32
Bounty of the seas...and the trees? Modeling the effects of terrestrial inputs on marine ecosystem services in the US Jodie Toft, J. Burke, M. Carey, G. Spiridonov, A. Guerry, P. Levin, , T. Minello, M. Plummer, M. Ruckelshaus, H. Townsend

Bounty of the seas...and the trees? Modeling the effects of terrestrial inputs on marine ecosystem services in the US Jodie Toft, J. Burke, M. Carey, G

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bounty of the seas...and the trees? Modeling the effects of terrestrial

inputs on marine ecosystem services in the US

Jodie Toft, J. Burke, M. Carey, G. Spiridonov,A. Guerry, P. Levin, , T. Minello, M. Plummer, M. Ruckelshaus, H.

Townsend

In what situations do watershed-based activities affect the success of marine

resource management?

watershed

water quality

oysters crabs

Simple linked watershed-marine models for application in the 3

systems?

Land use: upland

Land use: estuarine

Climate: SST

Climate: Precipitation

Puget Sound1. Hood Canal2. Whidbey

Basin

Chesapeake Bay1. Rappahann

ock2. Eastern

shore

Galveston Bay

HOOD CANAL

watershed

Establish baseline conditions (2004-6):

• discharge• total nitrogen

Discharge

kg/yr kg/ha/yr

Total Nitrogen Export

water quality

• Model temperature, salinity, nitrate

• Conduct sensitivity tests on baseline conditions (watershed)

12

3

45

6

8.5

9

9.5

10

10.5

11TEMPERATURESURFACE BOTTOM

25

26

27

28

29

30

31SALINITYSURFACE BOTTOM

02468

1012141618

1 2 3 4 5 6

BOX

NITRATESURFACE BOTTOM

BASELINE

12

3

45

6

% C

han

ge f

rom

Baselin

e T

em

p.

SENSITIVITY TESTS:Effect to Surface Temperature from +/- of Land-Based Discharge

-100%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%

150% Box 1

25% 50% 100%*

-100%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%

150%

DecreaseIncrease

Box 2 Box 3

Box 4

25% 50% 100%*

Box 5 Box 6

% C

han

ge f

rom

Baselin

e T

em

p.

SENSITIVITY TESTS:Effect to Surface Temperature from +/- of Land-Based Discharge

-100%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%

150% Box 1

25% 50% 100%*

-100%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%

150%

DecreaseIncrease

Box 2 Box 3

Box 4

25% 50% 100%*

Box 5 Box 6

-300%

-250%

-200%

-150%

-100%

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

Boxes 1 6

% C

han

ge f

rom

Baselin

e T

em

p.

+/- 2 degree change in Sea Surface

Temperature at Ocean Boundary

Pacificoysters

Model effects to production and value from:

1. Changes in temperature, salinity, nutrients

2. Dissolved oxygen events3. Loss/gain of nearshore habitat

Dungeness crab

0.0

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.7

0.3

0.20.1

0.0

Temperature (C)

6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Sal

inity

(pp

t)

21222324252627282930

Years

0 20 40 60 80 100

Du

ng

en

ess

cra

b (

No

. m

ale

Ag

e 4

+)

200000

400000

600000

800000

Survival larvae

Pacific oysters

In what situations do watershed-based activities affect the success of marine

resource management?

Land use: upland

Land use: estuarine

Climate: SST

Climate: Precipitation

watershed

water quality

Pacificoysters

Dungeness crab

Uptake?

Water Yield Model

Average Annual Discharge ComparedTo USGS and WADOE gauge observations

2006

Snapshot:Land CoverAvailable Water ContentSoil DepthTopographyWatershedsSub-Watersheds

Annual Values:PrecipitationPotential Evapotranspiration

LU Tables:Rooting DepthPlant ET coefficientWater Demand

Subwatershed Source Years N-SDuckabushRiverBrinno

n USGS Daily 2006 0.99

Hamma Hamma near Eldon USGS Daily 1951-1971 -0.46

SkokomishRiverPotlatch USGS Daily 2006 0.99

BigBeefCreekatmouth USGS Daily 2006 0.19LittleQuilceneatMouth WA Dept Ecy Daily 2006 0.67

BigQuilceneRiveratmouth WA Dept Ecy Daily 2006 0.60

DosewallipsRiveratBrinnon WA Dept Ecy Daily 2007-2011 -0.73

Nutrient Model: Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Phosphorus, TotalSubwatershed Years Difference

Duckabush Brinnon 1972-2010 57.245Skokomish Potlatch 1960-2010 90.271Big Beef at mouth 2004-2010 58.006

Nitrogen, TotalSubwatershed Years Difference

Big Quilcene at mouth 1999-2010 72.880Duckabush Brinnon 2006 0.184Skokomish Potlatch 2006 79.663Big Beef at mouth 2006 7.209

Skokomish

1

3

45

6

Duckabush

Hamma Hamma

Dosewallips

Big QuilceneLittle Quilcene

Big Beef Creek

• 2-Layer Box Model, 6 Regions

• Based on Babson et al. (2006), but rewritten in MATLAB for more general use

• 6 boxes in HC, 7 rivers

• IC’s: from MoSSea

• BC’s: from ADM001 DoE station

ADM001 (DoE)

Hans (ORCA)

2

Physical transport model

Biogeochemical Cycling

NPZDO modeling: Oxygen is added in proportional to nutrient uptake (Banas et al. 2009)

or see: http://faculty.washington.edu/banasn/models/lynch/