Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    1/40

    The US Airline Industry &Herbert Steins Law William S. Swelbar

    MIT International Center for Air Transportation36 th Annual FAA Aviation Forecast Conference

    February 16, 2011

    www.swelblog.com

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    2/40

    HERBERT STEINS LAW

    Herbert Stein (1916-1999) was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Presidents Nixon and Ford

    If something

    cannot go on forever,

    it will stop

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    3/40

    US Airline Industry: The Last Three DecadesBarriers to entry for new and existing carriers were removed If one had a dollar, an airplane and a certificate: an airline was born Entry and growth of Low Cost Carriers a major driver of change

    Barriers to exit for inefficient carriers were erected Bankruptcy, government, labor as an internal source of capital Inefficient providers remained in the market

    Finally in the 2000s, cost reductions and efficiency improvements that wereexpected during the previous two decades began to happen

    A market share mentality created an industry grew too big to be sustainable

    The market share mentality giving way to a profit mentality?

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    4/40

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    5/40

    LOOKING BACK

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    6/40

    With Rare Exception, Capacity Growth

    Exceeded the Growth in Real GDP

    -8%

    -6%

    -4%

    -2%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    Real GDP Percent Change ASM Percent Change

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    7/40

    The Market Share Mantra

    Built An Industry Too Big

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Real GDP Index ASM Index

    1 9 7 8 =

    1 0 0

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    8/40

    40%

    45%

    50%

    55%

    60%

    65%

    70%

    75%

    80%

    85%

    0

    200,000

    400,000

    600,000

    800,000

    1,000,000

    1,200,000

    Passenger Load Factor Percent RPMs Millions ASMs Millions

    Filling Airplanes Not A Problem

    As Evidenced by the Growth in Load Factors

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    9/40

    Enabled by Decreasing Real Fares

    I n f l a

    t i o n

    A d j u s

    t e d C e n

    t s p e r

    R e v e n u e

    P a s s e n g e r

    M i l e

    ( 1 9 8 2 =

    1 0 0 )

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Domestic International System

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    10/40

    As Real Fares Declined,

    The Industry Was Paying the Middleman More

    -15%

    -10%

    -5%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    Commissions as % of Operating Expenses Real Yield Percent Change

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    11/40

    A Classic Example of Competing Away the Efficiencies Got Rid of the Middleman, Gave $6B in Savings to the Consumer

    T o t a l C o m m

    i s s

    i o n

    C o s t

    ( m i l l i o n s

    )

    P e

    r c e n

    t o

    f P a s s e n g e r

    R e

    v e n u e s

    0.0%

    2.0%

    4.0%

    6.0%

    8.0%

    10.0%

    12.0%

    14.0%

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,000

    Total Commission Cost (millions) Percent of Passenger Revenues

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    12/40

    Unit Revenues Began to Drop Dramatically

    During the Second Half of 2000

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    Passenger Revenue per ASM Total Operating Expenses per ASM

    Pre-9/11 Average Difference:$0.73

    Post-9/11 Average Difference:$2.61

    C e n

    t s

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    13/40

    The Relationship of Revenue to GDP

    As It Turns Out, That Change Was Structural

    Source: MIT Airline Data Project

    0.30%

    0.40%

    0.50%

    0.60%

    0.70%

    0.80%

    0.90%

    1Q90 1Q91 1Q92 1Q93 1Q94 1Q95 1Q96 1Q97 1Q98 1Q99 1Q00 1Q01 1Q02 1Q03 1Q04 1Q05 1Q06 1Q07 1Q08 1Q09

    $27B$36B

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    14/40

    Through 2000, Unit Labor Costs on the Rise As

    Productivity Remained Relatively Unchanged

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    3.50

    4.00

    4.50

    0

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    3,000

    ASMs per Employee Total Labor per ASM

    A S M s

    ( 0 0 0 ) p e r

    F T E

    C e n

    t s p e r

    A S M

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    15/40

    The Restructuring Increased Output, but

    The Cost Per Unit of Output Going the Wrong Way

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    0

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    3,000

    Total ASMs per Employee (thousands) Total ASMs per Labor Dollar

    A S M s

    ( t h o u s a n d s

    )

    A S M s p e r

    L a

    b o r

    D o l l a r

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    16/40

    An Industry Built on $30 per Barrel In the Wing Oil5-Year Average* U.S. Price per Gallon of Jet Fuel

    * 3-Year Average for 2007-2010

    $0.88$0.78

    $0.69$0.60 $0.57

    $0.73

    $1.51

    $2.22

    $0.00

    $0.50

    $1.00

    $1.50

    $2.00

    $2.50

    1978-1983 1983-1987 1987-1991 1991-1995 1995-1999 1999-2003 2003-2007 2007-YE3Q10

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    17/40

    Fuel Surpasses Labor As Largest Cost Category

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    1 9 7 8 =

    1 0 0

    FuelIndex

    PassengerYield

    Consumer PriceIndex

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    18/40

    200 of the roughly 450 mainland U.S. markets comprise97% of domestic demand

    Yet the 250 airport markets comprising 3% of domesticdemand compete for the same pool of dollars Spending money in all of the wrong places?

