shares) in issue during the year 281,197,676 and 282,392,002 respectively. The comparative fi gures for FY2007 to FY2009 have been restated taking into account the Company’s bonus share issue on 30 March 2010.

(2) Net assets per share and net tangible assets per share as at end of fi nancial year 2011 are computed based on the share capital of 280,655,548 ordinary shares, representing shares issued and fully paid (excluding treasury shares) as at end of the year. The comparative fi gures for FY2007 to FY2009 have been restated taking into account the Company’s bonus share issued on 30 March 2010.

(3) Gearing is computed based on total borrowings divided by total equity.

(4) Return on shareholders’ funds is the profi t after taxation and minority interests expressed as a percentage of the average shareholders’ funds.

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

88,898

422

9,214

15,178

148,593

(151,484)

(25,353)

(7,498)

77,970

73,306

446

9,142

14,424

106,879

(118,254)

(10,860)

(6,521)

68,562

FIN

AN

CIA

LH

IGH

LIG

HT

S

3

Page 6: Breadtalk AR 2011

Our FoundationWe had a modest but auspicious beginning. Our maiden BreadTalk® outlet in Bugis Junction in 2000 attracted long queues with its signature Flosss bun. Two years later, BreadTalk® had expanded to 20 outlets in Singapore. It became a listed company in 2003 and its fi rst overseas outlet was opened in Jakarta, Indonesia the same year. Since then, thebrand has grown steadily, overcoming serious challenges posed by SARS in 2003 and the 2008 global fi nancial crisis.

The Group’s ability to keep up the pounding pace of growth can be attributed to our passion for creating and delivering exciting, innovative experiences. This stems from our intent to always instill creative differentiation in the concepts that are built. More than a place to refuel for food, our outlets have become social destinations much talked about by consumers and at friendly prices.

In Mainland China, our Bakery outlets are found in 43 cities – an increase of fi ve over the previous year. Capitalising on the excellent prospects for Mainland China, we have invested in a centralised frozen dough factory which was opened in Shanghai in January 2012. This is a joint venture with Japanese Ajinomoto Bakery Co., Ltd, a leading player in the fi eld of bakery dough products.

Our Restaurant Division further added three Din Tai Fung restaurants, and notable Din Tai Fung openings included the long-awaited 7,200 sq ft outlet at Central World Mall (Bangkok), a duplex restaurant at 112 Katong shopping mall and at the iconic Marina Bay Sands.

The Food Atrium Division added fi ve outlets, including two in Taiwan. We are the fi rst foreign food atrium brand to enter the highly competitive Taiwan market.

Despite the global uncertainty in 2011, the Group turned in a credible performance. By focusing on delivering innovative and exciting culinary experiences to our customers, we managed to deliver another year of record results to our shareholders.

We fi nished the year with a total of 534 outlets and restaurants, an increase of 86 over the previous year, while delivering a credible double-digit growth of 20.8% in sales turnover to S$365.9 million. Excluding gain from disposal of property in FY2010, the Group’s net profi t attributable to shareholders for FY2011 improved by 63.1% over the previous year to S$11.6 million.

2011: Promising Start to a New Decade

CH

AIR

MA

N’S

STA

TE

ME

NT

“Right from the start, “Right from the start,

we set out to infuse a creative we set out to infuse a creative

difference in our products difference in our products

and embraced this as our and embraced this as our

business philosophy.”business philosophy.”

George QuekGeorge Quek

4

Page 7: Breadtalk AR 2011

Going Forward: The Next Decade Begins

We started our second decade with 448 outlets and restaurants spanning 13 diverse countries in Asia and the Middle East. Our target consumers are fast growing with rising purchasing power and an appetite for new food experiences. This augurs well for the Group as our team strives continuously to lead the way for exciting dining concepts.

Our continued growth will come from sustained development of our proprietary brands, franchises and our nascent property investments to diversify our revenue streams. We will continue to nurture established relationships and build new ones. More than half of our bakery outlets are franchisee-operated, underscoring the importance of having the right downstream business partners to help us achieve our global expansion goals.

By executing our multi-pronged strategy, I am confi dent that we can be a 1,000-outlet Group in two to three years, with revenue in excess of S$1 billion in fi ve years.

With confi dence in the future, we commenced construction of our lnternational Headquarters (IHQ) in Singapore. The 10-storey building, scheduled for completion in 2013, will cost approximately S$64.1 million. Befi tting the Group’s emphasis on fl air and creativity, the building will stand out in the Paya Lebar iPark with its innovative design. The architectural concept takes its cue from the many delicate layers of a Danish pastry and alludes to the dynamic and multi-faceted BreadTalk Group.

Our IHQ will house the Group‘s main offi ce cum retail, Research & Development, training, logistics and central kitchen facilities, all under one roof. Bringing these diverse departments together will accelerate our ability to create fresh culinary delights, fast-track them through production and to the outlets.

New International Headquarters

The BreadTalk Group Training Academy will standardise preparation and delivery, and will also train overseas franchise staff to support our expansion plans. The Central Kitchen will cater to the Group’s operations in Southeast Asia. An enhanced R&D facility will continue to focus on creating trendsetting and alluring concepts and products to ensure the Group’s international competitiveness.

BreadTalk Group’s IHQ will forge

an exciting creative community. With

retail concepts on Levels 1 and 2, it will be a

destination hub for Paya Lebar’s

offi ce professionals.

5

Page 8: Breadtalk AR 2011

Our pioneering property investment via a stake in the new 112 Katong Shopping Mall has begun to yield results. With its strategic location in the heart of Katong, the mall has quickly gained a solid following from residents of District 15. Besides looking forward to a good return on our investment, we have secured vantage locations for our brands at the mall, strategically fronting the mall with strong presence of our concepts.

In recognition of our track record in conceptualisation and design development, as well as our extensive experience in F&B operations, we have been invited to participate in the revamping of the heritage CHIJMES site into a vibrant F&B destination for locals and tourists in the heart of downtown Singapore. Going forward, the Group will carefully evaluate investment opportunities that are strategic to upstream integration along the retail supply chain.

Property Investments

The Board of Directors has proposed an ordinary dividend of 1.0 cents per share and a special dividend of 0.5 cents per share, subject to shareholders’ approval at the AGM.

We have grown from a company with just a handful of staff to a Group with a global staff strength of 6000 running over 500 outlets in 11 years. This enormous achievement calls for the dedication of many. I am grateful to our directors, management, staff, business partners, and shareholders for sharing in our vision. Their unstinting support is the key ingredient in our success and with their continued partnership, we will continue to make our mark.

Managing for Rapid Growth

Dividend

In Appreciation

The Group has further strengthened our management bench with the hiring of our new CFO, Mr Lawrence Yeo. He comes with more than 20 years of experience, including 10 years in Group CFO capacities in SGX-listed companies in the retail and F&B sectors.

Our ambitious growth plans require us to open a dozen new outlets every month. But unlike making more buns, adding more territories, outlets and restaurants, the formula for growth requires more complex recipes. We have to evolve a multi-dimensional approach customised to the nature of the brand and product, the ownership structure, the country and even province concerned; the peculiarities of each site and the ability to exploit economies of scale among others. We are fortunate to have dedicated and experienced professionals within our team; and partners such as franchisees and property developers who work with us to see to the sustainable expansion of our network.

The biggest challenge facing us in the immediate future continues to be infl ation and rising costs. Over the years, BreadTalk® has successfully controlled our operational costs with a robust procurement system, and by paying close attention to raising productivity and cutting wastage. It is only possible if we take a conscientious approach towards how we operate our business. Our operating models will need to evolve to be complementary to the business climates that we face.

George QuekChairman

6

Page 9: Breadtalk AR 2011

George Quek Meng Tong

BO

AR

D O

F D

IRE

CT

OR

S

George, founder of the Group, was appointed to the Board on 6 March 2003 and last re-elected on 27 April 2010. Having led and grown the Company to its current empire, George continues to drive our strategic direction and development into the future.

George started his food and beverage business in Taiwan in 1982, successfully growing it into a chain of 21 Southeast Asian food outlets within a mere decade. Returning to Singapore in 1992, he then founded Topwin Singapore and subsequently Megabite China in 1996, establishing the food court businesses.

In 2000, he started the bakery business with BreadTalk® Pte Ltd and eventually brought it to list on the SGX in 2003 while creating a household name. George is a Brand Champion who has positioned the company’s brand portfolio into innovative concepts now widely accepted in Asia and throughout the world. His keen interest in the arts, creative talent and acute sense of anticipating consumer demands have led the BreadTalk Group to always position itself as an inspiring company that delights consumers time and again.

George holds a Doctorate in Business Administration (Honorary) from Wisconsin International University, USA. Amongst other awards, he won the Ernst & Young “Entrepreneur of the Year 2006” (Emerging Entrepreneur Category) and the “Entrepreneur of the Year Award 2002” organised by the Assocation of Small and Medium Entreprises and The Rotary Club of Singapore.

Chairman

LEFT TO RIGHT: ● Tan Khee Giap ● Katherine Lee Lih Leng ● George Quek Meng Tong ● Ong Kian Min ● Chan Soo Sen

7

Page 10: Breadtalk AR 2011

Soo Sen was appointed to the Board on 14 August 2006 and last re-elected 26 April 2011. He is the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, as well as member of the Audit Committee and Nominating Committee of the Company.

Soo Sen was a Member of Parliament for Joo Chiat Constituency from 1997 to 2011. He was a Minister of State and had served in several ministries including the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, Ministry of Education, and Ministry of Trade and Industry. Before entering politics, he was involved in the starting up of the China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park as its founding Chief Executive Offi cer in 1994, laying the foundation and framework for infrastructure and utilities development for the industrial park. He holds a Master in Management Science from the University of Stanford, USA.

After leaving public service in 2006, Mr Chan joined Keppel Corporation Ltd as Director, Chairman’s Offi ce. In 2009, he joined Singbridge International Singapore Pte Ltd, a company fully owned by Temasek Holdings to undertake major international projects, as Executive Vice President. Mr Chan is now advising a few investment companies on their China Projects. He is also an Independent Director in a fewlisted companies.

Kian Min was appointed to the Board on 30 April 2003 and last re-elected on 27 April 2010. He is the Lead Independent Director, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Nominating Committee, and member of the Remuneration Committee of the Company.

He was called to the Bar of England and Wales in 1988 and to the Singapore Bar the following year. In his 22 years of legal practice, he focused on corporate and commercial law, such as, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and restructuring and corporate fi nance. In addition to practising as a consultant with Drew & Napier LLC, a leading Singapore law fi rm, he is a senior adviser of Alpha Advisory Pte. Ltd. (a corporate advisory fi rm) and CEO of Kanesaka Sushi Private Limited, which owns and operates Japanese fi ne-dining restaurants in the region. He is also non-executive chairman of Hupsteel Ltd and serves as non-executive director of several other Singapore-listed companies.

Kian Min was awarded the President’s Scholarship and Police Force Scholarship in 1979. He holds a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) external degree from the University of London and a Bachelor of Science (Honours) Degree from the Imperial College of Science and Technology in England. He was a Member of Parliament of Singapore from January 1997 to April 2011.

Khee Giap was appointed to the Board on 26 April 2011. He is a member of the Audit Committee. Khee Giap is currently Co-Director of Asia Competitiveness Institute and an Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore. He is also the Chair of Singapore National Committee for Pacifi c Economic Cooperation. He holds directorships in a few listed companies in Singapore. Khee Giap graduated with a Ph.D from the University of East Anglia in 1987. He has consulted extensively with various government ministries, statutory boards and government-linked companies of the Singapore government. Khee Giap has served as a member of the Resource Panel of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Transport and Government Parliamentary Committee for Finance and Trade since 2007.

Katherine was appointed to the Board on 6 March 2003 and last re-elected on 26 April 2011. She oversees the Group’s research and development, as well as pioneers new ideas and concepts.

Responsible for concept creation, product development and enhancement of our various brands both locally and globally, Katherine also formulates product training and technical skill upgrade programmes to ensure proper transfer of knowledge and skills to our franchisees in line with our local operations so as to sustain product quality. In addition, Katherine spearheads product costing, which is an integral part of our product strategy.

Katherine has more than 15 years of experience in the industry. She was previously the Finance Director of Topwin Singapore prior to which she was in charge of the human resource and operations of more than 20 food and beverage outlets in Taiwan.

Katherine Lee Lih Leng

Ong Kian Min

Independent Director

Chan Soo Sen

Dr Tan Khee Giap

Independent Director

Independent Director

Deputy Chairman

8

Page 11: Breadtalk AR 2011

SE

NIO

RM

AN

AG

EM

EN

T

Eng Lock was appointed Group CEO on1 January 2011. As Group CEO, he oversees the Group’s global operations, focusing on strategic planning and business development. Eng Lock has a keen grasp on the Group’s business operations, since joining the company on 1 June 2010 as Group Managing Director. Prior to his appointment as CEO, Eng Lock was Regional Managing Director with Merrill Lynch Asia Pacifi c Ltd. in Hong Kong, overseeing their North Asia businesses. He has also garnered vast senior executive and management experience at DBS Bank and United Overseas Bank growing their regional franchises in Taiwan, China and the USA. Eng Lock holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Singapore.

Lawrence assumed duties as Group Chief Financial Offi cer on 10 October 2011. He has more than 20 years of fi nancial management experience in various roles and capacities including more than 10 years as Group CFO of SGX-listed companies.

With his extensive fi nancial expertise and hands-on experience in retail operations, he will add depth to BreadTalk®’s management bench.

Mr Yeo holds an MBA from the University of Strathclyde and a Bachelor of Accountancy degree from the National University of Singapore. He is also a FCPA of the Institute of Certifi ed Public Accountants of Singapore and a member of Singapore Institute of Directors.

Oh Eng Lock

Group Chief Executive Offi cer

Goh Tong PakPresident - Chairman’s Offi ceSpecial Projects

Lawrence Yeo

Group Chief Financial Offi cer

Henry Chu Heng HweeCEO - Bakery Division

● BreadTalk®

● Toast Box● Carl’s Jr.● The Icing Room● Bread Society

Jenson Ong Chin HockCEO - Food Atrium Division

● Food Republic

Cheng WilliamCEO - Restaurant Division

● Din Tai Fung● RamenPlay

Frankie Quek Swee HengCEO - China Region

James Quek Seng HwaCEO - Asean Region

9

Page 12: Breadtalk AR 2011

BreadTalk Group LimitedSales/Turnover Growth Excellence

(Hospitality/Food & Beverage)Award 2009/2010

BreadTalk® & Food RepublicListed by Brand Finance as one of Top 100 Brands

in Singapore, 2010

BreadTalk® Most Promising Brand

2002 To 2005Most Popular Brand 2002/2005

Most Distinctive Brand 2003 to 2005Silver Award 2004Gold Award 2005

Singapore Promising Brand Award - ASME and Lianhe Zaobao

BreadTalk® Finalist, World Retail Awards 2009Emerging Market Retailer of the

Year Category

BreadTalk®

Overall Winner,Regional Brands Category

Winner, Most Popular Brand, Singapore Prestige Brand Award 2011

BreadTalk®

Five Star Diamond Brand Award 2006Five Star Diamond Brand

Shanghai, PRC

BreadTalk®

Regional Brand Award 2006Singapore Promising Brand AwardAssociation of Small and Medium

Enterprises (ASME) and Lianhe Zaobao

BreadTalk® Design for Asia Award 2004

Hong Kong Design Centre

BR

AN

DA

CC

OLA

DE

S

Our consistent and dedicated efforts to brand management have placed our brands on both local and international platforms.

10

Page 13: Breadtalk AR 2011

BreadTalk® Finalist

Franchisor Of The Year Award 2005Franchising and Licensing

Association of Singapore (FLA)

BreadTalk Group LimitedMost TransparentCompany Award (SIAS)

2004 and 2005 - Sesdaq Category Runner-Up2007 - Sesdaq Category Winner

2008 - Catalist Category Runner-Up2011 - Mainboard award, Runner up

Toast BoxOverall Winner,

Promising Brands CategorySingapore Prestige Brand Award 2009

Food RepublicOverall Winner,

Promising Brands CategorySingapore Prestige Brand Award 2008

BreadTalk®

Superbrand StatusSingapore version 2002/2003

Singapore Superbrands Council

George QuekEntrepreneur of the Year 2006

Emerging Entrepreneur CategoryErnst & Young

BreadTalk®

Ranked Number 1Enterprise 50 Start Up Award 2002Accenture and The Business Times

George QuekEntrepreneur of the Year 2002

ASME and The Rotary Club

11

Page 14: Breadtalk AR 2011

BR

EA

DTA

LK G

RO

UP

LIM

ITE

D S

UB

SID

IAR

IES

100% 100% 100% 100%

30%

BreadTalk Group LtdBreadTalk Group Ltd

BreadTalk® International Pte Ltd

Together Inc. Pte LtdBreadTalk® Pte Ltd

Shanghai BreadTalk®

Co. LtdRamen Play Pte Ltd

Hong Kong BreadTalk® Ltd

Shanghai BreadTalk®

Gourmet Co. Ltd

Beijing BreadTalk®

RestaurantManagement Co. Ltd

Beijing BreadTalk®

Co. Ltd

BreadTalk® (Thailand)Company Limited

ML BreadWorksSdn Bhd

100%70%

75%

60%

100%100%

90%

49%

100%

100%

90%

49%

25%

Taster Food Pte Ltd

Taster Food International Pte Ltd

Taster Food (Thailand) Co. Limited

Charcoal Pte Ltd

Gro

up S

truc

ture

As

At

31 D

ecem

ber

201

1

Imagine Properties Pte Ltd

12

Page 15: Breadtalk AR 2011

100%100%

100%100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

90%

49%

50%

30%

85%

50%

100%

100%

100%

100%

60%Shanghai Star FoodF&B Management

Co., Ltd

Beijing Star Food F&B Management

Co., Ltd

Food Republic Shenzhen F&B Management Co.,Ltd

MWA Pte Ltd

Star Food Pte LtdTopwin InvestmentHolding Pte Ltd

Food Republic (Shanghai)Co., Ltd

Shanghai Ramen PlayCo., Ltd

Beijing Da Shi Dai Food & Beverage

Co., Ltd

BreadTalk® ConceptHong Kong Limited

Food Art Pte Ltd

Megabite (S) Pte Ltd

Food Republic Guangzhou F&B

Management Co. Ltd

Chongqing Food Republic Food & Beverage

Co., Ltd

Shanghai Hong Bu Rang Food & Beverage

Management Co., Ltd

Food Republic Hangzhou F&B Co., Ltd

Megabite Hong Kong Limited

75%

30%

50%

Megabite Eatery (M)Sdn Bhd

Food Republic TaiwanCo., Ltd

FR (Thailand) Co., Ltd

Apex ExcellentSdn Bhd

Out Of The Box Pte Ltd

Street Food Pte Ltd

Food Republic Pte Ltd

13

Page 16: Breadtalk AR 2011

People’s Republic of China

Oman

Kuwait

BahrainJordan

43 Cities in PRC (excluding Hong Kong)

JinhuaKunmingNanjingNantongNingboQuanzhouShanghaiShaoxingShenyangShenzhenShijiazhuangSuzhouTaiYuanTaizhou ( )Taizhou (

BeijingChangshaChangzhouChengduChongqingDalianFuzhouGuangzhouGuiyangHangzhouHarbinHefeiHuzhouJiaxinJinan

TianjinUrumuqiWenzhouWuhanWuxiXiamenXianXuzhouYanchengYangzhouZhengzhouZhenjiangZhuzhou

Bakery Food Atrium Restaurant

Bakery

Number of Outlets Worldwide

Food Atrium

Restaurant

PRC 230 ● Indonesia 79 ● Singapore 81 Philippines 21 ● Malaysia 9 ● Hong Kong 12

India 8 ● Jordan 1 ● Kuwait 5 ● Thailand 14

Korea 2 ● Bahrain 3 ● Oman 1 ● Vietnam 5

PRC 21 ● Singapore 7 ● Taiwan 2Malaysia 2 ● Hong Kong 5

Singapore 17 ● PRC 8 ● Thailand 1

GE

OG

RA

PH

ICA

LR

EA

CH

Spread across 16 countries in Asia and the Middle East, the BreadTalk Group’s creative concepts engage and excite consumers.

14

Page 17: Breadtalk AR 2011

People’s Republic of China

Korea

Taiwan

Philippines

Hong KongThailand

India

Malaysia

Vietnam

Singapore

Indonesia

15

Page 18: Breadtalk AR 2011

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

BA

KE

RY

In 2011, the Bakery Division opened 76 new outlets bringing the total number of outlets to 471: 24 outlets are owned and 52 are franchised. This contributed 53.2% to overall Group revenue, recording 23.0% growth to S$194.4 million. Excluding gain from disposal of property in 2010, operating profi t rose by 73.0 % to S$8.6 million. The profi t growth was mainly attributed to higher profi t contribution from Singapore and Mainland China bakery units on the back of higher revenue as well as smaller losses from the Malaysia bakery unit.

Financial Performance

Our Bakery Division continued to grow from strength to strength, especially in our key markets of Singapore, Mainland China and Hong Kong. As of end 2011, we have a total of 471 bakery outlets, an increase of 76 over the previous year. We expanded into Jordan in 2011, bringing the total number of countries with our presence to 16.

To grow more rapidly, we have aggressively pushed the BreadTalk® Transit concept which was fi rst introduced in Singapore in 2010. With smaller footprints than the regular outlets, we are able to access new locations like educational institutions, transit access points and other non-mall areas with high traffi c count. Implementation lead times are much shorter and fewer skilled workers are needed per outlet. Results have been encouraging and we have already rolled this concept out to Mainland China and Hong Kong.

On the Ground

4.4%

53.2%

471

Operation Margin for FY11

Contribution to FY11 revenue

Outlets as of 31 Dec 2011

This BreadTalk® Transit Store in

Shanghai promotes easy access to

products for busy city slick

ers, offering

a variety of bakery favourites for

customers on the go.

BreadTalk®’s innovative product team launched an exciting Mid-Autumn collection to suit the premium Mainland Chinese market.

16

Page 19: Breadtalk AR 2011

BAKERY

Toast Box, now in seven countries, continues to

develop and grow and can be found in Singapore’s

most prestigious locations like Resorts World Sentosa

and Marina Bay Sands.

In Mainland China, our Bakery outlets are found in 43 cities, an increase of eleven. We added fi ve more cities to our network in 2011, namely Zheng Zhou, Tai Yuan, Ji Nan, Yan Cheng and Tian Jin. To meet demands of our increasing outlets, together with Ajinomoto Bakery Co., Ltd of Japan, a joint venture Frozen Dough Factory - AB Pan was set up in Shanghai to supply frozen dough to fulfi ll the capacity of 200 outlets in Mainland China. This move has created many operational advantages such as improved consistency and quality of products, and reduced equipment needs per store, improving the outlets’ productivity.

Toast Box, now in seven countries, continues to develop and grow and can be found in Singapore’s most prestigious locations like Resorts World Sentosa and Marina Bay Sands. The Toast Box concept is that of a comfortable, modern rustic environment, offering simple but appealing Asian dishes with Nanyang Kopi and thick toasts as our signatures. In 2011, we successfully introduced this Southeast Asian concept to Taiwan via our Food Republic atrium in Taipei.

AB Pan Frozen Dough Factory supplies top quality

dough products to 200 stores in Mainland China.

Our signature Nanyang Kopi is a hot favourite among the offi ce crowd.

17

Page 20: Breadtalk AR 2011

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

B

AK

ER

Y The Icing Room is a highly participative and engaging concept offering aspiring “chefs” Design-It-Yourself (DIY) cake personalisation services and a beautiful selection of pastry delights. With décor accessories and colourful icing provided, customers enjoy expressing their creativity for a one-of-a-kind creation that unequivocally conveys their love to someone special.

To engage the young and foster family bonding, we also conduct weekly “TIR Junior Chef Workshops”, inculcating design and creative fun in our young customers. The Icing Room has grown to six outlets in Singapore and has a strong fan base among its target audience. We plan to bring this concept to Shanghai in 2012, together with our niche bakery brand, Bread Society.

Bread Society is designed to offer artisanal European-inspired breads, mixed and baked on site, to ensure the freshest and best premium taste experience possible. Recipes are grounded on back-to-basics goodness. This is ensured by having the whole process of bread making done on site and helmed by our highly experienced Japanese head chef. Our fi rst outlet is in Singapore’s iconic ION Orchard. As this is a niche brand concept, we will be selective about expanding this brand only to major cities.

The Icing Room provides the perfect

platform for exercising one’s culina

ry

creativity through its uni

que DIY

cake personalisation servi

ce.

Bread Society is an artisanal brea

d

concept that emphasizes the

back-to-basics goodness of premium

ingredients.

18

Page 21: Breadtalk AR 2011

Through relentless innovation and incisive strategic initiatives, the Group has built world-class brands that are acclaimed as trendsetters in the local and international F&B industry.

While we wish to aggressively add sites and expand to more countries, we are mindful that we must do so purposefully, with the right discipline and preparation. To support the guiding vision of our Chairman, our management team must be inspired to think out of the box, to challenge the status quo and be empowered to act. Teamwork, good morale and sharing of best practices are essential. To achieve these, we practise close and constant communications all round. Two examples are our Bakery CEO Forum and our Franchisee Forum whereby leaders and owners gather to share the best practices developed for each market as well as to strengthen the team spirit.

We are always mindful of rising costs, be they rental, raw materials or manpower, and will spare no effort to improve effi ciency and productivity. Productivity improvement must come from working smarter. Thus, strategic initiatives like our frozen dough factory joint venture in Shanghai is expected to provide greater effi ciency throughout for Mainland China outlets, with better staff productivity.

The Next Leap Forward

Our Annual Franchisee Forum provides the platform for the sharing

of ideas between partners operating the BreadTalk® brand.

Spread across 43 cities in

Mainland China, BreadTalk® delights

upwardly mobile Chinese consumers with

its creative concept stores in strategic

mall locations.

19

Page 22: Breadtalk AR 2011

Revenue from the restaurant segment rose strongly by 36.8% to S$77.0 million. Due to a strong performance in the 4th quarter, operating profi t for the year also grew by 38.0% to S$3.9 million. Contributing to this creditable performance was the fi rst Din Tai Fung restaurant in Bangkok, higher profi t contribution from Din Tai Fung operations in Singapore and smaller losses from RamenPlay outlets in Mainland China and Singapore and Carl’s Jr. in Mainland China.

Financial Performance

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

R

ES

TAU

RA

NT

5%

21%

26

Operation Margin for FY11

Contribution to FY11 revenue

Outlets as of 31 Dec 2011

Din Tai Fung’s fi rst duplex inSouth East Asia at 112 Katong, Singapore.

T F fi

Our signature Xiao Long Bao

is a classic favourite among

discerning connoisseurs.

20

Page 23: Breadtalk AR 2011

Din Tai Fung, awarded one Michelin Star and ranked as one of the world’s Top Ten Best Restaurants by The New York Times, has its roots dating back to Taiwan close to 40 years ago. We have the franchise rights for this celebrated brand for Singapore and Thailand.

Our fi rst Din Tai Fung restaurant in Thailand opened in May with a lot of fanfare. This is a 7,200 sq ft outlet at Central World Mall. The opening party was prominently featured across all main media as Bangkok’s Who’s Who turned up in droves. The response has been so overwhelming that the outlet is already profi table. This has encouraged us to step up our expansion plans for Thailand.

We also opened our fi rst duplex level Din Tai Fung at the newly opened 112 Katong Mall, fronting the mall façade with strong street level visibility. Its world-renowned reputation is further cemented with its presence at the iconic Marina Bay Sands property, serving an international clientele. The team’s dedication to deliver an exciting culinary experience sees close collaboration with our Taiwanese principal, serving up new dishes frequently, to the delight of its loyal customers.

On the Ground

Mr George Quek & Mr Yang Ji-Hua, owner of Din Tai Fung Taiwan at the restaurant’s Grand Opening

celebrations in Thailand.

Entering the iconic

Marina Bay Sands location

cements Din Tai Fung as a world

class brand name with its enduring

appeal to discerning diners.

Din Tai Fung’s fi rst outlet in Bangkok.

21

Page 24: Breadtalk AR 2011

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

R

ES

TAU

RA

NT

RamenPlay is a collaboration with Japan’s Sanpou Co., Ltd which has had decades of experience in the Japanese F&B industry. At RamenPlay, we offer authentic Japanese ramen delights, with premium ingredients in an upbeat and lively setting at our eight outlets in Singapore and Shanghai. Our Japanese chefs push the creative envelope to create new fl avours and concepts to enhance customers’ dining experience. With this innovative culture, we introduced 40 new menu items to draw in a younger clientele with a wider range of Japanese dishes while retaining our focus on ramen and rice dishes.

