Board of County Commissioners For St. Mary’s County · Reserve – Rainy Day 100 Reserve – Bond Rating 100 Reserve – BOCC Emergency Appropriations 100 Enterprise and Special

Board of County Commissioners

For St. Mary’s County

APPROVED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2007

ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MARYLAND

APPROVED REVENUES AND APPROPRIATIONS OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS

FISCAL YEAR 2007

ST. MARY'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Thomas F. McKay, President Kenneth R. Dement – 1st District Lawrence D. Jarboe – 3rd District

Thomas A. Mattingly Sr. – 2nd District Daniel H. Raley – 4th District

George G. Forrest County Administrator

St. Mary's County Government Governmental Center

P.O. Box 653 23115 Leonard Hall Drive

Leonardtown, Maryland 20650 (301) 475-4200

PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MARYLAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Elaine M. Kramer DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE L. Jeannett Cudmore BUDGET/FISCAL ANALYST M. Carlotta Bell Patricia M. Stiegman SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR Melvin E. Dennis

SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST Aretha S. Walls

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

INTRODUCTION

Introduction i Mission Statement ii Approved Operating & Capital Budget Signature Page ii Budget Message iii-v The St. Mary’s County Budget Process vi Readers’ Budget Guide vii Reading a Typical Budget Page – Operating Budget viii Reading a Typical Budget Page – Capital Budget ix-x Total Approved Budget Summary xi FY2007 Total Budget By Fund - Chart xii FY 2007 Total Budget Revenues - Chart xiii FY2007 Total Budget Expenditures - Chart xiv

OPERATING BUDGET

General Operating Fund 1 FY2007 Budget Highlights 2 – 4 General Fund Revenue Structure 6 St. Mary’s County General Fund Revenues - Summary 7 FY 2007 General Fund Revenues - Chart 8 General Fund Revenues - Overview 10 –11 St. Mary’s County General Fund Revenues - Detail 12 – 15 FY 2007 General Fund Operating Budget-Chart 16 St. Mary’s County Expenditures-Summary 17 General Fund Budget Structure 18 St. Mary’s County Expenditures - Detail 19 – 32 Operating Budgets County Departments 33 County Commissioners/County Administrator 34 – 35 Department on Aging 36 – 37 Office of County Attorney 38 Department of Economic and Community Development 39 – 41 Department of Finance 42 – 43 Marcey Halfway House 44 Department of Information Technology 45 Department of Human Resources 46 Department of Land Use & Growth Management 47 – 48 Department of Public Works and Transportation 49 – 54 Department of Recreation and Parks 55 – 57 Public Safety 58 – 59 Operating Budgets Elected Officials 61 Circuit Court 62 Orphan's Court 63 Office of the Sheriff 64 – 66 Office of the State's Attorney 67 Office of the County Treasurer 68


Operating Budgets State Agencies/Independent Boards 70 Department of Health 71 Department of Social Services 72 Alcohol Beverages Board 73 Supervisors of Elections 74 Cooperative Extension Service 75 Ethics Commission 76 Soil Conservation District 77 Wicomico Scenic River Commission 78 Board of Education 79 – 80 College of Southern Maryland 81 Board of Library Trustees 82 Operating Budgets Non-County Agencies 83 The A.R.C of Southern Maryland, Inc. 84 Big Brothers/Big Sisters 84 Catholic Charities 84 Southern Maryland Center For L.I.F.E 84 Center for Life Enrichment 85 Greenwell Foundation 85 Historic St. Mary’s City Foundation 85 St. Mary’s County Historical Society 86 Hospice of St. Mary’s 86 Lexington Park Lions Club 86 Literacy Council of St. Mary’s 86 Agriculture Weed Control 87 Maryland Historical Society 87 Minority Business Alliance 87 Mental Health Authority of St. Mary’s 88 Patuxent River Naval Air Museum 88 Navy Alliance 88 Lexington Park Rotary – Oyster Festival 89 St. Mary’s County Arts Council 89 St. Mary’s Caring, Inc. 89 St. Mary’s College River Concert Series 90 St. Mary’s College Scholarship Program 90 Seventh District Optimist 90 Sotterley Mansion Foundation 90 Southern Maryland Higher Education Center 91 Southern Maryland Child Care Resource Center 91 Southern Maryland Resource Conservation/Development Board 91 Three Oaks Center 92 Tri-County Alternatives for Youth & Families, Inc. 92 Tri-County Community Action (SMTCCAC, Inc) 92 Tri – County Council 93 Tri-County Youth Services Bureau 93 Unified Commission for Afro Americans 93 Walden/Sierra 94 SMC Forest Conservation District Board 94 Watermen’s Association 94 The Center for Family Advocacy 95


Operating Budgets Other Budget Costs Transfers and Reserves 96 Fire Departments and Rescue Squads 97 Supplemental Reserve 97 Leonardtown Tax Rebate 97 Employer Contributions – Retiree Health Benefits 98 Debt/Bank Administration Costs 98 Debt Service 98 Capital Projects-General Fund Transfer 99 Transfer – LOSAP Enhancements 99 Reserve – Rainy Day 100 Reserve – Bond Rating 100 Reserve – BOCC Emergency Appropriations 100 Enterprise and Special Revenue Funds 101 Recreation and Parks Enterprise Fund 102 Wicomico Shores Golf Enterprise Fund 103 Medical Adult Day Care Special Revenue Fund 104 Miscellaneous Revolving Fund 105 Emergency Services Support Fund 106 Fire Tax 107 Rescue Tax 108 Special Assessment Fund 109 CAPITAL BUDGET Capital Improvements Fund 111 FY 2007 Capital Budget Projects – Chart 113 FY 2007 Capital Budget Funding Sources – Chart 114 St. Mary’s County Approved FY 2007 Capital Improvement Budget 115 – 116 FY 2008-2012 Capital Program Projects Chart 117 FY 2008-2012 Capital Plan Funding Chart 118 Capital Improvements Budget & 5-Year Plan 119 – 120 Capital Projects Public Facilities 121 County Office Bldg HVAC Renovation and Addition 122 – 123 Naval Air Museum & Visitors Center 124 – 125 Renovation of Former SHA Building 126 – 127 Workforce Housing Initiatives 128 – 129 Building Maintenance and Repair Project-Critical 130 – 131 Garvey Center Interior Revitalization 132 – 133 Adult Detention Center Maintenance & Repairs 134 – 135 Airport Master Plan 136 – 137 Carter State Office Building Maintenance & Repairs 138 – 139 Emergency Equipment Shelter 140 – 141


Fuel Facility Upgrades 142 – 143 Parking and Site Improvements 144 – 145 Airport Improvements 146 – 147 College of Southern Maryland, Wellness & Pool 148 – 149 ADC Booking / Inmate Processing Area 150 – 151 ADC Minimum Security Facility 152 – 153 Agricultural Services Center 154 – 155 ADC Locking Mechanisms / Security Cameras 156 – 157 Adult Detention Center Expansion 158 – 159 Capital Projects Marine 161 Patuxent Beach Road Revetment 162 – 163 Thomas Road Revetment 164 – 165 Hollis Lake Inlet 166 – 167 St. Jeromes Creek Dredging 168 – 169 Capital Projects Highways 171 Asphalt Overlay 172 – 173 Modified Seal Surface Treatment 174 – 175 County Mapping 176 – 177 Streetscape Improvements 178 – 179 Bridge / Culvert Replacement & Repair 180 – 181 Regional Stormwater Management Facility 182 – 183 Golf Course Drive Drainage Improvements 184 – 185 Tulagi Place Revitalization 186 – 187 FDR Boulevard Extended (Neighborhood Connector) 188 – 189 Pegg Road Extension (to MD Route 5) 190 – 191 Transportation Plan Update 192 – 193 Roadway Base Widening 194 – 195 Removal of Roadside Obstacles 196 – 197 Neighborhood Preservation Program

198 – 199

Capital Projects Solid Waste 201 St. Andrews Landfill Area D/Future Expansion/Closures 202 – 203 Solid Waste Facility/Transfer Station

204 – 205

Capital Projects Land Conservation 207 Agricultural Land Preservation Program 208 – 209 Soil Survey 210 – 211 Capital Projects Recreation and Parks 213 Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Renovation 214 – 215 Three Notch Trail 216 – 217 Wicomico Shores Golf Course Clubhouse 218 – 219 Tennis Court Replacement 220 – 221 Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Shore Erosion 222 – 223 Parks Land Acquisition 224 – 225 St. Mary’s College Amphitheater 226 – 227 Leonard Hall Recreation Center Improvements 228 – 229 Lancaster Park Improvements 230 – 231 Park ADA Improvements-Playground Replacement 232 – 233


Lacrosse Fields 234 – 235 St. Clement’s Hundred-Blackistone Lighthouse 236 – 237 Myrtle Point Park 238 – 239 St. Mary’s Gymnastics Center 240 – 241 Capital Projects Public Landings 243 Derelict Boat Removal 244 – 245 Patuxent River Public Landing 246 – 247 Forest Landing 248 – 249 Wicomico Shores Public Landing 250 – 251 Leonardtown Wharf 252 – 253 Clark’s Landing Boat Ramp 254– 255 Wicomico Shores Public Landing - Parking 256 – 257 Capital Projects Public Schools 259 Leonardtown Elementary School – Addition/Renovation 260 – 261 Leonardtown Elementary School – State Relocatables 262 – 263 Leonardtown Elementary School – Local Relocatable Classrooms 264 – 265 State Relocatable For Capacity – Site To Be Determined 266 – 267 State Eligible – Local Relocatable Purchase 268 – 269 Chopticon High School – Sewer Plant 270 – 271 Well Replacement – Four schools 272 – 273 Middle School HVAC – Schematic Design 274 – 275 Ridge Elementary School – Site Parking Modifications 276 – 277 Relocatables for Various Sites 278 – 279 Flooring Replacement – Various Schools 280 – 281 Americans with Disabilities Act 282 – 283 Bethune Educational Center – Roof Systemic Renovation 284 – 285 Great Mills High School – Gym Floor Resurfacing 286 – 287 Building Generator System – Two Offices 288 – 289 First New Elementary School – Site in Wildewood 290 – 291 Spring Ridge Middle School – HVAC Systemic Renovation 292 – 293 Greenview Knolls Elementary School – HVAC Systemic Renovation 294 – 295 Lettie Marshall Dent Elementary School – Chiller Replacement 296 – 297 Chopticon High School – Gym Floor Replacement 298 – 299 Second New Elementary School – Site to be Determined 300 – 301 New High School – 1,200 capacity facility 302 – 303 Leonardtown Middle School – HVAC Systemic Renovation 304 – 305 Oakville Elementary School – HVAC Systemic Renovation 306 – 307 Benjamin Banneker Elementary School – HVAC Systemic Renovation 308 – 309 Third New Elementary School – Site to be Determined 310 – 311 New Middle School 312 – 313 APPENDIX St. Mary’s County Organization and Employees 316 St. Mary’s County Government Organizational Chart 317 Change in FTE Positions – Approved FY2007 Operating Budget 318 Authorized Positions – St. Mary’s County Budget 319 Authorized County Government Positions FY 2007 Approved Budget 320 – 324


St. Mary's County Salary Schedule 326 – 327 St. Mary's County Salary Schedule- Engineering 328 St. Mary’s County Salary Schedule – Information Technology 329 St. Mary's County Salary Schedule-Law Enforcement 330 - 331 St. Mary's County Salary Schedule-Corrections 332 Tax Information 333 St. Mary’s County Tax Rates 334 Impact of Local Taxes Using Average Values and Income for St. Mary’s 335 St. Mary’s County Property Tax Rates 336 St. Mary’s County Assessable Property Base 337 Comparison of Selected Taxes and Fees By Subdivision – FY 2006 338 Selected Financial Information 339 Long-term Obligation 340 Debt Affordability 341 St. Mary’s County Legal Debt Margin Under Existing Law 342 Fund Balance History General Operating Fund 343 Notes to Financial Statements 344 – 345 Origin of the Unreserved Fund Balance 346 History of St. Mary’s County County St. Mary’s County – Demographic Data

347 348 – 351

Code of St. Mary’s County Chapter 27 – Budgetary and Fiscal Procedures 352 – 354 Glossary 355 – 357

MISSION STATEMENT

St. Mary’s County Government will:

Be responsible and accountable to the County’s citizens Provide high quality, cost effective and efficient services Preserve the County’s environment, heritage, and rural character; and Foster opportunities for present and future generations.

Board of County Commissioners

For St. Mary’s County

i

ii

BUDGET MESSAGE

TO THE CITIZENS OF ST. MARY’S COUNTY: The Board of County Commissioners for St. Mary’s County unanimously approved a budget for FY2007 on May 30,

2006. For the third year in a row, we have reduced tax rates, while at the same time, fully funding the Board of Education’s operating and capital budget requests. This budget reflects a reduction to the Property Tax rate of 1.5 cents, continues the Senior Tax Credit programs, and cuts the Energy Tax rate in half, from 5% to 2 ½%. In addition to fully funding the Board of Education’s requests, we have significantly increased allocations to Public Safety, Elections, several of the non-profit entities that serve this community, the Library and the College of Southern Maryland. The budget includes several one-time allocations to fund technology, using our fund balance. The budget includes increased allocations to County departments to maintain roads, continue to provide solid waste and recycling services at minimal cost to the citizen/user, and increases funding in other service areas such as land use and recreation and parks. We are leveraging our local funds to obtain grants totaling $7.9 million, or 26% more than FY2006, to further our local initiatives, especially public safety.

Due to positive financial experience in FY2004 and FY2005, we had the opportunity to consider how best to use a

$19.7 million fund balance as well as recurring revenues to meet both short-and long term goals. In developing this resource allocation plan, the Board’s goal was to leverage the County’s current strong financial position to effectively and efficiently meet the needs of its citizens for services and investment in infrastructure, while at the same time reducing taxes.

RECURRING REVENUES

Revenue growth is estimated to be approximately $12.6 million, or 8.5%, net of the $3 million reduction in revenues attributable to reduced property and energy tax rates. This was partially offset by the 26% increase in grant funds, but these are restricted for specific purposes. The principal sources of recurring revenues continue to be the Property and Income Taxes, estimated to increase 6.1% and 8.1%, respectively, over FY2006. These estimates reflect a strong economy, including increases in the numbers of filers for income taxes and increasing levels of personal income. The property tax revenue estimate is based on the reduced rate, which is the 5th lowest in the State, and maintains the cap of 5% in the amount of increased assessment that can be billed. The estimated revenue increase is helped significantly by the generally increasing number of properties on the tax rolls. These increased revenue estimates are offset by the increased cost of the Senior Property Tax credit programs. After several years of reductions by the State, the County’s full share of Highway User fees is being realized, adding almost $1 million to the FY2006 level. And, recognizing a recurring trend in high levels of recordation fees, this budget increases the estimated revenues from that source by $2 million more than the FY2006 Approved Budget level, an increase of 13.7%. The FY2007 Approved Budget reflects a 50% reduction in the Energy Tax rate, which reduced the estimated FY2007 revenues by $1.3 million.

FUND BALANCE

The budget allocates $19,688,643 of fund balance, which was accumulated principally in FY2004 and FY2005. This high level is unusual for the County, and is largely attributable to just a few significant financial events. $6.4 million was realized by recordation fees exceeding the amount applied in the FY2004 and FY2005 budgets. That revenue estimate was revised significantly for FY2007. Approximately $5 million was realized by early distribution from the State of local income taxes that they collect on our behalf, simply a revenue shift from future years. Opportunities to refund general obligation bonds and solid credit ratings helped us to realize savings in debt service of approximately $2.1 million. And, better than expected experience in our employee health plans added another $1.1 million in premium savings. Positive expense variances each year, such as for personal services due to reorganization and turnover, or not having to use the Commissioners’ emergency reserve, yielded the balance of the savings. Having accumulated a fund balance in FY2005, the Commissioners had set aside $7.5 million to address BRAC related issues, but with the stated intention to use these funds in the FY2007 budget, if not otherwise needed.

Recognizing that these funds were generated from events that are non-recurring, the Board allocated the funds to be

used for non-recurring items. The largest application was the transfer of $14,228,277 to the capital projects fund as “pay-go” – but for previously approved capital projects that were scheduled to be bond financed through a FY2007 sale of general obligation bonds. This allows us to eliminate the planned bond sale for FY2007, reducing the future debt service requirements by an estimated $1.14 million annually, for the 20 year term of the bonds. The budget book contains a schedule of those projects affected; 76.5% of the total, or $10.9 million, was scheduled to fund public schools capital projects. Additionally, the Board set aside $3.5 million to be transferred to a trust to fund retiree health benefits for County employees. Beginning in FY2008, we will be required to fund a trust annually, similar to employer pension funding requirements. Both of these actions are expected to reduce future recurring costs. $625,000 is used to fund additions to the Bond Rating Reserve and the Rainy Day Fund. $400,000 is allocated to fund election costs that will be incurred in FY2007, but not needed in FY2008.The balance, $935,366, has been allocated to non-recurring costs, principally technology investment and public safety equipment, and other non-recurring allocations.

iii

COUNTY DEPARTMENTS The FY2007 Budget for County Departments reflects an increase of $4.6 million, of which $1.6 million is the increase in

grant related activities. The principal components of the increase of $1.8 million allocated to Public Safety are 911 related equipment for fire, rescue, and county vehicles, re-banding of the 911 systems, and equipment, training, and other related costs associated with emergency response and disaster preparedness. Public Works and Transportation’s approved allocation of $18.1 million, an increase of $1.9 million, reflects increased fuel and utility costs; Public Works is responsible for the maintenance and operations of county facilities, including the Office of the Sheriff. The Public Works budget also reflects increased costs of solid waste disposal, including opening and operating a new transfer station and costs for monitoring and remediation, and vehicle replacement. Additionally, the STS system is expected to cost $138,690 more to run in FY2007, bringing the total STS operating budget to $2.3 million. In addition to grant funding, STS requires $504,522 in county funding (compared to $386,758 in FY2006) and expects to generate $529,000 from charges and fees. County departments reflect a net increase of 9.5 FTE positions, two of which are fully reimbursed by the Housing Authority. The remaining positions are identified for the Northern Senior Center (.75), Land Use & Growth Management (1.0), Public Works & Transportation (2.0), Recreation, Parks & Community Services (2.75), and Public Safety (1.0). The Board allocated approximately $366,000 to fund enhancements to the State’s pension program for County employees, and approved a 4% COLA for County employees, of which 3% is effective July 1, 2006 and 1% is effective January 1, 2007.

SHERIFF

Our FY2007 budget allocates $23.1 million to the Office of the Sheriff, an increase of $2.3 million, or 11.1% more than FY2006. Of the $2.3 million increase, approximately $1.6 million represents increased county funding. The budget includes funds for pay increases for sworn officers which average 4% (parity with the Maryland State Police), in addition to scheduled merit increases. Addressing the expectations we identified during the discussions on the Recommended Budget, the Sheriff increased the number of new deputies he proposed to add in FY2007, from 3 to 5. Additionally, the budget reflects 8.5 other positions, including conversion of hourly positions to full-time, and 27 promotional ranks. The budget replaces 24 vehicles and adds 5 for the new deputies. The approved 6 year capital plan includes three capital projects totaling $5.6 million in FY2008 TO FY2010 for renovation of the existing Adult Detention Center as well as a new minimum security facility, totaling $19.5 million. Planning for expansion of the existing facility is included in the capital plan for FY2012.

BOARD OF EDUCATION

Our FY2007 allocation to the Board of Education totals $67,811,488, which is $5,177,264 more than FY2006. Included in the Approved Budget is $125,000 for after school programs, currently operated by Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Md. The allocation fully funds the Board of Education’s budget request, and exceeds St. Mary’s County Bridge to Excellence requirement by $2.7 million. By comparison, the County would meet the State mandated maintenance of effort with no increase in funding over FY2006. The Board of Education indicates that at the funding level of $67.7 million in County funds, their operating budget will total $150,497,071, an increase of $12,427,056 over FY2006. The Board of Education has indicated that this level of funding will ensure that their salaries remain competitive, address increased utility, and fuel costs, and that the textbook initiative and technology replacement will be continued. At this level of funding, 42.27 positions will be added, including 18.5 regular education and 4 special education teachers. Their request indicates that this staffing level fully implements all-day kindergarten in FY2007, earlier than the State requirement, achieves class size goals, and begins to address programs related to remediation and high school assessment that is required in future years.

In addition to the increased operating funds, the budget fully funds the Board of Education’s request for capital

projects, with the most significant capital project in FY2007 being the renovation/addition to Leonardtown Elementary School, which is planned for a total funding of $17.6 million and will increase capacity by 195 seats. The 6 year plan includes all projects and funding requested by the Board of Education, and addresses capacity issues through planning/construction of three elementary schools, a middle, and a high school, as well as several systemic renovations and other capital projects.

COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND AND LIBRARY

Increased County funding of 11.1% to the College of Southern Maryland brings the total county funding to $2.490 million, including a one-time allocation of $115,000 to assist with technology initiatives. This results in a total operating budget for College of Southern Maryland of $8.26 million. The total County funding to the Board of Library Trustees is $2,015,100, an increase of 13.1%, including a one-time $75,000 allocation earmarked for technology. The total operating budget for the Library is approximately $2.7 million. Both of these entities also receive significant State funding to support their operations.

iv

RESERVES The budget allocates $500,000 to our Bond Rating Reserve, an important factor in our credit rating, which helps us to

achieve a low interest rate on our capital project bonds. $533,255 is set aside for emergency appropriations for under budgeted expenditures, funding shortfalls, or to respond to requests for items not budgeted. And, $125,000 is added to the Rainy Day Fund, bringing the total for the Rainy Day Fund to $1,500,000.

CAPITAL BUDGET, ENTERPRISE & REVENUE FUNDS

This document contains not only the County’s operating budget, known as the General Fund, including grants, but also the Capital Improvements Budget, and the County’s Enterprise and Revolving funds. It also contains information and statistics of general interest, such as tax rates, debt statistics, staffing, and fund balance levels.

The Approved FY 2007 capital budget totals $39,121,102. County funding totals $23,553,976, or 60% of the total. As indicated previously, the Board of Education request is fully funded. Other projects of significance in FY2007 include Land Preservation, immediate construction of a Solid Waste Transfer Station, continued progress on Three Notch Trail, investment in the Leonardtown Wharf, and acquisition of land for parks.

The capital improvements program for fiscal years 2008 through 2012 totals $193,593,197. It includes all projects requested by the Board of Education. It also allocates significant resources to address needs expressed by the Sheriff related to the renovation and expansion of the existing Adult Detention Center, as well as a new Minimum Security Facility. Other projects in the plan include FDR Boulevard, Pegg Road Extension, improvements to the airport, and construction of a Wellness Center on CSM’s Leonardtown campus. The plan reflects $29 million for highways projects, about twice as much as had been in the previous 6-year plan. The Board believes that investment in transportation infrastructure is a critical need of our community. This 6-year plan also reflects significantly increased allocation for parks and recreation projects, with a total 6 year allocation of $16.4 million, compared to the plan reflected in the FY2006 budget of $5.4 million. This dramatic increase is funded principally through Federal and State funding, rather than increased local funding. A RESPONSIBLE AND RESPONSIVE PLAN

We believe this budget reflects the priorities and expectations that you have shared with us, throughout this budget process, and allocates available resources accordingly. Use of the fund balance reduces future debt and the corresponding debt service burden on future operating budgets. Reduced property and energy tax rates reduce the cost of government services to our citizens.

As a financial plan for this community, we believe this budget addresses the needs and expectations we have today

and positions the County to fulfill your vision for tomorrow

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. MARY’S COUNTY, MARYLAND

v

THE ST. MARY'S COUNTY BUDGET PROCESS

The County budget consists of the current expense operating budget, the capital budget and program, and the budget message. It represents a complete financial plan of the County and reflects receipts and disbursements from all sources. The County budget formulation process begins in August for the fiscal year that begins on the following July 1. The steps in the budget process are as follows: August/September

Department of Finance works with Board of County Commissioners to set the budget calendar as well as the parameters to be used for budget development

•

October

Spending units receive budget instructions, guidelines, and forms for the next fiscal year.

•

November •

•

General budget guidelines developed.

Multi-year estimates of reserves and baseline expenses developed by Department of Finance working with departments

December •

•

Presentation of economic outlook to County Commissioners.

Board of County Commissioners set budget parameters

January • Capital budget requests presented to Board of

County Commissioners. February •

•

•

Staff review of operating and capital budget requests by County departments and agencies.

Departments present Capital Budgets and plans to the Planning Commission for recommendation

Spending units transmit budgetary requests to the Department of Finance.

March •

•

•

County Administrator and Finance develop a

recommended budget for consideration to the County Commissioners.

County Commissioners consider recommended budget impact on debt affordability.

County Commissioners review and finalize a Recommended Budget.

April

County Commissioners hold public hearing on Recommended Budget.

•

May

Board of County Commissioners consider input received at the public hearings

•

•

•

•

Commissioners direct the reconciliation of available resources, including revenues and fund balance, to the spending plan / budget.

Commissioners develop a final budget.

Commissioners adopt resolution approving a final budget and tax rates for the new fiscal year (required on or before June 1).

June • Department of Finance prepares and distributes

an approved summary operating and capital budget document.

July • New fiscal year begins • Budget Book Published and released

vi

vii

READERS' BUDGET GUIDE

The Introduction includes information with respect to the history of St. Mary's County, demographic data, and the County budget process.

The Operating Budget section presents summary and detailed information concerning the General Fund revenue structure and FY 2007 projections. The General Fund expenditure structure is described; summary and detailed information is included by spending unit and departments. Spending unit budgets are individually presented by the following sections: County Departments, Elected Officials, State Agencies/Independent Boards, Non-County Agencies, and Other Budget Costs. Each spending unit budget displays a categorization of expenditures for the actual FY 2005 expenditures, the approved FY 2006 and FY 2007 budgets, a description of the spending unit's programs and responsibilities, and highlights of the budget for FY 2007. Performance indicators provide citizens and decision-makers with a clear understanding of both the size and scope of County services, as well as service and activity trends. Summary financial information is also presented on the County's Enterprise and Special Revenue Funds, Special Assessments Funds, and Fire/Rescue District Tax.

The Capital Budget section includes summary and detailed information relative to the Capital Improvements Fund and highlights of the FY 2007 Capital Budget and Five-Year Capital Program (FY 2008 to FY 2012). Individual project pages are presented within the following project categories: Public Facilities, Land Conservation, Marine, Highways, Solid Waste, Recreation and Parks, Public Landings, and Public Schools. Each project page contains a project description, planning justification, location, project cost by phase and year, funding source, other background information/comments, discussion of changes from the prior approved budget/plan, and a section on impact on annual operating budget.

The Appendix provides supplemental information on the County government organization,

authorized positions and salary schedules, the property tax and other local taxes, outstanding County debt fund balance, and legal budgetary and fiscal procedures. A glossary of terms is also included.

FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGET SUMMARY

Reading a typical budget page

Operating Budget The budget document presents in a standard format, the operating budget for each department and spending unit. The typical budget page describes the functions of the organization, actual and estimated expenditures over a three-year period, and major highlights of the new budget. Quantitative indicators of workload and performance are also presented.

A TYPICAL OPERATING BUDGET PAGE

The name of the organization The name of the organization Funds requested in New Year Funds approved in New Year Shows the budget of the organization by type of expense Original approved budget Audited actual expense Describes functions, activities, and goals of the organization positions Overview of the budget for the new year, including major changes from the prior budget Specific quantitative measures of work to be performed or accomplished or results obtained

viii viii

Department Of Information Technology

Department/ Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual Expenditures

FY 2006 Approved Budget

FY 2007 Requested Budget

FY 2007 Approved Budget

Total Information Technology 1,693,253 1,937,872 2,214,843 2,115,752

Program Description

The Information Technology Department has the overall responsibility for managing the County's computer hardware and software resources. Services of the Information Technology Department include: technical support, systems support, equipment maintenance, technology training, technical planning, telephone support, telecommunications, infrastructure access control and security.

Budget Highlights

The budget for the Information Technology Department is approved at $2,115,752. An increase of $177,880 or 9.2%. This budget includes costs for software licenses, maintenance, training, and upgrades for virtually all of the technology in use in county operations. These include a broad range of applications and support to include desktop applications, finance and payroll, GIS, jail management, permits and inspections, planning and zoning and a variety of other applications. Reclassification of the LAN Administrator is included.

Performance/Workload Indicators

Actual Estimated Projected

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Desktop and mobile computer systems 485 531 540 Networked printers 65 70 78 Servers 20 21 21 Novell user accounts 500 500 500 Novell GroupWise accounts 500 600 600 H.T. E. active modules 18 22 22 H.T.E. financial community service users 250 175 161 H.T. E. users

198

230

253

Help Desk Requests for Assistance

11,700

12,000

12,000 Cell phones/Pagers

141/181 145/140 145/140

Phone lines 1,025 950 930

St. Mary's County, Maryland Fiscal Year 2007 Budget

viii



Capital Budget A separate project page is presented for each capital project approved in either the budget year or planned for future program years. The project purpose and scope are described, estimated costs are broken down by project phase, and funding is indicated by specific revenue source. The specific location of the project is also indicated.

A TYPICAL CAPITAL BUDGET PAGE

Budget Account Number Specific capital project General budget category of capital project Description of project purpose and scope Planning Details Estimated costs of project

phases over the next 5 years Specific address Prior years funding Funds appropriated in current year for the project Project expenses Total estimated Project costs Specific source of funds for project by year total funding for project

ix

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION

Leonardtown Elementary School - Addition/Renovation PS-0601 St. Mary’s County Public Schools

DESCRIPTION: Addition/renovation to this building, originally constructed in 1954. This facility has undergone several additions in the early 1960's, one in 1976 and a

PreKindergarten addition in 1999. The building was originally constructed as a secondary school and now serves as an elementary school. There are remaining components of the building, including locker areas that do not serve a functional space as an elementary school. In addition, the facility requires modernization to remove original floors, ceilings, lighting, as well as asbestos removal. The facility is also in need of additional spaces for the implementation of full day Kindergarten and to meet capacity needs in this development district school. There will also be an HVAC upgrade and completion of the air conditioning and the site will be modified to separate bus & student traffic. This project includes an addition of 14,101 s.f. for a new building total of 66,513 with an increase of 195 seats at the state rated capacity level. New classrooms will accommodate new student growth and the implementation of full day Kindergarten. SMCPS Priority: FY2007-1, FY2008-1 Category: 1 Bid Date: March 2006 Start Construction: June 2006 Completion Date: December 2007 PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. The student body would be temporarily located at the annex behind Benjamin Banneker Elementary School during construction.

B. A/E fees for this project will be requested locally in FY 2007 and construction funds would be requested in FY 2008.

C. The electrical and communication systems are at the end of their useful lives.

D. This project is required to address existing elementary school capacity issues in the northern and central portion of the county. The enrollment projections indicate that with the completion of this project, the elementary schools in the adjoining area will be overcrowded by 453 in the five year timeframes. This project will work in conjunction with the planned first new elementary school to meet these capacity needs, as well as the implementation of full day Kindergarten. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Section

3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs. Priority A-1 LOCATION: 22885 Duke Street Leonardtown, Maryland 20650

APPROPRIATION TOTAL PRIOR FY 2007 5 Year Capital Plan

PHASE PROJECT APPROVAL BUDGET FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

ARCH/ENGINEERING 1,112,000 827,000 259,000 26,000 0 0 0 0

LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CONSTRUCTION 15,964,000 340,000 8,606,000 7,818,000 0 0 0 0

DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

INSPECTION 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0

UTILITIES 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0

EQUIPMENT 503,000 0 503,000 0 0 0 0 0

OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 17,619,000 1,167,000 9,408,000 7,044,000 0 0 0 0

COUNTY FUNDS:

COUNTY BONDS 4,725,623 843,775 666,848 3,215,000 0 0 0 0

LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

IMPACT FEES 2,854,475 323,225 2,531,250 0 0 0 0 0

GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 1,009,902 0 1,009,902 0 0 0 0 0

STATE FUNDS 9,029,000 Planning 5,200,000 3,829,000 0 0 0 0

FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL FUNDS 17,619,000 1,167,000 9,408,000 7,044,000 0 0 0 0



Capital Budget A separate project page is presented for each capital project approved in either the budget year or planned for future program years. The project purpose and scope are described, estimated costs are broken down by project phase, and funding is indicated by specific revenue source. The specific location of the project is also indicated.

A TYPICAL CAPITAL BUDGET PAGE Budget Account Number

Specific capital project General budget category of capital project Other Background Information/Comments Discussion of change From FY 2005 Budget Incremental costs of project

phases over the next 5 years Impact on annual Incremental costs in Operating budget current year for the project Staffing Requirements Discussion of Operating Budget Impact Additional Impact on Operating budget, if applicable

x

CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION Leonardtown Elementary School Addition/Renovation PS-0601 St. Mary’s County Public Schools

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENT: This project will address the items identified during the State of Maryland Adequacy Survey and will assist with the Maryland State Department of Education

requirement to provide full day Kindergarten prior to 2008. 1. Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will

exceed the budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currently bidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costs.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2004 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:This project increased in budget from the FY 2006 approved budget plan based on an increase of $37.16 per square foot based on the Public School Construction Program funding formula. In addition, this project will be approved under a new per student square footage of 108 s.f. per student versus the 105 s.f. per student in the FY 2006 project scope.

IMPACT ON ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET

INCREMENTAL OPERATING COSTS

DESCRIPTION FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

STAFFING –FTEs 0 2 0 0 0 0

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS 0 56,670 0 0 0 0

CONTRACTED SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 0 0 0 0 0 0

UTILITIES 0 12,754 0 0 0 0

FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0

OTHER (description significant items) 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 69,424 0 0 0 0 DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: * This staffing increase is for building service. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place throughout the system as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility. OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET:

TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET SUMMARY- FY 2007

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007ACTUAL APPROVED REQUEST APPROVED

General Fund $133,458,998 $151,279,974 $166,426,363 $180,569,812 *Enterprise Funds Recreation and Parks Activity Fund 2,160,221 3,067,868 2,887,592 2,928,905 Wicomico Shores Golf Fund 1,043,633 1,249,679 1,311,934 1,318,791

Special Revenue Funds Medical Adult Day Care Fund 816,710 783,703 735,382 761,035 Miscellaneous Revolving Fund 146,088 260,446 258,796 311,492 Special Assessments Fund 58,148 57,880 57,880 57,880 Emergency Services Fund 1,012,384 1,179,918 1,759,647 1,324,620

Other Operating Funds - Independent Boards (Non-Appropriated State, Federal, Miscellaneous Funds) Board of Education - General Operating 64,960,817 75,435,790 83,469,231 82,685,583 Board of Education - Restricted Fund 7,532,011 9,270,030 8,937,677 8,814,496 Board of Education - Revolving Fund 4,942,452 5,131,032 5,474,741 5,401,985 Board of Library Trustees 988,541 751,975 762,827 762,827 College of Southern Maryland 4,508,378 5,397,379 5,824,398 5,886,505

$221,628,381 $253,865,674 $277,906,468 $290,823,931

$29,865,605 $37,953,685 $32,486,741 $39,121,102

THE TOTAL BUDGET FOR ST. MARY'S COUNTY

Total Operating Fund

Total Capital Projects Fund

FUND DESCRIPTION

As part of the annual budget process, the Board of County Commissioners must also authorize the expenditure of State, Federal, and other revenues of the independent boards which manage the school system, public libraries, and the College of Southern Maryland. These revenues are received by the respective boards and not by the County government; thus, the revenues are not appropriated in the annual budget ordinance but are still authorized for expenditure by the Commissioners.

The combination of the general fund, enterprise funds, special funds, and the non-county operating funds of the independent boards comprise the entire operating budget for St. Mary's County. The Board of County Commissioners adopts a separate capital budget for the financing of long-term capital improvements.

The General Fund is the portion of the budget where general tax revenues such as property and income taxes are collected, and where general expenditures such as the County's cost for education, law enforcement, highway maintenance, and libraries are made.

Additionally, County expenditures also occur in several other funds. There are two separate enterprise funds which account for the operations of various county-wide recreation programs and the operations of the County's public golf course. There are also special revenue funds which account for the operations of an adult medical day care program, the emergency services support fund, special tax district costs, and other miscellaneous programs. These miscellaneous revolving funds include several Department On Aging and Recreation, Parks and Community Service activities. In addition to the County funding, the Library, Public Schools, and College of Southern Maryland receive significant resources from other sources, such as the State of Maryland, which are reflected as Other Operating Funds.

* The Approved General Fund budget includes the application of $19,688,643 in fund balance accumulated during FY2004 and FY2005. The Board of County Commissioners applied these funds to non-recurring items, such as pay-go for prior approved capital projects, one-time technology and elections costs, etc. as described elsewhere in this budget document. Recurring levels, comparable to the request, total $160,881,169, which is an increase of $12,628,160, or 8.5%, over the FY2006 approved budget.

xi

FISCAL YEAR 2007 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET - BY FUND

CSM - Non-County Funds2.0%

Enterprise Funds1.5%

General Fund62.1%

Library - Non-County Funds

0.3%

Special Revenue Funds0.8%

BOE - Non-County Funds33.3%

General Fund $ 180,569,812

Bd. of Education - Non-County Funds 96,902,064

CSM - Non-County Funds 5,886,505

Enterprise Funds 4,247,696

Special Revenue Funds 2,455,027

Library - Non-County Funds 762,827

Total - All Funds

xii

$290,823,931

Other Revenues0.7%

Fund Balance7.3%

Highway User2.7%

Other Local Taxes3.9%

Local Income Tax21.1%

Charges for Services

7.5%

Property Taxes22.4%

Grants34.4%

FY 2007 TOTAL BUDGET - REVENUES

State / Federal Grants $100,058,311

Property Taxes 65,211,852

Local Income Tax 60,941,191

Charges for Services / Licenses / Fines 21,918,375

Other Local Taxes 11,421,000

Highway User Revenues 7,924,122

Other Sources 2,112,732

Sub-Total 269,587,583

21,236,348 Appropriation of Fund Balance$1,517,705 – by Board of Education$19,688,643 – by County$30,000 - by Library

Total General Funds

xiii

$290,823,931

FY 2007 TOTAL BUDGET - EXPENDITURES

Transfers to Reserves

5.3%

Board of Library Trustees

1.0%

Volunteer Fire Dept./Rescue

Squads0.5%

College of Southern Maryland

2.9%

Debt Service4.5%

Non-County Agencies

0.5%

Sheriff's Department8.0%

Retiree Health1.7%

County Depts., Elected Officials & County Agencies

18.8%

Board of Education56.6%

Other Costs0.2%

Board of Education $164,713,552

County Departments, Elected Officials & County Agencies 54,723,012

Other Costs 596,879

Total Budget Expenditures $290,823,931

Transfers to Reserves (including CIP Pay-go) 15,446,532

xiv

Sheriff’s Department 23,156,367

College of Southern Maryland 8,376,505

Board of Library Trustees 2,777,927

Volunteer Fire Departments 1,524,620

Non-County Agencies 1,496,934

Debt Service 13,181,303

Retiree Health 4,830,300

GENERAL OPERATING FUND

APPROVED FY 2007 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS

Operating Budget

Following represent brief highlights of budget changes between FY 2006 and FY 2007. For more detail, please refer to the appropriate sections of this Approved Budget Book. GENERAL $180,569,812 general fund budget, a 19.4% net increase over Approved FY 2006. This is comprised of revenues totaling $160,881,169, an 8.5% increase over FY 2006, and the application of $19,688,643 in fund balance to capital as well as non-recurring operating costs and transfers to reserves. Revenues

Income tax rate remains at the 3.0%, which became effective January 1, 2006 (previously the rate was 3.05%); estimated income tax revenue reflects an 8.1% expected growth or approximately $4.6 million more than the Approved FY 2006

Property tax rate is reduced for the third year in a row; effective July 1, 2006 the rate is $.857 per $100 of assessed value, or 1.5 cents lower than FY2006. Property tax revenue is estimated to increase approximately $3.7 million, reflecting 6.1% growth, offset by the loss of $1.1 in revenue due to the rate reduction. The County’s Homestead Property Tax Credit rate of 5% is maintained, which generally sets a cap of 5% on the amount of increased assessment that is actually billed to property owners. More than half the counties set a higher cap, up to the 10% allowed by the State.

Property tax revenues reflect the reduced levels of revenues of $343,000 attributable to the continuation of the Senior Property Tax Credit programs – both the match to the State Homeowners Credit and the County Senior Tax Cap Program

Recordation fees are estimated to increase by $2 million. to $8.7 million, reflecting strong experience, both in activity and underlying values, experienced in recent years

Energy tax rates have been cut in half, from 5% to 2.5%, which means a reduction in the revenue of $1.9 million from the Approved FY 2006 levels

Highway user revenues reflect an increase of $956,902 or 13.7%, bringing the total revenue to over $7.9 million. This estimate is based on information provided by the State Prior years revenues reflected various levels of cuts made by the State to balance its own budget.

Grants are expected to increase by approximately $1.7 million, reflecting principally increased grant sources in several one-time Public Safety grants.

Applies the FY2005 audited fund balance of $19,688,643, as follows: • $14,228,277 for previously approved capital projects that were intended to be funded

by the sale of general obligation bonds. This eliminates what was required in FY 2007, and reduces debt service that would have to be funded for the next 20 years by $1.1 million annually.

• $3.5 million as initial funding to a trust that must be established to fund post-retirement County employee health benefits

• $663,152 in one-time technology costs • $625,000 in transfers to reserves, including $500,000 for the bond rating reserve and

$125,000 for the Rainy Day Fund • $400,000 in non-recurring election costs • $125,000 Boys & Girls Club, $9,000 AC Chancellors, $10,900 DPW Roll-Offs, $50,000

for House Keys, $60,000 transfer for LOSAP Enhancement, and $17,314 other one-time costs.

Expenses Personal services for County departments and elected officials reflect: Normal step increase and a 4% COLA, of which 1% will be effective January 1, 2007; Sworn Deputies - salary increases averaging 4% (parity), plus step, effective July 1, 2006 Increased pension costs of approximately $400,000, of which $366,000 relates to funds needed to implement the pension enhancement program offered by the State

County departments, combined, increased positions by 9.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions; 2.75 for Recreation, Parks & Community Services; 2 for Public /Works & Transportation; 1 animal warden: .75 office specialist position at the Northern Senior Center; 2 to support activities of the Housing Authority (fully reimbursed by revenues from the Authority) and 1 Senior Office Specialist LUGM

Adds 13.5 FTE positions to the Sheriff’s Department, of which 5 are new deputies Adds 3 FTE positions to the State’s Attorneys Office

Adds funding of approximately $324,000 for the County’s vehicle replacement program; through 5-year exempt financing, the County plans to replace 35 vehicles, at a total purchase cost a of approximately $1.4 million; 24 of these vehicles are for the Office of the Sheriff; in addition, this program is used to purchase the vehicles needed for the 5 new deputies, at a total purchase cost of $167,333

Provides approximately $1.1 million for the increased costs of utilities, including fuel and oil; attributable to both rate increases and usage, such as new or expanded County facilities such as the Welcome Center

Transfers $54,323 ( $589,007 was transferred in FY 2006) to fund the accumulated deficit of the Medical Adult Daycare Revolving Fund through 2005

Board of Education - $5,177,264 increase in County funds over FY 2006 Fully funds the request State Mandated Maintenance of Effort requires no additional funding over FY2006 level Provides $2.653 million more than the Bridge to Excellence Agreement Fully funds the negotiated agreements

Adds 42.27 FTE positions, of which 18.5 are regular education teachers and 4 are special education teachers; this will complete the conversion to all-day kindergarten.

Adds $125,000 in funding for after school programs – to partially offset the loss of funding that supported the contract with Boys & Girls Clubs for after school programs

The Sheriff’s budget increased by $2.3 million, or 11.1%; in addition to the COLA and vehicle replacement program listed above, the Sheriff’s budget reflects: 13.5 FTE positions, of which 5 are new deputies Additional Senior DFC ranks (8), Corporal ranks (5), Senior Correctional CO ranks (7),

and 1 Correctional Lieutenant Rank Department of Public Safety budget allocation increases approximately $1.8 million, or 49.3%; approximately $1.4 million of this increase relates to non-recurring grant funding for equipment; the balance, $393,063, represents a 14% increase and includes funding for radio equipment for fire, rescue, and county vehicles ($143,989) and upgrades to the existing pager system ($157,105)

Department of Public Works & Transportation budget allocation increased over $1.9 million; includes: $700,100 relates to costs of solid waste disposal and recycling, including tip fee increases $460,191needed to address increased costs of building maintenance $279,249 relates to highway maintenance expenditures increases $138,690 in increased costs to operate the STS system The costs of the salary and benefits and the vehicle replacement program described

above are also included in these figures. Funding for Elections increased $609,876, almost 144% over FY 2006.This reflects the increased costs incurred during an “election year”.

Fully funds the Library’s request, with an increase of 13.1%; these funds add hours to services at all libraries, and include a one-time allocation of $75,000 for technology Increases the allocation to the College of Southern Maryland by $249,237, or 11.1%, which brings the total county allocation to $2.490 million, and includes a one-time allocation of $115,000 for technology

County funding allocated to the various community-based non-profit entities is budgeted at $1,496,934, a 17% increase over FY 2006; 8 entities received increased allocations, with

the largest increases going to Walden-Sierra, Three Oaks Center, and The Center for Family Advocacy. The Minority Business Alliance received a new allocation of $10,000.

Sets aside $3.5 million as initial funding to a trust that will be established in FY2008 to fund post-retirement County employee health benefits; the expected annual contribution is estimated to be approximately $4.2 million Transfers $14,228,277 to the capital projects fund, to be used in lieu of general obligation bonds to fund 29 capital projects, including 11 schools projects totaling $10.9 million Increases the Rainy Day Fund by $125,000, bringing the total to $1,500,000

Sets aside a Reserve for Emergency Appropriations of $533,255, which is funding that the Board of County Commissioners can authorize for unexpected and unbudgeted expenditures

Capital Budget and Program

FY 2007 Capital Budget totals $39,121,102, of which $23,553,976, or 60.2%, is funded by the County

Fully funds the Board of Education request, requiring $7.185 million in county funding for FY 2007 Financed with approximately $7.1 million in County general obligation bonds, $14.9 million of Federal/State

funds. The remainder is projected to come from local sources such as transfer taxes, impact fees, and dedicated recordation fees and agriculture transfer taxes

Most significant projects for FY 2007(total funding):

Leonardtown Elementary School Addition/Replacement $9,408,000 Solid Waste Transfer Station 4,605,825 Land Acquisition for Parks 4,292,500 Land Preservation Programs 4,221,000 Leonardtown Wharf 1,100,000 Asphalt Overlay 1,000,000 Patuxent River Public Landing 975,000 FDR Boulevard, extended 800,000

FY2007 reflects the transfer of $14,228,277 as pay-go to the Capital Project Fund. Approximately 78% of this total relates to public school capital projects. Allocating this amount from the fund balance to pay for these already approved capital projects means that the planned sale of $15 million in bonds for FY 2007 is no longer necessary. The elimination of this sale means that there is about $1.14 million less in debt service that would have to be budgeted for the next 20 years in order to fund these already approved projects.

The FY 2008 to FY 2012 capital plan identifies $193,593,197 for capital projects, of which $105, 202,975, or 54.3% is expected to be funded by County sources

Fully funds the Board of Education revised request, which totals approximately $95.2 million, and includes construction of 2 new elementary schools and planning for a third, as well as planning and the start of construction for a new high school and planning for a new middle school Financed with approximately $54.4 million in County general obligation bonds over the 5-year period of FY 2008 to FY 2012. The remainder is projected to come from local sources such as transfer taxes, impact fees, dedicated recordation fees and agriculture transfer taxes, as well as $2.5 million in County pay-go funding.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY

NOT USED

GENERAL FUND REVENUE STRUCTURE

St. Mary's County General Fund Revenues are categorized into several classifications for estimating

and recording purposes. The broad revenue classifications are broken-down further into specific accounts. The revenue classifications include the following:

Property Taxes - Includes all revenues from real and personal property taxes, penalties and interest, and property tax credit adjustments.

Income Taxes - Local subdivisions in Maryland levy a percent of tax based upon individual State taxable income.

Other Local Taxes - Includes admissions and amusement taxes, recordation taxes, CATV franchise tax, energy taxes, trailer park tax, and public accommodations tax. Highway User – The County’s allocation of revenues collected by the State of motor fuel taxes, vehicle titling taxes and registration fees.

Licenses and Permits - Revenues received from individuals, firms, and corporations who must have a license or permit to engage in a particular trade, business, or activity. Examples include alcohol beverage licenses, traders licenses, amusement licenses, building permits, grading permits, and plumbing permits.

Charges for Services - Fees and charges assessed by the County to offset the costs of various services. Examples include zoning and subdivision fees, sheriff's fees, inspection fees, client fees, 911 fees, landfill tipping fees, and various correctional program fees.

Fines and Forfeitures - This classification relates primarily to revenues generated within the judicial system.

State/Federal Grants - Includes grant revenues received by the County government from the State and Federal governments. This revenue can take the form of a general formula aid (e.g. Police Protection Aid) or specific program grants (e.g. Aging - Title III - Congregate Meals)

Other Revenues - Includes investment income, tax sale revenue, grant program contributions and donations, and miscellaneous sources.

Other Financing Sources - Use of prior year fund balances as a funding source for the current budget.

ST. MARY'S COUNTY GENERAL FUND REVENUESSUMMARY

FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2007REVENUE SOURCE ACTUAL APPROVED RECOMMENDED APPROVED

REVENUES BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET AMOUNT PER CENT

Total, Property Taxes $58,279,110 $60,339,121 65,153,432 64,018,123 3,679,002 6.1%

Total, Income Taxes 54,148,444 56,350,000 60,841,191 60,941,191 4,591,191 8.1%

Total, Other Local Taxes 13,395,730 11,321,000 11,421,000 11,421,000 100,000 0.9%

Total, Shared Revenues 6,217,472 6,967,220 7,924,122 7,924,122 956,902 13.7%

Total, Licenses and Permits 813,928 1,003,852 966,296 960,796 (43,056) -4.3%

Total, Charges for Services 4,712,108 5,105,271 5,827,973 6,485,969 1,380,698 27.0%

Total, Fines and Forfeitures 216,458 276,877 239,980 240,915 (35,962) -13.0%

Total, State/Federal Grants 6,245,195 6,251,876 8,032,175 7,902,936 1,651,060 26.4%

Total, Other Revenues 1,206,379 637,792 906,117 986,117 348,325 54.6%

TOTAL, GENERAL FUND REVENUES 145,234,824 148,253,009 161,312,286 160,881,169 12,628,160 8.5%

Appropriation of Fund Balance:

Fund Balance -Used for Operations 0 3,026,965 4,156,547 5,460,366 2,433,401 80.4%

Fund Balance CIP/Paygo 0 0 14,827,465 14,228,277 14,228,277 100.0%

Sub-total 0 3,026,965 18,984,012 19,688,643 16,661,678 100.0%

TOTAL, GENERAL FUND SOURCES $145,234,824 $151,279,974 $180,296,298 $180,569,812 $29,289,838 19.4%

INCREASE (DECREASE)OVER APPROVED FY2006

Property Taxes $ 64,018,123

Local Income Tax 60,941,191

Other Local Taxes 11,421,000

Highway User Fees 7,924,122

Grants

Charges for Services / Licenses / Fines

7,902,936

7,687,680

Other Revenues 986,117

Total General Fund Revenues $160,881,169

Charges for Services

4.8%

Highway User Fees4.9%

Grants4.9%

Other Revenues0.6%

Other Local Taxes7.1%

Property Taxes39.8%

Local Income Tax 37.9%

FY 2007 GENERAL FUND REVENUES(Excluding the Impact of Use of Fund Balance - $19,688,643)


NOT USED

GENERAL FUND REVENUES Overview

The General Fund operating budget is approved at $180,569,812 in FY 2007. It is funded through revenue of

$160,881,169 as well as the use of the FY 2005 audited unreserved fund balance of $19,688,643. The revenue growth is approximately 8.5% over FY 2006, including grants.

Property Taxes Property tax revenues are projected to increase $3,679,002 over the FY 2006 budget, based upon the latest State Department of Assessments assessable base projections. The approved budget is based upon the tax rate of $0.857 per $100 of assessed property value. The FY 2007 property base is $7.310 billion, or $497 million higher than that used for FY 2006 estimation. Local Income Tax

FY 2007 local income tax revenues are projected to increase $4,591,191 over the budgeted FY 2006, or an increase of 8.1%. Including the impact of the reduced tax rate of 3.00% effective January 1, 2006.

Other Local Taxes Other local taxes increased by 0.9% to a total of $11,421,000. Recordation tax revenues continue to exhibit strong growth. The $8,700,000 is 29.9% more than budgeted in FY 2006, and reflects the fact that the FY 2005 actual revenues exceeded budget. FY 2006 collections to date are strong. Energy tax rate was reduced 50% in this approved budget with receipts estimated at $1.3 million for FY 2007, which represents a reduction of $1.9 million compared to FY2006 budget. The Public Accommodations Tax is projected to remain level over the FY 2006 amount of $500,000. This tax is imposed at a rate of 5% on the amount paid for room or building rental at a hotel, motel, apartment or other similar place providing sleeping accommodations. Highway User Fees Highway User revenue normally represents a State formula distribution to the counties of motor fuel taxes, vehicle titling taxes and registration fees. An estimate of revenues is provided from the State twice a year. This estimate reflects the increase of $956,902, or 13.7%, to bring the total to $7,924,122. Licenses and Permits

Estimated revenues from various licenses and permits are projected to decrease from $1,003,852 in FY 2006 to $960,796 for FY 2007. The principal cause for this decrease of revenue is due to the re-alignment of fees in Land Use and Growth Management and Department of Public Works & Transportation fees. Actual for FY2005 reflects a decrease compared to budget of $129,440.

GENERAL FUND REVENUES Overview

Charges for Services This revenue category is projected to increase from $5,105,271 in FY 2006 to an estimated $6,485,969 in FY 2007. The largest component of this increase is $269,025 attributable to the reimbursement of Housing Authority expenditures in the Department of Economic and Community Development.

Fines and Forfeitures Revenues from various fines, fees and forfeitures are projected to decrease by $35,962 from $276,877 in FY 2006 to $240,915 in FY 2007. This category reflects fines attributable to activities of the Circuit Court, Land Use and Growth Management, Animal Control, and the Alcohol Beverage Board. It also includes asset forfeiture revenues generated by the forfeiture program operated by the State’s Attorney’s Office and the Sheriff’s Department.

Grants State and Federal Grant receipts are projected to be $7,902,936 in FY 2007, which is higher than the original approved budget for FY 2006. The two biggest increases are non-recurring grants: the Emergency Numbers Board grant for $610,800, and the COPS grant for $428,827. This category includes both “recurring” grants, such as the Police Protection Aid, Prisoner Housing Subsidy, and other grants related to public safety, and the Transportation Grant which is used to support the operations of the St. Mary’s Transit (STS), as well as other grants that are anticipated, which are not recurring resources upon which the County can rely. Grants included in the approved budget were evaluated for consistency with programmatic objectives of the County and requirements for county matching funds.

Other Revenues This revenue category is projected to total $986,117 in FY 2007, which is $348,325 more than the FY2006 approved budget. The largest element in this section is investment income, which is estimated to increase by $329,925 over the approved FY 2006 budget based on earnings during FY2005 and FY2006 to date. This increase is largely due to higher interest rates and increased funds invested from both the 2005 Bond Issue ($16 million borrowed in January 2005) and reserves on hand.

Other Financing Sources The approved budget uses $19,688,643 of the June 30, 2005 audited unreserved general fund balance. This is used to fund non-recurring expenses such as setting up the required $3.5 million OPEB Trust, $1,960,366 of Technology/Non-Technology Iniatives and Pay-Go transfer of $14,228,277 for capital projects approved through FY 2006 that were budgeted with bond proceeds as the funding source. The largest component of the $14,228,277 is $11 million for Board of Education Projects. This Pay-Go transfer would eliminated the planned borrowing for the County of $20 million in FY2007, Based on the current recommended capital budget and plan, the next planned bond sale would likely be for $15 million in FY2008.

ST. MARY'S COUNTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES - DETAIL



PROPERTY TAXESReal Property - Full Year 52,264,565 54,916,634 60,649,428 59,606,147 4,689,513 8.5%Real Property - Half Year 474,009 478,509 451,756 443,985 (34,524) -7.2%Personal Property 157,788 258,380 272,849 268,155 9,775 3.8%Public Utilities 2,642,342 2,475,804 2,750,986 2,703,664 227,860 9.2%Ordinary Bus Corporation 2,502,174 2,325,241 2,455,639 2,413,398 88,157 3.8%Additions and Abatements (162,217) (468,105) (1,677,220) (1,677,220) (1,209,115) 258.3%Penalties and Interest 511,487 456,856 568,674 568,674 111,818 24.5%Other Tax Reimbursement (9,311) 0 (9,066) (9,066) (9,066) 100.0%Senior Tax Credit (County) (88,071) (89,000) (123,000) (123,000) (34,000) 38.2%Senior Tax Cap Credit 0 0 (220,000) (220,000) (220,000) 100.0%Enterprise Zone Credit (33,474) (61,000) (48,000) (48,000) 13,000 -21.3%Homeowners Tax Credit (County) (465,361) (480,533) (468,404) (468,404) 12,129 -2.5%Tobacco Barn Tax Credit (48,306) (48,036) (47,289) (47,289) 747 -1.6%Agricultural Tax Credit (3,728) (3,510) (2,673) (2,673) 837 -23.8%Payments In Lieu of Taxes 98,103 97,348 131,348 141,348 44,000 45.2%State Homeowners Credit 439,110 480,533 468,404 468,404 (12,129) -2.5% Total, Property Taxes 58,279,110 60,339,121 65,153,432 64,018,123 3,679,002 6.1%

INCOME TAXES Local Income Tax 54,148,444 56,350,000 60,841,191 60,941,191 4,591,191 8.1% Total, Income Taxes 54,148,444 56,350,000 60,841,191 60,941,191 4,591,191 8.1%

OTHER LOCAL TAXES Admissions and Amusement 104,600 120,000 120,000 120,000 0 0.0%Recordation Taxes 9,541,063 6,700,000 8,700,000 8,700,000 2,000,000 29.9%CATV Franchise Tax 545,222 601,000 601,000 601,000 0 0.0%Energy Taxes 2,496,406 3,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 (1,900,000) -59.4%Trailer Park Tax 229,727 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0.0%Public Accommodations Tax 478,712 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0.0% Total, Other Local Taxes 13,395,730 11,321,000 11,421,000 11,421,000 100,000 0.9%

Shared Revenues Highway Users Revenue 6,217,472 6,967,220 7,924,122 7,924,122 956,902 13.7% Total, Shared Revenues 6,217,472 6,967,220 7,924,122 7,924,122 956,902 13.7%

LICENSES AND PERMITS Beer, Wine, Liquor Licenses 92,068 95,350 99,736 99,736 4,386 4.6%Beer, Wine, Liquor Transfer 1,200 2,000 1,300 1,300 (700) -35.0%Amusement Licenses 10,959 7,000 7,500 7,500 500 7.1%Traders Licenses 145,590 123,000 123,000 123,000 0 0.0%Animal Licenses 5,050 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 0.0%Certificate of Occupancy/Inspections Overlot 2,021 9,400 92,760 92,760 83,360 886.8%Marriage Licenses 6,095 5,700 5,700 5,700 0 0.0%Taxicab Licenses 403 550 700 700 150 27.3%Electrical Licenses 17,325 5,500 5,500 0 (5,500) -100.0%Building Permits 448,151 586,252 565,000 565,000 (21,252) -3.6%Materials Testing 11,177 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0.0%Auto Tag Fees 3,269 4,100 4,100 4,100 0 0.0%Inspection Extension Fee 0 25,000 0 0 (25,000) -100.0%DPW & GP Inspection Fee 70,620 119,000 40,000 40,000 (79,000) -66.4% Total, Licenses and Permits 813,928 1,003,852 966,296 960,796 (43,056) -4.3%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES Development Services Fees 321,478 362,306 250,140 250,140 (112,166) -31.0%LUGM BOA Variance of Zoning 17,110 0 39,010 39,010 39,010 100.0%Other Income/Advertising 199 1,350 4,400 4,400 3,050 225.9%LUGM Environmental Permit Review 0 0 6,000 6,000 6,000 100.0%LUGM Impervious Surface 0 0 1,500 1,500 1,500 100.0%LUGM Electric Exam 675 0 18,300 18,300 18,300 100.0%LUGM Scenic Reimbursement 0 0 0 21,000 21,000 100.0%Town Run Conn Fees 41,065 0 0 0 0 100.0%Review Fees/Administrative Variances 0 1,500 2,000 2,000 500 33.3%Sheriff's Fees 67,429 76,608 76,250 76,250 (358) -0.5%Sheriff - Alcohol Enforcement 75,780 83,958 87,814 87,814 3,856 4.6%






Maps & Publications 4,503 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0%Filing Fees 0 1,500 0 0 (1,500) -100.0%Dodge Reports 320 240 240 240 0 0.0%Other Revenue 199 52,000 52,000 52,000 0 0.0%Juror Fee Reimbursement 37,110 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.0%Concept Site Plan Review 710 2,125 4,000 4,000 1,875 88.2%Traffic Impact Study Review 0 1,200 2,000 2,000 800 66.7%DPW&T Contract Review Fee 0 16,000 16,000 16,000 0 0.0%Major Subdivision 6+Lots 0 332 50,000 50,000 49,668 14960.2%DPW&T Development Review 112,706 100,000 80,000 80,000 (20,000) -20.0%DPW&T Minor Subdivision 2,767 26,025 30,000 30,000 3,975 15.3%DPW&T Major Site Plan 0 1,312 13,000 13,000 11,688 890.9%DPW&T Minor Site Plan 0 2,600 500 500 (2,100) -80.8%DPW&T Review of Records 0 3,080 500 500 (2,580) -83.8%DPW&T Offsite Ent. Inspection 0 0 1,600 1,600 1,600 100.0%Noxious Weed Fees 7,982 9,000 9,200 9,200 200 2.2%General Gov't - Other Fees 318 100 150 150 50 50.0%Reimbursement - Housing Authority 811,271 1,123,366 1,419,573 1,392,391 269,025 23.9%Reimbursement from Homeowners-Piney Point Gt 0 0 0 19,875 19,875 100.0%State Office Building 677,639 600,578 657,753 657,753 57,175 9.5%Regional Library 33,790 21,000 21,000 21,000 0 0.0%Public Safety- Housing State Prisoners 99,367 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.0%Public Safety - Work Release Fees 151,235 172,000 172,000 172,000 0 0.0%Public Safety - 911 Service Fees 545,782 375,000 525,000 525,000 150,000 40.0%Public Safety - Town Patrol 27,273 29,527 34,433 34,433 4,906 16.6%Public Safety - Home Detention 33,313 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 0.0%Public Safety - Weekender Fees 18,635 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0.0%Public Safety - Juvenile Transports 44,617 48,000 48,000 48,000 0 0.0%Public Safety - Sex Offender Fees 0 70 70 70 0 0.0%Tower Revenue Sharing 90,446 60,000 85,000 85,000 25,000 41.7%Public Safety-Other Reimbursements 0 0 150,000 750,000 750,000 100.0%MSP-Overtime Reimbursement/Other 22,969 20,240 19,400 28,778 8,538 42.2%Other Social Services 88,302 69,461 72,508 74,130 4,669 6.7%App Fee - Grading Permits 18,585 14,500 14,500 14,500 0 0.0%Other Highway Fees 99 62 62 62 0 0.0%DPW's PWA Inspection Fees (99,450) 150,500 147,500 147,500 (3,000) -2.0%Permit Ext. Fee (over 3) 0 300 150 150 (150) -50.0%Application Fee Construction 187,649 500 14,000 14,000 13,500 2700.0%Application Fees 0 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0.0%Application Fee - Grading Permit 0 1,250 15,500 15,500 14,250 1140.0%Application Fee Utility Permit 1,000 3,000 14,000 14,000 11,000 366.7%Permit Transfer Fee 0 600 400 400 (200) -33.3%Solid Waste Landfill Tipping Fees 426,352 336,000 400,000 413,000 77,000 22.9%Solid Waste Recycling Containers 21,086 41,400 41,400 41,400 0 0.0%Security Interest 1,045 2,200 2,200 2,200 0 0.0%State's Attorney Reimbursement 57,500 64,200 65,000 65,000 800 1.2%R & P Tennis Court Lighting 187 500 2,000 2,000 1,500 300.0%Wicomico Waterfront Park 8,414 8,600 9,000 9,000 400 4.7%R & P Contract Services - Grass Cutting 136,625 188,672 168,582 168,582 (20,090) -10.6%Museum Entrance Fees 17,225 46,320 36,700 36,700 (9,620) -20.8%Marcey House Client Fees 38,308 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 0.0%Aging Client Fees 838 400 0 0 (400) -100.0%States Attorney Client Fees 672 300 375 375 75 25.0%Public Service Ent. - Passenger 409,391 508,030 545,500 535,500 27,470 5.4%Washington Gas Light Co. 11,777 11,876 11,876 11,876 0 0.0%Rents and Concessions 50,682 79,500 76,000 26,000 (53,500) -67.3%911 Numbers Board 720 0 0 0 0 0.0%CDC Reimbursement 7,701 12,303 14,387 14,690 2,387 19.4%Airport Charges- Public Service Ent 80,712 100,000 60,000 60,000 (40,000) -40.0%Intergovernmental Reimb CDC 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 100.0%Bay Area Restoration Fund 0 34,280 0 0 (34,280) -100.0% Total, Charges for Services 4,712,108 5,105,271 5,827,973 6,485,969 1,380,698 27.0%





FINES AND FORFEITURES Court Fees, Fines, Forfeitures 77,338 136,500 101,512 101,512 (34,988) -25.6%LUGM Fines 9,650 4,500 1,500 1,500 (3,000) -66.7%Alcohol Beverage Fines 1,450 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.0%Finance Service Fee 28,817 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0.0%Other Fines & Forfeitures 43,409 45,000 46,500 46,500 1,500 3.3%Animal Control Fines 2,090 4,000 3,000 4,000 0 0.0%Asset Forfeiture Revenues 53,704 53,877 54,468 54,403 526 1.0% Total, Fines and Forfeitures 216,458 276,877 239,980 240,915 (35,962) -13.0%

STATE/FEDERAL GRANTS Prisoner Housing Subsidy Grant - State 392,233 406,800 660,000 660,000 253,200 62.2%Public Safety - Housing Federal Prisoners 815,601 450,000 0 0 (450,000) -100.0%Police Protection Aid 785,664 799,324 799,324 812,597 13,273 1.7%Comm Vehicle Traffic 0 3,500 4,200 4,200 700 20.0%Law Enforcement Terrorism 0 63,647 122,642 122,642 58,995 92.7%Domestic Violence Unit Pilot 0 0 0 33,322 33,322 100.0%Sex Offender Compliance 0 0 0 38,163 38,163 100.0%LLEBG Block Grant XI (JAG) 0 24,612 15,660 15,660 (8,952) -36.4%Bulletproof Vest Partnership 0 0 22,621 22,621 22,621 100.0%Portable Trash/Toilet 19,408 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0.0%Aging - Retired Senior Volunteers (RSVP) 47,453 47,847 47,847 48,493 646 1.4%STS Transportation Grants 1,141,999 1,235,380 1,388,336 1,250,236 14,856 1.2%Aging - Title III B - Community Services 59,147 68,905 68,905 68,905 0 0.0%Aging - Title III C1 - Congregate Meals 57,580 70,442 70,442 70,442 0 0.0%Aging - Title III C2 - Home Del. Meals 35,486 37,022 37,010 37,010 (12) 0.0%Aging - Title III D - Preventive Health 8,671 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.0%Aging - Title III E - Caregiver 36,094 30,495 30,495 30,495 0 0.0%Aging-NSIP 63,665 35,773 35,733 35,733 (40) -0.1%Aging - Ombudsman 3,890 10,890 10,890 10,890 0 0.0%Aging - Nutrition 38,153 38,153 37,920 37,920 (233) -0.6%Aging - Senior Info. & Assistance 11,588 11,588 11,321 11,321 (267) -2.3%Aging - Senior Care 97,458 97,458 97,458 97,458 0 0.0%Aging - Guardianship 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 0 0.0%Aging - Info Tech 4,845 5,000 3,823 3,823 (1,177) -23.5%Aging - Medicaid Waiver 74,596 126,774 115,375 115,375 (11,399) -9.0%Aging-VEPI 6,817 6,817 6,817 6,817 0 0.0%Aging - Health Insurance Counseling 10,799 10,998 10,998 11,043 45 0.4%Aging-CAMM 9,036 9,036 9,175 9,175 139 1.5%Aging - Alzheimer's 7,710 0 0 0 0 0.0%Strength Training Seniors 3,636 0 0 0 0 0.0%Tobacco Enforcement Grant 12,197 12,197 12,985 12,985 788 6.5%Cold Case OT 3,854 0 0 0 0.0%Agriculture - Johnson grass Grant 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 0 0.0%Emergency Management 70,067 50,048 70,067 70,067 20,019 40.0%State 508 - Fire & Rescue 201,696 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0.0%CRTK Grant MDE 0 0 0 27,750 27,750 100.0%MIEMSS Training & Recertification 1,634 3,000 3,360 3,360 360 12.0%Emergency Numbers Board 0 0 610,800 610,800 610,800 100.0%ENSB Equipment Grant 23,463 6,000 0 0 (6,000) -100.0%ALS Training 3,993 0 0 0 0 0.0%Homeland Security-Public Safety 372,773 218,258 218,258 218,258 0 0.0%Citizen's Corps 0 20,000 10,000 10,000 (10,000) -50.0%State Homeland Regional 56,752 0 0 0 0 0.0%Emergency Planner 50,628 63,750 81,250 81,250 17,500 27.5%Local Emergency Planning 0 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 100.0%Pre-Disaster Hazard Mitigation 0 0 586,800 0 0 0.0%Cooperative Reimbursement 348,424 398,915 600,897 602,165 203,250 51.0%Byrne Mem Grant CC 0 21,805 43,173 43,173 21,368 98.0%COPs Grant 0 64,787 493,614 493,614 428,827 661.9%Child Support Federal Incentive 0 0 4,362 4,362 4,362 100.0%MVOC Project Save 0 19,120 20,141 14,340 (4,780) -25.0%Marcey House 249,834 252,106 252,106 252,106 0 0.0%Critical Areas 50,500 38,000 38,000 36,000 (2,000) -5.3%Highway Safety 99,500 123,000 112,500 112,500 (10,500) -8.5%





Power Plant ELMS 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0%CLG Historic Roads 0 14,400 0 0 (14,400) -100.0%Alcohol Prevention 86,794 89,685 89,685 89,685 0 0.0%Injury Prevention Program 2,909 3,000 0 0 (3,000) -100.0%Hazard Mitigation Project 31,200 0 0 0 0 0.0%Summer Camp Food 17,638 0 0 0 0 0.0%C-SAFE Sheriff's 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0.0%C-SAFE State's Attorney 8,612 12,000 11,600 11,600 (400) -3.3%C-SAFE MSP 11,600 12,000 11,400 11,400 (600) -5.0%C-SAFE/Lead Coordination 0 2,600 3,600 3,600 1,000 38.5%C-SAFE OCS 2,600 0 0 0 0 0.0%Summer Youth Achievement 250 0 0 0 0 0.0%Lex Manor/Southampton 207,359 0 0 0 0 0.0%DSS Asst.Co.Attorney Grant 49,676 54,553 55,310 56,337 1,784 3.3%State Tourism Grants 39,143 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0.0%Family Services - Circuit Court 101,956 116,558 135,610 135,610 19,052 16.3%Juvenile Drug Court 98,248 79,832 79,832 79,832 0 0.0%CC Law Library 19,069 0 0 20,000 20,000 100.0%CC Drug Treatment Ct. Comm 0 0 0 78,443 78,443 100.0%CC TPR Mediation 15,154 0 0 0 0 0.0%Domestic Preparedness Phase I 7,237 0 0 0 0 0.0%Domestic Preparedness Phase II 104,548 0 0 0 0 0.0%Md. Arts Council 1,605 0 0 0 0 0.0%Local Law Enforcement Block Grants 28,299 0 0 0 0 0.0%Federal Forfeited Funds 8,209 0 0 0 0 0.0%MHT Cert Local Gov't - PZ 0 600 650 650 50 8.3%LUGM - SHA Scenic Byways 0 0 0 150,400 150,400 100.0%Breton Bay Watershed 0 30,000 0 0 (30,000) -100.0%Countywide Maintenance-R & P 6,267 99,000 99,000 99,000 0 0.0%Lifepak Defibrillator 18,852 0 0 0 0 0.0%Rural Access Defibrillator 12,637 12,643 9,948 9,948 (2,695) -21.3%Bioterrorism PreHosp 29,303 33,335 33,335 33,335 0 0.0%Hazardous Materials 0 4,550 3,300 3,300 (1,250) -27.5%School Bus Safety 15,032 17,500 15,000 15,000 (2,500) -14.3%Victims of Crime 0 43,173 0 0 (43,173) -100.0%Sum Assoc Vista Train 8,497 0 0 0 0 0.0%Pilot Highway Safety 0 15,000 0 0 (15,000) -100.0%Sewage Sludge - Health Department 14,657 25,000 3,600 3,600 (21,400) -85.6%PW & T Piney Point Mitigation 0 0 0 139,125 139,125 100.0%Supplemental Revenue Reserve 0 400,000 400,000 500,000 100,000 25.0% Total, State/Federal Grants 6,245,195 6,251,876 8,032,175 7,902,936 1,651,060 26.4%

OTHER REVENUES Investment income 1,093,362 534,100 784,025 864,025 329,925 61.8%Tax Sale Revenue (3,924) 2,142 2,142 2,142 0 0.0%Disposal of Fixed Assets 1,596 0 0 0 0 0.0%Contributions and Donations: Aging Grant Programs 22,133 30,000 38,400 38,400 8,400 28.0% Marcey House 11,403 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% Community Services 875 1,550 1,550 1,550 0 0.0% Special Events PIO 6,275 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Sheriff's Office 689 0 0 0 0 0.0% Tourism 73,970 50,000 60,000 60,000 10,000 20.0% Total - Other Revenues 1,206,379 637,792 906,117 986,117 348,325 54.6%

TOTAL, GENERAL FUND REVENUES $145,234,824 $148,253,009 $161,312,286 $160,881,169 12,628,160 8.5%

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Appropriation of Fund Balance: Operations 0 3,026,965 4,156,547 5,460,366 2,433,401 80.4% Pay-Go- Prior Approved CIP 0 0 14,827,465 14,228,277 14,228,277 100.0% Total - Other Financing Sources 0 3,026,965 18,984,012 19,688,643 16,661,678 527.2%

TOTAL, GENERAL FUND $145,234,824 $151,279,974 $180,296,298 $180,569,812 29,289,838 19.4%

FY 2007 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET *Excludes Transfers

Other State Agencies/Boards

4.5%

Non-County Agencies

0.8%

Other Costs3.4%

Debt Service8.0%

Public Works & Transportation

11.0%

Other County Departments

11.4%Public Safety

3.3%

BOE - Operating41.1%

Other Elected Officials

2.5%

Office of the Sheriff14.0%

Board of Education-Operating $67,811,488

Office of the Sheriff 23,156,367

Other County Departments 18,828,089

Public Works & Transportation 18,073,653

Debt Service 13,181,303

Other State Agencies/Independent Boards 7,472,202

Other Costs 5,627,179

Other Elected Officials 4,046,054

Transfers – Reserves and LOSAP 1,218,255

Non-County Agencies 1,496,934

Total Approved Spending $180,569,812

Total Expenditures* 165,123,280

Transfer to Pay-Go –Prior CIP 14,228,277

Public Safety 5,430,011

ST. MARY'S COUNTY EXPENDITURES - SUMMARY

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007Department/Spending Unit Actual Approved Request Approved

Budget Budget Budget Amount Percent County Commissioners/County Administrator 883,631 1,037,878 1,235,622 1,092,429 54,551 5.3%Department on Aging 1,691,653 2,573,144 2,253,852 2,112,317 (460,827) -17.9%County Attorney 402,413 491,253 663,253 519,351 28,098 5.7%Economic & Community Development 2,317,832 2,655,141 2,908,300 2,937,079 281,938 10.6%Department of Finance 1,112,142 1,228,259 1,277,740 1,305,677 77,418 6.3%Marcey Halfway House 392,853 412,632 428,304 431,198 18,566 4.5%Information Technology 1,693,253 1,937,872 2,214,843 2,115,752 177,880 9.2%Human Resources 1,164,256 1,428,509 1,652,966 1,555,167 126,658 8.9%Land Use & Growth Management 1,981,286 2,492,705 2,661,381 2,807,964 315,259 12.6%Public Works and Transportation 13,576,471 16,142,600 17,720,575 18,073,653 1,931,053 12.0%Recreation, Parks & Community Services 3,053,013 3,646,470 3,938,362 3,951,155 304,685 8.4%Public Safety 3,333,934 3,637,483 5,542,121 5,430,011 1,792,528 49.3%

Total, Departments 31,602,737 37,683,946 42,497,319 42,331,753 4,647,807 12.3%

Circuit Court 985,360 1,068,331 1,144,252 1,184,588 116,257 10.9%Orphan's Court 26,696 30,530 32,092 31,759 1,229 4.0%Office of the Sheriff 17,815,192 20,848,562 25,228,059 23,156,367 2,307,805 11.1%State's Attorney 1,940,776 2,128,701 2,516,312 2,476,566 347,865 16.3%County Treasurer 307,040 345,010 348,951 353,141 8,131 2.4%

Total, Elected Officials 21,075,064 24,421,134 29,269,666 27,202,421 2,781,287 11.4%

Department of Health 1,069,544 1,120,671 1,307,028 1,141,845 21,174 1.9%Social Services 326,574 342,408 350,507 353,099 10,691 3.1%Alcohol Beverage Board 174,889 203,321 213,182 215,156 11,835 5.8%Supervisors of Elections 446,038 424,495 1,613,628 1,034,371 609,876 143.7%Cooperative Extension Service 119,600 150,568 166,000 159,828 9,260 6.2%Ethics Commission 6,747 9,694 9,694 9,694 0 0.0%Soil Conservation District 41,238 47,495 52,109 52,109 4,614 9.7%Wicomico Scenic River Commission 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%County Funds - Board of Education 58,900,000 62,634,224 67,686,488 67,811,488 5,177,264 8.3%County Funds - College of Southern Md. 2,096,456 2,240,763 2,443,413 2,490,000 249,237 11.1%County Funds - Board of Library Trustees 1,666,464 1,781,142 2,054,341 2,015,100 233,958 13.1%

Total, Boards and State Agencies 64,848,550 68,955,781 75,897,390 75,283,690 6,327,909 9.2%

Non-County Agencies 1,355,627 1,279,030 1,996,806 1,496,934 217,904 17.0%

Volunteer Fire & rescue 508 Only 201,696 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0.0%Supplemental Expense Reserve 0 400,000 400,000 500,000 100,000 25.0%Leonardtown Tax Rebate 48,936 55,370 58,879 58,879 3,509 6.3%Retiree Health Costs 776,174 1,156,150 1,270,665 4,830,300 3,674,150 317.8%Bank/GOB Costs 44,633 29,000 38,000 38,000 9,000 31.0%Debt Service 12,063,329 12,903,553 13,182,638 13,181,303 277,750 2.2%

Other Budget Costs 13,134,768 14,744,073 15,150,182 18,808,482 4,064,409 27.6%

Sub-Total - General Operations 132,016,746 147,083,964 164,811,363 165,123,280 18,039,316 12.3%

Designated - CSM Scholarship 0 50,000 0 0 (50,000) -100.0%Designated - Enhanced LOSAP 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 100.0%CIP / Pay-Go 500,000 3,151,010 500,000 14,228,277 11,077,267 351.5%Rainy Day 250,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 0 0.0%Bond Rating Reserve 692,252 370,000 500,000 500,000 130,000 35.1%Emergency Appropriations 0 500,000 500,000 533,255 33,255 6.7%

Transfers & Reserves 1,442,252 4,196,010 1,625,000 15,446,532 11,250,522 268.1%

TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET 133,458,998 151,279,974 166,436,363 180,569,812 29,289,838 19.4%

Increase (Decrease)Over Approved FY2006

THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STRUCTURE

The detailed budget pages which follow provide a breakdown by department/spending unit of the audited FY 2005 expenditures, the original approved FY 2006 budget, and both the requested and approved FY 2007 budget. The categorization of expenditures within each department/spending unit is in accordance with the County's automated financial system and chart of accounts. Expenditures are further refined within the chart of accounts for budgeting and expenditure tracking purposes.