    The market share mentality created a system thatcompeted with itself. Airlines the culprit of fragmentingtheir own marketplace at home

    What About the U.S. Airport System?

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    19/40

    40 Percent of Mainland Airports Produce 97% of Demand

    Top 200 Airports

    Airports #201-450

    3%

    97%

    Percent of Domestic Demand

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    20/40

    Per Enplanement Profit and Loss

    Passenger Revenue Only1980 - 1989 1990 - 1999 2000 - 2009 2010E

    Passenger Revenue $105.16 $129.44 $135.91 $144.81

    Labor $39.66 $47.33 $49.04 $45.56Fuel $24.94 $17.64 $34.21 $44.30Commissions $8.99 $12.91 $3.16 $1.99Landing Fees $2.03 $2.90 $3.46 $4.05Aircraft Ownership $7.36 $12.87 $14.19 $12.82All Other $30.98 $44.12 $48.26 $49.45

    Total Op Expenses ex TR $113.96 $137.77 $152.33 $158.17

    Passenger Revenue Less Expense ($8.80) ($8.32) ($16.42) ($13.35)

    Interest $3.99 $3.16 $4.87 $6.11

    Passenger Revenue Less Expense + Interest ($12.80) ($11.49) ($21.28) ($19.47)

    Ancillary Fees $0.14 $8.70

    Restated With Ancillary Fees ($12.80) ($11.49) ($21.14) ($10.76)

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    21/40

    Producing Unacceptable Annual Net Profits

    1978 2010

    -30,000

    -25,000

    -20,000

    -15,000

    -10,000

    -5,000

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    P r e

    T a x

    P r o

    f i t ( b i l l i o n s

    )

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    22/40

    Or. A Cumulative Loss of Over $40 Billion Since 1978 1978 2010

    -50,000

    -40,000

    -30,000

    -20,000

    -10,000

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    C u m u

    l a t i v e

    P r e - T a x

    P r o

    f i t ( b i l l i o n s

    )

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    23/40

    And Not a Chance in Hell that the Industry

    Could Earn at Least Its Cost of Capital

    Source: IATA

    Return on Invested Capital in the Airline Industry v. the Cost of Capital

    P e r c e n

    t o

    f I n v e s

    t e d C a p i

    t a l

    Cost of Capital(WACC)

    93

    14.0

    12.0

    0.0

    Return on Capital

    (ROIC)

    94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 11F

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    8.0

    10.0

    10F

    Forecast

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    24/40

    If something

    cannot go on forever,

    it will stop

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    25/40

    B a n

    k r u p t c i e s

    BANKRUPTCIES

    CUMULATIVEBANKRUPTCIES SOME HIGHLIGHTED CARRIERS

    19781979 2 2 New York Air

    1980 4 61981 5 111982 10 21 Braniff 1983 5 26 Continental1984 17 43 Air Florida, Wien1985 10 53 PBA, Cascade1986 6 59 Frontier1987 9 68 Air Atlanta, Air South1988 11 79 Mid Pacific1989 7 86 Eastern, Presidential1990 6 92 Continental1991 16 108 Pan Am, Eastern, Bar Harbor, Midway, America West1992 5 113 TWA1993 3 116 Hawaiian1994 2 1181995 5 123 TWA1996 4 1271997 4 131 Air South, Western Pacific1998 2 1331999 4 1372000 7 144 Tower, Legend2001 2 146 TWA, Midway2002 4 150 Vanguard, United, US Airways2003 2 152 Hawaiian2004 6 158 US Airways, ATA, Polar2005 7 165 Delta, Northwest, Independence Air2006 1 1662007 2 168 Maxjet2008 5 173 Aloha, ATA, Skybus, Frontier, Air Midwest

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    26/40

    Airline Industry Restructuring Along the Way

    Labor was the bank of first resort throughout the 1980sand 1990s (Barrier to Exit) Temporary fixes Labor gives concessions and gets paid back and more time and again