An extensive new menu featuring

authentic

hand massaged ramen, premium Nigata rice

dishes and delectable side dishes for those

who love Japanese cuisine!

22

Page 25: Breadtalk AR 2011

Having secured the rights to selected cities in Mainland China, the positioning of Carl’s Jr. as a premium fast food brand has been well received by young working adults who relish the sumptuous taste of charbroiled burgers. Its positioning as a lifestyle brand has been one of exciting product and promotional initiatives that drive young consumers to our stores.

Carl’s Jr. at Metro City, Xujiahui, Shanghai

We will stay focused on creating and delivering fresh, innovative experiences and great taste in food. We will continually refresh our restaurants to keep pace with today’s affl uent consumers and their demanding lifestyles while offering meals that remain friendly to the pockets.

The Next Leap Forward

23

Page 26: Breadtalk AR 2011

Financial Performance

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

F

OO

D A

TR

IUM

4.9%

25.8%

37

Operation Margin for FY11

Contribution to FY11 revenue

Outlets as of 31 Dec 2011

Two outlets were opened consecutively in Taiwan in December 2011. The nostalgic 1950s style old Taiwanese food streets have redefi ned the arena of the competitive food court scene.

The Food Atrium Division continued to grow, adding fi ve new outlets. Revenue from our food atrium rose S$6.0 million or 6.8% to S$94.5 million. Operating profi t rose 6.5% to S$4.7 million mainly contributed by higher profi t from Mainland China and Singapore, offset by the start-up costs incurred in new outlets in Guangzhou, Taiwan and Thailand.

24

Page 27: Breadtalk AR 2011

The unique positioning of Food Republic with its thematic concepts and strong network of Asian and local food partners give us the exceptional advantage to win over property owners. Food Republic brings its exciting concepts to property developers, establishing the mall as a strong destination point.

We opened two outlets in Taiwan in December 2011 in Taipei and Taizhong. As the fi rst international food atrium player invited to enter Taiwan, we redefi ned the concept of a food court. The two food atriums have been set up beautifully, taking customers back to the 1940s and 50s of Taiwan’s food streets with original memorabilia and heritage local street eats (famous Taiwanese Xiao Chi), creating a unique mood and ambience which has never been seen previously in Taiwanese food courts. Results have been excellent.

In Mainland China, DaShiDai ( ) is a forerunner since 1997. As the country is geographically vast and diverse, it portends great opportunities for us to hone unique concepts that complement the different cities which have fast improving purchasing power. We set up in the fi rst outlet in Guangzhou at KK Mall at Taikoo Hui.

On the Ground

Food Republic 112 Katong presents the theme of a “Professional Chef’s Kitchen”. This outlet draws its inspiration from the rich Peranakan culture of Katong and reinforces the culinary heritageof the location with its strong lineup of well-known hawkers.

25

Page 28: Breadtalk AR 2011

BU

SIN

ES

S R

EV

IEW

F

OO

D A

TR

IUM

In Hong Kong, the renovation at City Plaza - Taikoo Sing, themed “A Touch of Luxury”, has been very well received by our target customers. Incorporating art sculptures juxtaposed with elegant furniture classics, this revamp to Hong Kong’s very fi rst outlet lends a refreshing feel to the upmarket mall.

We will stay focused on targeting discerning consumers and meeting their lifestyle aspirations. Our strategy of developing unique and creative themes for our food atrium, in addition to distinctive, affordable quality and heartwarming food, are key differentiators for the Food Republic brand.

The Food Republic KK Mall

GuangZhou hosts delectable

local delights from all over China.Th F d R bli KK M ll

The newly-refurbished Food Republic City Plaza at Hong Kong’s Taikoo Sing brings a “Touch of Luxury” to working

professionals who enjoy local delights set in a restaurant ambience.

26

Page 29: Breadtalk AR 2011

As a Group, BreadTalk® has forged strong relationships with landlords. Food Republic is a major tenant that enjoys signifi cant pull and negotiating muscle when sourcing for premier space in strategic locations. It is also a lead brand that allows for the other brands to be discussed in tandem during real estate negotiations. This is highly advantageous to our Group as we continuously look out for premier locations which present strong opportunities for our family of brands.

Asia will continue to be a strong region for Food Republic’s expansion. New markets such as Taiwan and Thailand will be key considerations in 2012. In Mainland China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore, we will continuously forge our base for stronger market penetration, to bolster our brand presence.

The Next Leap Forward

Dine under the stars at St. James Beer Garden. Enjoy great local food and down a refreshing beer!

Food Republic’s strong network of Asia’s top hawker brands is our competitive advantage as we bring great street eats ( ) to excite consumers’ tastebuds across different countries.

27

Page 30: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EIN

FO

RM

AT

ION

Board of Directors Principal Bankers

Investor Relations

George Quek Meng TongChairman

Katherine Lee Lih LengDeputy Chairman

Ong Kian MinIndependent Director

Tan Khee GiapIndependent Director

Chan Soo SenIndependent Director

171 Kampong Ampat#05-05 KA FoodLinkSingapore 368330Tel: (65) 6285 6116Fax: (65) 6285 1661

Company Secretary

Registered Offi ce

Share Registrar

Auditors

Tan Cher Liang

Boardroom Corporate & AdvisoryServices Private Limited50 Raffl es Place#32-01 Singapore Land TowerSingapore 048623

Ernst & Young LLPPublic Accountants and Certifi ed Public AccountantsOne Raffl es QuayNorth Tower Level 18Singapore 048583Partner-in-Charge:Ang Chuen Beng(appointed since fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011)

● DBS Bank Limited● HSBC Bank● Malayan Banking Berhad● Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited● Standard Chartered Bank● United Overseas Bank Limited

Spin Capital Asia22 Malacca Street#11-03 Royal Brothers Building Singapore 048980Tel: [65] 6 227 7790

Michael TanEmail: [email protected]

28

Page 31: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E This report sets out BreadTalk Group Limited’s corporate governance processes and structures that were in place throughout the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011, with specifi c reference made to the principles and guidelines of the Code and the Best Practice Guide issued by the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “SGX-ST”).

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) is pleased to confi rm that for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011, the Company has generally adhered to the framework as outlined in the Singapore Code of Corporate Governance 2005 (the “Code”) and the amendments to the listing manual which came into effect on 29 September 2011 as announced by SGX-ST to strengthen corporate governance practices and foster greater corporate governance disclosure, where it is applicable and practical to the Company. Where there are deviations from the Code, the reasons for which deviation are explained accordingly.

Board’s Conduct of its Affairs

Principle 1: Every company should be headed by an effective board to lead and control the company. The board is collectively responsible for the success of the company. The board works with management to achieve this and the management remains accountable to the board.

The primary function of the Board is to protect and enhance long-term value and returns for its Shareholders. Besides carrying out its statutory responsibilities, the Board’s roles include:-

A. BOARD MATTERS

Guideline 1.1 of the Code: The Board’s role

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Providing entrepreneurial leadership, set strategic directions and overall corporate policies of the Group;

Supervising and monitoring the performance of the management team;

Ensuring the adequacy of internal controls, risk management and periodic reviews of the Group’s fi nancial performance and compliance;

Setting the Company’s values and standards, ensuring that the necessary human resources are in place;

Approving annual budget, major investments and divestment proposals;

Assuming responsibility for good corporate governance practices; and

Approving corporate or fi nancial restructuring, share issuance, dividends and other returns to Shareholders, Interested Person Transactions of a material nature and release of the Group’s results for the fi rst 3 quarters and full year results.

29

Page 32: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD AND BOARD COMMITTEE MEETINGS

Name of Director

To assist in the execution of its responsibilities, the Board has established three (3) Board committees, namely the Audit Committee (“AC”), Nominating Committee (“NC”) and Remuneration Committee (“RC”), to which the Board has delegated decisions on certain Board matters to the specialised Board committees.

The Board met four (4) times during the fi nancial year to discuss the key activities and business strategies of the Group. All Directors were furnished with relevant information beforehand in order to enable them to obtain further explanation where necessary, and be adequately briefed prior to the respective meetings. Minutes of the meetings are also available to the respective Board members. Ad-hoc and non-scheduled meetings are convened by Board members to deliberate on urgent and substantive matters.

The Company’s Articles of Association provides for telephone, videoconferencing, audio-visual or other electronic means of communication to facilitate meetings of the Board.

Details of Directors’ attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings held during the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 is summarised as follows:

Number of Meetings

Attendance

George Quek Meng Tong

Ong Kian Min

4

4

4

4

3

3

4

NA

NA

4

3

3

1

NA

NA

1

-

1

1

NA

NA

1

1

1

Katherine Lee Lih Leng

Chan Soo Sen

Tan Khee Giap

BoardAudit

CommitteeNominatingCommittee

RemunerationCommittee

Guideline 1.3 of the Code: Disclosure on delegation of authority by Board to Board Committees

Guideline 1.4 of the Code: Board to meet regularly

Guideline 1.5 of the Code: Matters requiring Board approval

Matters that are specifi cally reserved to the Board for approval are:

matters involving a confl ict of interest for a substantial Shareholder or Director;

material acquisitions and disposal of assets;

corporate or fi nancial restructuring;

share issuances, dividends and other returns to Shareholders;

matters which require Board approval as specifi ed in the Company’s Interested Person Transactions policy; and substantial expenditures exceeding a prescribed limit.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

30

Page 33: Breadtalk AR 2011

All Directors are appointed to the Board by way of a formal letter of appointment indicating the amount of time commitment required and scope of duties.

The Company provides a comprehensive orientation programme to familiarise new Directors with the Company’s businesses and governance practices, as well as the Group’s history, core values, strategic direction and industry-specifi c knowledge so as to assimilate them into their new roles.

Directors also have the opportunity of visiting the Group’s operational facilities and meet with the management team to gain a better understanding of the Group’s business operations. Each Director is provided with an annually updated manual containing Board and Company policies relating to the disclosure of interests in securities and confl icts of interests in transactions involving the Company, prohibition on dealings in the Company’s securities, as well as restrictions on the disclosure of price sensitive information.

Board members are encouraged to attend seminars and receive training to improve themselves in the discharge of their duties as Directors. In addition, the Company works closely with professionals to provide Directors with updates on risk management and key changes to relevant regulatory requirements and accounting standards.

Guideline 1.7 of the Code: Formal appointment letter

Guidelines 1.6 and 1.8 of the Code: Directors to receive appropriate training

Guideline 2.1 of the Code:Independence of Board

Guideline 2.2 of the Code:Independent Directors

Principle 2: There should be a strong and independent element on the board, which is able to exercise objective Judgement on corporate affairs independently, in particular, from management. No individual or small group of individuals should be allowed to dominate the board’s decision-making.

The Board comprises fi ve (5) members with majority of independent Directors: three (3) Independent non-executive Directors and two (2) Executive Directors. They are as follows:

Dr George Quek Meng Tong (Chairman)Ms Katherine Lee Lih Leng (Deputy Chairman)Mr Ong Kian Min (Lead Independent Non-Executive Director)Mr Chan Soo Sen (Independent Non-Executive Director)Dr Tan Khee Giap (Independent Non-Executive Director)

The Board has three (3) Independent Directors whose independence is reviewed by the NC annually. The NC considers an “independent” Director as one who has no relationship with the Company, its related companies or its offi cers that could interfere or be reasonably perceived to interfere, with the exercise of the Director’s independent judgement of the conduct of the Group’s affairs, and is not a substantial Shareholder, or a partner (with 5% or more stake) or an executive offi cer, or a director of any for profi t business organisation to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries has made or received signifi cant payments (aggregated in excess of S$200,000 per year) in the current or immediate past fi nancial year. Moreover, the Chairman of the NC is not associated, directly or indirectly, with a substantial Shareholder to enhance an independent view to the best interests of the Company.

As a result of the NC’s review for fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011, the NC is of the view that the Independent Directors are independent of the Company’s management as contemplated by the Code.

Board Composition and Guidance

31

Page 34: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E The Board, in view of the nature and scope of business operations, considers that though small, the present Board size and composition facilitate effi cient and effective decision-making with a strong independent element.

Each Director has been appointed on the strength of his calibre, experience, grasp of corporate strategy and potential to contribute to the Company and its businesses. As each of the Directors brings valuable insights from different perspectives vital to the strategic interests of the Company, the Board considers that the Directors possess the necessary competencies to provide Management with a diverse and objective perspective on issues so as to lead and govern the Company effectively.

Guideline 2.3 of the Code: Appropriate Board size

Guideline 2.4 of the Code: Board to comprise Directors with core competencies

32

Page 35: Breadtalk AR 2011

The Company adopts a dual leadership structure whereby the positions of chairman and chief executive offi cer are separated. There is a clear division of responsibilities between the Company’s executive Chairman and Group Chief Executive Offi cer, which provides a balance of power and authority. As Chairman, Dr George Quek Meng Tong is responsible for ensuring Board effectiveness and conduct, as well as strategic development of the Group in addition to which, he shall assume duties and responsibilities as may be required from time to time. The Group Chief Executive Offi cer, Mr Oh Eng Lock has overall responsibility of the Group’s operations, organisational effectiveness and implementation of Board policies and decisions.

Notwithstanding the above, the Non-Executive and Independent Directors fulfi ll a pivotal role in corporate accountability. Their presence is particularly important as they provide unbiased and independent views, advice and judgement to take care of the interests, not only of the Company but also of Shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and the many communities in which the Company conducts business with. The Board had on 14 August 2006 appointed Mr Ong Kian Min as the Lead Independent Non-Executive Director to act as an additional channel available to Shareholders.

Principle 4: There should be a formal and transparent process for the appointment of new directors to the board. As a principle of good corporate governance, all directors should be required to submit themselves for re-nomination and re-election at regular intervals.

Principle 5: There should be a formal assessment of the effectiveness of the board as a whole and the contribution by each director to the effectiveness of the board.

The NC comprises the three (3) Independent non-executive Directors who have been tasked with the authority and responsibility to devise an appropriate process to review and evaluate the performance of the Board as a whole as well as each individual Director on the Board. The chairman of the NC is an Independent non-executive Director, and is not a substantial Shareholder or directly associated with a substantial Shareholder.

The composition of the NC is as follows:

Mr Ong Kian Min – ChairmanMr Chan Soo Sen – MemberDr Tan Khee Giap – Member

At least one-third (1/3) of the Board shall retire from offi ce by rotation and be subject to re-election at every Company annual general meeting, and the primary responsibilities of the NC are:

Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer

Board Membership and Board Performance

Guidelines 2.5 and 2.6 of the Code: Role of NEDs and regular meetings of NEDs

Guideline 3.1 of the Code: Chairman and chief executive offi cer should be separate persons

Guideline 3.2 of the Code: Chairman’s role

Guideline 3.3 of the Code: Appointment of Lead Independent Director

Guideline 4.1 of the Code: NC composition

Guidelines 4.2 to 4.6 of the Code: Duties of the NC

Once a year, a formal session is arranged for the Non-Executive Directors (“NEDs”) to meet without the presence of Management or executive Directors to discuss any matters that must be raised privately. The session is chaired by Mr Ong Kian Min, the Lead Independent Non-Executive Director, who is also the chairman of the AC and NC.

Principle 3: There should be a clear division of responsibilities at the top of the company – the working of the board and the executive responsibility of the company’s business – which will ensure a balance of power and authority, such that no one individual represents a considerable concentration of power.

33

Page 36: Breadtalk AR 2011

Access to Information

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E

For the year under review, with the Board’s approval, the NC has decided on how the Board’s performance is to be evaluated as a whole and proposed objective performance criteria including Board composition, size and expertise, Board information and timeliness, as well as Board commitment and accountability. In assessing each individual Director’s contribution and performance to the effectiveness of the Board, the NC takes into consideration factors such as attendance, preparedness, participation and candour.

The NC has met once during the fi nancial year under review on 24 February 2011. Each member of the NC shall abstain from voting on any resolution in respect of the assessment of his performance or re-nomination as a Director. Details of Board members’ qualifi cations and experience including the year of initial appointment are presented in this Annual Report under the heading “Board of Directors”.

Principle 6: In order to fulfi ll their responsibilities, board members should be provided with complete, adequate and timely information prior to board meetings and on an on-going basis.

Guidelines 5.1 to5.4 of the Code: Assessing theBoard’s effectiveness

To make recommendations to the Board on the appointment of new Executive and Non-Executive Directors, including making recommendations on the composition of the Board generally and the balance between Executive and Non-Executive Directors appointed to the Board, as well as ensuring there are procedures in place for the selection and appointment of NEDs.

To regularly review the Board structure, size and composition and make recommendations to the Board with regards to any adjustments that are deemed necessary.

To be responsible for assessing nominees or candidates for appointment or election to the Board, determining whether or not such nominees have the requisite qualifi cations and whether or not they are independent.

To make plans for succession, in particular for the Chairman, Group Chief Executive Offi cer and other key executives.

To determine, on an annual basis, if a Director is independent. If the NC determines that a Director, who has one or more of the relationships mentioned under the Code is in fact independent, the NC would disclose in full, the nature of the Director’s relationship and bear responsibility for explaining why he should be considered independent.

To recommend Directors who are retiring by rotation to be put forward for re-election.

To decide whether or not a Director is able to and has been adequately carrying out his duties as a Director of the Company, particularly when he has multiple board representations.

To be responsible for assessing the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and for assessing the contribution of each individual Director to the effectiveness of the Board and disclosing annually, this assessment process.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

34

Page 37: Breadtalk AR 2011

The Board receives complete and adequate information on an on-going basis. The Management provides the Chairman and Deputy Chairman with monthly management accounts and the rest of the Board members with quarterly management accounts. The agenda for Board meetings is prepared in consultation with the Chairman and it will be circulated at least one (1) week in advance to Board members of each meeting.

Furthermore, the Board has separate and independent access to the Company Secretary and senior executives, and there is no restriction of access to the senior Management team of the Company or Group at all times in carrying out its duties.

The Company Secretary or his agent attends all formal Board meetings to respond to the queries of any Director and ensures that Board procedures are followed and that all applicable rules and regulations are complied with.

Where decisions to be taken by the Board require specialised knowledge or expert opinion, the Board takes independent professional advice as and when necessary to enable it or the Independent Directors to discharge the responsibilities effectively.

Procedures for Developing Remuneration Policies

Principle 7: There should be a formal and transparent procedure for developing policy on executive remuneration and for fi xing the remuneration packages of individual directors. No director should be involved in deciding his own remuneration.

The RC, established for the purpose of ensuring that there is a formal and transparent procedure for fi xing the remuneration packages of individual Directors, comprises three (3) Independent Non-Executive Directors. The chairman of the RC is an Independent Non-Executive Director.

The RC comprises the following:

Mr Chan Soo Sen – ChairmanDr Tan Khee Giap – MemberMr Ong Kian Min – Member

The overriding principle is that no Director should be involved in deciding his own remuneration. The RC has adopted a written term of reference that defi nes its membership, roles, functions and administration.

During the fi nancial year under review, the RC had held one (1) meeting on 8 February 2011. The primary responsibilities of the RC are as follows:

B. REMUNERATION MATTERS

Guidelines 6.1 and 6.2 of the Code: Information to the Board

Guideline 6.3 of the Code: Access to and role of the Company Secretary

Guideline 6.5 of the Code: Access to independent professional advice

Guideline 7.1 of the Code: RC to consist entirely of NEDs and majority, includingRC chairman, must be independent

Guideline 7.2 of the Code: RC’s responsibilities

1.

2.

3.

4.

To review and recommend to the Board in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, a framework of remuneration and to determine the specifi c remuneration packages and terms of employment for each of the executive Directors and senior executives or divisional Directors (those reporting directly to the Chairman or Group Chief Executive Offi cer) and those employees related to the Executive Directors and controlling Shareholders of the Group.

To review and recommend to the Board in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, any long term incentive schemes which may be set up from time to time and to do all acts necessary in connection therewith.

To administer the BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme (the “Scheme”) and shall have all the powers as set out in the Rules of the Scheme.

To administer the BreadTalk Group Limited Restricted Share Grant Plan (the “RSG Plan”) and shall have all the powers as set out in the Rules of the RSG Plan.

35

Page 38: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E To carry out its duties in the manner that it deems expedient, subject always to any regulations or restrictions that may be imposed upon the RC by the Board from time to time.

As part of its review, the RC shall ensure that:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

5.

6.

Guidelines 8.1 to 8.5of the Code: RC to recommend remuneration of Directors and review remuneration of key executives

all aspects of remuneration including but not limited to Directors’ fees, salaries, allowances, bonuses, options and benefi ts-in-kind should be covered.

the remuneration packages should be comparable within the industry and comparable companies and shall include a performance-related element coupled with appropriate and meaningful measures of assessing individual executive Directors’ and senior executives’ or divisional Directors’ performance.

the remuneration package of employees related to Executive Directors and controlling Shareholders are in line with the Group’s staff remuneration guidelines and commensurate with their respective job scopes and levels of responsibility.

Level and Mix of Remuneration

Principle 8: The level of remuneration should be appropriate to attract, retain and motivate the directors needed to run the company successfully but companies should avoid paying more than is necessary for this purpose. A signifi cant proportion of remuneration, especially that of executive directors, should be structured so as to link rewards to corporate and individual performance.

The Company advocates a performance based remuneration system for executive Directors and key executives that is fl exible and responsive to the market, comprising a base salary and other fi xed allowances, as well as variable performance bonus and participation in an employee share award or scheme based on the Company’s performance and linking it to the individual’s performance.

In determining such remuneration packages, the RC will ensure that they are adequate by considering, in consultation with the Chairman or Group Chief Executive Offi cer amongst other things, the respective individuals’ responsibilities, skills, expertise and contribution to the Company’s performance, and whether they are competitive and suffi cient to ensure that the Company is able to attract and retain the best available executive talent, meanwhile keeping tabs that they are not excessive.

At an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 April 2008, the shareholders of the Company had approved the adoption of the RSG Plan. Under the RSG Plan and any other share based schemes of the Company, the aggregate number of shares to be issued shall not exceed fi fteen per cent. (15%) of the total issued share capital excluding treasury shares of the Company and will be in force for a maximum period of 10 years commencing from 28 April 2008.

36

Page 39: Breadtalk AR 2011

The award of shares under RSG Plan can be either performance based awards or time based awards. For performance based awards, entitled participant will be allotted fully paid shares upon satisfactory achievement of pre-determined performance targets. As for time-based awards, entitled participant will be allotted fully paid shares upon satisfactory completion of time based service conditions that is, after the participant has served the Company or as the case may be, the relevant associated company, for a specifi ed duration, as may be determined by the RC.

The adoption of RSG Plan is consistent with the continuing efforts of the existing Scheme in rewarding, retaining and motivating employees to achieve superior performance standards and afford the Company greater fl exibility to align the interests of employees with those of the shareholders. To date, the Company has issued 1,516,310 shares under its RSG Plan.

The RC has adopted a framework which consists of a base fee to remunerate Non-Executive Directors based on their appointments and roles in the respective Committees, as well as the fees paid in comparable companies. Fees for the Non-Executive Directors will be tabled at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting to be held on 25 April 2012 (the “AGM”) for Shareholders’ approval. The notice periods in the service agreements of the Executive Directors and key executives of the Group are set at a period of not more than 6 months. The Company confi rms that there is no onerous removal clause in any of the service agreements.

Guideline 8.6 of the Code: Notice periods in service contracts to be six (6) months orless

37

Page 40: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E

Principle 9: Each company should provide clear disclosure of its remuneration policy, level and mix of remuneration, and the procedures for setting remuneration in the company’s annual report. It should provide disclosure in relation to its remuneration policies to enable investors to understand the link between remuneration paid to directors and key executives, and performance.

A breakdown showing the level and mix of each Director’s and key Executives remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2011 is set out below:

Disclosure on Remuneration

REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND KEY EXECUTIVES

Name of Director

S$700,000 to below S$800,000

S$500,000 to below S$600,000

Below S$100,000

George Quek Meng Tong

Ong Kian Min

Katherine Lee Lih Leng

Chan Soo Sen

Tan Khee Giap

%

55

63

-

-

-

Salary(1)

%

39

32

-

-

-

Bonus /Profi t

Sharing

%

3

5

-

-

-

Shared-basedCompensation

%

2

-

-

-

-

Benefi ts-In-Kind

100

%

-

-

100

100

Directors’Fee2

%

100

100

100

100

100

Total

Guidelines 9.1 to 9.3 of the Code: Directors’, key executives’ and related employees’remuneration

38

Page 41: Breadtalk AR 2011

Notes:

(1) Salary is inclusive of fi xed allowance and CPF contribution.

(2) Directors’ fees will be paid after approval is obtained from Shareholders at the forthcoming AGM to be held on 25 April 2012.

(3) Mr Frankie Quek is the brother of Dr George Quek.

(4) Mr James Quek Seng Hwa has been appointed as CEO Asean with effect from 1 March 2011.

(5) Mr Cheng William has been appointed as CEO Restaurant Division with effect from 1 January 2011.

(6) Mr Lawrence Yeo Kia Yeow has been appointed as Group CFO with effect from 10 October 2011.

Save as disclosed, no other employee whose remuneration exceeded S$150,000 during the year is an immediate family member of any of the members of the Board.

Name of Key Executives(who are not Directors)

S$500,000 to S$750,000

S$250,000 to S$500,000

Below S$250,000

Oh Eng Lock

Goh Tong Pak

James Quek Seng Hwa(4)

Henry Chu Heng Hwee

Frankie Quek Swee Heng(3)

Jenson Ong Chin Hock

Cheng William(5)

Lawrence Yeo Kia Yeow (6)

%

60

85

52

66

85

63

54

32

Salary(1)

%

33

12

39

28

13

31

37

68

Bonus /Profi t-

Sharing

%

7

3

9

6

2

6

9

-

Shared-based

Compensation

Group Chief Executive Offi cer

President (Chairman’s

Offi ce)

CEO, ASEAN

Chief Executive Offi cer

(Bakery Division)

CEO, China

CEO, Food Atrium Division

CEO, Restaurant Division

Group Chief Financial Offi cer

Designation

%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Benefi ts-In-

Kind

%

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Total

39

Page 42: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E Principle 10: The board is accountable to the shareholders while the management is accountable to the board. The board should present a balanced and understandable assessment of the company’s performance, position and prospects.

For all announcements (including fi nancial performance reporting) made to the public via SGXNET and the annual report to Shareholders, as required by the SGX-ST, the Board has a responsibility to present a fair assessment of the Group’s position, including the prospects of the Group.

To enable effective monitoring and decision-making by the Board, Management provides the Board with a continual fl ow of relevant information on a timely basis as well as quarterly management accounts of the Group. Particularly, prior to the release of quarterly and full year results to the public, Management will present the Group’s fi nancial performance together with explanatory details of its operations to the AC, which will review and recommend the same to the Board for approval and authorisation for the release of the results.

Principle 11: The board should establish an audit committee with written terms of reference, which clearly set out its authority and duties.

The role of the AC is to assist the Board in the execution of its corporate governance responsibilities within the established Board’s references and requirements. The fi nancial statements, accounting policies and system of internal accounting controls are responsibilities that fall under the ambit of the AC. The AC has its set of written terms of reference defi ning its scope of authority and further details of its major functions are set out below and also in the Report of the Directors.

The AC comprises three (3) members who are all Independent non-executive Directors. The chairman of the AC is an Independent non-executive Director.

The members of the AC are:

Mr Ong Kian Min – ChairmanMr Chan Soo Sen – MemberDr Tan Khee Giap – Member

The members of the AC collectively have expertise or experience in fi nancial management, and are qualifi ed to discharge the AC’s responsibilities.

In performing its functions, the AC confi rms that it has explicit authority to investigate any matter within its terms of reference, full access to and co-operation from the Management, and has been given full discretion to invite any Director or executive offi cer to attend its meetings, as well as reasonable resources to enable it to discharge its functions properly.

C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND AUDIT

Audit Committee

Accountability

Guideline 10.1 of the Code: Board’s responsibility to the public

Guideline 10.2 of the Code: Management’s responsibility to the Board

Guidelines 11.1, 11.2 and 11.8 of the Code: Board to establish AC and composition of AC

Guideline 11.3 of the Code: AC’s authority

40

Page 43: Breadtalk AR 2011

The AC held four (4) meetings during the fi nancial year under review. It has reviewed the fi nancial statements of the Group for the purpose of the fi rst 3 quarters and annual results release before they were submitted to the Board for approval. It has also met with the Company’s internal and external auditors to review their audit plans and results, and has separate and independent access to the auditors. The AC had reviewed the non-audit services provided by the external auditors, Messrs Ernst & Young LLP and is of the opinion that the provision of such services does not affect their independence. The fees payable to auditors is set out on page 94 of this Annual Report.

