Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Brand logo
2
Table of content
o Methodology
o Background information
o Conclusions
o Brand Performance Parameters
o Brand Awareness
o Brand Funnel
o Brand Driver
o Brand Net Promoter Score (NPS)
3
Method
Target Group:
18(15)-70 yo.
Consumers of salty snacks within
the previous 4 weeks.
Length of questionnaire:
10,5 minutes
Sample size:
500
Field period:
Start: 09.04.2019
End: 14.04.2019
Methodogy: Online survey. Members of Userneeds’ online panel have
randomly been chosen. The sample is representative
regarding gender, age and geography for Danes.
Significant findings will be commented on throughout the
report.
Bases below 50 responses will be marked with a ‘*’.
Brand logo
4
50%50%FemaleMale
37%
31%
32%
Age
15-34
35-49
50-64
31%
14%
20%
24%
10%
Region
Hovedstaden
Sjælland
Syddanmark
Midtjylland
Nordjylland
Base: 500 interviews
Background information
5
50%Have kids living at home.
37%
31%
32%
Household income
<200.000
200.000-500.000
500.000<
50%
10%
40%
Occupation
Public
Other
Private
Background information
Base: Swirt
Brand
AwarenessBrand
Funnel
Brand
Driver
Brand
NPS
• Top of Mind
• Unaided
Awareness
• Aided Awareness
• Qualified
Awareness
• Aided awareness
• Unaided awareness
• Consideration
• Purchase intent
• Purchase
• Loyalty
• Brand driver
perception
• Correlation
between brand
perception and
brand loyalty
• Net Promoter Score
YOU ARE LOOKING IN TO THE FOLLOWING
Brand Performance Parameters
Brand
AwarenessBrand
Funnel
Brand
Driver
Brand
NPS
• Top of Mind
• Unaided
Awareness
• Aided Awareness
• Qualified
Awareness
• Aided awareness
• Unaided awareness
• Consideration
• Purchase intent
• Purchase
• Loyalty
• Brand driver
perception
• Correlation
between brand
perception and
brand loyalty
• Net Promoter Score
YOU ARE LOOKING IN TO THE FOLLOWING
Brand Performance Parameters
Brand
AwarenessBrand
Funnel
Brand
Driver
Brand
NPS
• Top of Mind
• Unaided
Awareness
• Aided Awareness
• Qualified
Awareness
• Aided awareness
• Unaided awareness
• Consideration
• Purchase intent
• Purchase
• Loyalty
• Brand driver
perception
• Correlation
between brand
perception and
brand loyalty
• Net Promoter Score
YOU ARE LOOKING IN TO THE FOLLOWING
Brand Performance Parameters
Brand
AwarenessBrand
Funnel
Brand
Driver
Brand
NPS
• Top of Mind
• Unaided
Awareness
• Aided Awareness
• Qualified
Awareness
• Aided awareness
• Unaided awareness
• Consideration
• Purchase intent
• Purchase
• Loyalty
• Brand driver
perception
• Correlation
between brand
perception and
brand loyalty
• Net Promoter Score
YOU ARE LOOKING IN TO THE FOLLOWING
Brand Performance Parameter
Conclusions
Conclusion
5140 = 11,6%
93 = 26,9%
212 = 61,5%
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
Brand logo
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Ratio scores Absolute scores
68
48
72
49
60
Echo-friendly Professional Customer-centric Innovative Focus on localcommunity
AWARENSS
F
U
N
N
E
L
D
R
I
V
E
R
S
N
P
S
Base: xxxxxx
Base: xxxxxx
Base: xxxxxx
Base: xxxxxx
Brand Awareness
13
Brand Awareness
Brand awareness is a key consideration in consumer behavior, advertising management, brand management and
strategy development, and is a key indicator of a brand's market performance. Brand awareness refers to the extent
to which customers and potential customers can recall a brand.
U Brand Awareness consists of four key indicators:
Top of Mind: Measuring the number of people who express top of mind knowledge of the brand without
prompting (first mentioned)
Unaided Awareness: Measuring the number of people who express knowledge of the brand without prompting
Aided Awareness: Measuring the number of people who express knowledge of the brand when prompted
Qualified Awareness: Measuring the number of people who express knowledge based on experience e.g. usage
of a brand when prompted (aided brand recall)
14
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
Brand Awareness
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X are shown in the table.
