Board of Directors Agenda

Board Members

Steve Vaus, Chair Mayor, Poway

Catherine Blakespear, Vice Chair Mayor, Encinitas

Cori Schumacher Councilmember, Carlsbad

Mary Salas Mayor, Chula Vista

Richard Bailey Mayor, Coronado

Ellie Haviland Deputy Mayor, Del Mar

Bill Wells Mayor, El Cajon

Paul McNamara Mayor, Escondido

Serge Dedina Mayor, Imperial Beach

Kristine Alessio Councilmember, La Mesa

Racquel Vasquez Mayor, Lemon Grove

Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Mayor, National City

Jack Feller Deputy Mayor, Oceanside

Kevin Faulconer Mayor, City of San Diego

Georgette Gomez Council President, City of San Diego

Jim Desmond Supervisor, County of San Diego

Kristin Gaspar Supervisor, County of San Diego

Rebecca Jones Mayor, San Marcos

John Minto Mayor, Santee

David A. Zito Mayor, Solana Beach

Judy Ritter Mayor, Vista

Advisory Members

Hon. Jesus Escobar, Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County

Bob Franzoia, Acting Director California Department of Transportation

Mona Rios, Vice Chair Metropolitan Transit System

Tony Kranz, Chair North County Transit District

Joe Stuyvesant, Navy Region Southwest Executive Director U.S. Department of Defense

Garry Bonelli, Chairman Port of San Diego

Ron Morrison, Director San Diego County Water Authority

Cody Martinez, Chairman Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association

April Boling, Chair San Diego County Regional Airport Authority

Hon. Carlos González Gutiérrez Consul General, Mexico

Hasan Ikhrata Executive Director, SANDAG

Board of Directors Agenda

Friday, July 26, 2019 9 a.m. to 12 noon

SANDAG Board Room 401 B Street, 7th Floor

San Diego

Agenda Highlights

• TransNet Major Corridors Program Update

• Regional Housing Needs Assessment DraftMethodology

Please silence all electronic devices during the meeting

You can listen to the Board of Directors meeting by visiting our website at sandag.org

Message from the Clerk In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the

compensation for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial

meetings is: Executive Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional

Transportation Commission (RTC) $100. Compensation rates for the EC and BOD are set

pursuant to the SANDAG Bylaws, and the compensation rate for the RTC is set pursuant to

state law.

Mission Statement The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional

decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus; makes strategic plans; obtains and allocates

resources; plans, engineers, and builds public transit; and provides information on a broad

range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life.

San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231

(619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org

2 120718

Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Request to Comment form located in the lobby. Members of the public may address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

Both agenda and non-agenda comments should be sent to the Clerk of the Board via [email protected]. Please include the meeting date, agenda item, your name, and your organization. Any comments, handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the meeting should be received by the Clerk no later than 5 p.m. two working days prior to the meeting. All public comments and materials received by the deadline become part of the official public record and will be provided to the members for their review at the meeting.

In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for email notifications at sandag.org/subscribe.

SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints, and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to the SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900 or (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request, call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión.

如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.

请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or visit 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.

3

Board of Directors Friday, July 26, 2019

Item No. Recommendation

+1. Approval of Meeting Minutes Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve the minutes from its June 28, 2019, meeting.

2. Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments

Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading “Reports.” Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

3. Policy Advisory Committee Chairs' Report Information

Policy Advisory Committee Chairs will provide updates on key Committee activities.

4. Executive Director's Report

Hasan Ikhrata, SANDAG

Discussion

An update on key programs, projects, and agency initiatives, including San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the Airport Connectivity Subcommittee will be provided.

Consent

+5. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group

Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, SANDAG

Approve

The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group was established in June 2019. The Working Group recommends that the Board of Directors approve the 2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan, including funding allocations available to the jurisdictions for Census outreach.

+6. Approval of Contract Awards

Julie Wiley, SANDAG

Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute contract awards for Job Order Contract – General Civil Construction, and the North Park/Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeways project.

4

+7. Policy Advisory Committee Actions, Including California Environmental Quality Act Exemption

Tessa Lero, SANDAG

Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to ratify the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees, including California Environmental Quality Act exemption for the Orange Bikeway project.

+8. Proposed Amendments to SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code

John Kirk, SANDAG

Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve proposed amendments to the SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code.

+9. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendments: Caltrans Planning Grants

April Petonak, SANDAG

Approve

The Executive Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the proposed amendments to the FY 2020 Program Budget, accepting $1,625,502 in Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant funding.

+10. FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit*

Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, SANDAG

Approve

The Audit Committee recommends that the Board of Directors exercise the option under the existing agreement with Crowe LLP to conduct the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit.

+11. iCommute Rideshare Week

Jay Faught, SANDAG

Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-05 in support of Rideshare Week September 30 – October 4, 2019.

+12. Requested Time Extensions: TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program Climate Action Plan Requirement

Tracy Ferchaw, SANDAG

Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve a six-month time extension for the City of Lemon Grove and City of Santee to complete their Climate Action Plan requirements under the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program respectively.

5

+13. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project

Dinara Ussenova, SANDAG

Approve

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget to:

1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project (CIP project No. 1131500) to establish the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project;

2. transfer $430,000 of SANDAG toll revenues to CIP Project No. 1131500; and

3. accept $90,000 from the North County Transit District to fund CIP Project No. 1131500.

+14. Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: El Portal Undercrossing

Bruce Smith, SANDAG

Approve


1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project (CIP Project No. 1146900) to establish the El Portal Undercrossing Project; and

2. accept $8.937 million in funding from the City of Encinitas and State Active Transportation Program to fully fund construction.

+15. SB 1 State of Good Repair Program: North County Transit District Project List

Michelle Smith, SANDAG

Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-04, authorizing the submittal of the North County Transit District project listing under the FY 2019-2020 SB 1 State of Good Repair Program.

+16. Proposition 68 Department of Conservation Local and Regional Planning Grant Program: SANDAG Project Submission

Allison Wood and Sarah Pierce, SANDAG

Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-03, approving the submission of an application to the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grant Program and authorizing SANDAG to accept award funding and enter into an agreement with the Department of Conservation.

+17. Equal Employment Opportunity Program

Rachel Nycholat, SANDAG

Information

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program, this report summarizes employment results for FY 2019 and reviews EEO Program goals for the upcoming year.

6

+18. San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan Draft Transportation Network

Rachel Kennedy, SANDAG

Information

This report provides an update on the proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan, which will be available for public review through August 21, 2019.

+19. Executive Director Delegated Actions*

André Douzdjian, SANDAG

Information

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarizes delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

+20. Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG

Tessa Lero, SANDAG

Information

Board members will report on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board Business meeting.

+21. Quarterly Finance Investments as of June 30, 2019*

André Douzdjian and Ray Major, SANDAG

Information

This quarterly report provides an update on SANDAG investments, including all money under the direction or care of SANDAG as of June 30, 2019.

Reports

+22. TransNet Major Corridors Program Update*

José Nuncio, SANDAG

Information

An overview of cost and anticipated revenue information for the TransNet Major Corridor Program, through 2048, will be presented.

+23. Regional Housing Needs Assessment Draft Methodology

Vice Chair Catherine Blakespear

Seth Litchney, SANDAG

Approve

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Subcommittee recommends that the Board of Directors release the draft RHNA methodology for public review.

7

+24. Memorandum of Agreement with City of Imperial Beach: TransNet Debt Financing Program*

Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, SANDAG

Approve

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, authorize the Executive Director to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Imperial Beach to issue $1.3 million in Commercial Paper through the TransNet Debt Financing Program.

+25. Regional Transportation Improvement Program Delegation of Authority*

Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Sue Alpert, SANDAG

Adopt

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), adopt RTC Resolution No. RTC-2020-01:

1. requesting delegation of approval for administrative modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program; and

2. delegating that approval to the Executive Director.

+26. 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5*

Supervisor Jim Desmond, Transportation Committee Chair Sue Alpert, SANDAG

Adopt

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), adopt RTC Resolution No. 2020-02, approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.

27. Risk Consideration: An Invitation from the Independent Performance Auditor to Board Members Regarding Risk Discussions

Mary Khoshmashrab, Independent Performance Auditor

Information

The SANDAG Independent Performance Auditor is in the process of performing an organizational-wide risk assessment (consideration of audit, fraud, and business risk). This item will outline next steps for Board Members to engage in a discussion with the Independent Performance Auditor on high-level risk concerns for the agency, including risk tolerance and risk appetite.

8

+28. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel - Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(2) (One Potential Case)

Amberlynn Griffin and Jim Linthicum, SANDAG

The Board of Directors will be briefed on construction claims related to the Los Peñasquitos Bridge project located in the City of San Diego.

29. Continued Public Comments

If the five-speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.

30. Upcoming Meetings Information

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, August 9, 2019, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, August 23, 2019, at 9 a.m.

Adjournment

+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment

* next to an agenda item indicates that the Board of Directors also is acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission for that item

Item: 1

Board of Directors July 26, 2019

June 28, 2019, Board of Directors Meeting Minutes

Chair Steve Vaus (Poway) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:02 a.m.

1. Approval of the Meeting Minutes

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Jim Desmond (County of San Diego), and a second by Councilmember Kristine Alessio (La Mesa), the Board of Directors approved the minutes from its May 10, 2019, Board Policy meeting, and its May 24, 2019, Board Business meeting. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Cori Schumacher (Carlsbad), Mayor Mary Salas (Chula Vista), Councilmember Mike Donovan (Coronado), Deputy Mayor Ellie Haviland (Del Mar), Mayor Bill Wells (El Cajon), Councilmember Joe Mosca (Encinitas), Mayor Paul McNamara (Escondido), Councilmember Mark West (Imperial Beach), Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Racquel Vasquez (Lemon Grove), Councilmember Mona Rios (National City), Deputy Mayor Jack Feller (Oceanside), Mayor Kevin Faulconer (City of San Diego), Mayor Rebecca Jones (San Marcos), Mayor John Minto (Santee), Mayor David Zito (Solana Beach), Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember John Franklin (Vista). No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

2. Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments

Barry Jantz, East County Economic Development Council (EDC), stated that the East County EDC will remain engaged in the Regional Plan process and will continue to work with SANDAG on the process.

Dan Summers, Ramona Community Planning Group, spoke regarding safety concerns on State Route 67.

Jim Cooper, Ramona Community Planning Group, spoke regarding safety concerns on State Route 67.

Martha Welch, a member of the public, spoke regarding the TransNet Ordinance and how the funds are allocated.

Pierre Cochet Weinandt, a member of the public, spoke regarding the 5 Big Moves.

Nicole Burgess, a member of the public, spoke regarding support for transit priorities in the region.

Sean Chanez, Pedego Electric Bikes, spoke regarding support for electric bikes.

Dan McMillan, Helix Water District, East County Economic Development Council, spoke regarding inclusion of east county roads in the Regional Plan.

Chair Vaus recognized outgoing Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) member Jonathan Tibbitts and thanked him for his service with the ITOC.

Chair Vaus stated that SANDAG received three awards from the San Diego American Planning Association Chapter.

Chair Vaus recognized SANDAG staff members for their outstanding work on the SANDAG Regional Mobility Hub Strategy, the Regional Climate Action Planning Framework, also known as ReCAP, and the Plug-In San Diego Regional Needs Assessment Mapping Tool.

Action: Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve the minutes from its June 28, 2019, meeting.

2

Chair Vaus stated that SANDAG received two awards recently from the California Association of Public Information Officials: the 511 Roadside Assistance Registration Wallet received an Epic Award for Marketing and Promotional Items and the 2018 San Diego Regional Bike to Work Day effort was also recognized with an Epic Award for a Recurring Special or Community Event. He recognized the project teams for their outstanding work.

Chair Vaus recognized Pam Scanlon who earned an international award for her work with the Automated Regional Justice Information System. Pam received the G. Thomas Steele Excellence in Law Enforcement Information and Technology Award, which is presented annually at the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Law Enforcement Information and Technology Section Conference.

3. Policy Advisory Committee Chairs' Report (Information)

No reports

Action: Information only.

4. Executive Director's Report (Information)

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director, provided an update on key programs, projects, and agency initiatives, including San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the Airport Connectivity Subcommittee.


6. Policy Advisory Committee Actions (Approve)

The Board of Directors was asked to ratify the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Desmond, and a second by Mayor Jones, the Board of Directors approved Consent Item No. 6, amending the Transportation Committee action on the Federal Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Grant Program project submittals. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Donovan, Mayor Wells, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember Alessio, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Councilmember Franklin, and Supervisor Desmond. No: Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Councilmember Mosca, Councilmember West, Mayor Vasquez, and Mayor Zito. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Kristin Gaspar (County of San Diego), and a second by Supervisor Desmond, the Board of Directors approved Consent Item No. 6, amending the Executive Committee action regarding draft Board of Directors agendas. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: Councilmember West and Councilmember Rios. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

Consent

5. Approval of Proposed Contract Award (Approve)

The Board of Directors was asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract award for iCommute services.

7. Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits (Approve)

The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors authorize the Executive Director to:

1. transmit the performance audit report of SANDAG to the Caltrans Director as required;

2. certify in writing to the Caltrans Director that the performance audits of transit operators located in the area under its jurisdiction have been completed;

3

3. implement the performance audit recommendations pertaining to SANDAG Transportation Development Act activities; and

4. transmit the other recommendations to the transit operators for implementation.

8. Annual Report to Legislature on Public Transit (Approve)

The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve the FY 2018 Public Transit Report for submission to the California Legislature.

9. TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program Amendment Request* (Approve)

The Board of Directors was asked to approve a Smart Growth Incentive Program schedule extension for the City of La Mesa’s North Spring Street Smart Growth Corridor Project.

10. Interstate 5/Voigt Drive Improvements Project* (Approve)

The Board of Directors was asked to:

1. approve the Guaranteed Maximum Price negotiated between Mid-Coast Transit Constructors and SANDAG for Supplement 6 to the Construction Manager/General Contractor Construction Service Agreement for the Interstate 5 (I-5)/Voigt Drive Improvements Project in the amount of $35.9 million;

2. authorize the Executive Director to execute Supplement 6;

3. approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget, adding $12 million in SB 1 Local Partnership Program funding and $4.4 million in project savings from Elvira to Morena and San Diego River Bridge Double Track projects (Capital Improvement Program [CIP] Project Nos. 1239811 and 1239815) to fully fund the I-5/Voigt Drive Improvement Project (CIP Project No. 1200507); and

4. approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget, accepting $14 million from UC San Diego for the UC San Diego Mid-Coast Improvements (CIP Project No. 1146700) to fund improvements along the corridor.

11. Transportation Development Act and State Transit Assistance Claims (Adopt)

The Transportation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors:

1. adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-19 through 2019-24, approving the FY 2020 Transportation Development Act and State Transit Assistance (STA) claims; and

2. adopt the STA findings as certified by North County Transit District.

12. Annual Review of Committees and Working Groups (Information)

This report provided an update on the status of all standing and temporary committees and working groups.

13. Executive Director Delegated Actions* (Information)

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarized delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

14. Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG (Information)

Board members provided brief reports on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board Business meeting.

Action: Upon a motion by Councilmember Mosca, and a second by Mayor Zito, the Board of Directors approved Consent Items Nos. 5, and 7 through 14, as amended. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios,

4

Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

Reports

16. Proposed Final FY 2020 Program Budget* (Adopt)

The Executive Committee recommended that the Board of Directors adopt Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Resolution No. RTC-2019-04, adopting the Final FY 2020 Program Budget.

André Douzdjian, Finance Director; and Sandi Craig, Senior Budget Program Analyst, presented the item.

Action: Upon a motion by Supervisor Desmond, and a second by Mayor Minto, the Board of Directors adopted RTC Resolution No. RTC-2019-04, adopting the Final FY 2020 Program Budget. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

15. 2019 Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Annual Report* (Information)

In accordance with the TransNet Extension Ordinance, Dustin Fuller, TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Chair, presented the 2019 Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee Annual Report, including the results of the annual FY 2018 TransNet Fiscal and Compliance Audit.


17. Grant Anticipation Notes Issuance: Review of Draft Documents (Adopt)

The Board of Directors was asked to adopt SANDAG Resolution No. 2019-25, authorizing the issuance of up to $335 million of bonds to advance implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project funding strategy; and the execution and distribution of the documents.

Mr. Douzdjian; Peter Shellenberger, Public Financial Management; Victor Hsu, Norton Rose Fulbright, LLP; and Devin Brennan, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, presented the item.

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Minto, and a second by Deputy Mayor Feller, the Board of Directors adopted SANDAG Resolution No. 2019-25, authorizing the issuance of up to $335 million of bonds to advance implementation of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project funding strategy; and the execution and distribution of the documents. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Mayor Wells, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Council President Georgette Gomez (City of San Diego), Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None.

18. Proposed New Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests (Approve)

The Executive Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve proposed new Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests.

Julie Wiley, Special Counsel and Manager of Contracts and Procurement, presented the item.

Action: Upon a motion by Chair Vaus, and a second by Councilmember Mosca, the Board of Directors approved proposed new Board Policy No. 040: Unsolicited Proposals and Partnership Requests. Yes: Chair Vaus, Councilmember Schumacher, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Donovan, Deputy Mayor Haviland, Councilmember Mosca, Mayor McNamara, Councilmember West, Councilmember Alessio, Mayor Vasquez, Councilmember Rios, Deputy Mayor Feller, Mayor Faulconer, Mayor Jones, Mayor Minto, Mayor Zito, Supervisor Desmond, and Councilmember Franklin. No: None. Abstain: None. Absent: El Cajon.

5

19. Buena Vista Lagoon Enhancement Plan Status (Information)

Keith Greer, Principal Regional Planner, presented an update on the status of the Buena Vista Lagoon Enhancement Plan.


20. Continued Public Comments

There were no continued comments.

21. Upcoming Meetings

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 12, 2019, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 26, 2019, at 9 a.m.

22. Adjournment

Chair Vaus adjourned the joint meeting at 11:02 a.m.

Meeting Start Time: 9:02 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 11:02 a.m.

6

Confirmed Attendance at SANDAG Board of Directors Meeting May 24, 2019

Jurisdiction Name Attended

Open Session

City of Carlsbad Cori Schumacher (Primary) Yes

City of Chula Vista Mary Salas (Primary) Yes

City of Coronado Mike Donovan (2nd Alt.) Yes

City of Del Mar Ellie Haviland (Primary) Yes

City of El Cajon Bill Wells (Primary) Yes

City of Encinitas Joe Mosca (2nd Alt.) Yes

City of Escondido Paul McNamara (Primary) Yes

City of Imperial Beach Mark West (1st Alt.) Yes

City of La Mesa Kristine Alessio (Primary) Yes

City of Lemon Grove Racquel Vasquez (Primary) Yes

City of National City Mona Rios (2nd Alt.) Yes

City of Oceanside Jack Feller (Primary) Yes

City of Poway Steve Vaus (Primary) Yes

City of San Diego Kevin Faulconer (Primary) Yes

City of San Diego Georgette Gomez (Primary) Yes

City of San Marcos Rebecca Jones (Primary) Yes

City of Santee John Minto (Primary) Yes

City of Solana Beach David Zito (Primary) Yes

City of Vista John Franklin (1st Alt.) Yes

County of San Diego Jim Desmond (Primary) Yes

County of San Diego Kristin Gaspar (Primary) Yes

Caltrans Ann Fox (2nd. Alt.) Yes

Metropolitan Transit System Mona Rios (Primary) No

North County Transit District Tony Kranz (Primary) Yes

Imperial County Sup. Jesus Escobar (Primary) Yes

U.S. Department of Defense Joe Stuyvesant (Primary) Yes

Port of San Diego Garry Bonelli (Primary) Yes

San Diego County Water Authority Ron Morrison (Primary) Yes

San Diego County Regional Airport Authority April Boling (Primary) Yes

Mexico Marcela Celorio (Primary) No

Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association Cody Martinez (Primary) No

Item: 5


2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group

Overview

On March 22, 2019, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to enter into an agreement with the 2020 California Complete Count Census Office to coordinate 2020 Census outreach efforts, including allocation of available funding, throughout the San Diego region. In June 2019, the SANDAG Chair approved the establishment of the 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group to oversee the development and execution of a 2020 Census Strategic Plan and Implementation Plan.

Key Considerations

The membership of the 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group includes a voting representative from each SANDAG subregion, the City of San Diego, and the County of San Diego. Additional nonvoting advisory members are included to foster input from other public agencies, the business community, the education community, and Community-Based Organizations (Attachment 1).

The Working Group is intended to review, provide guidance, and recommend approval of a Strategic Plan, which includes allocation of $1.56 million from the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office that SANDAG is administering (Attachment 2).

The Strategic Plan recommended by the Working Group would distribute funding to each of the 18 cities and the County to conduct Census outreach. The methodology used to determine the funding level for each jurisdiction includes a $1,000 minimum and is based on each jurisdiction’s proportion of the region’s hard-to-count populations. Funding can be used for the following outreach purposes: special events, leasing equipment for kiosks, targeted advertising, and assistance from community-based agencies (Attachment 3).

As part of its review of the Strategic Plan, the Working Group focused on the importance of collaboration between SANDAG, state, federal, and local efforts to reach populations that are hard to count and the need to locate assistance centers within hard to count communities. Requests also were made to ensure there is sufficient time in the funding process for the jurisdictions to design their outreach programs and flexibility in the contracting process to allow jurisdictions to work within their respective structures.

Next Steps

Pending approval of the Strategic Plan, the jurisdictions will have approximately three weeks to submit proposed implementation plans. Funds will be distributed based on approved deliverables through September 2020.

Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director

Key Staff Contact: Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, (619) 699-7326, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Membership Roster 2. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Charter 3. 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Draft Strategic Plan

Fiscal Impact:

SANDAG is receiving $1.56 million from the 2020 California Complete Count Census Office to coordinate 2020 Census outreach efforts throughout the San Diego region.

Schedule/Scope Impact:

The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group held its first meeting on June 26, 2019, and will meet as needed through December 2020.

Action: Approve

The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group was established in June 2019. The Working Group recommends that the Board of Directors approve the 2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan, including funding allocations available to the jurisdictions for Census outreach.

2020 Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group The 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group oversees the development and execution of outreach efforts in the San Diego region for the 2020 Census to ensure that everyone is counted once, only once, and in the right place. Staff contact: Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat, (619) 699-7326, [email protected]

Voting Members

Primary Members Alternates

Angelica Davis, Chair City of Chula Vista Representing South County

Reyna Ayala City of Imperial Beach Representing South County

Lyn Dedmon City of La Mesa Representing East County

Lorena Cordova City of El Cajon Representing East County

Kerry Jezisek City of Carlsbad Representing North County Coastal

Cecilia Barandiaran City of Oceanside Representing North County Coastal

Dulce Salazar City of Escondido Representing North County Inland

Keith Gemmell City of San Marcos Representing North County Inland

Sylvia Daniels City of Vista Representing North County Inland

Gloria Cruz-Cardenas San Diego City Council President Georgette Gómez's office Representing the City of San Diego

Tiffany Harrison Councilmember Monica Montgomery's Office Representing the City of San Diego

Geoff Patnoe Representing the County of San Diego

Tiffany Anderson Representing the County of San Diego

2

Attachment 1

Advisory Members


Michele Silverthorn United Way Representing Count Me 2020 Coalition

Ellen Nash Black American Political Association of California (BAPAC), San Diego Chapter Representing Count Me 2020 Coalition

Chevelle Tate California State President pro Tempore Toni Atkins’ Office Representing State Elected Officials

Lee Hernandez CA State Assemblymember Shirley Weber's Office (District 79) Representing State Elected Officials

Rudy Vargas Senator Kamala Harris’ Office Representing Federal Elected Officials

Gabriela Tenorio Senator Kamala Harris’ Office Representing Federal Elected Officials

Music Watson San Diego County Office of Education Representing K-12 Education

Andrew Sharp San Diego Unified School District Representing K-12 Education

TBD Representing Higher Education

TBD Representing Higher Education

Chris Nejo Pala Band of Mission Indians Representing Native Americans/Tribal Governments

Marcus Orozco Pala Band of Mission Indians Representing Native Americans/Tribal Governments

Megan Thomas San Diego Grantmakers Representing Philanthropy

TBD Representing Philanthropy

Sara Kamiab San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Representing Business Community

Jaymie Bradford San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Representing Business Community

Haney Hong San Diego Taxpayers Association Representing Taxpayers

Kelly Batten San Diego Taxpayers Association Representing Taxpayers

Elana Metz Representing Workforce Development

TBD Representing Workforce Development

Kimy Wall North County Transit District Representing Transit Agencies

TBD Representing Transit Agencies

Liz Vagani County of San Diego Public Library Representing Libraries

Missy Solis County of San Diego Public Library Representing Libraries

Monnee Tong City of San Diego Public Library Representing Libraries

3


Jennifer Avina League of Women Voters Representing Voters

Nancy Telford League of Women Voters – North County Representing Voters

Connie Hernandez Regional Program Manager Representing California Census Complete Count Office

N/A

Roberto Garcia Partnership Specialist Representing U.S. Census Bureau

Andrew Amorao Partnership Specialist Representing U.S. Census Bureau

Nataly Schlafer Partnership Specialist Representing U.S. Census Bureau

4

Revised: June 2019

2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Charter

Working Group Charter Purpose

The purpose of the 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) is to involve community leaders throughout the San Diego region in developing a strategic plan and implementation plan for how the county-allocated funds provided by the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office (through SANDAG Contract 5005761) will be used to best encourage all people to respond to the 2020 census, particularly those who have historically been difficult to count.

Line of Reporting

The Working Group will provide one or more progress reports on its efforts to the SANDAG Board of Directors.

Responsibilities

Oversee the development and execution of the strategic plan, which is the framework for the 2020 Census Complete Count outreach efforts in the San Diego region, and the implementation plan, which will further refine the action steps necessary to execute the strategic plan. These plans include allocation of the available funding across various outreach activities.

Membership

Each SANDAG subregion, as well as the City of San Diego and the County of San Diego, shall have a voting representative on the Working Group. The primary member of that subregion on the SANDAG Executive Committee shall appoint an elected official or staff member from one of the member agencies within that subregion, as well as one or more alternates, to represent the subregion as a voting member on the Working Group. Additional nonvoting advisory members may be added at the discretion of the Working Group Chair to foster input from other public agencies, the business community, the education community, and community-based organizations.

Selection of Chair

The voting members shall elect a Chair of the Working Group from among themselves. The Working Group chair may appoint a Vice Chair as needed to help manage the group’s workload and responsibilities.

Meeting Time and Location

The Working Group will meet at SANDAG as frequently as needed to achieve its responsibilities as determined by the Chair.

Duration of Existence

The work of the Working Group will conclude by December 2020 when the agreement with the California Complete Count Census 2020 Office expires.

Attachment 2

5

2020 Census Complete Count Strategic Plan

Information

County San Diego

Agreement # CCC-18-20001

Contact person Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat

Telephone (619) 699-7326

Email [email protected]

Submittal Date to State July 30, 2019

Contents

1.1 Outreach Plan ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Approach ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Table 1: Resources for Potential Outreach Activities .................................................................................................................. 7

1.3 Partnership Coordination .................................................................................................................................................... 8

Figure 1: 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Organizational Chart ..................................................... 8

Figure 2: CCC Subcommittee Structure .................................................................................................................................... 9

1.4 Resources and Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................. 10

1.5 Location of Hard to Count Populations ............................................................................................................................. 10

Figure 3: SANDAG SwORD ..................................................................................................................................................... 12

1.6 Language Access Plan ....................................................................................................................................................... 13

Table 2: Limited English Proficient Population in the San Diego Region ................................................................................... 14

1.7 Local Complete Count Committee (CCC) ......................................................................................................................... 14

1.8 Workforce Development ................................................................................................................................................... 15

1.9 Budget ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15

Table 3: Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Table 4: Deliverables Schedule ................................................................................................................................................ 17

1.11 Measuring Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 19

Appendix A: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Appendix B: ............................................................................................................................................................................ 22

6

Attachment 3

2

1.1 Outreach Plan

For more than 200 years, the U.S. Census Bureau has endeavored to count every resident in the nation to determine the

number of seats each state has in the U.S. House of Representatives and distribute federal funding to local communities

(e.g., Head Start programs, public transportation, road rehabilitation and construction). In support of this effort, the

California Legislature has appropriated $26.5 million for California counties to conduct outreach for the 2020 Census to

ensure that every resident is counted once, only once, and in the right place.

Serving as the State-designated Regional Census Data Center for San Diego since the late 1970s, the San Diego

Association of Governments (SANDAG) is actively supporting the Census Bureau and member agencies in preparing for

the 2020 Census. With a goal to achieve a complete count of all residents in the San Diego region, SANDAG will

coordinate local outreach efforts throughout the San Diego region and administer $1,565,350 in grant funding from the

state to support a grassroots approach to reaching communities least likely to self-respond to the 2020 Census

(i.e., complete the Census upon receiving an initial invitation). Historically, these “hard to count communities” have

primarily included, but are not limited to:

People without broadband internet access

Children under the age of 5

Individuals with limited English proficiency

There are four primary organizations actively working in the San Diego region to support and encourage a complete

count of every resident:

1. The U.S. Census Bureau conducts the count by administering the survey, following up door-to-door at residences

that do not self-respond, and deploying a media campaign to publicize the Census process that asks residents to

electronically submit their responses after receiving a postcard in the mail specifying a link and user ID.

2. The California Complete Count Office provides funding as appropriated by the State legislature for outreach.

Funding is allocated to local governments through SANDAG and to community-based organizations through the

United Way, as explained below.

3. SANDAG serves as the fiscal agent for funding from the State and coordinates outreach by the local governments.

4. The United Way (the Administrative Community-Based Organization, or ACBO) administers funding for grassroots

outreach by convening Count Me 2020, a coalition comprised of over 100 community-based organization and civic

groups (see Appendix A for a list of partners as of July 16, 2019).

This strategic plan is being developed to guide local government efforts to reach people in the San Diego region who are

least likely to respond to the 2020 Census. This document outlines specific strategies, tactics, and timeline(s) – and

describes the specific partnership(s) and how resources will be leveraged – to achieve the highest self-response rate on

the Census 2020 questionnaire. It involves close coordination with the Count Me 2020 coalition. While this plan focuses

on the efforts led by SANDAG with the local jurisdictions, the collaborative relationship between the ACBO and SANDAG

is viewed as a single effort. In addition, there continues to be close coordination with the California Complete Count

Office and the U.S. Census Bureau. More details will be provided through the Implementation Plan, which will be

completed by the end of September.

The plan includes an “air” and “on the ground” communications campaign involving trusted messengers1, which will

begin with an umbrella strategy to reach all residents, followed by an emphasis on hard to count populations.

The process will be guided by the SANDAG 2020 Census Complete Count (CCC) Stakeholder Working Group, providing

high level oversight of outreach to ensure that duplication is avoided, and any gaps are addressed. In addition, members

will encourage participation the 2020 Census, serving as ambassadors. Through regular meetings, they will provide input

1 Trusted messengers frequently work with and understand how to successfully engage community members. Trusted messengers are often

representatives from community-based organizations.

7

3

on the strategic and implementation plans, recommend approve for funding allocations, receive news and updates, and

monitor outreach progress. This working group will be supported by subcommittees to get the work done. All the work

will be completed in close collaboration with the ACBO. See Figures 1 and 2 for the organizational charts.

Goal: While the Census response rate in the San Diego region was 78 percent in 2000, it dropped to 72 percent in

2010. The goal of this outreach program is to combat this downward trend, surpass the 2010 rate, and reach the 2000

level or better.

1.2 Approach

The Statewide Outreach and Rapid Deployment (SwORD) mapping tool developed by the California Complete Count

Office was used to identify the areas and populations least likely to respond to the 2020 Census. The tool includes a hard

to count (HTC) index modeled on the U.S. Census Bureau’s hard to count score of past censuses and includes 14

demographic, housing and socioeconomic variables correlated with an area being difficult to enumerate (i.e., count). This

index helps to identify areas with high concentrations of the people who are least likely to respond to the Census. An

HTC index of 37 served as the minimum threshold for Census tracts or block groups requiring outreach. This level was

chosen because it is the average statewide.

The region’s 18 cities, along with the County of San Diego, (which are all SANDAG member agencies) have participated

in the creation of this strategic plan and have been invited to assist in implementing the outreach. The ACBO also has

supported strategic plan development to ensure alignment with the efforts of the Count Me 2020 Coalition.

Outreach will be deployed in three phases, consistent with the recommendations of the California Complete Count

Office and the U.S. Census Bureau: Educate, Motivate, and Activate. Specific details regarding activities in each phase by

will be coordinated through the SANDAG 2020 CCC Stakeholder Working Group and subcommittees. The lists below

reflect some of the possible activities the Working Group may choose to deploy. Much of the strategy can be completed

through existing resources within the local governments. Activities involving State funding are noted in italics and

summarized in Table 1. Additional information regarding the media strategy can be found in Appendix B.

Educate (October – December 2019): The public education phase will raise awareness that the 2020 Census is

happening and convey the importance of participating. Activities that may occur during this phase include the following.

Promote Census Job Openings

o Publicize available Census jobs to assist with the 2020 Census count (e.g., census takers or enumerators).

o Promote Census job openings through local workforce development agencies and community colleges. These

groups will be asked to identify viable candidates and provide application assistance.

Amplify Census Messaging

o Remind constituents why participation in the 2020 Census is important during presentations by elected officials,

as well as in newsletters and other communications.

o Include Census messages during community celebrations, festivals, and events (e.g., parades, fairs, festivals, and

other gatherings).

o Spread Census information through community centers (e.g., Boys and Girls Clubs, YMCA, churches, etc.),

community block grant recipients, community collaboratives, social service agencies, etc.

o Share Census messages in San Diego County Office of Education (SDCOE) channels, such as newsletters, social

media, and the SDCOE website.

o Targeted efforts by libraries among hard to count populations to encourage Census participation as part of their

regular operations.

o The County of San Diego is committed to promoting an accurate Census count and is considering the following

outreach strategies, especially among the hard to count communities of the unincorporated areas of the region.

8

4

Targeted messaging in existing County-controlled media channels such as publications, newsletters, social

media or other customer communications.

Encourage existing Live Well San Diego partners to engage in the Census effort.

Place signage in County offices, community centers, family resource centers, and animal shelters. The

budget includes funds to support the production of signage.

Provide Census information to County staff who interact with HTC populations in their regular duties.

o Partner with the San Diego Housing Commission and other trusted organizations to include signage about the

Census and messaging in regular communication channels. The budget includes funds to support the production

of signage.

o Solicit support from developers, the Housing Federation, and property owners to broadcast Census messages.

o Reach out to mobile home parks through mailings regularly sent to residents (e.g., when administrative fees are

due).

Teach Students About the Census

o Work with pre-schools, K-12, and colleges to incorporate “Statistics in Schools” curricula and send messages

home.

o Share the California Schools-based Communication Outreach Toolkit resources in multiple languages through

the 42 local school districts and the SDCOE.

o Provide training in San Diego County for history and social studies teachers through the SDCOE on the “Census

2020 Count Me In: Taking Informed Action Today” and “Census 2020 Count Me In: A Historical Perspective”

curricula for grades 5, 8, 11, and 12.

o Promote a window poster contest in the schools; ask local businesses to display posters. Incorporate these

activities into after school and park and recreation programs.

Educate staff

o Provide training on how to encourage participation in the 2020 Census, aligned with training provided through

the ACBO to ensure consistency.

o Promote ACBO trainings to reach as many organizations as possible.

Develop an ambassador program

o Solicit volunteers in the community that are passionate about having an accurate 2020 Census count, active in

their community and local organizations, and excited to engage others with information about the Census,

similar to the program in Virginia2.

o The budget includes funds to support the coordination of this program that will continue through the motivate

and activate phases.

2 commonwealth.virginia.gov/advisory-boards/virginia-complete-count-commission/ways-to-engage/

9

5

Motivate (January - February 2020): In early 2020, outreach will focus on motivating participation in the Census

overall and particularly in HTC communities and may include the following. These activities will be closely coordinated

with the ACBO to ensure cohesive messaging and avoid duplication.

Continue amplifying the message and teaching students about the Census, as described in the education phase.

Include alerts and reminders in public agency notices, mailers, inserts, utility and other bills, signage, newsletters,

website pages (including link to the Count Me 2020 website and the Census 2020 home page), social media3, etc.

This strategy is intended to reach all residents, including HTC populations.

Targeted efforts by libraries among HTC populations to encourage 2020 Census participation as part of their regular

operations.

Use postage meters to stamp Census messages on outgoing public agency mail.

Hold special events and town halls focusing on the 2020 Census. The budget includes funds to support these events

held exclusively for Census outreach, including incentives to increase attendance (e.g., refreshments, promotional

materials, activities for kids, items to create a fun and inviting atmosphere, etc.).

Hold events at affordable housing properties. The budget includes funds to support these events.

Activate (March – April 2020): As Census postcards are scheduled to arrive from the U.S. Census Bureau in

March 20204, the activation phase will focus on self-response. Similar to the motivation phase, these activities will be

closely coordinated with the ACBO and may include the following.

Hold ceremonial kick-off and media event to publicize the delivery of Census materials. The budget includes funds to

support these kick-off events (including incentives to increase attendance), which will be held in collaboration with

the Count Me 2020 Coalition.

Have a “Census Marathon” on public access stations or via social media channels (e.g., live Twitter chat on the

Count Me 2020 webpages) where people can call in or comment with questions about the Census and get help

filling out their form. The budget includes funds to support these events (including incentives to increase

participation), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition.

Connect youth groups with seniors to complete the Census.

Continue amplifying the message as described in the education phase.

Utilize existing public internet access points as questionnaire assistance kiosks at locations such as libraries,

affordable housing community centers, schools, community recreation centers/parks, senior centers, or other

community hubs. Auto launch these devices to the Census webpage for survey completion. The U.S. Census Bureau

will provide training to staff at these locations to provide assistance in filling out the Census.

Augment availability of internet access (e.g., at libraries, affordable housing community centers, schools, community

recreation centers/parks, senior centers, or other community hubs) by leasing additional devices dedicated to Census

completion in specific HTC locations. The budget includes funds to support equipment leasing.

Establish and staff questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks (including mobile) in areas where no public internet access

points are available and personal broadband internet access does not already exist (e.g., libraries, resource centers

available through schools, churches, senior centers, etc.). The budget includes funds to support equipment leasing.

Hold “Fill Out the Census” events at questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks, at schools using computer banks, and

using computer work rooms in affordable housing units, senior centers, LGBTQ centers, etc. The budget includes

funds to support these activities (including incentives to increase participation), which will be held in collaboration

with the Count Me 2020 Coalition.

3 Social media includes Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and NextDoor. 4 Consider timing of the primary election (March 3) when scheduling events and other outreach.

10

6

Publicize the Census Bureau’s toll-free Census Help Line for questionnaire assistance.

Coordinate with Count Me 2020 to establish a help desk system to answer Census-related questions, assist in

Census completion, and handle misinformation. One option under consideration is to develop a Memorandum of

Understanding between the United Way and 211 San Diego. The Partnership Specialist from the U.S. Census Bureau

would provide training to 211 staff. Another idea is to leverage the statewide contract with CommunityConnect

Labs for tools like the Help Desk, Misinformation Reporter, and Community Motivator.

Support phone banking and door-to-door outreach efforts by CBOs through an “Adopt a Block” program (similar to

the program in Los Angeles County). The budget includes funds to support these efforts.

Develop a Public-Private Partnership to provide mobile WiFi hot spots for outreach at community events or door-to-

door efforts, to facilitate Census participation outside of existing public internet access points.

Encourage local elected officials, influencers, and other prominent community members to share information about

the Census through social media, promoting participation.

Conduct a hyper-focused advertising campaign to reach people in HTC areas through outdoor and digital

advertising, and through advertising in print publications whose audiences include hard to count populations.

Conduct an earned media campaign (i.e., soliciting media coverage outside of a traditional advertising buy through

media events, press releases, etc.) to share details about how to participate in the Census.

Explore running videos about the Census on iTV, the SDCOE-operated television channel.

Non-Response Follow-Up (May – July 2020): The Activate Phase concludes with non-response follow-up, which may

include the following.

Inform law enforcement, emergency response and dispatch services, including 211 San Diego, about enumerators

(i.e., census takers) going door-to-door to follow-up on non-respondents so they can be prepared to handle calls

from the community that may arise during this time.

Hold press conferences with influential leaders to alert the community that the Census Bureau enumerators, or

Census takers, will visit homes of persons who have not responded. Key community stakeholders will be included to

provide linguistically appropriate messaging for HTC communities.

Show how enumerators, or Census takers, can be identified and encourage participation through agency and

department notices, mailers, inserts, utility and other bills, signage, newsletters, websites, and social media.

Assist Census Bureau staff in identifying tenant and homeowner representatives who can facilitate access to gated

and high security areas.

In areas where response rates remain low following the initial enumeration period:

o Collaborate with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to host events. The budget includes funds to support these

events (including incentives to increase participation), which will be held in collaboration with the Count Me

2020 Coalition.

o Redeploy previously acquired questionnaire assistance centers/kiosk resources to areas with low response rates if

not already in place.

11

7

Table 1: Resources for Potential Outreach Activities

Activity

Existing Public

Agency Budget

Resources

State Funding

Educate

Promote Census Job Openings X

Amplify Census Messaging X

Signage production X

Teach Students About Census X

Educate Staff X

Ambassador Program X

Motivate

Amplify Census Messaging X

Alerts/Reminders X

Targeted Outreach by Libraries X

Census message stamped on outgoing mail X

Special Events and Press Outreach X

Activate

Kick Off Event X

Census Marathon X

Amplify Census Messaging through Existing

Communication Channels

X

Existing Public Internet Access Points as Kiosks X

Lease Additional Devices for Libraries X

Establishing Kiosks in Areas with No Internet Access X

Fill Out the Census Events X

Help Desk X

Phone Banking/Door-to-Door Outreach X

Mobile WiFi hot spots through Public-Private Partnerships X

Participation Promotion by Community Influencers X

Targeted Advertising Campaign X

Earned Media Campaign X

Non-Response Follow-Up

Inform Emergency Response/Dispatch X

Press Conferences X

Encourage Participation X

Identify Tenant/Homeowner Representatives X

Host Events in Areas with Low Response Rates X

Move Kiosks to Areas with Low Response Rates X

12

8

1.3 Partnership Coordination

The outreach strategy will be guided by the 2020 Complete Count Census Stakeholder Working Group5 to avoid

duplication and ensure any gaps are addressed. The proposed structure is shown in Figure 1. One group will be

convened by SANDAG with representation from the jurisdictions, elected officials, business community, educators, health

and human services, and the media. The ACBO will convene another group that will focus on the community agencies

working directly with groups that can be hard to count. SANDAG and the ACBO will participate in both groups, as will

the US Census Bureau Partnership Specialists and the California Complete Count Office Regional Program Manager. The

red arrow at the top of Figure 1 signifies the close collaboration between the effort led by SANDAG and the one through

the ACBO.

Figure 1: 2020 Census Complete Count Stakeholder Working Group Organizational Chart

5 sandag.org/2020censuswg

13

9

Subcommittees will help to ensure that all stakeholders are represented, and all perspectives are incorporated. Potential

subcommittees are listed in Figure 2. SANDAG will take the lead by convening subcommittees related to outreach

through the region’s transportation agencies (i.e., MTS and NCTD), the existing SANDAG CBO group, Native Americans

and tribal governments, and hard to count communities in the unincorporated/rural area. The ACBO has active working

groups to: 1) support the execution of the strategic plan, including in Imperial County, 2) work alongside philanthropy to

identify additional funding sources to supplement the work, and 3) investigate opportunities to serve as the help desk

and information hub. Both organizations will have subcommittees (many of which could be joint working groups) that

focus on the strategic plan, implementation, media and events, language access, recruitment, assistance centers and

kiosks, non-response follow-up, and volunteers.

Figure 2: CCC Subcommittee Structure

14

10

1.4 Resources and Infrastructure

As required by the State, this section describes the use of the Statewide Outreach and Rapid Deployment (SwORD)

mapping portal and location of questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks.

SANDAG will be the primary designee to interface with SwORD. SANDAG will work with all partners to maintain

updated information in the system so that all outreach efforts are entered in SwORD in a timely manner. To facilitate this

process, all contracts for funding will require SwORD data entry.

Questionnaire Assistance Centers/Questionnaire Assistance Kiosks

In collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition led by the United Way and the jurisdictions, Questionnaire Assistance

Centers/Kiosks (QAC/QAK) will be established and managed throughout the San Diego region in HTC communities,

staffed with trained personnel who can guide people through survey completion in at least 12 languages, with options

for others depending on language prevalence in a given location (see Table 2). These locations will be in areas where

hard to count populations live, with particular attention to areas where there are no centers operated by the U.S. Census

Bureau. QAC/QAK locations will be publicized online, in printed material, and through the media campaign (e.g., social

media, press releases, etc.). The locations and details regarding events will be logged into SwORD for tracking purposes.

Through the strategic planning process, the cities and County have identified 48 libraries in block groups with an

HTC Index greater than 37 (Appendix A). All existing publicly accessible devices (e.g., computers or tablets) at each of

these libraries will automatically open the Census webpage for survey completion. Additional laptop stations equipped

with privacy screens are being considered for select locations to alleviate privacy concerns or where existing public access

devices are already in high demand.

In addition to libraries, the following institutions are being considered for QACs/QAKs: churches, recreation and

community centers, health clinics, multi-unit housing complexes, schools, etc. The goal is to locate QACs/QAKs in

community spaces where members of HTC communities congregate and feel safe. Any identified gaps will be filled

through mobile kiosks, mobile WiFi hot spots, or tablets with data connections, which also can be taken to events or

other outreach activities.

Staff at each QAC/QAK location will receive training on how to answer questions from residents, how to engage

residents, what information can be provided, and where to go for additional resources or support. QAC/QAK locations

also may host events where trained Census workers will be available to assist the public. Every effort will be made to

ensure that culturally and linguistically appropriate volunteers or staff are available.

1.5 Location of Hard to Count Populations

Strategic planning by local governments and stakeholders in the San Diego region has focused on identifying locations of

HTC communities. Using SwORD, SANDAG distributed data to each jurisdiction and the County describing the Census

block groups with an HTC index greater than 37 to inform their local plans. The data included the following:

The Census Bureau code for block groups (i.e., the smallest geographical unit used by the U.S. Census Bureau for

publishing data)

The description of the Census Bureau code for block groups

The city or Census Designated Place (CDP) - This field is blank when the block group does not reside in a city or CDP

Total population

The California Hard to Count Index

Top three reasons the block group is hard to count based on the 14 factors included in the California hard to count

index (i.e., demographic, housing, and socioeconomic variables correlated with an area being difficult to count)

Percent of total housing units that are vacant

Percent of total housing units with 3 or more units in a multi-unit structure

15

11

Percent of occupied housing units that are renter-occupied

Percent of occupied housing units with more than 1.5 persons per room

Percent of households that are non-family

Percent of adults (25 or older) who are not high-school graduates

Percent of persons who moved from outside county in past year

Percent of population under 5 years of age

Percent of households receiving public assistance income

Percent of population with income below 150 percent of poverty level

Percent of persons (ages 16 or older) unemployed

Percent of households in which no person age 14 years or older speaks English very well

Low Response Score (percentage)

2010 Mail Return Rate (percentage)

Percent African American

Percent American Indian/Alaskan Native

Percent Asian

Percent Hispanic

Percent Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

Percent White

Percent another race

Up to eight Community Anchor Institutions6 (name, address, and type of institution)

In addition, SANDAG created a public facing mapping tool (SANDAG SwORD) by adapting the statewide SwORD tool to

focus on San Diego and Imperial counties (Figure 3). SANDAG provided training sessions to jurisdictions, the ACBO, and

the Count Me 2020 Coalition that included guidance on using the tool and how to overlay predominant non-English

language information with the hard to count data. SANDAG SwORD tool will help local jurisdictions and community-

based organizations successfully conduct outreach focused in HTC areas. In addition, SANDAG has provided hard copy

maps from SwORD and data in spreadsheets for planning meetings. These SANDAG services will continue as planning

continues and plans are implemented.

6 Community anchor institutions include fire stations, health care facilities, police stations, libraries, and schools.

16

12

Figure 3: SANDAG SwORD

The goal is to create partnerships with leaders in the HTC communities who can act as trusted messengers that are

linguistically and culturally the same as the audience. As such, outreach and materials will be culturally and linguistically

appropriate for each HTC community (beyond simple translation). Outreach will be guided, but not limited, by the

following recommendations drawn from the Census Policy Advocacy Network (CPAN), a collaborative effort among

multiple statewide organizations in California to help shape policy concerning the 2020 Census.

Messaging

Use tested messages that have been shown to engage each community to participate in the 2020 Census.

Deliver messages through in-language trusted messengers.

Emphasize confidentiality and privacy procedures.

Emphasize the desirability of self-response.

Emphasize the safety of responding to enumerators (i.e., Census takers).

Emphasize the connection between Census participation and funding (e.g., special education, vocational

rehabilitation, community mental health services, disabled veteran outreach, and pro bono legal services).

Stress the importance of counting all household members regardless of age, including infants.

17

13

Outreach Strategies

Tailor strategies and tactics based on the different demographics within larger HTC populations (e.g., religion, sexual

identity, sexual orientation, housing status (renter, homeowner, homeless), U.S. born versus foreign born).

Translate materials into all relevant languages through coordination with the Count Me 2020 Coalition and

statewide efforts.

Provide information to faith-based organizations or religious leaders so they can encourage Census participation,

when appropriate.

Use a population-based strategy rather than geographic when the hard to count group is a dispersed community.

That is, focusing on the type of hard to count population rather than specific neighborhood.

Partner with community representatives and gatekeepers (e.g., through the Count Me 2020 Coalition), including

tribal governments, to ensure that messages are appropriate and reach the intended audience.

Publicize Census job opportunities in HTC communities.

Conduct events with necessary physical accommodations, assistive technology, and/or translation or interpretation to

meet the needs of people with disabilities.

Create a robust list of outdoor, service-based, and transitory locations that Census takers should visit to achieve a

complete count of the homeless population (e.g., soup kitchens, out of the way places people seek shelter).

Partner with trusted messengers for to provide advice and guidance to the U.S. Census Bureau regarding how to

achieve a complete count of the homeless population.

Media7

Broadcast messages through traditional media (print, broadcast, and radio), as well as social and digital, particularly

through media outlets that seek to serve specific ethnic groups.

Develop social media content to reach younger members of hard to count groups.

Develop an earned media strategy to ensure the Census 2020 message is delivered through trusted messengers,

including multi-lingual and media outlets that seek to serve specific ethnic groups.

Provide a toolkit to stakeholders with social media resources.

Questionnaire Assistance Centers/Kiosks

Locate questionnaire assistance centers/kiosks in trusted spaces (e.g., libraries, school computer labs, health clinics,

community-based organizations, health and human services organizations) within neighborhoods with HTC

populations.

1.6 Language Access Plan

In collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition led by the United Way, materials and messages will be translated and

culturally interpreted in the required 13 languages listed below (which is consistent with the ACBO’s strategic plan

previously submitted to the State in May 2019). This list is supported by data from the American Community Survey

(ACS) displayed in Table 2.

Spanish (paper surveys and field enumeration will be provided by the Census Bureau)*

Tagalog*

Filipino

Chinese*

7 Additional detail regarding the media strategy can be found in Appendix B.

18

14

Vietnamese*

Arabic*

Somali

Korean*

Farsi

Japanese*

Mandarin

Russian*

Chaldean Neo-Aramaic

*Internet self-response and questionnaire assistance provided by the Census Bureau.

Table 2: Limited English Proficient Population in the San Diego Region

Language Population

Spanish 266,778

Tagalog/Filipino 30,036

Chinese 24,021

Vietnamese 23,321

Arabic 10,007

Somali, Amharic or other Afro-Asiatic languages 8,861

Korean 7,867

Farsi/Persian, including Dari 6,757

Japanese 5,460

Russian 3,175

Source: 2017 ACS 5-year file, Table B16001

Efforts to meet language access will follow the lead of the Count Me 2020 Coalition and rely on their expertise and

trusted messengers as the following examples illustrate.

Coordinating with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to provide bilingual teams with interpreters and translated materials

at events where limited English proficiency populations are expected.

Holding primary language events, eliminating simultaneous translation, which reduces costs.

Enhancing as many events and activities of the jurisdictions with primary language speakers for the community in

which the event/activity is located.

Partnering with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to distribute information through trusted messengers that are

linguistically and culturally the same as the audience.

Staffing QACs/QAKs in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition to ensure appropriate language support.

Utilizing written language materials, visual materials, and automated announcements produced by the Count Me

2020 Coalition.

As noted in the ACBO’s strategic plan, the California Census Complete Count Office guidelines and requirements for

translation and interpretation services will be followed (i.e., as outlined in the Language and Communication Access

Plan), including accommodations for disabled persons. SANDAG will leverage previous translation efforts by the state and

Count Me 2020 Coalition where possible to avoid duplication of efforts.

1.7 Local Complete Count Committee (CCC)

The structure and organization of the CCC Stakeholder Working Group was previously described in section 1.3

Partnership Coordination.

19

15

1.8 Workforce Development

Three U.S. Census offices will operate in San Diego County with a capacity of up to 3,000 temporary workers. The

outreach plan includes assistance to the U.S. Census Bureau in hiring local Census enumerators (i.e., Census takers) and

other personnel to assist with the process of establishing trusted messengers for enumeration. Specifically, public

agencies, in collaboration with the Count Me 2020 Coalition, will share job announcements via social media, engage

residents in conversation, communicate with departments that assist with employment, post on the Count Me 2020

website, and follow through on requests by the Regional Program Manager.

1.9 Budget

Table 3 summarizes the plan of expenditures and the following descriptions provide more details for each line item.

Administrative Costs: SANDAG staff time required for oversight, coordination, and fiscal agent tasks.

Media: These funds will support media buys and contracting with marketing firm (to augment the statewide

outreach and public relations campaign).

Outreach: The following are examples of eligible expenses.

o Efforts by community-based organizations as requested by the local jurisdictions.

o Promotional materials including incentives to increase event attendance and remind people about the Census.

o Items to create a fun and inviting atmosphere (e.g., activities for kids).

o Equipment for Kiosks, which will be leased and coordinated across agencies to maximize efficiencies and

minimize costs.

o Non-Response Follow-Up events and outreach in areas with low response rates after April 1, 2020.

20

16

Table 3: Budget

Category Cost

Administrative Costs $156,535.00

Media $156,535.00

Outreach

Carlsbad $10,257.07

Chula Vista $89,162.11

Coronado $6,904.44

Del Mar $1,000.00

El Cajon $60,210.97

Encinitas $7,281.20

Escondido $73,397.78

Imperial Beach $20,882.07

La Mesa $31,854.41

Lemon Grove $3,877.55

National City $46,400.13

Oceanside $33,802.01

Poway $7,583.40

San Diego $647,137.16

San Marcos $29,221.95

Santee $1,000.00

Solana Beach $5,914.44

Vista $30,956.64

County-Unincorporated $145,436.66

Subtotal-Outreach $1,252,280.00

Total $1,565,350.00

Note: The allocation across categories is an estimate and may shift as outreach evolves and needs arise. For example,

jurisdictions can opt out of the funding or request a reduced amount.

When contracts are in place, the point of contact will be shared to facilitate coordination. In addition, local companies

will be asked to sponsor the effort to augment the budget for promotional materials.

The methodology for allocating funding to local jurisdictions is based on the hard to count population as follows.

Using the statewide average HTC index of 37, the population of each census tract with an HTC greater than 37 is

totaled for each jurisdiction.

The percentage HTC is based on this number divided by the total regional population.

For any jurisdiction without any census tracts meeting the threshold, $1,000 is set as the minimum allocation. For the

remainder, the percentage is applied to the total funding available (Table 3).

The allocation across categories is an estimate and may shift as outreach evolves and needs arise. For example,

jurisdictions can opt out of the funding or request a reduced amount. Payments will be based on deliverables rather than

reimbursements as shown in Table 4.

21

17

Table 4: Deliverables Schedule

Milestone Payment Amount Timeline

1. Implementation Plan 50% of Total Contract Amount Upon Contract Execution

2. First Progress Report 20% of Total Contract Amount Upon Contract Execution

3. Second Progress Report 20% of Total Contract Amount December 31, 2019

4. Third Progress Report 5% of Total Contract Amount March 31, 2020

5. Final Report 5% of Total Contract Amount September 1, 2020

22

18

1.10 Timeline

Activity Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

RPM Meetings

Form CCC

CCC meetings

Submit Strategic Plan

Subcommittee meetings

Contracts for outreach

Determine QAC/QAK locations

Quarterly Written Report

Implementation Plan

Outreach: Education Phase

Outreach: Motivation Phase

Be Counted California Events

April 1, 2020: National Day of

Action

Outreach: Activation Phase

Non-Response Follow-Up Plan

Outreach: Non-Response Follow-Up

Final Report

Close Out/Thank You

2019 2020

23

19

1.11 Measuring Results

Information regarding outreach activities will be collected throughout the 2020 Census Complete Count effort. Specific

metrics to define success of the advertising effort and local outreach efforts will be determined by subcommittees,

further identified in the Implementation Plan, and reflected in contracts with jurisdictions.

As activities are planned and implemented, they will be reported by jurisdictions and recorded in SwORD, including all

the data elements specified in the online tool as follows.

Reporter Details: Reporter name, organization name, parent organization

Activity Details: Activity type, start and end date and time, location, description, number of staff/volunteers

Collaboration: Primary organizer, additional organizers

Impressions (i.e., the number of times a message is seen or heard):

o Portion of Impressions specific to HTC audiences

o Portion of Impressions in each language

Feedback and Documentation: Website activity, Facebook link, YouTube/Video link, venue rating, participate

engagement rating, interaction quality rating, overall effectiveness, what went well, what could be improved,

audience questions/concerns

Funding Sources and Volunteer Hours

To gauge effectiveness, SANDAG staff and the 2020 CCC Stakeholder Working Group and its related subcommittees will

track all related activities against commitments made in this strategic plan, the implementation plan, and individual

outreach plans developed by the various participating agencies.

24

20

Appendix A: Count Me 2020 Coalition Partners as of July 16, 2019

ACCE Institute

211 San Diego

ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties

African Coalition Workforce

Alianza Comunitaria

Alliance for African Assistance

Alliance for Community Engagement

Alliance San Diego

American Friends Service Committee

Asian Pacific Islander Initiative

Asian Solidarity Collective

Bayside Community Center

Black American Political Association of California

Brawley Get Together Senior Citizen Club

Brown Bag Coalition

Building Skills Partnership

CA State Assembly

CA State Assembly 76th District, Tasha Boerner

Horvath

CA State Assembly 79th District, Shirley Weber

CA State Assembly 80th District, Lorena Gonzalez

CA State Senate

CA State Senate 39th District, Toni Atkins

Cal Organize

Calexico Neighborhood House

California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. (CRLA)

California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC)

California State University San Marcos

Campesinos Unidos

Casa Familiar

Center for Community Integration San Diego

Center for Social Advocacy (CSA)

Center for Social Advocates San Diego

Center on Policy Initiatives

Central Labor Council (AFL-CIO)

Central San Diego Black Chamber of Commerce

Chula Vista Community Collaborative

City Heights Community Development

Corporation

City of Carlsbad

City of Chula Vista

City of Escondido

City of Oceanside

City of San Diego

City of San Marcos

City of Vista

Comité Cívico del Valle

Community Housing Works

Council of Philippine American Organizations

(COPAO)

County of Imperial

County of San Diego – HHSA

Digital Impact And Inc.

Disability Rights San Diego

Employee Rights Center

Engage San Diego

Environmental Health Coalition

Farmworker CARE Coalition

Feeding San Diego

Fern Street Community Arts

Filipino Press

Friends of El Centro Community Services

Foundation

Gov House

Hanana Community Center

Health Education Advocacy Leadership, Inc.

Home Start

Home Start, Inc.