The Group has complied with Rule 712 and Rules 715 or 716 of the Listing Manual issued by Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited in relation to its auditors. As required by Rule 716 of the Listing Manual, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company has satisfi ed themselves that the appointment of different auditors for its subsidiaries would not compromise the standard and effectiveness of the audit of the Group.

Where there is any suspected fraud or irregularity, or failure of internal controls, or infringement of any Singapore law, rule or regulation which has a material impact on the Company’s operating results, the AC will commission and review the fi ndings of internal investigations into the matters. Endorsed by the AC, the Company has in place a whistle-blowing framework which provides an avenue for staff of the Company to access the AC chairman to raise concerns about improprieties and independent investigation of such matters by the AC. Contact details of AC have been made available to all staff.

1.

2

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

The main functions of the AC are as follows: Guideline 11.4 of the Code: Duties of AC

Guidelines 11.5 and 11.6 of the Code: Meeting with auditors and review of their independence

Guideline 11.7 of the Code: Whistle-blowing arrangements

Guideline 12.2 of the Code: AC to comment on the adequacy of internal controls

Guideline 12.1 of the Code: AC to review adequacy of the fi nancial, operational and compliance controls and risk management policies.

Review the audit plan of the Company’s external auditors and adequacy of the system of internal accounting control;

Discuss and review external auditors’ reports;

Review signifi cant fi nancial reporting issues and judgements so as to ensure the integrity of the fi nancial statements and any formal announcements relating to the Company’s or Group’s fi nancial performance;

Review and recommend the nomination of the external auditors for appointment or re-appointment;

Review the Interested Person Transactions;

Review the scope and result of the internal audit procedures; and

Review the remuneration packages of the employees who are related to the Directors or substantial Shareholders.

Principle 12: The board should ensure that the management maintains a sound system of internal controls to safeguard the shareholders’ investments and the company’s assets.

The Internal Auditors carried out internal audit on the system of internal controls and report the fi ndings to the AC. The Group’s External Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP have also carried out, in the course of their statutory audit, a review of the Group’s material internal controls. Material non-compliance and internal control weaknesses and recommendations for improvements noted during their audit are reported to the AC. The AC has reviewed the effectiveness of the actions taken by the management on the recommendations made by the Internal and External Auditors in this respect.

For the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011, the Board believes that in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the system of internal controls maintained by the Group’s management that was in place throughout the fi nancial period up to the date of this report, provides reasonable, but not absolute assurance against material fi nancial misstatements or loss. The Board notes that no system of internal control could provide absolute assurance against the occurrence of material errors, poor judgement in decision-making, human errors, losses, fraud or other irregularities. Based on the aforesaid, the AC and the Board are satisfi ed that there are adequate internal controls in the Group in addressing the Group’s fi nancial, operational and compliance risks.

Internal Control

41

Page 44: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E Principle 13: The company should establish an internal audit function that is independent of the activities it audits.

Since 2006, the Group had outsourced its internal audit function to RSM Ethos Pte Ltd, a merged entity of Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd and Ethos Advisory Pte Ltd (formerly known as Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd). The Internal Auditor is guided by the Standards for Professional Practice of Internal Auditing set by the Institute of Internal Auditors. The Internal Auditors report directly to the Chairman of the AC. The AC reviews the scope of internal audit function, internal audit fi ndings and the internal audit plan.

Principle 14: A company should engage in regular, effective and fair communication with its shareholders.

Principle 15: A company should encourage greater shareholder participation at annual general meetings and allow its shareholders the opportunity to communicate their views on various matters affecting the company.

The Board has adopted a policy of openness and transparency in the conduct of the Company’s affairs while preserving the commercial interests of the Company. Financial results and other price sensitive information are disseminated to Shareholders via SGXNET, press releases, the Company’s website, and through media and analyst briefi ngs.

The Board strives to ensure that all material information is disclosed to the shareholders on an adequate and timely basis. The Board informs and communicates with shareholders through annual reports, announcement released through SGXNET, press releases, advertisements of notice of general meetings in local newspapers.

Notices of general meetings are despatched to shareholders, together with the annual report or circulars within the time notice period as prescribed by the regulations. At general meetings, shareholders are given opportunities to voice their views and direct their questions to directors or management regarding the Company. The chairman of the AC, NC and/or RC are present and available to address questions at general meetings. The External Auditors are also present to assist the Board.

In preparation for the annual general meeting, shareholders are encouraged to refer to SGX’s investor guides, namely ‘An Investor’s Guide To Reading Annual Reports’ and ‘An Investor’s Guide To Preparing For Annual General Meetings’. The guides, in both English and Chinese versions are available at the SGX website via this link : http://www.sgx.com/wps/portal/marketplace/mp-en/investor_centre/investor_guide

The Company has in place an investor relations programme to keep investors informed of material developments in the Company’s business and affairs beyond that which is prescribed, but without prejudicing the business interests of the Company.

The Company’s Articles of Association do not restrict the number of proxy a shareholder can appoint to attend and vote on his/her behalf at all general meetings. There are separate resolutions at the general meetings for each distinct issue. The Board and Management are on hand at general meetings to address questions by shareholders.

Internal Audit

Communication with Shareholders

Guidelines 13.1 to 13.4 of the Code: IA to report to AC chairman

Guidelines 14.1 to 14.2 of the Code: Regular, effective and fair communications with shareholders

Guideline 15.3 of the Code: Chairman and external auditors present at general meetings

Guideline 15.1-15.2 and 15.4 of the Code: Shareholders should be allowed to vote in absentia, avoid bundling of resolutions and limit on proxy.

42

Page 45: Breadtalk AR 2011

The Company has adopted and implemented an Insider Trading (Prevention) Policy (the “Policy”). The Policy is to ensure that the Company’s Directors, offi cers, employees of the Group as well as consultants or contractors to the Group (collectively the “Covered Persons”) and immediate family members of Covered Persons are aware of their legal obligations in relation to the dealing of securities in the Company. Covered Persons who are in possession of unpublished material price sensitive information and use such information for their own material gain in relation to those securities is an offence. The Company, while having provided the window periods for dealing in the Company’s securities, has its own internal compliance code in providing guidance to its offi cers with regards to dealing in the Company’s securities including reminders that the law on insider trading is applicable at all the times.

On 28 May 2009, a Disciplinary Committee (“DC”) was formed to conduct inquiry on a possible breach of the Policy. The role of the DC is to report its fi nding to the Board and make recommendation as to the penalty if applicable. The Board will decide based on the DC’s recommendation.

The DC comprises three (3) members, a majority of whom are Independent Non-Executive Directors. The chairman of the DC is an Independent Non-Executive Director.

The DC consists of:

Mr Ong Kian Min – ChairmanDr George Quek Meng Tong – MemberMr Chan Soo Sen – Member

Dealing in Securities

Guideline 15.5 of the Code: Minutes of general meetings

Minutes of general meetings are prepared and made available to shareholders upon their requests by the Company Secretary.

When a potential confl ict arises, the Directors concerned do not participate in discussions and refrains from exercising any infl uence over other members of the Board.

The AC has reviewed the Interested Person Transactions (“IPT”) entered into during the fi nancial year by the Group and the aggregate value of IPT entered during the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 is as follows:

Interested Person Transactions

Name of Interested Person

(1) Monewell Enterprise - Purchase of Chinese New Year Cookies

(2) Kung Fu Kitchen - Food court rental income/ miscellaneous charges

Aggregate value of all IPTs conducted during the fi nancial year under review

under shareholders’ mandate pursuant to Rule 920 (excluding

transactions less than S$100,000)

Not applicable - the Company does not have a shareholders’

mandate under Rule 920

(3) Sky One Art Investment Pte Ltd - Purchase of furniture and fi ttings

Aggregate value (S$’000) of all IPTs during the

fi nancial year under review (excluding transactions

less than S$100,000 and transactions conducted

under shareholders’ mandate pursuant to Rule 920)

75.3

221.4

194.3

43

Page 46: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

RP

OR

AT

EG

OV

ER

NA

NC

E

Except as disclosed in Interested Person Transactions, there is no material contract or loan entered into by the Company or any of its subsidiaries involving interests of any Director or controlling shareholder during the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011.

The Group regularly reviews and improves its business and operational activities to identify areas of signifi cant business risks as well as taking appropriate measures to control and mitigate these risks. The Group reviews all signifi cant control policies and procedures and highlights all signifi cant matters to the AC and the Board.

During the last quarter of the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011, the AC and the Board had commissioned Management to seek quotations from several professional fi rms specialising in enterprise risk management in order to further enhance the robustness of overall risk management within the Group. The evaluation exercise is still ongoing and no candidate has been shortlisted yet. The existing fi nancial risk management objectives and policies are outlined in the fi nancial statements.

Material Contracts

Risk Management

44

Page 47: Breadtalk AR 2011

IndexPage

GE

NE

RA

LIN

FO

RM

AT

ION

Directors’ Report 46

Statement by Directors 53

Independent Auditors’ Report 54

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 56

Balance Sheets 57

Statements of Changes in Equity 59

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 62

Notes to the Financial Statements 65

45

Page 48: Breadtalk AR 2011

DIR

EC

TO

RS

’R

EP

OR

T The directors are pleased to present their report to the members together with the audited fi nancial statements of BreadTalk Group Limited (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) and the balance sheet and statement of changes in equity of the Company for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011.

Directors

The directors of the Company in offi ce at the date of this report are:

George Quek Meng Tong Katherine Lee Lih Leng Ong Kian Min Chan Soo Sen Tan Khee Giap

Except as disclosed in this report, neither at the end of nor at any time during the fi nancial year was the Company a party to any arrangement whose objects are, or one of whose object is, to enable the directors of the Company to acquire benefi ts by means of the acquisition of shares or debentures of the Company or any other body corporate.

Directors’ interests in shares and debentures

The following directors, who held offi ce at the end of the fi nancial year, had, according to the register of directors’ shareholdings required to be kept under section 164 of the Singapore Companies Act, Cap. 50, an interest in shares of the Company as stated below:

Arrangements to enable directors to acquire shares and debentures

Name of director

The Company(Ordinary shares)

George Quek Meng TongKatherine Lee Lih LengOng Kian MinTan Khee Giap

George Quek Meng TongKatherine Lee Lih Leng

As at 1January

2011

95,538,55652,282,800

120,000–

111,10494,220

Direct interestAs at 31

December2011

95,583,95252,319,880

120,000–

125,708117,140

As at 21January

2012

95,583,95252,319,880

120,000–

125,708117,140

52,282,80095,538,556

–20,000

94,220111,104

52,319,88095,583,952

–20,000

117,140125,708

52,319,88095,583,952

–20,000

117,140125,708

(Conditional award of restricted shares)

(Chairman)(Deputy Chairman)

As at 1January

2011

Deemed interestAs at 31

December2011

As at 21January 2012

46

Page 49: Breadtalk AR 2011

Directors’ interests in shares and debentures (cont’d)

By virtue of Section 7 of the Companies Act, Cap. 50, George Quek Meng Tong and Katherine Lee Lih Leng are deemed to be interested in the shares held by the Company in its subsidiaries.

Except as disclosed in this report, no other director who held offi ce at the end of the fi nancial year had interest in shares or debentures of the Company, or of related corporations, either at the beginning of the fi nancial year, date of appointment or the end of the fi nancial year or on 21 January 2012.

Directors’ contractual benefi ts

Except as disclosed in the fi nancial statements, since the end of previous fi nancial year, no director of the Company has received or become entitled to receive a benefi t by reason of a contract made by the Company or a related corporation with the director, or with a fi rm of which the director is a member, or with a company in which the director has a substantial fi nancial interest.

Share Option and Share Plans

The Company has a Share Option Scheme and a Restricted Share Grant Plan which are administered by the Remuneration Committee comprising three Directors namely Messrs Chan Soo Sen (Chairman), Ong Kian Min (Member) and Tan Khee Giap (Member). Details of the Share Option Scheme and the Restricted Share Grant Plan are as follows:

The BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme

The BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme (“ESOS”) was approved at an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 30 April 2003. The following persons are eligible to participate in the ESOS at the absolute discretion of the Remuneration Committee:

(i) Employees and Directors

Employees, Executive directors and Non-Executive directors of the Group who are not on probation and have attained the age of 21 years on or before the Offering Date.

(ii) Controlling Shareholders and their Associates

Controlling Shareholders or their Associates whose participation and actual number of shares issued to them must be approved by independent shareholders in general meeting.

(a)

47

Page 50: Breadtalk AR 2011

DIR

EC

TO

RS

’R

EP

OR

T Share Option and Share Plans (cont’d)

(a) The BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme (cont’d)

Size of ESOS

(b) The BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan

The total number of new shares over which options may be granted pursuant to the ESOS shall not exceed fi fteen per cent (15%) of the issued share capital of the Company on the date preceding the grant of an option.

The aggregate number of Shares available to eligible Controlling Shareholders and their Associates under the ESOS shall not exceed twenty fi ve per cent (25%) of the Shares available under the ESOS. In addition, the number of Shares available to each Controlling Shareholder or his Associate shall not exceed ten per cent (10%) of the Shares available under the ESOS.

Grant of ESOS

Options may be granted from time to time during the year when the ESOS is in force, except that options shall be granted on or after the second market day on which an announcement of any matter involving unpublished price sensitive information is released.

Acceptance of ESOS

The grant of an option shall be accepted not more than 30 days from the offering date of that option and accompanied by payment to the Company of a nominal consideration of $1 or such other amount as required by the Remuneration Committee.

Since the commencement of the ESOS up to the end of the fi nancial year, there were no options granted to any person. Any options granted under the ESOS do not entitle the holders of the options, by virtue of such holdings, to any right to participate in any share issue of any other company.

The BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan (“RSG Plan”) was approved at an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 April 2008.

The RSG Plan is centred on the accomplishment of specifi c pre-determined performance objectives and service conditions, which is the prerequisite for the contingent award of fully paid Shares (“Award”). The reward structure allows the Company to target specifi c performance objectives and incentivise the Participants to put in their best efforts to achieve these targets.

48

Page 51: Breadtalk AR 2011

Eligibility

The following persons shall be eligible to participate in the RSG Plan subject to the absolute discretion of the Remuneration Committee:

(i) Employees

(ii) Directors

Controlling Shareholders and their Associates within the above categories are eligible to participate in the RSG Plan. Participation in the RSG Plan by Controlling Shareholders or their Associates must be approved by the independent shareholders. A separate resolution shall be passed for each such Participant and to approve the number of Shares to be awarded to the Participant and the terms of such Award.

There shall be no restriction on the eligibility of any Participant to participate in any other share option or share incentive schemes implemented or to be implemented by the Company or another company within the Group.

Size of RSG Plan

The aggregate number of Shares available to eligible Controlling Shareholders and their Associates under the RSG Plan shall not exceed twenty fi ve per cent (25%) of the Shares available under the RSG Plan. In addition, the number of Shares available to each Controlling Shareholder or his Associate shall not exceed ten per cent (10%) of the Shares available under the RSG Plan.

The aggregate number of Shares to be awarded pursuant to the RSG Plan when added to the number of Shares issued and issuable in respect of such other Shares issued and/or issuable under such other share-based incentive schemes of the Company, including but not limited to the ESOS, shall not exceed fi fteen per cent (15%) of the total issued share capital excluding treasury shares of the Company on the day preceding the relevant Award Date.

Share Option and Share Plans (cont’d)

(b) The BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan (cont’d)

Employees who are confi rmed in their employment with the Company or any subsidiary, or employees of associated companies who hold such rank as may be designated by the Committee from time to time and who, in the opinion of the Committee, have contributed or will contribute to the success of the Group; and

Executive and non-executive directors of the Company and its subsidiaries, provided always that any of the aforesaid persons:

- have attained the age of twenty-one (21) years on or before the Award Date; and - not undischarged bankrupts.

49

Page 52: Breadtalk AR 2011

Grant of RSG Plan

The grant of Awards under the RSG Plan may be made from time to time during the year when the RSG Plan is in force.

While Awards may be granted at any time in the year, it is anticipated that Awards under the RSG Plan would be made once a year, after the Company’s annual general meeting. It will be administered by the Remuneration Committee.

Share Awards and Vesting

The fi nal number of restricted shares awarded will depend on the achievement of pre-determined targets over a one year period. On meeting the performance conditions for the performance period, one-third of the restricted shares will vest. The balance will vest equally over the subsequent two years with fulfi lment of service requirements.

The details of the restricted shares awarded under the RSG Plan since its commencement up to 31 December 2011 are as follows:

Share Option and Share Plans (cont’d)

(b) The BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan (cont’d)

Name of Participant

Directors of the Company

Associate of a Controlling Shareholder

George Quek Meng Tong (1)

Frankie Quek Swee Heng (2)

201,200 - 45,396 75,492 125,70865,000

176,000

106,000

-

-

37,080

26,880

58,860

48,660

117,140

57,340

65,000

25,000

Katherine Lee Lih Leng (1)

Conditional restricted

shares granted

during the year

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares awarded since

commencement of the Plan

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares lapsed since

commencement of the Plan

Aggregate conditional restricted

shares vested and released

during the year

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares vested and

released since commencement

of the Plan

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares outstanding at end of the year

DIR

EC

TO

RS

’R

EP

OR

T

50

Page 53: Breadtalk AR 2011

Share Option and Share Plans (cont’d)

(1) Also a controlling shareholder of the Company.(2) Associate of George Quek Meng Tong, a controlling shareholder of the Company.(3) This includes a total of 781,666 shares that were released via the issuance of treasury shares in relation to a sign-on bonus granted to Mr. Oh Eng Lock.(4) Ms Catherine Lee resigned as Group CFO with effect from 7 September 2011.

With the Remuneration Committee’s approval on the achievement of the performance targets for the performance period FY2009 and FY2010, a total of 432,892 restricted shares were released via the issuance of treasury shares.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee performed the functions specifi ed in the Companies Act. The functions performed are detailed in the Report on Corporate Governance.

Name of Participant

Participants who received 5% or more of the total grants available

Oh Eng Lock (3)

Goh Tong Pak

Catherine Lee Khia Yee (4)

Cheng William

James Quek

Other participants

Conditional restricted

shares granted

during the year

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares awarded since

commencement of the Plan

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares lapsed since

commencement of the Plan

Aggregate conditional restricted

shares vested and released

during the year

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares vested and

released since commencement

of the Plan

Aggregate conditional

restricted shares outstanding at end of the year

103,000

25,00051,000

34,000

107,000

206,000

681,000

933,666

298,200

187,600204,200

166,800

611,400

2,885,066

–51,000

84,420

135,420

16,660

91,016

45,50856,776

20,044

93,532

432,892

798,326

152,792

76,396

92,812

29,548

183,424

1,516,310

135,340

145,408

60,204

111,388

137,252

343,556

1,233,336

51

Page 54: Breadtalk AR 2011

Auditors

Ernst & Young LLP have expressed their willingness to accept re-appointment as auditors.

On behalf of the board of directors:

George Quek Meng TongDirector

Katherine Lee Lih LengDirector

Singapore23 March 2012

DIR

EC

TO

RS

’R

EP

OR

T

52

Page 55: Breadtalk AR 2011

STA

TE

ME

NT

BY

DIR

EC

TO

RS We, George Quek Meng Tong and Katherine Lee Lih Leng, being two of the directors of

BreadTalk Group Limited, do hereby state that, in the opinion of the directors,

On behalf of the board of directors:

George Quek Meng TongDirector

Katherine Lee Lih LengDirector

Singapore23 March 2012

the accompanying balance sheets, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, statements of changes in equity, and consolidated cash fl ow statement together with notes thereto are drawn up so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the Company as at 31 December 2011 and the results of the business, changes in equity and cash fl ows of the Group and the changes in equity of the Company for the year ended on that date, and

at the date of this statement, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.

(i)

(ii)

53

Page 56: Breadtalk AR 2011

IND

EP

EN

DE

NT

AU

DIT

OR

S’

RE

PO

RT To the members of BreadTalk Group Limited

We have audited the accompanying consolidated fi nancial statements of BreadTalk Group Limited (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) set out on pages 56 to 144, which comprise the balance sheets of the Group and the Company as at 31 December 2011, the statements of changes in equity of the Group and the Company, the statement of comprehensive income and cash fl ow statement of the Group for the year then ended, and a summary of signifi cant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management is responsible for the preparation of fi nancial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50 (the “Act”) and Singapore Financial Reporting Standards, and for devising and maintaining a system of internal accounting controls suffi cient to provide a reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorised use or disposition; and transactions are properly authorised and that they are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of true and fair profi t and loss accounts and balance sheets and to maintain accountability of assets.

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these fi nancial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Singapore Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the fi nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation of the fi nancial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the fi nancial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Report on the fi nancial statements

Management’s responsibility for the fi nancial statements

Auditors’ responsibility

54

Page 57: Breadtalk AR 2011

In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group and the balance sheet and statement of changes in equity of the Company are properly drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Singapore Financial Reporting Standards so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the Company as at 31 December 2011 and the results, changes in equity and cash fl ows of the Group and the changes in equity of the Company for the year ended on that date.

In our opinion, the accounting and other records required by the Act to be kept by the Company and by those subsidiaries incorporated in Singapore of which we are the auditors have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Ernst & Young LLPPublic Accountants and Certifi ed Public Accountants Singapore23 March 2012

Opinion

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

55

Page 58: Breadtalk AR 2011

CO

NS

OLI

DA

TE

D S

TAT

EM

EN

TO

F C

OM

PR

EH

EN

SIV

E I

NC

OM

E For the year ended 31 December 2011

Revenue

Gross profi t

Profi t before taxation

Profi t attributable to:

Other comprehensive income:

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

Total comprehensive income for the year

Total comprehensive income attributable to:

Earnings per share (cents)

Profi t for the year

Profi t before taxation and share of results of joint ventures

$’000

3

5

5

4

86

9

9

365,904

200,058

824

(5,370)

4.12

4.10

7,495

17,127

11,757

11,757

12,668

12,668

17,034

(165,846)

(145,520)(45,038)

93

11,592

12,503

165

911

911

165

(785)

(137,646)

(120,994)(41,872)

158

11,266

(574)

9,833

(98)

(859)

(1,433)

(98)

(635)

302,888

165,242

601

(5,520)

4.01

3.99

14,188

16,688

11,168

11,168

9,735

9,735

16,530

$’000

Cost of sales

Interest income

Share of results of joint ventures

Equity holders of the Company

Net loss on available-for-sale fi nancial assets

Equity holders of the Company

Non-controlling interests

Foreign currency translation gain/(loss)

Non-controlling interests

Distribution and selling expensesAdministrative expenses

Other operating income

Taxation

Basic

Diluted

Notes 2011 2010

Interest expense

The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the fi nancial statements.

56

Page 59: Breadtalk AR 2011

BA

LAN

CE

SH

EE

TS As at 31 December 2011

Non-current assetsProperty, plant and equipmentIntangible assetsInvestment securitiesInvestment in subsidiariesInvestment in associatesInvestment in joint venturesOther receivablesDeferred tax assets

Current assetsInventoriesTrade and other receivables PrepaymentsTax recoverableAmounts due from subsidiaries (non-trade)Amounts due from joint ventures(non-trade)Amounts due from minority shareholders of subsidiaries (non-trade)Cash and cash equivalents

Current liabilitiesTrade and other payablesOther liabilitiesProvisionAmounts due to subsidiaries (non-trade)Amounts due to joint ventures (non-trade)Finance lease obligations, securedLoan from a minority shareholder of a subsidiaryShort-term loansCurrent portion of long-term loansTax payable

Group Company

$’000 $’000

101112131415178

1617

1818

18

19

20212118182322

2425

88,8989,214

11,669--

4221,3892,120

113,712

7,39746,8005,389

230-

1,297

420

87,060

148,593

74,07441,1245,871

-39537

200

15,7648,3965,623

151,484

73,3069,142

11,669--

446857

1,898

97,318

6,11425,3453,306

9-

506

455

71,144

106,879

60,84632,3873,536

-14054

200

4,6986,2324,402

112,495

7,222--

40,476---

30

47,728

--

36-

15,335-

-

2,698

18,069

2502,115

-7,394

---

12,000--

21,759

5,766--

39,166---

12

44,944

-2683

-5,748

-

-

2,947

8,804

4891,845

-8,762

---

--

80

11,176

$’000 $’000

Notes 2011 20112010 2010

57

Page 60: Breadtalk AR 2011

Group Company

Notes 2011 20112010 2010

As at 31 December 2011 (cont’d)

Net current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Long-term loansFinance lease obligations, securedLoans from minority shareholdersof subsidiariesOther payablesOther liabilitiesDeferred tax liabilities

Net assets

Equity attributable to equity holders of the CompanyShare capitalTreasury sharesAccumulated profi tsOther reserves

Non-controlling interests

Total Equity

$’000 $’000

2523

2220218

26262727

(2,891)

15,156-

882-

7,0392,276

25,353

85,468

33,303(609)

41,5583,178

77,9707,498

85,468

(5,616)

8,11737

595,7592,647

16,619

75,083

33,303(199)

33,0902,368

68,5626,521

75,083

(3,690)

3,989--

---

3,989

40,049

33,303(609)

6,812543

40,049-

40,049

(2,372)

3,989--

---

3,989

38,583

33,303(199)5,064

415

38,583-

38,583

$’000 $’000

BA

LAN

CE

SH

EE

TS

The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the fi nancial statements.

