Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Board of Directors meeting
Brussels, 26 March 2019
Item 2. Draft Agenda (1/3)
1. Approval of agenda2. Approval of minutes previous meeting3. Proposal for new planning of Board of Directors meetings:3 times/year as from 2020 (for adoption)
4. Update on:• Advancement of EU DSO Entity preparation and structure of E.DSO internal task force with proposal for the EU DSO joint task force with the other DSO European Associations ‐Ruud/Roberto to report (for discussion/decision)
• Others on the EU DSO Entity TF: progress of Statutes– Ruud/Roberto/Aurore
5. Electricity Market Design: recent developments – Peter/Torsten6. EC DG Energy Presentation on the future of EU smart grid research (for discussion) – Mark Van Stiphout, Michela Marasco, Henriette Nesheim
7. Presentation on Brexit implications for the DSOs, Will Francis, UK permanent representation to the EU (for information/discussion)8. Presentation on Flexibility Platform with EPEX Spot in the Enera project (Markus Merkel) (for information)9. Smart Grid updates from E.DSO members (for information/discussion)10. Report on active MoU with third parties (for information) 11. E.DSO 2019 events and initiatives (for information/discussion)
• E.DSO Workshop ‘The Truth about #flexibility’ (Brussels, 10 April ) – Florian• InnoGrid2020+ edition (Brussels, 13‐14 May 2019) – Roberto• E.DSO Stakeholders & Innovation Council (Paris, 13 November) – Christian/Okko
Item 2. Draft Agenda (2/3)
12. Update on E.DSO activities: Policy Committee (for information) – Peter/Torsten
‐ Public Sector Information Directive: Trialogue outcome‐ E.DSO Platform Strategy‐ Climate‐proof grid and sustainable finance‐ Update on TSO/DSO Platform (ASM), Smart Grid Task Force and related activities
Projects Committee (for information) – Richard ‐ Projects Insight Papers: ‐ EU funding frameworks: Trans‐European Networks & Horizon Europe‐ E.DSO ongoing projects: INTENSYS4EU, CoordiNet, InterConnect‐ ETIP SNET
Technology Committee (for information) – Joachim ‐ Overview last meeting‐ Task Forces’ Progress
13. AOB (for information/discussion)• GDPR implementation and DPOs coordination at E.DSO• E.DSO representation in external events
14. Dates and places of 2019 meetings
Item 2. Draft Agenda (3/3)
Item 3. Approval Draft Minutes
Item 3. Planning BoD meetings
The Board of Directors is invited to agree on the following proposal aimed at rendering the association more efficient and agile:• Reduction of the meetings of the Board of Directors from 4 (four) to 3 (three) per year (February/June/October) starting in 2020
• 2 (two) Executive Committee meetings to be held in‐between Board of Directors meetings ( April/December)
• Sherpa calls to be held monthly with 2 (two) actual physical Sherpa meetings to be scheduled prior to the Executive Committee meetings
Item 4. Update on EU DSO Entity
Co‐operation of DSOs to promote the completion and functioning of the internal market in electricity and to promote optimal management and a coordinated operation of distribution and transmission systems.
The DSO Entity is an expert entity working for the common European interest, it shall not represent particular interest nor seek to influence the decision making process to defend certain interests.
EU DSO Entity purpose
Representation: Directly or through national association (designated by the Member State) or union level association.
Membership fee:According to the number of connected customers.
a) promoting operation and planning of DSO networks in cooperation TSOs;
b) facilitating the integration of renewable energy resources (including storage);
c) facilitating demand side flexibility and users access to markets;
d) digitalization of DSO systems (smart grids and smart meters);
e) supporting the development of data management, cyber security and data protection in cooperation with relevant authorities and regulated entities;
f) participating in the elaboration of network codes which are relevant to DSO grids and where relevant in cooperation with TSOs;
Tasks
EU DSO Entity (1/6)
EU DSO Entity main tasks
• DSOs and TSOs shall cooperate in planning and operating their networks. They shall exchange all necessary information and data regarding, generation assets and demand side response, the daily operation of their networks and the long‐term planning of network investments.
• TSOs and DSOs shall cooperate with each other in order to achieve coordinated access to resources such as distributed generation, energy storage or demand response that may support particular needs of both the distribution system and the transmission system.
TSO – DSO cooperationNetwork codes and guidelines
• The Commission may adopt implementing or delegated acts. Such acts can either be adopted as network codes on the basis of text proposals developed by the ENTSO‐E and / or EU DSO entity in mutual cooperation with ACER.
• If the subject‐matter of the network code is directly related to the operation of the distribution system and not primarily relevant for the transmission system, the Commission may require the EU DSO entity in cooperation with the ENTSO‐E to convene a drafting committee and submit a proposal for a network code to the agency.
EU DSO Entity (2/6)
Board of Directors (4Y):
• 9 DSOs > 1 million connections• 9 DSOs > 100.000 connections• 9 DSOs < 100.000 connections• Max 3 DSOs per MS and per industrial group• 4 observers (EDSO, eurelectric,
Geode, Cedec)
Expert group
General Assembly (potentially ± 2.400 members)
Board of Directors(27 members + 1 President)
Strategic Advisory Group
Expert group(s)(max 30 members)
Voting rights: • GA: 65% of all connections & 55% of all members. Blocked by 35% of all
connections or 75% of the members of the GA.• BoD: 15 members
Country expert group(1 member / MS)
Country Expert Group
• Members are appointed by the GA on proposal of the BoD.
• Give opinions on the developed proposals of the expert groups.
Expert group(s)• Members are appointed by the GA on proposal of the BoD.• Max 30 members with max 1/3 not members of the EU DSO Entity
President / Secretary General
President / Secretary General
Members:EDSO, eurelectric, Geode, Cedec & members not represented in the BoD (?).