Horn of Africa

House of China

Huda Community Center

Imperial Valley Food Bank

Imperial Valley LGBT Resource Center

Include People

Interfaith Community Services

International Rescue Committee

Islamic Center of SD

IWJSD

J. Walcher

JOB

Justice Overcoming Boundaries

Karama

Karen Organization of San Diego

Kitchens for Good

25

21

Korean American Coalition - San Diego

La Maestra Community Health Centers

Lao Community Cultural Center

Latinos y Latinas en Accion

League of Women Voters of North County

League of Women Voters, San Diego

License to Freedom

Logan Heights Community Development

Corporation

MAAC

Mabuhay Foundation

Majdal Community Center

Mano a Mano Foundation

Mas Pace

MEChA organizations

Mid-City CAN

Migrant Education Region IX

MiraCosta College

Muslim American Society-San Diego

NALEO Educational Fund

National Latino Research Center, CSUSM

Naval Support Services

Neighborhood House Association

New Neighbor Relief

Nile Sisters Development Initiative

North County Health Services

North County Lifeline

Nunez Law Corporation

Open Heart Leaders

Operation Samahan

Our Roots

Palomar College

Partnership for the Advancement of New

Americans (PANA)

Paving Great Futures

Pillars of the Community

Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest

Poder Popular para la Salud del Pueblo

Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians

RISE San Diego

San Diego Alliance for Asian Pacific Islander

San Diego Association of Governments

San Diego Council on Literacy

San Diego County Library Branches in North

County

San Diego Grantmakers

San Diego Hunger Coalition

San Diego Organizing Project (SDOP)

San Diego Urban Warriors Inc.

San Diego Youth Services

San Pascual Band of Mission Indians

SEIU 221

Social Advocates for Youth (SAY) San Diego

Somali Bantu Association of America

Somali Bantu Association of America (SBAOA)

Somali Bantu Community of San Diego

Somali Family Service of San Diego

Somali Family Services

South Sudanese Community Center

Spread The Love Charity IV

St. Vincent de Paul Village, Inc. (dba Father Joe's

Villages)

Survivors of Torture, International

Swift Solutions Consulting

The California Endowment

The Chicano Federation of San Diego County

The Filipino School

The Global Action Research Center

The San Diego Foundation

The San Diego LGBT Community Center

The San Diego LGBT Community Center (The

Center)

Think Dignity

U.S. Census Bureau

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris

Union of Pan Asian Communities (UPAC)

United Missionary Churches/Connecting Hope

United Taxi Workers of San Diego (UTWSD)

United Way of Imperial County

United Way of San Diego

United Women of East Africa

United Women of East Africa Support Team

Universidad Popular

University of California, San Diego

Urban League of San Diego County

UURISE

Viet Vot

Vision Y Compromiso

Vista Community Clinic

Vista Neighbors in Action

Woman Haven

Women Give

YMCA of San Diego County, Childcare Resource

Service

Youth Will

26

22

Appendix B:

Media Strategy

A media subcommittee will be formed, led by the Count Me 2020 Coalition and SANDAG, to coordinate development of

a robust earned and paid media campaign. Messaging will emphasize the importance of the Census and confidentiality

to assure people that it is safe to participate. Message and brand consistency will help improve recall rates, encourage

participation, and maximize the value of advertising investment. To measure the impact of media strategies, specific

goals/targets will be established (e.g., number of impressions, click-thru rates on digital advertising, and website analytics

such as page views).

The budget includes funds for SANDAG to contract with a marketing firm in conjunction with the Count Me 2020

Coalition to develop the branding, messaging, and outreach campaign, including message testing for HTC populations

(to augment the statewide outreach and public relations campaign).

The public information and public affairs officers from each jurisdiction will be asked to participate on the media

subcommittee to facilitate amplification of messages through local government channels. For example, messages from

the U.S. Census Bureau, the California Complete Count Office, and the Count Me 2020 Coalition will be broadcast

through city communication channels (e.g., newsletters, events, website pages, signage, social media, email blasts, etc.).

In addition, representatives from the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD), the

two local transit agencies, will be included in the CCC Stakeholder Working Group to coordinate publicity on transit

vehicles and through their newsletters and social media.

Messaging to people using streaming services is being researched. Telecommunications companies may be approached

for public service announcements, as well as mobile applications and radio outlets. Since the Major League Baseball

season begins simultaneously with the Census, the San Diego Padres may similarly be approached for public service

announcements (e.g., create a video of the Padres’ mascot completing a Census survey).

Stories from local residents may be collected for media spots. For example, a young man was interviewed on

April 1, 2019 as part of the 2020 Census Call to Action, and shared that his parents did not participate in 2010 and

indicated his commitment to outreach so his community is counted.

The regional effort will leverage and coordinate with the statewide media campaign and may include the following.

Public service announcements, airport marketing, and highway communications.

Media buys (March through June 2020):

o Outdoor: Gas pump toppers, bus placards, bus wraps, bus shelter/bench ads, billboards, etc. in HTC communities

o Print: Local ethnic media outlets specializing in HTC populations

o Digital: Geo-targeted, social media, pre-roll video

o Radio: Peak hour traffic announcements and segments

Census 2020 messages shown along with other advertisements that precede movies (in theaters within hard to

count areas in multiple languages).

Produce Census educational/motivational videos (using U.S. Census Bureau videos, material from the California

Census Office, and locally produced spots) shown on social media, digital advertising, public access television, and in

waiting areas in health care facilities, employment centers, and other areas that people spend time waiting.

Giveaways at events in HTC neighborhoods. Careful consideration will be made in choosing the specific giveaways to

ensure that they resonate with the intended audience.

27

23

Promotional materials: Signs/posters and fliers in different languages8. The budget includes funds to cover the costs

of producing promotional materials.

Messaging to reach transit specific users (e.g., Flex services, ADA paratransit, etc.).

Earned media:

o Community leaders will be invited to serve as spokespeople to appear on radio/TV talk shows to discuss subjects

such as confidentiality and the benefits of the Census to individuals and their communities.

o Local sports and entertainment personalities appearances on radio/TV stations and social media urging quick

response.

o Press releases and media events to share information about major Census 2020 milestones and activities.

All messages will meet the following requirements:

Immediately relevant

Consistent

Simple language

Pictures used to convey information whenever possible

Clear messaging (i.e., clear call to action and individual next steps)

Personal touch included

Proper translation, culturally relevant, and accommodates disabilities

Cognizant and appropriate for individuals with disabilities

Mandatory response stated

8 Translations will be vetted with organizations serving specific communities to ensure that they are culturally relevant.

28

Item: 6


Approval of Contract Awards

Overview

Pursuant to direction from the Board of Directors, construction awards valued at $5 million or more require Board approval.

Key Considerations

In May 2019, SANDAG advertised an invitation for bids (IFB) to seek qualified firms to provide on-call general civil services that consist primarily of, but not limited to, general civil and site improvements, earthwork, utilities, paving, concrete, drainage, building facilities, landscaping mitigation, site clearing and all required incidental professional and technical services for SANDAG and its member agencies, Caltrans, Metropolitan Transit System, and North County Transit District at locations throughout San Diego County.

Four bids were received, and staff proposes to award PUB Construction, Inc., the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, an agreement for Job Order Contract – General Civil Construction with a maximum capacity of $6 million. Considerations in developing the independent cost estimate of needed capacity include historical use of contractors to provide these services and staff knowledge of future needs to support the job order construction needs of the agency.

In April 2019, SANDAG issued an IFB to seek qualified contractors that could construct the North Park Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeway Project. As required by SANDAG Board Policy No. 024: Procurement and Contracting – Construction as well as federal provisions, an independent cost estimate resulting in $15,186,026.49 was prepared by SANDAG for the project. The project consists of constructing bikeways in the City of San Diego along Landis Street between Alabama Street and Chamoune Avenue, as well as Georgia Street between Robinson Avenue and Howard Avenue. The scope of the work includes buffered bike lanes, neighborhood traffic circles, raised crosswalks, signal modification, Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant ramps, curb extensions, road lumps, and other traffic calming measures linked to signage and striping. Two bids were received as a result of the IFB. SANDAG staff proposes to award West Coast General Group, a Joint Venture, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, a construction agreement for the project in the amount of $16,489,746.66. The award amount is within ten percent of the estimate and sufficient budget exists in the project budget.

Next Steps

Upon approval by the Board of Directors, agreements will be sent to the contractors for signature.


Key Staff Contact: Julie Wiley, (619) 699-6966, [email protected]

Action: Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to authorize the Executive Director to execute contract awards for Job Order Contract – General Civil Construction, and the North Park/Mid-City: Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeways project.

Fiscal Impact:

Funding for the proposed construction awards is included in the FY 2020 Program Budget through Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1223082; Overall Work Program Elements Nos. 1210030, 3312100, 1201507, 1200201; Bike Program Capital Improvement Program projects; and other projects as needed.


The Job Order Contract agreement will provide construction services from 2019 through 2022. The Landis and Georgia-Meade Bikeways project will take approximately 550 working days to complete.

Item: 7


Policy Advisory Committee Actions, Including California Environmental Quality Act Exemption

Overview

Board Policy No. 001: Allocation of Responsibilities, delegates certain responsibilities to the Policy Advisory Committees to allow SANDAG to effectively address key public policy and funding responsibilities. All items delegated to the Policy Advisory Committees are subject to Board ratification.

Below are the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees subject to ratification.

Executive Committee: July 12, 2019

Approved the submission of the Mobility as a Service Proof of Concept for Mobility Hubs project to the Federal Highway Administration Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Grant Program.

Approved the Board Business agenda for July 26, 2019, meeting, and canceled the August 9, 2019, Board Policy meeting.

Approved an amendment to Overall Work Program Element No. 3101500 (Airport Connectivity Planning), returning $380,000 to the SANDAG Contingency reserve.

Transportation Committee: July 19, 2019

Approved the California Environmental Quality Act exemption for the Orange Bikeway.


Key Staff Contact: Tessa Lero, (619) 595-5629, [email protected]

Action: Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to ratify the delegated actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees, including California Environmental Quality Act exemption for the Orange Bikeway project.

Item: 8


Proposed Amendments to SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code

Overview

Every two years, or as needed, staff reviews the SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code to determine if updates are needed.

Key Considerations

The proposed amendments to the Code shown in Attachment 1 reflect updates to existing job titles and the addition of new positions to the list of designated positions. These are consistent with the adopted FY 2020 Program Budget.

The Board of Directors last approved changes to the Conflict of Interest Code in March 2018.

Next Steps

The proposed amendments will implement updates to the list of designated employee and consultant positions subject to filing annual economic disclosure statements.


Key Staff Contact: John Kirk, General Counsel, (619) 699-1997, [email protected] Attachment: 1. SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code with Proposed Amendments

Fiscal Impact:

None


None

Action: Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve proposed amendments to the SANDAG Conflict of Interest Code.

Attachment 1

2

Conflict of Interest Code

The Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., requires SANDAG to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard model Conflict of Interest Code, which can be incorporated by reference, and which may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act after public notice and hearings. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission along with the attached Appendices in which officials, consultants and employees are designated and disclosure categories are set forth, are hereby incorporated by reference and constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of SANDAG.

The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees, consultants, or officials. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests. Designated persons shall file statements of economic interests with SANDAG when assuming or leaving their position and annually while holding the position. SANDAG will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Gov. Code Section 81008). Statements for all designated employees will be retained by SANDAG and provided to the Code Reviewing Body, the County of San Diego.

3

Appendix A Table 1

Designated Positions Disclosure Categories

(see Appendix B)

Members, and alternates, and advisory members of the Board of Directors 1, 2, 4

Members, and alternates, and advisory members of the Policy Advisory Committees 1, 2, 4

Members, and alternates, and advisory members of committees or working groups making decisions influencing expenditure of public funds

1, 2, 4

Account Executive (I, II, Associate) 3, 4

Accountant (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Administrative Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Administrative Office Specialist 3, 4

Borders Program Manager 3, 4

Business Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Business Services ManagerManager of Business Administration and Operations 2, 4

Business Services Supervisor 2, 4

Capital Development Project Analyst 1, 3, 4

Capital Development Project Manager 1, 3, 4

Chief Deputy Executive Director 1, 2, 4

Chief Economist 2, 4

Clerk of the Board 1, 2, 4

Communications Manager 3, 4

Contracts and Procurement Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 1, 2, 4

Counsel (Legal I, II; Associate Legal; Senior Legal; Deputy General; Special; General) 1, 2, 4

Creative Services Manager 3, 4

Customer Service Manager 3, 4

Customer Service Supervisor 3, 4

Department Director 1, 2, 4

Division Director 1, 2, 4

Document Processing Specialist III 3, 4

Economic Research Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

4


(see Appendix B)

Engineer (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 3, 4

Executive Assistant (I, II, Senior)/Clerk of the Board 1, 2, 4

Executive Director 1, 2, 4

Facilities/Maintenance Coordinator 3, 4

Finance Manager 1, 2, 4

Financial Analyst (I, II, Associate) 3, 4

Financial Programming Manager 1, 2, 4

GIS Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Goods Movement Policy Manager 1, 3, 4

Government Relations Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Human Resources Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Independent Performance Auditor 1, 2, 4

Information Systems Manager 3, 4

Information Systems Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Information Systems Specialist (I, II, III) 3, 4

Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 3, 4

Maintenance and Facilities Supervisor 3, 4

Maintenance Field Technician (Senior) 3, 4

Management Internal Auditor (Senior, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Manager of Business Administration and Operations 2, 4

Manager of Contracts and Procurement 1, 2, 4

Manager of Financial Programming and Project Control 1, 2, 4

Manager of Human Resources 3, 4

Manager of Software Development SolutionsRegional Information Services 3, 4

Manager of Transportation Analysis and ModelingRegional Models 3, 4

Manager of Small Business Development 2, 4

Marketing Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Office Administrator 3, 4

5


(see Appendix B)

Office Services Specialist (II, III) 3, 4

Operations Manager 3, 4

Paralegal 1, 2, 4

Principal Technology Program Manager 3, 4

Senior Budget Program Analyst 2, 4

Senior Financial Programming and Project Control Analyst 1, 2, 4

Special Project Director

Strategic Advisor (Executive, Principal) 1, 2, 4

Programmer Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Project Control Manager 1, 2, 4

Project Coordinator 3, 4

Project Development Program Manager 1, 2, 4

Public Communications Officer (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Regional Planner (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 1, 3, 4

Research Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Researcher and Modeler (I, II, Associate, Senior, Principal) 3, 4

Senior Budget Program Analyst 2, 4

Senior Financial Programming and Project Control Analyst 1, 2, 4

Special Project Director 1, 2, 4

Senior Risk Program Analyst 3, 4

Roadway Operations Manager 3, 4

Systems Engineer (I, II, Associate Senior) 3, 4

Technology Program Analyst (I, II, Associate, Senior) 3, 4

Toll Operations Supervisor 3, 4

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 82019, SANDAG consultants who pursuant to a contract with SANDAG, perform the same functions that would otherwise be performed by the persons designated in Table 1 of this document; who manage public investments; who grant agency approval to a contract or to the specifications for such a contract; or who decide whether the policies, standards, or guidelines for SANDAG have been met, also are required to fill out and submit a disclosure of financial interests. Those consultants are required to report in accordance with the disclosure categories shown in

6

Table 2. Consultants will be designated and informed of their obligation to file disclosures whenever any person who, in the opinion of SANDAG, may reasonably be expected to make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his/her position as a “consultant” to influence a governmental decision in which the person might reasonably be expected to have a financial interest or perform services that entail the making or participation in the making of decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest.

7

Table 2

Type of Consultant Designated Position Title Disclosure Categories

(see Appendix B)

Bond Counsel Consultant 2, 4

Disclosure Counsel Consultant 2, 4

Lobbying Consultant 1, 2, 4

Project Oversight Consultant 1, 2, 4

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Advisor Consultant 2, 4

Labor Compliance Advisor Consultant 2, 4

Financial Management Advisor Consultant 1, 2, 4

Auditor Consultant 1, 2, 4

8

Public Officials Who Manage Public Investments

The following positions also are listed below because the individuals holding these positions must file under Government Code Section 87200 as they are involved in the investment of public funds. These positions are listed here for informational purposes only:

Table 3

Public Official Description

Members and alternate members of the Board of Directors

Members and alternate members of the Policy Advisory Committees

Members and alternate members of committees or working groups making decisions influencing expenditure of public funds

Executive Director

Chief Deputy Executive Director

Director of Finance

General Counsel

Financial Management Consultant, Project Managers

9

Appendix B

When a designated person is required to disclose investment and sources of income, he or she need to disclose investments in business entities and sources of income that do business in SANDAG’s jurisdiction, plan to do business in the jurisdiction, or have done business in the jurisdiction in the past two years. In addition to other activities, a business entity is doing business within the jurisdiction if it owns real property within the jurisdiction. Persons designated in Appendix A shall disclose their financial interests pursuant to the appropriate disclosure categories described in the table below.

Table 4

Disclosure Category

Description

1 Interests in real property located within the jurisdiction or within two miles of the boundaries of the jurisdiction or within two miles of any land owned or used by SANDAG.

2 Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, or equipment of the type utilized by SANDAG.

3

Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, or equipment of the type utilized by the department or division to which the filer is assigned duties.

4 Investments and business positions in business entities, and income, including loans, gifts,* and travel payments, from sources that have filed a claim against SANDAG in the previous two years, or have a claim pending.

* Gifts with a value of less than $50 aggregate per year are not reportable financial interests at SANDAG

Amended January 2010

Amended March 2012

Amended December 2013

Amended March 2015

Amended January 2016

Amended September 2016

Amended March 2018

Amended

Item: 9


Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendments: Caltrans Planning Grants

Overview

In spring 2019, Caltrans announced the award of five planning grants to SANDAG totaling $1,625,502. These grants were approved by the Board of Directors as FY 2020 Pending Discretionary Grants. Acceptance of the awards requires amendments to the FY 2020 Program Budget and Overall Work Program (OWP) for the grant amounts and required matching funds.

Key Considerations

Table 1 below lists the work element number, the title of each awarded project, the award amount, and local match requirement.

Table 1

Work Element Number

Project Title Amount Awarded

Local / In-kind Match

Total Project Cost

2302400 Update of SANDAG’s Cross Border Travel Model Component of the Activity Based Model

$200,000 $118,753 $318,753

3101501 San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study 458,102 59,352 517,454

3102400 Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept of Operations: I-805 Direct Access Ramps

302,400 75,600 378,000

3201800 Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and Transportation Resilience Strategies

440,000 57,007 497,007

3401100 State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study $225,000 $29,151 $254,151

Total $1,625,502 $339,863 $1,965,365

Fiscal Impact:

Adds approximately $1.6 million in grant funds to the FY 2020 Program Budget.


Amendments must be submitted to Caltrans no later than November 1, 2019, to begin grant work.

Action: Approve

The Executive Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the proposed amendments to the FY 2020 Program Budget, accepting $1,625,502 in Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant funding.

2

Next Steps

Pending approval, staff will coordinate with Caltrans District 11 to amend the FY 2020 Program Budget and the OWP Agreement to accept the funds. Planning work will commence in FY 2020 and be completed by FY 2022.

Charles “Muggs” Stoll, Director of Land Use and Transportation Planning

Key Staff Contact: April Petonak, (619) 699-7322, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Update of Cross Border Travel Model Component of the Activity Based Model – New Work Element No. 2302400

2. San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study – New Work Element No. 3101501 3. Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept of Operations: I-805 Direct Access

Ramps – New Work Element No. 3102400 4. Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and Transportations Resilience Strategies –

New Work Element No. 3201800 5. State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study – New Work Element

No. 3401100

WORK ELEMENT: 2302400 NEW-Update of SANDAG’s Cross Border Travel Mode Component of the Activity Based Model

FY 2020 BUDGET: $116,753

AREA OF EMPHASIS: Modeling and Research

Amendment Title: Update of SANDAG's Cross Border Model

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 Total

SB1 Sustainable Communities Grant

$0 $106,763 $93,237 $200,000

TDA Planning/Administration $0 $9,990 $108,763 $118,753

TOTAL $0 $116,753 $202,000 $318,753

Funds Application

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $48,753 $70,000 $118,753

Contracted Services $0 $68,000 $132,000 $200,000

TOTAL $0 $116,753 $202,000 $318,753

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work element is to update SANDAG's Cross Border Model using a 2020 Cross Border Survey to ensure regional planning processes can rely on quantitative analysis tools adequate for border policy, investment, and travel behavioral challenges. The updated Cross Border Model will be a key component of SANDAG's third generation of Activity-Based Model (ABM3), designed for applications in the San Diego Forward: The 2025 Regional Plan. Emphasis in FY 2020 will be on developing scope of work, model structural design, survey data processing, and software implementation.

PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS

This is a new work element funded by the Caltrans Planning Grant. SANDAG has an existing Cross Border Model developed from a 2010 cross border survey. In FY 2020 OWP 2301100, a new cross border travel behavior survey is included, which will be used to update the Cross Border Model.

JUSTIFICATION SANDAG is required by state and federal law to maintain a transportation modeling system that addresses regional planning needs. One of the unique travel demand markets in San Diego are Mexican residents who cross the U.S-Mexican border and make trips in San Diego. Modeling travel behaviors and evaluating Mexican residents' travel demand impact on San Diego's transportation systems is critical for border investment, operation, and environmental decision-making process, one of SANDAG's core functions.

3

Attachment 1

Project Manager: Wu Sun

Committee(s): Transportation Committee

Working Group(s): None

PRODUCTS, TASKS, AND SCHEDULES FOR FY2020

Task No.

% of Effort

Task Description / Product / Schedule

1 20 Task Description:

Develop Scope of Work & Select Consultant

Product: Scope of work

Completion Date:

4/1/2020


Propose a Model Design Structure

Product: Memo of model design structure

Completion Date:

5/1/2020


Project Management

Product: Weekly project team meetings

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Cross border survey data processing and cleaning.

Product: Processed survey data.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Software update from Java-Based CT-RAMP to Python-Based ActivitySim

Product: Updated software

Completion Date:

6/30/2020

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

Continue work to develop, implement, calibrate, and validate the updated Cross Border Model, including updating model software from a Java-Based CT-RAMP platform to a Python-Based ActivitySim Platform. Additionally, a series of sensitivity and scenario tests will be performed to test the suitableness of the updated Cross Border Model in border decision-making process.

Note: This is a new work element funded by the Caltrans Planning Grant. This project is to update SANDAG's existing Cross Border Model from a 2010 cross border survey to a 2020 cross border survey. The updated Cross Border Model will be a key component of SANDAG's third generation of Activity-Based Model (ABM3), designed for applications in the San Diego Forward: The 2025 Regional Plan.

4

WORK ELEMENT: 3101501 NEW-San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study

FY 2020 BUDGET: $517,454

AREA OF EMPHASIS: Sustainable Development: Planning and Funding Strategies

Amendment Title: Caltrans Strategic Partnerships Grant - San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study

Prior FY 2020 Total

FTA 5304 Strategic Partnerships Transit $0 $458,102 $458,102

TDA Planning/Administration $0 $59,352 $59,352

TOTAL $0 $517,454 $517,454

Prior FY 2020 Total

Salaries, Benefits, Indirect $0 $59,601 $59,601

Contracted Services $0 $457,853 $457,853

TOTAL $0 $517,454 $517,454

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the San Diego Airport Transit Corridor Study will create a regional, long-term transit vision for the two critical transportation corridors that service the San Diego International Airport (SDIA); Harbor Drive and Pacific Highway; through the lens of comprehensive multi-modal corridor plans. Utilizing project recommendations from SANDAG's newly formed Airport Steering Committee coupled with CTC-approved corridor planning guidelines, this study will actively engage regional stakeholders, including the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, Port of San Diego, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, MTS, and Coastal Commission, to identify a shared vision and implementation strategy for transit projects to SDIA that will compete competitively for various federal, state, and local discretionary funds.


SANDAG and its partner agencies have completed numerous planning studies which were analyzed and discussed at various inter-agency team meetings as well as several Airport Steering Committee meetings. Additionally, SANDAG submitted a Request for Information to the Department of the Navy for information related to further development of the NAVWAR site to include transportation projects to the SDIA. Additionally, SANDAG released a RFI for Airport Connectivity Concepts and the proposals were analyzed by an expert review panel for consideration into further planning. Several land use concepts have been presented, sites narrowed for further study, and now modeling work has begun to inform staff and the Airport Steering Committee on identifying a shared vision and implementation strategy.

JUSTIFICATION With direction from the SANDAG Board of Directors and its newly formed Airport Steering Committee, SANDAG has committed to be the lead agency for the collaborative effort between the Port of San Diego, the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the City of San Diego, the two transit operators, as well as other stakeholders to continue its work assessing and evaluating concepts for further planning and design.

Attachment 2

5

Project Manager: Jennifer Williamson

Committee(s): None

Working Group(s): Airport Connectivity Subcommittee


Task No.

% of Effort



Working Group Prioritization

Product: SANDAG and Working Group staff will develop a summary of key findings.

Completion Date:

1/31/2020

2 3 Task Description: Project Management

Product: SANDAG will work to complete a task order for consultant assistance on airport transit corridor study and report quarterly on efforts.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Public Participation and Outreach

Product: Staff with develop a working group charter, create public involvement and outreach materials in addition to hosting and managing all stakeholder meetings.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Airport Corridor Study

Product: A feasibility study will be conducted and will include a prioritized list of projects. Siting, ROW needs, alignments, and priority measures will be conducted and modeled. The projects will then be moved into 30% design for public review and stakeholder use. Lastly, an analysis of capital and operating costs will be conducted.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Collaborative Funding to Facilitate Airport Ground Access

Product: A case studies white paper will be developed consisting of recommendations and a matrix of cost-sharing alternatives to be considered.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Draft and Final Report

Product: A draft report will be completed for review and then a final report submitted. SANDAG will then present the final report.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020

6

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

The main goal of this study is to develop airport transit corridor plans that will prioritize and identify implementation strategies for the region’s preferred SDIA transit projects. A critical component to this study will be the collaborative funding strategies analysis, preferred financial strategy, and multi-agency partnership agreements that will determine how partner agencies will fund any necessary project initiation documents and ultimately program the preferred transit projects.

Note: SANDAG was awarded a Caltrans Strategic Partnership Grant in the amount of $458,102 for FY 2020.

7

WORK ELEMENT: 3102400 NEW-Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study and Concept of Operations: I-805 Direct Access Ramp

FY 2020 BUDGET: $57,350


Amendment Title: Amendment to Accept Grant Funds

Funds Source

Prior FY 2020 FY 2021 - 2022 Total

FHWA Strategic Partnership for Sustainable Transportation

$0 $45,880 $256,520 $302,400


TOTAL $0 $57,350 $320,650 $378,000

Funds Application




TOTAL $0 $57,350 $320,650 $378,000

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the project is to develop a feasibility study and concept of operations to assess the operational and financial viability of implementing congestion pricing on the two existing Interstate 805 (I-805) Direct Access Ramps (DARs). The proposed study will also evaluate how Active Transportation and Demand Management (ATDM) strategies can be applied to the DARs to optimize the overall efficiency of the transportation system and will evaluate possible project delivery methods.


This is a new OWP Element. JUSTIFICATION This project will help examine the implementation of congestion pricing as part of the I-805 Express Lanes project, which is an integral part of the San Diego region's plan to deploy a system of interconnected managed lanes that can effectively meet the changing and diverse needs of travelers along the corridor. The study supports SANDAG's on-going effort and collaboration with state, regional, and local entities, as well as with transit operators, to improve tolling operations and promote ATDM strategies to maximize the efficiency to the existing transportation system.

8

Attachment 3

Project Manager: Alex Estrella

Committee(s): Transportation Committee

Working Group(s): None


Task No.

% of Effort



Project Initiation and Project Administration and Management

Product: Grant kick-off meeting, executed consultant contracts, quarterly reports.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Assess Existing Conditions and Operational Performance

Product: Inventory of Existing and Planned Transportation Infrastructure and Operational Analysis and Findings.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

This is a multi-year project and future activities include the identification and assessment of ATDM and congestion pricing concepts, completion of a sketch level tolling revenue assessment and financial plan, and completion of a congestion pricing implementation plan for the I-805 DARs.

9

WORK ELEMENT: 3201800 NEW-Holistic Implementation of Adaptation and Transportation Resilience Strategies

FY 2020 BUDGET: $119,996


Amendment Title: NEW-Holistic Implementation of Adaptation & Transportation Resilience Strategies

Funds Source


Public Transportation Account - Adaptation Planning Grant

$0 $115,027 $324,973 $440,000


TOTAL $0 $119,996 $339,011 $459,007

In-kind Match $0 $9,934 $28,066 $38,000

Total Project Cost $497,007

Note: In-kind match of $38,000 will be provided by San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative

Funds Application




Pass Through to Other Agencies

$0 $95,000 $200,000 $295,000

TOTAL $0 $119,996 $339,011 $459,007

In-kind Match $0 $9,934 $28,066 $38,000


OBJECTIVE

The objective of this grant-funded work element is to support SANDAG member agencies that are transitioning from planning to implementation of their climate planning work. In addition, this work element will help jurisdictions identify synergies among existing local, regional, and state mitigation, transportation, and adaptation policies, plans, and projects to maximize co-benefits and investment efficiencies. The major project deliverables include: (1) a methodology to help local jurisdictions prioritize adaptation strategies (Comprehensive Prioritization Tool);(2) a regional economic guidance document; (3) a guidance document for integrating equity into adaptation andtransportation resilience planning; and, (4) an adaptation implementation toolkit that incorporates previously-funded Senate Bill 1 grants to help jurisdictions build capacity to implement strategies that will provide theircommunities the most co-benefits.

Emphasis in FY 2020 will be on consultant procurement, beginning preparation of the regional economic guidance document, performing a review of existing equity indicators and local and regional climate and transportation planning documents, and beginning development of an engagement strategy to involve new partners and stakeholders.

Attachment 4

10


This new work element would leverage results from related SANDAG initiatives. With previously awarded SB 1 funding, SANDAG is currently developing a Regional Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Guidance Document and a Regional Adaptation Needs Assessment. In addition, the SANDAG Roadmap Program has provided technical assistance and regional guidance to local jurisdictions for the development, implementation, and monitoring of Climate Action Plans. This project will leverage these previous and current adaptation and mitigation efforts to support member agencies in prioritizing implementation of adaptation strategies that link mitigation, adaptation, and broader community benefits. JUSTIFICATION The San Diego region has made strides in achieving climate change mitigation goals through local Climate Action Plans (CAPs), with 18 of the region’s 19 jurisdictions either developing, updating, or adopting CAPs that focus on climate mitigation. However, planning for climate change adaptation in the region is still relatively nascent, and is often conducted in a silo separate from more advanced climate action planning. There are numerous opportunities to leverage existing CAP efforts to rapidly advance our local and regional capacity to adapt to and prepare for climate impacts that affect our regional transportation infrastructure and communities, while simultaneously addressing mitigation priorities. However, jurisdictions need tools and guidance on how to holistically implement local climate strategies before large investments are made without full consideration of synergies among transportation, mitigation, and adaptation efforts. This project will build on SANDAG’s previous SB 1-funded adaptation work and Roadmap Program activities to provide member agencies with tangible guidance on how to prioritize identified climate risks and adaptation needs.

Project Manager: Anna Lowe

Committee(s): Regional Planning Committee

Working Group(s): Regional Energy Working Group, Regional Planning Technical Working Group, Environmental Mitigation Program Working Group


Task No.

% of Effort



Project management, administration, and coordination.

Product: Prepare meeting materials and notes invoice packages and quarterly reports and develop case studies.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Develop economic guidance document for climate planning and transportation professionals.

Product: Summary of existing local and regional climate and transportation planning documents; draft regional economic guidance document.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Integration of equity into climate and transportation planning and implementation.

Product: Assessment of equity indicators in climate and transportation planning and implementation documents.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020

11


Develop a Comprehensive Prioritization Tool to support moving from planning to implementation.

Product: Begin development of the Comprehensive Prioritization Tool.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Develop, implement and track an engagement strategy to involve new partners, specifically equity and community organizations as well as new regional and statewide audiences.

Product: Develop engagement strategy; track engagement.

Completion Date:

6/30/2020

FUTURE ACTIVITIES Future activities include development of a methodology for prioritizing adaptation and transportation resilience strategies (Comprehensive Prioritization Tool); development of a regional economic guidance document; development of a guidance document for integrating equity into adaptation and transportation resilience planning; development of an adaptation implementation toolkit; and, related trainings, and outreach and engagement.

12

WORK ELEMENT: 3401100 NEW-State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study

FY 2020 BUDGET: $53,708


Amendment Title: State Route 94 Multiuse Pathway Feasibility Study

Funds Source


State Highway Account - Sustainable Communities

$0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000

TOTAL $0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000

In-kind Match $0 $6,958 $22,193 $29,151


Note: In-kind match of $29,151 will be provided by Jamul Indian Village of California.

Funds Application




TOTAL $0 $53,708 $171,292 $225,000

In-kind Match $0 $6,958 $22,193 $29,151


OBJECTIVE

The objective of this grant-funded work element is to study alternatives for a multi-use path along SR 94 between Jamacha Road/Campo Road and the Jamul Indian Village (Jamul). Through this study, Jamul Indian Village plans to address a missing active transportation link by looking at multi-use path alternatives to increase access to key community destinations and improve safety for residents, employees, and tribal members. This study will include the involvement of stakeholders and members of historically disadvantaged rural communities along the corridor. The study will complete a multi-use pathway concept plan, planning-level cost estimates, and a feasibility analysis. The core project team will include Caltrans, the County of San Diego, Grossmont Union High School District, and SANDAG with Jamul as a lead. Emphasis in FY 2020 will include procurement of the consulting services and development of existing conditions.

13

Attachment 5


This project was identified by the Jamul Indian Village of California and local stakeholders through the Intraregional Tribal Transportation Strategy (ITTS). It builds upon previous community engagement efforts made by the ITTS and the County Trails Master Plan. JUSTIFICATION The 2018 Intraregional Tribal Transportation Strategy (ITTS) identified SR 94 as a major commuter facility that provides access into and out of the Jamul Indian Village (Jamul). As a result of community input, SR 94 has been identified as a corridor that should provide increased mobility options. SR 94 serves as the only access to and from the reservation, which is one of the largest employment centers within the project area. With the newly completed gaming facility, there is an increase in vehicles along SR 94 due to visitors and employees coming to the site. However, the only existing method to and from the reservation is by driving or taking transit. To provide mobility options for employees and tribal members of the reservation. The study will address a missing active transportation link for the entire community as there are no existing bike or pedestrian facilities along SR 94 today.

Project Manager: Tracy Ferchaw

Committee(s): Transportation Committee, Borders Committee

Working Group(s): Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues


Task No.

% of Effort



Project Management:

Product: Consultant task order, PM meeting agenda and summaries, Project Development Team (PDT) notes, monthly invoices, and quarterly progress reports

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Existing Conditions Analysis

Product: Existing Plan Review, Collision Analysis, Opportunities and Constraints Map

Completion Date:

6/30/2020


Concept Development

Product: Alternative Alignments (up to 5), Intersection Designs, Cost Analysis, and Funding Opportunities

Completion Date: 6/30/2020


Stakeholder Engagement

Product: Open House and Workshop Events (up to 4) and Stakeholder Interviews (up to 4)

Completion Date: 6/30/2020

14

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

The study will ultimately result in a preferred alternative alignment and concept for the multi-use path along SR 94 that will improve access to key community resources for students, employees, tribal members, and residents. After the selection of a preferred alignment, the study will create an action plan that identifies steps to move towards project implementation. As funding sources are identified, steps to work towards project implementation include on-going coordination with project stakeholders, preliminary engineering to develop 30% plans, right-of-way considerations, environmental permits, and development of final design plans.

Note: The purpose of this amendment is to create an OWP to accept a Sustainable Communities Caltrans grant. SANDAG will be the Grantee with Jamul Indian Village of California as Sub-Recipient.

15

Item: 10


FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit

Overview

Board Policy No. 039: Audit Policy Advisory Committee and Audit Activities, authorizes the Audit Committee to recommend to the Board of Directors which firm to contract with to conduct the annual financial statement audit. To keep the FY 2018 interim audit on schedule, however, a procurement to select an audit firm was necessary prior to the formation of the Audit Committee. This procurement resulted in the execution of a five-year on-call contract with the independent audit firm Crowe LLP. The auditor has completed the FY 2018 audit and has commenced work on the FY 2019 audit.

Key Considerations

The Crowe LLP five-year on-call contract provides the Board of Directors the option to either continue with Crowe LLP each fiscal year or issue a new task order for auditing services. The standard timing for Audit Committee review and Board approval would be approximately one year prior to fiscal year end to account for the option of a new procurement. For the FY 2019 audit, that decision would have been in early FY 2019, around the time the auditor was completing the interim phase of the FY 2018 financial and compliance audit. To keep the FY 2019 interim audit on schedule, the agreement for year two was executed in May 2019.

Annual review and approvals have been scheduled in all future May meetings to provide the opportunity for the Audit Committee and Board to review options and make a decision in accordance with Board Policy No. 039.

At its July 12, 2019, meeting, the Audit Committee reviewed options for the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit and recommended the Board of Directors continue with Crowe LLP for the FY 2020 audit.

Next Steps

Crowe LLP is scheduled to present the Statement on Auditing Standards 114, which is a required communication, to the Audit Committee at its August 9, 2019, meeting.


Key Staff Contact: Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The Crowe LLP agreement annual cost was negotiated at the time of procurement. The $227,920 annual cost is funded from federal, state, TransNet, toll, member assessment, and other revenues.


With approval, the FY 2020 audit will commence May 2020.

Action: Approve

The Audit Committee recommends that the Board of Directors exercise the option under the existing agreement with Crowe LLP to conduct the FY 2020 SANDAG Financial and Compliance Audit.

Item: 11


iCommute Rideshare Week

Overview

The SANDAG iCommute program will promote Rideshare Week September 30 – October 4, 2019. The purpose of Rideshare Week is to encourage the use of transportation alternatives to driving alone.

Key Considerations

Rideshare Week is a nationally recognized annual event held in October to promote transportation alternatives to driving alone, including carpool, vanpool, and transit. SANDAG will promote ridesharing to employers and commuters during this week to increase awareness and participation in iCommute programs and services. Rideshare Week coincides with Free Ride Day, hosted by the Metropolitan Transit System and North County Transit District in conjunction with California Clean Air Day, on October 2, 2019.

Next Steps

Member agencies are asked to issue their own proclamation for Rideshare Week 2019 modeled after Attachment 1 to promote Rideshare Week within their own jurisdictions.

Employers will be invited to register to participate in Rideshare Week activities and receive promotional resources and recognition. Commuters across the region will be invited to participate in commuter-related promotions.


Key Staff Contact: Jay Faught, (619) 619-7324, [email protected]

Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2020-05, Rideshare 2019 Proclamation

Fiscal Impact:

Rideshare Week activities were approved in the FY 2020 budget.


Rideshare Week promotions and events take place between September 30 and October 4, 2019.

Action: Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-05 in support of Rideshare Week September 30 – October 4, 2019.

Attachment 1

2

401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 sandag.org

Resolution No. 2020-05

Rideshare Week 2019 Proclamation

WHEREAS, reducing traffic congestion and providing alternatives to driving alone are key components of the region’s quality of life; and

WHEREAS, Rideshare Week 2019 is a national event to promote alternative commute choices including carpool, vanpool, and transit; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG is committed to increasing awareness of sustainable transportation choices for the region’s commuters and employers; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG is encouraging employers to register to participate, and commuters to share the ride; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED that SANDAG hereby proclaims September 30 – October 4, 2019, as Rideshare Week, and encourages employers and commuters throughout the region to share the ride during this week and throughout the year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary

Member Agencies: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County of San Diego.

Advisory Members: California Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit System, North County Transit District, Imperial County, U.S. Department of Defense, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego County Water Authority, Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, and Mexico.

Item: 12


Requested Time Extensions: TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program Climate Action Plan Requirement

Overview

In October 2018, the Board of Directors awarded $2.5 million to the City of Lemon Grove in TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) funds for its Connect Main Street project and $306,999 to the City of Santee in TransNet Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP) funds for its Prospect Avenue and Mesa Road Improvements project. The SGIP and ATGP grants require that a Climate Action Plan (CAP) be adopted by the jurisdiction within one year of the Board of Directors’ approval of the grant. Failure to do so could result in funding being awarded to the next eligible project(s) in ranked order.

Due to various constraints, the City of Santee and the City of Lemon Grove are unable to complete their CAPs by the one-year deadline and are at risk of losing funding for their SGIP and ATGP projects.

Key Considerations

In December 2017, the Board of Directors approved the requirement that a local jurisdiction must have an adopted CAP to be eligible to receive SGIP and ATGP funding. The intention of the CAP requirement in the SGIP and ATGP call for projects is based on commitments made in San Diego Forward: The 2015 Regional Plan to implement climate action planning in the San Diego region.

In May 2018, the City of Lemon Grove completed the Broadway Downtown Village Specific Expansion which was funded with a prior SGIP planning grant. The prior project identified needed improvements that support new planned land uses that will revitalize downtown Lemon Grove. Funding for the Connect Main Street project, which is the current SGIP project subject to the CAP adoption requirement, will implement the improvements identified in the Downtown Village Specific Plan by providing for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly, and transit-oriented neighborhoods. These elements further the goals of the SGIP grant program.

The City of Santee’s Prospect Avenue and Mesa Road ATGP project will modify a downtown intersection and improve visibility, reduce pedestrian crossing distance, add a bicycle connection, and improve safety at an existing school crossing.

Fiscal Impact:

If the time extension is approved by the Board of Directors, the City of Lemon Grove would remain eligible to receive its $2.5 million Smart Growth Incentive Program award for the Connect Main Street project and the City of Santee would be eligible to receive its $303,999 Active Transportation Grant Program award.


The City of Santee will complete its Climate Action Plan by September 2019. The City of Lemon Grove is committed to completing its Climate Action Plan by April 2020.

Action: Approve

The Board of Directors is asked to approve a six-month time extension for the City of Lemon Grove and City of Santee to complete their Climate Action Plan requirements under the TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program and TransNet Active Transportation Program, respectively.

2

To maintain eligibility for the two projects’ funding, the City of Lemon Grove and the City of Santee have requested a six-month extension to complete and adopt their Climate Action Plans. Attachments 1 and 2 details the City of Lemon Grove’s and the City of Santee’s climate action planning efforts to date as well as milestones achieved.

Next Steps

If approved, work by the City of Santee and the City of Lemon Grove on their CAP efforts will be monitored and a grant agreement for their projects would be executed upon approval of the CAP.

If the extensions are not approved, the City of Santee and the City of Lemon Grove will not be eligible to receive funding for their projects. The $2.5 million awarded to the City of Lemon Grove would be allocated to the two partially-awarded SGIP projects that received a lower ranking (projects highlighted in Pink in Attachment 3). The $306,999 awarded to the City of Santee would be allocated to a partially funded ATGP project (SD Streamview Drive, highlighted in Pink in Attachment 4).


Key Staff Contact: Tracy Ferchaw, (619) 699-1977, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Letter from the City of Lemon Grove 2. Letter from the City of Santee 3. Smart Growth Incentive Program Capital Grants – Final Project Rankings and

Funding Recommendations – October 2018 4. Active Transportation Grant Program Capital Grants – Final Project Rankings and

Funding Recommendations

, ..

CITY OF LEMON GROVE "Best Climate On Earth"

Community Development Department

Tracy Ferchaw

SANDAG

401 B Street, Suite 800

San Diego, CA 92101

July 9, 2019

Dear Ms. Ferchaw,

The City of Lemon Grove (City) is currently participating in SANDAG's Energy Roadmap Program to develop

a Climate Action Plan (Plan). The Plan is required for the City to be eligible to receive a $2.5 million grant

from the Trans Net Smart Growth Incentive Program (SGIP) for the City's Connect Main Street project. The

SGIP grant eligibility requires that a Plan must be adopted within one year of the SANDAG Board of

Director's approval or by October 26, 2019. The City would like to request a six-month extension to

complete the Plan and allow time for City staff to present the final Plan to the City Council.

Previous efforts undertaken to maintain the project schedule.

The City has completed initial data collection to quantify emissions and responded to questions related

to City procedures. In conjunction with this data collection, City staff conducted multiple meetings with

SAN DAG staff and their consultants to develop preliminary measure scenarios and provide feedback. The

City has also initiated work on a public outreach plan to inform the development of the draft Plan.

Detailed explanation on the reason for the delay, and how it was unavoidable.

During the second half of 2018, the City experienced personnel issues that resulted in insufficient time

allocation to data collection and project management. The unforeseen lack of City resources resulted in

delays that prevented the Plan from moving forward.

Demonstrate the ability to succeed in the timeframe proposed.

On June 5, 2019 a new Community Development Manager began service with the City. The new

Community Development Manager will be responsible for completing the Plan. The requested six-month

extension will allow the Community Development Manager to finalize the Plan and present the final Plan

to the City Council by April, 2020. With additional resources in place, the City is committed to completing

the Plan according to the proposed schedule and to completing improvements associated the Connect

Main Street SGIP grant according to the approved schedule. The City acknowledges that failure to do so

could result in a loss of SGIP grant funding for the Connect Main Street project.

Community Development Manager

Community Development Department

City of Lemon Grove

Attachment 1

3

MAYOR John W. Minto

------- �•f-<7'""

""'1"\��-" ..... CITY OF SANTEE

CITY COUNCIL Ronn Hall

Stephen Houlahan

Laura Koval

Rob McNelis

July 17, 2019

Tracy Ferchaw SANDAG 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101

Dear Ms. Ferchaw,

The City of Santee is currently developing a Climate Action Plan (CAP). The Plan is required

for the City to be eligible to receive a $306,999.00 grant from the TransNet Active

Transportation Grant Program (ATGP). The ATGP grant Eligibility requires that a Plan must be

adopted within one year of the SAN DAG Board of Director's approval or by July 27, 2019. The

City would like to request a six-month extension to complete the Plan and allow time for City

staff to present the final Plan to the City Council.

Previous efforts undertaken to maintain the project schedule.

The City of Santee has developed a climate action plan, entitled "Sustainable Santee Plan."

This plan is designed to help Santee achieve State-targets on greenhouse gas ("GHG")

emission reductions. An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared in accordance with

the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Sustainable Santee Plan and the EIR

were made available for public and agency review and comment for 45 days. Staff is currently

responding to comments and preparing for a City Council Hearing on the EIR and the

Sustainable Santee Plan in August 2019.

A detailed explanation on the reason for delay, and how it was unavoidable.

The City Council public hearing to request adoption of the Sustainable Santee Plan was delayed

by the ever-changing regulatory framework for GHG reductions in California. In September

2018, then-Governor Brown signed Executive Order EO B-55-18 which established a State

wide policy of achieving carbon-neutrality by 2045. There was uncertainty on whether or how to

incorporate this goal into the essentially completed Sustainable Santee Plan.

Another unavoidable delay was that the plan required more public outreach and education than

was originally anticipated. Several stakeholder groups requested changes to the plan. City staff

has met with the Climate Action Campaign on several occasions to negotiate the final draft of

the Sustainable Santee Plan.

10601 Magnolia Avenue • Santee, California 92071 • (619) 258-4100 • www.cityofsanteeca.gov

�t Printed on recycled paper

Attachment 2

4

Santee Grant Extension Request July 17, 2019 Page 2 of 2

Demonstrate the ability to succeed in the timeframe proposed.

The project to develop and adopt a climate action plan required ten (10) steps. Most of the work

on this project has been completed. The City of Santee has completed seven of the below ten

steps, with steps 8 through 10 remaining:

1. Developed the Sustainable Santee Plan2. Published the Notice of Preparation in accordance with CEQA3. Held a Scoping Meeting in accordance with CEQA4. Refined the plan based on public input5. Developed the EIR6. Published a Notice of Availability for the Sustainable Santee Plan and EIR. The plan and

EIR were available for agency and public review and comment from March 15, 2019 toApril 29, 2019

7. The City received nine (9) comment letters on the Plan and EIR8. Complete responses to public and agency comments on the plan and the EIR9. Complete final plan and final EIR10. Conduct public hearing, certify the EIR and adopt the Sustainable Santee Plan no later

than August 28, 2019

With the additional time, staff intends to place the Sustainable Santee Plan and EIR on the City

Council Agenda no later than August 28, 2019.

We appreciate the San Diego Association of Government's consideration in this matter.

Respe8

1�

i:.:QQ, lanie Kush, AICP

Development Services Director

cc: Carl Schmitz, Principal Engineer File

5

20,800,000$ 632,909$ 850,000$

22,282,909$

1 National City Roosevelt Ave SG Revit. Plan Yes Yes 17 1 625,000$ 2,080,000$ 2,080,000$ 2,080,000$ 20,202,909$ 2 Vista Paseo Santa Fe Phase 3 Yes Yes 18 2 6,370,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 4,580,000$ 17,702,909$ 3 San Diego DT Mobility Cycle Way P1&2 Yes Yes 21 3 2,100,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 7,080,000$ 15,202,909$ 4 El Cajon El Cajon Transit Ctr. Connections Underway Underway 22 4 301,200$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 9,580,000$ 12,702,909$ 5 El Cajon Main St-Green St Gateway Underway Underway 26 5 1,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 12,080,000$ 10,202,909$ 6 Lemon Grove Connect Main St Phase 1&2 Underway Underway 33 6 1,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 14,580,000$ 7,702,909$ 7 Chula Vista TASIP Phase 3 Yes Yes 41 7 2,200,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 17,080,000$ 5,202,909$ 8 San Diego DT Wayfinding-Cycle Network Yes Yes 50 8 180,000$ 220,000$ 220,000$ 17,300,000$ 4,982,909$ 9 National City Highland Ave Mob. Mini-Hubs Yes Yes 51 9 1,000$ 1,863,665$ 1,863,665$ 19,163,665$ 3,119,244$

10 (tie) National City Sweetwater Protected BW Yes Yes 52 10 278,906$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 19,800,000$ 2,482,909$ 10 (tie) San Diego East Village Green Park Yes Yes 52 10 2,100,000$ 2,500,000$ 1,039,748$ 20,839,748$ 1,443,161$ 1,460,252$ 10 (tie) Escondido Grand Ave CS 1 (Rd Diet,SW,Env) Yes Yes 52 10 0$ 2,500,000$ 1,443,161$ 22,282,909$ 0$ 1,056,839$

13 National City 8th St Transit Ctr. Mobility Hub Yes Yes 56 13 1,000$ 2,175,945$ 0$ 24,458,854$ (2,175,945)$ 14 National City National City Wayfinding Yes Yes 60 14 1,000$ 1,376,948$ 0$ 25,835,802$ (3,552,893)$ 15 Escondido Grand Ave CS 2 (RDBT & Ped X) Yes Yes 66 15 300,000$ 2,500,000$ 0$ 28,335,802$ (6,052,893)$ 16 La Mesa DT Village Streetscape Phase 2 Yes Yes 71 16 309,870$ 2,065,800$ 0$ 30,401,602$ (8,118,693)$ 17 La Mesa Grossmont Center Dr Bridge Yes Yes 80 17 2,483,267$ 2,085,900$ 0$ 32,487,502$ (10,204,593)$ 18 Santee SD River Trail-Town Center Underway Yes 86 18 0$ 2,460,525$ 0$ 34,948,027$ (12,665,118)$

Recommended for full fundingRecommended for partial funding 19,800,000$ Recommended for no funding 2,482,909$

22,282,909$ 0$

3. The City of National City has declined funding of its Highland Avenue Mobility Mini-Hub application. This project is crossed out in red.

Total SGIP Capital Grant Funds Awarded:SGIP Capital Grants- Partially Funded:

SGIP Capital Grants- Fully Funded: Summary

*Rollover from SGIP Planning includes unspent funds of $292,909 and an additional $165,000 from St. Joseph's Park and $175,000 from Valley Center, totaling $632,909.

Notes:

Unspent Capital Funds (Rollover to SGIP Planning):

1. The SANDAG Board of Directors deemed the City of San Diego FRED Fleet Expansion project as ineligible on July 27, 2018. This project is not shown on the table.2. The City of Chula Vista requested the withdrawal of its F Street Promenade Phase 1 application. This project is not shown on the table.

Jurisdictions must have an adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) and an adopted Complete Streets (CS) Policy to receive grant funding. Jurisdictions that have not yet adopted these documents have up to one year from the Board's action on the final funding awards to adopt them before funding is transferred to the next highest-ranked project .

Smart Growth Incentive Program Capital Grants - Final Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations - October 2018

Final Rank

Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project Name

Additional Match Req. to Accept Partial

Funding

Sum of

Ranks

Complete Streets Policy (CS)?

Climate Action Plan

(CAP)?

SGIP Capital

Match Fund Amount

Remaining Funding

New Total Available:Rollover from CAP & CS:

Rollover from SGIP Planning*:Initial Total Available:

Requested Funding

Recommended Project Funding

Cumulative Funds Allocated

Final Rank

6

Attachment 3

2,700,000$

1,620,000$ 84,000$

0$ 1,704,000$

2 1 La Mesa LM University Ave Ped Bike Yes Yes 6 1 466,000$ 502,000$ 502,000$ 502,000$ 1,202,000$ 6 2 Solana Beach SB Lomas Santa Fe Active Trans. Yes Yes 12 2 68,450$ 616,050$ 616,050$ 1,118,050$ 585,950$ 5 3 San Diego SD Streamview Dr Yes Yes 19 3 200,000$ 1,500,000$ 585,950$ 2,618,050$ (914,050)$ 1 4 Del Mar Del Mar Streetscape Yes Yes 25 4 1,735,000$ 665,000$ 0$ 3,283,050$ (1,579,050)$ 3 5 National City National City Bicycle Wayfinding Yes Yes 28 5 1,000$ 826,800$ 0$ 4,109,850$ (2,405,850)$ 4 6 San Diego SD CH Ped. Improvements Yes Yes 36 6 1,000,000$ 1,200,000$ 0$ 5,309,850$ (3,605,850)$

1,080,000$ 56,000$

0$ 1,136,000$

17 1 National City National City Division St Yes Yes 6 1 100,000$ 312,000$ 312,000$ 312,000$ 824,000$ 18 2 National City National City Blvd Bike Conn. Yes Yes 12 2 1,000$ 394,001$ 394,001$ 706,001$ 429,999$ 16 3 La Mesa La Mesa Mass. Ave Yes Yes 19 3 39,000$ 123,000$ 123,000$ 829,001$ 306,999$ 19 4 Santee Santee Prospect Ave Underway Yes 23 4 174,120$ 348,760$ 306,999$ 1,177,761$ (41,761)$

Recommended for full fundingRecommended for partial fundingRecommended for no funding 1,118,050$

585,950$ 829,001$ 306,999$

2,840,000$ 0$

Final Rank

Remaining Funding

Project ID

Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project NameSum of Ranks

Final Rank

Requested Funding

Cumulative Funds Requested

CAP?Recommended Project Funding

Match Fund Amount

ATGP Large Category Grants ‐ Fully Funded:Summary

Jurisdictions must have an adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) and an adopted Complete Streets (CS) Policy to receive grant funding. Jurisdictions that have not yet adopted these documents have up to one year from the Board's action on the final funding awards to adopt them before funding is transferred to the next highest‐ranked project.

Final Rank

Requested Funding

Cumulative Funds Requested

CAP?

ATGP Capital ‐ Small Category

Sum of Ranks

Remaining Funding

Project ID

Jurisdiction Abbreviated Project NameFinal Rank

Match Fund Amount

Unspent Funds (Rollover to ATGP Non‐Capital):Total ATGP Capital Grant Funds Awarded:

ATGP Small Category Grants ‐ Partially Funded:ATGP Small Category Grants ‐ Fully Funded:

ATGP Large Category Grants ‐ Partially Funded:

Project Rankings and Funding Recommendations

CS Policy?

CS Policy?

Rollover from Large Category:Rollover from ATGP Non‐Capital (40%):

Initial Total Available (40% of ATGP Capital):

Recommended Project Funding

New Total Available:

Active Transportation Grant Program (ATGP) Capital ($2.7 million available, 75% of ATGP)Overall ATGP Capital Funding Available:

ATGP Capital ‐ Large CategoryNew Total Available:

Rollover from Small Category:Rollover from ATGP Non‐Capital (60%):

Initial Total Available (60% of ATGP Capital):

Attachment 4

7

Item: 13


Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project

Overview

In 2017, the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), North County Transit District (NCTD), Caltrans, and SANDAG entered into an Inter-Agency Fiber Optic Cable Sharing Agreement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to share spare fiber capacity. Spare capacity in the fiber optic cables is being used to expand each agency’s information network, and to create network redundancy. These partnerships allow agencies to save taxpayers’ dollars through strand exchange instead of installing costly new infrastructure.

Key Considerations

To utilize the spare capacity, gaps between existing cables must be closed. Since the MOU was executed, many of the gaps in the fiber optic network have been or are being closed as part of existing projects. However, gaps remain in both Escondido and Oceanside.

The Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project will close these two gaps. Attachment 1 shows the completed fiber optic network.

The cost of closing the gaps is estimated at $520,000. The transfer of $430,000 from SANDAG toll revenues and acceptance of $90,000 from NCTD`s positive train control (PTC) network project will fund the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project (Attachment 2). When the fiber optic redundant ring is complete, the South Bay Expressway Operation Center will connect to tolling systems throughout the San Diego region, improving toll road management and reliability of network connections. In addition, the fiber optic redundant ring will provide a secondary communications path for the Positive Train Control system and increase network reliability. MTS is planning to contribute $100,000 in this fiscal year, increasing the total project budget to $620,000. Concurrently, Caltrans is developing a project to establish connections to the Otay Mesa Transit Center and State Route 11 as its contribution to regional connectivity.

Next Steps

Project completion will enable a high-speed redundant information network for all four agencies. Highway, Managed Lanes, railroad, and bus Rapid transit control centers will have the capability to view and communicate without interruption through various surveillance methods to improve the safety and reliability

Action: Approve


1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project (CIP project No. 1131500) to establish the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project;

2. transfer $430,000 of SANDAG toll revenues to CIP Project No. 1131500; and

3. accept $90,000 from the North County Transit District to fund CIP Project No. 1131500.

Fiscal Impact:

The $430,000 of SANDAG tolling revenues will be taken from reserves and will not impact operations or the delivery of other projects.


Construction of the Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure project is expected to begin in late 2019 and be completed within one year.

2

of all systems. This project also will establish a reliable high-speed high bandwidth information network infrastructure to support future transportation applications on the technological horizon.


Key Staff Contacts: Dinara Ussenova, (619) 699-7339, [email protected] Chip Finch, (619) 595-5617, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Project Map: Fiber Optic Communication Network Expansion through Partnerships 2. Proposed Budget Amendment for Capital Improvement Program Project

No. 1131500, Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure

LemonGrove

San Diego RegionMap Area

LEGEND

Caltrans Fiber Caltrans Fiber (Future)NCTD FiberMTS FiberSANDAG Tolling Fiber (Future)Media 3

Caltrans Hub

Caltrans InterfaceCabinet

Map Not To Scale

Fiber Optic Communication Network Expansion Through Partnerships

4892 4/19

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

MTS ORANGE LINE

MTS GREENLINE

NC

TD CO

ASTER FIBER

NCTD SPRINTER FIBER

CALTRANSI-15 FASTRAK TOLL LANES144 STRAND FIBER

MTS SOUTH BAY BRT

MEDIA 3 COMMUNICATION FIBER

905

805

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

1

2-D

2

1-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

67

52 8

125

56

54125

Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

San Marcos

Chula Vista

Tijuana, B.C.

