16
Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

  • Upload
    shima

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Boundary Disputes & State Shapes . Elongated State : state that is geographically long and narrow, ie . Chile. . State Shapes . Compact State : the distance from the geographic center of the area to any point on the boundary does not vary greatly, ie . Hungary. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Page 2: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

State Shapes

Elongated State: state that is geographically long and narrow, ie. Chile.

Page 3: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Compact State: the distance from the geographic center of the area to any point on the boundary does not vary greatly, ie. Hungary.

Page 4: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Fragmented State: state split into many pieces, ie. Philippines and Indonesia.

Page 5: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Landlocked State: state not having direct access to an ocean, ie. Bolivia.

Page 6: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Microstate: state that is extremely small, ie. San Marino

Page 7: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Perforated State: state that totally surrounds another state, ie. South Africa.

Page 8: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Prorupt State: state having a portion of territory that is elongated, ie. Thailand

Page 9: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Frontier - zone where no state exercises political control, ie. Antarctica

Page 10: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Enclave & Exclave

Borderlines may be finite, but they can become quite irregular in pattern especially where cultural borderlines become fuzzy

Enclave- minority culture group concentrated inside a country that is dominated by a different, larger cultural group

EX: as simple as an ethnic neighborhood or a large area such as Quebec

Page 11: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Exclave- a fragmented piece of sovereign territory separated by land from the main part of the states territory

EX: Exclave is Alaska, its controlling State is the United States and its separated from its controlling state by Canada

Page 12: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Boundary Scale

Political boundaries represent the spatial limit of the political organization of territory

They exist at different scales:◦Supra-national-scale organizations, such as UN◦State-scale ◦Intra-state scale; boundaries used for the many

sub-divisions of territory within the state

Page 13: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

May be a source of friction between competing political entities (flashpoints)

May serve as peaceful reminders of contrasting but accepted differences

Page 14: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Boundaries & state cohesiveness

Centripetal forces ◦A clearly bounded territory promotes

unity/national stability Centrifugal forces

◦The more boundaries possessed by a state, the greater is the likelihood of conflict which disrupts unity/national stability

Page 15: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Possible centrifugal forces: ◦internal divisions in language, religion ◦lack of a long history in common◦state boundaries that are subject to dispute

Possible centripetal forces:◦clear and well accepted state identity◦long state history◦boundaries that are clearly delimited and well-

accepted

Page 16: Boundary Disputes & State Shapes

Remember 2 Types of States

Unitary State – centralized power For example, Cuba, former Soviet Union,North Korea

• Federal State – de-centralized powerFor example, U.S., Nigeria, India