- - -

58

Page 61: Breadtalk AR 2011

Stat

emen

ts o

f C

hang

es in

Eq

uity

fo

r th

e ye

ar e

nded

31

Dec

emb

er 2

011

Att

rib

utab

le t

o eq

uity

hol

der

s of

the

Com

pan

y

2010

Gro

up

At 1

Jan

uary

201

0

Profi

t fo

r the

yea

r

Net

loss

on

fair

valu

e ch

ang

es

of a

vaila

ble-

for-s

ale

fi nan

cial

as

sets

Fore

ign

curr

ency

tran

slat

ion

Oth

er c

omp

rehe

nsiv

e in

com

e fo

r the

yea

r, ne

t of

tax

Tota

l com

preh

ensi

ve in

com

e

for t

he y

ear

Tran

sact

ions

with

equ

ity

hol

der

s

Shar

e-ba

sed

paym

ents

Div

iden

ds

paid

(Not

e 34

)D

ivid

end

pay

able

(Not

e 20

)Tr

ansf

er to

sta

tuto

ry re

serv

eTr

easu

ry s

hare

s tr

ansf

erre

don

ves

ting

of re

stric

ted

shar

eg

rant

Purc

hase

of t

reas

ury

shar

esIs

suan

ce o

f new

sha

res

to

m

inor

ity s

hare

hold

ers

At 3

1 D

ecem

ber 2

010

Shar

e ca

pit

al

––

$’00

0

(Not

e 26

)

33,3

03

– – – – – – ––––

33,3

03

$’00

0

(Not

e 26

)

(283

)

Trea

sury

sh

ares

– – – – – – – –

(259

)34

3–

(199

)

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

24,7

82

11,2

66

Acc

umul

ated

p

rofi t

s

– – – –(2

,342

)–

(616

)

–––

11,2

66

33,0

90

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

1,45

5

Stat

utor

y re

serv

e fu

nd

– – – – – – 616 ––––

2,07

1

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

137 –

Tran

slat

ion

rese

rve

(859

)

(859

)

– – – – ––--

(859

)

(722

)

Fair

val

ue

adju

stm

ent

rese

rve

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

1,17

8

(574

)

(574

)

– – – – –––

(574

)

604

Shar

e b

ased

co

mp

ensa

tion

re

serv

e

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

90 – – – – 668 – – – ––

(511

)

– 247

Cap

ital

rese

rve

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

– – – – – – – – – ––168– 168

(574

)

(859

)

(1,4

33)

668

(2,3

42)

– – –

(259

)–

9,83

3

Tota

l

$’00

0

60,6

62

11,2

66

68,5

62

– – – – –(8

20)

1,93

5

––(98)

Non

-con

-tr

ollin

gin

tere

sts

$’00

0

5,50

4

(98)

6,52

1

(574

)

(859

)

(1,4

33)

668

(2,3

42)

(820

)

1,93

5

(259

)–

9,73

5

Tota

l eq

uity

$’00

0

66,1

66

11,1

68

75,0

83

Oth

er c

ompr

ehen

sive

inco

me

59

Page 62: Breadtalk AR 2011

Stat

emen

ts o

f C

hang

es in

Eq

uity

fo

r th

e ye

ar e

nded

31

Dec

emb

er 2

011

(co

nt’d

)

Att

rib

utab

le t

o eq

uity

hol

der

s of

the

Com

pan

y

2011

Gro

up

At 1

Jan

uary

201

1

Profi

t fo

r the

yea

r

Oth

er c

ompr

ehen

sive

inco

me

Fore

ign

curr

ency

tran

slat

ion

Oth

er c

ompr

ehen

sive

inco

me

f

or th

e ye

ar, n

et o

f tax

Tota

l com

preh

ensi

ve in

com

e

for

the

year

Tran

sact

ions

with

equ

ity

h

olde

rs

Shar

e-ba

sed

pay

men

tsD

ivid

ends

pai

d (N

ote

34)

Tran

sfer

to s

tatu

tory

rese

rve

Trea

sury

sha

res

tran

sfer

red

on

ves

ting

of r

estr

icte

d

shar

e gr

ant

Purc

hase

of t

reas

ury

shar

esIs

suan

ce o

f new

sha

res

to

min

ority

sha

reho

lder

s

At 3

1 D

ecem

ber 2

011

Shar

e ca

pit

al

––

$’00

0

(Not

e 26

)

33,3

03

– – – ––

33,3

03

$’00

0

(Not

e 26

)

(199

)

Trea

sury

sh

ares

– – – 148

(558

)

(609

)

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

33,0

90

11,5

92

Acc

umul

ated

p

rofi t

s

– – – –

(311

)

41,5

58

– –– –

–(2

,813

)

––

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

2,07

1

Stat

utor

y re

serv

e fu

nd

– – – – –311

2,38

2

– – –

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

(722

)

Tran

slat

ion

rese

rve

911

911

911 – –– 189– – –

Fair

val

ue

adju

stm

ent

rese

rve

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

604 – – – – – –– 604– – –

Shar

e b

ased

co

mp

ensa

tion

re

serv

e

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

247 – – – –

(166

)

–– 357

276 – –

Cap

ital

rese

rve

$’00

0

(Not

e 27

)

168 – – – – 18 –– 186– – –

911

911

12,5

03

(588

)

Tota

l

$’00

0

68,5

62

11,5

92

77,9

70

276

(2,8

13)

– – 165 – ––

Non

-con

-tr

ollin

gin

tere

sts

$’00

0

6,52

1

165

7,49

8

– – 812

911

911

12,6

68

(558

)

–Tota

l eq

uity

$’00

0

75,0

83

11,7

57

85,4

68

276

(2,8

13)

812

11,5

92

60

Page 63: Breadtalk AR 2011

(283)–

(199)

(199)–

(609)

343

148

(259)

(558)

33,303–

33,303

33,303–

33,303

90–

157

247

247–

276

357

(166)

4,2533,153

3,153

5,064

5,0644,561

4,561

6,812

(2,342)

(2,813)

––

168

168–

186

168

18

37,3633,153

3,153

157

38,583

38,5834,561

4,561

276

40,049

(2,342)

(2,813)

511

(259)

(558)

Statements of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2011 (cont’d)

2010

Company

1 January 2010Profi t for the year

Total comprehensive income for the year

Transactions with equity holders

Share-based paymentsTreasury shares transferred on vesting of restricted share grantPurchase of treasury sharesDividends paid (Note 34)

At 31 December 2010

2011

Company

1 January 2011Profi t for the year

Total comprehensive income for the year

Transactions with equity holders

Share-based paymentsTreasury shares transferred on vesting of restricted share grantPurchase of treasury sharesDividends paid (Note 34)

At 31 December 2011

Share capital$’000

(Note 26)

Treasury shares$’000

(Note 26)

Accumulated profi ts$’000

(Note 27)

Share based compensation

reserve$’000

(Note 27)

Capital reserve$’000

(Note 27)

Total equity$’000

The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the fi nancial statements.

61

Page 64: Breadtalk AR 2011

11

1110

10

442

785

125

1,219

(93)

23,920

(824)

277

289

(20)

31

25364

25

(358)

17,127

$’000

4,782

(1,416)

43,262 37,941

(6,616)(2,842)

(2,083)

18,712

53,799(4,933)

48,866

408

635

19

2,285

(158)

21,190

(601)

668

761

(4,568)

23

(5)3

563

30

16,688

$’000

4,070

(1,299)

(179)(1,330)

(983)

11,404

49,594(4,152)

45,472

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 December 2011

Notes 2011 2010

Cash fl ows from operating activitiesProfi t before taxationAdjustments for: Amortisation of intangible assets Depreciation of property, plant and equipment Impairment loss on intangible assets Impairment loss on property, plant and equipment Interest expense Interest income Property, plant and equipment written off Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment Share based payment expenses Share of results of joint ventures Translation difference Write-off of inventories Write-down of inventories Impairment/(write back of impairment) of trade receivables Impairment of other receivables Impairment of an amount due from an associate (non-trade)

Operating cash fl ows before working capital changes(Increase)/decrease in: Inventories Trade receivables Other receivables and deposits PrepaymentsIncrease / (decrease) in: Trade payables Other payables and other liabilities

Cash fl ows generated from operationsTax paid

Net cash fl ows from operating activities

62

Page 65: Breadtalk AR 2011

A

17

19

(616)

(12,000)

(126)

255

(100)

-

(291)

(500)

225

-

(49,725)

200

305(37,077)

$’000

21,227

(2,813)(761) (611)

(558)(820)

15,764(6,625)

(10,196)812(54)

15,916

882(83)

71,144

16,775

87,060

(499)

-

(61)

35

-

(5,750)

(37)

-

9,082

(30)

(33,602)

-

143(36,485)

$’000

(8,695)

(1,312)(2,342)

8,828(259)

(4,837)8,780

1,480(298)200

12,718

(86)

58,426

848

71,144

Notes 2011 2010

Cash fl ows from investing activitiesInterest income receivedPurchase of property, plant and equipment Additions to intangible assets Subscription of junior bondsCash paid for reinstatement expensesProceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipmentDeposit for subscription of junior bondsAmount due from joint ventures(non-trade)Amount due to joint ventures (non-trade)Amount due from an associate (non-trade)Loan to a joint ventureInvestment in a joint ventureDividends received from a joint venture

Net cash fl ows used in investing activities

Cash fl ows from fi nancing activitiesInterest paid Dividends paid to shareholders of the CompanyDividends paid to minority shareholders of a subsidiaryPurchase of treasury sharesProceeds from long-term loansRepayment of long-term loansProceeds from short-term loansRepayment of short-term loansCapital injection from minority shareholders of subsidiaries Repayment of fi nance lease obligationsLoans from minority shareholders of subsidiariesRepayment of amount due to landlord

Net cash fl ows from fi nancing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 December 2011

The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the fi nancial statements.

63

Page 66: Breadtalk AR 2011

Note A. Purchase of property, plant and equipment

During the year, the Group acquired property, plant and equipment with an aggregate cost of approximately $40,033,000 (2010: $39,168,000). The additions were by way of cash payments of $27,214,000 (2010: $28,769,000), increase in provision for reinstatement costs of $2,461,000 (2010: $536,000) and amount payable to other creditors of $10,358,000 (2010: $9,863,000).

Cash outfl ow for the year also include payments in respect of property, plant and equipment acquired in the previous years of $9,863,000 (2010: $7,716,000).

The accompanying accounting policies and explanatory notes form an integral part of the fi nancial statements.

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31 December 2011

64

Page 67: Breadtalk AR 2011

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS General

Corporate information

BreadTalk Group Limited (the “Company”) is a limited liability company, which is incorporated and domiciled in the Republic of Singapore and listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Ltd.

The registered offi ce and principal place of business of the Company is located at 171 Kampong Ampat, #05-05 KA FoodLink, Singapore 368330.

The principal activity of the Company is that of investment holding and provision of management services. The principal activities of the subsidiaries are shown in Note 13 to the fi nancial statements.

Fundamental accounting assumption

The fi nancial statements of the Group have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Group’s net current liabilities position as at 31 December 2011 was $2,891,000 (2010: $5,616,000).

Included in current liabilities are deposits from food court tenants and franchisees and stored value card deposits of $12,866,000 (2010: $12,516,000), provision for reinstatement costs of $5,871,000 (2010: $3,536,000) and deferred revenue of $14,496,000 (2010: $9,916,000) respectively. Deferred revenue relates to the unutilised value on the food court stored value cards, unredeemed cash vouchers sold and unearned franchise fees received. These current liabilities, because of their nature, are not expected to result in signifi cant cash outfl ow from the Group within the next 12 months.

In addition, the Group has unutilised banking facilities available for future use. The directors are confi dent that the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.

Summary of signifi cant accounting policies

Basis of preparation

The consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group and the balance sheet and statement of changes in equity of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (“FRS”).

The fi nancial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except as disclosed in the accounting policies below.

The fi nancial statements are presented in Singapore Dollars (SGD or $) and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand ($’000) except when otherwise indicated.

1.

1.1

1.2

2.

2.1

65

Page 68: Breadtalk AR 2011

Changes in accounting policies

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous fi nancial year except in the current fi nancial year, the Group has adopted all the new and revised standards and Interpretations of FRS (INT FRS) that are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The adoption of these standards and interpretations did not have any effect on the fi nancial performance or position of the Group and the Company.

Standards issued but not yet effective

The Group has not adopted the following standards and interpretations that have been issued but not yet effective:

Amendments to FRS 107 Disclosures – Transfers of Financial Assets 1 July 2011Amendments to FRS 12 Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets 1 January 2012Amendments to FRS 1: Presentations of Items of Other Comprehensive Income 1 July 2012Amendments to FRS 19 Employee Benefi ts FRS 27 Separate Financial Statements FRS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures FRS 110 Consolidated Financial Statements FRS 111 Joint Arrangements FRS 112 Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities FRS 113 Fair Value Measurements

Except for FRS 27 and FRS 110, the directors expect that the adoption of the standards and interpretations above will have no material impact on the fi nancial statements in the period of initial application. The nature of the impending changes in accounting policy on adoption of FRS 27 and FRS 110 is described below.

2.2

2.3

Effective for annual periods beginning on

or afterDescription

FRS 110 Consolidated Financial Statements and FRS 27 Separate Financial Statements.

FRS 110 replaces the control assessment criteria and consolidation requirements currently in FRS 27 and INT FRS 12 Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities.

FRS 110 defi nes the principle of control and establishes control as the basis for determining which entities are consolidated in the consolidated fi nancial statements. It also provides more extensive application guidance on assessing control based on voting rights or other contractual rights. Under FRS 110, control assessment will be based on whether an investor has (i) power over the investee; (ii) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and (iii) the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the returns. FRS 27 remains as a standard applicable only to separate fi nancial statements.

FRS 110 will take effect from fi nancial years beginning on or after 1 January 2013, with full retrospective application. When the Group adopts FRS 110, entities it currently consolidates may not qualify for consolidation, and entities it currently does not consolidate may qualify for consolidation. The Group is currently estimating the effects of FRS 110 on its investments in the period of initial adoption.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

1 January 20131 January 20131 January 20131 January 20131 January 20131 January 20131 January 2013

66

Page 69: Breadtalk AR 2011

Impairment of available-for-sale investments and held-to-maturity investments

The Group records impairment charges on available-for-sale equity investments when there has been a signifi cant or prolonged decline in the fair value below their cost. The determination of what is “signifi cant” or “prolonged” requires judgment. In making this judgment, the Group evaluates, among other factors, historical share price movements and the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost.

The Group assesses whether there is an indication that held-to-maturity investments may be impaired. In the assessment, the Group evaluates, among other factors, the cash fl ow projections and value of the related secured property.

Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements

Estimates, assumptions concerning the future and judgements are made in the preparation of the fi nancial statements. They affect the application of the Group’s accounting policies, reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses, and disclosures made. They are assessed on an on-going basis and are based on experience and relevant factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Judgments made in applying accounting policies

In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has made the following judgments, apart from those involving estimations, which have the most signifi cant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated fi nancial statements:

2.4

(i)

67

Page 70: Breadtalk AR 2011

Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements (cont’d)

(ii) Income taxes

The Group has exposure to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Signifi cant judgement is involved in determining the Group-wide provision for income taxes. There are certain transactions and computations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The Group recognises liabilities for expected tax issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the fi nal tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recognised, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. The carrying amount of the Group’s tax payable and deferred tax liabilities at 31 December 2011 were approximately $5,623,000 (2010: $4,402,000) and $2,276,000 (2010: $2,647,000) respectively. The carrying amount of the Group’s tax recoverable and deferred tax assets at 31 December 2011 was $230,000 (2010: $9,000) and $2,120,000 (2010: $1,898,000) respectively.

A subsidiary, BreadTalk Pte Ltd obtained the Development and Expansion Incentive (“DEI”) which entitles the qualifying income of the company earned up to the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2012 to be subject to the concessionary tax rate of 10%. Judgment is involved when determining the amount of qualifying income for the year.

Impairment of goodwill

The Group determines whether goodwill is impaired at least on an annual basis. This requires an estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating units to which the goodwill are allocated. Estimating the value in use requires the Group to make an estimate of the expected future cash fl ows from the cash-generating unit and also to choose a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value of those cash fl ows. The carrying amount of the Group’s goodwill at 31 December 2011 was $6,048,000 (2010: $6,173,000). More details are given in Note 11.

2.4

(i)

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the balance sheet date, that have a signifi cant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next fi nancial year are discussed below.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

68

Page 71: Breadtalk AR 2011

2.4

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

Signifi cant accounting estimates and judgements (cont’d)

Valuation and estimated useful life of brand value arising from acquisition of a subsidiary, Topwin Investment Holding Pte Ltd (“Topwin”)

Brand value arising from the acquisition of Topwin was separately identifi ed and recognised by management using the “relief from royalty method”. The premise of this valuation method is the assumption that the Group would be compelled to pay the rightful owner of the brand name if the Group did not have the legal right to utilise the brand name. The ownership of the brand therefore relieves the Group from making such royalty payments. This requires an estimation of the royalty payments including initial fees and continuing royalty payments based on a percentage of projected revenue. The basis used to determine the revenue projections is the revenue for each food court of Topwin achieved in the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2004 projected into the future. The useful life of the brand value is estimated by the directors to be 15 years as this is the length of time that they expect the benefi ts of the brand to fl ow to the Group. Amortisation of the brand amounted to $213,000 (2010: $213,000) for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 and the carrying amount of the brand value at 31 December 2011 was $1,706,000 (2010: $1,919,000). More details are given in Note 11.

Useful lives of property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Management estimates the useful lives of these assets to be within 2 to 20 years. The carrying amount of the Group’s property, plant and equipment as at 31 December 2011 was $88,898,000 (2010: $73,306,000). Changes in the expected level of usage and technological developments could impact the economic useful lives and the residual values of these assets, therefore future depreciation charges could be revised. In particular, renovation costs incurred and capitalised for bakery outlets, food courts and restaurants may be subject to immediate impairment upon their unforeseen closure due to unfavourable operations.

Impairment of loans and receivables

The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there is any objective evidence that a fi nancial asset is impaired. To determine whether there is objective evidence of impairment, the Company considers factors such as the probability of insolvency or signifi cant fi nancial diffi culties of the debtor and default or signifi cant delay in payments.

Where there is objective evidence of impairment, the amount and timing of future cash fl ows are estimated based on historical loss experience of assets with similar credit risk characteristics. The carrying amount of the Company’s loans and receivables at balance sheet date is disclosed in Note 31 to the fi nancial statements.

69

Page 72: Breadtalk AR 2011

Functional currency

The Group’s consolidated fi nancial statements are presented in Singapore Dollars, which is also the parent company’s functional currency. Each entity in the Group determines its own functional currency and items included in the fi nancial statements of each entity are measured using that functional currency.

Transactions and balances

Transactions in foreign currencies are measured in the respective functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries and are recorded on initial recognition in the functional currencies at exchange rates approximating those ruling at the transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.

Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on translating monetary items at the balance sheet are recognised in profi t or loss except for exchange differences arising on monetary items that form part of the Group’s net investment in foreign operations, which are recognised initially in other comprehensive income and accumulated under translation reserve in equity. The translation reserve is reclassifi ed from equity to profi t or loss of the Group on disposal of the foreign operation.

Consolidated fi nancial statements

For consolidation purpose, the assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into SGD at the rate of exchange ruling at the end of the reporting period and their profi t or loss are translated at the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transactions. The exchange differences arising on the translation are recognised in other comprehensive income. On disposal of a foreign operation, the component of other comprehensive income relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in profi t or loss.

In the case of a partial disposal without loss of control of a subsidiary that includes a foreign operation, the proportionate share of the cumulative amount of the exchange differences are re-attributed to non-controlling interest and are not recognised in profi t or loss. For partial disposals of associates or jointly controlled entities that are foreign operations, the proportionate share of the accumulated exchange differences is reclassifi ed to profi t or loss.

2.5

(a)

(b)

(c)

Foreign currency

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

70

Page 73: Breadtalk AR 2011

A person or a close member of that person’s family is related to the Group and Company if that person:

(i) Has control or joint control over the Company;

(ii) Has signifi cant infl uence over the Company; or

(iii) Is a member of the key management personnel of the Group or Company or of a parent of the Company.

An entity is related to the Group and the Company if any of the following conditions applies:

(i) The entity and the Company are members of the same group (which means that each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others).

(ii) One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity (or an associate or joint venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member).

(iii) Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.

(iv) One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an associate of the third party.

(v) The entity is a post-employment benefi t plan for the benefi t of employees of either the Company or an entity related to the Company. If the Company is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also related to the Company;

(vi) The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identifi ed in (a);

(vii) A person identifi ed in (a) (i) has signifi cant infl uence over the entity or is a member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity).

2.6

(a)

(b)

Related parties

A related party is defi ned as follows:

71

Page 74: Breadtalk AR 2011

2.7

(a)

(b)

Subsidiaries, basis of consolidation and non-controlling interests

Subsidiaries

A subsidiary is an entity over which the Group has the power to govern the fi nancial and operating policies so as to obtain benefi ts from its activities. The Group generally has such power when it directly or indirectly, holds more than 50% of the issued share capital, or controls more than half of the voting power, or controls the composition of the board of directors.

In the Company’s separate fi nancial statements, investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost less any impairment losses.

Basis of consolidation and business combinations

(A) Basis of consolidation

Basis of consolidation from 1 January 2010

The consolidated fi nancial statements comprise the fi nancial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries as at the end of the reporting period. The fi nancial statements of the subsidiaries used in the preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements are prepared for the same reporting date as the parent company. Consistent accounting policies are applied to like transactions and events in similar circumstances.

All intra-group balances, income and expenses and unrealised gains and losses resulting from intra-group transactions and dividends are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases.

Losses within a subsidiary are attributed to the non-controlling interest even if that results in a defi cit balance.

A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it:

• De-recognises the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary at their carrying amounts at the date when control is lost;• De-recognises the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest;• De-recognises the cumulative translation differences recorded in equity;• Recognises the fair value of the consideration received;• Recognises the fair value of any investment retained;• Recognises any surplus or defi cit in profi t or loss;• Re-classifi es the Group’s share of components previously recognised in other comprehensive income to profi t or loss or retained earnings, as appropriate.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

72

Page 75: Breadtalk AR 2011

Acquisition of non-controlling interests, prior to 1 January 2010, were accounted for using the parent entity extension method, whereby, the difference between the consideration and the book value of the share of the net assets acquired were recognised in goodwill.

Losses incurred by the Group were attributed to the non-controlling interest until the balance was reduced to nil. Any further losses were attributed to the Group, unless the non-controlling interest had a binding obligation to cover these. Losses prior to 1 January 2010 were not reallocated between non-controlling interest and the owners of the Company.

Upon loss of control, the Group accounted for the investment retained at its proportionate share of net asset value at the date control was lost. The carrying value of such investments as at 1 January 2010 has not been restated.

Basis of consolidation (cont’d)

(b) Basis of consolidation and business combinations (cont’d)

Basis of consolidation prior to 1 January 2010

2.7

(A)

Subsidiaries, basis of consolidation and non-controlling interests (cont’d)

Business combinations

Business consolidation from 1 January 2010

(B)

Business combinations are accounted by applying the acquisition method. Identifi able assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are recognised as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received.

When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the fi nancial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classifi cation and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.

Certain of the above-mentioned requirements were applied on a prospective basis. The following differences, however, are carried forward in certain instances from the previous basis of consolidation:

73

Page 76: Breadtalk AR 2011

2.7

(B)

Subsidiaries, basis of consolidation and non-controlling interests (cont’d)

Business combinations (cont’d)

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is deemed to be an asset or liability, will be recognised in accordance with FRS 39 either in profi t or loss or as change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classifi ed as equity, it is not to be remeasured until it is fi nally settled within equity.

In business combinations achieved in stages, previously held equity interests in the acquiree are remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date and any corresponding gain or loss is recognised in profi t or loss.

The Group elects for each individual business combination, whether non-controlling interest in the acquiree (if any) is recognised on the acquisition date at fair value, or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree identifi able net assets.

Any excess of the sum of the fair value of the consideration transferred in the business combination, the amount of non-controlling interest in the acquiree (if any), and the fair value of the Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any), over the net fair value of the acquiree’s identifi able assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. The accounting policy for goodwill is set out in Note 2.11(a). In instances where the latter amount exceeds the former, the excess is recognised as gain on bargain purchase in profi t or loss on the acquisition date.

Business combinations prior to 1 January 2010

In comparison to the above mentioned requirements, the following differences applied:

Business combinations are accounted for by applying the purchase method. Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition formed part of the acquisition costs. The non-controlling interest (formerly known as minority interest) was measured at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifi able net assets.

Business combinations achieved in stages were accounted for as separate steps. Adjustments to those fair values relating to previously held interests are treated as a revaluation and recognised in equity. Any additional acquired share of interest did not affect previously recognised goodwill.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

74

Page 77: Breadtalk AR 2011

When the Group acquired a business, embedded derivatives separated from the host contract by the acquiree were not reassessed on acquisition unless the business combination resulted in a change in the terms of the contract that signifi cantly modifi ed the cash fl ows that otherwise would have been required under the contract.

Contingent consideration was recognised if, and only if, the Group had a present obligation, the economic outfl ow was more likely than not and a reliable estimate was determinable. Subsequent adjustments to the contingent consideration were recognised as part of goodwill.

(B) Business combinations (cont’d)

(c)

2.7

2.8

Subsidiaries, basis of consolidation and non-controlling interests (cont’d)

Transactions with non-controlling interests

Non-controlling interests represent the equity in subsidiaries not attributable, directly or indirectly, to owners of the Company, and are presented separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and within equity in the consolidated balance sheet, separately from equity attributable to owners of the Company.

Changes in the Company owners’ ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions. In such circumstances, the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests are adjusted to refl ect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interest is adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity and attributable to owners of the Company.

Associates

An associate is an entity, not being a subsidiary or a joint venture, in which the Group has signifi cant infl uence. This generally coincides with the Group having 20% or more of the voting power, or has representation on the board of directors. An associate is equity accounted for from the date the Group obtains signifi cant infl uence until the date the Group ceases to have signifi cant infl uence over the associate.

The Group’s investment in associates is accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment in associates is carried in the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of the associates. Goodwill relating to associates is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is neither amortised nor tested individually for impairment. Any excess of the Group’s share of the net fair value of the associate’s identifi able assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities over the cost of the investment is included as income in the determination of the Group’s share of results of the associate in the period in which the investment is acquired.

75

Page 78: Breadtalk AR 2011

Associates (cont’d)

The profi t or loss refl ects the share of the results of operations of the associates. Where there has been a change recognised in other comprehensive income by the associates, the Group recognises its share of such changes in other comprehensive income. Unrealised gains and losses resulting from transactions between the Group and the associate are eliminated to the extent of the interest in the associates.

The Group’s share of the profi t or loss of its associates is shown on the face of profi t or loss after tax and non-controlling interests in the subsidiaries of associates.

When the Group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.

After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary to recognise an additional impairment loss on the Group’s investment in its associates. The Group determines at the end of each reporting period whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired. If this is the case, the Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate and its carrying value and recognises the amount in profi t or loss.

The fi nancial statements of the associates are prepared as of the same reporting date as the Company. Where necessary, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies in line with those of the Group.

Upon loss of signifi cant infl uence over the associate, the Group measures and recognises any retained investment at its fair value. Any difference between the carrying amount of the associate upon loss of signifi cant infl uence and the fair value of the aggregate of the retained investment and proceeds from disposal is recognised in profi t or loss.

Joint ventures

A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control, where the strategic fi nancial and operating decisions relating to the activity require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control and a jointly controlled entity is a joint venture that involves the establishment of a separate entity in which each venturer has an interest.

The Group’s investment in joint ventures is accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment in joint ventures is carried in the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of the joint venture. The Group’s share of profi t or loss of the joint venture is recognised in profi t or loss. Where there has been a change recognised directly in the equity of the joint venture, the Group recognises its share of such changes. After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary to recognise any additional impairment loss with respect to the Group’s net investment in the joint venture. The joint venture is equity accounted for from the date the Group obtains joint control until the date the Group ceases to have joint control over the joint venture.

2.8

2.9

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

76

Page 79: Breadtalk AR 2011

Adjustments are made in the Group’s consolidated fi nancial statements to eliminate the Group’s share of intragroup balances, income and expenses and unrealised gains and losses on such transactions between the Group and its jointly controlled entity. Losses on transactions are recognised immediately if the loss provides evidence of a reduction in the net realisable value of current assets or an impairment loss.

The fi nancial statements of the joint venture are prepared as of the same reporting date as the Company. Where necessary, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies in line with those of the Group.

Upon loss of joint control, the Group measures any retained investment at its fair value. Any difference between the carrying amount of the former jointly controlled entity upon loss of joint control and the aggregate of the fair value of the retained investment and proceeds from disposal is recognised in profi t or loss.

Property, plant and equipment

All items of property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Such cost includes the cost of replacing part of the property, plant and equipment and borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying property, plant and equipment. The accounting policy for borrowing costs is set out in Note 2.18. The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that future economic benefi ts associated with the item will fl ow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably.

Subsequent to recognition, property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. When signifi cant parts of property, plant and equipment are required to be replaced in intervals, the Group recognises such parts as individual assets with specifi c useful lives and depreciation, respectively. Likewise, when a major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement if the recognition criteria are satisfi ed. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognised in profi t or loss as incurred.

Depreciation of an asset begins when it is available for use and is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:

Leasehold property – 20 yearsMachinery and equipment – 5 - 6 yearsElectrical works – 5 - 6 yearsFurniture and fi ttings – 5 - 6 yearsOffi ce equipment – 3 - 6 yearsRenovation – 2 - 6 yearsMotor vehicles – 5 - 6 years

2.9

2.10

Joint ventures (cont’d)

77

Page 80: Breadtalk AR 2011

Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

Construction-in-progress is stated at cost. No depreciation is provided for construction-in-progress as these assets are not yet available for use.

Leasehold land represents the lease of land from Jurong Town Corporation and is intended for the construction of offi ce building and development of manufacturing facilities in Singapore.

Leasehold land will be depreciated over the remaining lease term upon completion of the construction of the building.

The carrying values of property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

The residual values, useful life and depreciation method are reviewed at each fi nancial year-end to ensure that the amount, method and period of depreciation are consistent with previous estimates and the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefi ts embodied in the items of property, plant and equipment.

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefi ts are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset is included in profi t or loss in the year the asset is derecognised.

2.10

Goodwill

Goodwill is initially measured at cost. Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating units that are expected to benefi t from the synergies of the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to those units.

The cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated is tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the cash-generating unit may be impaired. Impairment is determined for goodwill by assessing the recoverable amount of each cash-generating unit (or group of cash-generating units) to which the goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised in profi t or loss.

Intangible assets2.11

(a)

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

78

Page 81: Breadtalk AR 2011

Goodwill (cont’d)

Impairment losses recognised for goodwill are not reversed in subsequent periods.

Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation. Goodwill disposed of in this circumstance is measured based on the relative fair values of the operations disposed of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of foreign operations on or after 1 January 2005 are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign operations and are recorded in the functional currency of the foreign operations and translated in accordance with the accounting policy set out in Note 2.5.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments which arose on acquisitions of foreign operations before 1 January 2005 are deemed to be assets and liabilities of the Company and are recorded in SGD at the rates prevailing at the date of acquisition.