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

SanDiego

ESCONDIDO GAP CLOSUREOCEANSIDE GAP

CLOSURE

Attachment 1

3

Project Number: Corridor Director: Chip Finch

RTIP Number: N/A Project Manager: Dinara Ussenova

Project Name: Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closures PM Phone Number: (619) 699-7339

Draft Environmental Document N/A

Final Environmental Document N/A

Ready to Advertise Aug-19

Begin Construction Oct-19

Open to Public Oct-20

Construction Complete Jan-21

SANDAG Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years

Administration $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Support 0 0 35,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000

Construction Capital 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000

Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Communications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Project Contingency 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000

Total SANDAG $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

CALTRANS Expenditure Plan ($000)

Prior Years

Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Caltrans $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total Proposed SANDAG & Caltrans $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

TransNet Pass-Through $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Caltrans RE Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Funding Plan ($000)

Funding Source Prior Years

Local

91060000 NCTD $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000

93140001 SR 125 Toll Revenues $0 $0 $210,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000

$0 $0 $210,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000

Total $0 $0 $510,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520,000

92140001 I-15 FasTrak® Revenues

FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23

The Fiber Optic Information Network Gap Closure Project will close

the remaining gaps in Escondido and Oceanside. When completed,

the fiber optic ring will extend from Downtown San Diego to

Oceanside over to Escondido and back to Downtown San Diego.

New Project

FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24

1131500

Project Scope Site Location Progress to Date

Project Limits Major Milestones

Escondido (I-15 & West Washington) and Oceanside Transit Centers

FY 24

FY 24

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTALFY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23

Attachment 2

4

Item: 14


Proposed FY 2020 Program Budget Amendment: El Portal Undercrossing

Overview

The City of Encinitas is completing the design of the El Portal Undercrossing Project (Project) for the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor and has asked SANDAG to manage the construction phase of the Project. The Project will provide a direct connection to the Coastal Rail Trail, a Class I facility for pedestrian and bike use and a key active transportation corridor in the region.

Key Considerations

In May 2009, the City of Encinitas environmentally cleared three grade-separated pedestrian undercrossings of the LOSSAN railway tracks at Santa Fe Drive, El Portal Street, and Montgomery Avenue. In 2012 and 2013, SANDAG constructed the Santa Fe Drive undercrossing for the City.

In 2015, the City was awarded a California Transportation Commission Active Transportation Program grant of $3.802 million to construct the undercrossing at El Portal Street. The City has contributed another $5.135 million, bringing the total budget to $8.937 million (Attachment 1).

The City will be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of the Project and negotiation for a Memorandum of Understanding defining roles and responsibilities for delivery of the Project is underway.

Next Steps

Staff will work with the City of Encinitas to finalize project design and to advertise the Project for bid. Construction is expected to start in fall 2020.


Key Staff Contact: Bruce Smith, (619) 699 1907, [email protected]

Attachment: 1. Proposed FY 2020 Budget Amendment for Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1146900, El Portal Undercrossing

Fiscal Impact:

All costs associated with the construction of the El Portal Undercrossing Project, including design support and construction management, would be funded by the City of Encinitas.


Construction is expected to start in mid-2020 and the facility is scheduled to open in spring 2022.

Action: Approve

The Transportation Committee recommends the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the FY 2020 Program Budget to:

1. create a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project (CIP Project No. 1146900) to establish the El Portal Undercrossing Project; and

2. accept $8.937 million in funding from the City of Encinitas and State Active Transportation Program to fully fund construction.

Project Number: Corridor Director:

RTIP Number: ENC46 To be advised

Project Name:

Draft Environmental Document Mar-09

Final Environmental Document May-09

Ready to Advertise Mar-20

Begin Construction Sep-20

Open to Public Apr-22

Construction Complete Oct-22

SANDAG Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total

Administration $0 $0 $100 $153 $161 $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $439

Environmental Document 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Design 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Support 0 0 75 1,092 977 162 0 0 0 0 0 2,306

Construction Capital 0 0 0 2,800 2,200 367 0 0 0 0 0 5,367

Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Legal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Communications 0 0 25 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 225

Project Contingency 0 0 0 200 200 100 0 0 0 0 0 500Total SANDAG $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

Outside Agency Expenditure Plan ($000)

Budget Phase Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total

Environmental Document $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Right-of-Way Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Outside Agency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total SANDAG & Outside Agency $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

TransNet Pass-Through $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Caltrans RE Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Funding Plan ($000)

Funding Source Prior Years FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 Total

ATP - FHWA $0 $0 $97 $1,800 $1,800 $105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,802

91030151 City of Encinitas 0 0 203 2,545 1,838 549 0 0 0 0 0 $5,135

Total $0 $0 $300 $4,345 $3,638 $654 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,937

Local

Complete final design and construct pedestrian undercrossing underneath the existing NCTD operated railroad at the El Portal location described in the Project Limits below.

Project has been environmentally cleared and designed to the 95% level by the City of Encinitas. Permitting is in progress.

Project Limits Major MilestonesThe project is located at MP 237.1 on the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. The undercrossing will connecting Highway 101 to Vulcan Ave, within the City of Encinitas and is located East of El Portal street.

State

1146900 Bruce Smith

(619) 699-1907

Project Scope Site Location Progress to Date

El Portal Undercrossing PM Phone Number:Project Manager:

Attachment 1

2

Item: 15


SB 1 State of Good Repair Program: North County Transit District Project List

Overview

The SB 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) Program includes $107.6 million in funding statewide in FY 2019-2020 on a formula basis to transit operators for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. Of that amount, $6.2 million is expected to be available to the San Diego region—$1.6 million to North County Transit District (NCTD) and $4.5 million to Metropolitan Transit System (MTS).

Under the SGR guidelines, recipients must submit to Caltrans a list of projects proposed for SGR program funding to receive an allocation from the State Controller’s Office (SCO).

Per the SGR Program guidelines, SANDAG is responsible for submitting claims on behalf of NCTD while MTS may receive its funds directly. Additional information on the SGR Program may be found at: www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/spsgr/finalguidelines.pdf

Key Considerations

On December 20, 2018, the NCTD Board of Directors approved the use of SGR Program funds for the Locomotive Replacement project located in the cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Oceanside, San Diego, and Solana Beach, as well as at the Marine Corps Base at Camp Pendleton. This project will replace seven Tier 0 and two Tier 2 COASTER locomotives with cleaner, more efficient Tier 4 locomotives. Project benefits include more efficient operations, decreased emissions, and fuel savings.

The total project cost is $53.2 million and includes $5 million in SGR Program funding and $8.1 million in State Transit Assistance Program funds. The remaining project costs ($40.1 million) would be funded through a $22 million Carl Moyer Air Pollution Control District grant, State Rail Assistance, and local Transportation Development Act funding.

Next Steps

Pending approval by the Board of Directors, the NCTD project listing for FY 2019-2020 will be submitted to Caltrans as required per SGR Program guidelines by the September 1, 2019, deadline. The Board is scheduled to consider the NCTD SGR claim at its September 27, 2019, meeting following updated estimates provided in August 2019. Pending action at that time, SANDAG would pass the SGR funds on to NCTD for implementation of the Locomotive Replacement project.


Key Staff Contact: Michelle Smith, (619) 595-5608, [email protected] Attachments: 1. SANDAG Board Resolution No. 2020-04

Fiscal Impact:

The State of Good Repair Program is expected to provide $6.2 million to the San Diego region in FY 2019-2020 —$1.6 million to North County Transit District and $4.5 million to Metropolitan Transit System.


Updated estimates for the State of Good Repair Program are expected to be provided in August 2019. Pending approval by the Board at that time, SANDAG would pass the SGR funds on to NCTD for implementation of the Locomotive Replacement project.

Action: Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-04, authorizing the submittal of the North County Transit District project listing under the FY 2019-2020 SB 1 State of Good Repair Program.

http://www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/spsgr/finalguidelines.pdf

http://www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/spsgr/finalguidelines.pdf

Attachment 1

2



Authorization for Submittal of FY 2019-2020 Project Listing to the State of California for the State of Good Repair Program

WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments is an eligible project sponsor and may receive State Transit Assistance funding from the State of Good Repair Account (SGR) now or sometime in the future for transit projects; and

WHEREAS, the statutes related to state-funded transit projects require a local or regional implementing agency to abide by various regulations; and

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (Beall, 2017) named the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) as the administrative agency for the SGR; and

WHEREAS, Caltrans has developed guidelines for the purpose of administering and distributing SGR funds to eligible project sponsors (local agencies); NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments as follows:

1. That the attached SGR FY 2019-20 project listing for the North County Transit District (Exhibit A), is hereby approved; and

2. That the SANDAG Executive Director is hereby authorized to submit the SGR FY 2019-2020 project listing for the North County Transit District to the State of California.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary



SGR Costs Total Project

Project Start Date

MM/DD/YYYY

Project Completion

DateMM/DD/YYYY

2019‐20 SGR Costs99313

2019‐20SGR Costs99314

Total SGR Costs99313

Total SGR Costs99314

Total Other SB1 Costs

Please Identify Program in Notes

TotalSTA Costs ‐ Not Including

SGR

Total All Other Funds

Congressional Senate Assembly

Auto‐Populated from Regional Entity Info Tab New

1 San Diego Association of Governments North County Transit District Locomotive Replacement Project

This project will replace seven Tier 0 COASTER locomotives with cleaner, more efficient Tier 4 locomotives. Project benefits include more efficient operations, decreased emissions and fuel savings. Operational Equipment Replacement Poor 25 06/21/2018 12/31/2021

Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Mar, San Diego, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton San Diego Yes 1,303,339$ 340,986$ 3,853,576$ 1,144,990$ 8,130,450$ 40,155,440$ 53,284,456$ 49,50,52 36,38,39 75,76,78

A total of $15,621,000 is projected for State Rail Assistance (SRA). $22,627,226 is projected through Carl Moyer.

2 San Diego Association of Governments ‐$3 San Diego Association of Governments ‐$4 San Diego Association of Governments ‐$5 San Diego Association of Governments ‐$6 San Diego Association of Governments ‐$

Project LocationCity

Existing State of Good Repair Project

State of Good Repair Project Information Legislative Districts

Notes, Comments, Additional InformationAsset TypeDropdown Selection

Project Location County

Non‐SGR Costs

Project CategoryDropdown Selection

Current Condition of

AssetDropdown Selection

Useful LifeIf applicable

In Years

Project Dates

# Recipient/RegionAuto‐Populated

Sub‐Recipient/OperatorDropdown Selection

Project TitleProject Titles must match if appearing on a previous list.

Max 75 Characters

Project DescriptionMax 300 Characters

If you need more space place additional information in Notes

Exhibit A

3

Item: 16


Proposition 68 Department of Conservation Local and Regional Planning Grant Program: SANDAG Project Submission

Overview

The California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68) allocates funding to several State agencies including the Department of Conservation. The Department of Conservation issued a grant solicitation notice for Local and Regional Planning Projects on May 31, 2019.

This grant program allocates $950,000 for projects that integrate natural and working lands into local and regional planning documents to optimize greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions.

Key Considerations

Eligible applicants include counties, cities, councils of governments, municipal planning organizations, regional transportation planning agencies, resource conservation districts, other regional planning agencies, municipally owned special districts, water districts, other special districts, and tribal governments. There is no match required.

Based on the grant guidelines and evaluation criteria, the following regional project is recommended for submission:

San Diego Region TerraCount Assessment – SANDAG would request $100,000 to fund an on-call environmental planning consultant to collect data and run TerraCount, a scenario planning tool that can quantify the carbon stocks and other benefits of the region’s natural and working lands.

The San Diego region has approximately 1,336,000 acres of conserved lands, approximately 8,700 acres of which have been conserved through the SANDAG Environmental Mitigation Program. Using the TerraCount tool would allow SANDAG to explore how the region’s conservation efforts are helping the region meet California’s GHG reduction targets.

Next Steps

SANDAG would submit an application to the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grant Program on or before the grant deadline of July 31, 2019. Grant awards are tentatively scheduled to be announced in September 2019. If awarded funding, SANDAG would enter into a grant agreement with the Department of Conservation in fall/winter 2019.


Key Staff Contacts: Sarah Pierce, (619) 699-7312, [email protected] Allison Wood, (619) 699-1973, [email protected]

Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2020-03

Action: Adopt

The Board of Directors is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2020-03, approving the submission of an application to the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grant Program and authorizing SANDAG to accept award funding and enter into an agreement with the Department of Conservation.

Fiscal Impact:

If awarded funding, $100,000 in grant funds would be added to the FY 2020 budget.


If awarded funding, this project would be completed in FY 2020 and FY 2021, with data incorporated into San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan.

Attachment 1

2



Resolution of the San Diego Association of Governments to Apply for and Receive Funds from the Department of Conservation’s Local and Regional Planning Grants Program

WHEREAS, the State of California has a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and a carbon neutrality goal for 2045; and

WHEREAS, carbon sequestration from natural and working lands is a State-identified strategy to meet these goals; and

WHEREAS, Proposition 68 (The California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018) allocates a total of $30 million to the Department of Conservation (Department); and

WHEREAS, the Department is allocating $950,000 of Proposition 68 funding to the Local and Regional Planning Grants Program to support the integration of natural and working lands into local and regional planning documents; and

WHEREAS, funding from the Local and Regional Planning Grants Program can be used for the TerraCount tool, which models the GHG and natural resource implications of different development patterns and management activities; and

WHEREAS, outputs from the TerraCount tool may inform San Diego Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan and the extent to which natural and working lands help the San Diego region meet State GHG targets; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED, that the SANDAG Board of Directors:

1. Authorizes the submittal of a grant application for a Local and Regional Planning Grants Program.

2. Certifies that SANDAG understands the assurances and certification in the application.

3. Authorizes SANDAG to enter into a grant agreement with the Department for the project and accept the template terms and conditions, if the project is awarded funding.

3

4. Authorize SANDAG’s Executive Director, or his authorized delegate, to accept the award of grant funding and to execute tasks, such as signing documents related to the application, grant agreement, payment requests, and so on if the project is awarded funding.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 of July 2019.

Attest:

Chair Secretary



Item: 17


Equal Employment Opportunity Program

Overview

SANDAG is committed to values such as diversity, fairness, equity, and inclusion. While federal and state laws describe obligations SANDAG must adhere to, there is a shared philosophy among the Board of Directors, management, and employees that engaging, representing, and serving all residents of the San Diego region as well as making employment opportunities broadly available makes the organization more responsive to its stakeholders and ultimately more effective in the delivery of programs, projects, and services.

Key Considerations

FY 2019 Employment Results

Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program, describes the agency’s commitment to hiring and staffing practices. The following is a summary of employment results for the period July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.

Recruitments and New Hires

• 37 recruitments were conducted to fill 66 positions. 92 percent of job openings were advertised externally and available to both internal and external candidates; 8 percent were internal and open only to current employees. All recruitments are conducted in an open, competitive manner.

• Job notices for full-time positions were sent to more than 200 regional contacts as part of the agency’s efforts to reach qualified female, minority, and veteran candidates.

• Approximately 1,300 applications were received for job openings. Based on voluntary data provided by candidates, 51 percent identified as female and 53 percent identified as belonging to a minority group.

• 66 new employees were hired. 23 individuals were hired to fill core positions; the remaining 43 filled contingent positions.

• Of the 66 new employees hired, 62 percent were female, and 50 percent were from minority groups.

Promotions

• 48 employees were promoted; 21 individuals were promoted after successfully competing in either an internal or external recruitment.

• Of the 48 promoted employees, 69 percent were female, and 38 percent represented minority groups.

Fiscal Impact:

None


None

Action: Information

In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program, this report summarizes employment results for FY 2019 and reviews EEO Program goals for the upcoming year.

2

Employee Demographics

• As of June 30, 2019, 57 percent of agency employees were female, and 48 percent were from minority groups.

Overall, the reported statistics compare favorably to the San Diego Region Civilian Labor Force (derived from Census 2010 data), in which 46 percent of the population is female and 47 percent are from minority groups.

EEO Program Goals

In addition to reviewing annual employment results, SANDAG evaluates the effectiveness of its EEO Program by comparing the proportion of women and minorities in each of five defined job categories. The following chart represents FY 2019 EEO Program results compared to labor force availability. The agency’s FY 2020 goal is for females and minorities to be represented in approximately the same proportion as the availability of females and minorities within the San Diego Region Labor Force.

Job Category No. of

Employees

San Diego Region Labor Force*

SANDAG FY 2019 Results

Female Minority Female Minority

Officials/Administrators 19 41% 31% 42% 11%

Professionals 196 50% 35% 55% 38%

Technicians 74 47% 48% 55% 53%

Admin. Support 69 60% 46% 81% 68%

Service-Maintenance 17 44% 66% 6% 88%

* Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2006-2010 EEO Tabulation; compiled by SANDAG, December 2012

Next Steps

It is anticipated the number of opportunities to fill job openings within the next year will be similar to previous years. When such opportunities are available, SANDAG will continue its efforts to communicate the availability of positions to female and minority candidates through gender-neutral and race-neutral outreach and advertising strategies in support of its goal of reaching parity with the local labor force.


Key Staff Contact: Rachel Nycholat, (619) 699-1962, [email protected]

Item: 18


San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan - Proposed Draft Transportation Network

Overview

In February 2019, the Board of Directors unanimously

approved an action plan to develop the 2021 Regional

Plan. To preserve the region’s eligibility for

transportation funding and other compliance

requirements, this action plan included two key

components:

1. Pursuing state legislation to ensure the current

2015 Regional Plan remains valid for state funding

eligibility and other consistency purposes until the

new plan is adopted in 2021. (Assembly Bill 1730,

[AB 1730] Gonzalez)

2. Submitting San Diego Forward: The 2020 Federal

Regional Transportation Plan (2020 Federal RTP) to

the federal government without significant

modification of the projects in the 2015 Regional

plan while the region continues to work on

developing the 2021 Regional Plan.

Once the 2021 Regional Plan is adopted by the

Board of Directors, it would be submitted to both the state and federal governments. In the meantime,

SANDAG will continue to take action to improve mobility and reduce emissions in the region; including

through the development of a Regional Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Program; implementation of

the Environmental Mitigation Program; assistance to local jurisdictions for Climate Action Plan

implementation; and delivery of major transit projects like the Mid-Coast Corridor Trolley extension and

LOSSAN Double-Tracking.

Key Considerations

SANDAG will enter a 12-month air quality conformity grace period in December 2019. During this time,

projects in the current Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) can proceed; however, SANDAG

will be unable to process formal RTIP amendments. Adoption of the 2020 Federal RTP within the grace period

will help to preserve eligibility for local, state, and federal funding up until the time the 2021 Regional Plan is

adopted.

Consistent with the direction provided by the Board of Directors in February 2019, the proposed draft

transportation network largely includes the same projects, programs, and policies included in the

2015 Regional Plan to ensure the 2020 Federal RTP remains consistent with the results of the

2015 Regional Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and avoid the need to revisit that EIR. In addition,

AB 1730 as currently proposed includes an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act for the

2020 Federal RTP in reliance on the use of the 2015 Regional Plan network. The only modifications made

Fiscal Impact:

SANDAG will enter a 12-month air quality

conformity grace period in December 2019.

Adoption of the 2020 Federal Regional

Transportation Plan (2020 Federal RTP) within

the grace period will help to preserve eligibility

for local, state, and federal funding.


It is anticipated that the final 2020 Federal RTP

will be presented to the Board of Directors for

adoption in spring 2020.

Action: Information

This report provides an update on the

proposed draft transportation network for the

2020 Federal Regional Transportation Plan,

which will be available for public review

through August 21, 2019.

2

were to remove projects that have been completed since the 2015 Regional Plan was adopted; make minor

schedule updates to align with the current RTIP; and update the cost estimates and financial assumptions as

required by federal law. The list of transit, highway and Managed Lane projects, and active transportation

projects is detailed in Attachment 1 and mapped in Attachment 2. Investments that support goods

movement (shared rail and Managed Lane and highway improvements); transportation demand and system

management; technologies; operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation; and local streets and roads also are

components of the 2020 Federal RTP.

The proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal RTP meets both federal Title VI and air

quality conformity requirements. The 2020 Federal RTP uses the current travel demand model and growth

forecast1 as well as the performance measures from the 2015 Regional Plan. Staff modeled the performance

of the proposed draft transportation network, the results of which are detailed in Attachment 3.

Next Steps

Public comments about the proposed draft transportation network for the 2020 Federal RTP will be gathered

through August 21, 2019. Information about upcoming outreach efforts is posted on

SDForward.com/2020FederalRTP. Members of the public can provide comments on the proposed draft

network via letter, email, phone, and an online comment tool; at SANDAG working group meetings; and

during an August 2019 Vision Lab open house. Input received will be considered in the development of the

proposed preferred transportation network.

The Board will be asked to accept the preferred transportation network for use in development of the

Draft 2020 Federal RTP in fall 2019. This Draft plan would be available for review and comment in late 2019.

Staff anticipates that the 2020 Federal RTP will be provided to the Board for adoption in April 2020. This

schedule would result in SANDAG being within the grace period for purposes of air quality conformity for an

interval of approximately five to six months.

If the 2020 Federal RTP is not adopted during the 12-month grace period, SANDAG will enter a conformity

lapse. During a conformity lapse, federal transportation funds can only be used on exempt projects, safety

and certain transit projects; transportation control measures, including ridesharing, transit improvements,

traffic flow improvements, and bicycle facilities and programs; and project phases previously authorized by

the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.


Key Staff Contact: Rachel Kennedy, (619) 699-1929, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network

2. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network Maps

3. 2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Transportation Network Performance Measure

Results

1 Activity Based Model version 2, and Series 14.17 Regional Growth Forecast

http://www.sdforward.com/2020federalrtp

http://www.sdforward.com/2020federalrtp

2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained Projects

Transit Facilities

YearBuilt By Service Route Description

Capital Cost ($2019); millions

Capital Cost ($YOE); millions

2025 COASTER 398 Double tracking (20-minute peak frequencies and 120-minuteoff-peak frequencies) $609 $693

2025 Trolley 510 Mid-Coast Trolley Extension $1,273 $919

2025 Rapid 2 North Park to Downtown San Diego via 30th St, Golden Hill $54 $62

2025 Rapid 10 La Mesa to Ocean Beach via Mid-City, Hillcrest, Old Town $57 $65

2025 Rapid 120 Kearny Mesa to Downtown via Mission Valley $127 $145

2025 Rapid 550 SDSU to Palomar Station via East San Diego, SoutheastSan Diego, National City $112 $126

2025 Rapid 709 H St Trolley Station to Millennia via H St Corridor,Southwestern College $89 $101

2025 Rapid 950 (formerly 905)

Extension of Iris Trolley Station to Otay Mesa Port of Entry (POE) route with new service to Otay Mesa East POE and Imperial Beach

$3 $3

2025 Rapid SR 163 DARs(Transit Only)

Kearny Mesa to Downtown via SR 163. Stations at Sharp/Children's Hospital, University Ave, and Fashion Valley Transit Center

$204 $215

2025 Streetcar 554 Hillcrest/Balboa Park/Downtown San Diego Loop3 $39 $452025 Shuttle 448/449 San Marcos Shuttle1 $0 $0

2025 Airport Express -- Airport Express Routes2 $71 $82

2025 ITC -- San Diego International Airport ITC and I-5 Direct ConnectorRamps $231 $258

2025 Other --Other Improvements (Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and Ride, transit center expansions)

$721 $798

2025 -- -- Local Bus Routes - 15 minutes in key corridors -- --

2035 COASTER 398

Double tracking (20-minute peak frequencies and 60-minute off-peak frequencies, grade separations at Leucadia Blvd, stations/platforms at Convention Center/Gaslamp Quarter and Del Mar Fairgrounds, and extension to Camp Pendleton)

$1,224 $1,488

2035 SPRINTER 399

SPRINTER efficiency improvements (20-minute frequencies by 2025); double tracking Oceanside to Escondido for 10-minute frequencies and six rail grade separations at El Camino Real, Melrose Dr, Vista Village Dr/Main St, North Dr, Civic Center, Auto Pkwy and Mission Ave

$1,287 $1,604

2035 Trolley 510Phase I - Blue Line Frequency Enhancements and rail grade separations at 28th St, 32nd St, E St, H St, Palomar St, and Blue/Orange Track Connection at 12th/Imperial

$279 $339

3

Attachment 1

Transit Facilities




2035 Trolley 520Orange Line Frequency Enhancements and four rail grade separations at Euclid Ave, Broadway/Lemon Grove Ave, Allison Ave/University Ave, Severin Dr

$363 $464

2035 Trolley 561 UTC to COASTER Connection (extension of Route 510) $467 $676

2035 Trolley 562Phase I - San Ysidro to Kearny Mesa via Chula Vista via Highland Ave/4th Ave, National City, Southeast San Diego, Mid-City, and Mission Valley

$4,575 $6,613

2035 Rapid 11 Spring Valley to SDSU via Southeast San Diego, Downtown,Hillcrest, Mid-City $154 $199

2035 Rapid 28 Point Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town, Linda Vista $67 $86

2035 Rapid 30 Old Town to Sorrento Mesa via Pacific Beach, La Jolla, UTC $143 $185

2035 Rapid 41 Fashion Valley to UTC/UC San Diego via Linda Vista andClairemont $75 $102

2035 Rapid 90 El Cajon Transit Center to San Diego International Airport ITCvia SR 94, City College (peak only) $27 $32

2035 Rapid 473 Phase I - Solana Beach to UTC/UC San Diego via Hwy 101Coastal Communities, Carmel Valley $58 $76

2035 Rapid 635 Eastlake to Palomar Trolley via Main St Corridor $105 $139

2035 Rapid 638 Iris Trolley Station to Otay Mesa via Otay, Airway Dr, SR 905Corridor $52 $67

2035 Rapid 640A/640B

Route 640A: I-5 - San Ysidro to Old Town Transit Center via City College; 640B: I-5 Iris Trolley/Palomar to Kearny Mesa via Chula Vista, National City and City College

$208 $229

2035 Rapid688/689/690

Route 688: San Ysidro to Sorrento Mesa via I-805/I-15/SR 52 Corridors (Peak Only); Route 689:Otay Mesa POE to UTC/Torrey Pines via Otay Ranch/Millennia, I-805 Corridor (Peak Only); Route 690: Mid-City to Sorrento Mesa via I-805 Corridor (Peak Only)

$623 $757

2035 Rapid 910 Coronado to Downtown via Coronado Bridge $54 $702035 Streetcar 553 Downtown San Diego: Little Italy to East Village3 $15 $20

2035 Streetcar 555 30th St to Downtown San Diego via North Park/ Golden Hill3 $23 $29

2035 ITC -- Phase I - San Ysidro ITC $129 $165


$2,872 $3,843

2035 -- -- Local Bus Routes - 10 minutes in key corridors

2050 COASTER 398 Double tracking (completes double tracking; includes Del MarTunnel) plus 2 grade separations $3,921 $8,258

2050 SPRINTER 399 Branch Extension to Westfield North County $239 $479

2050 SPRINTER 588 SPRINTER Express $332 $545

2050 Trolley 510 Phase II - Blue Line rail grade separations at Taylor St andAsh St $307 $505

2050 Trolley 520 Orange Line Frequency Enhancements $0 $02050 Trolley 530 Green Line Frequency Enhancements $0 $0

4

Transit Facilities




2050 Trolley 560 SDSU to Downtown via El Cajon Blvd/Mid-City (transition ofMid-City Rapid to Trolley) $3,251 $6,192

2050 Trolley 562 Phase II - Kearny Mesa to Carmel Valley $2,191 $4,0712050 Trolley 563 Phase I: Pacific Beach to El Cajon Transit Center $1,579 $2,860

2050 Rapid 103 Solana Beach to Sabre Springs Rapid station via CarmelValley $91 $152

2050 Rapid 440 Carlsbad to Escondido Transit Center via Palomar Airport Rd $140 $234

2050 Rapid 471 Downtown Escondido to East Escondido $46 $94

2050 Rapid 473 Phase II - Oceanside to Solana Beach via Hwy 101 CoastalCommunities $118 $197

2050 Rapid 474 Oceanside to Vista via Mission Ave/Santa Fe Rd Corridor $99 $202

2050 Rapid 477 Camp Pendleton to Carlsbad Village via College Blvd, PlazaCamino Real $109 $181

2050 Rapid 235 Temecula (peak only) Extension of Escondido to DowntownRapid (formerly Route 610) $133 $222

2050 Rapid 636 SDSU to Spring Valley via East San Diego, Lemon Grove,Skyline $53 $88

2050 Rapid 637 North Park to 32nd St Trolley Station via Golden Hill $60 $101

2050 Rapid 650 Chula Vista to Palomar Airport Rd Business Park via I-805/ I-5 (peak only) $112 $186

2050 Rapid 653 Mid-City to Palomar Airport Rd via Kearny Mesa/I-805/I-5 $14 $232050 Rapid 870 El Cajon to UTC via Santee, SR 52, I-805 $100 $1902050 Rapid 890 El Cajon to Sorrento Mesa via SR 52, Kearny Mesa $16 $312050 Streetcar 565 Mission Beach to La Jolla via Pacific Beach3 $34 $572050 ITC -- Phase II - San Ysidro ITC $31 $51


$3,724 $6,839

Subtotal $33,090 $52,4531 Capital cost to be funded by the City of San Marcos.2 Implementation of these services is dependent upon funding from aviation and other private sources. 3 Streetcar cost is representative of 10 percent of the total capital cost.

5


Managed Lanes/Toll Lanes

RTP Phase Year Freeway From To Existing With

ImprovementsTransit Route



2025 I-5 Manchester Ave SR 78 8F 8F+2ML 650, 653 $51 $512025 I-5 SR 78 Vandegrift Blvd 8F 8F+2ML $116 $131

2025 I-15 I-8 SR 163 8F 8F+2ML 235, 610, 653, 690 $64 $72

2025 I-805 SR 94 SR 15 8F 8F+2ML 225, 650, 688, 689 $234 $264

2025SR 11/ Otay Mesa East Port of Entry (POE)

SR 125 Mexico -- 4T+POE 905 $472 $472

2035 I-5 SR 905 SR 54 8F 8F+2ML 640 $542 $6272035 I-5 SR 54 SR 15 8F 10F+2ML 640 $467 $5402035 I-5 La Jolla Village Dr I-5/805 Merge 8F/14F 8F/14F+2ML

I-5/I-805 Merge SR 56 8F/14F+ 2ML 8F/14F+4ML2035 I-5 SR 56 SR 78 8F+2ML 8F+4ML 650, 653 $2,082 $3,0202035 SR 15 SR 94 I-805 6F 6F+2ML 235, 610 $41 $592035 SR 78 I-5 I-15 6F 6F+2ML $1,621 $2,127

2035 SR 94 I-5 I-805 8F 8F+2ML 90, 225, 235, 610, $728 $955

2035 I-805 SR 905 Palomar St 8F 8F+2ML 688 $235 $316

2035 I-805 SR 54 SR 94 8F+2ML 8F+4ML 225, 650, 688, 689 $742 $998

2035 I-805 SR 163 SR 52 8F 8F+2ML 650, 688, 689, 690 $195 $269

2035 I-805 SR 52 Carroll Canyon Rd 8F+2ML 8F+4ML

30, 650, 653, 688, 689, 690, 870, 890

$778 $996

2050 I-5 I-8 La Jolla Village Dr 8F/10F 8F/10F+2ML $978 $2,0672050 I-5 SR 78 Vandegrift Blvd 8F+2ML 8F+4ML $632 $1,3362050 I-5 Vandegrift Blvd Orange County 8F 8F+4T* $3,165 $6,6872050 SR 15 I-5 SR 94 6F 8F+2ML $185 $391

2050 I-15 Viaduct -- 8F 8F+2ML 235, 610, 653, 690 $1,040 $2,197

2050 I-15 SR 78 Riverside County 8F 8F+4T* 610 $1,744 $3,684

2050 SR 52 I-805 I-15 6F 6F+2ML 653, 870, 890 $238 $503

2050 SR 52 I-15 SR 125 4F/6F 4F/6F+2ML(R) 870, 890 $405 $8562050 SR 54 I-5 SR 125 6F 6F+2ML $151 $3192050 SR 94 I-805 SR 125 8F 8F+2ML 90 $501 $1,0572050 SR 125 SR 54 I-8 6F/8F 6F/10F+2ML $690 $1,457

2050 I-805 SR 94 SR 15 8F+2ML 8F+4ML 225, 650, 688, 690 $83 $175

2050 I-805 SR 15 SR 163 8F/10F 8F/10F+4ML 650, 688, 689, 690 $1,567 $3,310

2050 I-805 SR 163 SR 52 8F+2ML 8F+4ML 650, 688, 689, 690 $438 $925

Subtotal $20,607 $36,374

650, 653 $422 $513

6


Highway Projects

Year Built By Freeway From To Existing With

Improvements



2025 SR 67 Mapleview St Gold Bar Ln 2C 4C $82 $922035 SR 52 Mast Blvd SR 125 4F 6F $103 $1462050 I-8 2nd St Los Coches 4F/6F 6F $44 $942050 SR 52 I-5 I-805 4F 6F $151 $3192050 SR 56 I-5 I-15 4F 6F $192 $4052050 SR 67 Gold Bar Ln Dye Rd 2C/4C 4C $591 $1,2482050 SR 94 SR 125 Avocado Blvd 4F 6F $190 $4012050 SR 94 Jamacha Steele Canyon Rd 2C/4C 4C $54 $1152050 SR 94 Avocado Blvd Jamacha 4C 6C $124 $2612050 SR 125 SR 905 San Miguel Rd 4T 8F $439 $7412050 SR 125 San Miguel Rd SR 54 4F 8F $241 $509

Subtotal $2,211 $4,331

7


Operational Improvements

Year Built By Freeway From To Existing With Improvements



2050 I-5 I-15 I-8 8F 8F+Operational $1,985 $4,1942050 I-8 I-5 SR 125 8F/10F 8F/10F+Operational $907 $1,9172050 I-8 SR 125 2nd St 6F/8F 6F/8F+Operational $227 $4802050 SR 76 I-15 Couser Canyon 2C/4C 4C/6C+Operational $178 $376

Subtotal $3,297 $6,967

8


Managed Lane Connectors

Year Built By Freeway Intersecting

Freeway Movement



2025 SR 15 I-805 North to North and South to South $110 $1242035 I-5 SR 78 South to East and West to North, North to East and West to South $344 $4512035 I-5 I-805 North to North and South to South * *2035 I-15 SR 78 East to South and North to West $144 $1892035 SR 15 SR 94 South to West and East to North $97 $1272035 I-805 SR 94 North to West and East to South $137 $1802050 I-15 SR 52 West to North and South to East $177 $3742050 I-805 SR 52 West to North and South to East * *

Subtotal $1,009 $1,445* Project cost included in associated Managed Lane project

9

2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained ProjectsFreeway Connectors

YearBuilt By Freeway Intersecting Freeway Movement



2025 SR 94 SR 125 South to East $94 $1062035 I-5 SR 56 West to North and South to East $371 $4522035 I-5 SR 78 South to East and West to South $371 $4872035 SR 94 SR 125 West to North $110 $1342050 I-15 SR 56 North to West $104 $219

Subtotal $1,050 $1,398

10

2020 Federal RTP Proposed Draft Phased Revenue Constrained ProjectsActive Transportation Projects

Year Built By Project Jurisdiction(s) Project

Phase



2025 Uptown - Fashion Valley to Downtown San Diego San Diego Const. $13.0 $13.0 2025 Uptown - Old Town to Hillcrest San Diego Const. $1.0 $1.0 2025 Uptown - Hillcrest to Balboa Park San Diego Const. $2.0 $2.0 2025 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights San Diego Const. $7.0 $7.0

2025 North Park - Mid-City - Hillcrest to City Heights (City Heights - Old Town Corridor) San Diego Const. $5.0 $5.0

2025 North Park - Mid-City - City Heights to Rolando San Diego Const. $3.0 $3.0

2025 Bayshore Bikeway - Main St to Palomar Chula Vista/Imperial Beach Const. $1.0 $1.0

2025 Pershing and El Prado - Cross-Park San Diego Const. $1.0 $1.0 2025 Terrace Dr/Central Ave - Adams to Wightman San Diego Const. $4.0 $4.0 2025 San Diego River Trail – I-805 to Fenton San Diego Const. $3.0 $3.0 2025 San Diego River Trail - Short gap connections San Diego Const. $2.0 $2.0 2025 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Leucadia to G St Encinitas Const. $7.0 $7.0

2025 San Ysidro to Imperial Beach - Bayshore Bikeway Connection

Imperial Beach/San Diego Const. $8.0 $8.0

2035 Downtown to Southeast connections - East Village San Diego ROW $1.1 $2.0

2035 Downtown to Southeast connections - Downtown San Diego to Encanto San Diego ROW $4.1 $6.0

2035 Downtown to Southeast connections - Downtown San Diego to Golden Hill San Diego ROW $3.6 $6.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pac Hwy (W Washington St to Laurel St) San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Pac Hwy (Laurel St to Santa Fe Depot) San Diego Const. $13.9 $21.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Encinitas Chesterfield to Solana Beach Encinitas Const. $4.8 $7.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego – Pac Hwy (Taylor St to W Washington St) San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego- Pac Hwy (Fiesta Island Rd to Taylor St) San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail to Santee Santee Const. $9.5 $14.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - UTC San Diego Const. $0.8 $1.0

2035 City Heights /Encanto/Lemon Grove Lemon Grove/ San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0

2035 City Heights/Fairmount Corridor San Diego Const. $20.9 $28.0

2035 Rolando to Grossmont/La MesaLa Mesa/ El Cajon/ San Diego

Const. $3.5 $5.0

2035 La Mesa/Lemon Grove/El Cajon connections Lemon Grove/ La Mesa Const. $10.4 $16.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail - Rose Canyon San Diego Const. $8.7 $13.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Qualcomm Stadium to Ward Rd San Diego Const. $3.5 $5.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Rancho Mission Rd to Camino Del Rio North San Diego Const. $0.5 $1.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 4 Cannon to Palomar Airport Rd Carlsbad Const. $8.7 $13.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 5 Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Station Carlsbad Const. $5.2 $8.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail Encinitas - Carlsbad to Leucadia Encinitas Const. $12.2 $18.0 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Del Mar Del Mar Const. $0.7 $1.0

11

Active Transportation Projects

YearBuilt By Project Jurisdiction(s) Project

Phase



2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Del Mar to Sorrento via Carmel Valley

Del Mar/ San Diego Const. $0.7 $1.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Carmel Valley to Roselle via Sorrento San Diego Const. $1.6 $2.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Roselle Canyon San Diego Const. $8.7 $13.0

2035 Chula Vista/National City connections Chula Vista/ National City Const. $19.1 $25.0

2035 Pacific Beach to Mission Beach San Diego Const. $17.4 $23.0 2035 Ocean Beach to Mission Bay San Diego Const. $41.8 $51.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Bridge connection (Sefton Field to Mission Valley YMCA) San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Mast Park to Lakeside baseball park Santee Const. $17.4 $23.0

2035 I-8 Flyover - Camino del Rio S to Camino del Rio N San Diego Const. $17.4 $23.0 2035 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Broadway to Eaton Oceanside Const. $0.7 $1.0

2035 El Cajon - Santee connections El Cajon/ La Mesa/ Santee Const. $20.9 $28.0

2035 San Diego River Trail - Father Junipero Serra Trail to West Hills Pkwy San Diego Const. $5.2 $8.0

2035 Inland Rail Trail Oceanside Oceanside Const. $33.1 $44.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail Carlsbad - Reach 3 Tamarack to Cannon Carlsbad Const. $8.7 $13.0

2035 Clairemont Dr (Mission Bay to Burgener) San Diego Const. $13.9 $21.0 2035 Harbor Dr (Downtown to Ocean Beach) San Diego Const. $12.2 $18.0 2035 Mira Mesa Bike Blvd San Diego Const. $7.0 $11.0 2035 Sweetwater River Bikeway Ramps National City Const. $15.7 $24.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail Oceanside - Alta Loma Marsh bridge Oceanside Const. $8.7 $13.0

2035 Coastal Rail Trail San Diego - Mission Bay (Clairemont to Tecolote) San Diego Const. $5.2 $8.0

2035 Bayshore Bikeway Coronado - Golf course adjacent Coronado Const. $5.2 $8.0

2050 San Luis Rey River Trail Oceanside, Unincorporated Const. $64.4 $122.0

2050 Encinitas-San Marcos Corridor – Double Peak Dr to San Marcos Blvd San Marcos Const. $20.9 $48.0

2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – Quince St to Broadway Escondido Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – Escondido Creek to Washington Ave Escondido Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – 9th Ave to Escondido Creek Escondido Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 Escondido Creek Bikeway – El Norte Pkwy to northern bikeway terminus Escondido Const. $10.4 $24.0

2050 Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Leucadia Blvd to El Camino Real Carlsbad, Encinitas Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – Via Rancho Pkwy to Lost Oak Ln Escondido Const. $7.0 $16.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – Rancho Bernardo Community Park toLake Hodges Bridge San Diego Const. $5.2 $12.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – Camino del Norte to Aguamiel Rd San Diego Const. $22.6 $39.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – Poway Rd interchange to CarmelMountain Rd San Diego Const. $29.6 $51.0

2050 SR 56 Bikeway – Azuaga St to Rancho PenasquitosBlvd San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – Murphy Canyon Rd to Affinity Ct San Diego Const. $69.6 $115.0

12


Year Built By Project Jurisdiction(s) Project

Phase



2050 SR 56 Bikeway – El Camino Real to Caminito Pointe San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 SR 52 Bikeway – I-5 to Santo Rd San Diego Const. $52.2 $104.0

2050 SR 52 Bikeway – SR 52/Mast Dr to San Diego River Trail San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 I-8 Corridor – San Diego River Trail to Riverside Dr Unincorporated Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 I-805 Connector – Bonita Rd to Floyd Ave Chula Vista, Unincorporated Const. $10.5 $24.0

2050 SR 125 Connector – Bonita Rd to U.S.-Mexico Border Chula Vista, San Diego Const. $67.9 $118.0

2050 SR 905 Connector – E Beyer Blvd to U.S.-Mexico Border

San Diego, Unincorporated Const. $59.2 $103.0

2050 El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Douglas Dr to Mesa Dr Oceanside Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 Vista Way Connector from Arcadia Vista,Unincorporated Const. $3.7 $8.0

2050 I-15 Bikeway – W Country Club Ln to Nutmeg St Escondido Const. $7.0 $16.0

2050 El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Marron Rd to SR 78 off ramp Carlsbad Const. $0.5 $1.0

2050 Carlsbad to San Marcos Corridor – Paseo del Norte to Avenida Encinas Carlsbad Const. $0.7 $2.0

2050 Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Kristen Ct to Ecke Ranch Rd Encinitas Const. $0.7 $2.0

2050 Encinitas to San Marcos Corridor – Encinitas Blvd/ I-5 Interchange Encinitas Const. $0.3 $1.0

2050 Mira Mesa Corridor – Reagan Rd to Parkdale Ave San Diego Const. $0.7 $2.0 2050 Mira Mesa Corridor – Scranton Rd to I-805 San Diego Const. $0.7 $2.0

2050 Mira Mesa Corridor – Sorrento Valley Rd to Sorrento Valley Blvd San Diego Const. $1.4 $3.0

2050 Mid-County Bikeway – I-5/Via de la Valle Interchange San Diego Const. $0.5 $1.0

2050 Mid-County Bikeway – Rancho Santa Fe segment San Diego, Unincorporated Const. $5.2 $12.0

2050 El Camino Real Bike Lanes – Manchester Ave to Tennis Club Dr Encinitas Const. $0.9 $2.0

2050 Mid-County Bikeway – Manchester Ave/I-5 Interchange to San Elijo Ave Encinitas Const. $1.4 $3.0

2050 Central Coast Corridor – Van Nuys St to San Rafael Pl San Diego Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 Clairemont – Centre-City Corridor – Coastal Rail Trail to Genesee Ave San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 SR 125 Corridor – Mission Gorge Rd to Glen Vista Way Santee Const. $0.5 $1.0

2050 SR 125 Corridor – Prospect Ave to Weld Blvd Santee, El Cajon Const. $1.4 $3.0 2050 I-8 Corridor – Lakeside Ave to SR 67 Unincorporated Const. $0.9 $2.0 2050 I-8 Corridor – Willows Rd to SR 79 Unincorporated Const. $8.7 $20.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – N Marshall Ave to El Cajon Blvd El Cajon Const. $0.5 $1.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – Washington Ave to Dewitt Ct El Cajon Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – SR 94 onramp to Del Rio Rd Unincorporated Const. $0.3 $1.0

2050 E County Southern Loop – Pointe Pkwy to Omega St Unincorporated Const. $1.4 $3.0

2050 SR 125 Corridor – SR 94 to S of Avocado St Unincorporated Const. $1.9 $4.0

13


YearBuilt By Project Jurisdiction(s) Project

Phase



2050 Centre City – La Mesa Corridor – Gateside Rd to Campo Rd

La Mesa, Unincorporated Const. $0.7 $2.0

2050 Bay to Ranch Bikeway – River Ash Dr to Paseo Ranchero Chula Vista Const. $0.9 $2.0

2050 Mid-County Bikeway – San Elijo Ave to 101 Terminus Encinitas Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 Central Coast Corridor – Van Nuys St San Diego Const. $0.3 $1.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – El Cajon Blvd to Washington Ave El Cajon Const. $1.7 $4.0

2050 E County Northern Loop – Calavo Dr to Sweetwater Springs Blvd Unincorporated Const. $1.2 $3.0

2050 Central Coast Corridor – Torrey Pines Rd to Nautilus St San Diego Const. $10.4 $24.0

2050 Central Coast Corridor – Via Del Norte to Van Nuys St San Diego Const. $8.7 $20.0

2050 Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Ingraham St from Garnet Ave to Pacific Beach Dr San Diego Const. $3.5 $8.0

2050 Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Clairemont Dr to Genesee Ave San Diego Const. $17.4 $30.0

2050 Kearny Mesa to Beaches Corridor – Genesee Ave to Linda Vista Dr San Diego Const. $10.4 $24.0

2050 Bay to Ranch Bikeway – E J St from 2nd Ave to Paseo Del Rey Chula Vista Const. $20.9 $36.0

2050 Chula Vista Greenbelt – Bay Blvd to Oleander Ave Chula Vista Const. $29.6 $51.0 Other Active Transportation Programs and Projects1

Safe Routes to School $78 $123 Safe Routes to Transit $1,230 $1,943 Regional Programs $34 $54 Local Bike Projects $1,399 $2,211 TDM/TSM $1,989 $3,143

Subtotal $5,810 $9,2811Includes Safe Routes to Transit projects at new transit station areas, local bike projects, localpedestrian/safety/traffic calming projects, regional bicycle and pedestrian programs and the Regional Safe Routes to School implementation

14

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

11

56

Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

San Diego

Camp Pendleton

Pauma and YuimaReservation

RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage

Mesa GrandeReservation

PalaReservation

Santa YsabelReservation

La JollaReservation

San PasqualReservation

Capitan GrandeReservation

LemonGrove

5050

FRT

P

MILES

KILOMETERS

Figure A.1

2025Proposed Draft Revenue ConstrainedTransit NetworkJuly 2019

COASTER/AMTRAK/Metrolink

Trolley/SPRINTER

Rapid Transit

Shuttle/Streetcar

Airport Express

Local Bus

San Diego-Coronado Ferry

Intermodal Transit Center

Safe Routes to Transit


Attachment 2

15

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

11

56

Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

San Diego


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Camp Pendleton

LemonGrove

5051

FRT

P

MILES

KILOMETERS

Figure A.2

2035Proposed Draft Revenue ConstrainedTransit NetworkJuly 2019


Trolley/SPRINTER

Rapid Transit

Streetcar/Shuttle

Airport Express

Local Bus





16

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

11

56


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

San Diego

Camp Pendleton

LemonGrove

Figure A.3

2050 Proposed DraftRevenue ConstrainedTransit NetworkJuly 2019

5052

FRT

P

High Speed Rail


Trolley/SPRINTER

SPRINTER Express

Rapid Transit

Shuttle/Streetcar

Airport Express

Local Bus




MILES

KILOMETERS


17

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+2TL

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

4T

4F

10F+4ML

10F+4ML

8F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

4C

4C

6F

4F

4F

8F

8F/10F

2C

6F4F

6F

6F

4F

4C

4T8F

2C

8F

2C

2C

4C

Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



LemonGrove

MILES

KILOMETERS

C =

F=

ML =

T =

TL =

Conventional Highway

Freeway

Managed Lanes

Toll Lanes

Transit Lanes

Figure A.4

2025Proposed Draft Revenue ConstrainedManaged Lanes and Highway NetworkJuly 2019

Freeway Connectors

Managed Lanes Connectors

Existing Managed Lanes

Managed Lanes

General Purpose Lanes

Toll Lanes

Existing Facility

Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements at Freeway Interchanges


5067

FRT

P

905

54

805

5

282

163

9415

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

18

6F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F/14F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+4ML

10F+4ML

8F/14F+2ML

8F+4ML

8F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+2TL

8F+2ML

8F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F/10F

6F+2ML

4C

2C

4C

4C

2C

4C

4F

4F

8F

6F 6F

2C

2C

8F+ 2ML

10F+2ML

8F

10F+4ML

4T4F

4T

905

54

805

5

282

163

9415

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



LemonGrove


Managed Lanes


Toll Lanes

Existing Facility


C =

F =

ML =

T =

TL =


Freeway

Managed Lanes

Toll Road

Transit Lanes

MILES

KILOMETERS

Figure A.5


Freeway Connectors

Managed Lanes Connectors

Freeway & Managed Lanes Connectors


5068

FRT

P

19

4C/6C+OPS

6F

10F+2ML

8F+OPS

8F/10F+OPS

8F+2ML

6F

4C

6C

8F

6F

6F+2ML(R)

6F+2ML(R)

4C

8F/10F+2ML

4C

4C

4C

2C

10F+4ML

8F+4ML

2C

4F

8F

6F/8F+OPS

6F

6F

2C

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F/14F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+4ML

6F+2ML

8F+4ML

8F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F/10F+OPS8F/10F+2ML

6F+2ML

6F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+4ML 6F+2ML

8F+2ML

8F+4ML

8F+4ML

8F+2TL

8F+4ML

8F+4ML

6F+2ML

4T4F

8F+4T 8F+4T

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego

LemonGrove

MILES

KILOMETERS

Figure A.6



Managed Lanes


Toll Lanes


Existing Facility

Freeway Connectors

ML Connectors

Freeway & ML Connectors


C =

F =

ML =

T =

R =

OPS =

TL =


Freeway

Managed Lanes

Toll Road

Reversible Lanes


Transit Lanes


5069

FRT

P

20

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125


5071

FRT

P

Figure A.7

2025Proposed Draft Revenue ConstrainedRegional BikeNetworkJuly 2019


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego

LemonGrove

MILES

KILOMETERS

Class I - Bike Path

Cycle Track

Bike Boulevard

Enhanced Class II - Bike Lane

Enhanced Class III - Bike Route

Freeways and Highways

Regional Arterials

21

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125

MILES

KILOMETERS

Class I - Bike Path

Cycle Track

Bike Boulevard




Regional Arterials

Figure A.8



RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego

LemonGrove


5072

FRT

P

22


RinconReservation

Sycuan Reservation

BaronaReservation

Jamul IndianVillage


PalaReservation


La JollaReservation



Oceanside

Carlsbad

Encinitas

DelMar

SolanaBeach

Poway

SanDiego

Coronado

ImperialBeach

LaMesa

Santee

El Cajon

Escondido

Vista

SanMarcos

ChulaVista

Tijuana, B.C.

UNITED STATES

MEXICO

NationalCity

County of San Diego

Camp Pendleton

San Diego

LemonGrove

905

54

805

5

282

163

94

15

15

56

78

67

8

125

75

94

52

76

11

1

2-D

21-D

5

5

5

15

805

76

78

78

6752

8

125

125


MILES

KILOMETERS

Class I - Bike Path

Cycle Track

Bike Boulevard




Regional Arterials

5073

FRT

P

Figure 2.14


23

Attachment 3

24

2020 Federal RTP: Proposed Draft Transportation Network Performance Measures Evaluation and Results

The proposed draft transportation network was evaluated using the performance measures from the

2015 Regional Plan, which were approved by the Board of Directors on March 28, 2014. The performance

evaluation was conducted for the network phase years of the plan: 2025, 2035, and 2050. Performance was

compared to current conditions (2016)1. The Activity Based Model 2 and Series 14.17 Regional Growth

Forecast were used for the analysis of the proposed draft transportation network.

Summary of Overall Findings

The proposed draft transportation network would perform better than 2016 in most areas.

Work trips by carpool, transit, and bike and walk would increase from 18.7 percent in 2016 to

24.6 percent in 2050, with the transit mode share more than doubling from 3.6 percent in 2016 to

7.5 percent in 2050.

More modest increases are seen in the combined carpool, transit, and bike and walk mode share for all

trips. Walk and bike mode share is projected to increase from 8.1 percent in 2016 to 10.6 percent in

2035 and 11.6 percent in 2050. Transit mode share for all trips is anticipated to increase from

1.5 percent in 2016 to 2.9 percent in 2050.

With the opening of the South Bay Rapid, Mid-Coast Trolley, and several Rapid routes serving the

South Bay and central San Diego, the percentage of the population within a half-mile of high-frequency

transit is anticipated to increase over the life of the plan from 32 percent in 2016 to 46 percent in 2025,

52 percent in 2035, and 55 percent in 2050. Similar increases are seen for the percentage of

employment located near to high-frequency transit, with 43 percent of jobs being located near

high-frequency transit in 2016 and 69 percent in 2050.

Vehicle delay per capita would stay relatively flat though the horizon of the plan with 10 minutes daily in

2016 and 2025 and 11 minutes daily in 2035 and 2050.

Average daily physical activity per capita would increase from 6 minutes in 2016 to 10 minutes in 2050.

The region’s air quality is projected to improve. Smog-forming pollutants per capita would be reduced

below 2016 levels.

Similar to non-disadvantaged communities, low-income, minority, and senior populations would

experience an increase in physical activity and improved access to high frequency transit stops.

Low-income population and minorities also see reduction in travel time to work by transit.

The Title VI analysis demonstrates that there are no disparate impacts or disproportionate effects for

minority or low-income individuals respectively.

1 The base year of the current Activity Based Model is 2016

Number Performance Measure 20162025 No

Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network

1

1AAverage peak-period travel time to work

(minutes)27 27 27 28 27 28 28

drive alone 25 25 26 26 25 26 26

carpool 2 23 23 23 24 23 25 24

carpool 3+ 23 23 24 24 23 23 23

transit 63 62 61 62 61 56 55

bike 22 22 22 22 22 23 24

walk 23 22 22 22 22 22 22

1B Daily vehicle delay per capita (minutes) 10 10 11 12 10 11 11

2

2AWalk, bike, transit, and carpool mode share

(all trips)54.3% 55.0% 53.9% 54.3% 55.1% 54.5% 55.1%

carpool 44.7% 43.9% 41.4% 41.0% 43.7% 41.2% 40.6%

transit 1.5% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 2.1% 2.7% 2.9%

bike & walk 8.1% 9.3% 10.5% 11.4% 9.3% 10.6% 11.6%

2B Walk, bike, transit, and carpool mode share

(work trips)18.7% 20.2% 20.7% 20.8% 20.7% 23.3% 24.6%

carpool 12.4% 12.2% 11.6% 11.5% 12.1% 12.6% 12.8%

transit 3.6% 4.5% 5.0% 5.0% 5.1% 6.6% 7.5%

bike & walk 2.7% 3.5% 4.1% 4.3% 3.5% 4.1% 4.3%

3

3A

Annual projected number of vehicle

injury/fatal collisions per thousand vehicle

miles traveled (VMT)

0.1262 0.1270 0.1267 0.1260 0.1269 0.1268 0.1258

3B

Annual projected number of bike/pedestrian

injury/fatal collisions per thousand

bike/pedestrian miles traveled (BPMT)

1.3634 1.2299 1.1722 1.1161 1.2144 1.1259 1.0517

4

4ABenefit/cost ratio of transportation

investments

4B

Average truck/commercial vehicle travel times

to and around regional gateways and

distribution hubs (minutes)

19 19 20 21 19 20 20

5

5AChange in the percent of income consumed

by out-of-pocket transportation costsN/A 1.1% 0.2% -0.2% 1.2% 0.3% -0.2%

6

6AAverage travel times to/from tribal lands

(minutes) 29 29 30 30 29 29 29

6B Average travel times to/from Mexico (minutes)

San Ysidro 22 23 25 26 24 24 25

Otay Mesa 25 25 23 21 26 25 24

Otay Mesa East N/A 22 22 22 19 20 21

Tecate 54 54 55 55 53 54 53

6C

Average travel times to/from neighboring

counties (Imperial, Orange, Riverside)

(minutes)

53 53 54 56 53 54 54

6DAverage travel times to/from military

bases/installations (minutes)19 20 20 21 20 20 20

7

Are travel times reduced?

Revenue Constrained Network Performance Measures

Are the relative costs of transportation changing similarly for all communities?

Do the transportation investments help to improve the regional economy?

Is the transportation system safer?

0.68 (preliminary, using 4% discount rate)

25


Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network


7A-1

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of a

high frequency (<=15 min peak and midday)

transit stop (communities of concern and

non communities of concern)

32% 36% 38% 39% 46% 52% 55%

7A-2

Percentage of employment within 0.5 mile of

a high frequency (<=15 min peak and

midday) transit stop

43% 46% 46% 44% 63% 66% 69%

7B-1Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of a

transit stop67% 66% 67% 67% 68% 69% 70%

7B-2Percentage of employment within 0.5 mile of

a transit stop82% 81% 81% 79% 85% 86% 85%

7C-1

Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of

a bike facility (class I and II, cycletrack, and

bike boulevard)

63% 64% 63% 63% 66% 68% 69%

7C-2

Percentage of employment within 0.25 mile

of a bike facility (class I and II, cycletrack, and

bike boulevard)

76% 77% 77% 77% 78% 79% 81%

7DAverage travel distance to work (drive alone,

carpool, transit, bike, and walk) (miles)11.4 11.1 11.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.3

drive alone 11.8 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.6 11.7 11.8

carpool 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 11.7 11.9

transit 11.8 12.4 12.0 12.0 12.5 12.1 12.2

bike 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.6

walk 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

7ETotal time engaged in transportation-related

physical activity per capita (minutes)6 7 8 9 8 9 10

7F

Percent of population engaging in more than

20 minutes of daily transportation related

physical activity

10.9% 12.3% 13.5% 14.3% 12.6% 14.4% 15.6%

8

8A.Percent of population within 30 minutes of

jobs and higher education

Auto 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Transit 81.5% 81.3% 81.3% 81.2% 83.6% 83.7% 84.1%

8B-1Percent of population within 15 minutes of

retail

Drive alone 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7%

Transit 57.5% 57.8% 58.6% 58.7% 58.8% 60.2% 61.1%


health care

Drive alone 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

Transit 58.5% 58.7% 59.6% 59.8% 59.7% 61.1% 61.7%


parks

Drive alone 99.1% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8%

Transit 34.3% 34.9% 35.6% 36.2% 35.4% 37.1% 38.8%


beaches

Drive alone 39.2% 39.2% 36.3% 35.1% 39.6% 38.7% 35.6%

Transit 3.8% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 4.0% 4.2%

9

9AOn-road smog-forming pollutants

(pounds/day) per capita *0.045 0.019 0.014 0.012 0.019 0.014 0.012

10

10A-1 Total on-road CO2 emissions (tons/day) 43,623 34,440 31,410 32,877 34,351 31,192 32,711

Are GHG emissions reduced?

