33
Attendance Area Adjustment Recommendation “Equity in Action” Dr. Michael Martirano Superintendent August 20, 2019

Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

AttendanceAreaAdjustment

Recommendation“EquityinAction”

Dr.MichaelMartiranoSuperintendentAugust20,2019

Page 2: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

WhatEQUITYMeanstoHCPSSPracticeEmpathy

EmbraceDifferences

Empower

ValueandRespect

HCPSSDEFINITION OF EQUITY:Providingtheaccess,opportunitiesandsupportsneededtohelpstudents,

familiesandstaffreachtheirfullpotentialbyremovingbarrierstosuccessthatindividualsface.Itdoesnotmeanequalorgivingeveryonethesamething.

RemoveBarriers

IndividualizeSupports

Page 3: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Balancecapacityutilization;alleviatecrowding

Advance equitybyaddressingFARMdistribution

Plan ahead fornewHighSchool#13

CriticalPRIORITIES

1

3

2

• Lookathighestandlowestutilizedschools

• Identifypotentialmovestorelievecrowding,followingPolicy6010standards

• LookatschoolswithhighestandlowestFARMparticipationlevels

• Identifyfeasiblereassignmentstobringschoolsclosertocountyaverage

• IdentifyareasthatcouldbeimpactedbyboundaryadjustmentsinSY23-24

• Avoiddoublemovesinboundaryscenarios

Page 4: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

57,346K–12projectedstudents,SY20-2132 schools(43%)Outsidetargetutilization

Below90%:11schoolsAbove110%:21schools

7,100additionalstudentsexpectedby2030

CAPACITY Imbalance

4211 21<90%

CapacityUtilization90%- 110%:TARGETCapacityUtilization

>110%CapacityUtilization

70%Lowest

CapacityUtilization

136%HighestCapacityUtilization

Page 5: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

FreeandReducedMeals(FARM)Participation

22.5%systemaverage

<5%–> 68%*schooldistribution

EQUITY Imbalance

*BasedonofficialSY18-19enrollment(9/30/18)andFARMparticipation(10/18)data

Page 6: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Facilityutilization:useofspace,enrollment,capital/operatingcosts,walkers,regionalprograms.Targetcapacityutilization:90-110%

Communitystability:feeds,contiguouscommunities,frequency

Studentdemographics:socio-economic,academicperformance

Policy6010

Page 7: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Highlyskilled,dedicatededucators

Smallclasssizes

Comparableopportunities

Excellentrankings

Building on STRENGTH

Page 8: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

EquitablecommunityINPUT

Enhanced,transparentCOMMUNICATION

CivilityandcarefulLISTENING

ConsultantFACILITATION

Accurate,currentDATA

Process and Data INTEGRITY

Page 9: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

ATTENDANCEAREACOMMITTEE(AAC)

ONLINERESPONSESCOMMUNITYSESSIONS

❖ Socio-economicimpact(FARM%):drivingfactor

❖ Moreextensive,lessfrequentreassignments

❖ Limitstudenttraveltimes;maintainwalkabledistances

❖ Boundarycontinuity

❖ Limitstudenttraveltimes;walkabledistances

❖ Boundarycontinuity❖ Socio-economicimpact

Diversecommunityrepresentation

800participants;4regionalsessions 2,176surveys;276alternativescenarios

❖ Neighborhoodschools,walkabledistances

❖ Avoidinglong-termuseofportables

Stakeholder VOICES

Page 10: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATION

Page 11: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Superintendent’s Proposal

Impact: CAPACITY Utilization

75%Lowest

CapacityUtilization

121%HighestCapacityUtilization

535 16

<90%CapacityUtilization

90%- 110%CapacityUtilization

>110%CapacityUtilization

4211 21<90%

CapacityUtilization

90%- 110%CapacityUtilization

>110%CapacityUtilization

136%HighestCapacityUtilization

70%Lowest

CapacityUtilization

Without Boundary Adjustment

Page 12: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Impact: CAPACITY UtilizationSY20-21:NARROWINGTHEGAP