Other intangible assets

Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value as at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses.

The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed to be either fi nite or indefi nite.

Intangible assets with fi nite lives are amortised over the estimated useful lives and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method are reviewed at least at each fi nancial year-end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefi ts embodied in the asset is accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with fi nite useful lives is recognised in profi t or loss in the expense category consistent with the function of the intangible asset.

Intangible assets with indefi nite useful lives or not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if the events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. Such intangible assets are not amortised. The useful life of an intangible asset with an indefi nite life is reviewed annually to determine whether the useful life assessment continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefi nite to fi nite is made on a prospective basis.

2.11 Intangible assets (cont’d)

(a)

(b)

79

Page 82: Breadtalk AR 2011

Other intangible assets (cont’d)

Gain or loss arising from derecognition of an intangible asset is measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognised in profi t or loss when the asset is derecognised.

2.11 Intangible assets (cont’d)

(b)

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

Trade mark

Costs relating to trade mark are capitalised and amortised on a straight-line basis over its estimated fi nite useful life of 5 years.

Franchise rights

Costs relating to master franchise fees paid are capitalised and amortised on a straight-line basis over the lease/franchise period ranging from 4 to 20 years.

Costs relating to territory reservation fees are capitalised. The costs were previously amortised by a fi xed amount as and when a new outlet starts operation. Based on a review performed for the year, the Group changed the amortisation method to straight line basis over the remaining useful life of 6 years. The change in estimate resulted in an annual amortisation expense of $102,000 and increased the amortisation expense for the year by $89,000.

Location premium

Consideration paid to previous tenants to vacate premises in order to secure the lease arrangement are amortised on a straight-line basis over the new lease agreement period of 4 years.

Brand value

Brand value was acquired through a business combination. The useful life of the brand is assessed to be fi nite and estimated to be 15 years because this is the length of time that the management expects the economic benefi ts of the brand to fl ow to the Group.

Brand value is amortised on a straight-line basis over its estimated economic useful life.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

80

Page 83: Breadtalk AR 2011

Impairment of non-fi nancial assets

The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, or when an annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Group makes an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount.

An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash infl ows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. Where the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash fl ows expected to be generated by the asset are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, recent market transactions are taken into account, if available. If no such transactions can be identifi ed, an appropriate valuation model is used. These calculations are corroborated by valuation multiples, quoted share prices for publicly traded subsidiaries or other available fair value indicators.

The Group bases its impairment calculation on detailed budgets and forecast calculations which are prepared separately for each of the Group’s cash-generating units to which the individual assets are allocated. These budgets and forecast calculations are generally covering a period of fi ve years. For longer periods, a long-term growth rate is calculated and applied to project future cash fl ows after the fi fth year.

Impairment losses of continuing operations are recognised in profi t or loss in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset, except for assets that are previously revalued where the revaluation was taken to other comprehensive income. In this case, the impairment is also recognised in other comprehensive income up to the amount of any previous revaluation.

For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the Group estimates the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s recoverable amount. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increase cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised previously. Such reversal is recognised in profi t or loss unless the asset is measured at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase.

2.12

81

Page 84: Breadtalk AR 2011

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial assets are recognised when, and only when, the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the fi nancial instrument. The Group determines the classifi cation of its fi nancial assets at initial recognition.

When fi nancial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of fi nancial assets not at fair value through profi t or loss, directly attributable transaction costs.

Subsequent measurement

The subsequent measurement of fi nancial assets depends on their classifi cation as follows:

(a) Loans and receivables

(b) Held-to-maturity investments

2.13 Financial assets

Non-derivative fi nancial assets with fi xed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classifi ed as loans and receivables. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less impairment. Gains and losses are recognised in profi t or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.

Non-derivative fi nancial assets with fi xed or determinable payments and fi xed maturity are classifi ed as held-to-maturity when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold the investment to maturity. Subsequent to initial recognition, held-to-maturity investments are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less impairment. Gains and losses are recognised in profi t or loss when the held-to-maturity investments are derecognised or impaired, and through the amortisation process.

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets include equity and debt securities. Equity investments classifi ed as available-for-sale are those, which are neither classifi ed as held for trading nor designated at fair value through profi t or loss. Debt securities in this category are those which are intended to be held for an indefi nite period of time and which may be sold in response to needs for liquidity or in response to changes in market conditions.

After initial recognition, available-for-sale fi nancial assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Any gains or losses from changes in fair value of the fi nancial assets are recognised in other comprehensive income, except that impairment losses, foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary instruments and interest calculated using the effective interest method are recognised in profi t or loss. The cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassifi ed from equity to profi t or loss as a reclassifi cation adjustment when the fi nancial asset is derecognised.

Investments in equity instruments whose fair value cannot be reliably measured are measured at cost less impairment loss.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

(c) Available-for-sale fi nancial assets

82

Page 85: Breadtalk AR 2011

Financial assets (cont’d)

Derecognition

A fi nancial asset is derecognised where the contractual right to receive cash fl ows from the asset has expired. On derecognition of a fi nancial asset in its entirety, the difference between the carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in profi t or loss.

All regular way purchases and sales of fi nancial assets are recognised or derecognised on the trade date i.e., the date that the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of fi nancial assets that require delivery of assets within the period generally established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned.

Impairment of fi nancial assets

The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any objective evidence that a fi nancial asset is impaired.

2.13

2.14

(a) Financial assets carried at amortised cost

For fi nancial assets carried at amortised cost, the Group fi rst assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for fi nancial assets that are individually signifi cant, or collectively for fi nancial assets that are not individually signifi cant. If the Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed fi nancial asset, whether signifi cant or not, it includes the asset in a group of fi nancial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is, or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on fi nancial assets carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash fl ows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the fi nancial asset’s original effective interest rate (i.e. the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition). If a loan has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss is recognised in profi t or loss.

When the asset becomes uncollectible, the carrying amount of impaired fi nancial assets is reduced directly or if an amount was charged to the allowance account, the amounts charged to the allowance account are written off against the carrying value of the fi nancial asset.

To determine whether there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on fi nancial assets has been incurred, the Group considers factors such as the probability of insolvency or signifi cant fi nancial diffi culties of the debtor and default or signifi cant delay in payments.

83

Page 86: Breadtalk AR 2011

Impairment of fi nancial assets (cont’d)

Financial assets carried at amortised cost (cont’d)

If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed. Any subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in profi t or loss, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortised cost at the reversal date.

Financial assets carried at cost

If there is objective evidence (such as signifi cant adverse changes in the business environment where the issuer operates, probability of insolvency or signifi cant fi nancial diffi culties of the issuer) that an impairment loss on a fi nancial asset carried at cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash fl ows discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar fi nancial asset. Such impairment losses are not reversed in subsequent periods.

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets

In the case of equity instruments classifi ed as available-for sale, objective evidence of impairment include (i) signifi cant fi nancial diffi culty of the issuer or obligor, (ii) information about signifi cant changes with an adverse effect that have taken place in the technological, market, economic or legal environment in which the issuer operates, and indicates that the cost of the investment in equity instrument may not be recovered; and (iii) a signifi cant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the investment below its costs. ‘Signifi cant’ is to be evaluated against the original cost of the investment and ‘prolonged’ against the period in which the fair value has been below its original cost.

If an available-for-sale fi nancial asset is impaired, an amount comprising the difference between its cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and its current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognised in profi t or loss, is transferred from other comprehensive income and recognised in profi t or loss.

Reversals of impairment losses in respect of equity instruments are not recognised in profi t or loss; increase in their fair value after impairment are recognised directly in other comprehensive income.

2.14

(a)

(b)

(c)

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

84

Page 87: Breadtalk AR 2011

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and at bank, unpledged fi xed deposits and short-term highly liquid investments which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to insignifi cant risk of changes in value.

Inventories

Inventories comprise raw materials, consumables, semi-fi nished goods, fi nished goods and base inventory.

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Costs comprise purchase costs accounted for on a weighted average cost basis. In the case of semi-fi nished goods, costs also include an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity.

Base inventory, comprising mainly cutlery and dining utensils, are written down to 50% of the original cost and all further replacement costs incurred in maintaining the base inventory is expensed.

Where necessary, allowance is provided for damaged, obsolete and slow moving items to adjust the carrying value of inventories to the lower cost and net realisable value.

Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

Financial liabilities

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial liabilities are recognised when, and only when, the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the fi nancial instrument. The Group determines the classifi cation of its fi nancial liabilities at initial recognition.

All fi nancial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value plus in the case of fi nancial liabilities not at fair value through profi t or loss, directly attributable transaction costs.

Subsequent measurement

After initial recognition, fi nancial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognised in profi t or loss when the liabilities are derecognised and through the amortisation process.

Derecognition

A fi nancial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expired. When an existing fi nancial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modifi ed, such an exchange or modifi cation is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in profi t or loss.

2.15

2.16

2.17

85

Page 88: Breadtalk AR 2011

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs are capitalised as part of the cost of a qualifying asset if they are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of that asset.

Capitalisation of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are in progress and the expenditures and borrowing costs are incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalised until the assets are substantially completed for their intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outfl ow of resources embodying economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be estimated reliably.

Provisions are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to refl ect the current best estimate. If it is no longer probable that an outfl ow of resources embodying economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation, the provision is reversed. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that refl ects, where appropriate, the risks specifi c to the liability. When discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a fi nance cost.

Leases

The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date: whether fulfi lment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specifi c asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset, even if that right is not explicitly specifi ed in an arrangement.

For arrangements entered into prior to 1 January 2005, the date of inception is deemed to be 1 January 2005 in accordance with the transitional requirements of INT FRS 104.

Finance leases, which transfer to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Any initial direct costs are also added to the amount capitalised. Lease payments are apportioned between the fi nance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged to profi t or loss. Contingent rents, if any, are charged as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred.

Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.

Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in profi t or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The aggregate benefi t of incentives provided by the lessor is recognised as a reduction of rental expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis.

2.18

2.19

2.20

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

86

Page 89: Breadtalk AR 2011

Defi ned contribution plans

The Group participates in the national pension schemes as defi ned by the laws of the countries in which it has operations. Contributions to national pension schemes are recognised as an expense in the period in which the related services are performed.

Singapore

The Group makes contributions to the Central Provident Fund (“CPF”) scheme in Singapore, a defi ned contribution pension scheme. The Group makes monthly contributions based on stipulated contribution rates.

People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)

Subsidiaries incorporated and operating in the PRC are required to provide certain staff pension benefi ts to their employees under existing PRC regulations. Contributions are provided at rates stipulated by PRC regulations and are contributed to a pension fund managed by government agencies, which are responsible for administering these amounts for the subsidiaries’ PRC employees.

Hong Kong

Subsidiaries incorporated and operating in Hong Kong pay contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory basis. The subsidiaries have no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are not reduced by contributions forfeited by those employees who leave the scheme prior to vesting fully in the contributions. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.

Employee leave entitlement

Employee entitlements to annual leave are recognised when they accrue to employees. The estimated liability for leave is recognised for services rendered by employees up to balance sheet date.

2.21 Employee benefi ts

(a)

(b)

87

Page 90: Breadtalk AR 2011

2.21

2.22

The BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan (“RSG Plan”)

Employees receive remuneration under the RSG Plan in the form of fully-paid shares (“Awards”) of the Company as consideration for services rendered. The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the Awards at the date on which the Awards are granted. The cumulative expense recognised at each reporting date until the vesting date refl ects the Company’s best estimate of the number of Awards that will ultimately vest. The charge or credit to profi t or loss for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period.

In the Company’s separate fi nancial statements, the fair value of the Awards granted to employees of its subsidiaries is recognised as an increase in the cost of the Company’s investment in subsidiaries, with a corresponding increase in equity.

Employee benefi ts (cont’d)

(c)

Revenue

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefi ts will fl ow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured, regardless of when the payment is made. Revenue is measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable, taking into account contractually defi ned terms of payment and excluding taxes or duty. The Group assesses its revenue arrangements to determine if it is acting as principal or agent. The Group has concluded that it is acting as a principal in all of its revenue arrangements. The following specifi c recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:

(a) Bakery sales, restaurant sales and sales to franchisee

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised upon the transfer of signifi cant risk and rewards of ownership of the goods to the customer, usually on delivery of goods. Revenue is not recognised to the extent where there are signifi cant uncertainties regarding recovery of the consideration due, associated costs or the possible return of goods.

Initial franchise income is recognised upon the grant of rights, completion of the designated phases of the franchise setup and transfer of know-how to the franchisee in accordance with the terms stated in the franchise agreement. Recurring franchise income is recognised on a periodic basis as a percentage of the franchisees’ revenue in accordance with terms as stated in the franchise agreement.

(b) Franchise income

Fixed rental income from the sub-lease of food courts is recognised as income in profi t or loss on a straight line basis over the lease term. The variable portion of the rental income which is computed based on a percentage of the food court tenants’ gross sales is recognised when such sales are earned.

Revenue from the sale of food and beverage is recognised upon delivery and acceptance by customers, net of sale discounts.

(c) Food court revenue

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

88

Page 91: Breadtalk AR 2011

Current tax

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date, in the countries where the Group operates and generates taxable income.

Current taxes are recognised in profi t or loss except to the extent that the tax relates to items recognised outside profi t or loss, either in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

2.22

2.23

2.24

Income recognition (cont’d)

Government grants

Income taxes

(d) Management fee

Interest income is recognised as interest accrued (using the effective interest method) unless collectibility is in doubt.

Dividend income is recognised when the Group’s right to receive payment is established.

(f) Dividend income

Management fee is recognised on an accrual basis.

(e) Interest income

Government grants are recognised at their fair value where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all attaching conditions will be complied with. When the grant relates to an expense item, it is recognised in profi t or loss over the period necessary to match them on a systematic basis to the costs that it is intended to compensate. Where the grant relates to an asset, the fair value is recognised as deferred capital grant on the balance sheet and is amortised to profi t or loss over the expected useful life of the relevant asset by equal annual instalments.

(a)

89

Page 92: Breadtalk AR 2011

Deferred income tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for fi nancial reporting purposes.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences, except:

Where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profi t nor taxable profi t or loss; and

Where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profi t nor taxable profi t or loss; and

In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred income tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profi t will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.

In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profi t will be available against which the deductible temporary diffrences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised except:

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that suffi cient taxable profi t will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profi t will allow the deferred tax asset to be utilised.

2.24 Income taxes (cont’d)

(b) Deferred tax

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

90

Page 93: Breadtalk AR 2011

2.24

2.25

Income taxes (cont’d)

Segment reporting

(b)

(c)

Deferred tax (cont’d)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Deferred income tax is recognised in profi t or loss. Deferred income tax relating to items recognised outside profi t or loss is recognised outside profi t or loss. Deferred tax items are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction either in other comprehensive income or directly in equity and deferred tax arising from a business combination is adjusted against goodwill on acquisition.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Tax benefi ts acquired as part of a business combination, but not satisfying the criteria for separate recognition at that date, would be recognised subsequently if new information about the facts and circumstances changed. The adjustment would either be treated as a reduction to goodwill (as long as it does not exceed goodwill) if it incurred during the measurement period or in profi t or loss.

For management purposes, the Group is organised into operating segments based on their products and services which are independently managed by the respective segment managers responsible for the performance of the respective segments under their charge. The segment managers report directly to the management of the Company who regularly review the segment results in order to allocate resources to the segments and to assess the segment performance. Additional disclosures on each of these segments are shown in Note 33, including the factors used to identify the reportable segments and the measurement basis of segment information.

Sales tax

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of sales tax except:

Where the sales tax incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the sales tax is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and

Receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of sales tax included.

The net amount of sales tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet.

91

Page 94: Breadtalk AR 2011

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares are recognised as share capital in equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of ordinary shares are deducted against share capital.

A contingent liability is:

Bakery salesRestaurant salesSales to franchiseeFranchise income Food court income

A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be confi rmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the Group.

Contingent liabilities and assets are not recognised on the balance sheet of the Group, except for contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination that are present obligations and which the fair values can be reliably determined.

The Group’s own equity instruments, which are reacquired (treasury shares) are recognised at cost and deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognised in profi t or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Group’s own equity instruments. Any difference between the carrying amount of treasury shares and the consideration received, if reissued, is recognised directly in equity. Voting rights related to treasury shares are nullifi ed for the Group and no dividends are allocated to them respectively.

2.26

2.27

2.28

3

Share capital and share issue expenses

Treasury shares

Contingencies

Revenue

(a)

(b)

a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confi rmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the Group; or

a present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:

(i) It is not probable that an outfl ow of resources embodying economic benefi ts will be required to settle the obligation; or

(ii) The amount of the obligation cannot be measured with suffi cient reliability.

Group 2011 2010 $’000 $’000

169,395 137,019 76,969 56,253 15,231 12,600 9,807 8,512 94,502 88,504 365,904 302,888

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

92

Page 95: Breadtalk AR 2011

4 Other operating income

5 Interest income and interest expense

Management fee income Government grant (1)

Grant income from Jobs Credit Scheme (2)

Income from expired food court stored value cardsSponsorship incomeSundry salesCompensation from landlordRental incomeAgency commissionGain on disposal of property, plant and equipmentMiscellaneous income

Interest income from:- Loans and receivables- Held-to-maturity fi nancial assets

Interest expense on:- Term loans- Finance lease obligations- Others

2010$’000

4,6421,014

356111436221

1,721226

–4,568

893

14,188

2010$’000

143458

601

(603)(8)

(24)

(635)

2011$’000

4,332840

–13965167

339–

3920

1,068

7,495

2011$’000

304520

824

(754)(3)

(28)

(785)

Group

Group

Government grant in relation to business expansion activities undertaken by certain subsidiaries in the PRC.

During the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2009, the Singapore Finance Minister announced the introduction of a Jobs Credit Scheme (“Scheme”). Under this Scheme, the Group received a 12% cash grant on the fi rst $2,500 of each month’s wages for each employee on their Central Provident Fund payroll. The Government extended the Scheme with another two payments at stepped-down rates of 6% and 3% in March and June 2010 respectively. During the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2010, the Group received grant income of $356,000 under the Scheme.

(1)

(2)

93

Page 96: Breadtalk AR 2011

Audit fees to:- Auditors of the Company- Other auditorsNon-audit fees to:- Auditors of the Company- Other auditorsAmortisation of intangible assets (Note 11)Impairment/(write back of impairment) of loans and receivables- Trade receivables (Note 17)- Other receivables (Note 17)- Amount due from an associate (non-trade) Directors’ feesDepreciation of property, plant and equipment (Note 10)Employee benefi ts (Note 7)Foreign exchange (gain)/loss, netLoss from misappropriation of funds (1)

Operating lease expenses- Fixed portion - Variable portionProperty, plant and equipment written offImpairment loss on intangible assets (Note 11)Impairment loss on property, plant and equipment (Note 10)Write-down of inventories (Note 16)Write-off of inventories (Note 16)

2010$’000

225235

11259

408

(5)3

30124

21,19084,338

368622

57,2536,7762,285

19761

–23

2011$’000

307269

12462

442

25364–

16823,920

102,284(58)

67,3407,3951,219

1252892531

Group

Staff costs (including directors)Salaries and bonusesCentral Provident Fund and other pension contributionsSales incentives and commissionShare-based payment (RSG Plan)Other personnel benefi ts

2010$’000

64,1226,9902,533

66510,028

84,338

2011$’000

76,0607,8112,357

27915,777

102,284

Group

6

7

Profi t before taxation

Employee benefi ts

This is determined after charging/(crediting) the following:

(1) This relates to loss as a result of misappropriation of funds by an employee of a subsidiary.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

94

Page 97: Breadtalk AR 2011

7 Employee benefi ts (cont’d)

RSG Plan

Under the RSG Plan, directors and employees receive remuneration in the form of fully-paid shares of the Company as consideration for services rendered. Restricted shares are granted conditionally and the fi nal number of restricted shares awarded will depend on the achievement of pre-determined targets over a one year period. On meeting the performance conditions for the performance period, one-third of the restricted shares will vest. The balance will vest equally over the subsequent two years with the fulfi lment of service requirements.

The fair value of the restricted shares granted is estimated based on the market price of the shares on grant date less the present value of expected future dividends during the vesting period.

During the year, 681,000 (2010: 1,356,539) restricted shares were granted. The number of restricted shares outstanding at year end is 1,233,336 (2010: 1,105,763) shares.

8 Taxation

Major components of income tax expense were:

Current tax- Current year - (Over)/under provision in prior year Deferred tax- Origination and reversal of temporary differences- Under/(over) provision in prior year Witholding tax Taxation expense

2010$’000

5,596(503)

(93)205

315

5,520

2011$’000

5,280(129)

(269)(156)

644

5,370

Group

95

Page 98: Breadtalk AR 2011

8 Taxation (Cont’d)

A reconciliation between the tax expense and the product of accounting profi t multiplied by the applicable tax rate for the year ended 31 December is as follows:

Profi t before taxation Tax at the domestic rates applicable to profi ts in the countries where the Group operates (1)

Tax effect of:Expenses not deductible for tax purposesIncome not subject to taxationShare of associates’ and joint ventures’ taxTax savings arising from development and expansionincentive (2)

(Over)/under provision in prior years- Current tax- Deferred taxWithholding tax expense Effect of partial tax exemption and tax relief Deferred tax assets not recognised Benefi ts from previously unrecognised deferred tax assetsTax savings from enhanced deductions (3)

Others

Taxation expense

2010$’000

16,688

2,853

1,249(64)(70)

(189)

(503)205315(62)

1,967 (64)(78)(39)

5,520

2011$’000

17,127

2,821

1,592(37)68

(222)

(129)(156)644(93)

1,829(434)(483)(30)

5,370

Group

This is prepared by aggregating separate reconciliations for each national jurisdiction.

In February 2004, the Economic Development Board granted the Development and Expansion Incentive under the International Headquarters (IHQ-DEI) Award to a subsidiary. Subject to certain conditions, the subsidiary enjoys a concessionary tax rate of 10% on its qualifying income for a period of 5 years commencing 1 January 2003. On 24 January 2008, the subsidiary was granted an extension of the DEI for another 5 years commencing 1 January 2008.

In Budget 2010, the Minister for Finance of Singapore introduced a new broad-based tax scheme to encourage businesses to invest in productivity and innovation. The scheme enhances existing tax measures that encourage productivity and innovative activities and consolidates them into a single scheme, known as the Productivity and Innovation scheme (“PIC”). The PIC is available for Year of Assessment (“YA”) 2011 to YA 2015.

(1)

(2)

(3)NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

96

Page 99: Breadtalk AR 2011

2010$’000

----

-

- --

12

12

As at 31 December 2011, the Group has tax losses of approximately $19,634,000 (2010: $12,721,000), unutilised capital allowances of approximately $198,000 (2010: $410,000) and other temporary differences of approximately $3,546,000 (2010: $2,714,000) that are available for offset against future taxable profi ts, for which no deferred tax assets are recognised on these amounts due to uncertainty of their utilisation. The utilisation of the tax losses is subject to the agreement of the tax authorities and compliance with certain provisions of the tax legislation of the respective countries in which the companies operate. As at 31 December 2011, $13,872,000 (2010: $8,765,000) of the unrecognised tax losses will expire between 1 and 10 years.

There are no income tax consequences attached to the dividends to the shareholders proposed by the Company but not recognised as a liability in the fi nancial statements (Note 34).

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Group’s profi t for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company of $11,592,000 (2010: $11,266,000) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, excluding treasury shares, of 281,197,676 (2010: 281,052,253) in issue during the year.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Group’s profi t for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the Company of $11,592,000 (2010: $11,266,000) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, excluding treasury shares, in issue during the year plus the weighted average number of restricted shares granted conditionally under the “BreadTalk Restricted Share Grant Plan” of 282,392,002 (2010: 282,153,201).

Deferred tax liabilities: Differences in depreciation for tax purposesProvisionsDividend income Other items

Deferred tax assets: ProvisionsDifferences in depreciation for tax purposesUnutilised tax lossesOther items

Deferred income tax

2011$’000

(1,941)–

(168)(167)

(2,276)

1,426

640–

54

2,120

2010$’000

1,035 438178

(444)

(388)(273)(20)

112

2010$’000

(2,383) -

(186)(78)

(2,647)

920

69326520

1,898

2011$’000

(442)–

(17)89

(342)

57264(34)

(425)

2011$’000

----

-

-

(4)–

(14)

(18)

GroupBalance sheet Profi t or loss

CompanyBalance sheet

8

9

Taxation (cont’d)

Earnings per share

Deferred income tax as at 31 December relates to the following:

Unrecognised tax losses, capital allowances and other temporary differences

Tax consequences of proposed dividends

97

Page 100: Breadtalk AR 2011

Leaseholdproperty

$’000

8,391–––

(4,925)(278)

3,188––––

140

3,328

1,613375––

(1,071)

–(61)

856145––––

45

1,046

2,332

2,282

–––––

––

––––––

5,147

5,147

Leaseholdland$’000

–4,462685(2)

–––

5,147–––––

5,147

Machinery and

equipment$’000

21,8696,1681,007(734)(287)(512)

27,5115,210(87)(830)(272)349

31,881

10,6263,685(49)(512)(174)

112(181)

13,5074,338

(4)(703)(190)109

129

17,186

14,004

14,695

Electricalworks$’000

16,0725,514

–(334)

–(499)

20,7534,960

63(1,437)

(73)67

24,333

7,1343,272

–(307)

42(241)

9,9004,008

3(1,307)

(9)105

37

12,737

10,853

11,596

Furniture and fi ttings

$’000

19,4965,412

–(383)(15)(981)

23,5294,732(63)

(2,334)(10)135

25,989

8,2113,955

–(255)(7)

196(461)

11,6394,346

(8)(2,130)

(1)7

64

13,917

11,890

12,072

Offi ceequipment

$’000

5,0401,120157(113)(8)

(140)

6,0561,431365(633)(26)110

7,303

2,75298253(99)(3)

–(81)

3,6041,139

3(573)(16)–

47

4,204

2,452

3,099

GroupCostAs at 1.1.2010AdditionsReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposalsTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011

AdditionsReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposalsTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

As at 1.1.2010Charge for the yearReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposals

Impairment loss for the year

Translation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011Charge for the yearReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposals Impairment loss for the yearTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

10 Property, plant and equipment

Net carrying amountAs at 31.12.2010

As at 31.12.2011

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

98

Page 101: Breadtalk AR 2011

Renovation (1)

$’000GroupCostAs at 1.1.2010Additions Reclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposalsTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011Additions Reclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposalsTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses

As at 1.1.2010Charge for the yearReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposals

Impairment loss for the year

Translation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011Charge for the yearReclassifi cationsWrite offsDisposals Impairment loss for the yearTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

39,12715,941

124(5,322)(1,773)(1,198)

46,89913,431

134(5,038)

(79)1,192

56,539

19,3468,642

(4)(3,431)(1,475)

411(554)

22,9359,735

(3)(4,382)

(44)68

571

28,880

23,964

27,659

Motor vehicles$’000

1,656498–(1)

(836)(31)

1,286125––

(39)25

1,397

919279––

(605)

–(18)

575209––

(34)–

17

767

711

630

Construction-in-progress

$’000

3,30253

(1,288)(2)(5)

(107)

1,95310,144(497)(42)–

160

11,718

–––––

––

––––––

1,953

11,718

Total$’000

114,95339,168

685(6,889)(7,849)(3,746)

136,32240,033

(85)(10,314)

(499)2,178

167,635

50,60121,190

–(4,604)(3,335)

761(1,597)

63,01623,920

(9)(9,095)(294)289

910

78,737

73,306

88,898

(1) Additions in renovation for the year include provision for reinstatement costs of $2,461,000 (2010: $536,000).

(2) The advance payment of land premium in 2009 was reclassifi ed from prepayment during 2010.

10 Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

Net carrying amountAs at 31.12.2010

As at 31.12.2011

99

Page 102: Breadtalk AR 2011

10 Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

Assets held under fi nance leases

As at 31 December 2011, the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment acquired under fi nance leases are as follows:

Leased assets are pledged as security for the related fi nance lease liabilities.

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Assets written off

Property, plant and equipment written off during the year arose mainly due to the refurbishment/closure of certain bakery outlets and food courts. The amount written off represents the total carrying value of the property, plant and equipment attributable to the bakery outlets and food courts at the date of refurbishment/closure.

The residual value of these assets has been assessed as nil.

Assets pledged as security

In addition to assets held under fi nance leases, the Group’s leasehold land with a carrying amount of $5,147,000 (2010: $5,147,000) is pledged to secure the Company’s bank loan (Note 25).