26


Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network


10A-2Total on-road CO2 emissions (pounds/day) per

capita26.31 19.43 16.74 16.39 19.38 16.62 16.31

27

Performance Measure 20162025 No

Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network

SE-1

All Modes Combined (minutes)

Low Income 24 25 25 25 25 26 26

Non-Low Income 27 28 28 29 28 28 29

Minority 27 27 28 28 27 28 28

Non-Minority 26 26 27 28 26 27 28

Auto, Drive Alone (minutes)

Low Income 22 21 21 22 21 21 21

Non-Low Income 26 26 27 27 26 27 27

Minority 25 25 26 26 25 26 25

Non-Minority 25 25 26 27 25 26 26

Auto, Carpool 2 (minutes)

Low Income 21 21 22 22 21 23 23

Non-Low Income 24 24 24 25 24 25 25

Minority 23 23 23 24 23 25 24

Non-Minority 23 23 23 24 23 25 25

Auto, Carpool 3 (minutes)

Low Income 22 21 22 22 21 21 21

Non-Low Income 24 24 24 25 24 24 23

Minority 23 23 24 24 23 23 23

Non-Minority 23 24 24 24 23 23 23

Transit (minutes)

Low Income 61 62 61 61 61 56 54

Non-Low Income 64 63 61 62 62 56 55

Minority 62 62 61 62 61 56 55

Non-Minority 65 63 61 62 62 57 54

Bike (minutes)

Low Income 18 19 19 19 19 19 20

Non-Low Income 25 25 24 25 25 26 27

Minority 21 23 23 23 23 24 25

Non-Minority 22 21 20 22 21 22 24

Walk (minutes)

Low Income 22 22 22 22 22 21 21

Non-Low Income 25 23 22 22 22 22 22

Minority 24 23 23 22 23 23 22

Non-Minority 22 21 21 20 20 20 20

SE-2

Low Income 2.9% 1.8% 1.6% 3.0% 1.9% 1.7%

Non-Low Income 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0%

Minority 1.1% 0.0% -0.6% 1.2% 0.0% -0.6%

Non-Minority 1.0% 0.3% 0.1% 1.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Senior 0.7% 0.0% -0.2% 0.7% 0.0% -0.2%

Non-Senior 1.3% 0.5% 0.1% 1.3% 0.5% 0.1%

SE-3

Low Income 41% 46% 48% 49% 57% 62% 64%

Non-Low Income 27% 32% 34% 36% 42% 48% 51%

Minority 39% 42% 43% 44% 53% 58% 60%

Non-Minority 24% 29% 31% 33% 38% 44% 46%

Senior 29% 32% 35% 38% 42% 48% 53%

Non-Senior 32% 37% 38% 40% 47% 53% 55%

SE-4

Low Income 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 78% 78%

Non-Low Income 62% 62% 63% 64% 64% 65% 67%

Minority 72% 71% 71% 71% 72% 73% 74%

Social Equity Performance Measures: Revenue Constrained Network

Average Peak Period Travel to Work

Change in percent of income consumed by out-of-pocket transportation costs

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of transit stops

28


Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network


Non-Minority 61% 61% 61% 62% 62% 63% 64%

Senior 64% 63% 64% 66% 64% 66% 68%

Non-Senior 67% 67% 67% 67% 68% 69% 70%

SE-5

Low Income 60% 62% 62% 62% 65% 68% 69%

Non-Low Income 64% 65% 64% 63% 66% 68% 69%

Minority 63% 64% 63% 63% 67% 68% 70%

Non-Minority 63% 64% 63% 63% 65% 66% 68%

Senior 62% 64% 64% 64% 65% 68% 70%

Non-Senior 63% 64% 63% 63% 66% 68% 69%

SE-6

Auto

Low Income 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Non-Low Income 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Minority 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Non-Minority 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Senior 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Non-Senior 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Transit

Low Income 87.5% 87.6% 87.4% 87.2% 88.4% 88.3% 88.4%

Non-Low Income 78.9% 78.7% 79.1% 79.2% 81.6% 82.0% 82.6%

Minority 85.7% 84.8% 84.5% 84.1% 86.9% 86.8% 87.1%

Non-Minority 77.4% 77.3% 77.3% 77.2% 79.8% 79.7% 79.7%

Senior 79.9% 78.8% 79.2% 80.3% 81.0% 81.7% 83.3%

Non-Senior 81.6% 81.6% 81.7% 81.5% 83.9% 84.1% 84.2%

SE-7

Auto

Low Income 99.5% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6%

Non-Low Income 99.7% 99.8% 99.7% 99.7% 99.8% 99.7% 99.7%

Minority 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

Non-Minority 99.5% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6%

Senior 99.5% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7%

Non-Senior 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7%

Transit

Low Income 67.7% 68.0% 68.7% 68.9% 68.5% 69.3% 70.1%

Non-Low Income 52.7% 53.2% 54.5% 55.0% 54.4% 56.5% 57.8%

Minority 63.5% 62.8% 63.0% 62.5% 63.7% 64.9% 65.2%

Non-Minority 50.5% 51.4% 52.6% 53.2% 52.5% 53.8% 54.9%

Senior 54.3% 53.9% 55.6% 57.5% 55.0% 57.2% 59.8%

Non-Senior 57.7% 58.1% 59.0% 58.9% 59.1% 60.6% 61.3%

SE-8

Auto

Low Income 99.7% 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% 99.7% 99.8% 99.8%

Non-Low Income 99.8% 99.9% 99.8% 99.8% 99.9% 99.8% 99.9%

Minority 99.8% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9%

Non-Minority 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

Senior 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

Non-Senior 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

Transit

Low Income 68.4% 69.0% 69.7% 69.9% 69.4% 70.2% 70.8%

Non-Low Income 53.9% 54.2% 55.5% 56.0% 55.3% 57.4% 58.3%

Minority 64.9% 64.1% 64.2% 63.7% 64.9% 66.0% 65.9%

Non-Minority 51.1% 51.9% 53.4% 53.9% 53.0% 54.6% 55.4%

Senior 55.5% 54.7% 56.5% 58.5% 55.7% 58.1% 60.5%

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of healthcare (auto/transit)

Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of a bike facility

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of retail (auto/transit)

29


Build

2035 No

Build

2050 No

Build

2025

Proposed

Draft

Network

2035

Proposed

Draft

Network

2050

Proposed

Draft

Network


Non-Senior 58.7% 59.1% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 61.5% 61.9%

SE-9

Auto

Low Income 98.9% 98.9% 98.7% 98.6% 98.9% 98.7% 98.6%

Non-Low Income 99.2% 99.2% 98.9% 98.9% 99.2% 98.9% 98.9%

Minority 99.3% 99.3% 99.1% 99.0% 99.3% 99.1% 99.0%

Non-Minority 98.8% 98.8% 98.5% 98.5% 98.8% 98.5% 98.5%

Senior 98.9% 98.9% 98.7% 98.8% 98.9% 98.7% 98.8%

Non-Senior 99.1% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8%

Transit

Low Income 40.5% 41.5% 42.2% 43.1% 41.7% 43.3% 45.8%

Non-Low Income 31.3% 31.9% 32.9% 33.7% 32.5% 34.6% 36.2%

Minority 39.4% 39.4% 39.5% 39.6% 39.7% 40.9% 42.1%

Non-Minority 28.3% 29.1% 30.4% 31.2% 29.9% 31.9% 33.8%

Senior 31.9% 32.4% 33.9% 36.0% 32.9% 35.4% 38.1%

Non-Senior 34.4% 35.1% 35.8% 36.3% 35.6% 37.3% 38.9%

SE-10

Auto

Low Income 42.4% 42.6% 39.5% 38.0% 43.0% 42.6% 38.7%

Non-Low Income 37.7% 37.7% 35.0% 34.0% 38.0% 37.2% 34.5%

Minority 36.9% 36.5% 33.4% 32.1% 37.1% 36.3% 32.8%

Non-Minority 41.9% 42.5% 40.3% 39.5% 42.7% 42.0% 39.8%

Senior 39.1% 38.9% 37.3% 36.1% 39.2% 39.4% 36.6%

Non-Senior 39.2% 39.2% 36.2% 34.9% 39.6% 38.6% 35.4%

Transit

Low Income 3.0% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3%

Non-Low Income 4.1% 4.1% 4.2% 4.4% 4.2% 4.3% 4.6%

Minority 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.6% 2.7% 3.0%

Non-Minority 5.5% 5.4% 5.6% 5.8% 5.6% 5.7% 6.1%

Senior 4.2% 4.4% 4.6% 4.6% 4.5% 4.7% 4.8%

Non-Senior 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1%

SE-11

PM10

Low Income 12.91 12.88 14.44 15.81 12.85 14.30 15.56

Non-Low Income 11.79 11.63 12.98 14.21 11.60 12.82 13.93

Minority 12.97 12.70 14.09 15.37 12.67 13.93 15.08

Non-Minority 11.19 11.14 12.46 13.57 11.12 12.33 13.32

Senior 11.62 11.50 13.12 14.66 11.47 12.97 14.37

Non-Senior 12.18 12.06 13.44 14.64 12.03 13.28 14.37

PM2.5

Low Income 6.04 5.45 5.94 6.44 5.43 5.88 6.34

Non-Low Income 5.52 4.91 5.34 5.79 4.90 5.27 5.67

Minority 6.06 5.37 5.80 6.26 5.35 5.73 6.14

Non-Minority 5.25 4.71 5.13 5.53 4.70 5.07 5.43

Senior 5.44 4.86 5.40 5.97 4.85 5.34 5.86

Non-Senior 5.70 5.10 5.53 5.96 5.08 5.47 5.85

Average Particulate Matter (PM) Exposure

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of active park (auto/transit)

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of active beach (auto/transit)

30

31

Summary of Findings from Social Equity Analysis (Check indicates no disparity found)

Social Equity Performance Measures Low-Income Minority Seniors

Average Peak Period Travel to Work – all modes N/A

Change in percent of income consumed by out-of-pocket transportation costs

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of high frequency transit stops

Percentage of population within 0.5 mile of transit stops

Percentage of population within 0.25 mile of a bike facility

Percentage of population within 30 minutes of jobs/higher education

(auto/transit)

Percentage of population within 15 minutes of goods/services (auto/transit):

Access to Retail

Access to Healthcare

Access to Active Parks

Access to Beaches

Exposure to PM10

Additional Performance Measure with Social Equity Analysis Low-Income Minority Seniors

Exposure to PM2.5

= No Disparate Impact or Disproportionate Effect

Executive Director Delegated Actions

Overview

Various Board Policies require the Executive Director to report certain actions to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis or upon taking specified actions.

Delegated Actions

Investment Transactions: Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy, states that a monthly report of all investment transactions shall be submitted to the Board. Attachment 1 contains the reportable investment transactions for June 2019.

Legal Matters: Board Policy No. 008: Legal Matters, authorizes the Office of the General Counsel or outside counsel to file documents and make appearances on behalf of SANDAG in court proceedings.

In the matter of Quintero v. SANDAG (Superior Court Case No. 2019-00017834), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 24, 2019, a Notice of Rescheduled Hearing and Case Reassignment was filed.

In the matter of SANDAG v. 8650 Villa La Jolla (Superior Court Case No. 2017-00039831), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 7, 2019, a Joint Status Conference Brief was filed.

• On June 27, 2019, an appearance was made for a Status Conference.

In the matter of SANDAG v. Costa Verde Hotel (Superior Court Case No. 2018-00030194), the following action was taken by Nossaman on behalf of SANDAG:

• On June 27, 2019, a Stipulation for Protective Order Re Confidentiality of Documents and Information was filed.

In the matter of Wahlstrom v. SANDAG (Superior Court Case No. 2019-00027143), the following action was taken by Best Best & Krieger on behalf of SANDAG:

• On July 1, 2019, an Answer was filed.

Board Policy No. 008 also authorizes the Executive Director to take action on claims filed against SANDAG:

• On May 29, 2019, the Chief Deputy Executive Director authorized the settlement of the Claim of Rafael Galicot in the amount of $537. Mr. Galicot claimed damages to his vehicle after it was struck by debris allegedly kicked up by a lawnmower operated by SANDAG staff alongside the South Bay Expressway. Upon investigation of the claim, it was determined that SANDAG was likely liable for the alleged damages.

Item: 19


Highlights:

Seventeen securities reached maturity and four securities were sold in June for a total of $42.1 million and five securities were purchased for $23.3 million, providing approximately $18.8 million of liquidity to SANDAG.

Action: Information

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarizes delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board Business meeting.

2

Budget Modifications: Board Policy No. 017: Delegation of Authority, authorizes the Executive Director to enter into agreements currently not incorporated in the budget, and to make other budget modifications in an amount up to $300,000 per transaction so long as the overall budget remains in balance. Attachment 2 contains the actions for June 2019.

Right-of-Way: Board Policy No. 017, Section 4.15, authorizes the Executive Director to execute all right-of-way property transfer documents, including rights of entry, licenses, leases, deeds, easements, escrow instructions, and certificates of acceptance. The list below reflects the approved documents for this reporting period.

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project – Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1257001

No. Address Nature of Activity (4.15) Date

1. 4320 and 4330 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92122; UTC Properties, LLC

Settlement Agreement (compensation for acquired property between SANDAG and Irvine Management)

6/24/19

2. 4250, 4270, and 4275 Executive Square, La Jolla, CA 92037; Irvine Company, LLC

Settlement Agreement (compensation for property damages), Joint Escrow

6/24/19

Elvira to Morena Double Track Project – Capital Improvement Program Project No. 1239811

No. Address Nature of Activity (4.15) Date

1. 7744 Hershel Avenue, San Diego, CA 92037; La Jolla Colony Community Association

Settlement Agreement (property rights between SANDAG and the La Jolla Community Association)

6/26/19


Key Staff Contact: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. June 2019 Investment Securities Transactions Activity 2. June 2019 Budget Transfers and Amendments

MONTHLY ACTIVITY FOR INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS JUNE 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019

Transaction Par OriginalDate Security/Coupon/Maturity Date Value Cost

BOUGHT6/13/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 8/31/23 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 3,925,794.65 6/24/2019 F F C B DEB 2.250% 2/08/23 5,000,000.00 5,082,900.00 6/24/2019 F H L B DEB 2.125% 3/10/23 5,000,000.00 5,063,453.45 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.625% 5/31/23 5,000,000.00 4,980,078.15 6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/30/23 4,300,000.00 4,235,500.00

TOTAL BOUGHT: $ 23,300,000.00 $ 23,287,726.25

MATURED6/3/2019 PFIZER INC 1.450% 6/03/19 $ 6,000,000.00 $ 6,018,300.00

6/15/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.875% 6/15/19 3,700,000.00 3,652,449.22 6/15/2019 TOYOTA AUTO 1.730% 2/16/21 16,277.26 16,275.34 6/15/2019 TOYOTA AUTO 1.140% 8/17/20 27,378.12 27,377.38 6/15/2019 NISSAN AUTO 1.320% 1/15/21 21,301.54 21,298.24 6/15/2019 JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 30,865.76 30,861.36 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.770% 1/18/22 20,199.11 20,195.61 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.760% 8/16/21 26,307.23 26,305.10 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.560% 9/15/20 34,104.31 34,097.70 6/15/2019 HYUNDAI AUTO 1.290% 4/15/21 63,067.70 63,059.21 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.990% 3/15/22 82,579.92 82,573.51 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.700% 6/15/21 39,747.17 39,743.69 6/15/2019 ALLY AUTO 1.780% 8/16/21 42,839.78 42,834.73 6/21/2019 HONDA AUTO 1.720% 7/21/21 21,926.89 21,925.59 6/21/2019 HONDA AUTO 2.050% 11/22/21 68,936.12 68,926.41 6/21/2019 F H L B DEB 1.125% 6/21/19 12,610,000.00 12,604,703.80 6/25/2019 F N M A GTD REMIC 1.646% 9/25/19 57,838.02 58,417.20

TOTAL MATURED: $ 22,863,368.93 $ 22,829,344.09

SOLD6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.750% 7/15/19 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 4,946,679.69 1

6/24/2019 U S TREASURY NT 0.750% 8/15/19 5,000,000.00 4,938,476.56 1

6/24/2019 F H L M C DEB 1.250% 8/01/19 5,000,000.00 4,956,985.60 1

6/24/2019 F N M A 1.000% 8/28/19 4,217,000.00 4,164,751.37 1

TOTAL SOLD: $ 19,217,000.00 $ 19,006,893.22

1 Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase new securities that would provide higher returns over a longer holding period.

Attachment 1

3

PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME

CURRENTBUDGET

NEW BUDGET CHANGE EXPLANATION

7500000 Service Bureau - Main Project FY 2020 $185.2 $87.2 ($98.0) Transferred funds from the Main Service Bureau project (7500000) to 2021 Border Master Plan Update (7515100) for FY 2020 administration costs.

7515100 2021 Border Master Plan Update $280.0 $378.0 $98.0 Additional budget for FY 2020 administration costs.

7500000 Service Bureau - Main Project FY 2020 $87.2 $63.2 ($24.0) Transferred funds from the Main Service Bureau project (7500000) to establish a new project.

7515300 Transportation Modeling for San Marcos University District Phase $0.0 $24.0 $24.0 New Service Bureau project for Transportation Modeling for San Marcos University District Phase II

JULY 2019 BUDGET TRANSFERS AND AMENDMENTSin '000s

Attachment 2

4

Item: 20


Meetings and Events Attended on Behalf of SANDAG

Since the last Board of Directors meeting, Board members participated in the following meetings and events on behalf of SANDAG. Key topics of discussion also are summarized.

June 9-12, 2019: National Association of Regional Councils Omaha, NE

National City Councilmember Ron Morrison participated in the annual National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) Conference as the SANDAG representative. The conference presented sessions on changing demographics; engaging the private sector; updates on current Supreme Court cases; disaster preparation; the intersection of land use, transportation, and urban design; regional funding initiatives; and surface transportation reauthorization.

June 17, 2019: Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency Board Meeting Orange, CA

Del Mar Deputy Mayor Ellie Haviland participated in the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor (LOSSAN) Agency Board Meeting as the SANDAG representative. The LOSSAN Board participated in discussions related to ridership, revenue, on-time performance, and marketing efforts. The Board approved mid-year amendments to the budget and the annual business plan.


Key Staff Contact: Tessa Lero, (619) 595-5629, [email protected]

Action: Information

Board members will provide brief reports on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG.

Highlights:

SANDAG held $944.1. million in several investment accounts as of June 30, 2019.

Item: 21 Board of Directors July 26, 2019

Quarterly Investments as of June 30, 2019

Overview

Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy follows the requirements of California Government Code Section 53646, which requires the chief fiscal officer to render a quarterly report on investments to the legislative body within 30 days following the end of the quarter.

Key Considerations

The quarterly report on investments includes the following information:

• The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested on all securities, investments, and moneys held by SANDAG

• Description of funds and investments under management of a contracted party

• Current market value as of the date of the report and source of the valuation for all securities under management of any outside party that is not a local agency or in State of California Local Agency Investment Fund)

The Director of Finance reports that the SANDAG investment portfolio (Attachment 1), together with the authorized short-term Commercial Paper Program, will provide the necessary liquidity to meet the expenditure requirements of SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and SourcePoint for the next six months.

The Director of Finance reports that there has not been any material event involving outstanding swap agreements, nor has there been any default by a swap counterparty or counterparty termination.

Investment Holdings

The following tables provide the portfolio cash and investments balances for all money under the direction or care of SANDAG, including funds of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, SourcePoint, and Automated Regional Justice Information System. Additional detail can be found in the attachments to this report.

Action: Information

This quarterly report provides an update on SANDAG investments, including all money under the direction or care of SANDAG as of June 30, 2019.

2


Key Staff Contacts: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Investment Portfolio Summary 2. Investment Securities Portfolio

$18,962,196 2.01%

$69,527,748 7.36%

$154,389,736 16.35%

$283,967,209 30.08%

$92,099,720 9.75%

$219,322,338 23.24%

$43,545 0.00%

$98,705,418 10.45%

$459,109 0.05%

$6,658,183 0.71% Investments Held By Institution

(Market Value)

US BANK, N.A.

LAIF

CAMP IP

CAMP CASH RESERVE

US BANK

US BANK IP

US BANK CASH RESERVE

COSD TREASURER'S POOL

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

$117,971,056 $105,966,433

$8,658,327 $207,501 $286,938

$711,044,948

12.50% 11.22%

0.92% 0.02% 0.03%

75.31%

SANDAG OTHERFUNDS

SANDAG SR125FUNDS

ARJIS FUNDS SOURCEPOINT FUNDS CORONADO BRIDGETOLL FUNDS

SDCRTC(COMMISSION)

FUNDS

Cash and Investment Balances By Agency/Unit(Market Value)

Percent

Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on

Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss ) Cost

US BANK, N.A.:

Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 664,737.02$ 0.07% 664,737.02$ 100.00% -$ N/A

Checking - SANDAG General 7,672,438.72 0.81% 7,672,438.72 100.00% - N/A

Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) 47,117.43 0.00% 47,117.43 100.00% - N/A

Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak ® 4,847,338.02 0.51% 4,847,338.02 100.00% - N/A

Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct 629,821.00 0.07% 629,821.00 100.00% - N/A

Checking - SourcePoint 31,993.40 0.00% 31,993.40 100.00% - N/A

Checking - ARJIS 392,732.12 0.04% 392,732.12 100.00% - N/A

Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Payment Account 4,534,224.23 0.48% 4,534,224.23 100.00% - N/A

Checking - State Route 125 (SR 125) Collection Account 141,793.65 0.02% 141,793.65 100.00% - N/A

TOTAL US BANK, N.A. 18,962,195.59$ 2.01% 18,962,195.59$ 100.00% -$ N/A

STATE OF CA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF):

TransNet (RTC) 62,202,239.48$ 6.60% 62,202,239.48$ 100.00% -$ 2.45%

SANDAG 7,325,508.45 0.78% 7,325,508.45 100.00% - 2.45%

TOTAL LAIF 69,527,747.93$ 7.38% 69,527,747.93$ 100.00% -$ 2.45%

Funds Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC:

INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO:

TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 107,069,102.22$ 11.36% 106,701,695.89$ 99.66% (367,406.33)$ 1.74%

TransNet Program Reserve (RTC) 33,914,667.45 3.60% 33,955,318.05 100.12% 40,650.60 1.64%

TransNet 2008 Bond Proceeds A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 12,843,049.34 1.36% 12,910,527.07 100.53% 67,477.73 2.33%

Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 821,139.00 0.09% 822,195.00 100.13% 1,056.00 1.63%

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO 154,647,958.01$ 16.41% 154,389,736.01$ 99.83% (258,222.00)$ 1.76%

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) - CASH PORTFOLIO:

I-15 FasTrak 650,996.97$ 0.07% 650,996.97$ 100.00% -$ 2.48%

ARJIS 5,717,622.49 0.61% 5,717,622.49 100.00% - 2.48%

California Coastal Commission 1,029,961.20 0.11% 1,029,961.20 100.00% - 2.48%

SANDAG SR 125 75,986,433.52 8.06% 75,986,433.52 100.00% - 2.48%

Coronado Bridge Toll Funds 286,938.08 0.03% 286,938.08 100.00% - 2.48%

SANDAG Shoreline Management Account 169,328.98 0.02% 169,328.98 100.00% - 2.48%

Sales Tax Account - TransNet Extension (RTC) 110,481,660.10 11.72% 110,481,660.10 100.00% - 2.48%

Wetland Mitigation TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 305,745.60 0.03% 305,745.60 100.00% - 2.48%

SANDAG

Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account)

as of June 30, 2019

3

Attachment 1

Percent



SANDAG


as of June 30, 2019

Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 31,869.29 0.00% 31,869.29 100.00% - 2.48%

TransNet Program Reserve (RTC) 21,060,036.64 2.23% 21,060,036.64 100.00% - 2.48%

2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Reserve Account (RTC) 4,341,164.33 0.46% 4,341,164.33 100.00% - 2.48%

2010 Bond Series A/B Accounts (RTC) 5,266,347.60 0.56% 5,266,347.60 100.00% - 2.48%

2012 Bond Series A Accounts (RTC) 8,406,753.98 0.89% 8,406,753.98 100.00% - 2.48%




2018 Swap Overlay Custody Account (RTC) 4,594,956.33 0.49% 4,594,956.33 100.00% - 2.48%

TOTAL CAMP - CASH PORTFOLIO 283,967,209.35$ 30.12% 283,967,209.35$ 100.00% -$ 2.48%

TOTAL PORTFOLIO (Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC) 438,615,167.36$ 46.53% 438,356,945.36$ 99.94% -$ 2.22%

US BANK:

Capital Project Retention Account 40,613,042.78$ 4.31% 40,613,042.78$ 100.00% -$ 1.65%

SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A 219,442.13 0.02% 219,442.13 100.00% - 0.85%

SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Reserve Account 13,870,500.31 1.47% 13,870,500.31 100.00% - 0.85%

SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Interest Account 4,857,822.65 0.52% 4,857,822.65 100.00% - 0.85%

SANDAG SR 125 First Senior Lien bonds 2017 Series A Principal Account 4,333,947.65 0.46% 4,333,947.65 100.00% - 0.85%

SANDAG SR 125 FasTrak Customer Prepaid Fund 2,022,268.86 0.21% 2,022,268.86 100.00% - 0.85%

2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Main Interest (RTC) 1,231,414.40 0.13% 1,231,414.40 100.00% - 0.30%

Commercial Paper Series B - NCTD Interest (RTC) 226,793.69 0.02% 226,793.69 100.00% - 0.30%

NCTD Certificates of Participation 24,300,000.00 2.58% 24,300,000.00 100.00% - 1.42%

Commercial Paper Notes Series B Interest (RTC) 7,818.37 0.00% 7,818.37 100.00% - 1.79%

Commercial Paper Notes Series B Principal (RTC) 416,669.33 0.04% 416,669.33 100.00% - 1.79%

TOTAL US BANK 92,099,720.17$ 9.77% 92,099,720.17$ 100.00% -$ 1.35%

Funds Managed by Ins ight North America, LLC:

US BANK - Custodian

INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO:

TransNet Extension (RTC) 217,791,874.78$ 23.10% 219,322,338.00$ 100.70% 1,530,463.22$ 2.03%

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES PORTFOLIO 217,791,874.78$ 23.10% 219,322,338.00$ 100.70% 1,530,463.22$ 2.03%

4

Percent



SANDAG


as of June 30, 2019

CASH PORTFOLIO:

TransNet Extension (RTC) 43,545.34$ 0.00% 43,545.34$ 100.00% -$ 0.00%

TOTAL CASH PORTFOLIO 43,545.34$ 0.00% 43,545.34$ 100.00% -$ 0.00%

TOTAL PORTFOLIO (Managed by Ins ight North America, LLC) 217,835,420.12$ 23.11% 219,365,883.34$ 100.70% 1,530,463.22$ 2.03%

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND:

SourcePoint Cash Reserve Fund 175,507.10$ 0.02% 175,507.10$ 100.00% -$ 2.43%

SANDAG I-15 FasTrak 38,980,823.01 4.14% 38,980,823.01 100.00% - 2.43%

TransNet Extension (RTC) 48,113,728.24 5.10% 48,113,728.24 100.00% - 2.43%

ARJIS 2,547,971.90 0.27% 2,547,971.90 100.00% - 2.43%

SANDAG SAFE Program 8,887,387.66 0.94% 8,887,387.66 100.00% - 2.43%

TOTAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND 98,705,417.91$ 10.47% 98,705,417.91$ 100.00% -$ 2.43%

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST:

Capital Project Retention Accounts 459,109.38$ 0.05% 459,109.38$ 100.00% -$ 0.27%

TOTAL CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST 459,109.38$ 0.05% 459,109.38$ 100.00% -$ 0.27%

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.:

SANDAG Section 115 Pension Trust 6,425,034.64$ 0.68% 6,658,182.68$ 103.63% 233,148.04$ 2.36%

TOTAL WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 6,425,034.64$ 0.68% 6,658,182.68$ 103.63% 233,148.04$ 2.36%

TOTAL SANDAG Portfolio 942,629,813.10$ 100.00% 944,135,202.36$ 100.16% 1,505,389.26$ 2.13%

Legend:

Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS)

Commercial Paper (CP)

State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)

North County Transit District (NCTD)

San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC)

5

CUSIP ID Issuer/Investment Issue DateMaturity

DateBook Value Market Value Pricing Date EOM Price Shares /Par Yield

Moodys

Rating

S&P

Rating

Managing

Institution

US Treasury and Agency Obligations:

3137EAEB1 F H L M C M T N 07/20/16 07/19/19 9,209,711.30$ 9,227,519.65$ 06/28/19 99.8 9,235,000.00$ 0.88 AAA AA+ 1

3135G0N33 F N M A 08/02/16 08/02/19 6,529,012.80 6,532,086.60 06/28/19 99.739 6,540,000.00 0.88 AAA AA+ 1

3135G0P49 F N M A 09/02/16 08/28/19 11,605,444.00 11,597,922.00 06/28/19 99.666 11,620,000.00 1.00 AAA AA+ 1

3135G0R39 F N M A 10/25/16 10/24/19 4,155,357.75 4,199,446.65 06/28/19 99.455 4,215,000.00 1.00 AAA AA+ 1

3137EAEF2 F H L M C M T N 04/20/17 04/20/20 1,729,066.30 1,726,186.20 06/28/19 99.232 1,735,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1

3137EAEH8 F H L M C 07/19/17 08/15/19 3,459,906.45 3,461,292.45 06/28/19 99.785 3,465,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1

912828L99 U S TREASURY NOTE 11/02/15 10/31/20 1,409,080.08 1,415,766.00 06/28/19 99.035 1,425,000.00 1.38 AAA N/A 1

3137EAEE5 F H L M C M T N 01/17/17 01/17/20 7,720,983.00 7,697,653.50 06/28/19 99.49 7,725,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1

912828X21 U S TREASURY NOTE 04/15/17 04/15/20 1,990,781.25 1,991,720.00 06/28/19 99.324 2,000,000.00 1.51 AAA N/A 1

3135G0T60 F N M A DEB 08/01/17 07/30/20 3,623,985.95 3,616,861.35 06/28/19 99.235 3,635,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1

3137EAEJ4 F H L M C 09/29/17 09/29/20 821,139.00 822,195.00 06/28/19 99.427 825,000.00 1.63 AAA AA+ 1

912828NT3 U S TREASURY NOTE 08/16/10 08/15/20 604,858.01 589,568.85 06/28/19 100.57 585,000.00 2.61 AAA N/A 1

3136AQDQ0 F N M A GTD R E M I C PASS THRU 10/01/15 09/25/19 3,725.74 3,681.98 06/28/19 99.705 3,688.80 1.65 N/A N/A 1

912828C57 U S TREASURY NOTE 03/31/14 03/31/21 3,541,276.64 3,568,513.57 06/28/19 100.461 3,541,000.00 2.23 AAA N/A 1

3130ADUJ9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 03/16/18 03/30/20 9,301,772.70 9,342,013.50 06/28/19 100.058 9,315,000.00 2.37 AAA AA+ 1

3130ACE26 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 09/08/17 09/28/20 6,181,623.30 6,248,486.00 06/28/19 99.094 6,290,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 1

3135G0T29 F N M A DEB 02/28/17 02/28/20 9,976,713.93 9,961,600.00 06/28/19 99.46 10,000,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1

3135G0T60 F N M A DEB 08/01/17 07/30/20 6,539,677.37 6,517,315.50 06/28/19 99.235 6,550,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 1

3137EAEK1 F H L M C M T N 11/15/17 11/17/20 4,087,167.00 4,098,729.00 06/28/19 99.763 4,100,000.00 1.88 AAA AA+ 1

912828TR1 U S TREASURY NOTE 10/01/12 09/30/19 4,998,437.50 4,985,750.00 06/28/19 99.539 5,000,000.00 1.00 AAA N/A 2

912828UF5 U S TREASURY NOTE 12/31/12 12/31/19 4,810,125.00 4,776,768.00 06/28/19 99.289 4,800,000.00 1.13 AAA N/A 2

3136G4DB6 F N M A M T N 09/30/16 03/30/20 5,097,450.00 5,071,593.00 06/28/19 99.207 5,100,000.00 1.26 AAA AA+ 2

3137EADM8 F H L M C M T N 10/02/12 10/02/19 4,943,250.00 4,987,900.00 06/28/19 99.638 5,000,000.00 1.25 AAA AA+ 2

3134G9AV9 F H L M C M T N 04/28/16 10/28/19 5,000,000.00 4,984,050.00 06/28/19 99.556 5,000,000.00 1.25 AAA AA+ 2

3134GAMB7 F H L M C M T N 10/06/16 07/06/20 5,498,625.00 5,467,880.00 06/28/19 99.256 5,500,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 2

9128282D1 U S TREASURY NOTE 08/31/16 08/31/23 3,925,794.65 3,941,880.00 06/28/19 97.738 4,000,000.00 1.40 AAA N/A 2

912828T26 U S TREASURY NOTE 09/30/16 09/30/23 4,235,500.00 4,235,500.00 06/28/19 97.66 4,300,000.00 1.40 AAA N/A 2

3130AA3R7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/17/16 11/15/19 9,471,914.10 9,573,696.00 06/28/19 99.565 9,600,000.00 1.38 AAA AA+ 2

3133EHGA5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 04/21/17 10/21/19 6,131,118.00 6,189,646.00 06/28/19 99.691 6,200,000.00 1.44 AAA AA+ 2

3137EAEE5 F H L M C M T N 01/17/17 01/17/20 4,921,800.00 4,982,300.00 06/28/19 99.49 5,000,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 2

3135G0T29 F N M A DEB 02/28/17 02/28/20 5,511,408.00 5,578,496.00 06/28/19 99.46 5,600,000.00 1.51 AAA AA+ 2

912828R69 U S TREASURY NOTE 05/31/16 05/31/23 4,980,078.15 4,980,300.00 06/28/19 98.856 5,000,000.00 1.63 AAA N/A 2

313379RB7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 06/05/12 06/11/21 4,924,100.00 5,001,350.00 06/28/19 99.725 5,000,000.00 1.88 AAA AA+ 2

3130AABG2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/30/16 11/29/21 4,915,300.00 5,010,550.00 06/28/19 99.758 5,000,000.00 1.87 AAA AA+ 2

313382AX1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/08/13 03/10/23 5,063,453.45 5,057,450.00 06/28/19 100.518 5,000,000.00 2.10 AAA AA+ 2

3130A12B3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/24/14 03/13/20 4,956,225.00 5,000,400.00 06/28/19 99.847 5,000,000.00 2.12 AAA AA+ 2

3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 05/08/19 02/08/23 5,082,900.00 5,072,400.00 06/28/19 101.448 5,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2

3133EKGC4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 04/05/19 04/05/23 6,968,500.00 7,089,390.00 06/28/19 101.02 7,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2

3135G0V59 F N M A DEB 04/12/19 04/12/22 4,982,050.00 5,062,800.00 06/28/19 100.74 5,000,000.00 2.22 AAA AA+ 2

3133EKKU9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 05/08/19 11/08/23 6,022,560.00 6,106,140.00 06/28/19 101.149 6,000,000.00 2.26 AAA AA+ 2

SANDAG

Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type)

as of June 30, 2019

6

Attachment 2



Moodys

Rating

S&P

Rating

Managing

Institution

SANDAG


as of June 30, 2019

3130A0XD7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 02/12/14 03/12/21 4,979,485.00 5,038,300.00 06/28/19 100.618 5,000,000.00 2.36 AAA AA+ 2

3133EKAJ5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BKS 02/11/19 02/11/21 4,999,029.10 5,053,550.00 06/28/19 100.797 5,000,000.00 2.48 AAA AA+ 2

3130AEWA4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 09/07/18 10/01/20 5,008,150.00 5,042,850.00 06/28/19 100.727 5,000,000.00 2.60 AAA AA+ 2

9128285R7 U S TREASURY NOTE 12/15/18 12/15/21 5,013,298.00 5,109,550.00 06/28/19 101.781 5,000,000.00 2.57 AAA N/A 2

3133XN4B2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS 11/09/07 12/09/22 3,648,843.00 3,671,085.00 06/28/19 111.127 3,300,000.00 4.73 AAA AA+ 2

Total US Treasury and Agency Obligations 228,580,676.52$ 229,690,131.80$ 229,204,688.80$

Corporate Obligations:

084664CK5 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 08/15/16 08/15/19 959,068.80$ 958,867.20$ 06/28/19 99.74 960,000.00$ 1.30 AA2 AA 1

44932HAA1 IBM CREDIT CORP 09/08/17 09/06/19 1,678,723.20 1,677,732.00 06/28/19 99.767 1,680,000.00 1.63 A1 A 1

437076BQ4 HOME DEPOT INC 06/05/17 06/05/20 1,044,393.90 1,041,373.85 06/28/19 99.305 1,045,000.00 1.81 A2 A 1

438516BQ8 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL 10/30/17 10/30/19 544,574.90 544,040.80 06/28/19 99.725 545,000.00 1.80 A2 A 1

857477AS2 STATE STREET CORP 08/18/15 08/18/20 3,063,060.00 3,013,320.00 06/28/19 100.166 3,000,000.00 2.54 A1 A 1

0258M0EE5 AMERICAN EXPRESSCREDIT 03/03/17 03/03/20 3,024,630.00 2,996,850.00 06/28/19 99.819 3,000,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 1

05531FAZ6 BB T CORPORATION 10/26/17 02/01/21 999,540.00 998,240.00 06/28/19 99.392 1,000,000.00 2.16 A2 A- 1

14913Q2A6 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 09/07/17 09/04/20 1,463,769.40 1,459,843.20 06/28/19 99.314 1,465,000.00 1.86 A3 A 1

24422ETZ2 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 01/08/18 01/08/21 419,781.60 421,255.80 06/28/19 100.009 420,000.00 2.34 A2 A 1

36962G2T0 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 05/04/07 05/04/20 3,829,770.00 3,580,710.00 06/28/19 102.418 3,500,000.00 5.42 BAA1 BBB+ 1

89236TDU6 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CPROP 04/17/17 04/17/20 2,039,061.60 2,036,083.20 06/28/19 99.526 2,040,000.00 1.95 AA3 AA- 1

037833CK4 APPLE INC 02/09/17 02/07/20 3,503,282.55 3,497,604.45 06/28/19 99.637 3,505,000.00 1.90 AA1 AA+ 1

94974BGF1 WELLS FARGO COMPANY 02/02/15 01/30/20 3,626,203.30 3,631,583.10 06/28/19 99.776 3,635,000.00 2.15 A2 A- 1

713448DJ4 PEPSICO INC 10/06/16 10/04/19 3,881,748.00 3,890,211.00 06/28/19 99.605 3,900,000.00 1.35 A1 A+ 2

44932HAA1 IBM CREDIT CORP 09/08/17 09/06/19 4,950,750.00 4,993,250.00 06/28/19 99.767 5,000,000.00 1.63 A1 A 2

17275RBJ0 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 09/20/16 09/20/21 3,914,240.00 3,976,520.00 06/28/19 98.702 4,000,000.00 1.86 A1 AA- 2

48127HAA7 JPMORGAN CHASE 10/22/14 10/22/19 3,971,480.00 3,998,680.00 06/28/19 99.883 4,000,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 2

693506BH9 PPG INDUSTRIES INC 11/12/14 11/15/19 2,577,146.00 2,597,790.00 06/28/19 99.865 2,600,000.00 2.30 A3 A- 2

68389XBB0 ORACLE CORP 05/05/15 05/15/22 3,993,280.00 4,042,840.00 06/28/19 100.033 4,000,000.00 2.48 A1 AA- 2

166764AH3 CHEVRON CORP 06/24/13 06/24/23 5,118,900.00 5,189,400.00 06/28/19 102.716 5,000,000.00 3.08 AA2 AA 2

437076BV3 HOME DEPOT INC 12/06/18 03/01/22 4,275,054.00 4,334,526.00 06/28/19 102.798 4,200,000.00 3.15 A2 A 2

17325FAQ1 CITIBANK NA 07/23/18 07/23/21 6,158,234.50 6,178,744.00 06/28/19 101.741 6,050,000.00 3.33 AA3 A+ 2

0258M0EE5 AMERICAN EXPRESSCREDIT 03/03/17 03/03/20 2,822,876.00 2,797,060.00 06/28/19 99.819 2,800,000.00 2.20 A2 A- 2

02665WAU5 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 03/13/15 03/13/20 2,366,640.00 2,397,312.00 06/28/19 99.817 2,400,000.00 2.15 A2 A 2

14913Q2S7 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 12/07/18 12/07/23 3,121,890.00 3,165,420.00 06/28/19 104.086 3,000,000.00 3.46 A3 A 2

14913Q2T5 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 02/26/19 02/26/22 4,019,240.00 4,084,480.00 06/28/19 101.272 4,000,000.00 2.89 A3 A 2

89236TBP9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 07/18/14 07/18/19 6,039,300.00 5,999,400.00 06/28/19 99.93 6,000,000.00 2.13 AA3 AA- 2

94988J5G8 WELLS FARGO BANK NA 12/08/16 12/06/19 5,679,752.33 5,694,642.00 06/28/19 99.825 5,700,000.00 2.15 AA2 A+ 2

Total Corporate Obligations 89,086,390.08$ 89,197,778.60$ 88,445,000.00$

Supra-National Agency Bond/Note:

45905UP32 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 09/19/17 09/12/20 3,666,180.00$ 3,656,514.75$ 06/28/19 99.248 3,675,000.00$ 1.57 AAA N/A 1

459058DW0 INTERNATIONAL BANK 10/07/14 10/07/19 1,844,909.00 1,833,697.15 06/28/19 99.817 1,835,000.00 1.88 AAA AAA 1

4581X0CD8 INTER AMERICAN DEVEL BK 11/08/13 11/09/20 3,638,415.12 3,613,940.40 06/28/19 100.064 3,605,000.00 2.12 AAA AAA 1

7



Moodys

Rating

S&P

Rating

Managing

Institution

SANDAG


as of June 30, 2019

45950KCM0 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 01/25/18 01/25/21 1,540,457.70 1,553,173.05 06/28/19 100.303 1,545,000.00 2.24 AAA AAA 1

45905UP32 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 09/19/17 09/12/20 4,922,860.00 4,974,850.00 06/28/19 99.248 5,000,000.00 1.57 AAA N/A 2

459058FZ1 INTERNATIONAL BANK M T N 03/21/17 04/21/20 5,025,900.00 4,990,300.00 06/28/19 99.67 5,000,000.00 1.88 AAA AAA 2

4581X0DB1 INTER AMERICAN DEVEL BK 04/19/18 04/19/21 3,898,440.00 3,950,739.00 06/28/19 101.026 3,900,000.00 2.59 AAA AAA 2

45950KCD0 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 07/10/14 09/16/19 4,964,750.00 4,994,600.00 06/28/19 99.814 5,000,000.00 1.75 AAA AAA 2

Total Supra-National Agency Bond/Note 29,501,911.82$ 29,567,814.35$ 29,560,000.00$

Certificates of Deposits :

06539RGM3 BANK OF TKYO MTBSHI LTD 09/27/17 09/25/19 1,950,000.00$ 1,947,192.00$ 06/28/19 99.753 1,950,000.00$ 2.07 P-1 A-1 1

22549LFR1 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK 02/08/18 02/07/20 1,920,000.00 1,925,241.60 06/28/19 100.108 1,920,000.00 2.66 P-1 A-1 1

65590ASN7 NORDEA BK AB PUBL 02/22/18 02/20/20 2,875,000.00 2,885,321.25 06/28/19 100.205 2,875,000.00 2.71 P-1 A-1+ 1

83050FXT3 SKANDIN ENS BANKEN 08/04/17 08/02/19 3,898,479.00 3,897,465.00 06/28/19 99.871 3,900,000.00 1.84 P-1 A-1 1

87019U6D6 SWEDBANK SPARBANK 11/17/17 11/16/20 2,905,000.00 2,896,430.25 06/28/19 99.278 2,905,000.00 2.28 Aa2 AA- 1

96121T4A3 WESTPAC BKING CORP NY 08/07/17 08/03/20 3,500,000.00 3,495,100.00 06/28/19 99.523 3,500,000.00 2.05 Aa3 AA- 1

Total Certificates of Deposits 17,048,479.00$ 17,046,750.10$ 17,050,000.00$

Asset-Backed Security:

89237WAD9 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER TRUST 08/10/16 08/17/20 95,465.21$ 95,301.66$ 06/28/19 99.748 95,467.77$ 1.14 AAA AAA 1

02007PAC7 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 01/31/17 06/15/21 335,375.25 334,613.02 06/28/19 99.653 335,404.57 1.70 AAA N/A 1

43814TAC6 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 03/28/17 07/21/21 234,223.83 233,544.43 06/28/19 99.607 234,237.77 1.73 AAA N/A 1

02007HAC5 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/29/17 08/16/21 415,776.32 414,981.22 06/28/19 99.661 415,825.35 1.78 AAA N/A 1

43813FAC7 HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 11/29/17 11/22/21 971,339.87 970,194.41 06/28/19 99.794 971,476.76 2.05 AAA N/A 1

02007YAC8 ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 11/22/17 03/15/22 1,422,309.70 1,420,329.12 06/28/19 99.707 1,422,420.08 1.99 AAA AAA 1

44931PAD8 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/29/17 08/16/21 287,752.94 287,076.92 06/28/19 99.608 287,776.22 1.76 N/A AAA 1

47787XAC1 JOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST 03/02/17 04/15/21 248,669.75 248,205.26 06/28/19 99.701 248,705.16 1.78 AAA N/A 1

89238MAD0 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 03/15/17 02/16/21 127,498.52 127,213.87 06/28/19 99.68 127,513.53 1.73 AAA AAA 1

44932GAD7 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 08/16/17 01/18/22 1,234,586.90 1,231,380.49 06/28/19 99.552 1,234,800.89 1.78 AAA AAA 1

89238KAD4 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 11/15/17 01/18/22 1,229,886.59 1,227,232.50 06/28/19 99.579 1,230,000.00 1.93 AAA AAA 1

89238BAD4 TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER 01/31/18 05/16/22 999,988.50 1,001,840.00 06/28/19 100.033 1,000,000.00 2.35 AAA AAA 1

44930UAD8 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 03/30/16 09/15/20 37,875.76 37,867.20 06/28/19 99.905 37,883.11 1.56 AAA AAA 1

44891EAC3 HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 09/21/16 04/15/21 458,132.56 456,640.95 06/28/19 99.492 458,194.23 1.29 AAA AAA 1

65478VAD9 NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER TRUST 04/27/16 01/15/21 123,493.67 123,178.11 06/28/19 99.66 123,512.83 1.32 AAA N/A 1

Total Asset-Backed Security 8,222,375.37$ 8,209,599.16$ 8,223,218.27$

Total Investments 372,439,832.79$ 373,712,074.01$ 372,482,907.07$

Note: Market value of securities are provided by SANDAG's custodian, U.S. Bank

1 Managed by PFM Asset Management, LLC

2 Managed By Insight North America, LLC

8

Item: 22


TransNet Major Corridors Program Update

Overview

The Board of Directors requested at its June 28, 2019, meeting that an item providing a “one-page summary” of costs and revenues associated with completion of the TransNet Major Corridors Program be provided. This report provides additional detail regarding anticipated funding in the near-, mid-, and long-term (FY 2019-23, FY 2024-35, FY 2036-48, respectively), initially reported in summarized form to the Board on February 22, 2019.

Key Considerations

Current costs for remaining, unprogrammed TransNet Major Corridors Program projects only (i.e., not including debt service) are estimated to be about $24.4 billion. These cost estimates were prepared as part of an update to the Regional Plan.

Attachment 1 shows the available TransNet and state/ federal formula funds that are estimated to become available in the near-, mid-, and long-term, totaling approximately $8.6 billion through 2048. In addition to these formula funds, it is estimated that an additional $6 billion could become available from successful grant applications in existing competitive funding programs.

• This leaves a funding gap of approximately $15.8 billion to complete all TransNet Major Corridor projects by 2048, including about $6 billion that could potentially be raised through competitive funding cycles. This means that every TransNet dollar used to deliver a project would need to be matched by $9.60 of other funds to complete the program.

Funding availability in the next five years is constrained due to SANDAG debt obligations. Of the $8.6 billion in TransNet and state and federal formula funds expected to be available through 2048, only about $291 million is estimated to be available between now and the end of FY 2023 (Attachment 2). This amount does not include TransNet and state and federal formula funds that the Board already has programmed through FY 2023 to other ongoing projects, nor the TransNet funding needed to cover debt service in this time period.

• Of the $291 million expected to be available through FY 2023, approximately $47 million is from TransNet and $244 million is from state and federal sources.


Key Staff Contact: José A. Nuncio, (619) 699-1908, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Costs and revenues needed to complete TransNet Major Corridors projects,

through 2048 2. Estimated Revenues ($YOE billions), FY 2019-2048

Fiscal Impact:

Approximately $8.6 billion is estimated to be available to finish TransNet Major Corridors Program projects through 2048. An additional $6 billion could also become available if the region is successful in competitive grant cycles. The current estimated cost to deliver these projects by 2048 is $24.4 billion.


Based on current estimates, approximately $9.8 billion in new matching funds and $6 billion in potential competitive funds are needed to address a funding gap of $15.8 billion to complete all TransNet Major Corridor projects by 2048.

Action: Information

An overview of cost and anticipated revenue information for the TransNet Major Corridor Program, through 2048, will be presented.

https://www.sandag.org/uploads/meetingid/meetingid_5038_25307.pdf#page=19

Attachment 1

2

Costs and Revenues Needed to Complete TransNet Major Corridors Program Projects through 2048

Costs ($YOE billions)

(Mid-Point of Range)

TransNet Major Corridors Remaining Capital Projects ($21.7B to $27.1B)1 $24.4

Total Costs $24.4

More Certain Revenues

TransNet Major Corridors ($2.1B to $2.4B) ($2.3B in YOE$ equates to approximately $1.4B in constant 2019$. Over 80% of the TransNet funds would be available after FY 2030.)2

$2.3

State/Federal Anticipated Formula Funds – Existing programs including RSTP, CMAQ, STIP, LPP ($5.7B to $6.9B)3

$6.3

Sub-Total ($7.8B to $9.3B) $8.6

Less Certain Revenues

Additional potential competitive funds from existing sources, including SB 1, BUILD, and others ($5.4B to $6.5B)4

$6.0

Sub-Total Less Certain Revenues ($5.4B to $6.5B) $6.0

Funding Gap ($9.3B to $10.4B) + Additional Potential Competitive Funds ($5.4B to $6.5B)5

$15.8

Current TransNet to Non-TransNet Leveraging Ratio Needed to Complete Major Corridors Program

1:9.6

Notes: 1. Does not include TransNet funds set-aside for debt service 2. Does not include TransNet funds programmed on other ongoing TransNet projects 3. Does not include state/federal formula funds already programmed on other ongoing projects 4. Does not include competitive funds already programmed on other ongoing projects 5. The size of the funding gap would depend to a large extent on the region’s ability to be successful in

competitive funding cycles

Attachment 2

3

Estimated Revenues ($YOE millions), FY 2019-2048

Funding Source FY 2019-23 Total

2019-2048

TransNet Major Corridors1 47 2,305

Sub-Total TransNet Major Corridors 47 2,305

State/Federal Formula

Federal RSTP2 189 2,477

Federal CMAQ 18 1,763

State STIP3 6 1,380

State LPP 32 732

Sub-Total State/Federal Formula4 244 6,352

TOTAL REVENUES 291 8,657

Notes:

1. TransNet Major Corridors receive 38% of Net Revenues. TransNet funds not shown on this table: All other programs, including Local Streets and Roads, Active Transportation, and Transit Operations.

2. Includes approximately $16 million in miscellaneous federal Highway Infrastructure Program and Corridor and Border Infrastructure funding

3. Includes approximately $6 million in miscellaneous FY 2020 state funds 4. Totals may not add up due to rounding

Estimated Revenues ($YOE millions), FY 2019-2023

Funding Source FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total

TransNet Major Corridors 0.9 2.7 6.7 10.8 25.7 46.8

Federal formula (RSTP/CMAQ) 2.7 46.0 46.2 46.2 65.1 203.2

State formula (STIP/LPP) 9.0 9.7 9.7 9.7 32.1

Total 3.6 57.7 62.6 66.7 100.5 291.1

Item: 23


Regional Housing Needs Assessment Draft Methodology

Overview

On July 5, 2018, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) determined the San Diego region would need to plan for 171,685 housing units during the 6th Housing Element Cycle (2021-2029).

On December 21, 2018, the Board of Directors formed the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Subcommittee to review and provide input and guidance on potential policy and technical options for developing the RHNA methodology, which is then used for the allocation of housing units to each jurisdiction.

Based upon objectives in state law, the RHNA Subcommittee identified priorities to be used in drafting the RHNA methodology and allocation. This information was shared with the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG), consisting of the planning and community development directors from each jurisdiction in the region and interested housing stakeholders.

At the June 14, 2019, meeting, the RHNA Subcommittee voted to recommend a methodology to the Board of Directors (Attachment 1). At its June 27, 2019, meeting, the TWG recommended the same methodology as the RHNA Subcommittee. Staff has determined that the recommended methodology furthers the five objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584.

Key Considerations

State law requires the SANDAG housing unit methodology further five objectives; however, state law does not dictate how those objectives should be prioritized. The RHNA Subcommittee determined the priorities for the methodology include increasing transit use, improving the jobs and housing relationship, providing an equitable distribution, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Attachment 3 summarizes the RHNA Subcommittee’s discussions during each of its meetings. Attachment 4 summarizes TWG and stakeholder meetings held to solicit input on the methodology.

Each objective can be prioritized and adjusted to consider other factors or data sets. The RHNA Subcommittee and TWG discussed several adjustments that could be made to the methodology based on local conditions and priorities, including adjusting the manner in which jobs were counted for each jurisdiction and determining what should qualify as a major transit stop. As described in the June 14, 2019, report to the RHNA Subcommittee, SANDAG staff recommended using the total number of jobs in the methodology. The RHNA Subcommittee included an adjustment to the total number of jobs to account for military jobs housed on base, since those jobs did not require off-base housing in the jurisdiction.

The RHNA Subcommittee members directed staff to focus on a methodology that was transparent and not overly complicated so that it could be easily understood by the public. Due to the Regional Plan’s inclusion of smart growth principles, which call for housing near transit and in urban areas, existing density, available space within each jurisdiction, the cost of land, airport land use regulations, and other limiting factors within each jurisdiction were not identified as priorities warranting an adjustment to the methodology.

Fiscal Impact: Development of the RHNA Plan is funded through Overall Work Program No. 3102000 in the FY 2019 Program Budget.


The RHNA methodology and draft allocation is scheduled to be adopted by the Board of Directors in late 2019. Local governments will have until April 2021 to update their housing elements to accommodate the housing unit allocations.

Action: Approve

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Subcommittee recommends that the Board of Directors release the draft RHNA methodology for public review.



2

Ultimately, the RHNA Subcommittee and TWG recommended that the following methodology be released for public review.

1. 65 percent of the total housing units should be allocated to jurisdictions with access to transit, including rail stations, Rapid bus stations, and major transit stops. Significant investments in transit have been made throughout the region, and the RHNA methodology prioritizes housing growth in those areas with access to transit. Encouraging housing growth near transit can help the allocation promote infill development and preserve open space, as most transit is located in urbanized areas. Improved access to transit also can lower the vehicle miles traveled in a car and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Within the housing units allocated for jurisdictions with access to transit, 75 percent of the units should be allocated to jurisdictions with rail stations and Rapid bus stations and 25 percent should be allocated to jurisdictions with major transit stops. To ensure future growth is located near transit, the methodology prioritizes 75 percent of the housing units in areas with rail and Rapid bus stations. Rail stations and Rapid bus stations usually are located along fixed routes that require significant capital investment to construct. Unlike bus stops or routes, rail and Rapid stations and routes are not amended or eliminated on regular basis.

The remaining 25 percent of the housing units would be allocated in jurisdictions with major transit stops. Major transit stops, as defined in state law, have two intersecting bus routes that arrive at 15-minute intervals during peak commute hours.

3. 35 percent of the total housing units should be allocated to jurisdictions based on the total number of jobs in their jurisdiction adjusted to account for military housing on bases. Jurisdictions should plan for housing to provide opportunities for more residents to live near their place of employment. The RHNA Subcommittee and TWG recommended the number of jobs in each jurisdiction with a military base be reduced to account for military jobs housed directly on a base.

4. The allocation should apply an equity adjustment. The HCD’s RHNA Determination divided the number of housing units needed in the region into four income categories based on the region’s current percentages of households in each income category. To promote equity and fair housing, the RHNA methodology would allocate more housing units of an income category to jurisdictions with a percentage of households in that category that is lower than the regional percentage.

Following a public hearing and public comment period, the draft RHNA methodology must be sent to HCD for a 60-day review period. If no changes to the methodology are required by HCD, the Board of Directors can adopt the final methodology and release a draft version of the allocation resulting from the methodology for a 45-day appeal period. Attachment 2 shows how the recommended methodology would be used to allocate housing units to each jurisdiction if no changes are made to the methodology between July and final adoption.

Next Steps

The Board of Directors is asked to release a draft of the RHNA methodology for public review. A public hearing will be conducted and the draft RHNA methodology will be sent to the HCD for its review following the Board’s acceptance of the draft at the end of the public review period.

The Board of Directors will be asked to approve a final RHNA Methodology and draft allocation based upon any comments from the public and HCD. Local governments will have until April 2021 to update their housing elements to accommodate the housing unit allocations.


Key Staff Contact: Seth Litchney, (619)699-1943, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Development Background for the Draft RHNA Methodology 2. Draft RHNA Methodology Recommended by RHNA Subcommittee and TWG 3. Summary of RHNA Subcommittee meetings 4. Summary of Additional Public Meetings Held to Solicit Input on the Draft

Methodology

Attachment 1

3

DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND FOR THE DRAFT RHNA METHODOLOGY

Introduction

State housing element law requires SANDAG to provide a discussion of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation methodology that includes the data and assumptions relied upon, and an explanation of how information about local government conditions and how each of the factors required by law was used to develop the proposed methodology. (See Government Code Section 65584.04.) In addition, SANDAG is required to describe how the draft methodology would further the five objectives in Government Code Section 65584. This document and the other attachments to the SANDAG Board Report concerning RHNA dated July 26, 2019, is intended to provide the information needed for the public to comment on the proposed draft methodology.

Data, Assumptions, and Information on Local Government Conditions

Prior to and during the development of the methodology, the RHNA Subcommittee, which was established by the Board of Directors, the Regional Planning Technical Working Group (including planning directors from each jurisdiction and housing stakeholders), the SANDAG Regional Planning Committee, and the Board of Directors held public meetings to obtain input on the data, assumptions and local condition information that SANDAG should use to develop the draft methodology. At these meetings, stakeholders, staff from the cities and the County of San Diego, and elected officials were asked to help determine the priorities for the methodology, and discuss the data needed to prepare the methodology. The Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG) held a workshop to discuss the RHNA objectives and factors in state law. The TWG members provided feedback on relevant data to consider approaches to the methodology. Attendees at each meeting provided information regarding the types of data SANDAG should use, assumptions that should be made, as well as information regarding conditions in their individual jurisdictions that should be taken into consideration. For example, the RHNA Subcommittee members were surveyed to determine which objectives and factors were highest priority for the region, and the draft RHNA methodology was developed based on that data and input. The TWG members provided written comments on the development of the methodology throughout the process.

There was general consensus at the meetings that the approach chosen should keep the allocation methodology simple and easy to explain to the public. Nuanced adjustments that may have modified the methodology in marginal ways in relation to the overall objectives and factors were discussed and considered. Factors and adjustments that would have created a complicated formula, however, ultimately were not pursued since the draft methodology was developed with the intent to keep it transparent and understandable.

RHNA Objectives

The RHNA methodology and allocation furthers the five objectives listed in Government Code Section 65584.

1. Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low-and very low-income households.

Per state law, the RHNA methodology allocates units in all four income categories to each of the region’s 19 jurisdictions. The methodology does so equitably, ensuring each jurisdiction receives an allocation for low-and very low-income units, and further, allocating a higher share of low-and very low units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share. State law requires jurisdictions to zone at higher densities to accommodate its low-and very low-income housing allocation. As jurisdictions plan for and build housing, the mix of housing types will increase.

4

2. Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.

The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs” to encourage efficient development patterns and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. By allocating housing units based on these two factors, SANDAG sets a guiding principle for local jurisdictions to zone and build housing near transit and jobs. Transit and job centers are located in the urbanized areas of the region. Therefore, an allocation based on the proximity of transit and jobs will lead to more infill development while protecting natural resources and open space. Because infill development does not rely on available space and can occur in areas that already have a dense population, the methodology supports provision of housing even in areas that are currently considered built-out.

SANDAG’s GHG reduction target, as set by the California Air Resources Board, is to reduce the region’s per capita emissions of GHG from cars and light trucks by 15 percent by 2020, compared with a 2005 baseline. By 2035, the target is to reduce GHG emissions by 19 percent per capita. The RHNA methodology encourages the development of housing near jobs and transit, which will provide the region’s residents with opportunities to live where they work and/or readily access transit, which can facilitate shorter commutes, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and increase trip-taking by transit or alternative modes.

3. Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.

SANDAG conducted an analysis of the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The analysis shows that the number of low-wage jobs far exceeds the number of existing housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.

The RHNA methodology allocates 35 percent of the 171,685-unit regional housing need based on each jurisdiction’s share of existing regional total jobs to encourage development of housing near job centers so that jurisdictions can improve the jobs-housing relationship.

The draft RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) also improves the balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share.

4. Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.

This objective guided the development of the Equity Adjustment used to ensure the methodology will result in allocation of housing units to each of the income categories. This adjustment results in a jurisdiction receiving a lower proportion of its total housing units within an income category when it has a higher share of households within that income category compared to the region. This method shifts units across income categories, rather than adding units to a jurisdiction’s total housing unit allocation, allowing for a mix of housing types and affordability near transit and jobs.

5. Affirmatively furthering fair housing. For purposes of this section, “affirmatively furthering fair housing” means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming

5

racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.

During development of the RHNA methodology, SANDAG reviewed the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) 2019 Opportunity Map for the San Diego region. The TCAC map demonstrates how public and private resources are spatially distributed within the region. The map is part of a larger study that shows how communities with better air quality, higher educational attainment, and better economic indicators are communities that have higher “opportunity”, or pathways that offer low-income children and adults the best chance at economic advancement. The study finds that historically communities with higher opportunity – through plans, policies, and practices – may have systematically denied equal opportunity to low socioeconomic and minority populations.

Areas of “low resource” and “high segregation & poverty” on the TCAC maps are also many of the same areas with a high concentration of low-income households in the San Diego region. The Equity Adjustment within the RHNA methodology addresses the disparities in access to resource-rich areas by providing housing opportunities for people in all income levels to reside in any given community. This is meant to foster and maintain compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The Equity Adjustment in the RHNA methodology assists in overcoming patterns of discrimination and transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity by allocating a higher proportion of low-income housing units to jurisdictions with a lower share of low-income households, which tend to be jurisdictions with a high concentration of resource-rich areas.

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Map

6

RHNA Factors

In addition to furthering the objectives outlined above, state law requires that SANDAG consider several factors in the development of the RHNA methodology, to the extent sufficient data is available pertaining to each factor. See Government Code Section 65584.04(e). The RHNA factors and how each were considered in the development of the draft RHNA methodology are described below.

1. Each jurisdiction’s existing and projected jobs and housing relationship. This shall include an estimate based on readily available data on the number of low-wage jobs within the jurisdiction and how many housing units within the jurisdiction are affordable to low-wage workers as well as an estimate based on readily available data, of projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction during the planning period.

The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to jobs” as a factor in allocating the regional housing need. The jobs factor seeks to encourage development of housing near job centers so that jurisdictions can achieve greater jobs-housing balance. The jobs factor uses current data on existing jobs instead of a projection. Given the housing shortage within the region, it is critical that housing is built where existing jobs are located to begin to address the current jobs-housing imbalance. Although data for projected job and household growth by income level for the next Regional Plan update is not yet available, SANDAG used the most recent readily available data for projected job growth and projected household growth by income level within each member jurisdiction to conduct its analysis.

SANDAG analyzed the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The analysis showed that the number of low-wage jobs far exceeds the number of existing housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction. The draft RHNA methodology is expected to increase the supply of affordable housing by allocating each jurisdiction low- and very low-income housing units. The draft RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) should also improve the balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share.

2. The opportunities and constraints to development of additional housing in each member jurisdiction, including all of the following:

a. Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state laws, regulations or regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by a sewer or water service provider other than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional development during the planning period.

SANDAG notes that general plans for some jurisdictions may account for constraints to housing development arising from lack of capacity for sewer or water service. For example, rural areas may rely more heavily on well water and septic systems, which constrains housing development due to lack of sufficient infrastructure. For the draft methodology, however, the “proximity to transit” factor allocates housing units based on each jurisdiction’s share of regional rail and Rapid bus stations as well as major transit stops. Rail and Rapid bus stations are located in the region’s more developed areas where land uses generate enough ridership to support the investment to the transit infrastructure. Major transit stops also are located in the region’s urbanized areas and surrounded by land uses that support higher service frequencies. By prioritizing transit connectivity, the methodology encourages infill development in urban areas that are likely to have existing capacity for sewer or water service.

7

c. The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities. The council of governments may not limit its consideration of suitable housing sites or land suitable for urban development to existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions of a locality, but shall consider the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. The determination of available land suitable for urban development may exclude lands where the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources has determined that the flood management infrastructure designed to protect that land is not adequate to avoid the risk of flooding.

The draft RHNA methodology is not constrained by existing zoning ordinances and land use restrictions. Instead the methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs”, which aligns with several beneficial land use planning principles, such as promoting infill and increasing residential densities. The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential densities are accounted for due to the methodology’s use of the proximity to jobs and transit factors. When development of housing is promoted near transit and jobs in areas that are already more densely populated and developed than other areas of each jurisdiction, it allows the jurisdictions to focus on infill development that can occur without reliance on the availability of additional land, but instead on underutilized land that can be converted to uses that allow for increased residential density.

The “proximity to transit” factor allocates housing units based on each jurisdiction’s share of regional rail and Rapid bus stations as well as major transit stops. Rail and Rapid bus stations are located in the region’s urbanized areas where land uses generate enough ridership to support the investment to the transit infrastructure. Major transit stops are also located in the region’s urbanized areas and surrounded by land uses that support higher service frequencies. By prioritizing transit, the methodology encourages infill development in areas that are suitable for urban development. A transit-focused methodology also promotes increased densities as jurisdictions must plan for housing in urban areas already served by high quality transit.

The RHNA methodology aligns with the region’s priorities for growth. As shown in Figure 3.1, general plans in the San Diego region have focused growth and development in existing urban areas, preserved more land for habitat and open space, and looked to accommodate more housing near transit and key destinations.

8

Figure 3.1: Priorities for Growth Then and Now

d. Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs, or both, designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis, including land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses.

General plans for individual jurisdictions may account for constraints to housing development arising from lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing federal or state programs. As shown in the figures below though, preserved land, farmland, and habitats are primarily in the eastern portion of San Diego County. The draft RHNA methodology focuses housing units in areas with access to transit and jobs, which are located in the existing urbanized areas. Therefore, the draft methodology will not encourage encroachment upon open space areas.

9

10

e. County policies to preserve prime agricultural land, as defined pursuant to Section 56064, within an unincorporated and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts its conversion to non-agricultural uses.

The County of San Diego General Plan accounts for some constraints to housing development arising from policies to preserve prime agricultural land and incorporates local ballot measure provisions prohibiting or restricting the conversion of agricultural to non-agricultural uses. The draft RHNA methodology allocates housing units based on access to jobs and transit, which are located in existing urbanized areas. Therefore, this constraint is not expected to impact the methodology’s capacity to allow for development of additional housing.

3. The distribution of household growth assumed for purposes of a comparable period of regional transportation plans and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation infrastructure.

As shown in Figure 3.1, plans for growth are focused on the urbanized areas of the region. The RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” as a factor—specifically high-quality transit, which is located in the urbanized area. The emphasis on proximity to transit allows local jurisdictions that have invested in transit the opportunity to maximize the use of existing transportation infrastructure.

4. Agreements between a county and cities in a county to direct growth toward incorporated areas of the county, and land within an unincorporated area zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation that is subject to a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of the jurisdiction that prohibits or restricts conversion to non-agricultural uses.

Regional planning undertaken by SANDAG and its member agencies during the past 15 to 20 years, has focused the region’s growth in the western third of the region, primarily in its incorporated cities and near transit service (Figure 3.1). SANDAG has funded “smart growth” grants to encourage growth in incorporated areas of the county with sufficient density to support transit-oriented development. Consistent with this, the draft RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to transit” and “proximity to jobs”. High-quality transit service and a high concentration of the region’s jobs are located in the urbanized, incorporated areas of the region. Thus, the methodology is consistent with agreements between SANDAG, the County of San Diego, and the cities to develop public transportation infrastructure and supporting land uses away from areas that are zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation. Interjurisdictional agreements may account for some development constraints; however, those agreements are not expected to be in conflict with the draft methodology due to the prioritization of proximity to transit and jobs.

5. The loss of units contained in assisted housing developments, as defined in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, that changed to non-low-income use through mortgage prepayment, subsidy contract expirations, or termination of use restrictions.

The data for these units is not readily available and varies by jurisdiction. The loss of assisted housing developments for lower income households is an issue that should be addressed by the jurisdictions when preparing their housing elements.

6. The percentage of existing households at each of the income levels listed in subdivision (e) of Section 65584 that are paying more than 30 percent and more than 50 percent of their income in rent.

This factor was not included in state law at the time the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) was making its determination on the regional housing need of the San Diego region, and sufficient data for this factor is not readily available. The San Diego region received its largest RHNA Determination this cycle, however, and it is expected that an influx of housing units in each income category will help alleviate the rent burden in the region.

11

7. The rate of overcrowding.

HCD used the 2012-2016 American Community Survey to determine the rate of overcrowding in the San Diego region when making its RHNA Determination. HCD then compared the San Diego region’s overcrowding rate (6.43% of all households) to the national rate (3.34% of all households). To address the needs of overcrowding in the region, HCD’s RHNA Determination included an overcrowding adjustment of 3.09 percent, which added 38,700 housing units to the regional housing need to alleviate overcrowding in the region. Thus, this factor has already been accounted for in the draft methodology.

8. The housing needs of farmworkers.

The draft RHNA methodology prioritizes “proximity to jobs” as a factor in allocating the regional housing need. Farmworkers are included in the data on existing jobs. Therefore, their housing needs along with the housing needs of all the region’s workers are considered.

The draft methodology increases the supply of affordable housing by allocating each jurisdiction low- and very low-income housing units. The RHNA methodology’s Equity Adjustment (see Objective 4) also improves the balance between the number of low-wage jobs, including farming jobs, and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction by allocating a higher share of low- and very low-income housing units to jurisdictions that currently have a smaller share of low-and very low-income households than the regional share. Although the low-income housing needs of farmworkers are unique given their low wages and job locations, the allocation expected from the draft methodology is expected to provide more low-income housing in every jurisdiction and accordingly should provide farmworkers the ability to live in more areas of the region and commute shorter distances to their seasonal jobs.

9. The housing needs generated by the presence of a private university or a campus of the California State University or the University of California within any member jurisdiction.

The major universities and community colleges in the San Diego region are located in urban areas served by the existing transportation network. The City of San Diego is home to San Diego State University; University of California San Diego; University of San Diego; Point Loma Nazarene University; various smaller, private universities; and three community colleges: San Diego City College, San Diego Mesa College, and San Diego Miramar College. It also has the greatest share of the region’s transportation system in part because of transportation investments near universities and colleges located within its jurisdiction.

Similarly, the cities of Chula Vista (Southwestern Community College), El Cajon (Cuyamaca College), Oceanside (MiraCosta College), and San Marcos (California State University San Marcos and Palomar College) have made transportation investments to improve access to transit near colleges and universities. By prioritizing transit proximity, the draft RHNA methodology encourages housing development near existing transit and the key destinations that transit links, including the region’s universities and colleges. The draft methodology will result in additional housing units being allocated based on proximity to transit. This will help these jurisdictions address the housing needs of students, faculty, and staff beyond what these colleges or universities may provide.

10. The loss of units during a state of emergency that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2), during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision pursuant to Section 65588 that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis.

Jurisdictions report demolished units to the Department of Finance on an annual basis. Demolished units include those lost during a state of emergency. Between 2011 and 2018, states of emergency in the San Diego region declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, and in which homes were lost, include the following wildfires: the 2014 wildfires (Cocos Fire and Poinsettia Fire), 2017 Lilac Fire, and 2018 West Fire.

12

HCD analyzed the most recent ten-year average rate of demolition within the San Diego region based on jurisdictions’ annual reports to the Department of Finance. The ten-year average rate of demolition in the San Diego region is 0.32 percent of the total housing stock. The RHNA Determination included HCD’s minimum replacement adjustment of 0.5 percent, which exceeds the region’s demolition rate. This adjustment added 6,255 housing units to the RHNA Determination. SANDAG does not have readily available data broken down by jurisdiction to use for this factor and has therefore relied on HCD’s data and adjustment to address this factor at a regional level.

11. The region’s greenhouse gas emissions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.

SANDAG’s GHG reduction target, as set by the California Air Resources Board, is to reduce the region’s per capita emissions of GHG from cars and light trucks by 15 percent by 2020, compared with a 2005 baseline. By 2035, the target is to reduce GHG emissions by 19 percent per capita. The RHNA methodology encourages the development of housing near jobs and transit, which will provide the region’s residents with opportunities to live where they work and/or readily access transit, which can facilitate shorter commutes, reduce GHG emissions, and increase trip-taking by transit or alternative modes.

12. Any other factors adopted by the council of governments, that further the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584, provided that the council of governments specifies which of the objectives each additional factor is necessary to further. The council of governments may include additional factors unrelated to furthering the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 so long as the additional factors do not undermine the objectives listed in subdivision (d) of Section 65584 and are applied equally across all household income levels as described in subdivision (f) of Section 65584 and the council of governments makes a finding that the factor is necessary to address significant health and safety conditions.

The presence of a significant number of military jobs in certain jurisdictions was taken in consideration in the development of the draft methodology. Information was sought from representatives of the military branches in the region and the number of on-base housing units provided by the military were taken into account during the development of the methodology. The number of jobs in each jurisdiction with a military base was reduced to account for military jobs housed directly on a base.

RHNA Calculator Toolwith RHNA Subcommittee Recommendations

A. B.

Transit Jobs

Weighting 65% 35% 100%

Units 111,595 60,090 171,685

Weighting Units

Subfactor 1: Rail & Rapid 75% 83,696

Subfactor 2: Select from:

i. High-Frequency Transit Stop (served by at least one local bus with 15 min. peak-period frequency) 25% 27,899

ii. Major Transit Stop (served by at least two local buses with 15 min. peak-period frequency) 100% 111,595

3a. Variable: Select between:

(a.) Number of Jobs

(b.) Number of Jobs with a Jobs-Housing adjustment

Weighting Units

Jobs-Housing Ratio

3c. Select Jobs Dataset: Select between:

1. Total Jobs

2. Civilian Jobs (excludes active duty military; includes civilian defense jobs)

3.

A.

Total Jobs Civilian JobsTotal Excluding

Housed Military w/ Total Jobs w/ Civilian Jobs

w/ Total Excluding

Housed Military

Carlsbad 1,087 2,860 3,947

Chula Vista 8,478 2,697 11,175

Coronado - 808 808

Del Mar - 167 167

El Cajon 1,630 1,694 3,324

Encinitas 543 1,038 1,581

Escondido 7,609 2,051 9,660

Imperial Beach 1,196 184 1,380

La Mesa 2,717 1,109 3,826

Lemon Grove 1,087 279 1,366

National City 4,076 1,327 5,403

Oceanside 3,804 1,683 5,487

Poway - 1,354 1,354

San Diego 74,478 33,962 108,440

San Marcos 1,630 1,526 3,156

Santee 543 694 1,237

Solana Beach 543 341 884

Unincorporated 1,087 4,802 5,889

Vista 1,087 1,514 2,601

Region 111,595 - - 60,090 - - - 171,685

Notes:

Income Category Very Low Low Moderate Above Mod. Total

Units 42,332 26,627 29,734 72,992 171,685

Very Low Low Moderate Above Mod.

Carlsbad 1,336 798 764 1,049 3,947

Chula Vista 2,770 1,788 1,922 4,695 11,175

Coronado 277 150 141 240 808

Del Mar 38 64 33 32 167

El Cajon 487 419 526 1,892 3,324

Encinitas 477 376 313 415 1,581

Escondido 1,875 1,256 1,536 4,993 9,660

Imperial Beach 234 128 190 828 1,380

La Mesa 865 491 582 1,888 3,826

Lemon Grove 298 166 194 708 1,366

National City 642 503 706 3,552 5,403

Oceanside 1,279 724 890 2,594 5,487

Poway 480 275 247 352 1,354

San Diego 27,667 17,390 19,391 43,992 108,440

San Marcos 738 537 549 1,332 3,156

Santee 412 203 191 431 1,237

Solana Beach 320 161 160 243 884

Unincorporated 1,614 872 1,024 2,379 5,889

Vista 523 326 375 1,377 2,601

Region 42,332 26,627 29,734 72,992 171,685

HCD Determination

Total

B.

Income Category Allocations Considering Equity Total Allocation

Major transit stops

Rail & Rapid

Units to be allocated based on the two priority categories (transit and jobs) is determined by multiplying the RHNA Determination Units

(171,685) by the percentages entered into each of the yellow boxes in this step. Note, there is an opportunity to assign weighting to

"Transit" subfactors in Step 2 and choose a specific "Job" variable in Step 3.

Step 1: Assign weighting to each variable category

Step 2: Assign weighting to each Transit subfactor

Step 3: Select options for "Jobs" Variable

A.

Jurisdiction Total Allocation1

Transit

1. The total number of units per jurisdiction assigned within each of the priority categories (transit and jobs) is determined by multiplying the number of units to be allocated for the specific priority category (See Step 1) by each

jurisdiction's share (as a percentage) of the total regional count for each variable and subfactor.

This Calculator Tool is intended to allow stakeholders to try out various methodologies to distribute the total regional housing allocation of: 171,685

3b. If applicable, assign weighting to Jobs subfactors: [If greyed out, skip this step!]

If Variable (b.) "Number of Jobs with a Jobs-Housing adjustment" was selected above, select weighting for "Jobs-Housing Adjustment". The Jobs-Housing Adjustment adjusts a jurisdiction's jobs-based unit allocation (based on

share of regional jobs) up or down based on the relative difference between a jurisdiction's job-housing ratio and the regional ratio. For example, if a jurisdiction has a higher jobs-housing ratio than the region, it would receive a

upward adjustment (higher housing unit allocation).

To avoid an overconcentration of low income households and comply with Government Code 65584 (d), this draft RHNA Allocation Methodology assigns more housing units of an income category to jurisdictions with a

percentage of households in that category that is lower than the regional percentage.

Total Excluding Housed Military

Select from drop-down:

B.

Select from drop-down:

Number of Jobs

Total Excluding Housed Military (excludes active duty military for which on-base military housing is provided;

1 housing unit = 1 job reduction)

Step 4: Equity Adjustment

Calculator Tool

Number of Jobs Jobs with J-H Adjustment

B.

Revised July 19, 2019

Attachment 2

13

RHNA Subcommittee Meeting Summaries Attachment 3

14

Meeting Date Materials Presented Comments/Direction

February 8, 2019 • RHNA Subcommittee Charter • RHNA Plan Timeline • RHNA Statutory Objectives and Factors

• Requested 5th Cycle RHNA Progress • Inquired about the impact of recent state legislation on the

RHNA process • Requested definitions of housing terms and information on

commuting patterns.

February 22, 2019

• SANDAG 2017 Regional Housing Progress Report • 5th Cycle RHNA Progress • Housing Legislative Update • SANDAG 2016 Commuting Patterns in the

San Diego Region • Housing Definitions • SANDAG Smart Growth Concept Map

• Requested a list of RHNA Objectives and Factors to prioritize • In addition to transit-oriented development, the allocation

should assign housing to job-rich areas

March 22, 2019 • RHNA Subcommittee Survey Results • Potential RHNA Methodology Framework

• Discussed the definitions used for the transit calculation including the rail, Rapid bus, and high frequency transit.

• Requested to pursue an allocation methodology based on the potential framework

April 26, 2019 • RHNA Allocation Calculator Tool • Regional Planning Technical Working Group (TWG)

Comments on RHNA Calculator Tool

• How should accessory dwelling units be considered in the allocation?

• Should a jurisdiction size or other constraints be considered in the allocation?

• Population should not be a factor in the methodology. • Transit should receive a higher prioritization to reduce VMT. • Allocation should provide 65% of the units to areas with

transit and 35% of the units based on jobs in the jurisdiction.

May 24, 2019 • Revised RHNA Allocation Calculator Tool • Additional TWG Comments on RHNA Calculator Tool

• Consider military housing as part of the jobs count for each jurisdiction.

• Keep the allocation methodology simple and easy to explain • Consider the type of job in each jurisdiction.

June 14, 2019

• Staff Recommended RHNA Methodology • On-Base Military Housing Data • Calculation of Methodology Adjusted for On-Base

Military Housing

• Discussed whether to adjust the jobs total to account for on-base military housing.

• Discussed transit calculation • Recommended a methodology to the Board of Directors

Summary of Additional Public Meetings Held to Solicit Input on the Draft Methodology Attachment 4

15

Meeting Date Discussion

Board of Directors September 14, 2018 Board of Directors Asked to Provide Ideas on RHNA Priorities

Regional Planning Committee October 5, 2018 RHNA Update on Board of Directors RHNA Priorities

TWG and Housing Stakeholders October 11, 2018 Board Direction on the RHNA and the Role of the Regional Planning Technical Working Group

TWG and Housing Stakeholders December 13, 2018 RHNA Workshop

TWG and Housing Stakeholders January 10, 2019 Update on RHNA Subcommittee, RHNA Work Plan, and Recap of the RHNA Workshop

Regional Planning Committee February 1, 2019 RHNA Update

TWG and Housing Stakeholders February 14, 2019 RHNA Update

TWG and Housing Stakeholders March 14, 2019 RHNA Methodology Discussion

TWG and Housing Stakeholders April 3, 2019 RHNA Methodology Workshop

TWG and Housing Stakeholders May 9, 2019 RHNA Methodology Calculation Tool Amendments Discussion

Board of Directors May 10, 2019 Update on the RHNA Subcommittee

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 6, 2019 Update on RHNA Subcommittee and Discussion on Methodology

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 13, 2019 RHNA Update and Discussion on Methodology

TWG and Housing Stakeholders June 27, 2019 RHNA Methodology Recommendation

Item: 24


Memorandum of Agreement with City of Imperial Beach: TransNet Debt Financing Program Overview

As permitted by the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Imperial Beach has requested to borrow $1.3 million of commercial paper through the TransNet Debt Financing Program to provide needed funding for the Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project. The city would use its annually-allocated TransNet Local Street Improvement (LSI) funds for debt repayment and costs associated with the advance funding subject to approval by the Board of Directors and execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) (Attachment 1).

Key Considerations

• Based on the 2020 five-year projection, the City has ample capacity (Attachment 2) to cover all debt obligations while continuing to use a portion of its annually-allocated TransNet LSI funds for other scheduled projects.

• The Imperial Beach City Council approved the terms of the MOA and borrowing of up to $1.5 million at its June 5, 2019, meeting (Attachment 3). Since then, the City has requested to remove one of the two projects listed in the resolution, which reduces the borrowing to $1.3 million.

• Using commercial paper on the project will benefit the general public in the projects high-use areas, including 45,000 square feet of new sidewalk and three new pedestrian crossings.

• The project meets all eligibility requirements (Attachment 4) of the TransNet Debt Financing Program.

Next Steps

With Board approval of this request and the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Amendment No. 5, the Executive Director will execute an MOA with the City of Imperial Beach.


Key Staff Contact: Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, (619) 699-1942, [email protected] Attachments: 1. Draft Memorandum of Agreement

2. City of Imperial Beach Capacity Analysis 3. City of Imperial Beach Resolution No. 2019-8044 4. Commercial Paper Requirements

Fiscal Impact:

Pending approval by the Board of Directors, there will be $27.4 million, out of a total $100 million, available (uncommitted) commercial paper under the TransNet Debt Financing Program.


SANDAG Board Policy No. 031: TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules (Rule No. 16) provides local jurisdictions access to commercial paper through the TransNet Debt Financing Program, subject to approval by the Board of Directors and execution of a Memorandum of Agreement.

Action: Approve

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, authorize the Executive Director to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Imperial Beach to issue $1.3 million in Commercial Paper through the TransNet Debt Financing Program.

https://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/publicationid_1283_6596.pdf

https://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/publicationid_1283_6596.pdf

https://www.sandag.org/organization/about/pubs/policy_031.pdf




C-70229 (Rev 03/19)

OHSUSA:767407459.1

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS, ACTING AS THE

SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND

THE CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH REGARDING DEBT FINANCING THROUGH THE TRANSNET PROGRAM

SANDAG AGREEMENT NO. 5005762

This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made and entered into effective as of this ____ day of ______, 201X, by and between the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (“SANDAG”) and the City of Imperial Beach (City).

RECITALS

The following recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

WHEREAS, SANDAG serves as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and in that role is responsible for the administration of programs under the TransNet Extension Ordinance (Proposition A, November 2004), which sets forth permitted uses for revenues from a ½ cent transactions and use tax in San Diego County (TransNet Extension Program); and

WHEREAS, in order to accelerate the implementation of TransNet tax funded projects, SANDAG has established a debt financing program to provide advanced funding for eligible projects under the TransNet Extension Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG requires that an agency receiving proceeds from the TransNet debt financing program shall be responsible for its proportionate share of the issuance costs, as well as the ongoing interest and related administrative costs from the date the proceeds are issued until the principal amount of the loan is fully repaid; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to borrow one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000)through the TransNet debt financing program for its Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project, or other projects eligible under the terms of this MOA and applicable SANDAG policies that have been approved in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and hereinafter called “PROJECTS”; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to memorialize their agreement in this MOA to carry out the purposes set forth above;

Attachment 1

2

C-70229 (Rev 03/19)

OHSUSA:767407459.1

AGREEMENT

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

SANDAG AGREES:

1. To lend the City one million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) through the TransNetdebt financing program for the PROJECTS subject to certain conditions set forth below andSANDAG Board Policy 031 (TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Rules) concerningTransNet Extension Program loans.

2. SANDAG will transfer the borrowed funds to the City within 30 days following a request forreimbursement of valid expenditures for the PROJECTS.

THE CITY AGREES:

1. The governing body of the City at its June 5, 2019, meeting approved the request to borrow anamount not to exceed one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) through theTransNet debt financing program for the PROJECTS.

2. The City agrees to use the funding provided under this MOA solely for the PROJECTS. ThePROJECTS consist of the acquisition or construction of public capital improvements that will beowned by the City or a state or local governmental agency. The City will not allow the fundingprovided by this MOA or the PROJECTS to be used (for example, by lease or contract) in thetrade or business of any non-governmental persons other than in their roles as members of thegeneral public (i.e., no private business use of the PROJECTS). The City expects to use thePROJECTS for the purposes described above for the entire useful life of the PROJECTS and willconsult with SANDAG prior to any change in use of the PROJECTS.

3. The City has not and will not finance any of the costs of the PROJECTS that will be reimbursedunder this MOA with proceeds of other debt issued by the City or any other entity. The Citywill submit a request for reimbursement of valid expenditures on a timely basis following theCity’s expenditures for the PROJECTS, and the City understands that federal income taxrestrictions generally limit the ability to use TransNet debt financing program to reimburse costspaid within the prior 18 months or with respect to an asset placed in service in the prioreighteen (18) months.

4. The City agrees to submit a request for reimbursement with all applicable documentation nomore than one time per quarter with a minimum amount of one hundred thousand dollars($100,000) and in one thousand dollars ($1,000) increments thereafter. If a reimbursementrequest includes an increment amount of less than one thousand dollars ($1,000), after the firstone hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) requested, the amount in excess of a one-thousanddollar ($1,000) increment will be carried forward to the next reimbursement request.

3

C-70229 (Rev 03/19)

OHSUSA:767407459.1

5. The City will pay its proportionate share of the commercial paper issuance costs, and annualdebt service costs which include principal and interest payments, and annual administrativecosts from the date the debt is issued until the final principal and interest amounts of theapplicable commercial paper are fully repaid.

6. Repayment of the principal amount shall commence within three years of the receipt of theproceeds and shall be completed within five years. Repayment of the proceeds may beaccomplished by rolling the outstanding amount into a long-term bond issued during the five-year repayment period if the opportunity for the conversion exists and is agreed to by SANDAG.In such cases, the City would be responsible for their proportionate share of bond issuance costsand annual debt service costs. The repayment of debt, in all cases, is the first priority on the useof the City’s annual TransNet revenues. The accounts may be deducted and the terms ofrepayment are estimated in the Repayment Schedule, Exhibit A hereto.

7. The City pledges that payment of the amounts set forth in paragraphs five (5) and six (6) above,in all cases, shall be the first priority use of the monies SANDAG would otherwise provide to theCity as its annual TransNet revenues. The City is not able to, and agrees not to or be deemedto, subordinate SANDAG’s lien on the TransNet revenues or establish, transfer, pledge or assignany other claim upon such funds. The amounts to be deducted and the terms of repayment (ifappropriate) are estimated and set forth in the Repayment Schedule, which is Exhibit A hereto.

8. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend SANDAG, the San Diego CountyRegional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof against all causesof action or claims related to projects financed through funding provided under this MOA.

THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE:

1. That all obligations of SANDAG under the terms of this MOA are subject to the appropriationof the required resources by SANDAG and the approval of the SANDAG Board of Directors.

2. Any notice required or permitted under this MOA may be personally served on the other party,by the party giving notice, or may be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, to thefollowing addresses:

For SANDAG: For City of Imperial Beach: 401 B Street, Suite 800 825 Imperial Beach Boulevard San Diego, CA 92101 Imperial Beach, CA 91932 Attn: Director of Finance Attn: City Manager

3. That unless it is amended by the parties in writing, this MOA shall terminate on____________________ or on such earlier or later date as the parties may agree to in writing.

4. The indemnification provisions of this MOA shall survive termination of the MOA.

5. This MOA shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If anyaction is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this MOA, the action shall be brought ina state or federal court situated in the County of San Diego, State of California.

4

C-70229 (Rev 03/19)

OHSUSA:767407459.1

6. All terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind each of the partieshereto, and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.

7. For purposes of this MOA, the relationship of the parties is that of independent entities andnot as agents of each other or as joint venturers or partners. The parties shall maintain sole andexclusive control over their personnel, agents, consultants, and operations.

8. No alteration or variation of the terms of this MOA shall be valid unless made in writing andsigned by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated hereinshall be binding on any of the parties hereto.

9. Nothing in the provisions of this MOA is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights inthird parties to this MOA or affect the legal liability of the parties to this MOA to third parties.

10. This MOA may be executed in any number of identical counterparts, each of which shall bedeemed to be an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the sameinstrument when each party has signed one such counterpart.

11. This MOA may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature, and a facsimile signature shallbe treated as an original.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this MOA effective on the day and year first above written.

SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH

KIM KAWADA

Chief Deputy Executive Director ANDY HALL

City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of General Counsel Legal Counsel

5

FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25

Annual Estimated Revenue 752,392 778,405 806,420 833,434 861,449 861,449

CP Interest is estimated at 2.5% (.38% monthly)

Principal Borrowed 1,300,000Term (Years) 5 60Estimated Interest Rate 2.5%

Draw Principal Interest Total D/SAugust-19 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$

September-19 300,000 5,000 625 5,625 595,000 October-19 300,000 10,085 1,240 11,324 884,915

November-19 300,000 15,257 1,844 17,101 1,169,658 December-19 100,000 20,520 2,437 22,957 1,249,138

January-20 22,306 2,602 24,908 1,226,832 February-20 22,306 2,556 24,862 1,204,526

March-20 22,306 2,509 24,815 1,182,220 April-20 22,306 2,463 24,769 1,159,914 May-20 22,306 2,416 24,723 1,137,608

June-20 22,306 2,370 24,676 1,115,302 July-20 22,306 2,324 24,630 1,092,996

August-20 22,306 2,277 24,583 1,070,690 September-20 22,306 2,231 24,537 1,048,383

October-20 22,306 2,184 24,490 1,026,077 November-20 22,306 2,138 24,444 1,003,771 December-20 22,306 2,091 24,397 981,465

January-21 22,306 2,045 24,351 959,159 February-21 22,306 1,998 24,304 936,853

March-21 22,306 1,952 24,258 914,547 April-21 22,306 1,905 24,211 892,241 May-21 22,306 1,859 24,165 869,935

June-21 22,306 1,812 24,118 847,629 July-21 22,306 1,766 24,072 825,323

August-21 22,306 1,719 24,025 803,017 September-21 22,306 1,673 23,979 780,711

October-21 22,306 1,626 23,933 758,405 November-21 22,306 1,580 23,886 736,099 December-21 22,306 1,534 23,840 713,793

January-22 22,306 1,487 23,793 691,487 February-22 22,306 1,441 23,747 669,181

March-22 22,306 1,394 23,700 646,875 April-22 22,306 1,348 23,654 624,569 May-22 22,306 1,301 23,607 602,263

June-22 22,306 1,255 23,561 579,957 July-22 22,306 1,208 23,514 557,651

August-22 22,306 1,162 23,468 535,345 September-22 22,306 1,115 23,421 513,039

October-22 22,306 1,069 23,375 490,733 November-22 22,306 1,022 23,328 468,427 December-22 22,306 976 23,282 446,121

January-23 22,306 929 23,235 423,815 February-23 22,306 883 23,189 401,509

March-23 22,306 836 23,143 379,203 April-23 22,306 790 23,096 356,897 May-23 22,306 744 23,050 334,590

June-23 22,306 697 23,003 312,284 July-23 22,306 651 22,957 289,978

August-23 22,306 604 22,910 267,672 September-23 22,306 558 22,864 245,366

October-23 22,306 511 22,817 223,060 November-23 22,306 465 22,771 200,754 December-23 22,306 418 22,724 178,448

January-24 22,306 372 22,678 156,142 February-24 22,306 325 22,631 133,836

March-24 22,306 279 22,585 111,530 April-24 22,306 232 22,538 89,224 May-24 22,306 186 22,492 66,918

June-24 22,306 139 22,445 44,612 July-24 22,306 93 22,399 22,306

August-24 22,306 46 22,353 0

1,300,000$ 80,312$ 1,380,312$

Assume Draw starting Aug 2019 $300K

Note: Amounts shown in whole dollars; may need to adjust for rounding.

Exhibit A

6

City of Imperial Beach Capacity Analysis$1.3 Million Commercial Paper

FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Total

Beginning Balance (est) $20,000 69,732$ 121,250$ 169,674$ 214,003$ 803,040$ 20,000$ Estimated Allocations1 752,392 778,405 806,420 833,434 861,449 861,449 2 4,893,549 CP Proceeds 1,300,000 - - - - - 1,300,000 CP Principal Repayment (184,698) (267,672) (267,672) (267,672) (267,672) (44,614) (1,300,000) CP Interest/Other Fees3 (21,062) (24,815) (18,124) (11,432) (4,740) (139) (80,313) CP Disbursement (1,300,000) - - - - - (1,300,000) RTIP programmed projects (496,900) (434,400) (472,200) (510,000) - - (1,913,500)

Ending Balance 69,732$ 121,250$ 169,674$ 214,003$ 803,040$ 1,619,736$ 1,619,736$

Notes:1. Estimated revenues are based on proposed fiscal year 2020 projections for the next five years, updated on an annual basis. Assumes 100% of estimatedrevenues are programmed for Congestion Relief projects.2. Estimated revenues are projected for five years; therefore FY 2025 uses the estimated amount for FY 2024.3. Interest repayments are calculated at 2.5% for the capacity analysis, but are paid based on actual costs. This includes interest costs and the City'sproportionate share of CP program administrative fees.

7

Attachment 2

8

Attachment 3

9

Commercial Paper Requirements

The TransNet Debt Financing Program includes certain eligibility requirements to advance-fund projects with either bond proceeds or commercial paper. To be eligible for these funds, the City must meet the following requirements:

Eligibility Requirement Results

Congestion Relief Project • The Imperial Beach Boulevard Enhancement Project includesmajor rehabilitation and reconstruction of the entirety ofImperial Beach Boulevard from Seacoast Boulevard to14th Street. The Project includes 160,000 square feet ofroadway grinding and overlay and 12,000 square feet ofnew structural pavement. Additionally, more than 45,000square feet of new sidewalk and three new pedestriancrossings are included in the Project.

Useful life exceeds repayment term – at least five years

The expected useful life of the Project is 50+ years.

Debt service requirements met prior to allocating TransNet to other projects

The City intends to use its annual TransNet LSI allocations to cover all debt obligations first with remaining available annual funds used for other programmed projects.

Project cannot include private use The Project would be entirely for public use.

Commercial paper will be paid to City on reimbursement basis based on Project-eligible expenditures

The City agrees to these terms.

Economic and/or community benefit The Project enjoys strong positive community support and will include new sidewalks and pedestrian crossings in heavily-traveled pedestrian thoroughfares.

Capacity available in the TransNet Debt Financing Program

Of the $100 million of commercial paper within the TransNet Debt Financing Program, there currently is $28.7 million available (uncommitted). There would be $27.4 million remaining if the Board of Directors approves the request.

Project must be programmed in the RTIP

Amendment No. 5 of the 2018 RTIP (Amendment) is scheduled for a public hearing and consideration of the proposed final Amendment at the July 19, 2019, Transportation Committee meeting. Adoption of the proposed final Amendment is scheduled for consideration by the Board of Directors at its July 26, 2019, meeting.

10

Attachment 4

Item: 25


Delegation of Approval for Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Overview

The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is the five-year program of transportation projects in the San Diego region.

Federal guidelines allow the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to approve administrative modifications to the RTIP. Caltrans, in turn, can delegate this authority to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) upon request and allow the MPO to delegate the approval to its Executive Director or designee. (Attachment 1).

Administrative modifications are changes which the federal government considers minor and include:

1. revising a project description without changing the scope;

2. revising funding for a project or phase, including the addition of funding that is limited to the lesser of 40 percent of the total project cost or $10 million;

3. a cost decrease with no limit as long as a phase is still fully funded; and

4. adding or deleting a project from the grouped project listings within the funding limits shown above and other minor changes.

These changes do not require a financial analysis, are available to the public during the review period prior to approval, and are posted on the SANDAG and Caltrans websites once approved. With delegated approval, these minor changes could be made in as little as eight weeks, making funds available an average of ten weeks sooner.

More significant increases, scope changes, and new projects would still need to be through a formal amendment. A formal amendment is posted for a 15-day public comment period, presented to the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) for comments, approved by the Transportation Committee, and ratified by the Board of Directors before being sent to Caltrans, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for final approval. This process would continue to take about four to six months.

Fiscal Impact:

Delegated approval of administrative modifications would make funds available to member agencies’ projects sooner.


This action would reduce the time required to make minor changes to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program by an average of 10 weeks.

Action: Adopt

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) adopt RTC Resolution No. RTC-2020-01:

1. requesting delegation of approval for administrative modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program; and

2. delegating that approval to the Executive Director.

2

Key Considerations

Delegating authority to the Executive Director would streamline and shorten the process of revising minor changes to the RTIP for most projects, helping local agencies access funds more quickly. It also would result in formal amendments with fewer projects, which would continue to be prepared for Transportation Committee approval, allowing for a more focused review on projects with more significant changes.

This change would result in an amendment to Chapter 2 (Attachment 2) of the 2018 RTIP which was approved by the Board of Directors on September 28, 2018. Updates which reflect the 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration, approved by the Board on May 24, 2019, are also included in Chapter 2. Amendments to the chapter, including information on the proposed delegation, were released for public comment on June 12, 2019, as part of Amendment No. 5 and no comments were received. The proposed change in delegation enacted by Resolution No. 2020-01 (Attachment 3) would be amended in Board Policy No. 017 during the annual policy update process.

The ITOC strongly supported this proposal at its June 12, 2019, meeting and recommended that SANDAG continue to notify interested parties when an administrative modification is being prepared and provide a link to view the proposed changes throughout the process.

Next Steps

Pending approval by the Board of Directors, SANDAG would submit a letter to Caltrans requesting delegated authority to allow the Executive Director to approve administrative modifications.


Key Staff Contact: Sue Alpert, (619) 595-5318, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Revised FSTIP/FTIP Amendments and Administrative Modification Procedures 2. 2018 RTIP Chapter 2 Revisions 3. RTC Resolution No. RTC-2020-01: Delegation of Authority to Approve

Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Delegating that Authority to the Executive Director

Attachment

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Chapter 2

Regional Transportation Improvement Program Development Process

12

Attachment 2

13

2-1

Chapter 2 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Development Process

This chapter discusses the federal, state, and TransNet programming requirements and the process used by the

San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to develop this update. It also describes the process for

amendments during this cycle.

Federal Transportation Requirements

SANDAG is designated by the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) as the Metropolitan

Planning Organization (MPO) for the San Diego region.

As the MPO, SANDAG must have a continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning

process in order to receive federal capital or operating funds. The planning process includes the development

of: (1) a long-range, minimum of 20 years, transportation plan describing the policies, strategies, and

transportation facility needs; and (2) a Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) covering at least a

four-year period. As both the MPO and the state designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA),

the SANDAG Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is equivalent to the FTIP.

Consistent with these requirements, the Board of Directors, in October 2015, adopted the Revenue Constrained

Regional Plan, San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan), and on December 2, 2015, the

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued a finding of conformity

for the Revenue Constrained Regional Plan. Both the Regional Plan and the RTIP documents fulfill federal

requirements.

Federal and state regulations identify the development process and required content for the programming

document. In general, the RTIP must include all major projects receiving certain categories of federal or state

transportation funding, which need federal and/or state approval. The RTIP also must include

Capacity Increasing (CI) projects and those projects which are identified as regionally significant. A regionally

significant project (defined in 23 CFR 450.104) is a transportation project that is on a facility which serves

regional transportation needs and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan area's

transportation network. The 2018 RTIP also includes the Program of Projects (POP) funded by TransNet, the

local transportation sales tax program administered by SANDAG.

The 2018 RTIP indicates the region’s priorities for the implementation of transportation projects. It is required

to include realistic estimates of project costs and anticipated program revenue. It also must be a financially

constrained program. This means that funding must be available and committed to implement the projects

listed in this document. As a result, all projects in the first two fiscal years must have dedicated funding, and

projects in the out-years either must have a firm funding commitment or a reasonable strategy or expectation

that funds will be available. In addition, all projects within the 2018 RTIP must be consistent with the

Regional Plan.

14

2-2

Air Quality Conformity

On April 15, 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) designated the San Diego air

basin as nonattainment for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard, effective June 15, 2004. However, several

areas that are tribal lands in eastern San Diego County were excluded from the nonattainment designation.

The air basin initially was classified as a basic nonattainment area under Subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act, and

the attainment date for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard was set as June 15, 2009. In cooperation with

SANDAG, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) developed an Eight-Hour Ozone

Attainment Plan for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard, which was submitted to the U.S. EPA on

June 15, 2007. The budgets in the Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County were found

adequate for transportation conformity purposed by the U.S. EPA, effective June 9, 2008.

However, on April 27, 2012, in response to a court decision, the U.S. EPA ruled that the San Diego basic

nonattainment area be reclassified as a Subpart 2 moderate nonattainment area, with an attainment date of

June 15, 2010. This reclassification became effective on June 13, 2012. Air quality data for 2009, 2010, and

2011 demonstrated that the San Diego air basin attained the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard; APCD prepared

a Maintenance Plan, with a request for redesignation to attainment/maintenance. On December 6, 2012, the

California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the

1997 National Ozone Standard for San Diego County for submittal to the U.S. EPA as a State Implementation

Plan (SIP) revision. Effective July 5, 2013, the U.S. EPA approved California’s request to redesignate the

San Diego County ozone nonattainment area to attainment for the 1997 Eight-hour Ozone National Ambient

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and its plan for continuing to attain the 1997 ozone standard for ten years

beyond redesignation.

On May 21, 2012, the U.S. EPA designated the San Diego air basin as a nonattainment area for the 2008 Eight-

Hour Ozone Standard and classified it as a marginal area with an attainment date of December 31, 2015. Tribal

areas that were previously excluded are now included as part of the San Diego region nonattainment

designation. This designation became effective on July 20, 2012. SANDAG determined conformity to the new

standard on May 24, 2013, using the applicable model approved by the U.S. EPA to forecast regional emissions

(EMFAC2011). The U.S. DOT, in consultation with the U.S. EPA, made its conformity determination on

June 28, 2013. The U.S. EPA’s final rule also provides for the revocation of the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone NAAQS

for transportation conformity purposes, effective July 20, 2013. On

December 23, 2014, a D.C. Circuit Court decision (NRDC v. EPA No. 12-1321), determined that the attainment

date for marginal areas would be set for July 20, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled

against parts of the EPA’s 2015 Ozone Implementation Rule related to the revocation of the 1997 ozone

standard and the relevant “anti-backsliding” requirements. However, according to Transportation Conformity

Guidance for the South Coast II Court Decision, nonattainment areas with existing 2008 ozone conformity

budgets are not required to address the 1997 ozone standards for conformity purposes.

Effective June 3, 2016, the U.S. EPA determined that 11 areas, including the San Diego air basin, failed to attain

the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015, and thus, are reclassified by

operation of law as “Moderate” for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. States containing any portion of these new

Moderate areas were required to submit SIP revisions that meet the statutory and regulatory requirements that

15

2-3

apply to 2008 ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate by January 1, 2017. The San Diego APCD

submitted a SIP revision addressing Moderate area requirements to CARB on December 27, 2016. Effective

December 4, 2017, the U.S. EPA found the motor vehicle emission budgets for the Reasonable Further Progress

milestone year of 2017 from the 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County adequate for

transportation conformity purposes for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

On October 26, 2015, the U.S. EPA published in the Federal Code of Regulation a new ozone standard, referred

to as the 2015 Ozone standard. The new standard revised the allowable ozone level to 0.070 parts per million.

The 2015 ozone standard became effective on December 28, 2015. On June 4, 2018, U.S. EPA published a

final rule that designated the San Diego region as nonattainment, with a classification of moderate, for the

2015 ozone NAAQS. The designation became effective on August 3, 2018, and started a one-year grace period,

during which time affected MPOs must demonstrate conformity of their transportation plans and

transportation improvement programs to the 2015 ozone standard. On May 24, 2019, the SANDAG Board

of Directors adopted the 2015 Ozone NAAQs conformity demonstration for the 2015 Regional Plan and the

2018 RTIP, and found that the 2015 Regional Plan and the 2018 RTIP, as amended, are in conformity with the

requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and applicable SIP for air quality. This conformity finding is pending

federal approval.

The San Diego region was designated by the U.S. EPA as a federal maintenance area for the Carbon Monoxide

(CO) standard. On November 8, 2004, CARB submitted the 2004 revision to the California SIP for CO to the

U.S. EPA, which extended the maintenance plan demonstration to 2018. Effective January 30, 2006, the

U.S. EPA approved this maintenance plan as a SIP revision. On March 21, 2018, the U.S. EPA documented in a

letter that transportation conformity requirement for CO will cease to apply after June 1, 2018.

The 2018 RTIP must be evaluated for conformity with the SIP for air quality attainment. The SIP requires that

the 2018 RTIP satisfy a number of specific tests to indicate that the program will achieve certain air quality

emissions reductions and require the RTIP to implement agreed-upon transportation control measures

(Transportation Tactics). Chapter 5 further describes the air quality conformity process.

Congestion Management Process

FHWA 23 CFR 450.322 requires that each Transportation Management Area (TMA) address congestion

management through a process involving an analysis of multimodal metropolitan-wide strategies. SANDAG, as

the designated TMA for the San Diego region, monitors the Congestion Management Process (CMP) for those

federally eligible projects. The passage of Assembly Bill 2419 (Bowler, 1996) allows TMAs to “opt-out” of the

state CMP. In October 2009, the San Diego region elected to be exempt from the state CMP, and since this

decision, SANDAG has been abiding by the federal requirement to ensure the region’s continued compliance

with the federal CMP.

The Regional Plan discusses several elements for use in the analysis of multimodal strategies including:

(1) performance monitoring and measurement of the regional transportation system; (2) multimodal

alternatives and non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) analysis; (3) land use impact analysis; (4) the provision of

congestion management tools; and (5) integration with the RTIP process. For the 2018 RTIP, SANDAG monitors

projects that add general purpose lanes by requiring sponsors of these projects seeking federal funds to submit

16

2-4

documentation that demonstrates the project was evaluated for multimodal alternatives, including non-SOV

capacity improvements. The most recent federal congestion management process can be found in

Appendix U.7 to the Regional Plan and in Appendix G to this document. Further information also can be found

on the CMP web page at sandag.org/cmp.

Federal Funding Programs

Federal funds programmed are based on the federal authorizing legislation, Fixing America’s Surface

Transportation (FAST) Act, which was signed into law by the President on December 4, 2015. The FAST Act

includes anticipated appropriations through FY 2019/20 and funding levels are conservatively estimated to

continue at the same levels as it is assumed the Congress will enact continuing resolutions or new legislation

upon the expiration of the FAST Act. These federal funding programs include the following:

• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ)

• FTA Sections 5307 (Urbanized Formula Grant), 5310 (Capital Program), 5311 (Rural Transit) Programs,

5337 (State of Good Repair), and 5339 (Bus and Bus Facilities)

• Highway Safety Improvement Program/High Risk Rural Roads Program

• Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, which is administered through the state and includes Regional

Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and Highway Bridge Program funds

• Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants Program

• Highway Infrastructure Program

Federal funding for the CMAQ and RSTP programs is apportioned by the state to the San Diego region by

formula. As the MPO, SANDAG is responsible for administering the program and project selection based on

priority established in the Regional Plan (see Expedited Project Selection Process in Appendix C).

CMAQ funds can be used for most categories of transportation projects that improve air quality, such as

purchase of alternative-fuel transit vehicles, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) activities, transit

operations, and high occupancy vehicle facilities as provided in federal law. CMAQ funds cannot be used for

projects that increase the transportation system’s capacity for SOVs. RSTP funds can be used for state highway,

local street and road, transit, bicycle, traffic signal, and TDM projects. Highway Infrastructure Program funds

were apportioned by the U.S. DOT Appropriations Act of 2018 and 2019 and can be used similarly to RSTP

funds.

Federal Submittal Requirements

Following approval by the SANDAG Board, the final 2018 RTIP will be submitted to Caltrans for inclusion in the

Federal State Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP), which incorporates the Transportation

Improvement Programs (TIPs) from other MPOs around the state. The 2018 RTIP also will be submitted to the

17

http://www.sandag.org/cmp

2-5

FHWA, FTA, and U.S. EPA for federal approval of the air quality conformity determination. The FHWA and FTA

approve the RTIP project programming as an element of the FSTIP.

The U.S. EPA acts as a commenting agency to the FHWA and FTA in the RTIP air quality conformity process.

The 2018 RTIP may be amended by SANDAG, as needed. However, any revisions that add or modify

capacity-increasing, non-exempt projects require an air quality conformity re-determination. A listing of projects

that are typically exempt from the air quality conformity determination is provided in Appendix E.

State Transportation Requirements

In addition to serving as the federal MPO, SANDAG is designated by the State of California as an RTPA. RTPAs

are responsible for implementing state laws regarding transportation planning and funding and to ensure

coordinated planning efforts meet both state and federal requirements. The 2018 RTIP is a document which

meets both federal and state regulations and includes major projects receiving state transportation funds.

State Transportation Improvement Program

The 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) adopted by the California Transportation

Commission (CTC) in March 2018 is the state’s spending plan. The FAST Act continues a program to provide

for a variety of alternative transportation projects, including many that were previously eligible activities under

separately funded programs. The Active Transportation Program (ATP) was created by Senate Bill 99

(Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Committee on Budget and

Fiscal Review, 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

The ATP consolidates existing federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation

Alternatives Program, Bicycle Transportation Account, and State Safe Routes to School into a single program.

ATP funds are administered by the CTC, with a separate program administered by the designated MPO, and

projects are selected through a competitive process.

Pursuant to Senate Bill 45 (Kopp, 1997) (SB 45), the STIP is comprised of the Regional Improvement Program

(RIP) and the Interregional Improvement Program (IIP). Under SB 45, SANDAG, as the RTPA, submits the RIP

projects while Caltrans submit its IIP projects, in cooperation with SANDAG, to the CTC by December 15 of

each odd-numbered year.

The CTC develops the STIP Fund Estimate (FE), which includes the RIP “County Share” and IIP fund allocations.

The program is updated every two years and currently covers the five-year period 2018/19 to 2022/23.

STIP-funded projects, like all other state and federally funded projects, must be listed in the RTIP in order for

the sponsor agencies to access funding. The STIP consists of funds from the Transportation Investment Fund as

well as from the Public Transportation Account and State Highway Account. Figure 2-1 illustrates the funding

distribution.

18

http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/ATP/AB_101_2013.pdf

2-6

Figure 2-1: State Transportation Fund Allocation Process

STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT (State and Federal Funds)

70% 30%

Non-STIP Projects

State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP):

Maintenance/Operations

Rehabilitation/Safety

Administration

Local Assistance

Support Engineering

Other

STIP Projects

Highways

Transit

Local Projects

Support/Engineering

75% 25%

RIP IIP

40% 60% 60% 40%

North Counties

South Counties

Interregional Program

State Discretionary

Program

SANDAG

Share

(Approximately 6.4% of total RIP)

Seventy-five percent of the STIP funds flow to the regions by formula whereby the regional planning agencies

are charged with developing an expenditure plan for the funds. Eligible project types include improvements to

state highways, local roads, public transit, intercity rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, grade separations,

transportation system management, TDM, soundwall projects, intermodal facilities, and safety. The regional

share is further divided between northern (40%) and southern (60%) areas of the state.

The remaining 25 percent of the funds flow through the IIP, which is a statewide competitive program

administered by Caltrans. Sixty percent (of the IIP shares) is directed to projects that improve interregional

transportation and 40 percent is programmed at the discretion of the CTC, subject to the north/south ratio

identified above. Eligible project types include intercity passenger rail, mass transit guideways, grade

separations, and state highways.

19

2-7

As the RTPA for the San Diego region, SANDAG is responsible for nominating projects to receive the region’s

share of regional STIP (STIP-RIP) funding (as discussed above). These projects in total must be constrained to

the “County Share” or “target” funding amount specified in the STIP FE published by the CTC. Caltrans is

responsible for nominating projects to be funded under the interregional STIP (STIP-IIP) statewide program.

The CTC must approve the local projects proposed in the RIP and IIP by including them in the adopted STIP or

a STIP amendment in order for these projects to receive funding.

SANDAG also nominates projects to receive state funds under the ATP, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital

Program, the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, the Local Partnership Program, and the Solutions for

Congested Corridors Program.

For state-funded programs, including the STIP and SHOPP, the revenues and program are based on the revised

2018 FE adopted by the CTC on August 16, 2017. The fund estimate included $2.2 billion in new STIP funding

capacity from the adoption of Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) (Beall), signed into law on April 28, 2017, which reset the

price-based excise tax to a traditional excise tax of 17.3 cents per gallon, with the provision to adjust the tax

annually for inflation beginning in 2019-20. This will stabilize the funding in the State Highway Account and

the STIP. SB 1 does not provide additional funding for the ATP portion of the STIP, creating a negative capacity

for Rail and Transit projects, which must be funded through other eligible STIP fund types.

For SANDAG, the priority for STIP-funded projects continues to be based upon the criteria approved by the

Transportation Committee at its October 21, 2005, meeting. These criteria include:

• Complete projects currently programmed in the STIP

• Place particular emphasis on programming and completing TransNet Early Action projects

• Program projects at the earliest possible time they can be constructed or implemented

• Maintain existing STIP funding levels as a minimum on existing programmed projects

• Reflect the efforts by the region and Caltrans to complete some of these projects outside the STIP through

other funding sources

Along with the Regional Plan, the SANDAG Board adopted the Sustainable Communities Strategy, which details

how the region will reduce greenhouse gas emissions to state-mandated levels over time. The state-

administered portion of the ATP is one of the components that would help the region meet its greenhouse gas

emissions targets, with the expectation that this program will help fund a number of regionally significant bike

projects. The final funding allocation for the state-wide-funded ATP projects included in the 2018 RTIP rests

with the CTC. The approval of the region-wide ATP is ultimately approved by the SANDAG Board.

A major element of active transportation is the implementation of the Regional Bikeway Program. On

September 27, 2013, the SANDAG Board approved the Regional Bike Plan Early Action Program (Bike EAP),

which prioritized regional bike projects to be funded with, among other programs, the TransNet Bicycle,

Pedestrian, and Neighborhood Safety (BPNS) Program and the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bike

Program.

20

2-8

In addition, Caltrans develops the 2018 SHOPP, which is divided into six project groupings – bridge preservation,

collision reduction, mandates, mobility, and roadway/roadside preservation. Projects funded with STIP and

SHOPP are programmed in the 2018 RTIP based upon the final CTC adoption.

State Submittal Requirements

The RTIP, which includes the entire San Diego region STIP-funded projects and all other federal and locally

funded projects, must be submitted to Caltrans by October 1, 2018. Once submitted, the state will post for a

30-day public notice review before federal submittal.

TransNet Requirements

TransNet is the local half-cent transportation sales tax funding program that was approved by San Diego voters

in November 2004. As part of the TransNet Ordinance, all local agencies are required to submit a five-year

TransNet POP for inclusion in the RTIP. Serving as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

(RTC), SANDAG is required to approve a multi-year TransNet POP, consistent with the RTIP update schedule,

which identifies all major transportation projects proposed to use the sales tax funds over the multi-year period.

In order to receive TransNet revenue, transportation projects must be included in the approved RTIP/TransNet

POP.

The TransNet Program includes several subprograms. After deducting for administrative expenses (1%),

2 percent for BPNS Program projects, and $250,000 (plus consumer price index) for the Independent Taxpayers

Oversight Committee (ITOC), the remainder of the revenues is divided between Major Corridors, Local System

Improvements, and Transit System Improvements. Under the TransNet Ordinance, the highway and transit

major corridor projects were specified in the approved ballot measure. The schedule and funding of the major

TransNet highway and transit projects are developed cooperatively by SANDAG, Caltrans, and the region’s

transit operators.

The Board of Directors adopted Bike EAP prioritized regional bike projects to be funded with, among other

programs, the TransNet BPNS and the TDA Bike Program. Additionally, the Board of Directors approved to set-

aside $1 million per year to support local, non-motorized projects. Projects funded under the call for projects

process with local agencies as the lead agency are generally listed as a grouped-project listing in the RTIP as

Various Agencies. EAP projects are listed under SANDAG as the lead agency, which can be either group-project

listing or individually listed. If a bike project is funded with federal or state funds in addition to the local TransNet

or TDA bike funds, those projects can be listed individually by the sponsoring agency.

The San Diego region’s 18 cities and the County developed the TransNet Program of local street and road projects.

The local TransNet five-year POP are identified as part of the project listing located in Chapter 3. Per Section 6 of

the TransNet Ordinance, the projects within each jurisdiction must be approved by each city council or the

County Board of Supervisors, after holding a public hearing, in the form of a signed resolution.

RTIP Development Process for TransNet

Designated as the region’s MPO and RTPA and as the RTC, SANDAG has the overall responsibility for developing

the required RTIP document. In a memo dated January 16, 2018, SANDAG requested that project sponsors

21

2-9

review and update the projects for submittal for inclusion into the 2018 RTIP. The individual project listings

included in Chapter 3 have been submitted by the project sponsors and reviewed for compliance by SANDAG.

The 2018 RTIP has been prepared with input and cooperation from Caltrans, the cities and County of

San Diego, the Metropolitan Transit System, the North County Transit District, and the SANDAG Transportation

Committee, as well as other technical and advisory working groups.

Public Participation

SANDAG has provided ample opportunity for community involvement and interagency consultation in the

development of the 2018 RTIP, and the SANDAG public participation process provides additional opportunity

for public review and comment on the draft document prior to its adoption. Opportunities for community

involvement and interagency consultation on the transportation projects included in the 2018 RTIP were

provided through public meetings of the various SANDAG committees and working groups that are responsible

for the development and oversight of the projects. These committees include the Transportation Committee,

the Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, the Community-Based Organization Working Group,

the Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues, the ITOC, and the San Diego Region

Conformity Working Group.