86% 130%

82% 136%

Elementary – without adjustmentsElementary – Superintendent’s proposal

LowestCapacityUtilization

HighestCapacityUtilization

91% 121%

96% 119%

70%

75%

126%

121%

Middle – without adjustmentsMiddle – Superintendent’s proposal

High – without adjustmentsHigh – Superintendent’s proposal

Page 13: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Impact: CAPACITY Utilization

Elementary

GreatestImpact

SUPERINTENDENT’SPROPOSAL,SY20-21

BWESfrom125%to108%CrESfrom116%to96%EESfrom118%to83%

FESfrom122%to105%HSESfrom126%to110%PRESfrom124%to99%

SJLESfrom119%to99%WavESfrom112%to106%TSESfrom123%to121%

DMSfrom115%to111%EMMSfrom130%to121%

HaMSfrom116%to108%PMSfrom121%to113%

HoHSfrom136%to119%CHSfrom120%to111%MHHSfrom117%to104%

HaHSfrom116%to108%LRHSfrom114%to107%

Middle

High

Page 14: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Impact: SOCIO-ECONOMIC EquityFREEANDREDUCEDMEALS(FARM)DISTRIBUTION

Superintendent’s Proposal

Without Boundary Adjustments

Elementary Middle High

• 12 schools at or above 50% FARM, including 4 above 60%

• All schools at or below 54%

• 6 above 50%• 10 highest schools

reduced by combined 82%

• 21 move closer to county average

• 2 schools above 50% FARM

• All schools at or below 45%

• 5 highest schools reduced by combined 38%

• 11 move closer to county average

• All schools at or below 42%

• 4 highest reduced by combined 18%

• 9 move closer to county average

• 4 schools above 40% FARM, including 3 above 45%

*BasedonofficialSY18-19enrollment(9/30/18)andFARMparticipation(10/18)data

Page 15: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Impact: SOCIO-ECONOMIC Equity

Elementary

Middle

High

GreatestImpact

FREEANDREDUCEDMEALS(FARM)DISTRIBUTION*

• SFESfrom68%to54%• PLESfrom63%to36%• LWESfrom61%to49%

• SESfrom61%to44%• DLESfrom55%to49%

• WLMSfrom47%to45%• TVMSfrom45%to42%

• LEMSfrom53%to41%• HCMSfrom52%to34%• OMMSfrom48%to45%

• LRHSfrom47%to42%• WLHSfrom46%to38%• OMHSfrom45%to41%

*BasedonofficialSY18-19enrollment(9/30/18)andFARMparticipation(10/18)data

Page 16: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

• TitleIandotherfederalgrant-fundedprograms

• Additionalreadingspecialists• Professionaldevelopment• Alternativeeducationprograms

• BSAPandHispanicAchievementliaisons

• Additionalfundsforafter-schoolandsummerprogramming

• Othersupports

Best Support for STUDENTS and Families

Superintendent’sProposal:NoimpactonHCPSSTitleIfunding

Page 17: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

SY2019-2020attendanceareaswithoutboundaryadjustments

Elementary Schools BEFORE Boundary Adjustment

• Schoolswithintarget:22of42

Page 18: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Elementary Schools AFTER Proposed Boundary Adjustment

SY19-20ESboundaries

• 3,194 studentsaffected(approx)• Schoolswithintarget:28of42

Page 19: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

page 1 of 2

Sending Receiving Appx.#Students PolygonsProposedforReassignmentAtholtonES GuilfordES 46 16,1014,1016BellowsSpringES WaterlooES 117 269,1076,1269BollmanBridgeES GuilfordES 38 25BryantWoodsES ClemensCrossingES 20 5133BryantWoodsES LongfellowES 85 268,1268ClemensCrossingES SwansfieldES 111 66,134,1066,1134,2134CradlerockES AtholtonES 70 54,2054CradlerockES JeffersHillES <10 45,1045DaytonOaksES BushyParkES 47 2205DeepRunES JeffersHillES 15 78DuckettsLaneES DeepRunES 130 266,1033DuckettsLaneES HanoverHillsES 108 1266ElkridgeES DuckettsLaneES 252 36,42,43,1043ElkridgeES RockburnES <10 5041FultonES LaurelWoodsES 140 256,1256HollifieldStationES VeteransES 117 105,1105,1308JeffersHillES PhelpsLuckES 23 261,1261LongfellowES BryantWoodsES 32 144,1144