Organization
EU DSO Entity (3/6)
ACER report
Drafting of deliverables
Adoption process of the Regulation
EC validation
Legal creation of the Entity
Entry into force of the Regulation 20 days after itspublication in the OJ (expected in August‐September2019)
Belgium royal decret of the AISBL: legalexistence of the association.Publication of the statutes &First AssemblyGeneral
EuropeanCommission willhave to validatethe deliverablesto give mandate to the DSOs to create officiallythe Entity
ACER has to report to the EuropeanCommission on the deliverableswithin 2 monthsafter theirsubmission by the DSOs.
Statutes/code of conduct/ rule of procedures/listof registeredmembers/ financing rules. Consultation with ENTSOE and otherstakeholders
3 months3 months 3 months12 months3Q 2019
3Q 2020
4Q 2020
1Q 2021
2Q 2021
Timeline for decisions
EU DSO Entity (4/6)
Scope of Task Force’s work: Last January, 4 EU DSO associations signed a MoU and kick off
meeting with the EC.
Interpretative document to be sent to EC (March) with questions and suggestions on Electricity Regulation.
TF works on issues which must be tackled internally without prior consultation of EC.
Updated statutes in line with Regulation and elaboration of other deliverables, some of them in consultation with ENTSO‐E and other relevant stakeholders.
EU DSO Entity (5/6)
RESOLUTION TO BE TAKEN BY E.DSO BOARD OF DIRECTORS (FOR DECISION):• The Policy Committee, having been tasked by the Executive Committee to
provide its view on the document at hand, recommends that the Board endorses this memo, in particular the points outlined in section 3 (proposal for enhanced governance).
• Furthermore, the Board should give an official mandate to E.DSO to represent its interests vis‐à‐vis the European Commission in meetings that concern the EU DSO Entity in the way as outlined in section 3.
• The Board should task the E.DSO secretariat with preparing a draft for an updated MoU for the 4 associations that reflects the changes stipulated in section 3 of this memo.
• Different options should be investigated by the E.DSO secretariat, and where applicable with the help of E.DSO members, for creating a joint fund in order to cover the running expenses, as described in point 7 of section 3.
Resolution on DSO Entity (6/6)
Item 5. Electricity Market Design
Electricity Market Design: final outcome
• Electricity Regulation• Network tariffs (Art.16)• DSO entity (Art.49‐51)• DSO/TSO responsibilities on network codes and data management (Art.27, 51, 54, 55)
• Electricity Directive• Active customers (Dir. Art.15)• Smart metering provisions (Dir. Art.19‐21)• Data management (Dir. Art.23)• Interoperability requirements and procedures for access to data (Dir. Art.24) • DSOs’ tasks in data management (Dir. Art.34)• TSOs’ tasks in data management (Dir. Art.40) • DSOs’ tasks in flexibility (Dir. Art.31, Art.32) • Demand response through aggregation (Dir. Art.17) • DSO storage ownership (Dir. Art.36) • Restriction of new DSO activities (Dir. Art.31.6) • Citizens energy communities (Dir. Art.16) • DSOs’ roles in EV charging infrastructure (Dir. Art.33)
Key DSO provisions
• No full‐fledged harmonisation of data formats but rather definition of interoperability requirements by ENTSO‐E • ENTSO‐E to promote digitalisation, cyber security and data protection and EU DSO entity to support these • Network codes can be based on text proposal from ENTSO‐E or, where so decided, from DSO entity in cooperation with ENTSO‐E (common drafting team)
DSO/TSO resps on NCs & data management (Reg. Art.27, 51, 54, 55)
• What does ‘promoting operation and planning of distribution networks in cooperation with opera on and planning of transmission networks’ mean? → what are the exact tasks or objec ves of DSOs (EU DSO) and TSOs (ENTSO‐E) in this regard?
• How do the EU DSO and ENTSO‐E organise among themselves the convention of a drafting committee, the work on network codes, the adoption process within their respective associations and reaching common agreement, and the submission of codes? Do both have to agree? What if one disagrees? Whose view takes precedence?
• Do the mentions of digitalisation, cyber security and data protection mean that network codes on these topics are expected?
• Member States setting up rules for access to customer data by eligible parties; must be GDPR compliant • Various data management models possible in different Member States, but data managing parties must grant non‐discriminatory access to eligible parties • Appointment of compliance offers within data managing parties • No additional costs for customers to access their data or make it available • Member States ensure that costs charged by regulated entities are reasonable and justified
Data management (Dir. Art.23)
• What is an eligible party? This is still not entirely clear. Does GDPR compliance mean that you need active customer consent in order for data to be shared with specific parties? If so, how does this go together with non‐discriminatory and simultaneous access for eligible parties?
Interoperability requirements and procedures for access to data (Dir. Art.24)
• No harmonisation of data formats but interoperability requirements, compliance with which is monitored by Member States
• Data management, incl. development of data management systems, cyber security, data protection mentioned as TSO tasks• Data Exchange of all necessary information and coordination with DSOs• In Member States with smart meter roll‐out and where DSO are involved in data management, they must have compliance programmes that specify how non‐discriminatory data access for eligible parties is ensured
TSOs‘ and DSOs’ tasks in data management (Dir. Art.40 & 34 resp.)
• While the Directive clearly specifies for vertically integrated undertakings falling above the de minimis threshold that compliance programmes need to be in place, it does not specify how Member States should ensure non‐discriminatory conduct of vertically integrated undertakings below the threshold. How can it be ensured that there is no misconduct?
• DSOs encouraged to procure flexibility if more cost‐efficient that standard grid re‐enforcement (only non‐frequency services) • DSOs (and TSOs) define flexibility market products • Obligation of DSOs to produce network development plans every two years; NRAs can request amendments
DSOs’ tasks in flexibility (Dir. Art.31, Art.32)
• Some DSOs in the EU operate peak shaving schemes through remotely operated household appliances – in return for different distribution tariffs prices. This is based on bilateral contracts with customers with no other party (aggregator) involved. The package is not clear on whether this solution might be preserved even under new condition and if it can be considered as marked based product. Will it therefore still be possible? Or could an exemption under Art.31.6 of the Directive apply?