PERSONAL SERVICES - Includes regular salaries, overtime, shift differential, and associated costs such as employer contributions to social security, pension and health insurance.

OPERATING EXPENSES - Includes the day-to-day operating expenses of the County categorized as follows:

1. Operating Supplies - Includes the cost of office supplies, advertising and legal notices, printing and

binding, books and publications, uniforms and clothing, supplies and materials, food and staff development.

2. Professional Services - Includes the use of architects and engineers, consultants, individuals who

perform services for the County but are not employees, use of outside firms to maintain County office equipment, and employment of accounting, auditing and medical experts.

3. Communication - Includes costs associated with telephone, postage and freight.

4. Transportation - Includes purchased fuel and oil, vehicle maintenance and repair, and costs

reimbursed to employees when traveling on County business.

5. Public Utility Service - Includes such utility costs as electricity, gas, water and sewer, and heating oil.

6. Repairs and Maintenance - Includes the costs to repair and maintain County facilities (heating, air-

conditioning, ventilation, electrical, plumbing, and roofing).

7. Rentals - Includes the cost whenever the County must rent facilities, tools, equipment or land.

8. Insurance - Consists of the costs for which the County must insure its fixed assets as well as general public liability and officials performance bonds.

9. Miscellaneous - Consists primarily of funds to be allocated to independent spending units outside

the County government. Also includes costs of conferences, lodging, professional memberships, and other costs not identified in other expense categories.

EQUIPMENT - Costs of acquiring new and replacement vehicles, shop and custodial equipment, and office and communications equipment. Equipment/vehicles lease payment, includes the acquisition of new or replacement equipment, using 5-year exempt financing; the amount shown is the annual lease cost.

ST. MARY'S COUNTY EXPENDITURES - DETAILS

FY 2006Department/Spending Unit FY 2005 Approved FY2007 FY2007

Actual Budget Request Approved Amount Percent COUNTY DEPARTMENTSCounty Commissioners/County Administrator Legislative/County Commissioners Personal Services 256,961 277,041 304,544 312,834 35,793 12.9% Operating Supplies 8,075 13,145 33,145 32,645 19,500 148.3% Professional Services 0 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 100.0% Communications 4,778 11,325 6,751 5,952 (5,373) -47.4% Transportation 788 3,500 4,928 4,928 1,428 40.8% Miscellaneous 4,552 34,300 46,200 42,700 8,400 24.5% Equipment 25,441 0 0 0 0 0.0% Legislative/County Commissioners 300,595 339,311 396,568 400,059 60,748 17.9%

County Administrator Personal Services 287,394 304,685 311,721 323,669 18,984 6.2% Operating Supplies 13,031 14,472 96,790 14,472 0 0.0% Professional Services 4,257 4,500 3,000 3,000 (1,500) -33.3% Communications 1,819 1,900 1,900 1,900 0 0.0% Transportation 0 230 594 594 364 158.3% Rentals 2,238 2,100 3,600 3,600 1,500 71.4% Miscellaneous 354 1,200 2,800 2,800 1,600 133.3% Equipment 239 0 0 0 0 0.0% County Administrator 309,332 329,087 420,405 350,035 20,948 6.4%

Public Information Personal Services 242,076 265,755 335,112 265,134 (621) -0.2% Operating Supplies 4,771 32,820 41,520 38,094 5,274 16.1% Professional Services 2,027 0 0 0 0 0.0% Communications 3,277 3,660 3,660 3,000 (660) -18.0% Transportation 606 985 1,387 1,387 402 40.8% Miscellaneous 20,572 31,980 36,970 34,720 2,740 8.6% Equipment 375 0 0 0 0 0.0% Public Information 273,704 335,200 418,649 342,335 7,135 2.1%

Bay Area Restoration Fund 0 34,280 0 0 (34,280) -100.0%

Total - County Commissioners/County Admin. 883,631 1,037,878 1,235,622 1,092,429 54,551 5.3%

Department on Aging Personal Services 733,069 986,196 1,121,525 1,023,593 37,397 3.8% Operating Supplies 118,268 108,800 140,300 140,300 31,500 29.0% Professional Services 35,076 34,800 30,000 30,000 (4,800) -13.8% Communications 18,682 30,800 31,448 26,448 (4,352) -14.1% Transportation 17,224 20,500 29,051 29,051 8,551 41.7% Rentals 9,451 6,000 11,611 11,611 5,611 93.5% Miscellaneous 3,380 3,300 4,300 4,300 1,000 30.3% Equipment 104 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0% Department on Aging 935,254 1,191,396 1,369,235 1,266,303 74,907 6.3%

Oakley Personal Services 0 27,176 73,209 33,915 6,739 24.8% Operating Supplies 0 17,155 12,730 12,730 (4,425) -25.8% Communications 0 600 400 400 (200) -33.3% Transportation 0 3,400 0 0 (3,400) -100.0% Rentals 0 6,492 6,752 6,752 260 4.0% Oakley 0 54,823 93,091 53,797 (1,026) -1.9%

SMILE/Medical Adult Daycare 111,500 620,707 85,823 85,823 (534,884) -86.2%




Actual Budget Request Approved Amount Percent


Grants Personal Services 312,597 330,960 289,187 361,551 30,591 9.2% Operating 145,800 152,259 172,974 147,288 (4,971) -3.3% Professional Services 152,080 124,243 137,052 128,703 4,460 3.6% Communications 0 0 360 0 0 0.0% Transportation 4,876 14,500 19,500 13,919 (581) -4.0% Rentals 2,220 0 0 0 0 0.0% Insurance 350 350 350 350 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 23,181 78,206 83,080 49,883 (28,323) -36.2% Equipment 3,795 4,500 2,000 3,500 (1,000) -22.2% Other 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0.0% Grants 644,899 706,218 705,703 706,394 176 0.0%

Total - Department on Aging 1,691,653 2,573,144 2,253,852 2,112,317 (460,827) -17.9%

County Attorney Personal Services 331,952 384,043 418,688 394,786 10,743 2.8% Operating Supplies 8,948 16,230 16,230 16,230 0 0.0% Professional Services 58,498 86,300 220,000 100,000 13,700 15.9% Communications 1,649 1,700 1,742 1,742 42 2.5% Transportation 306 400 563 563 163 40.8% Rentals 0 0 2,950 2,950 2,950 100.0% Miscellaneous 690 2,180 2,680 2,680 500 22.9% Equipment 370 400 400 400 0 0.0%

Total - County Attorney 402,413 491,253 663,253 519,351 28,098 5.7%

Dept. of Economic & Community Development Administration/Office of the Director Personal Services 175,593 185,488 189,879 195,757 10,269 5.5% Operating Supplies 14,973 5,400 5,400 5,400 0 0.0% Professional Services 25,906 2,750 2,750 2,750 0 0.0% Communications 21,387 22,738 23,878 23,878 1,140 5.0% Transportation 2,743 2,800 3,942 3,942 1,142 40.8% Miscellaneous 6,141 6,700 9,300 9,300 2,600 38.8% Equipment 333 0 0 0 0 0.0% Administration/Office of the Director 247,076 225,876 235,149 241,027 15,151 6.7%

Tourism Development Personal Services 108,488 117,564 163,442 124,084 6,520 5.5% Operating Supplies 130,370 132,925 174,925 169,925 37,000 27.8% Professional Services 14,735 86,550 107,166 97,166 10,616 12.3% Transportation 2,354 2,000 5,956 4,610 2,610 130.5% Equipment 2,367 0 0 0 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 15,663 19,500 27,472 24,960 5,460 28.0% Tourism Development 273,977 358,539 478,961 420,745 62,206 17.3%

Agriculture & Seafood Development Personal Services 113,911 125,377 127,157 129,354 3,977 3.2% Operating Supplies 2,615 3,400 3,400 3,400 0 0.0% Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Transportation 2,515 2,750 3,877 3,877 1,127 41.0% Miscellaneous 953 1,000 1,500 1,500 500 50.0% Agriculture & Seafood Development 119,994 132,527 135,934 138,131 5,604 4.2%

Business Development/Lexington Park Revitalization Personal Services 216,747 241,469 251,253 256,486 15,017 6.2% Professional Services 26,600 15,000 15,000 95,000 80,000 533.3% Operating Supplies 26,016 28,000 28,000 28,000 0 0.0% Transportation 3,048 3,760 5,294 5,294 1,534 40.8% Miscellaneous 6,853 11,100 16,100 16,100 5,000 45.0% Business Development 279,264 299,329 315,647 400,880 101,551 33.9%

Housing Personal Services 772,777 1,076,024 1,397,058 1,340,745 264,721 24.6% Professional Services 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 100.0% Communication 30,415 36,485 37,385 37,385 900 2.5% Transportation 4,220 7,400 10,804 10,804 3,404 46.0% Other 3,859 3,457 3,457 3,457 0 0.0% Housing 811,271 1,123,366 1,448,704 1,442,391 319,025 28.4%





Grants Personal Services 65,867 29,122 3,905 3,905 (25,217) -86.6% Operating Supplies 66,885 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0.0% Transportation 1,033 1,200 0 0 (1,200) -100.0% Public Utilities 16,810 6,000 0 0 (6,000) -100.0% Miscellaneous 417,065 347,074 250,000 250,000 (97,074) -28.0% Professional Services 18,590 92,108 0 0 (92,108) -100.0% Grants 586,250 515,504 293,905 293,905 (221,599) -43.0%

Total - Dept of Economic & Comm. Dev. 2,317,832 2,655,141 2,908,300 2,937,079 281,938 10.6%

Department of Finance Director of Finance Personal Services 405,420 458,690 470,305 484,397 25,707 5.6% Operating Supplies 8,005 11,700 17,525 17,525 5,825 49.8% Professional Services 5,329 744 0 0 (744) -100.0% Communications 13,920 18,750 18,500 17,000 (1,750) -9.3% Transportation 356 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0% Rentals 0 0 2,952 2,252 2,252 100.0% Miscellaneous 2,127 2,675 3,225 3,225 550 20.6% Equipment 1,230 0 0 0 0 0.0% Director of Finance 436,387 493,559 513,507 525,399 31,840 6.5%

Accounting Personal Services 370,016 404,216 400,897 410,010 5,794 1.4% Operating Supplies 4,256 9,998 12,500 12,500 2,502 25.0% Professional Services 1,142 1,142 1,142 1,142 0 0.0% Transportation 254 500 500 500 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 671 700 700 700 0 0.0% Accounting 376,339 416,556 415,739 424,852 8,296 2.0%

Auditing Professional Services 40,250 45,360 60,860 60,860 15,500 34.2% Auditing 40,250 45,360 60,860 60,860 15,500 34.2%

Procurement Personal Services 219,066 237,335 245,556 254,348 17,013 7.2% Operating Supplies 2,524 4,500 7,100 7,100 2,600 57.8% Professional Services 1,456 744 0 0 (744) -100.0% Communications 3,315 3,300 4,550 4,550 1,250 37.9% Transportation 117 125 176 176 51 40.8% Rentals 0 0 2,952 2,252 2,252 100.0% Miscellaneous 350 340 400 400 60 17.6% Equipment 620 0 0 0 0 0.0% Procurement 227,448 246,344 260,734 268,826 22,482 9.1%

Copy Center Operating Supplies 8,101 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% Professional Services 15,817 12,540 13,000 13,000 460 3.7% Rentals 7,800 3,900 3,900 2,740 (1,160) -29.7% Copy Center 31,718 26,440 26,900 25,740 (700) -2.6%

Total - Department of Finance 1,112,142 1,228,259 1,277,740 1,305,677 77,418 6.3%

Marcey Halfway House Marcey Halfway House Personal Services 325,444 354,657 354,631 363,752 9,095 2.6% Operating Supplies 39,241 25,913 39,862 33,635 7,722 29.8% Professional Services 20,091 24,600 25,332 25,332 732 3.0% Communications 4,342 4,150 4,165 4,165 15 0.4% Transportation 2,252 2,312 3,314 3,314 1,002 43.3% Repairs and Maintenance 1,183 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%

Total - Marcey Halfway House 392,853 412,632 428,304 431,198 18,566 4.5%





Department of Information Technology Information Technology Personal Services 903,045 1,018,918 1,064,274 1,104,694 85,776 8.4% Operating Supplies 490,636 487,790 663,513 533,513 45,723 9.4% Professional Services 38,079 55,700 58,700 51,200 (4,500) -8.1% Communications 78,206 80,800 109,500 109,500 28,700 35.5% Transportation 891 2,500 3,598 2,598 98 3.9% Miscellaneous 6,195 6,600 12,300 12,300 5,700 86.4% Equipment 165,019 274,064 253,458 252,447 (21,617) -7.9% Other - Lease Payments 11,182 11,500 49,500 49,500 38,000 330.4%

Total - Dept. of Information Technology 1,693,253 1,937,872 2,214,843 2,115,752 177,880 9.2%

Department of Human Resources Human Resources Personal Services 332,897 431,941 473,828 460,169 28,228 6.5% Operating Supplies 28,409 38,075 50,860 44,860 6,785 17.8% Professional Services 20,571 79,850 109,850 36,350 (43,500) -54.5% Communications 2,848 5,250 5,370 4,120 (1,130) -21.5% Transportation 306 1,000 1,600 1,600 600 60.0% Miscellaneous 9,560 15,800 17,855 17,855 2,055 13.0% Human Resources 394,591 571,916 659,363 564,954 (6,962) -1.2%

Risk Management Personal Services 33,160 35,126 43,394 40,004 4,878 13.9% Operating Supplies 2,947 3,350 3,350 3,350 0 0.0% Transportation 250 500 1,200 1,200 700 140.0% Insurance 732,478 815,147 942,389 942,389 127,242 15.6% Miscellaneous 830 2,470 3,270 3,270 800 32.4% Risk Management 769,665 856,593 993,603 990,213 133,620 15.6%

Total - Department of Human Resources 1,164,256 1,428,509 1,652,966 1,555,167 126,658 8.9%

Department of Land Use & Growth Management Administration Personal Services 326,641 460,751 436,022 465,151 4,400 1.0% Operating Supplies 45,489 51,860 65,510 65,510 13,650 26.3% Professional Services 14,978 33,550 37,550 34,050 500 1.5% Communications 16,252 20,000 20,360 16,360 (3,640) -18.2% Transportation 0 500 1,054 1,054 554 110.8% Rentals 0 300 300 300 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 900 2,900 4,950 4,950 2,050 70.7% Equipment 0 1,981 660 660 (1,321) -66.7% Administration 404,260 571,842 566,406 588,035 16,193 2.8%

Comprehensive Planning Personal Services 420,051 482,893 496,939 509,581 26,688 5.5% Operating Supplies 4,897 8,250 10,400 10,400 2,150 26.1% Professional Services 11,822 40,800 150,800 50,800 10,000 24.5% Transportation 327 1,000 1,408 1,408 408 40.8% Miscellaneous 3,393 6,375 8,875 8,875 2,500 39.2% Other Lease Payment 0 10,872 10,872 10,872 0 0.0% Equipment 3,356 400 3,800 3,800 3,400 850.0% Comprehensive Planning 443,846 550,590 683,094 595,736 45,146 8.2%

Development Services Personal Services 442,284 506,159 539,517 549,292 43,133 8.5% Operating Supplies 604 1,360 2,485 2,485 1,125 82.7% Professional Services 13,386 25,000 51,500 51,500 26,500 106.0% Transportation 997 2,600 3,744 3,744 1,144 44.0% Miscellaneous 648 3,400 4,600 4,600 1,200 35.3% Equipment 3,201 0 500 500 500 100.0% Development Services 461,120 538,519 602,346 612,121 73,602 13.7%

Planning Commission Personal Services 19,863 21,437 21,134 21,448 11 0.1% Miscellaneous 1,255 1,655 1,655 1,655 0 0.0% Planning Commission 21,118 23,092 22,789 23,103 11 0.0%





Board of Appeals Personal Services 0 0 18,100 18,564 18,564 100.0% Professional Services 15,401 18,100 0 0 (18,100) -100.0% Transportation 0 250 352 352 102 40.8% Miscellaneous 505 990 1,655 1,655 665 67.2% Boards and Commissions 15,906 19,340 20,107 20,571 1,231 6.4%

Historical Preservation Personal Services Operating Supplies 796 2,440 2,170 2,170 (270) -11.1% Professional Services 0 200 200 200 0 0.0% Transportation 0 120 169 169 49 40.8% Miscellaneous 400 300 560 560 260 86.7% Historical Preservation 1,196 3,060 3,099 3,099 39 1.3%

Permit Services Personal Services 199,961 235,756 234,830 239,650 3,894 1.7% Professional Services 1,619 2,600 2,600 2,600 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 185 400 400 400 0 0.0% Equipment 0 3,926 1,800 1,800 (2,126) -54.2% Permit Services 201,765 242,682 239,630 244,450 1,768 0.7%

Inspections & Compliance Personal Services 396,086 439,137 450,755 460,294 21,157 4.8% Operating Supplies 4,790 7,600 7,600 7,600 0 0.0% Professional Services 856 4,000 37,000 32,000 28,000 700.0% Transportation 10,079 9,765 14,221 14,221 4,456 45.6% Miscellaneous 1,001 3,033 4,033 4,033 1,000 33.0% Inspections & Compliance 412,812 463,535 513,609 518,148 54,613 11.8%

Board of Electrical Examiners Operating Supplies 761 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0.0% Professional Services 5,450 6,500 6,500 6,500 0 0.0% Communications 47 250 265 265 15 6.0% Transportation 455 800 1,126 1,126 326 40.8% Miscellaneous 50 195 195 195 0 0.0% Board of Electrical Examiners 6,763 8,945 9,286 9,286 341 3.8%

Grants Operating Supplies 666 5,000 0 0 (5,000) -100.0% Professional Services 6,834 63,900 0 192,400 128,500 201.1% Communications 0 1,000 0 0 (1,000) -100.0% Miscellaneous 5,000 1,200 1,015 1,015 (185) -15.4% Grants 12,500 71,100 1,015 193,415 122,315 172.0%

Total - Land Use & Growth Management 1,981,286 2,492,705 2,661,381 2,807,964 315,259 12.6%

Department of Public Works and Transportation Administration Personal Services 309,829 333,208 343,461 356,486 23,278 7.0% Operating Supplies 5,735 3,425 3,425 3,425 0 0.0% Professional Services 1,951 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0.0% Communications 9,991 12,202 12,373 11,023 (1,179) -9.7% Transportation 0 100 141 141 41 41.0% Rentals 2,276 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 274 1,100 1,450 1,450 350 31.8% Administration 330,056 355,035 365,850 377,525 22,490 6.3%

Engineering Services Personal Services 265,408 281,850 295,924 298,499 16,649 5.9% Operating Supplies 3,115 5,120 5,120 5,120 0 0.0% Professional Services 3,842 11,200 11,200 11,200 0 0.0% Transportation 359 300 422 422 122 40.7% Miscellaneous 1,978 1,770 2,270 2,270 500 28.2% Equipment 6,855 0 0 0 0 0.0% Engineering Services 281,557 300,240 314,936 317,511 17,271 5.8%

Development Review Personal Services 171,217 191,868 208,126 212,813 20,945 10.9% Operating Supplies 975 1,675 1,675 1,675 0 0.0% Professional Services 6,162 100,300 120,300 60,300 (40,000) -39.9% Transportation 247 300 422 422 122 40.7% Miscellaneous 1,151 500 625 625 125 25.0% Development Review 179,752 294,643 331,148 275,835 (18,808) -6.4%





Construction & Inspections Personal Services 330,178 379,997 391,053 382,275 2,278 0.6% Operating Supplies 5,036 3,800 3,800 3,800 0 0.0% Professional Services 13,560 10,100 10,100 10,100 0 0.0% Communications 3,106 2,300 2,300 2,300 0 0.0% Transportation 6,760 10,500 15,283 12,431 1,931 18.4% Other Lease Payment 0 3,624 3,624 3,624 0 0.0% Equipment 261 0 0 0 0 0.0% Construction & Inspections 358,901 410,321 426,160 414,530 4,209 1.0%

County Highways Personal Services 1,857,571 2,170,039 2,224,892 2,265,525 95,486 4.4% Operating Supplies 30,612 37,665 37,665 37,665 0 0.0% Professional Services 131,508 151,500 151,500 151,500 0 0.0% Communications 3,686 5,000 5,000 3,500 (1,500) -30.0% Transportation 111,421 151,700 221,482 221,482 69,782 46.0% Public Utility Service 43,474 55,500 74,750 71,833 16,333 29.4% Rentals 8,943 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 206,537 270,060 317,390 317,390 47,330 17.5% Other -Lease Payment 0 156,459 156,459 223,277 66,818 42.7% Equipment 2,794 15,000 15,000 0 (15,000) -100.0% County Highways 2,396,546 3,032,923 3,224,138 3,312,172 279,249 9.2%

Solid Waste Personal Services 695,969 694,030 747,386 882,942 188,912 27.2% Operating Supplies 35,131 35,800 35,800 40,300 4,500 12.6% Professional Services 93,375 105,350 201,171 201,171 95,821 91.0% Communications 2,299 2,000 2,000 3,500 1,500 75.0% Transportation 37,798 46,830 68,372 158,372 111,542 238.2% Public Utility Service 4,044 5,374 28,167 28,167 22,793 424.1% Rentals 0 300 300 300 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 1,295,318 1,490,500 1,640,500 1,712,051 221,551 14.9% Other Lease Payment 0 132,155 132,155 173,831 41,676 31.5% Equipment 320 7,400 7,400 7,400 0 0.0% Solid Waste 2,164,254 2,519,739 2,863,251 3,208,034 688,295 27.3%

Recycling Personal Services 90,422 97,692 100,616 102,734 5,042 5.2% Operating Supplies 4,104 4,550 4,550 4,550 0 0.0% Professional Services 220,436 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 0.0% Transportation 2,564 3,850 5,613 5,613 1,763 45.8% Rentals 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 5,000 25.0% Miscellaneous 32,188 50,150 50,150 50,150 0 0.0% Equipment 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0.0% Recycling 369,714 429,742 439,429 441,547 11,805 2.7%

Mailroom/Messenger Services Personal Services 91,228 98,977 101,691 103,756 4,779 4.8% Operating Supplies 243 650 650 650 0 0.0% Communications 361 900 900 900 0 0.0% Transportation 1,736 1,850 2,701 2,701 851 46.0% Repairs and Maintenance 48 0 0 0 0 0.0% Rentals 11,148 11,150 11,150 11,150 0 0.0% Mailroom/Messenger Services 104,764 113,527 117,092 119,157 5,630 5.0%

Vehicle Maintenance Shop Personal Services 543,192 602,717 592,399 606,085 3,368 0.6% Operating Supplies 33,511 31,850 36,850 36,850 5,000 15.7% Professional Services 1,913 4,769 4,769 4,769 0 0.0% Communications 3,818 5,200 5,254 4,954 (246) -4.7% Transportation 507,761 491,625 549,753 546,753 55,128 11.2% Equipment 5,609 5,700 105,700 5,700 0 0.0% Vehicle Maintenance Shop 1,095,804 1,141,861 1,294,725 1,205,111 63,250 5.5% Non-Public School Bus Transportation Personal Services 77,677 82,051 64,615 67,380 (14,671) -17.9% Operating Supplies 265 0 0 0 0 0.0% Professional Services 1,578,883 1,688,531 1,753,985 1,753,985 65,454 3.9% Communications 7,281 9,670 9,670 9,670 0 0.0% Transportation 0 100 141 141 41 41.0% Insurance 32,487 34,000 35,000 35,000 1,000 2.9% Miscellaneous 0 935 1,335 1,335 400 42.8% Non-Public School Bus Transportation 1,696,593 1,815,287 1,864,746 1,867,511 52,224 2.9%





St. Mary's County Airport Operating Supplies 368 1,300 1,300 1,300 0 0.0% Professional Services 4,211 6,857 6,857 6,857 0 0.0% Communications 2,626 2,300 2,318 2,318 18 0.8% Transportation 0 285 411 411 126 44.2% Public Utility Service 811 976 1,318 1,318 342 35.0% Repairs and Maintenance 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0% Rentals 1,608 1,143 1,143 1,143 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 350 325 325 325 0 0.0% Liability Insurance 0 1,493 1,493 1,493 0 0.0% St Mary's County Airport 9,974 15,679 16,165 16,165 486 3.1%

Grants/STS Personal Services 1,237,929 1,480,931 1,540,461 1,532,188 51,257 3.5% Operating Supplies 33,871 44,077 82,146 18,552 (25,525) -57.9% Professional Services 1,693 5,100 2,100 1,900 (3,200) -62.7% Communications 3,941 7,900 6,323 4,400 (3,500) -44.3% Transportation 197,859 401,038 623,297 544,668 143,630 35.8% Rentals 2,826 1,800 1,800 1,800 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 2,269 150,522 3,500 2,500 (148,022) -98.3% Grants -Sludge 14,657 25,000 3,600 3,600 (21,400) -85.6% Equipment 17,319 32,300 186,750 177,750 145,450 450.3% Grants/STS 1,512,364 2,148,668 2,449,977 2,287,358 138,690 6.5%

Capital Projects Personal Services 109,313 182,050 186,062 179,525 (2,525) -1.4% Operating Supplies 675 0 0 0 0 0.0% Communications 68 400 400 400 0 0.0% Transportation 1,251 0 0 0 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 78 635 773 773 138 21.7% Capital Projects 111,385 183,085 187,235 180,698 (2,387) -1.3%

Building Services Personal Services 833,490 922,001 946,876 963,389 41,388 4.5% Operating Supplies 138,157 142,964 149,964 166,964 24,000 16.8% Professional Services 499,157 551,580 551,580 562,380 10,800 2.0% Communications 6,560 18,637 18,643 18,643 6 0.0% Transportation 15,118 14,988 21,882 21,882 6,894 46.0% Public Utility Service 889,506 1,055,400 1,411,040 1,426,840 371,440 35.2% Repairs and Maintenance 157,453 172,000 172,000 172,000 0 0.0% Rentals 11,559 10,990 10,990 10,990 0 0.0% Other Lease Payments 0 0 0 5,663 5,663 100.0% Equipment 7,045 7,050 7,050 7,050 0 0.0% Building Services 2,558,045 2,895,610 3,290,025 3,355,801 460,191 15.9%

GRANTS-MITIGATION Professional Services 0 0 0 159,000 159,000 100.0% Mitigation Grant 0 0 0 159,000 159,000 100.0%

Carter State Office Building Operating Supplies 8,062 10,400 10,400 10,400 0 0.0% Professional Services 158,557 181,932 181,932 181,932 0 0.0% Public Utility Service 174,494 195,308 244,766 244,766 49,458 25.3% Repairs and Maintenance 65,649 98,600 98,600 98,600 0 0.0% Carter State Office Building 406,762 486,240 535,698 535,698 49,458 10.2%

Total - Dept. of Public Works and Trans. 13,576,471 16,142,600 17,720,575 18,073,653 1,931,053 12.0%

Department of Recreation, Parks & Comm. Svcs Administration Personal Services 740,735 873,407 867,718 885,482 12,075 1.4% Operating Supplies 4,485 5,700 5,700 5,700 0 0.0% Professional Services 1,328 1,360 0 0 (1,360) -100.0% Communications 8,272 8,795 9,018 8,443 (352) -4.0% Transportation 5,300 6,220 8,758 8,758 2,538 40.8% Rentals 0 0 2,432 2,432 2,432 100.0% Miscellaneous 908 1,220 26,570 16,570 15,350 1258.2% Equipment 880 0 0 0 0 0.0% Administration 761,908 896,702 920,196 927,385 30,683 3.4%





Parks Maintenance Personal Services 674,585 768,907 863,287 845,442 76,535 10.0% Operating Supplies 37,447 36,200 39,600 39,600 3,400 9.4% Professional Services 52,627 65,357 79,557 79,557 14,200 21.7% Communications 6,228 9,450 9,953 7,053 (2,397) -25.4% Transportation 16,319 20,450 29,852 27,852 7,402 36.2% Public Utility Service 32,991 48,562 62,269 58,269 9,707 20.0% Repairs and Maintenance 463,047 609,682 633,182 633,182 23,500 3.9% Rentals 6,071 7,725 7,725 7,725 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 819 800 1,090 1,090 290 36.3% Other -Lease Payment 0 30,320 30,320 57,047 26,727 88.1% Equipment 13,608 10,700 3,800 3,800 (6,900) -64.5% Parks Maintenance 1,303,742 1,608,153 1,760,635 1,760,617 152,464 9.5%

Museum Division Personal Services 291,956 333,298 382,334 392,485 59,187 17.8% Operating Supplies 14,444 23,542 24,042 24,042 500 2.1% Professional Services 6,097 9,150 10,250 10,250 1,100 12.0% Communications 4,622 8,775 8,844 17,219 8,444 96.2% Transportation 4,802 6,980 9,885 9,885 2,905 41.6% Insurance 3,900 4,560 5,160 5,160 600 13.2% Public Utility Service 14,128 27,786 38,846 35,346 7,560 27.2% Rentals 2,652 2,448 3,000 3,000 552 22.5% Miscellaneous 350 600 600 600 0 0.0% Equipment 142 2,000 1,600 1,600 (400) -20.0% Museum Division 343,093 419,139 484,561 499,587 80,448 19.2%

Community Services Personal Services 253,713 261,402 329,353 321,949 60,547 23.2% Operating Supplies 3,773 7,770 7,900 7,400 (370) -4.8% Professional Services 16,199 13,000 13,450 13,450 450 3.5% Communications 7,750 6,500 6,710 5,710 (790) -12.2% Transportation 2,014 5,240 6,836 6,336 1,096 20.9% Equipment 5,944 0 0 0 0 0.0% Other 0 5,663 5,663 5,663 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 590 1,020 1,020 1,020 0 0.0% Community Services 289,983 300,595 370,932 361,528 60,933 20.3%

Human Relations Commission Operating Supplies 520 600 600 600 0 0.0% Professional Services 827 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0.0% Communications 89 0 0 0 0 0.0% Transportation 0 100 141 141 41 41.0% Miscellaneous 221 333 350 350 17 5.1% Human Relations Commission 1,657 2,233 2,291 2,291 58 2.6%

Commission for the Disabled Operating Supplies 922 1,250 1,250 1,250 0 0.0% Transportation 0 0 150 150 150 100.0% Miscellaneous 0 0 150 150 150 100.0% Professional Services 842 750 750 750 0 0.0% Commission for the Disabled 1,764 2,000 2,300 2,300 300 15.0%

Commission for Women Operating Supplies 727 725 725 725 0 0.0% Professional Services 0 0 1,100 1,100 1,100 100.0% Miscellaneous 49 175 175 175 0 0.0% Commission for Women 776 900 2,000 2,000 1,100 122.2%

VISTA Program Professional Services 38,302 25,185 25,344 25,344 159 0.6% Operating Supplies 4,403 5,200 4,200 4,200 (1,000) -19.2% Communications 439 740 740 740 0 0.0% Transportation 3,415 3,500 4,928 4,928 1,428 40.8% Public Utility 1,029 2,088 2,600 2,600 512 24.5% Miscellaneous 482 750 750 750 0 0.0% VISTA Program 48,070 37,463 38,562 38,562 1,099 2.9%





Grants Personal Services 100,400 103,295 114,973 114,973 11,678 11.3% Operating Supplies 64,512 46,856 35,290 35,290 (11,566) -24.7% Professional Services 70,234 67,512 60,327 60,327 (7,185) -10.6% Communications 1,979 1,572 2,000 2,000 428 27.2% Repairs and Maintenance 6,267 99,000 99,000 99,000 0 0.0% Transportation 23,216 5,500 5,000 5,000 (500) -9.1% Public Utility Service 0 0 350 350 350 100.0% Miscellaneous 23,336 26,690 32,445 32,445 5,755 21.6% Rentals 5,712 15,360 2,800 2,800 (12,560) -81.8% Equipment 6,364 13,500 4,700 4,700 (8,800) -65.2% Grants 302,020 379,285 356,885 356,885 (22,400) -5.9%

Total - Department of Recreation, Parks & CS 3,053,013 3,646,470 3,938,362 3,951,155 304,685 8.4%

Public Safety Personal Services 1,142,748 1,381,703 1,471,229 1,497,957 116,254 8.4% Operating Supplies 6,768 14,100 14,100 14,100 0 0.0% Professional Services 13,445 68,400 171,200 176,305 107,905 157.8% Communications 165,264 296,344 311,174 226,361 (69,983) -23.6% Transportation 735 5,325 7,739 5,986 661 12.4% Miscellaneous 4,479 6,200 8,400 8,400 2,200 35.5% Equipment 796 0 65,000 65,000 65,000 100.0% Emergency Communications Center 1,334,235 1,772,072 2,048,842 1,994,109 222,037 12.5%

Emergency Radio Communications Personal Services 210,356 250,392 255,294 268,117 17,725 7.1% Operating Supplies 14,564 20,950 23,950 21,950 1,000 4.8% Professional Services 289,878 258,170 281,309 281,309 23,139 9.0% Communications 1,962 2,008 3,733 3,733 1,725 85.9% Transportation 831 3,175 4,615 3,563 388 12.2% Miscellaneous 2,187 4,120 5,470 5,470 1,350 32.8% Other -Lease Payment 0 129,321 129,321 129,321 0 0.0% Equipment 152,738 64,032 144,589 144,589 80,557 125.8% Emergency Radio Communications 672,516 732,168 848,281 858,052 125,884 17.2%

Emergency Management Personal Services 112,747 185,226 187,620 193,117 7,891 4.3% Operating Supplies 2,213 4,010 5,410 5,410 1,400 34.9% Professional Services 0 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 100.0% Communications 14,301 20,437 21,463 11,463 (8,974) -43.9% Transportation 1,948 3,947 5,759 4,587 640 16.2% Public Utility Service 2,448 2,400 2,816 2,816 416 17.3% Miscellaneous 328 900 1,100 1,100 200 22.2% Other 6,818 6,794 6,794 6,794 0 0.0% Emergency Management 140,803 223,714 242,962 237,287 13,573 6.1%

Animal Control Personal Services 208,085 224,532 283,800 260,761 36,229 16.1% Operating Supplies 4,407 7,450 7,450 7,450 0 0.0% Professional Services 217,609 275,870 297,854 266,070 (9,800) -3.6% Communications 0 1,810 1,816 1,816 6 0.3% Transportation 14,115 15,725 22,959 20,959 5,234 33.3% Miscellaneous 4,999 5,075 5,575 5,575 500 9.9% Other 12,231 12,231 12,231 0 0.0% Equipment 0 5,300 4,700 4,700 (600) -11.3% Animal Control 449,215 547,993 636,385 579,562 31,569 5.8%

Grants Operating Supplies 13,479 25,017 12,904 12,347 (12,670) -50.6% Personal Services 75,806 56,683 669,506 70,824 14,141 24.9% Professional Services 30,000 29,550 809,700 1,405,050 1,375,500 4654.8% Transportation 0 700 0 0 (700) -100.0% Miscellaneous 195 600 6,300 5,539 4,939 823.2% Equipment/Furniture 617,685 248,986 267,241 267,241 18,255 7.3% Grants 737,165 361,536 1,765,651 1,761,001 1,399,465 387.1%

Total - Public Safety 3,333,934 3,637,483 5,542,121 5,430,011 1,792,528 49.3%





ELECTED OFFICIALS Circuit Court Administration Personal Services 569,163 626,690 648,505 654,423 27,733 4.4% Operating Supplies 16,299 18,435 21,985 21,985 3,550 19.3% Professional Services 39,677 62,215 67,716 28,716 (33,499) -53.8% Communications 20,038 28,800 29,328 17,328 (11,472) -39.8% Transportation 446 500 704 704 204 40.8% Rentals 900 0 0 0 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 49,608 72,600 73,600 73,600 1,000 1.4% Equipment 798 5,946 26,275 13,250 7,304 122.8% Administration 696,929 815,186 868,113 810,006 (5,180) -0.6%

Law Library Operating Supplies 45,440 45,900 49,085 49,085 3,185 6.9% Communications 71 200 212 212 12 6.0% Law Library 45,511 46,100 49,297 49,297 3,197 6.9%

Grants Personal Services 84,001 103,992 109,045 167,312 63,320 60.9% Operating Supplies 23,055 7,448 10,681 30,546 23,098 310.1% Professional Services 119,068 84,734 86,592 106,903 22,169 26.2% Communications 4,000 4,000 4,750 4,750 750 18.8% Transportation 518 572 2,626 2,626 2,054 359.1% Rentals 0 476 476 476 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 10,347 5,823 12,672 12,672 6,849 117.6% Equipment 1,931 0 0 0 0 0.0% Grant 242,920 207,045 226,842 325,285 118,240 57.1%

Total - Circuit Court 985,360 1,068,331 1,144,252 1,184,588 116,257 10.9%

Orphan's Court Personal Services 19,395 22,063 23,625 23,292 1,229 5.6% Operating Supplies 0 300 300 300 0 0.0% Communications 1,421 2,287 2,287 2,287 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 5,880 5,880 5,880 5,880 0 0.0%

Total - Orphan's Court 26,696 30,530 32,092 31,759 1,229 4.0%

Office of the Sheriff Law Enforcement Personal Services 10,391,543 12,052,918 14,384,679 12,842,343 789,425 6.5% Operating Supplies 205,324 214,394 287,448 257,970 43,576 20.3% Professional Services 117,423 111,532 152,432 116,532 5,000 4.5% Communications 56,686 63,693 64,035 51,252 (12,441) -19.5% Transportation 286,571 370,200 594,502 559,420 189,220 51.1% Public Utilities 5,151 6,180 8,128 9,478 3,298 53.4% Rentals 53,936 73,060 77,509 75,949 2,889 4.0% Miscellaneous 85,686 87,740 95,740 89,259 1,519 1.7% Equipment 12,845 38,295 621,792 145,271 106,976 279.3% Other-Lease Payment 78,953 394,985 394,985 564,407 169,422 42.9% Law Enforcement 11,294,118 13,412,997 16,681,250 14,711,881 1,298,884 9.7%

Corrections Personal Services 4,689,528 5,468,667 5,688,345 5,643,292 174,625 3.2% Operating Supplies 462,104 516,150 575,050 546,150 30,000 5.8% Professional Services 803,003 697,873 878,831 797,303 99,430 14.2% Communications 25,619 20,483 20,609 21,409 926 4.5% Rentals 39,554 63,754 63,754 63,754 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 2,754 2,760 4,750 2,760 0 0.0% Equipment 6,614 3,692 11,852 6,192 2,500 67.7% Corrections 6,029,176 6,773,379 7,243,191 7,080,860 307,481 4.5%

Training Operating Supplies 17,678 21,748 37,499 34,615 12,867 59.2% Professional Services 7,500 0 0 0 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 142,003 78,662 116,991 104,777 26,115 33.2% Training 167,181 100,410 154,490 139,392 38,982 38.8%

Canine Operating Supplies 2,919 4,975 5,627 4,975 0 0.0% Professional Services 6,516 6,300 6,300 6,300 0 0.0% Equipment 1,146 500 500 500 0 0.0% Canine 10,581 11,775 12,427 11,775 0 0.0%





Grants Personal Services 257,800 441,139 407,552 475,360 34,221 7.8% Operating Supplies 2,900 3,501 5,825 6,605 3,104 88.7% Professional Services 84 84 105 105 21 25.0% Communications 3,771 3,236 4,038 6,378 3,142 97.1% Transportation 5,533 4,950 9,718 9,718 4,768 96.3% Rentals 0 500 500 500 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 4,445 7,232 25,511 25,591 18,359 253.9% Equipment 39,603 89,359 683,452 688,202 598,843 670.2% Grants 314,136 550,001 1,136,701 1,212,459 662,458 120.4%

Total - Office of the Sheriff 17,815,192 20,848,562 25,228,059 23,156,367 2,307,805 11.1%

Office of the State's Attorney Judicial Personal Services 1,428,853 1,542,319 1,753,303 1,719,522 177,203 11.5% Operating Supplies 26,079 29,710 29,710 29,710 0 0.0% Professional Services 44,414 47,360 47,360 47,360 0 0.0% Communications 18,037 25,400 25,910 20,010 (5,390) -21.2% Transportation 2,640 3,600 5,183 5,183 1,583 44.0% Rentals 2,277 5,165 5,165 5,165 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 4,286 4,300 4,950 4,950 650 15.1% Equipment 474 0 0 0 0 0.0% Judicial 1,527,060 1,657,854 1,871,581 1,831,900 174,046 10.5%

Project Graduation Operating Supplies 10,782 15,350 15,350 15,350 0 0.0% Professional Services 9,150 10,200 10,200 10,200 0 0.0% Communications 161 200 212 212 12 6.0% Rentals 2,000 2,250 2,250 2,250 0 0.0% Miscellaneous 13,829 13,500 13,500 13,500 0 0.0% Project Graduation 35,922 41,500 41,512 41,512 12 0.0%

Grants Personal Services 362,911 384,459 552,968 547,266 162,807 42.3% Operating Supplies 5,147 7,920 9,020 8,157 237 3.0% Professional Services 3,345 16,933 22,962 26,962 10,029 59.2% Communications 4,471 6,500 8,120 9,420 2,920 44.9% Transportation 154 600 1,263 1,263 663 110.5% Miscellaneous 1,597 1,905 8,886 8,886 6,981 366.5% Equipment 169 11,030 0 1,200 (9,830) -89.1% Grants 377,794 429,347 603,219 603,154 173,807 40.5%

Total - State's Attorney 1,940,776 2,128,701 2,516,312 2,476,566 347,865 16.3%

County Treasurer Personal Services 273,829 302,240 304,079 308,269 6,029 2.0% Operating Supplies 13,858 12,500 12,500 12,500 0 0.0% Professional Services 343 400 200 200 (200) -50.0% Communications 16,104 26,700 28,200 28,200 1,500 5.6% Transportation 250 250 352 352 102 40.8% Rentals 1,327 1,920 2,120 2,120 200 10.4% Miscellaneous 0 1,000 1,500 1,500 500 50.0% Equipment 1,329 0 0 0 0 0.0%

Total - County Treasurer 307,040 345,010 348,951 353,141 8,131 2.4%

STATE AGENCIES/INDEPENDENT BOARDS

Department of Health Operating Allocation 1,058,722 1,056,888 1,243,480 1,078,026 21,138 2.0% Personal Services 10,822 16,783 16,548 16,819 36 0.2% Mosquito Control/Gypsy Moth 0 47,000 47,000 47,000 0 0.0%

Total - Department of Health 1,069,544 1,120,671 1,307,028 1,141,845 21,174 1.9%

Department of Social Services Operating Allocation 203,456 211,894 215,214 214,832 2,938 1.4% Personal Services 64,892 69,461 72,104 74,130 4,669 6.7% Professional Services 8,550 6,500 7,800 7,800 1,300 20.0% Grant 49,676 54,553 55,389 56,337 1,784 3.3%

Total - Department of Social Services 326,574 342,408 350,507 353,099 10,691 3.1%





Alcohol Beverage Board Personal Services 84,952 97,213 99,191 101,165 3,952 4.1% Operating Supplies 736 2,950 3,900 3,900 950 32.2% Professional Services 7,726 11,300 11,300 11,300 0 0.0% Communications 912 1,000 1,036 1,036 36 3.6% Transportation 1,845 3,900 5,491 5,491 1,591 40.8% Miscellaneous 78,718 86,958 92,264 92,264 5,306 6.1%

Total - Alcohol Beverage Board 174,889 203,321 213,182 215,156 11,835 5.8%

Supervisors of Elections Personal Services 26,331 8,302 79,166 46,371 38,069 458.6% Operating Supplies 10,893 9,100 275,077 68,675 59,575 654.7% Professional Services 326,691 262,318 350,418 545,420 283,102 107.9% Communications 20,841 8,500 41,810 41,810 33,310 391.9% Transportation 2,136 3,500 7,000 4,814 1,314 37.5% Repairs 0 0 11,100 4,200 4,200 #DIV/0! Rentals 50,900 115,000 834,682 300,310 185,310 161.1% Insurance 250 0 1,100 1,100 1,100 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 4,704 16,775 11,775 16,775 0 0.0% Equipment 3,292 1,000 1,500 4,896 3,896 389.6%

Total - Supervisors of Elections 446,038 424,495 1,613,628 1,034,371 609,876 143.7%

Cooperative Extension Service Operating Supplies 5,915 5,500 6,600 5,500 0 0.0% Professional Services 87,245 126,561 136,400 134,329 7,768 6.1% Communications 5,499 6,327 7,100 6,399 72 1.1% Transportation 6,430 9,430 10,000 10,000 570 6.0% Rentals 2,009 2,050 2,900 2,900 850 41.5% Equipment 12,502 700 3,000 700 0 0.0%

Total - Cooperative Extension Service 119,600 150,568 166,000 159,828 9,260 6.2%

Ethics Commission Personal Services 6,086 8,861 8,861 8,861 0 0.0% Operating Supplies 62 183 183 183 0 0.0% Professional Services 599 650 650 650 0 0.0%

Total - Ethics Commission 6,747 9,694 9,694 9,694 0 0.0%

Soil Conservation District Personal Services 9,949 11,290 11,564 11,564 274 2.4% Operating Allocation 31,289 36,205 40,545 40,545 4,340 12.0%

Total - Soil Conservation District 41,238 47,495 52,109 52,109 4,614 9.7%

Wicomico Scenic River Commission Operating Allocation 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%

Total - Wicomico Scenic River Commission 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%

Board of Education Administration 3,269,939 3,425,644 3,361,082 3,356,866 (68,778) -2.0% Mid-Level Administration 9,722,470 10,464,111 11,211,296 11,210,634 746,523 7.1% Instructional Salaries 51,257,834 55,659,354 59,326,323 59,561,843 3,902,489 7.0% Instructional Textbooks & Supplies 2,789,073 2,934,014 3,308,182 3,301,182 367,168 12.5% Other Instructional Costs 464,750 635,956 614,772 739,772 103,816 16.3% Special Education 12,771,511 13,464,732 14,550,366 14,592,442 1,127,710 8.4% Student Personnel Services 891,109 1,001,438 1,046,336 1,046,416 44,978 4.5% Health Services 978,310 1,169,981 1,318,534 1,326,444 156,463 13.4% Transportation 9,351,855 9,789,326 11,000,475 11,000,980 1,211,654 12.4% Operation of Plant 9,270,338 9,946,925 11,594,391 11,551,088 1,604,163 16.1% Maintenance of Plant 2,803,432 2,888,019 3,140,610 3,127,628 239,609 8.3% Fixed Charges 19,347,030 25,731,659 29,683,698 28,682,122 2,950,463 11.5% Capital Outlay 938,166 958,856 999,654 999,654 40,798 4.3%

Sub-Total - General Operations 123,855,817 138,070,015 151,155,719 150,497,071 12,427,056 9.0%

Funding other than County Appropriation Fund Balance (59,708) 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,517,705 (882,295) -36.8% State, Federal, Other Revenue Sources 65,015,525 73,035,790 81,069,231 81,167,878 8,132,088 11.1% County Appropriation 58,900,000 62,634,224 67,686,488 67,811,488 5,177,264 8.3%

County Appropriation - Board of Education 58,900,000 62,634,224 67,686,488 67,811,488 5,177,264 8.3%





College of Southern Maryland Compensation 3,191,089 3,875,408 4,271,712 4,271,712 396,304 10.2% Contracted Services 438,289 589,951 598,331 598,331 8,380 1.4% Supplies & Materials 121,364 190,078 218,769 218,769 28,691 15.1% Communications 110,605 129,434 110,759 110,759 (18,675) -14.4% Conferences, Meetings & Travel 32,587 54,899 66,515 66,515 11,616 21.2% Scholarships & Grants 38,794 41,143 31,518 31,518 (9,625) -23.4% Utilities 283,127 317,323 442,109 442,109 124,786 39.3% Fixed Charges 45,856 49,705 47,855 47,855 (1,850) -3.7% Furniture & Equipment 114,220 57,844 67,235 67,235 9,391 16.2% Mandatory Transfers 2,189,756 2,332,357 2,363,008 2,363,008 30,651 1.3%

Sub-Total - General Operations 6,565,687 7,638,142 8,217,811 8,217,811 579,669 7.6% Funding other than County Appropriation Fund Balance State, Federal, Other Revenue Sources 4,508,378 5,397,379 5,824,398 5,824,398 427,019 7.9% County Appropriation 2,096,456 2,240,763 2,393,413 2,465,000 224,237 10.0%

CSM Foundation - Scholarships 0 0 50,000 25,000 25,000 100.0%

County Appropriation - College of Southern Md. 2,096,456 2,240,763 2,443,413 2,490,000 249,237 11.1%

Board of Library Trustees Lexington Park Library Personal Services 680,493 765,226 844,563 844,563 79,337 10.4% Communications 9,833 8,800 6,079 6,079 (2,721) -30.9% Public Utility Service 51,874 56,400 104,538 104,538 48,138 85.4% Lexington Park Library 742,200 830,426 955,180 955,180 124,754 15.0%

Leonardtown Library Personal Services 522,732 552,680 540,166 540,166 (12,514) -2.3% Communications 5,277 4,400 5,837 5,837 1,437 32.7% Public Utility Service 19,734 20,690 37,941 37,941 17,251 83.4% Leonardtown Library 547,743 577,770 583,944 583,944 6,174 1.1%

Charlotte Hall Library Personal Services 379,223 354,532 380,848 380,848 26,316 7.4% Communications 2,624 3,300 3,044 3,044 (256) -7.8% Public Utility Service 17,225 21,720 31,020 31,020 9,300 42.8% Charlotte Hall Library 399,072 379,552 414,912 414,912 35,360 9.3%

General Operating Personal 182,312 192,779 249,430 249,430 56,651 29.4% Operating Supplies 313,583 310,940 347,500 347,500 36,560 11.8% Professional Services 33,334 45,400 53,227 53,227 7,827 17.2% Communications 2,257 1,500 500 500 (1,000) -66.7% Transportation 3,906 3,500 5,300 5,300 1,800 51.4% Insurance 9,797 10,000 16,500 16,500 6,500 65.0% Miscellaneous 20,841 21,000 23,400 23,400 2,400 11.4% Equipment 48,063 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 0.0% General Operating 614,093 675,119 785,857 785,857 110,738 16.4%

Retiree Health 42,532 70,250 77,275 77,275 7,025 10.0%

Sub-Total - General Operations 2,345,640 2,533,117 2,817,168 2,817,168 284,051 11.2%

Funding other than County Appropriation Fund Balance 3,758 85,000 30,000 30,000 (55,000) -64.7% State, Federal, Other Revenue Sources 675,418 666,975 732,827 732,827 65,852 9.9% County Appropriation 1,666,464 1,781,142 2,054,341 1,979,341 198,199 11.1% County Appropriation from fund balance 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 100.0%County Appropriation - Board of Library Trustees 1,666,464 1,781,142 2,054,341 2,015,100 233,958 13.1%





Non-County Agency Contributions

The ARC of Southern Maryland, Inc. 132,150 132,150 138,758 132,150 0 0.0%Big Brothers / Big Sisters 2,424 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 0.0%Catholic Charities 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 0 0.0%So. Md. Center for L.I.F.E. 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 0 0.0%The Center for Life Enrichment 155,908 155,908 165,115 155,908 0 0.0%Chamber of Commerce 20,250 0 0 0 0 0.0%Greenwell Foundation 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0.0%Historic St. Mary's City Foundation 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0.0%St. Mary's Co. Historical Society 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 0 0.0%Hospice of St. Mary's 15,000 15,000 25,000 15,000 0 0.0%La Familia 1,500 0 0 0 0 0.0%Lexington Park Lions Club 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0.0%Literacy Council of St. Mary's County 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0.0%Agriculture Weed Control 12,023 13,800 14,000 14,000 200 1.4%Maryland Historical Society 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%Minority Business Alliance 0 0 28,750 10,000 10,000 100.0%Mental Health Authority of St. Mary's 54,945 54,945 59,945 54,945 0 0.0%Patuxent River Naval Air Museum 30,000 30,000 45,000 30,000 0 0.0%Navy Alliance 95,000 20,000 50,000 30,000 10,000 50.0%Lexington Park Rotary-Oyster Festival 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0%St. Mary's Art Council 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.0%St. Mary's Caring, Inc. 12,500 3,000 5,000 3,000 0 0.0%St. Mary's College River Concert Series 10,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 0 0.0%St. Mary's College Scholarship Fund 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 0.0%Seventh District Optimist 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.0%Sotterley Mansion Foundation 25,000 50,000 75,000 50,000 0 0.0%Southern Md. Higher Education Center 50,000 50,000 75,000 50,000 0 0.0%So. Md. Child Care Resource Center 7,400 7,400 19,000 12,400 5,000 67.6%Southern Md. Resource Conservation/Development Board 9,900 5,200 8,054 8,054 2,854 54.9%Three Oaks Center 50,000 59,500 150,000 130,000 70,500 118.5%Tri-County Alternatives for Youth & Families, Inc. 26,250 26,250 27,600 26,250 0 0.0%Tri-County Community Action (SMTCCAC Inc) 17,751 17,751 20,000 17,751 0 0.0%Tri-County Council 94,200 94,200 94,200 94,200 0 0.0%Tri-County Youth Services Bureau 116,479 116,479 133,848 58,240 (58,239) -50.0%Unified Commission for Afro Americans 5,000 5,000 7,500 5,000 0 0.0%Walden/Sierra 195,038 195,038 345,447 345,447 150,409 77.1%SMC Forrest Conservation District Board 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.0%Watermen's Association 15,000 15,000 35,000 20,000 5,000 33.3%The Center for Family Advocacy 90,409 84,909 108,089 108,089 23,180 27.3%

Total - Non-County Agencies 1,355,627 1,278,030 1,771,806 1,496,934 218,904 17.1%

Other Budget Costs

Volunteer Fire Depts. & Rescue Squads 201,696 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0.0%Supplemental Reserve 0 400,000 400,000 500,000 100,000 25.0%Leonardtown Tax Rebate 48,936 55,370 58,879 58,879 3,509 6.3%Employer Contributions - Retiree Health Benefits 776,174 1,156,150 1,270,665 4,830,300 3,674,150 317.8%Debt Administration Costs 44,633 29,000 38,000 38,000 9,000 31.0%Debt Service 12,063,329 12,903,553 13,182,638 13,181,303 277,750 2.2%

Total - Other Budget Costs 13,134,768 14,744,073 15,150,182 18,808,482 4,064,409 27.6%

Transfers & Reserves

Disignated scholarship - CSM 0 50,000 0 0 (50,000) -100.0%Capital Projects - General Fund Transfer 500,000 3,151,010 500,000 14,228,277 11,077,267 351.5%Transfer - Emergency Services Support Fund (LOSAP) 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 100.0%Reserve - Rainy Day 250,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 0 0.0%Reserve - Bond Rating 692,252 370,000 500,000 500,000 130,000 35.1%BOCC Reserve - Emergency Appropriations 0 500,000 500,000 533,255 33,255 6.7%

Total Transfers & Reserves 1,442,252 4,196,010 1,625,000 15,446,532 11,250,522 268.1%

TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET $133,458,998 $151,278,974 $166,211,363 $180,569,812 $29,290,838 19.4%

OPERATING BUDGETS

COUNTY DEPARTMENTS

County Commissioners/County Administrator


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Legislative/Co. Commissioners 300,595 339,311 396,568 400,059 County Administrator 309,332 329,087 420,405 350,035 Public Information 273,704 335,200 418,649 342,335

Total County Commissioners/County Administrator

883,631 1,037,878 1,235,622 1,092,429

Program Description

The Board of County Commissioners establishes all county policies, enacts ordinances which have the force and effect of law, reviews and approves annual budgets and work plans for all departments and agencies receiving County funds, conducts public hearings and makes decisions on land use matters involving zoning, water and sewer categories and appeals from the Planning Commission. The County Commissioners appoint all department heads and members of boards, committees and commissions, purchase and maintain County property, approve road construction and maintenance, and serve as the County’s chief elected officials in dealing with other counties, and the state and federal governments. The County Commissioners’ office serves as a contact point for citizens in a variety of areas ranging from general information to specific assistance with government procedures and programs. An appointed County Administrator is responsible for the day-to-day administration of County government, supervision of all government department heads, and coordination of staff activities under the County Commissioners’ jurisdiction. The County Administrator assigns and reports on general business actions and functions of County government and provides periodic performance reports on projects or problems. The County Administrator oversees the Public Information Office and provides staff support for meetings with the Board of County Commissioners, maintaining the minute books of these meetings. The County Administrator is responsible for the follow-up actions that result from developments at meetings as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. This office maintains the official record of resolutions and ordinances, provides office support for the individual County Commissioners, and maintains correspondence and administrative files for the Board of County Commissioners. The County Administrator serves as the official Board of County Commissioner representative at court actions, hearings, and inquiries at the local, regional and state level. He also maintains the “Seal of the County” and the County Commissioners’ official file, their reference library, prepares their agenda and schedules for the future events. The County Administrator coordinates with the Board of County Commissioners, the County Attorney, and the staff offices to develop proposed legislation annually for submission to the legislators. The Public information budget includes funds to operate and maintain broadcasting on Channel 12. They coordinate through the Board of County Commissioner’s special events such as Fire and Rescue Appreciation Day, Veteran’s Day Parade and Celebration, and Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. Public Information prepares for the Commissioners, proclamations, commendations, and special awards to recognize special accomplishments of individuals, organizations, and employees. The office manages the overall system of County Boards, Committees and Commission appointments. They also play a central role in the dissemination of information in emergency situations as well as issuing media releases and other information to the press and the public, as well as, overseeing the content and organization of information for the county website on behalf of the Commissioners. Governor Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. proposed and the Maryland General Assembly has found that the Chesapeake Bay has experienced a decline in water quality due to over enrichment of nutrients. On May 26, 2004, Governor Ehrlich signed into law Senate Bill 320 that established the Bay Restoration Fund (“BRF”). Senate Bill 320, codified at 2004 Laws of Maryland Chapter 428, requires owners of wastewater treatment plants to collect a $2.50 monthly fee from their users, effective January 1, 2005. The legislation also requires that users of on-site sewage disposal systems or holding tanks pay a fee of Thirty Dollars ($30.00)

County Commissioners/County Administrator


per user per year. Users of public sewer began being billed by MetCom on January 1, 2005. If you have a line on your tax bill labeled “BRF,” you are being billed this latter amount ($30.00 per year) because State and County records indicate that your property has at least one user of an on-site sewage disposal system or holding tank and your property is subject to the fee. Your payment of the BRF fee is to be paid to the State by the County and used by the State to upgrade onsite systems and implement cover crops to reduce nitrogen loading to the Bay; and will be pursued as unpaid after October 1, 2005. The County Commissioners adopted an Ordinance providing an exemption for land owners for whom this fee would impose a substantial financial hardship.

Budget Highlights The approved budget of the County Commissioners/County Administrator of $1,092,429, is $54,551 more than FY 2006. Budget includes reclassification for Fiscal Specialist I.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Resolutions passed by BOCC 55 50 55 Ordinances passed by BOCC 38 20 35 Bills to Legislators 8 11 11 Weekly Meetings of BOCC 65 66 66

Blue Sheet Events attended by BOCC 124 132 140

Sheriff’s Retirement Board meetings 17 18 12

SMC Public Schools joint meetings 7 10 10

Tri County Council meetings 7 6 6

Proclamations and Commendations issued 346 360 375

Board Meetings, special meetings and public forum events 77 78 80

Public Information releases and newsletters 260 260 275

Video-tape productions of BOCC meetings 230 240 250

Special Events: Fire/Rescue, Leg. Reception, Flag Day, Veteran’s Day, Black History, ribbon cuttings, groundbreakings 15 15 15

Department on Aging



FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006 Approved

Budget

FY 2007 Requested

Budget

FY 2007 Approved

Budget

Department on Aging 935,254 1,191,396 1,369,235 1,266,303 Oakley 0 54,823 93,091 53,797 SMILE/Medical Adult Day Care 111,500 620,707 85,823 85,823 Grants 644,899 706,218 705,703 706,394

Total Department on Aging 1,691,653 2,573,144 2,253,852 2,112,317

Program Description The Department on Aging’s basic purpose and mission is to provide an array of programs and services to the senior community that (1) foster continued physical and mental good health and promote “healthy” aging within the senior community, (2) provide appropriate support and health services that enable seniors to live independently in their homes and communities, (3) offer social, educational, and recreational activities that give members of the senior community ample opportunity to remain engaged with their peers, and (4) promote the concept of developmental aging under which one’s senior years are viewed as a further opportunity for additional personal growth and development rather than a period of decline. About one half of the Department on Aging general fund budget is financed from Federal and State grants as well as income from program fees and services. Federal grants support the operation of Department on Aging senior centers and nutrition sites as well as several home and community based services. State grants supplement those from the Federal Government and provide administrative support. Program income is derived from the Medical Adult Day Services Program, Senior Center Plus, and reimbursement from Medicaid for the direct provision of covered services by the Dept. of Aging. County funds primarily cover personal service costs, administrative expenses, and the direct provision of some services.

