1
Biodegradable mulch effects on soil physical properties and yield Elise Reid, Sam E. Wortman, Rhae Drijber, Humberto Blanco Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Background Organic growers face challenges for weed control and often use plastic or biodegradable plastic mulches to prevent weeds Biofabrics offer a more sustainable option to plastic mulches Biofabrics, such as polylactic acid (PLA) based fabrics may be incorporated into the soil, unlike plastics and many bioplastics Incorporating biofabrics could reduce labor for growers and be a potential organic option Additional soil amendments could increase mulch degradation and have an effect on soil physical properties and yield We are interested in the effects of incorporated PLA on soil physical properties and vegetable yield Methods A three year, randomized complete block split-split plot experiment is in process at both Lincoln and Scottsbluff, NE The first year was organic pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘Carmen’), the second was organic sweet corn (Zea mays cv. ‘Xtra-Tender 2171), and the third year will be a Brassicaceae Two mulch treatments: MaterBi/PBAT (Bio360, St. Remi, Canada) and a polylactic acid plus wood fiber particle biofabric (3M Company, St. Paul, MN) Split-plots incorporated the mulch via an articulating spader or the mulch was removed as a control Split-split plots included six soil management treatments: no amendment, 10 Mg/ha compost, cover crops, fallow irrigation, compost tea extract, or a combination of compost, compost tea, cover crops, and fallow irrigation (“kitchen sink;” SINK hereafter) The first season mulch was applied via a bedder and then incorporated into the soil after the fall harvest No mulch was reapplied following years Soil physical samples were taken either every 6 months or 1 year Yield was separated into marketable and non-marketable but only total is presented here Results Corn yield and total ears higher at Scottsbluff for compost and SINK treatments Soil tensile strength was higher in PLA mulch compared to bioplastic plots at Scottsbluff Sorptivity was increased at Lincoln in incorporated PLA mulch under SINK treatment versus no application control Scottsbluff sorptivity was significantly higher in SINK compared to no application control treatment In the spring and fall of 2018 Scottsbluff phosphorous levels were significantly higher for SINK and compost compared to all other treatments Spring nitrogen levels at Lincoln were highest in compost, but cover crops did reduce N levels in the SINK treatment. There was no difference in nitrogen levels in the fall Spring nitrogen levels at Scottsbluff were also affected in the SINK treatment by the cover crop. In the fall, compost and SINK treatments had significantly higher N levels than other treatments. Conclusions and take-aways Incorporated PLA mulch can increase the tensile strength of soil, which may be useful for soils with poor structure or aggregate stability Spring cover crops deplete nitrogen levels, especially noticeable in compost versus kitchen sink treatments. However, there were no differences the following fall. Low N levels may slow mulch degradation as N is limited for microbes during cover crop growth and decomposition. Alternatively, cover crops may promote mulch degradation through increased microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Yield was increased under compost and sink treatments in conditions with more nutrient poor soils Yield was not negatively affected by the incorporation of mulch Funding This project is based on research that was partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station with funding from the Hatch Act (accession 1014303) through the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), and the USDA NIFA Organic Transitions Program (award 2016-51106-25711). A A B B 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 East Campus* Scottsbluff Rate (cm/s 1/2 ) *PWF INC SNK vs. PWF INC NA Soil sorptivity between treatments Sink NA A A A A A A A A B B B B 0 10 20 30 Compost Sink Tea Irrigation NA Cover crop Average kg per 108 ft2 Soil amendment Total Corn Yield 2018 East Campus A B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 PLA BLK Strength of aggregate (N) Mulch type Soil tensile strength after 1 year at Scottsbluff A B A B 0 5 10 15 20 COM SNK COM COV Nitrogen (ppm) Treatment Spring 2018 Nitrogen levels Scottsbluff Lincoln

Biodegradable mulch effects on soil physical properties ......0.2 0.25 East Campus* Scottsbluff s 1/2) *PWF INC SNK vs. PWF INC NA Soil sorptivity between treatments Sink NA A A A

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biodegradable mulch effects on soil physical properties ......0.2 0.25 East Campus* Scottsbluff s 1/2) *PWF INC SNK vs. PWF INC NA Soil sorptivity between treatments Sink NA A A A