• DSOs not to own and operate storage but two exceptions apply: 1)market failure (market parties could not be awarded with the right because they cannot deliver timely and cost‐efficiently) and NRA has given approval; 2) if storage is an integrated network component and NRA has given approval • NRA market test every five years • Phase‐out of DSO activities within 18 months if market test positive
DSO storage ownership (Dir. Art.36)
• Limitation of DSO tasks to what is specified in Regulation and Directive but Member States can allow other activities • Multi‐utilities can continue owning and operating different networks (electricity, gas, telecommunications, etc.)
Restriction of new DSO activities (Dir. Art.31.6)
• New name: ‘local energy communities’ ‘citizens energy communities’ • Member States decide on: cross‐border participation possible or not; right of CEC to own, establish, purchase or lease distribution networks and manage them • Voluntary membership; customers remaining connected the distribution grid cannot be discriminated by CEC • Where CEC operates distribution network it is subject to same rules and regulation as a DSO • Can conclude agreement with DSO about operation of their network
Citizens energy communities (Dir. Art.16)
• Can DSOs be forced to lease out or even sell parts of their networks to CECs? • What does the possibility of cross‐border participation mean in reality, e.g. CECs as virtual
communities? Any problems associated with that? • It is stated that network charges should take into account electricity fed into the distribution grid
from the community grid and vice versa (suggesting volume), but what about capacity considerations?
Item 6. EC Presentation on future EU smart grids
research
25 June 2018 │ Version 23 Research and Innovation
#HorizonEU
Commission proposal for
THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME (2021 –2027)
Horizon Europe
Mark Van Stiphout, Deputy HoU, DG ENER C.2Michela Marasco, Policy Officer, DG ENER C.2Henriette Nesheim, Policy Officer, DG ENER B.1
E.DSO Board of Directors meeting, 26/03/2019
The future of EU Smart Grid research
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Horizon 2020 - next calls
25 June 2018 │ Version 23 Smart Citizen-Centered Energy System
EC-3Consumer
Engagement / Demand
Response
2020 - Demo ES-5Innovative
grid services(Consumers, DSO, TSO)
2018-2020 Demo
DC – AC/DC hybrid grid
2020
Energy Systems:
Grid
2020 calls
Smar
t and
Cle
an E
nerg
y fo
r Con
sum
ers
25 June 2018 │ Version 2329
Smart Citizen Centered Energy System:Local and Islands
ES-3Integrated
Local Energy Systems
2018 - 2020 Demo
ES-4Decarbonising
Energy systems of
Islands
2018-2020 Demo
Energy Systems:
Local & Islands
2020 calls
Rapid Relief Instrument
2020
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Towards Horizon Europe
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Integration of energy networks and vectors Storage Digitalisation Demand-Response Components
Future smart grid researchKey challenges and possible topics
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Strategic planning to define multiannual work programmes and calls for proposals
• Transparency and stakeholder involvement• Prioritisation and flexibility to align to political priorities • Internal programme coherence & synergies with other programmes
Work Programmes
Multiannual Strategic R&I Plan* Multiannual orientations and priorities in one document
* Areas for partnerships and missionsStrategic discussions with Member States and European Parliament Consultation with stakeholders
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Projects of Common Interest –Smart Grids
PCI Legal basis: TEN-E guidelines (Reg. (EU) 347/2013)
• Infrastructure is the backbone of the energy system
• Key instrument: Projects of Common Interest (PCI): Speed-up and facilitate the development of important energy infrastructure
• PCI list established every 2 years
• Comprehensive tool-box
2018-2019 PCI process – high level view
Methodology for assessing the smart grid PCI project &
application
March
4th PCI listKick-off meeting Project submission
(Mid Dec 2018 - 7 March 2019)
May June
ACER opinion
Sept Oct’ 19
Final 4th PCI list
Smart grids
4 Oct 2018
Public consultation &NRAs consultation
(11 March – 2 June)
Technical Decision Making Body meeting approval of the RG PCI list
High level Decision Making Body meeting
14 Dec
Timeline for identifying of projects of common interest (2018-2019)
6 Applications to the 4th PCIs list!
Connecting Europe Facility
- - Facilitate preparations of projects and reduce risk factors (grants for studies)
- - Reduce costs and improve access to long-term financing (financial instruments)
- - Assist in closing funding gap for PCIs without financial viability (grants for works)
- - CEF call every year (1-2)
Pictures sourced: www.finaid.ucr.edu
25 June 2018 │ Version 23
Thank you!#HorizonEU
http://ec.europa.eu/horizon-europe
Item 7. Presentation on Brexit implications for
DSOs
Item 8. Presentation on Flexibility Platforms
eneramarket
EDSO Board Meeting26 March 2019, BrusselsMarcus Merkel, EWE NETZ GmbH
Demonstration of a localmarketplace to address congestionon electricity networks
ENERA VISION: MAKING DECENTRALISED FLEXIBILITY AVAILABLE THROUGH WHOLESALE MARKET PROCESSES
41
NATIONAL ENERGY ONLY MARKET ENERA FLEXIBILITY MARKET
= order book = additional enera order book
TENNET
AVACON NETZ
EWE NETZ
SYSTEM OPERATORS
IN THE NORTHWEST OF GERMANY HIGH ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM WIND TURBINES OFTEN CAUSE GRID CONGESTIONS
Line, Transformer
Too much consumptionToo much production
Location
Reason
Increase load
Reduce production
Solution Reduce load
Increase production
enera region(current focus of enera project)
Not in focus(but manageable with enera market)
42
THE ENERA PROJECT CONNECTS FOR THE FIRST TIME DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF LOCAL FLEXIBILITY TO ADDRESS CONGESTIONS
Local Flexibility Supply
LocalFlexibility Demand
• Standards
• Neutrality
• Transparency
Flexibilitymarket platform
43
TENNET
AVACON NETZ
EWE NETZ
CONNECTING FLEXIBILITY SUPPLY AND DEMAND REQUIRES THREE BASIC LOCAL COMPETENCES
Local forecasting
Local marketing
Local verification
44
FORECASTING ON LOCAL BASIS IS ESSENTIAL IN REGIONAL MARKETS
45
Forecast by control area
Forecast by market area
THE LOCAL FLEXIBILITY MARKET OFFERS AN ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITY TO MARKET FLEXIBILITY
MarketerMarkets flexibility before delivery on the marketplace with the most attractive price level. The marketing can be regional or supra‐regional.