Budget Highlights The Department on Aging approved general fund budget is $2,112,317. Included and adds .75 FTE to support the Northern Senior Center. The budget continues current levels of operations and staffing. The reduction from FY 2006 to FY 2007 is primarily due to the non-recurring funding in FY2006 to remove deficit in the Medical Adult Daycare funds.



Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Serve mid-day congregate meals to support healthy nutrition among seniors. # of meals served/# of seniors served

11,403/ 714

12,000/ 725

12,000/ 725

Utilize Social/Recreation/Educational activities to broaden level of participation in Senior Programs # of new seniors served/# of seniors served/# of units of service for persons participating in activities and programs

164/ 3,115/ 65,600

250/ 3,365/ 66,000

300/ 3,665/ 66,500

Department on Aging


Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Medicaid Waiver - # of persons served 22 21 22 Senior Care - # of seniors aged 65 and over served 77 95 95 National Family Caregivers Support Program - # of persons served 24 61 60 Alzheimer’s Demonstration Grant - # of persons served 16 11 0 County Funds for In–Home Services - # of persons served 52 50 50 Title III B and Title III D Funds - # of persons served with services including Medication Management 125 100 100 Meals On Wheels # of meals served/ # of seniors served 50,711/306 50,000/300 50,000/300 Senior Center Plus # of clients to be served/# of days of service 2/67 2/100 4/208 Congregate Housing Program at St. Mary’s Home for the Elderly # of clients to be served / # of meals served 21/13,197 18/19,710 18/19,710 Department on Aging Senior I&A Program to provide information and referral to needed services # of contacts 7,520 4,000 4,700 Continue efforts to operate the Medical adult Day services Program efficiently Increase MA participation admissions by 1 at each center 7,952 8,200 9,000 Continue efforts to Meet contracted OHS participant days of service/ Maintain Private Pay participant days 2,893/685 3,700/692 2,674/700 Continue to support community and organizations through the RSVP Program # of volunteers/# of units of service 217/20,475 225/24,500 230/25,000

County Attorney



FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006 Approved

Budget

FY 2007 Requested

Budget

FY 2007 Approved

Budget

County Attorney 402,413 491,253 663,253 519,351

Program Description The County Attorney is responsible for providing legal services to the Board of County Commissioners, the County Administrator and various County departments, offices, agencies, boards and commissions. Activities include: researching legal issues and providing legal opinions; monitoring independent counsel; drafting major resolutions and ordinances; enforcement of the local ordinances and regulations; collection of various amounts due and owed to the County; acquiring title to real property purchased by the County at tax sales; and defending the County in court.

Budget Highlights

The budget for the County Attorney is approved at $519,351 or $28,098 more than the prior year. This increase reflects the full year budget for a Senior Office Specialist position that started January 2006.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Requests pending from prior years 26 10 10

New requests received 1176 1180 1200

Requests concluded 1150 1142 1190

Funds collected 139281 30000 25000

Litigation Cases - Won/Lost/Settled or Dismissed 10/2/2 12/1/2 15/0/5

Average response time on research projects (# days) 10 days 10 days 9 days

Public Information Act (PIA) Requests 22 15 15

Real Estate Transactions –Open/Close 9/8 35/34 40/38

Department of Economic and Community Development


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Administration/Office of the Director 247,076 225,876 235,149 241,027

Tourism Development 273,977 358,539 478,961 420,745

Agriculture & Seafood Development 119,994 132,527 135,934 138,131

Business Development 279,264 299,329 315,647 400,880

Housing Authority 811,271 1,123,366 1,448,704 1,442,391

Grants 586,250 515,504 293,905 293,905

Total Economic & Community Development 2,317,832 2,655,141 2,908,300 2,937,079

Program Description

The Department of Economic and Community Development carries out the policies of the Board of County Commissioners relative to administering agriculture, economic and community development, tourism and housing activities. The department’s development programs are influenced by the need to serve the county residents in creating a strong, diverse and resilient economy with good jobs and a rising quality of life. The department developed a multi-year economic development strategy for the county based on current economic trends and a situation analysis based on economic data and research. The department will continue to: support the defense technology sector; support new and expanding businesses; support Lexington Park revitalization; expand tourism development; diversify the agriculture sector; administer the various Agriculture Land Preservation programs, and provide housing opportunities, community development and neighborhood improvements.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget reflects a net increase of $281,938. The FY2006 budget included non-recurring costs. Funding increase of $319,025 relates to activities associated with the Housing Division, with the addition of 2 FTE’s, which are fully reimbursed. Additionally, the budget includes the reclassification of the coordinator in administrative division. Business Development includes contracted services related to program with CDC and the Department of Social Services. And, Tourism reflects full year funding of a contract with the Chamber of Commerce to operate the Welcome Center.



Provide oversight for redevelopment of the Lexington Manor Property and pursue funding for the redevelopment process

18M outside funding

Identify and market targeted industries valued for their contribution to qualify of life, employment, and tax base 240 packets 250 packets 270 packets




Actual FY 2005

Estimated FY 2006

Projected FY 2007

Create and place ads/features in targeted publications. Gain free publicity for county business. Work with IT department to upgrade the website. Work with State to ensure the county is accurately portrayed on the state website and publications 1 million 1 million 1 million Plan and produce events, symposia in support of business development and bring the St. Mary’s County EDC story to selected trade shows, conferences and forums

2,500 participants

2,500 participants

2,500 participants

Partner with key organizations/agencies to inform and assist small business owners. 800 businesses 800 businesses 800 businesses Ensure effective community development through participation on the county’s Community Development Corporation board 12 meetings 9 meetings 12 meetings

Communicate events and opportunities to businesses via an electronic newsletter distributed weekly NA 400 recipients 1,000 recipients Maryland Agriculture Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) The goal is to permanently preserve 1,000 acres per year

Farms in 101 Districts



St. Mary’s County Agricultural Land Preservation District 5- year Tax Credit Agreement

157 properties in district 160 districts

175 farms in district

Produce Newsletter (with over 730 recipients) 2 4 4

Increase Vendor and Customer Participation at the two Farmers Markets 30% 35% 20%

Increase attendance/visitors at the National Oyster Cook-off. 30% 40% 20%

Information requests fulfilled through mail and phone 15,458 16,000 16,000

Inquiry origins: Primary market (MD, VA, DC, PA DE, WV, NY, NJ) 53% 52% 52%

Total site visitation 848,655 850,000 900,000

Grants Received 44,509 42,803 42,803

Literature Distributed (pieces) 59,315 60,000 62,000

Cooperative Marketing Dollars (Private sector) 12,615 15,000 15,000

Taxes- State Sales Tax-Hotel 389,567 500,000 500,000



Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Taxes Admission/Amusement

Actual FY 2005

111,922

Estimated FY 2006

120,000

Projected FY 2007

120,000

County’s participation in promoting safe, affordable housing 50 Townhouse

rental units 50 Townhouse

rental units County’s adoption of the workforce housing program

225 Townhouse units

House Keys for St. Mary’s

County Assist 10 eligible

employees

County’s support of workforce housing construction 50 new units

Rental housing assistance 1,263 Housing

Choice Vouchers 1,263 Housing

Choice Vouchers 1,263 Housing

Choice Vouchers

Certificates

Rental Allowance Program – 60

Supportive Housing Program

30

Certificates Rental Allowance

Program – 60 Supportive

Housing Program 30 Bridge

Subsidy Program 5

Housing projects

Acquisition and

Rehabilitation 10 Townhomes

(Colony Square)

Rehabilitation Complete

rehabilitation

Construction

42 Condo units (Gateways)

Construction Complete

Construction

Department of Finance


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Administrative/Budget 436,387 493,559 513,507 525,399 Accounting 376,339 416,556 415,739 424,852 Auditing 40,250 45,360 60,860 60,860 Procurement 227,448 246,344 260,734 268,826 Copy Center 31,718 26,440 26,900 25,740

Total Department of Finance 1,112,142 1,228,259 1,277,740 1,305,677 Program Description The Department of Finance includes the Administrative/Budget, Accounting, Procurement, and the Copy Center. Department staff provide financial, budget, accounting, procurement and other related support to all departments and units of county government and elected officials, as well as a number of affiliated programs and entities. The Administrative/Budget Division is responsible for overall department management and serves as fiscal policy advisor to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Administrator. This responsibility includes budget formulation and management, administration of bond sales and other special fiscal services, including grants coordination and monitoring. The Accounting Division responsibilities include maintenance of general accounting and payroll/leave systems, revenue and disbursement systems, cash and debt management, financial audit activities, investment of County funds, energy tax administration, mosquito control program invoicing and collection, external financial reporting and special taxing districts administration. The Procurement Division is responsible for all procurement-related activities, including preparation, evaluation and negotiation of bids and contracts as well as numerous small procurements throughout the year. The Copy Center is not

mental Center and as back-up for all departments of the county. staffed, but serves as a reproduction facility for the Govern Budget Highlights

The Department of Finance approved budget is $1,305,677, an increase of $77,418. In addition to the net impact of the salary changes, including benefits premium increase, additional funds are included to fund audit related costs. Funds were included for the approved reclassification of the Senior Buyer in Procurement.




Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Budgets prepared and monitored: General Fund Operating Budget $126 million $157 million $180 million Capital Budget $32 million $22 million $39 million Bond Sale Preparation-General Obligation Issue 1 1 0 Grants Administered 70 70 150 Budget Amendments Processed 565 509 730 Financial System (HTE) Training Assistance Hours 1440 960 400 Invoices processed 28,000 30,228

34,200

Checks processed- Vendors 11,000 16,115 15,500 Checks processed-Payroll, Library, LOSAP 9,500 11,319 12,200 Journal Entries Processed 658 490 400

Personnel Action Forms Reviewed 2,600 2,672 4,000 Energy tax refunds processed 1,263 825 1,900 I.R.S. Forms (W-2, 1099R, 1099MISC, etc.) 2,000 2,000 2,000 Debt Service Obligation-Bonds and State loans monitored 21 22 23 # of Commitments processed(Purchase Orders, Contracts, etc.) 2,500 2,158 2,200 Delivery Orders, Modifications, and Change Orders)/ dollar value $10.5 million $7.5 million $8 million # of Bids Processed 140 140 150

Marcey Halfway House


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Marcey Halfway House 392,853 412,632 428,304 431,198

Program Description The Marcey Halfway House is a 15-bed residential treatment program for the rehabilitation of substance abusers, providing a temporary home structure and assisting in maintaining a chemical-free lifestyle. Marcey House offers a variety of services to the resident through a comprehensive range of community resources and in-house services. Funding sources include grant(s) from the State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration, client fees, fund raising, and contributions. County funding primarily supports personal services cost beyond any grant matching requirements.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget for Marcey Halfway House is $431,198, an increase of $18,566 over the prior year. Of the total budget, approximately $129,092 represents non-mandated county funding. Hours were increased to 32 hours/wk for RPT Senior Office Specialist.


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual FY 2005

Estimated FY 2006

Projected FY 2007

Intake/referrals from individuals seeking care for substance abuse treatment 638 550 590 Average Utilization Occupancy Rate. 14.6 15 15 Average length of care for program completion 5.0 months 6.5 months 5.0 months

Rate of employment, training and volunteerism at program completion 88.20% 93% 90%

Urinalysis negative test rate 5 Urinalysis test results 100% 100% 100%

Department of Information Technology


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Information Technology 1,693,253 1,937,872 2,214,843 2,115,752

Program Description The Information Technology Department has the overall responsibility for managing the County's computer hardware and software resources. Services of the Information Technology Department include: technical support, systems support, equipment maintenance, technology training, technical planning, telephone support, telecommunications, infrastructure access control and security.

Budget Highlights

The budget for the Information Technology Department is approved at $2,115,752, an increase of $177,880 or 9.2%. This budget includes costs for software licenses, maintenance, training, and upgrades for virtually all of the technology in use in county operations. These include a broad range of applications and support to include desktop applications, finance and payroll, GIS, jail management, permits and inspections, planning and zoning and a variety of other applications. Reclassification of the LAN Administator is included.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Desktop and mobile computer systems 485 531 540 Networked printers 65 70 78 Servers 20 21 21 Novell user accounts 500 500 500 Novell GroupWise accounts 500 600 600 H.T.E active modules 18 22 22 H.T.E. financial community service users 250 175 161 H.T.E. users 198 230 253 Help Desk Requests for Assistance 11,700 12,000 12,000 Cell phones/ Pagers 141/181 145/140 145/140 Phone Lines 1,025 950 930

Department of Human Resources


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Human Resources 394,591 571,916 659,363 564,954

Risk Management 769,665 856,593 993,603 990,213

Total Department of Human Resources 1,164,256 1,428,509 1,652,966 1,555,167 Program Description The Department of Human Resources reports to the County Administrator and is responsible for all personnel administration activities of the County workforce. This includes position classification; job advertising; applicant interviewing; testing; personnel actions; maintenance of personnel records; update and maintenance of the Personnel Manual; administration of the State Retirement and Pension System and the Sheriff’s Office Retirement Plan; employee health and life insurance programs; unemployment compensation; as well as the Employee Assistance Program; Savings Bond Program; and a Length of Service Awards Program for fire and rescue companies. The department also handles Risk Management, including the County’s general liability and property insurance costs, and is responsible for claims and risk management through activities and programs designed to reduce our risk and improve our loss experience.

Budget Highlights The budget for the Department of Human Resources is approved at $1,555,167. This is a $126,658 increase, or 8.9%, over the prior year. Approximately $127,000 more is provided for significantly increased premium quotes for County property and liability insurance. The Senior Human Resource Specialist position was reclassified and additional funds are included for hourly support.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Employment applications processed

1,700 2,400 2,600

New Hires (including PT, Temp, Sub., etc.)

123 135 150 Retirees/Separations/Other 10/59/13 12/63/33 14/67/20

Risk Management Claims Handled 188 200 200

Worker’s Compensation Claims Handled 112 125 120

Collections Completed 445 135 135

Breath Alcohol Tests Completed 108 50 50

Department of Land Use & Growth Management


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Administration 404,260 571,842 566,406 588,035 Comprehension Plan 443,846 550,590 683,094 595,736 Developmental Services 461,120 538,519 602,346 612,121 Planning Commission 21,118 23,092 22,789 23,103 Boards & Commissions 15,906 19,340 20,107 20,571 Historical Preservation 1,196 3,060 3,099 3,099 Permit Services 201,765 242,682 239,630 244,450 Inspections & Compliance 412,812 463,535 513,609 518,148 Board of Electrical Examiners 6,763 8,945 9,286 9,286 Grants 12,500 71,100 1,015 193,415 Total Dept. of Land Use & Growth Mgmt.

1,981,286 2,492,705 2,661,381 2,807,964

Program Description The Department of Land Use and Growth Management address functions including: planning, zoning and land use; updates of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and area plans, such as the Lexington Park Master Plan and the Wicomico Scenic River Management Plan; issuing building and other permits (including use and occupancy certificates; administering and verifying compliance with zoning, building, electric, plumbing, natural gas, HVAC, Floodplain, Minimum Livability and Maryland Accessibility codes; coordinating the daily inspections of all building, electrical, plumbing, natural gas and HVAC work with the County’s contract inspection agency; and conditional use, non-conforming use and mining operations, grading, road entrance, storm water management, and all other related development inspections. The department is intended to provide optimal customer service, complete but concise and consistent answers to inquiries, processing questions, etc., in the role as a “Development Assistance Center”. This program has a health and safety focus while streamlining procedures to meet everyday needs of homeowners or small business owners who want to improve their property or business. This department provides staff support to a variety of boards and commissions including: Planning Commission, the Board of (Zoning) Appeals, and the Historic Preservation Commission and supplemental support to numerous other boards and the Technical Evaluation Committee.

Budget Highlights

The budget for the Land Use and Growth Management Department is $2,807,964, a 12.6% increase over the prior year. This increase reflects 1.0 new Senior Office Specialist position, increased funding for the Deputy Director position, and grants. The budget includes $50,000 in contract services to begin the update of the Comprehensive Plan.

Department of Land Use & Growth Management


Selected Statistis/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistis/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Administration

Planning Commission meetings/Special 23/4 23/1 23/2 Board of Appeals meetings/work session/special 12/0/0 12/1/1 12/1/1 Court Transcripts 0 1 1 Board of County Commissioners 10 13 16 Elms Committee Meetings 4 4 4 Historic Preservation & other Board meetings 14 14 14 Joint Public Hearing -Comprehensive Plan and Lexington Park Plan 2 2 2 Development Review Forum meeting 13 12 12 Planning Division Zoning/PUD cases 2 2 2 Phasing Plan reviews 2 4 5 Subdivision reviews 111 169 189 Plat reviews (non-dividing) 198 226 260 Site Plan reviews 114 115 107 Forest Conservation reviews 27 61 59 Agricultural Land Preservation Districts 4 4 4 Comprehensive Water & Sewer Plan 6 8 0 Growth Allocation 2 2 2 TDR 3 4 5 Permits Review Division Applications processed 3,196 3,500 3,500 Residential Improvements 2,547 2,820 2,820 Non-Residential Improvements 133 155 155 Construction Inspections Construction Plans Reviewed 170 185 200 Site Plans Reviewed Ratio of "unsafe" structures made "safe"/total cases 247/25 222/222 18/25 Minimum Livability Cases 66 74 74 Mobile Home Park Licenses Issued $8,850 $8,850 $8,850 Certificates of Use and Occupancy Issued $998 $1,098 $1,594 Inspection Inquiries Received/Resolved 230/206 250/230 260/250 Contract Inspection Statistics 16,500 16,900 24,300

Department of Public Works & Transportation

DEPARTMENT/ SPENDING UNIT

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Administration 330,056 355,035 365,850 377,525 Engineering Services 281,478 300,240 314,936 317,511 Development & Plan Review 179,752 294,643 331,148 275,835 Construction & Inspections 358,901 410,321 426,160 414,530 County Highways 2,396,546 3,032,923 3,224,138 3,312,172 Solid Waste 2,164,254 2,519,739 2,863,251 3,208,034 Recycling 369,714 429,742 439,429 441,547 Mailroom 104,764 113,527 117,092 119,157 Vehicle Maintenance Shop 1,095,804 1,141,861 1,294,725 1,205,111 Non- Public School Bus Transportation 1,696,593 1,815,287 1,864,746 1,867,511

Airport Operations 9,974 15,679 16,165 16,165

St. Mary’s Transit System (Grant) 1,480,388 2,123,668 2,446,377 2,287,358

Mitigation Grant 0 0 0 159,000

Capital Projects 111,385 183,085 187,235 180,698

Building Services 2,558,045 2,895,610 3,290,025 3,355,801

Carter State Office Building 406,762 486,240 535,698 535,698

Total DPW & T 13,550,476 16,142,600 17,724,325 18,073,653

Program Description


The Department of Public Works & Transportation is organized into sixteen (16) operational accounts. The County Highways Division is responsible for the maintenance of County highways, traffic signage and the resolution of drainage complaints. The Solid Waste and Recycling Divisions are responsible for solid waste management, convenience center/landfill operations and recycling. The Construction and Inspections Division provides material testing and inspects County capital projects and new subdivision roads, manages the pavement overlay and line striping programs. The Engineering Service and Development Review Divisions are responsible for transportation planning, design, project management of marine and highway capital projects, county mapping, and the permitting and review of proposed development plans. The Administration Division provides staff support for the other divisions, and maintains the Department’s various information management systems. On April 20, 2000, the Transportation portion of Central Services was transferred to the Department of Public Works. This Division manages the Non-Public School Bus Transportation System, the Mail/messenger postal services, the St. Mary’s Transit System, and Vehicle Maintenance/fleet management for some of the County Agencies. The Airport Division was also transferred to Department of Public Works effective July 1, 2001. Effective July 9, 2003 and December 9, 2003, the responsibilities of the Capital Projects and Building Services Divisions were transferred to this Department.


Budget Highlights The Department of Public Works and Transportation budget is approved to increase by $1,931,053 to $18,073,653. The budget includes approximately $1,711,551 for tipping fees, an increase of $253,051 that is needed due to increased rates charged by Calvert County, increased volume as well as approximately $200,000 of monitoring and remediation costs associated with landfills. With the planned opening of a new transfer station in FY 2007, additional costs were added for operations, including 2 FTEs starting September 2006. The approved budget for the Building Services division reflects the increased costs associated with utilities for all public buildings operated by the county. The budgets for Highways and STS reflect increased costs associated principally with salary and benefits improvements and increased fuel costs.


Actual FY 2005

Estimated FY

2005Projected FY

2007 Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Administration

% Budget Spent on Staff Development/Seminars 1.0% 0% 0% # of Workman Compensation Claims

21 15 15

# of Positions (Temp or Full -Time)

5

5

5

# of Departmental Website Hits

103,000

106,000

109,000 Commissioner Action Items Received / Responded

21

25

25

# of Procurement Requisitions Processed 850 865 880 Total # of invoices Processed (excluding Fuel Service)

7,000

7,350

7,500

# of Vendors and / or Contracts Administered

10

35

50

Development Review / Engineering # of Subdivision Plans Reviewed 234 280 250 Average Duration of Review (# of days) 20 22 21

# of Technical Evaluation Committee Plans Reviewed / Average Duration of Review (# of days)

219 30

240 32

240 32

# of Site and Mining Plans Reviewed / Average Duration of Review (# of days)

180 17

220 13

220 13




Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Development Review / Engineering (Continued)

Actual FY 2005

Estimated FY 2006

Projected FY 2007

# of Record Plat Submissions Reviewed / Average Duration of Review (# of days)

367 11

320 7

320 7

# of Grading Permits Approved / Amount of Bond Estimate Surety ($)

21 $2.2M

22 $2.2M

25 $2.5M

# of Public Works Agreements Approved / Amount of Bond Estimate Surety ($)

7 $1.0M

8 $4.0M

10 $5.0M

# of Taxing District Public Hearings and Ordinances # of Petitions Received and Public Information Meetings Held

1 4

3 4

3 4

# of Capital Projects under Design/Construction # Performed In-House / # Performed by Consultant

18/7 5/13

12/8 6/6

12/8 6/6

Consultant Support (# of A/E’s Utilized) 8 8 8 # of Topographic Orders Processed / Revenue Generated to Recoup Costs

125 $13,111

130 $14,300

135 $14,850

Construction & Inspection # of Inspections (capital projects, subdivision & grading permits) 4,090 4,110 4,300

# Material Tests (subdivision/ capital projects) 172 169 170 Active Construction Bonding - construction permits $11,140,312 $12,018,462 $13,000,000

Active Construction Bonding - grading permits $6,477,411 $6,488,771 $6,500,000

Capital Project Value under Contract $1.6M $1.5M $1.5M

Asphalt Overlay Program (miles) 6.02 5.58 3.96

Surface Treatment Program (miles)

-0- -0- -0-

Slurry/Modified Seal Program (miles) 25.25 18.94 16.00

Guardrail Placement (ft.) / Total Guardrail (ft.) 90 / 879,775.5 500 / 80,255.5 500 / 80,775.5 Line Striping Performed 2,366,175 2,402,400 2,438,000

Department of Public Works & Transportation Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007


County Highways

Highway Maintenance Mileage (centerline miles) 602.5 610 616

# of County Roads 1,400 1,420 1,440

# of Maintenance Requests Received 1,044 1,075 1,200 Inches of Snow or Rain / Contractor, Overtime, Material Costs ($)

17.5” $189,628

10” $200,000

10” $210,000

Mowable (acres) 1,396 1,410 1,425

# of Utility Permits Issued 8 10 10 Metal Pipes Replaced (feet) 1,860 2,000 2,100

# Signs Installed / Total # of Signs 157 165 175

Berm Removal (miles) 15 20 25

Removal of Deformed Section Repair (miles) 1.4 2.0 2.00

Base Failure Repair (miles) 1.8 3.0 3.0

Shoulder Improvements (feet) 1,056 2,640 2,700

# of Adopt-a-Road Participants (voluntary) 36 38 40

Concrete Pipes Replaced (feet) 440 500 550

Highway User Fees (Gas Tax Revenues) $4,340,000 $6,419,895 $6,467,220

Solid Waste / Recycling Est. Total County MRA Waste Generated (tons) 61,900 66,852 72,200

# of Transfer Trailer / Roll-off Loads per Week 53 60 66

Total MSW/Rubble from Landfill (tons) Exported 7,109 7,677 8,291

Total MSW from Convenience Stations (tons) Exported 18,544 19,500 20,500

# Residential Solid Waste Permits Issued per Month 320 340 360

# Customers Served at St. Andrews Landfill 41,202 44,498 48,058

# Customers Served at Convenience Stations 730,614 789,063 852,188 Convenience Center / Landfill Recycling: Scrap Metal, Paper, Textiles, Cans, Used Oil, Cardboard, Tires (tons) 9,850 11,000 12,280

County MRA Recycling Rate including Source Reduction 23% 25% 26%

Household Hazardous Waste Collected (gallons) 6,500 7,020 7,581

Business / Commercial Recycling Efforts (tons) 8,352 9,270 10,290



Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Mailroom # of Pieces Processed

Actual FY 2005

257,724

Estimated FY 2006

260,200

Projected FY 2007

265,000 County / State Agencies Served by Mail Service

67 67 67

Vehicle Maintenance Size of Fleet (total #)

481

523

543 # Vehicles in Fleet / # Pieces of Equipment (Tagged) (Non-Tagged)

388 93

425 98

445 98

Purchase Value of Fleet ($M) $10.9M $11.0M $11.5.M

Replacement Value of Fleet ($M) $15.0M $16.0M $17.0M

# of Mechanics 6 6 7

# Mechanics / # Vehicles Ratio (50:1 for no outsourcing) 70.0 70.0 70.0

Total # of Job Orders Performed 6,286 6,500 6,750

Type “A” Maintenance (sub-total) 2,257 2,400 2,450

Type “B” Maintenance (sub-total) 490 500 510

Type “C” Maintenance (sub-total) 339 359 379

Unscheduled Maintenance (sub-total) 3,200 3,250 3,300

Unscheduled/Scheduled (2.5:1 max.)

1.04

1.04

1.04 Non-Public # of Buses Under Contract

43

43

43

# of Total Riders

2,150

2,200

2,250

Average # of Riders per Bus

50

50

50

# of Non-Public Schools Served

14

14

14

Annual Route Mileage

628,930

630,000

632,000


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators St. Mary’s Transit (STS) # of Riders - Fixed Route # Riders - ADA Para-transit

Actual FY 2005

302,764

7,557

Estimated FY 2006

344,224

7,600

Projected FY 2007

350,000

7,700

# Riders - Client Transportation (Adult Day Care) 17,028 18,000 18,000

# - Demand Response 13,591 14,000 14,500

Annual Route Mileage 1,040,081 1,050,000 1,055,000

Total Fare Box / Recovery ($ Revenues) –Goal 20% Minimum

$403,237 20%

$404,819 20%

$406,901 20%

Total Cost per Capita / County Share per Capita $16.84 / $3.09 $15.57 / $2.75 $15.50 / $5.72

% Grant Funded

80%

80%

80%


Department of Recreation, Parks and Community Services


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Administration 761,908 896,702 920,196 927,385 Parks Maintenance 1,303,742 1,608,153 1,760,635 1,760,617 Museum Division 343,093 419,139 484,561 499,587 Community Services 289,983 300,595 370,932 361,528 Human Relations Commission 1,657 2,233 2,291 2,291 Commission for the Disabled 1,764 2,000 2,300 2,300 Commission for Women 776 900 2,000 2,000 Vista Program 48,070 37,463 38,562 38,562 Grants 302,020 379,285 356,885 356,885 Total Recreation, Parks, and Community Services 3,053,013 3,646,470 3,938,362 3,951,155 Program Description The Department of Recreation, Parks and Community Services is responsible for providing a comprehensive program of public recreation in schools, parks, and other facilities. The Department also develops and maintains a park system, operates a golf course, manages two museums and offers programs and services that address social issues and community problems. The Department is organized into the following divisions: Administration, Museums, Parks, Recreation, Golf Course and Community Services. The Administration Division provides general direction and oversight of the Department and serves as the staff liaison to three advisory boards. The function of the Museum Division is to manage and operate several nationally accredited museum sites including the St. Clements Island - Potomac River Museum; the Little Red Schoolhouse Children’s Museum; the Piney Point Lighthouse Museum and Park; and the Drayden African-American schoolhouse. The Parks Division provides the grounds and facility maintenance at approximately 103 parks, schools, public landings, and county/state buildings, and oversees approximately 2,328 acres of County property. The Parks Division also oversees park operations including scheduling picnic pavilion rentals and athletic field usage by leagues; managing activities at Chancellor’s Run Regional Park; supervising the skate park and sprayground at Nicolet Park; and managing other park usage issues. The Recreation Division is responsible for providing a broad range of recreational programs, activities, and events for county residents. Program areas include sports, aquatics, licensed child care, summer camps, leisure classes, therapeutic recreation, and special events. Responsibilities also include the management of several recreation facilities including the St. Mary’s Gymnastics Center; the Leonard Hall, Margaret Brent, Hollywood, and Carver Recreation Centers; and the Great Mills Swimming Pool. Recreational programs are self-supporting through user fees and administered through the Recreation Activity Fund. The Division of Community Services administers a comprehensive alcohol and drug abuse prevention program; coordinates the County’s AmeriCorps*VISTA Volunteer program; oversees the Criminal Justice Coalition and the CSAFE initiative; provides a county-wide Highway Safety public education and awareness program; and manages the Teen Court program. The Division also provides administrative support to several County government advisory boards and acts as a resource and referral service to citizen and community inquiries about human service issues.

The Wicomico Shores Golf Course is a 145-acre, 18-hole championship golf course. The facility provides golf opportunities for all ages and includes a clubhouse with food service and banquet facilities. The golf course is self-supporting and the budget is administered through the Golf Course Enterprise Fund.



Budget Highlights The general fund budget for Recreation, Parks and Community Services is $3,951,155 or $304,685 more than the prior year. The 8.4% increase reflects costs for 2.75 FTES, 3 reclassifications and vehicle replacements.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Parks # Parks and school sites maintained 100 101 101 # Acres of parks, schools, and facilities maintained 2,200 2,252 2,252 # Athletic fields, courts, playgrounds, other facilities 159 170 169 # Recreation buildings and structures maintained 35 37 38 # Park improvement or construction projects 85 106 107 # Park users (estimated) 278,000 285,000 290,000 # Sports league participants using parks 12,802 12,340 12,865 Museums (St. Clements and Piney Point) # Total Visitors (daily admission and special events) 14,449 18,200 21,900 # Volunteers 62 65 75 # Volunteer hours 2,921 3,050 3,350 $ Value of volunteer service $26,901 $28,609 $31,892 # Boat tour trips to St. Clements Island 1,007 2,000 2,200 Recreation Division # Recreation program participants 26,328 28,600 29,790 Summer Camps 3,100 3,200 3,300 B&A Child Care 316 350 390 Gymnastics 2,764 2,850 2,900 Leisure Classes 2,041 2,300 2,500 Special Events 5,339 6,500 7,000 Sports 11,507 12,000 12,200 Teen Activities 1,261 1,400 1,500 # Volunteers 1,400 1,400 1,420 # Volunteers hours 70,000 70,000 70,000 $ Value of volunteer service $1,039,500 $1,039,500 $1,054,350 Wicomico Shores Golf Course # Total rounds of golf 39,147 44,938 47,000 # Season pass users 222 230 230 # Junior golf program participants 64 80 80 # Outings held 46 48 48 $ Amount of revenue generated $1,008,103 $1,158,350 $1,256,750 $ Golf revenue reinvested in facility improvements $39,799 $95,000 $100,000



Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual

FY 2005 Estimated FY 2006

Projected FY 2007

Community Services # Teen Court juvenile offenders 20 20 20 # Teen Court volunteers 120 130 150 # K-Kid Club participating youth 30 40 50 # Adult volunteers 60 80 100 # C-Safe program participants 770 1,078 1,155 # VISTA recruited community volunteers 583 755 810 # VISTA volunteer hours of service 11,622 12,840 13,500 # Drunk and drug awareness attendees 50 60 80 # Health Fairs participated in 2 5 7 # Editions of traffic safety editions N/A 9 12 % Seat belt usage 90% 90.5% 91.5% # Child passenger safety seat participants 150 250 400 # Attendees at highway safety awareness event N/A 30 50 # Businesses participating in Tipsy Taxi program N/A 12 15 # Participants in SOSAR service learning program 57 60 80 % of High School Seniors attending Project Graduation 76% 77% 78%

Public Safety


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Emergency Communications 1,334,235 1,772,072 2,048,842 1,994,109 Radio Communications 672,516 732,168 848,281 858,052

Emergency Management 140,803 223,714 242,962 237,287 Animal Control 449,215 547,993 636,385 579,562 Grants 737,165 361,536 1,765,651 1,761,001

Total Public Safety 3,333,934 3,637,483 5,542,121 5,430,011 Program DescriptionPublic Safety is an integral part of the County’s Emergency Response and Preparedness activities. The 24/7 operation provides continuous emergency and routine communications and dispatch to law enforcement, animal control, and fire and rescue services as well as other support agencies. Direct communications to all major response agencies is capable from one operation for enhancement of coordinated responses to any emergency situation. Additional communications with other numerous local and state agencies operating within the County is available as necessary. Radio equipment for the County Volunteer Fire and Rescue services is purchased and maintained by the County through Emergency Communications. The St. Mary's Emergency Management Agency (EMA) encompasses various aspects within St. Mary's County. EMA is mandated by Federal and State law and operates under guidelines and policies established by the County, Maryland Emergency Management Agency (MEMA), and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). EMA is charged with mitigation, planning, preparedness, response, and recovery activities from the effects of all natural, man-made, technological, or nuclear disasters. The Animal Control Program operates under EMA and is responsible for executing and enforcing the provisions of the State and County Animal Regulations. Coordination of the Emergency Medical Services Program is also accomplished through EMA and covers Basic Life Support and Advanced Life Support activities.

Budget Highlights The approved budget for Public Safety is $5,430,011, a $1,792,528 increase over the prior year. This 49.3% increase in expenditures is primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in grants, ranks for communication specialists, and 1 animal warden to start to start January 2007. The grants related principally to re-bonding and other 911 related improvements.

Selected Statistics /Workload Indicators


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Emergency Communications 911 Emergency dispatches 18,403 20,243 22,267 Transfers/Inquiries 18,118 19,632 21,596 Fire/medical 13,433 14,700 16,169 Police dispatch (MSP) 9,502 10,452 11,496 Console Radio Transmissions 526,050 578,655 636,520 Miscellaneous Activities (FMO, Forestry, & utilities) 23,249 25,574 28,131

Training (hours) 4,309 4,400 4,400

Sheriff’s office dispatches 51,045 56,150 49,872

Public Safety



Actual FY 2005

Estimated FY 2006

Projected FY 2007

Emergency Management Activation of the Emergency Operations Center

(EOC): Number of times activated 4 Full/25 Partial 30 36 Severe Weather Watches/Warnings received and disseminated: Winter Storms 3 4 5

Hurricanes/Tropical Storms 2 3 4

Thunderstorms/Flooding 5 6 7 Tornado Warnings 2 3 4

Fog 0 1 2 Heat Advisory 3 4 5 Animal Control # of Animals captured 2,851 3,136 3,449 # of Calls for service responses 6,006 6,200 6,500 # of Cruelty cases investigated 232 255 280 # of Animal bite investigations 287 315 346 # of Dog licenses sold 1,950 2,145 2,360


NOT USED

OPERATING BUDGETS

ELECTED OFFICIALS

Circuit Court


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Judicial 696,929 815,186 868,113 858,177 Law Library 45,511 46,100 49,297 49,297 Grants 242,920 207,045 226,842 226,842

Total Circuit Court 985,360 1,068,331 1,144,252 1,184,588

Program Description The Circuit Court for St. Mary's County is a court of general jurisdiction established pursuant to Article IV of the Maryland Constitution. The objective of the Court, as stated in the Plan of Action, is to provide for individual justice in the resolution of disputes, while assuring the prompt, efficient scheduling and disposition of cases. The Court manages its case load through a Differentiated Case Management Plan, which establishes time standards for the resolution of cases. The Circuit Court has full common-law power and jurisdiction in civil cases involving over twenty-five thousand dollars, and in most criminal cases originally charged as felonies. The Court exercises concurrent jurisdiction with the District Court in civil and equity cases if the amount in controversy exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars, in criminal cases in certain statutorily defined circumstances, and in certain family law proceedings such as domestic violence. The Court exercises appellate review of District Court cases and certain County administrative decisions. All juvenile matters fall within the Court's jurisdiction. The Court also selects and instructs members of the grand and petit juries.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget for the Circuit Court is $1,184,588, an increase over the prior year of $116,257. This includes reclassification of Court Administrator as well as the Family Services grant increase of $19,052.


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Scholarship Programs Family Services Grant 128,815 118,860 135,610 Juvenile Drug Court Grant 64,232 79,832 79,832 Child Support Grant 10,135 10,655 11,400 Law Library Collection 45,511 46,100 49,297

Orphan's Court


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Orphan's Court 26,696 30,530 32,092 31,759

Program DescriptionThe Orphan's Court consists of three members elected to concurrent four-year terms. The Court is responsible for hearing matters involving decedents' estates which are probated judicially and, approving administration accounts and awards of personal representatives' commissions and attorneys' fees in all estates. The Orphan’s Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Circuit Court in the guardianship of minors and their property, and handles the validity of wills and transfer of property in which legal questions and disputes occur.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget for the Orphan’s Court is $31,759, an increase of $1,229, and continues the same activity as FY 2006.

Office of the Sheriff


FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Law Enforcement 11,294,118 13,412,997 16,681,250 14,711,881 Corrections 6,029,176 6,773,379 7,243,191 7,080,860 Training 167,181 100,410 154,490 139,392 Canine 10,581 11,775 12,427 11,775 Grant 314,136 550,001 1,136,701 1,212,459

Total Office of the Sheriff 17,815,192 20,848,562 25,228,059 23,156,367

Program Description The St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office is comprised organizationally of Administration, Patrol, Criminal Investigations, Special Operations and Corrections with the following major functions: provide prompt and efficient investigation of all incidents, crimes and complaints, and keeping victims informed of status of investigations; expanded drug enforcement efforts directed against high level drug dealers and street level sellers; public awareness and educational programs that focus on the harmful effects of drugs and alcohol abuse; enhanced crime prevention programs, including grants, that provide high visibility of police patrols in high crime areas of the County; neighborhood crime watch programs in which citizens participate; home and commercial security surveys; timely service of criminal and civil process; security for the Courthouse and Circuit Courts; traffic safety and accident reconstruction; and efficient administration and operation of St. Mary’s County Detention Center.

Budget Highlights The approved budget for the Office of the Sheriff is $23,156,367, an increase of $2,307,805 or 11.1%. This includes merit increases, pay parity for sworn positions which averages 4%, and a phased 4% COLA for non-sworn positions. This approved budget includes five (5) new deputies and conversion of 7 hourly positions to full time with benefits, as well as one Fiscal Specialist I and RPT Classification Specialist (1). Ranks are also included for DFC (1), Senior DFC (8), Corporals (5), CFC (5), Senior CFC (7), and Correctional Lieutenant (1). The budget also includes funds for the purchase of 24 replacement vehicles and 5 new vehicles for Deputies above, using exempt financing. Grants increased $662,458 over the prior fiscal year, and the new funds principally support acquisition of equipment. Additional funding of approximately $109,000 for the Adult Detention Center is allocated to cover the increased cost of food and medical services for inmates.






FY 2005 Actual

FY 2006 Estimated

FY 2007 Projected

Calls For Service 57,417 58,680 59,971 Response Time: Call Waiting To Be Dispatched 4 min 49 sec 4 min 56 sec 5 min 2 sec Response Time: Average Response Time 6:46 7:05 7:26 Response Time: Average Time From Receipt Of Call To Completion 24:23 25:33 26:49

# Breaking & Entering 377 395 414 # Arsons 20 21 22 # Robberies 39 41 43 # Felony Assaults/Misdemeanors 1,048 1,098 1,151 # Rapes 18 19 20 # Murders 1 1 1 # Of Thefts 1,177 1,233 1,293 # Narcotic Violations 373 391 410 # Child Abuse Cases 72 75 79 # Number Of DWI 260 272 286 # Of Possession/Weapons 26 27 29 # Vandalism 848 889 931 # Liquor Violation 25 26 27 # Battered Spouses 365 383 401 # Of Disorderly Conduct Cases 40 42 44 # Of Larceny After Trust Cases 155 162 170 # Of Forgeries 38 40 42 # Of Fraud Cases 159 167 175 # Of Sex Offenses 77 81 85 Value Of Drugs Seized $90,398 $150,000 $200,000 Child Support Warrants Issued 179 206 190 Traffic Accidents 2,449 2,460 2,470 School Bus Inspections 462 469 476 D.A.R.E. # Of School Participants 2,500 2,600 2,700 Volunteer Hours 293 400 425


FY 2005

ActualFY 2006

EstimatedFY 2007

Projected

Corrections # Of Inmates Received 2,545 2,766 3,042 Average Daily Population 292 320 350 Inmates Participating in GED Program 597 626 680 Inmate Work Hours-County Projects 68,462 89,400 90,000 Work Release Fees Collected $151,235 $172,000 $172,000 Home Detention Fees Collected $33,313 $35,000 $35,000 Juvenile Transport Fees Collected $44,617 $48,000 $48,000 Weekender Fees Collected $18,635 $13,000 $13,000


Office of the State's Attorney


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Judicial 1,527,060 1,657,854 1,871,581 1,831,900 Project Graduation 35,922 41,500 41,512 41,512 Grants 377,794 429,347 603,219 603,154

Total Office of State's Attorney 1,940,776 2,128,701 2,516,312 2,476,566 Program Description The State's Attorney for each county and the city of Baltimore is empowered by the Maryland Annotated Code to prosecute and defend, on the part of the State, all cases in which the State may be interested, subject to the provisions of the Code. The Office of the State's Attorney performs the following functions: recovery of child support payments from absent parents; bad check collection program responsible for collection of worthless checks issued to merchants in St. Mary's County; sponsor of Project Graduation, as well as other education programs on crime prevention in public and private schools; operation of the Community Service Program which serves as a pretrial diversionary program for minor traffic offenders; collection of restitution due victims of crimes in District and Juvenile Courts, and a large percentage of the restitution for the Circuit Court; assistance with criminal investigations of police agencies; coordination of the activities of the Grand Jury; prosecution of all criminal and traffic matters in the District, Circuit, and Juvenile Courts for St. Mary's County; and is the forfeiting authority for property and monies received as a result of illicit drug trade and other crimes.

Budget Highlights The budget approved for the Office of the State’s Attorney is $2,476,566 which represents an increase of $347,865, or 16.3%. One Assistant State’s Attorney was added, along with the cost of two reclassifications (Investigator and Senior Office Specialist). Also included is a Domestic Violence Coordinator and Investigator, which are only 50% funded from general funds.



Circuit Court cases filed 642 675 700 Number of Estimated Court Hearings 1,113 1,668 1,750 Juvenile Delinquency Cases Held 344 360 378 Number of Juvenile Hearing 1,036 1,080 1,100 Community service participants 2,385 2,600 2,750 Community Service Hours Completed 32,568 35,499 39,048 Restitution on bad checks $273,530 $275,000 $280,000 Forfeited assets collected $28,030 $48,000 $52,000 Paternity orders established 182 140 152 Support orders established 462 424 424 Child support collected $9,924,395 $10,412,873 $10,925,394

County Treasurer


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

County Treasurer 307,040 345,010 348,951 353,141

Program Description The primary function of the Treasurer's Office is the billing and collection of real and personal property taxes for the State and County. Related responsibilities include the billing and collection of erosion, road, agricultural, and other miscellaneous special taxes, penalties and interest; verification and inspection of records and stamping of real property deeds for tax clearance prior to recordation; intake and processing of qualified senior tax credit applicants, completion and submission of bankruptcy documentation on real property accounts to the bankruptcy court; conducting of the annual tax sale; the billing, collection, and disbursement of the fire /rescue district tax on real and personal property. Other duties include the issuance of motor vehicle registration renewals, dog tags, and liquor licenses. The Treasurer’s Office is responsible for the preparation, dissemination, and maintenance of all relevant financial reports to local and state authorities.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget for the Office of the County Treasurer is $353,141, an increase of $8,131 or 2.4%. Current levels of staffing and costs are continued. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 # of Tax bills (real property, local personal property, corporations, 1/2 year new construction, semi-annual notices) 43,200 45,600 48,000 Delinquent and final notices 6,000 6,000 6,000 # of Tax payments processed 42,000 42,500 43,000 Walk-in taxpayers 15,500 16,500 17,000 Other walk-in customers (research of deeds and other legal documents for recordation, renew auto tags, purchase of liquor licenses, dog tags, intake of senior tax credit applicants) 14,800 15,000 15,200 Telephone inquiries 35,000 35,000 35,000


NOT USED

OPERATING BUDGETS

STATE AGENCIES/ INDEPENDENT BOARDS

Department of Health


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Department of Health 1,069,544 1,120,671 1,307,028 1,141,845 Program Description The Health Department is a State agency which receives the majority of its financial support from the State government, as well as fees and other collections. County funding is contributing to the costs of administration, school health, the oral health program, the communicable disease program, and the environmental health program.

Budget Highlights In accordance with the State core public health funding formula, the County must provide a minimum of $794,314 in local funding to the Health Department. In FY 2007, $1,094,845 is included in the approved budget, which is more than the minimum local funding requirement, and represents a 2.0% increase, similar to the state funding increase. In addition, $47,000 is allocated to fund the local match for the state mosquito control program and $2,000 for gypsy moth. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators

Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 # Walk-ins (Health Dept., Drug Screening, Walden, and other agencies) 13,884 13,994 14,000 Dental Health Program 108 125 125 Public Health Complaints 239 250 300 NCT Water supply samples 770 800 800 Certify potability of well/# of water samples collected 700/1666 650/1700 650/1700 # of anti-rabies clinics/# of vaccinations administered 9/971 9/1000 9/1000 # of positive rabies cases 14 12 12 Food service facility inspections 1,011 1,150 1,150 Outreach training to Food Service workers (# of courses) 4 5 5 # of soil evaluations conducted (new) 1.547 650 650

Department of Social Services


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Department of Social Services 326,574 342,408 350,507 353,099

Program Description The Department of Social Services is a State agency which provides a broad range of programs and services from public assistance to child welfare. County funding to support the Child Support Enforcement Program, Adult Foster Care, Child Foster Care and staff development and training. The function of the Child Support Enforcement program is to interview customers, locate absent parents, refer cases for legal establishment of paternity and/or court ordered support obligations, monitor collections, and enforce court orders for customers and children who are entitled to these services through the Department of Social Services. The function of the Adult Foster Care Program is to delay or eliminate the need for institutionalizing disabled or elderly adults. The Child Foster Care Program provides short-term continuous twenty-four hour care and supportive services for needy children.

Budget Highlights

The local portion of the Social Services budget is $353,099, a 3.1% increase over FY 2006. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Child Support collections $9,924,395 $10,412,873 $10,925,394 Child Support orders established 462 462 462 Child Support paternity established 182 182 182

Certified adult foster care homes 15 16 16 Adult clients living in provider's homes (p/mo. avg.) 13 13 14 Adult clients served with purchase of care funds 65 50 50 Children in foster care (p/mo. avg.) 72 74 74 Children in out-of-county placements 15 16 15 Children with supervised visitation/Average # visits weekly 15/35 25/37 22/37 # of children receiving medical/psychological services from specialist 39 37 35 % of parents court-ordered to attend alcohol/drug/mental treatment 63 76 76 Children placed for adoption 6 14 8 Continuous training 4 4 4

Deceased citizens requiring resources for burial. Average cost of $650 9 10 10 $5,125 $6,500 $6,500

Alcohol Beverage Board


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Alcohol Beverage Board 174,889 203,321 213,182 215,156

Program Description The Alcohol Beverage Board is responsible for the issuance of alcohol beverage licenses. It has the full power and authority to adopt such reasonable rules and regulations as deemed necessary to enable it to effectively discharge the duties imposed by Article 2B of the Laws and Regulations of the State of Maryland. The Board receives and reviews license applications, holds hearings, conducts inspections, files reports, and enforces underage drinking laws.

Budget Highlights The approved budget for the Alcohol Beverage Board is $215,156 and includes funding for the reclassification of the Board Administrator. Revenue collected by the Alcohol Beverage Board totals $104,036.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007License Fees $91,518 $93,480 $95,350

# of Temporary Licenses Issued 84 78 81 Transfer Fees $900 $1,700 $2,000 # of Transfers 9 17 20 # of Alcohol Licenses (at yr end) 155 158 161 Fines $1,750 $1,450 $3,000

Supervisors of Elections


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Supervisors of Election 446,038 424,495 1,613,628 1,034,371

Program Description The Board of Elections operates under State election laws, receiving direction from the State Administrative Board of Election Laws. Responsibilities include supervision of elections, registering voters, and receiving applications for candidates filing for elected office in St. Mary's County.

Budget Highlights The approved budget for the Board of Elections is $1,034,371, which is an increase of 143.7% over FY 2006. Election activities drive the need for such a funding level, including equipment and related costs for voting machines. FY 2007 will include a primary and general election. Some of the increased election year costs include $81,260 for printing and postage, $291,910 for equipment rental and approximate $545,000 for contracted services, including staffing and election judges.

Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistic/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007New Voter Registrations 4,152 4,983 7,021 Changes to voter records 7,373 8,848 10,013 Party Changes 743 892 10,013 Deletions 1,332 1,598 300 Confirmation Mailing 1,201 1,441 960 Voter Transfer 0 0 3,620 M.V.A 0 0 3,617

Cooperative Extension Service


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Cooperative Extension Service 119,600 150,568 166,000 159,828

Program Description The Cooperative Extension Service provides research-backed unbiased information, together with educational opportunities, developed by the University of Maryland System and other institutes of higher education to all adults and youth. The Extension Service is jointly funded by Federal, State and Local governments. All CES programs are developed and presented to implement the following initiatives: agriculture profitability; natural resource issues; improving diet, nutrition and health; building and developing human capital; increasing family economic stability; commercial horticulture and pest management; and aquaculture and marine resources.

Budget Highlights

The Cooperative Extension Service local budget is $159,828, which is $9,260 or 6.2% higher than the FY 2006 level of funding, and continues current service levels. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Master gardeners volunteer hours 3,750 3,750 4,200 Child Care provider training participants 310 310 250 Food Safety program participants 155 155 130 # Youth participating in 4-H clubs 1,050 1,050 1,330 Pesticide licenses renewed 80 80 85 Nutrient management plans 110 110 450 Direct Farmer Consultation 450 450 475 Beginner Farmer Workshop Series 30 30 35 Vineyard Research Outreach 40 40 50 Nutrient Voucher Training 230 230 100 Volunteers, 4H (MCE & Short Term) 71 71 80

Ethics Commission



FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006 Approved

Budget

FY 2007 Requested

Budget

FY 2007 Approved

BudgetEthics Commission 6,747 9,694 9,694 9,694

Program Description There is a five member St. Mary’s County Ethics Commission appointed by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with the County Public Ethics Ordinance. The Commission is the advisory body responsible for interpreting the Ordinance and advising persons subject to its application. The Commission hears and decides complaints; is the custodian of all financial disclosure statements, registrations, reports, and complaints; and conducts information and education programs.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget is $9,694, which is the same as the FY 2006 Approved Budget. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007Ethics /LGIT meetings 3 5 5

Soil Conservation District


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Soil Conservation District 41,238 47,495 52,109 52,109 Program Description The Soil Conservation District promotes wise and efficient use of the County's soils and water resources through a cooperative relationship between County, State and Federal governments. The District's first priority is the agriculture program. Through soils conservation and water quality planning, nutrient management planning and the implementation of best management practices, the agriculture community is actively working towards reaching the forty percent reduction of nitrogen and phosphorous loads to the Chesapeake Bay. The District also has a non-agriculture program which includes urban sediment control plans review, pond designs, and forest harvest sediment control plans.

Budget Highlights The County will fund $52,109 in FY2007 which is 9.7% more than FY2006. The increase relates principally to the cost of health insurance. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators

Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicator FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Approved erosion and sediment control plans: - Single Lot development disturbing less than .5 acres 1000 1000 1000

- Development that disturbs greater than .5 acres 264 250 250 Reviews/comments for Technical Evaluation Committee 200 200 200 Review storm water management plans 30 25 25 Development of Soil Conservation & Water Quality Plans 91 100 100 Buffers under the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program 10.4 acres 15 acres 15 acres District’s No-till Drill Lease Program

1006 acres 700 acres 1,000 acres

Application of structural soil conservation and water quality best management practices on agriculture land 11 15 20

Student participation in the Envirothon Program

106

120

130

Wicomico Scenic River Commission


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Wicomico Scenic River Commission 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Program Description

The Wicomico Scenic River Commission is a board created by the Commissioners of Charles and St. Mary’s Counties to ensure that the natural values of the Wicomico River, a state designated scenic river, are preserved, and that the resources within the watershed which spans the two counties, are used wisely. Membership is comprised of representatives from the watershed in both Charles and St. Mary’s Counties. All members are appointed by their respective board of County Commissioners.

Budget Highlights

The County will continue to fund $1,000, which is the same as FY2006. Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators

Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Oyster Bar Lease, Yearly Fees $158 $158 $158 Environmental Stewardship Awards $500 $600 $522 Program Brochure and educational materials, reproduction costs $100 $100 $120 Public Meeting Refreshments $100 $100 $200

Board of Education


Program Description

The Education Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland governs the conduct of public education in the State. The law provides that there shall be throughout the State of Maryland a general system of free public schools. A State Department of Education is established as a principal department of the State government. The State Board of Education determines overall elementary and secondary educational policies of the State. The law further provides that there is a county board of education for each county school system and that educational matters that affect the counties shall be under the control of the county board. The St. Mary's County Board of Education consists of five voting members and one student member. The Annotated Code of Maryland also requires that each county board prepare an annual budget for submission to the county fiscal authorities according to major budget categories.

Highlights of FY 2007 Approved Budget

The total operating budget approved by the Board of Education, including all funding sources, was $150,497,071, an increase of $12,427,057 or 9%. The school system is funded by a combination of state, federal, and local sources, which include the appropriation from the County as well as its own internally generated fund balance and other income. Funding other than the County appropriation was estimated by the Board of Education to be $82,685,583 including use of their fund balance in the amount of $1,517,705. The approved County appropriation of $67,811,488 which is $5,177,264 more than FY 2006, fully funds their request, and includes a one-time allocation for funding the Boys and Girls Club after-school program of $125,000. Based on the State mandated maintenance of effort calculation which addresses enrollment changes, the County would not be required to increase its FY 2006 funding at all. This appropriation exceeds the Bridge to Excellence Agreement by $2.7 million. This resolution ties the County funding to enrollment and uses cost per pupil data derived from the Thornton Commission study that identified adequate school funding on a per pupil basis. The resolution commits to fund public schools based on enrollment, including half of the projected increase, at a per pupil rate that was identified by the Board of Education to meet their needs through FY 2009, and is adjusted for enrollment demographics and county wealth. The County allocation in the resolution for FY2007 was to be based on a per pupil rate of $4,050 however the approved funding level equates to $4,245. Fuel, utilities and employee health costs far exceeded any assumptions, with health reflecting a 79% increase and utilities reflecting an 81% increase over the last three years. As a partner to this agreement, the Board of Education agreed to certain accountability measures related to student performance, teacher quality, and fiscal accountability. The Board of Education and the Board of County Commissioners also collaborate annually on initiatives that will promote a more effective and efficient county-wide operation. The budget for the Board of Education is based upon the following student data:

Level

FY2004

FY2005

FY2006 Budget

FY2006 Actual

FY2007 Approved

Kindergarten 1,028 1,063 1,078 1,044 1,021 Elementary 5,890 5,880 5,970 5,869 5,921 Middle 3,773 3,708 3,769 3,752 3,786 High 4,873 5,215 5,388 5,232 5,303 Total 15,564 15,866 16,205 15,897 16,031 K to 12 FTEs 15,283 15,621 16,118 15,811 16,031

State law requires that each local board of education prepare an annual budget according to certain enumerated categories. The local governing body is required to adopt a final education budget by these categories. The Board of Education budget is presented below by budget category and object of expenditure.

Board of Education


BUDGET SUMMARY

ACTUAL FY2005

APPROVED FY2006

REQUEST FY2007

APPROVED FY 2007

INCREASE

CCOUNTY FUNDS $58,900,000 $62,634,224 $67,686,488 $67,811,488 8.3%

EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY Administration $3,269,939 $3,425,644 $3,361,082 $3,356,866 9.8% Mid-Level Administration 9,722,470 10,464,111 11,211,296 11,210,634 7.1% Instructional Salaries 51,25,7834 55,659,354 59,326,323 59,561,843 7.0% Textbooks & Supplies 2,789,073 2,934,014 3,308,182 3,301,182 12.5% Other Instructional Costs 464,750 635,956 614,772 739,772 16.3% Special Education 12,771,511 13,464,732 14,550,366 14,592,442 8.4% Student Personnel Services 891,109 1,001,438 1,046,336 1,046,416 4.5% Health Services 978,310 1,169,981 1,318,534 1,326,444 13.4% Transportation 9,351,855 9,789,326 11,000,475 11,000,980 12.4% Operations of Plant 9,270,338 9,946,925 11,594,391 11,551,088 16.1% Maintenance of Plant 2,808,432 2,888,019 3,140,610 3,127,628 8.3% Fixed Charges 19,347,030 25,731,659 29,683,698 28,682,122 11.5% Capital Outlay 938,166 958,856

999,654

999,654 4.3%

TOTAL $123,855,817 138,070,015 $151,155,719 $150,497,071 9.0% FTE Staffing 1,690.18 1,788.18 1,830.45 1,830.45 2.4% EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT As a %

of Total APPROVED APPROVED FY 2007 FY2006

Salaries & Wages 86,888,705 92,922,439 6.9% Other Salaries & Wages 2,955,220 3,126,374 5.8% Contracted Services 10,811,433 12,001,286 11.1% Supplies & Materials 4,600,989 5,057,817 9.9% Other Charges 4,753,608 6,034,107 26.9% Fixed Charges 25,731,659 28,682,122 11.5% Equipment 741,762 776,287 4.7% Transfers to Other/LEAs 1,563,865 1,748,865 11.8% Transfers 22,774 147,774 598.1%

TOTAL 138,070,015 150,497,071 9%


College of Southern Maryland

Expenditure Object

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Total College of Southern Maryland 6,565,687 7,638,142 8,217,811 8,376,505 Non-County Revenue Sources 4,469,231 5,397,379 5,774,398 5,886,505

County Funds – College of Southern Maryland CSM Foundation – Scholarship

2,096,456

0

2,240,763

50,000

2,443,413

50,000

2,490,000

25,000 Program Description The College of Southern Maryland, Leonardtown campus provides comprehensive community college services to the residents of St. Mary's County. To this end, the college offers high quality transfer and occupational programs. Continuing education courses are offered for specialized training and for enrichment. The college supports and encourages economic development and community services. The college's primary purpose is instruction. Services, cultural and research activities are developed to the degree that they enhance and complement the instructional program or meet a specific community need. The college's open-door admissions policy encourages those who can benefit to participate in programs and activities. Highlights of FY 2007 Approved BudgetThe total budget for the College of Southern Maryland, Leonardtown Campus, is approved to increase from $7,638,142 to $8,376,505 an increase of 9.7%. Funding is provided by the County appropriation, State aid and student tuition and fees. The approved budget is based upon a 11.1% increase in County funding, which will bring county funding to $2,490,000 and exceeds request. This amount approved also includes $25,000 for CSM Foundation and $115,000 for a one-time technology imitative. The $115,000 technology initiative was not part of the original request for the College of Southern Md.


Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FTE Students 908.24 1033.00 1034.00 Total Costs per FTE County Funds $2,308.26 $2,169.18 $2,408.12 Non-County Revenue Sources $4,920.75 $5,224.96 $5,682.94

Board of Library Trustees


Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005

Actual Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Lexington Park Library 742,200 830,426 955,180 927,547 Leonardtown Library 547,743 577,770 583,944 589,664 Charlotte Hall Library 399,072 379,552 414,912 423,085 General Operating (incl. library collection) 614,093 675,119 785,857 787,631 Retiree Health 42,532 70,250 77,275 50,000

Total Board of Library Trustees 2,345,640 2,533,117 2,817,168 2,777,927 Non-County Revenue Sources 191,836 162,575 162,149 162,149

State Revenue 483,582 504,400 570,678 570,678 F und Balance 3,758 85,000 30,000 30,000

County Funds - Library Trustees 1,666,464 1,781,142 2,054,341 2,015,100

Program Description The St. Mary's County Memorial Library provides public library services six days a week to all County citizens. Branch libraries are located in the three major population centers - Lexington Park, Leonardtown, and Charlotte Hall. The Leonardtown library is considered the headquarters library and also houses the administrative office. The libraries currently consist of approximately 53,000-sq. ft. of floor space and have the capacity to hold over 225,000 items. Major activities of the libraries include: collection development and maintenance; cataloguing and processing; circulation; reference; children's programming; interlibrary loan; and administration.

Budget Highlights

The approved budget for the public library system is $2,777,927. County funding support is approved to be $2,015,100, which is a 13.1% increase over FY2006, and will be used to fund expanded hours as well as technology. A one-time allocation of $75,000 for technology initiatives is being funded from the County’s Fund Balance.


Actual Estimated Projected Selected Statistics/Workload Indicators FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 Circulation of books and other materials Increase 1,012,236 1,050,000 1,100,000 # of items in collection (includes books, audios, videos, etc.) 208,600 208,600 210,000 # of items purchased, classified and prepared for the shelf 25,000 25,000 30,000 # of patron visits to library branches 518,822 525,000 550,000 Attendance at library-sponsored programs 32,000 33,000 35,000

Library Cardholders 56,000 58,532 60,000

OPERATING BUDGETS

NON-COUNTY AGENCIES

80


The A.R.C. of Southern Maryland, Inc.

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

The A.R.C. of Southern Maryland, Inc. 132,150 132,150 138,758 132,150

Program Description/Highlights The ARC of Southern Maryland promotes community involvement, responsibility, independence and personal success for people with mental retardation/developmental disabilities. The ARC’s objectives include providing residential placement; individual supported living services; vocational day placement; supported employment opportunities, and family support services/respite care assistance to individuals and families. Continuation of the current $132,150 allocation approved to support current services. Big Brothers/Big Sisters


FY 2003 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Big Brothers/Big Sisters 2,424 4,000 4,000 4,000

Program Description/Highlights The Big Brothers/Big Sisters is a youth mentoring organization in St. Mary’s County. The approved level of $4,000 is comparable to the support provided previously. Catholic Charities


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Catholic Charities 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000

Program Description/Highlights Angel’s Watch Regional Shelter offers comprehensive emergency/transitional and domestic violence services for families, single women and women with children who are homeless through a variety of circumstances. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $15,000; continue, $5,000 to homeless shelter and $10,000 for Angel’s Watch.

Southern Maryland Center For L.I.F.E.


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2004

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Southern Maryland Center For L.I.F.E 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000

Program Description/Highlights The mission of the Southern Maryland Center for L.I.F.E. (Living Independently for Everyone) is to empower persons with disabilities to lead self-directed, independent and productive lives in their community. The Board of County Commissioners maintained an allocation of $15,000 in the approved budget.


Center for Life Enrichment


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Center for Life Enrichment 155,908 155,908 165,115 155,908

Program Description/Highlights The Center for Life Enrichment serves individuals with disabilities on a daily basis. The Board of County Commissioners approved continuation of the current $155,908 allocation. Greenwell Foundation


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Greenwell Foundation 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000

Program Description/Highlights The Greenwell Foundation was formed in 1969 by the Greenwell family, which recognized a need for all County families, including those with disabled members, and others who have disabilities, to have a place to go where they could enjoy the beauties of the County, the river, and the outdoors. The Greenwell’s donated their property to the State with the stipulation that it was to be used to enhance the enjoyment of nature for special populations. They also formed the Greenwell Foundation to ensure that their wishes were met and to provide activities and opportunities for people with special needs. The Board of County Commissioners approved the allocation of $30,000. Historic St. Mary’s City Foundation


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Historic St. Mary’s City Foundation 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500

Program Description/Highlights Historic St. Mary’s City is a museum of history and archaeology that commemorates the birthplace of Maryland and its significance as providing ground for the ideals of religious toleration and separation of church and state. The Board of County Commissioners approved $1,500 towards funding Maryland Day.


St. Mary’s County Historical Society


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

St. Mary’s County Historical Society 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500

Program Description/Highlights The St. Mary’s County Historical Society has a household membership of approximately 900, attracts over 3,000 visitors to the tourist information center and operates a genealogical research and information office at Tudor Hall. County funds have been used to subsidize a portion of the salaries of the organization’s paid employees and other office expenses. The Board of County Commissioners has approved continuation of the $12,500 allocation.

Hospice of St. Mary's


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Hospice of St. Mary's 15,000 15,000 25,000 15,000

Program Description/Highlights Hospice of St. Mary’s provides special care to terminally ill patients and their families in St. Mary’s County. Annually Hospice provides care to approximately 200 terminally ill patients and families, as well as bereavement services for 200 families and community members. The Board of County Commissioners allocated of $15,000 to support these activities.

Lexington Park Lions Club


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Lexington Park Lions Club 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500

Program Description/Highlights The Lexington Park Lions Club is part of an international organization that to raise funds to support community projects, especially programs that address the care and treatment of the eye. County funds of $1,500 subsidize the annual soapbox derby.


Literacy Council of St. Mary’s


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Literacy Council of St. Mary’s 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000

Program Description/Highlights The Literacy Council of St. Mary’s provides tutoring and reading assistance for county residents and students who need these services. County funding of $12,000 helps fund a part-time office manager to allow the Council to maintain the cohesiveness needed in their volunteer organization. .

Agriculture Weed Control


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Agriculture Weed Control 12,023 13,800 14,000 14,000

Program Description/Highlights This funding supports an agreement with the State Department of Agriculture to provide funding for the control and eradication of certain noxious weeds. This program administers 50 control contracts, and performs over 400 on-site inspections of 150 infested properties. The approved allocation for FY 2007 is $14,000, which will continue current services.

Maryland Historical Society


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Maryland Historical Society 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Program Description/Highlights The Maryland Historical Society is the only museum of Maryland history in the State and provides educational programs, exhibitions, research library and publications. More than 4,000 residents from St. Mary’s County participate annually in the museum’s education programs. The Board of County Commissioners continued their allocation of $1,000.


Minority Business Alliance


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Minority Business Alliance 0 0 28,750 10,000

Program Description/Highlights The Minority Business Alliance (MBA) is a non-profit organization, which seeks to develop a Business Support Network for small and minority-owned businesses. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $10,000 to support their programs. Mental Health Authority of St. Mary’s


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Mental Health Authority of St. Mary’s 54,945 54,945 59,945 54,945

Program Description/Highlights The Mental Health Authority of St. Mary’s is a nonprofit corporation functioning as a “Core Service Agency” to plan, manage, and monitor publicly funded mental health services in St. Mary’s County. County funds help fund centralized case management services for the public mental health system. $2,600 of the funding received from the County is designated to the Three Oaks Homeless Shelter for case management. The Board of County Commissioners has continued to fund $54,945. Patuxent River Naval Air Museum


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2005

Approved Budget

Patuxent River Naval Air Museum

30,000 30,000 45,000 30,000

Program Description/Highlights The operational plan of the Museum includes specific objectives with respect to outdoor display areas, indoor display areas, exhibit development/facility preparation, collections, education, and management procedures. Annually, the museum welcomes almost 50,000 visitors. The Board of County Commissioners has continued a $30,000 allocation operating.


Navy Alliance


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Navy Alliance 95,000 20,000 50,000 30,000

Program Description/Highlights The Alliance’s main objective is to initiate support for new programs in D.O.D authorization and appropriations legislation that are of interest to local defense activities as well as market Patuxent River Naval Air Station capabilities to international companies and countries. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $30,000 to support the Alliance. Lexington Park Rotary Club – Oyster Festival


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Lexington Park Rotary Club 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

Program Description/Highlights Over ten local service organizations participate in the Oyster Festival, with all proceeds going back to the local community in charitable endeavors. Through the Lexington Park Rotary’s charitable actions, hundreds of local families are able to seek medical help who might not otherwise; families’ homes are kept warm through the Energy Assistance Program; children in elementary schools receive free school supplies; and high school graduates are honored with college scholarships. From Hospice to the Three Oaks Center, and The Literacy Council to the Special Olympics, Rotary contributed over $300,000 to 30 different community organizations. The budget continues the level of support of at $5,000.

St. Mary’s County Arts Council


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

St. Mary’s County Arts Council

2,000

2,000

2,000

2,000

Program Description/Highlights The St. Mary’s County Arts Council increases the county and community’s awareness of the value of the arts and how the arts can enhance the quality of our community and individual lives; to foster and encourage the development of the arts and artists in St. Mary’s County; and to serve as a subsidiary of the Maryland State Arts Council to receive, review, and approve local project grant applications worthy of County and State support. The budget continues the level of support at $2,000.


St. Mary’s Caring, Inc


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

St. Mary’s Caring, Inc. 12,500 3,000 5,000 3,000

Program Description/Highlights St. Mary’s Caring, Inc. operates and funds a Family Center, providing hot meals and other services for low income children and adults of St. Mary’s County. The Center provides a safe and inviting location for people to meet and relax. Assistance to the unemployed, homeless, and working poor is provided by making referrals made to proper agencies. Special programs and events for children when resources permit have included providing space for an after school computer lab and free school supplies including backpacks. The Center is always available to various community organizations for a meeting space. $3,000 is included in the FY 2007 budget.

St. Mary’s College River Concert Series


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

St. Mary’s College River Concert Series 10,000 10,000 15,000 10,000

Program Description/Highlights The River Concert Series provides the citizens of St. Mary’s County and the rest of Southern Maryland with a series of high quality, professional performances in the summer. The goal of the River Concert Series is to enrich the cultural offerings of our region while raising the cultural profile of Southern Maryland throughout the State. The Board of County Commissioners is including $10,000 in the approved budget for sponsorship.