Impairment of assets

The impairment loss of $289,000 (2010:$761,000) recognised in “administrative expenses” in profi t or loss during the year comprised impairment loss on property, plant and equipment of certain food stalls which have been persistently incurring losses.

Group

106 152

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

Machinery and equipment

100

Page 103: Breadtalk AR 2011

CostAs at 1.1.2010AdditionsReclassifi cation

As at 31.12.2010and 1.1.2011AdditionsWrite off

As at 31.12.2011

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011Charge for the year

As at 31.12.2011

Net carrying amountAs at 31.12.2010

As at 31.12.2011

1––

115–

16

–1

16

7

9

Electircalworks$’000

–––

–3–

3

––

–1

1

2

Offi ceequipment

$’000

12723–

15023–

173

6243

10531

136

45

37

Construction-in-progress

$’000

35539–

5741,488(35)

2,027

––

––

574

2,027

Total$’000

1635,024685

5,8721,529(35)

7,366

6244

10638

144

5,766

7,222

Leaseholdland$’000

–4,462685(2)

5,147––

5,147

––

––

5,147

5,147

Accumulated depreciation

10 Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

Company

Furnitureand

fi ttings$’000

As at 1.1.2010Charge for the year

101

Page 104: Breadtalk AR 2011

CostAs at 1.1.2010AdditionsTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011AdditionsWrite offTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

Accumulated amortisation and impairment lossesAs at 1.1.2010AmortisationImpairment lossTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2010 and 1.1.2011AmortisationImpairment lossWrite offTranslation difference

As at 31.12.2011

Net carrying amount As at 31.12.2010

As at 31.12.2011

Brand value$’000

3,209–

3,209––

3,209

1,077213–

1,290213––

1,503

1,919

1,706

Trademark$’000

79022

8122

814

62779–

70652–

758

106

56

6,173–

6,173––

6,173

–––

––

125–

125

6,173

6,048

Location premium

$’000

505–

505––

505

505––

505–––

505

Total$’000

11,859499

12,329616(71)

28

12,902

2,76240819

(2)

3,187442125(71)

5

3,688

9,142

9,214

Franchise rights$’000

1,182477

1,630614(71)

28

2,201

55311619

(2)

686177–

(71)

5

797

944

1,404

11 Intangible assets

Brand value, trade mark, franchise rights and location premium are determined to have fi nite useful lives and are amortised on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated economic useful lives and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible assets may be impaired. Brand value, trade mark and franchise rights have remaining useful lives of 8 years (2010: 9 years), 1 to 5 years (2010: 1 to 5 years) and 1 to 5 years (2010: 1 to 5 years) as at 31 December 2011 respectively.

In the previous year, a subsidiary impaired its intangible assets of $19,000 as it had ceased operations.

Amortisation expense is included in “administrative expenses” in profi t of loss.

Goodwill $’000

Group

– – – –(29) (29)

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

102

Page 105: Breadtalk AR 2011

11 Intangible assets (cont’d)

Impairment testing of goodwill

Goodwill arising from the acquisition of Topwin Investment Holding Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries in 2005 was allocated to 2 cash-generating units (“CGU”), which represent the 2 geographical segments (i.e. Shanghai and Beijing segments) in which the acquired food courts are located. The food courts located in the same geographical segment are managed by the same management team.

Goodwill arising from the acquisition of ML Breadworks Sdn Bhd in 2007 was allocated to the legal entity acquired which represents the CGU. Meanwhile, goodwill on the acquisition of MWA Pte Ltd in December 2007 was primarily attributable to the food court operations at Wisma Atria, Singapore.

The carrying amounts of goodwill allocated to each CGU are as follows:

The recoverable amount is determined based on a value in use calculation using the cash fl ow projections based on fi nancial budgets approved by management covering a three-year period. The discount rates applied to the cash fl ow projections are derived from cost of capital plus a reasonable risk premium at the date of assessment of the respective cash generating units.

The calculations of value in use for the CGUs are most sensitive to the following assumptions:

Budgeted gross margins – Gross margins are based on budget approved by management.

Shanghai segmentBeijing segmentML Breadworks Sdn BhdFood court operation at Wisma Atria, Singapore

Carryingamount as at 31

Dec 2011$’000

3,5691,009

202

1,268

6,048

Carryingamount as at 31

Dec 2010$’000

3,5691,009327

1,268

6,173

Pre-taxdiscount

rate2011

11.5%11.5%8.5%

8.5%

Pre-taxdiscount

rate 2010

10.6%10.6%10.6%

10.6%

103

Page 106: Breadtalk AR 2011

11

12

Intangible assets (cont’d)

Investment securities

Pre-tax discount rates – Discount rates represent the current market assessment of the risks specifi c to each CGU, regarding the time value of money and individual risks of the underlying assets which have not been incorporated in the cash fl ow estimates. The discount rate calculation is based on the specifi c circumstances of the Group and its cash-generating units and derived from its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The WACC takes into account both debt and equity. The cost of equity is derived from the expected return on investment by the Group’s investors. The cost of debt is based on the interest bearing borrowings the Group is obliged to service. Segment–specifi c risk is incorporated by applying individual beta factors. The beta factors are evaluated annually based on publicly available market data.

Impairment loss on goodwill of $125,000 (2010: $Nil) on ML Breadworks Sdn Bhd was recognised in “administrative expenses” in profi t or loss for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 as the recoverable amount was less than the carrying value.

Junior bonds and redeemable preference shares

On 27 January 2010, the subsidiary, Imagine Properties Pte Ltd (“IPPL”) together with other investors, entered into a subscription agreement with PRE 1 Investments Pte Ltd (“PRE 1) for the subscription of junior bonds and attached redeemable preference shares in the capital of PRE 1. IPPL’s subscription was $10,750,000 in principal amount of junior bonds together with 43 preference shares at $0.10 per share, representing approximately 6.98% of the total aggregate value of the junior bonds and the preference shares issued by PRE 1. PRE 1 is the sole unitholder of the Perennial Katong Retail Trust which had acquired the Katong Mall (“property”).

Available-for-sale fi nancial assets- Equity instruments (quoted)- Redeemable preference shares (unquoted)

Held-to-maturity investments - 8% SGD junior bonds due on 29 January 2015

* less than $1,000

919*

10,750

11,669

919*

10,750

11,669

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

104

Page 107: Breadtalk AR 2011

12

13

Investment securities (cont’d)

Investment in subsidiaries

The junior bonds are secured by a mortgage over the property, assignment of rental proceeds of the property and debentures. The payments of the principal and interest on the junior bonds are subordinated to the payments of principal and interest on the bank borrowings obtained for the purchase of the Katong Mall.

The junior bonds mature in 2015 and will bear interest, payable semi-annually in arrears, at 8% per annum from 29 January 2012 to but excluding the maturity date of the junior bonds, subject to the extinguishment of unpaid interest.

Loans to subsidiaries are quasi-capital in nature, non-interest bearing and have no fi xed terms of repayment.

Details of the subsidiaries are as follows:

Name

Held by the Company

BreadTalk Pte Ltd (1)

BreadTalk International Pte Ltd (1)

Topwin Investment Holding Pte Ltd (1)

Star Food Pte Ltd (1)

Imagine Properties Pte Ltd (1)

Together Inc. Pte Ltd (8)

Country of incorporation

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Singapore

Principal activities

Bakers and manufacturers of and dealers in bread, fl our and biscuits

Investment holding

Investment holding

Investment holding

Investment holding

Investment holding

2011%

100

100

100

60

100

100

2010%

100

100

100

60

100

100

Unquoted equity shares at costLoans to subsidiariesShare based compensation reserve

28,28911,950

237

40,476

28,28910,750

127

39,166

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Company

Proportion of ownership

interest

105

Page 108: Breadtalk AR 2011

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

Investment in subsidiaries (cont’d)

Name

Held through subsidiaries

Taster Food Pte Ltd (1)

Charcoal Pte Ltd (1)

Shanghai BreadTalk Co., Ltd (2)

Shanghai BreadTalk Gourmet Co., Ltd (2)

Beijing BreadTalk Restaurant Management Co., Ltd (2)

Beijing BreadTalk Co.,Ltd (2)

Food Republic (Shanghai) Co., Ltd (2)

Beijing Da Shi Dai Food and Beverage Co., Ltd (2)

Chongqing Food Republic Food & Beverage Co., Ltd (3)

Country of incorporation

Singapore

Singapore

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

Principal activities

Operators of food and drinks outlets, eating houses and restaurants

Dormant

Bakers and manufacturers of and dealers in bread, fl our and biscuits

Management of food and beverage, manufacture and retail of bakery, confectionery products

Management of food and beverage, manufacture and retail of bakery, confectioneryproducts

Manufacture and sale of bakery and confectionery products

Food court operator

Food court operator

Food court operator

2011%

70

75

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2010%

70

75

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Proportion of ownership

interest

13

106

Page 109: Breadtalk AR 2011

13 Investment in subsidiaries (cont’d)

Name

Held through subsidiaries (cont’d)

Megabite Hong Kong Limited (4)

Megabite (S) Pte Ltd (1)

Food Republic Pte Ltd (1)

BreadTalk (Thailand) Company Limited (5)(14)

Megabite Eatery (M) Sdn Bhd (6)

BreadTalk Concept Hong Kong Limited (4)

ML Breadworks Sdn Bhd (7)

MWA Pte Ltd (1)

Food Art Pte Ltd (1)

Shanghai Star Food F&B Management Co., Ltd (2) (Note (a))

Beijing Star Food F&B Management Co., Ltd (9)

Ramen Play Pte Ltd (8)

Shanghai Ramen Play Co., Ltd (3) (Note (a))

Country of incorporation

Hong Kong

Singapore

Singapore

Thailand

Malaysia

Hong Kong

Malaysia

Singapore

Singapore

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

Singapore

People’s Republic of China

Principal activities

Food court operator

Investment holding

Food court operator

Management of food and beverage, manufacture and retail of bakery, confectionery products

Operator of food and beverage outlets

Management of food and beverage, manufacture and retail of bakery, confectionery products

Bakers and manufacturers of and dealers in bread, fl our and biscuits

Dormant

Operators of food and beverage outlets

Operators of restaurants

Operators of restaurants

Operators of restaurants

Operators of restaurants

2011%

85

100

100

49

100

85

90

100

100

60

60

60

60

2010%

85

100

100

49

100

85

90

100

100

60

60

60

60

Proportion of ownership

interest

107

Page 110: Breadtalk AR 2011

13 Investment in subsidiaries (cont’d)

Name

Held through subsidiaries (cont’d)

Taster Food International Pte Ltd (8)

Taster Food (Thailand) Co. Limited (11)(14)

Food Republic Hangzhou F&B Co.,Ltd (3)

Food Republic Shenzhen F&B Management Co.,Ltd (10)

Food Republic Guangzhou F&B Management Co., Ltd (13) (Note (a))

Food Republic Taiwan Co., Ltd (12) (Note (a))

FR (Thailand) Co., Ltd (11) (Note (a))

Country of incorporation

Singapore

Thailand

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

People’s Republic of China

Taiwan

Thailand

Principal activities

Investment holding

Operators of restaurants

Food court operator

Food court operator

Food court operator

Food court operator

Food court operator

2011%

63

31

100

85

64

90

49

(1). Audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Singapore(2) Audited by member fi rms of Ernst & Young Global in the respective countries(3) Audited by Shanghai Xin Gao Xin Certifi ed Public Accountants Co., Ltd, People’s Republic of China(4) Audited by S.F. Kwok & Co. Certifi ed Public Accountants, Hong Kong(5) Audited by CNN & S Co., Ltd, Thailand(6) Audited by RSM Robert Teo, Kuan & Co., Malaysia(7) Audited by C L Chong & Co., Malaysia(8) Audited by Trustnet Alliance, Singapore(9) Audited by Beijing Daxing Certifi ed Public Accountants Co., Ltd, People’s Republic of China(10) Audited by Shenzhen Zhigong Certifi ed Public Accountants, People’s Republic of China(11) Audited by Phattarakit Aupliting Offi ce Co.,Ltd, Thailand(12) Audited by KPMG, Taiwan(13) Audited by Guangzhou Dagong Certifi ed Public Accountants, People’s Republic of China(14) Considered a subsidiary of the Company as the Company has voting control at general meetings and Board meetings

2010%

63

31

100

85

Proportion of ownership

interest

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

108

Page 111: Breadtalk AR 2011

(a)

13 Investment in subsidiaries (cont’d)

New subsidiaries and additional investments

Shanghai Star Food F&B Management Co., Ltd (“Shanghai Star Food”)

During the year, Star Food Pte Ltd, a 60% owned subsidiary of the Group, subscribed for the additional share capital of its wholly owned subsidiary, Shanghai Star Food, of 1,600,000 new ordinary shares for a cash consideration of US$1,600,000 ($1,937,000).

Food Republic Taiwan Co., Ltd (“Food Republic Taiwan”)

Food Republic Taiwan was incorporated as a 90% owned subsidiary of Topwin Investment Holding Pte Ltd (“Topwin”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Group in March 2011 with a registered capital and paid up capital of NT$5,000,000 ($215,000).

Shanghai Ramen Play Co., Ltd (“Shanghai Ramen Play”)

During the year, Shanghai BreadTalk Co., Ltd and Food Republic (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, subscribed for 30% each of the additional share capital issued by Shanghai Ramen Play for a total cash consideration of US$750,000 ($969,000). The Company retains an effective interest of 60% in Shanghai Ramen Play.

Food Republic Guangzhou F&B Management Co., Ltd (“Food Republic Guangzhou”)

Food Republic Guangzhou was incorporated as a 75% owned subsidiary of Megabite Hong Kong Limited, a 85% owned subsidiary of the Group, in June 2011 with a registered and paid up capital of HK$1,000,000 ($157,000).

FR (Thailand) Co, Ltd (“FR Thailand)

During the year, Topwin subscribed for a 49% interest in FR Thailand for a cash consideration of THB 2,450,000 ($104,000). FR Thailand was incorporated in July 2011 with a paid up capital of THB 5,000,000 ($210,000).

FR Thailand has not commenced operations as at 31 December 2011. FR Thailand is consolidated as a subsidiary as the Company has voting control at general meetings and Board meetings.

109

Page 112: Breadtalk AR 2011

14 Investment in associates

Investment in shares, unquotedShares, at costImpairment lossLoan to an associateShare of post-acquisition results of associates

At end of year

Name

Held through subsidiaries

Hong Kong BreadTalk Ltd(“HKBT”) (1)

Out of The Box Pte Ltd (“OOTB”) (1)

Country of incorporation

Hong Kong

Singapore

Principal activities

Dormant

Dormant

1,252(385)614

(1,481)

1,252(385)614

(1,481)

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Loan to an associate is quasi-capital in nature, non-interest bearing and has no fi xed terms of repayment.

Details of the associates are as follows:

(1) Not a signifi cant associate and unaudited fi nancial statements have been used for the preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group.

The Group has not recognised losses relating to HKBT and OOTB where its share of losses exceeds the Group’s interest in these associates. The Group’s cumulative share of unrecognised losses as at 31 December 2011 was $375,000 (2010: $402,000). The Group has no obligation in respect of these losses.

2011%

25

30

2010%

25

30

Proportion of ownership

interest

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

110

Page 113: Breadtalk AR 2011

14

15

Investment in associates (cont’d)

Investment in joint ventures

Assets and liabilities

Total assets

Total liabilities

Results

Net profi t/(loss) for the year

Investment in shares, unquoted

Shares, at costShare of post-acquisition results of joint venturesExchange difference

188

3,486

88

43418

(30)

422

105

3,435

(69)

334125(13)

446

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Group

The summarised fi nancial information of the associates, not adjusted for the proportion of ownership interest held by the Group, is as follows:

111

Page 114: Breadtalk AR 2011

15 Investment in joint ventures (cont’d)

Details of the joint ventures are as follows:

Name

Held through subsidiaries

Shanghai Hong Bu Rang Food & Beverage Management Co., Ltd (1)

Apex Excellent Sdn Bhd (2)

Street Food Pte Ltd (3)

Country of incorporation

People’s Republic of China

Malaysia

Singapore

Principal activities

Dormant

Food court operator

Food court operator

2011%

50

50

50

2010%

50

50

50

Proportion of ownership

interest

(1) Audited by Shanghai Xin Gao Xin Certifi ed Public Accountants Co., Ltd, People’s Republic of China(2) Audited by RSM Robert Teo, Kuan & Co., Malaysia(3) Audited by Ernst & Young LLP, Singapore

Additional investment

During the year, a wholly owned subsidiary, Food Republic Pte Ltd., increased its shareholding in Street Food Pte Ltd (“Street Food”) by subscribing for additional 99,999 new ordinary shares of $1.00 each. The consideration for the new ordinary shares was satisfi ed by capitalizing part of the existing shareholders’ loan owing by Street Food to the shareholders.

The aggregate amounts of each of the current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities, non-current liabilities, income and expenses, adjusted for the proportion of ownership interest held by the Group in the joint ventures, are as follows:

Assets and liabilities

Current assetsNon-current assets

Total assets

2,000827

2,827

1,751150

1,901

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

112

Page 115: Breadtalk AR 2011

15

16

Investment in joint ventures (cont’d)

Inventories

Current liabilitiesNon-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Results

RevenueOther incomeExpenses

Profi t for the year

Balance sheet:

Raw materials and consumables, at costSemi-fi nished goodsFinished goodsBase inventories (1)

Total inventories at lower of cost and net realisable value

Profi t or loss:

Inventories recognised as an expense in cost of salesInclusive of the following charge:- Write-down of inventories- Write-off of inventories

2,4312

2,433

2,579459

(2,945)

93

6,252648300197

7,397

106,417

2531

1,481–

1,481

2,265324

(2,472)

117

5,392444137141

6,114

85,492

–23

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Group

Group

The Group has not recognised losses relating to Shanghai Hong Bu Rang where its share of losses exceeds the Group’s interest in this joint venture. The Group’s cumulative share of unrecognised losses as at 31 December 2011 was $153,000 (2010: $153,000). The Group has no obligation in respect of these losses.

(1) This is stated after writing down 50% of the original cost of base inventories.

113

Page 116: Breadtalk AR 2011

17 Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables(current):

Trade receivablesOther receivablesDeposits

United States DollarEuro

Other receivables(non-current):

Other receivables

Trade receivables

Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 15 to 60 days terms (2010: 30 to 90 days). They are recognised at their original invoice amounts which represents their fair values on initial recognition.

Trade receivables denominated in foreign currencies at 31 December are as follows:-

CompanyGroup

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

7,7307,369

31,701

46,800

1,389

2011 $’000

5,2033,930

16,212

25,345

857

2010$’000

---

-

2011 $’000

-

-26

-

26

-

2010$’000

63817

655

33925

364

2010$’000

2011 $’000

Group

114

Page 117: Breadtalk AR 2011

17 Trade and other receivables (cont’d)

Receivables that are past due but not impaired

Receivables that are impaired / partially impaired

Trade receivables past due:

Lesser than 30 days 30 to 60 days 61 to 90 days 91 to 120 days More than 120 days

Trade receivables – nominal amounts Less: Allowance for impairment

At 1 JanuaryCharge/(write back) during the yearWritten off during the yearTranslation difference

At 31 December

2,07645639079

660

3,661

361(361)

120253(13)

1

361

49525620589

340

1,385

167(120)

47

125(5)

––

120

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

GroupIndividually impaired

The Group has trade receivables amounting to $3,661,000 (2010: $1,385,000) that are past due at the balance sheet date but not impaired. These receivables are unsecured and the analysis of their aging at the balance sheet date is as follows:

The Group’s trade receivables that are impaired at the balance sheet date and the movement of the allowance accounts used to record the impairment are as follows:

Trade receivables that are individually determined to be impaired at the balance sheet date relate to debtors that are in fi nancial diffi culties and have defaulted on payments. These receivables are not secured by any collateral or credit enhancements.

Movement in allowance accounts:

115

Page 118: Breadtalk AR 2011

17 Trade and other receivables (cont’d)

Other receivables that are past due but not impaired

The Group has other receivables amounting to $2,307,000 (2010: $1,169,000) that are past due at the balance sheet date but not impaired. These receivables are unsecured and the analysis of their aging at the balance sheet date is as follows:

Other receivables that are impaired / partially impaired

The Group’s other receivables that are impaired at the balance sheet date and the movement of the allowance accounts used to record the impairment are as follows:

Other receivables - nominal amountsLess: Allowance for impairment

Other receivables past due: Lesser than 30 days 30 to 60 days 61 to 90 days 91 to 120 days More than 120 days

Movement in allowance accounts:

At 1 JanuaryCharge during the yearWritten off during the yearTranslation difference

At 31 December

Other receivables

Deposits

Other receivables (current) are non-interest bearing and are generally on 0 to 60 days terms (2010: 30 to 180 days).

Deposits include an amount of $12,000,000 (2010: $Nil) for the subscription of junior bonds relating to the Group’s investment in a retail property trust in Singapore.

1,246581594

840

2,307

82(82)

27564

(259)2

82

36631330341146

1,169

277(275)

2

2723––

275

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Group

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

116

Page 119: Breadtalk AR 2011

18. Amounts due from/to subsidiaries, joint ventures and minority shareholders of subsidiaries (non-trade)

Receivables that are past due but not impaired

Receivables that are past due but not impaired

Amount due from joint ventures (non-trade)

Amounts due from subsidiaries (non-trade)

Lesser than 30 days30 to 60 days61 to 90 days91 to 120 daysMore than 120 days

Total as at 31 December

Lesser than 30 days30 to 60 days61 to 90 days91 to 120 daysMore than 120 days

Total as at 31 December

125382426

975

1,188

84––

30

114

471515

–_

77

7–3–

27

37

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Company

Group

Group

The amounts due from/to subsidiaries and joint ventures are unsecured, non-interest bearing and generally on 30 to 60 days term except for:

(i) loans to subsidiaries of $20,000 (2010: $1,881,000) which are repayable on demand;

(ii) loans from subsidiaries of $7,378,000 (2010: $8,750,000). $7,000,000 and $378,000 are unsecured and repayable on demand.

(iii) loan to a subsidiary of $12,000,000 (2010: Nil) which bears an effective interest rate of 2.06% (2010: Nil) per annum and is repayable on demand

Amounts due from subsidiaries include dividend receivable of $2,200,000 (2010: $3,000,000).

The amounts due from minority shareholders of subsidiaries are unsecured, non-interest bearing and repayable on demand.

117

Page 120: Breadtalk AR 2011

7,29579,765

87,060

2010$’000

2010$’000

2010$’000

2010$’000

2010$’000

2010$’000

2011 $’000

2011 $’000

2011 $’000

2011 $’000

2011 $’000

2011 $’000

19

20

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other payables

Fixed depositsCash on hand and at bank

Trade and other payables (current):

Trade payablesOther payablesSales collection on behalf of tenantsAmount due to landlord (non-trade)

Other payables (non-current):

Amount due to landlord (non-trade)

United States Dollar

Fixed deposits of the Group and the Company have varying maturity periods between 1 week to 1 month (2010: 12 months) with effective interest rates ranging from 0.11% to 0.88% (2010: 1.71% to 2.25%) per annum.

Cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies at 31 December are as follows:

2,000698

2,698

–250

250

34

22,89638,69912,392

87

74,074

1,193

–2,947

2,947

–489

489

35

78470,360

71,144

18,11432,54910,100

83

60,846

59

1,455

Company

Company

Company

Group

Group

Group

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

118

Page 121: Breadtalk AR 2011

21

20

Other liabilities and provision

United States DollarOthers

24117

258

23235

267

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Group

Trade payable/other payables

These amounts are non-interest bearing. Trade payables are normally settled on 0 to 60 days terms (2010: 30 to 90 days terms) while other payables have an average term of 0 to 90 days term (2010: 30 to 90 days terms), except for retention sums which have repayment terms of up to 1 year. Other payables of the Group include food court tenant and stored value card deposits of $12,866,000 (2010: $12,516,000), amount payable for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $10,358,000 (2010: $9,863,000) and dividend payable to minority shareholders of a subsidiary of $Nil (2010: $820,000).

Amount due to landlord (non-trade)

The balance is payable to a landlord, who paid renovation costs on behalf of a subsidiary. This amount is unsecured and non-interest bearing.

Trade payables denominated in foreign currencies as at 31 December are as follows:

Other liabilities:

CurrentAccrued operating expensesDeferred revenueDeferred rent

Non-currentDeferred rent

2,115––

2,115

25,31814,4961,310

41,124

7,039

1,845––

1,845

21,5799,916892

32,387

5,759

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

CompanyGroup

Trade and other payables (cont’d)

119

Page 122: Breadtalk AR 2011

21

22

23

Other liabilities and provision (cont’d)

Loans from minority shareholders of subsidiaries

Finance lease obligations, secured

At 1 January AdditionsUtilisation

Total as at 31 December

Provision:

Provision for reinstatement costs

Not later than one yearLater than one year but not later than fi ve years

Total minimum lease paymentsLess: amounts representing fi nance charges

Present value of minimum lease payments

The loans from minority shareholders of subsidiaries are unsecured, non-interest bearing and repayable on demand except for loans of $882,000 (2010: Nil) which are not expected to be repaid on the next twelve months.

The Group has fi nance leases for certain items of machinery and equipment (Note 10).

Future minimum lease payments under fi nance leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:

The leases have options to purchase at the end of the lease term. The effective interest rates of the leases are 2.20% (2010: 2.20%) per annum. Lease terms do not contain restrictions concerning dividends, additional debt or further leasing.

3,5362,461(126)

5,871

56

38

94

(3)

91

38–

38

(1)

37

3,061536(61)

3,536

54

37

91

91

37

37

37

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Totalminimum

leasepayments

2011

Totalminimum

leasepayments

2010

Present value of

payments 2011

Present value of

payments 2010

Group

Group

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000

120

Page 123: Breadtalk AR 2011

–3,989

––––––

3,989

–3,989

3,989

5,2613,989738

1,403

2,965

1,830182

3,5173,667

23,552

8,39615,156

23,552

–3,989

––––––

3,989

–3,989

3,989

4,2383,9891,3661,849

1,959

176286486

14,349

6,2328,117

14,349

24

25

Short-term loans

Long-term loans

Bank loans- SGD- USD- HKD- RMB- RM- NTD

SGD loansSGD loanHKD loansHKD loans

RMB loans

RM loanRM loanTHB loansNTD loan

CurrentNon-current

2012 - 2014Note 1

2012 - 2015 2012 – 2015

(Note 3)2012 – 2015

(Note 3)2012 - 2014

Note 22012 - 2016

2015

12,000–––––

12,000

12,000–

1,5051,409203647

15,764

––––––

–778

2,1571,763

––

4,698

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

2011 2010$’000 $’000

Company

CompanyMaturity

Group

GroupTerm loans

The effective interests on these short-term loans range from 1.13% to 6.71% (2010: 1.86% to 7.72%) per annum. The interest rates of these fl oating rate loans are repriced from time to time at the discretion of the respective banks.

The bank loans are revolving term loans of 3 to 12 months (2010: 3 to 6 months).

Short term loans of $1,320,000 (2010: $1,945,000) are secured by continuing guarantees by the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Group. All other short term loans except for a loan of $12,000,000 (2010: Nil) are secured by continuing guarantees by the Company.

121

Page 124: Breadtalk AR 2011

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

26. Share capital and treasury shares

(a) Share capital

Issued and fully paid ordinary shares

25. Long-term loans (cont’d)

Note 1 – The loan will be converted to a 15-year term loan within 3 months of the Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) of the Group’s operations Headquarters or 30 April 2012, whichever is earlier.

Note 2 – The loan is repayable by 36 monthly instalments upon full drawdown of the loan to a specifi ed sum.

All the loans are fl oating rate loans with effective interest rates ranging from 1.25% to 7.29% (2010: 1.63% to 6.11%) per annum. The interest rates of these floating rate loans are repriced from time to time at the discretion of the respective banks.

Securities

Note 1 – Term loan of $3,989,000 (2010: $3,989,000) is secured by a charge over the Company’s leasehold land.

Note 3 – Term loans of $4,368,000 (2010: $3,808,000) are secured by continuing guarantees by the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Group.

All other term loans are secured by continuing guarantees by the Company.

At beginning of the year 281,893,238

281,893,238

234,911,034

46,982,204

33,303

33,303 281,893,238

33,303

33,303

Allotment of bonus sharesAt end of the year

Group and Company2011 2010

Number ofshares

Number ofshares$’000 $’000

The holders of ordinary shares (except treasury shares) are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the Company. All ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restrictions. The ordinary shares have no par value.