AggregatorForecasts the available flexibility of the plants assigned to it and makes this flexibility available to the flexibility marketer before delivery.
System OperatorsProvide incentives to offer local flexibility on the eneramarketplace.
TRADING
AGGREGATION
ALLOCATION
enera
Other markets
Intra‐Day
Asset OwnerProvides availabilities of plant.
46
DURING GREEN TRAFFIC LIGHT THE SYSTEM OPERATOR IS NOT ALLOWED TO TRADE LOCAL FLEXIBILITY
MarketerMarkets flexibility before delivery on the marketplace with the most attractive price level. The marketing can be ONLY be supra‐regional.
AggregatorForecasts the available flexibility of the plants assigned to it and makes this flexibility available to the flexibility marketer before delivery.
System OperatorsThere are no congestions in the grid. There is no need for System Operators to ask for flexibility.
TRADING
AGGREGATION
ALLOCATION
enera
Other marketsIntra‐Day
Asset OwnerProvides availabilities of plant.
47
DURING YELLOW TRAFFIC LIGHT THE LOCAL FLEXIBILITY MARKET IS AN ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITY TO MARKET FLEXIBILITY
MarketerMarkets flexibility before delivery on the marketplace with the most attractive price level. The marketing can be regional or supra‐regional.
AggregatorForecasts the available flexibility of the plants assigned to it and makes this flexibility available to the flexibility marketer before delivery.
System OperatorsProvides an incentive to offer local flexibility on the enera marketplace.
TRADING
AGGREGATION
ALLOCATION
enera
Other marketsIntra‐Day
Asset OwnerProvides availabilities of plant.
48
DURING RED TRAFFIC LIGHT THE SYSTEM OPERATORS CAN DIRECTLY CONTROL THE ASSETS
MarketerMarkets flexibility before delivery on the marketplace with the most attractive price level. The marketing can be regional or supra‐regional.
AggregatorForecasts the available flexibility of the plants assigned to it and makes this flexibility available to the flexibility marketer before delivery.
System OperatorsProvides an incentive to offer local flexibility on the enera marketplace.
TRADING
AGGREGATION
ALLOCATION
enera
Other marketsIntra‐Day
Asset OwnerProvides availabilities of plant.
49
ROLES AND DATA EXCHANGE DURING OPERATION OF THE ENERAVERIFICATION PLATFORM
Marketer
Aggregator
Asset Owner
System Operators
Verificationplatform
= delivery of data to the verification platform
= interaction without delivery of data to the verification platform
1* 2
3
1* Provides actual and planed feed‐in curves per plant/generator.
2 Allocates time series and compares calculated and realized values.
4
3 Verifies physical delivery based on regular plausibility checks.
Provides real time information on orders and trades.
*) process and responsibilities for data delivery still in conception phase
= data and data delivery process not yet defined
4
50
THE BIG PICTURE OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE ENERA MARKETPLACE – IN A NUTSHELL
51
Enera is a Single Buyer MarketOnly DSOs and TSOs are allowed to procure flexibility on the local enera marketplace. No direct local trades between othermarket actors.
The enera market is based on existing Intra‐Day Market processesTrades start at 15.00 (D‐1) and it is allowed to trade until 5 minutes before delivery. Analog to Intra‐Day Markets products for15 Minutes and 1 hour are traded.
A distinction is made between RES flexibility and conventional flexibilityThis is done with regard to regulatory obligations to grant priority dispatch on feed‐in from RES in Germany.
On the marketplace no energy is tradedOn the enera market only delivery obligations are traded which means that the provider of flexibility is obliged to change hisplanned schedule. This is the reason why imbalances of the provider are settled within the energy only market.