Biodegradable mulch effects on soil physical properties and yield

Elise Reid, Sam E. Wortman, Rhae Drijber, Humberto BlancoDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Background

• Organic growers face challenges for weed control and often use plastic or biodegradable plastic mulches to prevent weeds

• Biofabrics offer a more sustainable option to plastic mulches• Biofabrics, such as polylactic acid (PLA) based fabrics may be

incorporated into the soil, unlike plastics and many bioplastics • Incorporating biofabrics could reduce labor for growers and be a

potential organic option• Additional soil amendments could increase mulch degradation

and have an effect on soil physical properties and yield• We are interested in the effects of incorporated PLA on soil

physical properties and vegetable yield

Methods

• A three year, randomized complete block split-split plot experiment is in process at both Lincoln and Scottsbluff, NE

• The first year was organic pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘Carmen’), the second was organic sweet corn (Zea mays cv. ‘Xtra-Tender 2171), and the third year will be a Brassicaceae

• Two mulch treatments: MaterBi/PBAT (Bio360, St. Remi, Canada) and a polylactic acid plus wood fiber particle biofabric (3M Company, St. Paul, MN)

• Split-plots incorporated the mulch via an articulating spader or the mulch was removed as a control

• Split-split plots included six soil management treatments: no amendment, 10 Mg/ha compost, cover crops, fallow irrigation, compost tea extract, or a combination of compost, compost tea, cover crops, and fallow irrigation (“kitchen sink;” SINK hereafter)

• The first season mulch was applied via a bedder and then incorporated into the soil after the fall harvest

• No mulch was reapplied following years• Soil physical samples were taken either every 6 months or 1 year• Yield was separated into marketable and non-marketable but only

total is presented here

Results• Corn yield and total ears higher at Scottsbluff for compost and SINK treatments• Soil tensile strength was higher in PLA mulch compared to bioplastic plots at

Scottsbluff• Sorptivity was increased at Lincoln in incorporated PLA mulch under SINK treatment

versus no application control• Scottsbluff sorptivity was significantly higher in SINK compared to no application

control treatment• In the spring and fall of 2018 Scottsbluff phosphorous levels were significantly higher

for SINK and compost compared to all other treatments• Spring nitrogen levels at Lincoln were highest in compost, but cover crops did reduce

N levels in the SINK treatment. There was no difference in nitrogen levels in the fall• Spring nitrogen levels at Scottsbluff were also affected in the SINK treatment by the

cover crop. In the fall, compost and SINK treatments had significantly higher N levels than other treatments.

Conclusions and take-aways• Incorporated PLA mulch can increase the tensile strength of soil, which may be

useful for soils with poor structure or aggregate stability• Spring cover crops deplete nitrogen levels, especially noticeable in compost

versus kitchen sink treatments. However, there were no differences the following fall. Low N levels may slow mulch degradation as N is limited for microbes during cover crop growth and decomposition. Alternatively, cover crops may promote mulch degradation through increased microbial activity in the rhizosphere.

• Yield was increased under compost and sink treatments in conditions with more nutrient poor soils

• Yield was not negatively affected by the incorporation of mulch

FundingThis project is based on research that was partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station with funding from the Hatch Act (accession 1014303) through the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), and the USDA NIFA Organic Transitions Program (award 2016-51106-25711).

A

A

B

B

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

East Campus* Scottsbluff

Rat

e (

cm/s

1/2

)

*PWF INC SNK vs. PWF INC NA

Soil sorptivity between treatments

Sink NA

AA A A A AA A

B B B B

0

10

20

30

Compost Sink Tea Irrigation NA Cover crop

Ave

rage

kg

per

10

8 f

t2

Soil amendment

Total Corn Yield 2018

East Campus

A

B

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

PLA BLKStre

ngt

h o

f ag

greg

ate

(N)

Mulch type

Soil tensile strength after 1 year at Scottsbluff

A

B

A

B

0

5

10

15

20

COM SNK COM COV

Nit

roge

n (

pp

m)

Treatment

Spring 2018 Nitrogen levels

Scottsbluff Lincoln