St. Mary’s College Scholarship Program


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

St. Mary’s College Scholarship Program 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000

Program Description/Highlights The scholarship program was developed by the college in an attempt to create a series of new scholarships to provide an extra incentive for some of our most talented college-bound students to remain in the region. The Board of County Commissioners is including $6,000 in the approved budget toward this program.


Seventh District Optimist

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Seventh District Optimist 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

Program Description/Highlights Funds are approved for the purpose of advertising for the “Blessing of the Fleet” held each year in October.

Sotterley Mansion Foundation


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Sotterley Mansion Foundation

25,000 50,000 75,000 50,000

Program Description/Highlights Founded in 1961, Sotterley Mansion Foundation, Inc. is a private, nonprofit organization that functions as steward of Historic Sotterley Plantation. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $50,000 in the approved budget to support its activities.

So. Md. Higher Education Center


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

So. Md. Higher Education Center 50,000 50,000 75,000 50,000

Program Description/Highlights The Southern Maryland Higher Education Center was established in 1994 to provide graduate and upper-level undergraduate courses for citizens of Charles, St. Mary’s, and Calvert counties. In excess of 60% of enrollees are St. Mary’s County residents. The approved budget includes County funding of $50,000.


Southern Maryland Child Care Resource Center


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Southern Maryland Child Care Resource Center 7,400 7,400 19,000 12,400

Program Description/Highlights The Southern Maryland Child Care Resource Center was incorporated in 1997 and serves as a resource to children, their families, and community professionals in the Southern Maryland region. The Center provides parents with referral services and assistance in locating child care in Charles, Calvert, and St. Mary’s counties. The Center also provides training and technical assistance to child care providers and maintains a resource library. The Board of County Commissioners has allocated $12,400 in the approved budget to applied to rent and utility costs.

Southern Maryland Resource Conservation/Development Board


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

SO. Md. RC & D Board 9,900 5,200 8,054 8,054

Program Description/Highlights Southern Maryland R C & D Board was incorporated in 1993 and is a resource conservation and development organization. R C & D assists federal, state, and local agencies in planning and implementing natural resource conservation and community development projects that serve to enhance environmental protection, conserve natural resources, and improve community facilities. St. Mary's, Calvert, and Charles County funding is used to support a part-time secretary. Grants provide most of the funding used by the RC&D to support conservation, development and community outreach programs. $8,054 is included in the approved budget of the Board of County Commissioners.

Three Oaks Center


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Three Oaks Center 50,000 59,500 150,000 130,000

Program Description/Highlights The Three Oaks Center provides transitional and emergency housing that helps men meet basic needs for shelter, stabilization, assessment, and referral. The Center helps homeless men transition from a state of dependence to self-reliance, and is currently capable of operating at a maximum capacity of 20 (8 emergency and 12 transitional). Total bed-nights exceed 4,000 annually, with a daily average of 12 homeless men. Most of the bednights are provided for the transitional housing program. The Board of County Commissioners is including $130,000 in the approved budget, which is an increase of $70,500 or 118.5% over the prior year.


Tri- County Alternatives for Youth & Families, Inc.

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Tri-County Alternatives for Youth Families, Inc.

26,250 26,250 27,600 26,250

Program Description/Highlights Tri-County Alternatives for Youth and Families, Inc. is a provider of child welfare services to Southern Maryland children and adolescents who are diagnosed with compelling emotional and/or behavioral disorders. The continuation of care programs include: Therapeutic Group Home, Treatment Foster Care, Crisis and In-Home Programs, and Independent Living. An allocation of $26,250 is approved. Tri-County Community Action ( SMTCCAC, Inc)


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Tri-County Community Action

17,751 17,751 20,000 17,751

Program Description/Highlights The primary purpose of Tri-County Community Action is to alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty through programs such as Head Start, Emergency Advocacy Services, Residential Energy Assistance, Senior Companion, Weatherization Assistance, and Housing Services. St. Mary's County has funded a county coordinator position in the Senior Companion Program for the past ten years. General operations funding include fiscal control, personnel, planning, and quality control. Approved funding is $17,751.


Tri-County Council


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Tri-County Council 94,200 94,200 94,200 94,200

Program Description/Highlights

The Tri-County Council is the regional planning and development agency for the tri-county area of Southern Maryland, created by State law in 1966. $94,200 is included in the approved budget to support its efforts and initiatives. Tri-County Youth Services Bureau


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Tri-County Youth Services Bureau 116,479 116,479 133,848 58,240

Program Description/Highlights Tri-County Youth Services Bureau is a professional youth and family counseling and prevention service provider. Care services include individual, group, family and play therapies at three offices (Charlotte Hall office in St. Mary’s County). More than 7,000 tri-county youth and their families are served annually, with more than 5,200 persons in counseling. Funding is through the Maryland Department of Juvenile Justice, Friends of the Family, Inc., the three Southern Maryland counties, fees and contracts, and donations. The Board of County Commissioners allocated of $58,240, a reduction of $58,239 when compared to FY2006. Unified Commission for Afro Americans


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Unified Commission for Afro Americans 5,000 5,000 7,500 5,000

Program Description/Highlights Unified Commission for Afro Americans pursues a varied outreach program including gathering and sharing oral histories; holding lectures, seminars, and workshops; and promoting events – all in the pursuit of their mission. The Board of County Commissioners approved $5,000 to help support the “Juneteenth Celebration”.


Walden/Sierra, Inc.


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Walden/Sierra, Inc. 195,038 195,038 345,447 345,447

Program Description/Highlights Walden/Sierra was established in 1973 to provide comprehensive substance abuse treatment and prevention services as well as hotline/crisis intervention and mental health support services to the citizens of St. Mary’s County. The total number of clients over the age of 18 receiving substance abuse services averages approximately 1,400 annually. County general fund support is approved at $345,447, an increase of $150,409 over FY2006, which allows full operation of the crisis hotline and adds capacity to serve St. Mary’s residents.

SMC Forest Conservation District Board


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

SMC Forest Cons. District Board 0 1,000 1,000 1,000

Program Description/Highlights The mission of the Board is to promote the stewardship, conservation, management and wise use of Maryland’s forest resources, both urban and rural. The Board of County Commissioners is recommending $1,000 to help support of Arbor Day activities and also to send a student to the MD Dept. Natural Resources-Natural Resource Conservation Camp (NRCC) held in Garrett County, Maryland.

Watermen's Association


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Watermen's Association 15,000 15,000 35,000 20,000

Program Description/Highlights The Board of County Commissioners approved an allocation for the Watermen’s Association of St. Mary’s County in the amount of $20,000 an increase of $5,000. To assist the Association with its Oyster Replenishment program.


The Center for Family Advocacy

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

The Center for Family Advocacy 90,409 84,909 108,089 108,089

Program Description/Highlights The function of The Center for Family Advocacy is to provide needed support and services to the women of St. Mary’s County. The Center is the only St. Mary’s County provider of legal resources for victims of violence seeking protection from abuse in civil court. Major activities of the Center include: legal assistance; lay legal advocacy program for victims of domestic violence; support groups; crisis intervention/management; support to re-entry students; domestic violence education; information and referral; and legislative and legal advocacy. Major revenue sources supporting the Center include Maryland Legal Services, State grants, County government, fund-raising, and donations. The approved budget of the Board of County Commissioners includes county funding of $108,089.

OPERATING BUDGETS

OTHER BUDGET COSTS TRANFERS AND RESERVES


Volunteer Fire Departments and Rescue Squads – 508 Funds


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Volunteer Fire Departments 100,848 100,000 100,000 100,000

Volunteer Rescue Squads 100,848 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Fire Depts. & Rescue Squads

201,696

200,000

200,000

200,000

Program Description/Highlights Continue the Senator William P. Amoss Funds, formerly the 508 grant for Fire and Rescue at $100,000 each.

Supplemental Reserve


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Supplemental Reserve 0 400,000 400,000 500,000

Program Description/Highlights This represents funds identified in the expense budget, which have corresponding revenue from grants/other sources that may be received, but are not included in the budget, principally grant awards. As grants/other sources are received, the revenues and associated expenditures will be re-allocated through a budget amendment approved by the Board of County Commissioners to the appropriate department. The approved budget includes $500,000 for this purpose.

Leonardtown Tax Rebate

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Leonardtown Tax Rebate 48,936 55,370 58,879 58,879

Program Description/Highlights The County Commissioners appropriate an amount to the town of Leonardtown in consideration of the fact that the town provides some of its own services, in lieu of the County providing these services. The allocation is calculated based upon the assessed value of County-owned tax exempt property as of the prior July 1, within the Leonardtown corporate limits. The major properties within the town limits include the Governmental Center, Health Department, Courthouse, Library, College of Southern Maryland, and Nursing Center. The assessed value of the County-owned nontaxable real property amounts to $49,770,896. The grant is calculated to be $58,879.


Employer Contributions – Retiree Health Benefits

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Employer Contributions – Retiree Health Benefits 776,174 1,156,150 1,270,665 4,830,300

Program Description/Highlights This budget item reflects estimated retiree health insurance and unemployment insurance costs. The County government provides health insurance to its retirees based upon years of service. An increase in the numbers of qualifying individuals as well as increased health benefit costs result in a budgeted increase of $173,850 to an estimated $1,330,000 for premium payments in FY 2007. Also included is an allocation of $3,500,000, using the County’s fund balance. These funds will be used to initiate the trust in FY2008 for premium payments in FY2007. Starting in FY2008, the County will be required to fund the costs of retiree health, current and future, which is expected to exceed $4 million annually.

Debt/Bank Administration Costs


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Debt/Bank Administration Costs

44,633 29,000 38,000 38,000

Program Description/Highlights $38,000 is allocated in the FY 2007 budget to cover service and related charges from financial institutions, including administrative fees for bond escrow accounts and related processing.

Debt Service

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Debt Service 12,063,329 12,903,553 13,182,638 13,181,303

Program Description/Highlights This appropriation of $13,181,303 is needed to pay principal and interest on debt for capital projects. The estimated allocation of debt service, based upon the approved budget, is as follows: Board of Education $6,462,007 County Roads 1,766,395 College of Southern MD 1,063,746 Library 468,510 County-Other Projects 3,420,645


Capital Projects-General Fund Transfer


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

General Fund Transfer 500,000 3,151,010 500,000 14,228,277

Program Description/Highlights $14,228,277 is approved as a transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund to pay for capital needs. This allocation is funded from the County’s accumulated fund balance which is being applied to replace funding for prior approved projects intended to be bond funded. Public Facilities Project $2,460,810 Marine $61, 432 Highway $55,096 Solid Waste $390,500 Recreation & Park $375,000 Public Schools $10, 885,434

Detail by project is included on pages 114 to 115.

Transfer – LOSAP Enhancements


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Transfer – LOSAP Enhancements

0 0 0 60,000 Program Description/Highlights

$60,000 has been approved as a transfer of the County’s fund balance, to the Emergency Services Support Fund, to support enhancements to the LOSAP program.


Reserve – Rainy Day

Department/

Spending Unit

FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Reserve – Rainy Day

0

125,000

125,000

125,000

Program Description/Highlights The Rainy Day Fund was originally initiated in FY 2000 with a $250,000 set-aside, and a target set for one million. This fund is established as a source of funding for budget years when the revenue estimates indicate a temporary shortfall from the level required to fund the County’s operations and activities. It is funded through budgeted additions that are set aside at the start of the fiscal year. As of FY2007, this target was increased to $1.5 million, with the budgeted allocation of $125,000 in FY2007, the total will be $1,500,000.

Reserve - Bond Rating


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Reserve – Bond Rating 0 370,000 500,000 500,000

Program Description/Highlights The Bond Rating Reserve is a fund separate from the Rainy Day Reserve and represents a designation of fund balance. The reserve is set at 6% of general fund revenues. The approved budget allocates $500,000 to add to this reserve, which will bring the total reserve to approximately $9.1 million.

Reserve – BOCC Emergency Appropriations


FY 2005 Actual

Expenditures

FY 2006

Approved Budget

FY 2007

Requested Budget

FY 2007

Approved Budget

Reserve– BOCC Emergency Appropriations

0

500,000

500,000

533,255

Program Description/Highlights This reserve represents funding set aside annually which can be allocated during the fiscal year at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners to fund unanticipated or under budgeted expenditures or respond to other funding requests for items or activities not budgeted. The approved budget allocates $533,255. These funds are intended to be used during the year to address unusual and unbudgeted expenditures. One of the more common items is snow removal, as this is entirely dependent upon the weather and for which a pattern or trend cannot be established. Additionally, such funds allow the Board of County Commissioners to respond to grant opportunities which require a match of local funds. Such amount can also be used to mitigate the effects of revenue that does not meet current year budget expectations.

ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

Enterprise funds are used to account for certain services and programs which are operated similar to separate business enterprises. User fees and charges are levied at rates necessary to cover the costs of operation; thus enterprise fund activities are not dependent on taxes for their operating revenue.

The Department of Recreation and Parks operates two enterprise funds. The Recreation and Parks Activity Fund accounts for the operation of numerous countywide recreation programs. The Wicomico Shores Enterprise Fund accounts for the operations of the County's public golf course.

The operation of an adult day care program is accounted for in the Office on Aging, Medical Adult Day Care Special Revenue Fund. This program, formerly known as Southern Maryland Independent Life Environment (SMILE), is supported by client fees and Medicaid payments. The Miscellaneous Revolving Fund is a special revenue fund established to account for certain earmarked revenue sources designated to finance particular functions or activities. The Emergency Services Support Fund is a separate fund to collect revenue (Emergency Service Support Fees) and expend resources for Advanced Life Support, LOSAP and base operating allocations to Fire & Rescue entities. This also funds the principal and interest on the Revolving Loan Fund related debt.

FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2007Actual Approved Requested Approved

Budget Budget Budget

Source of Funds Charges for Service $2,292,581 $2,997,039 $2,799,491 $2,799,491 Grants 33,704 81,247 73,845 92,060 Total Source of Funds $2,326,285 $3,078,286 $2,873,336 $2,891,551

Use of Funds Programs, including depreciation $2,160,221 $3,067,868 $2,887,592 $2,928,905

Total Use of Funds $2,160,221 $3,067,868 $2,887,592 $2,928,905

Revenues Over(Under) Expenditures $166,064 $10,418 ($14,256) ($37,354)

Fund Equity (deficit) at June 30 $65,939 $76,357 $62,101 $39,003

An enterprise fund is established to account for governmental services which are entirely or predominantly funded by usercharges. Programs offered through the Recreation Division of the Department of Recreation, Parks and Community Servicesare financed through fees established for the different activities. Programs and facilities include child care centers, summer daycamps, sports programs, youth and adult leisure programs, amusement park ticket sales, gymnastics center, regional park,indoor recreation center, teen center, and museums.

RECREATION AND PARKS ENTERPRISE FUND

Source and Use of Funds


Budget Budget BudgetSource of Funds Golf Operations $822,013 $956,450 $1,010,500 $1,010,500 Restaurant 202,285 219,500 230,300 230,300 House 451 0 0 0 Interest Income 17,855 10,000 18,000 18,000 Grants 0 0 0 0 Golf Shop 51,511 74,200 84,700 84,700 Miscellaneous 8,895 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total Revenues $1,103,010 $1,261,650 $1,345,000 $1,345,000Use of Funds Golf Operations $117,234 $140,638 $154,212 $154,034 Greens and Grounds 370,961 440,089 460,697 464,839 Restaurant 166,803 196,063 200,854 200,795 House 58,523 72,220 70,850 70,850 Administration 157,413 165,537 172,631 175,568 Golf Shop 30,146 36,513 44,071 44,086 Capital / depreciation 103,145 40,000 50,000 50,000

Expenditures, excluding debt service $1,004,225 $1,091,060 $1,153,315 $1,160,172 Debt Service-Lease Payments 39,408 40,000 40,000 40,000 Debt Service - principal 0 57,424 57,424 57,424 Debt Service - interest 0 61,195 61,195 61,195Total Expenditures 1,043,633 1,249,679 1,311,934 1,318,791

Fund Equity at June 30, exclusive of net capital assets $686,193 $835,588 $1,016,078 $1,009,221

The Wicomico Shores Golf Enterprise fund finances the public golf operation in St. Mary's County. The Wicomico GolfCourse and Recreation Complex includes an 18-hole golf course, restaurant, banquet room, club house, pro shop, andtwo tennis courts. Primary revenue sources for this self-supporting enterprise are the greens fees generated throughgolf course operations and the changes from the restaurant, pro shop, and banquet facility. The budget numbersinclude an assumed level of debt service payments that would be required to fund the exempt financing which isintended to be used for the replacement of the club house. This project, estimated to cost $2 million is expected tobegin in FY2007, and requires an exempt finaincing of $118,619. All expenditures, including debt service on thefinancing, is funded by net revenues of the golf course operation. The net investment in capital assets atJune 30, 2005 was $2,423,897.

WICOMICO SHORES GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND




Source of Funds Charges for Service $106,961 $81,819 $116,868 $116,868 Grants 543,926 670,384 587,014 587,842 Transfers - General Fund 111,500 620,507 85,623 85,623

Total Source of Funds $762,387 $1,372,710 $789,505 $790,333

Use of Funds Programs $816,710 $783,703 $735,382 $761,035

Total Use of Funds $816,710 $783,703 $735,382 $761,035

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures ($54,323) $589,007 $54,123 $29,298

Fund Equity (deficit) at June 30 ($643,328) ($54,321) ($198) ($25,023)

A special revenue fund is established to account for revenues from earmarked revenue sources which are designated tofinance particular functions or activities of government. The Medical Adult Day Center Special Revenue Fund finances theDepartment on Aging Medical Adult Day Care Program. This program provides a wide range of supportive health and socialservices during the day to the mentally or physically handicapped adults of St. Mary's County in order to prevent or postponeinstitutionalization. The program operates two centers - the Ripple Center serving the northern section of the County, and theWeisman Center located in the Chancellor's Run Activity Center. Funding for the program is through the Medical AssistanceProgram, private-payment, grants, and County general funds. As of July 2005, the two centers merged to serve the averagedaily 46 clients. Fund balance from the General Fund was transferred to this fund to eliminate the deficit as of June 30, 2005.

MEDICAL ADULT DAY CARE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND


FY 2005 FY 2006 FY2007 FY 2007Actual Approved Requested Approved


Source of Funds Charges for Services $254,688 $216,200 $237,400 $237,400 Total Sources of Funds 254,688 216,200 237,400 237,400

Use of Funds Department of Aging Revolving Grants 117,268 160,000 160,000 160,000 Fuel Operations 6,060 7,350 7,350 7,350 Community Services Special Events 1,039 1,500 2,350 2,350 Community Services Alliance 0 1,600 1,600 1,600 Child Welfare Day 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 States Attorney Drug Enforcement 14,056 66,896 69,696 122,392 Community Services Teen Court 42 500 700 700 Sheriff's Department Forfeiture Fund 7,623 20,600 15,100 15,100

Total Uses of Funds 146,088 260,446 258,796 311,492

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 108,600 (44,246) (21,396) (74,092)

Fund Equity at June 30 $238,118 $193,872 $172,476 $119,780

MISCELLANEOUS REVOLVING FUND


The Miscellaneous Revolving Fund is a special revenue fund established to account for certain earmarked revenue sources designed to finance particular functions or activities including the County vehicle gas pump operation, Department on Aging events and programs, Community Services special events, and the drug enforcement/education fund.

FY 2007Requested

Budget

1,171,6230

30,6072700

1,204,930

42,772 649,104

64,000207,000332,010133,000

92,150170,833

68,7780

1,759,647

(554,717)

Transfer from General Fund 0 0 60,000

ApprovedBudget Budget

Actual

EMERGENCY SERVICES SUPPORT FUND Effective in FY 2005, the budget incorporates the Emergency Services Tax legislation, which dedicates a funding stream for the County’s emergency services activities and organizations. By identifying a special tax, based on assessed property values, the Commissioners set into place a funding mechanism to allow emergency services organizations, including fire and rescue, to plan for the future.

The Emergency Services Tax- Support Services is assessed at a rate of $0.016 on each $100 dollars of assessable and personal property. The funds are remitted by the Treasurer and credited to this revolving fund. Revenues generated are budgeted to support base allocations of $23,000 and $19,000 to each fire department and rescue squad, respectively, as well as for the other purposes listed below.

Balance at June 30

Approved

$45,297 $3,366 ($34,218)

Excess of Revenues (Under) Expenditures 45,297 (41,931) (37,584)

Total Use of Funds 1,012,384 1,179,918 1,324,620

Losap Enhancement 0 0 60,000 Grant 0 63,790 68,778F & R Revolving Loan Fund, Debt Service 146,728 183,312 170,833Rescue Squad LOSAP 92,663 97,050 92,150Rescue Squad Operating 133,000 133,000 133,000Fire Department LOSAP Allocation 295,545 317,588 332,010Fire Department Operating Allocation 207,000 207,000 207,000Emergency Services 14,664 29,570 64,000Advanced Life Support 117,723 103,608 154,077ALS Educational Assistance 5,061 45,000 42,772 Use of Funds Total Source of Funds 1,057,681 1,137,987 1,287,036

ALS Educational Assistance 0 0 2,700Grant 0 28,725 30,607

Emergency Services – Support Tax 1,057,681 1,109,262 1,193,729 Source of Funds


($551,351)

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

FIRE TAX

According to the St. Mary's County Code, a Fire Tax is to be assessed on every $100 of assessed valuation of all real and personal property. The proceeds from the tax are distributed to those fire companies located in the election districts in which the money is collected. The fire companies submit an annual budget and audit report to the Board of County Commissioners. The funds received by the fire companies and approved by the County Commissioners shall be used for the purpose of purchasing, repairing, replacing, operating, maintaining and housing their fire-fighting equipment and apparatus, and for the training of new volunteer firefighters.

DISTRICT NUMBER OF RATES PROPERTIES

1st Election District - Ridge 3,670 3.6¢ per $100 of assessment

2nd Election District - Valley Lee 3,478 4.4¢ per $100 of assessment

3rd Election District - Leonardtown 5,883 2.4¢ per $100 of assessment

4th Election District - Chaptico 4,671 4.4¢ per $100 of assessment

5th Election District - Mechanicsville 4,785 4.4¢ per $100 of assessment

6th Election District - Hollywood 5,350 4.4¢ per $100 of assessment

7th Election District - Avenue 3,216 4.4¢ per $100 of assessment

8th Election District - Lexington Park 10,621 5.0¢ per $100 of assessment

9th Election District - St. George Island 237 3.6¢ per $100 of assessment

Note: The volunteer fire companies submitted estimated FY 2007 operating budgets to the County which total $5,946,277 in aggregate spending. The companies have estimated revenues from the fire tax and emergency services support tax of $3,328,186 or approximately 56% of total revenue support.

RESCUE TAX Effective in FY 2005, the budget incorporates the Emergency Services Tax legislation, which dedicates a funding stream for the County’s emergency services activities and organizations. By identifying a special tax, based on assessed property values, the Commissioners set into place a funding mechanism to allow emergency services organizations, including fire and rescue, to plan for the future. The Emergency Services Tax, as a group, includes the existing Fire Tax, this Rescue Tax, and the Support Tax. The Rescue Tax is assessed at a rate per $100 of assessed valuation of all real and personal property on property in each election district, as identified below. The proceeds from the tax are distributed by the Treasurer to those rescue squads located in the election districts in which the money is collected. The Rescue Squads submit an annual budget and audit report to support the expenditure of these funds, which are to be used for the purpose of purchasing, repairing, replacing, operating, maintaining and housing their Rescue equipment, and for the training of volunteer Rescue Personnel.

DISTRICT NUMBER OF RATES PROPERTIES

1st Election District 3,670 .8¢ per $100 of assessment

2nd Election District 3,478 .8¢ per $100 of assessment

3rd Election District 5,883 .9¢ per $100 of assessment

4th Election District 4,671 .8¢ per $100 of assessment

5th Election District 4,785 .8¢ per $100 of assessment

6th Election District 5,350 1.1¢ per $100 of assessment

7th Election District 3,216 1.1¢ per $100 of assessment*

8th Election District 10,621 1.1¢ per $100 of assessment

9th Election District 237 .8¢ per $100 of assessment

Note: The Volunteer Rescue Squads submitted estimated FY 2007 operating budgets to the County which total $1,836,473 in aggregate spending. The companies have estimated revenues from the rescue tax and emergency services support tax of $836,571 or approximately 46% of total revenue support. * Reflects increase for Seventh District Rescue Squad from .8¢ to 1.1¢ per $100 of assessment. The rate increase is estimated to yield approximately $12,000 more in FY2007.

NUMBER OF DISTRICT PROPERTIES RATES Breton Bay Shore Erosion 25 Group A -- 15 -- $413.97/yr. - through 2006. Group B -- 10 -- $137.99/yr. - through 2006. Jefferson Island Erosion 1 Varying amounts each year through 2015 Tall Timbers Erosion #2 8 $8.85 per front foot - 25 years through 2011

Tall Timbers Erosion #3 62 $115.33 per front lot - 25 years through 2015 $57.28 per back lot - 25 years through 2015.

Duke Drive 10 $67.29 per lot - 20 years through 2008 Southhampton Lighting 75 $19.76 per lot - prior year SMECO charges Kline Drive 9 $100.48 per lot - 20 years through 2009 Scott Circle 24 $130.76 per lot - 20 years through 2012

Roof Top Circle 7 $237.80 per lot - 20 years through 2014

Miles Drive 5 $270.24 per lot - 20 years through 2015

Rosebank Village 9 $342.65 per lot - 20 years through 2018.

Cloverdale Acres 7 $512.75 per lot - 20 years through 2018.

Wicomico Shores 411 $228.73 per lot - 20 years through 2018.

Hollywood Shores 210 $39.47 per owner (plus annual maintenanceand inspection fee) - 15 years through 2013.

Mallard Creek 8 $259.26 per owner – 20 years through 2018.

Little Kingston Creek 21 $136.35 per owner – 20 years through 2018.

Mulberry South 23 $286.76 per owner - 20 years through 2020.

Golf Course Drive 59 $217.99 per property-20 years through 2026

Depending upon the type of special assessment, the project may require interfund loans. Provision is then made for the benefiting property owner to normally pay installments through the property tax system on an annual basis. Debt Service required in FY 2007 for existing Special Assessment will be $57,880.

In St. Mary's County there are four distinct classifications of special assessments. These include: Shore erosion control, Roadway improvements and lighting, Storm water drainage, and Waterway dredging. Following are the current districts:

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND


NOT USED

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND

The St. Mary's County Code requires the annual adoption by the Board of County Commissioners of a separate capital budget and program. The capital budget is the plan of the County to receive and expend funds for capital projects during the first fiscal year included in the capital program. The capital program is the plan of the County to receive and expend funds for capital projects during the fiscal year covered by the capital budget and the succeeding five years thereafter.

The following pages are divided into three sections:

1) Fiscal Year 2007 Approved Capital Budget - by project and funding source

2) Fiscal Year 2007 Approved Capital Budget and Fiscal Year 2008 to 2012

Approved Capital Program 3) Detail project information showing funding sources and uses throughout

the period covered by the budget and plan are categorized according to the following project classifications:

Public Facilities Marine Highways Solid Waste Land Conservation Recreation and Parks Public Landings Public Schools

Projects are shown for the approved FY 2007 appropriation year as well as the

planned projects for fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. Financing is presented in total for each of the respective years.

Capital project expenditures and revenues are accounted for in a separate Capital

Improvements Fund.


NOT USED

FISCAL YEAR 2007 CAPITAL BUDGET - PROJECTS

Public Schools $12,795,486

Recreation & Parks (includes Public Landings) 8,967,945

Solid Waste 5,010,825

Land Conservation 4,221,000

Public Facilities 3,766,100

Highways 3,311,571

Marine 1,048,175

Total $39,121,102

Solid Waste12.8%Marine

2.7%

Land Conservation10.8%

Recreation & Parks22.9%

Public Schools32.7%

Highways8.5%

Public Facilities9.6%

FISCAL YEAR 2007 CAPITAL BUDGET - FUNDING SOURCES*excludes FY 2007 Pay-Go of $14,228,272 for prior approved capital projects

Other Local Sources

7.8%

Impact Fees 9.4%

County Bonds18.1%

Transfer tax26.6%

State & Federal Funds38.1%

State & Federal Funding $14,917,126

Local Funds:

Transfer Taxes 10,421,521

County Bonds* 7,089,205

Impact Fees 3,673,250

Recordation Fees/Agricultural Tax 2,370,000

Pay-Go* 0

Other (Navy Museum, Piney Point Lighthouse) 650,000

Total $39,121,102

ST. MARY'S COUNTYAPPROVED FY2007CAPITAL BUDGET

ApprovedBudget Transfer State /

CAPITAL PROJECT Total Bonds Transfer Tax Impact Fees Pay-Go Federal Other

PUBLIC FACILITIES County Office Building (addition) 385,000 0 385,000 0 0 0 0Naval Air Museum & Visitor's Center 650,000 (975,046) 0 0 975,046 0 650,000Renovation of former SHA Building 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0Workforce Housing Initiatives 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0Building Maintenance & Repair - critical 285,000 (114,000) 285,000 0 114,000 0 0Garvey Center Interior Revitalization 155,000 0 155,000 0 0 0 0ADC Maintenance & Repairs 92,000 (231,387) 92,000 0 231,387 0 0Airport Master Plan 351,600 0 8,790 0 0 342,810 0Carter State Office Building Maint. & Repairs 322,500 0 0 0 0 322,500 0Emergency Equipment Shelter 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0Fuel Facility Upgrades 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0Parking and Site Improvements 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0Airport Improvements 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0College of So. Md., Wellness & Pool 0 (149,000) 0 0 149,000 0 0ADC - Booking / Inmate Processing Area 0 (125,000) 0 0 125,000 0 0Lexington Park Library 0 (12,659) 0 0 12,659 0 0Court House Addition/Renovation 0 (73,520) 0 0 73,520 0 0County Office Building HVAC 0 (109,473) 0 0 109,473 0 0Charlotte Hall Visitor's Center 0 (449,036) 0 0 449,036 0 0Lexington Manor South CBDG 0 (90,000) 0 0 90,000 0 0Court House Humidity 0 (120,797) 0 0 120,797 0 0Former Lexington Park Library 0 (10,892) 0 0 10,892 0 0

Total Public Facilities 3,766,100 (2,460,810) 2,450,790 0 2,460,810 665,310 650,000

MARINE Patuxent Beach Road Revetment 787,675 0 454,000 0 0 333,675 0Thomas Road Revetment 247,500 0 247,500 0 0 0 0Hollis Lake Inlet 13,000 0 6,500 0 0 6,500 0Holly Point Shore Erosion 0 (61,432) 0 0 61,432 0 0

Total Marine 1,048,175 (61,432) 708,000 0 61,432 340,175 0

HIGHWAYSAsphalt Overlay 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0Modified Seal 350,000 0 350,000 0 0 0 0County Mapping 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 0 0Streetscape Improvements 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 0 0Bridge / Culvert Replacement 157,000 (54,813) 157,000 0 54,813 0 0Regional Stormwater Mgmt. Facility 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0Golf Course Drive Drainage Improvements 167,630 167,630 0 0 0 0 0Tulagi Place Revitalization 98,000 0 98,000 0 0 0 0FDR Boulevard Extended 800,000 400,000 0 400,000 0 0 0Pegg Road Extension to Route 5 325,941 0 0 200,000 0 125,941 0Roadway Base Widening 23,000 0 23,000 0 0 0 0Removal of Roadside Obstacles 0 (283) 0 0 283 0 0

Total Highways 3,311,571 512,534 2,018,000 600,000 55,096 125,941 0

SOLID WASTELandfill Area D/Future Exp/Closures 405,000 (390,500) 405,000 0 390,500 0 0Transfer Station 4,605,825 4,605,825 0 0 0 0 0

Total Solid Waste 5,010,825 4,215,325 405,000 0 390,500 0 0

LAND CONSERVATION Agricultural Land Preservation Programs 4,221,000 0 501,000 0 0 1,350,000 2,370,000

Total Land Conservation 4,221,000 0 501,000 0 0 1,350,000 2,370,000

RECREATION & PARKS Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Phase II 200,000 (100,000) 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 0Three Notch Trail 347,000 0 0 167,000 0 180,000 0Wicomico Shores Golf Course Clubhouse 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 0Tennis courts replacement 75,000 0 50,000 25,000 0 0 0

Piney Pt. Lighthouse Museum Shore Erosion 235,445 0 235,445 0 0 0 0Parks Land Acquisition 4,292,500 0 0 0 0 4,292,500 0St. Mary's College Amphitheater 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0Leonard Hall Recreation Ctr. Improvements 250,000 0 0 150,000 0 100,000 0Lancaster Park Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 0Park ADA Improvements 300,000 0 0 150,000 0 150,000 0Lacrosse Fields 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0St. Clements Hundred - Blackistone Lthse. 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0Seventh District Park Improvements 0 (275,000) 0 0 275,000 0 0

Total Parks Acquisition /Development 6,664,945 (375,000) 700,445 542,000 375,000 5,422,500 0

Funding Sources

111

ST. MARY'S COUNTYAPPROVED FY2007CAPITAL BUDGET

ApprovedBudget Transfer State /

CAPITAL PROJECT Total Bonds Transfer Tax Impact Fees Pay-Go Federal Other

Funding Sources

PUBLIC LANDINGSDerelict Boat Removal 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 0Patuxent River Public Landing 975,000 0 0 0 0 975,000 0Forest Landing 99,000 0 0 0 0 99,000 0Wicomico Shores Public Landing 99,000 0 0 0 0 99,000 0Leonardtown Wharf 1,100,000 0 900,000 0 0 200,000 0

Total Public Landings 2,303,000 0 900,000 0 0 1,403,000 0

PUBLIC SCHOOLSLeonardtown ES - Addition/Renovation 9,408,000 666,848 0 2,531,250 1,009,902 5,200,000 0Leonardtown ES - State Relocatables 226,000 0 82,000 0 0 144,000 0Leonardtown ES - Local Reloc. 664,500 0 664,500 0 0 0 0State Relocatable - site to be determined 84,750 0 48,750 0 0 36,000 0State Eligible - Local Relocatable Purchase 55,200 0 (60,000) 0 0 115,200 0Chopticon High School - Sewer Plant 325,000 0 325,000 0 0 0 0Well Replacement - Four Schools 592,036 0 592,036 0 0 0 0Middle School HVAC - Schematic Design 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0Ridge Elementary - parking & site improv. 239,000 (193,363) 0 0 432,363 0 0Relocatables - for various sites 153,000 0 153,000 0 0 0 0Flooring Replacement-Various Schools 115,000 0 0 0 0 115,000 0ADA Improvement 450,000 (123,072) 450,000 0 123,072 0 0Bethune Educational Center - Roof Systemic 160,000 (163,000) 160,000 0 163,000 0 0Great Mills H.S. - Gym Floor 105,000 0 105,000 0 0 0 0Building Generator System - 2 Offices 143,000 0 143,000 0 0 0 0First New Elementary School (646 capacity) 0 (174,848) 0 0 174,848 0 0Carver Elementary School 0 (2,874,079) 0 0 2,874,079 0 0Greenview Knolls Roof 0 (36,968) 0 0 36,968 0 0Kindergarten Piney Point 0 (300,929) 0 0 300,929 0 0Kindergarten Town Creek 0 (176,226) 0 0 176,226 0 0Site Acquisition-various 0 (4,678,000) 0 0 4,678,000 0 0Margaret Brent Add/Renovation 0 (916,047) 0 0 916,047 0 0

Total Public Schools 12,795,486 (8,969,684) 2,738,286 2,531,250 10,885,434 5,610,200 0

TOTAL $39,121,102 ($7,139,067) $10,421,521 $3,673,250 $14,228,272 $14,917,126 $3,020,000

RECAP

FY2007 Approved Project Costs 39,121,102 7,089,205 10,421,521 3,673,250 0 14,917,126 3,020,000Application of Fund Balance to Prior Costs 0 (14,228,272) 0 0 14,228,272 0 0

TOTAL $39,121,102 ($7,139,067) $10,421,521 $3,673,250 $14,228,272 $14,917,126 $3,020,000

SUMMARY

Public Facilities 3,766,100 (2,460,810) 2,450,790 0 2,460,810 665,310 650,000Marine 1,048,175 (61,432) 708,000 0 61,432 340,175 0Highways 3,311,571 512,534 2,018,000 600,000 55,096 125,941 0Solid Waste 5,010,825 4,215,325 405,000 0 390,500 0 0Land Conservation 4,221,000 0 501,000 0 0 1,350,000 2,370,000Parks Acquisition & Development 6,664,945 (375,000) 700,445 542,000 375,000 5,422,500 0Public Landings 2,303,000 0 900,000 0 0 1,403,000 0Public Schools 12,795,486 (8,969,684) 2,738,286 2,531,250 10,885,434 5,610,200 0

TOTAL $39,121,102 ($7,139,067) $10,421,521 $3,673,250 $14,228,272 $14,917,126 $3,020,000

Transfer Taxes $6,421,521Ag Transfer Taxes 995,000Recordation Fees 475,000Impact Fees - Roads 262,500Impact fees - Parks 35,750

$8,189,771

In addition, the pay-go funding of $14,228,272 represents the use of fund balance, accumulated as of June 30, 2005 (and reported in the annual audit) which was applied by the Board of County Commissioners to capital projects that had been approved through FY2006 to be funded by the sale of general obligation bonds. The Pay-Go is only shown on the Capital Project Sheets that have funding in FY 2007 or in the Plan from FY 2008 to FY 2012.

Included in the funding identified above are the normal annual collections of capital project funding sources as well as accumulated unapplied resources, as of June 30, 2005, which may result from collections that exceed estimates or expenditures that are less than budgeted.

To the extent that such variances occur, these excess funds are retained within the capital projects fund and applied to subsequent years' capital projects, based on the approved budget.Included in the FY2007 Approved Capital Budget are the following accumulated excess collections. The amounts applied are limited to the amount of eligible expenditures, in certain cases, most notably impact fees.

111

FISCAL YEAR 2008 - FISCAL YEAR 2012CAPITAL PLAN - PROJECTS

Solid Waste0.06%

Marine0.04%

Land Conservation7.5%

Recreation & Parks5.1%

Public Schools49.5%

Highways13.4%Public Facilities

24.4%

Public Schools $95,182,000

Public Facilities 47,010,475

Highways 25,755,362

Land Conservation 14,475,000

Recreation & Parks (includes Public Landing) 9,717,860

Solid Waste 100,000

Marine 79,500

Total $193,593,197

FISCAL YEAR 2008 – FISCAL YEAR 2012 CAPITAL PLAN - FUNDING SOURCES

Transfer Taxes11.3%

Pay Go1.3%

County Bonds 28.1%

Impact Fees 11.3%

Other 2.4%

State & Federal Funds45.6%

State & Federal Funding $88,290,222

Local Funds:

County Bonds 54,449,496

Transfer Taxes 21,963,479

Impact Fees 21,790,000

Recordation Fees/Agricultural Tax 4,500,000

Pay-Go 2,500,000

Other (Piney Point Lighthouse) 100,000

Total $193,593,197

ST. MARY'S COUNTYCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AND 5-YEAR PLAN

ApprovedBudget

CAPITAL PROJECT FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

PUBLIC FACILITIESCounty Office Building (addition) 385,000 0 0 0 0 0Naval Air Museum & Visitor's Center 650,000 0 0 0 0 0Renovation of former SHA Building 500,000 0 0 0 0 0Workforce Housing Initiatives 250,000 0 0 0 0 0Building Maintenance & Repair - critical 285,000 190,000 274,775 240,000 42,000 236,000Garvey Center Interior Revitalization 155,000 0 0 0 0 0ADC Maintenance & Repairs 92,000 103,500 115,000 0 0 250,000Airport Master Plan 351,600 99,750 522,500 1,109,125 950,000 4,424,625Carter State Office Building Maint. & Repairs 322,500 308,800 397,500 279,000 300,000 320,000Emergency Equipment Shelter 500,000 0 0 0 0 0Fuel Facility Upgrades 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 0Parking and Site Improvements 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 0Airport Improvements 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 0College of So. Md., Wellness & Pool 0 8,950,000 50,000 0 0 0ADC - Booking / Inmate Processing Area 0 1,325,000 1,325,000 100,000 0 0ADC Minimum Security Facility 0 1,009,000 9,066,900 9,427,000 0 0Agricultural Services Center 0 1,750,000 300,000 0 0 0ADC -locking mechanisms/security cameras 0 0 1,250,000 1,250,000 0 0

ADC Expansion 0 0 0 0 0 320,000Total Public Facilities 3,766,100 13,961,050 13,551,675 12,405,125 1,542,000 5,550,625

MARINE

Patuxent Beach Road Revetment 787,675 0 0 0 0 0Thomas Road Revetment 247,500 0 0 0 0 0Hollis Lake Inlet 13,000 64,500 0 0 0 0St. Jerome's Creek Dredging 0 0 0 15,000 0 0

Total Marine 1,048,175 64,500 0 15,000 0 0

HIGHWAYSAsphalt Overlay 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000Modified Seal 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000County Mapping 80,000 0 80,000 0 80,000 0Streetscape Improvements 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0Bridge / Culvert Replacement 157,000 20,000 0 200,000 0 20,000Regional Stormwater Mgmt. Facility 250,000 168,500 0 0 0 0Golf Course Drive Drainage Improvements 167,630 0 0 0 0 0Tulagi Place Revitalization 98,000 0 0 0 0 0FDR Boulevard Extended 800,000 3,730,000 3,600,000 0 0 2,830,000Pegg Road Extension to Route 5 325,941 493,862 0 2,324,000 2,109,000 0Transportation Plan Update 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 500,000Roadway Base Widening 23,000 60,000 0 0 0 0Removal of Roadside Obstacles 0 0 260,000 0 260,000 0Neighborhood Preservation Program 0 0 0 0 500,000 1,500,000

Total Highways 3,311,571 5,872,362 5,400,000 3,924,000 4,359,000 6,200,000

SOLID WASTELandfill Area D/Future Exp/Closures 405,000 0 100,000 0 0 0Transfer Station 4,605,825 0 0 0 0 0

Total Solid Waste 5,010,825 0 100,000 0 0 0

LAND CONSERVATIONAgricultural Land Preservation Programs 4,221,000 2,731,000 2,741,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000Soil Survey 0 360,000 360,000 0 0 0

Total Land Conservation 4,221,000 3,091,000 3,101,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000

RECREATION & PARKS Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Phase II 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0Three Notch Trail 347,000 1,380,000 1,532,500 1,168,750 1,168,750 148,750Wicomico Shores Golf Course Clubhouse 500,000 0 0 0 0 0Tennis courts replacement 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0

Piney Pt. Lighthouse Museum Shore Erosion 235,445 14,110 0 0 0 0Parks Land Acquisition 4,292,500 0 0 0 0 100,000St. Mary's College Amphitheater 250,000 0 0 0 0 0Leonard Hall Recreation Ctr. Improvements 250,000 0 0 0 0 0Lancaster Park Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0Park ADA Improvements 300,000 0 0 0 0 0Lacrosse Fields 25,000 0 0 0 0 0St. Clements Hundred - Blackistone Lthse. 90,000 0 0 0 0 0Myrtle Point Park 0 0 0 250,000 500,000 500,000St. Mary's Gymnastics Center 0 0 0 0 180,000 2,375,000

Total Parks Acquisition /Development 6,664,945 1,644,110 1,582,500 1,468,750 1,898,750 3,123,750

Approved 5-Year Capital Plan

ST. MARY'S COUNTYCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AND 5-YEAR PLAN

ApprovedBudget

CAPITAL PROJECT FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

Approved 5-Year Capital Plan

PUBLIC LANDINGSDerelict Boat Removal 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Patuxent River Public Landing 975,000 500,000 225,000 0 0 0Forest Landing 99,000 0 0 0 0 0Wicomico Shores Public Landing 99,000 0 0 0 0 0Leonardtown Wharf 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0Clark's Landing Boat Ramp 0 99,000 99,000 0 0 0Wicomico Shores Public Landing - Parking 0 0 200,000 0 0 0

Total Public Landings 2,303,000 629,000 554,000 30,000 30,000 30,000

PUBLIC SCHOOLSLeonardtown ES - Addition/Renovation 9,408,000 7,044,000 0 0 0 0Leonardtown ES - State Relocatables 226,000 0 0 0 0 0Leonardtown ES - Local Reloc. 664,500 0 0 0 0 0State Relocatable - site to be determined 84,750 0 0 0 0 0State Eligible - Local Relocatable Purchase 55,200 0 0 0 0 0Chopticon High School - Sewer Plant 325,000 0 0 0 0 0Well Replacement - Four Schools 592,036 0 0 0 0 0Middle School HVAC - Schematic Design 75,000 0 0 0 0 0Ridge Elementary - parking & site improv. 239,000 0 0 0 0 0Relocatables - for various sites 153,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000Flooring Replacement-Various Schools 115,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 0ADA Improvements 450,000 500,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 445,000Bethune Educational Center - Roof Systemic 160,000 0 0 0 0 0Great Mills H.S. - Gym Floor 105,000 0 0 0 0 0Building Generator System - 2 Offices 143,000 0 0 0 0 0First New Elementary School (646 capacity) 0 7,846,000 12,847,000 0 0 0Spring Ridge MS - HVAC Systemic 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0 0Greenview Knolls ES - HVAC Systemic 0 2,231,000 0 0 0 0Lettie M. Dent ES - Chiller Replacement 0 195,000 0 0 0 0Chopticon H.S. - Gym Floor 0 0 185,000 0 0 0Second New Elem. School (646 capacity) 0 0 1,340,000 10,980,000 10,633,000 0New High School (1,200 capacity) 0 0 2,776,000 0 694,000 18,674,000Leonardtown M.S. - HVAC Systemic Ren. 0 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0Oakville ES - HVAC Systemic 0 0 1,699,000 0 0 0Benjamin Banneker ES-HVAC Systemic 0 0 899,000 0 0 0Third New Elementary School (646 capacity) 0 0 0 0 0 1,340,000New Middle School 0 0 0 0 0 974,000

Total Public Schools 12,795,486 20,817,000 25,736,000 14,369,000 12,377,000 21,883,000

SUMMARY - By Project TypePublic Facilities 3,766,100 13,961,050 13,551,675 12,405,125 1,542,000 5,550,625Marine 1,048,175 64,500 0 15,000 0 0Highways 3,311,571 5,872,362 5,400,000 3,924,000 4,359,000 6,200,000Solid Waste 5,010,825 0 100,000 0 0 0Land Conservation 4,221,000 3,091,000 3,101,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000Parks Acquisition & Development 6,664,945 1,644,110 1,582,500 1,468,750 1,898,750 3,123,750Public Landings 2,303,000 629,000 554,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Public Schools 12,795,486 20,817,000 25,736,000 14,369,000 12,377,000 21,883,000

TOTAL 39,121,102 46,079,022 50,025,175 34,962,875 22,967,750 39,558,375

SUMMARY - By Funding SourceState/Federal 14,917,126 24,599,247 21,337,437 18,527,588 7,278,941 16,547,009Impact Fees - Schools 2,531,250 3,146,000 6,916,500 2,531,250 2,531,250 2,531,250Impact Fees -Roads 600,000 635,000 337,500 337,500 337,500 337,500Impact Fees - Parks 542,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 500,000 398,750Transfer Taxes 10,421,521 4,830,854 5,132,625 3,818,728 3,176,750 5,004,522Ag/Recordation & Ag/Transfer 2,370,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000Pay-Go 14,228,272 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000Bonds (7,139,067) 10,867,921 14,651,113 7,847,809 7,743,309 13,339,344Other (Navy Museum; Piney Point Lighthouse) 650,000 100,000 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 39,121,102 46,079,022 50,025,175 34,962,875 22,967,750 39,558,375

Transfer Taxes $6,421,521 $830,854 $1,132,625 0 0 0Ag Transfer Taxes 995,000 0 0 0 0 0Recordation Fees 475,000 0 0 0 0 0Impact Fees - Schools 0 614,750 4,385,250 0 0 0Impact Fees - Roads 262,500 297,500 0 0 0 0Impact Fees - Parks 35,750 0 0 0 0 0

$8,189,771 $1,743,104 $5,517,875 $0 $0 $0

Approximately $1.1 million of park impact fees are estimated to be accumulated and/or collected, which are not appnot yet applied.

Included in the funding identified above are the normal annual collections of capital project funding sources as well as accumulated unapplied resources, which may result from collections that exceed estimates or expenditures that are less than budgeted.

To the extent that such variances occur, these excess funds are retained within the capital projects fund and applied to subsequent years' capital projects, based on the approved budget.

Included in the Approved Capital Budget and Plan are the following accumulated excess collections. The amounts applied are limited to the amount of eligible expenditures, in certain cases, most notably impact fees.

CAPITAL PROJECTS

PUBLIC FACILITIES

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2007

PROJECT TITLE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteA/E & INSPECTIONS /TESTING 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 180,000 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FRONT PORCH ADDITION 245,000 245,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES/HVAC 520,000 520,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0NETWORK / PHONES 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MEETING ROOM / ADDITION 1,625,000 1,240,000 385,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,970,000 2,585,000 385,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 385,000 0 385,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 2,435,000 2,435,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,970,000 2,585,000 385,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

LOCATION:

FY2005: Preliminary and schematic designs for a new meeting room facility to better serve the needs of the community; replacement of existing undersized and inefficient chillers, pumps and boilers; and a separate dedicated dehumidification system to resolve long term mold and humidity problems.

FY2006: Demolish existing IT building and replace with a new 5-6,000 sf Meeting Room. Project will avoid disruption and costs associated with providing adequate swing space during an extensive renovation project. FY 2006 project includes a 1,640 sf front porch adddition to create a formal entrance to the County Office Building, correct effects of long-term mechanical room leakage, provide additional storage space, and create improved welcome and informational areas. The meeting room will accomodate a capacity of 150-170 seats, the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator and other staff. Minor interior renovations to the County Office Building will facilitate the co-location of IT and Finance staff and an enclosed walkway will be provided to facilitate pedestrian movements between buildings. The design-build construction project will also accomodate larger foundations, an elevator shaft / stairwell space and HVAC system etc.for vertical expansion(s). FY2007: Design and construct a second story addition of approximately 5,000 to 6,000 square feet in accordance with the Governmental Center Master Plan.Project will avoid future roof removal, disruption of users, and will provide additional swing space to address demands for space and storage needs.Space may be roughed in and finished at a later date as may be required.

BOCC approved Space Needs Plan of March 2001 and approved revision of July 2002. Space needs planning remains a critical component in providing services to the community and adequate work / storage space for employees. The meeting room will be designed to allow for vertical expansion in order to preserve the availability of future footprints and building pad areas for the foreseeable future.

Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Section3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs.Priority A-1

3rd Election DistrictLeonardtown, MD

DESCRIPTION:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

PF-0502PROJ. NO.

County Office Bldg HVAC Renovation and Addition Public Facilities



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

0 0 0 0 0 020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000


DESCRIPTIONSTAFFING -FTEs

FURNITURE & EQUIPMENTOTHER (describe significant items)

TOTAL COSTS


PF-0502County Office Bldg HVAC Renovation and Addition PROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET

Public Facilities

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:There is an increased health awareness over the inability of the existing HVAC system to control humidity. The existing HVAC system is approaching 30 years old and has outlived its useful life expectancy.

Meeting Room and front porch scope has been reintroduced into the CIP in conjunction with the HVAC renovations. FY2007 monies may be utilized for second story rough-in space at approximately $64 per square foot. Unless utilized initially, an elevator shaft will be provided but no elevator at this time. The space could be finished in the future to provide future program growth.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN

DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:

OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET:

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIES

Additional maintenance, custodial care and utilities required.Additional partial Building Services FTE required. Greater efficiency in equipment may be offset by larger conditioned area and operations.



DESCRIPTION:Construct a new one-story 22,000 square foot facility to house the Patuxent Naval Air Museum. Project will include a mezzanine (alternate), exhibition space,auditorium/multipurpose space, gift shop, and administrative office. Plans and specifications have been completed and are ready for State review/approval,subject to the appropriation of funding. Project is expected to take 18 months to construct. Funding required Congressional Appropriation passed through the State of Maryland, Maryland General Assembly Capital Grant, private sector donations, real estate contribution, in-kind services, and the County CapitalImprovement Program.

The Museum Association is responsible for exhibits, furniture and equipment.


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 487,203 487,203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 53,371 53,371 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 6,974,670 6,974,670 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTR MGMT / INSPECTION 204,000 204,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MATERIALS TESTING 55,000 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SYSTEMS (phone, IT, security, PA) 69,000 69,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER (alternates, furniture, displays) 650,000 0 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 8,493,244 7,843,244 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 290,298 1,265,344 (975,046) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 975,046 0 975,046 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,225,000 1,225,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 3,377,900 3,377,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES (private) 2,625,000 1,975,000 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 8,493,244 7,843,244 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

PF-0103PROJ. NO.

Naval Air Museum & Visitors Center Public Facilities

The proposed access road is outside the scope of the current MOU between the Naval Air Museum Association and St. Mary's County. The two phase (site & building) costs will include Fed. Wage Rates (Ph2 only), construction management, materials testing, security, public address,and phone systems.

Project is based on an updated memorandum of Understanding between the Patuxent River Naval Air Museum Association and St. Mary's County.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:1.1.1.D. Concentrate community services and facilities in the Lexington Park and Leonardtown Development Districts. 5.1.5.A Promote and expand museums and historic sites.Priority A-1

8th Election District Lexington Park



OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:

RECAP STATE FEDERAL COUNTY PRNAM TOTAL2000 legislation 250,000 250,0002001 legislation 250,000 250,000HB140 225,000 225,000HB340 BQ 150,000 150,000HB340 BL 350,000 350,000SHA funds passed through State 3,377,900 3,377,900Capital appropriations 1,265,344 1,265,344Fund-raising 2,625,000 2,625,000

Sub-total 1,225,000 3,377,900 1,265,344 2,625,000 8,493,244In-kind: Land 2,400,000 311,000 2,711,000

Sub-total 3,625,000 3,377,900 1,576,344 2,625,000 11,204,244Temporary Museum (PF0102) 294,061 294,061Estimated in-kind services (PF0102 & PF0103) 170,000 170,000Total 3,625,000 3,377,900 2,040,405 2,625,000 11,668,305

FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

UTILITIES

Staff time is to be billed toward the project as "in kind" services as a part of the County's contribution.




No impact on the Operating budget. The Museum Association is responsible for exhibits, furniture and equipment, relocation and moving expenses, phones and computers. The Association and Navy Alliance are responsible for operational utility costs. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's fund balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:

Value Engineering meeting was held on November 18, 2004. Phase 1 should include the demolition, building pad preparation, relocation of utilities, entrance, and parking lot construction at $825,000. Phase 2 should include the building ($239/sf) and final sitework. Demolition of the O'Brien Building was completed in September 2005. Building portion of the project should be bid in the Spring of 2006 with sitework underway in the Fall of 2005. On September 13, 2005 the Board of County Commissioners accepted a Letter of Credit from the Museum Association.

Public Facilities

TOTAL COSTS


PF-0103Naval Air Museum & Visitors Center

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRenovation of Former SHA Building PF-0702

DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:County-wide

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION-FIELDWORK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:IV.1.2.1 and IV.2.4

Public Facilities

Five Year Capital Program


This project would provide funds to convert the old State Highway garage, in Leonardtown, into a Winery. Funds will support the cost of facility modifications and related fixed equipment to create a Winery. A Southern Maryland Wineries & Grape Growers Association was formed in 2005. Currently the Southern Maryland Agriculture Commission is administering a grape growers grant program. All of these initiatives are to support the local production of grapes as a viable agricultural product.

A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to keep agriculture a viable industry in St. Mary's County. Providing a winery for local grape growers, who are diversifying into grapes, has the potential to assist with this goal.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRenovation of Former SHA Building PF-0702



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



Public Facilities

CONTINUATION SHEET

The Town of Leonardtown is offering the use of the old State Highway Garage to become a winery. A consultant has reviewed the site for it's potential as a winery. The consultant's report is forthcoming. Grapes are currently being promoted as an alternative for tobacco production. A Southern Maryland Grape Growers & Wineries Association was formed in 2005. Funds for this project were taken from AP-0401 ($500,000 local transfer tax), if this project is abandoned funds should be returned.


INCREMENTAL OPERATING COSTSDESCRIPTION

STAFFING -FTEs

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENTOTHER (describe significant items)

TOTAL COSTS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWorkforce Housing Initiatives PF-0701

DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 125,000 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION-FIELDWORK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Facilities



This project would establish a fund to support the costs of County participation in workforce housing initiatives and projects that result in the creation of new workforce housing or continued availability of existing workforce housing. Uses would include acquisition of land, buildings or easements, construction of infrastructure such as roads or utilities, renovation of existing structuresand related capital activities. These activities could include county-wide programs as well as public-private partnerships to develop or rehabilitate specific properties.

The Comprehensive Plan sets forth the following goal in the Housing Element: Promote a safe, affordable variety of housing located in livable communities. Objective 4.1.2 is: encourage the provision of affrodable housing. This project is fully consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would assist in implementing the Housing Element. This project also builds on past planning documents for housing, including the Report on Housing Livability (2002) and the Housing Needs Assessment (2003).

Specific project location(s) to be determined in consultation with partners as project details are developed.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWorkforce Housing Initiatives PF-0701



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



Both County staff and a citizen's group organized by the St. Mary's County Chamber of Commerce are exploring new approaches to workforce housing needs. These funds can serve as seed money, already budgeted and available, for specific activities that flow from those reviews. Priority wil be given to partnership projects that leveraging larger amounts of funding from other sources.





TOTAL COSTS

Some initiatives my require staff time for development and implementation. Specific impacts must await development of specific proposals.

Public Facilities

CONTINUATION SHEET


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBuilding Maintenance and Repair Projects-Critical PF-0310

DESCRIPTION:

FY 2007: Leonardtown Health Department Roof Replacement-$285,000.

FY 2008: Marcey House ALS Roof Replacement-$52,500. Charlotte Hall Library Phase I HVAC unit replacement x 4-$90,000. Provide emergency generator for ALS Building-$37,500. Entrance canopy at Treasurer's Office - $10,000.

FY 2009: Charlotte Hall Library Phase II HVAC unit replacement x 4 -$90,000. DPW&T HVAC unit replacement-$45,000. Old Lexington Park Library roof replacement-$97,500. Walden Sierra Outpatient Center HVAC unit replacement-$42,000.

FY 2010: Charlotte Hall Library Phase III HVAC unit replacement x 4 -$90,000. Repair and replace thermostats and motorizeddampers in Annex (balance HVAC system) not done with original renovation project - $150,000.

FY 2011: Leonardtown Library Carpet in Foyer-$35,000. Unanticipated Repairs-$7,000.

FY 2012: Old Sheriff's Office 2nd floor (Board of Elections) replacement of HVAC unit and airhandler-$96,000. Old Hollywood School boiler and pump replacement-$120,000. Unanticipated repairs-$20,000.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:Based on need and the criteria outlined in the Division's Comprehensive Facilities Maintenance Plan.

LOCATION:Various locations.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,733,976 466,201 285,000 190,000 274,775 240,000 42,000 236,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,733,976 466,201 285,000 190,000 274,775 240,000 42,000 236,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 114,000 (114,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 1,619,976 352,201 285,000 190,000 274,775 240,000 42,000 236,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 114,000 0 114,000 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,733,976 466,201 285,000 190,000 274,775 240,000 42,000 236,000 0

Public Facilities



This program provides funds for construction, equipment replacement, repair projects, upgrades and critical / major maintenance items. Typical project scope requires funding in an amount less than $100,000. Projects require minimal use of architect / engineering services.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs.Priority A-1


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBuilding Maintenance and Repair Projects-Critical PF-0310



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



OTHER (describe significant items)TOTAL COSTS

Staff time will be required to implement individual projects.No increase in incremental operating costs is expected.

CONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENT


PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS

Projects are prioritized and managed by the DPW&T Building Services Division. The Department will be soliciting Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) consultants thru existing State contracts to assist the Division in evaluating it's current and proposed energy conservation measures. Outstanding FY2006 projects include, Leonardtown Library Roof Replacement-$65,000. Replace / upgrade Health Department main electric service panels-$30,000. Fire alarm system replacement at Old Lexington Park Library-$19,000. Paint County Blue Hangar at Airport.

Based on a 2005 inspection of roof leaks at the Health Department, the scheduled FY 11 project was reprioritized to FY 2007. Cost estimates have generally been increased 35% where appropriate to reflect current pricing, leaving little unanticipated repair contingency monies which were previously programmed into the project. An entrance canopy was added to the FY 2008 request based on input from the Risk Manager and LGIT. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.



Public Facilities

CONTINUATION SHEET



DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CARPET / TILE 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FURNITURE / PERSONNEL LIFT 85,000 0 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES / ADA ACCESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER (Entrance Canopies) 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 155,000 0 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 155,000 0 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 155,000 0 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Project includes revitalizing the interior space with new furnishings, flooring, and paint. Furniture replacement for patrons and staff - $85,000, replacement carpet / tile on both floors - $50,000, and two entrance canopies - $20,000. Furniture will be transportable to other existing or newer replacement centers.

Portions of the project were previously included and prioritized in the Maintenance and Repair-Programmatic Capital Improvement Program that was previously removed from the capital program. The programmatic improvements were intended to systematically address, carpet, paint, tile, partitions, and entrance canopies.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efffciciency and service of community facilities to meet population needs.Priority: A-1

3rd Election District Leonardtown, MD

PF-0703PROJ. NO.

Garvey Center Interior Revitalization Public Facilities





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



No impact on the Operating budget in FY2007.Implementing the conclusions of the Plan may impact the Operating Budget. Estimated costs are based on pro-rated costs of the existing facility-Electric:$8,200 per year-Water/sewer/trash:$1,000 per year--and Janitorial: $5,800 per year




TOTAL COSTS


New project with parameters of the project are as originally submitted in FY 2002. However, the design ($75K), and $675K for a second floor addition, and first floor expansion were removed from the request. The concept of providing a new multi-generational facility at the Governmental Campus was first discussed in FY 2007 work sessions. A new facility could also include a gymnasium to address some of the space shortcomings with the current Drill Hall. Size: approximately 30,000 sf at an estimated cost of $5M. Not included in the 6 year plan.

Public Facilities PF-0703Garvey Center Interior RevitalizationPROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,101,000 540,500 92,000 103,500 115,000 0 0 250,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,101,000 540,500 92,000 103,500 115,000 0 0 250,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 309,113 540,500 (231,387) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 560,500 0 92,000 103,500 115,000 0 0 250,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 231,387 0 231,387 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,101,000 540,500 92,000 103,500 115,000 0 0 250,000 0

Fulfillment of on-going maintenance obligations.


3rd Election District Leonardtown, MDGovernmental Center

Conduct ongoing and scheduled maintenance and repair projects for the facility. Repairs are partially reimbursable.

Prior Year projects include: Replacing the water pump system, wall dividers / repairs in the Special Operations Division, a generator for the kitchen equipment, replacing the tile flooring in the Medical Bathroom and installation of a drain in the shower room of Pod A. HVAC airflow improvements in the Isolation and Segregation Cells, and Inmate shower wall upgrades to stainless steel. FY2007 projects include: Heating / ventilation, and shelving for Headquarters and Corrections Division records.FY2008 projects include: Security fencing installation in Pod E Housing and Dayroom Areas, and ceiling tile / track replacement in the main hallways. FY2009 projects include: Entrance canopies /roofs over the rear and side entrances, and replacement of the security fencing in the Outdoor Recreational Yard. FY2012 projects include: HVAC replacement of water circulation pump and valve(s)

PF-0504PROJ. NO.

Adult Detention Center Maintenance & Repairs Public Facilities





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



No impact on the Operating budget.




TOTAL COSTS


FY 2010 projects for kitchen equipment upgrade and painting were removed to avoid redundancy in the request for improvements cited in the expansion and minimum security facility projects. FY 2012 project was added as a critical maintenance time for the existing facility. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.

Public Facilities PF-0504Adult Detention Center Maintenance & Repairs PROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAirport Master Plan PF-0704

DESCRIPTION:

A. AIRPORT DRIVE REALIGNMENT 1. Design and construction of a 2,000' relocation of Airport Drive in front of the SMHEF. 2. Improvements are required to meet the separation requirements from the relocated taxiway. 3. Utility relocation costs are anticipated. B. TAXIWAY SEPARATION AND EXTENSION & RUNWAY EXTENSION 1. Design and construction of the relocation of the taxiway and parallel extensions and runway extension. 2. A minimum 240' runway to taxiway centerline separation from current 207' is required. R/W extension is 1,200'. Category B-II facility. C. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL 1. Obstruction removal is required to meet the current 7:1 and proposed 34:1 approach surfaces. 2. Additional easements and property acquisition will have to be secured by the Real Property Manager.D. RELOCATION OF LAWRENCE HAYDEN DRIVE- Runway extension project also requires relocation of an existing County roadway. Design and construction of approximately 2,000' of existing Lawrence Hayden Road will be required.E. FUTURE PROJECTS-Includes construction of an aircraft apron adjacent to Runway 11 extended, construction of a 4,000' Airport Access Road to connect MD 235 with Lawrence Hayden Road, and construction of a 10-unit T hangar and 80' x 80' corporate hangar for County rental.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:Airport development projects are developed in accordance with the approved Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan (ALP) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on September 3, 2002, as amended on November 4, 2003. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of the infrastructure needed for commuter air travel services and shuttle connections. FAA and MAA approvals were also obtained.

LOCATION: 6th Election District Francis Duke Airport, Airport Road, Hollywood, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteAIRPORT DRIVE REALIGNMENT 527,250 0 0 52,250 475,000 0 0 0 0TAXIWAY SEPARATION & EXTENSION 1,181,625 0 0 0 0 231,625 950,000 0 0OBSTR. REMOVAL, LAND, ESMT'S 351,600 0 351,600 0 0 0 0 0 0RUNWAY EXTENSION 4,658,625 0 0 0 0 450,000 0 4,208,625 0RELOC LAWRENCE HAYDEN RD 522,500 0 0 47,500 47,500 427,500 0 0 0CONSTRUCT WEST APRON AREA 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 216,000 2,184,000AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD 510,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 510,000CORPORATE, T-HANGARS, MEDEVAC 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000TOTAL COSTS 10,751,600 0 351,600 99,750 522,500 1,109,125 950,000 4,424,625 3,294,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 268,791 0 8,790 2,494 13,063 27,728 23,750 110,616 82,350 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 268,788 0 8,790 2,493 13,062 27,728 23,750 110,615 82,350FEDERAL FUNDS 10,214,021 0 334,020 94,763 496,375 1,053,669 902,500 4,203,394 3,129,300OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 10,751,600 0 351,600 99,750 522,500 1,109,125 950,000 4,424,625 3,294,000


Public Facilities

This project provides for numerous Master Plan improvements at the Francis Duke Airport. Improvements are directly correlated with the completion of the Environmental Assessment which should be completed in late Spring 2006. The projects listed are eligible for 95% Federal, 2.5% State, 2.5% County funding.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.ii.e). Encourage development of commuter air travel services and shuttle connections to airports with regional, national and international connections.Priority B-1






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0







Project now reflects funding based on recent legislation at a 95% Federal, 2.5% State and 2.5% County levels.

Based on most recent 12/8/2005 Federal Aviation Administration Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) summary, Delta Airport Consultant review, and input from the Airport Advisory Committee. The final public meeting on the Environmental Assessment was held on May 22, 2006.



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Airport Master Plan PF-0704 Public Facilities



DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,583,425 655,625 322,500 308,800 397,500 279,000 300,000 320,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,583,425 655,625 322,500 308,800 397,500 279,000 300,000 320,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 2,583,425 655,625 322,500 308,800 397,500 279,000 300,000 320,000 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,583,425 655,625 322,500 308,800 397,500 279,000 300,000 320,000 0

PF-0505PROJ. NO.

Carter State Office Building Maint. & Repairs Public Facilities

Conduct ongoing and scheduled maintenance and repair projects for the facility. Repairs are 100% reimbursable by the Department of General Services. FY2007 projects include: Replacement of two roof top units, Phase I ceiling tile replacement, replacement of all exhaust fans.FY2008 projects include: Roof replacement, sub-panel additions, replace lighting in foyer, replacement of tile in Unemployment Office, upgrade of HAVC computer hardware / software. FY2009 projects include: Replacing HVAC pumps, and replacement of blinds, Phase II ceiling tiles, and Courtroom 1 carpet.FY2010 projects include: Carpet replacement in the States Attorney's Office, replacement of all restroom faucets, sprinkler / pump equipment upgrades, upgraded elevator and controls, and electric lock installation.FY2011 projects include: HVAC duct cleaning throughout, reshingling a portion of the roof, and front door replacement.FY2012 projects include: Replacement of roof (rubber and ballast) at $220,000 and complete replacement of blinds ($100,000).

Provide reimbursable on-going maintenance effort in accordance with existing long term lease agreement.


3rd Election District Leonardtown, MD Governmental Center





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




CONTINUATION SHEET

Public Facilities PF-0505Carter State Office Building Maint. & Repairs PROJ. NO.

No impact on the Operating budget.




TOTAL COSTS




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 425,000 0 425,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

INSPECTION / TESTING 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

PF-0705PROJ. NO.

Emergency Equipment Shelter Public Facilities

Design and construct an 8,000 square foot pre-engineered secured steel building on the Governmental Center Campus to shelter five (5) pieces of HazMat emergency response vehicles / trailers and sensitive scientific instruments purchased under Homeland Security funding. The facility is intended as a joint use facility between the Public Safety Department and Office of the Sheriff, whose specialized emergency response vehicles are also proposed to be accommodated for a total of eight (8) vehicles. Facility will be designed to include work station space for radio/equipment maintenance repair work.

Recommendations are based on the need for a minimally climate controlled environment to house first responder supplies, equipment, clothing, and instrumentation which is currently decentrally stored in unconditioned or partially unconditioned spaces. Federal and State grant funds have purchased approximately $347,000 of equipment for the mitigation, response and recovery from all hazard emergencies to protect the public and property of St. Marys County citizens.






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,0000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000




CONTINUATION SHEET

No additional funding sources have been identified at this time. Prior Homeland Security funding is not available at this time. The asset value of the Sheriff's vehicles to be housed in this facility are almost equal in value to the $347,000 purchased by Public Safety. Alternatively, the facility could be sited in conjunction with the future planned relocation of the Maryland State Police Medevac (rotary wing) which is planned to be relocated to the southwestern corner of the St. Mary's County Regional Airport property.

New project. Overall cost is based on $55 per square foot. Stormwater management will be performed under the previously funded regional facility if sited at the Governmental Center. An interim tent-framed temporary facility or leased space could be proposed as an interim alternative. The location of the facility may require relocation of the existing Sheriff impound lot.