On 30 March 2010, the Company issued bonus shares on the basis of one bonus share for every fi ve existing ordinary shares.

122

Page 125: Breadtalk AR 2011

26. Share capital and treasury shares (cont’d)

(b) Treasury shares

Treasury shares relate to ordinary shares of the Company that is held by the Company.

The Company acquired 1,090,000 (2010: 500,000) shares in the Company through purchases on the Singapore Exchange during the fi nancial year. The total amount paid to acquire the shares was $558,000 (2010: $259,000) and this was presented as a component within shareholders’ equity.

The Company reissued 432,892 (2010: 1,083,418) treasury shares pursuant to its restricted share grant at a weighted average share price of approximately $0.32 (2010: $0.32) each.

At beginning of the yearAcquired during the fi nancial yearAllotment of bonus sharesTreasury shares transferred on vesting of restricted share grant

At end of the year

580,582

1,090,000

- - -

1,237,690 580,582

432,892

(199)

(558)

(609) (199)

148

970,000

500,000

194,000

(1,083,418)

(283)

(259)

343

Group and Company2011 2010

Number ofshares

Number ofshares$’000 $’000

123

Page 126: Breadtalk AR 2011

2,071(722)

604

247 168

2,382189

604

357 186

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

357 247 186 168

27. Accumulated profi ts and other reserves

Accumulated profi ts

Included in the Group’s accumulated profi ts is an amount of $1,432,000 (2010: $1,432,000) which is not distributable by way of dividends. The amount arose from the waiver of inter-company debt in the subsidiary, Beijing BreadTalk Restaurant Management Co., Ltd, which was recognised as capital reserve in accordance with local accounting convention.

Other reserves

2011 2011 Note 2010 2010

$’000 $’000$’000 $’000

(a) Statutory reserve fund

(b) Translation reserve

Group Company

Statutory reserve fundTranslation reserveFair value adjustment reserveShare-based compensation reserveCapital reserve

3,178 2,368 543 415

- -

- -

- -

In accordance with the Foreign Enterprise Law applicable to subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), the subsidiaries are required to make appropriation to a Statutory Reserve Fund (“SRF”). At least 10% of the statutory after tax profi ts as determined in accordance with the applicable PRC accounting standards and regulations must be allocated to the SRF until the cumulative total of the SRF reaches 50% of the subsidiaries’ registered capital. Subject to the approval from the relevant PRC authorities, the SRF may be used to offset any accumulated losses or increase the registered capital of the subsidiaries. The SRF is not available for dividend distribution to shareholders.

The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the fi nancial statements of foreign operations whose functional currencies are different from that of the Group’s presentation currency.

124

Page 127: Breadtalk AR 2011

27. Accumulated profi ts and other reserves (cont’d)

(c) Fair value adjustment reserve

Net loss on available-for-sale fi nancial assets:

- Net loss on fair value changes during the fi nancial year

2011 2010

$’000 $’000

28. Commitments and contingencies

(d) Capital reserve

(a)

Group

574

49,355

6,000

2,372

1,952

600

47,324 1,834

Fair value adjustment reserve represents the cumulative fair value changes, net of tax, of available-for-sale fi nancial assets until they are disposed of or impaired.

Commitments

Capital reserve mainly arises from the gain or loss arising from purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of treasury shares. No dividend may be paid and no other distribution (whether in cash or otherwise) of the Company’s assets (including any distribution of assets to members on a winding up) may be made in respect of this reserve.

Expenditure contracted for as at the balance sheet date but not recognised in the fi nancial statements is as follows:

2011 2011 2010 2010

$’000 $’000$’000 $’000

Group Company

Commitment in respect of property, plant and equipment

Commitment in respect of investment securities

Commitment for capital contribution in a joint venture

Shareholder’s loan to a joint venture

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

125

Page 128: Breadtalk AR 2011

28. Commitments and contingencies (cont’d)

(b) Contracted operating lease commitments

Not later than one year Later than one year but not later than fi ve years Later than fi ve years

Not later than one year Later than one year but not later than fi ve years

(c) Operating lease The Group has entered into non-cancellable operating leases to sublease its food court and retail outlet premises. Sublease rental receivable as at 31 December is as follows:

(d) Letters of guarantees, secured

The Group has various operating lease agreements for equipment, offi ce, central kitchen, food court and retail outlet premises. These non-cancellable leases have remaining non-cancellable lease terms of between less than 1 year and 9 years. Most leases contain renewable options. Some of the leases contain escalation clauses and provide for contingent rentals based on percentages of sales derived from assets held under operating leases. Lease terms do not contain restrictions on the Group’s activities concerning dividends, additional debt or further leasing.

Future minimum lease payments payable under non-cancellable operating leases as at 31 December are as follows:

2011 2010

$’000

73,524170,789

17,231

261,544 211,772

61,052139,395

11,325

$’000

Group

2011 2010

$’000

30,889 21,189

52,078 48,324

29,458 18,866

$’000

Group

As at 31 December 2011, the banks issued letters of guarantees on behalf of the Group to lessors of premises amounting to approximately $9,352,000 (2010: $8,097,000).

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

126

Page 129: Breadtalk AR 2011

28. Commitments and contingencies (cont’d)

(e) Corporate guarantees

(f) Undertakings

(g) Leasehold land

As at 31 December 2011, the Company has given corporate guarantees to fi nancial institutions in connection with banking facilities provided to its subsidiaries of which $44,716,000 (2010:$23,246,000) of the banking facilities have been utilised as at year end.

In conjunction with the investment in junior bonds by the subsidiary, Imagine Properties Pte Ltd (“IPPL”) (Note 12), the Company, together with the other investors of the junior bonds, had executed a Sponsors’ Undertaking on 29 January 2010 whereby the Company undertakes to pay IPPL’s proportion of all cost overruns in connection to the additions’ and alterations’ works to be undertaken on the Katong Mall. As at 31 December 2011, there were no contingent liabilities resulting from the aforesaid undertaking.

In November 2009, the Company accepted an offer from Jurong Town Corporation (“JTC”) to acquire a leasehold land located at Paya Lebar iPark, Tai Seng Street, Singapore. The Company also signed a Building Agreement with JTC in October 2010.

Under the lease arrangement, the Company will construct a multi-storey building on the land. The building will serve as the Group’s manufacturing facility and operations Headquarters. Upon completion of the building and fulfi lment of other terms and conditions in the Building Agreement, the land together with the building erected thereon will be leased to the Company for a term of 30 years from 1 February 2010.

127

Page 130: Breadtalk AR 2011

29. Related party disclosures

(a) Sale and purchase of goods and services

In addition to those related party information disclosed elsewhere in the fi nancial statements, the following signifi cant transactions between the Group and related parties took place during the year on terms agreed between the parties:

Income Management fee income from a joint venture Rental and miscellaneous income from a party related to a director of the Company Dividend income from a joint venture

Income Management fee income from a subsidiary Dividend income from subsidiaries Training fee income from subsidiaries

Expenses Rental expense to a joint venture Royalty fees to minority shareholders Purchase of goods from a party related to a director of the Company

Expense Facilities fee to a subsidiary

Others Franchise fee to minority shareholders Purchase of furniture and fi tting from a company related to a director of the Company Design fee to a company related to a director of a subsidiary Purchase of lightings and fi ttings from a company related to a director of a subsidiary

155 -

2011

2011

2010

2010

$’000

$’000

327

73

52

221

1,654

7,247 4,672

22

194

97

228

38

200

142

273

79

58

1,282

6,399 4,680

22

25

59

84

80

$’000

$’000

Group

Company

-

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

128

Page 131: Breadtalk AR 2011

29. Related party disclosures (cont’d)

(b) Compensation of key management personnel

30. Financial risk management objectives and policies

The Group and the Company is exposed to fi nancial risks arising from its operations and the use of fi nancial instruments. The key fi nancial risks include interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and market price risk. The Audit Committee provides independent oversight to the effectiveness of the risk management process.

The Group’s and Company’s principal fi nancial instruments comprise bank loans, fi nance leases and cash and short term deposits. The main purpose of these fi nancial instruments is to raise fi nance for the Group’s and Company’s operations. The Group and Company has various other fi nancial assets and liabilities such as trade and other receivables, trade and other payables and related company balances, which arise directly from its operations.

It is, and has been throughout the current and previous fi nancial year, the Group’s and Company’s policy that no trading in derivative fi nancial instruments shall be undertaken.

Salaries and bonusCentral Provident Fund contributions and other pension contributionsShare-based payment (RSG Plan)Directors’ feesOther personnel expenses

Total compensation paid to key management personnel

Comprise amounts paid to:

Directors of the CompanyDirectors of a subsidiaryOther key management personnel

2011 2010

$’000 $’000

Group

6,428

120

344

168

5,835

7,597

622

7,597

259

1,418 1,479

6,017

570

575

124

5,388

7,392

509

7,392

172

129

Page 132: Breadtalk AR 2011

30. Financial risk management objective and policies (cont’d)

The following sections provide details regarding the Group’s and Company’s exposure to the above-mentioned fi nancial risks and the objectives, policies and processes for the management of these risks.

(a) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash fl ows of the Group’s and the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.

The Group’s and the Company’s exposure to interest rates risk arises primarily from its investment portfolio in fi xed deposits and its debt obligations. The Group does not use derivative fi nancial instruments to hedge its investment portfolio. The Group obtains additional fi nancing through bank borrowings and leasing arrangements. The Group’s policy is to obtain the most favourable interest rates available without increasing its foreign exchange exposure.

Surplus funds are placed with reputable banks.

Sensitivity analysis for interest rate risk

2011

- Singapore dollar - Renminbi- Hong Kong dollar- New Taiwan dollar- Ringgit Malaysia- Thai Baht

Effect on profi t net of tax Group

100 basispoints

increase$’000

100 basispoints

decrease$’000

(128) (40) (33) (30) (22) (31)

128 40 33 30 22 31

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

130

Page 133: Breadtalk AR 2011

30. Financial risk management objective and policies (cont’d)

The Group has transactional currency exposures arising from sales, purchases and borrowings that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of Group entities, primarily SGD, Renminbi (RMB) and Hong Kong Dollar (HKD). The foreign currencies in which these transactions are denominated are mainly US dollars (USD), HKD, RMB and SGD.

Currently, the Chinese government imposes control over foreign currency. RMB, the offi cial currency in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), is not freely convertible. Enterprises operating in the PRC can enter into exchange transactions through the People’s Bank of China or other authorised fi nancial institutions. Payments for imported materials or services and remittance of earnings outside of the PRC are subject to the availability of foreign currency which depends on the foreign currency denominated earnings of the enterprises, or exchanges of RMB for foreign currency must be arranged through the People’s Bank of China or other authorised fi nancial institutions. Approval for exchanges at the People’s Bank of China or other authorised fi nancial institutions is granted to enterprises in the PRC for valid reasons such as purchase of imported materials and remittance of earnings. While conversion of RMB into Singapore dollars or other currencies can generally be effected at the People’s Bank of China or other authorised fi nancial institutions, there is no guarantee that it can be effected at all times.

The Group is also exposed to currency translation risk arising from its net investments in foreign operations, in Malaysia, the PRC, Hong Kong and Thailand. The Group’s net investments in these countries are not hedged as currency positions in Ringgit Malaysia, RMB, Hong Kong Dollar and Thai Baht are considered to be long-term in nature.

Sensitivity analysis for foreign currency risk

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Group’s profi t net of tax to a reasonably possible change in the USD, HKD, RMB and SGD exchange rates against the respective functional currencies of the Group entities, with all other variables held constant.

(a) Interest rate risk (cont’d)

(b) Foreign currency risk

2010

- Singapore dollar - Renminbi- Hong Kong dollar- US dollar- Ringgit Malaysia- Thai Baht

Effect on profi t net of tax Group

100 basispoints

increase$’000

100 basispoints

decrease$’000

(68) (30) (45) (6) (5) (4)

68 30 45 6 5 4

131

Page 134: Breadtalk AR 2011

52

(6)

30. Financial risk management objectives and policies (cont’d)

Against SGD:

USD - strengthened 6% (2010: 6%) - weakened 6% (2010: 6%)

RMB - strengthened 5% (2010: 5%) - weakened 5% (2010: 5%)

Against RMB:

USD - strengthened 6% (2010: 6%) - weakened 6% (2010: 6%)

SGD - strengthened 5% (2010: 5%) - weakened 5% (2010: 5%)

Against HKD:

SGD - strengthened 5% (2010: 5%) - weakened 5% (2010: 5%)

USD - strengthened 6% (2010: 6%) - weakened 6% (2010: 6%)

RMB - strengthened 5% (2010: 5%) - weakened 5% (2010: 5%)

Against Ringgit MalaysiaSGD - strengthened 5% (2010: 5%) - weakened 5% (2010: 5%)

Effect on profi t net of tax Group

2011$’000

2010$’000

63

(3)

(56)

(63)

3

56

169

(3)

(5)

(169)

3

5

(1)

(8)

1

8

78

(43)

(52)

(78)

43

(2)

(2)

6

2

2

(34)

4

34

(c) Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of loss that may arise on outstanding fi nancial instruments should a counterparty default on its obligations. The Group’s and the Company’s exposure to credit risk arises primarily from trade and other receivables. For other fi nancial assets (including investment securities, cash and cash equivalents), the Group and the Company minimise credit risk by dealing exclusively with high credit rating counterparties.

The Group trades only with recognised and creditworthy third parties. It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verifi cation procedures. In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s exposure to bad debts is not signifi cant.

(4)

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

132

Page 135: Breadtalk AR 2011

30. Financial risk management objectives and policies (cont’d)

(c) Credit risk (cont’d)

Exposure to credit risk

At the balance sheet date, the Group’s and the Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by:

Credit risk concentration profi le

The Group determines concentrations of credit risk by monitoring the country profi le of its trade receivables on an on-going basis. The credit risk concentration profi le of the Group’s trade receivables at the balance sheet date is as follows:

Financial assets that are neither past due nor impaired

Trade and other receivables that are neither past due nor impaired are creditworthy debtors with good payment record with the Group. Cash and cash equivalents are placed with or entered into with reputable fi nancial institutions or companies with high credit ratings and no history of default.

Financial assets that are either past due or impaired

Information regarding fi nancial assets that are either past due or impaired is disclosed in Notes 17 and 18 above.

By country:

SingaporePeople’s Republic of ChinaIndonesiaThe PhillippinesThailandTaiwanOthers

93

3,9491,1531,114342702377

7,730

1%

51%15%15%4%9%5%

100%

66

3,485471617145226193

5,203

1%

67%9%12%3%4%4%

100%

Group2011 2010

$’000% oftotal $’000

% oftotal

an amount of $32,716,000 (2010: $23,246,000) relating to corporate guarantees provided by the Company to fi nancial institutions on its subsidiaries’ borrowings and other banking facilities.

the carrying amount of each class of fi nancial assets recognised in the balance sheets; and

133

Page 136: Breadtalk AR 2011

30. Financial risk management objectives and policies (cont’d)

(d) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group or the Company will encounter diffi culty in meeting fi nancial obligations due to shortage of funds. The Group’s and the Company’s exposure to liquidity risk arises primarily from mismatches of the maturities of fi nancial assets and liabilities. The Group’s and the Company’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and fl exibility through the use of stand-by credit facilities.

The Group monitors and maintains a level of cash and cash equivalents deemed adequate by the management to fi nance the operations of the Group.

Short-term funding may be obtained from short-term loans where necessary.

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

134

Page 137: Breadtalk AR 2011

Gro

upFi

nanc

ial a

sset

s :

Inve

stm

ent s

ecur

ites

Trad

e an

d ot

her r

ecei

vabl

esA

mou

nts

due

from

join

t ven

ture

s (n

on-t

rade

)A

mou

nts

due

from

min

ority

sha

reho

lder

s of

sub

sidi

arie

s (n

on-t

rade

)C

ash

and

shor

t ter

m d

epos

its

Fina

ncia

l Lia

bili

ties

:Tr

ade

and

othe

r pay

able

sA

ccru

ed o

pera

ting

expe

nses

(Not

e 21

)A

mou

nts

due

to jo

int v

entu

res

Loan

s an

d bo

rrow

ings

Com

pan

yFi

nanc

ial a

sset

s :

Oth

er re

ceiv

able

sA

mou

nts

due

from

sub

sidi

arie

sC

ash

on h

and

and

at b

ank

Fina

ncia

l lia

bili

ties

: O

ther

pay

able

s A

ccru

ed o

pera

ting

expe

nses

(Not

e 21

)A

mou

nts

due

to s

ubsi

dia

ries

Loan

s an

d bo

rrow

ings

30.

Fin

anci

al r

isk

man

agem

ent

obje

ctiv

es a

nd p

olic

ies

(con

t’d

)

The

tabl

e be

low

sum

mar

ises

the

mat

urity

pro

fi le

of th

e G

roup

’s an

d th

e C

ompa

ny’s

fi nan

cial

ass

ets

and

fi nan

cial

liab

ilitie

s at

the

bala

nce

shee

t dat

e ba

sed

on

con

tract

ual u

ndis

coun

ted

paym

ents

:

1 ye

ar o

r le

ss

46,8

00

$’00

0

74,0

74

15,3

352,

698

250

395

$’00

0

14,2

49

2011

1

to 5

ye

ars –

––

– –

$’00

0

14,2

49

1,29

7

Tota

l

15,3

35 250

$’00

0

1 ye

ar o

r le

ss 26

5,74

8

489

$’00

0$’

000

2010

1

to 5

ye

ars – – –

Tota

l

87,0

60420

1,29

71,

389 – –

48,1

89 420

87,0

60

14,2

49

14,

249

857

26,2

02–

506

– 4

55–

71,1

44

–25

,345 506

455

71,1

44

25,3

18

25,0

22

135,

577

15,6

3815

1,21

597

,450

15,1

0611

2,55

6

– –– –

–16

,911

74,0

7425

,318

395

41,9

33

60,8

4621

,579 140

11,3

08

59

8,22

7

60,9

0521

,579 140

19,5

35

124,

809

16,9

1114

1,72

093

,873

8,28

610

2,15

9

–2,

698

2,94

7–

2,94

75,

74826

18,0

3318

,033

8,72

18,

721

––

2,11

57,

394

12,3

01

– –4,

042

2,11

57,

394

16,3

43

1,84

58,

762 56

– –4,

044

489

1,84

58,

762

4,10

0

22,0

604,

042

26,1

0211

,152

4,04

415

,196

135

Page 138: Breadtalk AR 2011

Com

pan

y

Fina

ncia

l gua

rant

ees

30.

Fin

anci

al r

isk

man

agem

ent

obje

ctiv

es a

nd p

olic

ies

(con

t’d

)

The

tabl

e be

low

sho

ws

the

cont

ract

ual e

xpiry

by

mat

urity

of t

he C

ompa

ny’s

cont

inge

nt li

abili

ties.

The

max

imum

am

ount

of t

he fi

nanc

ial g

uara

ntee

con

trac

ts

are

allo

cate

d to

the

earli

est p

erio

d in

whi

ch th

e gu

aran

tee

coul

d be

cal

led.

1 ye

ar o

r le

ss

34,3

75

$’00

0$’

000

16,0

29

2011

1

to 5

ye

ars

$’00

0

50,4

04

Tota

l

$’00

0

1 ye

ar o

r le

ss

$’00

0$’

000

2010

1

to 5

ye

ars

Tota

l

8,1

34

27,

632

19,4

98

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

136

Page 139: Breadtalk AR 2011

30. Financial risk management objectives and policies (cont’d)

31. Financial instruments

(e) Market price risk

(a) Financial assets and liabilities

Market price risk is that the fair value or future cash fl ows of the Group’s fi nancial instruments will fl uctuate because of changes in market prices (other than interest or exchange rates). The Group is exposed to equity price risk arising from its investment in quoted equity instrument. This instrument is quoted on the SGX-ST in Singapore and is classifi ed as available-for-sale fi nancial asset. The Group does not have exposure to commodity price risk.

Sensitivity analysis for equity price risk

At the balance sheet date, if the share price had been 15% (2010: 15%) higher/lower with all other variables held constant, the Group’s Fair Value Adjustment Reserve in equity would have been $138,000 (2010: $138,000) higher/lower, arising as a result of an increase/decrease in the fair value equity instruments classifi ed as available-for-sale.

The carrying amount by category of fi nancial assets and liabilities are as follows:

Loans and receivablesTrade and other receivablesAmounts due from joint-ventures (non-trade)Amounts due from minority shareholders of subsidiaries(non-trade)Cash and fi xed deposits

Total

Available-for-sale fi nancial assetsInvestment securities

Held-to-maturity investmentsInvestment sercurities

Financial liabilities carried at amortised costTrade and other payablesAccrued operating expenses (Note 21)Amounts due to joint-ventures (non-trade)Short term loans (Note 24)Long term loans (Note 25)Loans from minority shareholders of subsidiaries

Total

2011 2010

$’000 $’000

Group

46,800

74,07425,318

15,76423,552

87,060

140,185

135,577

420

1,297

919

395

1,082

10,750

919

140

200

10,750

25,345

60,48621,579

4,69814,349

71,144

101,452

97,450

455

506

137

Page 140: Breadtalk AR 2011

31. Financial instruments (cont’d)

(b) Fair values

Financial instruments carried at fair value.

The fair value of quoted investment securities is determined by reference to the published market bid price at the balance sheet date.

Financial instruments whose carrying amount approximate fair value

Management has determined that the carrying amounts of unquoted investment securities, cash and bank balances, fi xed deposits, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables, related company balances and fl oating rate bank loans, based on their notional amounts, reasonably approximate their fair values because these are mostly short term in nature or are repriced frequently.

Financial instruments carried at other than fair value.

Set out below is a comparison of the carrying amount and fair value of the fi nancial instrument that is carried in the fi nancial statements at other than fair value as at 31 December.

Fair value is estimated by discounting expected future cash fl ows at market incremental lending rate for similar types of borrowing or leasing arrangements at the balance sheet date.

No disclosure of fair values are made for the Group’s quasi-capital loan to an associate, loans from minority shareholders of subsidiaries and long-term amount due to landlord, and the Company’s quasi-capital loans to subsidiaries as it is not practical to determine their fair values with suffi cient reliability since the balances have no fi xed terms of repayment.

Financial assets:Other receivablesInvestment in junior bonds (Note 12)

Financial liabilities:Obligations under fi nance leases

2011 2011 2010 2010 Fair valueCarrying amount

1,389

37

10,750

1,019

37

11,315

857

91

10,750

839

89

11,362

$’000 $’000$’000 $’000

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

138

Page 141: Breadtalk AR 2011

Capital management

The primary objective of the Group’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support business and maximise shareholder value.

The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in the light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during the year ended 31 December 2011 and 2010.

As disclosed in Note 27, subsidiaries of the Group operating in the PRC are required by the Foreign Enterprise Law of the PRC to contribute to and maintain a non-distributable statutory reserve fund whose utilisation is subject to approval by the relevant PRC authorities. This externally imposed capital requirement has been complied with by the respective subsidiaries for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 and 2010.

The Group monitors capital using gearing ratio (which is total borrowings divided by total equity) and net gearing ratio (which is total borrowings less cash and cash equivalents divided by total equity).

32.

Including bank loans, fi nance lease obligations and loans from minority shareholders of subsidiaries.

Total borrowingsLess: Cash and cash equivalents

Net cash

Total equity

Gearing ratio (times)

Net gearing

2011 2010

$’000 $’000

Group

40,435(87,060)

85,468

0.47

Net cash Net cash

19,338(71,144)

75,083

0.26

(46,625) (51,806)

(1)

(1)

139

Page 142: Breadtalk AR 2011

For management purposes, the Group is organised into business units based on their products and services, and has three reportable operating segments as follows:

(a) The bakery segment is in the business of manufacturing and retailing of all kinds of food, bakery and confectionary products including franchising.

(b) The food court segment is involved in the management and operation of food courts and operation of food and drinks outlets within the food courts.

(c) The restaurant segment is in the business of operating food and drinks outlets, eating houses and restaurants.

Except as indicated above, no operating segments have been aggregated to form the above reportable operating segments.

Management monitors the operating results of its business units separately for the purpose of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Segment performance is evaluated based on operating profi t or loss.

Transactions between operating segments are generally based on terms determined on commercial basis.

33. Segment information

NO

TE

S T

O T

HE

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TAT

EM

EN

TS

140

Page 143: Breadtalk AR 2011

168,9385,6232,276

176,837

$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000

Segment information (cont’d)33.

RevenueExternal salesInter-segment sales(Note A)

Total revenue

ResultsProfi t from operationsInterest incomeInterest expenseShare of jointventures’ results

Segment profi t Tax expense

Profi t for the year

Other informationInvestment in joint ventures

Additions to non-current assets (Note B)

Depreciation andamortisation

Other non-cash(income)/expenses(Note C)

Assets and liabilitiesSegment assets(Note A)

Deferred tax assets

Total assets Segment liabilities(Note A)

Tax payableDeferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Bakery operations(1)

Restaurant operations

Foodcourt

operations Others (2) Elimination Group2011

194,433

304

194,737

8,562239

(476)

8,325

11,683

9,487

1,231

9,895

4,297

186

422

17,754

10,540

536

1,529

38

311

422

40,843

24,362

2,264

90,899

63,006

3,87111

(94)

3,788

55,590

29,702

4,71255

(159)

93

4,701

104,673

80,833

(150)51956

313

35,715

25,405

–––

(26,692)

(30,008)

16,995824

(785)

93

17,127(5,370)

11,757

260,1852,120

262,305

76,969

76,969

94,502

1,394

95,896

(1,698)

(1,698)

365,904

365,904

141

Page 144: Breadtalk AR 2011

122,0654,4022,647

129,114

$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000

Segment information (cont’d)33.

RevenueExternal salesInter-segment sales(Note A)

Total revenue

ResultsProfi t from operationsInterest incomeInterest expenseShare of joint ventures’ results

Segment profi t Tax expense

Profi t for the year

Other informationInvestment in joint ventures

Additions to non-current assets (Note B)

Depreciation andamortisation

Other non-cash(income)/expenses(Note C)

Assets and liabilitiesSegment assets

(Note A)Deferred tax assets

Total assets Segment liabilities(Note A)

Tax payable Deferred tax liabilities

Total liabilities

Bakery operations(1)

Restaurant operations

Foodcourt

operations Others 2) Elimination Group2010

158,131

448

158,579

9,108104

(214)

8,998

12,450

8,235

(3,844)

10,571

2,857

(65)

446

11,623

10,463

2,458

5,023

43

668

446

39,667

21,598

(783)

79,296

53,006

2,8052

(2)

2,805

41,519

20,727

4,42437

(375)

158

4,244

86,986

64,422

227458(44)

641

23,258

15,108

–––

(28,760)

(31,198)

16,564601

(635)

158

16,688(5,520)

11,168

202,2991,898

204,197

56,253

56,253

88,504

2,160

90,664

(2,608)

(2,608)

302,888

302,888

142

Page 145: Breadtalk AR 2011

Segment information (cont’d)

Notes:

(A) Inter-segment sales, assets and liabilities are eliminated on consolidation.

(B) Additions to non-current assets consist of additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

(C) Other non-cash (income)/expenses consist of:

• impairment/(write-back) of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investment in associate, receivables, amount due from associates and inventories;

• write off of property, plant and equipment, bad debts and inventories;

• (gain)/loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment; • share based payment expenses; and

• unrealised foreign exchange (gain)/loss.

33.

Bakery operations comprise operation of bakery retail outlets as well as that operated through franchising.The business segment “Others” comprises the corporate services, treasury functions, investment holding activities and dormant associated company.Non-current assets information presented above consist of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

SingaporeMainland ChinaHong KongRest of the world

Total

2011 2011 2010 2010

$’000 $’000$’000 $’000

External sales Non-current assets (3)

Geographical information

191,237117,57335,20421,890

365,904

40,55238,1786,78512,597

98,112

157,50397,75533,45714,173

302,888

38,61933,4087,8792,542

82,448

(1)

(2)

(3)

143

Page 146: Breadtalk AR 2011

Dividends paid during the year: • First and fi nal exempt (one-tier) dividend for 2010 of 1.0 cent per share (2009: 1.0 cent per share)

Proposed but not recognised as a liability as at 31 December: Dividends on ordinary shares, subject to shareholders’ approval at the Annual General Meeting: • First and fi nal exempt (one-tier) ordinary dividend for 2011 of 1.0 cent per share (2010: 1.0 cent per share) • First and fi nal exempt (one-tier) special dividend for 2011 of 0.5 cent per share (2010: Nil cent per share)

Events subsequent to the balance sheet date

Dividends34.