DETAILS OF PROPOSED MOVES – ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Page 20: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

DETAILS OF PROPOSED MOVES – ELEMENTARY SCHOOL page 2Sending Receiving Appx.#Students PolygonsProposedforReassignmentManorWoodsES TriadelphiaRidgeES 74 157,1157PhelpsLuckES WaterlooES 213 69,70,1069,2069,3069,4069,5069PointersRunES DaytonOaksES 17 1192PointersRunES SwansfieldES 153 64,129,1064,1129RunningBrookES BryantWoodsES 20 204,1204RunningBrookES ThunderHillES 58 1146StJohnsLaneES ManorWoodsES 118 159,1159StevensForestES ThunderHillES 102 96SwansfieldES ClarksvilleES 161 135,1135,1174,2135,2174SwansfieldES LongfellowES 36 3138TalbottSpringsES StevensForestES 126 1059,2059,3059ThunderHillES TalbottSpringsES 120 65,151,1065,2065,2151TriadelphiaRidgeES BushyParkES 129 209,210,1210,1218,1222,2210VeteransES WorthingtonES 51 101WaterlooES PhelpsLuckES 258 98,100,277,1074,1098,1100,2074WaterlooES WorthingtonES 18 74WaverlyES WestFriendshipES 40 166,1166,2166WestFriendshipES BushyParkES 78 231,232,1231WestFriendshipES TriadelphiaRidgeES 63 171,178,179,1178,1179

Page 21: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Middle Schools BEFORE Boundary Adjustment

SY2019-2020attendanceareaswithoutboundaryadjustments

• Schoolswithintarget:14of20

Page 22: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Middle Schools AFTER Proposed Boundary Adjustment

SY19-20MSboundaries

• 1,351 studentsaffected(approx)• Schoolswithintarget:15of20

Page 23: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

DETAILS OF PROPOSED MOVES – MIDDLE SCHOOLSending Receiving Appx.#Students PolygonsProposedforReassignmentBurleighManorMS MountViewMS 107 157,303,1157,1171,1303ClarksvilleMS HarpersChoiceMS 207 28,185,186,1028,1185,1186,2028DunlogginMS OaklandMillsMS 34 111,1111,2111ElkridgeLandingMS BonnieBranchMS 57 92,1091,2091,5041ElkridgeLandingMS ThomasViaductMS 51 36EllicottMillsMS BonnieBranchMS 16 2074EllicottMillsMS OaklandMillsMS 44 65,1065,2065HammondMS LakeElkhornMS 127 13,14,15,57,1057,2057HarpersChoiceMS ClarksvilleMS 87 135,174,1135,1174,2135,2174HarpersChoiceMS WildeLakeMS 62 53,143,144,1144,2053LakeElkhornMS HammondMS 154 48,49,50,1048,1050,2050,3048MayfieldWoodsMS BonnieBranchMS <10 277MayfieldWoodsMS LakeElkhornMS <10 78,3071MountViewMS BurleighManorMS 53 168,1168MountViewMS GlenwoodMS 42 231,232,1231OaklandMillsMS LakeElkhornMS 48 56,1056,2056,3056PatapscoMS BurleighManorMS 62 159,1159PatuxentValleyMS ThomasViaductMS 23 25ThomasViaductMS ElkridgeLandingMS 117 37,1037,2043WildeLakeMS OaklandMillsMS 27 1146WildeLakeMS HarpersChoiceMS 17 1268,2204