At its July 27, 2018, meeting, the Board of Directors approved the distribution of the draft 2018 RTIP for a 30-

day public comment period. A public hearing on the Proposed Final 2018 RTIP was held at the Transportation

Committee meeting on September 7, 2018. Public comments were received and their corresponding SANDAG

responses will be included in Appendix J of this document. At its September 28, 2018, meeting, the Board of

Directors adopted the Final 2018 RTIP. The 2018 RTIP also will be available on the 2018 RTIP web page at

sandag.org/RTIP.

RTIP Amendment Process

On occasion, circumstances may dictate changes to the current RTIP following its adoption. Federal regulations

allow changes, or amendments, if the procedures are consistent with federal requirements for TIP development

and consistent with federal procedures for revisions to the FSTIP. SANDAG will consider such amendments

when the circumstances prompting the amendments are compelling, and when the changes will not adversely

affect air quality conformity or financial constraint of the TIP. The proposed changes to projects also must be

consistent with the rules of the particular funding program.

There are two types of processes to update the RTIP: (1) Administrative Modifications; and (2) Amendments

(described in detail below). SANDAG processes amendments generally on a quarterly basis and administrative

modifications on an as-needed basis. Both the 2018 RTIP and any amendment requests during the 2018 RTIP

cycle that involve the TransNet Program must include the sponsor’s governing board/council approval in the

form of a signed resolution. The 2018 RTIP quarterly amendment schedule can be found on the RTIP web page

at sandag.org/RTIP.

Caltrans currently approves Administrative Modifications in their entirety and Amendments prior to federal

approval, and is unable to approve an amendment with exceptions to specific projects. There are circumstances,

however, in which SANDAG may need to revise the amended projects after SANDAG approval should Caltrans

22

http://www.sandag.org/RTIP

2-10

object to the approval of a specific project. In such instances, SANDAG can revise the original submittal and

resubmit the amendment.

Administrative Modifications

Administrative Modifications require the approval of the Board of Directors, which has delegated its authority

to the Executive Director and has requested that the state delegate approval to SANDAG. Administrative

modifications do not require federal approval. Federal agencies are notified of the amendments for

informational purposes. The streamlined approach helps expedite the approval process. Project requests that

fall within the following criteria can be administratively amended:

• Revise a project description which does not change the scope of the project or is in conflict with the project

environmental document and wherein the project does not affect air quality or the timely implementation

of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) or impacts financial constraint

• Increase the funding amount up to 40 percent of the project cost, or $10 million, whichever is less

• Change in funding source

• Change a project lead agency

• Split or combine individually listed projects as long as cost, schedule, and scope remain unchanged

• Change required information for grouped-project (lump sum) listings

• Add or delete projects from grouped-project (lump sum) listings as long as the funding amount stays within

the guidelines indicated above

Amendments

Project requests that do not meet the Administrative Modification criteria require Amendments. The conditions

for amendments include but are not limited to the following:

• Add a new federal- or state-funded project or delete an existing federal- or state-funded project

• Shift funds from beyond the first four years (FY 22/2023) to the quadrennial element (FY 2018/19 through

FY 2021/22), or vice versa

• The request would affect air quality conformity or the timely implementation of TCMs

• The request would require additional air quality emissions analysis and/or a new finding of air quality

conformity by adding a new CI project or deleting an existing CI project

• The request would impact the financial constraint of the RTIP

• The request would result in major changes in scope, design, and/or concept

23

2-11

Amendments require an action by the Transportation Committee (Board of Directors if the amendment requires

redetermination of air quality), Caltrans, FHWA, FTA, and the U.S. EPA. Due to the lengthy process involved in

determining air quality conformity, amendment requests for regionally significant CI projects requiring new

emissions analysis will be scheduled on an as-needed basis (not on any regular schedule).

Grouped Project Listings

Grouped projects or lump sum line items are projects grouped under a specified work type (projects must be

exempt from air quality conformity). The purpose is to provide flexibility where the individual implementation

priorities are unclear. In cooperation with the MPOs around the state, Caltrans, FHWA, and the FTA, and based

upon 40 CFR 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3, an agreed upon list of grouped-project listings was developed for

use in the RTIP. Examples of some of the groupings include but are not limited to the following:

• Bike and Pedestrian Facilities/ATP

• Highway Bridge Program

• Highway Safety Improvement Program

• Highway Maintenance

• Minor Safety and Hazard Projects (SHOPP)

• Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation (SHOPP)

• Rehabilitation/Reconstruction of Track Structures and Trackbed (Coastal Rail Corridor)

• TransNet Smart Growth and Senior Mini-Grant Programs

For each grouped-project listing in the RTIP, SANDAG maintains a detailed list of projects that comprise the

grouped project, which can be found in Appendix A and also is available on the RTIP web page at

sandag.org/RTIP or sandag.org/rtipgroupedprojects.

Participation by Federal Agencies

This report was funded in part through grants from the FHWA, FTA, and U.S. DOT. The views and opinions of

SANDAG expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. DOT.

24

http://www.sandag.org/RTIP

https://www.sandag.org/index.asp?classid=13&projectid=534&fuseaction=projects.detail

Attachment 3

25


Regional Transportation Commission


Delegation of Authority to Approve Administrative Modifications to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Delegating that Authority to the Executive Director

WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for San Diego County pursuant to state and federal designation; and

WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require MPOs to prepare and adopt a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for their region; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG prepares and submits a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) which serves as its Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP); and

WHEREAS, SANDAG is responsible for preparing and processing administrative modifications and amendments to the RTIP; and

WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, in consultation with the California Department of Transportation, has provided Revised Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Amendment and Administrative Modifications Procedures (dated June 3, 2011); and

WHEREAS, these federal procedures allow minor changes to the FTIP to be made in an administrative modification; and

WHEREAS, minor changes are defined as follows:

1. Revise a description of a project or grouped project listing without changing the project scope or without conflicting with the approved environmental documents;

2. Revise funding amount listed for a project or a project phase. Additional funding is limited to the lesser of 40 percent of the total project cost or $10 million;

3. Program Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase, provided Right of Way and/or Construction phase(s) are already programmed in the current FTIP and additional funding amounts stay within the limits specified;

4. A cost decrease, as long as the reduction in cost does not result in the deletion of a project or a phase, and the affected project phase is still fully funded;

5. Change source of funds;

6. Change a project lead agency;

7. Program federal funds for AC conversion if capacity exists;

8. Changed the program year of funds within the current FTIP;

9. Split or combine an individually listed project or projects, provided that the schedule and scope remain unchanged;

10. Change grouped project listings description as long as it is consistent with the Programming Grouped Project Listings in the Air Quality Non-Attainment or Maintenance Areas guidance;

26

11. Add or delete a project from a grouped project listing, provided the funding amounts stay within the limits specified;

12. Program emergency repair projects on the state highways as a result of a natural disaster or catastrophic failure from an external cause, and that are not covered by the Emergency Relief Program, provided that these projects are exempt from Air Quality Conformity Requirements;

13. Re-program a project for which FHWA funds were transferred to FTA in the prior FTIP and FTA has not approved the grant yet;

14. Program an FTA funded project from the prior FTIP into the current FTIP provided there is no change in the original scope or cost; and

15. Make minor changes to an FTA funded grouped project listing. Minor changes include changing the number of transit vehicles purchased by 20 percent or less and changing the fuel type of transit vehicles.

WHEREAS, these federal procedures also delegate approval of administrative modifications to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and allow Caltrans to delegate to the SANDAG Board, as the MPO, and subsequently to the Executive Director (or designee); and

WHEREAS, delegating approval of administrative modifications to the Executive Director will benefit SANDAG by improving efficiency, expediting minor changes to the RTIP and making funds available to member agencies’ projects sooner; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED that the SANDAG Board of Directors, ALSO ACTING AS THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: that the SANDAG Board of Directors accepts the delegation of authority from Caltrans to approve administrative modifications to the RTIP in accordance with the attached FSTIP/FTIP Administrative Modifications and Amendments Procedures and delegates authority to the Executive Director (or designee) to approve administrative modifications to the Federal Transportation Improvement Program on behalf of the Board.


Ayes Noes Absent

Chair of the Board of Directors

of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

[Seal] Attest

Secretary of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation

Commission

Item: 26


2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program: Amendment No. 5

Overview

The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is a five-year document that reflects funding sources, project phases, and fiscal years of implementation for all transportation-related projects in the San Diego region that: (1) use federal, state, or TransNet funds; (2) increase capacity of the transportation system; or (3) are regionally significant. SANDAG develops the RTIP based on projects included in San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan, as submitted by member agencies (local jurisdictions, transit agencies, Caltrans).

The Board of Directors approved the 2018 RTIP, covering FY 2019 – FY 2023, on September 28, 2018. The 2018 RTIP is fiscally constrained, meaning that sufficient revenue is committed or reasonably assumed to be available from local, state, and/or federal sources for each phase of the project included in the RTIP. Amendments are made to the RTIP on a quarterly (or as-needed) basis to reflect funding or scope changes. Amendment No.5 is a quarterly amendment to the 2018 RTIP.

Key Considerations

Major changes are highlighted in Attachment 2. These changes include the programming of the SANDAG FY 2020 Program Budget approved by the Board of Directors on June 28, 2019, which added $22.4 million in Bike funds and $13 million into the Environmental Mitigation Program. The total increase of $453 million in programming primarily is in prior funds due to the State Route 905 project returning to the RTIP to pay final close-out expenses. Other changes include the programming of $1.3 million in TransNet Commercial Paper for the City of Imperial Beach (Agenda Item No. 20) and a new project, added to the grouped listing for State Highway Operation and Protection Program Mandates, to relinquish a 1.1-mile segment of State Route 75 to the City of San Diego.

Attachment 3 provides the detail of the proposed amendments and the 2018 RTIP in its entirety is available at sandag.org/2018RTIP.

The Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee reviewed the TransNet-funded projects included in Amendment No. 5 on July 10, 2019. No significant comments were received.

Following federal regulations, it has been determined that the 2018 RTIP would remain in compliance with regional plan consistency, emissions, transportation control measure (TCM) implementation, inter-agency consultation and public involvement, fiscal constraint as illustrated in Attachment 4, and performance management requirements upon approval of Amendment No. 5 (Attachment 5). Beginning on May 20, 2019,

Fiscal Impact:

Amendment No. 5 reflects an increase of $453 million to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.


Amendment No. 5 reflects one new project, one deleted project, and the carry-over of one closed project.

Action: Adopt

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), adopt RTC Resolution No. 2020-02, approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.

2

all Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) actions must address how the TIP supports the achievement of targets set for the Federal Performance Management rules for Pavement and Bridge Condition (PM2) as well as System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (PM3). Appendix H to the 2018 RTIP has been amended to include this information and is included as Attachment 6.

Next Steps

Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP would enable access to funds for the included projects to complete project delivery and implement the SANDAG FY 2020 Program Budget.


Key Staff Contact: Sue Alpert, (619) 595-5318, [email protected]

Attachments: 1. Resolution No. RTC-2020-02: Approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program

2. Table 1 – Summary of Changes Report – Amendment No. 5 3. Table 2 – 2018 RTIP – Amendment No. 5 4. Table 3a-3c Financial Summary – Amendment No. 5 5. Federal Requirements Analysis – Amendment No. 5 6. Appendix H – Federal Performance Management 7. Table 4 – Changes during the Public Comment Period

Attachment 1

3


Regional Transportation Commission

Resolution No. RTC-2020-02

Approving Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program

WHEREAS, on September 28, 2018, SANDAG adopted the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and found the 2018 RTIP in conformance with the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIP), and with the 2016 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS), in accordance with California law; and

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2018, the U.S. Department of Transportation determined the 2018 RTIP and the San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) in conformance to the applicable SIP in accordance with the provisions of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 51 and 93; and

WHEREAS, member agencies have requested various changes to existing projects for inclusion into the 2018 RTIP as shown in Table 2; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the metropolitan transportation planning regulations per 23 CFR Part 450 including the performance-based planning requirements; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the Regional Plan, which conforms to the applicable SIP and to the emissions budgets from the 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County, which were found adequate for transportation conformity purposes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in December 2017; and

WHEREAS, this amendment is consistent with the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Conformity Demonstration for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan and the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement, which was adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors on May 24, 2019 and which received a conformity determination from U.S. DOT on June 21, 2019; and

WHEREAS, the regionally significant, capacity increasing projects have been incorporated into the quantitative air quality emissions analysis and conformity findings conducted for the Regional Plan and the 2018 RTIP; and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP continues to provide for timely implementation of transportation control measures contained in the adopted RAQS/SIP for air quality and a quantitative emissions analysis demonstrates that the implementation of the RTIP projects and programs meet all the federally required emissions budget targets; and

WHEREAS, projects in Amendment No. 5 satisfy the transportation conformity provisions of 40 CFR 93.122(g) and all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450 including all performance-based planning requirements and are expected to support the achievement of approved targets; and

WHEREAS, all other projects in Amendment No. 5 are either non-capacity increasing or exempt from the requirements to determine conformity; and

4

WHEREAS, the projects in 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5 are fiscally constrained; and

WHEREAS, the projects in 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5 are consistent with the Public Participation Policy adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors; NOW THEREFORE

BE IT RESOLVED, that the SANDAG Board of Directors, ALSO ACTING AS THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DOES HEREBY: approve Amendment No. 5 to the 2018 RTIP; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the SANDAG finds the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, is consistent with the Regional Plan, is in conformance with the applicable SIP, and with the 2016 RAQS for the San Diego region, is consistent with SANDAG Intergovernmental Review Procedures, is consistent with all federal performance planning requirements, and is consistent with SANDAG Public Participation Policy, as amended.


Ayes Noes Absent

Chair of the Board of Directors

of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission

[Seal] Attest

Secretary of the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Regional Transportation

Commission

Project ID Lead Agency Project TitleTotal

Programmed Before

Total Programmed

Revised Cost Difference

Percent Change

Change Description

* indicates change due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

CAL09 * Caltrans Interstate 5 ‐ HOV/Managed Lanes $906,249 $906,249 $0 0%↑ Other Fed ‐ HIP; ↔ TransNet‐MC and MC AC; ↔ CMAQ and CMAQ Conversion; ↓ Earmark repurposing; ↑ RSTP

CAL09A * Caltrans I‐5 Lomas Santa Fe Interchange/HOV lanes $51,516 $51,516 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL09C * Caltrans I‐805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon $84,237 $83,950 ($287) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL18B * Caltrans I‐15 Managed Lanes‐ South Segment and Mira Mesa Transit Center $396,353 $396,118 ($235) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL26 * Caltrans State Route 52 Freeway (E&F) $452,117 $452,117 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL29 * Caltrans SR 76 Middle $152,867 $152,867 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL29B * Caltrans SR 76 East $202,499 $202,499 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC and TransNet ‐ MC AC between fiscal years

CAL38 * Caltrans SR‐905 New Freeway $419,916 $419,916 $0 0%↔ TransNet ‐BORDER between fiscal years; Project Carried Over from Amendment 16‐30 to make payments for close‐out

CAL44 CaltransGrouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction ‐ Highway Bridge Program

$202,718 $202,718 $0 0% ↔ HBP & ↔ Local Funds between fiscal years

CAL46B CaltransGrouped Projects for Safety Improvements ‐ SHOPP Collision Reduction (CR) Program

$106,317 $104,634 ($1,683) ‐2% ↓ SHOPP ‐ CR‐ NHS (AC) and SHOPP ‐ CR‐ STP (AC)

CAL46C CaltransGrouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements ‐ SHOPP Roadside Preservation Program

$33,339 $32,915 ($424) ‐1% ↓ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Roadside Preserv NHS

CAL46E CaltransGrouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation ‐ SHOPP Roadway Preservation Program

$448,764 $450,829 $2,065 0% ↑ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Roadway Preserv NHS

CAL46I CaltransGrouped Projects for Safety Improvements ‐ SHOPP Mandates Program

$45,669 $51,197 $5,528 12%↑ SHOPP (AC) ‐ Mandates; new project to relinquish 1 mile segment of SR 75 between Georgia Street and I‐5 to the City of San Diego

CAL67 * Caltrans State Route 94 Corridor Improvements $22,600 $22,100 ($500) ‐2% ↓ TransNet‐MC

CAL75 * Caltrans I‐5 Genesee Interchange and Widening $102,324 $103,741 $1,417 1% ↑ TransNet‐MC

Table 1 - Summary of Changes Report ($000)Amendment No. 5

California Department of Transportation

LEGEND:↑ Increase↓ Reduce↔ Revise

5

Attachment 2


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



CAL78B * Caltrans I‐805 HOV/Managed Lanes ‐ North $126,572 $126,572 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL78C * Caltrans I‐805 HOV/Managed Lanes ‐ South $226,533 $226,615 $82 0% + SHOPP (AC)‐Misc

CAL78D * Caltrans I‐805 South Soundwalls ‐ Unit 1 $38,829 $39,244 $415 1% ↑TransNet‐MC; ↑ RSTP funds

CAL114 * Caltrans I‐5/SR 56 Interchange $15,884 $15,884 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL277 * Caltrans I‐15/SR‐78 HOV Connectors $7,937 $7,937 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

CAL325A * Caltrans State Routes 905/125/11 Southbound Connectors. $68,947 $73,947 $5,000 7% ↑Local Funds ‐ Toll Funds

CAL398A * Caltrans La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Auxiliary Lane $6,750 $6,750 $0 0% Revise Footnote to add funds outside of the RTIP

CAL502 * Caltrans I‐805 North Construct Operational Improvements $4,242 $4,242 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

COR04 Coronado, City of Street and Road Preventive Maintenance; Minor Drainage Repair $6,264 $6,264 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source between TransNet ‐ LSI Carry Over and Local Funds

COR07 Coronado, City ofStreet and Road Major Rehabilitation; Major Drainage; Traffic Operations

$15,819 $15,819 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source

ESC04 Escondido, City of Citracado Parkway II $38,023 $40,311 $2,288 6%+ TransNet‐LSI; ↔ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local Funds ; ↓ Local RTCIPfunds

ESC06 Escondido, City of El Norte Parkway Bridge at Escondido Creek $5,402 $5,652 $250 5% ↑ Local Funds

ESC08 Escondido, City of Felicita Ave/Juniper Street $4,951 $5,201 $250 5% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

ESC24 Escondido, City of Centre City Parkway $2,209 $2,209 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over between fiscal years

ESC37 Escondido, City of Pavement Maintenance $31,992 $32,234 $242 1% ↑ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ Local funds

City of Coronado

City of Escondido

* indicates change due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

6


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



ESC38 Escondido, City of Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction $17,177 $15,457 ($1,720) ‐10% ↓ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

ESC39 Escondido, City of Traffic Signals $1,480 $1,480 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source between TransNet ‐ LSI Carry Over and TransNet ‐ LSI

ESC42 Escondido, City of Streetlight Retrofit $330 $1,622 $1,292 392% ↑ Local funds per the Escondido City Budget approved 6/12/19

IB02 Imperial Beach, City of Street Maintenance Operations $5,135 $5,173 $38 1% ↑ TransNet‐LSI

IB12 Imperial Beach, City of Major Street Improvements $7,588 $6,399 ($1,189) ‐16% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

LAM32 La Mesa, City of Pavement Management System $50 $50 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI between fiscal years

LAM33 La Mesa, City of Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, Ped Ramps $1,250 $1,654 $404 32% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI

LAM37 La Mesa, City of Traffic Signal Upgrades $500 $700 $200 40% ↑TransNet ‐LSI; Funds transferred from LAM44

LAM39 La Mesa, City of Traffic Calming Improvements & Active Transportation Improvements $500 $410 ($90) ‐18% ↓ TransNet ‐LSI

LAM40 La Mesa, City of Street Reconstruction (CR) $2,524 $3,502 $978 39% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI and ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

LAM44 La Mesa, City of Roadway Drainage Improvements $1,450 $350 ($1,100) ‐76%↓ TransNet ‐LSI; ↓ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over; + Local funds; funding moved to LAM33, LAM40 and LAM37

LAM48 La Mesa, City of West La Mesa Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Project $6,422 $6,131 ($291) ‐5% ↓ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over; ↓ ATP‐R

O40 Oceanside, City of Railroad Crossing Safey Improvements $5,650 $5,650 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐CP between fiscal years

City of Imperial Beach

City of La Mesa

City of Oceanside

7


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



All changes due to SANDAG FY20 Budget

SAN13San Diego Association of

GovernmentsJoint Transit Operations Center $2,086 $3,222 $1,136 54% ↑ Local Funds ‐ Toll Funds; SANDAG FY20 Budget


GovernmentsMid‐Coast LRT Corridor Project $2,171,201 $2,171,201 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC and MC AC between fiscal years

SAN26BSan Diego Association of

GovernmentsDowntown BRT Stations $20,979 $20,979 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years

SAN26CSan Diego Association of

GovernmentsSR 15 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mid‐City Centerline Stations $64,844 $63,844 ($1,000) ‐2% ↓ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsSan Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility/South Line Rail $88,987 $87,987 ($1,000) ‐1% ↓ TransNet ‐BORDER; ↓ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsSorrento to Miramar Double Track/Realign $74,851 $74,851 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsEscondido Maintenance Facility $7,516 $7,516 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsMetropolitan Planning $63,694 $64,136 $442 1% + FTA 5310


GovernmentsSuper Loop $36,071 $36,071 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsSouth Bay BRT $121,772 $123,672 $1,900 2% ↑ TransNet‐MC; ↓ Local funds


GovernmentsEastbrook to Shell Double Track $10,920 $10,526 ($394) ‐4% ↓ FRA‐PRIIA


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, Track, and Trackbed ‐ Blue Line Corridor

$162,319 $162,319 $0 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC; ↑ FTA 5307; ↓ Prop 1A ‐ High Speed Rail; ↓ Prop 1B ‐ SLPP


GovernmentsSan Elijo Lagoon Double Track $79,692 $79,351 ($341) 0% ↓ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsMid‐City Rapid Bus $44,478 $44,526 $48 0% ↑ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsTransNet Major Transit Corridor Operations $124,519 $120,094 ($4,426) ‐4% ↓ TransNet‐BRT/Rail Ops


8


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description




GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures, Track, and Trackbed ‐ Coastal Rail Corridor

$191,993 $191,995 $2 0% ↑ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsSorrento Valley Double Track $32,989 $32,989 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsUniversity Town Center (UTC) Transit Center $5,700 $5,700 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsDowntown Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility $45,975 $45,975 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsMira Mesa Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Priority Treatments $3,737 $3,971 $234 6% ↑ TransNet‐MC


GovernmentsElvira to Morena Double Track $193,760 $193,899 $139 0% ↑ TDA


GovernmentsSouth Bay BRT Maintenance Facility $60,030 $60,030 $0 0% ↔ Revise fund source


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Bayshore Bikeway

$38,752 $48,620 $9,868 25% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS; ↔ ATP‐R


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Coastal Rail Trail

$33,905 $34,657 $752 2% ↑TransNet‐BPNS


GovernmentsThe Inland Rail Trail $44,084 $45,885 $1,800 4% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ San Diego River Trail

$4,608 $4,856 $248 5% ↑TransNet‐BPNS


GovernmentsClairemont Mesa Blvd BRT Stations $1,774 $1,774 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Operating Assistance ‐ FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

$2,306 $2,481 $175 8% ↑ FTA 5310


GovernmentsI‐805/SR 94 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration Project $30,900 $30,900 $0 0% ↔ TransNet‐MC between fiscal years


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ North Park/Mid‐City Bikeways

$42,358 $43,108 $750 2% ↑TransNet‐BPNS; ↑TDA‐Bicycles


GovernmentsGrouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ‐ Uptown Bikeways

$29,819 $31,674 $1,855 6% ↑ TransNet‐BPNS

9


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



CNTY24 San Diego County Cole Grade Road $29,777 $26,381 ($3,396) ‐11% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

CNTY34 San Diego County Dye Road Extension $2,792 $2,782 ($10) 0% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY35 San Diego County Ramona Street Extension $1,772 $1,757 ($15) ‐1% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY84 San Diego County Stage Coach Lane / Reche Road Intersection Improvements $2,006 $1,446 ($560) ‐28% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

CNTY86 San Diego County Roadway Maintenance and Overlay $42,980 $42,980 $0 0% ↔ Revise funding between phases

CNTY88 San Diego County Ashwood Street Corridor Improvements (Mapleview to Willow) $23,773 $21,366 ($2,407) ‐10% ↓ TransNet‐LSI

CNTY89 San Diego County East Vista Way At Gopher Canyon Intersection Improvements $1,918 $1,870 ($48) ‐3% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local RTCIP funds

CNTY90 San Diego County Camino Del Rey Drainage Improvements $4,443 $7,275 $2,832 64%↑ TransNet‐LSI; ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; construc on funds which were outside of the current period were moved in to fully fund construction

SD208 San Diego, City of Juan Street Reconstruction $7,208 $7,133 ($75) ‐1% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over

SD209 San Diego, City of Torrey Pines Road Slope Restoration $3,847 $4,251 $405 11% ↓ TransNet‐LSI Carry Over; ↑ Local RTCIP funds

SD235 San Diego, City of Torrey Pines Road Improvement Phase 2 $1,600 $1,850 $250 16% + TransNet‐LSI (Cash); ↑ TransNet ‐LSI Carry Over

SNT04 Santee, City of Pavement Repair and Rehabilitation $26,035 $26,403 $368 1% ↓TransNet‐LSI; ↑ Local Funds

SNT20 Santee, City of Regional Arterial Management System $67 $74 $7 11% ↑ TransNet‐LSI

SNT22 Santee, City of Pavement Roadway Maintenance $5,066 $5,973 $907 18% ↓TransNet‐LSI; ↑ Local Funds

City of San Diego

City of Santee

County of San Diego

10


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



SNT26 Santee, City of SR‐67 Improvements/Woodside Avenue Interchange Improvements $2,914 $4,065 $1,151 40%↑ Local RTCIP; ↑ Local Funds ; Project costs increased due to delay in design approval

SNT28 Santee, City of Pavement Condition Report $70 $70 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐LSI between fiscal years

V08 Various Agencies Regional Habitat Conservation Fund $44,520 $57,960 $13,440 30%TransNet ‐LEMP added for regional land management and biological monitoring, per MOA aopted by BOD on 2‐22‐2019; ↓↔ TransNet ‐REMP; SANDAG FY20 Budget

V10 Various Agencies Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program $66,303 $66,346 $43 0% ↑ TransNet ‐LSI; ↓ Local funds

V11 Various Agencies State Route 11 $681,747 $681,747 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC and TransNet ‐Border between fiscal years

V12 Various Agencies Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. $21,482 $39,835 $18,353 85%↑ TransNet ‐BPNS; SANDAG FY20 Budget ‐ funds construction of Central Avenue Bikeway (SAN204) and Pershing Bikeway (SAN205)

V14 Various AgenciesGrouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian facilities ‐ Active Transportation Program (ATP) $49,783 $54,657 $4,874 10%

↑ TransNet ‐BPNS; +TransNet ‐CP; ↑ Local Funds; CP added for Imperial Beach Blvd Safe Routes to School (IB18)

V15 Various Agencies I‐5/Gilman Drive Bridge $24,607 $24,607 ($0) 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC between fiscal years

V18 Various Agencies I‐5/Voigt Drive Improvements $29,380 $29,380 $0 0% ↔ TransNet ‐MC between fiscal years and phases

Various Agencies

11


Programmed Before

Total Programmed


Percent Change

Change Description



Abbreviation Fund TypeATP‐R Active Transportation Program ‐ RegionalATP‐S Active Transportation Program ‐ Statewide CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air QualityFRA PRIAA Federal Railroad Administration ‐ Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement ActFTA 5310 Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled ProgramFTA 5309 NS Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Grants New StartsHIP Highway Infrastructure ProgramLocal Funds Funds available from other sources such as developer fees, fare revenue or general fundLocal Funds‐Toll Funds Funds provided by SR 125 TollsProp 1A High‐ Speed Rail Act (2008)Prop 1B California Bond ProgramsRSTP Regional Surface Transportation Block GrantRTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement ProgramSHOPP (AC) State Highway Operation and Protection Program Advanced ConstructionTDA Transportation Development ActTDA ‐ Bike Transportation Development Act for BicyclesTransNet ‐ Border Prop A Extension ‐ BorderTransNet ‐ BPNS Prop A Extension ‐ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety ProgramTransNet ‐ BRT/Rail Ops Prop A Extension ‐ Bus Rapid Tranist and Rail Operations TransNet ‐ CP Prop A Extension ‐ Commercial PaperTransNet ‐ LEMP Prop A Extension ‐ Local Environmental Mitigation ProgramTransNet ‐ LSI Prop A Extension ‐ Local System ImprovementsTransNet ‐ MC Prop A Extension ‐ Major CorridorsTransNet ‐ REMP Prop A Extension ‐ Regional Environmental Mitigation ProgramTransNet ‐ SGIP Prop A Extension ‐ Smart Growth Incentive ProgramTransNet ‐ SS Prop A Extension ‐ Senior Services

Additional explanation is provided for those projects that have a change of more than $10M or 40% based on the federal guidelines that determine what consists of a minor change and is considered an administrative modification.

12

San Diego Region (in $000s)

Table 2

2018 Regional Transportation Improvement ProgramAmendment No. 5

MPO ID: CAL09 18-05RTIP #:

Caltrans

Interstate 5 - construct High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/Managed Lanes

on I-5; construct Phase 1: Construct HOV from Lomas Santa Fe to

Birmingham and replace San Elijo Bridge; Construct Phase 2: construct

HOV lanes from Birmingham to SR78; Construct Phase 3: Soundwalls

on private property from Manchester to SR-78. Toll Credits will be used

to match federal funds for the PE phase, ROW phase and the CON

phase

Project Description:

Project Title: Interstate 5 - HOV/Managed Lanes EA NO: 235800

PPNO: 0615CDE, 0615

RTP PG NO: A-16, B-30

SANDAG ID: 1200511,

1200501, 1200504, 1200510,

1200509

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years, Revise funding between phases

Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-ExemptRT:5

Est Total Cost: $953,266 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Sep 2020 Phase 2: Sep 2024 Phase 3: Sep 2024

CONRWPEPRIORTOTAL 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $154,195 $3,724 $2,721 $6,000 $1,202 $1,000 $122,612 $36,718 $9,512 $168,842

TransNet - MC AC $5,642 $37,824 $(14,580) $(22,182) $(6,704)$0

CBI $416 $416 $416

CMAQ $113,584 $25,142 $26,021 $8,800 $103,904 $138,725

CMAQ - Conversion $14,580 $22,182 $6,704 $2,050 $41,417 $43,467

Earmark Repurposing $1,220 $1,220 $1,220

IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886

Other Fed - HIP $19,610 $19,610 $19,610

RSTP $66,694 $33,426 $4,500 $48,169 $10,118 $46,333 $104,620

STP $751 $751 $751

SB1 - CCP $195,000 $195,000 $195,000

STIP-RIP AC $68,943 $71,078 $89,063 $9,561 $219,523 $229,084

STIP-RIP State Cash $628 $628 $628

TOTAL $906,249 $415,959 $289,584 $103,441 $6,000 $1,202 $90,063 $215,314 $55,636 $635,299

* $5.324M programmed in CAL46A; $299K provided outside of the RTIP; $12.035M programmed in CAL443; $22.616M programmed in CAL468;

Demo IDs CA653, CA676 repurposed to FHWA transfer number CAT 16-070

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL

PROJECT LAST AMENDED 18-03

18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $154,195 $4,568 $5,023 $6,186 $122,608 $36,718 $10,646 $169,972

TransNet - MC AC $5,642 $73,138 $(22,633) $(24,870) $(24,589) $(6,688)$0

CBI $416 $416 $416

CMAQ $113,584 $4,390 $23,515 $8,800 $85,658 $117,973

CMAQ - Conversion $6,642 $24,870 $24,589 $6,688 $2,050 $4,012 $56,727 $62,789

Earmark Repurposing $1,220 $300 $1,220 $300 $1,520

IM $3,886 $3,886 $3,886

Other Fed - HIP $8,118 $8,118 $8,118

RSTP $66,694 $33,426 $50,674 $6,106 $43,340 $100,120

RSTP - AC Conversion $15,992 $15,992 $15,992

STP $751 $751 $751

SB1 - CCP $195,000 $195,000 $195,000

STIP-RIP AC $68,943 $71,078 $89,063 $9,561 $219,523 $229,084


$906,249 $415,959 $314,072 $71,079 $4,568 $5,023 $95,549 $215,309 $55,636 $635,304 TOTAL

1Page Tuesday, June 11, 2019

13

Attachment 3



MPO ID: CAL09A 18-05RTIP #:

Caltrans

I-5 from Via De La Valle to San Elijo Lagoon Milepost begins at 35.7

ends at 38.5 (2.8 miles) - construct interchange and High Occupancy

Vehicle (HOV) lane


Project Title: I-5 Lomas Santa Fe Interchange/HOV lanes EA NO: 07760, 2358U, 2T177

PPNO: 0701

RTP PG NO: A-9, 14, 18, 19,

22

SANDAG ID: 1200502

Change Reason: Revise funding between fiscal years


Est Total Cost: $67,720 Open to Traffic: Mar 2009


TransNet - MC $20,894 $44 $79 $2,832 $94 $18,090 $21,016

Prop 1B - CMIA $24,500 $24,500 $24,500

TCRP $6,000 $6,000 $6,000

TOTAL $51,516 $51,394 $44 $79 $2,832 $94 $48,590

* State contribution of $16.204M outside of the RTIP in prior years

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $21,001 $15 $2,832 $94 $18,090 $21,016

Prop 1B - CMIA $24,500 $24,500 $24,500

TCRP $6,000 $6,000 $6,000

$51,516 $51,501 $15 $2,832 $94 $48,590 TOTAL

MPO ID: CAL09C 18-05RTIP #:

I-805 from Carroll Canyon Road to I- 5 Milepost begins at 49.9 ends at

51.7 (1.8 miles) - construct Direct Access Ramps (DARs) and HOV

lanes to Carroll Canyon Road on I-805 and extend Carroll Canyon Road

as a four-lane arterial from Scranton Road to Sorrento Valley Road.


Project Title: I-805 Direct Access Ramp and HOV at Carroll Canyon EA NO: 2T040, 2T041

PPNO: 0716

RTP PG NO:

A-16,27,B-30,31,34

SANDAG ID: 1280505

Change Reason: Reduce funding, Revise funding between fiscal years


Est Total Cost: $95,443 Open to Traffic: Apr 2014


TransNet - MC $31,593 $502 $38 $16,606 $2,703 $12,824 $32,133

Other Fed - ARRA-RSTP $51,817 $51,817 $51,817

TOTAL $83,950 $83,410 $502 $38 $16,606 $2,703 $64,641

* Additional local contribution of $11.491M programmed in SD32

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $31,955 $464 $1 $16,615 $2,703 $13,102 $32,420


$84,237 $83,772 $464 $1 $16,615 $2,703 $64,919 TOTAL


14



MPO ID: CAL18B 18-05RTIP #:

Caltrans

In San Diego on I-15 from just south of SR 52 to SR 56 and on SR 163

from SR 52 to I-15. - construct managed lanes, south segment including

Direct Access Ramps and BRT Station: construct auxiliary lane along

northbound I-15 from Pomerado Rd. overcrossing to Carroll Canyon Rd.

overcrossing, construct transit center at Miramar College near Hillery Dr.


Project Title: I-15 Managed Lanes- South Segment and Mira Mesa Transit Center EA NO: 081501

PPNO: 0672G

RTP PG NO: A-9

SANDAG ID: 1201501,

1201506, 1201518



Est Total Cost: $396,118 Open to Traffic: Jun 2011


TransNet - MC $78,466 $1,909 $607 $36,359 $14,366 $30,257 $80,982

CMAQ $11,744 $11,744 $11,744

Prop 1B - CMIA $288,972 $288,972 $288,972

STIP-RIP NHS $8,853 $8,853 $8,853

STIP-RIP State Cash $1,147 $1,147 $1,147

Local Funds $4,420 $692 $3,728 $4,420

TOTAL $396,118 $393,602 $1,909 $607 $58,103 $15,058 $322,957

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $78,466 $2,751 $36,535 $14,366 $30,316 $81,217

CMAQ $11,744 $11,744 $11,744

Prop 1B - CMIA $288,972 $288,972 $288,972

STIP-RIP NHS $8,853 $8,853 $8,853

STIP-RIP State Cash $1,147 $1,147 $1,147

Local Funds $4,420 $692 $3,728 $4,420

$396,353 $393,602 $2,751 $58,279 $15,058 $323,016 TOTAL


15




Caltrans

In San Diego, Santee and Lakeside, from SR 125 to Cuyamaca Street to

SR 67 - construct 4 lane freewayProject Description:

Project Title: State Route 52 Freeway (E&F) EA NO: 010611

PPNO: 0260

RTP PG NO: A-5

SANDAG ID: 1205203

EARMARK NO: CA424/604,

HPP 1134/2735





TransNet - H $44,945 $671 $44,274 $44,945

TransNet - MC $65,165 $1,021 $343 $14,102 $33,538 $18,889 $66,529

DEMO $2,234 $2,234 $2,234

HPP $10,409 $10,409 $10,409

RSTP $53,238 $22,837 $30,401 $53,238

TCSP $1,228 $1,228 $1,228

STIP-IIP NHS $3,010 $2,125 $885 $3,010

STIP-IIP State Cash $5,355 $4,732 $623 $5,355

STIP-RIP NHS $26,558 $5,848 $20,710 $26,558

STIP-RIP Prior NHS $16,375 $16,375 $16,375

STIP-RIP Prior State Cash $802 $802 $802

STIP-RIP State Cash $177,501 $10,825 $19,274 $147,402 $177,501

TCRP $43,700 $43,700 $43,700

Local Funds $233 $233 $233

TOTAL $452,117 $450,753 $1,021 $343 $38,303 $206,713 $207,101

* State contributed $8.392M in additional funds outside of the RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - H $44,945 $671 $44,274 $44,945

TransNet - MC $66,186 $5 $338 $13,999 $32,271 $20,259 $66,529

DEMO $2,234 $2,234 $2,234

HPP $10,409 $10,409 $10,409

RSTP $53,238 $22,837 $30,401 $53,238

TCSP $1,228 $1,228 $1,228

STIP-IIP NHS $3,010 $2,125 $885 $3,010

STIP-IIP State Cash $5,355 $4,732 $623 $5,355

STIP-RIP NHS $26,558 $5,848 $20,710 $26,558

STIP-RIP Prior NHS $16,375 $16,375 $16,375


STIP-RIP State Cash $177,501 $10,825 $19,274 $147,402 $177,501

TCRP $43,700 $43,700 $43,700

Local Funds $233 $233 $233

$452,117 $451,774 $5 $338 $38,200 $205,446 $208,471 TOTAL


16




Caltrans

SR 76 from Melrose Dr. to So. Mission Rd. Milepost begins at 7.5 ends

at 12.5 (4.8 miles) - in San Diego County in and near Oceanside - widen

from 2 to 4 lanes


Project Title: SR 76 Middle EA NO: 08010, 08017

PPNO: 0759

RTP PG NO: A-9

SANDAG ID: 1207602

EARMARK NO: CA603/2719



Est Total Cost: $165,244 Open to Traffic: Nov 2012


TransNet - H $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

TransNet - MC $46,361 $1,878 $568 $9,772 $30,189 $8,846 $48,807

TransNet - REMP $6,146 $6,146 $6,146

DEMO - TEA 21 $5,519 $2,680 $2,839 $5,519

HPP $4,006 $4,006 $4,006


RSTP $6,314 $6,314 $6,314

STP $949 $949 $949

Local Funds $1,513 $1,513 $1,513

TOTAL $152,867 $150,421 $1,878 $568 $17,035 $36,875 $98,957

* State contribution of $13.452M outside of RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - H $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

TransNet - MC $47,920 $887 $9,772 $30,189 $8,846 $48,807

TransNet - REMP $6,146 $6,146 $6,146

DEMO - TEA 21 $5,519 $2,680 $2,839 $5,519

HPP $4,006 $4,006 $4,006


RSTP $6,314 $6,314 $6,314

STP $949 $949 $949

Local Funds $1,513 $1,513 $1,513

$152,867 $151,980 $887 $17,035 $36,875 $98,957 TOTAL


17




Caltrans

SR 76 from Mission Rd. to I-15 Milepost begins at 5 ends at 9.77 (4.77

miles) - In and near Oceanside from Mission Rd to I-15, widen from 2 to

4 lanes. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON

phase


Project Title: SR 76 East EA NO: 25715

RTP PG NO: B-32

SANDAG ID: 1207606



Est Total Cost: $202,499 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Aug 2013 Phase 2: May 2017


TransNet - H $12,139 $12,139 $12,139

TransNet - MC $33,028 $148 $60 $634 $125 $62 $11,487 $17,590 $4,980 $34,057

TransNet - MC AC $15,178 $4,760 $(19,938)$0

TransNet - REMP $8,133 $8,133 $8,133

RSTP $90,436 $3,250 $7,436 $86,250 $93,686

TPFP $300 $300 $300

Prop 1B - CMIA $27,387 $27,387 $27,387

Local Funds $6,859 $19,938 $3,264 $7,962 $15,571 $26,797

TOTAL $202,499 $193,460 $8,158 $60 $634 $125 $62 $34,326 $25,552 $142,621

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - H $12,139 $12,139 $12,139

TransNet - MC $32,930 $771 $63 $144 $48 $101 $11,818 $16,170 $6,069 $34,057

TransNet - MC AC $16,294 $3,644 $(19,938)$0

TransNet - REMP $8,133 $8,133 $8,133

RSTP $90,436 $3,250 $7,436 $86,250 $93,686

TPFP $300 $300 $300

Prop 1B - CMIA $27,387 $27,387 $27,387

Local Funds $6,859 $19,938 $3,024 $8,802 $14,971 $26,797

$202,499 $194,478 $7,665 $63 $144 $48 $101 $34,417 $24,972 $143,110 TOTAL


18




Caltrans

SR 905 from I-805 to Otay Mesa Port of Entry - construct 6-lane freeway

(Phase 1). Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON

phase


Project Title: SR-905 New Freeway EA NO: 093160, 28880

PPNO: 0374K

RTP PG NO: A-6

SANDAG ID: 1390501

EARMARK NO: CA281,

CA297, CA612, HPP 2813



Est Total Cost: $419,916 Open to Traffic: Aug 2012


TransNet - Border $1,282 $300 $4 $195 $1,383 $1,582

CBI $105,342 $105,342 $105,342

DEMO - Sec 115 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

DEMO - TEA 21 $40,485 $40,485 $40,485

HPP $5,836 $499 $5,337 $5,836

Other Fed - ARRA-STP $73,931 $73,931 $73,931

STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

STP - Sec 117 $1,067 $1,067 $1,067

STIP-IIP Interstate $100,666 $12,944 $28,087 $59,635 $100,666

STIP-IIP Prior NHS $6,406 $1,976 $4 $4,426 $6,406

STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $12,966 $7,000 $5,966 $12,966

STIP-IIP State Cash $23,296 $1,933 $9,176 $12,187 $23,296

STIP-RIP Interstate $20,974 $11,912 $9,062 $20,974

TCRP $23,365 $23,365 $23,365

TOTAL $419,916 $419,616 $300 $24,356 $228,532 $167,028

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - Border $1,582 $1,582 $1,582

CBI $105,342 $105,342 $105,342

DEMO - Sec 115 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000

DEMO - TEA 21 $40,485 $40,485 $40,485

HPP $5,836 $499 $5,337 $5,836

Other Fed - ARRA-STP $73,931 $73,931 $73,931

STP $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

STP - Sec 117 $1,067 $1,067 $1,067

STIP-IIP Interstate $100,666 $12,944 $28,087 $59,635 $100,666

STIP-IIP Prior NHS $6,406 $1,976 $4 $4,426 $6,406

STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $12,966 $7,000 $5,966 $12,966

STIP-IIP State Cash $23,296 $1,933 $9,176 $12,187 $23,296

STIP-RIP Interstate $20,974 $11,912 $9,062 $20,974

TCRP $23,365 $23,365 $23,365

$419,916 $419,916 $24,352 $228,337 $167,227 TOTAL


19




Caltrans

Countywide - projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt

Table 2 categories - widen narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges

(no additional travel lanes)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bridge Rehabilitation and Reconstruction - Highway

Bridge Program


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction

Est Total Cost: $202,718


HBP $37,741 $19,911 $2,513 $1,789 $8,294 $123,071 $193,319 $193,319

Prop 1B - LBSRA $1,319 $1,319 $1,319

Local Funds $2,018 $146 $37 $232 $337 $5,311 $8,080 $8,080

Local Funds AC $17,260 $(17,260)$0

TOTAL $202,718 $57,019 $2,797 $2,550 $2,021 $8,631 $129,701 $202,718

* Local Funds are programmed separately for Cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, San Diego and San Marcos

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

HBP $37,741 $20,241 $5,289 $15,418 $114,630 $193,319 $193,319

Prop 1B - LBSRA $1,319 $1,319 $1,319

Local Funds $2,018 $146 $397 $1,302 $4,217 $8,080 $8,080

Local Funds AC $17,260 $(17,260)$0

$202,718 $57,019 $3,127 $5,686 $16,720 $120,166 $202,718 TOTAL


Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and

Table 3 categories - Railroad/highway crossing, Safer non-Federal-aid

system roads, Shoulder improvements, traffic control devices and

operating assistance other than signalization projects, Intersection

signalization projects at individual intersections, Pavement marking

demonstration, Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area, Lighting

improvements, Emergency truck pullovers


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Collision Reduction (CR)

Program

Change Reason: Reduce funding

Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination program



SHOPP - CR - NHS (AC) $6,696 $25,944 $12,593 $28,894 $4,780 $78,907 $78,907

SHOPP - CR - STP (AC) $1,493 $2,612 $6,494 $15,128 $25,727 $25,727

TOTAL $104,634 $8,189 $28,556 $19,087 $44,022 $4,780 $104,634

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP - CR - NHS (AC) $6,696 $25,944 $13,725 $28,894 $4,780 $80,039 $80,039

SHOPP - CR - STP (AC) $1,493 $2,612 $7,045 $15,128 $26,278 $26,278

$106,317 $8,189 $28,556 $20,770 $44,022 $4,780 $106,317 TOTAL


20




Caltrans

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2

categories - fencing, safety roadside rest areaProject Description:

Project Title: Grouped Projects for Shoulder Improvements - SHOPP Roadside Preservation

Program


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Shoulder Improvements



SHOPP (AC)-Rdside Preserv NHS $995 $3,656 $28,264 $32,915 $32,915

TOTAL $32,915 $995 $3,656 $28,264 $32,915

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP (AC)-Rdside Preserv NHS $1,299 $3,776 $28,264 $33,339 $33,339

$33,339 $1,299 $3,776 $28,264 $33,339 TOTAL

MPO ID: CAL46E 18-05RTIP #:


categories – pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, emergency relief

(23 USC 125), widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no

additional travel lanes)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Pavement Resurfacing and/or Rehabilitation - SHOPP

Roadway Preservation Program

Change Reason: Increase funding

Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation



SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $8,925 $21,059 $85,724 $110,186 $224,935 $450,829 $450,829

TOTAL $450,829 $8,925 $21,059 $85,724 $110,186 $224,935 $450,829

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP (AC)-Rdway Presrv NHS $8,925 $21,059 $83,659 $110,186 $224,935 $448,764 $448,764

$448,764 $8,925 $21,059 $83,659 $110,186 $224,935 $448,764 TOTAL


21



MPO ID: CAL46I 18-05RTIP #:

Caltrans

Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt

Tables 2 and 3 categories -railroad/highway crossing, safer

non-federal-aid system roads, shoulder improvements, traffic control

devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects,

intersection signalization projects at individual intersections, pavement

marking demonstration, truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area,

lighting improvements, emergency truck pullovers, hazard elimination

program


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Safety Improvements - SHOPP Mandates Program


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Safety Improvement Program



SHOPP (AC)-Mandates $2,099 $16,730 $17,366 $9,063 $5,939 $51,197 $51,197

TOTAL $51,197 $2,099 $16,730 $17,366 $9,063 $5,939 $51,197

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP (AC)-Mandates $2,099 $16,630 $11,938 $9,063 $5,939 $45,669 $45,669

$45,669 $2,099 $16,630 $11,938 $9,063 $5,939 $45,669 TOTAL


In San Diego on SR 94 between I-805 and Downtown - Engineering study

for various corridor improvements to include Managed Lanes(ML)/Bus

Rapid Transit(BRT) lanes and connectors between SR 94 and I-805;

future phases are outside of RTIP cycle, but included in the long range

Regional Plan


Project Title: State Route 94 Corridor Improvements EA NO: 28710

PPNO: T0770

RTP PG NO: A-5,A-16,B-30

SANDAG ID: 1280508


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studiesRT:94



TransNet - MC $11,301 $2 $4 $793 $12,100 $12,100

TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000

TOTAL $22,100 $21,301 $2 $4 $793 $22,100

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $11,297 $3 $1,300 $12,600 $12,600

TCRP $10,000 $10,000 $10,000

$22,600 $21,297 $3 $1,300 $22,600 TOTAL


22




Caltrans

Interchange on I-5 at Genesee Avenue and Sorrento Valley Road -

reconstruct I-5 Genesee Bridge and interchange including ramps,

retaining walls; add type 1 bicycle facility between Voigt Drive and

Sorrento Valley Road. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for

the CON phase


Project Title: I-5 Genesee Interchange and Widening EA NO: 0223U, 06500

PPNO: 0129P

RTP PG NO: A-28,B-39

SANDAG ID: 1200506

EARMARK NO: 3086

Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise funding between fiscal years




TransNet - MC $14,959 $2,460 $1,798 $442 $6 $7 $1,252 $7,270 $11,150 $19,672

HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600

RSTP $47,643 $3,641 $51,284 $51,284

Prop 1B - SLPP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000

SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $12,987 $2,467 $500 $10,020 $12,987

Local Funds $10,198 $10 $1,688 $8,500 $10,198

TOTAL $103,741 $95,387 $6,101 $1,798 $442 $6 $7 $3,729 $9,458 $90,554

* $14.4M of City of San Diego contribution programmed under SD103; additional state funds of $1.013M outside the RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $15,910 $1,617 $711 $6 $5 $6 $1,304 $6,233 $10,718 $18,255

HPP $1,600 $1,600 $1,600

RSTP $47,643 $3,641 $51,284 $51,284

Prop 1B - SLPP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000

SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $12,987 $2,467 $500 $10,020 $12,987

Local Funds $10,198 $10 $1,688 $8,500 $10,198

$102,324 $96,338 $5,258 $711 $6 $5 $6 $3,781 $8,421 $90,122 TOTAL


23




Caltrans

On I-805 from the I-805/SR 52 to Sorrento Valley on SR 52 at the

I-805/SR 52 separation - preliminary engineering for construction of

managed lanes; design and construct Phase 1 - one High Occupancy

Vehicle (HOV) lane in the median in each direction including the south

facing Direct Access Ramps at Carroll Canyon Rd. Phase 1 Post Miles

23.7-27.6


Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - North EA NO: 08163, 2T200,2T330

PPNO: 0732

RTP PG NO: B-30

SANDAG ID: 1280503,

1280511



Est Total Cost: $126,572 Open to Traffic: Sep 2016


TransNet - MC $12,604 $5,178 $324 $306 $303 $2,216 $11,757 $515 $8,659 $20,931

CMAQ $61,870 $1,000 $60,870 $61,870

RSTP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775

Prop 1B - CMIA $40,638 $40,638 $40,638

Prop 1B - SLPP $1,358 $1,358 $1,358

TOTAL $126,572 $118,245 $5,178 $324 $306 $303 $2,216 $14,532 $515 $111,525

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $12,604 $5,449 $300 $300 $300 $1,978 $11,757 $515 $8,659 $20,931

CMAQ $61,870 $1,000 $60,870 $61,870

RSTP $1,775 $1,775 $1,775

Prop 1B - CMIA $40,638 $40,638 $40,638

Prop 1B - SLPP $1,358 $1,358 $1,358

$126,572 $118,245 $5,449 $300 $300 $300 $1,978 $14,532 $515 $111,525 TOTAL


24




Caltrans

I-805 Freeway - environmental document for I-805 widening in San Diego,

Chula Vista, and National City from Palomar Street to State Route 94;

design and construct 2 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the

median of I-805 including a Direct Access Ramp (DAR) and a transit

station at Palomar Street; design and construct one auxiliary lane on

northbound I-805 from Grove Street to 16th Street in National City;

design and construct one auxiliary lane on southbound I-805 from 20th

Street to Plaza Boulevard in National City; design one HOV lane in each

direction from Hilltop Drive to Landis Street and a direct HOV connector

from I-805 to I-15....


Project Title: I-805 HOV/Managed Lanes - South EA NO: 08161

PPNO: 0730A-B

RTP PG NO: A-16,B-30,B-31

SANDAG ID: 1280501,

1280514, 1280510

Change Reason: Add new funding source, Increase funding


Est Total Cost: $226,615 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Feb 2016 Phase 2: Jan 2017


TransNet - MC $141,200 $13,996 $3,158 $103 $19 $36 $56,842 $8,515 $93,155 $158,512

TransNet - Transit $42 $42 $42

IM $975 $975 $975

RSTP $9,661 $9,661 $9,661

Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763

SHOPP (AC)-Misc $82 $82 $82

Local Funds $348 $232 $180 $400 $580

TOTAL $226,615 $208,989 $14,310 $3,158 $103 $19 $36 $67,700 $8,597 $150,318

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $141,200 $14,145 $2,686 $477 $2 $2 $56,842 $8,515 $93,155 $158,512


IM $975 $975 $975

RSTP $9,661 $9,661 $9,661

Prop 1B - CMIA $56,763 $56,763 $56,763

Local Funds $348 $232 $180 $400 $580

$226,533 $208,989 $14,377 $2,686 $477 $2 $2 $67,700 $8,515 $150,318 TOTAL


25



MPO ID: CAL78D 18-05RTIP #:

Caltrans

From Naples Street to I- 805/SR 54 Separation - construct soundwalls;

preliminary engineering and right of way for Sweetwater River Bridge

upgrade.. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the PE

phase, ROW phase, and the CON phase


Project Title: I-805 South Soundwalls - Unit 1 EA NO: 2T260, 43018

SANDAG ID: 1280515


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Noise attenuationRT:805



TransNet - MC $3,184 $1,701 $2,303 $459 $182 $113 $3,845 $249 $3,848 $7,942

RSTP $29,029 $2,273 $12,611 $2,402 $16,289 $31,302

TOTAL $39,244 $32,213 $3,974 $2,303 $459 $182 $113 $16,456 $2,651 $20,137

* $72k of SHOPP contribution programmed under CAL371; Construction of Sweetwater River Bridge programmed under CAL484 in grouped

listing CAL46D

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $3,184 $3,012 $892 $259 $107 $73 $3,779 $249 $3,499 $7,527

TransNet - MC AC $2,273 $(2,273)$0

RSTP $29,029 $12,611 $2,402 $14,016 $29,029

RSTP - AC Conversion $2,273 $2,273 $2,273

$38,829 $32,213 $5,285 $892 $259 $107 $73 $16,390 $2,651 $19,788 TOTAL


26




Caltrans

At I-5/SR 56 interchange - in San Diego, construct freeway to freeway

interchange, associated operational improvements, and the relocation of

the fiber optic cable line; future phases are outside of TIP cycle but

included in the long range plan. Phase I: To construct one additional

auxiliary lane in the east and westbound directions on SR-56 from El

Camino Real to Carmel Country Rd. Phase II: Construct the west to

north connector, extend the NB I-5 local bypass, and reconstruct the Del

Mar Heights O.C. Phase III - Construct the south to east connector,

extend the SB I-5 local bypass, and construct the Carmel Creek Dr. slip

ramp


Project Title: I-5/SR 56 Interchange EA NO: 17790

RTP PG NO:

A-7,19,33,39,40,B-33

SANDAG ID: 1200503,

1200513



Est Total Cost: $17,958 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Jan 2026 Phase 2: Jan 2035 Phase 3: Jan 2035


TransNet - MC $502 $130 $520 $440 $262 $1,854 $1,854

CBI $1,942 $1,942 $1,942

DEMO - Sec 115 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

DEMO - TEA 21 $375 $375 $375

HPP $4,529 $4,529 $4,529

IM $1,927 $1,927 $1,927

STP $2,952 $2,952 $2,952

STP - Sec 112 $396 $396 $396

Local Funds $909 $909 $909

TOTAL $15,884 $14,532 $130 $520 $440 $262 $15,884

* State contributed $2.073M in additional funds outside of the RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $613 $482 $472 $287 $1,854 $1,854

CBI $1,942 $1,942 $1,942

DEMO - Sec 115 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

DEMO - TEA 21 $375 $375 $375

HPP $4,529 $4,529 $4,529

IM $1,927 $1,927 $1,927

STP $2,952 $2,952 $2,952

STP - Sec 112 $396 $396 $396

Local Funds $909 $909 $909

$15,884 $14,643 $482 $472 $287 $15,884 TOTAL


27




Caltrans

SR-78 from Post Mile 15.49 to R16.6 and on I-15 from Post Mile R30.63

to R31.56 - preliminary engineering for northbound I-15 to westbound

SR-78 and eastbound SR-78 to southbound I-15 HOV connectors and

operational improvements


Project Title: I-15/SR-78 HOV Connectors EA NO: 2T240

RTP PG NO: A-19

SANDAG ID: 1207802


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studiesRT:15



TransNet - MC $816 $5 $64 $44 $8 $937 $937

STIP-RIP AC $7,000 $7,000 $7,000

TOTAL $7,937 $816 $7,005 $64 $44 $8 $7,937

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $816 $46 $55 $20 $937 $937

STIP-RIP AC $7,000 $7,000 $7,000

$7,937 $816 $7,046 $55 $20 $7,937 TOTAL


Southbound SR 125 to southbound SR 905 and southbound SR 125 to

eastbound SR 11 - in San Diego County, in and near San Diego at Route

905/125/11 separation, construct southbound connectors from State

Route 125 to SR 905 and SR 11


Project Title: State Routes 905/125/11 Southbound Connectors. EA NO: 28882

RTP PG NO: A-7,B-33

SANDAG ID: 1390505



Est Total Cost: $73,947 Open to Traffic: May 2021


SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $49,747 $49,747 $49,747

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $7,162 $600 $7,818 $7,448 $887 $285 $7,385 $115 $16,700 $24,200

TOTAL $73,947 $56,909 $600 $7,818 $7,448 $887 $285 $7,385 $115 $66,447

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP Augmentation - Mobility $49,747 $49,747 $49,747

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $7,162 $1,389 $7,231 $3,017 $400 $1 $7,385 $115 $11,700 $19,200

$68,947 $56,909 $1,389 $7,231 $3,017 $400 $1 $7,385 $115 $61,447 TOTAL


28




Caltrans

I-5 from La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Milepost begins at

28.6 ends at 29.3 (.7 miles) - in the city of San Diego construct a

one-half mile southbound auxiliary lane


Project Title: La Jolla Village Drive to Genesee Avenue Auxiliary Lane EA NO: 2T215

PPNO: 1136

RTP PG NO:

A-5,16,31,38,B-30

SANDAG ID: 1200512

Change Reason: Other, Revise footnote


Est Total Cost: $6,750 Open to Traffic: Jul 2021


SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 $6,750

TOTAL $6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750

* Environmental Clearance completed under I-5/Genesee project (CAL75); additional $499K of state funds outside of the RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

SHOPP (AC)-Mobility $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 $6,750

$6,750 $1,000 $5,750 $1,000 $5,750 TOTAL


I-805 from Just South of Governor Drive to Just North of Governor Drive

Milepost begins at 24 ends at 25 (1 miles) - along I-805 from SR-52 to

Nobel Drive. Construct one northbound (.5 miles) and one southbound (.4

miles) auxiliary lane


Project Title: I-805 North Construct Operational Improvements EA NO: 43039

PPNO: 1285

SANDAG ID: 1280516


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Hazard elimination programRT:805



TransNet - MC $32 $10 $42 $42

STIP-RIP AC $4,200 $4,200 $4,200

TOTAL $4,242 $4,200 $32 $10 $4,242

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $25 $15 $2 $42 $42

STIP-RIP AC $4,200 $4,200 $4,200

$4,242 $4,225 $15 $2 $4,242 TOTAL


29



MPO ID: COR04 18-05RTIP #:

Coronado, City of

Acacia Way (Coronado Ave-Cabrillo Ave); Alder St. (Coronado Ave-10th

St); Balboa Ave. (6th St.-Acacia Way); Carob Way (Cabrillo Ave.