35.

36.

Group and Company

2,813 2,342

2,807 2,813

1,403 –4,210 2,813

(i) Investment in retail property trust in Singapore

(ii) Partial redemption of junior bonds

Authorisation of fi nancial statements

The fi nancial statements for the year ended 31 December 2011 were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 23 March 2012.

On 10 February 2012, the Group announced that the subsidiary, Imagine Properties Pte Ltd (“IPPL”) had completed the subscription of $18,000,000 in principal amount of junior bonds and was issued 72 ordinary shares of $1.00 per ordinary share in the share capital of Perennial (Chijmes) Pte Ltd in relation to the company’s investment in a retail property trust in Singapore. The initial deposit of $12,000,000 (Note 17) was paid during the year and the balance subscription amount of $6,000,072 was paid in January 2012.

On 27 February 2012, IPPL received a partial redemption of $3,526,000 on the junior bonds of $10,750,000 at 31 December 2011.

2011$’000

2010$’000

144

Page 147: Breadtalk AR 2011

52,319,880 18.6495,538,556 34.06

30,282,000 (2) 10.7930,282,000 (3) 10.79

Size of Shareholdings No. of Shareholders % No. of Shares %

1 - 999 55 3.39 20,528 0.01

1,000 - 10,000 970 59.88 4,732,609 1.69

10,001 - 1,000,000 570 35.19 32,362,179 11.53

1,000,001 and above 25 1.54 243,540,232 86.77

Total 1,620 100.00 280,655,548 100.00

Issued and fully Paid-up CapitalNumber of Ordinary Shares in Issue (excluding treasury shares)Number of Treasury Shares heldClass of SharesVoting Rights

: S$33,302,916: 280,655,548: 1,237,690: Ordinary Shares: One vote per share

Statistics of ShareholdingsAs at 20 March 2012

Distribution of Shareholdings

Twenty Largest Shareholders

%

11.56 10.8710.479.098.525.645.413.403.352.852.342.272.091.861.540.750.750.730.570.50

84.56

No. of Shares

32,447,105 30,500,000 29,379,000 25,522,80023,905,000 15,836,20415,180,000 9,549,9509,408,000 8,000,0006,562,7756,369,0005,872,775 5,231,1774,323,0002,118,6002,100,0002,055,000 1,591,0001,399,200

237,350,586

No.

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.

(1)

(2)

(3)

Name

Katherine Lee Lih LengMayban Nominees (S) Pte LtdMorgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte LtdUnited Overseas Bank Nominees Pte LtdHong Leong Finance Nominees Pte LtdCitibank Nominees Singapore Pte LtdHL Bank Nominees (S) Pte LtdHSBC (Singapore) Nominees Pte LtdDBS Nominees Pte LtdSBS Nominees Pte LtdBank of Singapore Nominees Pte LtdCitibank Consumer Nominees Pte LtdOversea-Chinese Bank Nominees Private LimitedGeorge Quek Meng TongBNP Paribas Securities Services Singapore Pte LtdUOB Kay Hian Pte LtdTan Kim KoonBNP Paribas Nominees Singapore Pte LtdRoyal Bank of Canada (Asia) LtdLiow Siew Pieng

Total :

Based on information available to the Company as at 20 March 2012, approximately 35.95% of the Company’s shares are held in the hands of public. Accordingly, the Company has complied with Rule 723 of the Listing Manual of SGX-ST.

SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS(As recorded in the Register of Substantial Shareholders as at 20 March 2012)

Name of Substantial Shareholders

1. George Quek Meng Tong (1)

2. Katherine Lee Lih Leng (1)

3. Keywise Greater China Opportunities Master Fund4. Keywise Capital Management (HK) Ltd (2)

5. Fang Zheng (3)

95,538,556 34.0652,319,880 18.6430,282,000 10.79

Katherine Lee Lih Leng is the spouse of George Quek Meng Tong. Saved as disclosed above, there are no familyrelationship among our Directors and Substantial Shareholders.

Keywise Capital Management (HK) Ltd, as the fund manager, is deemed interested in these shares held by KeywiseGreater China Opportunities Master Fund.

Fang Zheng is deemed interested in these shares by virtue of him being the sole shareholder of Keywise CapitalManagement (HK) Ltd.

- -- -

- -

Direct InterestNumber of Shares

Direct InterestNumber of Shares % %

145

Page 148: Breadtalk AR 2011

NO

TIC

E O

FA

NN

UA

L G

EN

ER

AL

ME

ET

ING

AS SPECIAL BUSINESS

To consider and if thought fi t, to pass the following resolutions as Ordinary Resolutions, with or without any modifi cations:

To receive and adopt the Directors’ Report and the Audited Financial Statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2011 together with the Auditors’ Report thereon. (Resolution 1) To declare a fi rst and fi nal dividend of 1.0 cent per share tax exempt (one-tier) anda special dividend of 0.5 cent per share tax exempt (one-tier) for the year ended31 December 2011 (2010: 1.0 cent). (Resolution 2)

To re-elect the following Directors retiring pursuant to Article 104 of the Company’s Articles of Association: Mr George Quek Meng Tong (Resolution 3)Mr Ong Kian Min (Resolution 4)

Mr Ong Kian Min will, upon re-election as a Director of the Company, remain as the Lead Independent non-executive Director, Chairman of the Audit and Nominating Committees and a member of the Remuneration Committee. Mr Ong will be considered independent for the purposes of Rule 704(8) of Listing Manual of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited.

To approve the payment of Directors’ fees of S$168,000 for the year ended 31 December 2011 (2010: S$124,000). (Resolution 5)

To re-appoint Messrs Ernst & Young LLP as the Auditors of the Company and to authorise the Directors of the Company to fi x their remuneration. (Resolution 6) To transact any other ordinary business which may properly be transacted at an Annual General Meeting.

AS ORDINARY BUSINESS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of BreadTalk Group Limited (“the Company”) will be held at 171 Kampong Ampat #05-05, KA FoodLink, Singapore 368330 on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 9.30 a.m. for the following purposes:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

146

Page 149: Breadtalk AR 2011

provided that:

[See Explanatory Note (i)] (Resolution 7)

Authority to issue shares

That pursuant to Section 161 of the Companies Act, Cap. 50 and Rule 806 of the Listing Manual of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“SGX-ST”), the Directors of the Company be authorised and empowered to:

issue shares in the Company (“shares”) whether by way of rights, bonus or otherwise; and/or

make or grant offers, agreements or options (collectively, “Instruments”) that might or would require shares to be issued, including but not limited to the creation and issue of (as well as adjustments to) options, warrants, debentures or other instruments convertible into shares,

new shares arising from the conversion or exercise of any convertible securities

new shares arising from exercising share options or vesting of share awards which are outstanding or subsisting at the time of the passing of this Resolution; and

any subsequent bonus issue, consolidation or subdivision of shares;

at any time and upon such terms and conditions and for such purposes and to such persons as the Directors of the Company may in their absolute discretion deem fi t; and

(notwithstanding the authority conferred by this Resolution may have ceased to be in force) issue shares in pursuance of any Instruments made or granted by the Directors of the Company while this Resolution was in force,

the aggregate number of shares (including shares to be issued in pursuance of the Instruments, made or granted pursuant to this Resolution) to be issued pursuant to this Resolution shall not exceed fi fty per centum (50%) of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company (as calculated in accordance with sub-paragraph (2) below), of which the aggregate number of shares to be issued other than on a pro rata basis to shareholders of the Company shall not exceed twenty per centum (20%) of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company (as calculated in accordance with sub-paragraph (2) below);

in exercising the authority conferred by this Resolution, the Company shall comply with the provisions of the Listing Manual of the SGX-ST for the time being in force (unless such compliance has been waived by the SGX-ST) and the Articles of Association of the Company; and

unless revoked or varied by the Company in a general meeting, such authority shall continue in force until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier.

(subject to such calculation as may be prescribed by the SGX-ST) for the purpose of determining the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under sub-paragraph (1) above, the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) shall be based on the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company at the time of the passing of this Resolution, after adjusting for:

(2)

(4)

7.

(a)

(b)

(1)

(3)

(i)

(ii)

(a)

(b)

(c)

147

Page 150: Breadtalk AR 2011

8. Authority to issue shares under the BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme

That pursuant to Section 161 of the Companies Act, Cap. 50, the Directors of the Company be authorised and empowered to offer and grant options under the prevailing BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme (“the Scheme”) and to issue from time to time such number of shares in the capital of the Company as may be required to be issued pursuant to the exercise of options granted by the Company under the Scheme, whether granted during the subsistence of this authority or otherwise, provided always that the aggregate number of additional ordinary shares to be issued pursuant to the Scheme shall not exceed fi fteen per centum (15%) of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company from time to time and that such authority shall, unless revoked or varied by the Company in a general meeting, continue in force until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier.

[See Explanatory Note (ii)] (Resolution 8)

9. Authority to issue shares under the BreadTalk Group Limited Restricted Share Grant Plan That pursuant to Section 161 of the Companies Act, Cap. 50, the Directors of the Company be authorised and empowered to offer and grant awards in accordance with the provisions of the BreadTalk Group Limited Restricted Share Grant Plan (“the Plan”) and to allot and/or issue from time to time such number of fully-paid shares as may be required to be allotted and/or issued pursuant to the vesting of the awards under the Plan, provided always that the aggregate number of new ordinary shares to be allotted and/or issued pursuant to the Plan, the Scheme and any other share based schemes (if applicable), which the Company may have in place, shall not exceed fi fteen per centum (15%) of the total issued shares excluding treasury shares in the capital of the Company from time to time and that such authority shall, unless revoked or varied by the Company in a general meeting, continue in force until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier.

[See Explanatory Note (iii)] (Resolution 9)

NO

TIC

E O

FA

NN

UA

L G

EN

ER

AL

ME

ET

ING

148

Page 151: Breadtalk AR 2011

Authority to grant awards to Participants pursuant to the Rules of, and issue shares under, the Plan

That, contingent upon the passing of Resolution 9, in order to reward, retain and motivate employees who had met specifi c performance objectives set by the Company, the Directors of the Company be authorised and empowered to grant awards in accordance with the provisions of the Plan to the following participants of the Plan (“the Participants”) and to issue shares in the Company to the Participants of awards granted by the Company under the Plan, provided always that the aggregate number of shares available to Controlling Shareholders and their associates under the Plan shall not exceed twenty fi ve per centum (25%) of all the shares available under the Plan and that the number of shares available to each Controlling Shareholder or his associate shall not exceed ten per centum (10%) of all the shares available under the Plan. Such authority shall, unless revoked or varied by the Company in a general meeting, continue in force until the conclusion of the Company’s next Annual General Meeting or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier.

Name of Participants No. of shares to be awarded

Controlling ShareholdersMr George Quek Meng Tong 65,000 (Resolution 10)Ms Katherine Lee Lih Leng 65,000 (Resolution 11)

Associates of Controlling ShareholdersMr Frankie Quek Swee Heng 25,000 (Resolution 12)

Renewal of Share Purchase Mandate

That for the purposes of Sections 76C and 76E of the Companies Act, Cap. 50, the Directors of the Company be and are hereby authorised to make purchases or otherwise acquire issued shares in the capital of the Company from time to time (whether by way of market purchases or off-market purchases on an equal access scheme) of up to ten per centum (10%) of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company (as ascertained as at the date of Annual General Meeting of the Company) at the price of up to but not exceeding the Maximum Price as defi ned in paragraph 3.4 of the Appendix to the Annual Report to Shareholder dated 9 April 2012, in accordance with the terms of the Share Purchase Mandate set out in the Appendix, and this mandate shall, unless revoked or varied by the Company in a general meeting, continue in force until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier.

[See Explanatory Note (v)] (Resolution 13)

[See Explanatory Note (iv)]

11.

10.

By Order of the Board

Tan Cher LiangCompany SecretarySingapore9 April 2012

149

Page 152: Breadtalk AR 2011

Resolution 9 in item 9 above, if passed, will empower the Directors of the Company from the date of the above Meeting until the next Annual General Meeting, to offer and grant awards under the BreadTalk Group Limited Restricted Share Grant Plan (“the Plan”) in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and to issue from time to time such number of fully-paid shares as may be required to be issued pursuant to the vesting of the awards under the Plan subject to the maximum number of shares prescribed under the terms and conditions of the Plan. The aggregate number of ordinary shares which may be issued pursuant to the Scheme, the Plan and any other share based schemes (if applicable) is limited to 15% of the total issued share capital of the Company excluding treasury shares from time to time. Resolution 9 is independent from Resolution 8 and the passing of Resolution 9 is not contingent on the passing of Resolution 8.

(iii)

The Ordinary Resolution 7 in item 7 above, if passed, will empower the Directors of the Company, effective until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held or such authority is varied or revoked by the Company in a general meeting, whichever is the earlier, to issue shares, make or grant Instruments convertible into shares and to issue shares pursuant to such Instruments, up to a number not exceeding, in total, 50% of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company, of which up to 20% may be issued other than on a pro-rata basis to shareholders.

For determining the aggregate number of shares that may be issued, the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) will be calculated based on the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company at the time this Ordinary Resolution is passed after adjusting for new shares arising from the conversion or exercise of any convertible securities or share options or vesting of share awards which are outstanding or subsisting at the time when this Ordinary Resolution is passed and any subsequent bonus issue, consolidation or subdivision of shares.

The Ordinary Resolution 8 in item 8 above, if passed, will empower the Directors of the Company, from the date of this Meeting until the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held or such authority is varied or revoked by the Company in a general meeting, whichever is the earlier, to issue shares in the Company pursuant to the exercise of options granted or to be granted under the Scheme up to a number not exceeding in total (for the entire duration of the Scheme) 15% of the total number of issued shares excluding treasury shares in the capital of the Company from time to time, and the aggregate number of ordinary shares which may be issued pursuant to the Scheme, the Plan and any other share based schemes (if applicable) is limited to 15% of the total issued share capital of the Company excluding treasury shares from time to time. Resolution 8 is independent from Resolution 9 and the passing of Resolution 8 is not contingent on the passing of Resolution 9.

(i)

(ii)

Explanatory Notes:

NO

TIC

E O

FA

NN

UA

L G

EN

ER

AL

ME

ET

ING

150

Page 153: Breadtalk AR 2011

Name

George Quek Meng Tong

Katherine Lee Lih Leng

Frankie Quek Swee Heng

Other Participants*

TOTAL

Aggregate Number of Restricted Shares Granted

201,200

176,000

106,000

2,401,866

2,885,066

Aggregate Number of Restricted Shares Vested

75,492

58,860

48,660

1,333,298

1,516,310

* None of the Other Participants is either a controlling shareholder of the Company or an associate of a controlling shareholder of the Company.

The Directors confi rm that, as at the Latest Practicable Date (i.e. 20 March 2012):

(a) the aggregate number of shares issued under the Plan do not exceed 15% of the total issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company;

(b) the aggregate number of shares granted to Controlling Shareholders and their associates does not exceed 25% of the shares available under the Plan; and

(c) number of shares granted to each controlling shareholder or his or her associate respectively does not exceed 10% of the shares available under the Plan.

The rationale for Resolution 10 Mr. George Quek Meng Tong (George Quek), if re-elected, will remain as is the Chairman of the Group and he holds an aggregate of 52.70% of the shareholding (direct and deemed interests). He is one of the co-founders of the Group and has been instrumental in the Group’s development over the years. He is responsible for overseeing the overall management of the Group and is pivotal in charting the direction and growth of the Group.

George Quek has been with the Company since the start in 2000 and has played a pivotal role in steering the growth of the Group in their operations locally and in this region and building up a good track record and reputation for the Group.

His knowledge and contacts in the food and beverage industry, of which he has more than 3 decades of experience, are key factors to the success of the Group. His invaluable experience has not only been instrumental in establishing the “BreadTalk” brand name, but also in setting new F&B trends and redefi ning the Asian food scene. He also played a signifi cant role in the Company’s foray into the food court business in Shanghai and Beijing, Mainland China.

Resolutions 10, 11 and 12, in item 10 above, if passed, will empower the Directors of the Company to issue shares in the Company to the Controlling Shareholders and their associates, granted by the Company under the Plan. The resolutions in item 10 are independent from each other and the passing of each such resolution is not contingent on the passing of any of the other resolutions in item 10. Resolution 10 is contingent on the passing of Resolution 3. Shareholders who are eligible to participate in the Plan shall abstain from voting on Resolutions 10, 11 and 12.

As at the Latest Practicable Date prior to the printing of this Notice of Annual General Meeting (i.e. 20 March 2012), the number of shares granted in respect of the Plan since its commencement date are as follows:

(iv)

151

Page 154: Breadtalk AR 2011

George Quek continues to play an instrumental role in charting our Group’s expansion and business development plans. As the Chairman of the Company, he has in-depth knowledge of the needs of the business as it evolved over the years. His ability to anticipate business trend and demand has enabled the Company to grow the business rapidly.

The Company believes that George Quek will continue to play a key role in the growth and future development of the Group and there are further potential contributions that he can make. The Company intends to have the fl exibility to structure his remuneration package to include such Awards in future if it is in the interest of the Company to do so. By extending the Plan to George Quek, the Company will have an additional tool to craft a more balanced and innovative remuneration package that will link his total remuneration to the performance of the Group.

The Directors are of the view that the remuneration package of George Quek is fair given his contributions to the Group. The extension of the Plan to George Quek is consistent with the Company’s objectives to motivate its employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance and contribution which is vital to the success of the Company. Although George Quek already has a shareholding interest in the Company, the extension of the Plan to him will ensure that he is equally entitled, with the other employees who are not Controlling Shareholders, to take part in and benefi t from this system of remuneration, thereby enhancing his long term commitment to the Group.

The participation of and grant of the Awards to George Quek under the Plan has been approved in principle by shareholders when they approved the Plan at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 April 2008. Resolution 10 seeks for the above stated reasons, shareholders approval for the Directors decision to grant 65,000 shares to George Quek in accordance with the Plan.

The rationale for Resolution 11

Ms. Katherine Lee Lih Leng (Katherine Lee) is the Deputy Chairman of the Company and holds an aggregate of 52.70% of the Company’s shareholding (direct and deemed interests). She is one of the co-founders of the Group and has been assisting the Chairman, George Quek in the Group’s development since its inception. She oversees the Research and Development Department where she is responsible for product development for local and overseas markets. She is also responsible for steering the Group’s new concept developments for the various brands, pioneering new ideas and concepts. She has therefore contributed greatly in the increase and development of the range and quality of the Group’s products, which is one of its unique strengths and factors for its success. In the areas of training, Katherine Lee has actively organized product training and technical skill upgrades to ensure systematic transfers of knowledge and skills to the franchisees and their operations teams to maintain their competitive edge.

The Company believes that Katherine Lee will continue to contribute to the success of the Group. The Company intends to have the fl exibility to structure her remuneration package to include such Awards in future if it is in the interests of the Company to do so. By allowing her to participate in the Plan, the Company will have an additional tool to craft a more balanced and innovative remuneration package that will link her total remuneration to the performance of the Group.

The extension of the Plan to Katherine Lee is consistent with the Company’s objectives to motivate its employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance and contribution which is vital to the success of the Company. Although Katherine Lee already has a shareholding interest in the Company, the extension of the Plan to her will ensure that she is equally entitled, with the other employees who are not Controlling Shareholders, to take part in and benefi t from this system of remuneration, thereby enhancing her continued commitment to the Group.

NO

TIC

E O

FA

NN

UA

L G

EN

ER

AL

ME

ET

ING

152

Page 155: Breadtalk AR 2011

The Ordinary Resolution 13 proposed in item 11 above, if passed, will empower the Directors of the Company effective until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or the date by which the next Annual General Meeting of the Company is required by law to be held, whichever is the earlier, to repurchase ordinary shares of the Company by way of market purchases or off-market purchases of up to 10% of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) in the capital of the Company at the Maximum Price as defi ned in Paragraph 3.4 to the Appendix. The rationale for, the authority and limitation on, the sources of funds to be used for the purchase or acquisition including the amount of fi nancing and the fi nancial effects of the purchase or acquisition of ordinary shares by the Company pursuant to the Share Purchase Mandate on the audited consolidated fi nancial accounts of the Group for the fi nancial year ended 31 December 2011 are set out in greater detail in the Appendix.

The participation of and grant of Awards to Katherine Lee under the Plan has been approved in principle by shareholders when they approved the Plan at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 April 2008. Resolution 11 seeks for the above stated reasons, shareholders approval for the Directors decision to grant 65,000 shares to Katherine Lee in accordance with the Plan.

The rationale for Resolution 12

Mr. Frankie Quek Swee Heng (Frankie Quek), Chief Executive Offi cer, Mainland China, holds an aggregate of 0.15% of the Company’s shareholding (direct and deemed interests). He is involved in the formulation and implementation of the expansion plans of the Group in the Mainland China. With his business acumen and extensive knowledge of the local food and beverage industry, he is assisting the Chairman, George Quek, in overseeing the growth and expansion as well as daily operations of the Group, focusing on the Group’s expansion into the Mainland China. Frankie Quek has been based in Shanghai since 2005 where he has been overseeing the growing bakery and food court operations in Shanghai and Beijing. His expertise has further led to the successful expansion of the BreadTalk brand name to many other Mainland China cities through a franchise model system managed by the in house franchise team. The Company therefore believes that he has the potential and ability to contribute to the further success of the Group.

By allowing him to participate in the Plan, the Company will have an additional tool to craft a more balanced and innovative remuneration package that will link his total remuneration to the performance of the Group. Frankie Quek will also be able to share in any future appreciation of the Company’s share price that is commensurate with the Company’s future growth through an increase in his shareholdings to a more signifi cant level.

The Directors are of the view that the remuneration package of Frankie Quek is fair given his contributions to the Group. The extension of the Plan to Frankie Quek is consistent with the Company’s objectives to motivate its employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance and contribution which is vital to the success of the Company.

As the Plan serves as recognition of the past contributions of those eligible to participate in the Plan, as well as to secure future contributions for the Company and the Group from them, the Directors consider it important that Frankie Quek should be included in the Plan. The Directors consider it crucial for the Company to provide suffi cient incentives which will instill a sense of commitment to the Group.

The participation of and grant of Awards to Frankie Quek under the Plan has been approved in principle by shareholders when they approved the Plan at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28 April 2008. Resolution 12 seeks for the above stated reasons, shareholders approval for the Directors decision to grant 25,000 shares to Frankie Quek in accordance with the Plan.

(v)

1.

2.

A Member entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting (the “Meeting”) is entitled to appoint proxies to attend and vote in his/her stead. A proxy need not be a Member of the Company.

The instrument appointing a proxy must be deposited at the Registered Offi ce of the Company at 171 Kampong Ampat #05-05, KA FoodLink, Singapore 368330 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the Meeting.

Notes

153

Page 156: Breadtalk AR 2011

This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 157: Breadtalk AR 2011

BREADTALK GROUP LIMITEDCompany Registration No. 200302045G(Incorporated In Singapore)

PROXY FORM(Please see notes overleaf before completing this Form)

Name NRIC/Passport No. Proportion of Shareholdings

Name NRIC/Passport No. Proportion of Shareholdings

or failing him/her, the Chairman of the Meeting as my/our proxy/proxies to vote for me/us on my/our behalf at the Annual General Meeting (the “Meeting”) of the Company to be held on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 9.30 a.m. at 171 Kampong Ampat #05-05, KA FoodLink, Singapore 368330 and at any adjournment thereof. I/We direct my/our proxy/proxies to vote for or against the Resolutions proposed at the Meeting as indicated hereunder. If no specifi c direction as to voting is given or in the event of any other matter arising at the Meeting and at any adjournment thereof, the proxy/proxies will vote or abstain from voting at his/her discretion. The authority herein includes the right to demand or to join in demanding a poll and to vote on a poll.

(Please indicate your vote “For” or “Against” with a tick [√] within the box provided.)

No. Resolutions relating to: For Against

1 Directors’ Report and Audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011. 2 Payment of proposed fi rst and fi nal dividend and special dividend.

3 Re-election of Mr George Quek Meng Tong as a Director. 4 Re-election of Mr Ong Kian Min as a Director.

5 Approval of Directors’ fees amounting to S$168,000 for the year ended 31 December 2011. 6 Re-appointment of Messrs Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors. 7 Authority to issue new shares.

8 Authority to issue shares under the BreadTalk Group Limited Employees’ Share Option Scheme. 9 Authority to issue shares under the BreadTalk Group Limited Restricted Share Grant Plan (the “Plan”). 10 Share award under the Plan to Mr George Quek Meng Tong. 11 Share award under the Plan to Ms Katherine Lee Lih Leng.

12 Share award under the Plan to Mr Frankie Quek Swee Heng. 13 Renewal of Share Purchase Mandate.

1.

2.

3.

For investors who have used their CPF monies to buy BreadTalk Group Limited’s shares, this Report is forwarded to them at the request of the CPF Approved Nominees and is sent solely FOR INFORMATION ONLY.

This Proxy Form is not valid for use by CPF investors and shall be ineffective for all intents and purposes if used or purported to be used by them.

CPF investors who wish to attend the Meeting as an observer must submit their requests through their CPF Approved Nominees within the time frame specifi ed. If they also wish to vote, they must submit their voting instructions to the CPF Approved Nominees within the time frame specifi ed to enable them to vote on their behalf.

IMPORTANT:

I/We, of

being a member/members of BREADTALK GROUP LIMITED (the “Company”), hereby appoint:

and/or (delete as appropriate)

No. of Shares

No. of Shares

%

%

Address

Address

Signature of Shareholder(s)

or, Common Seal of Corporate Shareholder

Total number of Shares in: Dated this day of 2012

(a) CDP Register

(b) Register of Members

No. of Shares

155

Page 158: Breadtalk AR 2011

Please insert the total number of Shares held by you. If you have Shares entered against your name in the Depository Register (as defi ned in Section 130A of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of Singapore), you should insert that number of Shares. If you have Shares registered in your name in the Register of Members, you should insert that number of Shares. If you have Shares entered against your name in the Depository Register and Shares registered in your name in the Register of Members, you should insert the aggregate number of Shares entered against your name in the Depository Register and registered in your name in the Register of Members. If no number is inserted, the instrument appointing a proxy or proxies shall be deemed to relate to all the Shares held by you.

A member of the Company entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the Company is entitled to appoint proxies to attend and vote in his/her stead. A proxy need not be a member of the Company.

Where a member appoints more than one proxy, the appointments shall be invalid unless he/she specifi es the proportion of his/her shareholding to be represented by each proxy. If no proportion or number of shares is specifi ed, the fi rst named proxy may be treated as representing 100% of the shareholding and any second named proxy as an alternate to the fi rst named.

The instrument appointing a proxy or proxies must be deposited at the Registered Offi ce of the Company at 171 Kampong Ampat #05-05, KA FoodLink, Singapore 368330 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for the holding of the Meeting.

The instrument appointing a proxy or proxies must be executed under the hand of the appointor or of his attorney duly authorised in writing. Where the instrument appointing a proxy or proxies is executed by a corporation, it must be executed either under its seal or under the hand of an offi cer or attorney duly authorised or in such manner as appropriate under applicable laws. Where the original instrument appointing a proxy or proxies is executed by an attorney on behalf of the appointor, the original power of attorney or other authority, if any, under which the instrument of proxy is signed or a duly certifi ed copy of that power of attorney or other authority (failing previous registration with the Company) shall be attached to the original instrument of proxy and must be left at the Registered Offi ce, not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for the holding of the Meeting or the adjourned Meeting at which it is to be used failing which the instrument may be treated as invalid.

A corporation which is a member may authorise by resolution of its directors or other governing body such person as it thinks fi t to act as its representative at the Meeting, in accordance with Section 179 of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of Singapore. The Company shall be entitled to treat an original certifi cate under the seal of the corporation as conclusive evidence of the appointment or revocation of appointment of a representative.

General:

The Company shall be entitled to reject the instrument appointing a proxy or proxies if it is incomplete, improperly completed or illegible or where the true intentions of the appointor are not ascertainable from the instructions of the appointor specifi ed in the instrument appointing a proxy or proxies. In addition, in the case of Shares entered in the Depository Register, the Company shall reject any instrument appointing a proxy or proxies lodged if the member, being the appointor, is not shown to have Shares entered against his name in the Depository Register as at 48 hours before the time appointed for holding of the Meeting, as certifi ed by The Central Depository (Pte) Limited to the Company.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Notes :

156