Public Facilities PF-0705Emergency Equipment ShelterPROJ. NO.

No impact on the Operating budget in FY 07.Implementing the conclusions of the Plan may impact the Operating Budget. Estimated costs are based on pro-rated costs of the existing facility-Electric:$22,000--Water/sewer/trash:$7,000--and Oil: $11,000




TOTAL COSTS




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UNDERGROUND TANK & PUMPS 225,000 0 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EMERGENCY GENERATOR 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 250,000 0 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 200,000 0 25,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 250,000 0 25,000 225,000 0 0 0 0 0

PF-0706PROJ. NO.

Fuel Facility Upgrades Public Facilities

Adapt the County-owned fuel facilities at both the Governmental Center and St. Andrews properties to accommodate the use of bio-diesel and ethanol fuels. The Leonardtown facility is primarily a gasoline distribution facility and the California facility is primarily a diesel fuel dispensing facility. Project proposes to expand the Leonardtown facility with a 10,000 gallon underground double-walled diesel tank and pump to primarily accommodate the Board of Education-owned Fleet (approximately 20 buses). The tank will be able to accommodate regular premium diesel or any grade of biodiesel fuels. The project also contemplates the addition of an emergency back-up generator to run both the fuel tanks and the Building Maintenance Division during emergency response / operations.

At the California site, there is one 10,000 gallon tank for gasoline and one 10,000 gallon tank for diesel which have generator back-up. At the Leonardtown site, there are two 10,000 gallon tanks for gasoline, no diesel tanks, and no generator back-up. One underground diesel tank and one facility operable under generator power is not sufficient for emergency back-up, storage, or operations. An additional underground tank is not needed at the California site if the Board of Education buses fuel in Leonardtown. Conversion to ethanol does not incur any additional capital cost.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain the environmental health of the County and reduce damage to the Chesapeake Bay.Priority: A-1

3rd and 8th Election Districts Leonardtown and California, MD





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




CONTINUATION SHEET

The Maryland Soybean Board and Maryland Grain producers support this initiative. Biodiesel is a mix of #2 low sulphur premium diesel fuel with vegatable / soy bean oil. Ethanol is a gasoline additive that could be used in conjunction with 87 octane conventional gasoline currently burned in fleet vehicles, including the Office of the Sherriff. The addition of an underground tank in Leonardtown would allow one of the underground tanks at St. Andrews to be dedicated for biodiesel use. Approximately 1,500 gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel are burned each day. Reorder levels for existing tanks are based on a full load delivered to ensure reduced costs due to economic scale. Full loads: diesel @ 7,000-7,500 gallons and gasoline @ 8,000-8,500 gallons. As such, at the reorder level of approximately 16,000 gallons or 11 days of back-up storage is availbale. During Countywide emergency operations when diesel fuel use is elevated (ie. snow removal) only 2-5 days of emergency storage would be available.

New initiative. There may be grant funding available and / or possible cost recovery opportunities if the entire fleet is converted to alternative fuel source(s).

Public Facilities PF-0706Fuel Facility UpgradesPROJ. NO.

In August 2005, Bio-diesel was approximately 5-7 cents higher per gallon than petroleum diesel fuels. The two products ( at an 80/20 mix level) will be considered as a part of a regional bid with possible positive environmental impacts from the County fleet in FY07. As of 4 October 2005; current cost for diesel fuel is $2.76 per gallon (State tax is paid separately at an additional $0.25 per gallon), current cost for gasoline is $2.41 per gallon (including State tax). Mixes as high as 50/50 are available, but are not recommended for use by the Transportation Manager.

On older vehicles the use of biodiesel fuel will result in an increase in cost for fuel filter replacement.




TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONParking and Site Improvements PF-0307

DESCRIPTION:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:The following identified projects represent additional infrastructure and maintenance improvements:(1) FY 2007-Provide 51 parking spaces to satisfy lease obligations with Maryland Money Market in conjunction with the Navy Museum.(2) FY 2009-Overlay (14,000 sf) parking lot at Leonard Hall School and (72,000 sf) Health Department parking lot. Estimated cost: $150,000.(3) FY 2011-Overlay (7,000 sf) Historical Society, (25,000 sf) Great Mills Pool and (17,000 sf) 911 Communications Center lots. Estimated cost: $80,000.

Other projects that could be prioritized and funded include:Improve pedestrian circulation / replace sidewalks at the Leonardtown Library.Improve parking and sidewalks at the Chancellor's Run Activity Center.Improve the entrances and paving at the Clements, Valley Lee and Oakville Convenience Centers.Provide security and customer lighting at six Convenience Centers.Replace sidewalk and curb & gutter along frontage at Leonard Hall School.Add parking lot and walkway lighting at the Governmental Center and Health Department.


LOCATION:Various locations throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DESIGN/PLANNING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 561,854 261,854 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 561,854 261,854 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 511,854 261,854 100,000 0 100,000 0 50,000 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 561,854 261,854 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0

Public Facilities

Parking area improvements, security lighting, safety improvements, signage, concrete wheel stop replacement, curb and gutter repairs, landscaping and other exterior features at various County locations. Project may include convenience center improvements, pothole / base repairs, cracksealing, repaving and restriping parking lots, and additional STS bus stop shelters.



A comprehensive listing of parking lots and their respective condition was developed in 2005 and included in the Facilities Directory for scheduled paving by priority. There is approximately 1,231,000 square feet of parking lots in various stages of deterioration and in need of a 1-1/2" maintenance overlay.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONParking and Site Improvements PF-0307



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS

Any additional lighting will require an operating budget adjustment. Use of solar powered and photo cell technology will be utilized, but still requires partial O&M costs for general maintenance and repair.

It is estimated that for every $1 spent on preventive maintenance (system preservation), that between $4 and $10 is saved on future rehabilitation and reconstruction costs.

SUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENTOTHER (describe significant items)

STAFFING -FTEs

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICES

Project may include the establishment of a park and ride lot on MD 235 thru a lease agreement with the SHA and to establish a northern maintenance outpost via the utilization of the existing salt dome in FY 2007. Other projects are based on the prioritized needs for system / infrastructure preservation. Only those lots rated in "Poor" condition are programmed as being funded as a part of this project. Prior $50,000 amounts were sufficient for patching only, and have been increased. There exists lease obligations with Maryland Money Market to provide 51 exclusive spaces adjacent and within 150 feet of the shared property line.



A comprehensive listing of parking lots and their respective condition was developed in 2005 and included in the Facilities Directory for scheduled paving by priority. There is approximately 1,231,000 square feet of parking lots and 143,100 sf of campus / facility sidewalks in various statge of deterioration. Maintenance paving will avoid full reconstruction. Most of the parking lots are curb and gutter and the cost includes the current unit pricing for paving ($0.45/ sf)plus the necessary expense of milling ($1.00 / sf). The prior approvals reflect the Charlotte Hall Library parking lot expansion, and Old Hollywood School Parking lot for the Teen Center and Adult Day Care with upgrades to Scriber Lane per MOU. Note that the maintenance of the old Lexington Park Library property / grounds may be passed on to new owners. Prior approved monies are for the grant approved STS bus shelter.

CONTINUATION SHEET

Public Facilities


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAirport Improvements PF-0509

DESCRIPTION:

FY 2007 projects include identification and removal of obstructions and pavement rehabilitation of existing ramp and apron areas.Visual glide slopes and other approach surfaces are required to be free of obstructions. FAA evaluation is expected in June 2006.Project will include re-signing MD 235 and the re-dedicated terminal building to reflect formal working name of the airport.Projects also include the balance of maintenance paving, airfield signage for pilots/transients, and removal of existing obstructions.FY 2009 project includes the removal of obstructions within existing easement areas. Airfield signage for pilot and transients is needed.FY 2011 includes the installation of a green/white location beacon to improve inclement and night approaches.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:Airport development projects are developed in accordance with the approved Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan (ALP) approved by the Board of County Commissioners on September 3, 2002.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:7.2 Public facilities and infrastructure are funded and constructed concurrent to accommodated development demand.

Priority -A-1

LOCATION: 6th Election District Francis Duke Airport, Airport Road, Hollywood, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteAIPORT SIGNAGE AND LANDSIDE SIG 22,000 0 4,000 0 18,000 0 0 0 0TAXIWAY A REPAIRr AND SEAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0REHAB T-HANGAR TAXIWAYS 84,000 0 26,000 0 58,000 0 0 0 0UPPER RAMP APRON AREA REHAB 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0ROTATING BEACON UPGRADE 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0OBSTRUCTION (REMOVAL) 494,000 350,000 70,000 0 74,000 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 800,000 350,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 530,000 80,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 270,000 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 800,000 350,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 0

Public Facilities


This project provides for numerous improvements at the St. Mary's County Regional Airport. Several improvements are necessary to maintain services to improve safety, manage risk, and improve operations. These projects are 100% County funded, and are not expected to be eligible for grant funding via the FAA Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP).






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT

FAA 9/24/05 correspondence was forwarded to the County airport consultants to review in conjunction with the Environmental Assessment and Master Plan information gathered to date. Obstructions identified within existing easements will be coordinated for removal with the assistance of the County's Real Property Manager.

FY 2007 projects originally programmed were performed in FY 2005 per February 22, 2006 MAA correspondence, an addendum to MAA-GR-98-016 was used to fund 80% of several of the FY 2007 projects. There is over 852,000 square feet of asphalt paving at the airport and a formal crack sealing program was needed to address the Maryland Aviation Administration's Pavement Evaluation Report. In 2005, a tie-down replacement program was established to replace the existing in-ground systems and the existing REIL system was replaced / upgraded. Non-federal aviation airfield signage, runway crack sealing, and the painting of tie-down designations was also addressed in FY 2006 as a part of the MAA grant.



CONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIES



CONTINUATION SHEET

Airport Improvements PF-0509 Public Facilities

TOTAL COSTS OTHER (describe significant items)

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONCollege of Southern Maryland, Wellness & Pool PF-0506

DESCRIPTION:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. State funding participation is available through the Maryland Higher Education Commission. Cost share is 75% State / 25% County.B. Project will be managed by CSM Staff, including design, solicitation, award and contract management.C. Project timing is based on updated support documentation provided by the CSM in November 2005.D. Preliminary program is as follows:

Capacity Quantity Function Sq. Ft. 25 1 Classroom 550 3 4 Staff Offices 500 60 1 Wellness Center 4,000

75 1 Pool 8,125 2 1 Wellness Center Storage 400 2 1 300 38 2 1,680 20 2 1,100

2 1 2,000

18,655

LOCATION:3rd Election DistrictIntersection of MD Route 5 and MD Route 245, Leonardtown, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 596,000 596,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 8,592,000 0 0 8,592,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 358,000 0 0 358,000 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 9,596,000 596,000 0 8,950,000 50,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 2,250,000 149,000 (149,000) 2,200,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 149,000 0 149,000 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 7,197,000 447,000 0 6,750,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 9,596,000 596,000 0 8,950,000 50,000 0 0 0 0

Public Facilities

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:1.1.1. D. Concentrate community services and facilities in Lexington Park and Leonardtown.Priority B-1

LoungeGeneral Storage

TOTAL

Design and construction of a single building (32,000 g.s.f.) housing a Wellness Center, indoor swimming pool and support facilities on the Leonardtown campus of the College of Southern Maryland. The approved master plan provides for development of the campus in multiple phases.



Pool StorageShower Room


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONCollege of Southern Maryland, Wellness & Pool PF-0506



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



Public Facilities

CONTINUATION SHEET


Possible increase in county contribution to college operating budget due to increase in staffing, utilities, custodial care, equipment, furniture, and supplies.




Project was supported via Board of County Commissioner letter dated October 7, 2003 to the CSM President.

Project costs have increased due to market conditions by approximately 25%. Original approved FY 2006 program included a construction budget of $ 7,187,564. As of November 2005, the schematic design was not completed resulting in a need to shift the project to FY 2008 to accommodate the design phase. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.





DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,426,000 0 0 1,213,000 1,213,000 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 224,000 0 0 112,000 112,000 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 3,050,000 300,000 0 1,325,000 1,325,000 100,000 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 1,325,000 125,000 (125,000) 662,500 662,500 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 175,000 0 125,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,500,000 125,000 0 662,500 662,500 50,000 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 3,050,000 300,000 0 1,325,000 1,325,000 100,000 0 0 0

PF-0503PROJ. NO.

ADC Booking / Inmate Processing Area Public Facilities

Conduct a Master Plan study in FY2005 for the Adult Detention Center to advise on the conditions, needs, alterations, timing and costs for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. In addition, perform the identified capital improvements which are anticipated and programmed to be 50% reimbursable by the State.

FY2006: Begin the design for the 2,650 expansion of the sallyport and renovation of the Booking / Inmate Processing Area (designed in the mid 1980's) to add two (2) additional Observation Cells, remodel the Property Room to an automated property bag system, add holding cells, storage space for forms and office supplies, staff bathroom, shift supervisor office, law enforcement officer space, interview room, and an armory.

FY2008 - 10: Phased construction of the Sallyport and Booking Inmate Processing Area.

Develop an approved master plan as a part of The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




CONTINUATION SHEET

The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request, requires a locally approved master plan or study for grants and matching funds. Upon approval of a master plan, grants and matching funds may be applied for to effect the capital construction project.

Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.

Public Facilities PF-0503ADC Booking / Inmate Processing Area PROJ. NO.

No impact on the Operating budget.Implementing the conclusions of the Plan may impact the Operating Budget.




TOTAL COSTS




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 1,009,000 0 1,009,000 0 0 0 0 0PARKING 620,000 0 0 0 310,000 310,000 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 10,990,900 0 0 0 5,495,400 5,495,500 0 0 0SITEWORK 1,000,000 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 0 0 0INSPECTION 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0FURNITURE / EQUIPMENT 800,000 0 0 0 200,000 600,000 0 0 0UTILITIES 4,193,000 0 0 0 2,096,500 2,096,500 0 0 0CONTINGENCY 850,000 0 0 0 425,000 425,000 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 19,502,900 0 0 1,009,000 9,066,900 9,427,000 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 9,751,400 0 0 504,500 4,533,400 4,713,500 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 9,751,500 0 0 504,500 4,533,500 4,713,500 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 19,502,900 0 0 1,009,000 9,066,900 9,427,000 0 0 0

PF-08XXPROJ. NO.

ADC Minimum Security Facility Public Facilities

Design and construct a new two-story 83 - 86,000 square foot minimum security facility as a supplemental outpost to the Adult Detention Center based on the draft Master Plan Study recommendations which advise on the conditions, needs, alterations, timing and costs for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. Facility includes four self-supporting pods, 56 cells (224 beds), exercise and laundry areas, central food service area, and expanded parking facilities (work release-89 spaces, visitor-30 spaces, staff- 28 spaces).

Recommendations of the draft Master Plan that will have to be included as a part of a future Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efffciciency and service of community facilities to meet population needs.Priority: B-1






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 23 23

0 0 0 0 1,332,000 1,332,0000 0 0 0 600,000 600,0000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 443,000 443,0000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 2,375,000 2,375,000



PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICES (food, medical)SUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIES

CONTINUATION SHEET

The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request, requires a locally approved master plan or study for grants and matching funds. The master plan was funded in FY2006 and requires State approval. Total projected beds are based upon a forecast model that takes into account future admissions and anticipated population growth. Unless the facility is proposed as an addition to the existing ADC, final site selection may require relocation of the existing Sheriff impound lot currently adjacent to the Building Services Division. Concept B was selected which will need to address parking via the Town of Leonardtown (joint use with CSOB) and the existing demised area cited in the CSOB lease dated June 1, 1998. Per the 3/17/05 meeting with the Town of Leonardtown, sewer capacity issues must be addressed.

New project. Building construction costs are based on $210 per square foot with 5% contingency ($900,000). Food Service and Laundry equipment costs are estimated at $600,000. Presentation to the BOCC was made on May 30, 2006.

Public Facilities PF-08XXADC Minimum Security Facility PROJ. NO.

No impact on the Operating budget in FY2007. FTE is based on the April 2006 staffing analysis prepared by Carter Gable Associates, Inc.Implementing the conclusions of the Plan may impact the Operating Budget. Estimated costs are based on pro-rated costs of the existing facility-Electric:$241,000-Water/sewer/trash:$77,000--Gas:$5,000--Oil: $120,000--and Janitorial: performed in-house by the Office of the Sheriff

Incremental contract services for Food and Medical are estimated at $250,000 and $350,000 respectively.




TOTAL COSTS




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 165,000 0 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,805,000 0 0 1,505,000 300,000 0 0 0 0INSPECTION / TESTING 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT / FURNITURE 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,050,000 0 0 1,750,000 300,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 550,000 0 0 250,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS / SCD 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,050,000 0 0 1,750,000 300,000 0 0 0 0

Design and construct a new 13,500 square foot pre-engineered facility and expanded parking in accordance with the Governmental Center Master Plan. The primary facility will be funded by the Soil Conservation District (SCD) and is planned to co-locate the SCD adjacent to the Department of Land Use & Growth Management. In addition, the facility will house the Agricultural and Seafood Division , Farm Bureau, and Cooperative Extension Services. A second floor may be fully or partially funded by the County to co-locate the Environmental Health offices (3,000 sf) from the Merek Building to help streamline development review services. Likewise, the second floor could be further expanded to relocate other programmatic functions, address interim storage space needs, or for future space planning purposes.

Space needs planning remains a critical component in providing services to the community and adequate work / storage space for employees.


PF-08XXPROJ. NO.

Agricultural Services Center Public Facilities





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 68,500 68,500 68,500 68,5000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 68,500 68,500 68,500 68,500



Estimated costs are based on pro-rated costs of the existing facility-Electric:$37,500--Water/sewer/trash:$12,000--and Oil: $19,000. Janitorial costs are anticipated to continue to be paid by others.




TOTAL COSTS


The project was initially discussed with the Soil Conservation District Board on February 3, 2005 and with the Board of County Commissioners on February 22, 2005. There is reasonable justification to relocate the Environmental Services Division of the Health Department (3,000 sf) in order to help streamline development review services to the community. This would also address the space needs identified by the Health Officer and is consistent with the County Administrator's and Board of County Commissioner's July 15, 2005 and September 27, 2005 correspondence. Space in the old Sheriff's Office may also become available when Housing moves to a permanent location in Lexington Park which would allow Elections to expand. An elevator ($120K) could be added to the facility and the second floor leased out. Project should also alleviate the need for the Health Department to rent additional space which could be as much as $15-20 per sqare foot.

A $250,000 proposed cost share arrangement with the SCD is shown to reflect design for a second floor expansion, upgraded foundations, elevator shaft, and interim HVAC locations. Overall cost is based on approximately $111 per square foot. Storwmater Management will be performed under the previously funded regional facility if sited at the Governmental Center. FY 2008/2009 County monies may include approximately 3,000 square feet or more of roughed in / finished space for the relocation of Environmental Services and costs for some expanded parking.

Public Facilities PF-08XXAgricultural Services Center PROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LOCKING SYSTEMS / SEC. CAMERAS 2,500,000 0 0 0 1,250,000 1,250,000 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,500,000 0 0 0 1,250,000 1,250,000 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 1,250,000 0 0 0 625,000 625,000 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,250,000 0 0 0 625,000 625,000 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,500,000 0 0 0 1,250,000 1,250,000 0 0 0

Assuming the Master Plan study in FY2005 is completed and approved, perform the identified capital improvements which are anticipated and programmed to be 50% reimbursable by the State. FY2009-10: Replace the 1989 electronic locking control panels / mechanisms and cabinetry in each of the housing areas and upgrade the security camera system both inside and outside the facility.

Develop an approved master plan as a part of The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs. Priority B-1


PF-09XXPROJ. NO.

ADC Locking Mechanisms / Security Cameras Public Facilities





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



No impact on the Operating budget.10-20% inventory of custom space parts will be procured/fabricated as a part of the capital project.

Over $150,000 in operating funds have been spent to date for repairs and emergency maintenace.




TOTAL COSTS


The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request, requires a locally approved master plan or study for grants and matching funds. Upon approval of a master plan, grants and matching funds may be available.

Public Facilities PF-09XXADC Locking Mechanisms / Security Cameras PROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET




DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 320,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,515,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,515,000CONTINGENCIES 251,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 251,000INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000UTILITIES 74,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74,000OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 3,360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 3,040,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 1,520,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,520,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,680,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 1,520,000FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 3,360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 320,000 3,040,000

Design and construct a 22,000 square foot expansion to the Adult Detention Center based on the draft Master Plan Study recommendations which advise on the conditions, needs, alterations, timing and costs for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. The expansion is recommended to be added to the southern side of the existing facility to provide an additional 32 cell pod with a control room in Phase 1, which will provide space for 64 additional inmates and an additional 32 cell pod in Phase 2. Funding is based on the premise that costs are 50% reimbursable by the State.

Recommendations of the draft Master Plan that will have to be included as a part of a future Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request. According to statistics, the current jail is over capacity by an estimated 128 individuals.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs.Priority: B-1


PF-12XXPROJ. NO.

Adult Detention Center Expansion Public Facilities





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



No impact on the Operating budget during the period from 2007 to 2012. Food Service and Medical Services incremental costs are estimated at $75,000 and $150,000 respectively. Estimated costs are open when and operational, are based on pro-rated costs of the existing facility-Electric:$31,000-Water/sewer/trash:$10,000--Gas:$1,000--Oil: $15,000--and Janatorial:performed in-house by Office of the Sheriff. Estimated future personnel needs are 5 FTE's at an estimated cost of $307,000. Based on the April 2006 staffing analysis prepared by Carter Cable Associates inc.




TOTAL COSTS


The Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Local Jail Capital Improvement Request, requires a locally approved master plan or study for grants and matching funds. The master plan was funded in FY 06 and requires State approval. Total projected beds are based upon a forecast model that takes into account future admissions and anticipated population growth.

New project. Building construction cost is based on $250 per square foot with a 5% contingency. Infrastructure in the existing jail may need to be upgraded to support a second phase addition. Presentation to the BOCC was made on May 30, 2006.

Public Facilities PF-12XXAdult Detention Center Expansion PROJ. NO.

CONTINUATION SHEET



NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

MARINE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2007

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONMA-0502

DESCRIPTION:

A. Requested Corps of Engineers (COE) assistance as a Section 14 project on October 3, 2000. Tentative COE funding approval has been secured. COE funds 100% of project planning, and 65% of remainder. DNR can finance 100% of the County share interest-free.B. Design, preparation of bid documents and inspection will be performed by the Corps of Engineers.C. The triple-cell concrete pipe structure (County Bridge No. SM 0046P) will be assessed for replacement concurrent with the revetment construction.D. A Corps of Engineers Permit, State Wetlands License and Water Quality Certification may be required, which will effect project timing.E. The FY 2007 construction costs are based on a estimate of $568 per linear foot plus 10% contingency.F. Construction monies shown as County may be financed through the DNR structural shore erosion control program via a no-interest loan over a period of up to 25 years. G. FY 2003 prior preliminary design monies of $19,683 were expended by the County to expedite the project but are not reimbursable.H. Final design and permitting by the Corps is expected to occur in FY 2006 pending the availability of Federal funding.


LOCATION:8th Election District.Along Patuxent Beach Road waterfront in Town Creek,Lexington Park, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 137,300 137,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 755,000 30,000 725,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 62,675 0 62,675 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 954,975 167,300 787,675 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteCOUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 516,300 62,300 454,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 333,675 0 333,675 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 105,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 954,975 167,300 787,675 0 0 0 0 0 0

Patuxent Beach Road Revetment

Construct 1250 feet of stone revetment along the Patuxent Beach Road waterfront to bolster the deteriorated timber bulkhead and provide the needed shore erosion protection to the County maintained road.

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has prepared an Environmental Assessment for the construction of an emergency shoreline stabilization project along Patuxent Beach Road. In addition to the transportation system preservation goals, the Comprehensive Plan goals include the protection of sensitive areas, reduction in damage to the Chesapeake Bay, implementation of resource protection measures, control and minimization of soil loss, and the protection of the quality of water resources. Project is consistent with the Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program guidelines to preserve, protect, develop, restore and enhance the coastal zone (includes entire coastline of St. Mary's County) for this and succeeding generations. The US Army Corps of Engineers estimates that for every dollar spent to control erosion, as much as $1.75 is returned to the economy in the form of improvements to water resources. The Shoreline Conditions Assessment being conducted by the County will further validate the need for this project.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b.iv). Improve safety, traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St. Mary's County.Priority A-1

Marine





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Patuxent Beach Road Revetment MA-0502 Marine

CONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENTOTHER (describe significant items)

TOTAL COSTS



On February 5, 2006 the COE advised that work on this project will be suspended until additional Federal monies are made available. On August 24, 2005, the DNR advised that they may be able to fund the project via an interest free loan to the County. Pending revised estimates and availablility of State loan funds, the Federal balance is being shown as County funded at this time.

In October 2002 the project scope was increased from 750 to 1250 feet in length.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONThomas Road Revetment MA-0301

DESCRIPTION:

A. State assistance under the Department of Natural Resources Shore Erosion Control Program provide up to a 25 year interest-free loan for the design and construction. This program was re-established in FY 01.B. The FY 2007 project consists of extension of the existing revetment by approximately 250 feet adjacent to the County maintained roadway to correct erosion occurring to the south of the revetment and the possible extension to tie in the existing revetments on either side of the George Property. C. Design, preparation of bid documents will be performed by in-house engineering / surveying consultant support.D. Construction costs are based on $500 per linear foot based on 2005 bid results on similar projects.E. Property ownership will be verified prior to grant application. A Corps of Engineers Permit and State wetlands License must also be obtained in FY 2006 which may affect project timing. Application is expected to be completed and approved in FY 2004. F. The additional design and scoping monies in FY 2005 are required to include the revetment extensions from the original 250 feet to 495 feet in length. G. FY 2003/05 request includes design and appraisal costs needed to determine benefit assessment.H. The County may be able to recoup the differential cost of the extended project via a two member taxing district between the County and benefiting property owner.I. On July 26, 2001 the DNR listed this site as their # 2 Statewide Priority for Shore Erosion Control projects, pending County sponsorship.


LOCATION:2nd Election DistrictOn St. George's Island off of Piney Point Road near St. George'sIsland Beach on the Potomac.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 18,000 18,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 247,500 0 247,500 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 265,500 18,000 247,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 265,500 18,000 247,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 265,500 18,000 247,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Design and construct approximately 495 feet of stone revetment along Thomas Road to connect and protect the existing revetments and the County maintained road.

In addition to the transportation system preservation goals, the Comprehensive Plan goals include the protection of sensitive areas, reduction in damage to the Chesapeake Bay, implementation of resource protection measures, control and minimization of soil loss, and the protection of the quality of water resources. Project is consistent with the Maryland Coastal Zone Management Program guidelines to preserve, protect, develop, restore and enhance the coastal zone (includes entire coastline of St. Mary's County) for this and succeeding generations. The US Army Corps of Engineers estimates that for every dollar spent to control erosion, as much as $1.75 is returned to the economy in the form of improvements to water resources. The Shoreline Conditions Assessment being conducted by the County will further validate the need for this project.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3 1 2 B i b iv) Improve safety traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St Mary's County

Marine





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Thomas Road Revetment MA-0301 Marine


TOTAL COSTS




PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONHollis Lake Inlet MA-0503

DESCRIPTION:Design and construction of a pipe outfall system to provide tidal exchange and help alleviate locaized upstream/overland drainage issues within the

A. A State grant may be available for 50% of the project costs via the Waterway Quality Cost Share Program. B. The FY 2008 project proposes to use an emergency spillway, one or more pipes with an inlet control structure upstream and tidal check wall valves downstream. Hydrologic, hydraulic and coastal analyses are required in FY 2006 along with with the Pre-Application.C. Application must be made for Corps of Engineers and State Permits in FY 2007. The permit application process and availability of State funding may affect the project timing. The Pre-Application may require additional study using the County share of FY 2005 funding.D. The County could request the community participate in the project by providing payback of 50% of the project costs through a special Taxing District if State monies are not available.


1st Election District.Scotland

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteENGINEERING/PRE-APPLICATION 26,000 13,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 62,000 0 0 62,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 2,500 0 0 2,500 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 90,500 13,000 13,000 64,500 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 45,250 6,500 6,500 32,250 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 45,250 6,500 6,500 32,250 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 90,500 13,000 13,000 64,500 0 0 0 0 0

Rodo Beach Community. The project was agreed to by the Board of Commissioners as a part of the Rodo Beach Road Taxing District.

The Comprehensive Plan goals include the protection and preservation of ecosystems and to protect tidal and non-tidal wetlands resources. Project is also consistent with the general goals of regional storm water management.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:1.3.2.A.iv). Implement programs designed to improve environmental and cultural aspects of existing neighborhoods.Priority A-1

Marine





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Hollis Lake Inlet MA-0503 Marine


TOTAL COSTS



An informational meeting was held with the residents in 2005. Residents will pay for the $1,000 wetlands license and the County will complete the alternatives and design analysis. The Board of County Commissioner's response to the community's Ocober 21, 2005 letter is reflected in this project.

Construction moved to FY 2008 and monies added to FY 2007 to complete the design needed for the project. FY 2005 monies are required for the studies needed to put together a Pre-Application.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONMA-0401

DESCRIPTION:

A. The County will act as the local sponsor for the USACE portion of the work. All lands, easements and DMP sites for both projects are the responsibility of the County, to be reimbursed via the State Waterway Improvement Fund, pending the Department of Natural Resources Need and Feasibility Report.B. Prior FY 2000 State funding request in the amount of $337,000 was not approved. C. Scope of work includes procurement of a 20 acre DMP site for the estimated 66,000 cubic yards of material to be dredged from the channels. This is a local cooperation requirement and may include placement of material at economically / environmentally alternative locations. Due to the magnitude of the project, hydraulic dredging is required. Project costs have been reduced from $800,000 to approximately $300,000.D. Efforts to secure a donated or permanent DMP site have been unsuccessful. A Waterway Improvement Project Request Form was submitted on July, 12, 2002 for FY 2004, which includes property acquisition funding. DNR has indicated that funding priority would increase if the County were to agree to reclaim / redevelop the DMP site as a public boating facility or as a regional long-term DMP site. Alternatively, the County is evaluating the possible long-term (10 year) lease of a site at an estimated $120,000 and have found two viable locations.E. The timing of the project will depend upon the availability of State funds and the results of the State's grant priority allocation currently underway. The respective Project Request Form was submitted to the DNR on July 12, 2002.F. Construction costs are preliminary and subject to change following completion of the design and detailed construction plans.G. If the County can demonstrate a public facility on the Southern Prong (ie. road end landing), all costs should be 100% reimbursable from the State.

reflects a considerable cost increase.I. Program includes closeout of the DMP site(s) in FY 2010.J. Dredging in the Federal Channel will be to: a depth of 7' (MLW); length of 4900'; and width of 60-100'. Dredging in the Southern Prong will be to: a depth of 5' (MLW), length of 2230'; and width of 50'.


LOCATION:1st Election District.Ridge area off of Airdale Road, just south of St. Jerome Point.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 130,000 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 40,000 25,000 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0DREDGING 459,000 459,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 21,000 21,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DMP Capacity 45,000 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONTINGENCY 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 875,000 860,000 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 775,000 760,000 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 875,000 860,000 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0

Marine

Obtain, design and construct a Dredge Material Placement (DMP) site for the Army Corps of Engineers dredging of the Federal Navigation Channel at St. Jeromes Creek, and, immediately following, contract to dredge the St. Jeromes Creek Southern Prong channel, utilizing the same DMP site.

The Comprehensive Plan supports projects that are complimentary to water dependent recreational and access facilities. Project is consistent with the State Waterway Improvement Program as authorized under the Natural Resources Article. Projects are prioritized based on need, demand and benefit to the boating public.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.5. aii. Accommodate and promote fishing, boating, sailing and other water oriented recreational activities by county residents and visitors.

St. Jeromes Creek Dredging

H. The DNR funding Application for the project was signed by the Board of County Commissioners on November 11, 2003. DNR's May 21, 2004 response





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTRACTED SERVICES

TOTAL COSTS




May 31, 2006 letter for Governor confirmed the availability of State funding in the amount of $585,000 for the southern prong.On February 5, 2006 the COE advised that work on the Federal portion of the project will be suspended until additional federal monies are made available.

Federal funds are apparently now in place to begin the federal dredging of the channel. $850,000 for the dredging and and additional $200,000 of federal monies were secured in 2005 with the physical dredging to occur in the Spring of 2006.



PROJ. NO.St. Jeromes Creek Dredging MA-0401 Marine

CONTINUATION SHEET


NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

HIGHWAYS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAsphalt Overlay HW-0301 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Overlay, widen, upgrade and perform pavement and system preservation improvements to existing roads throughout the County via the Asphalt overlayand rental contractors. The berm removal and overlay of the roadway extends the service life by approximately fifteen (15) years. A. The County's Asphalt Overlay Program is used to widen, upgrade and strengthen roadway surfaces on collector roads to a 20' roadway with 4' shoulders. Prior to construction, the roadways are typically 16' to 18' wide, with no shoulders and inadequate drainage. The overlay thickness varies from 2" to 4", depending on the original surfaces. Preparatory and follow-up work, as necessary, is performed under the County's Rental Contracts, to include incidental re-striping. B. Approximately five (5) to six (6) miles of roadway are now overlaid annually throughout the County compared to ten (10) to fifteen (15) miles in prior years. As of October 2002, approximately 78% of the total amount of routes require preventive and routine maintenance. Since 2004, the $750K funding levels have reduced the asphalt overlay program by more than half and have been further impacted as the surface treatment and slurry seal programs are not being funded.C. When possible, the surfacing of other capital projects is included in the Asphalt Overlay Contract so that "economies of scale" are realized.D. The majority of annual preparatory and follow-up work is performed by the rental contractor. Approximately 22% of the budget is for rental equipment and labor, 10% for materials (i.e., pipes, gravel, seed, mulch, paving fabric, etc.), 6.5% for driveway tie-ins and 5% for pavement patching.E. Asphalt overlay (1" to 2" thickness) is the most expensive process and also requires adjustment to the shoulders and readjusting of driveway entrances. The final surface is smooth and there are basically no "loose stones" to contend with. The service life of the pavement can be extended up to 15 years, and the roadway can be immediately opened to traffic after the application has been completed.F. The County has many subdivisions that were built in the mid and late 1970's. The roads in these subdivisions were built below today's standards and are 15-20 years old. Repairs to existing residential streets, underdrains, paving fabric, trench repair, and full depth patching are not included in the program.G. A simple 20' wide 2" overlay with minor equipment rental can cost two times amount of a standard 1.5" overlay Roads requiring 20' wide intermediate rehabilitation with a 2" overlay can cost five to six times the amount of a standard overlay Paving 4' wide shoulders can add a cost equivalent to two times the overlay costs, plus stormwater management and mitigation. H. Intermediate rehabilitation also requires base asphalt at an additional cost of approximately $10 per linear foot over the base rehabilitation and repair program which is no longer funded as a separate capital project.PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

LOCATION:All Election Districts throughout the County

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 9,050,000 3,050,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 9,050,000 3,050,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 897,750 897,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 7,277,250 1,277,250 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 875,000 875,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 9,050,000 3,050,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0

The overlay programs are consistent with the Department's Pavement Management Plan and Route Evaluation Study designed to provide a balance between preventive maintenance and total roadway reconstruction. Roadways are rated based on weighted factors for elements of pavement distress, geometry, ride, volume, width, signage, markings, etc and prioritized for inclusion in the capital program. Each program is also consistent with the approved Comprehensive Plan policy regarding development and maintenance of the transportation system. These programs support and promote resource protection, environmental and community character, cost containment and system preservation goals.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b.iv Improve safety, traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St. Mary's County.Priority A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Asphalt Overlay HW-0301 Highways


TOTAL COSTS



Of all roadways currently maintained by the County: 62% are asphalt; 37% have a surface treatment / slurry and / or modified seal; and only 1% (2.4 miles) are unsurfaced. In light of the condition of the County roads in FY2004, the funding was reduced by 50%. When coupled with the 30% increase in costs, this effectively reduces the program by approximately 70%. It is estimated that for every $1spent on preventative maintenance (system preservation), that between $4 and $10 is saved on future rehabilitation and reconstruction costs. The level funding needs to reflect the increase in unit pricing per ton from $38/ton (2004), $48/ton (2005), $59/ton (2006), estimated $64/ton (2007).

A minimum of $1,250,000 is needed to keep pace with the 25% increase costs of materials and labor experienced between 2004 and 2005 and the 30% increase anticipated in 2006. In addition, since the removal of the annual $200,000 / $375,000 slurry /surface treatment programs. An additional $250,000 could be added to possibly fund increased base rehabilitation and repairs and / or the use of surface treatment (tar and chip) as a cape seal. The requested increase will provide for a total estimated seven (8) to eight (9) miles of overlay under this program. Prior Asphalt Overlay funding levels were at $1.5M per year. Over $8,000,000 in overlays was identified during the September 2005 field inspection and pavement assessment which evaluates fatigue cracking, roughness, moisture infiltration, raveling, skid resistance, transverse cracking, traffic volume, and bleeding.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONModified Seal Surface Treatment HW-0303 Highways

DESCRIPTION:

Seal lower volume (<2000 ADT) and lower truck traffic roadways throughout the County with an aggregate modified single surface treatment. Modified seal replaced the slurry seal and surface treatment programs. Modified seal performs better, is more costs effective than slurry seal, and provides some structural strength to the pavement section due to the size of the aggregate used. The application extends the road's service life approximately four (4) to seven (7) years by modified sealing. A. Modified Seal uses an emulsion that is rapid setting. As a result, traffic can usually be placed back on the roadway within 2-3 hours. The mix seals old, cracked, oxidized pavement and can help extend service life of existing pavements 2-3 years.B. Patching using modified seal at $0.84 per square yard is significantly less expensive than asphalt patching, which is needed for slurry seal programs. The potential for citizen complaints related to loose aggregate in residential areas has been significantly reduced through the use of the modified surface treatment program in lieu of the standard surface treatment. Program is typically limited for use on roadways classified lower than a collector.C. The current contract price for this application is $0.84 per square yard using #8 aggregate and #9 stone.D. Approximately 25-30 miles of road are sealed throughout the County on an annual basis.E. With the modified seal program, there is a residue (sandy grit) that remains loose on the finished surface, but it dissipates in a short period of time. On an as needed basis, the County Highways Division also dispatches a vacuum truck after the surface has set to remove any remaining residue that is not otherwise dissipated. In addition, incidental striping may be performed under this program.F. The final surface is similar to an asphalt overlay in appearance, an example of which is evidenced on Millstone Landing Road. However, for higher volume roadways either surface treatment, asphalt overlay, or cape seal (ie. Yowaiski Mill Road) is needed.PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

LOCATION:All Election Districts throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,790,000 900,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 315,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 210,000 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 0TOTAL COSTS 3,000,000 900,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 120,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 1,050,000 700,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 80,000 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 1,750,000 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 3,000,000 900,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0

The overlay programs are consistent with the Department's Pavement Management Plan and Route Evaluation Study designed to provide a balance between preventive maintenance and total roadway reconstruction. Roadways are rated based on weighted factors for elements of pavement distress, geometry, ride, volume, width, signage, markings, etc and prioritized for inclusion in the capital program. Each program is also consistent with the approved Comprehensive Plan policy regarding development and maintenance of the transportation system. These programs support and promote resource protection, environmental and community character, cost containment and system preservation goals.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2..B.i.b.iv Improve safety, traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St. Mary's County.Priority A-1



OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:A. The majority of preparatory work (such as berm removal, minor patching and pipe replacement) is performed by Highway Maintenance crews and rental contracts in support of this program as is the follow-up incidental striping.B. In 1998, the decision to defer the use of slurry seal was effected to reduce citizen complaints, increase the competitive nature of the bid process, and to obtain lower unit pricing-resulting in the maintenance of additional roadway mileage. Funding was $200,000 per year and enabled the County to treat approximately 20 miles of roadway per year.C. Slurry seal adds no structural strength, has a textured surface, improves skid resistance and helps prevent water infiltration of the pavement, which is the most frequent cause of deterioration and failure. The cost is about $0.15-$0.20 more per square yard than surface treatment. D. In 2004, the decision to eliminate surface treatment was effected to reduce citizen complaints. Funding levels were at $375,000 per year and between 50-60 miles were tar and chipped each year. Surface treatment is needed to address cracking and to improve structural strength. Pavement life is increased by 3-5 years.


FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS

It is estimated that for every $1 spent on preventive maintenance (system preservation), that between $4 and $10 is saved on future rehabilitation and reconstruction costs. Operating funding for materials will need to increase to address increased repairs.


STAFFING -FTEs


An additional $50,000 is needed to keep pace with the estimated 20% increase in costs of materials and labor experienced already and an additional $30,000 (10%) escalation expected in 2006 to $0.94 per square yard. In addition, since the removal of the annual $200,000 slurry seal program in 1998, we recommend an additional $20,000 to address the increase in full depth patching and use of surface treatment as a cape seal (ie. with an asphalt overlay). Only twenty seven (27) miles were performed under this program in FY 2005, with seventy one (71) miles performed in 2002 between the slurry and tar and chip programs.



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Modified Seal Surface Treatment HW-0303 Highways


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONCounty Mapping HW-0502 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Detailed topographic mapping of the County growth centers. Aerial photography and digital data will be collected for use in establishing a County-wide network and a layered multi-agency GIS system. Development of a GIS roadway centerline layer. Mapping will support regional stormwater management analyses corridor mapping / preservation, GASB financials, aid in evaluating traffic impact studies, establish a GIS centerline,facilitate planning/development review and expedite Emergency Management Agency (EMA) response.Funding planned in the five-year capital program provides for the continued densification of existing control points (130) and globalpositioning surveys and aero triangulation by the State.A. The mapping will be in conjunction with and support of the new Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In November, 1992, the Department set the first 130 precise Global Positioning Stations (GPS) using numbered brass caps embedded in concrete monuments in accordance with the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Blue-Booking Standards. Through subsequent densification, the County currently has 283 monuments. It is this Department's objective to continue with GPS network densification until all new subdivision and site plan surveys can feasibly tie into same and form a County-wide network. A listing of GPS points and their respective locations is available to the public at no cost.B. Mapping will aid and support GIS and GASB requirements, regional stormwater management design/analysis needed for the developing growth areas, will aid in transportation planning, corridor mapping traffic impact studies, inventory of storm structures, signage, etc., and facilitate development review. The results of mapping to date have already been utilized by numerous County and non-County agencies.C. Detailed topographic data will aid County personnel and local engineering firms in the planning and design of public and private facilities and development projects. Prior funding procured updated mapping sheets for use by the Department LUGM and engineering community and is being coordinated with the Information Technology Department.D. The topographic and photographic data has been procured for the entire County and is currently sold to the local engineering community and/or private individuals to recoup costs via an established fee schedule. Revenues are estimated at $25,000 per year.E. It is recommended that the topography be flown and updated every five (5) years. The County was flown in calendar year 1993, 1998, and 2003 and is anticipated to be reflown in FY 2008 along with the purchase of a GIS digital elevation model (DEM), and tax map polygon closure for St. Mary's County. This project is critical to the development of GIS and corridor preservation/mapping.F. FY 2007, FY 2009, and FY 2011 requests include $50,000 for the continued densification of existing control points (130) and global positioning surveys and $30,000 for aero triangulation by the State. FY 2009 and FY 2011 funding include the re-fly and procurement of updated topographic sheets. Of the estimated 350 sheets, only the developing areas need be updated at a cost of $1,375 per sheet. Lidar data collection for 2' counters: $61,000 for 300 square miles at 95% accuracy (7.28").G. Future requests could be reduced as the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance requires installation of monuments by developers.PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

LOCATION:All Election Districts.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 230,000 80,000 50,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER/MAPPING 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER/AERO TRIANGULATION 90,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 0TOTAL COSTS 420,000 180,000 80,000 0 80,000 0 80,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 420,000 180,000 80,000 0 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 420,000 180,000 80,000 0 80,000 0 80,000 0 0

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:This project is integral in implementing the policies of the plan. E.g., Sec. 3.2.3 calls for carefully monitoring population increases to ensure maintaining and improving levels of efficiency of community facilities to meet population needs. Priority A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.County Mapping HW-0502 Highways


TOTAL COSTS



The County is currently working with the Department of Natural Resources who plans on flying the County and collect lidar data. A flyover for orthophotograph for the entire county is approximately $130-140,000. It is recommended that developing portions of the County be reflown at least every five (5) years.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONStreetscape Improvements HW-0501 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Provide street tree plantings and other streetscape improvements along designated County roadways to enhance the aesthetic and rural character of the community in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Project will also assist in the revitalization efforts of Lexington Park.A. The project is supported by several provisions in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is recognized as a valuable supplement to future developer funded efforts along our County roadways. B. Creation of landscaping as a public amenity, a "Bay Friendly" environmental program, and promoting rural / scenic character is a desired element of our planned roadways network. C. Project will be used to satisfy forest conservation requirements as a result of County roadway construction which should be funded as separate projects and will also help address the consumption of natural resources by revitalizing existing development areas.D. Future projects may include the planting of an estimated 200 - 400 indigenous trees per year (2 1/2" caliper @ 6' height) along County roadways. Future funding may also be used for brick pavers, sidewalks and town and village center signage. E. FY 2007-11 project may also include streetscape and street improvements (street trees, sidewalk benches, crosswalk pavers, lighting) along designated streets in Town Center areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan, in Development Districts as shown in the Tulagi Place Master Plan and in the priority funding areas. Public/private partnerships are also being developed that compliment existing SHA projects. Completed projects include the following properties along MD 246: Dorsey/Decesarius, St. Mary's Motors/Taylor Gas, Toyota of Southern Maryland, Decker LineX, Memorial Sitting Garden and Lore's Laundry, Crystal Car Wash, CVS Pharmacy, Checkers Restaurant, and Gibson County Sausage and Produce. Future projects include Lexington Park, Leonardtown, and development districts.F. Monies approved in previous fiscal years to match public / private partnership grants or the addition of brick pavers, lighting upgrades, street furniture and placement of overhead utilities into underground conduits. FY 2006 monies are for the installation of approximately 38 decorative street lights along South Shangri-La Drive and on the east side of South Essex Drive to complete the Pathways to Schools sidewalk project funded by the MDOT in FY 2003.


LOCATION:All Election Districts throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 376,267 196,267 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 376,267 196,267 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 347,946 167,946 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 IMPACT FEES 28,321 28,321 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 376,267 196,267 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 0

Projects are supported in the Lexington Park Plan in areas targeted for rehabilitation and revitalization. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan encourages that the County's unique rural character and attributes be maintained and enhanced. In addition, the Plan policy describes the desire to improve aesthetics along primary transportation routes, to designate scenic roadways, and in commercial core / higher density residential areas, to provide street tree plantings. For existing county maintained roadways, where ordinances did not require the minimization of the removal of trees associated with development activities, this project will help mitigate the impacts of tree removal along the roadway systems. The new Road Ordinance requires streetscaping as an integral part of new developments.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b.iv Improve safety, traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St. Mary's County.Priority A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Streetscape Improvements HW-0501 Highways


TOTAL COSTS

The installation of the decorative lighting impacts the County Highways Division Operating Budget each subsequent year. Cost for electric service is $9 per light per month assuming installation of 38 lights. The amount shown reflects a 25% increase in FY 06, based on SMECO rate increase estimates.



Monies are intended for enhancement to existing properties beyond Zoning Ordinance requirements and are not intended to coincide with new construction. Individual projects will be brought to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. Great Mills Road streetscaping should begin in calendar year 2008 which this project could also help enhance.

Reduction of an additional $20,000 to fund the balance of the 45 streetlights planned for this corridor.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBridge / Culvert Replacement & Repair HW-0701 Highways

DESCRIPTION:

Design, replace, rehabilitate and upgrade the deteriorated metal culvert crossings with reinforced concrete pipe through the County's collector road network. Many of the existing pipes at major culverts are failing structurally and/or are inadequate to handle the runoff,which results in localized flooding, pavement failure and potential safety concerns.A. The State Highway Administration indicated that the sufficiency ratings for the Dr. Johnson Road structure now meet eligibility requirements for Federal Bridge Replacement funding. B. FY 2007 and 2010 monies will be utilized for the replacement and upgrade of deteriorated structures at major culvert crossings. Typical culvert replacement applications include: Baptist Church Road at Forest Hall Branch (completed), Bayside Road at Cecil Creek (completed), Bayside Road at Tenneson Creek, Flat Iron Road at Warehouse Run (completed), Jones Road at Richneck Creek (completed), Oakville Road at Coatigan Run (completed), Bayside Road at Tenneson Creek (two locations), Blake Creek Road at Big Duke Creek, Busy Corner Road at tributary of St. Clements Creek, Davis Road at Indiantown Run, Drayden Road at Herring Creek, Flat Iron Road at Johns Creek, Flat Iron Road at Lennie's Creek, Maypole Road at Miski Run, Friendship School Road at Burnt Mill Creek, Lockes Hill Road at Lockes Swamp Creek, Dr. Johnson Road at St. Clements Creek, St. Jeromes Neck Road at Shea Alley Way, Jones Road at Toms Swamp Run, Hurry Road at Nelson Run, Mechanicville Road at Chaptico Creek and Coffee Hill Run.C. FY 2008 & 2012 are for survey, design, and permitting to offset in-house services.


COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:

Priority A-1

LOCATION: Various locations throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 40,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION / REPAIR 357,000 0 157,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 397,000 0 157,000 20,000 0 200,000 0 20,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 397,000 0 157,000 20,000 0 200,000 0 20,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 397,000 0 157,000 20,000 0 200,000 0 20,000 0

Section IV.3.1.2.B.i.a: Develop and implement transportation plans and road standards that support and promote resource protection, environmental and community character preservation , and cost containment goals.

National Bridge Inspection Standards require inspection, maintenance and repair programs be established on all public roads. Federal monies are utilized for periodic inspections on inventoried structures with supplemental inspections by the County. Project also addresses the Adequate Public Facilities and infrastructure maintenance requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.



OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:A. The Code of Federal Regulations, Subpart C, entitled National Bridge Inspection Standards, applies to all structures defined as "bridges" located on all public roads. As per subpart 650, 305, each bridge is to be inspected biennially, at regular intervals not to exceed two (2) years in accordance with the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual. Program funding may be utilized for recommended safety corrections and minor paving adjacent to the structures.B. An inventory of flooded conditions is also maintained, which includes Adkins Road, Bayside Road, Big Chestnut Road, Bishop Road, Bushwood Road, Chingville Road, Cornfield Harbor Road, Old Breton Beach Road, Old Hermanville Road, Palmer Road, Parsons Mill Road, Pincushion Road, River Road and St. Jerome's Neck Road.C. Typical costs for minor structure replacements and repairs are between $30-$50,000. Monies shown for design may be needed to offset STV Inc. consultant recommendations for immediate repairs based on the 2005 Bridge Inspection reports.


FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




TOTAL COSTS

Recommendations for minor repair of bridge structures are prioritized and performed annually under the County Highways Division operating budget.



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Bridge / Culvert Replacement & Repair HW-0701 Highways



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRegional Stormwater Management Facility HW-0503 Highways

DESCRIPTION:This project provides a study for regional stormwater management within the development growth areas of the County, develops a pilotfacility to establish the program's viability and supports the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The study for the development ofregional stormwater management structures will help in planning the development of the growth area. The study will provide for the location for the stormwater management structures, costs for construction, mechanisms for developer cost participation, etc.May also include establishing a formal County wetland mitigation and banking site for County Government projects.A. Data collection will be accomplished by utilizing available resources such as land use maps, topography, aerial photos, etc.B. The initial site selected for the location of phased stormwater management structures is the Governmental Center Complex. Design is complete. The scope of services will include construction cost estimates. The site will also be used as a banking site to address the new Stormwater Management Ordinance on County government roadway widening projects. Other potential sites were also identified during the study.C. The phased water quantity and quality retrofit designs for the Governmental Center Master Plan facilities is planned in FY 2007-08 as will mitigating roadway widening projects. Future sites may also include airport property, Tall Timbers and Golden Beach areas.D. Future projects may include the establishment of a regional wetland mitigation banking area on County-owned properties for all capital improvement projects @ $1.20 s.f. The plats necessary for a forest conservation easement mitigation site may also be funded under this type of project.E. A $320,000 Department of Natural Resources Stream Restoration and Watershed Management Grant was not approved in FY2005. As such, the project costs have been phased over several years and should be permitted in FY2006.F. When the County population exceeds 100,000 future retrofit and SWM enhancement projects will be required to address NPDES requirements.G. The project will also be able to address the possible siting of an EOC grant funded equipment shelter at the Governmental Center.


LOCATION:Major growth and development areas of the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 418,500 0 250,000 168,500 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 433,500 15,000 250,000 168,500 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 433,500 15,000 250,000 168,500 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 433,500 15,000 250,000 168,500 0 0 0 0 0

The Comprehensive Plan supports the stewardship of the Chesapeake Bay. In conjunction with the new Stormwater Management and Comprehensive Zoning Ordinances, areas with historical drainage issues and / or governmental facility complexes will be analyzed.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:2.1.2. Adopt a comprehensive approach to management of pollution (point and non-point sources) to minimize adverse impacts on water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that result from high nutrient loadings in runoff from surrounding lands or the pollutant discharges from point sources, and from unvegetated areas and impervious surfaces.Priority A-1



OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:A. There is a statewide program to pay fees-in-lieu of constructing wetlands. The State charges $50,000 per acre for fees in lieu and there exists a mitigation site at Zekiah Swamp for projects in Calvert, Charles, St. Mary's and Prince George's Counties at $44,000 per acre. Proposed scope of this project is for the County to identify its own site. B. A future project for the purchase of the 66.9 acre Nimmerichter Parcel 151, just south of the SMC Airport may be pursued. This can be used as a wetland mitigation/banking site, stormwater management / quality area and for future airport development @ $3,500/acre.C. A previous FY2002 project was utilized for the design and construction of a regional bioretention demonstration project adjacent to Taylor Gas in Lexington Park.


FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Regional Stormwater Management Facility HW-0503 Highways


TOTAL COSTS

In order to prepare for NPDES requirements and to assist in infrastructure / asset management under GASB, we are currently evaluating and implementing a multi-year digital in house mapping effort of all storm drain systems using portable GPS equipment.



Future projects may also be needed to establish regional wetland mitigation banking area(s) on County-owned properties for all capital improvement projects @ $1.20 s.f. and plats necessary for a forest conservation easement mitigation site(s) were removed.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONGolf Course Drive Drainage Improvements HW-0702 Highways

DESCRIPTION:

Perform drainage improvements and install underdrains along portions of Golf Course Drive. Prior construction of the roadway was completed as a part of a Special Road Taxing District. On October 6, 2005 a geotechnical report was received with recommendations. There is a high water table in the vicinity of the project which adversely affects the drainage in this area.

Estimated costs to improve drainage include: Excavation, topsoil, aggregate, fabric, 2800 linear feet of perforated and non-perforated PVC pipe ($11,200), directional boring under existing driveways in lieu of open cutting ( $65,000 vs. $31,000), sediment control, and utility relocation allowances ($43,500).

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: Supplemental work to an approved Special Road Taxing District.


LOCATION: 4th Election District. Wicomico Shores.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 91,000 0 91,000 0 0 0 0 0 0UNDERDRAINS 11,200 0 11,200 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 43,500 0 43,500 0 0 0 0 0 0STREET FURNITURE/LANDSCAPING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER/CONTINGENCY 21,930 0 21,930 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 167,630 0 167,630 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 167,630 0 167,630 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES (taxing district) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 167,630 0 167,630 0 0 0 0 0 0

3.1.2.B.i.b. Effect improvements and additions to the road network to correspond to and support the infrastructure needs in growth areas; to ensure adequate highway and road system capacity; to provide planned level of service for existing and proposed development.Priority: A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Golf Course Drive Drainage Improvements HW-0702 Highways

Public meetings were held with the Board of County Commissioners on June 14, and June 28, 2005 to discuss some of the drainage concerns along the roadway. The Levy Ordinance for the Special Road Taxing District has not yet been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The original assessment estimate was $340/year per benefited property. Based on the work performed, the proposed assessment is $217.99 / owner per year over 20 years. Final project costs were $168,557.69 @ 4.4135% interest.

New project. If the project is treated as an addition to the existing Special Taxing District, an estimated $167,630 of additional costs could be incurred which could add an additional $216.79 to the District's assessment. Total assessment would be $434.78 per owner per year which exceeds the original $340 quoted amount at the time of the establishment of the District. The project would be eligible for reimbursement under the existing Special Road Taxing District, but the Board has agreed to fund it with County funds.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONTulagi Place Revitalization HW-0602 Highways

DESCRIPTION: Construction of several revitalization projects in conjunction with the Lexington Park Plan that will focus on future investments in transportation elements that will help leverage the completion of larger projects.

A. The County completed the acquisition of Lexington Manor on December 20, 2004. B. Coral Place streetscape and reconstruction project was completed in 2004. C. FY 2006 / 2007 includes monies for the acquisition of property options and related costs required for key elements of the Plan, such as the Lei Drive/ Willows Road traffic circle. Prior monies included completion of the schematic design of the traffic circle / round-a-bout In October 2005, $100,000 was transferred by budget amendment to the CDC to pursue land acquisition options.D. In 2005, the CDC and developer began a Master Plan for the South Parcel of Lexington Manor for community and recreational use. E. Construction monies in FY 2006 include the major reconstruction of 1,000' of Midway Drive and final improvements to Bunker Hill Drive which serve as the primary entrance from MD 246 (Great Mills Road) to Nicolet Park. Community Legacy program grant of $48,750 is available to fund a portion of the new sidewalk costs of the project. FY 2005 design was completed as a part of the prior Tulagi Place Master Plan project. F. FY 2006 monies also include the completion of the Pathways to Schools project along Shangri-La Drive with the addition of street furnishings such as decorative receptacles, benches, landscaping and lighting along Bunker Hill Drive. The Pathways to Schools project completes pedestrian access links along South Shangri-La Drive and South Essex Drive to the new Lexington Park School and Library.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: Lexington Park - Tulagi Place Master Plans and Comprehensive Plan. A. The 2002 St. Mary's County Comprehensive Plan designates Lexington Park and Leonardtown as the two development districts in the County. Accordingly, as most of the County's expected growth is to be directed to development districts and community facilities and services are to be concentrated there.B. The Lexington Park Development District is approximately equivalent to the County's 8th Election District. The 8th district contains 39,228 acres, slightly under one fifth of the County land area. Lexington Park is the most densely populated district in the County land area. Over one -third of the total County population lives in the 8th District. This area is projected to grow by approximately 20 percent over the next 15 years, reaching 39,162 by the year 2020.


LOCATION: 8th Election District. Southeast side of the Great Mills Road/Coral Place intersection.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION / ESMT'S 198,000 100,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STORMWATER MGMT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STREET FURNITURE 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SOUTH PARCEL MASTER PLAN 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 773,000 675,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 98,000 0 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 226,250 226,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 48,750 48,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 773,000 675,000 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

3.1.2.B.i.b. Effect improvements and additions to the road network to correspond to and support the infrastructure needs in growth areas; to ensure adequate highway and road system capacity; to provide planned level of service for existing and proposed land uses; and to address adequate facilities outside the growth areas. 7 F. 1) and 2)Priority A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,6000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Tulagi Place Revitalization HW-0602 Highways

The previously programmed $3.3M Neighborhood Improvement Program capital project to systematically reconstruct the Patuxent Park and Southampton subdivisions were removed form the capital program. FY 2006 monies include a $50,000 Community Legacy Grant approved in July 2005 for the construction of sidewalk along Bunker Hill Drive as the primary entrance to Nicolet Park.

Since the December 2004 acquisition of Lexington Manor, several of the County funded roadway extension projects should be able to be constructed by others as a part of ongoing private development within this development district. The respective estimated FY 2009 / 10 land acquisition costs for these key elements: $240,000 / $190,000 were removed from the budget.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONFDR Boulevard Extended (Neighborhood Connector) HW-0703 Highways

DESCRIPTION: Construct a phased divided two 11' lane residential access way from MD Route 4 to MD 246 and eventually south to Willows Road to help relieve congestion and reduce delays along the MD 235 corridor. Project could remove 10 to 15,000 trips per day in portions of the MD 235 corridor.

Phase 1A. First Colony Boulevard to Old Rolling Road (0.7 miles). FY2008-2009 Dedication through First Colony is anticipated to be provided by the developer(s). Phase 1B. Old Rolling Road to MD 237 (1.0 miles). FY 08-09 Reconstruction and traffic calming is anticipated within the Hickory Hills development (0.5 miles). Mazel Subdivision is building approximately 0.3 miles and providing additional dedication through the development.Phase 2. MD 237 to Pegg Road (1.8 miles). FY2012-Balance to CompletePhase 3. Pegg Road to MD 246 (0.9 miles). Future Phase ($3M)Phase 4. MD 246 to Shangri-La Drive (0.2 miles) and then to Willows Road (0.4 miles). Future Phase ($2.1M)Phase 5. MD4 north to MD 235 (0.4 miles) is anticipated to be developer funded.

The project is anticipated to be five (5) miles in length, includes a raised 10-16' median with extensive use of traffic calming devices (i.e.. narrow lanes and round-a-bouts), 5' pedestrian / 6' bicycle accommodations, streetscaping, street lighting, especially through residentially developed areas.Where dedication via development is not realized, land acquisition for the corridor are programmed.

This project is eligible for mitigation, fees-in-lieu of construction, dedication, and partial construction by developers. If these efforts arerealized during the course of the project, the overall cost of the project may be reduced.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: Approved Lexington Park Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan. A. In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, an evaluation of new roads will be conducted to ensure they do not adversely impact cultural, historical and environmental features. Prior funding completed the survey, preliminary design, engineering report, environmental study, corridor alignment, and plat(s). A 1997 Feasibility Study was also completed in joint cooperation with the State Highway Administration.B. The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes transportation system preservation and the need to effect improvements and additions to the road network based on capacity, safety, traffic flow, level of service, land use, etc.


LOCATION: 8th Election District. West of MD 235 from MD 4 to Willows Road.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 800,000 0 300,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000LAND ACQUISITION 2,100,000 0 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 0 100,000 0CONSTRUCTION 10,000,000 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 340,000 0 0 80,000 100,000 0 0 80,000 80,000UTILITIES 600,000 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 150,000 150,000STREET FURNITURE/LANDSCAPING 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 13,940,000 0 800,000 3,730,000 3,600,000 0 0 2,830,000 2,980,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 10,980,000 0 400,000 3,095,000 3,262,500 0 0 2,492,500 1,730,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 2,960,000 0 400,000 635,000 337,500 0 0 337,500 1,250,000 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 13,940,000 0 800,000 3,730,000 3,600,000 0 0 2,830,000 2,980,000

3.1.2.B.i.b. Effect improvements and additions to the road network to correspond to and support the infrastructure needs in growth areas; to ensure adequate highway and road system capacity; to provide planned level of service for existing and proposed land uses; and to address adequate public facilities outside the growth areas. 3.1.2.B.iii.a Construct FDR Boulevard. 1.1.2.D.i Update planning for FDR Boulevard in Lexington Park.Priority A-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.FDR Boulevard Extended (Neighborhood Connector) HW-0703 Highways

Portions of the corridor may be dedicated by developers and/or partially constructed prior to 2012. Property acquisition estimates are based on $5/sf for residential properties and $10/sf commercial properties. Impact fee and mitigation funding mechanisms are currently under review to help effect a more expedited implementation schedule for key elements of the Lexington Park Plan. Construction costs are based on $2.9M per mile. Estimated construction costs are Phases 1A/B-$5M, Phases 2/3-$7.8M, Phase 4-$1.7M. A good example of a similar roadway might be Rte 765 in Calvert County (Lusby to Solomons).

Addition of the project as a key element of the Lexington Park Plan. FDR to Pegg Road/Pegg Road to Indian Bridge Road also provides an interior loop.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

An estimated $2-$5 per linear foot would be the operational impact.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONPegg Road Extension (to MD Route 5) HW-0601 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Extend Pegg Road to provide a direct phased connection between MD 237 and Indian Bridge Road (Phase 1), then to MD 5 for access to the Patuxent River Naval Air Station (Phase 2) as per the Lexington Park Transportation plan recommendation.Functional Classification: ArterialPhase 1 Length: 1 mile to Indian Bridge Road--Phase 2 Length: 1.3 miles to MD Route 5.Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph within an 80-100' right of wayADT PHV (1996): 2342-306; (2002) 4650 - 419A. Due to the heavy flow of traffic between the Lexington Park area and the Leonardtown area (as seen in the turning movements at the intersection of MD 246/MD 5 and MD 246/237) it is recommended that a road be constructed that would allow for a direct connection between MD 237 and MD 5. The proposed road would commence at the Pegg Road / MD 237 intersection, and proceed southwest, to MD 471 (Phase I), then across MD 471 to form a T-intersection with MD 5 (Phase II). The proposed Pegg Road extension would allow motorists a more direct route to/from Lexington Park, especially to the PNAWC. Motorists wishing to access the PNAWC from the Leonardtown area will have a more convenient trip with the proposed Pegg Road extension and the opening of the North Gate, opposite Pegg Road at MD 235. The existing intersections of MD 246/MD 5 and MD 246/MD 237, as well as the mainline of MD 246, will benefit (LOS, safety, operations) from the traffic diversion created by the proposed extension road. Phase I is anticipated to be built in 2010-2011. B. Survey, alignment, and corridor adoption is anticipated in FY 2007. Design will include the extension of Pegg Road to Arterial standards with (2-12' lanes; a 16' raised median, 12' shoulders with 6' paved for bicycles). Environmental study to begin in CY 2006. C. Plats, appraisals, and land acquisition is anticipated to begin in FY 2008 with construction drawings and displacements in FY 2009.D. Construction costs are based on preliminary estimates that are subject to change. Bridge structures may be required in Phase 2 which could cost upwards of $3M with permitting in FY 2012. Balance to Complete funding does not reflect the $3.8M to complete Phase 2.E. If available, project is anticipated to be 75% reimbursable by the State, with the exception of land acquisition. PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

LOCATION:8TH Election DistrictBetween existing Pegg Road at the intersection with MD Route 237 and MD Route 5

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 893,258 473,455 125,941 293,862 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 400,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 6,733,000 0 0 0 0 2,090,000 1,643,000 0 3,000,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION / TESTING 207,132 0 0 0 0 84,000 66,000 0 57,132UTILITIES / TRAFFIC SIGNAL 200,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 150,000 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WETLAND MITIGATION 350,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 250,000 0 0TOTAL COSTS 8,783,390 473,455 325,941 493,862 0 2,324,000 2,109,000 0 3,057,132

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 6,305,230 0 0 367,921 0 1,860,559 1,645,559 0 2,431,191 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 1,469,691 94,691 200,000 0 0 337,500 337,500 0 500,000 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,008,469 378,764 125,941 125,941 0 125,941 125,941 0 125,941FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 8,783,390 473,455 325,941 493,862 0 2,324,000 2,109,000 0 3,057,132

In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, an evaluation of new roads will be conducted to ensure they do not adversely impact cultural, historical and environmental features. Project is consistent with the Lexington Park Transportation Plan. Project provides a secondary exit from Pax River NAS in the event of a nuclear emergency per the Radiological Emergency Plan. The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes transportation system preservation and the need to effect improvements and additions to the road network based on capacity, safety, traffic flow, level of service, land use, etc.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b. Effect improvements and additions to the road network to correspond to and support the infrastructure needs in growth areas; to ensure adequate highway and road system capacity; to provide planned level of service for existing and proposed land uses; and to address adequate facilities outside the growth areas.Priority B-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 25,000 25,000 00 0 0 25,000 25,000 0




Operating budget impact based on $2 per linear foot historical expenditure data for entire County road network.



A portion of the corridor may be built by developers prior to 2011. Displacements should be minimal. Bridge structure(s) may be required in Phase 2, in 2012. A July 13, 2005 correspondence from the Department of Natural Resources indicated the possible presence of the narrowmouth toad, endangered flora, threatened fish, and wetlands of special State concern in the vicinity of the alignment. If a FONSI (Finding Of No Significant Impact) is received, a full NEPA study will not be required.

Total project amount has been increased based on a wetland delineation in November 2005 which has determined that at least one major bridge structure will be required (see note D). Estimated project cost increase of 25% are also included based on current market / escalation. Property acquisition costs in 2007 and 2008 were reduced by the Board from $230,000 and $610,000 respectively based on current discussions regarding property dedications with Elizabeth Hills and Kings Christian Academy. A portion of the Phase 2 construction (bridge) was also placed into the balance to complete.




CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Pegg Road Extension (to MD Route 5) HW-0601 Highways

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2007PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONTransportation Plan Update HW-0401 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Update1992 Lexington Park Transportation Plan in response to growth in conjunction with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Perform County-wide transportation planning and develop a comprehensive Highway Safety Improvement Program in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The services are performed in multiple phases:Phase 1: Update the Lexington Park Transportation Plan (FY 2002). Phase 2: Begin data collection for County-wide Transportation Plan as a part of an integrated strategic planning effort (FY 2003) Phase 3: Prepare a County-Wide Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails Plan (FY 2004). Phase 4: Update the Transportation element of the Lexington Park Plan and prepare a draft County-wide Transportation Plan (FY 2005). Phase 5: Finalize the Countywide Transportation Plan and begin the public approval process, prepare graphic displays / updates as required (FY 2006).Phase 6: Perform a digital roadway inventory, video / photo log, update Plan input data / modeling , address right-of-way resolutions (FY 2008 / 2009). Phase 7: Assist with Comprehensive Plan small area plans, update Transportation Plan data, corridor preservation /purchase (FY 2009 / 2010 / 2012) A. The original Plan was based on 1992 land use assumptions, which dramatically changed since the Base consolidation. According to the Maryland Office of Planning, growth increased more than 10% above prior estimates and evaluation will assess impact on the transportation network in the year 2020. The updated Lexington Park Plan will incorporate current approved developments and the most recent State Highway Administration studies. B. County-Wide Transportation, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Amish Trails Plan. Prepare a trails plan for use by both the public and private sectors of a Retrofit Sidewalk Program and a State-wide bicycle map along State routes. Connecting and providing safe/convenient bicycle and pedestrian facilities to residential, employment, recreational, shopping and transit centers is an essential part of a well planned transportation system. Access to historical sites, schools, libraries, hospitals, parks, piers and boat ramps must also be considered. A full inventory of existing trails and facilities will be required as a part of the planning process. This project is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the SHA Planning Guidelines for Transportation Projects; and the Retrofit Sidewalk Program. Projects providing linkages or completing existing trail systems will receive preference by the Recreation Trails Advisory Committee. The Transportation element will include cross county connectors, Leonardtown's Transportation Plan, access management strategies, corridor mapping, new zoning, transit routes, SHA r/w needs, village and town center plans.C. Update study and modeling results based on current traffic counts, LOS, accident data, and demographics, etc. Include the necessary labor costs to perform data entry into the existing Carte Graph system proposed in the completion of the Route Evaluation Study. Prepare graphical displays, corridor alignments and mapping (i.e.. Pegg Road extended), and public presentation materials to facilitate Plan approval. Separate designs and programmatic studies may be warranted to address circulation and congestion issues (i.e.. roundabouts, spot / safety improvements, etc.). D. Perform the necessary title work and deed research to help resolve real estate and right-of way ownership / maintenance issues associated with county roadways, including corridor management planning. Funding priority should be given to higher classification roadways.E. Develop a digital roadway inventory for all County roadways to be used for mapping, highway maintenance, and GASB needs. Funding may include development of a video log, which will be updated every five (5) years and incorporated into CarteGraph database.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: Comprehensive Plan, Integrated Strategic Planning, Lexington Park Transportation Plan, SHA CTP, Route Evaluation Study, Article 66B, Roadway and Corridor Mapping


Priority A-1LOCATION: Various locations throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 350,000 200,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 850,000 200,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 500,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 550,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 300,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 150,000 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 850,000 200,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 500,000 0

3.1.2.B.i.a. Develop and implement transportation plans and road standards that support and promote resource protection, environmental and community character preservation, and cost containment goals.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Transportation Plan Update HW-0401 Highways

Includes monies in 2012 to begin medium range acquisition of right-of-ways, corridors, and/or the purchase of properties requiring displacement of existing dwelling units (i.e.. FDR Boulevard corridor from First Colony to MD237).