Page 24: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

High Schools BEFORE Boundary Adjustment

SY2019-2020attendanceareaswithoutboundaryadjustments

• Schoolswithintarget:6 of12Oakland Mills HS

Page 25: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

High Schools AFTER Proposed Boundary Adjustment

SY19-20HSboundaries

• 2,851 studentsaffected(approx)• Schoolswithintarget:10of12

Page 26: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

New High School #13 Consideration

AreasLikelyImpactedbyHS#13BoundaryStudy2023-2024SchoolOpening

HighModerateFair

Alternative1newHS#13

ProbabilityofInclusion

Alternative2newHS#13

Page 27: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

DETAILS OF PROPOSED MOVES – HIGH SCHOOLSending Receiving Appx.#

Students PolygonsProposedforReassignment

AtholtonHS RiverHillHS 51364,117,118,120,123,126,127,128,129,190,296,1064,

1117,1120,1123,1128,1129,1190,1296AtholtonHS WildeLakeHS 97 2133,3133,4133CentennialHS MarriottsRidgeHS 231 97,154,214,1154,2154HammondHS AtholtonHS 215 48,50,57,270,273,1048,1050,1057,2050,2057,3048HowardHS LongReachHS 233 44,86,87,299,1086,1087,1299,2087,3087,4087LongReachHS HammondHS 119 33,266,1033LongReachHS OaklandMillsHS 192 35,78,79,80,1035,1080,1082,2035,3035,3071,4035MarriottsRidgeHS GlenelgHS 57 231,232,1231MtHebronHS CentennialHS 85 308,1308,2308MtHebronHS MarriottsRidgeHS 82 159,1159OaklandMillsHS AtholtonHS 256 49,52,54,58,1054,1058,2054ReservoirHS RiverHillHS 96 114,122,125,1114,1115,1125,2114,3115

RiverHillHS GlenelgHS 202180,182,199,200,201,202,203,1176,1180,1182,1199,

1201,1202,2182,3182RiverHillHS WildeLakeHS 276 176,181,183,1181,1183,1185,1200,2176,2183,3176WildeLakeHS OaklandMillsHS 65 111,1111,1146,2111WildeLakeHS RiverHillHS 132 135,174,1135,1174,2135,2174

Page 28: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

TRANSPORTATION Factors

• Traveltime

• Cost

• Currentwalkerswhomaybebused

• AlignmenttoPolicy6010

Page 29: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Impact:SUMMARY

ES MS HS

3,194

28outof42

Studentsreassigned (approx)

SchoolsWITHINtargetutilization

1,351

15outof20

2,851

10outof12

Total

53outof74

7,396

Socio-economicEquity(FARM%)

Atorbelow54%

Atorbelow45%

Atorbelow42%

Superintendent’sProposed2020-2021BoundaryAdjustmentPlan

Withoutadjustment 22 614 42

Withoutadjustment 68% 47%53%

Page 30: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Ongoing PROCESS

Boundaryreview2019forSY20-21

NewHS#13openingSY23-24

NewES#43openingSY24-25

NewES#44openingSY26-27

TalbottSpringsESreplacementSY22-23

HammondHSaddition/renovationSY23-24

JumpStart;boundaryadjustment2018

NewHHES2018

Page 31: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Balancecapacityutilization;alleviatecrowding

Advance equitybyaddressingFARMdistribution

Plan ahead fornewHighSchool#13

CriticalPRIORITIES• Progressinreducingschoolsmostimpactedbycrowdingthroughbetteruseofschoolswithavailablecapacity.Increasesnumberwithintargetfrom42to53.

• Maintainsneighborhoodschoolstoextentfeasible.

• 10highestESschoolsdecreasebycombined82%;allESunder55%.

• 5highestMSand4highestHSdecreasedbycombined38%and18%,respectively.

• 21ES,11MS,9HSmoveclosertocountyaverage.

• MinimizesimpactforhighschoolsmostlikelytobeaffectedbyHS#13boundaryadjustments,toavoiddoublemoves.

Page 32: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

NEXT STEPSBoardPublicHearings

7p.m.

BoardWorkSessions6:30p.m.

BoardAction:Thursday,November21

Familiesassignedto:• Tuesday,September17 CHS,HoHS,MHHS,OMHS• Tuesday,September24 AHS,HaHS,LRHS,WLHS• Thursday,September26 GHS,MRHS,RHS,RHHS

• Thursday,October10 • Tuesday,November12• Thursday,October24 • Thursday,November14• Wednesday,October30 • Monday,November18(with

preliminarydecision)• Thursday,November5

Page 33: Boundary review MJM presentation 08-20-19 FINAL€¦ · Impact: CAPACITY Utilization Elementary Greatest Impact SUPERINTENDENT’S PROPOSAL, SY 20-21 BWES from 125% to 108% CrES from

Looking AHEAD