-Coronado Ave.); Pine Ct. (Pine St. - End); 10th St. (Pine St.-Alameda

Blvd.); Strand Way (Pomona-442 Fts/Tulagi Rd.); Marina Ave. (Alameda

Blvd.-Ocean Blvd.); Encino Row (10th St.-FAve.): Tolita Ave. (Alameda

Blvd.-Isabella Ave.); Alamdea Blvd.(Olive Ave.-Ocean Blvd.); 1st St.

(Alameda-Orange) 1st St. (Orange-East End); G Ave. (10th St.-Ocean

Blvd.); and Bayshore Bikeway (Leyte-Coronado Blvd.) - In Coronado,

citywide annual preventive maintenance program that slurry seals

approximately one-seventh of City streets on a rotating basis. Slurry

sealing extends the life of the road by protecting it from oxidation and

revitalizes old bituminous-wearing surfaces to make slippery surfaces.

Pavement markings are also repainted, improving visibility at night and

enhancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety


Project Title: Street and Road Preventive Maintenance; Minor Drainage Repair TransNet - LSI: Maint

Change Reason: Revise Fund Source




TransNet - L $1,581 $138 $1,443 $1,581

TransNet - LSI $206 $36 $170 $206

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $259 $320 $40 $539 $579

Local Funds $2,738 $310 $250 $300 $300 $242 $3,656 $3,898

TOTAL $6,264 $4,784 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $456 $5,808

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $1,581 $138 $1,443 $1,581

TransNet - LSI $206 $36 $170 $206

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $259 $20 $239 $259

Local Funds $2,738 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $262 $3,956 $4,218

$6,264 $4,784 $320 $310 $250 $300 $300 $456 $5,808 TOTAL


30



MPO ID: COR07 18-05RTIP #:

Coronado, City of

St. Kitts, Port Royale, Bridgetown Bend, Cajon Place, Country Club,

Coronado Avenue - In Coronado, as-needed city wide rehabilitation of

roadways including removal and replacement of severely damaged areas,

grinding and overlays of 1 1/2". Pavement markings are also repainted,

improving visibility at night and enhancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety


Project Title: Street and Road Major Rehabilitation; Major Drainage; Traffic Operations TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L $1,665 $165 $1,500 $1,665

TransNet - LSI $3,293 $132 $583 $606 $609 $630 $1,298 $4,556 $5,854

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,615 $500 $70 $70 $90 $93 $339 $3,100 $3,439

Local Funds $2,191 $770 $690 $660 $275 $275 $63 $4,798 $4,861

TOTAL $15,819 $9,764 $1,402 $1,343 $1,336 $974 $998 $1,865 $13,954

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $1,665 $165 $1,500 $1,665

TransNet - LSI $3,293 $632 $653 $676 $699 $723 $1,298 $5,379 $6,677

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,615 $339 $2,277 $2,616

Local Funds $2,191 $770 $690 $660 $275 $275 $63 $4,798 $4,861

$15,819 $9,764 $1,402 $1,343 $1,336 $974 $998 $1,865 $13,954 TOTAL


31



MPO ID: ESC04 18-05RTIP #:

Escondido, City of

Citracado Parkway from West Valley to Andreason (.5 miles) - widen

from 2 to 4 lanes with raised medians, construct bridge over Escondido

Creek


Project Title: Citracado Parkway II RTP PG NO: B-37

RAS (M-40)

TransNet - LSI: CR

Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise Fund Source

Capacity Status:CI Exempt Category:Non-Exempt

Est Total Cost: $40,311 Open to Traffic: Dec 2021


TransNet - L $581 $581 $581

TransNet - LSI $1,350 $250 $1,600 $1,600

TransNet - LSI (Cash) $988 $988 $988

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $15 $1,685 $1,700 $1,700

HUD $908 $908 $908

SB1 - LPP Comp $12,500 $12,500 $12,500

Local Funds $17,272 $534 $1,445 $1,100 $5,608 $1,000 $13,743 $20,351

Local RTCIP $953 $730 $1,683 $1,683

TOTAL $40,311 $20,702 $1,279 $16,980 $1,350 $6,516 $1,581 $32,214

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

$581 $581 $581

$988 $988 $988

$1,700 $1,700 $1,700

$908 $908 $908

$12,500 $12,500 $12,500

$17,272 $5,608 $1,000 $10,664 $17,272

TransNet - L

TransNet - LSI (Cash) TransNet - LSI Carry Over HUD

SB1 - LPP Comp

Local Funds

Local RTCIP $953 $1,264 $1,857 $4,074 $4,074

$38,023 $20,702 $2,964 $14,357 $6,516 $1,581 $29,926 TOTAL


32




Escondido, City of

Bridge 57C0356 (1 miles) - construct a two lane bridge and street

improvements on both sides of bridge to match adjacent street

segments. The project includes construction of new medians with

landscaping, rehabilitation of existing pavement, and striping upgrades to

match the completed alignment. A pedestrian signal will be installed in

the vicinity of the bridge to accommodate pedestrians and cyclists using

the Escondido Creek Trail.


Project Title: El Norte Parkway Bridge at Escondido Creek RTP PG NO: B-37

RAS (M-40)

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L $2,000 $50 $1,950 $2,000

TransNet - L (Cash) $167 $167 $167


TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,021 $2,021 $2,021

Local Funds $406 $250 $656 $656

TOTAL $5,652 $3,381 $2,271 $50 $5,602

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $2,000 $50 $1,950 $2,000

TransNet - L (Cash) $167 $167 $167



Local Funds $406 $406 $406

$5,402 $3,381 $1,872 $149 $50 $5,352 TOTAL


33




Escondido, City of

Juniper Street between Chestnut Street and Vermont Avenue; Felicita

Avenue between Juniper Street and Escondido Boulevard - widen from 2

to 4 lanes with left turn pockets; traffic signal modifications at

Felicita/Escondido Blvd., pin on curb median on Felicita Avenue, street

improvements that will accommodate curb and gutter, sidewalk, street

crossings, class II bike lanes, and active transportation

education/encouragement activities at Juniper, Oak Hill, and Central

Elementary Schools; construction for ATP project only


Project Title: Felicita Ave/Juniper Street RTP PG NO: B-38

RAS (M-40)

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L (Cash) $115 $115 $115


ATP - R $86 $93 $1,107 $179 $1,107 $1,286

Local Funds $3,500 $3,500 $3,500

TOTAL $5,201 $3,701 $93 $1,407 $200 $3,615 $1,386

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L (Cash) $115 $115 $115


ATP - R $86 $93 $1,107 $179 $1,107 $1,286

Local Funds $3,500 $3,500 $3,500

$4,951 $3,701 $143 $1,107 $200 $3,615 $1,136 TOTAL


34




Escondido, City of

Intersection at W. Mission Ave. and Centre City Pkwy - reconfigure

existing street lane alignment, extend center median, and replace two

existing traffic signals to accommodate one additional left turn lane and

adjusted lane alignment to eastbound W. Mission Avenue at its

intersection with Centre City Parkway


Project Title: Centre City Parkway RTP PG NO: B-38

RAS (M-40)

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L $974 $974 $974

TransNet - L (Cash) $374 $374 $374


Local Funds $272 $272 $272

TOTAL $2,209 $1,730 $479 $272 $1,937

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $974 $974 $974

TransNet - L (Cash) $374 $374 $374


Local Funds $272 $272 $272

$2,209 $1,730 $279 $200 $272 $1,937 TOTAL


35




Escondido, City of

various streets primarily in the maintenance zone of focus, and those

classified as Collector and above throughout the city; the city's

maintenance zones can be identified in the uploaded Maintenance Zone

Map; FY19 - Maintenance Zone SO - this is an annual project that

includes maintenance (crackseal, chipseal, slurry, sidewalk repairs) of

various street elements citywide


Project Title: Pavement Maintenance TransNet - LSI: Maint





TransNet - LSI $2,046 $1,677 $1,158 $1,200 $1,244 $1,289 $8,614 $8,614


TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,046 $1,072 $3,118 $3,118

Local Funds $7,652 $2,510 $2,476 $2,559 $2,636 $2,661 $20,495 $20,495

TOTAL $32,234 $11,751 $5,259 $3,634 $3,759 $3,880 $3,950 $32,234

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $2,046 $1,114 $1,154 $1,196 $1,240 $1,285 $8,034 $8,034


TransNet - LSI Carry Over $2,046 $1,072 $3,118 $3,118

Local Funds $7,652 $2,510 $2,590 $2,667 $2,693 $2,719 $20,833 $20,833

$31,992 $11,751 $4,696 $3,744 $3,863 $3,933 $4,004 $31,992 TOTAL


36




Escondido, City of

Includes rehabilitation of various streets primarily in the maintenance

zone of focus, and those classified as Collector and above throughout

the City; the City's maintenance zones can be identified in the uploaded

Maintenance Zone Map: FY19 - Maintenance Zone SO - annual project

to rehabilitate existing pavement greater than 1" in depth within the city's

8 maintenance zones. Each year the project rotates to a new zone, and

identified roads in poor condition are treated


Project Title: Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L (Cash) $2,843 $2,843 $2,843

TransNet - LSI $4,927 $685 $1,135 $1,051 $1,004 $957 $9,758 $9,758



TOTAL $15,457 $8,425 $2,887 $1,135 $1,051 $1,004 $957 $15,457

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L (Cash) $2,843 $2,843 $2,843

TransNet - LSI $4,927 $1,248 $1,242 $1,191 $1,244 $1,297 $11,149 $11,149



$17,177 $8,425 $3,778 $1,242 $1,191 $1,244 $1,297 $17,177 TOTAL


In Escondido citywide as shown in attached priority list - construction of

new signals and modification of existing signals citywide; signals will be

constructed in accordance with the adopted traffic signal priority list.

With these funds new signals are anticipated at Rock Springs/Lincoln

Ave, Rock Springs/Mission Ave., Metcalf/Mission, and traffic signal

modification at Mary Lane/Bear Valley Pkwy


Project Title: Traffic Signals TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects



TransNet - LSI $250 $87 $250 $250 $250 $1,087 $1,087

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $150 $10 $233 $30 $363 $393

TOTAL $1,480 $150 $260 $320 $250 $250 $250 $30 $1,450

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250 $1,250


$1,480 $150 $330 $250 $250 $250 $250 $30 $1,450 TOTAL


37




Escondido, City of

Locations of streetlights retrofitted will be throughout the City of

Escondido - This project will retrofit existing street lights throughout the

city with new, LED lighting. The number of streetlights retrofitted will be

dependent upon pricing of each fixture.


Project Title: Streetlight Retrofit


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Lighting improvements



Local Funds $130 $292 $300 $300 $300 $300 $1,622 $1,622

TOTAL $1,622 $130 $292 $300 $300 $300 $300 $1,622

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

Local Funds $130 $200 $330 $330

$330 $130 $200 $330 TOTAL


38



MPO ID: IB02 18-05RTIP #:

Imperial Beach, City of

Various locations - preventative maintenance - slurry seals and localized

pavement repairsProject Description:

Project Title: Street Maintenance Operations TransNet - LSI: Maint





TransNet - L $1,655 $1,655 $1,655

TransNet - LSI $1,850 $210 $226 $234 $242 $250 $3,011 $3,011

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $507 $507 $507

TOTAL $5,173 $4,012 $210 $226 $234 $242 $250 $5,173

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $1,655 $1,655 $1,655

TransNet - LSI $1,850 $210 $217 $224 $232 $240 $2,973 $2,973


$5,135 $4,012 $210 $217 $224 $232 $240 $5,135 TOTAL

MPO ID: IB12 18-05RTIP #:

Various Locations - work includes but not limited to overlay greater than

1", new sidewalks, curbs and gutters, ramps, and storm drainProject Description:

Project Title: Major Street Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200

TransNet - LSI $2,675 $470 $271 $201 $230 $260 $782 $3,326 $4,108

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,763 $328 $503 $1,588 $2,091

TOTAL $6,399 $4,638 $798 $271 $201 $230 $260 $1,285 $5,114

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L (Cash) $200 $200 $200

TransNet - LSI $2,675 $490 $506 $524 $542 $560 $899 $4,398 $5,297

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,763 $328 $503 $1,588 $2,091

$7,588 $4,638 $818 $506 $524 $542 $560 $1,402 $6,186 TOTAL


39



MPO ID: LAM32 18-05RTIP #:

La Mesa, City of

Citywide - Preparation of pavement management system; this

information is used to determine the condition of City streets and help

prioritize street projects.


Project Title: Pavement Management System TransNet - LSI: Maint


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $50


TransNet - LSI $50 $50 $50

TOTAL $50 $50 $50

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $10 $40 $50 $50

$50 $10 $40 $50 TOTAL


Citywide - remove and replace identified and prioritized tripping hazards;

installation of and replacement of pedestrian ramps, in order to comply

with the Americans with Disabilities Act; replace or install new

sidewalks, curbs and gutters


Project Title: Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, Ped Ramps TransNet - LSI: Maint





TransNet - LSI $354 $300 $300 $350 $350 $1,654 $1,654

TOTAL $1,654 $354 $300 $300 $350 $350 $1,654

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250 $1,250

$1,250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,250 TOTAL


40




La Mesa, City of

In La Mesa, various locations citywide - Traffic signal upgrades including

protected left turns, overhead signals in lieu of island signals and

pedestrian ramps for improved pedestrian access.


Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrades TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Intersection signalization projects

Est Total Cost: $700


TransNet - LSI $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700 $700

TOTAL $700 $300 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500 $500

$500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $500 TOTAL


Citywide - implement traffic calming measures including signage and

striping, speed humps and other tools in locations throughout the City in

accordance with the City's Neighborhood Traffic Management Program


Project Title: Traffic Calming Improvements & Active Transportation Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Non signalization traffic control and operating



TransNet - LSI $10 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $210 $410

TOTAL $410 $10 $100 $100 $100 $100 $200 $210

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $250 $250 $500

$500 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $250 $250 TOTAL


41




La Mesa, City of

In La Mesa, various locations citywide - street reconstruction including

construction of a new structural pavement surface greater than 1" in

depth, to provide a smooth travel surface


Project Title: Street Reconstruction (CR) TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - LSI $647 $391 $413 $488 $562 $2,501 $2,501

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,001 $1,001 $1,001

TOTAL $3,502 $1,648 $391 $413 $488 $562 $3,502

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $541 $213 $251 $362 $433 $1,799 $1,799


$2,524 $1,266 $213 $251 $362 $433 $2,524 TOTAL


Various locations citywide - improvements to address inadequate street

drainage by constructing new or improving existing storm drain or surface

improvements, reducing roadway flooding


Project Title: Roadway Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR

Change Reason: Add new funding source, Reduce funding






Local Funds $230 $230 $230

TOTAL $350 $120 $230 $350

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $350 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,350 $1,350


$1,450 $450 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,450 TOTAL


42




La Mesa, City of

Various streets in the City - Enhance safety in West La Mesa by

completing more than 4.8 miles of bicycle and pedestrian enhancements

linking four schools and a City park. An educational campaign will further

promote active transportation as a viable mode


Project Title: West La Mesa Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Project TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities



TransNet - CP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000


ATP - R $1,894 $450 $1,444 $1,894

Local Funds $1,598 $1,598 $1,598

TOTAL $6,131 $1,894 $4,237 $450 $5,681

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - CP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000


ATP - R $450 $1,469 $450 $1,469 $1,919

Local Funds $1,598 $1,598 $1,598

$6,422 $450 $5,972 $450 $5,972 TOTAL

Page 31 Tuesday, June 11, 2019

43



MPO ID: O40 18-05RTIP #:

Oceanside, City of

Coastal railroad corridor at the following streets: Surfrider Avenue,

Mission Avenue, Wisconsin Avenue, Oceanside Boulevard, and Cassidy

Street - in the City of Oceanside, rail crossing safety improvements;

including upgrades to the railroad signaling and communication systems,

queue-cutter traffic signals at Mission Avenue, pedestrian crossing

gates, sidewalk and median reconstruction, and fencing


Project Title: Railroad Crossing Safey Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Railroad/highway crossing



TransNet - CP $1,064 $1,417 $2,519 $5,000 $5,000

TransNet - LSI $650 $650 $650

TOTAL $5,650 $1,714 $1,417 $2,519 $650 $5,000

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - CP $3,312 $1,688 $5,000 $5,000

TransNet - LSI $650 $650 $650

$5,650 $3,962 $1,688 $650 $5,000 TOTAL


44



MPO ID: SAN13 18-05RTIP #:


Regionwide - operations facility/control center to coordinate and integrate

several Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) deployments; part of ITS

regional architecture


Project Title: Joint Transit Operations Center SANDAG ID: 1142600

EARMARK NO:

E2008-BUSP-0111


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Construction or renovation of power, signal, and

communications systems



TransNet - H $1 $1 $1

FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,668 $1,668 $1,668

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $5 $173 $1,257 $118 $1,549 $4 $1,553

TOTAL $3,222 $1,674 $173 $1,257 $118 $1,549 $1,673

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - H $1 $1 $1

FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,668 $1,668 $1,668

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $5 $409 $3 $1 $416 $417

$2,086 $1,674 $409 $3 $1 $2,085 TOTAL


45





On and along existing coastal rail corridor from Old Town Transit Center

to Gilman Drive, along I-5 from Gilman Drive to UC San Diego, and along

Voigt Drive and Genesee Avenue to Westfield UTC. - construct new

10.9-mile extension of the Trolley Blue Line with stations at Tecolote

Road, Clairemont Drive, Balboa Avenue, Nobel Drive, Veterans

Administration Medical Center, Pepper Canyon and Voigt Drive on theUC

San Diego campus, Executive Drive, and Westfield UTC


Project Title: Mid-Coast LRT Corridor Project PPNO: 7307

RTP PG NO: A-13; B-26

SANDAG ID: 1257001



Est Total Cost: $2,171,201 Open to Traffic: Sep 2021


TransNet - MC $331,714 $136,289 $173,061 $200,070 $127,093 $159,465 $11,777 $53,321 $1,062,594 $1,127,692

TransNet - MC AC $316,243 $0

TransNet - MC TIFIA Payback

$93,353 $130,038 $(25,000)$(132,941) $(381,693)

$(537,484) $(537,484)$(537,484)

FTA 5307 $129 $129 $129

FTA 5309 (NS) $330,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $1,043,380 $1,043,380

Other Fed -TIFIA $537,484 $537,484 $537,484

TOTAL $2,171,201 $978,086 $329,642 $403,099 $812,554 $94,152 $(446,332) $11,906 $53,321 $2,105,974

* TIFIA loan/payback and FFGA funding are outside of this RTIP cycle; the funding is shown in the last fiscal year in order to demonstrate full

funding for the project

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $331,714 $117,135 $172,616 $191,140 $68,661 $246,426 $11,777 $53,321 $1,062,594 $1,127,692

TransNet - MC AC $347,930 $93,353 $10,038 $(37,941)$(100,000)$(313,380)$0

TransNet - MC TIFIA Payback $(537,484) $(537,484)$(537,484)

FTA 5307 $129 $129 $129

FTA 5309 (NS) $330,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $1,043,380 $1,043,380

Other Fed -TIFIA $537,484 $537,484 $537,484

$11,906 $53,321 $2,105,974 TOTAL $2,171,201 $1,009,773 $310,488 $282,654 $790,683 $68,661(291,058)

MPO ID: SAN26B 18-05RTIP #:

Broadway corridor; Park Blvd, 11th Ave, Kettner Street and India Street -

construct new and modify existing transit stations in downtown San

Diego for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) services


Project Title: Downtown BRT Stations SANDAG ID: 1201509



Est Total Cost: $20,979 Open to Traffic: Oct 2016


TransNet - MC $20,842 $101 $36 $4,551 $16,428 $20,979

TOTAL $20,979 $20,842 $101 $36 $4,551 $16,428

* $135K applied to CIP 1201507 - SAN26C

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $20,974 $5 $4,551 $16,428 $20,979

$20,979 $20,974 $5 $4,551 $16,428 TOTAL


46



MPO ID: SAN26C 18-05RTIP #:


On SR 15 at University Avenue and El Cajon Boulevard. - construct two

new BRT transit stations in the median of SR-15Project Description:

Project Title: SR 15 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mid-City Centerline Stations RTP PG NO: A-20

SANDAG ID: 1201507



Est Total Cost: $63,844 Open to Traffic: Feb 2018


TransNet - MC $36,861 $3,171 $662 $8,056 $48 $32,590 $40,694

CMAQ $21,428 $21,428 $21,428

FTA 5307 $1,722 $761 $961 $1,722

TOTAL $63,844 $60,011 $3,171 $662 $8,817 $48 $54,979

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $36,861 $4,759 $74 $8,056 $48 $33,590 $41,694

CMAQ $21,428 $21,428 $21,428

FTA 5307 $1,722 $761 $961 $1,722

$64,844 $60,011 $4,759 $74 $8,817 $48 $55,979 TOTAL


On trolley system from Palomar Street station to San Ysidro station -

SD&AE freight facility and South Line Mainline in San Ysidro - expansion

of freight yard including adding storage racks and construction of

truck-loading staging area; upgrading of freight railway including

crossovers and signals


Project Title: San Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility/South Line Rail RTP PG NO: A-5

SANDAG ID: 1300601,

1300602


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Track rehabilitation in existing right of way



TransNet - Border $11,789 $275 $318 $3,537 $398 $8,447 $12,382

TransNet - MC $113 $320 $67 $500 $500

CBI $600 $600 $600

DEMO - TEA 21 $8,996 $3,232 $2,105 $3,659 $8,996

Prop 1B - TCIF $65,433 $65,433 $65,433

Local Funds $76 $76 $76

TOTAL $87,987 $87,007 $595 $385 $7,369 $2,503 $78,115

* $1.2M of federal DEMO funds included in OWP 34200; $390K contribution from Chula Vista included in CHV60

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - Border $11,789 $1,093 $3,537 $398 $8,947 $12,882

TransNet - MC $85 $915 $1,000 $1,000

CBI $600 $600 $600

DEMO - TEA 21 $8,996 $3,232 $2,105 $3,659 $8,996

Prop 1B - TCIF $65,433 $65,433 $65,433


$88,987 $86,979 $2,008 $7,369 $2,503 $79,115 TOTAL


47





Phase 1: Control Point (CP) Pines (Mile Post (MP) 249.8) to CP Miramar

(MP 251)Phase 2: CP Miramar (MP 251) to CP Cumbres (MP 252.9) -

realign curve and construct second main track; fully funds PE and design

for both Phase 1 and Phase 2; construction for Phase 1 only


Project Title: Sorrento to Miramar Double Track/Realign EA NO: R690SA

PPNO: 7301

RTP PG NO: A-5

SANDAG ID: 1239801,

1239812





TransNet - MC $33,722 $1,321 $7,146 $1,340 $8,634 $6,187 $28,708 $43,529

Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $3,102 $3,102 $3,102

Prop 1B - TCIF $10,800 $10,800 $10,800

SB1 - LPP Formula $1,720 $1,720 $1,720

SB1 - TCEP $10,500 $10,500 $10,500

STIP-IIP PTA $3,900 $3,900 $3,900

STIP-IIP State Cash $1,300 $1,300 $1,300

TOTAL $74,851 $54,544 $1,321 $17,646 $1,340 $18,656 $16,687 $39,508

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $33,849 $2,615 $5,725 $1,340 $8,168 $6,730 $28,631 $43,529


Prop 1B - TCIF $10,800 $10,800 $10,800

SB1 - LPP Formula $1,720 $1,720 $1,720

SB1 - TCEP $10,500 $10,500 $10,500

STIP-IIP PTA $3,900 $3,900 $3,900

STIP-IIP State Cash $1,300 $1,300 $1,300

$74,851 $54,671 $2,615 $16,225 $1,340 $18,190 $17,230 $39,431 TOTAL


48





Escondido at Washington and Centre City - improvements to

maintenance facility including electronic gates, surveillance systems,

video cameras, security


Project Title: Escondido Maintenance Facility SANDAG ID: 1142300


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Const of new bus or rail storage/maint facilities

excluded in 23 CFR part 771



TransNet - MC $1,983 $153 $96 $2,233 $2,233

FTA 5307 $3,183 $411 $2,772 $3,183

FTA 5309 (Bus) $902 $902 $902

Local Funds $1,198 $107 $1,091 $1,198

TOTAL $7,516 $7,266 $153 $96 $518 $6,998

* STIP-TransNet swap

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $1,983 $250 $2,233 $2,233

FTA 5307 $3,183 $411 $2,772 $3,183

FTA 5309 (Bus) $902 $902 $902

Local Funds $1,198 $107 $1,091 $1,198

$7,516 $7,266 $250 $518 $6,998 TOTAL


49





Countywide - ongoing regional transportation planning as well as

administrative oversight for various TransNet and FTA-funded programsProject Description:

Project Title: Metropolitan Planning SANDAG ID: 33001, 33201,

33202& 33203, 33003, 33216,

34200, 23016


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Non construction related activities



TransNet - BPNS $248 $147 $147 $542 $542

TransNet - MC $395 $395 $395

TransNet - SGIP $248 $147 $147 $542 $542

TransNet - SS $280 $130 $130 $540 $540

CBI $250 $250 $250

FTA 5307 $24,692 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $49,350 $49,350

FTA 5309TOD $239 $239 $239

FTA 5310 $442 $442 $442

ITS $231 $231 $231

Local Funds $5,441 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $11,605 $11,605

TOTAL $64,136 $32,024 $7,030 $6,588 $6,164 $6,164 $6,164 $64,136

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $248 $147 $147 $542 $542

TransNet - MC $395 $395 $395

TransNet - SGIP $248 $147 $147 $542 $542

TransNet - SS $280 $130 $130 $540 $540

CBI $250 $250 $250

FTA 5307 $24,692 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $4,931 $49,350 $49,350

FTA 5309TOD $239 $239 $239

ITS $231 $231 $231

Local Funds $5,441 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $1,233 $11,605 $11,605

$63,694 $32,024 $6,588 $6,588 $6,164 $6,164 $6,164 $63,694 TOTAL


50





In University City along Voigt Drive, Genesee Avenue, Nobel Drive,

Gilman Drive, and Executive Drive - new Rapid bus service, traffic signal

priority measures, signalized intersections, street modifications, rapid

bus vehicles, and enhanced transit stops


Project Title: Super Loop RTP PG NO: A-5

SANDAG ID: 1041502





TransNet - MC $32,821 $1,203 $10 $9,930 $595 $23,508 $34,033


FTA 5309 (NS) $617 $617 $617

Local Funds $722 $722 $722

TOTAL $36,071 $34,859 $1,203 $10 $11,246 $595 $24,230

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $31,757 $2,276 $9,930 $644 $23,459 $34,033


FTA 5309 (NS) $617 $617 $617

Local Funds $722 $722 $722

$36,071 $33,795 $2,276 $11,246 $644 $24,181 TOTAL


51





From the Otay Mesa Border Crossing to Downtown San Diego along SR

125, Palomar Street, I-805, and SR 94 - Rapid transit service from the

I-805/Palomar Direct Access Ramp (DAR) to the Otay Mesa Border,

including the construction of a guideway on East Palomar over SR 125,

around Otay Ranch Town Center Mall and through the new Millenia

development; construction of 7 new Rapid transit stations


Project Title: South Bay BRT RTP PG NO: A-13, A-35,

B-26

SANDAG ID: 1280504





TransNet - MC $67,945 $29,175 $4,992 $22,021 $3,530 $76,561 $102,112


FTA 5307 $545 $545 $545

FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,827 $1,827 $1,827

CAP-TRADE $11,000 $11,000 $11,000

Other State - LCTOP $376 $376 $376

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $6,500 $6,500 $6,500

Local Funds $1,164 $180 $984 $1,164

TOTAL $123,672 $89,505 $29,175 $4,992 $24,721 $3,530 $95,421

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $67,779 $31,268 $1,010 $21,860 $3,525 $74,672 $100,057


FTA 5307 $545 $545 $545

FTA 5309 (Bus) $1,827 $1,827 $1,827

CAP-TRADE $11,000 $11,000 $11,000

Other State - LCTOP $376 $376 $376

Loc Funds - Toll Funds $6,500 $6,500 $6,500

Local Funds $1,319 $335 $984 $1,319

$121,772 $89,494 $31,268 $1,010 $24,715 $3,525 $93,532 TOTAL


52





On coastal rail corridor from Control Point (CP) Eastbrook near Harbor

Drive to CP Shell near Surfrider Way - in Oceanside, design to add a

new 0.6 mile section of double track, add new signals and replace the

San Luis Rey River Bridge over San Luis Rey River


Project Title: Eastbrook to Shell Double Track PPNO: 2074

SANDAG ID: 1239809





TransNet - MC $2,674 $671 $1,656 $5,000 $5,000


SB1 - LPP Formula $2,000 $2,000 $2,000

TOTAL $10,526 $8,200 $671 $1,656 $10,526

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $2,649 $1,251 $1,100 $5,000 $5,000


SB1 - LPP Formula $2,000 $2,000 $2,000

$10,920 $8,569 $1,251 $1,100 $10,920 TOTAL


Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3

categories - rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track and

trackbed in existing rights-of-way (non-capacity increasing)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures,

Track, and Trackbed in Existing Rights-of-Way: Blue Line Corridor

SANDAG ID: 1210030,

1210040


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures



TransNet - MC $47,293 $990 $400 $55 $48,738 $48,738

FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335

FTA Funds - AR-5307 $7,798 $7,798 $7,798

Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,837 $57,837 $57,837

Prop 1B - SLPP $35,648 $35,648 $35,648

Local Funds $11,963 $11,963 $11,963

TOTAL $162,319 $160,874 $990 $400 $55 $162,319

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $47,493 $1,172 $78 $48,743 $48,743

FTA 5309 (NS) $335 $335 $335

FTA Funds - AR-5307 $7,772 $7,772 $7,772

Prop 1A - High Speed Rail $57,855 $57,855 $57,855

Prop 1B - SLPP $35,651 $35,651 $35,651

Local Funds $11,963 $11,963 $11,963

$162,319 $161,069 $1,172 $78 $162,319 TOTAL


53





On coastal rail corridor in Cardiff and across San Elijo Lagoon from MP

239.2 near Montgomery Ave to MP 241.3 in Solana Beach - install 1.5

miles of new double track, replace Bridge 240.4, reconfigure Control

Point (CP) Cardiff with double crossovers, install new signals and

drainage structures


Project Title: San Elijo Lagoon Double Track SANDAG ID: 1239806,

3310708





TransNet - MC $17,105 $7,532 $916 $42 $2,324 $1,018 $22,253 $25,595

RSTP $9,413 $5,263 $422 $3,728 $9,413

Prop 1B - TCIF $4,343 $4,343 $4,343

STIP-RIP AC $40,000 $40,000 $40,000

TOTAL $79,351 $70,861 $7,532 $916 $42 $7,587 $1,440 $70,324

* $735.6K paid towards OWP 33107.08 and 33107.01

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $17,105 $8,016 $774 $41 $2,324 $1,018 $22,593 $25,935

RSTP $9,413 $5,263 $422 $3,728 $9,413

Prop 1B - TCIF $4,343 $4,343 $4,343

STIP-RIP AC $40,000 $40,000 $40,000

$79,691 $70,861 $8,016 $774 $41 $7,587 $1,440 $70,664 TOTAL


54





From San Diego State University to Downtown San Diego along El Cajon

Boulevard, College Avenue, Park Boulevard, and Broadway - provide new

Rapid Bus service including: consolidated transit stops, SR 15 transit

plaza, synchronized traffic signals with extended green lights for buses,

new low-floor vehicles, new shelters, improved waiting areas, real-time

next-bus arrival signs, service frequency upgrade to every 10 minutes in

the peak period, and every 15 minutes off-peak


Project Title: Mid-City Rapid Bus SANDAG ID: 1240001



Est Total Cost: $44,526 Open to Traffic: Oct 2014


TransNet - MC $21,473 $25 $156 $3,650 $214 $17,790 $21,654


FTA 5307 $320 $320 $320

FTA 5309 (NS) $22,379 $729 $21,650 $22,379

TOTAL $44,526 $44,345 $25 $156 $4,872 $214 $39,440

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $21,529 $77 $3,650 $214 $17,742 $21,606


FTA 5307 $320 $320 $320

FTA 5309 (NS) $22,379 $729 $21,650 $22,379

$44,478 $44,401 $77 $4,872 $214 $39,392 TOTAL


Countywide - I-15 BRT, SuperLoop, Mid-City, South Bay BRT, Otay

Mesa BRT and Mira Mesa BRT operating and maintenance costsProject Description:

Project Title: TransNet Major Transit Corridor Operations SANDAG ID: 1139601,

1139602, 1139603, 1139604,

1139607


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance



TransNet - BRT/Rail Ops $16,479 $19,948 $27,098 $28,019 $28,550 $120,094 $120,094

TOTAL $120,094 $16,479 $19,948 $27,098 $28,019 $28,550 $120,094

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BRT/Rail Ops $15,405 $26,000 $26,846 $27,718 $28,550 $124,519 $124,519

$124,519 $15,405 $26,000 $26,846 $27,718 $28,550 $124,519 TOTAL


55





Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Parts 93.126 and 93.127 Exempt

Tables 2 and 3 categories: rehabilitation or reconstruction of track

structures, track, and trackbed in existing right-of-way (non-capacity

increasing)- from Oceanside to San Diego along the Coastal Rail

Corridor; design track improvements


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Rehabilitation or Reconstruction of Track Structures,

Track, and Trackbed in Exisiting Rights-of-Way: Coastal Rail Corridor

SANDAG ID: 1239803,

1239805, 1239810, 1239813,

1239814, 1239815, 1239816





TransNet - MC $39,059 $12,696 $16,835 $1,846 $500 $225 $71,160 $71,160

CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154

FTA 5307 $6,711 $6,711 $6,711

FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321


Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360

RSTP $25,136 $25,136 $25,136

CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017

SB1 - LPP Formula $4,750 $4,750 $4,750

Local Funds $301 $301 $301

TOTAL $191,995 $159,894 $12,696 $16,835 $1,846 $500 $225 $191,995

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $38,520 $15,816 $14,295 $2,369 $158 $71,158 $71,158

CMAQ $64,154 $64,154 $64,154

FTA 5307 $6,711 $6,711 $6,711

FTA 5339 $5,321 $5,321 $5,321


Other Fed - ARRA - FRA $3,360 $3,360 $3,360

RSTP $25,136 $25,136 $25,136

CAP-TRADE $4,017 $4,017 $4,017

SB1 - LPP Formula $3,500 $1,250 $4,750 $4,750

Local Funds $301 $301 $301

$191,993 $158,105 $17,066 $14,295 $2,369 $158 $191,993 TOTAL


56





From MP 247.8 to MP 248.9 north of Sorrento Valley Coaster Station -

convert 1.1 miles of single-track to double-track, raise tracks to minimize

flooding during storms, construct two new bridges, expand parking lot at

Sorrento Valley Station, and install new signals - does not add additional

transit service


Project Title: Sorrento Valley Double Track SANDAG ID: 1239807





TransNet - MC $3,577 $278 $45 $803 $323 $2,774 $3,900

CMAQ $3,867 $3,867 $3,867

RSTP $12,861 $5,156 $7,705 $12,861

Prop 1B - TCIF $12,055 $12,055 $12,055

Local Funds $306 $306 $306

TOTAL $32,989 $32,666 $278 $45 $5,959 $323 $26,707

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $3,818 $76 $6 $803 $323 $2,774 $3,900

CMAQ $3,867 $3,867 $3,867

RSTP $12,861 $5,156 $7,705 $12,861

Prop 1B - TCIF $12,055 $12,055 $12,055

Local Funds $306 $306 $306

$32,989 $32,907 $76 $6 $5,959 $323 $26,707 TOTAL


Within the parking area of the UTC shopping mall area - off street transit

center for existing Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County

Transit District (NCTD) for local and express service for SuperLoop,

Mid-Coast and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)


Project Title: University Town Center (UTC) Transit Center SANDAG ID: 1143200


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Reconstruction or renovation of transit structures



TransNet - MC $5,378 $315 $7 $267 $5,433 $5,700

TOTAL $5,700 $5,378 $315 $7 $267 $5,433

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $5,361 $339 $267 $5,433 $5,700

$5,700 $5,361 $339 $267 $5,433 TOTAL


57





Downtown San Diego - block bounded by A Street , B Street, State

Street and Union Street - environmental certification and land acquisition

for bus stopover facility and potentially a multi-use facility that could

include office, residential and retail development.


Project Title: Downtown Multiuse and Bus Stopover Facility SANDAG ID: 1201514


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Bus terminal and transfer points



TransNet - MC $7,807 $10,475 $27,693 $4,483 $41,492 $45,975

TOTAL $45,975 $7,807 $10,475 $27,693 $4,483 $41,492

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $43,954 $2,021 $4,935 $41,040 $45,975

$45,975 $43,954 $2,021 $4,935 $41,040 TOTAL


On Mira Mesa Boulevard from I-15 to UC San Diego - bus rapid transit

priority treatments on Mira Mesa Blvd.Project Description:

Project Title: Mira Mesa Blvd. Bus Rapid Transit Priority Treatments SANDAG ID: 1201511


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects



TransNet - MC $3,383 $25 $303 $260 $1,386 $2,585 $3,971

TOTAL $3,971 $3,383 $25 $303 $260 $1,386 $2,585

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $3,612 $125 $1,386 $2,351 $3,737

$3,737 $3,612 $125 $1,386 $2,351 TOTAL


58





On coastal rail corridor from Control Point (CP) Elvira near SR 52 to CP

Friar near Friars Road - convert 2.6 miles of single-track to double-track

and install new signals. Replace 1 mile of double track. Construct

new/replacement bridges at MP 260.4, 259.6, 259.1, 258.6, and 257.2.

Construct new water/sewer facilites for the City of San Diego between

Friars Road and SR 52 - does not add additional transit service


Project Title: Elvira to Morena Double Track SANDAG ID: 1146500,

1239811





TransNet - MC $20,413 $12,173 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $6,098 $987 $35,026 $42,111

TransNet - MC AC $0

CMAQ $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 $24,878

FTA 5307 $3,636 $2,080 $1,556 $3,636

Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 $9,920

RSTP $29,688 $4,688 $927 $24,073 $29,688

CAP-TRADE $61,983 $61,983 $61,983

STA $520 $520 $520

TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052

Local Funds $15,021 $1,701 $16,722 $16,722

TDA $389 $389 $389

TOTAL $193,899 $169,591 $14,783 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $22,244 $1,914 $169,741

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $20,413 $12,173 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $6,098 $987 $35,026 $42,111

TransNet - MC AC $0

CMAQ $24,878 $2,776 $22,102 $24,878

FTA 5307 $3,636 $2,080 $1,556 $3,636

Fed Rail Admin (FRA-PRIIA) $9,920 $6,082 $3,838 $9,920

RSTP $29,688 $4,688 $927 $24,073 $29,688

CAP-TRADE $61,983 $61,983 $61,983

STA $520 $520 $520

TCRP $4,052 $4,052 $4,052

Local Funds $15,021 $1,701 $16,722 $16,722

TDA $250 $250 $250

$193,760 $169,591 $14,644 $3,217 $6,120 $187 $22,244 $1,914 $169,602 TOTAL


59





At South Bay Maintenance Facility on Main Street in the city of Chula

Vista - expansion of maintenance facility to accommodate maintenance

of BRT vehicles - property acquisition, site preparation, lighting, parking,

fencing and bus servicing facilities


Project Title: South Bay BRT Maintenance Facility SANDAG ID: 1201513


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Const of new bus or rail storage/maint facilities

excluded in 23 CFR part 771



TransNet - MC $30,894 $40 $1 $427 $173 $30,336 $30,935

FTA 5307 $8,846 $2,996 $4,840 $1,010 $8,846

FTA 5339 $3,122 $3,122 $3,122

STA $5,250 $1,052 $2,300 $1,898 $5,250

Local Funds $9,658 $9,658 $9,658

TDA $2,218 $629 $1,189 $400 $2,218

TOTAL $60,030 $59,988 $40 $1 $5,104 $8,502 $46,424

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $30,894 $40 $427 $172 $30,336 $30,934

FTA 5307 $8,846 $2,996 $4,840 $1,010 $8,846

FTA 5339 $3,122 $3,122 $3,122

STA $5,250 $1,052 $2,300 $1,898 $5,250

Local Funds $9,658 $9,658 $9,658

TDA $2,219 $629 $1,190 $401 $2,219

$60,030 $59,988 $40 $5,104 $8,502 $46,425 TOTAL


60






Table 3 categories - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and

Non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Bayshore Bikeway SANDAG ID: 1129900,

1143700, 1223055, 1223056





TransNet - BPNS $6,444 $2,867 $1,790 $7,519 $10,208 $673 $29,501 $29,501

ATP - R $1,280 $8,941 $10,221 $10,221

ATP - S $4,944 $4,944 $4,944

Coastal Conservancy $2,500 $2,500 $2,500


STIP-RIP STP TE $1,340 $1,340 $1,340



TOTAL $48,620 $10,398 $4,147 $6,734 $16,460 $10,208 $673 $48,620

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $6,717 $6,322 $5,926 $544 $122 $2 $19,633 $19,633

ATP - R $10,221 $10,221 $10,221

ATP - S $4,944 $4,944 $4,944

Coastal Conservancy $2,500 $2,500 $2,500


STIP-RIP STP TE $1,340 $1,340 $1,340



$38,752 $10,671 $16,543 $10,870 $544 $122 $2 $38,752 TOTAL


61






categories - bicycle and pedestrian facilities (both motorized and

non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Coastal Rail Trail SANDAG ID: 1223016,

1223017, 1223018





TransNet - BPNS $10,122 $14,117 $5,126 $1,238 $3 $3 $30,609 $30,609

ATP - R $1,025 $1,025 $1,025

STIP-RIP STP TE $587 $587 $587


Local Funds $250 $250 $250

TDA - Bicycles $2,139 $2,139 $2,139

TOTAL $34,657 $12,031 $16,256 $5,126 $1,238 $3 $3 $34,657

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $11,179 $14,039 $4,628 $5 $3 $3 $29,857 $29,857

ATP - R $1,025 $1,025 $1,025

STIP-RIP STP TE $587 $587 $587


Local Funds $250 $250 $250

TDA - Bicycles $2,139 $2,139 $2,139

$33,905 $13,088 $16,178 $4,628 $5 $3 $3 $33,905 TOTAL


62





On and along the North County Transit District rail corridor from North

Melrose Drive in Oceanside to North Pacific Street in San Marcos -

Construct seven miles of new bike path. Construction is funded through

phase 3


Project Title: The Inland Rail Trail PPNO: 7421W

RTP PG NO: A-19

SANDAG ID: 1223023





TransNet - BPNS $7,393 $2,115 $1,500 $698 $742 $2,152 $2,945 $7,352 $12,449

ATP - R $500 $5,103 $500 $5,103 $5,603

STIP-RIP AC $16,322 $16,322 $16,322

STIP-RIP STP TE $1,414 $1,414 $1,414

STIP-RIP State Cash $2,298 $183 $2,115 $2,298

Local Funds $1,080 $1,080 $1,080

TDA - Bicycles $6,719 $2,025 $4,694 $6,719

TOTAL $45,885 $35,226 $2,615 $6,603 $698 $742 $7,354 $2,945 $35,586

* $1.461M of BTA programmed under County of San Diego CNTY78

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $7,393 $1,600 $1,655 $2,088 $2,090 $6,470 $10,648

ATP - R $500 $5,103 $500 $5,103 $5,603

STIP-RIP AC $16,322 $16,322 $16,322

STIP-RIP STP TE $1,414 $1,414 $1,414

STIP-RIP State Cash $2,298 $183 $2,115 $2,298

Local Funds $1,080 $1,080 $1,080

TDA - Bicycles $6,719 $2,025 $4,694 $6,719

$44,084 $35,226 $2,100 $6,758 $7,290 $2,090 $34,704 TOTAL


63







non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - San Diego River Trail SANDAG ID: 1223052,

1223053





TransNet - BPNS $908 $614 $2,800 $34 $4,356 $4,356

Coastal Conservancy $500 $500 $500

TOTAL $4,856 $1,408 $614 $2,800 $34 $4,856

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $1,078 $2,859 $171 $4,108 $4,108

Coastal Conservancy $500 $500 $500

$4,608 $1,578 $2,859 $171 $4,608 TOTAL


Clairemont Mesa Boulevard from State Route 163 to Interstate 15 (1.2

miles) - traffic Signal Priority on Clairemont Mesa Boulevard and transit

station improvements at eastbound Ruffin Road stop


Project Title: Clairemont Mesa Blvd BRT Stations SANDAG ID: 1201515






TransNet - MC $1,646 $19 $109 $980 $794 $1,774

TOTAL $1,774 $1,646 $19 $109 $980 $794

* Total estimated cost reflects final design and construction of five additional transit stations

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $1,764 $10 $690 $1,084 $1,774

$1,774 $1,764 $10 $690 $1,084 TOTAL


64






categories: operating assistance to transit operators - operating

assistance to transit agencies


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Operating Assistance - FTA Section 5310 Enhanced

Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

SANDAG ID:

1271000,1271800, 1272000,

3321400


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Transit operating assistance



TransNet - SS $98 $684 $685 $1,466 $1,466

FTA 5310 $651 $651 $651

Local Funds $181 $184 $364 $364

TOTAL $2,481 $749 $865 $869 $2,481

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - SS $98 $684 $685 $1,466 $1,466

FTA 5310 $476 $476 $476

Local Funds $181 $184 $364 $364

$2,306 $574 $865 $869 $2,306 TOTAL


In Chula Vista, on East Palomar Street between Heritage Road and

I-805, on I-805 between East Palomar Street and SR 94 and on SR 94

between I-805 and Downtown San Diego. - design and construct new

freeway shoulder infrastructure on East Palomar, I-805 and SR 94;

implement technology improvements within the corridor to support

freeway bus operation; procurement of 16 new Compressed Natural Gas

(CNG) buses. - no additional lanes


Project Title: I-805/SR 94 Bus on Shoulder Demonstration Project SANDAG ID: 1280513


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Mass Transit - Purchase new buses and rail cars to replace existing

vehicles or minor expansions of fleet



TransNet - MC $3,510 $1,788 $8,837 $2,422 $204 $55 $744 $16,072 $16,816

FTA 5309 (Bus) $14,084 $1,455 $12,629 $14,084

TOTAL $30,900 $17,594 $1,788 $8,837 $2,422 $204 $55 $2,199 $28,701

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $15,478 $1,323 $5 $5 $5 $832 $15,984 $16,816

FTA 5309 (Bus) $14,084 $1,455 $12,629 $14,084

$30,900 $29,562 $1,323 $5 $5 $5 $2,287 $28,613 TOTAL


65







Non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - North Park/Mid-City

Bikeways

SANDAG ID: 1223020,

1223078, 1223079; 1223087,

1223080, 1223081, 1223082





TransNet - BPNS $4,988 $3,300 $13,639 $11,926 $760 $16 $34,629 $34,629

SB1 - TIRCP $5,872 $5,872 $5,872

TDA - Bicycles $1,807 $800 $2,607 $2,607

TOTAL $43,108 $6,795 $4,100 $19,511 $11,926 $760 $16 $43,108

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $5,104 $2,946 $13,931 $11,718 $166 $14 $33,879 $33,879

SB1 - TIRCP $5,872 $5,872 $5,872

TDA $216 $440 $115 $229 $1,000 $1,000

TDA - Bicycles $1,607 $1,607 $1,607

$42,358 $6,927 $3,386 $19,918 $11,947 $166 $14 $42,358 TOTAL




Non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities - Uptown Bikeways SANDAG ID: 1223022,

1223083, 1223084, 1223085,

1223086





TransNet - BPNS $6,239 $2,015 $9,814 $8,610 $898 $27,576 $27,576

TransNet - SGIP $609 $39 $648 $648

Local Funds $361 $979 $860 $2,200 $2,200

TDA - Bicycles $1,250 $1,250 $1,250

TOTAL $31,674 $8,098 $2,415 $10,793 $9,470 $898 $31,674

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $5,937 $3,254 $10,058 $5,620 $852 $25,721 $25,721

TransNet - SGIP $648 $648 $648

Local Funds $361 $729 $1,110 $2,200 $2,200

TDA - Bicycles $1,250 $1,250 $1,250

$29,819 $7,187 $4,263 $10,787 $6,730 $852 $29,819 TOTAL


66




DELETEDSan Diego Association of Governments

Along the LOSSAN Corridor in San Diego County - Design of rail signals

at key locations along the LOSSAN Corridor within San Diego County to

increase service efficiency


Project Title: Signal Respacing and Optimization SANDAG ID: 1239818

Change Reason: Delete project



Est Total Cost: $0


TOTAL

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $500 $500 $1,000 $1,000

SB1 - LPP Formula $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

SB1 - TIRCP $15,900 $15,900 $15,900

$17,900 $1,000 $500 $500 $15,900 $2,000 $15,900 TOTAL


67



MPO ID: CNTY24 18-05RTIP #:

San Diego County

Cole Grade Road from N. of Horse Creek to South of Pauma Heights

Road (2.9 miles) - widen to accommodate 14-ft traffic lane in both

direction, 12-ft center 2-way left turn, 6-ft bike lane & 10-ft pathway


Project Title: Cole Grade Road RTP PG NO: B-36

RAS (M-46)

TransNet - LSI: CR



Est Total Cost: $26,381 Open to Traffic: Jan 2022


TransNet - L $350 $350 $350

TransNet - L (Cash) $335 $335 $335

TransNet - LSI $1,194 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $1,698 $18,018 $19,716

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,980 $4,000 $1,730 $4,250 $5,980

TOTAL $26,381 $3,859 $4,000 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $4,113 $4,250 $18,018

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $350 $350 $350

TransNet - L (Cash) $335 $335 $335

TransNet - LSI $1,194 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $1,698 $18,018 $19,716

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $5,376 $4,000 $1,750 $4,750 $2,876 $9,376

$29,777 $7,255 $4,000 $6,504 $6,638 $3,370 $2,010 $4,133 $4,750 $20,894 TOTAL


Dye Road to San Vicente Road from 500 ft west of Ramona Street to

Intersection of Warnock Dr and San Vicente Rd (1.15 miles) - in Ramona

- study, design and construct a 2-lane community collector road with

intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes, curb, gutter, and pathway/walkway


Project Title: Dye Road Extension RTP PG NO: A-29; B-36

RAS (M-46)

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L $300 $300 $300

TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $250 $250

TransNet - LSI $879 $10 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $1,848 $274 $2,122


TOTAL $2,782 $1,529 $20 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $2,508 $274

* construction funds are outside of the the 5-year RTIP cycle

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $300 $300 $300

TransNet - L (Cash) $250 $250 $250

TransNet - LSI $889 $10 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $1,858 $274 $2,132


$2,792 $1,539 $20 $11 $11 $11 $1,200 $2,518 $274 TOTAL


68




San Diego County

Ramona Street from Boundary Ave. to Warnock Dr. (.25 miles) - in the

community of Ramona, construct new road extension; 2 lanes with

intermittent turn lanes, bike lanes and walkway/pathway


Project Title: Ramona Street Extension RTP PG NO: B-36

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - L $287 $233 $54 $287

TransNet - LSI $830 $14 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,286 $150 $1,436



TOTAL $1,757 $1,136 $29 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,553 $204

* Construction funds are outside of the 5-year RTIP cycle

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L $287 $233 $54 $287

TransNet - LSI $845 $14 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,301 $150 $1,451



$1,772 $1,151 $29 $14 $14 $14 $550 $1,568 $204 TOTAL


Intersection at Stage Coach Lane and Reche Rd - in unincorporated

Fallbrook: widen intersection approaches to provide additional turn lanes

and relieve congestion at the intersection


Project Title: Stage Coach Lane / Reche Road Intersection Improvements TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Intersection channelization projects



TransNet - LSI $206 $150 $171 $35 $150 $356


TOTAL $1,446 $1,246 $200 $171 $35 $1,240

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $206 $150 $171 $35 $150 $356


$2,006 $1,806 $200 $171 $35 $1,800 TOTAL


69




San Diego County

Countywide - annual maintenance project that includes maintenance of

various street elements (crackseal, chip seal, AC overlay greater than 1"

thick, sidewalk repairs, etc.)


Project Title: Roadway Maintenance and Overlay TransNet - LSI: CR

Change Reason: Revise funding between phases


Est Total Cost: $42,980CONRWPEPRIORTOTAL 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $2,316 $2,400 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $13,899 $13,617 $27,516


TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,532 $1,111 $421 $1,532

Local Funds $9,296 $4,554 $760 $13,090 $13,850

TOTAL $42,980 $13,226 $6,954 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $15,852 $27,128

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $2,316 $2,400 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $14,632 $12,884 $27,516


TransNet - LSI Carry Over $1,532 $1,379 $153 $1,532

Local Funds $9,296 $4,554 $760 $13,090 $13,850

$42,980 $13,226 $6,954 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $5,700 $16,853 $26,127 TOTAL


Ashwood Street/Wildcat Canyon Road from Mapleview Street to 1100

feet north of Willow Road (1.1 miles) - in the unincorporated community

of Lakeside - traffic signal improvements at Mapleview and Ashwood;

traffic signal installation at Willow and Ashwood/Wildcat Canyon; and the

addition of turn lanes, addition of a passing lane in a non-urbanized area,

bike lanes, and pedestrian facilities


Project Title: Ashwood Street Corridor Improvements (Mapleview to Willow) RTP PG NO: A-29 AND B-37

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - LSI $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $13,434 $13,434


Local Funds $1,863 $1,863 $1,863

TOTAL $21,366 $1,863 $3,100 $2,969 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $3,357 $2,575 $15,434

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $2,407 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $2,407 $13,434 $15,841


Local Funds $1,863 $1,863 $1,863

$23,773 $4,270 $3,100 $2,969 $3,949 $4,894 $4,591 $5,764 $2,575 $15,434 TOTAL


70




San Diego County

Intersection at East Vista Way and Gopher Canyon Road - in the

unincorporated Bonsall: this is a congested intersection leading into the

Bonsall community and this improvement is on the Community Sponsor

Group's priority list; adding turn lanes at this intersection


Project Title: East Vista Way At Gopher Canyon Intersection Improvements RAS (M-46)

TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:All Projects - Interchange reconfiguration projects



TransNet - LSI $243 $214 $29 $243

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $840 $160 $1,000 $1,000

Local RTCIP $628 $218 $409 $627

TOTAL $1,870 $1,711 $160 $432 $29 $1,409

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $243 $214 $29 $243


Local RTCIP $466 $218 $247 $465

$1,918 $1,759 $160 $432 $29 $1,457 TOTAL


Camino Del Rey from 500 feet west of Golf Club Drive to 2700 feet east

of Golf Club Drive (.9 miles) - in unincorporated Bonsall: the project will

upgrade the existing drainage system so that it will accommodate a

100-year flood


Project Title: Camino Del Rey Drainage Improvements TransNet - LSI: Maint





TransNet - LSI $1,000 $3,000 $1,356 $5,356 $5,356

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $415 $1,000 $504 $1,415 $504 $1,919

TOTAL $7,275 $415 $1,000 $504 $1,000 $3,000 $1,356 $1,415 $504 $5,356

* additional construction funds beyond 5 year RTIP

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $949 $10 $10 $1,000 $400 $569 $1,000 $1,969

TransNet - LSI Carry Over $970 $1,000 $504 $1,970 $504 $2,474

$4,443 $1,919 $1,000 $504 $10 $10 $1,000 $2,370 $1,073 $1,000 TOTAL


71



MPO ID: SD208 18-05RTIP #:

San Diego, City of

Juan St from Taylor St to Sunset Road (1 miles) - this project provides

for the replacement of the existing concrete pavement, curb, gutter and

sidewalk on Juan Street from Taylor Street to Sunset Road; Phase I

(Taylor Street to Harney Street) will provide new asphalt cement and

cement treated base pavement; Phase II (Harney Street to Sunset Road)

will provide new Portland cement concrete pavement - Project No.

S-00602 (52-729.0)


Project Title: Juan Street Reconstruction TransNet - LSI: CR



Est Total Cost: $7,133CONRWPEPRIORTOTAL 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L (Cash) $2,259 $2,259 $2,259



Local Funds $2,700 $1,000 $1,700 $2,700

TOTAL $7,133 $7,092 $41 $1,000 $6,133

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - L (Cash) $2,259 $2,259 $2,259



Local Funds $2,700 $1,000 $1,700 $2,700

$7,208 $7,092 $116 $1,000 $6,208 TOTAL


Torrey Pines Road from Little St to Roseland Dr (.1 miles) - this project

provides for reconstructing a 350-foot section of earthen slope along the

south side of Torrey Pines Road between Lookout Drive and Roseland

Drive(S-00877)


Project Title: Torrey Pines Road Slope Restoration RAS (M-45)

TransNet - LSI: CR

Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise Fund Source

Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Safety - Safety Improvement Program




Local Funds $280 $280 $280

Local RTCIP $2,852 $425 $3,277 $3,277

TOTAL $4,251 $3,826 $425 $280 $3,971

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23


Local Funds $280 $280 $280

Local RTCIP $2,852 $2,852 $2,852

$3,846 $3,826 $20 $280 $3,566 TOTAL


72




San Diego, City of

Torrey Pines Road from Amalfi to Hillside Drive (1 miles) - in San Diego,

on Torrey Pines Road between Hillside Drive and Amalfi Street, provides

path of travel for pedestrians and bicyclists (S15023)


Project Title: Torrey Pines Road Improvement Phase 2 RAS (M-45)

TransNet - LSI: CR





TransNet - LSI $1,075 $1,075 $1,075



Local RTCIP $300 $300 $300

TOTAL $1,850 $1,375 $475 $300 $1,550

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $1,075 $1,075 $1,075


Local RTCIP $300 $300 $300

$1,600 $1,375 $225 $300 $1,300 TOTAL


73



MPO ID: SNT04 18-05RTIP #:

Santee, City of

Multiple locations as recommended by Pavement Management Analysis

report. - Reconstruction and rehabilitation in the form of removal and

replacement of existing pavement sections 2 inches minimum, 1.5 inch

minimum overlay, pedestrian ramps, sidewalk improvements, and

drainage improvements as part of the rehabilitation improvements.


Project Title: Pavement Repair and Rehabilitation TransNet - LSI: CR

Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise project description




TransNet - Bond $9,856 $343 $9,512 $9,855

TransNet - L $7,729 $7,729 $7,729

TransNet - LSI $627 $332 $339 $376 $347 $453 $213 $2,260 $2,473



Local Funds $1,186 $279 $614 $422 $422 $422 $15 $3,329 $3,344

TOTAL $26,403 $22,400 $611 $953 $798 $769 $875 $728 $25,675

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - Bond $9,856 $343 $9,512 $9,855

TransNet - L $7,729 $7,729 $7,729

TransNet - LSI $627 $332 $366 $355 $445 $482 $220 $2,387 $2,607



Local Funds $1,186 $279 $416 $475 $485 $15 $2,827 $2,842

$26,035 $22,400 $611 $782 $830 $930 $482 $735 $25,300 TOTAL


74




Santee, City of

This will be implemented on all citywide traffic signals through the RAMS

program - ability to coordinate signal plan development across

jurisdictional boundaries with a common time source and a common

platform to build an integrated corridor management system; this will

include software maintenance, hardware maintenance, and

communication infrastructure through the Regional Arterial Management

System (RAMS). TransNet - LSI RAMS of $7 is programmed through FY

2022


Project Title: Regional Arterial Management System TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Traffic signal synchronization projects

Est Total Cost: $74


TransNet - LSI $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $7 $74 $74

TOTAL $74 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $7 $74

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $67 $67

$67 $37 $7 $7 $7 $7 $67 TOTAL


Various locations as defined in Santee's Pavement Management

Analysis Report - Maintenance repair in the form of crack filling, grind

and patch failed areas followed by Cape seal or Slurry seal of the street.