TOTAL COSTS




PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRoadway Base Widening HW-0704 Highways

DESCRIPTION:This project provides a full evaluation of approximately 84 miles of existing County maintained roadways that do not meet the minimum eighteen (18) foot width requirement. Not all roadways less than eighteen feet in width would need to be widened. The proposed improvements would occur in multiple phases, with the first evaluation phase occurring in FY2007.

A. There are currently 228 roadways, approximately twenty percent (20%) of the roads maintained, that are less than eighteen feet in width.B. The network of roadways that would be eligible for upgrade under this program is approximately 84 miles. C. Review of these roadways will occur in FY 2007 using qualified County inspections staff. D. The project will be coordinated with Public and Non-Public School Bus Drivers, Volunteer Fire and Rescue Squads, Fire Board Association, Office of the Sheriff, Public Safety, and the State Highway Administration. E. Widening projects will also allow for two-way, delivery, and emergency vehicular access.F. An average of 3-3.5' of widening is required with up to an 8' maximum in order to achieve edge protection and the eighteen foot width.G. Individual projects may include base widening, shoulder, ditch, pipe work, clearing, and sidewalk / trail related workH. Construction should occur within existing dedicated and/or prescriptive rights-of-way and may be performed in conjunction with the County's pavement overlay contracts. I. Projects will be prioritized based on need, function, traffic volumes, and safety considerations. A minimum qualifying / eligibility criteria should be established (i.e.. And ADT below 300).J. As these roadways are already County maintained, requiring the establishment of Special Road Taxing Districts may not be well received by the community. Several inquiries from communities have been received as previously recorded subdivisions have building rights and are not required to met current Adequate Public Facilities requirements for roads (i.e.. 0.22 miles of Deagles Boatyard Road in the 2nd ED). K. Stormwater management will also need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis under the new Ordinance criteria.L. Planned projects include: FY 2007- 1600' of Bull Road shoulder widening. FY 2008 - 0.22 miles of Deagles Boatyard Road widening.


COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b.ivPriority B-1

LOCATION:Various Locations Throughout the County

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 83,000 0 23,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 83,000 0 23,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 83,000 0 23,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 83,000 0 23,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0

3.1.2.B.i.b. Effect improvements and additions to the road network to correspond to and support the infrastructure needs.




Estimated cost is approximately $50 per linear foot for widening, excluding overlay. Prior project was approved as a part of a phased FY2004 Capital Improvement Program for funding in FY2006 and FY2008 at $265,000 per year.

The Board of County Commissioners received letters from the Avenmar Homeowners Association and Society Hill Garden Club requesting a trail extension along Bull Road from Cooper Road to Avenmar Drive. A 6' paved shoulder was requested to serve this community.


FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




TOTAL COSTS


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Roadway Base Widening HW-0704 Highways

Placed back into the CIP for consideration. Deagles Boatyard Road is located near St. George's Beach in Piney Point just south of the Piney Point Aquaculture Center.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRemoval of Roadside Obstacles HW-0304 Highways

DESCRIPTION:Grading, tree removal, cut and fill operations, intersection improvements, utility relocations both lateral and underground, fore slope adjustments, extending the length of drainage culverts, etc., to remove roadside obstacles in high hazard locations and improve dangerous roadway conditions. Sight distance improvements and removal of roadside hazards are necessary to assure highway safety is maintained. Program was originally established at a funding level of $260,000 per year.A. The proposed design and construction work may be performed by the County's Rental Contractors and may include design services.B. AASHTO recommendations for treatment of roadside obstacles on existing roadways should be considered in the following priority: elimination of the hazard, relocation of the hazard, corrective measures to reduce the hazard, and barriers to reduce accident severity.C. A "clear zone" of 10 feet or more from the edge of the travel way for rural local roads, and a minimum of 1.5 feet beyond the face of curb in urban sections should be provided. These recovery areas should be clear of all unyielding objects such as trees or unyielding sign supports, utility poles, light poles and any other fixed objects that might cause safety concerns or damage an out-of-control vehicle. Intersection alignment and vertical/horizontal sight distance require similar attention.D. Typical applications include: The intersection of Mt. Wolfe Road and Iroquois Lane (sight distance); the intersection of Cherry field Road and Drayden Road (FY 03 eval. sight distance); Bethel Church Road at Coffee Hill Run (culvert extension); Flat Iron Road (sight distance at Michelle Drive), Queentree Road, approximately 500' north of Widow Lane (roadside grading to accommodate tracking of trucks and school buses); the intersection of Grayson Road and Villa Road (grading/tree removal); the intersection of Lane down and Larredore Road (tree removal), Far Cry Road, the intersection of St. George's Park Road intersection with Deagle Boat Yard Road (sight distance/utilities), River Road and William Howard Way intersection, Steer Horn Neck Road (sight distance at various locations), Settlers Lane and Old Rolling Road intersection, Big Chestnut Road (road grade) at the intersection of Bayside Road, Maypole Road (widening), White Point Road (widening), Riverwinds Drive (widening), Joe Hazel Road (widening), Waterside Drive, Lockes Crossing and Old Village Road intersection (utility pole), Cedar Lane, Brown Road, Vista Road, Blacksmith Shop Road (intersection), Spruce Drive at Chestnut Road and Gunston Drive and Flat Iron Road (sight distance problem at Booth Farm), and White Lane and Oaks Road (intersection sight distance).E. Priorities and designs are based on traffic volume, accident history, level of hazard and extent of corrections required.F. Project may include the relocation of utility poles and placement of guardrails within the clear zone and establishment of prior rights, but does not include relocation of utilities underground. Skewed intersections that affect sight distance and operational safety, such as the Horseshoe and Manor Road intersection (FY 2003) will also be systematically addressed. G. The cost of adding rumble strips / pavement grooving along the roadway shoulder (one side) is approximately $1.39 per linear foot or $7,340 per mile.PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:

LOCATION:Roads throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 722,000 462,000 0 0 260,000 0 260,000 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION/TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 982,000 462,000 0 0 260,000 0 260,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 201,717 202,000 (283) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 780,000 260,000 0 0 260,000 0 260,000 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 283 0 283 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 982,000 462,000 0 0 260,000 0 260,000 0 0

Obstruction removal programs are consistent with the horizontal and vertical requirements of the Road Ordinance and the transportation system maintenance policy in the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, obstructions to cross-visibility provisions were included in Chapter 81 of the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to assist in cases where the obstruction lays on private property that affects the vision of operators of vehicles traveling on County roads.COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.B.i.b.iv. Improve safety, traffic flow and aesthetics along primary routes in St. Mary's County.Priority B-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0






Monies shifted from FY 2008, 2010, and 2012 to FY 2009 and FY 2011. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.




CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Removal of Roadside Obstacles HW-0304 Highways


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONNeighborhood Preservation Program HW-11XX Highways

DESCRIPTION: Project includes the infrastructure improvements to the Patuxent Park and Southhampton Subdivisions in conjunction with preservation and revitalization efforts in the immediate area, which will provide new and/or reconstructed infrastructure (sidewalks, curb & gutter, storm drainage, utility and street improvements) in areas where substandard, deteriorated, or no infrastructure exists.

A. The Patuxent Park and Southhampton Subdivisions are the first neighborhoods selected for improvement under this initiative.B. Staff representatives from DPW&T, Legal's Real Property Manager, DECD, and LU&GM will work with the residents in each of the selected neighborhoods to prioritize the proposed improvements based on cost, community need, and compatibility with redevelopment plans within each area. Initial phases require design monies.C. Projects will be prioritized based on their ability to: Promote revitalization in development districts; Establish or expand businesses within the neighborhood; Correct deteriorated conditions within public right-of-ways; Rehabilitate existing housing or manage housing stock within the neighborhood; Plan, promote, or finance voluntary neighborhood and developer-funded improvements.D. Construction progress will be based on the amount of funding approved, which may affect project timing.E. Cost estimates are based on a unit price of $400 per linear foot of urban roadway to complete the right-of-way rehabilitation of both subdivisions. F. Patuxent Park Subdivision is the oldest subdivision in the County and was constructed in 1948. Upgrades include approximately 16,500 linear feet of roadways and could be performed in three (3) phases of approximately one mile each at a total of $6.6M. Phase: 1 FY2011/2012.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION: Approved Lexington Park Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan policies are designed to address goals for community revitalization and maintain priority for community facility investments in the growth areas. Resources are to be obtained and focused to revitalize neighborhoods and communities.


LOCATION: 8th Election District. Off MD 246 between midway and Essex Drives in Lexington Park and adjacent to old Carver Elementary.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RECONSTRUCTION 1,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 1,300,000 0DEMOLITION 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 150,000 0INSPECTION/TESTING 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 50,000 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STREET FURNITURE/LANDSCAPING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 1,500,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 1,500,000 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES (developer) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 1,500,000 0

Objective 1.3.2 Foster and enhance sense of community and remedy negative conditions in existing developed areas. 3.1.2.B I maintain a transportation system that is well integrated into the community fabric that addresses goals for community revitalization.Priority B-1





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




An estimated $2-$5 per linear foot would be the operational impact for raodway maintenance.




For the Patuxent Park project: Phase 1 design was completed, Phase 2 was partially designed, and Phase 3 was surveyed under prior project HW 7350. In addition, the construction of a portion Midway Drive was funded as a part of the Tulagi Place Revitalization under HW 0602 which should be completed during FY 2007. It is anticipated that the design will be completed with this funding. Reconstruction cost is based on $500 per linear foot. Coordination with METCOM is needed to ensure existing infrastructure does not need to be replaced and/or upgraded. It is assumed that the existing lighting will be salvageable. New standard SMECO lighting could be provided at an estimated cost of $25,000 per mile. A future project may include the South Hampton subdivision which would require upgrades to approximately 7,000 linear feet of roadways and could be performed in three (3) half mile phases at a total of $2.8M, which has a history of infrastructure (water, sewer etc) maintenance problems.

Resubmission of the project as a key element of the Lexington Park Plan.



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Neighborhood Preservation Program HW-11XX Highways


NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

SOLID WASTE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2007 PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSt. Andrews Landfill Area D / Future Exp / Closures SW-0302 Solid Waste

DESCRIPTION:

A. AREA C EXPANSION. Prior monies were for the final design for Area C as primary per the contingency plan for St. Mary's County in accordance with the Solid Waste Plan and Refuse Disposal Permit issued by M.D.E. This 23.3 acre site may allow 13-15 years of disposal capacity from the six convenience centers. Estimated costs for Area C may include: construction-($7,600,000); inspection-($400,000); plan includes Leachate collection and off-loading, scale houses and entrance road improvements. The estimate for capping monies are: design-($235,000); capping construction- ($4,700,000) and QAQC construction management & inspection-($250,000).B. EVALUATION OF AREA D 1. FY 2003 prior to Refuse Disposal Application, a phase 1 and 2 hydrolgeologic and hydrologic study is required to determine soil depths, movement and direction of ground/surface waters. FY 2006 cost includes: $239,000 to complete the needed feasibility studies, groundwater hydropunch "grab samples" to assess possible environmental concerns, and $80,000 in FY 2007 for monitoring wells. 2. Project includes preparation of a two (2) lot subdivision plat to include the acquired Warnsing property and to reduce the buffer impacts on the Area C design. Beginning Area D evaluation in CY2003 may ensure grandfathering status from new MDE regulations. 3. Studies are required to determine the feasibility of the area as a possible landfill site. C. FUTURE SOLID WASTE PLANNING: 1. FY 2007 consultant evaluation, feasibility, alternatives analysis of our solid waste system: ($130,000) and remediation. 2. FY 2009 monies are for possible joint funding, for an expansion to the Appeal facility in Calvert County or design of an alternative. 3. Any additional analysis of Area D for future solid waste planning was discontinued in FY 2006. D. FY 2007 includes $275,000 for implementation of State approved gas extraction system at St. Andrews and flare retrofit at Clements Landfills.


COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.C. Meet increasing demand for solid waste management through use of traditional and innovative methods.Priority A-1

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to

APPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 549,000 319,000 130,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 555,500 280,500 275,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,104,500 599,500 405,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 390,500 (390,500) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 580,000 75,000 405,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 390,500 0 390,500 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 134,000 134,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,104,500 599,500 405,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0

Provide the evaluation and expansion capabilities for the remaining property at the St. Andrews site in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Plan and Maryland Department of the Environment requirements to allow for 20-30 years of additional disposal capacity.

Ordinance No. 2001-35A and as approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment on April 8, 2002. The Comprehensive Plan implementation policy includes addressing the goals and objectives of the Solid Waste Management and Recycling Plan. Evaluations and possible future projects are based on the recommendations in the plan and contingency agreements in place.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,0000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.St. Andrews Landfill Area D / Future Exp / Closures SW-0302 Solid Waste

In addition to Area C, Area D could provide an additional 26.3 acres ( 15-17 years) of capacity if only residential waste from the convenience centers and landfill are disposed of. The one year of required groundwater monitoring will not be performed in FY 2007. The State approval process should begin at least three years prior to the closure of Area C. Estimated costs for area D are based on $137,000 per acre-$3,600,000 for construction and $181,000 for inspection. The closure for this area is based on MDE estimates at $150,600 per acre-design ($198,000), construction ($3,960,000), inspection & QAQC ($190,000), plus 5% contingency




STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

Reflects SMECO estimate for three phase service to St. Andrews for remediation system to run the active landfill gas extraction system. Electrical costs have been incorporated into the FY2007 operating budget.


CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2007 PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSolid Waste Facility/Transfer Station SW-0601 Solid Waste

DESCRIPTION:

A. Estimated size of facility is 12,000 s.f. (100 x 120) and will be a pre-fabricated engineered building.B. Assumed location is at the St. Andrews Landfill Area A, which was the location of the prior paved Yard Waste Composting Site.C. Use of existing infrastructure at the St. Andrews Landfill will be maximized (fencing, gating, roadway, entrance, scale house, fuel facility, etc.) D. A design-build solicitation or turn key construction award may be utilized to expedite the project.E. Maryland Department of the Environment permitting will be performed by and in the name of the County (Permittee).F. Scales and computer/software at the scale house will be upgraded. To facilitate the movement of vehicles through the facility and minimize queuing, low maintenance above ground scales will be installed for both tare and gross weights.G. Current drop-off area for County residents will remain operational to maintain ease of access and segregate smaller vehicles from commercial traffic.H. Allowing the County commercial sector access to the facility via tipping fees will help offset operational costs. I. It is recommended that the County contract all hauling to final disposal site(s) such as the King George Landfill in Virginia in lieu of purchasing new fleet vehicles and personnel costs associated self-hauling to utilize the productive capacity of private enterprise.J. It is anticipated that King George County has a remaining capacity of approximately 20 years. Current tipping fee rate was recently lowered to $40 per ton for new customers. Existing customers are assessed a $39 per ton tipping fee.K. Estimated duration of State permitting: 6-8 months concurrent with design / site plan approval. Construction: 4-6 months. Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan update is also required in calendar year 2006. L. A dedicated excavator with grapple and front end loader will be required. Existing equipment (I each) is currently utilized, but could be used as back-up if necessary.


LOCATION: 8th Election District St. Andrews Landfill adjacent to Route 4, California, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to

APPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 210,175 210,175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SITE WORK / CONSTRUCTION 3,600,000 0 3,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0SCALE UPGRADES 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 460,000 0 460,000 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECT / MATERIALS TESTING 145,825 0 145,825 0 0 0 0 0 0BOND / CONTINGENCY 310,000 0 310,000 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 4,816,000 210,175 4,605,825 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 4,816,000 210,175 4,605,825 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 4,816,000 210,175 4,605,825 0 0 0 0 0 0

Provide a transfer station on County-owned property to serve the solid waste disposal needs for the citizens and contractors of St. Mary's County. Estimated design capacity is 500 tons per day to account for increases and fluctuations of solid waste during the ten year planning period of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management and Recycling Plan.

In accordance with the Solid Waste Management and Recycling Plan as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners via Ordinance No. 2001-35A and as approved by the Maryland Department of the Environment on April 8, 2002: To utilize the productive capacity of private enterprise for the collection, disposal, and disposition of solid waste and to assure the public is served by efficient, effective, economical, and well managed solid waste disposal program (Policy 5 & 6). COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.2.C. Meet increasing demand for solid waste management through use of traditional and innovative methods.Priority A-1







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20122 5 5 5 5 5

77,250 258,000 263,200 268,500 273,900 279,5000 527,000 583,000 614,000 646,000 680,0000 147,000 151,000 155,000 160,000 165,000

90,000 0 0 0 0 01,360,000 (15,000) (20,000) (25,000) (30,000) (35,000)

15,000 0 0 0 0 01,542,250 917,000 977,200 1,012,500 1,049,900 1,089,500



OTHER (OVERTIME)TOTAL COSTS

The recent raise in tipping fees by Calvert County will result in an estimated $372,000 increase in tipping fees for FY2007 ($13 per ton x 28,620 tons). Anticipated interim County convenience centers tipping fee and hauling expenses at the King George Landfill facility are approximately 20,000 tons x $47 / ton = $940,000 with an estimated landfill tonnage of 8,620 tons x $65 / ton = $560,300 of rubble continuing to be self-hauled to Calvert. Beginning in FY2008, anticipated capture rate for St. Mary's County commercial sector is 2/3 of the 70,000 tons. The associated tipping fee and hauling expenses for commercial sector waste at King George is $47 / ton x 47,000 tons = $2,209,000. Revenues, assuming the commercial sector pays the prevailing tip fee rate (effective 7/1/06 via BOCC Resolution), of $65 / ton would be approximately $3,055,000. The resulting net reduction of current expenditures could be utilized for operational impacts associated with the new facility as described below.

Estimated operational cost industry standards for fuel, lighting, supplies, materials etc are $1.5 / ton per year ($147,000 annually). Personnel needs are estimated as follows: 1 Foreman/Operator- Grade 6 ($71,000); 1 Weighmaster-Grade 3 ($50,000); 1 FT Equipment Operator III - Grade 5 ($55,000); Convert 2 PT attendants to FT (versus rotation) or 2 Laborers- Grade 1 ($82,000); for a total of $258,000. It is assumed that the equipment will be purchased outright as a part of the capital budget, but could be included as new equipment in the respective solid waste budget and financed over five years via exempt financing. Three phase service provided as a part of landfill remediation may also be utilized for this and the STS Bus Barn projects. Landfill gas to energy studies may result in proposals to help reduce electrical costs.

CONTRACTED SERVICES (hauling @ $7 per ton)SUPPLIES & MATERIALS & UTILITIESFUEL AND OILTIPPING FEES(less rev from commercial in FY08)

DESCRIPTIONSTAFFING -5 FTEs (2% COLA PER YEAR)


Per the approved Solid Waste Management and Recycling Plan, Chapter A.5, St. Mary's County government-operated solid waste facilities will not accept solid waste from out-of-County sources, except under regional government agreement. Calvert County be increased their tipping fees from $52 to $65 per ton (25%) effective April 1, 2006. In addition, the Calvert County Commissioners will limit the size of vehicles allowed to enter the Appeal Facility effective September 1, 2006. This vehicle restriction affect fleets greater than 38 feet in length (ie. St. Mary's County). Building cost is estimated at $200 per square foot. EPA's Waste Transfer Station Stations: A Manual for Decision-Making was also utilized.

New project discussed with the Board of County Commissioners at their March 7, 2006 budget work-session and during facility tours on March 10, 2006. Calvert County tipping fees were raised and, Charles County plans to raise their tipping fee from $65/ton to $75-78/ton effective July 1, 2006. St. Mary's County plans to self-haul or contract long-haul waste to King George County in FY 2007 during the construction of a transfer station. It is anticipated that St. Mary's County commercial sector waste will begin to be received at the facility in FY 2008.



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Solid Waste Facility/Transfer Station SW-0601 Solid Waste


NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

LAND CONSERVATION


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAgriculture Land Preservation Programs AP-0401DESCRIPTION: All agricultural land preservation programs have been combined into one CIP budget. Dedicated funding sources for all agriculture land preservation programs come from the agriculture transfer tax and a portion of the County recordation tax ($.35 of every $4.00 collected). The following programs are funded through this CIP. A. The County provides matching funds for the Rural Legacy Program. The Patuxent Tidewater Land Trust and St. Mary's County Government are co-sponsors of the Rural Legacy project in the Huntersville area and the Mattapany Rural Legacy area. St. Mary's County has been awarded $10.8 million in state funds in the past for the Rural Legacy Program. The funds will be used by the Trust to acquire easements over several large parcels of rural property along the Patuxent River in the Huntersville area and land South of the Lexington Park Development District between the Chesapeake Bay and Rt. 5 south to Ridge in the Mattapany area.

B. The County provides matching funds for the Maryland Agriculture Land Preservation Foundation Program. Each year the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) requests the amount of matching funds the County has available to commit to the MALPF program. The State has a general allotted amount of $350,000 available to every County. In the matching funds program, for every dollar the County allocates, the State matches it with $1.50 up to a maximum of $666,000. As long as the State provides this level of matching funds and there is a demand for the program the County will continue to provide the maximum amount of matching funds to leverage the most state dollars. This program will continue from FY 2007 and beyond.

C. Other programs under consideration for funding include a County Purchase of Development Rights Program, enactment of the Installment purchase program, additional funds to supplement the Rural Legacy program, direct County purchase of critical farm land, County purchase of transfer of development rights, earmarked funds for a designated agriculture preservation area, and support for alternative agricultural activities.



Priority A-1

LOCATION:Rural Preservation District

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteEASEMENT ACQUISITION 20,185,352 4,980,352 4,221,000 2,731,000 2,741,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 22,956,352 4,980,352 4,221,000 2,731,000 2,741,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 3,139,000 654,000 501,000 481,000 491,000 501,000 511,000 521,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 8,775,000 2,025,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER-Recordation/Agriculture T 8,271,352 2,301,352 2,370,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 0TOTAL FUNDS 22,956,352 4,980,352 4,221,000 2,731,000 2,741,000 2,751,000 2,761,000 2,771,000 0

Land Conservation



Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive plan.

2.4 Preserve available agricultural and rural resource areas, agricultural uses and activities throughout the county for their importance as components of both an important local industry and of rural character.


PROJECT TITLE PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAgriculture Land Preservation



INCREMENTAL OPERATING DESCRIPTION FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

STAFFING -FTEs 0 0 0 0 0 0

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0CONTRACTED SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER (describe significant items) 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.AP-0401 Land Conservation



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSoil Survey AP-08XX

DESCRIPTION:

A. The information developed for the survey will provide a valuable planning tool for use by public and private parties in evaluating a wide variety of land development/land management issues.B. The survey will be completed via contract with a U.S.D.A. certified soil scientist.C. Project is eligible for 50/50 matching funds.D. Soil interpretations will be developed for the following: Cropland including row crops and small grain crops, Pasture and hayland, Forestry, Windbreaks, Recreation, Engineering.E. Non-farm uses including water management, on-site waste disposal, and building site locations and location of source materials, particularly sand and gravel; Development of a social map showing the extent and projected depth of sand and gravel deposits; Wildlife habitat.


LOCATION:County-wide

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 720,000 0 0 360,000 360,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION-FIELDWORK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 360,000 0 0 0 360,000 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,080,000 0 0 360,000 720,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 360,000 0 0 180,000 180,000 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 360,000 0 0 180,000 180,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER-Recordation/Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 720,000 0 0 360,000 360,000 0 0 0 0

Land Conservation

The purpose for updating the St. Mary's County soil survey is to provide current, detailed technical soil data for intensive agricultural land management, assessment of agricultural land, community development, commercial timber production, and other resources based land use.

This is an essential tool for all GIS applications. It will assist in future land planning in the County.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:2.4 Preserve available agricultural and rural resource areas, agricultural uses and activities throughout the county for their importance as components of both an important local industry and of rural character.Priority B-1




PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSoil Survey AP-08XX



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

Land Conservation



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS


NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

RECREATION AND PARKS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRF-0103 Recreation and Facility Development

DESCRIPTION:

Fiscal Year 2007

Fiscal Year 2008


A revised plan outlining this project and planning timeline was endorsed by the BOCC on 10/28/03.

LOCATION: 2nd Election District.44701 Lighthouse Road Piney Point, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 75,537 75,537 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 626,191 626,191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,287,945 887,945 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,989,673 1,589,673 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 252,653 352,653 (100,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 220,000 170,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 205,000 105,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,001,191 851,191 100,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 150,000 100,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 110,829 10,829 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,989,673 1,589,673 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0


Continue renovations of the Navy workshop building and begin exhibit development and installation; complete unfinished site work, landscaping, and exterior exhibits; and complete the demolition of the coast buildings on the south campus. Grant funding anticipated from the Maryland Heritage Areas Authority and the Chesapeake Bay Gateways Network as well as corporate sponsorship.

Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Renovation

2.1.2.B.iii (page 63). It is consistent with Goal 2.3 in the Comprehensive Plan to "Preserve the natural, recreational, historical, and cultural heritage in conjunction with economic and social well being to maintain and enhance the quality of life (page 77). Further, Policy 2.3.1C is intended to "Promote historic resources for economic opportunity" (page 78).Priority A-1



In June, 2002, the County acquired two acres of property adjacent to the Piney Point Lighthouse Museum and Park from the Steuart Transportation Company to expand and enhance the Piney Point Lighthouse Museum, an existing County historic site and tourist attraction. The property includes three buildings one of which has been renovated to relocate the Piney Point Lighthouse Museum; a second building has been renovated and expanded for displaying the historic Lundeberg boat collection; and the third will be renovated to interpret the military and maritime history in the area. Renovation of the first floor of the former office building for relocation of the Museum was completed and the Museum reopened in the Spring 2005. Work will continue as outlined below to complete the museum complex and park grounds.

The project is consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a short-term facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2006 - FY'2008.

The Museum Division's 2002 Strategic Plan also specifically addresses this project and the project is identified as a Target Investment Zone in the Southern Maryland Heritage Plan endorsed by the BOCC in 2003.

Continue museum and site improvements to possibly include parking enhancements, landscaping, walkways to link the north and south campus, installation of outdoor interpretive exhibits; construction of a shelter for the "Early Times" dory boat; and demolition of former Coast Guard garage and Chief Petty Officers house on south campus. Funding request includes a $50,000 increase in County funds and a $100,000 grant request from the Maryland Heritage Areas Authority.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20121.16 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66

41,899 71,606 71,606 71,606 71,606 71,6061,100 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650

0 500 800 800 800 8006,100 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,100

800 1,000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

49,899 80,856 80,156 80,156 80,156 80,156


OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET:N/A

The FY2007 funding request reflects an increase of $100,000 over the FY2006 CIP; $50,000 more is requested in County funds and an additional $50,000 is requested in State funds from the Maryland Heritage Areas Authority. The additional $50,000 in County funding is offset by the deletion of $50,000 in County funding in FY2008. As a result, there is no net increase in County funding requested for the project. The FY2008 request is $75,000 more than requested in the FY2006 CIP and reflects a reduction in the amount of County funding by $50,000 and State funding by $25,000 but an increase of $50,000 in federal funding and an increase of $100,000 in possible corporate funding. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.

PROJ. NO.Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Renovation RF-0103 Recreation and Facility Development

A concept plan for this project was approved by the BOCC in October 2003. Phase I, a renovation/expansion project to house the Lundeberg wooden boat collection, was completed at a cost of $115,000. Phase II was the renovation of the first level of the former office building to relocate the Museum at a cost of about $230,000. Phase II construction was completed and the Museum reopened in the Spring 2005. With grant funding received in FY '06, Phases III and IV are in progress to develop a site/landscaping plan; develop a comprehensive exhibits master plan; and develop exhibits for the "Potomac River Maritime Exhibit" (the boat building).

CONTINUATION SHEET

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALS

With the opening of the new Piney Point Lighthouse Museum building and the Potomac River Maritime Exhibit building in Spring, 2005 and the Navy Workshop Building in 2008, the management and administration of the Museum will be increased significantly. The above operating expenses will be off-set by an estimated $20,000 - $25,000 in revenues generated by the museum.

UTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENTOTHER (describe significant items)

TOTAL COSTS



STAFFING -FTEs



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 1,028,750 125,000 120,000 120,000 212,500 0 0 148,750 302,500LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 10,948,450 840,200 227,000 1,260,000 1,320,000 1,168,750 1,168,750 4,963,750DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 11,977,200 965,200 347,000 1,380,000 1,532,500 1,168,750 1,168,750 148,750 5,266,250

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 242,500 242,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 3,125,750 257,500 167,000 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 148,750 1,302,500 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS-Local POS 3,175,000 325,000 150,000 300,000 300,000 350,000 350,000 1,400,000FEDERAL FUNDS 5,433,750 140,000 30,000 580,000 982,500 568,750 568,750 2,563,750OTHER SOURCES - Donations 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 11,977,200 965,200 347,000 1,380,000 1,532,500 1,168,750 1,168,750 148,750 5,266,250



This project continues development of the Three Notch Trail (TNT), a 10 ft. wide multi-use trail on the County owned railroad right-of-way. FY2007 funds will complete Phase II, a two mile section from the Northern Senior Center to the County line in Charlotte Hall. FY2007 funds will also be used for design and engineering for Phase IV, a three mile section running from Walmart in California to Pegg Road in Lexington Park. Design and construction of Phase IV will be coordinated closely with DPW&T in relation to the construction of FDR Blvd. Phase III of the trail is being constructed by private developers in the California area over the next 2-3 years as part of shopping center or residential development projects. This two mile section includes partnerships with Wal Mart, K-Mart, South Plaza, First Colony, Bay Center, and Wildewood. Other phases of the trail will be constructed over the next several years. The trail will enable walking, biking, horseback riding, running and roller blading. The trail will also serve as a transportation alternative and connect residential neighborhoods to shopping, restaurants, and businesses. The proposed phasing and funding plan for development of the TNT is included in the project detail.

The project is also consistent with the 2005 Lexington Park Development District Master Plan (page 84) and the Draft 2005 St. Mary's County Transportation Plan (page 80). Finally, the Southern Maryland Regional Trail and Bikeway System Study (June 2001) recommends developing the Three Notch Trail as one of the regions top trails priorities. This plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in 2001.

The project is consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from the two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-15 as a short-term facility development recommendation for FY2003 - FY2007 and beyond to FY2020 if needed to complete.

The funding sources for the project include County park impact fees, State Program Open Space funds, and National Recreational Trails grant and federal Transportation Enhancement Act (TEA) funding. Also, because the FDR Boulevard Extended road project is being included in the County's FY20'07 CIP, joint planning and coordination with DPW&T has been initiated as the Trail and FDR will share part of the right of way south of Chancellor's Run Road to Pegg Road. Easements will also be necessary with SMECO for trail development in some areas.

Parallel to Route 235 and Route 5.


The Comprehensive Plan addresses the need for a bicycle plan in section 3.1.2 including a goal to "encourage a transportation network which provides alternative means and methods of travel." The Comprehensive Plan also indicates the County should "provide sidewalks, walking paths, and bike paths and lanes as requirements of road systems and to connect other public and private sites (page 91).

3.1.2.B.ii. Encourage development and utilization of alternative transportation in the county.

PROJ. NO.Three Notch Trail PA-0106 Parks Acquisition & Development




Source of Funding: FY2008 $120,000 (County funds); FY2009 $1,320,000 (Federal $982,500, State $300,000, County funds $37,500).Phase VI: Mechanicsville - New Market (Rt. 5 - Rt. 236, five-mile section)Estimated Cost: $2,550,000 (Construction $2,125,000, A & E 10% $212,500, Contingency 10% $212,500).

Phase VII: Wildewood - Hollywood Road (three and one-half mile section)Estimated Cost: $1,785,000 (Construction $1,487,500, A & E 10% $148,750, Contingency 10% $148,750).

Phase VIII: Hollywood Road - Friendship School Road (four and one-half mile section)Estimated Cost: $2,430,000 (Construction $2,025,000, A & E 10% $202,500, Contingency 10% $202,500).

Phase IX: Friendship School Road - Baggett Park (two and one-half mile section)Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 (Construction $1,000,000, A & E 10% $100,000, Contingency 10% $100,000).


FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

3,000 3,500 4,000 4,080 4,500 4,9200 0 0 0 0 0

500 500 500 500 500 5000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

3,500 4,000 4,500 4,580 5,000 5,420

DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:Minor repairs and maintenance to trail by

OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET:N/A.

Source of Funding: FY2017 - $100,000 for A & E (County funds); FY2018 for Construction - $1,100,000 (Federal $500,000, State $350,000, County funds $250,000).


Estimated Cost: $1,440,000 (Construction $1,200,000, A & E 10% $120,000, Contingency 10% $120,000).

Source of Funding: FY2009 - $212,500 for A & E (County funds); FY2010 - $1,168,750 for Construction (Federal $568,750, State $350,000, County funds $250,000); FY2011 - $1,168,750 for Construction (Federal $568,750, State $350,000, County funds $250,000).

Source of Funding: FY2012 - $148,750 for A & E (County funds); FY2013 - $1,636,250 for Construction (Federal $1,036,250, State $350,000, County funds $250,000).

Source of Funding: FY2014 - $202,500 for A & E (County funds); FY2015 - $1,113,750 for Construction (Federal $513,750, State $350,000, County funds $250,000); FY2016 - $1,113,750 for Construction (Federal $513,750, State $350,000, County funds $250,000).

Source of Funding: FY2005 - $155,000 (Federal $30,000; County funds $125,000); FY2006 - $455,000 (Federal $30,000, State $175,000, County funds $250,000); FY2007 - $202,000 (Federal $30,000, State $150,000, County funds $22,000). Phase III: California Area (Wildewood Blvd to Wal Mart, two-mile section)Estimated Cost: $25,000 (Construction $25,000). Source of Funding: FY2007 - $25,000 (County funds).

STAFFING -FTEs

This phase is being constructed by private developers over the next two years. Developers include Wildewood, Bay Center Shopping Center, First Colony, South Plaza, Laurel Glen Shopping Center, and Wal Mart. Minimal county funds are needed for this phase for miscellaneous items.Phase IV: California to Lexington Park (Wal Mart to Pegg Road - three-mile section)Estimated Cost: $1,380,000 (Construction $1,200,000, A & E 10% $120,000, Contingency 5% $60,000).


Source of Funding: FY2007 - $120,000 (County funds); FY2008 - $1,260,000 (Federal $580,000, State $300,000, County funds $380,000). Phase V: Laurel Grove to Rt. 5, Mechanicsville (three-mile section)




Three Notch Trail (Proposed Phasing Plan/Cost Estimate/Source of Funding):Phase I: New Market to Charlotte Hall (one-mile section)Estimated cost: $355,200 (Construction $339,200, A & E -0- (done in-house), Contingency 5% - $16,000).Source of Funding: FY2002 - $50,200 (State $50,000; Other $200); FY2003 - $100,000 (Federal $50,000, County funds $50,000); FY2004 - $80,000 (Federal $30,000, County funds $50,000); FY2005 - $125,000 (State $100,000; County funds $25,000). Phase II: Charlotte Hall (two-mile section from Northern Senior Center to County Line)

The FY2007 request is about $50,000 less than theFY2006 budget while the requests in FY2008 - FY2012 range from $900,000 to $1.4 million more than included in the FY2006 budget. Much of this additional funding will need to come from the State POS and federal trail and transportation programs or the proposed phasing plan will need to be modified.

DESCRIPTION

Estimated cost: $812,000 (Construction $720,000, A & E 10% - $70,000, Contingency 3% - $22,000).

PROJ. NO.Three Notch Trail PA-0106 Parks Acquisition & Development



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:Third Election DistrictRt. 244 and Medley's Neck RoadLeonardtown, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 114,772 114,772 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,885,228 1,385,228 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS- POS 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES-Golf Enterprise 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

The project is also consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals.

The Comprehensive Plan addresses the need to "Create new and enhanced Parks and Recreation facilities" in Objective 3.1.5 (page 105) as well as in Action 50 to maintain and upgrade park facilities.

PROJ. NO.Wicomico Shores Golf Course Clubhouse RP-0301 Recreation and Parks

This project has been in the works for several years. Initially intended as new construction, it now is a renovation/expansion of the existing golf course clubhouse. This is needed to bring the facility into compliance with current building, safety, and ADA codes. It will also relocate golf operations and the food and beverage service from the lower level to the ground level of the facility where the banquet room is located. The lower level will be converted to golf cart and general storage. This project will significantly improve the use, accessibility, and marketability of the facility.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.5 Create new and enhanced parks and recreation facilities that link existing parks and communities, expand recreation opportunities and preserve environmental, aesthetic, and cultural quality.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



No County funding involved in the golf operating budget.


TOTAL COSTS



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

This project was not included in the FY2006 CIP. The $1.5 million project was previously in the CIP in FY2003 with $500,000 of the total coming from the golf enterprise fund balance and up to $1,000,000 coming from exempt financing through the County. The project is being revised in 2007 to reflect BOCC direction at the 2/10/06 budget work session to increase the budget by $500,000 using State Program Open Space funding. The request for additional funding was initiated by staff because of the significant increase in construction costs in the past two years as well as the increase in interest rates (for exempt financing). The BOCC concurred that the use of these State funds was appropriate for this project as it is a dedicated funding source for recreational facility development and because POS funds had previously been used for capital projects at the golf course. The BOCC proposed using additional cash from the golf enterprise fund balance (estimated balance at this time is about $800,000). The Board also indicated that it would look to recoup the amount of POS funds put into the project at some point in the future for other recreational projects. This would come from surplus revenues in the golf enterprise fund.

In late 2003 bids came in well over budget to build a new clubhouse and that solicitation was cancelled. A Golf Advisory Board was established in the spring, 2004 and, after considerable review, the Board recommended renovating the existing facility. With BOCC concurrence, a design/build renovation project was advertised in the winter/spring, 2005. However, there were no responses to that solicitation. In the fall, 2005 the BOCC approved pre-selecting a contractor to do a design/build renovation project based upon a competitive "request for expression of interest" process. Interested contractors were interviewed by a selection committee on 2/9/06. A contract was awarded in early April to the selected contractor for development of the clubhouse program, a concept plan, and cost estimate. The concept plan and preliminary cost estimate were endorsed by the Golf Advisory Board on 5/25/06 and adopted by the BOCC on 6/6/06. A contract for design and engineering was awarded in June 2006 after approval of the concept plan by the BOCC. A contract for construction is expected to be awarded and construction begin in the Fall 2006 and the renovated clubhouse should be completed by Spring 2008.



Wicomico Shores Golf Course Clubhouse RP-0301 Recreation and Parks


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONTennis Court Replacement RP-0701 Recreation and Parks

DESCRIPTION:


Priority B-1

LOCATION:Various Parks throughout the County.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 275,000 0 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 275,000 0 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 275,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 200,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 275,000 0 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0


Replace the surfacing at several tennis courts in County parks at a cost of $25,000 per court. Courts are proposed for replacement as follows: two courts at Dorsey Park and one court at Jarboesville Park in FY2007; two courts at Fifth District park in FY '08; two courts at Seventh District Park in FY2009; two courts at Cecil Park in FY2010; and two courts at Chancellor's Run Park in FY2011. The surfacing on these courts is in fair to poor condition and needs to be replaced to insure usable and safe facilities.

The project is also consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2006 - FY2015.








FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Tennis Court Replacement RP-0701 Recreation and Parks

The average life of an asphalt tennis court is 15 years and most of these courts are more than 20 years old. The cracks in the courts have been repaired as possible over the past several years, but replacement is now necessary per the schedule proposed in the project description. As part of a comprehensive parks maintenance plan, five courts were previously replaced at Town Creek, Laurel Grove, and Cardinal Gibbons parks in the past few years, and two courts will be replaced in 2006 at Wicomico Shores. The FY '06 CIP proposed replacing two courts at either Leonardtown Elementary or Dorsey Park. The School Department has determined that the courts at Leonardtown Elementary must be demolished to accommodate the school renovation/expansion project; as a result, Dorsey Park is the recommended replacement site. Also, because of the demolition of the lighted courts at Leonardtown Elementary, a tennis court lighting project will be considered in the FY2008 CIP to replace this loss.

N/A




The FY2006 CIP included $60,000 in funding in FY2007 to replace three courts at $20,000 each. Changes in the FY2007 request include: 1) the project was increased by $15,000 ($5,000 per court) based upon cost increases for petroleum based products; 2) a tennis court replacement plan was previously included in the CIP but deferred beyond FY2007 during last year's budget process due to funding limitations. This request proposes to reinstitute the annual replacement plan. 3) the recommended funding source for the additional $15,000 needed in FY2007 is park impact fees.

N/A





PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONPiney Point Lighthouse Museum Shore Erosion RP-0502

DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:2nd Election District.44701 Lighthouse RoadPiney Point, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 445,445 210,000 235,445 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 23,665 9,555 0 14,110 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 499,110 249,555 235,445 14,110 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 249,555 249,555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 249,555 0 235,445 14,110 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 499,110 249,555 235,445 14,110 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation and Parks

The lighthouse is a significant historical resource and major tourist attraction for the Piney Point community and the County. Erosion control is needed to protect the historic structures and to protect the County's investment in the lighthouse museum and park.

This project will utilize two interest free State loans to correct a serious erosion problem that is threatening the Piney Point Lighthouse. The County has been working with State officials for several years about this problem and an interest free State loan in the amount of $249,555 was approved in FY'06. Another State shore erosion loan in the same amount is being requested in FY'07. Approximately 600 feet of the shoreline behind the Lighthouse and Keepers Quarters will be stabilized through this project. A combination of erosion control techniques will likely be used including rip rap, marsh creation, and breakwaters. The term of the loan is for fifteen (15) years which would result in a repayment schedule of $33,274 per year for fifteen (15) years unless repayment is accelerated.

The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for F2005 - FY2007.



Compliance with Comprehensive Plan SectionPolicy IV.1.1.1.E: Balance development goals with environmental protection and enhancement of the value of the waterfront as a resource for recreation and water dependent facilities. Goal IV.2.1: Promote universal stewardship of the Chesapeake Bay and of the land.... Goal IV.2.2: Protect sensitive areas. 2.1.2.B.iii. Control and minimize runoff and erosion and loss of soils to enhance and protect the quality of water resources, protect sensitive habitats, maintain and enhance productivity of prime agricultural lands, and prevent loss of property.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Piney Point Lighthouse Museum Shore Erosion RP-0502 Recreation and Parks

Recreation and Parks staff first met with DNR shore erosion officials in 1995 about this problem. The situation was revisited again in 1998 but a lack of funding in the shore erosion control program resulted in no action being taken. The erosion problem has worsened over the past few years as a result of erosion control measures taken on an adjacent property and the effects of Hurricane Isabelle. The problem needs to be corrected or the loss of shoreline will threaten the Lighthouse and Keepers Quarters in a few years. An interest free loan agreement in the amount of $249,555 was executed in 2005 between the County and State. State officials have indicated that another interest free loan in the same amount has been included in the Shore Erosion Control budget in FY2007.



STAFFING -FTEs

PERSONAL SERVICES COSTSCONTRACTED SERVICESSUPPLIES & MATERIALSUTILITIESFURNITURE & EQUIPMENT

N/A


No operating impact is anticipated as a result of this shoreline stabilization project.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONParks Land Acquisition RP-0604

DESCRIPTION:



Priority B-1

LOCATION:3rd Election District.Leonardtown area.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 4,300,000 7,500 4,292,500 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER- MASTER PLAN 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0TOTAL COSTS 4,400,000 7,500 4,292,500 0 0 0 0 100,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 4,575,000 7,500 4,292,500 0 0 0 75,000 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 4,400,000 7,500 4,292,500 0 0 0 0 100,000 0


3.1.5 Create new and enhanced parks and recreation facilities that link existing parks and communities, expand recreation opportunities and preserve environmental, aesthetic, and cultural quality.



Recreation & Parks

The project is also consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-14 as a mid range land acquisition and development recommendation for FY2011 - FY2015.

This combines what had been two separate park acquisition projects into one project. The first is a 12.5 acre parcel on Breton Bay which is proposed for acquisition for a Waterfront Park. The second is approximately 100 acres in the central part of the County for an active park for athletic facilities and recreational amenities (a site has not been identified at this time). Two park acquisition projects (Central County Park and Potomac River Waterfront Park) were included in the 2005 Land Preservation Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) which was adopted by the County Commissioners in December, 2005. The Central County Park project would accomodate regional needs and possibly include soccer, lacrosse, baseball/softball, and football playing fields, a children's playground, picnic shelters and pathways. The Waterfront Park would provide water access, fishing, crabbing and restroom facilities. With the increased growth in the 3rd election district, there is a need for additional athletic fields, park facilities and public access to the water. State POS funds are proposed in FY2007 to acquire the property and funds are requested in FY2012 to develop park master plans. Park design, engineering and construction is projected in FY2013 - FY2015 or later.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Parks Land Acquisition RP-0604 Recreation & Parks



A Central County Park project was previously included in the CIP in FY2011 and a Potomac River Waterfront Park acquisition is included in the LPPRP in the 2115 - 2020 time frame. However, the potential availability of significant State POS funds for park and open space acquisition has resulted in this proposal being brought forward now. Preliminary discussions have been held with POS officials regarding possible funding and with property owners about their interest in working with the County. Results of those discussions were positive and staff discussed the project in Executive Session with the BOCC in December 2005 and again in April 2006. The Board gave direction to staff to explore these possible acquisitions further and appraisals are being done on waterfront property.

This project has changed significantly in terms of scope, timing, and cost because of the reasons explained above. Previously, an acquisition project was included in the CIP in FY2011 at an estimated total cost of $300,000 (which was intended as a place holder as a specific property had not been identified). The project has been moved forward to FY2007 and the acquisition cost increased to $4,300,000 to reflect the acquisition of considerably more land than originally envisioned, including waterfront property. The cost estimate is based on one specific parcel that has been identified for possible acquisition and an estimate of the cost for the other parcel. It is proposed that $100,000 of the County's current allocation of local POS funding and $700,000 in FY2007 local POS funding be used with the balance of $3.5 million to come from State-side POS funds.

TOTAL COSTS

No impact until the park is opened. Based upon the proposed timeline, that would be in 2013 or later.

N/A






DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:1st Election DistrictSt. Mary's City, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 160,000 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0



The River Concert Series is designed to provide the citizens of St. Mary's County and southern Maryland with high quality, professional musical performances throughout the summer while enriching the cultural offerings of the region and raising the profile of the area throughout the State. Since it's inception in 1999 attendance has grown from a few thousand to more than 30,000 in 2005. The River Concert Series is one of the County's and the regions most important cultural events and was recognized as such by receiving Maryland's 2003 Tourism Impact Award.

3.1.5 This project is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Goals: 1) Chapter III.6.1 "tourism development and broadened economic opportunity are closely linked to historic, cultural, and environmental resources." 2) Chapter IV.2.2 to "preserve the County's natural, recreational, historical and cultural heritage in conjunction with economic and social well-being to maintain and enhance quality of life."


The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The LPPRP notes a significant deficit in facilities for holding concerts/festivals (outdoor theaters) on page III-10 in the Summary Needs Report.

PROJ. NO.St. Mary's College Amphitheater RP-0702 Recreation and Parks

This project is proposed as a partnership between St. Mary's College of Maryland, St. Mary's County, and the State of Maryland. It will construct a permanent stage, a support building, site improvements, and infrastructure to support the very successful River Concert Series and other outdoor events at the College. The project envisions the construction of a 55' x 90' raised brick stage platform located on the College "Green" where the current concert series is staged. A "Saddleback" tent will be purchased as part of the project that will cover the stage for River Concert Series performances and other events but will be removed and stored when no events are planned. The support building will provide 500 square feet of storage space and 500 square feet for a green room and reception area for visiting artists and speakers. The project will also include a brick paved drive around the stage, a loading dock, permanent electrical hookups and infrastructure for the stage and audience area, an emergency generator, and an irrigation system for the lawn seating area.






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



This project is new in Fiscal Year 2007. The County budget amount reflects only the County's contribution to this project, which will remain a St. Mary's College project and become their asset/facility. The project budget includes: Architect/Eng: $160,000, & Construction: $1,840,000

St. Mary's College Amphitheater RP-0702 Recreation and Parks

St. Mary's College project organizers have had meetings with County staff and some local and State elected officials about the project. The College hopes to begin construction in the summer of 2007. Since this is a community project, it is not eligible for typical higher education funding. Of the State's $1,000,000 share the intent is to request that the Governor include $500,000 of that in the State's FY2007 capital budget and the other $500,000 be requested through a FY2007 bond bill (or possibly split over two fiscal years). Depending on the decisions made at the State level about the amount or timing of State funding, the County may be asked to forward fund or fill in any shortfalls. St. Mary's College plans to begin fundraising for the project.





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

No operating budget impact is expected for St. Mary's County Government.

N/A


TOTAL COSTS



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:Third Election District23145 Leonard Hall DriveLeonardtown, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS-Local POS 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES - Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 250,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


The Comprehensive Plan addresses the need to "Create new and enhanced Parks and Recreation facilities" in Objective 3.1.5 (page 105) as well as in Action 50 to maintain and upgrade park facilities. One of the goals in the 2000 Land Preservation and Recreation Plan regarding facilities addresses the need for expanding, improving, and retrofitting existing facilities to meet existing and future demand for a broad and diverse array of recreational and leisure opportunities." (page 7 - 7).



The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a mid range rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2012 - FY2020.

PROJ. NO.Leonard Hall Recreation Center Improvements RP-0703 Recreation and Parks

This project will provide air conditioning and air circulation in the gymnasium and install shower facilities for this heavily used indoor recreation center. The project is intended to improve the environment for program participants during the summer heat and humidity. The shower facilities would address hygiene issues for public participants as well as County employees participating in day time wellness activities.






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

2,500 10,000 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,0000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

2,500 10,000 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000



This project is new in Fiscal Year 2007.

Leonard Hall Recreation Center Improvements RP-0703 Recreation and Parks

Attendance at the Leonard Hall Recreation Center for youth sports camps and adult sport leagues in the summer is approximately 7,500. There have been numerous complaints over the past year from participants in those programs about the heat and poor air quality. Some of those complaints were directed to the R&P Advisory Board and the Board requested that staff address this problem in the FY2007 CIP. The need for showers has also been identified by the public and by the County Employees Association.





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

Estimates are included for electrical costs for operating the air conditioning and air circulation systems.

N/A


TOTAL COSTS



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:Eighth Election District 21550 Willows RoadLexington Park, MD


FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES - Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0




The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-15 as a short term facility development recommendation for FY2006 - FY2008.

PROJ. NO.Lancaster Park Improvements RP-0704 Recreation and Parks

This project will utilize a State Community Parks and Playground Grant to construct an off-leash "dog park" and a hard surface pathway for walking and jogging. The dog park will be fenced and will include water and separate areas for small and large dogs. The pathway will weave through areas of Lancaster Park and connect to the 50-acre south parcel of the former Lexington Manor property which is now County park land. The old houses in the south parcel were demolished in 2006 and the area restored and maintained as open space until a master plan for the park property is developed. Through this connection, the pathway will be lengthened considerably, at no additional cost, and will provide opportunities for walking and jogging along the tree lined former streets of Lexington Manor.






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

100 125 150 175 200 225125 150 175 200 225 250

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

225 275 325 375 425 475




Lancaster Park Improvements RP-0704 Recreation and Parks

The dog park and the pathway were included in the original park master plan but funding limitations prevented them from being constructed when the park was built. The funding source for this, the Community Parks and Playground Program (CPPP), is a competitive grant process and projects can only be in parks located in priority funding areas. A grant application was approved by the State and funding is included in the State's FY2007 budget for this project. The County previously received two CPPP grants for a playground and two picnic shelters at Nicolet Park.





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

Supplies needed include trash bags, rakes, and other minor items to maintain the dog park. Utility cost is for water.

N/A


TOTAL COSTS



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:


FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES - Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 300,000 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


PROJ. NO.Park ADA Improvements-Playground Replacement RP-0705 Recreation and Parks

This project will purchase and install accessible and usable playgrounds at Elms Beach Park and Cecil Park. The new playgrounds will replace structures with playgrounds that meet current ADA or safety requirements.

Cecil Park- Second Election District, 19241 St. George Church Rd., Valley Lee, MDElms Beach Park- First Election District, 49300 St. James Church Rd, Lexington Park, MD



The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. Facility rehabilitation and development projects are recommended at both Cecil and Elms Beach Parks on page III-16 of the plan.






FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



Recreation and Parks developed a park ADA transition plan in the late 1990's that was adopted by the R&P Advisory Board and Board of County Commissioners. That plan detailed improvements needed at existing parks throughout the County to meet ADA regulations. A phased improvement plan was incorporated into the capital budget to address ADA requirements. That ADA plan has been completed with the exception of replacement playgrounds at Cecil Park and Elms Beach Park.

Park ADA Improvements-Playground Replacement RP-0705 Recreation and Parks





CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.

This project is new in Fiscal Year 2007; however, a related project had been included in prior requests.

N/A

N/A


TOTAL COSTS



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:Third Election DistrictRt. 244 and Medley's Neck RoadLeonardtown, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 2,500 0 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 22,500 0 22,500 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. Although not specifically identified as an acquisition, facility development or rehabilitation project, the draft plan notes a significant deficit in facilities to conduct field sports (football, soccer, lacrosse and field hockey) on page III-10 in the Summary Needs Report.


PROJ. NO.Lacrosse Fields RP-0706 Recreation and Parks

Pending approval from Florida Rock/Arundel Corporation officials, this project will construct a small, gravel parking lot for informal playing fields being established for the St. Mary's Girls Lacrosse League on land to be leased from Maryland Rock in Medley's Neck. The parking area is projected to be approximately 17,000 s.f. which will accommodate about fifty cars.








FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 012,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000



Grass cutting at approximately $3,000 per month for four months and portable toilets at $80 per month for four months.

N/A


TOTAL COSTS



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


The lacrosse fields are proposed to be established on an existing turf area previously mined for gravel and reclaimed by Maryland Rock. The turf area is relatively flat and the R&P Parks Division top dressed and over seeded the fields in late fall to improve playability. Recreation & Parks has obtained site plan approval from LUGM to construct the gravel parking area. However, Maryland Rock officials informed R&P's in March 2006 that the project would have to be deferred until authorization was obtained from the parent company - Florida Rock/Arundel Corporation. Maryland Rock is uncertain when approvals will be obtained.



Lacrosse Fields RP-0706 Recreation and Parks



DESCRIPTION:


Priority A-1

LOCATION:7th Election DistrictColton's Point, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES-Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

PROJ. NO.St. Clement's Hundred-Blackistone Lighthouse RP0707 Recreation and Parks

This project is a partnership between the St. Clement's Hundred organization, St. Mary's County, the State of Maryland and the Federal Government. The project will be done in phases with Phases I and II costing an estimated $1.1 million. Phase I will rebuild/restore the external shell (the brick and mortar) of the Blackistone Island Lighthouse which was demolished by fire in 1956. Phase I is estimated to be completed by January 2008. Phase II will rebuild the internal framework of the Lighthouse. This phase would add the second level flooring and would also partition the interior space to match the original layout of the rooms. There will be no plumbing, no electric and no air conditioning. It is estimated that Phase II will be completed between 2008 - 2010. Future phases will add interpretative exhibits and provide limited user amenities to the original site. This "project" reflects as costs only the County allocation, as the full project is under the management and control of St. Clements Hundred.

The new lighthouse would operate as an educational center expanding the ongoing programs of the St. Clement's Island and Potomac River Museum. It would enrich the museum's programs to attract and inform visitors, and especially to teach elementary school-aged children about the colorful early history of the lower Potomac in the commercial transportation of our nation, thus enriching the awareness of all Americans in the significance of this treasured historical landmark.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:This project is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Goals: 1) Chapter III.6.1 "tourism development and broadened economic opportunity are closely linked to historic, cultural, and environmental resources." 2) Chapter IV.2.2 to "preserve the County's natural, recreational, historical and cultural heritage in conjunction with economic and social well-being to maintain and enhance quality of life."







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.St. Clement's Hundred-Blackistone Lighthouse RP0707 Recreation and Parks

St. Clement's Hundred project organizers have had meetings with County staff and local and State elected officials about the project. The St. Clement's Hundred hopes to begin construction in January, 2008. Of the State's share, $125,000 has been approved as a FY 2007 State bond bill and additional $150,000 bond bill will be requested in FY 2008. $600,000 in federal funding is being requested with Congressman Hoyer's assistance. The private, non-profit St. Clements Hundred organization has raised nearly $200,000 in private funding for the project to date. The project budget reflected is based on the County commitment only, and would subsequently be documented in a Memorandum of Agreement.

This project is new in FY 2007, and is based upon a request submitted by St. Clements Hundred in February 2006.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

This will need to be considered as part of the FY2008 budget process. It is expected that the reconstructed Lighthouse will bring a significant increase in visitors to the St. Clements Island Museum and it will have an impact on the Museum operations, particularly the water taxi operation to the Island.

None.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONMyrtle Point Park RP-0503 Recreation & Parks

DESCRIPTION:


LOCATION:8th Election District.24050 Patuxent BoulevardCalifornia, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 500,000 500,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER - MASTER PLAN 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,275,000 25,000 0 0 0 250,000 500,000 500,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 750,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,275,000 25,000 0 0 0 250,000 500,000 500,000 0

This 192-acre property on the Patuxent River was acquired for a county park in January 1997 and has been open for public use for hiking, picnicking, nature study, and other passive uses since that time. The Board of County Commissioners adopted a park master plan in October 2005 that formally established Myrtle Point as a nature park. Amenities and facilities include a Visitor/Nature/Heritage Center, a canoe and kayak launch, picnic areas, trails, restrooms, environmental boardwalks, a small amphitheatre, parking, and shoreline access. Funding is requested in FY2010 for design and engineering and in FY2011 and FY2012 for phased park development.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.5.Create new and enhanced parks and recreation facilities that link existing parks and communities, expand recreation opportunities and preserve environmental, aesthetic, and cultural quality.Priority A-1

The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-15 as a short to mid range facility development recommendation for FY2010 - FY2014.








FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 1 1 1

0 0 0 60,496 62,030 63,5160 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 2,500 2,500 2,5000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 62,996 64,530 66,016



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Myrtle Point Park RP-0503 Recreation & Parks

The master plan adopted by the BOCC for Myrtle Point Park was the result of considerable community involvement including a public workshop in the winter 2005. The plan was strongly supported by the Friends of Myrtle Point Park and was unanimously recommended by the Recreation and Parks Citizen Advisory Board. The Chesapeake Bay Gateways Network recently designated Myrtle Point as a Chesapeake gateways site. This designation will enable the County to apply for federal funding for program development and site interpretation.

$500,000 has been added in FY2012 for continued park development. Staff and the R&P Board are working now to create a park development phasing plan and cost estimate.

TOTAL COSTS



STAFFING -FTEs

A Park Manager/Naturalist position is requested beginning in FY2010 to oversee the operation and management of the park. The manager/naturalist will be responsible for developing environmental education programs and activities at the park and will also be involved in park development including grant writing and fundraising for the Nature and Heritage Center.

N/A





DESCRIPTION:


Priority B-1

LOCATION:8th Election District.Great Mills RoadGreat Mills, MD.

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,250,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000UTILITIES 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000EQUIPMENT 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000OTHER 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000TOTAL COSTS 2,555,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 2,375,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 2,555,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 2,375,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES - Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,555,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 2,375,000

This project would construct a 15,000 s.f. Gymnastics Center. Recreation, Parks and Community Services has operated a successful gymnastics program for the past ten years in rented space in Lexington Park. The program includes instruction for more than six hundred (600) recreational and competitive gymnasts including a sixty (60) person gymnastics team. It is proposed that the facility be constructed on County owned land next to the Great Mills Swimming Pool or at Nicolet Park. Partial funding reimbursement is proposed to come from user fees which currently pay the $60,000 annual rent.


PROJ. NO.St. Mary's Gymnastics Center RP-11XX Recreation and Parks





The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-12 as a mid range facility development recommendation for FY2012 - FY2015.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



N/A

N/A


TOTAL COSTS




The current rental lease for the Gymnastics Center expires on May 31, 2012. The existing space is about 12,000 s.f. and is only marginally adequate now. The limited space creates problems with the lack of proper distance for runways for the vaulting events and restricts proper seating when hosting competitions. With program growth anticipated over the next five years, the current building will be inadequate. An alternative approach would be to acquire an existing "warehouse" type building preferably in the central part of the County.


CONTINUATION SHEET

The estimated cost of constructing the facility has been increased by $405,000 (19%) to reflect increased construction costs over the past year.

St. Mary's Gymnastics Center RP-11XX Recreation and ParksPROJ. NO.


NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

PUBLIC LANDINGS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONDerelict Boat Removal PL-0302 Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:To remove derelict boats and obstructions to navigation from the waterways of the State located within St. Mary's County. The removal of derelict boats will improve and help maintain safe waterway access to the general boating public. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources funds this project annually through the State Waterway Improvement Program.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:This project is justified based upon the need for maintaining safe and attractive waterways in the County, both for economic and recreational benefits. This is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan by:

Goal 2.3.2 - Objective: "Support water dependent facilities." This goal is also addressed in the 2000 Land Preservation and Recreation Plan with references to water access and development/maintenance of public landings (page 7-5).

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.5.A.ii. Accommodate and promote fishing, boating, sailing and other water oriented recreational activities by county residents and visitors. Provide adequate public access to the shore front, to the rivers and to the bays through the purchase and maintenance of public landings, developed and natural waterfront parks. Ensure the availability of appropriated zoned waterfront land for private marinas and landings.

Priority A-1

LOCATION:Chesapeake Bay, Potomac River, Patuxent River, and adjoining waterways.

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 365,451 185,451 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 365,451 185,451 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 365,451 185,451 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 365,451 185,451 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONDerelict Boat Removal PL-0302 Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:N/A

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:N/A


INCREMENTAL OPERATING COSTSDESCRIPTION FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012




DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:N/A



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONPatuxent River Public Landing PL-0601 Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:This project will acquire two acres of property and develop a boat ramp, pier and parking area for public access on the Patuxent River in the California area. This project was discussed with the Board of County Commissioners in December, 2005 and direction was received to explore it further. A potential property has been identified for possible acquisition. The estimated cost for acquisition and demolition of existing structures is $1.2 million. Program Open Space is the source of funding for property acquisition ($300,000 in local POS funds and $900,000 in State-side POS funds). Discussion with POS officials indicates that the State is very interested in assisting with local acquisition projects. The estimated cost to design, engineer, and develop the boat ramp, pier and parking is $800,000.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:As identified by the County Comprehensive Plan there is a need for additional public access to the Patuxent River in the County.

The project is also consistent with the 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-14 as a short term acquisition and development recommendation for FY2006 - FY2009.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:2.3.2 Support water dependent facilities3.1.5.A.ii. Accommodate and promote fishing, boating, sailing and other water oriented recreational activities by county residents and visitors. Provide adequate public access to the shore front, to the rivers and to the bays through the purchase and maintenance of public landings, developed and natural waterfront parks. Ensure the availability of appropriated zoned waterfront land for private marinas and landings. Priority A-1

LOCATION:8th Election DistrictAlong the Patuxent River

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 1,200,000 300,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 725,000 0 0 500,000 225,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,000,000 300,000 975,000 500,000 225,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 225,000 0 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,775,000 300,000 975,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,000,000 300,000 975,000 500,000 225,000 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONPatuxent River Public Landing PL-0601 Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:There are three public boat launching facilities on the Patuxent River. Forest Landing is located in the Hollywood area and is in excellent condition; however it has limited parking and is at the mouth of Cuckhold Creek, quite a distance from the Patuxent. Cape St. Mary's is located in Sandgates and the boat ramp is in poor condition; this ramp is available to the public through a lease agreement with a private owner and it is unlikely that the owner will improve the ramp. Clarkes Landing is a very informal ramp in Hollywood because of very limited parking, improvement of the ramp is not a recommended option at this time. Leasing or acquiring land for a possible parking area for the public ramp and/or converting the private ramp at Clarkes Landing restaurant to a public ramp have been explored with the owner and are not feasible at this time. This potential acquisition was discussed with the BOCC in December 2005 and direction given by the Board to explore this further with the property owner.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:The request for State funding for acquisition increased from $200,000 to $900,000 in FY2007 because of having a specific parcel and estimated purchase price. $75,000 in State Waterway Improvement (WWI) funding is also requested in FY2007 to do the design and engineering for the project. The funding request in FY2008 and FY2009 hasalso been revised. In FY2008 it is proposed that $250,000 in WWI funding and $250,000 in local-side POS funding be used to construct the boat ramp, step down piers, and bulk heading. WWI officials have indicated that they can match 50/50 on large projects and that we can use local POS funds as the local match (as long as the POS funds are not bond funding). In FY2009, $225,000 is proposed to replace an existing large fishing/crabbing pier on the Patuxent (WWI funds can't be used for replacing that pier as it won't serve the boating public).






DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:Funds for minor repairs, trash removal and portable toilets are provided through State Waterway Improvement grants so no additional County funds are anticipated at this time.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONForest Landing PL-0701 Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:Design, engineering and replacement of approximately 140-ft of existing bulkhead which is badly deteriorated.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:This project is justified based upon the need for maintaining safe and attractive waterways in the County, both for economic and recreational benefits. This is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan by Goal 2.3.2 - Objective: "Support water dependent facilities."

The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a short term facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2007.


LOCATION:8th Election District44600 Forest Landing RoadHollywood, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONForest Landing PL-0701 Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:The boat ramp and pier at Forest Landing have been replaced in the past year utilizing Patuxent River oil spill remediation funds. This project would continue improvements at this heavily used water access facility.










PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWicomico Shores Public Landing PL-0702 Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:Replace 330-ft of pier that is approximately twenty-five (25) years old and is badly deteriorated due to age, weather, and usage. The first 770-ft of the pier was replaced as a result of damage from Hurricane Isabel.

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:This project is justified based upon the need for maintaining safe and attractive waterways in the County, both for economic and recreational benefits. This is addressed inthe Comprehensive Plan by Goal 2.3.2 - Objective: "Support water dependent facilities."

The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a short term facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2007.


LOCATION:4th Election District35222 Army Navy DriveMechanicsville, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 99,000 0 99,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWicomico Shores Public Landing PL-0702 Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:Replacement of this section of pier would complete the Wicomico Shores Public Landing improvement project. The total project included replacement of the boat ramp, dredging the boating channel, shore erosion control measures, and replacement of two piers.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:This project is new in Fiscal Year 2007.









PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Wharf PL-0402 Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:The Town of Leonardtown is undertaking a $5.6 million project to develop the Leonardtown waterfront area. This project includes a public waterfront area, promenade, and public boat slips to accommodate boat traffic. This project represents funding provided by the County to fund selected aspects of the park/wharf development, and is a component of a broader development and multi-phased project being undertaken by the Town of Leonardtown. The County has appropriated a total of $2.1 million for Phrase I of the Wharf project.


COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.5.A.i. Establish a county-wide system of recreational facilities (including boat landing, waterfront parks, regional parks, town and village parks, and in high density areas. Children's play lots. Which meet year round recreation desires. Provide additional public open space and recreation lands, particularly active parks in and near development districts.3.1.5.A.ii. Accommodate and promote fishing, boating, sailing and other water oriented recreational activities by county residents and visitors. Provide adequate public access to the shore front, to the rivers and to the bays through the purchase and maintenance of public landings, developed and natural waterfront parks. Ensure the availability of appropriated zoned waterfront land for private marinas and landing.Priority A-1

LOCATION:3rd Election DistrictLeonardtown, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 350,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,195,000 650,000 545,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 355,000 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 1,535,000 635,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 115,000 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,100,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Wharf PL-0402 Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:The Town expects to acquire funding from a variety of sources, including State and other grant sources. An existing MOU between the Town and the County that specifies the costs expected to be funded with the County's contribution as well as the basis for reimbursement of such costs will be revised and approved by the Town council and BOCC.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:This project was first approved in the FY2004 budget with $1 million in County funds allocated over three years. At the budget work session on 5/15/06 the Town of Leonardtown requested additional funding to help address a budget shortfall of approximately $3.3 million for the project. This estimated need for County funds was subscquently revised to an additional $1.1 million. At a subsequent work session the BOCC authorized an additional $900,000 in County funds and $200,000 in local POS funds for the project.






DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:N/A - Operation is the responsibility of the Town of Leonardtown

OTHER IMPACT ON OPERATIONS/OPERATING BUDGET:This development will reconnect downtown Leonardtown to Breton Bay, providing a waterfront experience currently lacking in St. Mary's County. Impacts will include increased tourism activity as well as enhanced general retail opportunities in Leonardtown. The public improvements are essential to these future economic benefits.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONClarke's Landing Boat Ramp PL-08XX Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:This project uses State Waterway Improvement funds in FY2008 and FY2009 for design, engineering and construction of a replacement boat ramp on the Patuxent River in the Hollywood area.


The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 as a short term facility rehabilitation and development recommendation for FY2007 - FY2008.