Base: 500 interviews
15
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
4 %
4 %
4 %
4 %
-
4 %
3 %
4 %
4 %
-
5 %
1 %
5 %
5 %
-
5 %
10 %
10 %
5 %
+
25%
25%
25%
13%
17%
33%
17%
17%
Brand Awareness
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X by gender.
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X by age.
Base: 500 interviews
Base: 500 interviews
Base: 500 interviews
Base: 500 interviews
Base: 500 interviews
Base: 500 interviews
16
Brand Awareness
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X by region.
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
25%
25%
25%
13%
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
25%
25%
25%
13%
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
25%
25%
25%
13%
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
25%
25%
25%
13%
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
25%
25%
25%
13%
17
2 %
4 %
4 %
3 %
4 %
8 %
8 %
6 %
3 %
5 %
5 %
4 %
3 %
5 %
5 %
4 %
2 %
4 %
4 %
3 %
Brand Awareness
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X by region.
18
Brand1
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
Brand2 Brand3 Brand4 Brand5 Brand6 Brand7 Brand8
Brand Awareness
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X and the listed competitors..
Base: 500 interviews
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
19
Brand1
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
Brand2 Brand3 Brand4 Brand5 Brand6 Brand7
Brand Awareness
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X and the listed competitors..
Base: 500 interviews
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
20
Brand1
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
Brand2 Brand3 Brand4 Brand5 Brand6
Brand Awareness
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X and the listed competitors..
Base: 500 interviews
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
21
Brand1
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
Brand2 Brand3 Brand4 Brand5
Brand Awareness
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
XX %
The U Brand Awareness key indicators for Brand X and the listed competitors..
Base: 500 interviews
Top of mind
Unaided awareness
Aided awareness
Qualified awareness
Brand Funnel
23
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Ratio scores
Brand Funnel
A Brand Funnel describes the consumer's journey from awareness of a brand to the actual conversion (purchase).
A Brand Funnel can be used to gain insight into the consumers' preferences and decision-making, and thus insight
into a brand's strengths and weaknesses relative to its competitors.
A Brand Funnel identifies the key touch points for a brand relative to the market and is an in-depth analysis of the
different stages of a customer’s relationship with a brand.
U Brand Funnel consists of the following key touch points:
Aided Awareness: Measuring the number of people who express knowledge of the brand when prompted
Unaided Awareness: Measuring the number of people who express knowledge of the brand without prompting
Consideration: Measuring the number of people who actively consider the brand
Purchase intent: Measuring the number of people who intent to purchase or use the brand
Purchase: Measuring the number of people who purchase or use the brand within a given time period
Loyalty: Measuring the number of people who are loyal to the brand in terms of re-purchase
24
Brand Funnel
The Brand Funnel for
Brand X is presented in
the figure.
Base: 500 interviews
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Ratio scores Absolute scores
25
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the aided awareness level for Brand X and its competitors. By comparing the results it is possible to compare the awareness levels. Based on the
Brand Funnel it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting through out the different touch-points in the Brand Funnel.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
26
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the unaided awareness level for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from aided awareness to unaided awareness. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting aided awareness to unaided awareness.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
20%
-5%
1%
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
27
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the consideration rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from unaided awareness to consideration. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting unaided awareness to consideration.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
28
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the purchase intention rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from consideration to purchase intent. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting consideration to purchase intention.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
29
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from purchase intent to actual purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting purchase intention to actual purchase.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
30
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from purchase to loyalty and re-purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting purchase to loyalty and re-purchase.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
31
Brand Funnel
The Brand Funnel for
Brand X is presented
in the figure.
Base: 500 interviews
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Ratio scores Absolute scores
32
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the aided awareness level for Brand X and its competitors. By comparing the results it is possible to compare the awareness levels. Based on the Brand Funnel it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting through out the different touch-points in the Brand Funnel.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
33
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the unaided awareness level for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from aided awareness to unaided awareness. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting aided awareness to unaided awareness.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
20%
-5%
1%
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
34
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
The table presents the consideration rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from unaided awareness to consideration. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting unaided awareness to consideration.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
35
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from consideration to actual purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting consideration to actual purchase.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
36
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from purchase to loyalty and re-purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting purchase to loyalty and re-purchase.
Indicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate Base: 500 interviews
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
37
Brand Funnel
The Brand Funnel for
Brand X is presented
in the figure.