The responsibility for imbalances stays in the domain of the provider of flexibility and the balancing responsible party
Trade is done when congestion is expectedAs in Intra‐Day Markets a continues trading on the enera market is possible. But the grid operators will only use the marketplace if congestion is expected.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
52
Item 9. Smart Grids updates: Tour de Table
Item 10. Active E.DSO MoU
Item 10. Ongoing E.DSO MoU
Item 11. E.DSO events and initiatives
INNOGRID: May 13th & 14th, Brussels 8th year edition ‘Connecting physics and digits: Power Platforms on the rise‘:
Projects parallel session on ASM, sector coupling, storage, advanced resilience & innovations
Sponsors Smartwires, Supergrid Institute, EPRI, Cyient, N‐side; Partners: ISGAN, LF Energy, FSR
2nd Innovation Award and 3rd Ana Aguado Scholarship to be granted during the event
More than 30 EU projects to be presented at the conference and exhibition
The Truth about Flexibility: April 10th, Brussels Session 1: Making flexibility a reality
What is feasible already, what can we expect in the future, and what will remain a dream
Session 2: What will it take to deliver the flexibility promiseMaking a business case from projects to large‐scale deployment
8.E.DSO – Events (1/3)https://www.innogrid2020.eu
E.DSO Stakeholder and Innovation Council: November 13th, Paris To be organized on the framework of the Utilities Week 12‐14 November 2019 Follow up on the topics addressed on the 1st Stakeholder & Innovation Council
Item 12. Update on E.DSO activities
Item 12a. Policy CommitteePSI Directive – final outcome
• January: Constructive and extensive feedback from PolCommembers; E.DSO publishes Trilogue recommendations
• 22 January: Agreement reached at 2nd Trilogue
• 6 February: COREPER adopts text
• 19 February: ITRE adopts text
• Formal approval still pending (likely 2 April and 3 April for Council and Parliament respectively)
PSI Directive – final outcome• Recital 22: ‘When allowing the re‐use of documents, particular attention should be given to the protection of critical infrastructure’ and refers to both the European Critical Infrastructure Protection (ECIP) Directive as well as the Network Information Security (NIS) Directive (++)• Art.2(da): PSI Directive shall not apply to ‘documents access to which is excluded or restricted on the grounds of protection of sensitive critical infrastructure information as defined in point (d) of Article 2 of Directive 2008/114/EC’ (+)• Recital 15: ‘Member States may also decide to apply the requirements of this Directive to private undertakings, in particular those that provide services of general interest’, thus leaving this up to be decided at national level ( ‐ )• There is no corresponding Article to this Recital – as it should rather be seen as an ‘encouragement’ or possibility (+)• Art.3(a): PSI Directive ‘is without prejudice to the provisions of Union and national law on the protection of personal data, in particular those of the General Data Protection Regulation’ (++)
• Art.13(1) and 13(1a): A list of thematic categories of high value datasets is included in the Directive’s Annex and can be complemented by the Commission through delegated acts. The Commission uses implementing acts to define ‘a list of specific high value datasets belonging to the categories set out in Annex […] which shall be available for free, machine‐readable, provided via APIs and, where relevant, as a bulk download’ (?)• Art.13(2): EC must carry out consultations, incl. at expert level, and conduct an impact assessment, incl. a CBA, before identifying specific high value datasets (++)• Art.5(5): ‘Where making available documents immediately after collection would exceed the financial and technical capacities of the public sector body, thereby imposing a disproportionate effort, documents […] shall be made available for re‐use in a timeframe or with temporary technical restrictions that do not unduly impair the exploitation of their economic and social potential’ (+)• This also applies to public undertakings, in accordance with Art.5(5aa) (+)
PSI Directive – final outcome
Item 12a. Platform Strategy –Objective
Request official mandate for Policy Committee from BoDFormation of a small Task Force developing a framework concept for aggregation mechanisms based on evidence gathered from different Member States.Expressions of interest to participate in the Task Force can be made at the meeting or via email to the E.DSO secretariat ([email protected])
It is expected that “#platforms” will become a mainstream topicon the agenda of the EU Commission from 2019 Q3 onwards
Who will be in the driver seat on this topic: ENTSO‐E or E.DSO (or jointly)?It is expected that for DSOs there will be a window of opportunity during H1 2019We distinguish between two separate issues that are both strategically relevant right now and can be picked up by the Policy Committee:
1) Flexibility aggregation platform (regulated domain) 2) Data management
1) Flexibility aggregation platform
Context and problem definition* 1. Today in Europe, many market actors (including DSOs and TSOs) have started to
consider and/or to develop platforms for trading and procuring flexibility. Therefore, it is relevant to also address flexibility and active system management from this perspective.
2. However, market model options have not been selected and the way that TSOs and DSOs implement their mutual coordination is not yet fully clear.
3. It is necessary to come to a definition of platforms, to define the options and to identify the implementation issues.
4. The objective is to start to understand the possible relationships between market models and coordination options with these platforms. Making the right choices may lead to very effective TSO‐DSO coordination solutions, whereas misaligning choices may lead to very complex and costly solutions.
*source: draft ASM report
1)
1) In general matching sellers and buyers to been seen in the commercial domain, with balancing market as an exception
Functional Reference Diagram
• Market Platform• Receiving and accepting bids• Merit order• Validation and settlement
• Buyers co‐ordination• Grid prequalification• Product prequalification• Forecasting• Aggregating and manifesting demand for flexibility
• Data exchange• Functionality to ensure no harmful impact
Commercial and Regulated Domain
Platform Options1. Option A: DSOs and TSOs interact via their own separately developed platforms (D‐CM, T‐CM,
BAL platforms) with FSPs in the market, directly or via market trading platforms (e.g. in the day‐ahead or the intraday timeframe). Coordination between TSOs and DSOs is realised by direct information exchange between these platforms.
2. Option B: DSOs interact with FSPs in the market directly or via market trading platforms through their own separate platform (D‐CM), and the TSO uses the balancing platform also for T‐CM. Coordination between TSOs and DSOs is realised by direct information exchange between these platforms.
3. Option C: DSOs and TSOs interact with the market via a combined platform for D‐CM and T‐CM, through which TSO‐DSO coordination for congestion management might also be realised(e.g. algorithms to avoid conflicts and double‐dispatch of flexibility). TSOs operate a separate platform for BAL. Coordination between TSOs and DSOs is realised by direct information exchange between the balancing and congestion management platforms.
4. Option D: TSOs and DSO interact with market FSPs or market trading platforms via a joint platform for D‐CM, T‐CM and BAL. This platform could still consist of decentralised TSO and DSO data requirements and a defined and secured data exchange.
• Network Code on demand response, including aggregation, energy storage, and demand curtailment rules
• Based on EG3 report• Important principles in the TSO/DSO report on Active System Management
• Definition of options and identification of issues
• Recommendations (Best Practice)
• Markets and products for flexibility organised on an MS level
• Technology• Hardware• MS‐specific solutions to be implemented
European and Member State Framework
Member States agreed “common framework” at EU level
Best Practice PerspectivesRecommendation how TSO and DSO should co‐operate in defining the interface between the commercial and regulatory domain (which could include good practices for the API).