Project Title: Pavement Roadway Maintenance TransNet - LSI: Maint

Change Reason: Increase funding, Revise project description




TransNet - LSI $1,129 $142 $149 $164 $182 $197 $134 $1,830 $1,964


Local Funds $279 $1,030 $422 $422 $422 $9 $2,566 $2,575

TOTAL $5,973 $2,563 $421 $1,179 $586 $604 $619 $221 $5,752

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - LSI $1,129 $142 $157 $152 $191 $206 $140 $1,836 $1,976


Local Funds $279 $416 $475 $485 $1,656 $1,656

$5,066 $2,563 $421 $573 $627 $676 $206 $218 $4,848 TOTAL


75




Santee, City of

Intersection at SR-67 and Woodside Ave - This project proposes to

improve traffic circulation at the intersection of Woodside Avenue at

State Route 67 and make a sidewalk connection to North Woodside

Avenue. It includes replacing the stop sign controlled intersection with

medians, sidewalks, roundabout and/or other traffic signal improvements.

The project will also require improvements within the Caltrans

right-of-way on the State Route 67 off-ramp.


Project Title: SR-67 Improvements/Woodside Avenue Interchange Improvements RAS (M-48)


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment



Local Funds $1,363 $1,363 $1,363

Local RTCIP $569 $146 $1,987 $715 $1,987 $2,702

TOTAL $4,065 $569 $146 $3,350 $715 $3,350

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

Local Funds $490 $490 $490

Local RTCIP $569 $1,855 $569 $1,855 $2,424

$2,914 $569 $2,345 $569 $2,345 TOTAL


All local streets city wide - The pavement condition report will be

prepared by an assets management consultant to conduct a complete

survey of all city streets, and propose repair and funding strategies in

order to maintain current and future pavement conditions


Project Title: Pavement Condition Report TransNet - LSI: CR


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Engineering studies

Est Total Cost: $70



TOTAL $70 $70 $70

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23


$70 $70 $70 TOTAL


76



Various Agencies


MPO ID: V08 RTIP #:18-05

Project Title: Regional Habitat Conservation Fund SANDAG ID: 1200300

Project Description: Countywide - regional habitat management and monitoring


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Plantings, landscaping, etc



$1,441 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $13,075 $366 $13,441

$38,124 $4,261 $1,791 $25,004 $19,172 $44,176

TransNet - LEMP

TransNet - REMP

Local Funds $343 $343 $343

TOTAL $57,960 $38,467 $4,261 $3,232 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $38,079 $19,881

* Local EMP has additional $20M in the CIP not programmed

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

$38,502 $4,100 $1,574 $24,302 $19,875 $44,177 TransNet - REMP

Local Funds $343 $343 $343

$44,520 $38,845 $4,100 $1,574 $24,302 $20,218 TOTAL

77



MPO ID: V10 18-05RTIP #:

Various Agencies


Table 3 categories - Transportation enhancement activities (except

rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings,

structures, or facilities)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for TransNet Smart Growth Incentive Program SANDAG ID: 12240036,

1224021, 1224028, 1224029,

1224030, 1224031, 1224032,

1224033, 1224034, 1224035,

1224039, 1224041, 1224042,

1224043, 1224046, 1224047,

1224048, 1224049, 1224050,

1224051, 1224052, 1224053,

1224054, 1224055, 1224056,

1224057, 1224058, 1224059,

1224060, 1224061, 1224062,

1224063, 1224064, 1224065,

1224066, 1224067, 1224068


Capacity Status:NCI Exempt Category:Other - Transportation enhancement activities



TransNet - BPNS $1,698 $2,002 $3,700 $3,700

TransNet - LSI $1,424 $915 $129 $101 $443 $412 $3,424 $3,424


TransNet - SGIP $4,151 $6,599 $9,414 $8,013 $3,408 $531 $32,118 $32,118

Local Funds $7,565 $6,645 $5,633 $5,665 $1,290 $26,797 $26,797

TOTAL $66,346 $14,838 $16,468 $15,176 $13,779 $5,141 $943 $66,346

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $1,698 $2,002 $3,700 $3,700

TransNet - LSI $1,424 $900 $2,324 $2,324


TransNet - SGIP $4,151 $6,599 $9,414 $8,013 $3,408 $531 $32,118 $32,118

Local Funds $7,565 $6,660 $5,762 $5,766 $1,732 $369 $27,854 $27,854

$66,303 $14,838 $16,468 $15,176 $13,779 $5,140 $900 $66,303 TOTAL


78




Various Agencies

On new alignment from SR 125 to the U.S.-Mexico Border - Construction

of four-lane toll highway facility, CVEF and POE in three segments:

Segment 1: SR-11/905 to Enrico Fermi; Segment 2: SR-11 from Enrico

Fermi to Siempre Viva; Segment 3: POE from Siempre Viva to Mexico

Border.. Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the ROW

phase


Project Title: State Route 11 EA NO: 05631

PPNO: 0999

RTP PG NO: A-6; B-5

SANDAG ID: 1201101,

1201102, 1201103

EARMARK NO: CA393/740



Est Total Cost: $681,747 Open to Traffic: Phase 1: Mar 2016 Phase 2: Sep 2021 Phase 3: Nov 2022


TransNet - Border $1,860 $5,628 $500 $3,360 $4,628 $7,988

TransNet - MC $2,056 $2,287 $500 $2,983 $1,860 $4,843

CBI $123,789 $3,350 $29,698 $94,091 $3,350 $127,139

HPP $800 $800 $800

INFRA $49,278 $49,278 $49,278

ITS $439 $439 $439

Prop 1B - TCIF $71,625 $2,530 $74,155 $74,155

SB1 - TCEP $42,168 $8,710 $1,150 $32,308 $42,168

STIP-IIP NHS $6,882 $6,882 $6,882

STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $5,200 $5,200 $5,200

STIP-IIP State Cash $919 $919 $919

Local Funds $247,001 $114,935 $3,858 $358,078 $361,936

TOTAL $681,747 $213,570 $105,241 $1,000 $247,001 $114,935 $62,849 $101,729 $517,169

* Environmental Document funded from STIP-IPP of

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - Border $1,860 $5,628 $2,860 $4,628 $7,488

TransNet - MC $2,056 $2,287 $2,483 $1,860 $4,343

CBI $123,789 $3,350 $29,698 $94,091 $3,350 $127,139

HPP $800 $800 $800

INFRA $49,278 $49,278 $49,278

ITS $439 $439 $439

Prop 1B - TCIF $71,625 $2,530 $74,155 $74,155

SB1 - TCEP $42,168 $8,710 $1,150 $32,308 $42,168

STIP-IIP NHS $6,882 $6,882 $6,882

STIP-IIP Prior State Cash $5,200 $5,200 $5,200

STIP-IIP State Cash $919 $919 $919

Local Funds $4,858 $2,489 $240,654 $114,935 $4,858 $358,078 $362,936

$681,747 $213,570 $110,099 $2,489 $240,654 $114,935 $62,849 $101,729 $517,169 TOTAL


79




Various Agencies



non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities. SANDAG ID: 1223054,

1223057, 1223058, 1223059,

1223060, 1223062





TransNet - B $500 $500 $500

TransNet - BPNS $4,461 $2,967 $1,791 $18,259 $5,217 $91 $32,786 $32,786


ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450

Local Funds $1,100 $5 $1,105 $1,105

Local RTCIP $14 $14 $14

TOTAL $39,835 $7,055 $2,967 $6,241 $18,259 $5,217 $96 $39,835

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - B $500 $500 $500

TransNet - BPNS $5,339 $2,881 $1,963 $4,071 $180 $14,433 $14,433


ATP - S $4,450 $4,450 $4,450

Local Funds $1,100 $5 $1,105 $1,105

Local RTCIP $14 $14 $14

$21,482 $7,933 $2,881 $6,413 $4,071 $180 $5 $21,482 TOTAL


80




Various Agencies



Non-motorized)


Project Title: Grouped Projects for Bicycle and pedestrian facilities - Active Transportation

Program (ATP)

SANDAG ID: 1223014





TransNet - BPNS $3,017 $148 $94 $26 $3,285 $3,285

TransNet - CP $1,300 $1,300 $1,300

TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200



ATP - R $13,698 $1,080 $2,886 $17,664 $17,664

ATP - S $4,024 $9,740 $1,951 $1,182 $3,468 $20,365 $20,365

Local Funds $2,062 $3,419 $5,908 $164 $183 $10 $11,745 $11,745

TOTAL $54,657 $22,851 $14,635 $12,139 $1,372 $3,651 $10 $54,657

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - BPNS $3,076 $72 $62 $20 $3,230 $3,230

TransNet - LSI $200 $200 $200



ATP - R $13,698 $1,080 $2,886 $17,664 $17,664

ATP - S $4,024 $9,740 $1,951 $1,182 $3,468 $20,365 $20,365

Local Funds $2,062 $5,800 $7 $164 $183 $10 $8,226 $8,226

$49,783 $22,910 $16,940 $4,906 $1,366 $3,651 $10 $49,783 TOTAL


I-5 Bridge 57-1084 - In San Diego, construct new overcrossing over I-5

between Gilman Drive and Medical Center DriveProject Description:

Project Title: I-5/Gilman Drive Bridge EA NO: 2T175

SANDAG ID: 1200508



Est Total Cost: $24,607 Open to Traffic: Feb 2019


TransNet - MC $8,802 $4,411 $1,545 $242 $439 $14,561 $15,000

Local Funds $5,608 $2,474 $1,525 $9,607 $9,607

TOTAL $24,607 $14,410 $6,885 $3,070 $242 $439 $24,168

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $8,802 $4,421 $1,777 $439 $14,561 $15,000

Local Funds $5,608 $2,474 $1,525 $9,607 $9,607

$24,607 $14,410 $6,895 $3,302 $439 $24,168 TOTAL


81




Various Agencies

between La Jolla Village Drive and Genesee Avenue - in San Diego, on

Interstate 5, construction of the realignment of both Campus Point and

Voigt Drive between I-5 and Genesee Avenue


Project Title: I-5/Voigt Drive Improvements EA NO: 2T215

RTP PG NO:

A-5,16,31,38,B-30

SANDAG ID: 1200507



Est Total Cost: $29,380 Open to Traffic: Jan 2021


TransNet - MC $4,844 $1,480 $4,443 $5,297 $5,305 $1 $5,751 $3,980 $11,639 $21,370

SB1 - LPP Formula $4,130 $4,130 $4,130

Local Funds $3,880 $880 $3,000 $3,880

TOTAL $29,380 $8,724 $5,610 $4,443 $5,297 $5,305 $1 $6,631 $3,980 $18,769

PE RW CONPRIORTOTAL


18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23

TransNet - MC $5,674 $5,486 $5,465 $4,698 $47 $6,211 $4,000 $11,159 $21,370

SB1 - LPP Formula $4,130 $4,130 $4,130

Local Funds $3,880 $3,880 $3,880

$29,380 $9,554 $9,616 $5,465 $4,698 $47 $6,211 $4,000 $19,169 TOTAL


82



RTIP Fund Types

Federal Funding

ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Federal Stimulus Program)

BIP/CBI Border Infrastructure Program/Corridors and Borders Infrastructure Program

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

DEMO - TEA 21 High Priority Demonstration Program under TEA-21

DEMO-Sec 115 High Priority Demonstration Program under FY 2004 Appropriations

DEMO-Sec 117/STP Surface Transportation Program under FHWA Administrative Program (congressionally

directed appropriations)

EARREPU Earmark Repurposing

INFRA/FASTLANE Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grant

FRA-ARRA Federal Railroad Administration (Federal Stimulus)

FRA-PRIIA Federal Railroad Administration Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008

FTA Section 5307 Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program

FTA Section 5309 (Bus) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Program

FTA Section 5309 (NS) Federal Transit Administration Discretionary - New Starts Program

FTA Section 5310 Federal Transit Administration Elderly & Disabled Program

FTA Section 5339 Federal Transit Administration Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grant Program

HBP Highway Bridge Program under SAFETEA-LU

HPP High Priority Program under SAFETEA-LU

ITS Intelligent Transportation System

NHS National Highway System (administered by Caltrans)

RSTP Regional Surface Transportation Program

STP-RL Surface Transportation Program - Highway Railway Crossings Program (Section 130)

TCSP Transportation, Community & System Preservation

TE Transportation Enhancement Program

TIFIA Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (Federal Loan Program)

TPFP Truck Parking Facilities Program (Federal Discretionary)

CMAQ/RSTP Conversion Reimbursement of advanced federal funds which have been advanced with local funds in

earlier years

State Funding

ATP Active Transportation Program (Statewide and Regional)

CMIA Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (State Prop. 1B)

Coastal Conservancy California Coastal Conservancy Fund

LBSRA Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (State Prop. 1B)

Prop 1A - High Speed Rail High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (State Prop. 1A)

PTA Public Transportation Account

SB1 - CCP Senate Bill 1 - Congested Corridors Program


83



SB1 - TCEP Senate Bill 1 - Trade Corridor Enhancement Program

SB1 - LPP Formula Senate Bill 1 - Local Parternship Formula Program

SB1 - LPP Comp Senate Bill 1 - Local Parternship Competitive Program

SB1 - TIRCP Senate Bill 1 - Transit and Intercity Rail Program

SHOPP (AC) State Highway Operation & Protection Program

STA State Transit Assistance

STIP-IIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Interregional Program

STIP-RIP State Transportation Improvement Program - Regional Improvement Program

TCIF Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (State Prop. 1B)

TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

TCRP Traffic Congestion Relief Program

Local Funding

Local Funds AC Local Funds - Advanced Construction; mechanism to advance local funds to be reimbursed at

a later fiscal year with federal/state funds

RTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program

TDA Transportation Development Act

TransNet-Border Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Border

TransNet-BPNS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood

Safety Program

TransNet-CP Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Commercial Paper

TransNet-H Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Highway

TransNet-L Prop. A Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local Streets & Roads

TransNet-L (Cash) TransNet - L funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent

TransNet-LSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements

TransNet-LSI Carry Over TransNet - LSI funds previously programmed but not requested/paid in year of allocation

TransNet-LSI (Cash) TransNet - LSI funds which agencies have received payment, but have not spent

TransNet-MC Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Major Corridors

TransNet-MC AC TransNet - Major Corridors - Advanced Construction; mechanism to advance TransNet funds to

be reimbursed at a later fiscal year with federal/state funds

TransNet-REMP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Environmental Mitigation Program

TransNet-SGIP Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Regional Smart Growth Incentive Program

TransNet-SS Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Senior Services


84

Table 3a: Revenues Legend

San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (in $000s) - Amendment No. 5

Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Sales Tax $2,834,889 $679,732 $685,549 $506,968 $566,655 $454,752 $499,765 $281,701 $359,149 $423,517 $332,791 $5,248,325 $5,278,797

-- County $2,834,889 $679,732 $685,549 $506,968 $566,655 $454,752 $499,765 $281,701 $359,149 $423,517 $332,791 $5,248,325 $5,278,797

Other Local Funds $505,849 $150,215 $143,467 $101,528 $107,421 $300,326 $307,845 $150,932 $149,766 $55,741 $56,508 $1,264,591 $1,270,856

-- City General Funds $356,775 $108,896 $107,006 $88,267 $96,649 $52,218 $53,390 $26,997 $25,831 $29,103 $29,870 $662,256 $669,521

-- Street Taxes and Developer Fees $149,074 $41,319 $36,461 $13,261 $10,772 $248,108 $254,455 $123,935 $123,935 $26,638 $26,638 $602,335 $601,335

-- RSTP Exchange funds

Other $679,936 $99,859 $97,221 $96,356 $102,094 $86,716 $92,258 $104,824 $105,684 $101,897 $103,024 $1,172,437 $1,180,216

Local Total $4,020,674 $929,806 $926,236 $704,852 $776,170 $841,793 $899,868 $537,457 $614,599 $581,156 $492,323 $7,685,353 $7,729,869

State Highway Operations and Protection Program $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080

SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 SHOPP Prior State Transportation Improvement Program $559,651 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $580,157 $744,465 STIP (Including Augmentation) $517,894 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $557,772 $702,708 STIP Prior $41,756 $22,384 $41,756 Proposition 1 A $99,680 $99,698 $99,680 Proposition 1 B $675,274 $2,530 $2,530 $1,319 $1,319 $679,126 $679,123 Active Transportation Program $20,872 $22,570 $13,440 $20,614 $20,614 $1,964 $10,905 $3,468 $3,468 $69,324 $69,299 Highway Maintenance (HM) $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $55,163 $40,706 $40,376 $24,987 $22,211 $20,000 $21,789 $35,518 $28,394 $217,097 $225,539 $393,471 $393,471 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $12,713 $280,449 $279,199 $102,579 $102,579 $38,548 $22,648 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $454,448 $437,548 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $101,298 $77,933 $101,298 State Transit Assistance (e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) $117,898 $40,342 $40,342 $22,040 $22,040 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $239,295 $239,295 Other $91,702 $11,587 $11,587 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $139,029 $139,029State Total $1,832,633 $546,770 $535,938 $418,548 $421,462 $313,582 $308,412 $346,066 $338,942 $349,773 $358,214 $3,619,305 $3,795,600 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $638,912 $71,000 $71,000 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $991,584 $991,584 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $97,086 $97,086 $97,086 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $353,331 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $313,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $58,636 $58,636 $58,636 5310 - Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities $4,287 $3,895 $4,512 $8,181 $8,798 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $8,674 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $13,188 $13,188 5337 - State of Good Repair $207,504 $48,914 $48,914 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $429,109 $429,109 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $24,038 $13,559 $13,559 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $63,756 $63,756 Other $50,572 $50,546 $50,572Federal Transit Total $1,443,040 $238,271 $238,888 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $434,413 $434,413 $2,778,798 $2,779,441

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)1,2,3 $344,793 $13,129 $8,250 $15,319 $33,819 $33,807 $23,517 $33,794 $31,387 $33,794 $33,794 $474,635 $475,560 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $232,339 $3,350 $3,350 $130,347 $235,689 GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $8,118 $19,610 $8,118 $19,610 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $105,994 $580 $580 $57,253 $106,574 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $3,117 $9,226 $9,226 $10,914 $10,914 $3,833 $3,833 $9,533 $9,533 $4,549 $4,549 $41,172 $41,172 National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA) $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 Public Lands Highway $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $6,519 $6,519 Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $389,499 $42,591 $42,591 $43,985 $43,985 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $607,956 $607,956 Other $247,867 $5,425 $5,425 $9 $9 $300 $177,603 $253,301Federal Highway Total $1,323,609 $134,957 $141,570 $73,477 $91,977 $81,619 $71,329 $87,282 $84,875 $82,599 $82,299 $1,552,882 $1,795,659 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $25,870 $26,264 $25,870

Other

Federal Railroad Administration Total $25,870 $26,264 $25,870

Federal Total $2,792,519 $373,228 $380,458 $294,510 $313,010 $302,652 $292,362 $308,316 $305,909 $517,012 $516,712 $4,357,944 $4,600,970

TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484

Innovative Financing Total $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484

$8,645,826 $1,849,803 $1,842,632 $1,417,910 $1,510,642 $1,995,512 $2,038,126 $1,191,839 $1,259,449 $1,447,940 $1,367,249 $16,200,086 $16,663,923

1 2019/2019 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to OCTA of $20,197 and Caltrans of $18,590 and includes loans from other MPOs totalling $12,697 and a $1,000 deobligation2 2019/2020 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to STANCOG of $6,393 and MCAG of $3,8963 2020/2021 Reflects repayment of Loaned CMAQ apportionment to Madera CTC of $2,407 $16,663,923

2021/2022 2022/2023

Yellow Highlighting indicates a change fromthe prior amendment

Prior YearsTOTAL2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021

REVENUES TOTAL

FRA

STA

TELO

CA

LFE

DER

AL

TRA

NSI

T

INN

OV

ATI

VE

FIN

A

FED

ERA

L H

IGH

WA

Y

85

Attachment 4

Table 3b: Program Legend


Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Sales Tax $2,834,889 $648,856 $654,632 $498,330 $554,255 $451,813 $498,470 $266,970 $351,463 $403,398 $316,661 $5,171,021 $5,210,369 -- TransNet $2,834,889 $648,856 $654,632 $498,330 $554,255 $451,813 $498,470 $266,970 $351,463 $403,398 $316,661 $5,171,021 $5,210,369 Other Local Funds $505,849 $150,215 $143,467 $101,528 $107,421 $300,326 $307,845 $150,932 $149,766 $55,741 $56,508 $1,264,591 $1,270,856 -- City General Funds $356,775 $108,896 $107,006 $88,267 $96,649 $52,218 $53,390 $26,997 $25,831 $29,103 $29,870 $662,256 $669,521 -- Street Taxes and Developer Fees $149,074 $41,319 $36,461 $13,261 $10,772 $248,108 $254,455 $123,935 $123,935 $26,638 $26,638 $602,335 $601,335 Other $679,936 $99,859 $97,221 $96,356 $102,094 $86,716 $92,258 $104,824 $105,684 $101,897 $103,024 $1,172,437 $1,180,216

Local Total $4,020,674 $898,930 $895,319 $696,213 $763,770 $838,854 $898,572 $522,726 $606,912 $561,037 $476,194 $7,608,049 $7,661,440

State Highway Operations and Protection Program $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 SHOPP (Including Augmentation) $98,382 $121,521 $121,399 $167,210 $172,900 $223,358 $223,358 $267,164 $267,164 $2,877 $2,877 $880,512 $886,080 State Transportation Improvement Program $559,651 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $580,157 $744,465 STIP (Including Augmentation) $517,894 $20,753 $20,753 $72,183 $72,183 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $1,105 $89,668 $89,668 $557,772 $702,708 STIP Prior $41,756 $22,384 $41,756 Proposition 1 A $99,680 $99,698 $99,680 Proposition 1 B $675,274 $2,530 $2,530 $1,319 $1,319 $679,126 $679,123 Active Transportation Program $20,872 $22,570 $13,440 $20,614 $20,614 $1,964 $10,905 $3,468 $3,468 $69,324 $69,299 Highway Maintenance (HM) $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 $6,311 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) $55,163 $40,706 $40,376 $24,987 $22,211 $20,000 $21,789 $35,518 $28,394 $217,097 $225,539 $393,471 $393,471 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) $12,713 $280,449 $279,199 $102,579 $102,579 $38,548 $22,648 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $10,204 $454,448 $437,548 Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $101,298 $77,933 $101,298 State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42 $117,898 $40,342 $40,342 $22,040 $22,040 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $19,672 $239,295 $239,295 State Emergency Repair Program Other $91,702 $11,587 $11,587 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $8,935 $139,029 $139,029State Total $1,832,633 $546,770 $535,938 $418,548 $421,462 $313,582 $308,412 $346,066 $338,942 $349,773 $358,214 $3,619,305 $3,795,600 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program $638,912 $71,000 $71,000 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $70,418 $991,584 $991,584 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization $97,086 $97,086 $97,086 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) $353,331 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $313,380 $313,380 $1,066,711 $1,066,711 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants $58,636 $58,636 $58,636 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program $4,287 $3,895 $4,512 $8,181 $8,798 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program $8,674 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $903 $13,188 $13,188 5337 - State of Good Repair $207,504 $48,914 $48,914 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $43,173 $429,109 $429,109 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program $24,038 $13,559 $13,559 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $6,540 $63,756 $63,756 Other $50,572 $50,546 $50,572Federal Transit Total $1,443,040 $238,271 $238,888 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $221,033 $434,413 $434,413 $2,778,798 $2,779,441 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $344,793 $12,640 $8,250 $15,319 $33,819 $33,807 $23,517 $33,794 $31,387 $16,169 $16,185 $456,521 $457,951 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) $232,339 $3,350 $3,350 $130,347 $235,689 GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) $8,118 $19,610 $8,118 $19,610 High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo $105,994 $580 $580 $57,253 $106,574 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) $3,117 $9,226 $9,226 $10,914 $10,914 $3,833 $3,833 $9,533 $9,533 $4,549 $4,549 $41,172 $41,172 Public Lands Highway $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $3,260 $6,519 $6,519 National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA) $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 $49,278 Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $389,499 $40,318 $42,591 $18,265 $4,500 $448,082 $436,590 Other $247,867 $5,425 $5,425 $9 $9 $300 $177,603 $253,301Federal Highway Total $1,323,609 $132,195 $141,570 $47,757 $52,492 $37,649 $27,359 $43,327 $40,920 $21,018 $20,734 $1,374,893 $1,606,684 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) $26,264 $26,264 $26,264 Other

Federal Railroad Administration Total $25,870 $26,264 $26,264

Federal Total $2,792,519 $370,465 $380,458 $268,790 $273,525 $258,682 $248,392 $264,360 $261,954 $455,431 $455,148 $4,179,955 $4,412,390 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484Innovative Financing Total $537,484 $537,484 $537,484 $537,484

$8,645,826 $1,816,165 $1,811,715 $1,383,552 $1,458,756 $1,948,603 $1,992,860 $1,133,152 $1,207,808 $1,366,241 $1,289,555 $15,944,794 $16,406,520

*Negative programming amount is reflective of the need to show the TIFIA loan payback in the five-year RTIP. Payback will begin in future years. $752,071 $15,869,035

LOC

AL

Funding Source

PROGRAM TOTAL

INN

OV

ATI

VE

FIN

A

FED

ERA

L H

IGH

WA

YFE

DER

AL

TRA

NSI

TST

ATE

FRA

Prior Years2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021

Yellow Highlighting indicates a change from the prior amendment

2021/2022 2022/2023 TOTAL

86

Table 3c: Revenues versus Program Legend


Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current Prior Current

Local Total $30,876 $30,917 $8,638 $12,400 $2,939 $1,295 $14,731 $7,686 $20,119 $16,130 $77,304 $68,428

State Highway Operations and Protection Program SHOPP (Including Augmentation) SHOPP Prior State Transportation Improvement Program STIP (Including Augmentation) STIP Prior Proposition 1 A Proposition 1 B Active Transportation Program Highway Maintenance (HM) Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) State Transit Assistance (STA)(e.g., population/revenue based, Prop 42) Other State Total 5307 - Urbanized Area Formula Program 5309a - Fixed Guideway Modernization 5309b - New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) 5309c - Bus and Bus Related Grants 5310 - Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Formula Program 5311 - Nonurbanized Area Formula Program 5337 - State of Good Repair 5339 - Bus and Bus Facilites Program OtherFederal Transit Total Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) $489 $17,625 $17,609 $18,114 $17,609 Coordinated Border Infrastructure (SAFETEA-LU Sec.1303) GARVEE Bonds (Includes Debt Service Payments) Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) High Priority Projects (HPP) and Demo Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) National Significant Freight & Highway Projects (FASTLANE/INFRA)

Surface Transportation Program (Regional) $2,273 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $43,955 $159,874 $171,366 OtherFederal Highway Total $2,762 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $61,580 $61,564 $177,988 $188,975 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) OtherFederal Railroad Administration TotalFederal Total $2,762 $25,720 $39,485 $43,970 $43,970 $43,955 $43,955 $61,580 $61,564 $177,988 $188,975 TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act)Innovative Financing Total

$33,638 $30,917 $34,358 $51,885 $46,909 $45,266 $58,687 $51,642 $81,700 $77,694 $255,292 $257,403

Funding Source

REVENUES - PROGRAM TOTAL

LOC

AL

FED

ERA

L H

IGH

WA

Y

INN

OV

ATI

VE

FIN

A

FED

ERA

L TR

AN

SIT

FRA

STA

TEYellow Highlighting indicates a change from the prior amendment

TOTAL2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023

87

Federal Requirements Analysis for 2018 RTIP Amendment No. 5

Metropolitan Planning and Transportation Conformity The U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Metropolitan Planning Regulations1 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Transportation Conformity Regulations2 establish six criteria requirements which the RTIP must satisfy. The metropolitan planning regulations require that: (1) the RTIP be financially constrained and (2) make progress toward achieving federal performance targets. The transportation conformity regulations state that the RTIP must: (3) be consistent with San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (2015 Regional Plan); (4) meet regional emissions tests; (5) include timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs); and 6) include inter-agency consultation and public involvement.

The 2018 RTIP meets all six tests required under federal metropolitan planning and transportation conformity regulations. SANDAG made these findings for the 2018 RTIP under the required federal tests on September 28, 2018. On December 17, 2018, Federal Highways and the Federal Transit Administration jointly found that the 2018 RTIP conforms with the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. Amendment No. 5 continues to meet all federal requirements.

Financial Constraint Test

Federal regulations 23 CFR Section 450.326(j) require the 2018 RTIP to be a revenue-constrained document with programmed projects based upon available or committed funding and/or reasonable estimates of future funding. Chapter 4 of the 2018 RTIP discusses in detail the financial capacity analysis of major program areas, including a discussion of available revenues.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, are reasonable when considering available funding sources as demonstrated in Tables 3a through 3c, including a comparison from the prior approved version (changes are highlighted in yellow.)

Performance Management Test

Federal regulations 23 CFR Section 450.326(c) require the 2018 RTIP to be designed such that once implemented, it makes progress toward achieving the performance targets established under 450.306(d) and shall include, to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the RTIP toward achieving the performance targets identified in the transportation plan, linking investment priorities to those performance targets. Appendix H of the 2018 RTIP provides information on the projects which support safety and transit asset management performance management requirements. The 2015 Ozone Conformity Demonstration, which was federally approved on June 21, 2019, includes Appendix B. This appendix updates the description of SANDAG’s implementation of Federal Performance Management planning requirements to address the Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measure (PM2) Final Rule and the System Performance, Freight, and CMAQ Performance Measures (PM3) Final Rule as required after the two-year phase-in date of May 20, 2019. This information will be submitted with Amendment No. 5 as an amendment to Appendix H.

88

Attachment 5

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2018 and 2019 performance targets for safety (PM1) established by the Board of Directors, on January 26, 2018 and January 25, 2019 respectively. Progress toward targets will be achieved through investment in projects with the primary purpose of improving safety, active transportation projects, and safety features within larger transportation projects.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2020 and 2022 performance targets for pavement and bridge condition (PM2) through investment in projects with the primary purpose of improving pavement conditions on the National Highway System. These targets, set by the state, were approved by the Transportation Committee on October 5, 2018

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the approved performance targets for the system performance, freight, and CMAQ performance measures (PM3) through investment in projects that provide travel choices, promote non-single occupant vehicle travel, reduce excessive delay and pollutant emissions.

Finding: The projects contained within the 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, make progress toward achieving the 2019 regional performance targets for transit asset management approved by the Board on September 28, 2018. The program includes investments in the four key categories for transit asset management: equipment, facilities, infrastructure, and rolling stock.

Consistency with San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan Test

Finding: The 2018 RTIP, through Amendment No. 5, is consistent with the 2015 Regional Plan adopted in October 2015 (policies, programs, and projects). All projects conform to the scope, cost, and schedule included in the 2015 Regional Plan.

Regional Emissions Tests

These findings are based on the regional emissions analysis tests shown in Table 5-2 in Chapter 5 of the 2018 RTIP and Table 9 of the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Conformity Demonstration for the 2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP.

Finding: The regional emissions analyses for the 2018 RTIP are an update to the regional emissions analyses for the 2015 Regional Plan.

Finding: The regional emissions analyses included in the 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration are an update to the regional emissions analyses for the 2018 RTIP.

Finding: The proposed amendment does not reflect a change in the design, concept, or scope of the projects or the conformity analysis years as modeled for the regional emissions analysis of the 2018 RTIP and 2015 Ozone Standard Conformity Demonstration.

Finding: The 2018 RTIP, including Amendment No. 5, remains in conformance with the applicable State Implementation Plan3 (SIP).

Timely Implementation of TCM Test

Finding: The TCMs, established as Transportation Tactics in the 1982 SIP, have been fully implemented and Amendment No. 5 continues to fund the four TCMs, which include: (1) ridesharing; (2) transit improvements; (3) traffic flow improvements; and (4) bicycle facilities and programs.

89

Inter-Agency Consultation and Public Involvement Test

Finding: The 2018 RTIP complies with all federal and state requirements for public involvement by following the strategies described in Board Policy No. 025: Public Participation Plan Policy. Amendment No. 5 was posted for a 15-day public comment period from June 12, 2019, through July 2, 2019.

Finding: The SANDAG Conformity Working Group (CWG), including members from the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, Caltrans, California Air Resources Board, SANDAG, U.S. DOT, and U.S. EPA, serve as a forum to meet the federal and state requirements for interagency consultation for the 2018 RTIP. All exempt projects in Amendment No. 5 were submitted to the CWG on June 13, 2019, for its review and members concurred with the exempt categorization.

1 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 450, subpart C 2 40 CFR part 93, subpart A 3 2008 Eight-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan for San Diego County (December 2016)

90

Appendix H

Federal Performance Management

91

Attachment 6

Appendix H Federal Performance Management

Transportation Performance Management

Introduction

Signed into law in 2012, the federal surface transportation bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st

Century Act (MAP-21) included provisions for the establishment of a performance and outcome based

program, which includes national performance goals for the Federal-Aid Highway Program in seven areas:

safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic

vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays (23 USC 150(b)). This act significantly

advanced the application of performance-based planning and programming in the field of transportation. It

established a system to further inform transportation planning and programming with the unified application

of observed data, performance measures, and performance targets in the areas of safety, asset condition,

and system performance.

The subsequent surface transportation bill, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act continued

these performance provisions. Starting in 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal

Transit Administration (FTA) issued a series of Final Rules to implement the performance provisions of

MAP-21 and FAST Act. These rules establish the protocols, including the timelines, processes, data, and

reporting requirements to comply with the performance provisions. The rules were designed to be applicable

nationwide and to provide meaningful information at regional scales and larger. FHWA released three rules

that are commonly referred to as PM 1 for safety, PM 2 for asset condition, and PM 3 for system

performance, freight movement, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (23 CFR Part 490). FTA released

a transit asset management (TAM) rule establishing procedures to help maintain key transit assets in a state

of good repair. A separate transportation planning rule (23 CFR Parts 450, 771 and 49 CFR Part 613), jointly

released by FHWA and FTA, guides how performance is integrated into planning and programming processes

and documents. This rule states that the regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shall be

designed such that it “makes progress towards achieving performance targets” and that it includes, “to the

maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP towards achieving the

performance targets.”

In support of these rules, SANDAG has entered into data sharing and target setting coordination agreements

with Caltrans, the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and the North County Transit District (NCTD).

In March 2018, SANDAG and Caltrans signed an addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

on Planning and Programming to meet the performance-based planning and programming requirements

established in MAP-21. In April 2018 SANDAG and Caltrans entered into a data concurrence agreement to

enable the use of mutually agreed upon datasets for target setting purposes. In May 2018 SANDAG, MTS,

and NCTD signed an addendum to the master MOU adding coordination efforts on data collection and

data sharing to support transit asset management regional targets.

92

As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the San Diego region, SANDAG is required to set

targets for the performance measures in these rules. Appendix H of the 2018 RTIP includes the PM 1 2018

safety targets and 2019 regional TAM targets set by SANDAG and a description of efforts underway to help

achieve the established targets. Appendix H has been amended to include the 2019 PM 1 safety targets and

2019 TAM targets, and additionally documents the performance management targets established for PM 2

and PM 3 as well as regional investments which help to support achievement of all of these targets.

PM 1: Transportation Safety

Target Setting Process The target setting process consists of Caltrans, in consultation with California MPOs and the Office of

Transportation Safety, establishing statewide safety targets. The statewide safety target setting process is

informed by safety plans including the Caltrans State Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and Office of Traffic Safety

Highway Safety Plan (HSP). Once Caltrans has established statewide targets, SANDAG has 180 days to take

action to support the statewide targets or develop and support regional targets. PM 1 requires annually

updated targets .

On January 26, 2018, the SANDAG Board of Directors approved supporting the 2018 statewide safety

targets. On January 25, 2019, the Board approved support of the 2019 statewide safety targets established

by Caltrans and continued SANDAG efforts to plan and program projects that will help to contribute to

achievement of the statewide safety targets. Both the 2018 and 2019 statewide safety targets for the PM 1

performance measures are shown in Table H-1.

Table H-1: Statewide Performance Management 1 Safety Targets

Performance Measure 2018 Statewide PM 1

Safety Target 2019 Statewide PM 1

Safety Target

Number of Fatalities 3,590.8 3,445.4

Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

1.029 0.995

Number of Serious Injuries 12,823.4 12,688.1

Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT

3.831 3.661

Number of Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

4,271.1 3,929.8

Source: Caltrans, 2017 and 2018

Measures and Methodology The performance measures included in PM 1 are applicable to all public roads regardless of ownership or

maintenance responsibility. Table H-2 provides an overview of the calculations and data sources for each

performance measure included in PM 1.

93

Table H-2: PM 1 Performance Measure Methodology

PM 1 PERFORMANCE MEASURE METHODOLOGY

Performance Measure Calculation Data Source

1. Number of Fatalities Five year rolling average • Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT

Five year rolling average of annual fatality rate

• FARS • Highway Performance

Monitoring System (HPMS)

3. Number of Serious Injuries Five year rolling average • Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT

Five year rolling average of annual serious injury rate

• SWITRS • HPMS

5. Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries

Five year rolling average of the annual sum of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries

• FARS • SWITRS

Source: 23 CFR 490

San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (2015 Regional Plan) and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes as a policy objective the provision of safe, and secure travel choices. This

policy is supported by the Regional Plan’s Active Transportation Implementation Strategy and Urban Area

Transit Study which include safety strategies for active transportation. For development of the 2018 RTIP,

additional fields were added to the RTIP Database (ProjectTrak) to allow project sponsors to provide project

information related to investments in safety. The 2018 RTIP includes approximately 300 safety related

projects. These projects were identified by the project sponsors and include over $1 billion dollars in

investments for the five-year RTIP program (FY 2019 - FY 2023). Just under half of these projects are

considered categorical safety projects under the conformity rule, with safety improvements being the main

project goal. These safety category projects account for approximately 55 percent of the programmed safety

dollars. The remaining projects include a variety of project categories and include projects where only a

portion of the overall investment includes safety related elements such as the addition of bike lanes as part of

a roadway widening project. Table H-3 summarizes the 2018 RTIP safety investments by project category.

94

Table H-3: 2018 RTIP Safety Program Summary by Project Category

2018 RTIP SAFETY PROGRAM SUMMARY BY PROJECT AREA

Project Category Safety Programming ($000)

Safety Focused Projects1 $822,738

Intersection and Interchange Projects2 $28,104

Studies, Landscaping, and Enhancement Projects3 $43,671

Additional Safety Improvements Included in other projects4 $282,937

Public Transit5 $91,005

Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements6 $230,469

TOTAL $1,498,924

Source: ProjectTrak, July 2019

Notes: 1 Examples of projects in this category include Safety Improvement Program projects, railroad/highway crossings,

pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, non-signalization traffic control, lighting improvements, increasing

sight distance, hazard elimination program, guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions, and adding medians.

2 Projects in this category include, traffic signal synchronization projects, intersection signalization, interchange

channelization, and interchange reconfiguration.

3 Some examples of projects contained within this category include engineering studies, landscaping, and

transportation enhancement projects.

4 This category includes safety elements that are part of a larger project.

5 This category includes safety elements related to public transit.

6 This category includes bicycle and pedestrian projects.

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on safety related concerns and projects with local jurisdictions,

Caltrans, public transit providers, public safety agencies, and the public through a number of working groups

and committees. The following committees and working groups were involved in the development of the

2018 and 20191 safety target setting process:

Public Safety Committee: Composed of both elected officials and public safety representatives, the goals of

the Public Safety Committee include improving the quality of life in the region by promoting public safety and

justice through collaboration, information sharing, effective technology, and objective monitoring and

assessment.

Transportation Committee: Composed of elected officials and partner agencies, the Transportation

Committee provides oversight for the preparation and implementation of San Diego Forward: The Regional

Plan (Regional Plan), which merges the Regional Transportation Plan, the Sustainable Communities Strategy,

1 The Active Transportation Working Group and Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues

did not convene during the 2019 target review period.

95

and the Regional Comprehensive Plan, and assists with other regional transportation planning and

programming efforts. It provides oversight for the major highway, transit, regional arterial, and regional

bikeway projects funded under the RTIP, including the TransNet Program of Projects.

Active Transportation Working Group: This group provides input on regional active transportation policy,

planning, and implementation activities. The Active Transportation Working Group makes recommendations

and fosters cooperation among the jurisdictions, agencies, and stakeholders within the San Diego region to

plan for and support the development of local and regional improvements for active transportation modes

(bicycling and walking), including Safe Routes to Transit, Safe Routes to School, facility development,

operation and maintenance, education, encouragement, and evaluation.

Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee: Comprised of local jurisdiction public works directors, the

Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee reviews and advises on the development and maintenance

of the regional road system. The Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee prioritizes project funding

requests and makes recommendations to the Transportation Committee.

Interagency Technical Working Group on Tribal Transportation Issues: This group serves as a forum for

regional tribal governments to discuss and coordinate transportation issues of mutual concern with the

various public planning agencies in the region, including SANDAG, Caltrans, the County of San Diego, and

the transit operators.

Regional Planning Technical Working Group: This group provides advice to the Regional Planning Committee

and the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of the Regional Plan. The Regional

Planning Technical Working Group consists of the planning or community development director from each

member agency and representatives from other single-purpose regional agencies. The working group also

provides coordination on regional growth management issues among member agencies.

San Diego Regional Traffic Engineers' Council: This group serves as the agency's technical advisory committee

on regional traffic engineering matters. Membership consists of a traffic engineering representative from

each of the region's cities, the County of San Diego, and Caltrans.

SANDAG also provides guidance and funding to local jurisdictions to improve safety for all roadway users,

including a Regional Complete Streets Policy and funding through the Smart Growth Incentive Program and

Active Transportation Grant Programs.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting The Board of Directors approved supporting the 2018 and 2019 statewide safety targets, established by

Caltrans. Once safety data is available for 2018 and 2019, the FHWA will determine if California has made

significant progress toward meeting the established safety targets. SANDAG will continue to collaborate with

Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs on future safety targets.

96

PM 2: Pavement and Bridge condition

Target Setting Process Similar to the process for PM 1, for the performance measures included in PM 2, SANDAG and all MPOs have

the option of supporting the state department of transportation’s pavement and bridge condition targets or

developing regional targets. On May 20, 2018 Caltrans established statewide targets for the PM 2

performance measures, shown in Table H-4. The statewide targets were informed by Caltrans Transportation

Asset Management Plan which considers life-cycle costs, risk and cost effectiveness. On October 5, 2018 the

SANDAG Transportation Committee approved supporting the statewide targets for pavement and bridge

condition established by Caltrans in accordance with the FAST Act.

Targets for PM 2 are based on a four-year performance period. The current performance period spans from

2018 to 2022. In addition to the four-year target, a midcycle two-year target is established. At the midpoint

of the performance period, Caltrans and MPOs can evaluate the progress to the four-year target and may

elect to update the four-year target at that point.

Table H-4: Statewide Performance Management 2 Pavement and Bridge Condition Targets

PM 2 STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION

Performance Measures

2-Year NHS Targets 4-Year NHS Targets 2020 2022

Good Poor Good Poor

Pavements on the NHS

Interstate 45.1% 3.5% 44.5% 3.8%

Non-Interstate 28.2% 7.3% 29.9% 7.2%

Bridges on the NHS 69.1% 4.6% 70.5% 4.4%

Source: Caltrans, 2018

Measures and Methodology The performance measures included in PM 2 are applicable to the National Highway System (NHS). In general

pavement condition for PM 2 is based on roughness, cracking, and rutting for asphalt pavement. Faulting is

used for concrete pavement. The pavement measures are aggregated to lane miles based on measurement

and observation of the curb lane.

Bridge condition is based on engineering assessment of the deck and support structures. The bridge

measures are aggregated to the bridge deck area. This section, including Tables H-5 and H-6, summarizes the

calculation and data sources for each performance measure included in PM 2.

For performance monitoring, pavement is categorized into asphalt, Jointed Concrete Pavement (JCP) and Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP). Each category of pavement is assessed using various rating systems as listed below. The pavement category rating system is included in Table H-6.

• Asphalt: International Roughness Index (IRI), rutting, cracking percent

• JCP: IRI, faulting, cracking percent

• CRCP: IRI, cracking percent

97




1. Pavement on the Interstate in good condition Lane miles with all metrics rated as good

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)

2. Pavement on the interstate in poor condition Lane miles with two or more metric rated poor

HPMS

3. Pavement on the non-interstate NHS in good condition

Lane miles with all metrics rated as good

HPMS

4. Pavement on the non-interstate NHS in poor condition

Lane miles with two or more metric rated poor

HPMS

5. Percentage of NHS bridges by deck area in Good condition

Deck area of NHS bridges with condition index of 7 or above (deck, superstructure, and substructure) divided by deck area of all NHS bridges

National Bridge Inventory (NBI)

6. Percentage of NHS bridges by deck area in Poor condition

Deck area of NHS bridges with any condition index of below 5 (deck, superstructure, and substructure) divided by deck area of all NHS bridges

NBI

Source: 23 CFR 490

98

Table H-6: Pavement Category Rating System

Source: FHWA, Transportation Performance Management (TPM)

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes $204 billion dollars2 for major project expenditures; 21 percent of that is

established for maintenance and operations on highway and local streets and roads. As projects transition

from the Regional Plan and are programmed into the SANDAG RTIP, project sponsors provide information

that allow summary statistics of investments on the NHS. The 2018 RTIP includes investments that are

anticipated to help preserve, maintain, or enhance the condition of NHS facilities. This includes 36 pavement

and 16 bridge projects on the NHS totaling over $620 million dollars. Tables H-7 and H-8 summarize the

investments currently programmed in the 2018 RTIP that support the pavement and bridge performance

targets respectively.

Table H-7: 2018 RTIP Pavement Program Summary

2018 RTIP NHS PAVEMENT INVESTMENTS

Project Phase Investment

($000)

Environmental / Preliminary Engineering / Design $41,000

Right of Way $7,000

Construction $403,000

$451,000

Source: ProjectTrak, April 2019

2 Year of expenditure dollars

99

Table H-8: 2018 RTIP Bridge Program Summary

2018 RTIP NHS BRIDGE INVESTMENTS

Project Phase Investment

($000)

Environmental / Preliminary Engineering / Design $11,000

Right of Way $2,000

Construction $164,000

$177,000

Source: ProjectTrak, April 2019

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on transportation infrastructure related concerns and projects with

local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the public through several working groups and committees. The PM 2 targets

on pavement and bridge conditions were developed in coordination with the Transportation Committee,

Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, and San Diego Regional Traffic Engineer Council. For more

information on these groups see Interagency Coordination under PM 1: Transportation Safety.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting On October 5, 2018, the Transportation Committee approved supporting the 2020 and 2022 statewide

pavement and bridge condition targets, established by Caltrans. Once the full performance period has

elapsed FHWA will determine if California has made significant progress toward meeting the pavement and

bridge condition targets. SANDAG continues to collaborate with Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs

on the monitoring of progress towards targets.

PM 3: System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

Target Setting Process PM 3 consists of six performance measures that support three federal programs, National Highway Performance Program (NHPP), freight movement, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ). The target setting process and timeframe is specific to each of these programs. This section summarizes the target setting timeframes, processes, and performance periods for the performance measures included in PM 3.

Three of the performance measures included in PM 3 allow SANDAG and all MPOs the option of supporting the state department of transportation’s targets or developing regional targets. For these performance measures, SANDAG chose to support the statewide targets. These measures include: percent of reliable person-miles traveled on the interstate, percent of reliable person-miles traveled on the non-interstate NHS, and percent of interstate system mileage providing reliable truck travel time.

The performance measure related to total emissions reductions by applicable pollutants under the CMAQ Program allows MPOs to establish regional targets based on emissions anticipated to be reduced from CMAQ-funded projects.

For the following two performance measures Caltrans and SANDAG are required to establish a single, unified target for the urbanized area within the SANDAG planning area. Figure H-1 shows SANDAG’s Urbanized Area.

• Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay per Capita

• Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel

100

Figure H-1

101

The target setting timeframes for PM 3 performance measures vary by the associated federal program.

Table H-9 summarizes the target setting dates for each of the PM 3 performance measures. On October 5, 2018,

the SANDAG Transportation Committee approved supporting the statewide targets for system performance,

freight, and CMAQ established by Caltrans in accordance with the FAST Act.

The CMAQ emissions reduction measure four-year performance period follows the federal fiscal year and

spans from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2021. The remaining performance measures follow the follow

the calendar year, starting in January 1, 2018, and ending December 31, 2021.

Table H-9: Statewide and Regional Performance Management 3 System Performance, Freight and CMAQ Target Setting Approvals

PM 3 PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGET APPROVAL DATES FOR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, FREIGHT, AND CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY

Program Performance Measure Dates Targets Established

National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)

Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate

October 5, 2018

Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS

Freight Movement on the Interstate System

Percent of Interstate System Mileage Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time (Truck Travel Time Reliability Index)

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)

Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel

May 4, 2018 Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay per Capita

Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable Pollutants under the CMAQ Program

September 15, 2018

Source: 23 CFR 490, SANDAG

The CMAQ Total emission reduction performance target reflects the anticipated cumulative emission

reduction to be reported in the CMAQ Public Access System.

102

Table H-10: Statewide and Regional Performance Management 3 System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Targets

PM 3 STATEWIDE AND REGIONAL TARGETS

Performance Measures 2017

Baseline Data 2-Year Target

2020 4-Year Target

2022

Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate

64.6% 65.1% (+0.5%) 65.6% (+1%)

Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS

73.0% N/A 74.0% (+1%)

Percent of Interstate System Mileage Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time (Truck Travel Time Reliability Index)

1.69 1.68 (-0.01) 1.67 (-0.02)

Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable Pollutants under the CMAQ Program

San Diego Urban Area (UA)1

VOC (kg/day) 66 137

CO (kg/day) 0 0

NOx (kg/day) 82 168

Statewide

VOC (kg/day) 951.83 961.35 (+1%) 970.87 (+2%)

CO (kg/day) 6,863.26 6,931.90 (+1%) 7,000.54 (+2%)

NOx (kg/day) 1,753.36 1,770.89 (+1%) 1,788.43 (+2%)

PM10 (kg/day) 2,431.21 2,455.52 (+1%) 2,479.83 (+2%)

PM 2.5 (kg/day) 904.25 913.29 (+1%) 922.34 (+2%)

Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay per Capita2

San Diego UA 18.4 hours N/A 18.0 (-2.0%)

Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel3

San Diego UA 23.8% 24.8% (+1%) 25.2 (1.4%)

Source: Caltrans, and SANDAG 2018

Notes: 1 The CMAQ targets were established in the CMAQ Performance Plan on September 15, 2018, and include emission reductions from projects reported in the CMAQ Public Access System.

2 Source: NPMRDS Analytics Tool (https://npmrds.ritis.org/analytics/)

3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

103

Measures and Methodology For the reliable person miles traveled performance measures the Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR) is first

calculated for each applicable roadway segment for four time periods. 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.,

and 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. on weekdays and 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. during weekends. The LOTTR is the 80th percentile

travel time divided by the 50th percentile travel time. The LOTTR is weighed by the facility segment length,

annual traffic volume, and vehicle occupancy value.

Freight movement is assessed by a Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index. Reporting is divided into five

periods: morning peak (6 to 10 a.m.), midday (10 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and afternoon peak (4 to 8 p.m.) Mondays

through Fridays; weekends (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.); and overnights for all days (8 p.m. to 6 a.m.). The TTTR ratio is

generated by dividing the 95th percentile time by the normal time (50th percentile) for each segment. Then,

the TTTR Index is generated by multiplying each segment’s largest ratio of the five periods by its length, then

dividing the sum of all length-weighted segments by the total length of Interstate.

The Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay per Capita is the amount of time spent in congested

conditions, which are defined as conditions that result in excess delay at speeds of 20 miles per hour (mph) or

60 percent of the posted speed limit, whichever is greater. Travel time data is aggregated in 15-minute

intervals per vehicle. The morning period is 6 to 10 a.m. on weekdays. The afternoon period is 3 to 7 p.m. or

4 to 8 p.m., providing flexibility to State DOTs and MPOs.

Additional details on the methodology used in calculating the six performance measures included in PM 3 are

summarized in Table H-11.

104




1. Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate

Percent of Interstate by length with an LOTTR less than 1.5

National Performance Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS)

2. Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS

Percent of non-Interstate NHS by length with an LOTTR less than 1.5

NPMRDS

3. Percent of Interstate System Mileage Providing Reliable Truck Travel Time (Truck Travel Time Reliability Index)

Weighted sum of reliable segments divided by all segments

NPMRDS

4. Total Emissions Reductions by Applicable Pollutants under the CMAQ Program

Daily Kilograms of Emission Reductions

CMAQ Public Access System

5. Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay per Capita

Time of excess delay weighted by average vehicle volume and occupancy by vehicle class

NPMRDS, Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)

6. Percent of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel

Commute to work totaled by mode, 5-year estimate

American Community Survey (ACS)

Source: 23 CFR 490

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments A foundational element of the 2015 Regional Plan is the continued development of a regional transportation

system that provides multimodal transportation options to the traveling public. Fostering travel choices

between the places where people live, work, and play supports travel time reliability, promotes non-SOV

travel, and reduces excessive delay and pollutant emissions. Of the nearly $16 billion dollars programmed in

the 2018 RTIP $7.2 billion dollars are programmed for multimodal facilities, transit, active transportation,

transportation systems and demand management including over $44 million in the region’s rideshare

programs.

Interagency Coordination SANDAG coordinates and collaborates on transportation infrastructure related concerns and projects with

local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the public through established working groups and committees. The PM 3

targets on System Performance, Freight, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality were developed in

coordination with the Transportation Committee, Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee, and

San Diego Regional Traffic Engineer Council. For more information on these groups see Interagency

Coordination under PM 1: Transportation Safety.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting At the end of the performance period, FHWA will determine if California has made significant progress

toward meeting the targets established for Interstate and non-Interstate NHS travel time reliability and freight

reliability measures. SANDAG continues to collaborate with Caltrans, FHWA, and other California MPOs on

105

the monitoring of progress towards targets. At the midpoint of the four-year performance period, SANDAG,

Caltrans and other California MPOs will evaluate progress towards achieving the 2022 targets. At the

midpoint, MPOs and Caltrans can elect to update the 2022 target.

Data for the travel time reliability measures under PM 3 will become available on an annual basis and inform

agencies on progress toward performance targets. SANDAG, Caltrans and member jurisdictions have

significantly invested in projects that are anticipated to support the achievement of PM 3 targets.

Transit Asset Management

Target Setting Process There are two types of targets for Transit Asset Management (TAM), provider targets, and regional targets.

The SANDAG planning area includes two providers of public transportation subject to this target setting

requirement, the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD). The

provider targets are established by MTS and NCTD separately for their service area during the development of

their four-year TAM Plan. The provider targets are updated annually. MPOs, in coordination with providers,

are responsible for developing regional TAM targets. MPOs are required to set TAM targets with each update

of their Regional Transportation Plan.

The TAM Final Rule includes four asset categories: equipment, facilities, infrastructure, and rolling stock.

There is one performance measure for each asset category. Each asset category may contain several asset

types which are calculated separately. Regional TAM targets are required for each asset type. The

performance measures are calculated such that a value of zero indicates that the asset type is in a state of

good repair. The 2019 regional TAM targets are shown in Table H-12.

106

Table H-12: Regional TAM Targets

REGIONAL TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS

Asset Category Performance Measure Asset Type 2019

Regional Target

Equipment: Non-revenue support-service and maintenance vehicles

Percentage of nonrevenue vehicles met or exceeded Useful Life Benchmark (ULB)1

Automobiles 33.3%

Trucks and other Rubber Tire Vehicles

50.5%

Steel Wheel Vehicles 0.0%

Facilities: Maintenance and administrative facilities; and passenger stations (buildings) and parking facilities

Percentage of assets with condition rating below 3.0 on FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) Scale2

Passenger Facilities 0.0%

Passenger Parking Facilities

0.0%

Maintenance Facilities 0.0%

Administrative Facilities 0.0%

Infrastructure: Only rail fixed-guideway, track, signals and systems

Percentage of track segments with performance restrictions

Commuter Rail 2.0%

Light Rail 1.8%

Rolling Stock: Revenue vehicles by mode

Percentage of revenue vehicles met or exceeded Useful Life Benchmark

Articulated bus 0.0%

Over-the-road bus 0.0%

Bus 13.8%

Cutaway Bus 7.2%

Light rail vehicle 0.0%

Minivan 100.0%

Commuter rail locomotive

71.0%

Commuter rail passenger coach

57.0%

Vintage trolley/streetcar 0.0%

Source: 49 CFR 625; SANDAG, MTS, and NCTD

Notes: 1 Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) is a value used with lifecycle cost to assess when an asset costs more to maintain

than to replace. MTS and NCTD used the same ULB.

2 TERM is a five-point scale (1-5) with one signifying poor condition and five excellent.

To coordinate the development of regional TAM targets, MTS and NCTD provided SANDAG with their

respective target values and inventory quantities by asset type. MTS and NCTD target and inventory values

were applied in developing regional TAM targets using a weighted average calculation.3

3 The calculation involved multiplying each provider’s target by their inventory. The results were added together, divided

by the sum of the inventories, and multiplied by 100.

107

Measures and Methodology The performance measures and their calculations are specified in the TAM Final Rule. Additionally, the asset

types that are included in each asset category are established by FTA and detailed in the FTA Asset Inventory

Module. The infrastructure asset category assesses performance restrictions on rail segments. A performance

restriction exists when the permissible speed is less than the guideway’s full-service speed. For more details

on infrastructure performance refer to the FTA Performance Restriction (Slow Zone) Calculation.

2015 Regional Plan and 2018 RTIP Investments The 2015 Regional Plan includes $204 billion dollars4 in transportation investments; 50 percent of that is for

transit consisting of 29 percent for transit capital and 21 percent for transit operations and maintenance.

Transit capital investments include construction of transit facilities and procurement of transit fleet vehicles.

Transit operations and maintenance includes costs associated with running the transit system, repairs, and

preventative maintenance. The 2018 RTIP was reviewed for projects sponsored by SANDAG, MTS and NCTD

that include elements that corresponded to a TAM asset category as shown in Table B-13. The 2018 RTIP

includes over 40 projects totaling more than $2 billion dollars in support of TAM targets.

Table H-13: 2018 RTIP Regional TAM Programming

2018 RTIP TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY CATEGORY

Project Asset Category MTS NCTD SANDAG TOTAL TAM

Programming ($000)

Equipment $- $- $941 $941

Facilities $143,886 $146,784 $77,624 $368,294

Infrastructure $35,441 $13,822 $1,287,753 $1,337,016

Rolling Stock $821,515 $108,054 $14,700 $944,269

TOTAL $1,000,842 $268,660 $1,381,018 $2,650,520

Source: ProjectTrak, July 2019

Interagency Coordination In 2018 SANDAG, MTS and NCTD updated their master MOU agreements to include provisions on the

sharing of TAM and performance data including targets, inventory and asset conditions. SANDAG continues

to coordinate and collaborate with the MTS, NCTD, and FTA to support TAM objectives.

Target Achievement and Future Target Setting The Board of Directors approved the 2019 regional TAM targets at its September 28, 2018, meeting. As data

is shared by MTS and NCTD, in alignment with their annual updates, SANDAG will continue to work with the

providers and FTA to monitor progress on achievement of regional TAM targets.

4 Year of expenditure dollars

108

https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/ntd-asset-inventory-module

https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/ntd-asset-inventory-module

https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/asset-management/tam-infrastructure-performance-measure-reporting-guidebook

https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/asset-management/tam-infrastructure-performance-measure-reporting-guidebook

Project ID Change Reason

V07 Project deleted during the public comment period due to a programming error - will be included in Amendment No. 7

CNTY21 Project removed from the RTIP at the request of the County - will be included in Amendment No. 6

IB20 Project removed from the RTIP at the request of the City.

Changes During Public Comment Period

Amendment No. 5

Table 4

Attachment 7

109