17
Bohdan Konôpka, Jozef Pajtík, Martin Lukáč

Bohdan Konôpka, Jozef Pajtík, Martin Lukáč Lukac_biomass...the diameter measurement was also taken each 100 cm from the tree base to the top

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bohdan Konôpka, Jozef Pajtík, Martin Lukáč

Area affected by windthrow

19.11.2004, Slovakia19.11.2004, Slovakia2.5 wide, 50km long strip of spruce forest2.5 wide, 50km long strip of spruce forestWind velocity 160Wind velocity 160‐‐200km/h200km/h

Tatra mountains, Slovakia

19151915

20042004

Site characteristics

Locality Soil type Soil skeleton Proportion of skeleton Water regime

Koprová Humic podzol boulder 65% well drained Podbanské Cambic podzol stony 45% well drained Smokovec Haplic cambisol moderately stony 25% well drained Kežmarské Stagnic pseudogley stony 40% water-logged

Stem volume measurement

47 wind‐uprooted spruce trees were randomly selected for stem and below‐ground parts measurementsbranches were cut off from the stem and the tree height and  DBH was measured. the diameter measurement was also taken each 100 cm from the tree base to the top.

Coarse root sampling (<1cm)

Coarse root sampling

Root/shoot ratio

Root/shoot ratio

Stand 1 Stand 2 Stand 3 Stand 40.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Stand 2 vs. Stand 4; P=0.045

Stump biomass as % of total  belowground biomass

Stump biomass / belowgroud biomass

Koprova

dolina

Nad Podban

skym

Stary S

mokove

cKez

marske

zlab

y

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Belowground stump volume /  stem volume

1 2 3 40.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Stand 2 vs. Stand 4; P=0.821

Coarse root volume / stem  volume

1 2 3 40.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Stand 2 vs. Stand 4; P=0.025

Belowground volume ‐

DBH

0 20 40 600.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kôprová

Podbanské

Smokovec

Kezmarské

DBH [cm]

Ro

ots

+ s

tum

p v

olu

me

[m

3]

Stand 2 vs. Stand 4; P=0.002

Belowground volume – stem  volume

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5Kôprová

Podbanské

Smokovec

Kezmarské

Stem volume [m3]

Ro

ots

+ s

tum

p v

olu

me

[m

3]

Stand 2 vs. Stand 4; P=0.008

Proportion of coarse root  at different depths

Stone content: 1‐ 65%, 2‐ 45%, 3‐ 25%

Conclusions

soil waterlogging results in predomination of roots at the expense of shootsit is possible to construct reliable models predicting belowground biomass, soil water affects biomass allocation predictionmodel parameters have to be site specific, especially if they are to be applied to sites with contrasting soil water conditions.

Acknowledgements