Understand what is required for platforms to work together: Data security/security standards – DSO accountability and consequences in each scenario. Role of DSOs in local/national platforms : possible participation in governance. Data format and types of data : minimum requirements to allow cross analysis and European wide benchmarks
Work with industry to understand requirements for the commercial domain and how grid operators could help facilitate this, e.g. by communication interfaces.
Proactive
Action Propose joint definition of platform and market interface
E.DSO Arguments
Avoid costly and complex landscape with possible emerging system risks
EuropeanCommission
Repeatedly emphasising that TSOs and DSOs ACT on coordination next to describing models and option
DSO Assns GEODE on board, Eurelectric positive, CEDEC unknown
ENTSOE Reaction
Difficult to refuse (negative reaction not liked by EU Commission)
Results • E.DSO topic owner at DSO side• Co topic owner with ENTSO‐E• Influence on topic developments at ENTSO‐E• A common platform and market interface
definition
Reactive
Action None
E.DSO Arguments
Wait and see
European Commission
Emphasising that TSOs and DSOs ACT on coordination next to describing models and option
DSO Assns Not relevant
ENTSOE (re)Action
• Proceed with platform development: extending balancing platform with congestion management capabilities for transmission & distribution grids
• Using the EDSO argument from the proactive scenario
Results • ENTSO‐E is topic owner• Favoured by European Commission• DSOs/EDSO in defensive position on system
operator responsibilities
E.DSO platform strategy: pro-active or reactive
2) Data management
Data Collection and Storage = DSO
Data Platform Operator = DSO‐ Open data (energy mix, consumption level, load
profiles…)‐ Close data : grid operation data / info, building
consumption data…
Data Platform Operator : local authorities / consortiums‐ Open data (energy mix, consumption level, territory vision)
Data Collection and Storage = TSO
Data Platform Operator = TSO
Additional issue: Data Management
Trends• Data=new gold: access to data=access to customers & markets• Accessibility & sharing of data is going to be addressed in a generic way (cross sectoral) at national and EU level
• GDPR compliancy is transforming a supplier centric market model to a customer centric market model
Challenges• How to define, implement and govern a generic data access and sharing framework ?
• How will DSO’s ,TSO’s & markets exchange data in such a framework irrespectively whether the data is in a datahub or locally stored?
Needed• Definition of the framework at EU level, choices & implementation at MS level
• TSOs and DSOs in MS closely working together on these implementation issues
Customers Service Providers
1. Data format2. Data exchange
protocols3. Metadata
4. Auth. & identification5. Consentmanagement
6. Legal aspects
7. Cost Allocation
8. SLA’s
9. Governance
Availability of data
Analytics & Application
Accessibility of data
Accessibility of data will become a topic of its own
(TSO DSO) Data Management
Source:
A European communication about principles of aggregation mechanisms to be implemented in the Member States. This might include the following:
• Defining the interface between the commercial and regulatory domain (which could include good practices for the API) and disseminate this interface to the market to ensure a level playing field. The aim should be to identify synergies and commonalities which might be exploited at the European level.
• Understand what is required for mechanisms to work together at a distribution and transmission level aiming to learn from best practices and agreeing on EU common practices, where relevant.
• Work with industry to understand requirements for the commercial domain and how system operators could help facilitate this, for example by sharing of data and defining the communication interfaces.
A clear perspective on the reasons why certain mechanisms are to be preferred over other arrangements.Results to be delivered before summer 2019.
Platform Strategy: Deliverables
Platform Strategy/concept for an aggregation mechanism
Resolution of the Board of Directors (for decision):
E.DSO’s Board endorses this concept note and gives a mandate to the Policy Committee to elaborate a more detailed concept for an aggregation mechanism already in the first half of 2019. The concept should then possibly be presented at the next June 2019 Board of Directors meeting. A small task force should be established with volunteers from E.DSO’s members, under co‐ordination of the Policy Committee.
WHAT
HOW
A mainstreaming of the concept sustainable finance with the purpose to support the long‐term strategy of carbon neutrality by 2050
By establishing a framework to determine the environmental sustainability of an economic activity‐ TAXONOMY
1. Climate change mitigation2. Climate change adaption3. Protection of water and marine
resources4. Circular economy, waste
prevention5. Pollution prevention & control6. Protection of healthy
ecosystems
CONDITIONS
Contribute to at least one of the environmental objectives
Do no harm to the other environmental objectives
Comply with min. social safeguards
Comply with quantitative/ qualitative technical screening criteria EN
VIRO
NMEN
T‐AL
OBJEC
TIVE
S
Item 12b. Sustainable Finance: Taxonomy
Technical Expert Subgroups
TaxonomyEU Green Bond
StandardBenchmarks Disclosures
EU Green Bond
StandardBenchmarks
Interim report open for feedback
Sustainable Finance: Taxonomy
• All «neighboring» Associations have a clear say (next slide) on the Climate targets and the EU Climate policy after Paris and Katowice COPs
• For Members part of Groups, their parent companies have addressed the topic• According to the coming Taxonomy Directive we shall need reference standards to comply with future obligations to access funding and stay high in the inevitable ranking that will be produced
• The Policy Committee should be entrusted the developmemnt of a paper to be adopted by June 2019 Board in Madrid.