LOCATION:6th Election District.Hollywood, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 14,000 0 0 14,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 184,000 0 0 85,000 99,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER- Parking Lease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 198,000 0 0 99,000 99,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteINSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 198,000 0 0 99,000 99,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 198,000 0 0 99,000 99,000 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONClarke's Landing Boat Ramp PL-08XX Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:Clarkes Landing is a very informal ramp in Hollywood. Because of very limited parking and the lack of County owned land to expand the parking area, the ramp has not previously been recommended for improvement. Discussions have been held with a property owner about leasing or acquiring land for parking but an agreement is uncertain pending the outcome of potential private development plans involving the property. Discussion has also been held with the same property owner about converting the private ramp at Clarkes Landing restaurant to a public ramp but that idea is not viable at this time. Whether or not this project moves forward is dependent upon whether the Commissioners decide to pursue the proposed Patuxent River Public Landing project. If the Board decides to move forward with the other project, this one will likely be deferred. This project is also contingent upon being able to successfully address the parking problem. The project is tentative pending decisions made by the Board of County Commissioners regarding a potential acquisition for a new Patuxent River Public Landing and on whether privately owned land adjacent to the ramp can be leased for parking.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:This project was deferred from FY2007-FY2008 to FY2008-FY2009 because of the possible Patuxent River Public landing project and the uncertainty of leasing land for parking.




PERSONAL SERVICES COSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0CONTRACTED SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER (Leasing land for parking) 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

TOTAL COSTS 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000

DISCUSSION OF OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT:Funds will also be needed for leasing land for parking.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWicomico Shores Public Landing - Parking PL-09XX Public Landings

DESCRIPTION:Acquire approximately 1.25 acres of property adjacent to the Wicomico Shores Public Landing for parking. This property is privately owned but currently being used for parking purposes by users of the boat ramp.


The project is also consistent with the Draft 2005 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) in which priorities for recreational land acquisition, facility development and rehabilitation are based on a needs analysis from two State surveys, input from the Recreation and Parks Board and consideration of identified needs in the context of State and County goals. The project is further identified on page III-16 under other development projects.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:2.3.2 Support water dependent facilities3.1.5.A.ii. Accommodate and promote fishing, boating, sailing and other water oriented recreational activities by county residents and visitors. Provide adequate public access to the shore front, to the rivers and to the bays through the purchase and maintenance of public landings, developed and natural waterfront parks. Ensure the availability of appropriated zoned waterfront land for private marinas and landings.Priority B-1

LOCATION:4th Election District35222 Army Navy DriveMechanicsville, MD

Total Prior FY 2007 Five Year Capital Program Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCHITECT/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance to Five Year Capital ProgramCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0


CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWicomico Shores Public Landing - Parking PL-09XX Public Landings

OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION/COMMENTS:The property owner has unofficially continued to allow parking in the area, however, acquisition is recommended to ensure the long term use by patrons of the public boat ramp. Development of the land is possible in the future contingent upon expansion of the wastewater treatment plant at Wicomico Shores.

DISCUSSION OF CHANGE FROM FY 2006 APPROVED BUDGET/PLAN:This project is new in Fiscal Year 2007.









NOT USED

CAPITAL PROJECTS

PUBLIC SCHOOLS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Elementary School - Addition/Renovation PS - 0601

DESCRIPTION:

SMCPS Priority: FY2007-1, FY2008-1Category: 1

Bid Date: March 2006Start Construction: June 2006Completion Date: December 2007PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. The student body will be temporarily located at the annex behind Benjamin Banneker Elementary School during constructionB. A/E fees for this project were approved locally in FY 2007 and construction funds are being requested in FY 2008C. The electrical and communication systems are at the end of their useful livesThis project is required to address existing elementary school capacity issues in the northern and central portion of the county. The enrollmenprojections indicate that with the completion of this project, the elementary schools in the adjoining area will be overcrowded by 453 in the five yeatimeframe. This project will work in conjunction with the planned first new elementary school to meet these capacity needs, as well as the implementatioof full day Kindergarten. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needsPriority A-1LOCATION:22885 Duke StreetLeonardtown, Maryland 20650

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 1,112,000 827,000 259,000 26,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 15,964,000 340,000 8,606,000 7,018,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 503,000 0 503,000 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 17,619,000 1,167,000 9,408,000 7,044,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 4,725,623 843,775 666,848 3,215,000 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 2,854,475 323,225 2,531,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 1,009,902 0 1,009,902 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 9,029,000 Planning 5,200,000 3,829,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 17,619,000 1,167,000 9,408,000 7,044,000 0 0 0 0 0

St. Mary's County Public Schools



Addition/renovation to this building, originally constructed in 1954. This facility has undergone several additions in the early 1960's, one in 1976 and a PreKindergarten addition in 1999. The building was originally constructed as a secondary school and now serves as an elementary school. There are remaining components of the building, including locker areas, that do not serve a functional space as an elementary school. In addition, the facility requires modernization to remove original floors, ceilings, lighting, as well as asbestos removal. The facility is also in need of additional spaces for the implementation of full day Kindergarten and to meet capacity needs in this development district school. There will also be an HVAC upgrade and completion of the air conditioning and the site will be modified to separate bus & student traffic. This project includes an addition of 14,101 s.f. for a new building total of 66,513 s.f., with an increase of 195 seats at the state rated capacity level. New classrooms will accommodate new studengrowth and the implementation of full day Kindergarten





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 2 0 0 0 0

0 56,670 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 12,754 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 69,424 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Leonardtown Elementary School - Addition/Renovation PS - 0601 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project will address the items identified during the State of Maryland Adequacy Survey and will assist with the Maryland State Department of Education requirement to provide full day Kindergarten prior to 2008.1. Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceed the budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currently bidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costs.

This project increased in budget from the FY 2006 approved budget plan based on an increase of $37.16 per square foot based on the Public School Construction Program funding formula. In addition, this project will be approved under a new per student square footage of 108 s.f. per student versus the 105 s.f. per student in the FY 2006 projecscope.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

* This staffing increase is for building service. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place through the operating budget as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Elementary School - State Relocatables PS-0701

DESCRIPTION:

SMCPS Priority: FY2007-03Category: 2

Bid Date: March 2006Start Construction: June 2006Completion Date: August 2006

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. State relocatable units are required to assist with the housing of students during the construction of the addition/renovation at Leonardtown Elementary SchooB. The use of these units at the Annex will lessen the impact on students, shorten the construction timeframe and eliminate the associated budget impact o a multi-phase project with students on-site.

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.4 Meet the existing and future demands for public education and information coordinated with overall quality of life and development goals of the countyPriority A-1

LOCATION:Leonardtown AnnexLoveville, Maryland 20656

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 226,000 0 226,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 226,000 0 226,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 82,000 0 82,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 144,000 0 144,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 226,000 0 226,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is to relocate one (1) state four classroom unit from the Great Mills Annex to Leonardtown Elementary School for use during the construction of the addition/renovation and to allow for the implementation of full day Kindergarten while the school is relocated from their building. These units will be added to the complex behind Benjamin Banneker Elementary School, which has been used to house two other schools during the construction of their addition/renovation projects.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Leonardtown Elementary School - State Relocatables PS-0701 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was added to the FY 2007 capital improvements program to meet the capacity needs associated with housing students during the construction of the Leonardtown Elementary School Addition/Renovation project.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Elementary School - Local Relocatable Classrooms PS-0702

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. These units are needed in conjunction with the existing units at the Annex to meet the capacity needs of Leonardtown Elementary School durin the housing of students while the addition/renovation is completedB. The use of these units at the Annex will lessen the impact on students, shorten the construction timeframe and eliminate the associated budget impact o a multi-phase project with students on-site.



Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 52,000 0 52,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 612,500 0 612,500 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 664,500 0 664,500 0 0 0 0 0 0



This project is for the relocation of four (4) single classroom units from Leonardtown Elementary School to the Leonardtown Elementary School Annex, the relocation of four (4) single classroom units from the George Washington Carver Elementary School Annex to the Leonardtown Elementary School Annex, the relocation of one restroom unit from the George Washington Carver Elementary School Annex to the Leonardtown Elementary School Annex. These units are required for the housing of students during the addition/renovation of Leonardtown Elementary School. These units will be added to the complex behind Benjamin Banneker Elementary School, which has been used to house two other schools during the construction of their addition/renovation projects.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Leonardtown Elementary School - Local Relocatable PS-0702 St. Mary's County Public Schools

Based on a better understanding of the anticipated relocatable prices as a result of the fall hurricanes, this project was reduced by $70,000.

This project was added to the FY 2007 plan to address the housing of students during the addition/renovation of Leonardtown Elementary School, which received construction funding approval from the State in FY 2007.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONState Relocatable For Capacity - Site To Be Determined PS-0703

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. Additional classroom space is required to allow for the implementation of full day Kindergarten while meeting the capacity needs of this schooB. This project will utilize a state relocatable classroom versus purchasing a new local unitC. For the 2006-07 school year, this facility is projected to be 34 seats short on capacity. The relocatable will add an additional 25 seats to this schoo


LOCATION:37480 New Market Turner RoadMechanicsville, Maryland


FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 48,750 0 48,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 36,000 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 84,750 0 84,750 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is to relocate one (1) state single classroom unit from Margaret Brent Middle School to an elementary school to allow for the implementation of full day Kindergarten and to meet capacity needs. The school system is monitoring the enrollment at each of several schools that are anticipated for implementation of full day Kindergarten in 2006. The school system will assign this unit to a school by the end of January 2006-2007.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs


This project was added to the FY 2007 capital improvements program to meet the capacity needs associated with housing students based on capacity needs and associated with the implementation of full day Kindergarten.



State Relocatable For Capacity - Site To Be Determined PS-0703 St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONState Eligible - Local Relocatable Purchase PS-0611

DESCRIPTION:

SMCPS Priority: FY 2007-05Category: 2


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is required to replace a state four classroom unit that was destroyed by fire with four classrooms that will be locally ownedB. The state participation in participating in the purchase of locally owned relocatables for capacity is only good through FY 2008C. This project is required to provide housing for Leonardtown Elementary School during the relocation of the school during construction



Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 24,800 0 24,800 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 265,400 235,000 30,400 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 290,200 235,000 55,200 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 166,127 166,127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 8,873 68,873 (60,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 115,200 0 115,200 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 290,200 235,000 55,200 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is to purchase two (2) double classroom units to replace the quad classroom unit that was destroyed by fire in October 2005. This unit was critical to the ability tprovide housing during the construction of the addition/renovation at Leonardtown Elementary School and to assist the school in providing for the implementation of full day Kindergarten during construction. This project takes advantage of a limited time state funding source to purchase locally owned relocatables through a state cost share project. These units will be added to the complex behind Benjamin Banneker Elementary School, which has been used to house two other schools during the construction otheir addition/renovation projects.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs


This project was added to the FY 2007 to replace a state four classroom unit that was destroyed by fire.



State Eligible - Local Relocatable Purchase PS-0611 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was reduced by $60,000 in anticipation of receiving compensation from the insurance company as a result of the fire at George Washington Carver, which destroyed a four classroom unit. The reimbursement check will be used to fund this project

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONChopticon High School - Sewer Plant PS-0704

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: To be determinedStart Construction: To be determinedCompletion Date: To be determined

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This is a Maryland Department of the Environment code compliance project

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needsPriority A-1

LOCATION:25390 Colton Point RoadMorganza, Maryland 20660

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 310,000 0 310,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 325,000 0 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 0



The school system was notified by the Maryland Department of the Environment that testing was required on the original sand filter system, which was installed in 1964, to determine if the system is functioning properly. This testing was conducted in December 2005. In the event that the system is not functioning property, this project would replace the original sand filtration system and not the associated components such as the plant or septic tank, which are currently functioning properly.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs


This project was added to the FY 2007 plan based on a requirement to upgrade the original sand filter system by the Maryland Department of the Environment.



Chopticon High School - Sewer Plant PS-0704 St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONWell Replacement - Four Schools PS-0705

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: January 2006Start Construction: July 2006Completion Date: January 2007

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This is a Maryland Department of the Environment code compliance project


LOCATION:FOUR SCHOOL NAMES




The school system was notified in August 2005 of an action plan outlining remediation options in order to be in compliance with the New Arsenic Rule prior to January 23, 2006. Based on engineering review and analysis it has been determined that the replacement of wells at Hollywood Elementary School, Dynard Elementary School, Leonardtown High School and a well shared by Leonardtown Middle School and the Dr. James A. Forrest Career and Technology Center will be requested to meet the code compliance. The school system has requested an extension for the timeline to meet this requirement in order to complete this project. This project will be for the replacement of the four wells.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Well Replacement - Four Schools PS-0705 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was added to the FY 2007 plan based on a requirement comply with the new arsenic rule.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONMiddle School HVAC - Schematic Design PS-0706

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: N/AStart Construction: May 2006 *Completion Date: August 2006 *

* report only

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. These funds are required to allow for the scope of work and phasing plan to be completed prior to requesting construction funding approval from th Public School Construction Program in FY 2008 for the Spring Ridge Middle School project and FY 2009 for the Leonardtown Middle School project


LOCATION:Spring Ridge Middle SchoolLeonardtown Middle School

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0



This project is required to prepare for the upcoming replacement of the HVAC systems at both Spring Ridge Middle School and Leonardtown Middle School. Both systems are 30+ years in service and parts are no longer available for some components of the systems. These systems need to be analyzed to determine the exact scope of work involved with regards to the replacement systems, as well as a phasing plan for the completion of the project which will not be able to be completed over the course of one summer based on the size of the project. These funds will be used to develop the scope of work and phasing plan for the projects which will be requested in FY 2008 and FY2009.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs


The project was added in FY 2007 to develop the scope of work and phasing plan for the upcoming projects. The Spring Ridge Middle School HVAC project was deferred from FY 2007 to FY 2008 to allow for this design work to be completed.



Middle School HVAC - Schematic Design PS-0706 St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONRidge Elementary School - Site Parking Modifications PS-0608

DESCRIPTION:



Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Section3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needsPriority A-1

LOCATION:49430 Airedele RoadRidge, Maryland 20680

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 22,000 22,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 658,000 419,000 239,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 680,000 441,000 239,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 20010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 680,000 441,000 239,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 680,000 441,000 239,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is required to provide separation between bus and pedestrian parking and access to the school, in order to provide safe access for all students, staff and parentsBusses currently awaiting for arrival and departure of students stack on the adjacent county road. This project will address the deficiency identified as part of the State of Maryland Adequacy Survey.







FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 20110 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Ridge Elementary School - Site Parking Modifications PS-0608 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was bid in April 2006 and based on the increases in petroleum based products and construction in general, the project was over budget. The project budget was set in the previous fiscal year and based on the construction schedule work was scheduled for completion the following summer. The school system discussed the project increase with the St. Mary's County Department of Public Works, which indicated that their costs for overlay has increased during the same time period from $38.00 per ton to $64.00 per ton. The work will be completed during the summer of 2006.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION Relocatables for Various Sites PS-0405

DESCRIPTION:





LOCATION:Benjamin Banneker Elementary School27180 Point Lookout RoadLoveville, Maryland 20656

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 258,605 81,855 8,000 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,743,648 874,898 125,000 348,750 348,750 348,750 348,750 348,750 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 260,605 81,855 10,000 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 0UTILITIES 260,605 81,855 10,000 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 33,750 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 3,523,463 1,120,463 153,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 3,523,463 1,120,463 153,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 3,523,463 1,120,463 153,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 0


A. This project is needed to address the capacity at Benjamin Banneker Elementary School. For the 2006-07 school year the school is projected to be 88 seats short without this relocatable unit.



Based on current and projected enrollment this request is to provide relocatable classrooms to meet the needs at various locations. The enrollment is evaluated both in the fall and the spring to identify which schools will need relocatables for the following year. Based on construction timing, relocatables relocated/purchased during the summer will not be in place until the fall of the current budget year. This project request is to relocate one (1) three classroom unit from the George Washington Carver Elementary School Annex to Benjamin Banneker Elementary School. This unit was temporarily located at the Annex as a result of the fire, however, the unit was already scheduled to be placed at Benjamin Banneker Elementary School.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

6,215 6,215 6,215 6,215 6,215 6,2150 0 0 0 0 0

6,215 6,215 6,215 6,215 6,215 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Relocatables for Various Sites PS-0405 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project funding was reduced by $337,000 based on actual enrollment and capacity needs.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

There will be no change in staffing based on the increased square footage.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONFlooring Replacement - Various Schools PS-0707

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: To be determinedStart Construction: To be determinedCompletion Date: To be determined



LOCATION:Various School Locations

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 215,000 0 115,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 215,000 0 115,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 100,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0STATE FUNDS - ASP 115,000 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 215,000 0 115,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0


A. This project is needed to provide a safe and orderly school environment for students, staff and the community.



This project will replace existing carpeting and tile within the school system with new VCT flooring. As identified in our Comprehensive Maintenance Plan, there is an extensive list of schools that have flooring that has outlived its useful life and requires replacement to ensure that a safe learning environment is provided. Transitioning from carpeting to VCT will improve indoor air quality and maintainability.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Flooring Replacement - Various Schools PS-0707 St. Mary's County Public Schools

The Public School Construction Program announced that St. Mary's County Public Schools would be receiving $115,000 in Aging School Program funding for FY 2007, which is an increase from the $85,000 normally received. At this time, the school system has not been informed of what the requirements will be for utilizing these funds. It may be that the funds will be utilized for other projects based on the approved criteria.

This funding source was added to the FY 2007 capital plan to address the replacement of aging and deteriorating flooring components within the schools in order to provide for a safe learning environment.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONAmericans with Disabilities Act PS-0403

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: On-GoingStart Construction: On-GoingCompletion Date: On-Going

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. The ADA projects listed below are required to meet Federal Law

FY 2007 - RestroomsFY 2008 - RestroomsFY 2009 - RestroomsFY 2010 - RestroomsFY 2011 - RestroomsFY 2012 - PlaygroundsFY 2013 - Playgrounds


LOCATION:Various locations

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 239,875 34,375 22,500 25,000 27,500 27,500 27,500 23,000 52,500LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 4,305,125 620,625 427,500 475,000 522,500 522,500 522,500 422,000 792,500DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 4,545,000 655,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 445,000 845,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 1,026,928 305,000 (123,072) 0 0 0 0 0 845,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 3,395,000 350,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 445,000 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 123,072 0 123,072 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 4,545,000 655,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 445,000 845,000




The school system is implementing a phased approach to addressing the needs and expectations of individuals with disabilities that use the public schools, students, staff, parents/guardians, and the community. Under federal law, the school system was to have all of its facilities compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Based on funding, this project has been divided over the course of the last twelve years, with seven years remaining for a total compliance time of twenty-two years. The remaining projects address accessibility for restrooms, playgrounds, and signage within the building. Significant progress has been made as a part of our addition/modernization process; however, we must also meet the need of our facilities which have not been modernized yet. The school system meets the current needs of our students and staff.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs





Americans with Disabilities Act PS-0403 St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBethune Educational Center - Roof Systemic Renovation PS-0609

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: To Be DeterminedStart Construction: To Be DeterminedCompletion Date: To Be Determined

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project funding request is required to award a contract for the replacement of the failing roof


LOCATION:22975 Colton Point RoadBushwood, Maryland

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 323,000 163,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 323,000 163,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS (163,000) 0 (163,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 323,000 163,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 163,000 0 163,000 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 323,000 163,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is required to replace the existing roof on the Bethune Educational Center, which houses the Department of Information and Technology for the school system. This roof is 43 years old and has deteriorated extensively over the past few years. Several major storms last year including ice storms and hurricanes have caused significant damage to the roof. Frequent maintenance of this roof is required. This project was bid in 2005 and the project was over bid based on increased construction costs. This request is for additional funding to rebid and award the project.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS


STAFFING -FTEs


This project request is for additional funds to award a contract. The project was bid in 2005 and the bids exceeded the project funding available in FY 2006. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.



Bethune Educational Center - Roof Systemic Renovation PS-0609 St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONGreat Mills High School - Gym Floor Resurfacing PS - 0607

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is needed to maintain the safety and use of the original gymnasium floor


LOCATION:21130 Great Mills RoadGreat Mills, Maryland 20634

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 190,000 85,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 190,000 85,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 190,000 85,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 190,000 85,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0


This project is to replace the gymnasium floor, which was not undertaken during the addition/renovation in 1997 due to funding constraints. This project would replace the existing gymnasium floor and will address the soft spots which have developed in the floor, which hampers game play. Funding for this project was approved locally in FY 2006 for partial funding. Matching state funds were requested through the state Aging School Program funding but were not approved as being state eligible. This additional local funding will allow for the bid and award of this project.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Great Mills High School - Gym Floor Resurfacing PS - 0607 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was added to reflect the additional funding required to complete this project based on the state's determination of ineligibility for use of Aging School Program funding.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBuilding Generator System - Two Offices PS-0708

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This system is required to maintain the computer networking system and energy management systems for the school system functioning during powe outages.


Priority A-1

LOCATION:Bushwood, Maryland 20618Loveville, Maryland 20656




This scope of this project will be to place a 50kw generators permanently mounted on site to power both the Bethune Educational Center and the Supporting Services building during outages. The size of the generators will be determined by the investigation of a design engineer into the incoming electrical service, switch gear, and panel board wiring for each facility. The system will employ an automatic transfer switch to immediately energize the generator and switch power over to the generator upon an outage. The generator will be sized to accommodate the emergency operational electrical needs of each facility, security system, fire alarm system, telephone system, necessary emergency lighting, and computer equipment needed to operate on an emergency basis.

3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needs







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Building Generator System - Two Offices PS-0708 St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was added to the program to meet the needs of our information technology department and the supporting services department.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONFirst New Elementary School - Site in Wildewood PS-0404

DESCRIPTION:


Bid Date: October 2007Start Construction: January 2008Completion Date: July 2009PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is required to address existing elementary school capacity issues in the central portion of the county, as well as providing additional classroom to support the required implementation of full day Kindergarten at other schools through boundary realignmentB. This project will be funded under the new cost sharing by the state at 72% participation for construction funds onlyCOMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.4 Meet the existing and future demands for public education and information coordinated with overall quality of life and development goals of the countyPriority A-1LOCATION:Extension of Wildewood Parkway

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 1,340,000 868,000 0 472,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 19,468,000 0 0 7,174,000 12,294,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 125,000 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 75,000 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 553,000 0 0 0 553,000 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 21,561,000 868,000 0 7,846,000 12,847,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 20010 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 3,318,500 174,848 (174,848) 0 3,318,500 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 230,152 230,152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 6,409,500 463,000 0 3,146,000 2,800,500 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 174,848 174,848 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 11,428,000 0 Planning 4,700,000 6,728,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 21,561,000 868,000 0 7,846,000 12,847,000 0 0 0 0




This request is for a new elementary school to provide existing and projected capacity needs in the development districts. The school will be a 646 capacity facility based on 67,830 square feet and will be designed as a two-story facility. This project includes 3,000 s.f. of community space as part of the Public School Construction Program initiative, for a total new building s.f. of 70,830. The area in which the school will be constructed is the fastest growing part of the county, with 32% of the building permits issued annually. This project will support the implementation of full day Kindergarten via realignment of students from potentially six elementary schools. The location of this school will be adjacent to the Wildewood Planned Unit Development and will be accessed off of an extension to Wildewood Parkway. The enrollment projections indicate that with the completion of this project, the elementary schools in this area will continue to be overcrowded by 111 seats in FY 2011 and will begin to provide state justification for the second planned new elementary schoolNote: Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceed the budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currently bidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project treflect the associated increase in construction costsIn addition, the school system will be incorporating sustainable design elements into the project, which increase the emergency efficiency and provide for enhanced educational environments. Although there will be associated reductions in the energy costs for operation of this facility upon completion, the upfront cost of construction will need to be increased to cover these design elements.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 13 0 0 0

0 0 739,190 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 80,038 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 819,228 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.First New Elementary School - Site in Wildewood PS - 0404 St. Mary's County Public Schools

The FY 2007 request is for planning approval from the Public School Construction Program. Design funds for this project were approved in FY 2006.

This project increased in budget from the FY 2006 approved budget plan based on an increase of $37.16 per square foot based on the Public School Construction Program funding formula. In addition, this project will be approved under a new per student square footage of 108 s.f. per student versus the 105 s.f. per student in the FY 2006 project scope. Funding for FY2007 which reflects negative bonds, indicates the application of the County's balance as replacement funding. See discussion elsewhere in this budget book regarding the use of $14,228,272 of fund balance to replace general obligation bonds.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

* This staffing increase is for administration, building service, guidance, media, nurse and secretarial. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place throughout the system as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility. Funding for the FTE positions is based on the salaries as of the FY 2007 budget.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSpring Ridge Middle School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS - 08XX

DESCRIPTION:



COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.2.3 Maintain and improve levels of efficiency and service of community facilities to meet population needsPriority B-1

LOCATION:19856 Three Notch RoadLexington Park, Maryland

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 375,000 0 0 300,000 75,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 4,525,000 0 0 2,211,000 2,314,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 20,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 20,000 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 4,940,000 0 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 1,673,000 0 0 823,000 850,000 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 28,000 0 0 28,000 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 3,239,000 0 0 1,700,000 1,539,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 4,940,000 0 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0 0 0


This request is for the renovation of the entire HVAC system, including new roof top units, piping and insulation, boilers, pump, ductwork and an upgrade of the temperature control system. This project is needed to address the facility infrastructure needs. This is the original system constructed in 1974, which is 31 years old. The parts needed to keep the system running are no longer available and parts must be made to fix problems. At the time of construction the system will be 35 years old.

A. The mechanical system manufacturer for this system is out of business and all replacement parts are unavailable and must be custom manufactured or adapted from other company's parts. The system requires constant maintenance attention.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




There will be a reduction in utility costs due to the increased energy efficiency of the new system.




This project was deferred to FY 2008 pending completion of the schematic design which funding is being requested for in FY 2007. In addition, the project scope increased based on complete replacement of the entire system and based on the increased construction costs.



PROJ. NO.Spring Ridge Middle School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS - 08XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONGreenview Knolls Elementary School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS-08XX

DESCRIPTION:




Priority B-1

LOCATION:45711 Military LaneGreat Mills, Maryland 20634

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 175,000 0 0 175,000 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 2,036,000 0 0 2,036,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 15,000 0 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 2,231,000 0 0 2,231,000 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 981,000 0 0 981,000 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 1,250,000 0 0 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 2,231,000 0 0 2,231,000 0 0 0 0 0


This project includes the renovation of the entire HVAC system, including rooftop units, piping, insulation, boilers, pumps, and an upgrade of the temperature control system. This project also includes asbestos removal in the boiler room and at various locations in the building. This project is needed to address the facility infrastructure needs. This school is not scheduled for a modernization project within the current six year capital improvement program, but has been updated through systemic renovation projectsincluding a roof replacement. The remaining renovation work is scheduled for a future year which is out of the current six-year capital improvements program.

A. The existing boilers and rooftop units require constant maintenance.B. This is the original system built in 1965, which is 40 years old. At the time of construction the system will be 44 years old. C. This is the last school to need a complete new HVAC system and central air conditioning of the entire facility.D. The planning approval for the total renovation of this facility has been deferred beyond FY 2012.








FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Greenview Knolls Elementary School - HVAC Systemic PS-08XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

The funding for this project increased based on the new state construction costs per square foot.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

There may be a small reduction in utility costs due to the increased energy efficiency of the new system.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLettie Marshall Dent Elementary School - Chiller Replacement PS - 08XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is needed to maintain the HVAC system at the school


LOCATION:25390 Colton Point RoadChaptico, Maryland

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 195,000 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 195,000 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 195,000 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES (State ASP Fund) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 195,000 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0


This project is to replace the existing chiller which was installed in 1980. The chiller requires constant maintenance to address refrigerant leaks and the worn-out compressor. The manufacturer of this equipment is no longer in business and parts are no longer available to support this unit.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Lettie Marshall Dent Elementary School - Chiller Replacement PS - 08XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was identified as part of our Comprehensive Maintenance Plan as needing to be replaced in order to maintain the HVAC system at the school.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONChopticon High School - Gym Floor Replacement PS - 09XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is needed to maintain the safety and use of the original gymnasium floor


LOCATION:25390 Colton Point RoadChaptico, Maryland

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 185,000 0 0 0 185,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 185,000 0 0 0 185,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 185,000 0 0 0 185,000 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 185,000 0 0 0 185,000 0 0 0 0


This project is to replace the gymnasium floor, which was not undertaken during the addition/renovation in 1999 due to funding constraints. This project would replace the existing gymnasium floor and will address the soft spots which have developed in the floor, which hampers game play.







FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Chopticon High School - Gym Floor Replacement PS - 09XX St. Mary's County Public Schools



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONSecond New Elementary School - Site to be Determined PS - 09XX

DESCRIPTION:


Note: Site acquisition funds for this project were consolidated into project FY 2007-13 to allow greater flexibility during the acquisition process

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is required to address existing elementary school capacity issues countywide based on local rated capacity. The enrollment projections indicate that even with the completion of the first new elementary school, based on lower classes sizes, the elementary school level countywide will continue to be overcrowded by 125 - 4 seats in the five to ten year time frame.B. Under state legislation, the state rated capacity at the elementary school level will be reduced starting in July 2006. This change results in the justification for additiona elementary school capacity projects.COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.4 Meet the existing and future demands for public education and information coordinated with overall quality of life and development goals of the countyPriority B-1

LOCATION:To be determined

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 1,340,000 0 0 0 1,340,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 20,860,000 0 0 0 0 10,227,000 10,633,000 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000 0 0 0UTILITIES 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 553,000 0 0 0 0 553,000 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 22,953,000 0 0 0 1,340,000 10,980,000 10,633,000 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 5,816,500 0 0 0 0 648,750 5,167,750 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 5,708,500 0 0 0 1,340,000 2,531,250 1,837,250 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 11,428,000 0 0 0 Planning 7,800,000 3,628,000 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 22,953,000 0 0 0 1,340,000 10,980,000 10,633,000 0 0




This request is for a new elementary school to provide existing and projected capacity needs in the development districts. The school will be a 646 capacity facility based on 67,830 square feet and will be designed as a two-story facility. This project includes 3,000 s.f. of community space through the Public School Construction Program initiativefor a total building s.f. of 70,830. The area in which the school will be constructed is in the fastest growing part of the county, with 32% of the building permits issued annually. This school will be located in either the Leonardtown or Lexington Park development districts to support continued growth within the county. The enrollment projections indicate that with the completion of the first new elementary school, the elementary schools in this area will continue to be overcrowded by 111 seats in FY 2011 and will begin to provide state justification for this second planned new elementary schoolNOTE: Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceed the budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currently bidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costsIn addition, the school system will be incorporating sustainable design elements into the project, which increase the emergency efficiency and provide for enhanced educational environments. Although there will be associated reductions in the energy costs for operation of this facility upon completion, the upfront cost of construction will need to be increased to cover these design elements





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0




Funds would be required in FY 2012 - FY 2013. This staffing increase is for administration, building service, guidance, media, nurse and secretarial. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place throughout the system as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility. A total of 13 positions is estimated with a budget impact of $739,190.00 based on salaries as of the FY 2007 budget.




This project is needed to address existing and projected capacity needs at the elementary school level.

This project increased from the approved FY 2006 based on increased state construction dollar cost per square foot calculations.



PROJ. NO.Second New Elementary School - Site to be Determined PS - 09XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

CONTINUATION SHEET


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONNew High School - 1,200 capacity facility PS-09XX

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. Over the next five to ten years there will be a need for additional capacity at both the middle school and high school level. This project may open as a transitiona school to meet the projected capacity needs until a new middle school can be constructed

COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION:3.1.4 Meet the existing and future demands for public education and information coordinated with overall quality of life and development goals of the countyPriority B-1

LOCATION:To Be Determined

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 3,470,000 0 0 0 2,776,000 0 694,000 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 51,661,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,324,000 33,337,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0UTILITIES 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0EQUIPMENT 1,177,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,177,000OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 56,658,000 0 0 0 2,776,000 0 694,000 18,674,000 34,514,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 19,796,844 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,407,844 15,389,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 1,436,906 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,436,906 0 IMPACT FEES 6,001,250 0 0 0 2,776,000 0 694,000 2,531,250 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 29,423,000 0 0 0 Planning 0 0 10,298,000 19,125,000FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 56,658,000 0 0 0 2,776,000 0 694,000 18,674,000 34,514,000




This project is a new high school to meet capacity needs generated by new student growth for planned housing developments within the Lexington Park and Leonardtown Development Districts. This facility will be a 187,350 square foot facility and have a state rated capacity of 1,200. The school will be located in the Maryland Route 4 and Maryland Route 235 corridor to provide relief to all three existing high schools. Depending on the need at the middle school level, this facility may open as a combined middle/high school transitional school.NOTE: Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceed thebudget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currently bidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costsIn addition, the school system will be incorporating sustainable design elements into the project, which increase the emergency efficiency and provide for enhanced educational environments. Although there will be associated reductions in the energy costs for operation of this facility upon completion, the upfront cost of construction will need to be increased to cover these design elements





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.New High School - 1,200 capacity facility PS-09XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

The funding for this project increased based on the new state construction cost formula.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

Funds for this would be required in FY 2013 - FY 2014. This staffing increase is for administration, building service, guidance, media, nurse and secretarial. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place throughout the system as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility. A total o26 positions is estimated with a budget impact of $1,447,940.00 based on salaries as of the FY 2007 budget.



PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONLeonardtown Middle School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS - 09XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. Currently, rain leaking through the air handlers is creating the most problems with water infiltration into the classrooms. It should be noted that most of the classroom ductwork was resealed and rewrapped in 2000 in an effort to decrease air leaks and increase the effectiveness of the system, while awaiting the complete


Priority B-1

LOCATION:24015 Point Lookout RoadLeonardtown, Maryland

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 375,000 0 0 0 300,000 75,000 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 4,525,000 0 0 0 2,211,000 2,314,000 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 4,940,000 0 0 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 252,213 0 0 0 252,213 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 1,448,787 0 0 0 598,787 850,000 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 3,239,000 0 0 0 1,700,000 1,539,000 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 4,940,000 0 0 0 2,551,000 2,389,000 0 0 0


This request is for the renovation of the entire HVAC system, including new roof top units, piping and insulation, boilers, pumps, and an upgrade of the temperature control system. This project is needed to address the facility infrastructure needs. This is the original system constructed in 1975, which is 30 years old.




renovation of the system.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Leonardtown Middle School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS - 09XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project was deferred to FY 2008 pending completion of the schematic design which funding is being requested for in FY 2007. In addition, the project scope increased based on complete replacement of the entire system and based on the increased construction costs.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS




PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONOakville Elementary School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS-09XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. The existing boilers and rooftop units require constant maintenanceB. This is the original system built in 1966, which is 39 years old. At the time of construction the system will be 44 years old. C. This is one of two schools still remaining that need a complete new HVAC system and central air conditioning of the entire facilityD. The planning approval for the total renovation of this facility has been deferred beyond FY 2012


Priority B-1

LOCATION:26410 Three Notch RoadMechanicsville, Maryland 20659

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 114,000 0 0 0 114,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 1,565,000 0 0 0 1,565,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 1,699,000 0 0 0 1,699,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 701,000 0 0 0 701,000 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 998,000 0 0 0 998,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 1,699,000 0 0 0 1,699,000 0 0 0 0


This project includes the renovation of the entire HVAC system, including rooftop units, piping, insulation, boilers, pumps, and an upgrade of the temperature control system. This project also includes asbestos removal in the boiler room and at various locations in the building. This project is needed to address the facility infrastructure needs. This project is not scheduled for a modernization project within the six year capital plan, but has had a roof replacement and a Kindergarten classroom addition. The remaining modernization/renovation work is scheduled for a future year which is out of the current six-year capital improvements program.








FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Oakville Elementary School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS-09XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project increased in funding based on the state construction funding per square foot costs.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS




PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONBenjamin Banneker Elementary School - HVAC Systemic Renovation PS-09XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. The existing boilers and units require constant maintenanceB. This is the original system built in 1983, which is 22 years old. At the time of construction the system will be 27 years old. C. There are currently no plans to modernize this facility within the capital improvements program


Priority B-1

LOCATION:27180 Point Lookout RoadLoveville, Maryland 20656

Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 59,000 0 0 0 59,000 0 0 0 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 840,000 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 0 0DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UTILITIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 899,000 0 0 0 899,000 0 0 0 0

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 396,000 0 0 0 396,000 0 0 0 0 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 503,000 0 0 0 503,000 0 0 0 0FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 899,000 0 0 0 899,000 0 0 0 0


This project includes the renovation of the entire HVAC system, including units, piping, insulation, boilers, pumps, and an upgrade of the temperature control system. This project is for the early childhood center building which is the smaller building located on the Benjamin Banneker Elementary School property, which was constructed in 1983The system is currently 22 years old and will be 27 years old at the time of project completion.





PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONPS-09XX



FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



TOTAL COSTS



STAFFING -FTEs


This project increased in scope based on the state construction costs per square foot.



PROJECT TITLESt. Mary's County Public SchoolsBenjamin Banneker Elementary School - HVAC Systemic Renovation

CONTINUATION SHEET


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONThird New Elementary School - Site to be Determined PS -12XX

DESCRIPTION:



PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is required to address existing elementary school capacity issues countywide based on local rated capacity. The enrollment projections indicate tha even with the completion of the second new elementary school, based on lower classes sizes, the elementary countywide will continue to be overcrowdedB. Under state legislation, the state rated capacity at the elementary school level will be reduced starting in July 2006. This change results in the justification fo additional elementary school capacity projects



Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 1,340,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,340,000 0LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 20,860,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,860,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000UTILITIES 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000EQUIPMENT 553,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 553,000OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 22,953,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,340,000 21,613,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 11,525,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,340,000 10,185,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 11,428,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Planning 11,428,000FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 22,953,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,340,000 21,613,000




This request is for a new elementary school to provide existing and projected capacity needs in the development districts. The school will be a 646 capacity facility based on 67,830 square feet and will be designed as a two-story facility. This project includes 3,000 s.f. of community space through the Public School Construction Program initiative, for a total building s.f. of 70,830. The area in which the school will be constructed in the fastest growing part of the county, with 32% of the building permits issued annually. This school will be located in either the Leonardtown or Lexington Park development districts to support continued growth within the county.

NOTE: Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceedthe budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currentlybidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costs.In addition, the school system will be incorporating sustainable design elements into the project, which increase the emergency efficiency and provide for enhanced educational environments. Although there will be associated reductions in the energy costs for operation of this facility upon completion, the upfront cost of construction will need to be increased to cover these design elements





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.Third New Elementary School - Site to be Determined PS - 12XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project is needed to address existing and projected capacity needs at the elementary school level.

This project increased based on the state construction costs per square feet.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS

Funds would be required in FY 2012 - FY 2013. This staffing increase is for administration, building service, guidance, media, nurse and secretarial. It assumes that the new teachers required for this school will be in place throughout the system as enrollment continues to increase during the design and construction of this facility. A total of 13 positions is estimated with a budget impact of $739,190.00 based on salaries as of the FY 2007 budget.


PROJECT TITLE PROJ. NO. PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONNew Middle School PS -12XX

DESCRIPTION:


PLANNING JUSTIFICATION:A. This project is required to address projected middle school capacity issues countywide. The enrollment projections indicate that beginning in FY 2014 th middle schools will be becoming overcrowded to meet the state eligibility requirements for approval



Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toAPPROPRIATION PHASE Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 CompleteARCH/ENGINEERING 1,948,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 974,000 974,000LAND ACQUISITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONSTRUCTION 29,181,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,181,000DEMOLITION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0INSPECTION 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000UTILITIES 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000EQUIPMENT 771,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 771,000OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL COSTS 32,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 974,000 31,276,000

FUNDING SOURCE Total Prior FY 2007 Balance toCOUNTY FUNDS: Project Approval Budget FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Complete COUNTY BONDS 16,310,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 974,000 15,336,000 LOCAL TRANSFER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPACT FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STATE FUNDS 15,940,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Planning 15,940,000FEDERAL FUNDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FUNDS 32,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 974,000 31,276,000




This project is for a new middle school to meet capacity needs generated by new student growth from planned housing developments within the Lexington Park and Leonardtown Development Districts. This facility will be a 101,500 square foot facility and have a state rated capacity of 700. The school will be located in the Maryland Route 4 and Maryland Route 235 corridor to provide relief to three of the existing four middle schools.NOTE: Based on increases in petroleum based products and other associated construction costs, the school system is anticipating that the bids for this project will exceed the budget for this project, which is based on the per square foot costs approved by the Public School Construction Program for FY 2007. Based on projects that are currentlybidding within the county and throughout the state, we are estimating a significant shortfall in the budget. The school system will adjust the FY 2008 request for this project to reflect the associated increase in construction costs.In addition, the school system will be incorporating sustainable design elements into the project, which increase the emergency efficiency and provide for enhanced educational environments. Although there will be associated reductions in the energy costs for operation of this facility upon completion, the upfront cost of construction will need to be increased to cover these design elements.





FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 20120 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0



CONTINUATION SHEET

PROJ. NO.New Middle School PS - 12XX St. Mary's County Public Schools

This project is needed to address existing and projected capacity needs at the middle school level.

This project is a new FY 2012 project.



STAFFING -FTEs


TOTAL COSTS


NOT USED


NOT USED

ST. MARY’S COUNTY

ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

ST. MARY’S COUNTY GOVERNMENT Organizational Chart

CITIZENS OF ST. MARY’S COUNTY

Department of Public Works

and Transportation

Department of Economic and Community

Development

Department on Aging

Department of Recreation, Parks and

Community Services

Department of Public Safety

Department of Information Technology

Department of Land Use and

Growth Management

Human Resources

Marcey House, Director

Public Information,

Boards, Committees, and Commissions

County Attorney

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

* Local Elected Officials Circuit Court State’s Attorney Orphan’s Court Treasurer Sheriff

*Major Independent Boards Board of Education Board of Library Trustees College of Southern Maryland

*Other Agencies Alcohol Beverage Board Cooperative Extension Service Department of Health Department of Social Services Metropolitan Commission Supervisors of Elections


* County Commissioners have funding responsibility only

Department EffectiveIncrease Position Description Grade Date

Department on Aging0.75 Office Specialist - RPT, Northern Sr. Center S02 7/1/2006

Department of Economic Comm Development1.0 Housing Specialist, Housing S05 7/1/20061.0 Senior Housing Specialist, Housing S06 7/1/2006

Land Use & Growth Management1.0 Senior Office Specialist S03 7/1/2006

Public Works & Transportation2.0 Equipment Operator III S05 9/1/2006

Recreation, Parks & Community Services1.0 Sports Specialist S07 7/1/20061.0 Coordinator, Parks Maintenance S08 7/1/2006

(1.0) Coordinator, Parks Administration S08 7/1/20061.0 Groundskeeper S02 7/1/2006

0.75 Teen Court Coordinator S07 7/1/2006

Public Safety8 Ranks, Communication Specialist III S06 7/1/20064 Ranks, Communication Specialist II S05 7/1/2006

1.0 1 Animal Warden S05 1/1/2007

Office of the Sheriff (See Note Below) 1 Rank, DFC M02 7/1/20068 Ranks, Senior DFC M07 7/1/20065 Ranks, Corporal M03 7/1/2006

5.0 Deputies M01 7/1/20061.0 Senior Office Specialist - Hourly conversion S03 7/1/20061.0 Armorer - Hourly conversion S07 7/1/20065.0 Special Deputy -Hourly conversion S05 7/1/20061.0 Fiscal Specialist I S03 7/1/20060.5 Classification Specialist - RPT S03 7/1/2006

5 Ranks, CFC V02 7/1/20067 Ranks, Senior CFC V03 7/1/20061 Rank, Correctional Lieutenant V07 7/1/2006

State's Attorney1.0 Assistant State's Attorney,Domestic Violence AE69 7/1/20061.0 Domestic Violence Coordinator-50% Revolving Fund S05 7/1/20061.0 Investigator-50% Revolving Fund S07 7/1/2006

26.0 Net Increase in FTE Positions

CHANGES IN FTE POSITIONS APPROVED FY2007 OPERATING BUDGET

FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2007Departments Revised Approved Revised Requested Approved

Board of County Commissioners 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 County Administrator 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 9.00 Marcey House 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Department on Aging 33.00 37.00 34.50 35.50 35.25 County Attorney 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Economic and Community Dev. 40.50 31.00 35.00 38.00 37.00 Department of Finance 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 Information Technology 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Human Resources 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 Land Use & Growth Management 35.00 36.00 36.00 37.00 37.00 Planning Commission 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Public Works and Transportation 126.50 127.50 127.50 127.50 129.50 Recreation,Parks & Comm Service 43.00 43.00 43.00 47.00 45.75 Public Safety 32.00 35.00 35.00 36.00 36.00 Circuit Court 19.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 Orphans Court 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Sheriff 223.00 233.00 232.00 260.00 245.50 States Attorney 30.00 30.00 30.00 33.00 33.00 Treasurer 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Social Services 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Alcohol Beverage Office 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Alcohol Beverage Board 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Election Board 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Total County Government 674.00 682.50 683.00 726.00 709.00

Increase over Prior Year 6.50 8.50 0.50 43.00 26.00

Authorized Positions - St. Mary's County BudgetFull Time Equivalent (FTE) Positions

AUTHORIZED COUNTY GOVERNMENT POSITIONS FY 2007 APPROVED BUDGET

This position and grade authorization chart includes only budgeted full-time and regular part-time positions.

M Merit A Appointed C Contract R Revenue G Grant E Elected

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS M 1 Administrative Assistant to BOCC S08 E 5 Commissioner Elected M .5 Senior Admin Coordinator-RPT S05 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M 1 Admin. Asst. to the County Admin. S07 C 1 Video Technician S03 C 1 County Administrator M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Fiscal Specialist I S03 M 1 Public Information Coordinator S06 C 1 Public Information Officer M 1 Admin Coordinator S04 M 1 Switchboard Operator S01 MARCEY HOUSE G 1 Clinical Program Manager S07 G 1 Director S11 G 1 House Manager/Day S04 G 1 House Manager/Night S04 G 0.5 Senior Office Specialist S03 G 1 House Manager/ Evening S04 DEPARTMENT ON AGING C 1 Director G/M 1 Fiscal Specialist III S05 M 1 Supervisor S07 M 1 Senior Administrative Coordinator S05 M .75 Office Specialist S02 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Data Base Administrator S04 M 1 Deputy Director S11 M 1 Food Service Tech S02 M .5 Food Service Tech-Oakley S02 M .5 Food Transporter S02 M 3 Operations Manager S08 M 3 Program Specialists S05 M 2 Program Coordinators S07 M 1 Manager S10

M 1 I & A Caseworker S05

Department On Aging – Grant/MADS G 1 Nurse Managers S09 G 5 Nurse Assistants S03 G 1 Social Workers S08 G 1 Activity Coordinator S05 G 1 Client Account Specialist S04 G .5 Food Service Tech S02 G .5 Food Transporter S02 G .5 I & A Caseworker S05 G 1 Manager, Home & Com Ser S10 G .5 Office Specialist S02 G 2 Program Managers S08 G .5 Program Specialist S07 G 1 Project Manager S07 COUNTY ATTORNEY M 1 Property Manager S08 M 1 Office Specialist S02 C 1 Deputy County Attorney S11 C 1 County Attorney M 1 Paralegal S07 M 1 Senior Admin. Coordinator S05 Economic & Community Development Administrative Services C 1 Director M 1 Coordinator S06 Economic Development & Tourism Division M 1 Agricultural Development Manager S09 M 1 Coordinator S07 M 1 Business Development Manager S10 M 1 Tourism Manager S09 M 2 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Administrative Coordinator S04 M 1 Exec Director, CDC S10

Housing Authority G 5 Administrative Coordinator S04 G 1 Executive Director S10 G 1 Resource Specialist S06 G 1 Supervisor S07 G 1 Fiscal Specialist III S05 G 7 Housing Specialist S05 G 2 Office Specialist S02 G 2 Program Manager S09 G 4 Senior Housing Specialist S06 G 3 Maintenance Mechanic S03 FINANCE DEPARTMENT C 1 Chief Financial Officer M 1 Senior Administrative Coordinator S05 M 1 Deputy Director, Finance S11 M 2 Budget Analyst S09 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 Accounting M 1 Accountant S06 M 1 Accounting Officer S10 M 4 Fiscal Specialist III S05 M 1 Senior Accountant S08 Procurement M 1 Buyer S06 M 1 Procurement Manager S10 M 1 Procurement Specialist S04 M 1 Senior Buyer S08 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY C 1 Director M 1 Help Desk Tech IT I M 1 Lead Technician IT III M 1 PC Technician I IT I M 1 PC Technician lI IT II M 1 Senior Admin. Coordinator S05 M 1 AS/400 Programmer Analyst IT II M 1 WAN Administrator IT IV M 1 Network Manager IT IV M 1 AS 400 System Analyst IT IV M 1 Telecommunications Specialist S06 M 0.5 Webmaster-RPT IT II M 0.5 Archives Assistant S02 M 1 Archives Manager S06 M 1 GIS Supervisor S09

HUMAN RESOURCES M 1 Benefits Coordinator S07 M 1 Deputy Director S10 C 1 Director M 2 Human Resources Specialist S04 M 1 Sr. Human Resource Spec S06 M 1 Human Resources Analyst S08 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 LAND USE & GROWTH MANAGEMENT C 1 Director M 1 Fiscal Specialist IV S06 M 1 Office Manager S07 M 1 Office Specialist S02 M 1 Sr. Office Specialist S03 M 1 Senior Administrative Coordinator S05 M 1 Deputy Director S11 Comprehensive Planning M 1 Addressing Technician S04 M 1 GIS/Database Specialist S08 M 1 GIS/CADD Operator S06 M 1 Planner I S06 M 1 Planner II S07 M 1 Planner III S08 M 1 Planner IV S09 M 1 Senior Planner S10 Development Services Division M 2 Sr. Office Specialist S03 M 2 Planner I S06 M 1 Planner III, Zoning Administrator S09 M 2 Planner II S07 M 1 Planner IV S09 M 1 Planning Specialist S04 M 1 Sr. Planning Specialist S05 Inspections M 1 Code Coordinator S08 M 1 Inspections Coordinator S05 M 4 Inspector II S06 M 1 Inspector III S07 Permit Services M 1 Permits Coordinator S08 M 3 Permits Specialist I S04 M 1 Permits Specialist II S05 Planning Commission A 1 Chairman A 6 Member

PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION Administrative Services C 1 Director M 1 Fiscal Manager S08 M 1 Office Manager S07 M 1 Permits Specialist II S05 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 Project Management/Develop Rev M 1 Deputy Director D M 2 Engineer III C M 1 Engineer Technician S07 M 2 Senior Engineer Technician S08 Construction/Inspection M 4 Inspector III S07 M 1 Manager S09 Highway Maintenance Division M 4 Equipment Operator I S03 M 6 Equipment Operator II S04 M 16 Maintenance Worker S02 M 5 Road Foreman S06 M 6 Equipment Operator III S05 M 1 Inspector I S05 M 1 Manager S09 M 1 Supervisor S07 M 1 Traffic & Permits Foreman S06 M 1 Sign Maintenance Operator S04 M 1 Fiscal Specialist I S03 Solid Waste/Recycling M 7 Landfill Attendant S01 M 1 Manager S09 M 6 Equipment Operator III S05 M 2 Weighmaster S03 Transportation/Mailroom M 2 Mail Clerk S02 M 1 Manager S10 M 1 Supervisor S07 Vehicle Maintenance M 3 Equipment Mechanic I S04 M 1 Shop Foreman S06 M 2 Equipment Mechanic II S05 M 1 Equipment Operator I S04 M 1 Supervisor S08 M 1 Supply Specialist S04 M 1 Coordinator S07

St. Mary's Transit System G 12.5 Bus Driver S03 G 1 Equipment Mechanic I S04 G 1 STS Trainer S04 G 1 Supervisor S08 G 3 Transportation Specialist S04 G 1 Fiscal Specialist IV S06 Capital Projects M 1 Engineer II B M 1 Senior Project Manager C Building Services M 1 Building Service Manager S09 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Coordinator S06 M 1 Janitor III S03 M 5 Lead Maintenance Mechanic S05 M 8 Maintenance Mechanic S03 M 1 Facilities Mechanic S02 M 1 Supervisor S07 RECREATION, PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES Administrative Services C 1 Director M 2 Fiscal Specialist IV S06 M 1 Executive Coordinator S07 M 1 Sports Specialist S07 M 1 Senior Admin Coordinator S05 M 3 Coordinator S08 M 1 Manager S10 M 1 Therapeutic Recreation Specialist S08 M 1 Senior Office Special S03 M 1 Office Specialist S02 Parks Division M 1 Maintenance Crew Chief S04 M 4 Groundskeeper S02 M 4 Maintenance Foreman S06 M 1 Manager S09 M 1 Coordinator S08 M 2 Senior Groundskeeper S03 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Shop Foreman S06 Museum Division M 1 Museum Coordinator S08 M 1 Museum Director S10 M 1 Museum Supervisor S07 M 1 Museum Specialist S06 M 1 Museum Technician S04

Community Services Division M 2 Coordinator S08 M 1 Manager S10 M 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M .75 Teen Court Coor. S07

Wicomico Golf Division

R 1 Assistant Manager S06 R 1 Food and Beverage Specialist S03 R 1 Golf Course Foreman S04 R 3 Groundskeeper S02 M 1 Manager S09 R 1 Supervisor S07

PUBLIC SAFETY Emergency Communications Division C 1 Director M 4 Communications Specialist S04 M 1 Manager S10 M 1 Fiscal Specialist S04 M 12 Comm. Speciaist II S05 M 4 Comm. Specialist IV S07 Comm. Spec II Ranks (4) S05 Comm. Spec III Ranks (8) S06 Radio Division M 1 Tech Service Coordinator S08 M 1 Lead Technician – RF S08 M 2 Radio Frequency Technician I S06 Emergency Management Division M 1 Emergency Services Coordinator S08 M 1 Emergency Management Mgr S09 G 1 Emergency Planner S08 M 1 Office Manager S07 M 1 Supervisor-Animal Control S07 M 4 Animal Warden S05 CIRCUIT COURT A 1 Sr. Assignment Clerk S06 A 3.5 Bailiff A 0.5 Chief Bailiff A 1 Real Time Court Reporter S10 A 1 Court Reporter S08 A 3 Judge A 1 Office Manager S06

A 1 Senior Legal Assistant S06 A 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 A 1 Admin Coordinator S04 A 1 Court Administrator S09 A/G 1 Coordinator S07 A/G 1 Senior Legal Assistant S06 ORPHAN'S COURT E 3 Judge SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Administrative Services E 1 Sheriff Elected M 1 Investigator S06 M 1 Civilian Training Instructor S08 M 2 Coordinator S07 M 3 Crime Lab Technician S07 M 1 Armorer S07 M 2 Fiscal Specialist I S03 M 1 Fiscal Specialist IV S06 M 1 Police Services Specialist S04 M 2 Senior Administrative Coordinator S05 M 5 Special Deputy S05 M/G 1 Senior Classification Specialist S03 M 4.5 Classification Specialist S04 M 5 Station Clerks S03 M 1 Station Clerk Supervisor S06 M 2 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 Staff Specialist S05 M 1 Manager-Fiscal S08 M 1 Supervisor S06 M 1 Court Security Officer V01 M 3 Process Server S03 M 1 Security Specialist S03 M 1 Systems Administrator ITII M 1 Admin Coordinator S04 1 Property Specialist S04 Police Services Division M Authorized M 1 Captain (Rank only) M06 11 Corporal M03 Corporal (5 Ranks) M03 M/G D.F.C. (1 Ranks) M02 M 50 D.F.C. M02 M 37 Deputy M01 M 4 Lieutenant M05 M/G 9 Sergeant M04 M 10 Senior DFC M07 Sr. DFC (8 Ranks) M07

M Correctional Division M 1 Sr. Administrative Coordinator S05 33 Correctional Officer V01 M Correctional Officer I (5 Ranks) V02 M 20 Correctional Officer I V02 6 Correctional Officer III V04 M Correctional Officer V (1 Rank) V07 M 5 Correctional Officer IV V05 M 2 Correctional Officer V V07 M 1 Lieutenant-Corrections M05 M 1 Inmate Services Coordinator S08 M 1 Inmate Ser Coord-Admin S04 M 5 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 4 Correctional II Senior V03 Sr. CFC (7 ranks) V03 M OFFICE OF STATE'S ATTORNEY A 1 Chief Investigator S09 A/G 1 Asst. States Attorney I M 4 Asst. States Attorney II A 1 Community Services Coordinator S05 M 2 Deputy States Attorney M/G 1 Fiscal Specialist III S05 M/G 5 Legal Assistant I S04 M 7 Legal Assistant II S05 G 1 Bad Check Coordinator S05 M 1 Program Manager S08 M 1 Senior Legal Assistant S06 E 1 Senior Office Specialist S03 M 1 States Attorney Elected A 1 Victim/Witness Coordinator S06 R/M 2 Asst. States Attorney R/M 1 Domestic Violence Coor. S05 R 1 Investigator S07 1 Law Clerk S06

E TREASURER M 1 County Treasurer Elected M 1 Fiscal Special III S05 M 2 Fiscal Specialist IV S06 1 Fiscal Technician S07 M ALCOHOL BEVERAGE BOARD M 1 Board Administrator S05 M 0.5 Senior Office Specialist S03 A 0.5 Alcohol Beverage Board Inspector S04 A 1 Chairman 4 Member A BOARD OF ELECTIONS 3 Member M SOCIAL SERVICES G 1 Human Services Case Worker S08 1 Senior Legal Assistant S06


NOT USED

Grade Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10

Annual Salary: $21,740 $22,303 $22,908 $23,471 $24,012 $24,596 $25,180 $25,699 $26,305 $26,8451 Bi-Weekly Pay: $836.16 $857.79 $881.09 $902.72 $923.52 $945.98 $968.45 $988.42 $1,011.71 $1,032.51

Hourly Rate: $10.45 $10.72 $11.01 $11.28 $11.54 $11.82 $12.11 $12.36 $12.65 $12.91

Annual Salary: $23,925 $24,552 $25,201 $25,807 $26,456 $27,083 $27,689 $28,316 $28,944 $29,5932 Bi-Weekly Pay: $920.19 $944.32 $969.28 $992.58 $1,017.54 $1,041.66 $1,064.96 $1,089.09 $1,113.22 $1,138.18

Hourly Rate: $11.50 $11.80 $12.12 $12.41 $12.72 $13.02 $13.31 $13.61 $13.92 $14.23

Annual Salary: $26,348 $27,018 $27,711 $28,381 $29,073 $29,787 $30,436 $31,172 $31,864 $32,5133 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,013.38 $1,039.17 $1,065.79 $1,091.58 $1,118.21 $1,145.66 $1,170.62 $1,198.91 $1,225.54 $1,250.50

Hourly Rate: $12.67 $12.99 $13.32 $13.64 $13.98 $14.32 $14.63 $14.99 $15.32 $15.63


Hourly Rate: $13.92 $14.30 $14.64 $15.02 $15.38 $15.76 $16.12 $16.48 $16.85 $17.20$1,355.20


Hourly Rate: $15.02 $15.44 $15.88 $16.31 $16.74 $17.18 $17.62 $18.05 $18.49 $18.93$1,155.20


Hourly Rate: $16.82 $17.31 $17.79 $18.29 $18.77 $19.26 $19.74 $20.23 $20.72 $21.20


Hourly Rate: $18.48 $19.05 $19.64 $20.23 $20.80 $21.40 $21.99 $22.56 $23.15 $23.73


Hourly Rate: $20.70 $21.36 $22.01 $22.65 $23.31 $23.99 $24.63 $25.28 $25.93 $26.59$1,906.40 $1,845.60


Hourly Rate: $22.31 $23.14 $23.98 $24.78 $25.62 $26.44 $27.25 $28.08 $28.91 $29.73


Hourly Rate: $25.67 $26.61 $27.56 $28.50 $29.43 $30.40 $31.32 $32.26 $33.23 $34.17


Hourly Rate: $29.52 $30.60 $31.68 $32.79 $33.87 $34.96 $36.06 $37.13 $38.23 $39.31

St. Mary's County Salary Schedule

County ScaleIncludes 4% COLA; 3% effective July 1, 2006 and 1% effective January 1, 2007



Hourly Rate: $13.18 $13.47 $13.72 $13.99 $14.29 $14.55 $14.81 $15.08 $15.37 $15.70


Hourly Rate: $14.53 $14.81 $15.11 $15.42 $15.74 $16.04 $16.32 $16.64 $16.93 $17.25


Hourly Rate: $15.96 $16.29 $16.64 $16.95 $17.30 $17.62 $17.94 $18.29 $18.60 $18.98


Hourly Rate: $17.57 $17.94 $18.31 $18.67 $19.02 $19.40 $19.76 $20.12 $20.51 $20.87


Hourly Rate: $19.35 $19.79 $20.23 $20.66 $21.10 $21.53 $21.96 $22.41 $22.85 $23.26


Hourly Rate: $21.70 $22.18 $22.65 $23.15 $23.64 $24.13 $24.62 $25.10 $25.59 $26.06$2,186.40


Hourly Rate: $24.32 $24.91 $25.49 $26.07 $26.67 $27.25 $27.83 $28.42 $29.00 $29.56


Hourly Rate: $27.24 $27.89 $28.57 $29.21 $29.86 $30.53 $31.18 $31.81 $32.48 $33.10


Hourly Rate: $30.56 $31.36 $32.19 $33.01 $33.84 $34.67 $35.50 $36.32 $37.13 $37.94


Hourly Rate: $35.12 $36.07 $36.99 $37.95 $38.89 $39.85 $40.79 $41.72 $42.66 $43.62$3,359.20 $8.26 $40.12


Hourly Rate: $40.39 $41.51 $42.59 $43.67 $44.77 $45.85 $46.95 $48.02 $49.13 $50.16

St. Mary's County Salary Schedule



Annual Salary: $41,533 $42,615 $43,697 $44,778 $45,881 $46,941 $48,045 $49,148 $50,230 $51,289A Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,597.44 $1,639.04 $1,680.64 $1,722.24 $1,764.67 $1,805.44 $1,847.87 $1,890.30 $1,931.90 $1,972.67

Hourly Rate: $19.97 $20.49 $21.01 $21.53 $22.06 $22.57 $23.10 $23.63 $24.15 $24.66

Annual Salary: $52,479 $53,993 $55,508 $57,044 $58,558 $60,094 $61,586 $63,144 $64,615 $66,129B Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,018.43 $2,076.67 $2,134.91 $2,193.98 $2,252.22 $2,311.30 $2,368.70 $2,428.61 $2,485.18 $2,543.42

Hourly Rate: $25.23 $25.96 $26.69 $27.42 $28.15 $28.89 $29.61 $30.36 $31.06 $31.79

Annual Salary: $59,315 $61,197 $63,079 $64,939 $66,800 $68,660 $70,564 $72,381 $74,284 $76,145C Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,281.34 $2,353.73 $2,426.11 $2,497.66 $2,569.22 $2,640.77 $2,713.98 $2,783.87 $2,857.09 $2,928.64

Hourly Rate: $28.52 $29.42 $30.33 $31.22 $32.12 $33.01 $33.92 $34.80 $35.71 $36.61

Annual Salary: $69,850 $72,229 $74,652 $76,988 $79,368 $81,791 $84,148 $86,571 $88,929 $91,330D Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,686.53 $2,778.05 $2,871.23 $2,961.09 $3,052.61 $3,145.79 $3,236.48 $3,329.66 $3,420.35 $3,512.70

Hourly Rate: $33.58 $34.73 $35.89 $37.01 $38.16 $39.32 $40.46 $41.62 $42.75 $43.91


Annual Salary: $52,393 $53,496 $54,556 $55,638 $56,719 $57,822 $58,861 $60,007 $61,089 $62,235A Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,015.10 $2,057.54 $2,098.30 $2,139.90 $2,181.50 $2,223.94 $2,263.87 $2,307.97 $2,349.57 $2,393.66

Hourly Rate: $25.19 $25.72 $26.23 $26.75 $27.27 $27.80 $28.30 $28.85 $29.37 $29.92

Annual Salary: $67,643 $69,179 $70,693 $72,208 $73,743 $75,236 $76,772 $78,308 $79,822 $81,358B Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,601.66 $2,660.74 $2,718.98 $2,777.22 $2,836.29 $2,893.70 $2,952.77 $3,011.84 $3,070.08 $3,129.15

Hourly Rate: $32.52 $33.26 $33.99 $34.72 $35.45 $36.17 $36.91 $37.65 $38.38 $39.11

Annual Salary: $78,048 $79,909 $81,769 $83,673 $85,511 $87,372 $89,232 $91,114 $93,018 $94,943C Bi-Weekly Pay: $3,001.86 $3,073.41 $3,144.96 $3,218.18 $3,288.90 $3,360.45 $3,432.00 $3,504.38 $3,577.60 $3,651.65

Hourly Rate: $37.52 $38.42 $39.31 $40.23 $41.11 $42.01 $42.90 $43.80 $44.72 $45.65

Annual Salary: $93,753 $96,111 $98,534 $100,870 $103,271 $105,672 $108,073 $110,453 $112,833 $115,255D Bi-Weekly Pay: $3,605.89 $3,696.58 $3,789.76 $3,879.62 $3,971.97 $4,064.32 $4,156.67 $4,248.19 $4,339.71 $4,432.90

Hourly Rate: $45.07 $46.21 $47.37 $48.50 $49.65 $50.80 $51.96 $53.10 $54.25 $55.41

St. Mary's County Salary Schedule - Engineering



Annual Salary: $33,616 $34,503 $35,412 $36,277 $37,142 $38,051 $38,894 $39,803 $40,668 $41,533ITI Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,292.93 $1,327.04 $1,361.98 $1,395.26 $1,428.54 $1,463.49 $1,495.94 $1,530.88 $1,564.16 $1,597.44

Hourly Rate: $16.16 $16.59 $17.02 $17.44 $17.86 $18.29 $18.70 $19.14 $19.55 $19.97

Annual Salary: $42,896 $44,108 $45,384 $46,617 $47,850 $49,105 $50,338 $51,571 $52,825 $54,058ITII Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,649.86 $1,696.45 $1,745.54 $1,792.96 $1,840.38 $1,888.64 $1,936.06 $1,983.49 $2,031.74 $2,079.17

Hourly Rate: $20.62 $21.21 $21.82 $22.41 $23.00 $23.61 $24.20 $24.79 $25.40 $25.99

Annual Salary: $50,467 $52,068 $53,691 $55,335 $56,892 $58,493 $60,094 $61,673 $63,252 $64,853ITIII Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,941.06 $2,002.62 $2,065.02 $2,128.26 $2,188.16 $2,249.73 $2,311.30 $2,372.03 $2,432.77 $2,494.34

Hourly Rate: $24.26 $25.03 $25.81 $26.60 $27.35 $28.12 $28.89 $29.65 $30.41 $31.18

Annual Salary: $61,954 $63,923 $65,869 $67,838 $69,785 $71,775 $73,679 $75,625 $77,572 $79,541ITIV Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,382.85 $2,458.56 $2,533.44 $2,609.15 $2,684.03 $2,760.58 $2,833.79 $2,908.67 $2,983.55 $3,059.26

Hourly Rate: $29.79 $30.73 $31.67 $32.61 $33.55 $34.51 $35.42 $36.36 $37.29 $38.24


Annual Salary: $42,377 $43,286 $44,173 $45,103 $45,946 $46,833 $47,720 $48,585 $49,472 $50,424ITI Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,629.89 $1,664.83 $1,698.94 $1,734.72 $1,767.17 $1,801.28 $1,835.39 $1,868.67 $1,902.78 $1,939.39

Hourly Rate: $20.37 $20.81 $21.24 $21.68 $22.09 $22.52 $22.94 $23.36 $23.78 $24.24

Annual Salary: $55,313 $56,546 $57,801 $59,012 $60,267 $61,500 $62,776 $63,987 $65,220 $66,497ITII Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,127.42 $2,174.85 $2,223.10 $2,269.70 $2,317.95 $2,365.38 $2,414.46 $2,461.06 $2,508.48 $2,557.57

Hourly Rate: $26.59 $27.19 $27.79 $28.37 $28.97 $29.57 $30.18 $30.76 $31.36 $31.97

Annual Salary: $66,454 $68,054 $69,590 $71,213 $72,792 $74,328 $75,972 $77,572 $79,151 $80,774ITIII Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,555.90 $2,617.47 $2,676.54 $2,738.94 $2,799.68 $2,858.75 $2,921.98 $2,983.55 $3,044.29 $3,106.69

Hourly Rate: $31.95 $32.72 $33.46 $34.24 $35.00 $35.73 $36.52 $37.29 $38.05 $38.83

Annual Salary: $81,509 $83,435 $85,425 $87,372 $89,297 $91,265 $93,234 $95,159 $97,128 $99,118ITIV Bi-Weekly Pay: $3,134.98 $3,209.02 $3,285.57 $3,360.45 $3,434.50 $3,510.21 $3,585.92 $3,659.97 $3,735.68 $3,812.22

Hourly Rate: $39.19 $40.11 $41.07 $42.01 $42.93 $43.88 $44.82 $45.75 $46.70 $47.65

St. Mary's County Salary Schedule - Information Technology



DEP Annual Salary: $39,386 $41,401 $43,608 $45,921 $48,453 $49,362 $50,270 $51,266 $53,214 $54,2521 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,514.84 $1,592.36 $1,677.22 $1,766.18 $1,863.56 $1,898.52 $1,933.48 $1,971.77 $2,046.67 $2,086.63

Hourly Rate: $18.94 $19.90 $20.97 $22.08 $23.29 $23.73 $24.17 $24.65 $25.58 $26.08

DFC Annual Salary: $42,101 $44,329 $46,721 $49,318 $52,067 $52,997 $53,993 $55,075 $57,087 $58,2122 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,619.29 $1,704.97 $1,796.98 $1,896.86 $2,002.56 $2,038.35 $2,076.64 $2,118.25 $2,195.66 $2,238.94

Hourly Rate: $20.24 $21.31 $22.46 $23.71 $25.03 $25.48 $25.96 $26.48 $27.45 $27.99

SDFC Annual Salary: $45,072 $47,522 $50,162 $52,932 $55,875 $56,957 $57,996 $59,143 $61,264 $62,4547 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,733.53 $1,827.77 $1,929.32 $2,035.85 $2,149.05 $2,190.67 $2,230.62 $2,274.73 $2,356.30 $2,402.08

Hourly Rate: $21.67 $22.85 $24.12 $25.45 $26.86 $27.38 $27.88 $28.43 $29.45 $30.03

CPL Annual Salary: $48,366 $51,050 $53,884 $56,892 $60,095 $61,220 $62,368 $63,579 $65,787 $67,0633 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,860.24 $1,963.44 $2,072.48 $2,188.17 $2,311.35 $2,354.63 $2,398.76 $2,445.36 $2,530.25 $2,579.36