    Consolidation among regional competitors in the mid1980s proved key in building national networks Strong carriers buying strategic assets from weakcompetitors

    Recession in the early 1990s serves as catalyst to firstround of hub closures

    Poor attempts at building airlines within airlines tocombat low cost competition still in its infancy

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    27/40

    Airline Industry Restructuring Along the Way

    Travel agent commission structure targeted by the industryNegotiation of Open Skies Agreements becomes goal of USaviation policy Alters carrier thinking regarding international flying

    International alliances in formative yearsSignificant changes to US Bankruptcy Code

    The over exuberant use of 50 -seat regional jet begins Begins process of replacing mainline domestic flying

    Southwest crosses the MississippiIndustry enjoys most profitable period in its historyAt the peak of the cycle, the industry tries to buy labor peaceand overpays

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    28/40

    Airline Industry Restructuring Along the WayFirst transatlantic alliances immunizedNetwork carrier cost structures exploited by the vigorousincursion of low cost carrier capacityInsurance costs skyrocket after 9/11

    Five of the seven network carriers file for bankruptcyNearly $12 billion in labor savings won150,000 jobs shedMaintenance outsourcing becomes a more widespread practice

    First round of meaningful capacity reductionsSignificant shift of domestic flying from network carriers totheir respective regional partners takes placeNetwork carriers shift capacity away from US domestic marketand redeploy aircraft to international markets

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    29/40

    As fuel prices increase, various hedging strategies employed withmixed success

    As fuel prices peak, industry employs a number of strategies togenerate ancillary revenue

    As fuel prices peak, industry announces significant capacityreduction and puts a capacity discipline mantra to work

    New round of consolidation not limited to network carriers

    Industry seems intent on not implementing their patternbargaining sins of the past with labor

    Pushing the envelope to find new ways to take cost out of theoperation Few magic bullets remain

    Airline Industry Restructuring Along the Way

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    30/40

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    31/40

    A LOOK AT CERTAINAIRLINE COSTS

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    32/40

    The Expense Portion of the Income Statement

    Labor: Expectations far exceed industrys ability to pay Want a restoration of pay without commensurate productivity Hard to restore pay when benefit costs so high

    Maintenance: Outsourcing has slowed as a practice

    Commissions: Low hanging fruit has been picked but Americanbelieves the middleman still has too much influence in this area

    Airport Costs: Along with employee benefits and GDS fees, thisarea promises to be a cost center scrutinized by airlines goingforward

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    33/40

    Landing Fees

    The Age Old Airline v. Airport Conflict

    $-

    $2

    $4

    $6

    $8

    $10

    $12

    $14

    $16

    $18

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Capacity Tons Landed (millions) Cost per Capacity Ton Landed

    C

    a p a c

    i t y

    T o n s

    L a n

    d e d

    ( m i l l i o n s

    )

    C o s

    t p e r

    C a p a c

    i t y

    T o n

    L a n

    d e

    d

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    34/40

    Unit Costs that Grow in Real Terms

    Have Been Addressed in the Past

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    1 9 7 8 =

    1 0 0

    Indexed Landing Fees Consumer Price Index

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    35/40

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    36/40

    But the Cost of Benefits Are a Concern

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    Total Employee FTEs Benefits per FTE Index CPI 1978=100

    T o

    t a l E m p

    l o y e e F

    T E s

    B e n e

    f i t s / C P I

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    37/40

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    38/40

    WHAT TO MAKE OF THE LAST

    30 YEARS OF THE USCOMMERCIAL AIRLINE BUSINESS

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    39/40

    What to Make of the Last 30 Years?Then: Barriers to entry for new and existing carriers were removed

    Now: Interestingly, fuel costs/volatility proving to be a barrier to entry Fuel costs have limited the growth of the Low Cost sector in a significant way

    Then: Barriers to exit for inefficient carriers were erectedNow: Unlikely that labor is a source of capital this time around Traditional external sources of capital not likely to fund inefficient operators

    Then: Finally in the 2000s, cost reductions and efficiency improvements thatwere expected during the previous two decades began to happen

    Now: Will the industry stand and not give in to destructive pattern bargaining? Will the industry stand and not give in to the urge to add capacity? Along those lines, will the industry stop competing with itself? Will the industry finish the work of removing the middleman where possible?

  • 8/7/2019 Bill Swelbar FAA 2011

    40/40

    If something

    cannot go on forever,

    it will stop