E.DSO to produce and launch:The «Smart and Sustainable Grids Charter» – a reference paper for DSOs to enable the clean and responsible Energy Transition through the distribution
networks
MEETING DIRECTOR GENERAL DG‐CLIMA ON
APRIL 3
Climate Targets Compliance and a Sustainable Grids Policy Paper
Associations’ position papers
Lasta meeting Joint NC TF March 13th @ Eurelectric
TSO/DSO: Active System Management
Members: ENTSO‐E; 4 DSO associations
Members: ACER and ENTSO‐E as moderators; all stakeholders
Members: EC as moderator; ENTSO‐E; 4 DSO associations
ESC Grid ConnectionDef. of storage
deviceshydro pump‐
storage modulesMixed Customer
Sites
TSO/DSO Platform
1. ASM2. Reactive Power Management
3. Data management
4. Storage 5. Network Planning
6. Network Codes Implementation
High Level meetings
MoU Coop Platform Agreement AOB
• Meeting on 6th March• CEP impact assessment and workplan• Update of MoU
TSO / DSO Active Working Groups
• Meeting 28th February TSO DSO NC IG• New development process for NCs and GLs• Defining new topics for further discussion• ASM report – Validation and publication
ASM Event April 16th
• STORAGE: The EG members are working on the requirements for each family of storage.
• MCS: members are working on the draft report with implementation examples, connection cases, voltage criteria option.
• Ongoing meetings for the 3 groups.
Item 12b. Projects Committee
Date Location Topic
October 2017 Vienna E‐mobility
December 2017 Düsseldorf ETIP SNET
April 2018 Bari Active System Management
July 2018 Paris Digitalisation
September 2018 Brussels E.DSO projects
December 2018 Athens TSO/DSO
March 2019 Prague EV charging
June 2019 Graz Smart Cities
September 2019 Warsaw To be determined…
MEETINGS
Projects Committee
• Projects Insight Papers (PIPs):• PIPs E‐mobility and Active System Management finalised• PIP Digitalisation: drafting started and ongoing
• TEN‐E/PCI: • Publication of Joint DSO Statement on TEN‐E Regulation• Positive new position of the EU institutions on TEN‐E Regulation
• ETIP SNET:• Drafting of new Roadmap (2021‐2030) & Implementation Plan (2021‐2023) to be published by end 2019
• Need for new E.DSO Members’ experts• to contribute to this task
RECENT ACTIVITIES
Recent E.DSO projects activities
• E.DSO Projects:
• January: End of Flexiciency project on EU‐wide market platform• January: Launch of CoordiNet project on TSO/DSO/Consumers• March: Selection of InterConnect project with 2 E.DSO Members• February: Participation in 2 project proposal to ES‐1 call on Flexibility and retail market options for the distribution grid, with 3 E.DSO members in each of them
• February: Participation in an Erasmus+ project with 1 E.DSO Member
7. E.DSO’s projects: ongoing and future (1/3)
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
INTENSYS4EU (80k€) – H2020
CoordiNet (200k€) – H2020
InterConnect (100k€) – H2020
PlatOne (400k€) – H2020
Euniversal (220k€) – H2020
EDDIE (240k€) – Erasmus+
Pending approval
At the moment, E.DSO is engaged in projects for a total sum of budgets reaching 280,000€ (not counting LTPs’ budgets). In 2018‐2019, it has been participating in 4 project proposals worth a total of 960.000€ budget only for the Association.
By the end of 2019, E.DSO could have a project budget up to 1,200,000€ until 2023, most of it being funded 100% (+25% indirect costs) by the European Union.
PlatOne400,000 €
EDDIE240,000 €
Euniversal220,000 €
InterConnect100,000 €
CoordiNet200,000 €
INTENSYS4EU80,000 €
• TSO‐DSO cooperation to remove barriers of market participation for customers and small market player ‐ special emphasis on flexibility.
• E.DSO has a leading role in the dissemination and communication of the project.CoordiNet
• Runs ETIP SNET, providing strategic guidance on R&I activities raised by integration issues of the electricity system into the wider European energy system
• E.DSO contributes to communication tasks, and provide input to the ETIP SNET governing board, chaired by E.DSO member.
INTENSYS4EU
•Develop tools and solutions for end‐users to empower them in managing their consumption and self‐generation in a flexible and interoperable ecosystem. A 30M‐budget proposal, InterConnect gathers 56 partners, including 3 E.DSO members.
•E.DSO contributes to the replicability and identification of DSO solutions for smart grids.
InterConnect
7. E.DSO’s projects: ongoing and future (2/3)
• Develop a two‐layer platform based on edge cloud technology and blockchain mechanisms to provide an easy and secure access to customer level data for operation and flexibility markets.
• E.DSO would lead the harmonization of the demonstration sites and play an important role in the communication.
PlatOne
• Develop universal approach to interlink active system management with electricity markets and flexibility services, enabling the transformation to a multi‐energy, multi‐consumer energy system.
• E.DSO would lead the harmonization of the demonstration sites and play an important role in the communication.
EUniversal
• Fill the gap between existing skills and the ones required in the future power system by mapping the stakeholders, their needs, and linking these with university programmes.