Hourly Rate: $23.25 $24.54 $25.91 $27.35 $28.89 $29.43 $29.98 $30.57 $31.63 $32.24

SGT Annual Salary: $51,937 $54,837 $57,909 $61,156 $64,596 $65,895 $67,063 $68,383 $70,656 $72,0284 Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,997.57 $2,109.10 $2,227.29 $2,352.14 $2,484.48 $2,534.41 $2,579.36 $2,630.13 $2,717.52 $2,770.31

Hourly Rate: $24.97 $26.36 $27.84 $29.40 $31.06 $31.68 $32.24 $32.88 $33.97 $34.63

LT Annual Salary: $60,896 $64,142 $67,583 $71,218 $75,020 $76,377 $77,735 $79,242 $81,703 $83,2735 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,342.15 $2,467.00 $2,599.34 $2,739.17 $2,885.37 $2,937.59 $2,989.81 $3,047.75 $3,142.41 $3,202.79

Hourly Rate: $29.28 $30.84 $32.49 $34.24 $36.07 $36.72 $37.37 $38.10 $39.28 $40.03

CAPT Annual Salary: $65,224 $68,730 $72,410 $76,271 $80,387 $81,830 $83,315 $84,927 $87,495 $89,1716 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,508.61 $2,643.46 $2,785.00 $2,933.51 $3,091.81 $3,147.30 $3,204.42 $3,266.44 $3,365.17 $3,429.64

Hourly Rate: $31.36 $33.04 $34.81 $36.67 $38.65 $39.34 $40.06 $40.83 $42.06 $42.87j

St. Mary's County Salary ScheduleLaw Enforcement

COLA; 2% Market Increase effective July 1, 2006Salary <$45,000=$900 COLA$45,000 to $70,000 2% COLASalary >$70,000=$1400 COLA


DEP Annual Salary: $55,291 $56,351 $57,455 $58,559 $59,706 $60,874 $62,043 $63,255 $64,488 $65,7431 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,126.58 $2,167.36 $2,209.81 $2,252.26 $2,296.37 $2,341.32 $2,386.26 $2,432.87 $2,480.31 $2,528.59

Hourly Rate: $26.58 $27.09 $27.62 $28.15 $28.70 $29.27 $29.83 $30.41 $31.00 $31.61

DFC Annual Salary: $59,316 $60,485 $61,653 $62,865 $64,077 $65,332 $66,566 $67,864 $69,206 $70,5472 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,281.39 $2,326.33 $2,371.28 $2,417.89 $2,464.50 $2,512.77 $2,560.22 $2,610.16 $2,661.76 $2,713.36

Hourly Rate: $28.52 $29.08 $29.64 $30.22 $30.81 $31.41 $32.00 $32.63 $33.27 $33.92

SDFC Annual Salary: $63,644 $64,899 $66,154 $67,453 $68,773 $70,115 $71,476 $72,855 $74,235 $75,6357 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,447.85 $2,496.13 $2,544.40 $2,594.34 $2,645.11 $2,696.72 $2,749.09 $2,802.13 $2,855.17 $2,909.03

Hourly Rate: $30.60 $31.20 $31.81 $32.43 $33.06 $33.71 $34.36 $35.03 $35.69 $36.36

CPL Annual Salary: $68,383 $69,725 $71,088 $72,410 $73,810 $75,210 $76,674 $78,138 $79,666 $81,1933 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,630.13 $2,681.74 $2,734.17 $2,785.00 $2,838.85 $2,892.71 $2,949.01 $3,005.32 $3,064.07 $3,122.82

Hourly Rate: $32.88 $33.52 $34.18 $34.81 $35.49 $36.16 $36.86 $37.57 $38.30 $39.04

SGT Annual Salary: $73,407 $74,829 $76,250 $77,714 $79,220 $80,727 $82,275 $83,867 $85,500 $87,1344 Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,823.35 $2,878.02 $2,932.69 $2,989.00 $3,046.93 $3,104.87 $3,164.44 $3,225.64 $3,288.47 $3,351.30

Hourly Rate: $35.29 $35.98 $36.66 $37.36 $38.09 $38.81 $39.56 $40.32 $41.11 $41.89

LT Annual Salary: $84,885 $86,519 $88,195 $89,913 $91,632 $93,393 $95,196 $97,042 $98,930 $100,8395 Bi-Weekly Pay: $3,264.81 $3,327.64 $3,392.10 $3,458.20 $3,524.29 $3,592.02 $3,661.38 $3,732.37 $3,805.00 $3,878.44

Hourly Rate: $40.81 $41.60 $42.40 $43.23 $44.05 $44.90 $45.77 $46.65 $47.56 $48.48$4,020.80

CAPT Annual Salary: $90,889 $92,692 $94,475 $96,278 $98,145 $100,076 $101,985 $103,958 $105,995 $108,0326 Bi-Weekly Pay: $3,495.73 $3,565.09 $3,633.64 $3,703.00 $3,774.81 $3,849.06 $3,922.50 $3,998.39 $4,076.73 $4,155.06

Hourly Rate: $43.70 $44.56 $45.42 $46.29 $47.19 $48.11 $49.03 $49.98 $50.96 $51.94

St. Mary's County Salary ScheduleLaw Enforcement

COLA; 2% Market Increase effective July 1, 2006Salary <$45,000=$900 COLA$45,000 to $70,000 2% COLASalary >$70,000=$1400 COLA


Correctional Officer Annual Salary: $35,887 $36,645 $37,445 $38,202 $38,916 $39,673 $40,452 $41,252 $42,009 $42,788

CO Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,380.29 $1,409.41 $1,440.19 $1,469.31 $1,496.77 $1,525.89 $1,555.84 $1,586.62 $1,615.74 $1,645.70Hourly Rate: $17.25 $17.62 $18.00 $18.37 $18.71 $19.07 $19.45 $19.83 $20.20 $20.57

Correctional Officer First ClassCO I Annual Salary: $40,236 $41,058 $41,923 $42,766 $43,588 $44,432 $45,297 $46,098 $46,920 $47,785

Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,547.52 $1,579.14 $1,612.42 $1,644.86 $1,676.48 $1,708.93 $1,742.21 $1,772.99 $1,804.61 $1,837.89Hourly Rate: $19.34 $19.74 $20.16 $20.56 $20.96 $21.36 $21.78 $22.16 $22.56 $22.97

Senior Correctional Officer First ClassCO II Annual Salary: $42,355 $43,286 $44,216 $45,103 $45,946 $46,877 $47,785 $48,672 $49,559 $50,467


Corporal Annual Salary: $45,406 $46,336 $47,331 $48,239 $49,213 $50,186 $51,138 $52,090 $53,042 $53,993CO III Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,746.37 $1,782.14 $1,820.42 $1,855.36 $1,892.80 $1,930.24 $1,966.85 $2,003.46 $2,040.06 $2,076.67

Hourly Rate: $21.83 $22.28 $22.76 $23.19 $23.66 $24.13 $24.59 $25.04 $25.50 $25.96

Sergeant Annual Salary: $49,429 $50,467 $51,463 $52,566 $53,582 $54,642 $55,681 $56,676 $57,736 $58,709CO IV Bi-Weekly Pay: $1,901.12 $1,941.06 $1,979.33 $2,021.76 $2,060.86 $2,101.63 $2,141.57 $2,179.84 $2,220.61 $2,258.05

Hourly Rate: $23.76 $24.26 $24.74 $25.27 $25.76 $26.27 $26.77 $27.25 $27.76 $28.23

Lieutenant Annual Salary: $58,190 $59,401 $60,613 $61,824 $63,057 $64,269 $65,502 $66,713 $67,924 $69,158CO V Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,238.08 $2,284.67 $2,331.26 $2,377.86 $2,425.28 $2,471.87 $2,519.30 $2,565.89 $2,612.48 $2,659.90

Hourly Rate: $27.98 $28.56 $29.14 $29.72 $30.32 $30.90 $31.49 $32.07 $32.66 $33.25


Correctional OfficerCO Annual Salary: $43,545 $44,281 $45,059 $45,795 $46,595 $47,352 $48,110 $48,845 $49,624 $50,273


Correctional Officer First ClassCO I Annual Salary: $48,629 $49,472 $50,316 $51,160 $52,025 $52,825 $53,647 $54,534 $55,378 $56,330


Senior Correctional Officer First ClassCO II Annual Salary: $51,311 $52,241 $53,150 $54,015 $54,902 $55,832 $56,676 $57,606 $58,493 $59,380


Corporal Annual Salary: $54,967 $55,919 $56,892 $57,844 $58,817 $59,748 $60,699 $61,694 $62,625 $63,576CO III Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,114.11 $2,150.72 $2,188.16 $2,224.77 $2,262.21 $2,297.98 $2,334.59 $2,372.86 $2,408.64 $2,445.25

Hourly Rate: $26.43 $26.88 $27.35 $27.81 $28.28 $28.72 $29.18 $29.66 $30.11 $30.57$2,175.20

Sergeant Annual Salary: $59,769 $60,829 $61,846 $62,927 $63,944 $65,004 $66,042 $67,059 $68,098 $69,179CO IV Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,298.82 $2,339.58 $2,378.69 $2,420.29 $2,459.39 $2,500.16 $2,540.10 $2,579.20 $2,619.14 $2,660.74

Hourly Rate: $28.74 $29.24 $29.73 $30.25 $30.74 $31.25 $31.75 $32.24 $32.74 $33.26Lieutenant

CO V Annual Salary: $70,391 $71,624 $72,835 $74,090 $75,279 $76,534 $77,724 $78,914 $80,168 $81,444Bi-Weekly Pay: $2,707.33 $2,754.75 $2,801.34 $2,849.60 $2,895.36 $2,943.62 $2,989.38 $3,035.14 $3,083.39 $3,132.48Hourly Rate: $33.84 $34.43 $35.02 $35.62 $36.19 $36.80 $37.37 $37.94 $38.54 $39.16

St. Mary's County Salary ScheduleCorrections


TAX INFORMATION

Property Tax Per $100 of assessed value 0.872 0.857

Local Income Tax Percentage of taxable income 3.00% 3.00%Admissions & Amusement Tax Percentage of receipts 2% 2%Recordation Tax Per each $500 of value when $4.00 $4.00

property is sold and title recorded Transfer Tax Property transfer value 1% 1%

Trailer Park Tax Space rental receipts 10% 10%

Cable T.V. Franchise Tax Percentage of subscriber revenues 5% 5%

911 Fee (Local) Monthly telephone bill 75¢ 75¢

Public Accommodations Tax Percentage of transient charge 5% 5%

Energy Taxes:

Electricity Tax % of the billed unit charge per kilowatt-hour 5% 2.5%

Fuel Oil % of the billed unit charge per gallon 5% 2.5%

Liquefied Petroleum % of the billed unit charge per gallon 5% 2.5%

Natural Gas % of the billed unit sales 5% 2.5%

Impact Fees:

Schools Per residential dwelling unit $3,375 $3,375

Parks Per residential dwelling unit $675 $675

Roads Per residential dwelling unit $450 $450

Total Impact Fees $4,500 $4,500

FY 2006 Approved

Rate

ST. MARY'S COUNTY TAX RATES

BasisTax FY 2007

Approved Rate

Impact of Local Taxes Using Average Values and Income for St. Mary's County

Average Residential Property Taxpayer

Fair Market Value $250,000 *

Current Property Tax Bill: Rate per $100County Property Tax 0.857 2,143$ Fire Tax 0.041 103 Rescue Tax 0.009 23 Emergency Services Support Tax 0.016 40

Total 2,309$

Average St. Mary's County Personal Income Tax Return

Adjusted Gross Income 60,460$ ** Net Taxable Income 46,438$ **

Net County Income Tax 1,393$ ***

* Based on average value of homes sold in FY 2005 from Department of Assessments and Taxation. **Based on 34,238 taxable returns filed for tax year 2004*** Effective January 1, 2006 St. Mary's local rate is 3.00%

Source: Income Tax Summary Report, Tax Year 2004 State Comptroller's Office.

ST. MARY’S COUNTY

PROPERTY TAX RATES

FISCAL APPROVED CONSTANT YIELD YEAR TAX RATE TAX RATE 1992 2.32 2.19 1993 2.32 2.15 1994 2.27 2.19 1995 2.18 2.18 1996 2.13 2.13 1997 2.11 2.11 1998 2.08 2.08 1999 2.08 2.05 2000 2.08 2.02 2001 2.27 2.03 2002 .908 .883 2003 .908 .889 2004 .908 .887 2005 .878 .880 2006 .872 .833

2007 .857 .812 The property tax rate for FY 2007 is $.857 per $100 of assessed valuation. This is $.045 higher

than the "constant yield" tax rate, which is certified to the County by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation letter of February 14, 2006. The "constant yield" rate is that rate necessary to offset any overall increase in the level of assessments on existing properties. The estimated revenue yield from each 1¢ on the property tax rate is approximately $747,003.

ST. MARY'S COUNTY ASSESSABLE PROPERTY BASE

BUDGET

ESTIMATE FY 2006

BUDGET ESTIMATE

FY 2007

Real Property-Full Value: Full Year

$ 6,563,501,194

$ 6,955,209,633

Half Year

103,613,847

Business Personal Property 123,310,000 125,160,000

Public Utilities 125,977,000 126,192,000

Total Assessable Base $ 6,812,788,194

$ 7,310,175,480

Source: State Department of Assessments and Taxation, Constant Yield Letter dated 2/14/2006. and SDAT website for personal and public utilities updated 11/30/2005.

St. Mary’s County Department of Finance

Real Homestead Local Recorda- Local Admissions Trailer Local Hotel/ Tele- Energy/Subdivision Property Property Income tion Transfer & Amusement Park "911" Motel phone Electricity Cable

Tax (1) Tax Credit Tax (2) Tax Tax Tax Tax Fee Tax Tax Tax Tax

ALLEGANY $1.00 10% 2.93% $3.00 0.5% 7.5% 15.0% $0.75 8.0% - 0.30$ 2.0%-5.0%ANNE ARUNDEL $0.93 2% 2.56% $3.50 1.0% 10.0% 8.0% $0.50 7.0% 8.0% .0020/.0025 5.0%BALTIMORE CITY $2.308 4% 3.05% $5.00 1.5% 10.0% - $0.75 7.5% 12.0% 0.0080$ 5.0%BALTIMORE COUNTY $1.115 4% 2.83% $2.50 1.5% 10.0% 7.0% $0.75 10.0% 8.0% 0.0053$ 5.0%

CALVERT $0.89 10% 2.80% $5.00 - 10.0% 20.0% $0.75 5.0% - - 5.0%CAROLINE $0.91 10% 2.63% $3.30 0.5% - $15.00 $0.75 - - - -CARROLL $1.05 7% 3.05% $5.00 - 10.0% - $0.75 5.0% - - 5.0%CECIL $0.98 8% 2.80% $4.10 $10/deed 6.0% $20.00 $0.75 5.0% - 5.0%

CHARLES $1.03 10% 2.90% $5.00 - 10.0% $15/mo $0.75 5.0% - - 5.0%DORCHESTER $0.92 5% 2.62% $5.00 0.8% 1.0% 15.0% $0.75 5.0% - - -FREDERICK $1.00 5% 2.96% $5.00 . .5-5% 15.0% $0.75 3.0% - - -GARRETT $1.00 5% 2.65% $3.50 1.0% 4.5% 15.0% $0.75 4.0% - - - HARFORD $1.09 10% 3.06% $3.30 1.0% 1-10% $10/mo $0.75 - - - 3.0%HOWARD $1.04 5% 3.20% $2.50 1.0% 7.5% 10.0% $0.65 5.0% - - 5.0%KENT $0.99 5% 2.85% $3.30 0.5% 4.5% 20.0% $0.75 5.0% - - 3.0%-5.0%MONTGOMERY $0.856 10% 3.20% $3.45 .25-6% 7.0% - $0.75 7.0% $2/line 0.0114$ 5.0%

PRINCE GEORGE'S $0.960 3% 3.20% $2.20 1.4% 10.0% $5/mo $0.75 5.0% 8.00% 0.0048$ 5.0%QUEEN ANNE'S $0.870 5% 2.85% $3.30 0.5% 5.0% - $0.75 5.0% - - 5.0%ST. MARY'S ** $0.872 5% 3.00% $4.00 1.0% 2.0% 10.0% $0.75 5.0% - 5.0% 5.0%SOMERSET $0.99 10% 3.15% $3.30 - 4.0% - $0.75 5.0% - - 3.0%

TALBOT $0.52 0% 2.25% $3.30 1.0% 5.0% $50/qtr $0.75 4.0% - - -WASHINGTON $0.95 10% 2.80% $3.80 0.3% 3-5% 15.0% $0.75 6.0% - - -WICOMICO $0.99 10% 3.10% $3.50 - 6.0% 15.0% $0.75 5.0% - - 5.0%WORCESTER $0.73 3% 1.25% $3.30 0.5% 3.0% 18.0% $0.75 4.0% - - -

(1) Per $100 of assessed value.Many counties levy special service property taxes by district. (St. Mary's County has an additional fire tax of 2.4 to 5.0 cents depending upon election districand Rescue tax ranging from .08 to.11 cents.)Except as noted below, those special service taxes are in addition to those represented on this table

- Charles County includes $.16 fire tax levy in addition to the county base tax rate.- Montgomery County rate includes a weighted average of special service taxes, adding approximately 60 to 80 cents to the base county tax rate

(2) As percent of Maryland State taxable income.** St. Mary's FY 2007 Approved Budget includes a reduction of the Property Tax Rate to $.857 and the Energy Tax Rate t o 2.5% , effective July 1, 2006

Source: Budgets, Tax Rates, & Selected Statistics, Fiscal Year 2006 Maryland Association of Counties Local Government Fiscal Overview, Maryland Department of Legislative Services, published January 24, 2006

COMPARISON OF SELECTED TAXES AND FEES BY SUBDIVISION - FY 2006

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION DEBT

The St. Mary’s County Code requires that the budget include a statement of the bonded and other indebtedness of the County government and its agencies, including self-liquidating and special taxing district debts. The following statement of long-term obligations is included in the Annual Financial Statement and Independent Auditors’ Report of the County Commissioners of St. Mary’s County for the year ended June 30, 2005. Another statement is included which summarizes the legal debt margin of the County under existing law. Section 27-11 of the Code of St. Mary’s County provides that the aggregate amount of bonds outstanding at any one time may not exceed 2% upon the assessable basis of the County. Excluded from the debt limitation calculation are bonds issued for special taxing districts or self-liquidating projects (e.g. Hospital Bonds). Also included is information regarding debt capacity and, and some key debt affordability measures are discussed. FUND BALANCE Included are selected pages from the most recent audited financial statements regarding fund balance. These include: a schedule summarizing the key elements of fund balance, as reported; a brief narrative explanation of the components; and, a brief discussion, excerpted from the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) sections of the audited financial statements that addresses the development of the fund balance.

Long-term obligations

Primary Government

Year ending June 30

General Obligation Bonds Hospital Bonds State Loans

Special Assessment

Fund Total2006 12,374,061 3,834,907 28,594 57,880 16,295,442 2007 12,140,660 2,250,069 28,594 57,616 14,476,939 2008 12,133,508 2,253,231 28,594 49,757 14,465,090 2009 11,524,074 2,251,936 28,576 49,490 13,854,076 2010 10,708,717 1,679,976 21,891 49,223 12,459,807 2011-2015 43,776,553 8,366,784 90,030 137,839 52,371,206 2016-2020 35,974,413 8,414,144 42,586 6,582 44,437,725 2021-2026 16,388,117 5,062,518 29,056 21,479,691

155,020,103$ 34,113,565$ 297,921$ 408,387$ 189,839,976$

The totals above are composed of principal and interest as follows:

General Obligation Bonds Hospital Bonds State Loans

Special Assessment

Fund TotalPrincipal 113,135,000$ 23,630,000$ 293,854$ 408,387$ 137,467,241$ Interest 41,885,103 10,483,565 4,067 0 52,372,735

155,020,103$ 34,113,565$ 297,921$ 408,387$ 189,839,976$

SOURCE: Audited financial statements, page 60

The County Commissioners for St. Mary's CountyNotes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

The annual requirements to amortize all debt outstanding as of June 30, 2005, including interest of $53,372,736, except for the accrued landfill closure and postclosure costs, accumulated unpaid leave benefits, exempt financing and Maryland Water Quality Loan, are as follows:

DEBT AFFORDABILITY

Debt affordability is evaluated from both a legal and a financial perspective. St Mary’s County is one of a number of jurisdictions, which has established a legal limitation on the amount of debt, which the government can incur. In Chapter 27 of the St. Mary’s Code, the legal debt limitation is based on the aggregate amount of debt outstanding at any one time, which may not exceed 2% of the County’s assessable property tax base. Excluded from this calculation are bonds issued for projects to be paid from other than county government sources. These other sources currently consist of special-taxing districts, St. Mary’s Hospital, Wicomico Golf Course Enterprise Fund, and the St. Mary’s Nursing Center.

A legal ceiling on debt, however, is just a part of the determination of debt affordability. There is a need to examine the economics of debt, not just its legality. Under the most favorable circumstances, a local government’s debt is:

• proportional in size and rate of growth to its tax base; • does not extend past the useful life of the facilities that it finances; • is not used to balance the operating budget; • does not require repayment schedules that put excessive burdens on operating expenditures; • not so high as to jeopardize the government’s credit rating.

Evaluations of the County’s credit worthiness by the three major credit rating agencies (Moody’s

Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch) in March 2005 resulted in the conclusion that debt levels were moderate, debt service requirements were manageable, amortization of outstanding debt was rapid, and that overall debt was within various parameters established for assessing debt burden. The agencies recognized the pressures on the county capital plan as the result of population growth and the need for significant infrastructure improvements. However, the agencies felt that with the growing economy in St. Mary’s County and with continued strong management performance, that the debt position would remain manageable.

In March 2005, the County returned to the market to sell $16.2 million in General Obligation Bonds on current capital projects. The County’s ratings currently are AA for Fitch, AA- for Standard & Poor’s and Aa3 for Moody’s Investors Service. These ratings apply to the new issue as well as all outstanding general obligation bond debt.

There are two key debt affordability measures that the County considers in developing its operating and

capital budgets and will closely monitor in the future. These are: Outstanding general obligation bond debt as a percent of the assessable base

St. Mary’s County Legal Debt Limit 2.0% St. Mary’s County 7/1/2006 Debt Percentage 1.44%

General Fund Debt Service as a percent of General Fund Expenditures

Debt Affordability Benchmark 12.0% St. Mary’s County FY2007 7.09%

Current projections indicate that based on the fiscal year 2007 Capital Budget and 5 year plan, the

County will stay well within the parameters set by this Board of County Commissioners in connection with its debt affordability study. It is the Board’s intention to continue to monitor debt affordability measures in the context of the entire County financial position, and to continue to manage the balance between programmatic needs and fiscal affordability.

ST. MARY'S COUNTY LEGAL DEBT MARGIN UNDER EXISTING LAW

Estimated 7/1/2006 assessed property value

7,206,561,633

Legal debt limit

2%

Borrowing limitation under the law

$144,131,233

Outstanding debt issued as of July 1, 2007

112,013,086

Debt margin as of July 1, 2005

$32,118,147

Ratio of debt to assessed property value

1.55%

Note: The St. Mary's County Code requires that the aggregate amount of bonds outstanding at any one time may not exceed 2% of the assessable property base of the County. Excluded from this calculation are bonds issued for projects to be paid from other than County government sources (e.g., special-taxing districts, St. Mary's Hospital, St. Mary's Nursing Center). The County's ratio of debt to estimated assessed property value as July 1, 2006 is estimated to be 1.55%. By comparison, the ratio as of July 1, 2006 was 1.84%. Based on the plan, the ratio is estimated to decrease during the period of the 6 year capital plan. The legal debt limit must be analyzed in conjunction with other debt affordability measures such as debt service as a percent of general fund revenues, debt per capita, and debt as a percentage of per capita personal income. A review by the Department of Finance of these debt affordability measures in comparison to credit industry benchmarks and to other counties indicates that St. Mary's County is currently well within reasonable outstanding debt limits. The ratio of debt service to the operating budget stays well below the 12% recommended by the debt affordability study. Further, the ratio is well below the 10% level set as a goal by the Board of County Commissioners. The ratio for FY2006 was 8.61%. Based on the plan, the ratio is expected to be 7.09% in FY2007 and even lower in the remaining years of the 6 year capital plan. Note that these calculations reflect the impact of the approved transfer of $14,228,277 of fund balance to fund the cost of capital projects previously approved and intended to be funded by general obligation bonds. This transfer eliminates the need to sell bonds in FY2007, which has the effect of reducing the amount of debt service that would have had to be budgeted annually by approximately $1.04 million annually for the 20 year term of the bonds. This is the principal factor that decreases these ratios from the earlier 6 year plan.

Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal YearEnded Ended Ended Ended

6/30/2002 6/30/2003 6/30/2004 6/30/2005

Reserved Encumbrances $549,206 $338,460 $360,984 1,009,160 Inventory 327,116 359,750 414,267 479,925 Land Tax Sale 24,921 13,370 13,370 2,468 Domestic violence program 9,555 20,655 3,675 1,170 Prepaid expenditures 15,729 0 0 0 Compensated Absences 330,145 61,668 13,695 58,773

Total Reserved Fund Balance $1,256,672 $793,903 $805,991 $1,551,496

Unreserved Designated for subsequent years 1,041,592 2,497,915 1,964,104 3,026,965 Designated for Rainy Day Fund 605,408 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 Designated for Bond Rating ( 6%) 7,512,795 7,825,109 8,202,929 8,895,181 Designated for Economic Stabilization 0 0 7,500,000 7,500,000 Undesignated - Available for Future Budgets 2,392,186 1,834,641 3,026,965 12,188,643

Total Unreserved Fund Balance 11,551,981$ 13,157,665$ 21,693,998$ 32,860,789$

Total Fund Balance 12,808,653$ 13,951,568$ 22,499,989$ 34,412,285$

Source: Annual Audit Reports

GENERAL OPERATING FUND FUND BALANCE HISTORY

Economic stabilization reserve – The Board of County Commissioners have designated an economic stabilization reserve, set at $7.5 million. This reserve is intended to position the County to address unbudgeted costs or needs that arise due to the impending Base Re-alignment and Closure (BRAC) process as well as uncertainty of State funding, especially for school construction. It is the intention of the Board to decide on the use of unused funds no later than June 1, 2006; which is coincident with approval of the FY2007 budget.

8. Fund Balances

A summary of the reserved and unreserved - designated and undesignated fund balances as of June 30, 2005 is as follows:

General FundSpecial

AssessmentsFire & Rescue

Revolving Emergency Support TotalCapital Projects

FundPension Trust

Fund

ReservedEncumbrances $1,009,160 $2,626,480Inventory 478,925Land Tax Sale 2,468Retirement of Long-Term Obligations ($1,214,433) ($1,214,433)Domestic Violence Programs 1,170Future Project Revenue

Bonds Sold 9,969,922Roads- Impact Fees 589,612Parks- Impact fees 175,468Schools- Impact Fees 4,633,344Transfer Tax 4,364,860

Other, Including Federal and State Grants 58,773 16,356,415Total Reserved Fund Balances $1,550,496 ($1,214,433) $0 $0 ($1,214,433) $38,716,101 $0

UnreservedDesignated $20,910,209 $0 $896,546 $45,299 $941,845 $662,112 $22,036,072Undesignated 12,188,643 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Unreserved Fund Balances 33,098,852 0 896,546 45,299 941,845 662,112 22,036,072

Total Fund Balances (deficit) $34,649,348 ($1,214,433) $896,546 $45,299 ($272,588) $39,378,213 $22,036,072

SOURCE: Audited financial statements, page 76

The County Commissioners for St. Mary's CountyNotes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2005

Special Revenue Funds

The County Commissioners for St. Mary’s County Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2005 8. Fund balances (continued) The reserve for fund balance represents: Encumbrances - The amount of outstanding purchase orders at June 30, 2005. Inventory - The amount of inventory at June 30, 2005, carried as an asset. Fixed assets - The cost of land purchased at tax sales by The County Commissioners for St. Mary's County carried as an asset at June 30, 2005. Retirement of long-term obligations - The amount of future revenue to be used for the retirement of long-term obligations. Domestic violence programs - The amount of marriage license fees committed for domestic violence programs by resolution. Future project revenue - The amount of revenue previously collected which is anticipated to be used for future capital projects. Amounts have been collected from bonds, transfer tax and other sources. Other - The amount of funds committed for general fund expenditures. The designated fund balance is composed of: Budgetary (Non-GAAP) Basis

Appropriation for FY 2006 operating budget $ 3,026,965 Bond rating reserve - 6% of FY 2006 budgeted general fund revenues 8,895,181 Rainy day fund 1,250,000 Economic stabilization reserve 7,500,000 20,672,146 Adjustments to modified accrual basis 238,063 $20,910,209 Economic stabilization reserve – The Board of County Commissioners have designated an economic stabilization reserve, set at $7.5 million. This reserve is intended to position the County to address unbudgeted costs or needs that arise due to the impending Base Re-alignment and Closure (BRAC) process as well as uncertainty of State funding, especially for school construction. It is the intention of the Board to decide on the use of unused funds no later than June 1, 2006; which is coincident with approval of the FY2007 budget.

SOURCE: Audited Financial Statements , page 77

ORIGIN OF THE UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE Following explanations are taken from the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) sections of the FY2004 and FY2005 audited financial statements. It explains the derivation of the $19,688,643 fund balance, which is available for use in balancing the FY2007 budget. A table presenting fund balance is found on a preceding page in this recommended budget book. Following is a brief overview of the financial occurrences that yielded this fund balance level:

• Recordation tax revenues exceeded budget by $2.9 million in FY2004 and $3.5 million in FY2005, a reflection of the extremely high level of activity that has occurred in St. Mary’s County for several years and the impact of increased assessments. The FY2007 budget estimate for revenue has been increased by almost 30%. However, the accumulated $6.4 million is a component of the current fund balance.

• FY2004 and FY2005 income tax revenues exceeded budget by $3.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Each year included approximately $2.5 million of accelerated distributions by the State. This $5 million represents no increase in revenues, but an earlier distribution of our income tax revenues.

• Debt service was approximately $1.4 million less than budget in FY2004 and $.7 under budget in FY2005, reflecting the timing of issuance of general obligation bonds and the positive impact of the refunding. This contributed $2.1 million to the fund balance.

• Positive health claims experience resulted in a significant premium refund in FY2005, under our retrospective rating arrangement that reduced employer costs by approximately $1.1 million in FY2005. This is an element of the fund balance.

• Positive expenditure variances were realized throughout County departments, a reflection of conservative budget estimates, strong management of expenditures to match budgeted priorities, and the direction by the new Board of County Commissioners to consolidate for efficiency and limit or defer filling vacancies, and other measures, wherever possible. Savings realized in personal services in FY2004 alone totaled approximately $1.7 million, excluding grants. Some of these measures were taken in anticipation of the need to fund unexpected outlays related to Hurricane Isabel. However, though expenses topped $1 million, the County was able to realize both recovery from the Government and savings in its own accounts, so as to cover virtually all operating outlays, using less than $10,000 of the Commissioners’ reserve for emergency appropriations.

As a result of having an unexpected fund balance level in FY2004, the Board designated $7.5 million as an economic stabilization reserve to address BRAC related needs. At that time, the Board also indicated that it was their intention to decide on the use of these funds no later than June 1, 2006; which is coincident with approval of the FY2007 budget. This designated reserve of $7.5 million and the fund balance generated in FY2005 of $12.1 million, now comprise the $19,688,643 fund balance available for use. The approved budget applies all of the fund balance, as follows

$14.28 million to capital projects, essentially eliminating the sale that was required in FY 2007 and reducing debt service that would have to be funded for the next 20 years by $1.04 million annually.

$3.5 million as initial funding to a trust that must be established to fund post-retirement County employee health benefits

$1.9 million in one-time technology costs/initiatives

viii

ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MARYLAND

Yesterday ---

The first European settlers landed in this area on March 25, 1634 when over 300 passengers disembarked from the Ark and Dove. Led by Leonard Calvert, this first group of settlers left from Cowes, the isle of Wight, England and landed on an island in the Potomac River which they named St. Clements Island (sometimes referred to as Blackistone Island).

Later, seeking a more protected area in which to settle, Governor

Calvert sailed up the St. Mary's River to the base of a high bluff where the ship could be brought almost to the shore. The Indians there, members of the Piscataway tribes of the Algonquin nation, proved friendly and agreeable to trade. Under a mulberry tree, axes, hoes, cloth, and hatchets were exchanged for an area of 30 square miles. There the colonists established St. Mary's City, which in colonial days contained a church, a jail, the State House and about 30 houses protected by two forts, St. Mary's City and St. Inigoes.

It was in St. Mary's City on January 26, 1635, that the General Assembly

first met and where the State House was built in 1676. Composed of the Lord Proprietor, the Governor, the Upper House appointed by the Lord Proprietor, and the Lower House of Burgesses, the assembly followed the customs and practices of the British Parliament.

On April 21, 1649, "An Act Concerning Religion", later known as the

Toleration Act, was passed by the General Assembly. It granted religious freedom to all who believed in God. This was the first law granting freedom of religion, a freedom that would later be included as the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The years during which St. Mary's City served as the capital of Maryland

were anything but quiet as the political upheaval and religious controversies in England were reflected in the Maryland colony. This period of unrest culminated in the Protestant Revolution of 1689-1692 during which the government of Lord Baltimore was overthrown and the Toleration Act was voided. The first royal governor, Lionel Copley, was appointed in 1692 and two years later the capital was moved to Anne Arundel Town, later called Annapolis. Later, in 1710, the county seat was moved from St. Mary's City to the newly established town of Leonardtown.

During the Revolutionary War of 1812 minor battles were fought in St.

Mary's County. Burning and looting of homes was so prevalent that many residents were financially ruined.

During the Civil War St. Mary's County was supportive of the South and

was often referred to as "Little Dixie". Many residents crossed the Potomac to fight with the South. Point Lookout at the southern tip of the County, became the site for the Hammond General Hospital, built by the Union Government. The Point Lookout Prison was built after the Battle of Gettysburg. Thousands of Confederate soldiers died there. Although a monument at Point Lookout lists 3,384 Confederate dead, it is thought that many more died and were buried in the sand.

Today ---

From 1790 to 1940 the population of St. Mary's County was constant at

about 15,000 residents, most of whom worked as farmers or watermen. The County changed in 1942 with the letting of a contract for the first increment of construction of the Patuxent River Naval Air Station. Since that time the County's population has grown from 14,626 in 1940 to 86,211 today.

There are numerous post offices in St. Mary’s County but only one

incorporated town, Leonardtown, the county seat.. Leonardtown was the first town to be incorporated in the United States. With a population of about 1,896, Leonardtown is over-shadowed by Lexington Park, a community of 27,003 outside the gates of the Patuxent River Naval Air Station. Another area of great population growth is the northern part of the County, which is home to many residents who commute to work in the Washington, DC metropolitan area.

Farming, once a major activity in St. Mary's remains important to the

economy. Today there are about 353 full-time and 320 part-time farmers.

The centuries old seafood industry has slowed. There are just 600 licensed watermen currently engaged in commercial fishing and the harvesting of oysters, soft clams, crabs, and eels.

The rural nature and surrounding waters of our county are ideal for

recreational activities. The tourism industry has seen a gradual increase in outdoor interests such as boating, biking and fishing. Preservation and interpretation of our historic areas has also led to a rise in heritage tourism.

Roads within the County are maintained by the State Highway

Administration working in liaison with the County Department of Public Works. County roads are named and State roads are numbered. St. Mary's County has a special taxing district resolution allowing homeowners to petition the County for acceptance of their roads into the County system, provided the homeowners bear the cost of upgrading the road to County standards.

The Captain Walter Francis Duke Regional Airport at St. Mary’s is

located 8 miles north of the Naval Air Station on Airport Road The Airport, constructed in 1969, is adjacent to the St. Mary’s Industrial Park. It is owned and operated by the Board of County Commissioners. Services available include fuel sales, mechanic services, charter flights, flight school, and a paint shop.

Local newspapers, radio and television stations cover local and national

news and events.

Form of Government ---

In Maryland, county governments may be organized as charter counties, code counties or non-home-rule counties. All act under limitations legislated by the State government. St. Mary's is a non-home-rule county governed by an elected five-member Board of County Commissioners. This Board exercises the powers conferred upon it by the General Assembly of Maryland, including authorization to issue debt to finance capital projects.

The County Commissioners are elected for four-year terms. All are

elected by the entire County voting population. Four commissioners must live in the district they represent. The fifth Commissioner, the President of the Board, may live anywhere in the County.

The County is administered under a line organizational method, with an

appointed County Administrator responsible for the day-to-day administration of the County government. The Commissioners serve on a part-time basis, meeting at least weekly at the Governmental Center in Leonardtown. Meetings are open to the public, and minutes of meetings are available to all.

The County Commissioners establish all County policies; enact

ordinances which have the force and effect of the law; review and approve annual budgets and work plans for all departments and agencies receiving County funds; conduct public hearings and make decisions on land use matters, including zoning, water and sewer categories, and appeals from the Planning Commission.

In addition, the County Commissioners appoint all department heads,

members of boards, commissions, and committees; purchase and maintain County property; approve roads construction and maintenance; and serve as the County's chief elected officials in dealing with other counties, the state, and federal government.

Reprinted From: Know Your County

League of Women Voters of St. Mary's County

Fifth edition 2001

St. Mary’s County is situated on a peninsula in Southern Maryland with over 400 miles of shoreline on the Patuxent River, Potomac River andChesapeake Bay. Home to the U.S. Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD), and over200 high-tech defense contractors, the county has emerged as a world-class center for maritime aviation research, development and testing. Duemainly to the influx of technical jobs resulting from the consolidation of several Navy activities, the county had one of the largest increases in itsmedian household income during the past decade in the state.

The area combines access to technology with a rich heritage and a myriad of outdoor opportunities. The county’s location allows for easy accessto major metropolitan areas while offering residents a high quality of life and affordable lifestyles. St. Mary’s 1,830 businesses employ 26,500workers; an estimated 37 of these businesses have 100 or more workers. Businesses include BAE Systems, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, NorthropGrumman, Titan Systems, Wye Laboratories and many others. Non-defense employers include the Lundeberg School of Seamanship, St. Mary’sHospital, St. Mary’s College of Maryland and Merkle Mailing. The Lexington Park area has been designated a State Enterprise Zone and FocusArea, affording a number of incentives for expanding businesses.

LOCATION

Driving distance from Leonardtown:

(in miles) (in kilometers)

Atlanta, GA 610 981

Baltimore, MD 80 129

Boston, MA 470 756

Chicago, IL 737 1,186

New York, NY 263 423

Philadelphia, PA 174 280

Pittsburgh, PA 282 454

Richmond, VA 95 153

Washington, DC 54 87

POPULATION

St. Mary’sCounty Maryland

1990 Census 75,974 4,780,753

2000 Census 86,211 5,296,486

2005 Estimate 96,550 5,609,200

2010 Projection 108,150 5,907,575

2015 Projection 119,900 6,127,225

Selected areas population (2000 Census): California, 9,307;Leonardtown, 1,896; Lexington Park, 11,021.

U.S. Bureau of the Census; Maryland Department of Planning.

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

(2005 Estimate)

Age Number Percent

Under 5 7,530 7.8

5 - 19 21,320 22.1

20 - 44 34,280 35.5

45 - 64 23,910 24.8

65 and over 9,510 9.8

Total 96,550 100.0

Note: Columns may not add due to rounding.

Maryland Department of Planning.

CLIMATE

Yearly Precipitation (inches) 47.5

Yearly Snowfall (inches) 17.8

Summer Temperature (°F) 74.4

Winter Temperature (°F) 37.4

Duration of Freeze-Free Period 199 days

Note: Temperature and precipitation data based on 30-year averages.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Maryland StateOffice of Climatology.

ST. MARY’S COUNTY, MARYLANDBRIEF ECONOMIC FACTS

Department of Business &Economic Development

2005-2006 www.ChooseMaryland.org 888-ChooseMD

MAJOR EMPLOYERS

Firm Product/Service Employment

Patuxent River Naval Military installation 10,500 Air Station

DynCorp/CSC Profes. and tech. services 1,500

EMA Engineering, scientific 1,000 and management services

St. Mary's Hospital Medical services 900

BAE Systems Tech. products and services 854

Advanced Info. Engineering Aeronautics; R,D,T, and E 700 Services (Veridian) systems engineering

Information Spectrum Profes. and tech. services 450

Northrop Grumman Systems and software devt. 450

St. Mary's College of Higher education 400 Maryland

Food Lion Groceries 344

Target Consumer goods 319

Booz Allen Hamilton Systems engr. and mgt. 315

Sabre Systems Engineering services 300

Burch Oil Gas and oil 280

Charlotte Hall Vets. Home Nursing home, asst. living 280

Wal-Mart Consumer goods 280

Mantech International Systems and software devt. 260

J.F. Taylor Technology simulations 225

Lundeberg School of Seamanship training 210 Seamanship

Eagle Systems Systems engr. and mgt. 200

National Technology Assoc. Systems engr. and mgt. 200

Lowe's Home improvement prod. 193

DCS Technology simulations 175

Merkle Mailing Services Data entry and fulfillment 145

St. Mary’s County Department of Economic & Community Develop-ment; Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development.

LABOR AVAILABILITY

(by place of residence) St. Mary’s County

Civilian Labor Force (2004 annual averages):

Total civilian labor force 48,697

Employment 47,086

Unemployment 1,611

Unemployment rate 3.3%

Residents commuting outside

the County to work (2000): 11,130 25.7%

Employment in selected occupations (2000):

Management, professional and related 16,228 39.1%

Service 5,436 13.1%

Sales and office 9,751 23.5%

Production, transp. and material moving 3,837 9.3%

Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office ofLabor Market Analysis and Information; Maryland Department ofPlanning in conjunction with U.S. Bureau of the Census.

EMPLOYMENT

(2004, by place of work) Annual AverageAverage Weekly

Industry Employment % Wage

Federal government 6,973 18.6 $1,427

State government 769 2.0 705

Local government 3,317 8.8 716

Private sector 26,480 70.5 722

Nat’l. resources and mining 27 0.1 607

Construction 1,834 4.9 639

Manufacturing 487 1.3 884

Trade, transp., and utilities 6,426 17.1 558

Information 233 0.6 799

Financial activities 1,067 2.8 675

Prof. and business services 8,581 22.9 1,112

Educ. and health services 3,849 10.3 631

Leisure and hospitality 3,096 8.2 212

Other services 875 2.3 440

Unclassified 5 0.0 286

Total 37,539 100.0 852

Note: Percentages may not add due to rounding.

Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office ofLabor Market Analysis and Information.

ST. MARY’S COUNTY, MARYLAND

HOURLY WAGE RATES

(2005) Experi-

Selected Occupations: Median Entry enced

Accountants $23.25 $16.25 $30.75

Bookkeeping/accounting clerks 15.50 11.00 18.25

Computer support specialists 20.50 14.75 24.50

Computer systems analysts 32.00 21.50 36.75

Customer service representatives 13.00 8.75 15.75

Electrical engineers 35.25 23.75 40.25

Electronic engineering technicians 30.75 22.25 34.25

Freight, stock and material movers, hand 10.75 8.75 14.50

Industrial truck operators 14.50 10.75 17.75

Machinists 18.50 12.75 21.50

Network administrators 28.00 19.75 35.75

Packers and packagers, hand 10.75 8.00 12.00

Secretaries 15.25 10.25 17.75

Shipping/receiving clerks 11.50 7.75 14.25

Team assemblers 10.25 8.00 12.25

Note: These wages are an estimate of what workers might expect toreceive in Southern Maryland (Calvert, Charles and St. Mary’sCounties). Wages may vary by industry, employer, and locality.

Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office ofLabor Market Analysis and Information.

BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY

A variety of business sites are available in St. Mary’s County.Industrial and office parks offer raw acreage, furnished officespace and everything in between. Utilities including fiber opticlines, public water, sewer and natural gas are available at mostlocations.

The greatest concentration of manufacturing is in St. Mary’sIndustrial Park in California, near the regional airport. Hightechnology firms are clustered in and around Lexington Park.Major business parks are located at Wildewood, Lexington ParkCorporate Center, Exploration, Willows Run and Pine Hill.

St. Mary’s County Department of Economic and CommunityDevelopment maintains a listing of available office, warehouseand industrial sites and space and publishes an annual directoryof technology companies and resources. Both are available inPDF format on www.stmarysmd.com/decd.

Market Profile Data

Land - cost per acre Low High Average

Industrial $40,000 $100,000 $60,000

Office $60,000 $125,000 $80,000

Rental Rates - per square foot

Warehouse / Industrial $7.00 $13.00 $10.00

Flex / R&D / Technology $7.00 $13.00 $10.00

Class A Office $9.00 $19.50 $13.25

St. Mary’s County Department of Economic & CommunityDevelopment.

EDUCATION

Educational Attainment - age 25 and over (2000):

High School Graduate or Higher 85.3%

Bachelor’s Degree or Higher 22.6%

Public Schools

Number: 16 Elementary; 4 Middle; 4 High

Enrollment: 16,567 (Sept. 2004)

Cost per Pupil: $8,168 (2003-2004)

Students per Teacher: 15.8 (Oct. 2004)

High School Career/Tech Enrollment: 2,027 (2005)

High School Graduates: 893 (June 2004)

Private Schools

Number: 29; Enrollment: 2,940 (Sept. 2004)

Higher Education

(2004) Enrollment Degrees

2-Year Institutions

Harry Lundeberg School of Seamanship 205 *

College of Southern Maryland** 7,415 557

4-Year Institution

St. Mary’s College of Maryland 1,936 396

Other universities offering programs in the county at the Frank

Knox Center include: Embry Riddle Univ., Florida Institute of

Technol., Univ. of Tennessee Space Institute, and the Univ. of

Maryland University College. At the Southern Maryland Higher

Education Center, programs are offered by: Catholic Univ.,

College of Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins Univ., Old Dominion

Univ., Univ. of Maryland College Park, Univ. of Maryland

University College, Towson Univ., and Washington College.

*No degrees/certificates awarded in 2004 due to changes in courserequirements.**Includes 4 campuses in Calvert, Charles and St. Mary’s Counties.

Maryland State Department of Education and Higher EducationCommission; U.S. Bureau of the Census.

TAX RATESSt. Mary’s

County Maryland

Corporate Income Tax (2006) none 7.0%

Base - Federal taxable income.

Personal Income Tax (2006) 3.00% 4.75%*

Base - Federal adjusted gross income.*Graduated tax peaking at 4.75% on taxable income over$3,000.

Sales and Use Tax (2006) none 5.0%

Exempt - sales for resale; manufacturer’s purchase of rawmaterials; manufacturing machinery and equipment; pur-chases of materials and equipment used in R&D and testingof finished products; purchases of computer programs forreproduction or incorporation into another computer programfor resale.

Real Property Tax (FY 2006) $0.872 $0.132

Effective rate per $100 of assessed value.In addition to this rate, there are some miscellaneous taxesand/or special taxing areas in the county. In an incorporatedarea, a municipal rate will also apply.

Business Personal PropertyTax (FY 2006) $2.18 none

Rate per $100 of depreciated value.Exempt - manufacturing and R&D machinery, equipment,materials and supplies; manufacturing, R&D, and warehousinginventory.

Major Tax Credits Available

Enterprise Zone (including Focus Area); Job Creation;Research and Development.

Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation;Comptroller of the Treasury.


PERSONAL INCOME

Per Capita Personal Income - 2003

St. Mary’s County $31,140

Maryland $37,446

U.S. $31,472

Total Personal Income (millions) - 2003

St. Mary’s County $2,887

Maryland $206,412

U.S. $9,151,694

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Technology Strategy and Business DevelopmentMaryland Department of Business & Economic Development217 E. Redwood Street • Baltimore, Maryland 21202Telephone: (410) 767-6870 • Toll Free: 888-ChooseMDFax: (410) 333-6792TDD/TTY: (410) 333-6926http://www.ChooseMaryland.org

TRANSPORTATION

Highways: Maryland arteries in the county connect with U.S.301 and I-95.

Rail: The closest rail depot, CSX Transportation, is in adjacentCharles County at Waldorf.

Truck: 17 motor freight common carriers serve the county.

Water: Served by the Port of Baltimore, 50' channel; a leadingU.S. automobile and break-bulk port; six public terminalsincluding the state-of-the-art Intermodal Container TransferFacility; 81 miles from Leonardtown.

Air: Served by Baltimore/Washington International ThurgoodMarshall Airport (BWI), Dulles International Airport and ReaganWashington National Airport. Capt. Duke Regional Airport at St.Mary’s (www.stmarysmd.com/dpw/airport) is available for privateplanes.

UTILITIES

Electricity: Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.Customers of investor-owned utilities and major cooperativesmay choose their electric supplier.

Gas: Natural gas is available from Washington Gas.

Water: St. Mary’s County Metropolitan Commission servesgreater Lexington Park-Hollywood area, Charlotte Hall/GoldenBeach, and Piney Point. Municipal system serves Leonardtown.

Sewer: St. Mary’s County Metropolitan Commission servesgreater Lexington Park-Hollywood area and Piney Point.Municipal system serves Leonardtown.

Telecommunications: Local Carrier - Verizon Maryland. LongDistance Carriers - AT&T, MCI, Sprint, and numerous additionalcarriers and resellers of WATS and MTS. Cable internet serviceavailable.

RECREATION and CULTURE

Residents and visitors to St. Mary’s County enjoy boating,fishing, biking, hunting, hiking, camping, swimming and golfingin this scenic peninsula. Over 400 miles of shoreline offerspectacular water views from the two public golf courses andthe county’s many parks.

Many historical treasures can be found in St. Mary’s County.Sotterley Plantation, Historic St. Mary’s City, and the GodiahSpray Plantation allow visitors to experience life from the past.Historic St. Mary’s City features a replica of “The Dove,” one oftwo ships that brought settlers in 1634. It is moored near areplica of the old State House in St. Mary’s City. Museumsinclude the Patuxent River Naval Air Museum, Old Jail Museum,St. Clements Island-Potomac River Museum, and Piney PointLighthouse Museum and Park.

The county’s Recreation and Parks Department maintains 20county parks. Public facilities include a year-round pool, boatramps, beaches, fishing piers, lighted tennis courts and sportsfields, picnic facilities, playgrounds and a skatepark. The countyis also home to four state parks: Point Lookout, St. Mary’s River,St. Clements Island and Greenwell State Parks.

Festivals and fairs celebrate the county’s unique way of life.Weekly throughout the summer St. Mary’s College sponsors theRiver Concert series. Yearly events include the Crab Festival inJune, County Fair in September, Blessing of the Fleet andOyster Festival/National Oyster Shucking Championships andNational Oyster Cook-off in October. The Governor’s Cup YachtRace, the largest overnight race on the East Coast, finishes atSt. Mary’s College in August. St. Mary’s City events includeMaryland Day, Woodland Indian Culture Days, Grand MilitiaMuster, Hearth and Home in Early Maryland, and an ArchaeologyWeekend.

Contact St. Mary’s County Division of Tourism at (800) 327-9023for more information.

GENERAL INFORMATION

County Seat - Leonardtown

Government - Five commissioners elected for four-year terms.

Elevation - Sea level to 188 feet

Land Area - 373 square miles

St. Mary’s County Department of Economic &

Community Development23115 Leonard Hall Drive • P.O.B. 653, Governmental CenterLeonardtown, Maryland 20650Telephone: (301) 475-4200 x1400 • Toll Free: (800) 327-9023Fax: (301) 475-4414 • E-mail: [email protected]://www.stmarysmd.com/decd

Department of Business &Economic Development

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTACTS:

Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Governor

Michael S. Steele, Lt. Governor

Aris Melissaratos, Secretary


2005-2006 www.ChooseMaryland.org 888-ChooseMD

CODE OF ST. MARY'S COUNTY CHAPTER 27 - BUDGETARY AND FISCAL PROCEDURES

27-1 Fiscal and tax year.

The fiscal or budget year and the tax year of the county shall begin on July 1, and shall end on June 30 of the succeeding year, unless otherwise prescribed by State Law.

27-2 Definitions.

In this chapter the following words have the meaning indicated:

CAPITAL BUDGET - The plan of the county to receive and expend funds for capital projects during the first fiscal year included in the capital program. CAPITAL PROGRAM - The plan of the county to receive and expend funds for capital projects during the fiscal year covered by the capital budget and the next succeeding five (5) fiscal years thereafter.

CAPITAL PROJECT:

(A) Any physical public betterment or improvement and any preliminary studies and surveys relative thereto;

(B) The acquisition of property of a permanent nature for public use; and

(C) The purchase of equipment for any public betterment or improvement when first constructed.

COUNTY GOVERNMENT - Includes all offices, courts, departments, institutions, corporations, boards, commissions, agencies and their officers, agents and employees who receive or disburse county funds.

CURRENT EXPENSE BUDGET - The plan of the county to receive and expend the funds for charges incurred for operation, maintenance, interest and other charges for the ensuing fiscal year.

27-3 Submission of lists of proposed projects by county agencies.

(A) The county budget shall consist of the current expense budget, the capital budget and capital program and the budget message.

It shall represent a complete financial plan for the county reflecting all receipts and disbursements from all sources, including all revenues, all expenditures and the surplus or deficit in the general and all special funds of the county government.

(B) Annual work programs.

(1) When the Board of County Commissioners directs, each office, court, department, institution, board, commission,

corporation or other agency of the county government shall submit to the Chief Financial Officer annual work programs setting forth the nature, volume, cost and other factors concerning the work to be performed and the estimates of the revenues and expenditures of their operations for the ensuing fiscal year. Estimated revenues shall be detailed as to source and estimated expenditures as to function, activity or otherwise, as directed by the Chief Financial Officer.

(2) The proposed current expense budget shall contain not less than the following information:

(a) A statement of all revenue estimated to be received by the county during the ensuing fiscal year, classified so as to show the receipts by funds and source of income;

(b) A statement of debt service requirement for the ensuing fiscal year; (c) A statement of the estimated cash surplus, if any, available for expenditure during the ensuing fiscal year;

(d) A statement of the bonded and other indebtedness of the county government and its agencies, including self-liquidating and special taxing district debts;

(e) A detailed statement of the estimated receipts and budget outlays of the current ending fiscal year, listing such

budgetary items by function, activity and subactivity, and a detailed statement of the recommended and approved expenditures for the ensuing fiscal year, listing such expenditures by function, activity, and subactivity; and

(f) Any other material which the County Commissioners may deem advisable.


(C) List of Capital Projects. (1) At whatever times the Board of County Commissioners may direct, each office, court, department, institution, board,

commission, corporation, or other agency of the county government shall submit to the Chief Financial Officer for transmission to the Planning Commission an itemized list of the capital projects which each agency proposes to undertake in the ensuing fiscal year and the next succeeding five (5) fiscal years thereafter. After consideration by the Planning Commission, the Director of Planning and Zoning function shall transmit to the Chief Financial Officer the list of projects recommended by the Commission together with his recommendations on the projects to be undertaken in the periods aforesaid and estimates of the cost thereof. The County Commissioners, with the assistance of the Chief Financial Officer, shall consider such recommendations with the other budget proposals and shall recommend to the general public, together with the current expense budget, a complete capital budget and capital program.

(2) The proposed capital budget and capital program shall be so arranged as to set forth clearly the plan of proposed

capital projects to be undertaken in the ensuing fiscal year and in each of the next five (5) fiscal years and also the proposed means of financing them. The capital budget shall include a statement of the receipts anticipated during the ensuing fiscal year from all borrowing and from other sources for capital projects.

(D) The budget message shall contain supporting summary tables and shall explain the proposed current expense budget and

capital program, both in fiscal terms and in terms of work to be done. It shall outline the proposed financial policies of the county for the ensuing fiscal year and describe the important features of the current expense budget. It shall indicate any major changes in financial policies and in expenditures, appropriations and revenues, as compared with the fiscal year currently ending, and shall set forth the reasons for such changes. The message shall also include such other material as the County Commissioners may deem desirable.

27-4 Deadline for preparation and signing; inspection by public.

Before April 1 in each year, the County budget shall have been prepared and signed by a majority of the Board of County Commissioners. At least three (3) complete copies shall be open to inspection by the public during regular business hours at the office of the Board of County Commissioners. One (1) copy shall be supplied to each newspaper of general circulation in the county and to each county library.

27-5 Notice of hearings; hearing dates.

Upon approval of the proposed county budget, the Budget Officer of the county shall cause to be published in at least one (1) or more newspapers of general circulation published in the county, a notice of the places and times of the public hearings on the proposed budget. The hearings shall be held not less than twenty (20) nor more than forty (40) days after the date of the filing of the proposed budget.

27-6 Revisions after public hearing; adoption of budget. After the public hearings specified in the preceding section, the Board of County Commissioners may revise the proposed budget and any part of it by increasing, decreasing, eliminating, or adding items. Items may not be consolidated in such a manner as to reduce the detailed statements of the appropriations. The Board of County Commissioners shall further be authorized to revise the schedule of anticipated receipts and estimated rates for general and special taxes. The annual budget and appropriation act shall be adopted by June 1, or if June 1 is a legal holiday, the first day thereafter. The adoption of the budget shall be by the affirmative vote of not less than three (3) members of the Board of County Commissioners.

27-7 Distribution of copies of budget; levy of taxes. (A) The budget, as adopted, shall be reproduced in sufficient copies for distribution, free of charge, to the press and the head of

each office, department or agency of the county government. Copies of the budget shall likewise be given to any interested person on request. However, in order to discourage waste, the County Commissioners may prescribe a charge for each copy of the adopted budget, but that charge is not to exceed the actual cost of its reproduction.

(B) The adopted budget shall take effect on the first day of the fiscal year to which it applies.

(C) When the county budget shall have been finally adopted in the Annual Budget and Appropriation Act, the County Commissioners shall levy and cause to be raised the amount of taxes required by the budget in the manner provided by law so that the budget shall be balanced as to proposed income and expenditures.


27-8 Transfer of appropriations; unexpended and unencumbered appropriations. (A) Transfers of appropriations between general classifications of expenditures in the current expense budget may be authorized

by the County Commissioners. (B) Interproject transfers of appropriations between capital projects in the capital budget may be authorized by the County

Commissioners. (C) These provisions may not be construed to prevent the County Commissioners from providing interfund cash borrowing to

meet temporary cash requirements nor to prevent reimbursements among funds to services rendered. (D) Unless otherwise provided by public general law, all unexpended and unencumbered appropriations in the current expense

budget remaining at the end of the fiscal year shall revert to the county treasury. An appropriation for a capital project in the capital budget does not revert until the purpose for which the appropriation was made has been accomplished or abandoned. However, any capital project shall stand abandoned if three (3) fiscal years elapse without any expenditure from or encumbrance of that appropriation. The balances remaining to the credit of the completed or abandoned capital projects shall be available for appropriation in subsequent capital budgets.

27-9 Additional or emergency appropriations. (A) During any fiscal year, the County Commissioners, upon the recommendation of the Chief Financial Officer, by ordinance,

may make additional, supplementary or emergency appropriations from contingent funds, from revenues received from anticipated sources but in excess of budget estimates therefor or from revenues received from sources not anticipated in the budget for the current fiscal year, provided that the Chief Financial Officer shall first certify, in writing, that such funds are available for such appropriation. A supplemental appropriation may not exceed the amount of the funds so certified.

B) To the extent that there are not any available unappropriated revenues to meet such emergency appropriations, the County

Commissioners, by ordinance, may authorize the issuance of emergency notes which may be renewed from time to time. However, such notes and renewals shall be paid not later than the last day of the fiscal year next succeeding that in which the emergency appropriation was made. The total of emergency appropriations in any fiscal year shall not exceed one percent (1%) of all appropriations, including those for debt service, made in the budget for such year.

27-10 Expenditures in excess of amounts appropriated.

An office, department, institution, board, commission or other agency of the county government during any fiscal year may not expend, or contract to expend, any money or incur any liability or enter into any contract, which by its terms involves the expenditure of money, for any purpose in excess of the amounts appropriated or allotted for the same general classification of expenditure in the budget for such fiscal year or in any supplemental appropriation as hereinabove provided. A payment may not be made nor any obligation or liability incurred, except for small purchases in an amount less than one hundred dollars ($100.), unless the chief financial officer first certifies that the funds for the designated purpose are available. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this section is null and void.

27-11 Percentage limitation for certain evidences of indebtedness; exceptions. (A) Unless and until otherwise provided by ordinance of the County Commissioners within the limitations provided by public

general law, the aggregate amount of bonds and other evidences of indebtedness outstanding at any one time may not exceed two percent (2%) upon the assessable basis of the county. However, tax anticipation notes or other evidences of indebtedness having a maturity not in excess of twelve (12) months, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by the county payable primarily or exclusively from taxes levied in or on or other revenues of special taxing areas or districts heretofore or hereafter established by law, and bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued for self-liquidating and other projects payable primarily or exclusively from the proceeds of assessments or charges for special benefits or services, are not subject to or to be included as bonds or evidences of indebtedness in computing or applying the percent limitation above provided.

(B) All bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued under the authority of the Sanitary Commission Act shall be construed

as exempt, under Subsection A above, from the percent limitation in this section provided but shall continue as heretofore to be subject to the percent limitation as from time to time provided in said Act.

(C) All bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued by the County Commissioners for the benefit of St. Mary's Hospital of St.

Mary's County may not be included as bonds or other evidences of indebtedness in computing or applying the percent limitation provided in Subsection A of this section.

GLOSSARY Accounting System The total structure of records and procedures which are used to record, classify, and report information

on the financial position and operations of a governmental unit. Accrual Basis of Accounting The method of accounting under which revenues are recorded when earned (whether or not cash is

received at that time) and expenditures are recorded when goods and services are received (whether or not cash disbursements are made at that time).

Appropriation An authorization granted by a legislative body to incur obligations and make expenditures for specific

purposes within a specific time frame. Appropriation Ordinance The official enactment by the Board of County Commissioners establishing the legal authority for

officials to obligate and expend resources. Appropriation Phase Different distinct stages of a capital improvements project requiring commitment of funds, usually over

multiple fiscal years (i.e., land acquisition, architect/engineering, construction, inspection, utilities, equipment).

Assessable Tax Base The total valuation placed upon real and personal property, less certain exemptions, by the State

Department of Assessments and Taxation for the purposes of levying property taxes. The Board of County Commissioners determines the tax rate to be applied against the tax base to generate tax revenues to support the annual budget.

Assessed Valuation The valuation established for individual real estate or other property by the State for purposes of

taxation. Authorized Position Employee positions authorized in the annual budget by the Board of County Commissioners. Position

status will vary depending upon factors such as full or part-time status, merit system or contract position, etc.

Bond Rating Evaluation of the credit quality of bonds usually made by independent rating services. Ratings

generally measure the probability of the timely repayment of principal of and interest on municipal bonds. Before a bond issuance, rating agencies may require information on demographics, debt burden, economic base, finances and management structure. The information is evaluated and the bond issue is assigned a letter rating which reflects the creditworthiness of the bonds.

Bonds A written promise to pay a specified sum of money, called the face value or principal amount, at a

specified date or dates in the future, called the maturity date, together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Bonds are primarily used to finance capital projects.

Budget A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and

the proposed means of financing them. Budget Calendar The schedule of key dates which St. Mary’s County follows in the preparation and adoption of the

budget. Budget Document The document prepared by the Department of Finance to present the comprehensive financial program

of the Board of County Commissioners. Included in the document are the Commissioner’s budget message, the planned expenditures, estimated revenues, program and project descriptions, budget highlights, performance and workload indicators, various supporting schedules and other supplemental information. The County’s long-term capital improvements program is also incorporated in the document.

Budget Message A general discussion of the budget by the Board of County Commissioners which contains an overview

of the approved budget, explains some of the principal budget issues and major items funded, and describes how the budget is financed.

Capital Budget A plan of capital expenditures and the means of financing them usually based on the first year of the

capital improvement program; represents the appropriation of bonds or operating revenue for improvements to facilities and other infrastructure.

Capital Improvements Program A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of several future years

setting forth each capital project, identifying the beginning and ending date for each project, the amount to be expended in each year, and the method of financing those expenditures. Annually the Board of County Commissioners adopts a capital budget and five-year capital program.

Capital Improvements Fund A fund created to account for all capital project expenditures and revenues. Capital Project Major construction, acquisition or renovation activities which add value to a government’s physical

assets or significantly increases useful life.

GLOSSARY Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) An increase in salaries to offset the impact of inflation on compensation. Debt Limit The maximum amount of gross or net debt which is legally permitted. The St. Mary’s County Code

requires that the aggregate amount of bonds outstanding at any one time may not exceed two percent of the assessable property tax base of the County.

Debt Service The required principal and interest payments due on debt issued by the County for financing long-term

capital improvements according to a predetermined payment schedule. Deficit The excess of liabilities over assets or the excess of expenditures over revenues during a single

accounting period. Department A basic organizational unit of a government which is functionally unique in its delivery of services. Energy Tax A local tax imposed on the sale of electricity, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and fuel oil used or

to be used in the County. Encumbrances A commitment of funds against an appropriation which may be in the form of a purchase order or

contract. The encumbrance reserves the appropriated funds for a future expenditure. The total of expenditures and encumbrances for a department in a given fiscal year may not exceed its total appropriation.

Enterprise Fund A fund established to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to

business enterprises and where operations are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges. Examples in St. Mary’s County are two Recreation and Parks funds – one for various county-wide recreation programs and the other for operations of the County’s public golf course.

Expenditures The payment for goods delivered or services rendered and which decreases net financial resources. Fire Tax A separate ad valorem tax based upon property value which is used as a source of funding for the

volunteer fire services in St. Mary’s County. The tax is assessed per $100 of assessed valuation and a separate tax rate is set for each election district.

Fiscal Year A twelve-month period designated as the operating year for accounting and budgeting purposes in an

organization. St. Mary’s County’s fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 of the following year.

Fixed Assets Assets of a long-term character which are intended to continue to be held or used, such as land,

buildings, machinery, furniture, and other equipment. Fund An independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash and/or

other resources together with all related liabilities, obligations, reserves, and equities which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives.

Fund Balance The excess of the assets of a fund over its liabilities and reserves. A negative fund balance is

sometimes called a deficit. General Fund The general operating fund that is used to account for all transactions of a governmental unit which are

not accounted for in another fund. Generally, the governmental accounting fund that accounts for the ordinary operations of a governmental unit which are financed from taxes and other general revenues.

General Fund Transfer In St. Mary’s County this refers to the transfer of general fund current revenues from the operating

budget to the capital budget to finance certain capital projects in lieu of borrowing funds. Utilizing current revenues instead of long-term financing is often referred to as “pay go”.

General Obligation Bonds Bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing body and generally are considered to

be payable from taxes and other general revenues. Grade/Step Refers to the placement on the St. Mary’s County salary schedule and depends on the position

classification and the individual employee status and longevity. Grant A contribution of assets by one governmental unit or entity to another unit. Typically, these

contributions are made to local governments from the state and federal governments and are usually made to aid in the support of a specified function, but may also be for general purposes.

Homestead Tax Credit A State property tax credit program that limits the increase in residential taxable assessments each

year to a fixed percentage. Each county is required to limit taxable assessment increases to 10% or less.

GLOSSARY Impact Fees One-time charges assessed against new development that attempt to recover from the developer the

capital cost of the additional public facilities needed to serve that development. Income Tax Until tax year 1999, the local rate was expressed as a percentage of the State personal income tax

liability. Effective with tax year 1999, the ratio is expressed as a percentage of taxable income. Investment Securities purchased and held for the production of income in the form of interest and dividends. An

investment instrument is the specific type of security which a government purchases and holds. Modified Accrual The basis of accounting under which expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is

incurred and revenues are recognized when susceptible to accrual (i.e., when they become both measurable and available). In St. Mary’s County, the modified accrual basis of accounting is used by all governmental fund types which include the general fund.

Non-County Agencies Those public entities, non-profit private entities, and private entity agents of County government which

may receive some funding from the County government in support of their efforts but where no legal funding requirement exists.

Object of Expenditure Expenditure classifications based upon the types of categories of goods and services purchased. In St.

Mary’s County government, this includes personal services, operating supplies, professional services, communications, transportation, utilities, repairs and maintenance, operating expenses, rentals, insurance, miscellaneous, and equipment and furniture. These objects of expenditures are delineated in more detail in the accounting system according to account elements.

Operating Budget The annual budget which supports the day-to-day operations of the County government. Most of the

expenditures occur in the general fund, but there are also some operational costs funded through enterprise and special revenue funds.

Operating Expenditures The costs of day-to-day operations such as personnel, materials, and equipment required for a

department to function. Performance/Workload Indicator Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed or to be accomplished within an

activity or program (e.g., total number of permits processed). Also, a specific quantitative measure of results obtained through an activity or program (e.g., percentage of library materials available within seven days of the request at a specific branch library).

Personal Services Expenditures related to compensating employees, including salaries, wages, and fringe benefit costs. Property Tax Tax on the value of real and personal property and is levied almost exclusively by local governments.

In Maryland, the State Department of Assessments and Taxation is responsible for the valuation and assessment of all property in the State. The local government is responsible for setting the tax rate to be applied to the property assessments to generate revenues in support of the local budget. The property tax is the major revenue source in Maryland county governments and is collected by the Treasurer.

Reserve A portion of a fund’s assets that is restricted for a specific purpose and not available for appropriation or

expenditure. Revenue Funds that a government receives as income and represents an increase in net financial resources.

These receipts may include tax payments, interest earnings, service charges, fees, grants, intergovernmental payments, and other miscellaneous sources.

Special Assessment Fund A fund to account for the provision and financing of certain public improvements which primarily benefit

particular taxpayers against whose properties special assessments are levied (e.g., shore erosion control districts). The special assessments fund the repayment of costs increased for the capital improvements, including debt service.

Special Revenue Fund A fund used to account for revenues from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources which by

law are designated to finance particular functions or activities of government. State Agencies/ Certain organizational entities are either State agencies or legally independent Boards and not directly

responsible to the Board of County Commissioners. However, the County is responsible for providing partial or full funding support. Examples include the Supervisors of Elections and the Board of Education.

Transfer Tax A tax imposed on instruments transferring title to real property. Transfer tax revenues in St. Mary’s

County are a dedicated source of revenue for the capital budget. User Charges The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a public service by the party who benefits from the service.

Documents

Board of County Commissioners For St. Mary’s County · Reserve – Rainy Day 100 Reserve – Bond Rating 100 Reserve – BOCC Emergency Appropriations 100 Enterprise and Special