Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biodiversity footprinting metrics
Common Ground paper EIB, Brussel, 17 September 2018
PublicClassification: Page:
▪ Contacts through the EU B@B and initiative on Platform for
Biodiversity Accounting Financials (PBAF) in the Netherlands
▪ March 2018: launch of the informal working group
▪ Objective: establish a solid basis (common ground) for a
biodiversity footprinting methodology for financials in
2018
▪ Relevant for non-financial institutions (and CDC Biodiversité
works with about 20 non-FI through the B4B+ Club, with an
adapted approach)
2
History of the partnership
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page:
1. CBD targets or national assessment
2. Portfolio / corporate assessment
3. Supply chain comparison
4. Product assessment
5. Project assessment
3
Uses of biodiversity footprint assessments
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page:
Requirements
▪ Transparent & consensual
▪ Understandable
▪ Responsive to changes
▪ Cover the most important pressures on
biodiversity
▪ Quantitative link between pressures and
impacts
▪ Complementary and compatible with local
indicators
▪ Relevance
▪ Rigor
▪ Consistency
4
Points of departure
Desired characteristics
▪ Focused on biodiversity and not just
ecosystem services (common and
charismatic species)
▪ Cross-sectoral
▪ Global
▪ Covering the entire value chain
▪ Practicability
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page: 5
Our approach – Methodological steps
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page:
▪ In line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol’s approach
▪The attribution of the impacts must be consistent
with the accounting choices of the entity assessed in
terms of what it controls:
▪ Financial control (>50%)
▪ Operational control
▪ Share of the assets owned (pro rata)
6
Step 1 - Attribution to a portfolio or a holding
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page: 7
Step 1 – Impacts in the value chain: scopes
Year n-1
Year n
Scope 0Scope 3
(variations)
Scope 1
The GBS’ scopesScope 2
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page:
▪ To avoid, reduce and offset impacts:
▪ Additional measures and safeguards are needed
▪ Complementary indicators can provide guidance
▪ For instance, for location-specific characteristics like
“Proximity of HCVA’s/protected areas” or “Presence
of endangered or threatened species”:
▪ Company has a Biodiversity Management Plan in
place (e.g. area registered as a VCA)
▪ Indicators: field ecological monitoring, Red List-
based indicator
8
Step 4 - Investment policy options
Pictu
re: D
avid
Behre
ns
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page:
▪End of 2018: publication of a short paper on our common approach
▪27-29 November 2018: BBOP and EU B@B annual meetings, building
roadmaps to achieve net positive impact
▪November 2018: side-events at CBD COP14
▪ Use of biodiversity footprints in strategic business decisions and
investments
▪ Enabling environments for biodiversity footprints to facilitate a biodiversity
net gain future
9
Toward common ground on indicators and roadmaps
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
PublicClassification: Page: 10
ACTIAM Pilot on biodiversity footprinting: trase
http://degroenezaak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ASN-LOGO-nieuw.jpg
Biodiversity footprintingBrussel, 17 September 2018
DISCLAIMER
ACTIAM NV WANTS TO PROVIDE ACCURATE AND ACTUAL INFORMATION FROM RELIABLE SOURCES. HOWEVER, ACTIAM CANNOT
GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION (HEREINAFTER CALLED: THE INFORMATION) THAT IS
GIVEN IN THIS PRESENTATION. THE INFORMATION CAN CONTAIN TECHNICAL OR EDITORIAL INACCURACIES OR TYPOGRAPHIC
ERRORS. ACTIAM DOES NOT GIVE GUARANTEES, EXPLICITLY OR IMPLICITLY, WITH REGARD TO THE QUESTION IF THE
INFORMATION OBTAINED BY THIS PRESENTATION IS ACCURATE, COMPLETE OR UP-TO-DATE. ACTIAM NV IS NOT OBLIGED TO
ADJUST THE PROVIDED INFORMATION OR TO CORRECT INACCURACIES OR ERRORS.
THE RECIPIENTS OF THIS INFORMATION CANNOT DERIVE RIGHTS FROM THIS INFORMATION. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS
PRESENTATION IS BASED ON HISTORICAL DATA AND IS NO RELIABLE SOURCE FOR PREDICTING FUTURE VALUES OR RATES. THE
INFORMATION IS COMPARABLE WITH, BUT POSSIBLY NOT IDENTICAL TO THE INFORMATION THAT IS USED BY ACTIAM FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES. ACTIAM DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE QUANTITATIVE YIELDS/PROFITS OR OTHER RESULTS WITH REGARD TO THE
PROVIDED INFORMATION WILL BE THE SAME AS THE POTENTIAL PROFITS AND RESULTS ACCORDING TO THE PRICE MODELS OF
ACTIAM NV.
THE DISCUSSION OF RISKS WITH REGARD TO ANY INFORMATION CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS A COMPLETE ENUMERATION OF ALL
RECURRING RISKS. THE HERE MENTIONED INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE INTERPRETED BY THE RECIPIENT AS BUSINESS,
FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, HEDGING, TRADE, LEGAL, REGULATING, TAX OR ACCOUNTING ADVICE. THE RECIPIENT OF THE
INFORMATION HIMSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR USING THE INFORMATION. THE DECISIONS BASED ON THE INFORMATION ARE FOR
THE RECIPIENT´S EXPENSE AND RISK. THE RECIPIENT CAN THEREFORE DERIVE NO RIGHTS FROM THE PROVIDED INFORMATION.