• E.DSO would take a strong part in the mapping of stakeholders.EDDIE
7. E.DSO’s projects: ongoing and future (3/3)
Next Projects Committee activities
• Potential future topics*• Data management• Energy / system efficiency• Cybersecurity / system security
• Horizon Europe• Following the new R&D&I Framework talks through ETIP SNET• New position paper to be drafted on EU Funding
• CoordiNet (+ INTERRFACE)• Coordination within Projects Committee on these TSO/DSO projects
*In addition to plan
Main activities/ achievements
Item 12.c Technology Committee Overview of activities
• 28th 29th May, Rotterdam• 20th September Warsaw • 04th December Brussels
• Knowledge sharing session on Cybersecurity
• E.DSO event “ The truth on flexibility” – 10th of April, Brussels
• ASM Report Event – 16th of April, Brussels
• Technology Roadmap work group started
• Ongoing ENCS / E.DSO collaboration outside TC
• Visit Supervision Centre & Smart Grids Laboratory(EDP)• Approval of minutes of Brussels meeting Presentation of STEDIN Technology Roadmap• Presentations by TF1 on “Active network and distribution automation” • Presentations by TF3 on “Data management and use”
• Update on latest EU policy developmentsTechnology Roundtable session
Risks/support/decisions needed
Next Steps
Next meetings
TF leaders• Johannes Stürmer‐ Westnetz
Sharing sessions:• WebCo on 22.01.2019• WebCo on 05.02.2019
Work Progress:• Survey Analysis
89
Name Company
Anne van der Molen Stedin
Blanda Prousch Innogy
Claes Ahlrot E.ON
Eirini Leonidaki HEDNO
Ewa Mataczyńska PGE
Fons Jansen Enexis
Giovanni Valtorta Enel
Johannes Stürmer Innogy
Juan Marco E.DSO
Niels Blaauwbroek Stedin
Martin Johansson Vattenfall
E. Voumvoulakis HEDNO
Item 12.c Technology Committee
Task Force 1 – Active Network Management & Distribution Automation
TF leaders• Jan Kula (CEZ Distribuce)• Arjan Wargers (Enexis, ElaadNL)
New members• New member: Karima Boukir, Enedis
Sharing sessions:• Call on 11th January • Call on 7th February
Work Progress:• Draft paper “Smart Charging Use‐case Description” • Draft paper “Facilitating the EV market”
90
Name CompanyArmin Gaul Innogy
Arjan Wargers Enexis
Kostis Andreadis HEDNO
Kostas Magkaniotis HEDNO
George Goulas HEDNO
Jan Kula CEZ Distrib.
Nicolas Lecomte Enedis
Włodzimierz Lewandowski
PGE Distrib.
Juan Marco E.DSO
Frank Geerts Alliander
Lukas Krivanec PRE‐Distrib.
Karima Boukir Enedis
Item 12.c Technology Committee
Task Force 2 – E ‐ Vehicle
TF leaders• Ignacio Gago (Iberdrola)
New members• Adam Tering (CEZ Distrib.)• Yakup Koc (Stedin)
Sharing sessions:• Workshop No. 1 – 11th April • Workshop No. 2 – July
Work Progress:• Data Analytics use cases• Advanced smart meter functionality
91
Item 12.c Technology Committee
Task Force 3 – Data Management
Name CompanyPaulo Libano EDP
Philipp Tüllmann
Innogy
Ignacio Gago Iberdrola
George Tsirogianni
HEDNO
Jeff Montagne Enedis
Fons Jansen Enexis
Tania Vázquez EDP Spain
Alejandro Garcia
EDP Spain
Adam Teringl CEZ Distribuce
Yakup Koc Stedin
Lars Garpetun Vattenfall
TF leaders• Nuno Medeiros (EDP Distribuição)
Sharing sessions:• Next call in February 28th
• Physical meeting in May 20th ‐ Oporto
Work Progress:• NIS Directive Alignment Strategy• Cybersecurity Act Alignment Strategy• Network code on cyber‐security Alignment Strategy• Smart Metering Security Requirements• EC report benchmarking smart metering deployment 92
Item 12.c Technology Committee
Task Force 4 – Cybersecurity
Name CompanyBernard Cardebat Enedis
DimitriosMichalopoulos
Deddie
Christiane Gabbe Innogy
Wolfgang Loew EVN
Guillermo Manent Iberdrola
Luisella Pierik Stedin
Rickard Venetjoki EON
Hans Hjertsall EON
Maximilian Urban Netz‐noe
Christophe Poirier Enedis
Lars Garpetun Vattenfall
Maarten Hoeve ENCS
Anjos Nijk ENCS
Nuno Medeiros EDP
TF leaders• Michael Wilch
New members since last BoD• Vaclav Janousek, CEZ Distribuce• Christos Christodoulou, HEDNO• Joost Gottmer, Alliander• Manuel Jaekel, Innogy• Jesus Varela, Iberdrola
Sharing sessions:• Physical meeting at 13th March as joint
meeting with Eurelectric
Work Progress:• Coordinated Security Analysis public consultation by
ACER• Expert Groups: ‘Mixed Customer Sites” & “Storage”• Network Code Emergency and Restoration: Joint
TSO‐DSO‐initiative 93
Item 12.c Technology Committee
Task Force 5 – Network Codes
Name Co. TF5NC/ GL ER MCS Strg.
Michael Wilch INNOGY XSebastian Granier ENEDIS X XGuillaume Pelton ENEDIS XManuel Jaekel INNOGY X X X XJesus Varela IBERDROLA X XNelida Santos IBERDROLA X XJoost Gottmer ALLIANDER X XChristos Christodoulou HEDNO XGiovanni Valtorta ENEL XJuan Marco E.DSO X X X XVaclav Janousek CEZ X
Item 13. Any other business
Item 13.a GDPR implementation & DPOs coordination at E.DSO
• Second Data Protection Officers meeting from E.DSO members in Brussels last 18 March:
E.DSO presented a proposal of questionnaire submitted to the DPOs of its members for a legal
analysis of the level of implementation of the GDPR by
DSOs
GDPR and DPOs coordination• E.DSO participation in a public consultation on the GDPR:
• E.DSO has been requested by the DPOs (proposal from the Dutch DSOs) to provide a joint DSO position with comments on the
Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under
Regulation 2016/679. = Position of DSOs for future revisions (especially in precising the case of smart metering and other personal data processing activities by DSOs)
The Commission is asking for comments on the guideline till 2 April 2019.
Item 14. Dates 2019 Meetings
• Thursday, 6 June 2019 in conjunction with Cired Conference (Madrid)
• Thursday, 19 September 2019 (Warsaw) • Executive Committee: Thursday, 24 October (Brussels), TBC
• Wednesday, 11 December 2019 (Brussels)
June 2020 booked for hosting , by Caruna, Helsinki, Finland ,