Base: 500 interviews
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor lorem ipsum dolor
Ratio scores Absolute scores
38
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the aided awareness level for Brand X and its competitors. By comparing the results it is possible to compare the awareness levels. Based on the Brand Funnel it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting through out the different touch-points in the Brand Funnel.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
39
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the consideration rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from aided awareness to consideration. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting aided awareness to consideration.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
40
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from consideration to actual purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting consideration to actual purchase.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
41
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 3
Brand 4
Brand 5
Brand 6
Brand 7
Brand 8
Brand Funnel
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
The table presents the purchase rate for Brand X and its competitors and the conversion from purchase to loyalty and re-purchase. By comparing the results and the conversion rates of the individual brands it is possible to identify how each brand performs in terms of converting purchase to loyalty and re-purchase.
Base: 500 interviewsIndicates the brand with the best conversion rate
Indicates the brands with neither the best nor the poorest conversion rates
Indicates the brand with the poorest conversion rate
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
1%
20%
-5%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
Brand Driver
43
Brand Drivers
Brand drivers are a great way to help guide and influence your branding in the marketplace. A Brand Driver Analysis
gives you a deeper understanding of brand perception and how it is perceived relative to your competitors. A Brand
Driver Analysis consists of both functional and emotional attributes, since both are involved in consumer’s decision-
making and in influencing brand perception.
By identifying brand drivers and the attributes that drives the brand you can expand a brands’ identity and define
which strategies should be the focal point in the process of developing the brand and differentiate it relative its
competitors.
44
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
3501/05/2002
01/06/2002
01/07/200201/08/2002
01/09/2002
Series 1 Series 2
Brand Drivers
The chart shows the brand perception of Brand X relative to the listed competitors. The result for each brand driver
is shown as a percentage of those who know the individual brands.
Base: Aided awareness of each brand
Results and
impactDrivers
45
This model ensures an overall overview
of how the brand performs in terms of
brand loyalty, as well as how brand
loyalty is influenced by the customers
assessment of the chosen brand
drivers. These brand drivers all have an
impact on brand loyalty. This correlation
based model makes it possible to
identify which drivers should be
improved, strengthened, monitored or
maintained in order to strengthen brand
loyalty.
Driver1
Driver5
Driver2
Driver3
Driver4Brand loyalty
Identification of brand loyalty drivers
Driver6
Driver7
Driver8
Results and
impactDrivers
46
Driver1
Driver5
Driver2
Driver3
Driver4 Brand loyalty
Identification of brand loyalty drivers
Driver6
Driver7
This model ensures an overall overview
of how the brand performs in terms of
brand loyalty, as well as how brand
loyalty is influenced by the customers
assessment of the chosen brand
drivers. These brand drivers all have an
impact on brand loyalty. This correlation
based model makes it possible to
identify which drivers should be
improved, strengthened, monitored or
maintained in order to strengthen brand
loyalty.
Results and
impactDrivers
47
Driver1
Driver5
Driver2
Driver3
Driver4
Brand loyalty
Identification of brand loyalty drivers
Driver6
This model ensures an overall overview
of how the brand performs in terms of
brand loyalty, as well as how brand
loyalty is influenced by the customers
assessment of the chosen brand
drivers. These brand drivers all have an
impact on brand loyalty. This correlation
based model makes it possible to
identify which drivers should be
improved, strengthened, monitored or
maintained in order to strengthen brand
loyalty.
Results and
impactDrivers
48
Driver1
Driver5
Driver2
Driver3
Driver4
Brand loyalty
Identification of brand loyalty drivers
This model ensures an overall overview
of how the brand performs in terms of
brand loyalty, as well as how brand
loyalty is influenced by the customers
assessment of the chosen brand
drivers. These brand drivers all have an
impact on brand loyalty. This correlation
based model makes it possible to
identify which drivers should be
improved, strengthened, monitored or
maintained in order to strengthen brand
loyalty.
49
68
48
72
49
60
Echo-friendly Professional Customer-centric Innovative Focus on local community
Brand Drivers – Overall brand perception of main brand
The chart illustrates the average perception of each brand driver for the main brand. The brand driver with the highest score is the
brand with the highest brand linkage and brand perception.
50
Based on the customers' response
patterns, it is possible to estimate
which brand driver has the greatest
impact on brand loyalty and which
brand drivers have less impact.
Customers perception of the
individual brand drivers and the
individual drivers’ impact on the
overall brand NPS can be placed in
the priority map shown.
Customers’ perception of the
individual brand drivers are
presented on the vertical axis of the
priority map, where the impact of
the brand drivers are presented on
the horizontal axis. All brand
drivers are somewhat important
and should be something that
brand constantly should focus on.
The priority map, on the other
hand, shows which brand drivers
should be prioritised when working
on improving brand loyalty.
How to interpret the priority map:
Threats should always be
prioritised over strengths,
opportunities and weaknesses and
it should be prioritised in this order.
Opportunities
AdaptIf it is possible to influence the
customer's perception of the
importance (impact) of the brand
driver, it can become a strength.
Conversely, it is also important
to maintain a high level of brand
perception and thus avoid the
brand driver becoming a
weakness
Strengths
MaintainIt is essential to maintain and or
seek to strengthen the drivers
that have great impact on brand
loyalty and achieves high brand
perception.
Weaknesses
MonitorIt is important to monitor brand
drivers with little impact on brand
loyalty that achieves low brand
perception. If customers'
perception of the importance
(impact) increases, the brand
driver can become a threat and
thus have a negative impact on
brand loyalty
Threats
PrioritiseDrivers that achieve low brand
perception but have great impact
on brand loyalty should be given
the highest priority. The right
strategy will provide the greatest
increase in brand loyalty
Avera
ge b
rand p
erc
eption s
core
Impact on brand NPS
High
HighLow
Low
Priority map – Impact on XXs’ brand NPS
51
The priority map for Brand X shows
the brand drivers that are considered
threats, strengths, opportunities and
weaknesses.
Prioritise the brand drivers that have
the most impact on customer loyalty.
The brand drivers should be
prioritised in the following order:
Ave
rag
e b
ran
d p
erc
eptio
n s
co
re
Impact on brand NPS
High
HighLowLow
Priority map – Brand X
Threats
Strengths
Opportunities
Weaknesses
Reliable
Easygoing
Inspirational
Original
Innovative
Fashionable
Trendy
Value for money
Sustainable
40,0
45,0
50,0
55,0
60,0
65,0
70,0OpportunitiesAdapt
ThreatsPrioritise
WeaknessesMonitor
StrengthsMaintain
Base: 500 interviews
Brand NPS
53
Net Promoter Score
The Brand Net Promoter Score is a management tool that can be used to measure the loyalty of a company or
brand’s customer relationships. The Brand Net Promoter Score identifies your brand’s Promoters (loyal customers),
Passives (satisfied but indifferent customers) and Detractors (unsatisfied customers). You can use Net Promoter
Score as the key measure of your customers’ overall perception of your brand.
With the Net Promoter Score you can identify your primary focus when working with your brands customer
experience hence reduce churn and create customer promoters that enhance and accelerate the growth of your
business.
54
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X is shown in the figure.
Main Brand
51The Brand Net Promoter
Score is calculated by using
the answer to one key
question, using a 0-10 scale.
The question the Net
Promoter Score is based on
is: How likely is it that you
would recommend the brand
to a friend or colleague?
40 = 11,6%
93 = 26,9%
212 = 61,5%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
detractors passives promoters
NPS= %PROMOTERS-%DETRACTORS
55
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand4
47
Base: 500 interviewsBrand5
51
Base: 500 interviews
Brand6
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand7
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand8
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand9
47
Base: 500 interviewsBrand10
51
Base: 500 interviews
56
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand4
47
Base: 500 interviewsBrand5
51
Base: 500 interviews
Brand6
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand7
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand8
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand9
47
Base: 500 interviews
57
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand4
47
Base: 500 interviews
Brand5
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand6
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand7
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand9
47
Base: 500 interviews
58
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviewsBrand4
47
Base: 500 interviews
Brand5
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand6
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand7
49
Base: 500 interviews
59
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviews
Brand4
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand5
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand6
47
Base: 500 interviews
60
Net Promoter Score
The Net Promoter Score and the shares of Promoters, Passives and Detractors for Brand X and the competitive
brands.
Brand1
51
Base: 500 interviews
Promoters Passives Detractors
Brand2
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand3
49
Base: 500 interviews
Brand4
51
Base: 500 interviewsBrand5
47
Base: 500 interviews
61
www.ubrandperformance.com
62
www.ubrandperformance.com
63
www.ubrandperformance.com
64
www.ubrandperformance.com
65
Tal 1/2
66
Tal 2/2
67
Tal 1/2
68
Tal 2/2
69
Icons 1/2
70
Icons 2/2
71
Icons 1/2
72
Icons 2/2